Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Axes Apple AirPlay Support (cnet.com)

If you stream Netflix on your iPhone or iPad, the app will no longer support Apple AirPlay. A report adds: This means that you won't be able to cast shows on Netflix from your iOS device to your Apple TV. Netflix's note says AirPlay is "no longer supported" due to "technical limitations." "With AirPlay support rolling out to third-party devices, there isn't a way for us to distinguish between devices (what is an Apple TV vs. what isn't) or certify these experiences. Therefore, we have decided to discontinue Netflix AirPlay support to ensure our standard of quality for viewing is being met," a Netflix spokesperson said in an email.

169 comments

  1. The big boys battle by XXongo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, the big boys battle for who gets paid for what you watch, and how they get the money.

    Nothing to do with us.

    1. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15-30% cut on a subscription is harsh to comprehend. If Apple was managing the streaming infrastructure then sure sounds reasonable.

      Really want to see the media providers, hardware providers and store fronts all be separate companies

    2. Re:The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the big boys battle for who gets paid for what you watch, and how they get the money.

      Nothing to do with us.

      Nothing to do with us except "when elephants dance, mice get trampled."

    3. Re:The big boys battle by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am not sure why AirPlay is part of this fight. Apple Historically had the ability to a Companies biggest competitor and strongest strategic business partner at the same time. Yes Apple iTune services is in direct competition with Netflix, but using Apple Products (for those who like them) with Netflix, is a popular viewing method. Making Netflix harder to use on Apple Products, will make the product owners have to choose between getting new hardware, or switching services. Being that Netflix isn't in the business of selling Netflix boxes, that will mean a drop in customers for Netflix, as a good number (I expect 20%) would stick with Apple and Drop Netflix. Where if Netflix continued to play well with Apple Products, then there will be a smaller number of switchers where many would just buy into both services, and less would do a full switch.
      The trick to Apples model is you have a physical device where there is an emotional attachment to, vs a service which you can drop without feeling bad about it.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re: The big boys battle by dagoalieman · · Score: 1

      Because Netflix will still work.. but Airplay wonâ(TM)t. People will blame Apple for that, public pressure will grow for Apple to cave. I just donâ(TM)t think that many people use AirPlay for this to work as well as Netflix wants with Bluetooth speakers, smart TVs, consoles etc in mix.

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    5. Re:The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a typical contard who either is deliberately uninformed about, or deliberately pretends to not understand, what net neutrality is about. Nothing new here.

    6. Re:The big boys battle by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Probably because casting via Airplay will almost always be to a device where you could run the Netflix app independently. (EG TVs or even AppleTV) It's also one less thing you have to use Apple Development for.

    7. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If cord cutting is when you cancel Cable, what is it called when you cancel Netflix?

    8. Re:The big boys battle by fermion · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Netflix has been pretty controlling about where it allow content to play. For instance I had a VGA monitor connected to my desktop, and netflix would load content saying it required me to use the HDMI connections. I agree that this sounds like a response to the Apple TV+, but it could be that the airplay interface is just too open for netflix.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re: The big boys battle by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      It's called "a sudden outbreak of sanity".

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re: The big boys battle by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Nononono. It's called "Netflix needs to take on even more debt to pay Winona Ryder for Stranger Things Season 3".

    11. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disney owns Hulu not Netflix.

    12. Re:The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you mean "a popular viewing method"? iPhone sells are dropping sharply enough for Apple to start being opaque about it.

    13. Re: The big boys battle by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Because Netflix will still work.. but Airplay wonÃ(TM)t. People will blame Apple for that, public pressure will grow for Apple to cave. I just donÃ(TM)t think that many people use AirPlay for this to work as well as Netflix wants with Bluetooth speakers, smart TVs, consoles etc in mix.

      Actually, AirPlay support is up to individual apps themselves. It's a really common requested feature as well - if you offer a streaming audio or video app, and don't offer AIrPlay, people will complain bitterly to your support line about the lack of AirPlay.

      Apple has nothing to do with this, other than perhaps blocking apps from doing an inventory of your AV equipment (new data gathering opportunity - see what equipment you own and sell that information to the manufacturers - "Netflix says Sony TVs are most popular, followed by Samsung"). And Apple would be right, because well, it's not a great leap to go from "inventory of your AV equipment" to "Rob Me App - gets a list of all your expensive AV gear to see if you're a mark worth stealing from".

    14. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute. You actually think they manage anything...

      Yup, Netflix would trust the TB/s to some company who is extremely bad at dealing with predictable surges in ther MB/s (new model release software update horror stories abound)

    15. Re: The big boys battle by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      Actually, AirPlay support is up to individual apps themselves. It's a really common requested feature as well - if you offer a streaming audio or video app, and don't offer AIrPlay, people will complain bitterly to your support line about the lack of AirPlay.

      Really? I stream from my phone all the time, and I have never once complained about the lack of AirPlay. I just haven't seen the need for it with my Samsung Note 8. I guess AirPlay is just a feature for a small market share player...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about subscriptions though, this is AirPlay. This is the same as Netflix removing support for Google Cast because there are smart TVs with Google Cast built in.

    17. Re:The big boys battle by exomondo · · Score: 0

      Making Netflix harder to use on Apple Products, will make the product owners have to choose between getting new hardware, or switching services.

      Airplay wouldn't even be necessary if Apple TV weren't such a shitty experience, that remote is absolutely horrendous.

      Being that Netflix isn't in the business of selling Netflix boxes, that will mean a drop in customers for Netflix, as a good number (I expect 20%) would stick with Apple and Drop Netflix.

      Why? You can still use Netflix on Apple TV, it's just a crap experience because the Apple TV interaction model is horrendous.

    18. Re: The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me I'll just use a Chromecast along with my Apple TV, problem solved.

    19. Re:The big boys battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because they can no longer track and do annalytics over airplay due to 3rd party non apple devices using it.

    20. Re:The big boys battle by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Netflix is only "controlling" because the content providers have it in their licensing agreement with Netflix. Things like region locks, and only allowing HD streaming to devices that support HDCP in every step of the chain is all in their licensing agreement with the content providers. It really is those guys you hate. Netflix tries to enforce those things because they are legally obligated to (or they don't get a license for much if any content at all).

  2. They're not entirely wrong. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    I recently tried to do Netflix AirPlay from my phone in a hotel. It was a very poor implementation of AirPlay on the hotel TV, and Netflix showed up with a blank solid coloured screen with only the audio playing. For that matter, no other video app worked either. YouTube just crashed, Crunchyroll froze, and Infuse played audio/video well enough but with chunky scaling, jittery motion, and no subtitles.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure why that would stop Netflix from supporting AirPlay, since it presumably works fine on actual Apple devices.

    1. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      On the other hand chromecasting to arbitrary devices has worked ok for me. I have both a chromecast 2 and a TV with built in support and I have no problem casting from my phone or PC to either.

    2. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by ledow · · Score: 5, Informative

      Presumably it has much more to do with being able to Airplay a perfectly viable compressed bitstream to an uncontrolled device that could be recording it or doing anything else with it (whereas Apple tended to respect the DRM etc.).

      Airplay->MP4 anyone? I'm sure it's possible.

    3. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

      Netflix is glad to support airplay as long as they know their DRM/licenses will be properly enforced. They donâ(TM)t care about third parties so much as they canâ(TM)t guarantee that third parties will prevent piracy the way they want it done. Thatâ(TM)s a part of what this pissing match is about. That, and money of course.

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    4. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I'm not sure why that would stop Netflix from supporting AirPlay, since it presumably works fine on actual Apple devices.

      Probably some company isn't paying some other company (enough) for something - to support or allow this.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Airplay->MP4 anyone? I'm sure it's possible.

      It's possible. And it would be an AAC audio stream with H.264 video. You may choose to transcode back to something like AC3 for compatibility, but only if connecting to a 5.1 receiver.

    6. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by flippy · · Score: 1

      I agree, it wouldn't be that difficult to do from a technical perspective. I even understand Netflix' concerns, and I think they're valid concerns. How long do you think Netflix would be able to continue to get licenses for content if it was relatively easy to strip any protection from the content? I'd just love to see a company be honest about what's driving them to a decision like this. I'd support such a company 110%.

    7. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i own a hotel and build an inroom entertainment sony android / chromecast. every guest was sble to stream from their devices but netflix stopped supporting it :-( a shame. nowadays inprovide hotelwide netflix accounts so my guest can watch their shows but with our accounts they still seem happy

    8. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airplay->MP4 anyone? I'm sure it's possible.

      So is HDMI->MP4.

    9. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why I just bring a roku with me to the hotel - Roku's being able to work via Hotel Wifi is a godsend

    10. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The in-room TV did have direct support for a few streaming services (including Netflix), but I'm a bit hesitant to be entering my Netflix password on an untrusted public device.

      Netflix still supports Chromecast, what part of your setup did they stop supporting?

    11. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is AirPlay? Is that one of those Apple bullshit renaming of another companies invention, like FireWire was?
      I'm guessing it is Intel's WiDi.
      Be nice if the summary mentioned that.

    12. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already very easy to strip protection from content. Any media you want is already available through pirate channels.

      These concerns only add inconvenience for paying users. Non-paying pirates can watch anything they want, on any device they want, without arbitrary restrictions.

      That's the fallacy of DRM. There is no data protection benefit once one unencrypted copy goes public.

    13. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by flippy · · Score: 1

      It's easy to strip protection for sd'ers. I'd be hard-pressed to say it was easy for the average Joe.

    14. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by unami · · Score: 1

      It's not about apple devices but about third-party tvs (samsung, sony, vizio, etc.) that recently got airplay 2 support. It eill work fine, because it's apple certified. But When people don't use the netflix apps on those devices, netflix will get less user data from those devices, i guess.

    15. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they seriously doing this because of fear that the shows will be ripped and uploaded to torrent? No amount of DRM will stop that.

    16. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by DaveSewhuk · · Score: 1

      I guess any device that uses HDMI is out, as the encryption keys are in the wild now. Airplay uses AES encryption so it is not in the clear either.

    17. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No they're doing it out of fear that if the companies that they license content from will blame the inevitable piracy on netflix's "inadequate" DRM and refuse to continue licensing their content.

    18. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Red_Forman · · Score: 2

      So is MP4->GIF, unfortunately.

    19. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Is that pronounced "jif" or "ghif"?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choosy developers choose jif

    21. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd guess wrong asshole.

      And did you know FireWire was invented by Apple? They started development as early as 1988 if my memory serves me correctly. They then opened the standard up after it was finalized, when it was named IEEE 1394. A few other companies were involved in development, but it was always an Apple thing.

      Then those assholes at Sony came along and called it i.link and I'm sure someone else renamed it as well, since it's an open standard.

      But no, even your blind Apple hate doesn't make airplay anything like WiDi.

    22. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAZINGA!

    23. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, lose your outrage. Apple didn't rename someone else's invention Firewire. They invented it, and called if Firewire, and then finished the spec process in concert with other companies and the IEEE, which is where it was assigned the IEEE-1384 designation.

      Sony made their own implementation and called it i.Link, while most people in the PC space didn't use a named implementation, just referred to it by the IEEE spec number. But Firewire was the original.

    24. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lot of words to say no and not provide a reason for how it is different from WiDi or Miracast.
      For anyone curious, the difference is Airplay works ONLY on Apple devices.

      So yeah, gp is right. Airplay is another Apple branding of an industry standard process.

    25. Re: They're not entirely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. Ars has a good write up on the 1394 standard history.

      The beginning
      "It actually started in 1987," Michael Johas Teener, the chief architect of FireWire, told Ars. He was then a system architect in National Semiconductor's marketing department, there to impart technical knowledge upon the clueless sales and marketing staff.

      So NatSemi originated it. Not Apple.

    26. Re:They're not entirely wrong. by DethLok · · Score: 1

      "ghif" with the "gh" as in "though" or "tough" or "thorough"?

  3. Monopolization by fluffernutter · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find most of the technology today could be so awesome if everything would integrate. Unfortunately, monopolization of the internet as all that destroyed that possibility.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Monopolization by sad_ · · Score: 1

      the importance of free and open standards!

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  4. Standard of Ripping by devslash0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my opinion they're simply saying that users would use 3rd party devices to rip their content and they have no other way of stopping it. They're not wrong.

    1. Re:Standard of Ripping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because netflix content doesn't get ripped and put up the thepiratebay already?

    2. Re:Standard of Ripping by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      This is the correct answer.

    3. Re:Standard of Ripping by WankerWeasel · · Score: 2

      It's just the timing that seems strange. They've allowed this for years but shortly after Apple announces a competing service to their own, they make this change. Something that wasn't a security issue for years, suddenly is.

    4. Re:Standard of Ripping by flippy · · Score: 1

      It's not about the timing of Apple announcing a streaming service, it's about the timing of AirPlay playback being integrated into non-Apple hardware.

  5. Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "technical limitation" is that they don't want to send video to a device that can decrypt and archive it.

    1. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or their agreements with movie studios require that.

    2. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 1

      I imagine that it's a little bit of both - and that's a completely valid concern from them. I just wish they'd be honest and say it. I have a feeling that people would actually appreciate that honesty.

    3. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "archive it"

      LOL

    4. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      I guess their agreements with movie studios forbid that. ;-P

    5. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would think, but many people get upset when you are honest with them. My company had to add a fee to cover potential tax liabilities as the result of a really terrible US Supreme Court ruling. Can't tell you how many people got upset over it and now refuse to buy anything from us. Or when we had to drop out of Europe because they passed the GDPR for which we could not and would not comply with due to limited resources. Or when the government started imposing a 10% tariff on electronics. Each time we added on a new fee. We explained that these things were entirely outside of our control and that rather than hide those costs we would be up front about them. If one tax, tariff, or law changed we would respond be eliminating the fee. Unfortunately a lot of socialists don't understand basic economics. When your cost of doing business goes up because of bad government and stupid political decisions somebody has to flip the bill and ultimately that is going to be the consumer. If you don't up your prices then you go out of business. But certain people don't like to hear that. If you try to explain one another company isn't doing X they'll also bark at you. I'm sorry if you can't read, but it's not my fault that you aren't carefully reviewing even the checkout information which was clearly explained with even the most important bits in bold (and not say hidden in some policy somewhere).

    6. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 2

      I'm with you, and some people would probably get upset. But those people would probably get even MORE upset when Netflix either had to a) hike up prices because new agreements with more flexibility will cost more or b) let a whole bunch of content disappear from their service.

      And those people who get upset when your prices rise because your cost of business goes up through actions beyond your control? Those are the most problematic customers anyway, in my experience. You may very well be better off without them.

    7. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one minds if you recoup your costs and even a little extra if your product is good.

      We hate when you pretend your tax liability is somehow our problem. Your tax liability comes out of your profits, not our pockets. Having shit removed from your office is also a cost of doing business, but you are not line itemizing that on your customer's bills are you, you hypocrite?

    8. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 2

      Umm, that's not how running a business works. You're essentially saying "If the government raises your tax liability, Mr. Company, you should just suck it up and make less money (or perhaps go from a profit to a loss, depending on the situation). We don't care that it costs you more to provide the same service/product."

      I have been involved in two real-world businesses, and seen this sort of thing happen to my competitors. You know what happens to businesses that suck up ever additional cost and let it eat into their profits? THEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

    9. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their words: “user experience” is almost always a euphemism for tightening down DRM.

      Hey Netflix, I’ll tell you what a piss-poor user experience really is: having a setup that used to work flawlessly but suddenly shows a big unfriendly HDCP error when trying to play Netflix content, leaving me to randomly unplug, power cycle, and reconnect all devices in the chain for 15 minutes until the message disappears. I’ll tell you one thing: I don’t get any of that crap when dealing with the Pirate Bay.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's not transparency that annoys people, it's complexity.

      What happens when the cost of materials/supplies goes up? Do you add an "inflation fee" too?

    11. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I’ll tell you one thing: I don’t get any of that crap when dealing with the Pirate Bay.

      I'll tell you one thing, if you just use decent HDMI cables you'll probably never get this error. HDMI has poor fault tolerance and basically treats any hiccup as an attack. I've never once had an HDCP error since that protocol became the norm.

    12. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by PPH · · Score: 2

      We hate when you pretend your tax liability is somehow our problem.

      Why? You may very well have voted for the people that imposed these taxes. So here are the consequences. Don't like them? Vote differently next time.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 1

      This is getting a little off-topic, but I doubt they do that. Customers understand that things like the cost of materials and supplies goes up over time, and will accept that in increases in the base price. I can certainly understand the logic (although I may not agree with it 100%). Tariffs and increased tax rates may be just temporary things, and I'd rather see that in a separate line-item than bundled into an overall price number. It makes it easy to do, and easy to understand if, as the poster suggests, his company is willing to do away with those fees when the things that caused the costs associated with them go away. Want to make it really complex and next to impossible for their customers to actually understand? Keep fluctuating the base price up and down with every little blip.

      A perfect example of this is gasoline prices in the US. The prices for consumers fluctuate almost every single day. I have a fair understanding of economics, and that makes NO sense. Mr. Station Owner, the cost of the gasoline ALREADY IN YOUR TANKS didn't change from when it was delivered.

    14. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I voted for Bernie :(

    15. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Your answer is to use better cables? Let me guess, monster 24 ct gold ones to be exact?

    16. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

      How are you going to get your stuff from Pirate Bay now that the pirates can't rip Netflix streams? (end sarcasm)

    17. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Mr. Station Owner, the cost of the gasoline ALREADY IN YOUR TANKS didn't change from when it was delivered.

      The cost of the gasoline in their tanks might be less than they have to sell it for. You have to sell based on futures pricing, and have it even out in volume and incidental purchases at an attached convenience store. Also, if their tank isn't totally empty when they get more gasoline in, they would have to calculate how much to raise the price and raise it instantly while people might be in the middle of pumping. Usually for price increases, the sign on the street changes before the price on the pump and the reverse is true for decreases.

    18. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 1

      If they truly sell on futures pricing, why does the price to the consumer go up the instant the futures price does, but doesn't go down anywhere nearly as quickly when the futures price goes down?

    19. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Most likely a balance of covering their losses from when they had to sell low, response time of competitors on the price change, and that these changes likely come from corporate (except when competitors drop first).

    20. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not at all - bargain-priced Monoprice cables for me, usually. You can't go by price to tell if something is good.

    21. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 1

      Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not blaming this on the actual station owners. I shouldn't have said that. But, if the industry wants to claim "we sell based on futures pricing", and the time delay on price decreases is longer after a futures price decrease than the time delay on price increases after a futures price increase, I call BS. The consumer is getting ripped off. You can't have it both ways.

      I tracked this for a full six months once, correlating the futures prices to the pump prices, because I wanted to know if they were being truthful about selling based on futures pricing. It was consistent that pump price increases were almost immediate after futures prices went up, and took a week or more to go down after futures prices decreased.

    22. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I said it was based on it, I didn't say it was 1:1. "Ripped off" just means profit. It's not like the average consumer has their own supply chain - and oil pipelines have enforced a sort of natural monopoly.

      But the fact is, refineries probably bring in more oil when prices are low, but sell it off very fast. After a price increase, it takes a lot longer to get rid of what's in storage tanks because there's lower demand.

      Either way, you can look at publicly traded gas station chains and see that their profit margin on gasoline is not very high at the end of the day (I think less than 2%). That profit probably happens more at the supplier/refinery level.

    23. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by flippy · · Score: 1

      I'm OK with them charging whatever they need to to stay in business. I'm just saying that they're disingenuous when trying to explain the pricing to consumers, and that I'm NOT OK with.

    24. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

      Is Netflix DRM really so bad? I watch Netflix regularly, and I do it on my laptop, on my phone, on my tablet, on Chromecast. I have not had to buy any special gadgets except the Chromecast - and I could even skip that and watch Netflix on my PS4 or connect the TV to my laptop if I wanted to be masochistic. The whole setup just works - pretty much all the time - and I have access to an order magnitude more entertainment than what I actually have time for, between Netflix and a few other streaming services.

      Maybe it is an attitude that just comes with age. When I was in my twenties, I would tinker and create complex technical setups for just about everything. Which is fun when you are into that. But it also means spending hours and hours searching the net for how to do that thing which almost noone is doing which requires that piece of software you have to compile from some alpha version that does not really fit with your setup ... you spend hours and hours creating something that works - and then half a year later it breaks due to some version of something changing somewhere or some service changing their protocol - and you barely remember what you did in the first place, and instead of watching that move you planned you end up spending the whole night fixing your tech.

      At some point I just got fed up with the complexities of filling up life with nonstandard complex tech setups and doing everything the hard way. My tip - if you have HDMI problems, just spend a few dollars to fix your tool chain. HDMI works just fine for almost all of us. Netflix is not the problem here.

    25. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      the cost of the gasoline ALREADY IN YOUR TANKS didn't change from when it was delivered

      The owner isn't charging you for the product they bought, they are charging you for the replacement of the product you consumed. If they didn't, they wouldn't be able to stock as much the next time they get supplied, and so on until they have no product to sell. That is why the price changes daily, you are at the mercy of the oil supplier, not the re-seller.

      The same is true with Netflix, if they don't adjust the price or service to keep future supplier costs under control; it will eventually eat up all the profits until everything they do is at a loss. Then the company closes its doors.

      If you want someone to blame, just follow the chain of money. In this case it goes all the way up to the media companies who want more profit per showing while providing the same product which now costs them nothing to distribute. I'm sure this has to be a few media companies business models. Make as much shoddy content as possible, even if it is at a loss. Then sell it to cable companies and streaming companies for decades making back the money several folds. Every piece of content will make you some money, so the more you have the more you make. But this all relies on keeping consumers from owning or controlling the media (or a copy thereof).

      Of course I don't subscribe to Netflix or own an AirPlay device. If I did, a simple Amazon search shows a few pass-through HDMI boxes that record straight to MP4. I might invest in one of those.

    26. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Netflix DRM is not the really issue here, it’s DRM in general and the industry’s insistence that it actually be used. And it’s been like this since DRM was invented: it always came with some downside for the honest consumer, who is effectively being punished for being honest. DRM is fine when it’s seamless, except for denying people their fair-use rights (making a copy/recording for personal use). But in practise it’s not always seamless. We should not have to deal with this crap, nor spend a few bucks “fixing our tool chain”. I spent enough, on media player devices, AV receivers, TVs... all fully HDMI compliant, including the cables, up to the right version. And judging from my time spent googling these issues, I’m not the only one having these gremlins. Stuff just works better without DRM

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    27. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you one thing, if you just use decent HDMI cables you'll probably never get this error.

      It is not always the cables. Unless the cable is over 6', or is made of crappy wire, almost any HDMI cable is fine. HDCP errors can be because of small timing issues between devices, stream timing errors, or just random fluctuations. In general HDCP was not designed to enhance the viewers experience, it was to limit your experience. Take it away and you the viewer loose nothing. Add it, and you the viewer can loose everything.

      I just had a co-worker who hooked up a sound bar via HDMI, it would take 5 minutes before it would be recognized and start playing the audio. I gave him an optical cable instead, once hooked up the audio worked right off the bat. I'm sure he just loves how the manufacture added HDCP for his enjoyment!

    28. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, optical will not transmit DD+ or HD audio - not enough bandwidth. Standard AC3 over optical is probably good enough for most people if all the equipment will handle that and not drop all the way down to stereo.

    29. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more likely, they do not want to give 30% share of income to Apple. All this has nothing to do with limitations or experience-bs, it is all business driven decision making.

    30. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by labnet · · Score: 1

      It it doesn’t work that way. Casting instructs the Apple TV (or Xbox for that matter) to directly play the stream, not to route it via the casting device.

      --
      46137
    31. Re: Fake Excuse, DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I can see it, I can pirate it. Period. I will never stop. YARRRRR

    32. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And that means there has to be a protocol that the receiving device can use to retrieve the video that ultimately requires a level of trust in the device. Handing the decryption keys to the device by either method means the device could intercept and store the stream.

    33. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately a lot of socialists don't understand basic economics.

      Unfortunately a lot of capitalists also don't understand basic economics either.

      The real issue with listing those costs is when the company tries to disguise a cost of doing business expense as a government mandated fee or tax. Not saying you or your company did this, but the telecom sector is really good at it. Plus those fees never seem to disappear from the cable bill.

    34. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      The sound bar was a "5.1" setup, really though it was one of those "3.1" and we bounce sound off the ceiling to fake rear channels. So the TOSLink cable was just fine as it support 5.1 Dolby Digital. There may have been some compression artifacts, but I would never have bought a system that tries to fake speaker placement. I actually told him to buy a good receiver and re-purpose some old stereo speakers for the fronts. Then once he had the cash, buy a good center, fronts, rears, and a powered subwoofer. That way he could really tick off the neighbors. He was in a hurry and wanted something now.

      Anyway, he is happy with the optical cable as now the sound bar fires right up after he turns on the tv. He said even the subwoofer works, which with HDMI it never did. So in the end, an old tech that doesn't support DRM sounds way better than the newer stuff with DRM, because it worked.

    35. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      And yet, this is so easy to do with any device. It might be a hurdle for Grandma (a small hurdle btw), but the folks that Netflix should be concerned about are recording their content out the wazoo (and there's not a whole lot they can do to stop it either). Netflix == not very smart.

    36. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by omnichad · · Score: 1

      the folks that Netflix should be concerned about are recording their content out the wazoo

      Netflix has no vested interest in true security - just the illusion of security. The only thing they have to lose is content licensing deals, and their current level of security works fine to keep that.

    37. Re:Fake Excuse, DRM by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Where I live petrol stations can change their price once a day, and they have to tell the govt fuel watch service what that price will be, by I think 6pm the previous day.

      Makes planning on buying fuel quite easy.

      fuelwatch.wa.gov.au is the site showing all the fuel prices for the state.

  6. Touche, Apple, touche by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    Would have loved to be a fly on the wall to see the sardonic look on the Netflix exec's faces when writing this explanation, Apple has used this lame excuse so many times.

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
    1. Re: Touche, Apple, touche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where you would choose to be a fly on the wall? Do think the executives actually write this stuff?

  7. What is the use case? by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    What is the use case that requires AirPlay support to cast Netflix to a device? What AirPlay receiver doesn't already have a Netflix client?

    1. Re:What is the use case? by rthille · · Score: 2

      Credentials sharing. I'm wiling to send a video stream from my device to the Hotel TV (though, given the sophistication of malware these days, any interaction might be unsafe). But there's no way in hell I want to put my Netflix credentials into some random hotel device.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    2. Re:What is the use case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use an old Apple TV at cabins that don't have internet. I don't want to have to join the Apple TV to what ever iPhone we're using's hotspot, I can just stream what ever we are watching to the Apple TV.

      Also, at the university I work at we have a number of Apple TVs setup in conference room mode. Users can stream from their devices to the Apple TV but can't open any app on the Apple TV itself.

      All of these use cases no longer work with Netflix.

    3. Re:What is the use case? by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      Change the password afterward. You should be changing it regularly anyhow.

    4. Re:What is the use case? by teg · · Score: 1

      What is the use case that requires AirPlay support to cast Netflix to a device? What AirPlay receiver doesn't already have a Netflix client?

      My use case is streaming to other people's AppleTVs without logging them out of their Netflix applications and entering my own credentials. For me, this happens when I go to visit family (holidays etc), or houses shared with other parts of my family. It also happens on hotels - I'd rather not have to remember to log out when checking out.

      It's something I need a couple of times a year, and unfortunately I needed it last weekend - first weekend by the sea this year, as the snow and winter are finally gone.

    5. Re:What is the use case? by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      Ah - the use case is laziness. ;-)

    6. Re:What is the use case? by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Funny

      But it's the same as my bank account password!

    7. Re:What is the use case? by flippy · · Score: 1

      And the combination to my luggage!

    8. Re:What is the use case? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      No no no, he meant change your Netflix password. Log into the Netflix site, and click on "Account -> Settings -> Privacy -> Privacy Settings 3 -> Security and Email -> Preferences -> Personalization -> Account Services -> Login -> Password -> Set password -> (Re-enter authentication credentials) -> Send password reset email", then follow the instructions.

      Just change your Netflix password every time you visit and leave a hotel and there won't be any issue.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:What is the use case? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The use case for any technology ever is laziness. That's the whole point.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re: What is the use case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It has an Apple logo on it. Of course it doesn't work for very long!"

  8. Elite level corporate doublespeak by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    That's some elite level corporate doublespeak. I wonder what would happen if a big company stopped shamelessly lying and just told the truth?

    1. Re:Elite level corporate doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The words "Sued into oblivion" come to mind.

    2. Re:Elite level corporate doublespeak by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Which evoke a couple more: "perverse incentive."

    3. Re:Elite level corporate doublespeak by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would happen if a big company stopped shamelessly lying and just told the truth?

      As Jack Nicholson once famously said, "The truth! You can't handle the truth!"

      End communication.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  9. Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised by this. Netflix is anal retentive about DRM.

    Sometime last year Netflix "disabled" the ability to take screenshots on the iOS app. I put "disabled" in quotes because "technically" it still works but effectively it is broken. Captions will show (if you have them on) but you now get a black screen. REALLY? You are fucking worried about a *single frame* ??? Apparently these idiots don't understand the concept of "free advertising" when a user shares a single frame with others generating interesting in the movie / show.

    So now I have to use yet-another-device, such as my phone/camera, to take a picture of my iPad showing a single frame from a movie. This "screenshot-is-black" shenanigans isn't stopping anyone.

    Yeah, "First. World. Problems." but it is evidence that Netflix continues to slowly jump the shark one small piece at a time.

    I'm surprised they don't have ads with all the other inconveniences they have been adding by removing functionality.

    1. Re:Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by flippy · · Score: 2

      You have to realize that Netflix still has to make deals to get any content they don't produce themselves, and that means getting the other side to agree to those deals. It may very well be that language prohibiting these types of things is written into those agreements.

      As far as using a phone or camera to take a shot of something you're watching on a tablet, the good old "analog loophole" will always be there, since it's pretty close to impossible, if not actually impossible, to close that loophole. At least not without getting the buy-in of every single camera and phone manufacturer.

    2. Re:Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by hublan · · Score: 1

      Many, if not most, of those restrictions (DRM, screenshots, device count, VPN, regional restrictions, subtitles, display aspect, etc) are not coming from Netflix themselves. Instead, they usually come from the licensing agreements they make with the 3rd-party content providers. It's a lot easier, from a legal perspective and potential user-confusion, to just make all those restrictions simply apply to all content, rather than try to selectively enforce them.

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    3. Re:Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ads are coming. They're slowly ramping up the monthly fee for subscriptions, and then they'll introduce a lower tier plan that's around the cost of what the plans used to be but includes ads injected every so many minutes.

      There's no way they're not going to do this. That sweet ad revenue is too enticing. As long as they don't go as full-fledged stupid with it as HULU gets with certain shows, it'll probably work too.

      Wife and I have been having a debate about whether Netfix is worth keeping around. They keep removing features and content, and keep increasing fees. Doesn't seem like a way to keep customers happy to me.

    4. Re:Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's one of those cases where the deals Netflix signed with the studios basically say that "You will not allow this video to play on hardware that does not support HDCP" or something. Since there's no way for Netflix to know whether your AirPlay-compatible device isn't just some box that collects the video, they could held liable.

    5. Re:Netflix also "disables" screenshots on iOS by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's not even that the ad revenue is enticing. It's necessary.

      If Netflix has a successful show, or licenses one, then its success makes it more expensive.

      Licensing agreements demand viewing data, and when Netflix reveals something has been watched 20 million times, they'll want more money for the next agreement. Or they'll want money per view.

      For Netflix's own content, they have to pay to produce it. When actors learn that their show or movie is successful, they demand more money for the next season / the sequel.

      The bottom line is that more views means more cost, but not more revenue. Their only option is ads, premium content on top of the subscription, or eventually crumbling under the weight of their debt.

  10. "Certify those experiences" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, is Netflix a standards body now?

    1. Re:"Certify those experiences" by tepples · · Score: 1

      The agreements that allow Netflix to carry programming produced by entities other than Netflix include a requirement for Netflix to behave as a standards body with respect to compliance and robustness.

  11. DRM is the real (and only reason) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real, and only reason is the lack of DRM in that path.

    It is a fact that lots of Apple-TV-but-not-really devices are utter crap. But that's also true for Android screen casting, etc. It is to be expected, it has never been a problem.

    The fact that you can stream it to an *-tv device that just encodes it back apparently is.

  12. Not Netflix's fault by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a Hollywood requirement, not a Netflix requirement. Netflix (and Hulu, and Amazon Video, etc) would love nothing more than to let you stream anything to anywhere. It would be a lot simpler for them.

    The Hollywood movie studios are the ones requiring the streamed movie be locked down . Hollywood's fear is that if an unencrypted video stream is ever exposed, that you'll just capture the stream to make a copy of the movie. So they require the stream to remain encrypted all the way from Netflix's servers to the final display device.

    If it's a dedicated video playback device, then the device (and playback software like the Netflix app) has to be submitted to Hollywood for approval. That's why the Netflix app showed up on iPhones first, then on the different Android handsets one at a time. Netflix had to submit their app on every single hardware device to Hollywood for their approval. The iPhones were first because approving them meant the most people could get Netflix for the fewest models needing approval. Then the more popular Android handsets, followed by the lesser-known Android handsets. Every streaming device has to go through the same approval process - smart TVs, Blu-ray players with streaming capability, PS4, Xbox, etc.

    For general purpose computing devices (i.e. PCs), Hollywood requires the video stream be decoded inside an encrypted virtual machine, which then sends the decoded video directly to the GPU for display. This is why you needed Flash or Silverlight installed on your browser in the pre-HTML 5 days. Those were the only technologies allowing the construction of a virtual machine. And decoding the video in a virtual machine precludes using the hardware decoder in the GPU, which is why you used to need at least an i3 to decode streamed 1080p video, while the puny little SoC on your phone could also stream it (the phone wasn't considered a general purpose computing device, so it could get Hollywood's approval for the entirety of the phone hardware, allowing it to use the GPU to decode the stream).

    This is why the Netflix app won't run if your phone is rooted. Hollywood considers that to be converting your phone from a dedicated hardware device to a general purpose computing device. So if the Netflix app detects your phone is rooted, it invalidates itself and won't play. (You can get around it by hiding root from the Netflix app.)

    Since Hollywood's approval was only for Airplay to certain Apple devices, opening up AirPlay violates Hollywood's terms of approval. So Netflix is forced to discontinue support for AirPlay, unless they want to go through the trouble of submitting every possible display device you can connect to using AirPlay.

    1. Re:Not Netflix's fault by Orphis · · Score: 1

      I worked in the music industry. Similar constraints there which were severely limiting too.

      Like the one where we had to protect our binaries with an obfuscating compiler on desktop. One that would create bad code from time to time, crash on some constructs and not support "modern" (aka C++11) standards. It took a while to get that changed. But on iOS? Everything was fine and dandy.

    2. Re:Not Netflix's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, this is Hollywood's reasoning.

      What they just don't get is that no matter how uncrackable they make it, someone is going to crack. And then everyone else isn't going to screw around with their security schemes, they're just going to get it from bit torrent. I can't even remember the last time I ripped a blu-ray, as easy as it is to do that, it's easier still to torrent someone else's rip.

      So all Hollywood is doing by limiting what you can do with their product is making the pirated versions online a superior product. I'm at a point in life where I don't mind paying for content if that's the easiest way to access the content, my time is more valuable than my money at this point in life. But as soon as the pirated version is a superior product, I'm pirating it.

    3. Re:Not Netflix's fault by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You've been able to save AirPlay streams for a while now.

      There's even software that advertises this specific use case, airserver.com - that've been doing it for years now.

    4. Re:Not Netflix's fault by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Except HDCP (up to at least 1080p content) is a totally busted encryption protocol. The master keys where reverse engineered years ago. You can just go onto eBay and purchase a HDMI capture device stick it between a device and the TV and record everything being played.

  13. Not a big deal by itguy01 · · Score: 0

    This isn't a big deal really...All things considered, airplay controls (takes over) your phone so if you stream content to a screen you can't use your phone plus it drains your battery (unless plugged in) just get an appleTV or comparable device and you'll be better off.

    --
    ~I bet you were looking down here for an awesome siggy like everyone else..sorry to disappoint~
  14. In other words... by Gnomaana · · Score: 1

    In other words.... we can't completely control what you do with the content you paid us for so we are limiting your viewing. You know, just in case we figure out a way to rake in more cash at a later date and this interferes with those plans.

  15. SSSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lehengacholionline.in

  16. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call BS on the UI experience line. Chromecast is a more open standard with a wide variety of implementations on display devices aside from using an actual chromecast. No way netflix can or has "certified" all of these combinations. Yet Netflix still works with chromecast?

    I however am all for anything that sticks it to Apple, so keep sticking it to them Netflix

    This likely has more to do with Apple launching a competing service to Netflix's and netflix trying to cripple the experience of apple users due to some back room deal between apple and netflix that went sour.

  17. The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to do with us.

    If you're a Netflix customer, then: wrong. This whole "certified" problem is almost certainly about DRM. And if you're a Netflix customer, then you are paying for DRM and therefore helping to cause this problem. The fact that you spend money on DRM is why Apple will eventually be successfully pressured to identify Airplay rendering targets (so that some can be blacklisted, or not-whitelisted). (Then next year they'll sell special speakers that comply with the DRM, obsoleteing your old ones and helping to cement the impossibility of using homebrewed equipment.)

    If you had the ethics to pirate Netflix, then you wouldn't be contributing to the problem. So everyone, please remember: if something has DRM, then you should be pirating that thing, rather than paying for it. DRM==NO SALE. You'll find that Netflix titles are just as easy to pirate as anything else, so get on that.

    Hold this position and eventially Netflix may be able to stand up to the production companies that are insisting on this dystopia. Keep pirating them, and never, ever pay. Don't be the last holdout asshole who still pays to support DRM, and fucks up the world for everyone. Instead, lead.

  18. I think it's fair, by unami · · Score: 1

    as long as they also certify and ensure the quality on any bluetooth-speaker and headphones you can listen to Netflix on.

  19. Chromecast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then how does Netflix get away with bouncing to a Chromecast? You can plug a Chromecast into anything, right? A bunch of TVs have those built in.

    In any case, I'm pretty sure Apple is under the same, or similar, restrictions as Netflix as far as streaming movies through AirPlay goes. Seems to work for them just fine.

    1. Re:Chromecast by PPH · · Score: 1

      You can plug a Chromecast into anything, right?

      Anything that can negotiate a secure connection between the Chromecast dongle and the display device over the HDMI port.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Chromecast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that can negotiate a secure connection between the Chromecast dongle and the display device over the HDMI port.

      Which is the same requirement for Apple TV, and, I'm sure, whatever the internals are on the 3rd party TVs. So what's the difference?

    3. Re:Chromecast by PPH · · Score: 1

      So what's the difference?

      Too many 3rd party apps and devices out there for Netflix to keep track of them. Particularly if it's Apple managing the connections. Netflix may not be able to certify proper DRM function through Apple, so they just dropped the support.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  20. In other words... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Netflix and Apple just realized they are selling competing streaming services? I think it would probably be better not to use a service linked to specific hardware. (iTunes runs fine on Windows.)

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  21. Re:The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by flippy · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true AC and a thief. If you enjoy the content, be willing to pay for it. Don't tell content makers that their product is worthless.

    "the ethics to pirate Netflix"? Good lord, I've never heard a more perverse use of the word ethics.

  22. Re:The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I’ve pirated content from Netflix on a few occasions. Why? Because I pay my sub same as everyone else, but the selection they offer here is rather limited compared to that in the US. And the content I was after was not available here through other channels either. No bad feelings about that: either take my money or shut up about “piracy”.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  23. Netflix "agreements" with itself by tepples · · Score: 1

    You have to realize that Netflix still has to make deals to get any content they don't produce themselves, and that means getting the other side to agree to those deals. It may very well be that language prohibiting these types of things is written into those agreements.

    But why should these restrictions affect Netflix originals? Do the agreements between the streaming division of Netflix and the video production division of Netflix have the same restrictions, and if so, why?

    1. Re:Netflix "agreements" with itself by flippy · · Score: 1

      Because it's a giant pain in the ass to reprogram your entire system to make it work in some cases and not in others. Make a single mistake and I guarantee you that the content makers will have no problem invalidating those agreements and even suing Netflix out of business. Like it or not, it's a smart business decision given the technical issues.

    2. Re:Netflix "agreements" with itself by flippy · · Score: 1

      Besides, why should they be willing to let their own content get pirated any more easily than 3rd-party content?

  24. Re:The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by flippy · · Score: 1

    Jared, that's not what the poster was talking about. He was advocating pirating Netflix for EVERYTHING, on PRINCIPLE, WITHOUT paying for a subscription.

  25. Petty DRM squabbles by ilsaloving · · Score: 2

    You know, whenever I see ridiculous DRM squabbles like this, my immediate reaction is to want to crack it, just cause.

    There have been a few times that I've bought material (usually from smaller artists) where their entire DRM scheme was a sentence that said, "We would greatly appreciate it if you don't share our stuff." And I haven't.

    These same artists also tend to get far more repeat business from me too, including one where I bought their entire discography without even listening to the songs first.

    It's funny/sad how not being jerked around has become a genuine feature I look for (and will pay a premium for) in my purchases now.

    1. Re:Petty DRM squabbles by flippy · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, you're the exception, not the rule. I agree with your sentiments 100%, but the fact is that if it is easy for the general public to get around DRM, and thereby a LOT of people aren't paying for content, the general public will do so. There seems to be a feeling of "it costs so much, they're overcharging, so it's OK to steal from them, they're making SOOOOOO much already" mentality that so many people have, and that's just ethically and morally wrong. This is entertainment content we're talking about here, not things that are critical to life.

    2. Re:Petty DRM squabbles by kingbilly · · Score: 1

      This times 1000. All to often, people who I think are "good" people (you get the point) will surprise me with what amounts to theft or similar. For basically the same reasons you mention (they already have money, it grows on trees!).

      Family members complained that my cousin was eligible for free coffee where we work, for himself, but not for family members. In the same conversation they said the coffee shop did not give him enough hours. This is average America folks. They can't possibly be bothered to connect the dots. If the coffee is being given away for free, what money are the owners of the shop supposed to use to pay the employees for "enough hours"?

    3. Re:Petty DRM squabbles by flippy · · Score: 1

      Kingbilly, I'm right with you. I'm certainly not one to argue for corporate greed, but again, we're talking about entertainment content here. The ethical solution to "I think they're priced too high, they're ripping me off" ISN'T "so I'm going to steal from them". It's "then I will simply choose not to purchase their product/service". Netflix is hardly an essential for life. Vote in the market with your pocketbook - if enough people decide the prices are too high, one of two things will happen: either the prices will come down, or they'll go out of business. Don't steal just because a luxury item is priced too high for your liking.

    4. Re:Petty DRM squabbles by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Wow! For years, I have read your usename as Its a Loving (thinking it was a wordplay on its a living) but just now, after ALL this time, I see it as Ilsa Loving. I just did a Google search to see if it was someone famous that I should know and I find an IT manager type from Quebec. That is pretty neat.

      What changed this time? So weird. Sorry for this interruption in your daily scheduled routine. Carry on carrying on. I just felt the need to share this odd incident. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  26. $laves Dont Own Their Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats that? A dumb pipe is limiting what you can do with the content?

    CONSUMERS ruin everything.

  27. Tethering surcharge by tepples · · Score: 1

    just get an appleTV or comparable device and you'll be better off.

    That fails when your cellular ISP charges more for bytes sent to and received from an Apple TV device than for bytes sent to and received from an app running on the iPhone. People had been using AirPlay to avoid a tethering surcharge.

  28. Re:The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    Fair enough!

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  29. Netflix's Explanation by itguy01 · · Score: 0

    Netflix is offering more details on its decision to remove AirPlay functionality from its iOS app. The change was announced in an update to a support document on Netflix’s website last week, with the company attributing it to unnamed “technical limitations.”... Full Story: https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/07...

    --
    ~I bet you were looking down here for an awesome siggy like everyone else..sorry to disappoint~
  30. Not an issue at all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I stream from my iphone to my Apple TV when I can just watch Netflix on my AppleTV? Uh....it makes no sense to be doing this in the first place.

  31. Re: The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck em. That's his choice. Don't hate the player, hate the game.

  32. Re: The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by flippy · · Score: 1

    It is his choice. Just as it is my choice to call him a thief, since that's what he is.

  33. Who's losing here? by cshamis · · Score: 1

    If I already have an Apple TV, I can watch Netflix directly in the Apple TV Netflix App. If I already have Netflix on my smart-tv I can watch it on that App. But, If I have a TV that supports Airplay 2, but doesn't already have a Netflix app then... I... have to buy an Apple TV?

    1. Re:Who's losing here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could just cut your subscription to Netflix and be done with all the bullshit. This is nothing more than to force the consumers' hands. Disney is going to chip away at them, Apple will too now. They're trying to play defense but it looks more like they shit the bed and are trying to save face.

  34. Re: The big boys stomp on us, because we paid the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is such a thing as righteous piracy, corporate stooge. When outlaws are making the laws, the lawful become outlaws.

  35. Gas companies operate differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If theyâ(TM)re not making the money they want, behold, thereâ(TM)s suddenly a production or other supply problem! Reduced supply... gotta raise the price!

  36. Re: The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh, Netflix and DRM actually makes sense.

    They're selling you a rental service, not outright content purchase.

    I'm with you all the way if it was actually selling you ther content permanently, but they're not

  37. Ha! Netflix, this is not about VIEWING QUALITY! by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    Nice try Netflix, this is not about viewing quality, this is about DRM, controlling content, and controlling users streams.

    What if someone streams to a Mac or PC running Air Parrot and then records the stream, oh the horrors.
    ( https://www.airsquirrels.com/a... )

    It looks like Apple won't enforce your DRM because you won't pay them for using their platform.
    ( https://9to5mac.com/2019/03/18... )

    It is so sad when the big boys can't share their toys. :(

    You should have wrote a big article reading, "Apple is taking Airplay away from iPhone customers" however it would be untrue, but might get Apple to make the changes you need for your DRM.

    The Apple TV 4k and iPhone Airplay streaming are as good as it gets, it is too bad Netflix customers won't get to fully enjoy all the benefits of their purchases.

  38. lol there is always... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mircast on my reciever!

  39. Some BS me thinks! by sid1950 · · Score: 0

    Firstly as far as I am aware this does not mean you can't watch Netflix on an Apple device. All it means is that if you want to send Netflix from one Apple device to another Apple device via AirPlay, you can't. Since Netflix already supplies an app for iOS and Apple TV, what is the problem? As far as I can see this only effects the "most convenience" way to use your Apple kit with Netflix. So now it might take a few seconds longer, because you have to use a different app! Talk about childish bleating from the Twitterati! Get a grip!

    --
    Best wishes,

    Sid

  40. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not even lying.

    >to ensure our standard of quality for viewing is being met

    A reasonable consumer would assume that this is a statement of their benevolence and desire to provide the viewer with "quality" services. Things like picture quality.

    Nope.

    The "quality" they talk about is the quality of their monetization and has no regard whatever for the people that actually pay for their houses and yachts.

  41. Re:The big boys stomp on us, because we paid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the ethics to pirate Netflix"

    An oxymoron :p

  42. Re: The big boys stomp on us, because we paid the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    righteous piracy

    Another oxymoron!

  43. Not Just Airplay.... by ghiasquared · · Score: 1

    Same timing as airplay they also removed full video mirroring from Samsung phones to SMART TVs. Haven't had the chance to check Miracast, but I wouldn't doubt issues are there also.