Slashdot Mirror


Quake III Arena Demo Test for Linux

We're being barraged with submissions that the Quake 3 Demo Test for Linux is now available, along with Win32 and Mac versions for the OS-challenged. I just tried it and the download was maxing out my DSL line, so I guess the Sandpiper guys are on the job.

43 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Publicity by Hobbex · · Score: 2


    Probably 100,000 Linux users read the story about the Linux version being pulled from the UT cd. I'm willing to bet you Brandon got less than 50 hatemails.

    We will never get away from that half a promille of the Linux users who behave like children (mostly because, well, they are children).

    -
    We cannot reason ourselves out of our basic irrationality. All we can do is learn the art of being irrational in a reasonable way.

  2. Re:System by Accipiter · · Score: 2
    144 megs of RAM?

    Just out of morbid curiosity, how did your system get that number?

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  3. Publicity by SmileyBen · · Score: 3

    Let's hope that the word actually gets out that such a thing as Quake 3 for Linux exists. Games are (sadly) one of the major blocks for people from moving to Linux, and if they realise that they can still play the best FPS they'll be one step closer!

    (Who cares about spreadsheets, when you have Quake?)

    1. Re:Publicity by Abigail-II · · Score: 2
      Games are (sadly) one of the major blocks for people from moving to Linux.

      Eh, who cares? Who wants to have people whose main interest is playing games? All you would be getting is tons of people not able to install Red Hat. That wouldn't help the Linux community at all. "A nice platform to play games on" wouldn't help Linux at all. Look what that did to the Atari.

      -- Abigail

    2. Re:Publicity by Upsilon · · Score: 2

      I can't believe this comment was moderated up. It is extremely offensive and doesn't provide anything to back up its extraordinarily biased opinion.

      Look, I don't care whether or not you play games, but I'd like to tell that gaming is one of MY main interests. "...not able to install Red Hat"?! What on earth makes you say something like that?! I've installed Red Hat, Caldera, SuSE, and Debian all quite easily (and I much prefer Debian). I've also set up and administered an internet gateway with firewalling, a web server, a samba server, an NFS server, a mail server, and all that good stuff. I hate to break it to you, but serious gamers are generally some of the most technically enabled computer users out there. Afterall, when we're not playing games we're upgrading and tweaking our computers for maximum performance ;-)

      Gaming is a serious force in the computer industry. It is what drives the majority of hardware advances. And there are a LOT of gamers out there who would love to use Linux and would make extremely valuable additions to the Linux community, but are put off by the fact that there are very few Linux games out there. If Linux is ever going to succeed as a desktop OS then it's going to need games. You don't have to play them, but you have no right to make such offensive comments towards those who do.

      --
      I am not an idiot. Please use my name to email me.

      "That's right, I'm quoting myself."

      -Upsilon

  4. Sandpiper? by volkris · · Score: 2

    So how does Sandpiper work? Distributed proxies? It seems kinda sketchy.

    ~Chris

    1. Re:Sandpiper? by QuMa · · Score: 2

      Yes, I've been looking into that too. They sure are fast!

      As far as I can see, you delegate a hostname to them (say www1.yourdomain.com), and they have it resolve differently from different locations. The only bad thing I can find here is that they claim to have a patent pending on the strategy. Let's hope they don't get it.

      For more info look at their 'Tech Literature'.

    2. Re:Sandpiper? by degas · · Score: 3

      After reviewing their website, it seems they have servers located worldwide and on every major backbone. I believe requests are routed to Sandpiper's home servers which provide real time network status that locates a server that is close and has available bandwidth for the client. From then on that server and client continue the transaction.

    3. Re:Sandpiper? by Rilke · · Score: 3

      Basically just round-robin DNS, just like everyone else does. The difference is that their machines are geographically disparate, and apparently they do a few real-time heuristics on the requesting IP address, the current load of their machines, and presumably the current status of a few traceroute checks.

      I'm not sure what they're handling for quake, but the www.quake3arena.com address is /.'ed at the moment, so one hopes they're not handling that one.

  5. Hmmm. by Signal+11 · · Score: 3
    Let me get this straight... you've spent thousands of hours playing quake... you've avoided coding your project for two months... your drivers are out of date... your dog left you... your SO left you... you haven't slept in weeks... and your boss wants to know if you're still working there.

    After all this, you're gonna download Q3 and do it all again?! Yessir.. that's the general idea...


    --
    1. Re:Hmmm. by cheese63 · · Score: 2

      twice today. thats alot of grits. why exactly would you pour grits down your pants, anyways? i mean, seriously, poor people are starving in other countries and here you are, pouring hot grits down your pantalones. you should be ashamed.
      and really, if you have nothign better to do than pour hot grits down your pants, well, um..
      (after five minutes of thought)
      shit, i can't think of anything better to do either. nevermind, carry on with your grit-pouring

    2. Re:Hmmm. by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 2

      Heh. Well. Yes. :)

      q3 demo has quite a few improvements over q3test 1.08.

      -new map: q3dm1. flat, no ups or downs, for newbies, I hate it, but that's just me. (q3test1 renamed to q3dm7, q3test2 renamed to q3dm17, q3tourney renamed to q3tourney2)
      -bots. 6 of them. 5 skill levels to choose from. ranging from wondering what all the pretty lights are about to.. lamer with a zbot. (it's funny to watch them try to hit you with the gauntlet from the other side of q3dm17 (q3test2))
      -too many little things that you'll notice and go "ah" to list.

      of course, lots of bug fixes, and a menu layout change. read john carmack's .plan updates (archives at http://www.fingershack.com/ finger/index.php3?update=1121) for info on various bug fixes.

      So. now you know.

      -Warren

  6. Re:14%? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2
    Actually, 14% isn't that small: that's 1 in 7. However, you're right that 14% isn't that big, either.

    I'm not flaming you, I just wanted to point out that raw percentages are rather mis-leading: even 1% isn't really terribly small. Percentages are just not a good means for convaying magnitues.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  7. Re:Umm by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2

    I beleive that's a server message (ie sent from the server).

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  8. Someone, just the binaries please? by Ricardo+Casals · · Score: 2

    A while ago I took the binaries for Q3Test 1.08 and posted them on cdrom.com for all those who had the Windows version and didn't need to re-DL a 50MB pak? Could someone do the same for the Demo please? I know it would only be like 1meg and taring a directory is easy as pie (just make sure you don't tar the pak along with it).

    Please? I mean, they should already do this over at iD, but someone just do it for them. I did. ;)

    --
    yeah ... i'm going to have to go ahead and not put a .sig here, alright?
  9. Niiiiiiice speed... by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 3
    Maxxed out at 230k/s via my rogers@home cable connection. You GOTTA like that!

    50mb came down the pike in 5 minutes. Pshew... long way from the bad ol' days of:

    *RIIING*

    Hello?

    Hey, can you put the bbs up?

    Huh? Oh, yeah, hang on... *shuffle tap tap tap click* Ready?

    Yep...

    *BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP*



    --
    rickf@transpect.SPAM-B-GONE.net (remove the SPAM-B-GONE bit)
    --
    "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
    1. Re:Niiiiiiice speed... by Chemical+Serenity · · Score: 2
      What's this 2400 crap?

      Back in the REAL day, I used to be able to hold a carrier while resetting my acoustic coupler (damn thing would wig out periodically) by whistling at the appropriate tone.

      I became considerably happier when I got my first 300bps direct-connect modem. No command sets, no autodial or autoanswer or anything... just a big beige box with a serial port, a phone port, a switch for send/receive, and a BIG RED BUTTON.

      Goddamn I feel old.

      --
      rickf@transpect.SPAM-B-GONE.net (remove the SPAM-B-GONE bit)

      --
      "People will pay big bucks for the luxury of ignorance."
  10. Re:Mouse wheel support? by tweek · · Score: 2

    I had no problem getting the mid wheel setup under the new demo. Works like a charm. Getting the demo to run as a whole was a tad bit more dificult but it runs none the less. and it sure is nice lookin ;)
    "We hope you find fun and laughter in the new millenium" - Top half of fastfood gamepiece

    --
    "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  11. Re:Come on! by Svenne · · Score: 2

    Well, somewhat true. Voodoo1 and Voodoo2 takes over the CRT, so it'll automatically be fullscreen (if you connect a diffrent monitor to your Voodoo you'll see that X is still unning as usual in the bg). With a MGA Gx00, you have the choice of running windowed or fullscreen. The only thing is, fullscreen is really only "windowed-up-in-the-left-corner-of-the-screen" while the resolution is changed to make it look like fullscreen. It works fine though. :)

    /Svenne, aka Kerberos

    --

    Slagborr
  12. Re:Games don't run well in Linux? by SKicker · · Score: 2

    Trying to argue that consoles are better that PCs on features alone is pointless. You can .always. get a better gaming system on a PC than any console if you throw enough money at it.

    consoles are better in terms of price/performance.
    Quality of games available might be another argument.

    scratchy sound? We must be really weird to listen to all the near CD quality mp3's everyone here has on cheap speakers. You plug your PC into your stereo.

    Im personally not bothered about a few fps difference in speed between windows/linux if it means i dont have to keep booting into windows to run games. As long as the speed difference is not too big then im happy.

    looking at unreal tournament and quake3, 'cross platform games, more of your please' is all i can say.

  13. Re:smp? tnt? hrmmmm..... by tweek · · Score: 2

    in your $HOME/.q3a/demoq3/ dir you can edit the
    q3config.cfg and change seta r_smp "0" to seta r_smp "1" I would gather. I don't have an smp machine at home to test it on or I would. As far as the TNT (i have an stb velocity 4400), I can get it to run smashingly but everytime I restart it acts funny (sounds getting hung and what not). All I have to do is something silly like go into setup for graphics and slide the detail down a notch so it forces you to apply the changes, once it restarts to apply it works fine. go figure. Others have said that for the TNT make sure you lighting is set to lightmap instead of vertex but it works fine for me either way. Full screen and windowed.
    "We hope you find fun and laughter in the new millenium" - Top half of fastfood gamepiece

    --
    "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  14. Only supports Voodoo by heroine · · Score: 2

    Rather dissapointing that we're at a point where every week a new graphics card comes out with a proprietary chipset yet we can only run games on one chipset introduced 5 years ago that costs twice what most chipsets cost nowadays. 3DImage 975: $30 cheap. Voodoo 3: $73 obsolete.

    1. Re:Only supports Voodoo by 23 · · Score: 4


      come on,

      they said/wrote that about the last version too and after actually reading the README (ghasp!) you just stick in something like
      "./linuxquake3 +set r_glDriver=/yourspecificpathtoyour/veryownMesaGL.s o"
      with your very own HW-acceleration. Viper770, I think a Riva TNT2 chip, works really smoothly.

      Admittedly I haven't dl'd the new version yet but common sense dictates them leaving that commandline option working.

      Roland

  15. Re:Works with TNT2 by psychos · · Score: 2

    I got annoyed with having to use NVidia's 3.3.3.1 X server, and their glx.so module wouldn't work in 3.3.5, so I compiled their source against 3.3.5.

    The binaries are available here.

    Doesn't seem any faster than their 3.3.3.1 server, but at least it lets you use 3.3.5.

  16. Re:SPISPOD! by Booker · · Score: 4

    Heh... if I remember the story correctly, it was before Doom came out - rumors were flying about what Id was working on, and someone created the hoax of "Smashing Pumpkins Into Small Piles Of Putrid Debris" - a rendered 3D full-VR multiplayer environment with AI bots and ... you name it, it was gonna be it. Apparently quite a few people were taken in with this hoax.

    Then, in a strange twist of events, someone actually went out an _coded_ SPISPOPD - only it was a lame 2d sprite game. :)

    To honor the whole thing, "idspispopd" became a cheat code in Doom.

    That is, if I remember correctly.
    ----

  17. HTTP/FTP Mirror by itp · · Score: 3

    HTTP here.

    FTP here.

    --
    Ian Peters

  18. Pak-free mirror by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 2

    I've posted a tarball of the Demo without the Pak files included for all of you who requested it. It is located at http://www.glue. umd.edu/~spong/q3demoTEST-1.10-5-NOPAK.i386.tar.gz . I don't know if this is violating any kind of license, so Id Software: let me know if it is and I'll take it down.

    "Software is like sex- the best is for free"
    -Linus Torvalds

  19. Re:System by suprax · · Score: 2

    Well, the thing is, I don't think my cheap video card can even run it. I'm going to try, but I'm already convinced that it will flop.

    But after all this great information, I am seriously cosidering a high-end video card.

    --
    Scott Miga
    suprax@linux.com

  20. Re:System by suprax · · Score: 2

    That's exactly how I got 144 megs of ram.

    As for the old 16MB SIMM, yes, it does slow down the system a tiny bit, but nothing noticeable.

    --
    Scott Miga
    suprax@linux.com

  21. Works with TNT2 by matthewg · · Score: 2

    It works beautifully with my Riva TNT2.

    1. Re:Works with TNT2 by matthewg · · Score: 4

      Okay, here's what I did to get it working. First, install the GLX package from nvidia at http://www.n vidia.com/Marketing/Products/Pages.nsf/pages/linux download. Make sure you put the 'Load "glx.so"' stuff in XF86Config as per NVidia's instructions. Copy the libGL.so that comes with GLX into the q3demoTEST directory. Then, start X in 16bpp mode. Once X starts, cd q3demoTEST ; ./linuxquake3 and frag away.

  22. System by suprax · · Score: 2

    I was just wondering what kind of system it was that those pictures were taken on?

    I have a AMD K6-2 400, with 144 megs ram, but a cheap video card.

    The game should look good if I get a good video card, but what does everyone suggest? And is my system fit for running smooth and looking good in q3?

    --
    Scott Miga
    suprax@linux.com

    1. Re:System by FigWig · · Score: 2

      Those screenshots were taken on a IBM PC Jr with a Hercules video card and 512kB RAM.

      So it should work fine for you.

      --
      Scuttlemonkey is a troll
    2. Re:System by jemfinch · · Score: 2

      Ok, to start off, the cheap video card is going to kill you in 3d games. You HAVE to have a good video card to play games well. v2 is barely tolerable, v3 works fine--that's what i use.

      Also, while 3d games are very floating point intensive, the K6-2 is terrible at floating, due to a lack of a pipelined fpu. So you're also going to be processor limited in the game.

      If you're not up for a processor + video card upgrade anytime soon, then if any of the new hardware T&L video cards (such as the GeForce 256, the ATI Rage MAXX, or the Savage 2000) get good linux support, just buy one of those. That should improve your fps far more than a simple v3 or so would since you will be processor limited.

      Jeremy

    3. Re:System by suprax · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I knew that the generic video card would kill me, but I didn't think the processor would matter, as 400 isn't too shabby yet.

      I think I am going to spend some cash on a good well-worth it video card. Which one do you suggest out of the ones listed?

      Thanks for the help though, and hopefully soon I can be checking out what q3demo is all about. :)

      --
      Scott Miga
      suprax@linux.com

  23. Quick Fix by da3dAlus · · Score: 2

    According to somebody who commented on the game at linuxgames.com said that by replacing the MesaVoodooGL.so.3.3 with MesaVoodooGL.so.3.1 from the old q3test 1.08 will fix the problem.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  24. Re:SMP support? by jemfinch · · Score: 2

    do you have a voodoo3? The voodoo3 drivers in both linux and windows are *NOT* smp-friendly. Apparently they're locking some resource q3 needs for r_smp 1 to work, so until 3dfx fixes it, r_smp will get you nothing.

    But just so you know you're not all alone, I only use one of my two celerons with my v3 3000.

  25. Re:o/t - FPS sickness by the_argent · · Score: 2

    Actually, one of the guys that comes to our regular lan parties is in the same boat as you. A few games of q3 or halflife and he's about to hurl. What he uses is an elastic band that fits around your wrist and has a plastic bit that presses on a presssure point that alleviates your motion sickeness. You can probably find them in a drugstore. I don't have a specific name of brand. Hope that helps.

  26. Re:What? by jellicle · · Score: 2

    Actually, it was just a self-referential joke - I use Win95/98 on a daily basis and Linux very rarely, so I was joking that... oh, never mind. Didn't mean to pull your wind-up string, buddy. Sounds like you need to go frag someone - and since there are any post offices open this time of night, I hope it will be in Quake.
    --
    Michael Sims-michael at slashdot.org

  27. Re:I don't guess this is a misconfiguration... by bgdarnel · · Score: 2

    Check out this site for drivers. I also have a K6-2 300 with a G200, and I get more than 1fps, but not enough to be playable. I'm using the Debian-packaged version of the drivers, now horribly outdated (from august, iirc). I'll try compiling from the latest source and see how it turns out.

  28. Re:I don't guess this is a misconfiguration... by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 2

    but my K6-2 300 with a Matrox G200 is unplayable. About one fps.

    The only time I've seen it go that slow is using software rendering.

    You need 3D hardware with drivers to run Q3 at a reasonable speed.

    Try GLX. I've been playing Q3Test on my 450 MHz Celeron 300A, 64MB, G200 8MB. I've turned much of the detail down to max the framrate, as multiplayer shooters are best in go-fast-but-look-ugly mode. The limiting factor for internet play is definately my 33.6 modem.

    Modems suck. I'll have to leave it running overnight to download the Q3Demo. But it's worth it.

  29. Re:Faster in Linux by longspur · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm, I don't know about you but I can tell he's lying. Using my Telepathy-over-IP (patent pending) I can sense that his roomate's computer is getting exactly 5.6 fps more than his running the same benchmark...


    *sarcasm off*


    How many games have you played under Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD/Solaris/Irix/whatever ? Have you thoroughly benchmarked all the possible hardware/driver combinations under Linux using each game? How do you know that "There is no possible way that Linux is faster." What studies of the kernel architecture for each OS have you done that I can refer to in order to find truth in your statement?


    Most of the /. community is not here to try and moderate you down and bash on you just because the majority of us use an operating system(s) currently engaged with Microsoft products in a stuggle for market share. You haven't even been moderated down yet, what makes you think we want to do that? Your opinion is as free as anyone else's, but that gives you no right to personally insult others and refute their claims without evidence to prove your points.


    You may choose to insult me as you did the previous poster, daring the moderators to "hurt" your posts in some masochistic manner, but all of this would only serve to make us think less of you and what you have to say.
    --

    --
    keep acting shocked and move slowly towards the cake.
  30. Re: One last note, about the games... by ayf6 · · Score: 2

    Well you didnt do your homework Quake 3 GREW UP ON THE MAC!