Slashdot Mirror


Maps, the Most Popular Elements of In-flight Entertainment Systems, Are About To Get a Big Upgrade -- and Some Ads (wsj.com)

The in-flight moving map, object of fascination for travel geeks and impatient fliers, is going in a new direction. But have your credit card ready: The beloved map will become one more revenue-generator for airlines [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled.], reports the Wall Street Journal. From the story: Maps are the most popular elements of in-flight entertainment systems, capturing passenger attention by posting live updates about a trip, most importantly when you'll arrive. Airlines offer movies, TV shows, podcasts and games on entertainment systems, but the boring map, which made its debut over 30 years ago, turns out to be the most useful, maybe even anxiety-reducing, focus of bored passengers. The map gives you a sense of control, showing not only exactly where you are, but altitude, airspeed, time zone, temperature, distance traveled and miles left to go. For some, there's a sense of adventure built in: You may never visit the Faeroe Islands, but you feel like you've been there when your flight draws a line over them.

Now manufacturers are giving maps a makeover. You'll be able to get encyclopedic details on Mount Fuji as you fly past, track your spouse's flight from your seat and zoom in for details on points of interest like the top 10 rides at Disneyland compiled from social media. The map will be loaded with data about your flight, down to which languages flight attendants onboard speak, when dinner will be served and how long you'll be in Brazilian airspace. And guess what? Airlines will be using the maps to sell you things like tickets to those popular amusement park rides. Hotels, theme parks, restaurants or other attractions may be throwing advertising onto your route. Shopping malls and stores, too. After all, they know where you're going.

182 comments

  1. What fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess someone got paid to put the maps server on the plane.

    Lucky bastard.

  2. Maps == IFE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like this article was written by someone that thinks Maps on their iPad equals "the Internet"

  3. So they put some cheap tablet in your backseat by xack · · Score: 1

    But because “it’s on a plane” it’s news.

    1. Re:So they put some cheap tablet in your backseat by forkfail · · Score: 1

      You don't fly much, do you? ;-)

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:So they put some cheap tablet in your backseat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. And that is exactly what is in coach.

      Now, up in Polaris... it is an entirely different matter.

    3. Re:So they put some cheap tablet in your backseat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My takeaway was that they are going to put cancer in maps.

  4. Forget Maps by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've always wanted my infotainment centre to play snake... so I can play "Snakes on a Plane".

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Forget Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted my infotainment centre to play snake... so I can play "Snakes on a Plane".

      I am sick and tired of these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane!!

      Best movie line ever, especially since it only exists because of the fans who caused them to bring Samuel L Jackson back to record it.

      I may have to watch that cheese ball again sometime.

    2. Re:Forget Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your joke is bad, and you should feel bad.

    3. Re:Forget Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT"S TIME TO GET THESE MOTHERFUCKING ADS OFF THIS MOTHEFUCKERING PLANE

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    4. Re:Forget Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Forget Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wanted my infotainment centre to play snake... so I can play "Snakes on a Plane".

      I don't want no motherfucker snakes on my motherfucker airplane. Even if the snakes are fuckin' virtual.

  5. Marketing is getting silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As someone who flies a lot, it's annoying enough with the ads you can't skip before movies. Putting ads on the map is taking it a step too far. That kind of solidified my use of a tablet stocked with games I'll actually play, movies I want to watch etc.

    1. Re:Marketing is getting silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who flies a lot, it's annoying enough with the ads you can't skip before movies. Putting ads on the map is taking it a step too far. That kind of solidified my use of a tablet stocked with games I'll actually play, movies I want to watch etc.

      Not as bad as when they pause your movie to try to get you to signed up for a credit card.

    2. Re:Marketing is getting silly by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      And if you fly that much, you probably already pay for internet in the air - so you can just use flightaware to see where you are.

    3. Re:Marketing is getting silly by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Download Avare to that tablet, along with the maps. It's open source. No ads. You can also download weather.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  6. You can bring your own snake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I play with mine quite often!

    Sometimes, on my favorite airline, there's even a guy letting you play with his!

    1. Re:You can bring your own snake! by RFjunkie · · Score: 1

      Hmm, like "Fly United?" (BSEG)

      --
      Olphart at play. Ruck FepubliKKKans. Welcome to the Worldwide Idiocracy, y'all.
    2. Re:You can bring your own snake! by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever been in a cockpit before? Have you ever seen a grown man naked?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    3. Re:You can bring your own snake! by thomn8r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you like movies about gladiators?

    4. Re:You can bring your own snake! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been in a Turkish prison?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:You can bring your own snake! by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Do you like it when Scraps grabs hold of your leg and starts rubbing up and down?

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    6. Re:You can bring your own snake! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Surely you can't be serious.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:You can bring your own snake! by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      And don't call me serious.

    8. Re:You can bring your own snake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call me Shirley!

  7. No I won't by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'll be able to get encyclopedic details on Mount Fuji as you fly past, track your spouse's flight from your seat and zoom in for details on points of interest like the top 10 rides at Disneyland compiled from social media.

    No I won't, because I won't use the map if it ceases to do the one thing I care about it doing well. Quit trying to make everything "better" with stupid shit no one asked for and ruining the experience with the added cruft and bullshit.

    For some, there's a sense of adventure built in: You may never visit the Faeroe Islands, but you feel like you've been there when your flight draws a line over them.

    Who the hell writes something like that with a straight face? Are we still doing sacrifices to the volcano gods?

    1. Re:No I won't by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Are we still doing sacrifices to the volcano gods?

      And if not, this would be a good reason to restart this ancient tradition.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: No I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I want encyclopedic details on Mount Fuji all the time.

    3. Re: No I won't by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      Buy an encyclopedia on Mount Fuji. Or at the very least a few books on the subject and leave the frickin map alone!

    4. Re:No I won't by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who the hell writes something like that with a straight face?

      I see you're a person who fundamentally doesn't understand people. Who writes or thinks like that? About half of the population. In terms of personality Slashdot is an echo chamber of the technical stereotype, and as such it often boggles the minds of people here that words and thoughts trigger their creative side rather than their logical one.

      Here's a trick you can play at your next company meeting when you're bored and out of ideas. Get people to write words about snowman. Don't tell them to describe them, or define them, just to "Write about snowman". Engineers and the like will start throwing adjectives out "cold, wet, white, sticks for arms", but people with other personality types come up with all sorts of stuff. Last time this exercise was done at a shitty team building event I was forced to go to, one person wrote a poem about children building a snowman, the other only described what he felt "joy, happiness, Christmas, etc"

      So next time you start a sentence with "who the hell..." remember *you* are unique and the quite likely answer is "any number of the 7.529 billion people on this planet that aren't you".

    5. Re:No I won't by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      True enough. When I was younger I was sure that so many people are nuts. Today I know that I am the crazy one. It is still difficult to accept, though.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:No I won't by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      "Who the hell writes something like that with a straight face? "

      Marketing departments. Most have a two drink minimum...

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    7. Re:No I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of personality Slashdot is an echo chamber of the technical stereotype

      You mean retards on the spectrum

    8. Re:No I won't by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Who writes or thinks like that? About half of the population.

      And assuming a normal distribution of intelligence in the population then half the population is dumber than the other half.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re: No I won't by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Buy an encyclopedia on Mount Fuji.

      I doubt that Mt. Fuji has many encyclopedia stores.

    10. Re:No I won't by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

      I see you're a person who fundamentally doesn't understand people. Who writes or thinks like that? About half of the population. In terms of personality Slashdot is an echo chamber of the technical stereotype, and as such it often boggles the minds of people here that words and thoughts trigger their creative side rather than their logical one. Here's a trick you can play at your next company meeting when you're bored and out of ideas. Get people to write words about snowman. Don't tell them to describe them, or define them, just to "Write about snowman". Engineers and the like will start throwing adjectives out "cold, wet, white, sticks for arms", but people with other personality types come up with all sorts of stuff. Last time this exercise was done at a shitty team building event I was forced to go to, one person wrote a poem about children building a snowman, the other only described what he felt "joy, happiness, Christmas, etc" So next time you start a sentence with "who the hell..." remember *you* are unique and the quite likely answer is "any number of the 7.529 billion people on this planet that aren't you".

      You must be a lawyer. Everything you posted is factually correct but completely useless to the discussion.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    11. Re:No I won't by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Chill don't worry, I am sure they won't make it the default screen that is permanently on and you can not turn it off, well, for economy class anyhow. So you either pay for content or you get the default advertising screen for twelve hours straight, it's FREE. You know, you just know it is coming, I can tell, oh yeah ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re: No I won't by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...and a two-digit IQ maximum.

    13. Re:No I won't by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh sweetheart. High functioning autists are more evolved than the emotion laden fools we have to suffer.

      Like you.

    14. Re:No I won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've just lumped yourself with the GP as not understanding people.
      After all you just accused Plato, a famous F personality who would be exactly the kind of person to write like this of being dumb.

      Pot, meet kettle.

    15. Re:No I won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Depends on what the discussion was about. The only discussion I am having is how the GP doesn't understand people and I offered him a simple test he can do next time he's bored to prove it.

    16. Re: No I won't by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      ... on the other hand, it would be a pretty poor encyclopedia store that didn't have at least a representation of Fuji-san. Even if filed under "Hokusai".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:No I won't by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Here's a trick you can play at your next company meeting when you're bored and out of ideas. Get people to write words about snowman.

      If I ever found myself required to attend such a meeting, I'd be quite likely to enliven the meeting with a practical demonstration of sepukku. Life would clearly have been over for some time.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    18. Re:No I won't by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They'll be confiscating sticky tape and blank paper from cabin baggage?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re: No I won't by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      ... on the other hand, it would be a pretty poor encyclopedia store that didn't have at least a representation of Fuji-san.

      Well, of course. But that store is unlikely to be on Mt. Fuji, now is it?

    20. Re:No I won't by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      emotion laden.
      sigh.

  8. estimating the % of fiberglass in my corn flakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    takes high heat to thin that stuff? eat 'em & weep eye gas?

  9. Live streaming is the solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone has a camera. Pax will just gang up and share. With a SDR, maybe we will pick up the gps signals too.
    So far, anyone you advertises in my space - I never buy their products new. Stream the New Britain episode where the drunk pilot is having one more for the road. Stream parody ads like SNL. The weight of everyone slipping a bigger tablet in their carry on will outweigh measly ineffective ad revenue.

  10. profit by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

    Typical tech companies. Give you some basic shitty word-bubble pamphlet feature and think that it is enough to "make up for" a constant onslaught of ads while they take the profit.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  11. It's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't pay the high prices they charge on a plane for their entertainment. The map is the default free thing you get.

  12. Idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not done until people dress like this: https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/maya-rudolph-idiocracy-7e492.jpeg

  13. Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    For example letting passengers unlock the "optional" safety features of their 737 Max the airline was too stingy to purchase and Boeing too greedy to include in the $121M base price.

    1. Re:Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      For example letting passengers unlock the "optional" safety features of their 737 Max the airline was too stingy to purchase

      The sad part is people who haven't been following the 737 Max debacle closely (I hadn't until just last week) will assume this is just humorous hyperbole.

      Between this "optional safety" thing and the fact that 737's AoA correction system relied on only two phyical AoA sensors--but then goes on to only use data from one sensor at a time, effectively making it single point of failure--and all of this comes 10 years after AoA issues lead to Air France flight 447 falling from the sky like a stone (despite there being nothing whatsoever wrong with it other than faulty airspeed sensor readings)--it's all damn near self-parodying. And the FAA knew about this stuff and shrugged and signed off.

      It may be the most egregious thing I've seen since the day I first read Feynman's appendix to the Challenger commission report.

    2. Re:Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comparing this to Air France flight 447 is unfair. That fell from the sky because the pilots were not paying attention to what they were doing or how to fly when your airspeed indicator is suspect.

    3. Re:Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Yes, they were very different in many ways but Air France 447 drew attention to the lack of AoA feedback in the cockpit. And then 10 years later Boeing goes and makes AoA warnings OPTIONAL in their new plane (this on top of the other fundamental flaws in their AoA correction system.) 447 was a sign that designers needed to think more carefully about AoA safety and ergonomics, that's my point, but instead Boeing managed to commit several huge bone-headed oversights.

      As a side note, not to exonerate the pilots entirely (one of them clearly was a huge contributor to the accident), but there were at least two major design flaws that strongly contributed to Flight 447's demise:

      1. The way the "alternate law" override was designed, the stall alarm was only coming on when the copilot allowed the nose to drop below a certain point, and it stopped blaring whenever he pulled the nose back up (the plane was actually stalling the whole time, but the computer basically derped out and said "I have no idea what is going on so I'm not gonna blare the siren or do anything else" while the AoA was above a certain critical threshhold. The way to halt the stall was to keep applying nose down until he picked up airspeed, of course. But the stall warning was only coming on when he gave it some nose down. That's pretty messed up. He should've had the sense to ignore the warning and give it a strong nose down anyway, but the avionics designers have to be faulted for allowing this perverse negative feedback loop to arise.

      2. Far worse than #1, Airbus' fly by wire sidestick setup apparently allowed one pilot's stick-up inputs to silently override the other's stick-down inputs. So it was basically one pilot who crashed the plane while the other pilots were wondering why their stick wasn't doing anything. Back in the day, the two pilot-copilot controls were mechanically linked together, so you'd instantly notice if you were trying to do the opposite thing as the other person. There's nothing inherently wrong with an unobtrusive fly by wire sidestick (I can understand the advantages this change brought), but there absolutely needed to be stick vibration and alarms going off saying "you fucking jackasses; you're doing opposite things and I don't know which one of you I should be listening to." Apparently, in case of a contradiction the avionics just ignores both stick inputs and sits there quietly doing nothing, leaving BOTH pilots sitting there wondering why the plane has suddenly become unresponsive.

      So yeah, pilot error was a big part of it but you can't tell me there wasn't also a pretty big contribution from design flaws. They had more than enough time to fix the problem if only the pilots had been able to figure out what was going on and get on the same page, but the "smart" avionics were working against them. And again, their lack of feedback re: angle of attack (and also the role the attack of attack reading played in the switch to alternate law) should have been an indicator to everyone that angle of attack information needed to be handled more intelligently and urgently, instead of being an "optional" add-on layered on top of a shitty single-point-of-failure system.

    4. Re:Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Yes, they were very different in many ways but Air France 447 drew attention to the lack of AoA feedback in the cockpit. And then 10 years later Boeing goes and makes AoA warnings OPTIONAL in their new plane (this on top of the other fundamental flaws in their AoA correction system.) 447 was a sign that designers needed to think more carefully about AoA safety and ergonomics, that's my point, but instead Boeing managed to commit several huge bone-headed oversights.

      I took a different lesson away from the compare/contrast.

      The problem with Airbus was that they allowed a single sensor to command major control inputs. It was a stupid engineering decision that the subsequently fixed by having the computer cross check multiple sensors.

      The problem with the Boeing was that they allowed a single sensor to command major control inputs. It was stupid beyond belief. So stupid, I'm reticent to even call it an engineering decision, because that would imply that it was being made someone competent in the state of the are. Airbus had just recently had a major scandal due to the same issue. Every aviation accident gets report and the authorities maintain databases so that we can all learn from past mistakes. Boeing making the same STUPID mistake, right after Airbus is unforgivable.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    5. Re:Maybe Boeing can add in-flight purchases by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you could look certainly at it that way. The distinction here between the two being is that Boeing's system directly manipulated the control surfaces whereas Airbus' system merely changed how the pilots were interacting with the control surfaces (gave them the rope with which to hang themselves), but you can certainly argue it's ultimately the same thing.

      But I also think the fact that an effective a cockpit angle of attack warning / malfunction detection could've potentially prevented both cases (well, all three I guess), should be highlighted. It's not just a measurement problem; it's a de-emphasizing what should be considered crucial information. Apparently planes didn't historically have AoA indicators so they're simply not thought of as important enough to be standard, which is just an obscenely dumb position to take. I've heard same say you don't want more "confusing" warnings/instruments, but this is the twenty-first century, damnit. It doesn't have to be another confusing audible alarm or cryptic dial; there's no reason at all why these can't be simple, small, intuitively color-coded things.

      The pilots should be able to glance at the instrument panel and see a little graphic showing the tilt of the plane along with a degree number. If the computer things it's a dangerous number it shouldn't be, the graphic and the number turn red and a flashing (!) appears. If it thinks the sensor is malfunctioning (of course it actually needs some way of figuring this out, like a second goddamn sensor), it turns some other warning color and a flashing (??) appears (or maybe ?! if it's a combination of unsafe and unsure.) You could and should have similar pictoral+number instruments showing the other two plane's positioning attributes--yaw and roll. And hell, highlight the control surfaces on each picture of the plane with colors/arrows/numbers indicating the current control surface status. This isn't an array of confusing dials you're dealing with here. That's just three intuitive instrument displays that even a (halfway clever) layman could decipher that tells you what the plane is doing and what you're trying to do with it and whether the computer is a) happy about what's going on and b) confident that it even knows what is going on. You could probably cram those three little displays in under six square inches and mentally tune them out when they're the color they're supposed to be. This should be standard on all commercial aircraft.

      It's true that roll/yaw/AoA isn't as essential in daily operation as stuff like altitude and airspeed, but in an emergency? Come on. EVERYONE knows spatial disorientation is a major issue for pilots, even without issues like error-prone computer-corrections (Boeing) or anti-ergonomic human controls (the sidesticks cancelling each other out on Airbus.) This solves this more a general problem in a near idiot-proof way, at a quick glance. Instead of trying to instill more complex drills into the heads of pilots, just give them the all information they need to figure out what the airplane is currently doing and whether the computer is confident that it knows what is going on.

      You know how claymore antipersonnel mines have "this side towards enemy" stamped on them? That's not a bad thing. That's not an insult to anyone's intelligence; that's just sane ergonomic design that takes into account how crazy shit can get when you're in an emergency situation where every second counts.

      So yeah, of course the broken sensors and single points of failure is a huge and hugely moronic problem, but even so in both cases there's a strong chance that the humans might have been able to compensate for the mechanical failures... had they actually been able to quickly ascertain what airplane was doing that was incorrect. And in both cases, the key missing information was Angle of Attack. The idea that AoA information/alerts should be "optional" is a suicidally insane position to take. It's one of the most fundamental pieces of information you can have about the aircraft's current state.

  14. Here's an idea ... by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maps, the Most Popular Elements of In-flight Entertainment Systems, Are About To Get a Big Upgrade -- and Some Ads

    Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

    1. Re:Here's an idea ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent idea. More revenue streams for airlines mean cheaper bare bones tickets for those of us who can plan ahead well enough to bring a book or load a movie onto our own tablet.

    2. Re:Here's an idea ... by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      That is not how capitalism powered by shareholders works. Nothing ever gets cheaper, have you not noticed that?

    3. Re:Here's an idea ... by thomn8r · · Score: 1

      More revenue streams for airlines mean cheaper bare bones tickets

      Found the clueless capitalist

    4. Re:Here's an idea ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Cute. You really think just 'cause they find a new way to milk you that you could get something else cheaper.

      Did the tickets get cheaper when they stopped serving drinks for free? Or when the seats got stacked so tightly that the average midget can no longer sit without getting thrombosis?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Here's an idea ... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

      That's generally what I do when I fly domestic. But many planes will turn it back on any time the flight attendants make an announcement. On some planes this resets the system to being turned on once the announcement is done.

    6. Re:Here's an idea ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

      The last time I flew on TAP the back of the seats had tablet holders in them. So there are alternatives to infotainment systems, but as far as alternatives go your "book" whatever the hell those are sounds like the worst of them all.

    7. Re:Here's an idea ... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is a good idea, but I prefer watching air crash investigation on my tablet. Usually scares the shit out if the neighbours.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Here's an idea ... by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      "Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought)."

      Or just imagine having hot sex with one of the flight attendants. Just be sure to keep a hat in your lap...

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    9. Re:Here's an idea ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That is how capitalism works. If there's one thing it's good at, capitalism is good at optimizing production. At all costs.

      Lots of things have gotten cheaper. Air transport in particular is much cheaper than it used to be. That's one of the reasons airlines are doing their best to nickel and dime their passengers to death: they used to make lots of money of highly regulated international flights. International deregulation allowed much more competition.

    10. Re:Here's an idea ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes. They did. You can look up the numbers. Here's a good place to start, for the US market: http://darinlee.net/pdfs/airli...

      International flights used to be heavily regulated because they involved travelling through other countries' airspace. Those flights subsidized domestic flights to some extent. Deregulation of international flights, development of high efficiency engines and certification of twin engine planes to fly overseas has made air transport a lot cheaper.

      The reason we're getting nickel and dimed is because competition in the airline business is cutthroat, and base ticket price is the overwhelming differentiating factor.

    11. Re:Here's an idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading's for nerds.

    12. Re:Here's an idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a good idea, but I prefer watching air crash investigation on my tablet. Usually scares the shit out if the neighbours.

      Once about a decade ago, I and a co-worker were flying home ... we've both logged more time in commercial aircraft that we can count.

      At one point I turned to him and said "hey, we're on descent, but they haven't lowered the landing gear yet ... shouldn't it be down by now?" Well, 10 seconds later they waived off and did a fly around; sure enough this time around you could hear the landing gear coming down. My co-worker said aloud "Ooops, someone missed a step in the checklist".

      The lady behind us turned white and almost fainted.

      Way way back I worked in the airline industry, and occasionally one of the smart ass maintenance engineers would be like "what's your flight tomorrow?", and then they'd proceed to look it up in the system and say "looks like it had an oil leak, but they fixed it yesterday".

      There's some dark humor in that industry. To everybody else, ETOPS is Extended-range Twin-Engine Operations Performance Specification and mandates how far you could fly with one of your two engines out. To me it will always be Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim, because nobody wants to be feet-wet (over water) and down an engine.

      Most people would be just as happy not having any knowledge. And I must confess, some of the time so would I.

    13. Re: Here's an idea ... by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

      Some of these systems already 'thought' ahead and left out the off button.

    14. Re:Here's an idea ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And people like you who are sensitive only to price and always pick rock bottom pricing end up destroying any attempt at quality or customer service. You complain that you get treated like cattle, but weren't willing to pay that extra $50 to a competitor who treats you better. Therefore you cause an entire industry to race to the bottom providing the cheapest possible transport with the bare minimum of service. Well done.

      Some people who care more about quality choose to pay business class. There you don't get treated like animals, staff are always smiling and never grumpy, the food is better, etc. Price is always a conscious choice - but the consumer has to be aware that if they demand rock bottom pricing they get rock bottom quality. After all you get what you pay for.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Here's an idea ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Air transport in particular is much cheaper than it used to be.

      And the quality of service is much worse than it used to be in the 60's and 70's. Now your knees are against the seat in front, you're jammed into your seat with barely any wriggle room, the staff always look pissed off and you're lucky if you get a packet of peanuts.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:Here's an idea ... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Maps, the Most Popular Elements of In-flight Entertainment Systems, Are About To Get a Big Upgrade -- and Some Ads

      Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

      The early entertainment systems did not have an OFF button or feature. I had to vandalize them in order to get them to turn off and quit flickering in my field-of-view while trying to read a book.

      Prior to this, I had simply been putting the barf bag over the screen to hide it, but was directed by flight staff that such is not allowed, and that I must remove the barf bag cover. I shit you not. So, nowhere to rest my eyes, hence the vandalism. I don't live in a Clockwork Orange.

      PS—Statute of limitations ran out years ago, so :-P.

    17. Re:Here's an idea ... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Swissair Flight 111 had the entertainment systems burn the plane down.

    18. Re:Here's an idea ... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you want that experience, pay for business class. It’s about the same price, adjusted for inflation, as tickets were in the pre-deregulation era.

    19. Re:Here's an idea ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you be pissed off if you had to babysit 130 people jammed into seats with barely any wiggle room?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    20. Re:Here's an idea ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Haven't flown a domestic flight lately have you? Hint: They don't hire stewardesses on looks anymore.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    21. Re:Here's an idea ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What's with the personal attacks? You don't know anything about how I make choices.

      I absolutely do choose airlines that offer a more leg room, comfortable seats, and pleasant customer service, because those things matter to me. I don't choose them for whether or not they show ads on their entertainment systems, because I can easily skip that.

      I also support the people paying $10,000+ to shuffle onto the plane first and sit in a slightly bigger seat, because it subsidizes my $500 ticket. I'm quite happy to skip the $9500 charge for business class in favour of $50 to fly a better airline. The more stuff they charge for that I don't care about (but others do), the better.

    22. Re:Here's an idea ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's what I do. KLM is a sweet airline to cross the Atlantic on :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    23. Re:Here's an idea ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Well they chose the job, no one forced them. People like that maybe shouldn't be working in a public-facing customer service kind of work, but in some office somewhere. If you hate your job, if the pay is shit and the hours are long, and the boss is an asshole, a mature person would try to find a better job not take it out on the customers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    24. Re:Here's an idea ... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Maps, the Most Popular Elements of In-flight Entertainment Systems, Are About To Get a Big Upgrade -- and Some Ads

      Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

      That's when they reset the screen every 15 mins so that even if you turn down the brightness and contrasts (no way for the user to shut down the screen) it resets back to normal.

      Budget airlines that used to run ads through their screens used to do this before they realised they'd save more money by not having seat back screens.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Here's an idea ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      for those of us

      Usually when you use the word "us", you are including yourself in a group. I was also identifying the group when I said "people like you". Notice I didn't say YOU, I said LIKE you. So no personal attack. I was merely referring to the same hypothetical group you created. A personal attack is saying ceoyoyo you are a dumb @#$@ and I hate your guts, for example.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    26. Re:Here's an idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here's an idea, just shut down the damn entertainment system and read a book (I know, radical thought).

      On flights at night, when the rest of the cabin is dark, this can be even more intrusive to other people around you in economy than the seat back movie. So yes, open that book, turn the overhead light on and disrupt the sleep of those around you so that you can read a book.

    27. Re:Here's an idea ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't noticed that.

      Many things get cheaper as technology advances, manufacturing costs drop, competition enters the market.

      Have you not noticed that?

    28. Re:Here's an idea ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Fuck yes. Ryanair are shitty in uncountable ways but they'll get you to Malta and back for less than the cost of a train to London.

      Flight prices are ludicrously low.

    29. Re:Here's an idea ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If you can't sleep because someone else has a light on the issue isn't them.

      Anyway, I don't turn on a light to read books on aircraft any more. Yet another advantage to Amazon Kindle devices.

    30. Re:Here's an idea ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Flight prices are ludicrously low.

      Which has got to change.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    31. Re:Here's an idea ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      But many planes will turn it back on any time

      ... sticky tape, sheet of paper. They supply paper in appropriate-size sheets in most toilets - unless they've stated to charge extra for the paper. Or access to the toilet.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    32. Re:Here's an idea ... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      They also don't hire stewardesses anymore. I got cursed at for using that term: They're all stewards. Though frankly, I'd subdivide that group into gay men and cranky old women.

  15. Get ready for more brawls by sacdelta · · Score: 1

    Just what I need. Additional reasons for the person behind me who does not understand that only a gentle press is needed for a touch screen to be tap-tap-tapping the back of my seat.

    --

    Brought to you by: "Al"toids - the curiously weird mint.

    1. Re:Get ready for more brawls by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

      Just what I need. Additional reasons for the person behind me who does not understand that only a gentle press is needed for a touch screen to be tap-tap-tapping the back of my seat.

      No, sorry, that is always a kid. For some inexplicable reason, once you strap the little one into that seat they have some sort of primal urge to start kicking the seat in front for the next couple hours.

    2. Re:Get ready for more brawls by Cederic · · Score: 1

      On my last flight that was me. The cunt in front demanded to recline his seat, leaving me with a screen a hand span from my face.

      The 'How to sit comfortably' guide wasn't responding to the touch screen so I couldn't access its advice on how to sit comfortably with a screen in my face, so instead spent the time prodding the screen to make it work.

      The cunt in front got upset about this and called the flight attendant. She called her supervisor. Her supervisor told me that "he has a right to recline his seat" so I told her that I had a right to try and interact with the screen that's right in my face.

      They gave me a tablet I could put on the table of the empty seat next to me - literally the only empty seat on the aircraft (I'd chosen well). Although I could have moved to sit there it would've put me behind the cunt in front's wife who was also reclining.

      He's the second person that's threatened physical violence to me on an aircraft - and both because I stopped them invading my person space. Cunts.

  16. Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    Now the passengers will know they are flying to the wrong city earlier in the flight.

    1. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Now the passengers will know they are flying to the wrong city earlier in the flight.

      But it won't stop passengers booking flights to Sydney, Nova Scotia instead of Sydney, Australia
      https://www.thestar.com/news/g...

      Stil, it wasn't the pilots who made the Stuttgart/Edinburgh error, unlike this pilot who accidentally keyed in Melbourne instead of Kuala Lumpur and turned a 9 hour flight into a 1 hour flight
      https://www.theguardian.com/au...

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it won't stop passengers booking flights to Sydney, Nova Scotia instead of Sydney, Australia

      I hadn't heard of that one, but I've seen Melbourne, Florida vs Melbourne, Victoria.

      {searching for flights}

      Good, the flights to Melbourne aren't as expensive as I thought. Oh wait...

    3. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I once had to fly to Toledo, Ohio. I called up the local travel agent here in Europe and said to book me a business class flight to Toledo. She said she can't find any business class flights but she can find plenty of economy flights for about $150. It took us a bit of a back and forth about price before I realised she was trying to send me to Spain.

    4. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it won't stop passengers booking flights to Sydney, Nova Scotia instead of Sydney, Australia

      I hadn't heard of that one, but I've seen Melbourne, Florida vs Melbourne, Victoria.

      Just because it gave me an excuse to google.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39459471
      (that article links to some other incidents and one of those, has links to even earlier incidents).

    5. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by mpercy · · Score: 2

      "I once had to fly to Toledo, Ohio."

      I'm sorry.

    6. Re:Stuttgart or Edinburgh? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not as sorry as I was. I landed in Chicago and spent the weekend there where I met an Australian couple in a blues bar. The lady asked me where I'm going and I said Toledo. She said "Oh there's a song about Toledo, you should look it up" https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Anyway after I got to Toledo and spent a few days there working, my colleagues asked me "so what do you think of Toledo?"

      I only replied: "Have you ever heard the song by John Denver?"

      They haven't invited me back.

  17. I suggest you take your (or your wife's) stilettos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And put it through the screen!!

    Tell them no, we will not tolerate this any more!

  18. Imagine a future... by v1s10nary · · Score: 1

    ... where your existence is reduced to an advertising ID that determines every interaction you make. As you get older, everything from the ads you see to the media that you consume is crafted specifically to your current age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, religion, etc.

    Is this inevitable?

    --
    "The cause of fear is ignorance."
    1. Re:Imagine a future... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That depends on whether people who are heavily in debt are more or less likely to have children.

      If more likely, evolution will select for those who are susceptible to psychological attacks... sorry, targeted advertising. If less likely, it will select those who are resistant, and such things will stop being economically viable.

      Of course, runaway consumption will probably kill us all first.

    2. Re:Imagine a future... by v1s10nary · · Score: 1

      If more likely, evolution will select for those who are susceptible to psychological attacks... sorry, targeted advertising.

      I would compare the current system more to digitized slavery than psychological attacks. In the eyes of big data human beings are only worth as much as the marketable data they provide. We have become dependent on a wide range of social media platforms and other miscellaneous services that are offered as "free"; all the while the companies behind them are profiting off of everything we do.

      --
      "The cause of fear is ignorance."
    3. Re:Imagine a future... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You're not enslaved. Nobody is forcing you to use social media, or to give anybody any private data. You ARE the target of a variety of very carefully researched and optimized psychological techniques designed to make you desire things. That predates any social media, big data, etc., but those developments have made it much more effective.

      A little of bit of research into advertising psychology is... chilling.

  19. NOT for me, thanx. by RFjunkie · · Score: 1

    Thanks /.! I needed a fresh reason for never flying commercial. I first flew commercial a month after the new Boeing 747 entered service. That was super! Extremely comfortable, plenty of room for everyone, an actual bar, and terrific service. I met my soon-to-be wife that day too, a nurse(wuv me sume nursies!) working as a flight attendant. OK, backintheday she was a stewardess, but y'all get the idea. I was a lilbit younger then, and hoped that experience would last. Sadly, it's gone to carp, as horrible today as it was great back then. Thanks, greedy capitalists, for the perspective, and nuffin else. Barstids.
    I avoid things I see advertised and/or suck. Flying today sucks arse. Ads suck more arse, and don't even take me anydangwhere. Ads AND flying, jammed in a tube, rubbing shoulders with smelly people, passing thru TSA and the rest of carppy airpatches? Thanks, airlines, ya monetizing, leveraging fookers, I'll happily pay substantially more to avoid all that, um, stuff. My wife and I fly a few times a year, and apart from billboards we can ignore on the drive to the airport, we see no ads, get a more informative map, relax in cool comfort, and enjoy the great service that we learned to love.
    Thanks for the warning /. and WSJ. /. rocks!

    --
    Olphart at play. Ruck FepubliKKKans. Welcome to the Worldwide Idiocracy, y'all.
    1. Re:NOT for me, thanx. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't I know it, flying commercial sucks. I just cannot comprehend why everyone just doesn't charter their own private flights. How incompetent is your private secretary that they can't do this for you?

    2. Re:NOT for me, thanx. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private flights? They have their charm but don't hold a candle to my train cars and private train station.

    3. Re:NOT for me, thanx. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. But there can be some problems. One time, one of my limousines came to my New York property to pick me up, when I was actually at my ranch in Texas. I thought the limousines were just mixed up, but the damn aircraft was in the wrong place too. I cut down some of the waiting time though by getting my other plane (in California) to pick me up.

      captcha: armchair

    4. Re:NOT for me, thanx. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Good lord man, you're manservant should have already checked this out ahead of time! Call the Chamberlain and have that man flogged!

  20. Cattle class by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is only a matter of time until economy class gets always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

    When ticket price is the only metric and all feasible optimizations already achieved, airlines will turn into abuse and heinous behavior to further drive costs down.

    1. Re:Cattle class by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Not much later, any kind of personal entertainment system gets banned (for security reasons of course) so you can't escape it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Cattle class by sinij · · Score: 2

      Clockwork Orange-like seat attachments for forced viewing are next.

    3. Re:Cattle class by MooseTick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment"

      And next someone will figure out how to cram a paperclip into the speaker and "disable" it. Bonus points if they then complain its not working and ask for a refund.

    4. Re:Cattle class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like music playing in grocery stores?

    5. Re:Cattle class by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      It is only a matter of time until economy class gets always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

      The flight attendant is now demonstrating how to buckle your seatbelt, and attach your mandatory head restraint and eyelid clips.

      Thank you for flying Clockwork Air!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Cattle class by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      When ticket price is the only metric and all feasible optimizations already achieved, airlines will turn into abuse and heinous behavior to further drive costs down.

      Good. The world has only gotten better now that the ability to fly is no longer reserved for the rich.

    7. Re:Cattle class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

      Sounds like my local gas stations; all of the local stations have screens with very loud sound that start playing ads as soon as the pump is activated. Insanely annoying! At first, only a few had it so I just went out of my way to fill up at another stations; eventually those stations updated, now I can't find one in the area without this "feature"...

    8. Re:Cattle class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll put my blanket over it if I have to.

    9. Re:Cattle class by mpercy · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer 5th Element flight seating.

    10. Re:Cattle class by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It is only a matter of time until economy class gets always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

      That's got to square with another optimization taking place - the removal of infotainment equipment in cattle class. After all, each one of those things costs a lot of money and is pretty crappy, so what airlines have done is... replace it with an app.

      At which point you have to use your phone or tablet (or rent one!) to do anything the infotainment system used to do.

      Makes the seats a lot cheaper as well. Plus the opportunity to upsell them on the WiFi.

    11. Re:Cattle class by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      It is only a matter of time until economy class gets always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

      When ticket price is the only metric and all feasible optimizations already achieved, airlines will turn into abuse and heinous behavior to further drive costs down.

      . . . driving passengers mad, and resulting in vandalism. The video components are cheap to make, but a repair service call on a commercial airliner costs a little bit more. The airlines can then spend their ad money on repairs, and on refunds to angry passengers who actually (mysteriously) wanted the ads splashed in their face for hour, but got a broken system instead.

    12. Re:Cattle class by eth1 · · Score: 1

      "without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment"

      And next someone will figure out how to cram a paperclip into the speaker and "disable" it. Bonus points if they then complain its not working and ask for a refund.

      And someone will make a killing selling black clingy plastic screen covers for $10 at the airport.

      Unfortunately, you can still see everyone else's screen (which was hilarious the last flight I was on - someone on the aisle was watching a movie with nudity, with kids on the other side of the aisle a few rows back watching intently...)

    13. Re:Cattle class by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

      It is only a matter of time until economy class gets always-on advertisements without ability to turn off, mute, or skip on infotainment.

      You can tilt the bill of your baseball cap down and shut out the infotainment from the screen. Put in the earpods of your mobile and mute the infotainment. There, that wasn't hard.

      I hate air travel for many reasons. As if the security screening, horrible food, and uncomfortable seating wasn't bad enough now they shove ads on the screens directly in front of us.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    14. Re:Cattle class by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

      Have you flown economy recently? I just flew across the United States on Southwest, and there wasn't _any_ in-flight entertainment. Experienced passengers made sure that their phones were fully charged and they had downloaded a few movies. I read a book.

      --
      Long live the Speaker Bracelet
      Rolo D. Monkey
    15. Re: Cattle class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emirates already does nearly 5 min of ads but thankfully you can fast forward but canâ(TM)t just skip. Itâ(TM)s annoying.

    16. Re:Cattle class by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The moment these devices are incapable of being turned off is the moment they begin to magically self destruct.
      Snippy snip.

    17. Re:Cattle class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tampering with the smoke detectors or advertainment systems is a felony."

  21. Wait, why was this downvoted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's exactly right. This is not news. This is not even anti news. It's just ... why did they make me read this? What could I or anyone *possibly* gain from this? What could they even gain from *posting* this?

  22. An ad company by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    is always going to add ads long term.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. Monetisation by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Hey boss, you know that basic flight info we threw on there because it seemed like the least we could get away with?

    Yeah

    People seem to actually quite like it.

    CHARGE FOR IT AND COVER IT IN ADS!

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  24. Time to get hacking? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    There are only a few times in my life that I've considered illegally constructing a military-grade GPS receiver, and this is one of those times.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Time to get hacking? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. Download Avare. You'll have to hold it close to a window to get GPS reception inside the metal tube. But it gives you all the relevant information for free.

      I like to predict at what speed the plane will leave the ground.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  25. Know one without product placement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why a book? Is it somehow a bad story when it appears on a screen?.

    And why text? Is audio, video, or even an immersive haptic holographic binaural experience somehow making the story worse?

    And why only put information *inside* your brain, like a zombie?
    Is being creative *yourself* somehow worse??

    Frankly, exchanging life stories and drawing something with your seat neighbor is most likey the most fruitful thing you can do on a plane.
    Doing it over the Internet, with a friend somewhere else, is likely the second best thing.

    What makes planes suck, is that you can't get any of a human's core instinct-driven things there: (Enjoyable) food, sex, sleep. Even social interaction is made taboo by you anti-social psycho snobs.
    Only learning, and distracting yourself stay. Stupid.

    1. Re:Know one without product placement? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      And why a book?.

      No reason really, I'm no enemy of alternative data storage methods. Feel free to bring a papyrus scroll or a set of clay tablets if they let you.

  26. Sense of control? by Topmounter · · Score: 1

    If that is one's idea of a 'sense of control' then wow. Regardless, not worth paying up for a 'premium' maps experience.

  27. Maps are a default, not most popular by ZipK · · Score: 1

    IFE maps rack up screen time because travelers leave them on as a bland, background default - not because they're actively watching or engaging with them. Most of the IFE map screen time is as a nightlight.

    1. Re:Maps are a default, not most popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IFE maps rack up screen time because travelers leave them on as a bland, background default - not because they're actively watching or engaging with them.

      Or, you know, you're stuck on a plane for hours, and this is the adult alternative to "are we there yet?"

      In many cases, I'd rather put in headphones and listen to music and read a book while the flight map is displayed in front of me, and I'll keep tabs on it. I wouldn't say it's riveting, but it's somewhat interesting as a distraction.

      On occasion it's interesting to play the "where are we now?" game. If you're flying in the day it's kinda cool to say "Oh, I see, we're here flying that way and that bay down there is this".

      Flying is hours of boredom punctuated by moments of sheer terror (and I say this as someone who has been in emergency landings and experienced every possible weather delay known to man) ... the map is actually one of the highlights for me, the airports themselves being the shittiest parts.

      You can tell you've flown a lot when no matter the time of day you're flying into your local airport you can orient yourself and say "OK, downtown, east end, west end, this landmark, that landmark ... and there's my house right there". Same goes if you can pantomime the safety lecture without looking.

      And, no, I'm not bragging about how much time I've spent on planes -- I'd dearly love to have all of that time back.

  28. Receive only by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    So far as I know (aside from local oscillator leakage which must hardly be a problem if the rest of the phone/tablet has clocks running) it is perfectly fine to receive GPS signals on a phone while it is in airplane mode.

    If an app can store a reasonable map of the world on the phone so that it does not need an internet connection, then I see no reason why it could not display where you are, your speed and, given a destination, its estimate of when you will arrive.

    What with that and the movies I have on my sd card, I suspect all I would need is a little double sided tape to mount my tablet on the back of the seat in front of me

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:Receive only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a bit of a problem when the receiver is inside a metal tube, but that may change with newer planes made of carbon fiber.

    2. Re:Receive only by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      On Delta, Google Maps (the iPad app at least) works with the free tier wifi. I assume it’s used for the satellite imagery displayed on their maps. So, if you can get a GPS signal, you can see that for free.

    3. Re:Receive only by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Put "Avare" on you phone. It is open source. GPS receiver is on in airplane mode. You'll need to hold the phone near a window in most planes to get a satellite lock, but I got a lock in a center seat on a recent flight. Put "GPS Status" on your phone. It seems to be able to get a satellite lock faster than other apps. Getting a GPS lock before you get on the plane also seems to help. Download the airport plates along with the maps, and you can track your plane as you taxi out to the runway.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  29. Really? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Might be a touch of hyperbole there.

    I'm not sure it's an "object of fascination" so much as "something slightly distracting to while away the mind-numbing boredom of a long distance flight"? I see it as a digital equivalent to a cat-toy or one of those baby-mobiles, except for adult humans.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Really? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Glancing at the flight map is the silent equivalent of repeatedly asking “are we there yet?” from the back seat.
      My personal favourite is the nose wheel cam that comes on during landing... though there seem to be only a few airlines that actually have this. I’ve personally only seen it on JAL and Thai flights.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Really? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I love that Cam. The airport in Hiroshima, Japan is on the side of a mountain, so as you take off it's runway, runway, runway suddenly NOTHING.

  30. Paywall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And have your credit card ready to read this article

  31. The maps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't give you any real information of where you are at the moment. At least the Delta ones I've seen recently didn't. They show the U.S. with a giant plane covering four states! I couldn't zoom in to see which state I was actually over at the time. Useless!

  32. Map...no...forward looking video?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't tried in years, but my old Garmin GPS used to work for a 'map' giving location, speed, altitude, etc. Neat to know, but I wouldn't pay or suffer through ads to see that info.

    What might be neat - at least for a few flights would be a video feed of the pilots forward-looking view...especially take-off and landing. I might pay a buck to watch that once.

  33. Umm... by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    Bring a GPS?

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  34. Not sure what they are talking about... by Shaitan · · Score: 1

    30 years ago? I've yet to see a live map of any sort on a commercial flight. That would be all the things they've just described but where exactly does this supposed map live? You've got a seat back, potentially a window, and a screen up front that shows airline commercials and lame movies. Oh and a headphones jack. Once upon a time you also had an ash tray but I only got to use it once as a kid and pesky adults all ready to jump in and parent ruined it.

    1. Re:Not sure what they are talking about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen them but I don't they're "live" - they seem to just be canned animations of an airplane clipart moving across a map in a line, where the line is your itinerary, and the plane just moves across at a constant speed based on the schedule. There's no awareness of actual position, direction, or speed.

    2. Re:Not sure what they are talking about... by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      My wife tells me she has seen the map but only on long international flights. So not really something most of us see regularly.

    3. Re:Not sure what they are talking about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 years ago? I've yet to see a live map of any sort on a commercial flight.

      Well, have you ever flown? :-P

      Honestly, on most flights over 2 hours I've seen them for years on many different airlines. At least a decade since it was pretty common to see, at least for me anyway.

      Then again, most US airlines are just letting the cheap-ass subsidiaries run the flights (I'm looking at you Air Wisconsin operating for US Air) -- those little subsidiaries are pretty much built to give you shitty service, no perks, and none of the things you actually paid for on your ticket.

      If you think United or US Air give shit service, wait 'til you fly on one of the regional subsidiaries -- I've pretty much tried to avoid them wherever possible, because ShitStainIdiots Airways doesn't make for a good flight experience, ever.

    4. Re:Not sure what they are talking about... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      30 years ago? I've yet to see a live map of any sort on a commercial flight. That would be all the things they've just described but where exactly does this supposed map live? You've got a seat back, potentially a window, and a screen up front that shows airline commercials and lame movies. Oh and a headphones jack. Once upon a time you also had an ash tray but I only got to use it once as a kid and pesky adults all ready to jump in and parent ruined it.

      Many larger/legacy airlines are putting seatback IFE in most of their aircraft, even ones designated for shorter hauls(2-3 hours). Even older aircraft are getting them as airlines go through and update their interiors. Your LCCs/ULCCs might not if you fly those. Adding amenities and services like seatback IFE helps legacy airlines justify the price premium over LCCs without significantly impacting operational costs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Not sure what they are talking about... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I have a departure from this, and I'm almost hesitant to mention it for fear of destroying it.
      JetBlue has a subsidary/sister company called JetsuiteX, runs 25 passenger small jets between Burbank CA, Las Vegas NV, San Jose CA and a couple of other seasonal routes.
      Fares are equivalent to normal flights, however they operate out of their own hangar. They run a TSA precheck on you, and quick bomb swab when you arrive.
      NO TSA security theater/your water is evil/take off your shoes/our scanner isn't working.
      You can arrive 30 minutes before departure-you wait in the hangar, they've got free snacks and foosball.
      Flight was calm, one attendant handing out stuff- which included free drinks!
      When you arrive at your destination, no rotating baggage conveyor: they just set your bags down next to the plane exit and off you go.
      Curb to curb, roughly 1.5 hours LA to Vegas

      I recently flew it from Burbank to Vegas, BEST FLIGHT EVER. Free drinks, too.

  35. So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be able to get encyclopedic details on Mount Fuji as you fly past, track your spouse's flight from your seat and zoom in for details on points of interest like the top 10 rides at Disneyland compiled from social media.

    So in other words, the poison that is social media will now infect the one thing on a flight you could enjoy in peace, a simple GPS map showing you were you are. Now we get to wade through all the malware--excuse me, adverstising--and get bombarded with information we neither want nor need, if we want to see where we are.

    I've been a technophile all my life, and I'm just about ready to smash my iphone to pieces, throw my laptop off my balcony, and smash my bespoke, self-built Gentoo PC to smithereens. This is how vile advertising, and social media, have made what was once a shining example of human ingenuity and knowledge: the Internet. I already tune out and just listen to music on flights because the "entertainment" systems have become such cesspools of advertising and promotion, with just the GPS map on to track my progress. Now that that is going I'll just shut off the screen, or paste a piece of paper in front of it if they, as I predict they will do next, remove the off switch.

    If a technophile can become utterly sick of technology, just imagine what this shit will ultimately do to the rest of the population.

    And yes, I realize this is just one example of the rot, and not even a major one at that compared to engineering elections, brexit, and the like, but it is collective sum of so many little things that is making the Internet antithetical to human mental health and well-being. It's gotten so bad the Luddites are starting to look like reasonable prognosticators.

    1. Re:So in other words... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of technophiles are going through this: pulling back from the bastardization of technology.

  36. Just a matter of time... by Pyramid · · Score: 1

    ...before breathable air will become a fee based "value add" on commercial airlines.

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  37. There is a feature that I would like to have back by Hasaf · · Score: 1

    In the past, it was possible to listen to the air traffic chatter (channel 4 in the seat audio, as I recall). I actually enjoyed that. It was just the cockpit comms on whatever frequency they were on, but it allowed me to know what was happening along the flight.

    As I said, it is a feature that was removed to protect us from the terrorists (who didn't use it) and I would like it back.

  38. the technical mind by Shane_Optima · · Score: 2

    Engineers and the like will start throwing adjectives out "cold, wet, white, sticks for arms", but people with other personality types come up with all sorts of stuff. Last time this exercise was done at a shitty team building event I was forced to go to, one person wrote a poem about children building a snowman, the other only described what he felt "joy, happiness, Christmas, etc"

    Heh. Funny you should say that. After I read that bit the GP was complaining about, I immediately thought "The Faroe Islands? Well, that's not exactly the sexiest... um, a commercial flightpath right over the Faroe Islands without stopping? I'm not sure if that's ever happened. If so, it would have to be something like nonstop Reykjavík to Oslo, maybe. In which case, I really doubt you're missing out on very much you couldn't get at either your origin or your destination, except for perhaps.... [checks Wikipedia]... nope, nevermind, you could gorge on freshly killed puffins while you're still in Iceland."

    1. Re:the technical mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of flights out of LHR, FRA, or CDG go over the Faroes.

    2. Re:the technical mind by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      "Directly over", the original paragraph said? Well, maybe I need to see a great circle-generating map to see why that would be the case. The Faroes are pretty far north so there's probably some distortion going on. I don't have a globe handy.

  39. Sometimes I really hate capitalism... by dark.nebulae · · Score: 1

    They forget to mention that maps was like the only option that didn't include some form of video ads, so if it were on there was no chance of distraction.

    But now we have to wring every last penny out of every aspect of life. Get bombarded with ads or pay to be ad-free.

    That's probably the next step in the maps evolution; people will turn the crap off if it becomes too ad-laden. Then they'll offer an ad-free version for a small price...

    We don't have to turn everything into a revenue source...

  40. Makin' money? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    The beloved map will become one more revenue-generator for airlines

    Are they kidding? Who is going to pay money to see a plane icon on a map? I occasionally will see where we are at via the maps, but only because it doesn't cost anything. I wouldn't pay ten cents to look at that.

  41. Pathetic by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    You may never visit the Faeroe Islands, but you feel like you've been there when your flight draws a line over them.

    Really?

    What next? "You may never be get surgery to remove that cancerous lump from your lung, but you'll feel like you have when we draw a red x through it on the CT scan!"

    1. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CT scans that miss things all the time? Sometimes it feels like modern medicine is just a game of Etch A Sketch with more expensive toys.
      When did doctors substitute imaging for thinking?

  42. What about the rest of us? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    These improvements get a lot of attention because they connect with long (and expensive) international flights. What about those of us in the flying public who rarely fly that far? I've flown less than 1,000 total miles in the last 18 months myself, and I can't recall the time I last flew more than 3 hours nonstop. On these flights we're happy if we have a power outlet to charge our laptop or phone, and we are lucky if we get a back of pretzels as a snack.

    Will these upgrades trickle down or will we be left out?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  43. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you just stop monetization already.... 100% won't be looking at an Ad Polluted map.

  44. Brasilia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm going to Brasil to get drugs. duh.

  45. Work around by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    If you have an Android device, download the Avare app. It provides you with the same sectional map that pilots use. And it is much better than the map that the airlines show you. You have to download the correct maps for the section of the country you'll be flying over.

    You'll need to hold it near the window on many airplanes for it to get a GPS signal. But, once it locks, you'll get all the airspeed and ETA data that the airlines have. You'll have more fun tracking which of the airways the airplane uses.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  46. Just use your iPhone by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    People don't realize the new cell services will still work while you're on a plane.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  47. Re:YANNA - Yet Another Non-News Article by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

    When was the last time, more than 10% of /. was actual news?

    In can't remember.

    But I do remember /. having more than 30 posts a day. And 500 comments per post. And trolls being funny.

    It's largely an open-access website. How many submissions of what you consider real news have you taken the time to write up this year?

    I also think what we've witnessed is the entirely expected fragmentation of "tech" nerdery. 20 years ago, everything was big news because everything was NEW. "Handheld phones in the future may be able to send and receive HD video" would have been a blockbuster headline that blew everyone's minds. Everyone would stop what they were doing to talk about that one big change. These days there are 500 "new" things every day which are technically-tech, because we've got freaking light bulbs with freaking wi-fi cards attached to their heads. It's much harder to discern what ought to be considered "news for nerds" when the technological society has forced nerditude on every aspect of our lives. Your refrigerator now tells your grocery-delivery service when to order more milk. Are milk jugs news for nerds?

    Was "Hellmouth" really news for nerds, even back in the day?

    Being a nerd 30 years ago, when the people who created /. were entering adulthood, was much more pan-nerdy. The range of "nerd" was much more narrow. Generally the physics nerd and the math nerd and the computer nerd and the networking nerd and the sci-fi nerd were all the same damn nerd. This meant there was a very easily-targeted common space of topics you could post on a nerd news site and feel confident 95% of your readers were either already interested in, or were broadly curious enough to enjoy hearing something different.

    Nowadays, you have coding nerds who know zero physics.
    You have science nerds who actually suck at using computers.
    You have "cyberspace/cloud" moguls and web developers who have no personal experience with dial-up modems.
    And of course you have all the culture nerds who think liking Avengers and Big Bang Theory makes them a nerd.
    And many more.

    I don't envy the editors trying to find the right way to target, capture, and maintain readership in this bizarre constantly-shifting niche which was in large part CREATED by Slashdot 25 years ago.

    At the same time, the level of triggering in Politics has allowed it to spread past its previous egghead/policy-wonk domain. It is no accident that the articles with the highest comment totals are usually global warming and net neutrality. I could guarantee you the site mods try to walk a line between allowing political discussion, using political discussion to generate comments/pageviews, while also not letting Slashdot become "/pol/ for nerds, stuff that triggers".

    Again, the site is largely a result of what the userbase needs it to be. The world has moved on since 20 years ago; maybe people don't need Slashdot to be what it was 20 years ago. Maybe they get that somewhere else. Or maybe we're all middle-aged dudes now and our attention is captured and held by different things, so the fresh takes are gone. Maybe as sci/tech nerdery has gone mainstream (and in fact come to rule society), we no longer need to have a special geek ghetto we all hide in and tell each other the same fr0sty inside jokes to feel some kind of belonging.

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  48. Just remove the IFE entirely. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Now that airplanes have wifi, and EVERYONE brings their own screens with them, the seat back IFE is obsolete. They should just remove them entirely. Just give me a damn charger port, and if you want to sling some crappy entertainment my way, that's fine too, but the screen in the seat back just isn't needed anymore.

    If they want to make the screen actually useful, maybe put Android Auto and Apple CarPlay into it, and let it be a second screen for my phone while it charges.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  49. Everything keeps becoming more shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    God I miss the 20th Century

  50. Already experienced it personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Middle East Airlines last summer, Larnaca to Beirut. With sound from loudspeakers. That said, to slightly make up for it, MEA had the funniest, tongue-in-cheek safety video I've ever seen.

  51. LOL SUCKERS! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Pay money, to watch a map on the screen. Oh well, other than the drunks, kids kicking the back of your seat, other than sleeping, not much else to do while you are prisoner on a sealed metal tube.

  52. Until the WiFi doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of the last half dozen flights I've been on, the WiFi did not work on 2 of them. And let me say, the pax were grumpy.

    On my very last flight, it was delayed 2 hours for them to fix the WiFi, because it's become a "cannot leave without it" item. Probably to avoid violence in the cabin.

  53. Meta-humor from the editors ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Submitter : The beloved map will become one more revenue-generator for airlines [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled.]

    I never believed the allegation that the Editors were dead, hung AI, only spoke Ukrainian, etc. Their freedom to inject humour into boring stories is still there.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  54. Re:There is a feature that I would like to have ba by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    The proud bird restaurant in Los Angeles, before they refurbed it, used to have sets of headphones along a window looking out over the LAX runway. You could sit and listen to air traffic chatter there while having a meal. I'm not sure if they survived the refurb, I assume not.