Slashdot Mirror


Myth II and Railroad Tycoon II For Linux

pridkett writes "Loki Games, the same people who brought us Civ:CTP for Linux have just announced that they will be porting Myth II and Railroad Tycoon II to Linux. " This just came across my inbox as well-I've played both games on WinX before-let's hope they do as good a job of porting this, as they did with Civ:CTP.

75 comments

  1. Re:CIV: CTP sales results? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does your web page say CTF is out of stock? Is that because you ran out or you still haven't get the game boxes yet?

  2. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like you, I am shocked also...*every single game* they have released up to now has been a strategy game! ;-)

  3. Re:where 2 buy in '.au'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out my site at Civ:CTP Linux news page and read the news section for the 17th of may. It has information on Australia if thats what your looking for :) NaTaS

  4. Yeah I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me Baldur's gate and I promise to nuke windows on my PC!

  5. Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, can we have fewer strategy games and more of other types too? Like..ULTIMA IX: Ascention? Please? Pretty please? What I wouldn't give to hear the Guardian's voice booming from my Linux box at 3am...

    Now THAT'S a title I'd pay real money for under Linux...strategy games aren't that interesting to me...

  6. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe me, we are looking at some top action titles. We just can't reveal any deals yet. :)

  7. Re:Architectures other than Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are currently working on PPC and Alpha.
    The PPC version is encouragingly close.
    gdb is having problems with stack traceback on Alpha, and there still seem to be some kernel stability problems with sound (Linux 2.2.8) -- O Gurus? But it's coming along too. :-)

  8. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I talked to the Tribes folks at E3 (really nice folks, BTW. :) and they said they wanted to do a Linux server, and were considering a Linux client. Now this is pure uncut rumor, so please don't go bombarding their mailboxes, but they get the thumbs up from me... :)

    -Sam

  9. RTII RTII RTII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All my birthdays come at once! Voodoo Banshee support, and now RTII. Finally, the killer app which was preserving my Windows partition will be no more.

    RTII will be the first game I will have paid for twice.

  10. Great, now if they only Had StarCraft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would *love* to see StarCraft ported to Linux... It would be nice too if nVidia actually supported my TNT card.

  11. Consider me sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I played around with the Railroad Tycoon II demo on Windows and found it to be every bit as entertaining as the original, and then some (much like SimCity 3000 is a welcome refresh of the original SimCity). It's a good thing I never got around to buying it, because now I'll definitely pick up the Linux version when it's available. (Actually I might have bought it anyway even if I already owned the Windows version!)

    Here's to seeing more games ported to Linux! (Now if only I could get Mesa working properly with my Voodoo3!)

  12. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myth2 uses D3D so I wouldn't rule out BZ just because of that

  13. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The upside for us, aside from getting to play without Win95/98/NT, is that by only buying the cream of the crop, we get only the best stuff. Saves a lot of time in choosing a new distraction, I would think."

    This has been the Mac users arguement for years! I hope the trend continues into the future.

  14. Re: It happens anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, this could be a bit of a problem. But take a look at Diablo: Blizzard didn't include cheats in single or multiplayer version, so to get them, people are patching the binaries. Last I checked, you were able to modify your own character however you wanted, control other characters, mess around in their inventories, force them to teleport, et. al. If anything, we might see a decrease in it with open source games, because people won't get the "look at me, I'm a h4x0r, i'm kool!!!!11" thrill from being able to run a little program that other people don't have.

  15. What's involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From a purely intrest point of view as I doubt my programming is up to it, Can anyone tell me whats involved in porting a game?

    I presume it would be quite different from porting traditional software as you'd have more of a performance issue with graphics/sound etc?

    ----
    Doze - Sorry forgot password!

  16. RT-II vs RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I've played both at length. Here's my impression of the differences:
    1. RT2 is awesomely pretty.
    2. You no longer have to worry about signalling. All tracks are treated as if they have regular passing loops, so one train stops as the other goes by. Double track allows two moving trains. I was disappointed by this at first, but the scenarios are so big that it is both good and necessary.
    3. The opponents now run real trains, instead of using a formula.
    4. I think there is no longer a cost penalty to changing cars at each station (but I still use fixed configs out of habit).
    5. There are no more rate wars. You can build a station in a town which already has one, and the traffic gets shared between the railroads. So you can still drive down opponents revenues by running a frequent loss making service to their stations, but there are no longer any special rules - it is a natural part of the game mechanic.
    6. The maps are huge and based on real topo data. For example, there is a US transcontinental scenario, and you usually end up building a route fairly similar to one of the real ones, becuase the terrain demands it. On some of the European scanarios you can spend ages surveying the best route through mountains - great fun.
    7. The scenarios contain much more variety of special conditions and events. For example there is one scenario where all the track is built and you have to run one train to as many stations as possible in a fixed time. (I got a gold with 2 stations to spare - eventually)
    I was feeling a bit alientated that I seem to be the only person in the world who loves RT2 and Lemmings 3D. Its nice to know that at least one of my passions is normal.
  17. Website dedicated to loki's games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    hey guys as you probally already know there is a webpage at http://natas.kfa.cx/~civ that is dedicated to Civ:CTP for Linux. I run this website and next week should be opening http://natas.kfa.cx/~loki which will be dedicated to all the games that Lokisoft is porting. Right now I have decided to make a page for each game and have a news section, Faq, message-board ect. Now I am looking for people to help me out with these sites. I myself will take care of the main page http://natas.kfa.cx/~loki but I need people to help make and maintain the pages for each game. So if anyone out there wants to help me out email me at natas@natas.kfa.cx saying you wanna help!
    Thanks,
    NaTaS

  18. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Not likely since they way the convince game companies to allow to port is through residual profits. These companies can get a little extra profit at low risk from selling to people who wouldn't buy their Windows version. Thus is the binaries are free for people who already have the Windows version then they don't get any gain out of it.

  19. ah, nuts... by smartax · · Score: 1

    Ah, nuts... they got mangled.
    Que sera sera...

  20. Re:CIV: CTP sales results? by smartax · · Score: 1

    Now it says "In Stock"... I forgot to enter that into our database.

    Sorry for any confusion.

    -Ben

  21. Plug plug plug! by smartax · · Score: 2

    I've just discussed it with my cohorts, and we at handeye.com plan to sell these games on our web site, just like we're selling Civ:CTP now.

    By the way, if you're one of our Civ:CTP customers, sit tight, because your game is on the way. I finished Perl-ifying our shipping process a few hours ago, and conveniently the boxes should be arriving today (5/18) from Loki. We'll slap labels on 'em and shoot 'em out the door as soon as we can see cardboard.

    Excuse me if this announcement is a little premature, but we're like really excited, primarily because we're such Linux nerds. So bear with us. (And go to our web site.)

    -Ben
  22. Re:CIV: CTP sales results? by smartax · · Score: 4

    /me crunches some numbers...

    We ( handeye.com) are one of the sites that sells this game. Our sales have thus far been pretty healthy, considering that everything up 'til now has been a pre-order. We have around 1000 copies of Civ:CTP, about 20% of which were pre-ordered. As of today, when we actually receive the boxes from Loki (and ship out the games), we expect our sales to perk up a little.

    News like this (the porting of these two games) makes me very happy, as a long-time Linux enthusiast and occasional gamer. It's great to see that there's a market for Linux games and a growing market for commercial Linux software in general. (What else is new, though, right?)

    <kiss target="ass">
    I'd like to thank quite a few of you (you know who you are) for making us a well-trafficked web site. We've gotten about 400,000 hits since our public launch in late April/early May, and people have been sending positive feedback. We especially get warm feelings when people tell us we're giving back to the Linux community. Anyway, I'll keep churning out the Perl as long as you folks are interested in buying games.
    </kiss>

    -Ben (who hopes his lt's and gt's don't get mangled when he submits this)
  23. Nooooooo! by Pasc · · Score: 1
    RRT2 for Linux!?

    Now I will never get any work done!

  24. Re:Eight titles in 1999 by Yarn · · Score: 1

    Team Fortress 2: Server, probably, client Very unlikely, Valve have already refused to do a linux client for halflife.

    Tiberium Sun (of course): possible, strategy is easier to port

    Battlezone 2: i doubt it, they used d3d for BZ 1, afaik they've not switched. This makes it hard to port.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  25. Told ya so... by whoop · · Score: 1

    See this for my prediction on Railroad Tycoon 2, almost two weeks ago.

    Anyway, I wonder if it's purely coincidence that my application for the beta of CTP included suggestions to port these two (along with HalfLife/TF2, I'm keeping my fingers crossed).

    The first step in legitimizing Linux apps is the porting of these popular games. Once they see how many thousands are bought up, the issue of "not enough users" can be put to rest. Hell, I'll even buy the solitaire game just to support Loki.

  26. Eight titles in 1999 by whoop · · Score: 1

    So remember, there's still time to speculate on the other four...

    My wishlist:
    Team Fortress 2
    Tiberium Sun (of course)
    Battlezone 2 (if it gets released this year, though I doubt it)

    That's about it for current games .. RT2/Myth2 would have been up there.

    1. Re:Eight titles in 1999 by whoop · · Score: 1

      Isn't OpenGL easier to port? I don't recall if BattleZone had it, but it is possible they'd support it now, with enough encouragement...

    2. Re:Eight titles in 1999 by Praxxus · · Score: 1

      Eric's Ultimate Solitaire. That's one of them. Yay! Another solitaire game for Linux! Now if we just could get a commercial Minesweeper clone... *snort snort snort*

      --

      --
      Okay, I got Linux installed. So where's the free beer everyone keeps talking about??
  27. Re:Rock On!!! by whoop · · Score: 1

    It is a worthy successor to the original. The original had some complaints from me, but expansion pack takes care of most of them. I have had some random crashes with the pack, but autosaving make it tolerable...

  28. Re:Transport Tycoon!!! by whoop · · Score: 1

    I know Transport Tycoon did work at one time under dosemu. I had a whole lotta fun back then. Of course that was long before they even thought of putting sound in dosemu, and I loved it.

    My only requirement for many of these games is that they at least have an option to run windowed, not full screen. That makes them so much easier to hide when the boss comes up to my desk...

  29. Rock On!!! by Micah · · Score: 1

    Railroad Tycoon was one of my favorite games ever. I haven't played RT2. How does it compare to the original?

    I'm also busy hacking on an airline simulator that I'm hoping will be sort of in the spirit of RT. It won't be a polished game for a LONG time (unless lots of people want to help me. :-) ) but hopefully it will be playable and fun. http://cvs.seul.org/~yoderm/ will get my preliminary hackings.

  30. Hasbro Interactive's RISK by Micah · · Score: 1

    I'd *love* to see that one.

    Of course, if someone would improve the AI in XFrisk it wouldn't be necessary. I have a good idea for AI but don't have time to even think about implementing it.

  31. Transport Tycoon!!! by Skip · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed Transport Tycoon a whole lot more 'cos it had planes and ships and trucks and stuff!!!

    Is RRT2 gonna be limited to just trains or will we get all the other vechiles???

    Skip
    --------------------
    flifson@csdotuctdotacdotza

    --
    Skip
    --------------------
    "To create an apple pie from scratch,
    you first must create the universe."
  32. This is a good thing :) by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Tempt:

    More commercial software is always a good thing with Linux. I don't subscribe to the RMS view of "ooh, it should -all- be free.", because it would take a hell of a lot of opensource effort to do a polished game - the artwork etc needs a great deal of effort and coordination.

    I haven't looked at CivCTP for linux yet, but the bugs in the Windoze version were horrible (my flatmate gave up in disgust and returned the game), so hopefully those problems will have vanished (they seemed to be copy-protection related).

    Anyway, much joy and happiness to the world - things can only get better.

    1. Re:This is a good thing :) by Jonas+�berg · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of artists, copywriters and whatnots out there that wants to help the open source community. If you wanted to, I'm sure you could raise support for a game in the community. However, you'd probably have to do around 50% yourself before enough people began improving upon it, so thats why most such projects doesn't succeed.

  33. Uhh... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by OGL:

    I for one am really dissapointed. Why more strategy titles? Wasn't Civ enough? I'd really prefer an action game for a change of pace (besides quake3 of course). Myth looks pretty fun, but it's been out for ages on my friend's Mac, so who really cares...and Railroad Tycoon? Couldn't they have switched gears and done a differenet type of game hsving completed Civ: CTP? I'm just puzzled as to why they would keep selecting games from the same genre over and over.

    -W.W.

    1. Re:Uhh... by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd expect strategy to a bigger seller as compared to action on Linux. Kids are the target audience for action games, and while they are a few high schoolers and younger kids using Linux, I'd expect most people discover Linux in college after using UNIX workstations.

      Besides "action game" these days practically means "Quaking Wolfenstein Marathon of Doom" games and there's plenty of those repetitive shoot-em-ups on Linux already.

    2. Re:Uhh... by toriver · · Score: 1

      Which "they" are you talking about? The "they" in this case _do_ produce strategy games, if you want action games, try getting a company that _make_ action games to port their games. Or do you want game producers to sit and say "Oops, there are too many Linux games in that category already, we'll skip our port of our game to Linux until other genres are more represented..."?

    3. Re:Uhh... by BJH · · Score: 1


      "Over and over and over"? They've released ONE (count it, ONE) game, announced three new games, one of which happens to be very vaguely similar to the first, and you're already bitching about having too many games of the same genre?

      Jeez, you just can't please some people...

  34. Re:One less reason to boot up under MacOS! by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by mizzer:

    Isnt Loki making a LinuxPPC version of Civ before the Macos version come out? If so, I bet they will be making PPC versions. And did you notice "ERIC'S ULTIMATE SOLITAIRE" will be ported! Myth2, Quake1, and Erics! Those are like the only 3 games I play on my mac. DROOL DROOL, now when R5 comes out I shall be even happier.

  35. Re:Linux for games? Don't hold your breath by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    P1)

    What games push your hardware to it's fullest potential rather than just mebbe pushing it a little bit here and there? Furthermore, while one contemporary 1st tier 3D sound or 3D graphics chipset is certainly less than optimal, it is also sufficient.

    P2)

    The Game Library that powers CivCTP (SDL) and Hopkins_FBI runs under BeOS,MacOS and Win32 as well for the 'dont' wanna read the manual sets.

    P3)

    The fractured Unix GUI doesn't mean a DAMN thing for game developers. They implement their own gui's to begin with. If anything, PC games more reflect the 'user interface chaos' inherent in the Unix Desktops.

    P4)

    Actually, CivCTP runs reasonably well on my ancient hardware. Even Win32 only houses don't target the highest spec machines available. They want to make as much money as they can and more systems that can run their games represent more potential unit sales for them.

    People play far more than just Quake variants.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  36. Maybe... by Niomosy · · Score: 1

    Seeing RRT gives me hope for Roller Coaster Tycoon! That would be awesome!

    Still want Civ II though. CTP is nice but it's just not quite Civ II MPE (I suppose TOT would be okay but the interface wasn't all that friendly when I was playing it at E3)

    -Matt

  37. One less reason to boot up under MacOS! by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    I'm really looking forward to the Linux releases of these games! Now I have even less of a reason to ever leave LinuxPPC. :)

    I'm hoping that the LinuxPPC binaries will be no more than a simple recompile?

  38. freeBSD? by Kevin · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried CTP linux version of FreeBSD yet? if so, how did it work?

    --
    -- Viva FreeBSD --
    1. Re:freeBSD? by bahwi · · Score: 1

      It worked pretty good for me. The sounds isn't perfect, if you really want that get OSS(which is on my list of to-get items).

  39. Games On Linux by Hrunting · · Score: 4

    More important than the fact that games are being released for Linux is the fact that gaming subsystems are being developed for Linux. Carmack's recent investment in the Mesa project and the release of games like the Q3Test show that there's an interest in taking advantage of some of Linux's possibilities. I don't know how well it's going to work out as right now, Linux really doesn't have the strongest of foundations for gaming, but the beginning holes are there as more and more processors and video chips are being supporting (the OSS drivers were a big step forward). Unfortunately for me, one of the biggest reasons that I run Linux is also one of the biggest reasons that I don't play games on it: my computer's simply too old.

    I look forward to seeing how the market responds to this. I hope companies actually start developing Linux binaries that they can include on the shipping CDs so we don't have to wait for some other company to port them. id has already shown that the process can be relatively simply. Not that I want to see Loki Games disappear, but I hope we won't have to depend on just them for Linux versions of our favorite Windows games.

    1. Re:Games On Linux by Gary+Franczyk · · Score: 1

      Shipping binaries for both systems on a single disk would be terrific. But I think they are testing the waters right now to see if there is demand for the software... That way they arent wasting resources trying to get a linux port onto the same disk when nobody is going to use it.

    2. Re:Games On Linux by Le+douanier · · Score: 1


      Even if more companies where porting their games to Linux themselves I don't think that it will cause Lokei to disappear. Like they said in an interview their is enough good games to port on Linux to allow many players in this game. And even if every great game was ported under Linux by the original developper they still could do their own games, which is harder and require more money I agree but they probably have now more experience to port game under Linux than any other big software company save Id and that can help.

      Even if I don't have a Linux box around me I want to thanks Loki to help us which are both Linux fans and gamers to have more great games on Linux (but srill not enough :().

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  40. good point, cause i'm about to get for win32box! by goon · · Score: 1

    i'd be interested to hear about this, 'cause yr right about the data. can anyone who has civ port enlighten us about this? thinks...might have to do some research! wonder how it would play on win32 box using l*nux box as server and using vnc?

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  41. where 2 buy in '.au'? by goon · · Score: 1

    can anyone give a company/url to get these gms in 'aus'?

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    1. Re:where 2 buy in '.au'? by goon · · Score: 1

      many thx...i just got my order of 2xtux's for the young bloke, from the very same company a couple of days ago.

      here's the site, http://everythinglinux.com.au for those interested.

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  42. doh!, previous purchases =! upgrade by goon · · Score: 3

    Loki and Activision sell their respective versions of Civilization: Call to Power independently of the other. In addition, we pay royalties to Activision based on sales of the Linux version. We currently have no plans to provide a Linux 'upgrade' for purchasers of the Windows version, but will announce an upgrade policy on this website should that change.

    guess i'll have to wait...but i still want the box damn it! heres the link to the faq if yr interested.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  43. OMYGOD! by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 0

    Looks like I will be buying my first game for years!

    I loved Railroad Tycoon!

    Ken Broadfoot

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
  44. Answer: Demographics by Sleepy · · Score: 2

    It isn't fair to label, sure, and I am using broad generalizations about the community here (shields up!) but I would guess these games are "more portable to Linux" for the following reasons:

    1)most of us grew up on early "classics", running on Amiga's, Atari's, Mac or god forbit, a CGA-equipped IBM PC [erk!].

    2)Since we started out on those "alternative" platforms, we were also the most likely group to switch to Linux... and here we are...

    3)As a group it could be argued we prefer strategy games over other types.. these are the only games we had (like freeciv, nettrek etc.) when we switched to Linux/Unix. It could also be argued a higher percentage of us at one time played D&D/AD&D even though most of the population never has.

    5) A large percentage of us also have played MAME or MESS-based games. MAME made it a lot easier to mostly convert my PC to Linux, so I could do something useful with the system. :)

    When I finally switched from Atari ST to a PC clone, the only game worth playing on it was Civ... at least until DOOM came along!

    If these games are successful, I would like to see them include "original" versions, like Railroad I (cheezy CGA graphics and all). Sure, MESS or DOSemu might run the original if you can locate an old pirated copy, but I'd rather buy it as part of a "remake" which includes the original.

    Commercial games have their own appeal, but does anyone besides me doubt a commercial company has the creativity and resources to match a driven open-source movement like the MAME project, which now has OpenGL support and soon "netplay"? Williams and Activision simply rereleased their old "classics" without [optional] enhancements. :-/

    I already own Myth II on a hybrid Mac/PC disk, running it on both computers. Unless there's some kind of trade-up I won't buy the Linux version..

  45. I can't see how games can be Free ... by cthonious · · Score: 1

    or rather "open source" ... would't it be easy to modify the code and recompile, so that you could cheat?

    --

    support gun control: take guns from cops
    1. Re:I can't see how games can be Free ... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      .. would't it be easy to modify the code and recompile, so that you could cheat?

      You mean like, as oppoesd to the dozens (hundreds?) of cheats published in game rags every month?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  46. I was referring to multi-player cheating... by cthonious · · Score: 1

    Most games are multi-player now. I'm not talking about the built in ones, which are ususally disabled when you are playing a network game.

    --

    support gun control: take guns from cops
  47. Cool! by Pondo · · Score: 1

    I will definitely buy Tycoon. I used to play Tycoon I for hours on my old CGA 286. I thought it was the best thing since sliced bread.

    I can't express how cool it is that we're getting all of the good games ported to Linux now. I plan to buy CTP, as well. I've never played it, and it may just sit on my shelf looking pretty, but I wouldn't care. These games companies need to see a great response from the Linux community, so they port the rest of the cool games over.

    I think the best thing we can do as a whole would be to go ahead and buy these pieces of software, thereby voting with our pocketbooks. The upside for us, aside from getting to play without Win95/98/NT, is that by only buying the cream of the crop, we get only the best stuff. Saves a lot of time in choosing a new distraction, I would think.

    I should really be studying for my Ethics final. Has anyone ever cheated on an Ethics exam? I almost want to, just for the irony of it all.

  48. CIV: CTP sales results? by Gary+Franczyk · · Score: 2

    Has anyone seen any sales results for CIV Call to Power yet? I'd like to know how well it is selling. I noticed that it is out of stock everywhere I have seen it for sale on the web. More games is going to make it A LOT easier to convert others to linux and make booting to Windows completely unnessessary for some!

  49. YES!!!!! but... by Plasmoid · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good but we need Alpah Centauri for Linux. If only AC was ported no less than 5% of computers running windows would switch to Linux :)

    But for Linux to become a viable (read more than 10 games) gaming platform we need Linux only games. I mean more than xbill.

    While Tux: search for hearing is great and all(must buy Voodoo2...), we need a major/commercial release.

    --
    You don't exist. Go away. --SysVinit Halt
  50. excellent by Aussie · · Score: 0

    More games, hurrah.

    This is gonna make it easier to convince friends to try Linux.

  51. Why not ship a linux distro too? by HomerJ · · Score: 2

    Would be interesting to see if Loki or Id would ship a linux distro with their linux based games.

    Would get more people into trying linux. People would see Quake 3 or RC2 for linux and think "woah, that's neat, too bad I don't have linux..wait what's this? comes with redHat 6.0? I think I'll try this"

    Of course, you can replace RedHat 6.0 with any other distro, just that that's the one that would probably ship with a game.

  52. At last... by BJH · · Score: 1


    Well, I know I'm gonna be buying MythII for sure, even if it's just to give me a game other than QuakeII to play on my VoodooII card.

    My, that was a lot of II's, wasn't it?

  53. Architectures other than Intel? by BJH · · Score: 1


    I just hope that Loki sees the light and includes binaries for all major Linux architectures on the CD. I wouldn't mind playing Tycoon on my Alpha...

  54. Myth II rocks by PMcGovern · · Score: 2

    This is great news. Myth is one of the most innovative and enjoyable games out today. It's a cross between Chess and Quake. Incredibly Bloody with great strategy. Who could ask for more? I still keep my Mac around so I can play...but it looks like now I'm going 100% Linux. Yipee!

  55. Re:No lie, M2 is the greatest game since Quake by SalsaDoom · · Score: 0

    I donno, but I played Myth 1, and it was damn fun. If Myth II is half is good (and it sounds better), well heh.

    Man, if they keep these linux games rolling out, i'm going to be a very poor man =) Heh oooh well =)

    --
    "Computers will never truly be free until the last windows user is strangled with the entrails of the last mac user."
  56. I wonder... by Cowards+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    ...if they'll provide binaries for those of us who already have the games on That Other Platform.

    I already own the data, all I need are nice new Linux binaries.

  57. Linux for games? Don't hold your breath by bcaulf · · Score: 1
    I don't think we are likely to see a large scale move toward commercial games on any Unix including Linux. Here's why:
    • The platform with the most cutting-edge hardware is the most prominent gaming platform. Linux is nowhere near Windows on support for the most current graphics, sound and controller hardware. There is no comparison.
    • The growth areas in gaming are focused on people who bought their first computer recently and are not into reading manuals. I'm talking Deer Hunter and Myst territory. These are just the people who are never going to consider Linux.
    • The fractured nature of the Unix GUI scene does not help game designers who want as tightly defined a target platform as possible. A console is their dream, with Windows exhibiting way too much hardware diversity. Unix is worse--diverse software as well as hardware.
    • Linux's key strengths are wasted on games. No one wants to run new games on ancient hardware, or over networked X, or multiuser. Commercial games are not going to be GPL'd (at least not right away). And no one cares about uptime for gaming. But the windows strengths--consistent development platform, bleeding edge hardware support, market share, easy OS installs/upgrades--are exactly what game developers need.
  58. Lets not be selfish now by rakshasa · · Score: 1

    Linux Only games are ok, but lets not be selfish. Linux is a great operating system and it rocks when we get good games (especially MythII!) for it, but the majority of players out there are on windows and mac. (I play all my games on my mac) Anyway, more platforms = more people to play with, always a good thing, especially for MythII, which I believe is the most fun, while still mentally challenging multiplayer game of all time.
    What linux needs is some games released at the SAME time as other platforms, and some games reading "System requirements:" with a Linux, right beside Windows 98 and Macintosh. Now wouldnt that be beautiful?
    oh, and btw, does anyone know if this port of MythII will include multiplayer over bungie.net?

    Rakshasa

  59. woo yay by ill · · Score: 1

    Game support for linux is good, at least another part of the software developing world can be working on our side. Afterall, look at what happened with q3, everyone was hurrying to get redhat(gag) on their computers.

    1. Re:woo yay by j+c+s · · Score: 0

      Yes, but I believe Donkey Kong was the best game ever.

  60. No lie, M2 is the greatest game since Quake by Inhume · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I couldn't agree more. Aside from the immortal Quake (NOT the festering pile that was Quake II, mind you), Myth II has to be the best multiplayer game around, at least for me. Quake, Myth II, and now q3test are really the only PC games I play with great frequency, so this could hardly be better for me. Now I'll have to think long and hard about wiping out my NT 4 drive and going to an all-Linux box.

    Oh wait, DAMN nVidia won't help by bestowing an OpenGL ICD on me for my Viper V550, so I guess I'm pretty much looked into keeping Windows around, at least for a while. Sigh.

    PS> Anyone know if I'm gonna be expected to shell out for this? I already bought my Win/Mac copy of MII back in January, I don't want to have to buy a second one :-(

  61. More games for Linux, eh? by Kit+Lo · · Score: 1

    I would love to see Starsiege: Tribes 2 for Linux. The original Tribes was made with the 3dfx-only Glide API, so porting that will be a pain in the butt, but Tribes 2 is going to be made using OpenGL for the 3D graphics stuff, and it's going to be released for the Windows and Mac platforms anyways.

  62. Games are Great by MasterAlex · · Score: 1

    Yes, Im not a gaming freak (I dont have time for gaming much...) but its right, if you can get many games for Linux, Linux WILL succeed against Microsoft. Yesteraday I downloaded the Quake3 Test for Linux, and I told some friends. Today they all wanted to install Linux ;) And the biggest problem is, that many people WILL change to Linux, but they also want to play some nice games, and at the moment the only really great game they can play is Quake2... Im sure I WILL buy Civilication:CTP just because its the first commercial game which is released for Linux in a box.

  63. really? by Atrophis · · Score: 1

    These people really kick a$$, wish everyone would do this kind of stuff.

    Hey, i know, how about port tribes =)

    --

    i cant seem to come up with a sig.