Slashdot Mirror


Vizio Wants Next-Generation Smart TVs To Target Ads To Households (reuters.com)

Smart TV manufacturer Vizio has formed a partnership with nine media and advertising companies to develop an industry standard that will allow smart TVs to target advertisements to specific households, the companies said this week. From a report: The consortium includes major TV networks like Comcast Corp's NBCUniversal and CBS, as well as advertising technology companies like AT&T's Xandr. Addressable advertising, or targeting viewers on the household level based on their interests, has long been the goal of TV marketers. But TVs lack cookies that internet browsers use to allow ads to follow people around the web. [...] The consortium of companies, dubbed Project OAR, or Open Addressable Ready, hopes to define the technical standards for TV programmers and platforms to deliver addressable advertising on smart TVs, which are WiFi-enabled TVs with apps for services like Netflix Inc and Hulu, by the end of this year, McAfee said. Further reading: In January this year, Bill Baxter, chief technology officer of Vizio, spoke about business of data collection in an interview. He said: It's about post-purchase monetization of the TV. This is a cutthroat industry. It's a 6-percent margin industry, right? I mean, you know it's pretty ruthless. You could say it's self-inflicted, or you could say there's a greater strategy going on here, and there is. The greater strategy is I really don't need to make money off of the TV. I need to cover my cost. And then I need to make money off those TVs. They live in households for 6.9 years -- the average lifetime of a Vizio TV is 6.9 years. You would probably be amazed at the number of people come up to me saying, "I love Vizio TVs, I have one" and it's 11 years old. I'm like, "Dude, that's not even full HD, that's 720p." But they do last a long time and our strategy -- you've seen this with all of our software upgrades including AirPlay 2 and HomeKit -- is that we want to make things backward compatible to those TVs. So we're continuing to invest in those older TVs to bring them up to feature level comparison with the new TVs when there's no hardware limitation that would otherwise prevent that.

235 comments

  1. Welp... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Welp... by telek83 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads... Squid + Privoxy and man in the middle yourself so you can filter the https connections too. Problem solved!

    2. Re:Welp... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      We'll see what kind alternatives the invisible hand of capitalism leaves us.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you fit a smart TV in the back of the horse and buggy you take to work each day at the coal mine anyway?

    4. Re:Welp... by BobSwi · · Score: 1

      Look mom, I've privoxied my pi-hole!

    5. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here! Samsung is already off the list! In fact, I will NEVER buy ANY so called "smart" TV!! I will not be spied upon, and I will not have ANY ads shoved in my face!!! I only use streaming services that don't have ads, and any that start showing ads will get dropped!!!! You greedy bastards that want to target me with ads can just EAT SHIT AND DIE, AND EAT MORE SHIT AND DIE AGAIN!!!!!!

    6. Re:Welp... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

      You don't have to turn on the "smart" features. They are off by default.

      Also, Vizio won't be the only company doing this. Likely, they all will.

    7. Re:Welp... by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      You can't use internet technology to filter broadcast/cable TV...

    8. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If he didn't have any money then Vizio would be the brand to get. They are the shittiest, cheapest pieces of shit out there.

    9. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTA television cannot have targeted ads because it's a one way transmission.

      Nobody has cable any more.

      Want to try again?

    10. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the ads from from WiFi you can. Hence the whole smart tv! Unless it's part of a continuous stream (not even YouTube does that) it can be filtered.

    11. Re:Welp... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      You should thank Bill Baxter for advertising that information.
      Everyone should thank him.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    12. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads... Squid + Privoxy and man in the middle yourself so you can filter the https connections too.

      Problem solved!

      If you must update the TV, use an Ethernet cable, or setup a Wifi password you intend to never use again. Don't just assume it forgot it because you told it to. Beyond that, don't plug your tv into the internet. The tv in front of me for this pc certainly isn't plugged in...

    13. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

      You don't have to turn on the "smart" features. They are off by default.

      Also, Vizio won't be the only company doing this. Likely, they all will.

      Actually, we might pretty much have lost control of privacy. Think about, even if you trust your wifi access point, and all of your neighbors not to happily offer access to your TV that may also have a microphone and a camera, can you also trust those wifi services and such setup by cable modems and all that?

      Seriously, if a 3 letter agency wanted the camera on your new fancy TV to be something they could turn on (with a court order of course) could you even tell that it was happening?

    14. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed on that. I'm actually about to get a few bucks from a class-action lawsuit against Vizio, because their smart TV was attempting to monitor what you watched. In practice, the thing would reboot itself or freeze up and was useless, I took it off the network and used a Roku instead.

    15. Re:Welp... by I75BJC · · Score: 1

      We bought an LG Smart TV because Samsung Smart TVs present ads during viewing (according to roommate). In setting up the LG, I found a setting to reduce the prospect of seeing duplicate ads.

      Sounds like all the TVs are up with Vizio already. The LG uses WebOS and that definitely can be used to present ads to viewers. If the TV is not connected to the Internet, (either a wired or wireless connection on the LG), can it present ads to us?

    16. Re:Welp... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads...

      Why give the television access to your network at all? The manufacturers only support a particular generation for 3-4years at most. For the vast majority of people, that television is going to be in their home significantly longer than that.

      Get a Roku, get an Apple TV, get a Fire stick - use that device to feed the shows to the flat screen.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    17. Re: Welp... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody has cable any more.

      Then how do home users receive their Internet? And how do they get the bundle discount on said Internet?

    18. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you tolerate it online

    19. Re:Welp... by tepples · · Score: 0

      Why give the television access to your network at all?

      In order to activate the TV's operating system so that even the non-smart features of the TV will work. Otherwise, the TV gets stuck at the EULA screen and won't even show ATSC in, composite in, S-Video in, component in, VGA in, or HDMI in.

    20. Re:Welp... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Soon all TV will do this...

      Perhaps.. But the great thing about capitalism is that if the people don't want this crap and one company builds a TV that doesn't do it, they'll take the lion's share of the market..

      Or... perhaps you should develop your idea and come up with a squid box that requires minimal user interaction.. You could sell it as the "TV ad blocker" or some such thing.. All it takes is one great idea...

    21. Re: Welp... by jpaine619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OTA television cannot have targeted ads because it's a one way transmission.

      True

      Nobody has cable any more.

      And then you went all dumb.... There are still roughly 83,000,000 households in the US that pay for either cable or IPTV. At what point did 83,000,000 (a number greater than the total population of Germany) become "nobody"? This number is declining, to be sure, but it's going to be a long, slow, and drawn out death..

    22. Re: Welp... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Nobody has cable any more.

      Then how do home users receive their Internet? And how do they get the bundle discount on said Internet?

      Mostly via cable, of course.. The GP is probably a millennial moron who doesn't understand the world past his own front door. Of course DSL (telco) is still very popular. Fixed wireless is growing. In the 8 years I've been doing it I've never had a month where I had a decline in subscribers... Last, but not least, is satellite internet which is sucky but better than dial-up (which still exists but has declined to the point where we can probably ignore it).

    23. Re:Welp... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Soon all TV will do this, better idea is force the TV through a proxy that filters ads...

      Why give the television access to your network at all? The manufacturers only support a particular generation for 3-4years at most. For the vast majority of people, that television is going to be in their home significantly longer than that.

      Get a Roku, get an Apple TV, get a Fire stick - use that device to feed the shows to the flat screen.

      Good points, but if you don't think Apple TV and Firestick will try this bullshit, eventually, then..... Hell, maybe they already do.. I don't know..

    24. Re:Welp... by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      Came here to say the same thing. In fact, pretty sure any future tv purchases I make will either be dumb ones or never ever see a connection to the internet.

    25. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron paine. Of course OTA could have targeted ads encrypted into a digital transmission, you don't know what you're talking about.

    26. Re:Welp... by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 2

      I know what kind of TV I WON'T be considering for my next purchase...

      You don't have to turn on the "smart" features. They are off by default.

      Also, Vizio won't be the only company doing this. Likely, they all will.

      Actually, we might pretty much have lost control of privacy. Think about, even if you trust your wifi access point, and all of your neighbors not to happily offer access to your TV that may also have a microphone and a camera, can you also trust those wifi services and such setup by cable modems and all that?

      Seriously, if a 3 letter agency wanted the camera on your new fancy TV to be something they could turn on (with a court order of course) could you even tell that it was happening?

      I use a method espoused by a white house staffer to prevent my microwave from spying on me. Piece of tape. Works wonders.

    27. Re:Welp... by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then you send it back for a refund.

    28. Re: Welp... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, most of the world is not the US (and often has better Internet access).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    29. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to activate the TV's operating system so that even the non-smart features of the TV will work. Otherwise, the TV gets stuck at the EULA screen and won't even show ATSC in, composite in, S-Video in, component in, VGA in, or HDMI in.

      What TV does this?

    30. Re:Welp... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      In setting up the LG, I found a setting to reduce the prospect of seeing duplicate ads.

      If you want to keep your privacy, then you don't "set it up". You just use it as a dumb TV.

      I use my smart TV as a smart TV, because I don't really care if "they" know what I am watching (mostly documentaries). But it is my choice.

      If the TV is not connected to the Internet, (either a wired or wireless connection on the LG), can it present ads to us?

      Your cable provider (Comcast, Spectrum, etc.) can feed you ads, but LG can't (unless they cut a deal with the cable company).

    31. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how do home users receive their Internet?

      PPPoE via optical fibre is the preferred (but not only) way, because it's cheap, reliable and fast. Coverage is already very extensive in most of Africa, Asia, Europe and Australia. And in North America, companies that purportedly offer Internet over cable have to a large extent quietly replaced their titular coaxial cable with fibre and while they lead you to believe they are giving you Internet access over fibre, they are actually giving you regular direct Internet access and sending a simulation of cable signal tunnelled through PPPoE. Cable's pretty much dead in all but name.

      And how do they get the bundle discount on said Internet?

      Pay for Internet, get Internet. It's that simple. The only way bundle discounts can work is by inflating the unbundled price to force customers to buy something they otherwise wouldn't in order to buy what they actually wanted. It's a scummy practice even in those places where it isn't outright illegal.

    32. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how "capitalism" works because markets are deliberately constucted such that consumers can not make rational decisions.

    33. Re: Welp... by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Internet via cable. TV via antenna. No bundling discount but no ad problem.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    34. Re:Welp... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me if you couldn't activate the TV unless it was allowed to phone home at least once.

      And then every so often they'd decide that you 'need' a software upgrade (for 'security', of course) and that the TV won't work until you allow it to upgrade or install new spyware or whatever.

      Maybe they'll start making sets that *have* to be connected, either all the time or periodically. The lust to advertise is so great that this kind of thing makes perfect sense to the ad companies.

      Hell, they'd implant LCDs in our foreheads and show ads on them if they could just find a way. And I don't mean a legal way, I just mean a way.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    35. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Then pretty soon the market will cluster around the few devices that do not do this? Sure, some people will stick with say Firestick forever, but many will say "screw this" and swap to Roku. Then if Roku does the targeted ads they'll switch to Apple, etc. The only way the targeted ads work is if the consumers don't give a shit anymore. We may be getting closer to that point but we're not at the 100% sheep level.

    36. Re: Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And a free market requires that both parties in a transaction have the necessary information to make a decision. If that doesn't exist then the market really isn't that free.

    37. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The hand of capitalism may be invisible, but you can still feel it when it slaps you.

    38. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Turn OFF the smart features and get an external box for the TV stuff. That is, treat the TV as a dumb monitor. et a Roku for less than $100 that gives you more choices than most smart TVs will. Or get a Firestick, an AppleTV, a ChomeCast, etc. This stuff is highly affordable now, they're very tiny and can easily be hidden out of sight and are not at all like last generation's large "set top boxes".

      The only worry is if the TV refuses to do anything until you configure it to be on your wifi. I doubt it will be there soon, there's still a big market for people to use TVs are dumb monitors (ie, for game consoles). If it does happen, then feed it a dummy wifi AP until it's configured then disable that (or set up a permanent trap on your router, stick in adblock, etc). If that fails to work, then move to a country that still values privacy as a civil right.

    39. Re: Welp... by highinthemountains · · Score: 1

      Iâ(TM)ve heard that Visio isnâ(TM)t the only manufacturer that is going to be doing this. I guess spying on me while Iâ(TM)m watching tv isnâ(TM)t enough of a revenue stream, now Iâ(TM)ll be seeing pop up ads.

    40. Re:Welp... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      Then pretty soon the market will cluster around the few devices that do not do this? Sure, some people will stick with say Firestick forever, but many will say "screw this" and swap to Roku. Then if Roku does the targeted ads they'll switch to Apple, etc. The only way the targeted ads work is if the consumers don't give a shit anymore.

      I'm guessing that either all of your friends are geeks, or you don't get out much. I see zero sign that the majority of people will offer any more than token resistance to this kind of targeted advertising. Facebook lives, Google thrives, and corporations in general rule because most people just accept the status quo.

      We may be getting closer to that point but we're not at the 100% sheep level.

      No, we're not at 100% sheepness, but we're way north of 90%, and some would say we're well past 99%. In any case, this shit is a done deal, and most people will just suck it up, as they have with Windows 10, shitty cellular providers, and corrupt governments.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    41. Re:Welp... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Well said and well played! I might have gone with "you can still feel it when it probes your anus" - I guess you're just classier than I am...

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    42. Re:Welp... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > It wouldn't surprise me if you couldn't activate the
      > TV unless it was allowed to phone home at least once.

      > And then every so often they'd decide that you 'need' a software > upgrade (for 'security', of course) and that the TV won't work
      > until you allow it to upgrade or install new spyware or whatever.

      Get an HDHomeRun https://www.silicondust.com/pr... Tuner, which feeds OTA TV to your LAN, and display output on your computer monitor. No need to connect to the internet. TV tuner cards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... also work fine.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    43. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If everyone really just accepts the status quo, then streaming television would never have gotten off the ground and the cord cutters would be a very tiny minority.

    44. Re:Welp... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      I use a method espoused by a white house staffer to prevent my microwave from spying on me. Piece of tape. Works wonders.

      That's assuming you know the location of the camera ... er, cameras. And then there are the microphones - a piece of tape isn't terribly effective for those.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    45. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable TV. But of course you knew that's what he was taking about and you're being disingenuous to instigate an argument.

    46. Re:Welp... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      After running a Tesla coil over the stinking thing. "It came dead from the factory." Cost the pigfuckers some small amount of money.

    47. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very dishonest of you to lump IPTV in with cable TV. It's almost as if you knew your argument was bullshit needed something to boost your numbers. Every recent indication has shown that more people than ever are cutting the cord on cable TV.

    48. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem you are the millennial for not knowing that "cable" is the colloquial shorthand for "cable TV" and has been for decades.

      Go back to Twitter, little boy. You don't belong here.

    49. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All TVs will be doing this? Then I will enjoy what I have for longer time. Unfortunately, I have a smart TV which is so smart that it has an incredible latency when switching channels. This shall go fast. If I hear "smart TV" I think "rather not".

    50. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany there is cable but many people use DSL and although there is a TV bundle offer, people who have a house usually put a parabolic antenna onto the roof (SAT TV). TV is a broadcast medium and best served over a broadcast channel.

    51. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what then? The internet ads know when OTA ads are playing for every channel everywhere and perfectly sync up to display targeted ads, all without backlash from OTA advertisers or OTA television stations?

      Even if that were remotely possible, why wouldn't you simply not connect your TV to the internet? Or do you think TV makers are going to require an internet connection just to watch OTA programming?

    52. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be an upside to this. One of the biggest problems with devices these days is that the vendor stops providing security updates. The way Visio talks, they're even adding features to very old TVs.

      In addition, it sounds like these TVs can eventually be sold as loss leaders, so TVs become super cheap. Personally, all of my TVs are not given any network connectivity, but I could see putting them on the network and simply denying internet access at my firewall, but only if I needed to connect them to some other network enabled device (I dunno, maybe some kind of remote.)

      Personally, I rely on my Shield TV, and Nvidia is still adding features even though it's almost 4 years old. Nvidia still makes money on these after sale, but it's all from app store commissions rather than ads.

    53. Re:Welp... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Soon all TV will do this

      Fortunately dumb computer monitors are as cheap as TVs and the screens are no worse these days either.

    54. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This number is declining, to be sure, but it's going to be a long, slow, and drawn out death..

      Well, shoving more ads onto the TV is certainly going to help accelerate that process.

    55. Re: Welp... by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      I see another poor bastard has replied on Slashdot using an iPad.

      For goodness sakes this needs to be fixed.

    56. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly think I know only one person who has cable who is under the age of 60. You don't need cable to have internet.

      I don't live in some modern wonderland. I live in Buffalo NY, which, while I think it's a pretty great area, is also arguably pretty "bush league" when it comes to trends and modernity. So I think it's safe to say the phrase "Nobody has cable any more" is pretty accurate.

      Why would you pay more to add things you don't want to your internet cost? Oh good I can get a land line and television. For the low price of a hundred bucks a month I can pretend it's the 1950s. Or I can save that money, or pay it and have gigabit internet and NOT have two useless things in my house.

      Also, if you don't mind skipping out on the cable box channel guide and on demand service, you can (at least on verizon) switch from coax to ethernet delivered internet. You lose the MoCA technology that allows internet transfer to the cable box, but since that's exactly what we are talking about, I don't see how it's an issue.

      More to the point, this entire thread is off topic. The idea is that the TV is injecting the ads, because smart TV's are connected to the internet. So ads will be in the menus, while running apps like netflix or whatever. The poster who said you can't filter broadcast/cable TV has nothing to do with what TFA is taking about, so honestly this whole coversation is pointless.

      Filter out the ad domains before they hit your TV. If you want to watch cable or OTA TV, then yes, you'll get the ads embedded in the stream-- just like you still get some twitch ads even when you subscribe or run adblock since they aren't injected, they are embedded in the actual broadcast.

    57. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that is clever... more people should do this.

    58. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...We have a winner

    59. Re: Welp... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      300 years ago the 1% were royalty and the overwhelming majority of the population lived in what we now call third-world squalor.

      It was capitalism that allowed for the technological and economic and social advances. Capitalism did not cause poverty - it existed before. Capitalism created more wealth. Yes. Many people got rich (read about the Pareto Distribution) but the poor got wealthier as well.

      Which did better - East Germany or West Germany? (both with the same original culture) Which did better - North Korea or South Korea? (both with the same original culture)

      Socialism failed. By the 1970s even the socialists knew that. Hence the rise of this pseudo-intellectual sop called post-modernism and it's newer intersectional variant.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    60. Re: Welp... by godefroi · · Score: 1

      I get my internet service over cable. There is, however, no cable connected to my television.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    61. Re:Welp... by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Right, just like the internet search clustered around companies that don't, and the online shopping market clustered around companies that don't, and ...

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    62. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately dumb computer monitors are as cheap as TVs and the screens are no worse these days either.

      Then you'll get ad-sponsored TVs. Cheaper because of the ads, and the masses will go for them. Cheap is king. Similar to how a laptop full of adware cost less than one without.

      Of course, people still buy lots of computer monitors, they won't be driven out of the market by this. And someone with a soldering iron will figure out a way to dumb down the most popular brand of smart tv, getting us cheaper monitors. Sponsored by ads that never get shown. Similar to how you buy a cheap laptop and formats it to get rid of the adware.

    63. Re: Welp... by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but have you seen any 60-80â computer monitors lately? If you want a big screen you have to buy a TV.

    64. Re:Welp... by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      If everyone really just accepts the status quo, then streaming television would never have gotten off the ground and the cord cutters would be a very tiny minority.

      Not quite the same thing. People didn't shift to streaming because of its technological superiority, they moved to it because it allowed them to watch their desired content on their own timetable, and on mobile devices without making an additional expenditure. DVRs helped bridge the gap, but streaming gave that specific experience which regular cable TV did not...and aside from a monthly fee that costs less than most value meals at McDonald's, there was virtually no tradeoff to be had.

      The issues with targeted advertising are far less directly beneficial. The options aren't 'targeted ads' or 'no ads', it's ads either way and the question is whether those ads are for products from Microsoft or Maybelline, and that's purely a matter of principle - relatively few people will make even a single purchasing decision based on the presence or absence of a targeted ad system.

    65. Re:Welp... by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 1

      Bought a Samsung last year. Haven’t seen any ads. Of course I also don’t use any of the built-in apps, so YMMV.

    66. Re: Welp... by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 1

      Just realized this myself, and now am having to force iPad to load desktop site every time I log in. Never quite understand why a system that is touted as faster than most laptops is treated as if it were a low-end phone when using some websites. (/., Google app pages, etc. - it’s maddening)

    67. Re: Welp... by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Or, get a really super small viewing space!

    68. Re: Welp... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      50 inch monitors are available and sensibly priced.
      HD projectors support larger formats than that if you're sat that far away from your screen. My house isn't that large.

    69. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will *complain* that it happens and then stay with it regardless. It's the same as "Facebook sucks because it does all this terrible stuff with our data... Oh look, I just got a bunch of updates on my Facebook app!"

    70. Re:Welp... by wiggles · · Score: 1

      I don't want to hear about it, dear. Here's a kleenex box - keep it in your room. Don't forget to lock the door.

    71. Re: Welp... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I get my internet service over cable. There is, however, no cable connected to my television.

      Surely there's a power cable. And perhaps an HDMI cable too.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    72. Re:Welp... by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      There's probably a market for sending the TVs out of the factory pre-loaded with some ads. Lower-valued, because there'd be no feedback on how often they were watched and all that jazz, but I wouldn't put it past them to want to get a few bucks out of the people that never bother connecting.

    73. Re:Welp... by lgw · · Score: 1

      This i why my TV is just the monitor for my HTPC. Plus if I want to search for something on YouTube/Netflix/whatever, I can use an actual keyboard to type on, not mess around with a remote and an on screen keyboard.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    74. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why give the television access to your network at all?

      In order to activate the TV's operating system so that even the non-smart features of the TV will work.

      What idiot brands do that? Name-and-shame, please, so we know what to stay well away from.

    75. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points, but if you don't think Apple TV and Firestick will try this bullshit, eventually, then...

      Even if they do, it's a far less expensive (and materially wasteful) thing to replace a plug-in device that you no longer like than it is to replace a TV because the manufacturer starts enabling undesirable "features".

    76. Re:Welp... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They shifted to streaming because cable prices were too high. The "status quo" is to stick with cable and keep doing what they tell you to do. People who dropped cable and went to streaming were breaking free of the status quo, no matter what their reason was.

    77. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 inch monitors are available and sensibly priced.

      Even if they are (and if they are, they're not at all well advertised), 50 inches is on the small side for a living room TV. Where can we find 65+ inch monitors with multiple HDMI inputs?

    78. Re:Welp... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it is very easy to make that happen. You can only fight so much before you burn out, and for something as relatively unimportant as ads, people are going to have a very low threshold before they throw their hands up in the air and decide fighting 'the man' isn't worth the effort anymore.

      Everyone already has enough going on in their lives, and fighting with something that is supposed to be entertainment, isn't high on the priority list.

    79. Re: Welp... by fropenn · · Score: 2

      None of the mainstream candidates in the US really want to turn the US into a socialist country. That's just thrown about by those on the right to inflame their base and raise money.

      However, there is a push from some candidates for more government regulation of the free market to reign in some of the excesses, abuses, and corruption and to produce revenue to support infrastructure and social programs for those for whom the free market has failed.

      There is also a push from some candidates to move some major industries (such as healthcare) away from free market toward more socialized systems.

      This is called a "mixed economy," and is where the US already is and is where the US would remain even if healthcare is eventually socialized.

    80. Re:Welp... by SB5407 · · Score: 1

      In what world do you live in that the monetization features on popular mainstream electronic devices are turned off by default?! Even Apple gives you a unique Advertising Identifier by default.

    81. Re:Welp... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      No, because their TVs, lacking the payments for advertisements, will be $50 more expensive and people will ignore them.
      I would not be surprised to see TVs soon that DEMAND network connectivity to function.
      Perhaps a modding community might spring up to eliminate this.

    82. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, but in the last few years Google has really pushed other ISP's to improve. I guess I'll just have to settle for my meek 1Gbps up/down connection here in the US. :(

    83. Re:Welp... by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      I don't think I will either. Doesn't Vizio make cheaper low-end screens? If I'm going to buy something like that the Roku TVs are cheaper and at least in the same ballpark of picture quality from what I can tell.

      I just started looking for a new TV and it's frustrating because I really don't know what I want or what is a good value. My Panasonic plasma died 2 days ago and now just blinks the LED power light 5 times whenever I turn it on. This may be repairable, but is it really worth it? I'm inclined to think not.

      I don't think I need 4K, but it looks like most of them are anyway. The good news is they're all cheaper than the last time I bought a TV.

      I was in Walmart an hour ago looking at their TVs. It's really hard to tell what looks good in a store with fluorescent lights reflecting off all the screens. One thing I noticed is they all looked terrible when looked at from an angle which made the curved Samsung screens look attractive, but I don't think I want to spend that much.

      Of course there really wasn't much information on them at all besides price, screen size and number of HDMI inputs. Some article I read says I really should get one with 4 HDMI inputs, Most of the ones I was looking at had 2 or 3.

      I bought a Vizio laptop once. It was nice except the SSD was way too small and it had sat in the store's inventory so long the battery was no longer chargeable. By that time Vizio had given up on its foray into the laptop market. To their credit someone at Vizio was willing to help me get a battery, but by then I had already returned it.

      And not that this can be anything but a very strange coincidence, but the Panasonic died at the very same instant I turned on an RC car. I was on the couch 8 feet away from the TV and it only takes 4 AA batteries. Right when I turned it on, the TV turned off and I think I may have heard a "pop", but I'm not sure. (maybe a capacitor blowing up?).

      It was a weird enough coincidence that I actually considered how they could be connected, but I can't imagine any scenario where that makes any sense.

    84. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until there are youtube-style popup ad overlays over the OTA broadcasts, plus the ones on the smart tv interface and in all your streaming service. Now all those ads will be the same ones you see on Facebook.

    85. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be an ad bar at the bottom of the screen for 5 seconds when you change channels.

    86. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've discovered the real reason behind media companies' persecution of Kodi.

    87. Re: Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which gets ads from where? The aether? Your ass? Or are you saying that TV makers will preload their televisions with ads and run those same ones over and over forever, even years after a product isn't current or doesn't exist any more?

    88. Re:Welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None do it, tepples is a pedantic aspie who doesn't understand basic concepts of society or nuances of human comminucations and often scrapes together the most far-fetched hypothetical situations and excuses. He is a retard and you can ignore him without concern over missing out on anything.

  2. Hmm by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, I don't mind if they replace existing ads.

    On the other hand, they mention Netflix in passing here - so would that mean Netflix playing on this TV would have ads? No thanks!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mention it in passing to illustrate what the definition of "smart TV" is.

      I knew you had to be wrong, but you made me RTFS to work out how.

    2. Re:Hmm by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      they mention Netflix in passing here - so would that mean Netflix playing on this TV would have ads? No thanks!

      Netflix already has ads, mostly previews for their original content.

      By tracking your viewing habits, they can give you better recommendations.

    3. Re: Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix already knows what I watch on Netflix and still promotes their garbage regardless of how I rate shows.

    4. Re:Hmm by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They'll lose so many customers when this happens it will be scary. Streaming providers probably understand to some degree that people who cut the cable cord still remember where they put the scissors. Watching TV is not a requirement and people are perfectly capable of deciding to shut it off permanently.

    5. Re:Hmm by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Netflix does not show those ads while watching shows. It basically promotes itself and shows by showing them higher up on the list and auto-playing previews when you're idle. It experimented in a small subset of the market by showing some ads before the movies start but it was not making people happy so they stopped that. But if it ends up like the crappy CBS streaming service showing ads in the middle of shows then the customers will unsubscribe in droves. People who don't mind ads are already over on Hulu.

  3. FUCK YOU, Im sure by wolfheart111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I speak for ALL OF US. Nothing more to be said, you can close this thread now :)

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re: FUCK YOU, Im sure by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Informative

      That sounds like projection. You must be an Apple customer.

    2. Re:FUCK YOU, Im sure by Guyle · · Score: 1

      I'm in agreement sir. I won't be purchasing any new Vizios anytime soon if this is where they're going with it.

    3. Re:FUCK YOU, Im sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I bought a new Vizio a few months back, but won't be buying any new ones if this is the case. They just fucked themselves.

    4. Re:FUCK YOU, Im sure by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You can add me to this, FUCK YOU VISIO, I'll never buy one of your gods-be-damned TVs if you're going to be like this.
      Of course I don't have and don't want a so-called 'smart TV' in the first place and I know I'm not alone in that.

  4. Tight margins, huh? by Krishnoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a cutthroat industry. It's a 6-percent margin industry, right?

    I'll give you 10% extra if you replace that hardware and software with a couple additional DVI and DisplayPort adapters. You could even make it a swap-out-able module.

    1. Re: Tight margins, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That already exists. Many vendors offer a âoeproâ series of displays that are basically the same panels without the consumer software and with dvi or DisplayPort in addition to hdmi. They are for public installations like bars or waiting rooms they also are used for video systems in corporate conf rooms.

    2. Re:Tight margins, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give you 10% extra if you replace that software with open source code that I could tailor to my needs, and you could even cut development costs.

    3. Re:Tight margins, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The evil of HDMI wasn't HDCP. It was how suddenly we need a proprietary plug to hook up a TV. DVI could easily be the plug right now....no reason it isn't, except for DRM.

    4. Re:Tight margins, huh? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      DVI could easily be the plug right now....no reason it isn't, except for DRM.

      HDMI is a better plug anyway, because it's cheaper and smaller. It's also a lot better self-guiding than DVI. There's a retention mechanism, which unfortunately is rarely available, but it does show up now and then. And it's not like adapters (or cables with one of each) are rare.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Tight margins, huh? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      HDMI is a better plug anyway, because it's cheaper and smaller.

      In fact, it's so cheap and small that the slightest twist or turn will make the screen all green or purple.

    6. Re:Tight margins, huh? by Gibgezr · · Score: 1

      Well, there's also the problem of audio: DVI wasn't designed to carry audio signals, and the only way to get it to work is to converts from DVI to HDMI while relying on a non-standard configuration that some video card manufactures use for this purpose.

  5. No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw Smart TVs and their aggresive 'it won't work until you connect me to your wi-fi' bullshit

    1. Re: No Thanks by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Ian't the whole concept of BluRay centered around such a requirement?

    2. Re: No Thanks by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Had BluRay players for years while on dial up with no WiFi, never a problem.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re: No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blueray DRM updates are embedded on-disc with new releases. No network required.

    4. Re: No Thanks by caution+live+frogs · · Score: 2

      My Sharp BluRay player actually has a setting that allows me to block discs from accessing the network. All I see is a brief pop up that says “disc trying to access network, blocked” or some such, and then it finishes loading. Turning this option on took disc load times down dramatically because they no longer download some crappy new trailer before going to the menu.

      Now if only the menu options allowed me to override the built-in ads and skip straight to menu, I’d be happy... why consumers can’t do this on media we f’n ALREADY PAID FOR is beyond me. The only people who don’t see the FBI warning and the preloaded ads are the pirates.

    5. Re: No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ian't the whole concept of BluRay centered around such a requirement?

      I don't know if this has changed, but my Blu-Ray play has never had a network connection, and I've had it for years.

      Why the hell would I trust a content provider to download software updates for my Blu-Ray player? After the Sony rootkit shit, there is no way in hell I'd allow that -- the only reasonable assumption is anything requiring a network connection to play a Blu-Ray is actively hostile to your own interests and self-serving to the company who sold it.

      A 'smart tv' with no network connection and only and HDMI input which doesn't participate in anything but displaying the image is pretty much just a dumb monitor, and that's all I need from it. My TV doesn't change channels or even make sound, it renders what my amp tells it to with the one single HDMI cable running into it.

      If I bought a Blu-Ray player or TV which could not operate without a network connection, I would be returning it.

      Fuck Vizio and their ads, and fuck network connected appliances that don't need it.

      Having my TV have any network connectivity is just stupid. You can't get updates for most phones, I can only assume TVs and the like are even worse.

  6. You Can Put Ads on my TV by DewDude · · Score: 1

    But you better be getting enough revenue from them...becuase I'm not going to pay you $2000 for a fucking television you'll make even more off me at the expense of making me sit through bullshit ads.

    I automatically don't buy shit advertised to me.

    1. Re: You Can Put Ads on my TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoe-sent from my Android phoneâ

    2. Re:You Can Put Ads on my TV by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Think of the poor executives, not only is it getting harder to come up with the money to buy another yacht, but now it is getting expensive to bribe universities to accept their kids who will be the next generation of executives and your leaders.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  7. thanks but no by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I'll gladly pay twice as much for a dumb tv, thanks.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:thanks but no by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      All right! It's now a bidding war!

  8. Offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do that offline without physical media and I might be impressed...

  9. Hello HOUSEHOLD 43392-AL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We see you've been searching for BIG BLACK COCK recently and would like to offer you AN INVITATION TO ROOSTER RALLY 2019. Would you like to know more?

    1. Re:Hello HOUSEHOLD 43392-AL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you cannot reset this devices Advertising ID

  10. This is why.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...my Vizio tv isn't connected to the internet, nor will it ever be, except for firmware upgrades.
    My AppleTV isn't trying to monetize me.

    1. Re: This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yay. Now the magic of TV can be replaced by unknown server errors. On the other hand, fuck that.

    2. Re:This is why.... by Zaelath · · Score: 2

      Why would you even do the firmware upgrades?

      I've had several Smart TVs because they were the only ones w/ the size/features I wanted, and none of them have ever needed a firmware update.

    3. Re:This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even upgrade firmware if it isn't connected to the internet....unless there is something broken that I can't live without....if it ain't broke don't fix it.

      Most firmware fixes purport to be:
      Security fixes ( I don't need this if not connected directly to internet)
      Fixes for problems in the Hardware (probably don't need these unless I am experiencing a problem)
      Feature Updates (these are probably more trouble). My FireTV keeps changing interfaces on me and I hate it.

      I will still have my RasPI running Android with NetFlix, Amazon, etc. connected to the internet and get my content thought that...the TV needs to be a dumb display.

      I recently setup a new LG TV for someone and it was pissing me of with the stupid EULA to even turn it on.

    4. Re:This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming a bug in the firmware was preventing a function from working, then? Because the only other reason I can see for updating firmware is security, which is irrelevant if it's not connected to anything.

    5. Re:This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they are tracking you and building a database to determine your media habits. Don't kid yourself if you think that isn't being used to build some monetary gain for them. Just because their business model is 33percent mine doesn't mean they don't want anything else.

      For better or worse I've isolated my smart TV and moved to Roku as my TV app. They are content agnostic but provide you a portal to Netflix (no ads, just tracking and some terribly poor decisions about playing content in your searches) Amazon Prime (no Ads... unless you count them stopping your binge to show you some content you didn't ask for... [Hint... AD]) and Hulu (you can pay to skip ads or just watch them to keep your price down) and a few other channels that are paid directly.. or paid by ads.

      In content ownership there is nothing free... even like beer. Every one of the content providers have a stake in your information and will monetize it.

    6. Re: This is why.... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      The 'security' is to protect the content from you. Aka: DRM.

    7. Re:This is why.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Because I hope they change what I consider a design flaw.

    8. Re:This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My AppleTV isn't trying to monetize me.

      LOL, you do realize Apple's new push is "services" right? And "services" == monetizing customers

    9. Re:This is why.... by PPH · · Score: 1

      I recently setup a new LG TV for someone and it was pissing me of with the stupid EULA to even turn it on.

      Don't you have a four-year-old around who can click 'Agree'? Sorry, LG, my kid can't enter into a contract.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My LG from 2014 can be upgraded with the new firmware on an USB stick. I think I will keep using this model for longer. It even has 3D, which I enjoy very much.

    11. Re:This is why.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately smart TVs have become like everything else that supports updates - they release them with half finished beta software and maybe fix it later.

      I bought an LG smart TV, initially the CEC function was barely working. A few months later a firmware update fixed it.

      Sometimes they do actually add useful functionality too. Panasonic recently introduced Dolby Vision support via firmware update.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. How about not buying TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You fat fucking nerds should exercise instead of sitting on your shit stained couches watching geek crap on your idiot boxes.

  12. Always look on the bright side of life by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

    Say what you want but there are positives about this:
    1) they're being upfront with their intentions (though I still don't trust them)
    2) If they can make money after the purchase of the TV then they have less incentive to design it will intentional obsolescence. (my biggest concern of any smart TV)
    3) It may lower the price of TV's
    4) I'm confident that while most people won't know how to block the ad-tracking, I'll still be able to allow the TV access to Netflix only and nothing else.

    1. Re: Always look on the bright side of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will just make the Netflix app phone home when you launch it and give you a check your internet connection error when it is blocked.

    2. Re:Always look on the bright side of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you want but there are positives about this:
      1) they're being upfront with their intentions (though I still don't trust them)
      2) If they can make money after the purchase of the TV then they have less incentive to design it will intentional obsolescence. (my biggest concern of any smart TV)
      3) It may lower the price of TV's
      4) I'm confident that while most people won't know how to block the ad-tracking, I'll still be able to allow the TV access to Netflix only and nothing else.

      1.) They are upfront about their stated intentions. That doesn't mean they match their real intentions.
      2.) No, they only have an incentive to continue planned obsolescence as they don't have to dump it to add on the double dip of ad revenue. Cost to the manufacturer doesn't pair with price to the consumer. Rather, the difference is called profit margin and nobody is going to say "hey, we made 5% more due to ads, so we can lower the price of purchase by 5%!" Nope, shareholders want that as a return.
      3.) See number 2.
      4.) Do you have a way to prove the justification for your confidence?

    3. Re:Always look on the bright side of life by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      1. So are muggers.
      2. And why would you think they wouldn't just double dip with a device that is obsolete in six months and shoving ads in your face?
      3. Please, don't make me laugh. Did you notice the big drop in price when Cable TV started showing ads? Yeah, I thought not.
      4. It's entirely possible the TV simply won't work if it's not online with Vizio's ad service. I'm probably being paranoid but it wouldn't surprise me.

  13. This is satire, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, the more I read these articles the more convinced I become that I'm living in some kind of satire-based, candid-camera type show. I mean this product idea just screams DO NOT BUY ME on so many levels it simply has to be a wind-up because no sane person would honestly suggest it with a straight face.

    The idea that could something that combines the reality-dreck that passes for TV these days with targeted advertising (and I'm going to assume all the spying that goes with it)... I mean seriously, in what alternative universe is that an attractive proposition??? And then to go on and suggest that a person who has managed to score an old-fashioned, non-smart TV would want to retroactively obtain such features... the mind boggles.

    1. Re: This is satire, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This our world now.

  14. if the tv is going to have it's own ads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then the manufacturer of said tv better be paying the fucking cable bill. with commercial time over 20 minutes per hour, we see enough ads, tyvm.

  15. I want Vizio by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To go out of business.

  16. Maybe later... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    They live in households for 6.9 years -- the average lifetime of a Vizio TV is 6.9 years.

    That's way to damn short. I've never bought a Vizio, and now know that I probably never will. I'd rather pay more and keep it for much longer. Why do I need to send a TV to the landfill every 7 years anyhow?

    You would probably be amazed at the number of people come up to me saying, "I love Vizio TVs,

    I probably would be.

    I have one" and it's 11 years old. I'm like, "Dude, that's not even full HD, that's 720p."

    So what? Perhaps they should look at the quality of the programing instead of the resolution. I'd rather watch standard definition reruns of All in the Family than most of what I saw the last time I watched broadcast TV several years ago. Even if it is in "Super Ultra Double Plus Good 27.53K with HDR".

    I currently have a 1080P projector in my media room. Sure 4K is nice an all, but my current projector works just fine. My eyesight isn't getting any better as the years go by anyhow. And for a lot of people, upgrading from a 40 inch 720P TV that they are watching from a 14 foot viewing distance, is 4K really going to be much of an improvement if they go to a 50 inch TV? Plus they will probably need other new equipment to get the most out of it anyhow. If they are using cable, then they're not getting much in 4K anyhow.

    1. Re:Maybe later... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Vizio started out by offering a durable product with terrible filtering which could be disabled completely, offering the lowest possible latency on native resolution signals, and with loads of brightness. It's unfortunate what's become of them since. It reminds me of Apex, who made their name by selling a player with very little filtering, and a trivial region-free hack from the remote. They were great for watching Anime.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely know what tv to never buy.

  18. About advertisers by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone who is interested the modern advertising industry is the brain child of one Edward Bernays who deceived women into thinking that smoking was a sign of their freedom.

    I highly recommend a documentary called Century of the Self for anyone who want to see just how we got into the situation we are in now.

    For all of the things that a human beings time gets wasted on, advertising has to be the most offensive.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  19. I guess I'm on my last TV by ahodgson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is the way the industry's going, fuck'em.

  20. It's inevitable, so ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    ... get over it or get used to it.

    I don't know why in simple hell my Dish® isn't doing this already.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:It's inevitable, so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't connect my dish to the internet then wipe the drive with a bulk tape eraser when it dies. Done.

  21. Doesn't bother me by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I haven't owned a TV in 20+ years.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re: Doesn't bother me by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1
  22. Large Computer Monitor by mssymrvn · · Score: 1

    And this is why my next LCD TV is going to be a large computer monitor, and not a TV at all.

  23. by their ads ye shall know them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you have friends over and they notice your TV keeps playing ads for "anal intruder"...

  24. TV = Monitor by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Really why would you want a crap computer that you can't control attached to your TV when you can have a good one you do control.

  25. My nearly 4 year old vi\zio tv had 2 things going by bobstreo · · Score: 2

    for it.

      I) It was cheap at the time and my previous dumb TV had died

    2) It was dumb as dirt. HDMI ports with some CEC support.

    If this one goes, I'll probably buy a smart tv (since there aren't any choices) and toss a streaming device on it like an android TV box. Netflix, and kodi support are pretty much all I use, with the occasional chromecast from my computer. If the streaming device dies or needs to be replaced, it's usually less than $100.

    No smart TV will have any access to any Internet access. If they start putting 4G/5G sim cards in their devices, I'll be removing them as well.

    If the current prices aren't sufficient to support Vizio's profit model, they may want to rethink their business.

  26. that's why I keep notes by epine · · Score: 1

    That's why I keep notes: to inform my future purchasing decisions.

    From my notes today:

    Vizio Settles With FTC, Will Pay $2.2 Million and Delete User Data — 6 February 2017

    Vizio allegedly collected data on what people viewed on 11 million of its TVs and then shared the data with third parties, without informing people about the data collection or receiving consent.

    Gotta move a lot of glass to pay a $2 million fine on 6% margins.

    No wait—it's only the margins on the televisions that are a thin 6%. Other parts of the business are total payola.

    1. Re:that's why I keep notes by Cederic · · Score: 1

      5 years of advertising income for under 20 cents in fines? A sound (if unethical) bit of business that.

  27. Thats why by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    streaming without ads is winning.
    Buying physical media with no ads was a good idea.
    Not networking a smart TV and using it as a display for no ad streaming services.
    More ads is not a good idea.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  28. Already Exists by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    I've seen situations where two TVs in the same house watching the same cable channel get separate ads... this tech already exists.

    1. Re:Already Exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should change your user name to The New GAY 2.0. You're a boot licker and a corporate whore.

  29. I want our military to target Vizio by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 1

    I bet they get what they want before I get what I want

    --
    I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
  30. No, wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Netflix already has ads, mostly previews for their original content.

    You are thinking of Amazon Prime video, Netflix does not do previews before shows you watch (though it does do previews if you hover over an item, not really the same as an ad).

    By tracking your viewing habits, they can give you better recommendations.

    Maybe, but the article was specifically about ads...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recommended content is still an ad.

    2. Re:No, wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I have to laugh, because Youtube very often insists on showing you ads before you can watch a movie preview. But a movie preview is just an advertisement itself. So Youtube insists on showing you ads before you can see other ads!

    3. Re:No, wrong by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Are you sure youtube has ads?

    4. Re:No, wrong by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It does w/o adblock.

    5. Re:No, wrong by lgw · · Score: 1

      Netflix sometimes show previews during the end credits, which annoys me.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  31. for your consideration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    in the UK they recently annouced the ability to track rfid chipped mental health patients via the smart meter on the side of the house. hypothetically, you are sitting in your home surfing porn. what geek doesn't? anyway, you wonder in the television room put on the boob tube and channel surf. normal right? you settle on a movie ... your gf / wife hears it and joins you. your kid hears it and joins you. do you see where this is going? yup, the first commercial break features some donkey dicked black guy balling some tiny white chick...

    this is great for the divorce lawyers. honestly, do you really believe they aren't either listening via the tv microphone or watching via the tv camera or both?

    1. Re:for your consideration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you settle on a movie ... your gf / wife hears it and joins you. your kid hears it and joins you. do you see where this is going? yup, the first commercial break features some donkey dicked black guy balling some tiny white chick...

      What the fuck kind of movies do you watch with your family?

  32. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your own advice. It's be best for everyone. Especially a total failure you obviously are. I bet you are a nig sucking on the welfare tit hating what you are. A waste.

  33. Ad for something for which you have already paid by tepples · · Score: 1

    "Recommended content" is an ad for something for which you have already paid. Many people are more likely to excuse an ad for something for which you have already paid than an ad for something available for an additional fee.

  34. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody cares what you watch or what platform you like you world's dumbest cheerleader. You're too fucking boring. Your entire life is pointless. Kill yourself.

  35. Every. Single. Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edward Bernays was born to a Jewish family
    You are literally Hitler !

    1. Re:Every. Single. Time. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Edward Bernays was born to a Jewish family

      A nephew of Sigmund Freud.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Every. Single. Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol whose acclaimed surgeon friend forgot a couple of meters of medical gauze up the nose of freud's lover after her nose had collapsed/become infected from doing too much cocaine

    3. Re:Every. Single. Time. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Crazy times those crazy times.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  36. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MonkeyWelfareNig, No. You care or you would not reply. No, You are boring, pointless and obviously very stupid with nigbrain, low. There is no defense for you against those facts. Take your own advice AND your meds. Kill your useless wasted life self. It is the best thing you can do for yourself and everyone else. Seriously. Sucking on welfare like the nig you are? I know you hate yourself. You reply projects it. Makes sense. Quit leeching off the rest of the good people you stinking nig. You would for once be of service to humanity. Thank you. Subhuman darkies like you are drags on the system and society. Just die nig. Die.

  37. Nope by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    People have been posting videos of their tvs made for the Chinese market playing commercials when they start up or even switch inputs.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  38. TURN IT OFF! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blow up the fucking TV and go outside and interact with people!

    Sheesh, it's really simple

  39. Re:Ad for something for which you have already pai by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    Amazon's ads are the thin edge of the wedge.

    The cable companies did the same shit here, but that was to pad out 22 minutes of content into a 30 minute slot; why pay for showing 3 episodes of a show when you can pay for 2? Then they slid across to actual paid advertisements, because hey, you've already accepted you're paying for TV AND getting ads.

    If Amazon don't start at least having an ad supported version of Prime, then I would be very surprised, and I'd expect whatever you're paying now for TV with interstitial ads to be what you pay for the ad supported non-premium service.

    In the words of Frito: I can't believe you like money too. We should hang out.

  40. And this is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought two brand new excellent TVs. Both dumb TVs. And each only around $300 each.

    I'm not wasting a dime on so-called "smart" TVs.

  41. Edward Bernays... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Edward Bernays... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      This is hilarious - thanks!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  42. No "Smart TV" for me until ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    No "Smart TV" for me until I can replace its entire software/firmware load with an open-source alternative.

    My family's TV watching (mostly CDs of old movies) is done using a NTSC CRT TV fed with analog video.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:No "Smart TV" for me until ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know "Smart TVs" can be turned into "Dumb TVs" by disconnecting from the internet, right? You can even use analog cables.

      Old CRT TVs are great for very limited uses (e.g., some vintage video game consoles), otherwise you're just missing out (size, image quality, device support).

      $20 says you're not against smart TVs, you're against TV in general (esp. cable TV).

    2. Re:No "Smart TV" for me until ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      You know "Smart TVs" can be turned into "Dumb TVs" by disconnecting from the internet, right?

      No, I don't know that.

      And as someone who's been helping to build the bloody Internet, and both hardware and software for it, for decades, I know several ways that such a box (with a camera and microphone connected to a networkable computer that potentially has one or more radio peripherals) could bug the room it's in and "phone home" with the results, even if not "connected to the Internet" in one of the ways prescribed by the manual.

      And the spooks who specialize in this may have still more ways.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  43. Wheel of Morality turn, turn, turn... by Mnemennth · · Score: 1
    ...tell us the lesson that we should learn.

    "Meh."

    mnem
    and a half.

  44. VISIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VISIO, there's a brand I won't touch. Not that I was ever interested but good to know what I can pass up.

  45. So, Free smart TVs are the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they after the google and facebook business model? are they going also to mine cryptocurrency with our energy bills? who knows, but probably they are seriously thinking on it.

  46. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody cares what you watch or what platform you like you world's dumbest cheerleader. You're too fucking boring. Your entire life is pointless. Kill yourself.

  47. So wait by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    So...now we'll have to run ad blockers on our TVs?

    ---------------

    Farnsworth: It's very simple. The ad gets into your brain just like this liquid gets into this egg. [He holds up an egg and injects it with liquid. The egg explodes, covering him and Leela in yolk.] Although, in reality, it's not liquid, but gamma radiation.

    Fry: That's awful. It's like brainwashing.

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?

    Fry: Well, sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines and movies and at ball games, on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams. No, sir-ee!

    Bender: Quit squawking, flesh wad. Nobody's forcing you to buy anything.

    Amy: Yeah. I mean we all have commercials in our dreams but you don't see us running off to buy brand-name merchandise at low, low prices.

    [After a long silence they get up and run out.]

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  48. A dollar and a dollar by presearch · · Score: 1

    Took long enough. When I was working at Intel, they were developing a dedicated set-top SOC (Canmore I recall?). The salespeople were all excited and drooling on the meeting table about "a dollar and a dollar"; money from the chip, and money from a cut of ad revenue. The core software came from Yahoo and it was some of the worst code I've ever seen. Ugly inside, undocumented, very broken, and even more ugly outside.

    Like all things Intel, much money was burned, flaky dev kits were sent out, and the project killed and the work thrown away.
    https://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/2008/20080820comp_a.htm/

    1. Re:A dollar and a dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That press release returns a nice 404... Got another link?

  49. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO U

  50. Block at the router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's start getting a router / DNS solution that simply says Fuck you to all those advertising networks and drives them to /dev/null. The TV will have to call out of your network. Well, I can control that.

  51. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Nobody cares what you watch or what platform you like

    They may not care what he in particular likes, but they sure care about what 100,000 people in his demographic like. And he's part of the collective, so to speak. So yeah, they care what he likes, just not him specifically.

    In other words you're just another data point to be gobbled up. They care enough to collect the data, it's just not personal.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  52. Hell NO! We don't want this!!!! by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    I will not be buying Vizio!

  53. Time to.... by drew_92123 · · Score: 2

    It's time to start taking aim at CEOs..... with high powered rifles.....

    1. Re:Time to.... by jma05 · · Score: 0

      Er no, just with your wallets.

  54. Is there any organized opposition? by tanstaaf1 · · Score: 1

    I'd be willing to spend some money to opt out of the surveillance dystopia we continue racing towards. I'd personally be willing to spend $500 to $1000 EXTRA to get a TV which worked FOR my privacy and against any sneaky attempts to collect information about me or target me for advertising. In the area of phones, I currently have an iphone for this reason and I put down money for a "purism" phone for this same reason. At work, I am heading an initiative to physically separate the network from the internet -- since for the most part there is NO good reason why anyone using office resources needs to access internet from the same computer system (we have purchased laptops for those who need to shop or conduct other internet business and these laptops have a separate wifi internet access). On my home computer I block almost everything. But what can I reasonably do about TV, short of not having any? Specifically, why can't I get a TV which is legitimately "smart" enough to act on my preferences to not share my information; to not allow "software updates" (which never seem to add anything I actually want my TV, so they are not upgrades, but clearly are adding more and more of the pork that Google and other evil companies are determined to subject me to)? Why don't I even have this choice? It has occurred to me recently that there ought to be a cottage industry in hacking smart TVs to add advertisement blocking, etc.....but there is a difference between ought and is. And even if there IS such a cottage industry, how do I find them? I've tried searching the internet using all the key words I can think of (e.g., "TVs which do not have android"; "privacy oriented smart TVs"; etc.) but the search results have not been at all helpful. Suggestions?

    1. Re:Is there any organized opposition? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The problem is, once you've spent that extra $1K, The manufacturers will say "Hey, they're willing to spend $1K more on TVs, let's raise all our prices!"

    2. Re:Is there any organized opposition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not quite expensive. From cheap to more expensive you may have :
      - really low end TV, like a 21" one, plugged into OTA antenna
      - computer monitor, 24" or 27", and cheap external ATSC or DVB-T tuner (comes with its own remote and may has a USB port)
      - big computer monitor, 32" to 40" and bigger - a few ones may have dual HDMI + displayport and even a remote and sort of usable speakers

      Computer monitor will lack RCA, S-video, RGB etc. in - if that were really important maybe scaler boxes meant for playing old consoles at better quality will be useful.
      DVD players with HDMI output (scaled) are a cheap commodity.

  55. If the TV is free, then that is acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    similar to me with a shirt with giant advertisement on it (GAP), or buttversizement clothes. They should be free.

  56. Any reason you can't use a monitor as a TV? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Not like you can use the TV's built-in tuner anymore, what with cable channels being scrambled. So what reason is there to buy a TV instead of a computer monitor?

    1. Re:Any reason you can't use a monitor as a TV? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. HDTV antenna. Donesky!

    2. Re:Any reason you can't use a monitor as a TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not like you can use the TV's built-in tuner anymore, what with cable channels being scrambled. So what reason is there to buy a TV instead of a computer monitor?

      As long as you aren't trying to buy a 60" UHD monitor.

    3. Re:Any reason you can't use a monitor as a TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quality of the picture, eliminating pulldown through 24p hz matching, better color space, HDR, better screen uniformity, etc.

      It's like asking why everyone doesn't just buy motorcycles instead of cars. They are both modes of transportation, and for some people, one would be just as good as another. For others, there are features that a car has that a motorcycle does not which are considered requirements for them.

      If you don't care about any of the things I mentioned, then go for it. Grab the biggest cheapest monitor you can find and you'll probably be super happy (honestly most people will).

      But if you are looking for a really high quality picture or care about that sort of thing, then I don't think there are many large monitors that will perform as well as a decent TV.

  57. Piss off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off with all the ads already. I'm to the point where I purposely avoid products that bombard me with this bullshit.

  58. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I owned a Vizio 55-inch "Smart" TV. Vizio had already gotten into trouble for collecting user TV activity without properly disclosing that. I quickly realized that the "Smart" features of my Vizio were worse than what I got out of my gen. 1 Chromecast. So I disabled Vizio's "Smart" TV functions.

    But the firmware of my Vizio TV was terrible. The TV would turn itself on overnight! I would come into my living room the next morning to see the TV turned on, but the remote would not work. The few buttons on the TV including the power button would not work either. I had to pull the electrical cord to get the Vizio pos TV to turn off. This happened at least three times over two years.

    Changing channels on the Vizio "Smart" TV was slow. Much slower than my non-smart Sharp TV which I love. And since I was using an antenna, channels with weak signal would cause the Vizio "Smart" TV to strangely change to a channel across the dial (going from something like 45-3 to 15-1 without any user input). I repeatedly hid 15-1 from my channel lineup, but the Vizio would add it back repeatedly.

    I finally called Vizio's customer support. The moron from Vizio did not seem to know that channels on physical frequencies (specified in megahertz) are mapped onto logical channels (45-3 for instance). He kept talking nonsense to me. Then when I complained about the firmware problems, what was his solution??? THAT I SHOULD BUY A NEW VIZIO TV BECAUSE THE FIRMWARE ON THEIR NEW TVs WORKS BETTER! I paid Vizio for a final product, not for some piece of shit alpha TV which spies on its users.

    BTW, from the Vizio CTOs comments, 720p IS full HD, in that the original HD spec allows either 720p or 1080i. So even Vizio's CTO doesn't know what he is talking about. And no, Vizio does not support their older TVs at least not with firmware that works.

    Avoid Vizio at all costs. Vizio TVs suck.

  59. Yup, very evil. Samsung's privacy = horrifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as others. My Onkyo Reciever spies on me, my samsung TV spies on me, my android phone spies on me, my Windows 10 DEEPLY SPIES ON ME, my Office 2019 spies on me, My Microsoft SQL Server Spies on me, My PC Hardware Spies on me, My Nvidia Display driver spies on me, The White Boxes with two little rubber duck antenna every few power polls that collect Wifi/Bluetooth MAC addresses for State Agen. of Transportation spies on me, the cameras on the busses+buildings spies on me, My car spies on me by send involuntary data out to who knows where, Traffic cameras spies on me, License Plate readers Spies on me, My ISP is creepy also (They do deep packet inspection), All cloud services spy on me, Facebook well, duh.

    this should've been a list of things that shouldn't spy on you.

    Anyway, humans are doing evil with technology and the consumer is just a cow.

  60. Re:My nearly 4 year old vi\zio tv had 2 things goi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll probably buy a smart tv (since there aren't any choices)

    STOP FUCKING BELIEVING THIS.

    Get a commercial display. They cost a bit more, they last a lot longer, they have more inputs than most TVs and they don't have any "smart" crap in them whatsoever. This comes up every fucking time we have a conversation on Slashdot about Smart TVs but there's always people like you who completely ignore this advice.

    Commercial display.

    Say it again!

    Commercial display.

    What's that name?

    COMMERCIAL FUCKING DISPLAY.

    Stop throwing your hands up and saying "durrrr no choice, gotta cave..." NO. Bad consumer! Buy a fucking commercial display!

  61. Don't hook TVs up to the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop hooking TVs up to the Internet in the first place. It's stupid and serves no purpose. If you don't give it internet it can't spam ads at you now can it? Don't be a retard. Screens do not need internet and never have. They're screens, they only need to display what they're told.

  62. Re:My nearly 4 year old vi\zio tv had 2 things goi by godefroi · · Score: 1

    They don't cost "a bit more", they cost several times more for a display of equal size. 55" displays go for anywhere from $1,500 up to several thousand dollars. Yes, it's an option, but be upfront about what it's going to cost.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  63. Do not want 'targeted' advertising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me, targeted advertising is counter-productive; you want your ads to be seen by the largest number of people, not just a specific group. If I have to see ads, I don't want to see the same ads from the same companies day-in and day-out; it's not only boring, it's annoying and angering. I use ad-blockers not because I don't want to see ads but because I don't want to see the same ads everywhere I go.

    1. Re:Do not want 'targeted' advertising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an unreasonable opinion, but at the same time it would be nice to not get hit by random adds that you have no interest in. Over the past week I've been getting hammered by Lexus oil/brake maintenance advertisements on YouTube, I've never owned a Lexus in my life.

  64. Don't Blame VISO! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Anybody notice the FCC has been talking and working in this direction almost as if they were industry insiders and not regulators...

    This is just a case of a CEO letting the cat out of the bag; they are all seriously working on making this happen and have been doing experiments in this area for years now. The FCC in their pocket moving to make this dream come true is on the edge of happening and at least 1 CEO seems to think it's a done deal regardless of what happens with Trump.

    Parent's 2 links are highly recommended; should be required for every citizen.

  65. Prior Art Exists.... by swschrad · · Score: 1

    like, for instance, all commercial TV broadcasting...

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  66. One more reason to pirate content by tratson · · Score: 1

    So I pay Netflix et al for premium content with no commercials and the "smart" TV then injects it's own? When my kids ask me to get a new movie I wait until it is released on B-Ray and then bittorrent it into my networked kodi install. I know 100% what is on my system and that it is safe for my kids to watch. I will quit pirating when my children quit being the product. Until then I feel no guilt or shame in preventing the brainwashing and exploitation of my family. Greedy bastards be damned! I love my older LG television BECAUSE it is dumb as brick.

  67. Bet they will offer a subscription, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to block ads.But will they give away the TVs so you will put up with the ads?

  68. DUDE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 years old my ass

    ""Dude, that's not even full HD, that's 720p."

    DUDE...sell me a frickin' 28" TV that isn't then 720p STILL......... my 7" phone can handle how about you?

  69. My current experience with Vizio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bought a new 70" TV (E70-F).

    Developed issues within a couple months (kept restarting on itself).

    Vizio sent out technician to basically replace all boards.

    New problems emerged (backlight flicker).

    Vizio wants to replace my TV with a refurbished TV. Says it's my only option.

    Terrible.

  70. Re:Kendall is the world's most boring incel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does some random person on Slashdot-in this case SuperKendall- bother you so much? I see lots of people here I disagree with, I just go "meh", and move on. It's irrelevant.
    Unless...you know him in real life. It has been my experience that such emotional anger is usually produced by failed relationships.

  71. Vizio can get ^#^%&(*@!(!# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the average lifetime of a Vizio TV is 6.9 years." - if they start pulling this crap the life of any TV like this will be 0.0000000000 years.

    I will spend $1000 to put a firewall in front of it to block that shit, advertising has sucked enough minutes of my life.

  72. 720p... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dude, that's not even full HD, that's 720p."

    B...
    F...
    D...

    Our house's primary TV is a 20+ years old 36-inch tube. It'll be replaced when it dies, most likely by a "smart" TV just because I don't expect there to be any other option, and I really would like something more in the 65-inch range. But it will NOT be internet-connected, unless it connects to a neighbor's wi-fi. Which I fully expect it to try on it's own.

  73. Re:Ad for something for which you have already pai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frito: I can't believe you like money too. We should hang out.

    I believe the quote goes as follows: "Whoa, you like money and sex? We should hang out."