Slashdot Mirror


Student Used 'USB Killer' Device To Destroy $58,000 Worth of College Computers (theverge.com)

A former student of The College of Saint Rose in Albany, New York, has pled guilty to charges that he destroyed tens of thousands of dollars worth of campus computers using a USB device designed to instantly overwhelm and fry their circuitry. The plea was announced today by the Department of Justice, FBI, and Albany Police Department. The Verge reports: Vishwanath Akuthota, the former student, now faces up to 10 years in prison (with up to three years of supervision after release) and a fine totaling up to $250,000. He was arrested and taken into custody in North Carolina on February 22nd, just over a week after he went on a spree of inserting the "USB Killer" device into 66 of Saint Rose's computers around various locations on campus. Such devices can be easily and freely purchased online and can overload the surge protection in many PCs.

Akuthota, 27, apparently made video recordings of himself inserting the malicious USB device into the computers and said "I'm going to kill this guy" as the PCs were overloaded and permanently ruined. So it's fair to say the FBI and APD had all the evidence they needed. In total, Akuthota caused $58,471 worth of damage. As part of his guilty plea, he has agreed to pay back that amount to the college, a small private school in New York's capital city. The Verge reached out to The College of Saint Rose for a statement on today's news, but a spokesperson said the college had been asked by law enforcement to refrain from commenting.

121 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by DatbeDank · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're going to do something stupid or better yet illegal, don't record yourself.
    Here's a fun Q&A with him on FB: https://www.facebook.com/saint...

    Sounds like he got fired and was looking for revenge! Curious what he did to deserve the firing.

    1. Re:Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Highdude702 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My first thought was "HAHAHAHAHAHA Dumb fuck". Then I actually thought about it, and I laughed harder... So yea and he made it to college! Go our education system..

    2. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're going to do something stupid or better yet illegal, don't record yourself.

      "If you're going to do something stupid, do it intelligently?"

    3. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      If you are going to do something both stupid and illegal don't record yourself doing it.

      The recordings are essentially a confession, it's a slam dunk case and he's going to go to jail as a result of his stupidity in doing the action and stupidity in recording it. Had he not recorded it proving this would have been harder and he might have got a plea. With a solid confession on board the DA has no reason to plea and they will throw the book at him.

    4. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by youngone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While I am sure you're right, and he certainly deserves some sort of punishment, does up to 10 years in prison (with up to three years of supervision after release) and a fine totaling up to $250,000 sound like proportional punishment to you?
      I am genuinely curious, because to me even if he gets half of that it seems like total overkill to me.
      The silly boy is probably an entitled prick, and was fired for good reasons, but wouldn't a few months prison, and some probation seem like an appropriate response?

    5. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Honestly, prison seems excessive for most any property crime. Restitution with penalties and interest, an ankle monitor, and a few years of weekends picking up trash seems good. Throw in a jumpsuit that says I'm the jackass that burned out the computers fr fun. If he doesn't seem genuinely repentant, make him wear donkey ears while he picks up the trash.

    6. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that someone who would do this, was rightfully fired.

      If you're going to do something stupid like this, frying/damaging computers is always going to come back to the last person seen using it. Killing one computer won't draw attention unless it's like, the server room.

      But what's the point of frying a bunch of end-user machines, 60K in machines is probably 60 machines, or two classrooms worth. They're not engineering laptops which are easily worth 3K a piece.

    7. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know those guys get their education for free. Paid for by their governments. Here in the US, you sell yourself into indentured servitude for life when you want to better yourself.

      Oh, he will have a job and you won't.

    8. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course that would be unreasonable, but that's how the attorney general gets to prescribe your actual sentence through a plea deal. We'll drop the crazy charges and you'll serve one year or we go to court and try to nail you for ten, what'll it be? It's a huge risk to fight the charges even if you're innocent, if you're objectively guilty and take it to court for a lesser sentence your legal team had better be miracle workers. In most cases a jury will end up much closer to the legal maximum than the plea deal because they feel like slam dunking criminals. Remember this case?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even if he didn't record it, I am guessing the college has CCTV somewhere, and it actually working. 1-2 machines, he would never have gotten caught, but enough data points will get the university police starting to check access cards and eyeball camera footage, especially if it makes the press.

      I don't understand why someone would want to head to a US prison. Unlike European or Indian prisons where they focus on rehabilitation and offer vocational training, a US prison is basically a storage bin, and being from that part of Asia, there are not many prison gangs he can join in order to ensure personal protection. Most likely he will get PC, which means he gets locked up for 23 hours a day... and that isn't good for the sanity.

    10. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm not convinced he will have a job after this.

    11. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      He will be lucky to get a burger flipping job.

      Especially in India.

      Step 1: Murder god
      Step 2: Grind up god into paste
      Step 3: Fry god on grill
      Step 4: ?????
      Step 5: Profit!

    12. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a huge risk to fight the charges even if you're innocent,

      My understanding is hiring a lawyer to get a plea deal is around $10-30k. If it goes to trial it's a minimum of $100k. Just for the lawyer. Expert witnesses and other crap add to that.

      Think about that for a bit. You get charged with something you didn't do. Not only are you trading off 1 year vs 10, if you roll the dice and go for broke you're, well, broke even if you win.

      Something is broken with our system of "justice".

    13. Re:Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Well at least frying a bunch of computers is better than shooting up a building full of people.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      [In the future] He will be lucky to get a burger flipping job.

      Not like his high powered job at the college then. From his Q&A in th eFacebook link :

      My responsibilities are
      1. Set up stage for jazz band for practice.
      2. etc

    15. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah but how are we going to keep the PIC funded if we adopt your idea? Don't you understand there's campaign donations involved here?

    16. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      Honestly, prison seems excessive for most any property crime

      Does it though? I mean, you willingly destroyed property that has some value to it. Someone else now has to dedicate time and effort to restore what was broken and there are a bunch of people who couldn't do their work because of some idiots actions. Sure, you could get the perpetrators to "right the wrong" by spending their own time and money restoring the original state but that doesn't make up for lost productivity and whatever other consequences there were - you know, intangible things.

      I think prison is entirely appropriate here and for other property crimes. If someone decides to destroy/ruin/steal someone else's property, they should be put behind bars for a while so they understand there are consequences to stupid and negative actions.

    17. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Something is broken with our system of "justice".

      You are right, but I can assure you that things are far far worse than you can possibly imagine. I am a career IT guy (I am American by the way) but I have plenty of friends who are lawyers and they've taught me a lot about how the US justice system really works. Imagine the following scenario which could happen. Just suppose some friend or neighbor or acquaintance gets angry with you and sues you over something that is complete bs, but they are trying to ruin you financially. You hire lawyer and fight them and win but it cleans out your bank account completely. And the whole case was bs and just an attempt to ruin you, which they sort of accomplished by wiping out your bank account. I've yet to meet a single lawyer or judge who doesn't think that the system worked perfectly when person gets wiped financially from lawyer fees when winning against an unjust lawsuit. And you should know that the entire law enforcement and legal system is designed to make sure that lawyers will get paid if nobody else does. If you win a judgement in court and your opponent has to pay you something and they just refuse, good luck getting a local law enforcement person to help you collect. Maybe you will. Maybe you won't. But if a lawyer is owed money, law enforcement will leave no stone unturned to make sure that the lawyer will get paid.

      In one of the most horrific cases I personally know of where the system abused someone, I have a friend whose wife filed for divorce a few years ago. Basically she got mad that he looked at porn online and she flipped out and filed for divorce. She is bi-polar, which may have played a role in this. She quit her job as a nurse deliberately and claimed she couldn't be employed again because of her mental problems. No lawyer advised her to do this. She just did it on her own. So she went to her town's most successful divorce lawyer who specialized in representing women and that lawyer took on the case knowing that the wife had no funds at all with which to pay the lawyer. None. My friend unfortunately did not take this very seriously and hired the cheapest lawyer he could find. My friend got his rear end handed to him in court. The wife's lawyer ran up huge bills and then at the end of the case sued the husband for the full amount. So my friend had to liquidate his 401K fund to pay his now ex-wife's lawyer's costs to divorce him. The ex-wife won half the 401K in the divorce, but it's completely gone now because all that 401K money went to her lawyer. Keep in mind that her lawyer took the case deliberately knowing that her client couldn't pay her at all and they would just go after the husband for the money. And it worked. I asked a lawyer friend for thoughts about it and he told me this kind of thing happens all the time. So yeah, our system of justice is completely broke and the lawyers and judges and cops like it just fine exactly like it is.

    18. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you keep him out of jail you have the possibility of him being gainfully employed and able to pay for restitution for the damages he caused.

      Throwing him in jail is just costing society even more money. I think at this point, he is pretty scared shitless anyways. Do you really think he's likely to offend again to the point that he needs to be locked up for the safety of society? I'm not sure if that makes sense.

    19. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      I was talking to an Indian coworker of mine about this yesterday. You pretty much have to pay for private primary and secondary school since the public schools are abysmal. College is also not free. It's much cheaper than U.S. universities (~$500-3000/year) but the avg. Indian income is around $600/year. So here's our comparison:

      Her:
      * Parents paid for expensive primary and secondary education
      * Worked way, way harder than I did while she was in school
      * Parents paid for college that was expensive relative to national income level
      * Has to deal with biased belief among American hiring managers that Indian (and/or female) employees just aren't as effective

      Me:
      * Free primary and secondary education at decent public schools (magnet)
      * Free (tuition at least) undergraduate education by way of merit scholarship; parents paid room/board, which was relatively painless for them
      * Free postgraduate education by way of fellowship and tuition reimbursement
      * Hiring managers never discount my ability because I'm foreign, or a woman (I'm a white dude)

    20. Re:Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by fazig · · Score: 1

      How about neither?
      It's not a dichotomous choice of either frying a bunch of computers or shooting up a building of people. And it's also not like getting revenge in some destructive way was the only option in this case.

    21. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think prison is entirely appropriate here and for other property crimes. If someone decides to destroy/ruin/steal someone else's property, they should be put behind bars for a while so they understand there are consequences to stupid and negative actions.

      How does one pay restitution when they are locked up in prison? Punishment isn't the sole purpose of the justice system. There are ways to implement a punishment, pay back the damaged parties, and eventually reincorporate the offender as a valuable member of society. Put the guy to work and direct the earnings towards the damaged party. You could having him pick up trash off the side of the road, or ideally assign him a job where he can learn a valuable skill and proceed into a successful life once his restitution is paid. If it makes you feel better, throw him in jail for a month to let him know what awaits if he fucks up again, then put an ankle bracelet on him and make him stay in some sort of halfway home until his debt is paid. Just throwing him behind bars for 5-10 years isn't going to solve anything.

    22. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by laird · · Score: 1

      Except that if you're innocent, you can often get the other side to cover legal costs.

      Of course, in this case not only did he do something blatantly illegal, he filmed himself doing it, so 'innocent' isn't really an option.

    23. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      If you're going to do something stupid or better yet illegal, don't record yourself.

      "If you're going to do something stupid, do it intelligently?"

      Crime in a nutshell, lol

      The number of super genius criminals who outsmart everybody (like in the movies) is very, very small ...

    24. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by jnork · · Score: 1

      He meant that his parents were not forced to pay out of pocket for his primary education. He was not discussing the wider economic issues of public school funding.

      You're right, but only by changing the context of the discussion.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    25. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by AF_Cheddar_Head · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting the state to pay for your legal costs if you are found not guilty.

      If you win a civil suit then maybe but not in a criminal case.

    26. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      The assistant DA will often accept a plea for less of a sentence in order to spare the taxpayer the expense and time of a trial that has a known outcome due to all the considerations you mention.

      This guy will see the inside of a jail for a few years, and still get a fine; but it won't be what is reported here. Especially since it was a non-violent crime - they'll kick him due to overcrowding long before he's in for 10 years even if he eats the whole meal.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    27. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      He'll never do the 10. This is the opening shot from the DA, pushing this guy and his lawyer into the room to plead it down to 1-2 years plus a multi-year tail of probation and parole. State's attorneys do this all the time - announce the maximum to scare the shit out of you (especially if they have a solid case, which they definitely do here), and then offer a deal that saves the taxpayers the expense and hassle of a jury trial as well as the expense of locking this asshole up for a further 8 years.

      And really, in this case, everyone wins. He pays the restitution to the school, he gets put away into a box for a little bit, the Assistant DA notches another "win" as they contemplate a run for a judgeship or actual DA, society is rid of this asshole for a bit while not paying for a lengthy trial and to put him up for 10 years after the inevitable sentencing because he's an idiot and posted what amounts to a video confession to YouTube.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    28. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I would guess (I have no data) that the extreme vast majority of dropped charges and acquittals are not paired with the government handing over a "oh, our bad" with a check for the cost of your legal team to defend against the State's charges.

      In civil matters, yes there are measures for counter-suing to cover legal costs, as well as punitive damages that can be levied for frivolous actions. Not so much with criminal actions - sure there are statutes against malicious prosecution and so on, but good luck making that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    29. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Is prison warranted in property crimes? How about if we're talking about white collar criminals who take millions? Bank robbers who threaten people with weapons?

      I definitely think there is a place for prison for property crimes. Either repay the full amount, or whatever you can, then somewhere between 1 day/$200 - 1 day/$1000 for whatever can't be repaid/repaired. Let's say we're generous, and give 1 day/$1000 owed. Perhaps they find he has $5000. From the $58,000 he owed, they take his $5000, then give him the option of paying the $53,000 over time (no bankruptcy get out of jail), or you go to jail for 53 days to pay your $53,000 debt. If you think that's too generous, give him 265 days.

      Consider Bernie Madoff. $20 billion profit from his scheme would result in a 20,000 day stay in the slammer, which would be 54 years, which seems very reasonable for the crime committed, although I wouldn't bicker if somebody wanted the 270 year penalty instead.

    30. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by sjames · · Score: 1

      To what end? They can't pay their restitution in prison, they can't maintain their other responsabilities, it costs society over 60K/year to keep them there, renders them LESS able to integrate productively into society later, teaches them that society is the enemy, and schools them in new more exciting ways to commit crime.

      If you beat a dog that pees on the rug, all you'll get is a dangerously bad tempered dog that pees on the rug.

    31. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The assault in a bank robbery is not a property crime, it's assault.

      As for Madoff, a long term membership in Club Fed on our dime doesn't do anything to make the people he wronged whole. Paying back every last penny he stole with penalties and interest does.

      How are you going to enforce a 270 year prison sentence? Are you planning to keep his rotting corpse in a cell?

    32. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Smart ones don't.

      I came out with a 4-year degree and a total of $15k in debt while supporting a wife and two children.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    33. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Consider Bernie Madoff. $20 billion profit from his scheme would result in a 20,000 day stay in the slammer, which would be 54 years, which seems very reasonable for the crime committed, although I wouldn't bicker if somebody wanted the 270 year penalty instead.

      Using your math of 1 day per $1000, I have arrived at a far different number than you. I come up with 20 MILLION days in jail.. That's 54,794 1/2 years...

      You are valuing jail time at 1 day per million dollars stolen, which seems woefully inadequate...I suspect if I stole a million dollars from you, you'd be rather upset if I got 1 day in jail.....

    34. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      It's cute that you think everyone can be rehabilitated.. Like that swatter guy, who was trying to swat people from jail... Some people are too stupid to be anywhere else other than jail...

    35. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      It's cute that you think everyone can be rehabilitated..

      Please show me in my post where I say that everyone can be rehabilitated. I was talking specifically about this instance. There are people that are just too dangerous to be in the general population.

      Like that swatter guy, who was trying to swat people from jail... Some people are too stupid to be anywhere else other than jail...

      Two thoughts on this. One: If he was able to commit the same crime FROM PRISON then obviously prison wasn't an effective solution for him either, now was it? Two: Kind of hard to find the time to threaten people on twitter when you're only two activities are working 80 hours a week cleaning horse barns in Wichita and being confined to a house with no internet and cell phone service. Maybe this wanna be gang-banger prick would reform if his ability to be an "Internet celebrity" was taken away and he was given something productive to do, maybe he wouldn't. But obviously throwing people into a box for the majority of their life isn't as effective as we think it is.

    36. Re: Why Record Videos of illegal activity? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Your friend was very very stupid or he got VERY bad legal and financial advice.

      He should have given the wife her half of the 401k then declared bankruptcy to wipe out the legal fees. He would have lost all cash savings, but he would have kept his car and house (if he still owned one). This type of civil financial verdict can be wiped out with a bankruptcy claim and 401k's are protected from Legal judgements until the funds are withdrawn. He basically fucked himself over.

  2. 10 years in prison is excessive... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And shows how fucked up the US "justice" system is. Average sentence for murder is something like seven years. He should be given a psych evaluation and made to pay restitution via wage garnishment in the future.

    1. Re: 10 years in prison is excessive... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Wholeheartedly agreed.

    2. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the average sentence for murder is much longer. Average time served is seven years.

      In this case, even if sentenced to the max (unlikely), he'll probably spend no more than 3 years in prison before he is paroled.

    3. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 4, Informative

      And shows how fucked up the US "justice" system is. Average sentence for murder is something like seven years. He should be given a psych evaluation and made to pay restitution via wage garnishment in the future.

      He is unlikely to get 10 years. That's the maximum sentence when they add up the maximum for each charge and it makes it more newsworthy. The maximum for murder is life without parole or death, and as you say the average may be closer to 7 years. In this case since he admitted fault and agreed to pay for the damages he will get some smaller sentence, possibly time already served or a few months. It is likely his visa will be revoked.

    4. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh horseshit. First of all, he has not been sentenced to anything yet. 10 years is the maximum he could get, whereas the maximum for murder is life imprisonment, or in some cases death. Secondly, the AVERAGE murder sentence is 40.6 years, where did you get that idiotic 7 years? The average property crime sentence is about 4 years. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pu...

    5. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Highdude702 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Incorrect. It is a federal case so he has to do I believe 85% before he is eligible for parole. That means at a maximum sentence of 10 years he would do 8.5 years minimum. When it comes down to state there is different rules all around the country. Nevada has a scaling system where its x-x months/years and the front number can not exceed 40% of the back number. So for instance he could get a 4-10 year sentence. In 4 years from the date of arrest he would get a chance to see the parole board. depending on the crime they can choose to dump him(not release). That normally depends somewhat on your case, your behavior in prison, and wot not. Some states have a flat time system and you do the time they give you. 48 months is 48 months. Telling you this from experience unfortunately.

    6. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      His confession (recording of the act) makes it unlikely prosecutors will make any deal of any kind. All his bargaining power is gone with that confession. They tend to throw the book at people when they have a confession. If he pleads guilty the Judge might have some sympathy, but if he fights it he'll get the full kit.

    7. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that 10 years isn't excessive. However, in New York(where this happened) 2nd degree murder is 15-25 years. First degree is 20-life. Aggravated murder is life. So, murder is a longer sentence in this case. As for that 7 year average, I'm not going to do all the math. However, only 10 states have a minimum under 10 years. A couple of those, only with mitigating circumstances. Most of the rest have one that is a fair bit higher. Thus, the average should still be above 10 years for minimum sentencing. That doesn't even get into average sentencing.

    8. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

      You could do more monetary damage by totaling someone’s parked Tesla with a lifted pickup truck, and you’re likely not going to face jail time for that.

      He should have to pay for the replacement costs of computers he damaged and any labor costs associated with replacing them/restoring the backups/reconfiguring them. That alone is enough of a deterrent to keep copycats from getting any ideas - there’s no need to “send a message.”

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    9. Re: 10 years in prison is excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thatâ(TM)s not how it works. 10 years is the max sentence of the computer fraud and abuse act.

    10. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Secondly, the AVERAGE murder sentence is 40.6 years

      Yet somehow the MEDIAN murder sentence (on the first page of your link) is less than 14 years, far closer to OP's estimate than your supposed statistic.

      Sentences for particularly egregious murders tend to be tens or even hundreds of times longer than the murderer can be expected to live, which makes the concept of an "average" sentence fairly meaningless.

    11. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Federal sentences come from guidelines with charts and point systems. Google "USSC". Whenever you hear "up to N years", it's going to be nowhere near that much unless a whole bunch of aggravating factors line up, like having a long record.

    12. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      I'll take a link to bjs.gov over SlaveToTheGrind's opinion

      Opinion? One more time:

      Yet somehow the MEDIAN murder sentence (on the first page of your link) is less than 14 years

      Reading comprehension is an increasingly lost art.

    13. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Learn to read. The first page is not showing the sentence length, it is showing time spent in prison before first release. Sentence length is on page 4.

    14. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by gravewax · · Score: 1

      that is a false equivalency. This wasn't one incident, it was many repeated incidents and they were without a doubt planned, intentional and completely malicious in nature. This sort of shit needs far more of a message than you will have to pay the damages.

    15. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by bws111 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Still can't read, huh? The OP did not say the amount of time spent in prison, he said the average SENTENCE for murder was 7 years, and he was comparing it to a max 10 year SENTENCE for this crime, as if this crime was getting more time than the average murderer. If you want to compare time actually served, then the MEDIAN 1 year for property crimes must be compared with the MEDIAN 14 years for murder. Whether you compare sentences (average 40.6 years for murder vs MAX 10 years for this), or average time served, either way the OP (and you) are completely wrong.

    16. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      His confession (recording of the act) makes it unlikely prosecutors will make any deal of any kind. All his bargaining power is gone with that confession. They tend to throw the book at people when they have a confession. If he pleads guilty the Judge might have some sympathy, but if he fights it he'll get the full kit.

      The average sentence for rape in the US is about 10 years, the average rapist is released after a little over 5 years. This guy fried some computers, not a particularly nice thing to do but throwing the book at him meaning 10 years in the slammer and 3 years with an ankle brace plus a 250.000 dollar fine seems a bit excessive. Make him pay for the damage he did, lock him up for three years and send him back to India. He fried $58,471 worth of computers, he didn't rape somebody. If he wrote that USB death stick software himself, the CIA might even want to consider making him a job offer.

    17. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Jails are crowded. Investing a jail cell for 10 years for a non-violent crime, when more dangerous people deserve harsh punishment, may not appreal to a prosecutor.

    18. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If he wrote that USB death stick software himself,

      It's hardware. Basically a transformer that steps up the voltage, stores the charge in a capacitor then zaps the USB circuit and thus the motherboard with 200V or so.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    19. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Plus median doesn't mean much - only that 50% serve more than the median and 50% serve less.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    20. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      This guy caused MONETARY DAMAGE, the most heinous of all crimes in America. What the fuck is a rape compared to LESS MONEY? Oh boo hoo someone got touched up a bit. Get over it. This is fucking MONEY we're talking about here.

    21. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Well then deport the guy instead of paying a private company a fuckton of money to keep him.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    22. Re: 10 years in prison is excessive... by BKX · · Score: 1

      The problem with using that ~14 year statistic is that it includes people whose sentence ended by death, and the number of people who died in prison during their terms is not insignificant. That means we can really infer a whole lot about murder sentences from that statistic. If say it's a bit less meaningless than the 40 year average sentence statistic but still it's not that useful. Even then, around 15 years for your average murder makes sense to me. Realize that most of the murders are going to be second-degree, not first. In other words, these are mostly spur-of-the-moment murders and not planned out ahead of time. That is, most of these murderers aren't likely to do it again, so there's no need to lock them up forever. Fifteen years seems about right.

    23. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna guess that counts the guy that got convicted with life without parole and 3 months later killed him self. That probably counts as serving 3 months on a m1 or something stupid like that. you know how statistics lie and shit. I know here in nevada If you murder someone(m1) you're lucky to get to see the light of day within the next 10 years. that's the cool down period for that crime. They lock you in a cell, and to shower, they have a shower box that rolls around and it gets rolled up to your door and locked on. the door opens you shower and then get back in the cell. 10 years of that. providing you don't act like an asshat, they let you go to a max yard after that.

    24. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by thereddaikon · · Score: 1

      People rarely get hit with the maximum penalty though. That max is there to prevent judges with justice priapisms from putting a guy behind bars forever because he didn't pay a parking ticket.

      He plead out and agreed to pay for the damages so he likely wont get the maximum sentence.

    25. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Yes i know that, i was just correcting the GP on the fact that if they give him max he will be doing 8.5 years.

    26. Re: 10 years in prison is excessive... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Why would you even try to bring the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act into this? The computers are probably lab PCs that almost certainly had no data of value (and might have even been re-imaged on a daily/weekly basis). This is just property damage. If there's any abuse involved with the CFAA, though, it's usually in using it as a threat on just about any crime that touches a computer.

    27. Re:10 years in prison is excessive... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Kids and their toys. When I was in high school some local delinquents discovered that they could scuff their feet on a carpet to build up a static charge, touch the keyboard lock and zap the motherboard. No fancy USB killer stick needed. Myself and a few volunteers spent a weekend opening the machines up, identifying which could be saved, and disconnecting the keyboard locks. And the computer room got a humidifier.

    28. Re: 10 years in prison is excessive... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The history of successful prosecutions against guilty people, and the public embarrassment when they fail to convict a dangerous person, both indicate their interest. I'd agree that their efforts are too often misplaced or politically diverted.

  3. Re:There was easier way for him to destroy those P by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    such as installing Windows 10 on them.

  4. Re:But why? by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

    It's self explanatory, he did it because hes stupid.. They didn't need to mention it. We all got it.

  5. Because for a lot of folks, that's the whole point by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a lot of the people doing stuff like this, if they can't brag about the crime, there's no point doing it. It's not really anarchy or revenge that they seek. They're attention whores. They thrive on the publicity and praise/criticism they get. For them, pulling a stunt like this without recording it (and distributing the recording) is like the proverbial tree that falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear. In their minds, it's indistinguishable from the tree never falling / them never having committed the crime.

  6. Re:Fuses by willy_me · · Score: 4, Informative

    A fuse would not protect from this sort of over voltage damage. Fuses are slow and by the time sufficient current is flowing to blow the fuse - the circuitry is already shot. Electronic fuses (MOSFETS with controllers) are much faster and do not need to be replaced. Most devices use current limited load switches to limit surge current and prevent damage. But even these devices, while better then fuses, would not help. ESD protection diodes would help but they are not designed for large amounts of energy and will quickly burn up. With the amount of energy this guy was adding, the diodes will literally pop off the PCB. USB is quite well protected (now, not originally) but all consumer electronics will break when you have hundreds of volts applied. Well, ethernet would at least prevent the damage from cascading into the device - but few interfaces are protected like ethernet.

  7. $58,000? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! He destroyed one Mac!

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:$58,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That kind of Mac would make my penis queef.

  8. Re:There was easier way for him to destroy those P by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    that does not really damage the hardware to the point of junking it.

  9. How much damage could of been done with etherkille by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    How much damage could of been done with etherkiller?

    http://www.fiftythree.org/ethe...

  10. Re:Fuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In my day we understood what a fuse could and couldn't do. I guess if you think the type of fuses you would put on a board can prevent these high voltage dumps we are from very different days.

  11. Re:Fuses by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Informative

    these USB killers do way more than a hundred volts. IIRC it was in the thousands and it usually hits them multiple times before you can yank the usb, cycling about once a second. Though there is no amperage behind it the volts come in so quickly that I doubt even ESD protection could block it. When this was demoed it killed even protected computers because it slams it 3-4 times before the person can react and yank it out of the slot.

  12. Re:Fuses by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Given that USB is typically integrated with the chipset, except on boards that have use for especially large numbers of ports, probably $30 nominal probably isn't far off(that's roughly what Intel says the tray price for a middling platform controller hub is, presumably lower in real volume); but with the significant downside of being a zillion-ball BGA that's nontrivial to rework without appropriate tools and expertise(and those aren't just a soldering iron) and which leaves the computer completely nonfunctional unless replaced since it also handles most of the critical system functions that haven't been moved onto the CPU itself.

    A torched trace or fuse, or a little discrete USB chip, is less of a catastrophy(though most IT operations try to avoid that sort of labor intensive and unpredictable nonstandardization if they can, it has a nasty habit of proving a false economy); but having the PCH zapped makes the motherboard a write-off unless you have suitable replacement parts and BGA rework gear; it doesn't just force you to not use a couple of USB ports.

  13. First time for everything by sjames · · Score: 3, Funny

    For once, an MBA has to actually pay for the damage himself.

  14. $58K!?!?! by Jason+Straight · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, that means 4 Macbooks?

    1. Re:$58K!?!?! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      used ones you mean.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:$58K!?!?! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      w o o o o o o s h!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  15. Didn't get 10 years Unless you want a million laws by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He didn't get 10 years.

    The article, like most, quotes the maximum anyone could ever get for violating a particular statute. Rarely does anyone get the maximum. The judge takes into account exactly what the person did, their record, etc. In most cases, the penalty is actually negotiated with the defendant via their attorney.

    The crime he was charged with would be something like "intentionally destroying property greater than $10,000". That covers taking a baseball bat to your ex-boyfriend's car, destroying the school computers, intentionally driving a bulldozer through someone's house, and lots of other ways of destroying lots of things. The WORST possible cases of "intentionally destroying property valued *over* $10,000" could get 10 years, if the defendant told the judge "fuck you, I'll do it again when I get out".

    You can reduce the judge's descretion by enacting a specific law against "destroying a schools computers" and another law against "destroying your neighbor's car" ans another against "destroying the judge's house", but I think we have enough laws already.

  16. Re: There was easier way for him to destroy those by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Unless you personally use it 24/7 with no breaks, you can schedule that update and reboot for later that night, when you're asleep.

  17. Re:Fuses by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    > Diodes are cheap.

    As is the empty space in a car lock. Filling the ignitio with epoxy makes the car useless. Blowing the USB ports on a school computer makes the keyboard, mouse, printer, or other devices useless.

  18. This isn't a new or original idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many years ago I worked for a technical institute. Got an urgent call "the computers where exploding"

    Some little turd of an individual had switched all the machines off then set the power supplies to 110v (in a 220v country)
    So the next person to turn the machine on got a loud bang and smoke...

    Many machines where destroyed. Many courses had to be cancelled.

    People like this need locked up, forever.

     

    1. Re:This isn't a new or original idea by craighansen · · Score: 1

      Even the above post says "many years ago." 110+220 V power adapters that don't require an explicit switch ARE the norm these days.

  19. US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo clinic by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    US prison has free healthcare fmc Rochester has mayo clinic

  20. Re: There was easier way for him to destroy those by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

    So, I have to leave my computer switched on for the entire night for Microsoft's convenience? Also, I might not want to install that particular update, what now?

    My computer exists only to serve me and obey only me. End of story.

    --
    What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
  21. Re:Fuses by gravewax · · Score: 1

    time to pull the machine apart, test hard drives and any other components connected etc etc. So $100-$200 in parts. $500 in labour and we are now at approximately what they are suggesting. Honestly the value they have calculated looks quite reasonable.

  22. An Indian? Who would have guessed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another non-white parasite, desperate to ruin white countries. Thanks, Jews! I'm sure we'll forgive you!

  23. Re:US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo clin by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    US prison has free healthcare fmc Rochester has mayo clinic

    I can guarantee you it ain't free.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  24. Was anyone ever charged for the Etherkiller? by Shane_Optima · · Score: 2

    I have to admit, I laughed pretty hard the first time I saw the picture of the etherkiller. (Several people have made similar cables, usually much less hacky looking, e.g. with matching colored cables.)

    I always wondered if some poor bastard ever unwittingly plugged in one of these things that some malicious person left lying around and if so, what happened (and if anyone was ever charged.)

    1. Re:Was anyone ever charged for the Etherkiller? by Megane · · Score: 1

      and if anyone was ever charged

      Or even dis-charged.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  25. Dumbass by DrXym · · Score: 1

    It's possible the cops / feds could have secured a conviction based on other evidence, but making video recordings of the criminal act is the sheer height of stupidity. I'd love to know why he was a "former student" but he's clearly not the sharpest tool in the drawer.

  26. Re: US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo cli by Code+Herder · · Score: 1

    Honest question, Iâ(TM)m not american: is this seen as an unexpected good bonus? I honestly assumed they would get free healtcare since they cant go out and see a doctor or pay for it.

  27. Re: Proportional? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Protection against the 'killer' USB devices is a matter of cost.

    Anyone shipping computers that can't handle the 'pretty much any pin could get shorted to any other pin(s)' cases commonly caused by dodgy peripherals or connector and wiring damage is, indeed, doing shamefully shoddy work and deserves all the warranty returns they get(potentially more if the warranty is stingy). Some basic ESD endurance is also pretty much expected in consumer devices: requiring ESD protection measures on stuff that isn't bare components prior to assembly or oddball specialty hardware aimed at trained operators is pretty tacky

    However, the 'killer' widgets deliberately produce output much more hostile than any standard mishap(usually some sort of charge pump to obtain a voltage well above what's usually available and then hammer one or more of the lines with it until the port stops supplying it with enough power to recharge). If you want to resist that it will substantially increase cost and board space, especially for USB 3 that has more data lines to protect and needs to use protective methods that won't interfere with much higher speed signals. 'Industrial' USB isolation boxes can easily run you north of $100/port depending on how picky you are.

  28. Re: There was easier way for him to destroy those by Code+Herder · · Score: 1

    Funny thing, with the hacking laws he mightâ(TM)ve gotten MORE time in jails than simply wrecking the computers. Aaron swartz was going away for 35 years for download some science articles. Think about that, its insanity.

  29. Object lesson by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Tangential to the subject of the article....look at all the consumers of the news who posted "omg 10 years in prison!" whose naivete allowed them to (somewhat) read the article, believe the idea that he's going to get 10 years (not understanding the hyperbole common to news reporting), and be outraged.

    Think of these naive and gullible news consumers next time you read about people being outraged (particularly non Americans commenting on American news) and how easily their feelings are accidentally or deliberately incited.

    --
    -Styopa
  30. Re:Fuses by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

    The IT persons frustration should be factored in. It's not just their time that was wasted, but the fact they were likely pulled off other tasks

    I'm can't quite understand the folks who are defending the perp. I mean, this wasn't a political statement, it wasn't done for any higher purpose, it was done because the guy had zero respect for the people who own and maintain the equipment.

  31. Uh yeah by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Vishwanath Akuthota, the former student

    Well I would certainly hope he's "former."

  32. What's newsworthy by MasseKid · · Score: 2

    I fail to understand why this is newsworthy. Next we will see an article about how you can buy hammers nearly anywhere and they can be used to do massive damage to cars, PCs, laptops, monitors, cell phones with no training at all!

  33. Re:NO NO! you dont know Akhuthota like i do.went t by greylion3 · · Score: 1

    in 10 years he would have Statute of limitations to remove the college damages bill.

    Except he made the news, so anyone searching for his name online can find the news articles.

    I remember some other case mentioned here a few years ago, where two wall street traders, or investors (not sure) were convicted of some type of financial fraud.
    After the statute of limitations, they tried to get Google to delete all mention of them, but Google refused.
    As their crime had also made the news back then, it came down to them essentially being part of history for it.

    --
    Privacy begins with ..
  34. Re:US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo clin by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    $2-3 copay fed
    TX $100/year MAX some situations are free and you get it even if you have no funds.

  35. Re:There was easier way for him to destroy those P by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's a joke, relax Satya.

  36. Re: US prison has free healthcare - YES by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you get free health care.
    Not always good care.
    Last time I was at the eye doctor there was a prisoner in handcuffs and belly chain sitting at the refractometer with a cop standing next to him. Nurse said they get 2-3 a week from the local jail.

    For the large prisons a lot of the medical needs [like glasses] are cared for inside the walls - I knew an internist and a psychiatrist that had offices inside the walls of San Quinton in California.

    There are some cases of people committing crimes in order to get healthcare.

  37. Re:US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo clin by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean for the prisoner. It is probably even getting charged to the prison at a premium price because that bill is just handed over to the taxpayer. It ain't free, at all. It is strange though that prisoners seem to get better basic health care than the general public.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  38. What a dumb ass by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    If found guilty, on top of remuneration to the school they should make him pay back all of the aid given to him in the US and then since he is here on a student visa, kick his dumb ass out of the US.

    Former Indian Student Arrested for Intentionally Causing Damage to Protected Computers Owned by Local College

  39. Re:Fuses by Jfetjunky · · Score: 2

    Straight from the website: "When the device is charged, -200VDC is discharged over the data lines of the host device. This charge/discharge cycle is repeated many times per second, until the USB Killer is removed." So not thousands. And it does have A LOT of amperage behind it. That's why it works. It can surge a large amount of amperage for a very brief time, which can cook any hotspot in a silicon device once it's broken down (which it will do because nobody is putting 200V process silicon parts in high speed USB devices).

    USB protection is designed to prevent against reasonable faults (a device drawing too much power, minor overvoltages, ESD strikes). This is not a reasonable fault. Additionally, it surges the data lines, which are more sensitive. They have to be more sensitive because they are high speed lines that have signal integrity constraints. You can't just start adding protection to them willy nilly without affecting that.

    Their cover story is "The USB Killer is a CE Approved and FCC Approved testing device designed to test the surge protection circuitry of electronics to their limits - and beyond." which we all know is B.S. And It's probably not likely people will start designing their USB hardware to survive this unless people don't quit acting like dicks.

  40. I hope they covered _all_ the damage... by laird · · Score: 1

    I hope they accounted for all the damage that he did. He didn't just destroy some computers that have to be replaced, he's wasting a lot of people's time buying and setting up replacement computers, and may have destroyed work that was stored on the computers. And anybody that does something so randomly destructive needs to be punished in order to discourage future random destruction by others.

  41. It's just stuff, it's not like he hit anybody by edris90 · · Score: 1

    All world we live in , where raking some stuff is reacted to more seriously then physically assaulting a person. The world's full of stuff. Stuff comes and goes. Not a big deal.

  42. Re:66 USB Chips by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    ... unless the USB controllers are integrated into the rest of the communications bus controllers (do they still call them "Northbridge" and "Soutbridge"?) to reduce the chip count. Which is very common on barebones boxes for distribution to public computing areas.

    I wonder if the shifters of such boxes have considered the marketing benefits of a separate, grounded, USB board for the external sockets. Fry that and it's a 10$ fix, not a dead 250$ box - neglecting technician time.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  43. Proper restitution by gosand · · Score: 1

    Honestly, prison seems excessive for most any property crime. Restitution with penalties and interest, an ankle monitor, and a few years of weekends picking up trash seems good. Throw in a jumpsuit that says I'm the jackass that burned out the computers fr fun. If he doesn't seem genuinely repentant, make him wear donkey ears while he picks up the trash.

    Restitution should be having to pay for the replacement systems and personally rebuilding and configuring each one of them.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Proper restitution by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Restitution should be having to pay for the replacement systems and personally rebuilding and configuring each one of them.

      Right.. That's the guy I want building my computers...... I hope you aren't serious..

  44. I still plan to get one of those.... by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    To use in training sessions at clients as to the danger of "found" USB keys. I figure bringing in a "trash" obsolete PC that needs to go to recycling anyway and frying it in front of a group of office staff may make an impression, particularly if I manage a model that smokes nicely.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  45. Re:Not reflective of our educational system at all by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if he was actually smart, he would have been smart enough to know recording his self was the stupidest thing he could have possible done. Just saying..

  46. Re:66 USB Chips by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    $10 price difference is enough to sway a cost sensitive purchasing agent to buy a different brand. And the repair time or service call are much more expensive, taking the system offline for as much as a few weeks while the machines get pulled out of service, shipped to the vendor or an on-site tech visits, and the hosts repaired and tested.

  47. Re:US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo clin by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    $2-3 copay fed TX $100/year MAX some situations are free and you get it even if you have no funds.

    Liberal? You do understand the previous poster was trying to point out the fact that someone is paying for it, right? Nothing is free, someone has to pay, in the end...

  48. Re: US prison has free healthcare fmc roc mayo cli by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Honest question, Iâ(TM)m not american: is this seen as an unexpected good bonus? I honestly assumed they would get free healtcare since they cant go out and see a doctor or pay for it.

    If you want to be honest, please call it Taxpayer funded healthcare. "Free" is a lie..

  49. Sentence of UP TO 10 years by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    While I am sure you're right, and he certainly deserves some sort of punishment, does up to 10 years in prison (with up to three years of supervision after release) and a fine totaling up to $250,000 sound like proportional punishment to you?...

    Honestly, prison seems excessive for most any property crime.

    You did read that the penalty is "up to" ten years in prison. News stories always mention the maximum sentence for a crime, but first-time offenders with no aggravating factors never get sentenced to the maximum, and defendants that cooperate (by pleading guilty) always get a reduced sentence.

    My bet is that he gets sentenced to time served and a fine... and deportation.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  50. Re:Both good and bad [Re: Why Record Videos...] by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    My point was just to dispute the "Indians get a free rid to college whereas U.S. folks have to pay for it" complaint. Side note: if the person you were working with who didn't know her ass from a hole in the ground was hired by your company, then you're company is at least as bad at interviewing as she was at coding. :)

  51. Re:Both good and bad [Re: Why Record Videos...] by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    you're = your