Slashdot Mirror


Review:Austin Powers, The Spy Who Shagged Me

When I saw the original Austin Powers, I was unimpressed. It was funny- better than recent Mike Meyers fare (Axe Murderer and WW2 were each mediocre IMHO) but it certainly wasn't setting the world on fire. With word of the sequel coming out, I watched the tape again. And again. And again. It grew on me a lot. And so I was quite excited when I went to the theater (Holland has 2 theaters: wouldn't ya know it, Austin Powers was shown in the crappy one) to see it, I went in open minded, and enjoyed the ride. Click below to read my take on it. Ok, here's the Plot Summary: Austin (Meyers) goes back to the 60s in a psychedelic VW to chase Dr. Evil (Meyers) who's evil henchman Fat Bastard (Meyers) stole Austin's "Mojo". Dr. Evil has a death ray, and the best charachters from the original (SCOTT! The Frau, Number 2, and even Mr. Bigglesworth, although in limited form) are back.

As with the original, the bad guys steal the show. Every time Dr. Evil's gang of baddies meets up in his hollowed out volcano fortress, get ready to laugh. Scott's charachter is expanded, and given a rival in the form of "Mini-Me", Dr. Evil's clone... 1/8th the size (complete with his own miniature kitty).

Austin is once again the least interesting of the charachters. He repeats many of the original jokes, and throws in a few new zingers that will get ya good. Dr. Evil is a little softer this time around, but still drop dead funny. Mini-Me is absolute genius. Truly offensive, and a total a riot. Almost every gag involving him got a huge laugh from the sold out theater I was in, and usually I was part of it.

And then there is the matter of Heather Graham- ah yes Heather, let me sing your praises. As Felicity Shagwell she performs quite well. With tight outfits and dirty innuendo absolutely perfect for Austin's counterpoint, she scores many points, and usually is the best part of any of the Austin Power scenes. She won't win an acadamy award, but she'll get your Mojo going, and squeeze a lot of laughs out of you.

So anyway, the summary: this is probably the second most hyped film of the season, but its worth the hype. Its not going to change the world, cause world peace, feed the homeless, or preach to you about anything. It will make numerous random low brow jokes about short people, fat people, poop, farting, sex, lesbianism, and involves lots of disobediant children. If you enjoy watching the bad guys sing commercials, and build fortresses with names like "Moon Unit Alpha" and "Moon Unit Zappa", well If thats your bag, you'll enjoy this film baby. If its not, go watch something else and save the bucks.

Austin Powers was better the second time around tho. I'm curious what this one will do for me if I see it again. But this movie is definitely gonna make a lot of money this summer. And it deserves it more than that other summer blockbuster does.

190 comments

  1. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The rocket sighting sequence will go down history as one of the funniest moments in film--on par with the mini Stonehenge descending on the stage in Spinal Tap.

    Word is 40% of the film was improvised, and it shows. I for one like the improvisation.

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon they forget MASH...

    2. Re:Funny by jpatters · · Score: 1

      Someone else mentioned M*A*S*H...

      Also,

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer
      Stargate SG1
      Highlander
      La Femme Nakita (haven't watched this one, but have heard it is good)

      You are welcome to think that any of those are terrible. Except M*A*S*H. Don't be dissin' M*A*S*H.

      --
      "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    3. Re:Funny by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      Don't say that! :)

      I cannot think of a movie turned into an episode-based series that has worked. Ever. They're all terrible. Same goes for cartoons of the movie. The Fugitive worked in the other direction. Some people would say Lost in Space and others have qworked in the other direction. But that's it. Just imagine the formula they would write to in a series... So repetative, such a stain on the memory of the movies...

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    4. Re:Funny by noom · · Score: 1


      I thought the improvisation was good, but it tended to make the film seem more like sketch comedy (SNL style) with a tenuous thread of plot woven through it. The fact that plot really isn't necessary to make this film enjoyable makes me think that it would probably do well as a 30/60min TV series.

  2. Holland onyl has 2 theaters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the population of holland... i would have thought any town over 100,000 would have more than a couple of cinemas.

    1. Re:Holland onyl has 2 theaters? by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      I think it's Holland, MI.

    2. Re:Holland onyl has 2 theaters? by Mr.+Me · · Score: 1

      From Holland.org

      Population (1990 census):
      City of Holland - 30,375
      Metropolitan Holland area - 73,000

      Holland actually has 3 theaters, but the Knickerbocker generally only shows foreign/art/independent films.


      --
      --
      There is a fine line between stupidity and insanity. I should know, I'm standing on it.
  3. It's a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this last night as well and thought it was great. The one thing that bothered me most about it though was the grotesque amounts of strategic product placement. In this movie it got to the point of singing (multiple) corporate jingles and/or slogans. It always annoys me when you can tell the camera-angle shifts so you can see the logo dead-center. I guess hollywood will do anything to make a buck.

    1. Re:It's a... by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

      Ummmmmm DUH

      Didn't you see the product placement scenes in Waynes World? It's part of the gag. At least Mike Myers makes them funny! Damm you are sooooooo uptight!

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
  4. Distraught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was very dissapointed. I liked the original, but this one was pretty bad. What anoys me most is the how this movie gets good reviews, while TPM gets trashed by reviews. I do not understand.

    1. Re:Distraught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TPM may have been dissapointing, but it was MUCH better than this movie was.

    2. Re:Distraught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, everyone expected THE WORLD of TPM, and one movie can only do so much. I think the reviewers decided beforehand that they were going to trash TPM. A lot of the reviews I've read seem very clich\'e. Meanwhile, nobody expects a whole lot from Austin Powers.....

    3. Re:Distraught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better, maybe. But austin powers was successful in that it did what it set out to do - be a coarse movie with a lot of sex jokes. TPM, in the tradition of ESB and ANH, was nothing even close. On it's own, as a regular sci-fi flick it was great. It had a lot to live up to, and it didn't make it.

    4. Re:Distraught by drachen · · Score: 1

      How can you even compare the two movies? They're both totally different and the point of them was totally different.

    5. Re:Distraught by SumoRoach · · Score: 0

      TPM was so sorely disappointing. That was the reason why it got so trashed.

  5. Jar Jar Binks or Heather Graham? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Austin Powers publicity people are missing a wonderful ad opportunity ...

  6. Re:It's a parody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advertisement seemed to blatent to be serious. I saw it more as a parody of movies with more subtle product placement. For example, when Fat Bastard is singing a Chili's commercial, it's just too obvious to be anything but parody.

  7. Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    godfather II? maybe?

    1. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens? Evil Dead 2?

    2. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot Shots! Part Deux, Superman II, Goldfinger (remember Pussy Galore), Rambo, and Naked Gun 2.5. Of course, except for Goldfinger, these are not necessarily classics of American cinema.

      And finally, Titanic II (if it ever gets made) will be better than the original because the damn ship is sunk and Leonardo swims with the fishes.:-)

    3. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Army of Darkness is probably the best film I've ever seen. Too bad there isn't a Evil Dead 4 planned... :-/
      Austin Powers was great though. I can'l wait till the sequel comes to Norway...
      Ah.. I'll probably have it on DVD before then anyway.

      Groovy, baby!

    4. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Army of Darkness is probably the best film I've ever seen. Too bad there isn't a Evil Dead 4 planned... :-/
      Austin Powers was great though. I can't wait till the sequel comes to Norway...
      Ah.. I'll probably have it on DVD before then anyway.


      Groovy, baby!
      ..and..
      Hail to the king, baby!

    5. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget, of course, the most _OBVIOUS_ example:

      The Godfather.

      Sleeping with the fishes,
      - Otis

    6. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I take it that you did not see Alien when it first appear on the silver screen. Up to that point, scifi films were fairly sterile. Alien was ground breaking in that it introduced "regular" people in a unglamorous environment in space. Add in the terror in space, and you have a classic.

      Aliens was also very good. Ripley at the end of the film played the role of the tough, kick-ass woman to another level. This was not the norm in cinema. Hamilton in T2 completed this evolution.

    7. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Terminator 2, Gremlins 2, Star Trek II, IV, VI just off the top of my head.

    8. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Headius · · Score: 1

      Aliens (Alien 2) was by far the best of the series. Alien didn't move fast enough, although it was excellent moviemaking. Alien 3 didn't have nearly enough guns, and although it had more plot, it wasn't the good old-fashioned People vs Aliens type movie. It was bags of meat running around avoiding a lion. Alien 4 was very cool, with nice flashy special fx, but the plot lacked depth, and was an obvious kludge to bring Ripley back for one more movie.

      AP 2 was a pretty decent movie, but like the first one, I'm gonna have to see this many more times to get all the little jokes hidden in everything. This series is one you just have to see more than once to really appreciate.

    9. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by JavaTHut · · Score: 1

      Short circuit II!

    10. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Try The Empire Strikes Back or The Return of the Jedi, both better than the original A New Hope.

      Also, though there are some people who consider this to be blasphemy, I liked Romero's Dawn of the Dead better than Night of the Living Dead.

      And I know MANY people who liked Back to the Future 3 over the first two.

      It's all really a matter of preference, but there ARE examples out there.

    11. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by Eric+Savage · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not heard the rumors then. They are planning on a Titanic II, and it will have Leonardo in it (at a rumored $30 million paycheck). I don't know how they will work him into it because I though he died in the first one (I didn't see it). They way women talk about him, makes me feel like testosterone is a bad thing...

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    12. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by ZenBoy · · Score: 0

      Edward Penishands 2 was far far better than the first, the character had evolved from just a freak with dildos attached to his wrists into a true porn star...

      --
      -Zen I'm gonna make the _world_ my bitch.
    13. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by bskin · · Score: 1

      Terminator 2.

      Not exactly geek fare, but when you're in the mood for a blow stuff up movie, it certainly does the job.

      --
      'I love it when somebody's own sig describes how much they suck so much
      more concisely and elegantly than I possibly ever could.'

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
    14. Re:Name me a sequel better than the original. by MaCa · · Score: 1

      Alien 4 was better then Alien 3, that was better then Alien 2, that was better then the original! :)

      Scream 2 was exellent ( IMHO and if you had seen Scream 1 before.... )

      etc etc etc

  8. Linda Blair eat your heart out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the movie was great!

    Fat Bastard was a hilarious new villian, Felicity Shagwell was a mega-babe, and although some of the movie references got old after awhile a few were actually really funny.

    My favorite is when he tries to stop the rotating chair by screaming "The power of Christ compells you!" over and over again! Hardly anyone got that in the audience (most teens), but I busted up laughing at the Exorcist reference.

  9. Ah, Spinal Tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the first time I watched Spinal Tap and that Stonehenge scene came. I never laughed so hard in my life.

    My second favorite scene was when one of them got caught with a cucumber wrapped in foil at the metal dector...

  10. Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie was junk!
    The creators said: What made the firts movie such a money maker? Good humor (which there was in the first)? NAHH!! Prattfalls and sex!

    So that's all the second movie was.. Most of the humor was very immature or taken from the first movie.. In short, it sucked.

    1. Re:Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, you suck.

  11. Driztel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Zappa's other kid?

    1. Re:Driztel? by Stitchley · · Score: 1

      Dweezel

  12. Re:Already out? (thursday) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was supposed to be out on Friday, June 11, but all Milwaukee area theaters had 9:30 showings of it on Thursday the 10th.

  13. It was ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought TPM was much better though. The movie was basically a saturday night live show with all the skits on one theme. There really was no fluid flow from one scene to the next. The first had some sense of order and fluidity. Also Austin, in the 60's without his mojo, just wasn't too funny. It was much better when he was out of place in teh 90's. Most of the movie was just references to different culutural aspects, and I think they just played on that tooo much. They didn't even really build on any particular aspect, they just gave one-liners from many different aspects and it sort of got old. Also, there was too little time spent on Austin, although his scenes were much less funnier than Dr. Evil's, the name of the movie is Austin Powers heh! The blatant plugs of various companies got irritating too. I think the AOL and chilijis plug fit in well, but the Virgin Atlantic plug was just plain gay. Also, although Heather Graham is hot as hell, her acting was horrible. She didn't seem to be in the role at all. I think if you watch the movie again (and are not as entranced with her body as you were the first time), it becomes pretty apparent. The foil between the contrasting Elizabeth Hurley and Austin worked *much* bettter. There was tension and comedy. There was no tension or anything in this relationship, Felecity was mroe than willing. No challenge or anything.

    It was definetely funny and worth the money, but I don't think it is as good as Rob is portraying it. I definetely don't thikn its like Austin Powers 1, where it can get funnier everytime you watch it. This one is just going to get worse, as the things mentioned above, get much more apparent every time you watch it. The first one also was funnier just on the fact htat it was the first paradoy on all the spy flicks, so the jokes were just better and fresher. Too many AP1 jokes are rehashed in the sequel. Austin shoulda got some new lines in the second one (while maintianing his original ones as well).

  14. Comparisons between Jar-Jar and mini-me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas just couldn't have put someone like mini-me in the movie heh. Any comparison is just plain ridiculous. Star Wars isn't a comedy its a psuedo-serious movie. I watched it again, after austin powers, and Jar-Jar really isn't taht bad. Some of the little kids really did like him, and although I didn't find his actions particularly funny, I didn't find them horrificly irritating either. Of course mini-me is definetely the funnier of the two characters, but they just can't be compared because they are developed in two different contexts ! (just like perl! context matters)

    1. Re:Comparisons between Jar-Jar and mini-me by HaKn5La5H · · Score: 1

      the difference is that in star wars, people want a continuation of the original 'Star Wars'. when jar jar was added, they realized the movie was not only different, but aimed at a completely new target audience. it's like going into Hellraiser 3 and watching the TelleTubbies! it's as irritating as hell. but, with austin powers, everything's up for grabs - they can do anything.

  15. it's Dweezil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is also another son Ahmet. together they both host the rather funny tv show "Happy Hour". it airs on the usa network at 9pm est saturdays. think of it as being like the american version of a japaneese gameshow, very wacky without hard and fast rules :)

    http://www.usanetwork.com/ser ies/happyhour/index.html

    1. Re:it's Dweezil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Hair Metal" is unduly harsh.

      I saw Z play in the UK in about 93 and they were wonderful. The funniest part being the 20 minute disco/70s medley at the beginning of the gig. Classic.

      In the end they played for a Springsteenesque 2 and three quarter hours. As far as I remember the ticket only cost me about GBP5 (~USD7.50).

      The funniest thing I ever saw was the episode of Ren & Stimpy with a 'Powdered Toast Man' section that had Frank Zappa doing the voice of The Pope.

      You just had to be there kids. It was priceless.

    2. Re:it's Dweezil by Kyt · · Score: 1

      Dweezil also does the voice of Ajax on "Duckman". And he had a short-lived hair-metal gig in the late 80s...

      As for the new Powers flick, I find it more than just a little disturbing that the most intriguing part of the promos is the seduction scene with Dr. Evil and his evil hench-wench. *shudder*

      --
      "I'd like to make a promise and I'd like to make a vow, that when I've got something to say, sir, I'm gonna say it now
    3. Re:it's Dweezil by bjb · · Score: 1
      PTM: "Grab tenaciously to my buttocks!"

      Pope: "Both of them?"

      (my two cents)

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  16. Re:Heather Graham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I noticed that too.

  17. commricals BEFORE austin powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went and saw austin powers last night and found it very enjoyable, not as good as the original but a very good sqeual, but i have a bitch I dont know if it was just the theater i went to but i paid 8 bucks a ticket and then before the movie started i was greeted with 5 mins of commericals, one for the navy one for creative labs, one for nintendo and a couple others, then had they showed 8 previews, If they are going to show commericals they could at least drop the ticket prices a bit.

    1. Re:commricals BEFORE austin powers by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

      You know, there are usually enough cinemas near each other in a region, with the same films, to compete with each other on ticket prices.

      So why are ticket prices so high? And of course the refreshment prices, and the pre-movie ads...

      Could it be that all those multi-million-dollar price tags on the films themselves are being passed on to the theaters? That maybe the profit margins in the theater business aren't as high as all that?

      Of course, I've never worked in the theater business, so I wouldn't know. But with movie viewership on a slide everywhere, I don't see why the theater operators wouldn't let some of the profits go back into the business so that it doesn't die altogether.

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
  18. hash bar availabilty==null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ain't Amsterdam.

  19. commercial "radio" too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the Cinerama 16-plex (evil Southern California import) here in Seattle, they pipe in pseudo commercial radio 15 minutes before the film, pimping the latest lamo-pop music and other consumer tripe. This is followed by 10 minutes of on screen commercials and then previews.

    No repeat business here.

    1. Re:commercial "radio" too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cinerama is a one-screen theater.
      The one fixed up by Paul Allen (of Microsoft).
      Probably the best theater in the country.
      Defininately in the state. You must have made
      a mistake.
      Also, they are showing star wars right now so
      I KNOW you are wrong.

    2. Re:commercial "radio" too by GPB · · Score: 1

      He was probably talking about the Meridian 16, which is the big movie complex downtown by Gameworks.

      I went and saw it there and it did indeed have the stupid radio playing before-hand. Cinerama is indeed an awesome theater however.

  20. Immature humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the humor was very immature

    Well didn't you kinda expect that?

  21. The sound of silence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing how spool & groin jokes are supposed to pass for humor. The audience I saw it with had the same reaction as me, this was one repetetive and boring movie. Mini-me was the only fresh idea and like everything else in this movie was repeated so often it lost any humor it had. How anyone over 8 years old could enjoy this drivel is beyond me.

  22. Re:It wasn't original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i haven't even seen it yet, and i'm sorry,
    but i was just reading the salon.com write-up,
    and started laughing hysterically reading the line about "fat bastard, the pissed off scotsman"


    if just reading a (negative) review about the flick is enough to make me laugh, this has got to be a pretty amusing movie.

    ---------------------
    -astrix8
    javanet.com/~user
    ---------------------

  23. Space Needle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The space needle and starbucks references got
    a big laugh here in Seattle. :)

  24. Re:yeah Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, what profanity? There wasn't a single 'fuck', 'shit' or 'asshole', and certainly nothing cruder than that. Perhaps the innuendo confused you... it did get a PG-13 after all, and they were clearly aiming for that rating.

  25. Re:CmdrTaco as a movie critic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And it deserves it more than that other summer blockbuster does." - CmdrTaco

    Uh, what colour is the sky on your planet? Taco says right in the review that he clearly *didn't* love TPM.

  26. Re:yeah Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez... so you fully admit that you've been brainwashed into this prudish white-anglo-saxon mindset that some words should be 'taboo'.

    Sorry, but most everywhere else in the world, people don't bitch and moan about a few profanities!

  27. Fat Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that thought this guy was the most repulsive guy ever in a movie. I mean it's one thing to show semen in someone's hair (Something About Mary) but something entirely different to see some nasty fat looking guy who's at deaths door knocking loudly. I don't know about where you guys were but all the scenes with that guy in them were dead silent here.

  28. APII is SUPPOSED to be hilarious idiots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw AP1, it was funny. I saw it the second time, it was VERY funny..i saw it over and over again, and it was hilarious. AP II, is equally hilarious, i see ppl posting shit like "THIS IS A SERIOUS, UPTIGHT, DETAILED,REVIEW OF EVERY ASPECT OF THE AP2 MOVIE"!!! that is really dumb.. wuts the matter with you guys? enjoy the movie!! don't look at the details..AP2 ROCKS!!! I AM GOING TO WATCH AP2 OVER AND OVER AGAIN..HEHE

  29. it sucked tremendously. DO NOT SEE IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i counted one or two laughs, but i think it was out of pity for how pathetic everything was.

  30. Re:Heather Graham VS Elizabeth Hurley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I had read something about her not wanting to be in the second.

    Either way, Heather in my opinion did just a good job if not better.

    Besides, Hurley is just so me washed up model (joking)

  31. Re:So I Married an Axe Murderer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reel.com has 'SIMAAM' on DVD for 12.49 right now. I have no idea how long it will be at that price though...

  32. Please say it isn't true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all we need. Another Leo movie, I hope somebody kicks his wimp butt good someday.

    1. Re:Please say it isn't true! by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      Good God, then you haven't hear the rumor about LDC bring discussed for the Anakin Skywalker role in the next SW episode. Gag me.

  33. IF YOU LIKED 'FAT BASTARD' YOU WILL *LOVE *... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Following the huge success of Mike Myers FAT BA***RD, in his newest new film, see Austin powers persued by the arch foe... STUPID NI**GER!.

    Watch as he steals babies, rapes white women and sleeps in a coconut oil slicked bed full of watermelon seeds.

    Watch as he confesses to his inferiority to the male lead, and begs his 'massah' for help

    Watch as the female lead kicks him in the nuts and says, 'Thats for calling me a cracker whore, DARK**!'

    Hate isnt cool, even if TV and movies keep telling you it is.

    1. Re:IF YOU LIKED 'FAT BASTARD' YOU WILL *LOVE *... by HaKn5La5H · · Score: 1

      a little on the extremist side, don't you think - even if it is a retalitory exaggeration

  34. Re:Heather Graham VS Elizabeth Hurley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although Hurley maybe better in some respects, Graham does a remarkable job of (stealing quote from review) "getting your mojo going" simply because she is a female version of Austin (and amazingly better looking). Hurley was a good girl, Graham was a bad girl and we all know we like bad girls better :)

  35. Fat Bastard speaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep your babies away from this guy, folks.

  36. Re:it's Dweezil & Ahmet Rodin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't forget lil' brother Ahmet Rodin.

    Dweezil is a pretty hot guitarist just like his dad.

    he's played with interesting people like Donny Osmond

    and covered twisted toonz like the BGs *stayin alive*

  37. Re:Heather Graham VS Elizabeth Hurley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, it spoofed Bond in other ways.
    I don't know if he intentionally did it, but the actual James Bond did get married in "Her Majesty's Secret Service" and she ended up getting killed at the end of the movie.
    So killing off Hurley was another way of following the pattern.
    Plus I tend to agree that Heather Graham is a serious ultra hottie!


    -My $.02 borrowed from another sig

  38. Re:PG-13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like you wouldn't run screaming for a boycott on a movie that implied Linux was ripped off/dressed-up NT code...

    Don't go raggin' on the religious folks for opposing something that is offensive to them.

  39. Re:yeah Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like those other parts of the world where folks are butchering each other?

    Just wanting the world to be a civil place doesn't make a person a prude. Lay off the judgemental attitude and expand your vocabulary.

    Civility is the cornerstone of civilization.

  40. www.zipit.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were maiking jokes about the www.zipit.com.org and someone tried it without the org....turns out its a gay dating webpage! Hope that corporate audit thinks it's a Winzip site....

  41. Re:Elizabeth Hurley == an abominable actress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, dude, if you've seen My Favorite Martian there's no way you can call her a great actress. She's a hack. A hack with a good ass, but a hack all the way.

  42. Re:Tomb Raider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about Denise Richards? I saw shots of her in the new Bond movie and she was dressed up nearly exactly like Lara :)

  43. Re:Swift's text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The text of Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" is to be found here.

    Regards, Ralph.

  44. MaCa's on drugs - blast him with the phasers.R���? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    | Alien 4 was better then Alien 3, that was better
    | then Alien 2, that was better then the
    | original! :)

    Oh come on. _The Blood Waters of Dr. Z_ was a better film than _Alien 3_ (aka Alienses).

    _Aliens_ was an inferior film to the original mainly because nearly all the suspense was drained from the film by heavy automatic weapons fire and a really, really annoying kid. All that was left was Scrawny Weaver running around with a machine gun. And don't get me started on the whole dropship sequence!

  45. Frank Zappa Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Just wanted to point out that "Moon Unit Zappa"
    was the name of (the late (sniff)) Frank
    Zappa's daughter. Somewhere I've got a 45 of
    "valley girl" with her picture on the slipcover.
    A treasure.

    If everyone already knows this, moderate this post
    into the basement.

    -- cary

    1. Re:Frank Zappa Reference by gwendoline · · Score: 1

      i have it, too, and i know *exactly* where it is and if you ask nicely, i'll recite it for you ;)

  46. Summed up review by Shiska · · Score: 1

    2 hour commercial with some sporadic boobage.
    ----------------- ------------ ---- --- - - - -

    --
    ----------------- ------------ ---- --- - - - -
    Your honor is perfectly understandishable.
  47. ed2 & aod by mosch · · Score: 1

    evil dead 2 and army of darkness (evil dead 3). That's a series that got better and better every time they made another movie.

  48. Mini Me instead of Jar Jar by Fiznarp · · Score: 1

    Lucas should have cast Mini-Me instead of Jar Jar... that would have been a riot.

  49. Bah. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    And it deserves it more than that other summer blockbuster does.

    Heresy!

    This was just an amusing bathroom-humor movie. It was not an epic saga =)

    1. Re:Bah. by MrSparkle · · Score: 1

      Well, don't forget the farting and "pudu" jokes in SW:TPM...


      Jesse

  50. Re:Starbucks by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

    Amazon.com? :)

    (Is it something in Seattle's water, or is it a coincidence that they spawn huge, monolithic companies?)

  51. Mr. Bigglesworth nitpicking by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by oNZeNeMo (guns'n ammo):

    Mini-Me doesn't have a Mini-cat.

    1. Re:Mr. Bigglesworth nitpicking by cwj123 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that cat was the same size as the original Mr. Bigglesworth.

    2. Re:Mr. Bigglesworth nitpicking by mstra · · Score: 1

      Sure he did! Remember, he was trying to gnaw its ear?

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    3. Re:Mr. Bigglesworth nitpicking by mstra · · Score: 1

      It most certainly was not! It was smaller...and Dr. Evil refers to it as "Mini-Mr. Bigglesworth."

      m.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
  52. that woman? by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by funk311:

    i believe the woman you are refering to (that woman from the first movie) is Liz Hurley...

  53. Heather Graham VS Elizabeth Hurley by gavinhall · · Score: 2

    Posted by JudgementX:

    WARNING--DISCUSSES SOME PARTS OF MOVIE

    Okay first off, I loved Austin Powers and I definetely love the sequel, but one thing that really bothered me was the writing off of Elizabeth Hurley as a fembot and then replacing Austin's counterpoint with Heather Graham. I mean I won't argue the fact that Heather Graham is hot as hell, but Hurley was definetely a better actress and played a better role at countering Austin's lines in the original. I realize that it was supposed to be a funny write-off with Vanessa being a Fembot and it allowed Austin to go back to swinging, but I just wish that they didn't kill Vanessa off. That way she could be in the next Austin Powers because she was one of the best parts of the first one. Part of me was kinda sad when she blew up (literally) after remember how funny and awesome she was in the original... sigh... But I'm sure that everyone just cares that Heather Graham is a hotty...but alas my heart goes out to Elizabeth Hurley who is definetely the more shagadelic babe. Comments anyone?

    1. Re:Heather Graham VS Elizabeth Hurley by RimRod · · Score: 1

      The reason Hurley was written out is that Austin Powers decided to spoof/mimic the James Bond movies by having a different female lead in every one of the movies. Since Austin Powers had just married Hurley at the end of AP I, they needed a way to clear the path for the new lead.

      Besides, it was damn funny :)

      --
      - ...and remember, you can't invade Brainania. It's not on the big map.
  54. Re:seeing it in the right atmosphere... by volkris · · Score: 1

    Are you smoking cra-- oh... nevermind...


    :)

  55. I didn't think it was that great by volkris · · Score: 1

    I didn't expect it to be that great because I figured they'd just recycle all the same jokes from the last movie, and they did, but it beat my expectations. But still, I thought it was only okay.

    I guess his brand of low brow humor just isn't my bag, baby.

    Then again Kids in the Hall... now THAT's commedy.

  56. Elizabeth Hurley == tight, and a solid actress too by jabbo · · Score: 1
    One of my friends in SF pointed out that she ought to get some new, high-profile parts to keep her movie career swingin'. She did the artsy Permanent Midnight and some other forgettable films, but dammit, she's way too hot and too solid an actress to be marginalized!

    Maybe it's time for a letter-writing campaign. ;-)

    --
    Remember that what's inside of you doesn't matter because nobody can see it.
  57. Swift's text by Kyt · · Score: 1

    Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal." Certainly gives one food for thought (if you'll forgive the pun).

    Now, see? An incomplete B.A. in English Literature IS useful! :)

    --
    "I'd like to make a promise and I'd like to make a vow, that when I've got something to say, sir, I'm gonna say it now
  58. It wasn't original by Leebert · · Score: 1
    I didn't like it because the structure was almost entirely the same as the original... Even the same materials were used, just slightly expanded (probably with the rejected stuff from the first)... Number two falling over the cliff, Dr. Evil telling Scott to shut up with all of the "shhh!" stuff, it just wasn't as funny the second time around.

    There were funny original scenes, but they were rare.

    I for one was quite disappointed.

    1. Re:It wasn't original by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      >Number two falling over the cliff..

      Considering how much you paid attention to the file (it was Mustafa that fell over the cliff).. I don't give your comments much weight.

      Yes, I saw the film.. yes, a lot of it was recycled.. and yes, I thought it was funnier than hell. I mean what were you expecting?!? AP movies are "turn off your brain and just enjoy the ride" types of movies.. stop analyzing them.

      The line where they looked into the camera (AP and Basil Exposition) and basically said "forget the plot holes and just enjoy yourself," had me cracking up... they admitted that rather than try to make the picture fit perfectly with the first, they just decided to have fun.

      BTW, the falling over the cliff thing.. he (Mustafa) even asked Austin if he remembered him, then said what his name was. Were you sleeping?

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    2. Re:It wasn't original by Quarters · · Score: 1

      I look at the repetativeness of the second one as part of the running gags. It's a play on all of the James Bond movies and how they are completely formulaic. So, it can't be a spy movie sequel UNLESS it is very similar to what came before it.

    3. Re:It wasn't original by Buttercup · · Score: 1

      It was worse than that, it was stupid and boring. I thought the original Powers was brilliant, funny, and irreverent. The second was so pointless I fell asleep. Fell asleep! I don't remember the second half at all.

      Have we ever seen Myers so annoying? Except for his Scottish accent as Fat Bastard (reprising yet another past movie role) he was unfunny in the extreme. C'mon, please, the little silhouette with Heather Graham pounding a tennis racquet into his ***hole was cheap, pandering, at best, to the dirty little man in all of us.

      A highly forgettable movie, which is disappointing, considering how it will blemish my memory of the classic original.

      MJP

      --
      Don't try that "protecting the children" shit you people use to keep the tits and bad words off my TV. --Seanbaby
  59. Already out? by suprax · · Score: 1

    The new Austin Powers movie is already out or did Rob get a free preview of it or something? I thought it was due out this summer.

    1. Re:Already out? by suprax · · Score: 1

      Well, most High School's aren't out yet, at least around here, and I was most likely referring to the "high school summer", where it's the 2 months after school has ended for the year and vacation has arrived. On a side note, I just stopped by blockbuster and rented the orignal austin powers, to wet my appitite. :)

    2. Re:Already out? by larimer · · Score: 1

      Uhh...it's the middle of June -- that usually counts as "this summer"...even here in snowy Minnesota.

      Yes, it's out. It opened Friday.

      --quazi

    3. Re:Already out? by delmoi · · Score: 1

      haha, I got out of highschool 1 month ago :P
      (and I got out of highschool for *good* to :)



      ---------------
      Chad Okere

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  60. Movies turned into far superior TV series by osu-neko · · Score: 1
    Try Highlander. After watching a few seasons of Highlander (feel free to skip the first season or two -- it takes a while for the series to really get going), with the story and character development and so on, it's really impossible to go back and watch the movies. The first movie was great, or so I thought, but having watched it again recently, it's utter crap compared to the series. The Kurgan is particular is so incredibly cheesy and cartoonish, no where near as well played as Kalas from the series.

    Buffy The Vampire Slayer is also a great example of a mediocre (well, bad really) movie turned into a great series.

    Again, I think it's the format that makes the difference. You can't tell a great story in 2 hours. Best you can do is hit the highlights to entertain those with attention spans too short to follow a series. No real chance for in depth background or in depth development in a 2 hour movie. Can you imagine the whole B5 storyline compressed into 2 hours? Gimme a break! TV series have to be very badly done to not be better than a movie...

    Unfortunately, most TV series are very badly done...

    --

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  61. My Take On It by pridkett · · Score: 1

    Here is my take on the movie. I went to see it thursday (at a sneak preview where it was showing on more screens than star wars).

    Overall the movie was funny. Being as I live in chicago I also have some sort of perverse attachment to Jerry Springer, so the whole springer scene in the beginning and end was excellent. Definately gets you going.

    There were some parts that you would rather not have to see, such as the Felicity and Fat Bastard scene.

    I would have to agree that Mini-Me was one of the best parts of the movie. What could be cuter than a little midget giving the finger?

    But it didn't seem like a movie. Just a conglomeration of skits put together that on their own were hilarious. Worth a viewing once, but I wouldn't say much more than that. I don't think it will have the staying power of other great comedy movies like Ghostbusters and Caddyshack because it dates itself too much to the 90's with the songs and the jokes etc.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    1. Re:My Take On It by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      to the original Austin Powers, where they show a conflict between British Intelligence and the Unger Ground Laaaiiirr - Austin vs Dr Evil in their original time and place. Hopefully with touches of the original James Bond movies, combined with 60s cliches. Have them at one of the key concerts or in Czecaslovakia or France '68 or something :) :) (It may be too complex for an AP movie, but imagine if Austin started the 68 riots as a plan to destabilise France just because in tradition the French and British do that to eeach other as much as possible. :) ) With two movies to reflect on, any blast to the past would really rock. Plus they can plug the prequal thing :)

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    2. Re:My Take On It by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 1

      Sorry aboutthat last one... my browser has done something *wierd*...

      I don't think it will have the
      staying power of other great comedy movies like Ghostbusters and Caddyshack because it dates itself
      too much to the 90's with the songs and the jokes etc.


      I'm not so sure. It's more a testament to the time, and I think people will appreciate that. Half the in-jokes in the first one were partly lost on me because, for example, they don't sell lucky charm breakfast cerials in Australia (we got Kelloggs baby). But at the same time, it's so ridiculous that you laugh anyway. You have a valid point - Python continues to be funny today. Whereas the D-Generation, Late Show (not Larry's) or Good News Week - both in their time have been incredible funny Australian shows, but often with current politics and news as their focus, which will make them lose their sting with time.

      But then, people still read Swift's A Modest Proposal and Gullivers Travels both of which are primarily political satires, so perhaps there's hope for Austin Powers yet :)

      I really hope they do something godo with the next movie. A really good thing would be if they made a prequal to the original Austin Powers, where they show a conflict between British Intelligence and the Unger Ground Laaaiiirr - Austin vs Dr Evil in their original time and place. Hopefully with touches of the original James Bond movies, combined with 60s cliches. Have them at France '68 or something :) :) (It may be too complex for an AP movie, but imagine if Austin started the 68 riots as a plan to destabilise France just because in tradition the French and British do that to eeach other as much as possible. :) ) With two movies to reflect on, any blast to the past would really rock.

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    3. Re:My Take On It by miracle69 · · Score: 1

      So I take it that the "Alan Parsons Project" joke was dated to the 90's?

      Or the ID4 gag.

      Or the "Oil Crisis and a Flock of Seagulls Joke"

      And the rocket description scene was truly entertaining.

      Watch it again. There are several really witty musical references not confined to the 90s, as well as multiple scenes blatently copied from other movies. Of course, it wasn't Mel Brooks blatant, but it was still there.

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    4. Re:My Take On It by tyse · · Score: 1

      I saw it in Seattle, and when the Space Needle
      came one, everyone fell apart laughing.

    5. Re:My Take On It by Stitchley · · Score: 1

      Speaking of local reactions, I live in Oakland, and when Dr. Evil mentioned busting a cap in a cop's ass in Oaktown, it was teriffic. Everyone in the theatre began cheering and hollering. It was great!

  62. for an interesting review comparison... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    See the Salon article

    --which takes an opposite view...that too much time is wasted on Dr. Evil, and not enough on other characters and Powers himself.

    Personally, I find Powers, as a caricature, terribly amusing, at a low consumption level. After about five minutes, I find myself wanting to tear my hair out. The problem I had with the first film is that it was like a Saturday Night Live skit that was too long. (A common criticism.) Nevertheless, I find Powers so interesting, I'll probably see the film anyway.

  63. seeing it in the right atmosphere... by Mickey+Jameson · · Score: 1

    I saw a 4:15 showing of it yesterday, and it was complete with idiots chanting, "yeah baybee" throughout the 6 previews shown, and 11-16 year old kiddies running rampant. The movie itself was cheezy as hell, but it was supposed to be that way. The original, as everyone knows, was a comical parody of 60's spy flicks, and the sequel was obviously based around the same thing.
    It amuses me to hear people say that it was unoriginal and predictable. It was SUPPOSED to be all of that. However, at the same time, it was very creatively written and directed. The character acting of Austin Powers and Dr. Evil were excellent, and Felicity Shagwell and Fat Bastard actually had me laughing out loud.
    It's simply a great movie. I'd definitely see this movie again before seeing The Phantom Menace again. And no, I'm not smoking crack.

    1. Re:seeing it in the right atmosphere... by parasite · · Score: 1

      I don't appreciate being called a 16yr old kiddie, geezer!

      =P
      Our plans are simple.. . infiltrate and take over the world!! You old hoagies don't stand a chance -- you'll inevitably be extinct! BWAhahahah

  64. Starbucks by Mickey+Jameson · · Score: 1

    I found it quite comical that the most evil coffee company is also owned by one Dr. Evil. :)

    1. Re:Starbucks by Octopus · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      I saw AP2 last night, and when it cut to the Space Needle the entire audience lost it for about a minute and a half. Very cathartic. I wish it was M$, but they NEVER would've gone for that.

      As far as "huge, monolithic companies" go, most high-tech people here consider M$ a "Hahvahd" company. Adobe ain't native either. Amazon is local, but horror stories from contract workers around here keep Amazon pride low in this region. Boeing is being hated more and more. And Starbucks is just a big fat joke. Other cities eat their franchises up like crazy because they don't know better, but NW people tend to support small coffeehouses and independent roasters, etc. (Except for uppity Eastsiders who crave "consistency" and Oprah books.)

      -- octopus

    2. Re:Starbucks by oratop · · Score: 1

      When they were showing the starbucks in seattle, I just couldn't help but wonder how funny it would have been if they would have used that "OTHER" company from Washington instead.

  65. Re:Fat Bastard instead of Jar Jar by Mickey+Jameson · · Score: 1

    If that were the case, I might have seen TPM a second time. And when I go shopping and see all of those "cute" Jar Jar T-shirts, dolls, and posters with Fat Bastard on there instead of Jar Jar, it would really make my day.

  66. My Sky... by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

    ...is the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  67. Somewhat disappointing by ivarneli · · Score: 2

    It looks like I'm pretty much alone on this one, but I really didn't like AP2 that much. It was about what I had expected, but it just wasn't as enjoyable to me as the first one. It kinda gave me the impression that everybody just got together for a weekend and threw together a movie. I know it's supposed to be like that, but I thought the general style of the first movie was better.

    The characters didn't really seem to carry over from the first movie very well either. Dr. Evil seemed way too... competent in this movie, Austin seemed too incompetent, and Felicity doesn't even compare to Vanessa in the first one.

    Then there were those other characters... I think Fat Bastard and Mini Me both give Jar Jar some strong competition for "Most Annoying Character of 1999".

    Now, before you start flaming me, I just want to make a point... I didn't say I hated the movie. The jokes were wonderful... I think I laughed way more at this movie than I did at AP1 the first time I saw it. But the movie itself just didn't appeal to me... that's why I think the first one was better.

    1. Re:Somewhat disappointing by Skankmofo · · Score: 1

      I think people who were really into the first movie and saw it many times would not like this movie on a "whether it is a good movie basis" but will still enjoy the humor a lot. The big fans may have been expecting an original plot then see it and realize that it is essentially the same plot only backwards (goes back in time instead of forwards, and attacks from moon instead of center of the earth).

      This leads big fans to not really enjoy it on a cinematic basis, but you have to realize that nearly EVERY little and big thing in this movie is a satire. The generic plot is making fun of the generic plots of the spy movies, so you really can't criticize it for that. The first one was more original because it was the first one. It is hard to use the same characters and still be original in the sequel.

      I think the reason the star wars trilogy was so well recieved is because they didn't have VCR then and the fans couldn't buy the movie and watch it a million times then be disappointed when they saw the sequel because they had grown to love the the first or second one (you get the point). With this the fans have been watching the first movie so much and may be expecting so much (see: TPM) only to be let down by certain elements.

      Think of it this way, if this movie had been the first one would you have liked Austin Powers as much? Personally, I thought this movie was funnier though it may not have the repeatability the first movie had.

      Whether you like each character, can't really help that. I hated Fat Bastard, I thought he was extremely stupid and unneccesary, but Mini-Me was absolutely hilarious. Fat Bastard's only funny thing was "Get in my tummy!" (overplayed in the commercials).

      Just try to look at the movie for how it was, and forget what you expected it to be. Movies are so much better when you know nothing about them going into it (why i hate critics).

      --
      "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep." --Saul Belloe
  68. Should have been * R * by Sixty4Bit · · Score: 1
    It would have been better in my opinion. Call me a pervert, but seeing Heather naked again (first time was in Boogie Nights) would have been wonderful. PG-13 as a rating for comedies sucks. I like comedies that are either RAW (Cheech & Chong) or CLEAN (Disney). Film companies trying to get both the adults and the kids with the PG-13 are not allowing either group to fully enjoy the film. There is no way I would take my 13-15 year old to see that movie.


    And as an adult movie it was ruined by not being RAW enough.

    --
    This is not the sig you are looking for...
  69. PG-13 by BigEd · · Score: 1
    Notting Hill was rated PG-13... and it's WAY worse. I think that the MPAA is getting a lot less strict with dialogue and sexual innuendo, and a lot more strict with violence and explicit sex scenes.

    I think with the recent pushes from President Clinton and family type organizations to stop kids from viewing violence and sex in movies we'll see more and more movies come out PG-13 that would have been R a couple of years ago. Not because they're any less raunchy, but because right now violence is the current target. I'm kind of surprised that Phantom Menace got the PG rating. A certain Darth Maul scene really did (IMHO) deserve a PG-13 rating, and Lucas must have thought the same thing since he did the scene two different ways (hopefully that was spoiler free enough).

    I think it will be interesting to see how Hollywood reacts to the latest attacks on violence from politicians. There are already quite a few studios who demand R ratings, how long will it be before PG-13 is as far as a director can take a movie and still get good funding? Even some of the independent/smaller studios (can we say Mirimax) are shying away from more violent/sexually explicit films. I have a strong stomach for sex and violence (my girlfriend always complains that all of the movies we watch are too dark, hence the occasional Notting Hill), but I fear that some day soon I won't even be able to watch violent art house movies on the big screen anymore.

    --
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:PG-13 by mwillis · · Score: 1

      > independent/smaller studios (can we say Mirimax)

      You mean Miramax, a studio/distribution arm of that small company called Disney?

      The independence of Miramax is sorely testable, even outside the legal sphere -- after all, the holy rollers love a boycott. Remember how upset people got about Priest?

  70. Vertically Challenged by BigEd · · Score: 1
    No, then everyone would be crying that The Phantom Menace makes fun of the vertically challenged...

    Smaller person: "That 'Jar-Jar' character belittles my people"
    Larry King: "I think he's an insult to all of us, little man (*snicker*)"

    --
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. -- Oscar Wilde
  71. Austin Powers Rocked! by Cybersonic · · Score: 1

    ** MILD SPOILER ALERT **

    I loved it! I was quite suprised that the movie only had a PG-13 rating though.. The movie was clearly full of sexual innuendo/content. (of course I LOVED that ;)

    My favorite part was Dr. Evil singing his version of 'Just The Two Of Us' , REALLY cool.

    I wonder which companies paid for advertising? :) From the 'AOL You Have Mail' Headquarters call in the sports car, Dr. Evil's corperation owning Starbucks coffee, and the clearly shown Virgin superstore.. i was just a little curious...

    Quite a lot of cameo appearences also... my suggestion: go see it right now! (unless your a highly religious nut who hates perversion, in that case avoid it at all costs)

    -Cybie! - My cool homepage - My really cool START page :)

    --
    Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
  72. "My dad is evil and wants to take over the world" by True+Dork · · Score: 1

    I saw it last night too, and I'm going to have to say that I about cried laughing during the Jerry Springer scenes. Seeing Jerry Springer fighting with Dr Evil was too funny. I thought the movie as a whole was very well done. There arent very many movies that I will watch over and over, but I think this one will make that list.

  73. Tomb Raider by Thag · · Score: 1

    OK, it's not like it would ever win an Oscar, and it would be surprising if it even wound up being a good movie, but Liz Hurley would be a great choice to play Lara Croft. She has the looks, she can act, and she's British. I don't know if she can do running backflips while firing mini-Uzis in each hand, but they could hire a trainer...

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  74. Improvisation by prok · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or did Number 2 look like he was laughing his ass off when Dr. Evil was throwing the big globe in his face ?

    1. Re:Improvisation by mdemeny · · Score: 1

      I thought so too.

  75. Re:So I Married an Axe Murderer by Sethb · · Score: 1

    I agree, the first time I saw "SIMAAM" I was mildly amused, but when HBO and Showtime started running it several times a week, and I saw it more, I laughed more and more each time I saw it. It's not my favorite Mike Meyers movie, hands down.
    Mike Meyers as his dad is absolutely hilarious, and the whole bit he does about Colonel Sanders putting a secret ingredient in his extra crispy tasty chicken to make you crave it fortnightly makes me bust up.

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  76. Star Wars by prijks · · Score: 0

    I took a break from my busy summer star wars viewing schedule to see this one. I guess it was worth it (Heather Graham definitely was fun to watch, but she's no Natalie Portman :P)

    But anyway, I think that has been the only non-star wars movie i'll have seen this summer. because star wars ruled! I recommend you all go see it again. Those of you who hated it..... I was really unimpressed with it my first time. But the second time was better. And now that i've seen it six times, I want to see it more and more and more... besides, we can't let titanic win!

    do your moral duty. see austin powers once, it's worth it. but see star wars many, many times... it's worth it even more...

  77. Re:it's shagadelic baby! by nebby · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, he also played the role of Fat Bastard, which was funny as all hell as well!

    --
    --
  78. Repeated Jokes by nebby · · Score: 1

    I've heard alot of posts on hear about AP complaining that the repeated jokes were bad. I thought it was pretty hysterical! I don't think they were expecting you to think they were funny for the same reason you did in the first movie, I think they wanted you to think they were funny just because they were being done again!

    The "Zip It" scene was pretty damn funny IMHO

    --
    --
    1. Re:Repeated Jokes by delmoi · · Score: 1

      www.zip-it.com
      hehe


      ---------------
      Chad Okere

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  79. Re:It wasn't original, but decent enough by SyniK · · Score: 1

    I totally argee. The need to redo jokes from the first wasn't needed, but the orginal ones that are in AP2 are good enough on their own merit. I wasn't disappointed with it, but IMO it wasn't as good as the first. Austin Powers (the character) was just better in the first. I guess it's just because Austin Powers in his own environment is just like everyone else, but in the 90s he was a sight to behold.

    --
    -Tom
  80. Ummm... by The+Baz · · Score: 1

    Could someone please tell Rob that it's Mike Myers? I mean, I hate to be "that guy" who nitpicks, but a journalist of Rob's caliber surely won't mind getting the little details right.

    bAz

  81. Re:So I Married an Axe Murderer by Maniacal · · Score: 1

    I have to agree. SIMAAM is a hilarious movie. One of my all time favorites.

    "HEED...Pants" You gotta love when he plays his dad. "Probably going to cry himself to sleep on his HUGE pilla"

    --
    MG
  82. It was Awesome - But they Missed a Major Joke by Skankmofo · · Score: 1

    I thought the movie was one of the funniest I have ever seen. It may have just been the laughing mood I was in, but I cracked up at nearly everything. There are so many small little Simpson-eque type jokes thrown in throughout the movie that you only really appreciate the second time you see it.

    But, they missed a HUGE joke, which I was waiting for the entire "Shuttle" scene. I would think since the movie is all about England they would have gotten this, but why wasn't there a SHUTTLECOCK joke?

    It kind of made me mad they didn't have one, but oh well. The movie was great and I highly reccomend it if you are in a jovial mood at the time.

    --
    "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep." --Saul Belloe
  83. Did anyone catch the space suit joke? by joshv · · Score: 1

    There are three ports on their space suits, labelled:
    H2O, O2 (two's subscripted)
    and
    P2 (two superscripted)

    Water, Oxygen, and pee-pee. I figured this out in the middle of another gag and just about lost it.

    -josh

  84. Re:In Like Flint? by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    Yep... I think I was the only one in the theater where I saw it who not only has seen the Flint films... but knew that the joke was a reference to reality and not something made up.

    Coburn rocked in those films! :)

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  85. They have to do it anyways by Paradox · · Score: 1

    Most movies end up doing this. But most try and lessen the impact of it. But I think the whole idea was to make fun of the sponsorship.

    Having Dr. Evil own Starbucks is damned funny, and if made more money for the movie, all the better.
    - Paradox

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    1. Re:They have to do it anyways by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's a logical step from the one to the other. If Dr. Evil takes over the coffee supply of the Seattle area, all the coffee-dependent technology shops here, M$ included, will be under his heel. :-)

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
    2. Re:They have to do it anyways by www · · Score: 1

      It would be funny if they made an Austin Powers 3, where Dr. Evil owned M$ (trying to take over the world).

      --
      -- no .sig here
  86. Austin Powers by generic · · Score: 1

    My wife and I went to see it friday night. We never made it into the film. A line of 14 - 16 year olds were waiting to get into the theatre in full 60's sytle dress. It was pretty "cute" seein g them all dressed up in what looked like their parents old wardrobes; however, my wife and I really wanted to see the new AP2 movie.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  87. It's almost like you were expecting a good story! by grappler · · Score: 2

    Austin Powers is a clever spoof on Bondish movies that seem to come out every year. Austin Powers is funny. Austin Powers is lowbrow, slapstick, and sometimes, witty to the point of genius.

    Austin Powers is not meant to have any kind of engaging plot. Austin Powers does not care that Austin Powers is not meant to have any kind of engaging plot, and the makers make no attempt to hide this fact. Some movies will go to great lengths to try to fill holes in the plot, at the expense of hokiness. Austin Powers basically tells the audience point blank that it doesn't care. At all. It's that scene when Austin is going back in time and gets confused by the paradoxes that arise. He - and the audience - are told, and I quote, "enjoy the ride".

    If you laughed more in this than the first, great! I did. I can't imagine why else anyone would want to see it if not to laugh.

    Just my $0.000000002

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  88. Re:Somewhat disappointing [SPOILERS] by Force · · Score: 1
    One of the points made by TSWSM was how sequels are usually (always?) worse than the originals. Not only were they parodying the most-hyped film of '99, but also the second-most hyped one (themselves). There was quite alot of self-parody in there.

    The thing that really annoyed me was how moronic the majority of the audience were. Did they not watch the credits of AP? Did they not think "gee, maybe they'll do the same thing?" I guess not. Everyone else stood up as soon as the credits started rolling and made like lemmings to the exits. The first bits of extra footage stopped them in their tracks, but they didn't bother to sit down. Idiots. So that ends, they start moving to the exit again. "Duh, that must be it, even though the text has moved over to the other side of the screen". Idiots, they actually seemed surprised when the second bit started. By the time all the credits had rolled by, there were 6 people left in the theatre, 4 of whom actually saw the last bit (the other two were making out in the back row).

    Ob Spoiler: "I've made a makeshift splint. Here goes nothing. ... Augh!"

  89. Re:yeah Austin by cwj123 · · Score: 1

    As a matter of fact there were 5 asses (1 used as "a-hole"), 4 damns, 4 craps, 2 uses of "bugger," 2 hells, 1 incomplete "What the..." (from Scr eenIt)

  90. Heather Graham by DragoonAK · · Score: 1

    Actually, I personally thought she was pretty painful to watch. Kinda had a "Why am I saying these lines?" attitude. She didn't seem to get into the same spirit that the woman from the first movie did, even if she was a Fembot.

    1. Re:Heather Graham by paul7e · · Score: 1

      I think that Heather Graham's part would have been much better if she'd been on rollerskates, at least once.

      --
      Silly Rabbit, sigs are for kids.
  91. Re:Hidden Cut by IceFox · · Score: 1

    For those unfortunet saps that didn't wait what happed at the very end?

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  92. My review. by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    I saw this last night too, in the middle of hick ville, but I do agree it was alot better than the first. The only problems I saw were the couple of jokes that were re-used, but they were still funny or more than the first, and the blantant advertisement that was in the movie. But there are som neat tech toys they show off that I think the average geek would love to get their hands on to.
    I ate my tag line.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  93. Re:Hidden Cut by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    I saw the the 3 other scenes durring the credits, but I didn't get to see the rest.. Had to get my ass out of there.
    I ate my tag line.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  94. Re:ed2 & aod by Dan+B. · · Score: 1

    Totally agree. Evil Dead was just a crappy horror movie that looked funny, whereas the two sequels were supposed to be horror comedies and achieved their goals

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
  95. Re:the rocket phallus by mwillis · · Score: 1

    Maybe at first, I think this was done to death. I mean, to repeat the joke a second time was kind of flogging a dead horse.

    Otherwise I enjoyed it. Jerry Springer bit -- hilarious.

  96. Original Austin by trickydick · · Score: 1

    I too was not really impressed with the first Austin Powers movie the first time I saw it. But the more I watched it the funnier it got, I worked at a theater at the time so I watched it a lot. I still haven't decided which one I like better yet, Scott and Mini-me made this one great. And regarding Heather Graham,... ahhhhhhhhhhhhh

  97. Ads, Commercials, Yuck by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    I almost threw up when they did that Heinnekhen ad... I could deal with the Virgin Atlantic banner, and even the Starbucks thing was ok because at least that was part of a joke... you know "Ha ha, they own part of starbucks, starbucks is evil." but the beer thing was just terrible. Just a flat out ad.

  98. Most of it is just parody by Chewie · · Score: 1

    I saw an interview with Meyers on E! (that great cultural train wreck) the day before the movie opened, and he basically said that he just gets the jingles in his head, and when he can't get them out, it just strikes him as really funny. For my part, I now might actually enjoy those stupid Chili's commercials!

    --
    49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
  99. In Like Flint? by FroBugg · · Score: 1

    Anyone catch the "In Like Flint" scene in the very beginning? I found that to be hilarious, seeing as the Flint movies (were the two or three?) were some of the first movies to spoof the spy genre.

    Great movie overall, even the recycled jokes were still funny.

    --FroBugg

    1. Re:In Like Flint? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but in AP-I the phones ring just In Like Flint too! Do they in II ?
      - - -

  100. Mac G3 by The+Samo+Fool · · Score: 1

    Did every one catch the mac G3 (iMac too?) keyboard that was sitting next to the "time machine"? I especially ejoyed all the product sponsorships that had no point other than shameless advertising, and Mustafa's return.

  101. This movie rocked... by Duckman · · Score: 1

    Anybody who enjoyed the first movie will get a belly full of laughs out of this one. Mind you you have to wait a bit until they are done rehashing the old bits from the first movie. The new material was right on track and in most cases much funnier than the original.

  102. Re:"My dad is evil and wants to take over the worl by TheZork · · Score: 1

    Scott Evil (the funniest and most under-valued character in the films) is a rebellious teen, right? We find that he is the love child of Dr. Evil and Frau Farbissina, conceived during a mojo-fueled session of passionate sex in 1969. Wouldn't that make Scott close to 30 years old in 1999? Time travel's a bitch, I suppose.

    TheZork
    (who can proudly assert that he has never - not even in front of a mirror at home - done an Austin Powers impression)

  103. Re:the rocket phallus by Ped+Xing · · Score: 1

    Mike Meyers makes a comment about the Peeing scene in the original Austin Powers (DVD Commentary) that he loves taking a mildly amusing joke and stretching it out until it is stupid, and then stretching it out even longer until it becomes hilarious.

    The "That looks like a..." joke is a perfect example of how funny this can be, I think.

  104. Hidden Cut by Binestar · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else wait til the end of the Credits and see the Easter Egg?

    Now THAT was hilarious.

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
    1. Re:Hidden Cut by Binestar · · Score: 1

      For those unfortunet saps that didn't wait what happed at the very end?

      Well, right at the end of the credits they go back to the guy who is hurt really really bad and do another scene with him. I believe the line was "Hello? Anyone up there? I've made a makeshift splint and well... here goes nothing! *snap* OOow."

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  105. Looking back on it... by Jeckle · · Score: 1

    I really dug the movie, both of them. Where I used to work my co-workers and I would quote the movie quite often ("there really is nothing like a freshly shorn scrotum...") and I have always thought it was hillarious. I even dug Axe Murderer (Nancy Travis.... mmmmmm - Myers gets all the good babes!). I got tired of WW2 thanks to HBO as is always the case but WW is hillarious to this day.

    I really liked the opening sequence and was glad that the rehashed choreographed scenes from the first movie were kept to a minimum, plus I really liked what they did with it this time around with the tent scene. I think I was crying there for a bit it was so funny. I agree with Rob in that Mini-Me was great as was Scott Evil. Dr. Evil was pretty good as well although not quite as funny as the first time 'round. I won't even go into Heather Graham... but I agree with everyone else! Even though Liz Hurly is the better choice IMHO.

    The scene with Mustafa was classic Mike Myers, and Fat Bastard was a riot. All of this and the word plays, penis synonym sequences, and just the saying, "I am a sexy bitch!" really made this movie a blast to watch. I may have to see this one again before it leaves the theater.

    --
    /Sig/
  106. Comparison... by schon · · Score: 1

    But it didn't seem like a movie. Just a conglomeration of skits put
    together that on their own were hilarious.


    This is exactly what Myers movies are about... actually, your
    comment above is almost exactly what I heard someone say about Wayne's
    World... and that really is a great movie... (if you like that sort
    of humor...) I think that Myers has a knack for turning sketch
    comedy into movies, which is a real talent..

    Just my 2c

  107. One little thing... by jfunk · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the movie yet, I may not, I don't know. I just bought a DVD player yesterday and I'll probably be spending much of my time watching all of my favourite movies on that great invention (I saw Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas last night and again today and it's just so much better on this format). I bought A Fish Called Wanda when I bought it too. I like the "fishtank" mode :-)*

    Point? Yeah, my point. Just a little tiny point. Garth was not "created" by Myers. He is based on Dana Carvey's brother, Brad, who, interestingly enough, was one of the creators of the Video Toaster. Notice in WW2 the scene where Garth wears a Video Toaster shirt.

    Just thought I'd bring that little nitpick up, even if it's a little offtopic.

    Ok, ok, to bring it more ontopic:

    I was very disturbed by the way the commercials decided to hang off the Phantom Menace hype in the commercials. I wasn't very impressed.

  108. Waynes World II by Breace · · Score: 1

    I give WW2 a two thumbs up.

    As I write the software for our Inflight Entertainment system, I get to see certain movies a LOT of times. It seems by the end of a project I've seen them a thousand times. Especially the beginning parts, before the system crashes. ;)

    One of the movies I must have seen most is Waynes World II. And I have to say that it still doesn't bother me to see it again. There are so many little jokes that you don't notice the first time around. (Especially when you are not a native-English speaking person)

    If someone mentions Illinois, the following dialog is automatically triggered in my head:
    'MM: Ok. Allright, so here we are in our new surroundings. The abandoned acme doll factory, downtown Aurora, Illinois. DC: We now have an official babe-layer. MM: I know man, this place is gonna be chick-central. etc.'

    I look forward to use Austin Powers when I'm testing our new system. :)

    Breace.

  109. Nah. by Shelrem · · Score: 1

    No, i have to say, i liked it as PG-13. While, i doubt anything would've offended me if it were rated R, it's just so much fun for them to play with the audience. I mean, a great deal of the humor just wouldn't have been there if they were allowed to show everything and say anything. Dancing around the subject is funny, because when you finally do hit the audience with something, it's much more effective.

    Half of the fun was avoiding the subject.

    -Ben C.

    p.s. I have to say, i liked this one better than the first, but i do have to go back and see the first again.

    p.p.s. I got to see it on the 10th @ 9:50PM! ;-D

  110. Re:FAT BASTARD WAS ****ING HILARIOUS !! by miracle69 · · Score: 1

    Oh Man! I totally forgot about that essay. It wasn't history, but fiction.

    Who wrote that? I remember it well, but I can't remember who wrote it. It was a satirical piece about how the Scottish could raise money by breeding and selling their kids for food/hides.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  111. My Two Cents... by kronius · · Score: 2

    I thought the movie was good, but there were problems. I loved a lot of the original jokes, but the COMMERCIALS gave away too many of them. Most of what the commercials didn't give away was stuff from the first movie.

    I thought a lot of the "dated" jokes were funny, but they might hurt the movie's rewatchability in the long run. The movie was definitely entertaining and worth the money to go see if you enjoyed the first one. I just wish the commercials hadn't given so much away. I plan on seeing it again.


    -

    --

    -
    It is possible for your mind to be so open that your brain falls out.
  112. it's shagadelic baby! by z1lch · · Score: 1

    what more can a girl say? there aren't many men with such atrocious mysogynist recycled lines and ridiculous teeth that'll have a cynical sex kitten on her back on the shagpile in seconds. austin rocks! myers is hilarious in both roles although my personal favourite has to be Dr Evil.

    the new film is really a piece of shite but then you're going for frivolous entertainment not earth shattering commentary.

    send up in style.

    --
    BLAMMO shaken not stirred
  113. Re:So I Married an Axe Murderer by timothy · · Score: 1

    NullGrey is correct: Meyer's grows on you! (At least on me.) Wayne's World never did much for me, but So I Married An Axe Murderer is sheer genius. It took a full watching to convince myself of that, so I would advocate anyone doubtful of its worth simply give it the 93-or-whatever minutes and then decide.

    Hah! I never thought I would get a legitiamte chance to praise SIMAAM on slashdot. Oh but since I can, finally ...

    I borrowed this video from my co-worker, after I mentioned that I really liked Austin Powers.

    I was reluctant to take it, though, because as I told him, I've seen the cover of the video a million times and it just looked awful. Maybe I only saw it previous to Austin Powers and hadn't associated MIke Myers with making me pee from laughing yet, since I wasn't a big SNL fan.

    Result? I've had it for months and watched it many times. Will my coworker ever get it back? When I buy the DVD he will.

    I mentioned this to a few friends, including my friend Liz Klodginski, in an attempt to turn her on to this incredible movie. To my surprize, someone had already beaten me to it, and made her watch it over her objections -- good move! It's the sort of thing that it takes someone else to convince you, and then BOOM.

    Mike Myers' facial expressions are so funny the movie would be funny even without sound.

    ok, ok, ok

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  114. yeah Austin by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed the film to, and I must agree that they incoporated a lot of wit into it....

    My favorite part of the movie would have to be the part where Felicity and Austin entertain themselves by "harrassing" (by way of kissing, changing his clothes, teasing him) the Royal Guard.
    Furthermore, I would like to express my disappointment at the heightened use of profanity in this movie. I don't recall it being used in the first one (though it may have been there, I can't recall), but it's everywhere in this one. I don't mean to be a stuffie or a narrow-minded, idealistic naivette, but I don't enjoy profanity, though I realize that virtually 99.99999% of movies these days use it, as well as good portions of the population... Nevertheless, it's my firm conviction that life can continue without it, although it makes for an expressive flavoring particle!

    --

    Insert mind here.
  115. similar reaction by sesquiped · · Score: 1

    Just sharing:

    The first time I saw Austin Powers (original) I thought it was good and fun, but not hillarious. The 2nd time I saw it, it got a little funnier, and the thrid time, it was even more. It really is true, as CmdrTaco says, that it grows on you.

    (I haven't seen the 2nd but I will soon.)

    So... If you've only seen the original once and didn't like it too much, SEE IT AGAIN!!! and again. and again. It'll get better every time.

  116. So I Married an Axe Murderer by NullGrey · · Score: 1

    ...Axe Murderer and WW2 were each mediocre IMHO...

    "So I Married an Axe Murderer" was the same for me as "Austin Powers" was for Rob. The first time I saw it, it was mildly amusing, and then it got funnier and funnier each time I watched it. It was one of my favorite movies in college, and there was a week where my dorm neighbor watched it once a day. Maybe most of Meyer's humor is like this: Amusing the first time, funny the second, and hilarious the third.


    +--
    Given infinite time, 100 monkeys could type out the complete works of Shakespeare.

    --
    +-- (Score:-1, Moderator on Power Trip)
  117. SNL Reference by SilentBob · · Score: 1

    I dig this flick, it's to Austin Powers 1 what Wayne's World 2 was to Wayne's World. And did anyone else catch the reference to the old SNL sketch with Martin Short (I think) where they were doing the synchronized swimming? In the sketch, Martin Short and some other guy were practicing to become the first men's synchronized swimmers or something like that, and one of the moves that they do in the sketch Austin does in his opening water scene.

  118. the rocket phallus by DanJose52 · · Score: 1

    very witty scenes describing Dr Evil's choice of rocketship design...

    Dan

    Stars collide, worlds survive for a pretty piece of flesh.

  119. Well, they're down with the recycling movement... by RimRod · · Score: 1

    My main problem with Austin Powers II was that it just used many of the jokes from the first one, blatantly spoofing itself.

    Now, a LOT of comedy sequels do this. Austin II actually did a good job of it. The jokes got a good reaction the first time around, and they got a good reaction the second time around too. But for me, the jokes in the first movie elicited laughs and knee-slapping, and the same jokes in the second elicited a smile and a nod at the references. It's almost like they said, "We know it's still funny, so here it is again!

    Even one of the new jokes, the clipped penis references when looking up at the spaceship in the sky, was "sequeled" so to speak. The first time they had the sequence, it was hilarious. The second time, twenty minutes later, it got a lot less open laughter.

    On the upside, there were two aspects that really stood out and made this movie worth seeing. The first was Scott Evil. Seth Green is one of the most talented and hard-working young actors out there, and the chemistry between him and Mike Meyers is golden. I laughed straight through the Jerry Springer bit at the beginning. The second shining beacon of light was Mini Me. Mike Meyers knows how to create characters. Wayne, Garth, Dr. Evil, Austin Powers...and now Mini Me. Even if he's not playing them, his interaction with characters he thought up is nearly flawless. I'm an avid fan of professional wrestling, and the fight scene with Austin and Mini Me gave away Verne Troyer (Mini Me) as someone with definite training in the squared circle. Midget wrestlers--seemingly by convention--are always masked, so now I'm wondering which one(s) he has been.

    I imagine that if you haven't seen the original, Austin Powers II would be just as funny for you as the first one was for the rest of us. And for the rest of us who have seen it, it's just a notch or two below. But not by much :)

    --
    - ...and remember, you can't invade Brainania. It's not on the big map.
  120. Holland theaters by Ductman · · Score: 1

    I think holland does prety good with the 2. Btw CMDRtaco if you read this, the theater that austin powers 2 played in, in the Holland 7, wasnt all that bad. They are planing to make them all like that. I dont know why the star dosnt pull in more movies.

    Get me out of this town PLEASE -ductman

  121. Re:"My dad is evil and wants to take over the worl by nobody/incognito · · Score: 1

    you were warned not to think about things like that!

    nobody

    --
    parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus
  122. so its a bit like star wars then by chris_c · · Score: 1

    good but not that good

  123. FAT BASTARD WAS ****ING HILARIOUS !! by xHost · · Score: 1

    I really really don't get it, a lot of you people on /. must have some pent up angst from window bsod's or end users. Austin Powers 1 and 2 were
    damn funny movies, and TPM was a good star wars movie. You people need to just let things go and get immature for 2 hours, I nearly died laughing out loud in the theatre ... need I remind of scenes like in the Tent ?? Fat Bastard describing is urgent need to **** and eat mini-me (the scottish-english baby eating was a funny joke too, if you don't get it check your History notes) Jerry Springer ??? The Rocket Discoveries ??

    Yes, the movie was immature, rude, skittish, but hell, what DO you expect ? Its a Mike Myers film, so pull that pickle out of your ass and have a good time!

    1. Re:FAT BASTARD WAS ****ING HILARIOUS !! by xHost · · Score: 1

      Jonathan Swift wrote an essay on how the english should eat the Irish babies since that was 'all they were good for'