Slashdot Mirror


Google Maps GPS Simulator

garbletext writes "A new version of Google Maps introduced this week includes a beta feature dubbed My Location that was designed to simulate the GPS experience on mobile phones and handheld devices that do not include GPS hardware, like Apple's iPhone. Essentially, the My Location feature takes information broadcast from mobile towers near non-GPS equipped mobile phones to approximate the device's current location on the map down to about 10 city blocks. "It's not GPS, but it comes pretty close (approximately 1000m close, on average)," the Mountain View, Calif.-based search giant explained on its website. "We're still in beta, but we're excited to launch this feature and are constantly working to improve our coverage and accuracy." The My Location feature is currently available for most web-enabled mobile phones, including Java, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and Nokia/Symbian devices."

205 comments

  1. iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except this doesn't actually work on iPhone.

    1. Re:iPhone by bconway · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't worry, that was covered in the article.

      The My Location feature is currently available for most web-enabled mobile phones, including Java, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, and Nokia/Symbian devices. However, it is not yet compatible with Apple's iPhone.

      Still, Apple has promised to continuously update and improve upon the feature set of its inaugural mobile handset, making it more than likely that the feature will turn up once it emerges from the beta stage.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    2. Re:iPhone by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Funny

      once it emerges from the beta stage.

      So, knowing Google, it'll be ready for the iPhone 6G in 2013?

    3. Re:iPhone by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      No, knowing Google, it's already the final version!

    4. Re:iPhone by snickkers · · Score: 1

      I thought it meant it won't happen until the iPhone comes out of beta. Which makes sense, and probably still means a need to wait until 2013.

      --
      GLORX 3:16
    5. Re:iPhone by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      There's a thing called Navizon that works on the iphone, but it's pretty poor - every now and then I put it back on but it's so far failed to *ever* get any kind of approximation of where I am.

  2. Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by rustalot42684 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can pay to have my cellphone tell me I'm somewhere in downtown Toronto. Just what I've always wanted - I always keep forgetting these minor details.

    1. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You're saying you'd rather type in "Toronto", on a cell phone, rather than just have Google Maps know already?

      What, are you some kind of privacy nut? (rim shot)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by colonslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's better than somewhere in Canada; a map zoomed in to near your current location could be much more helpful, especially because of slow networks and high bandwidth costs

    3. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Fyre2012 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've used the service on my Blackberry 8800 in downtown toronto, and in my experience I was able to narrow my location down to within 10 meters or so on any given downtown street.
      It even points in the direction you're moving
      Pretty neet to have it using the satelite view as well. Very quick and responsive, and you can always just press '0' to go to 'my location'
      Works well using directions too... you just tell it to use 'my location' as a starting or destination point.

      Tho it doesn't work indoors... at all.
      ymmv =)

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    4. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by the_wishbone · · Score: 1

      Your Blackberry 8800 has an actual GPS receiver in it...TFA is talking about triangulating your location based on cell tower locations. Completely different. This is meant for phones WITHOUT GPS.

    5. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lol that's not what it will tell you. When you're inside a building it will tell you you're 2 miles away from the tower. And in the elevator it will tell you you're 4 miles away from the tower. And as soon as you walk out, you're suddenly one mile from the tower! All it can go by is the signal strength as far as I know. That's so stupid. With one tower, it can tell you you're somewhere on a ring around the tower. With two it can approximate a linear area that you're in. With 3 towers it can tell you where you are. Even with 3, it won't be accurate because signal strength goes up and down. Plus with multiple towers, they'd kinda have to be owned by the same network and have the same radio tower technology and receivers or it wouldn't work very well.
      Just get a damn GPS phone, people.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    6. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by kc2keo · · Score: 0

      I also wonder how long it will remain in Beta. Maybe it will be like Gmail.

    7. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember, this is just telling you where you are, not where you should or would like to be.

      Which probably isn't in downtown Toronto.

      And no matter where you go, there you are.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    8. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Wow, Google is better than I thought. Now, the (my) body will be in two places at once.

      (I had to borrow a modified phrase from Captain Crain of the Seaview, when the enemy agent in Sickbay hosed their INS (inertial navigation system), in the episode "Hail to the Chief"; her brain-cooking MK-G machine at full power threw off Seaview's compass in the Control Room (proximity of the MK-G), but not in Maneuvering Control... Crain got reports on the two directions, and, frustrated as hell, he proclaimed to Adm. Nelson, "This submarine is better than I THOUGHT! We can travel in two directions at the same time! Funny as hell. I'm starting to RELIKE VTTBOTS, despite the wooden sets, guide wires towing the sub, and repeated cannibalized stock footage.... Ahh, nostalgia...)

      Now, how to get some NSA access for Google?

      If you think you're being tracked, give or drop your cell phone on someone. Your clothes (especially the shoes and any metallic keys -- even the chip in your ass or pelvis if one's there), too if you think somethings affixed to you. Do it in an elevator (with no camera). Now, they'll have agents running all over the building they KNOW you entered. (Your mission: figure out how to get out or get into ANOTHER building where you can put on some clothes and dye or cut your hair, etc...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    9. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by absent_speaker · · Score: 1

      Yes, but many 8800's have their GPS disabled. Verizon + AT&T both disable the GPS unless you fork over the $10 for their proprietary navigation systems.

    10. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Fyre2012 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hm, interesting... when I check the GPS status in my options, it says it's disabled and the coordinates are all 0's, so I was always baffled when I got a blue dot on google maps.

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    11. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      Even with 3, it won't be accurate because signal strength goes up and down.

      It won't be "accurate" regardless, but it will still be ballpark. Your examples are nisleading. If you're in a building, or an elevator for that matter (per your example), the signal strength is degraded for all nearby towers and thus you can still be triangulated in the same way.

      Obviously a GPS-enabled phone is still the best solution.

    12. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      With two it can approximate a linear area that you're in.
      The intersection of 2 circles on a plane is 2 points, not a line.
      --
      :x
    13. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even points in the direction you're moving
      Guess what - *I* point in the direction I'm moving!

    14. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Except your GPS-enabled phone won't be able to reach its satellites *at all* inside that elevator, which makes your Google approximation better by process of elimination ;)

      The only solution is GPS + IMU (inertial motion unit), which will track your movements via accelerometer while you are without GPS signal, and resync when it reacquires. I look forward to buying my own $5000, 4-lb phone!

    15. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      You could take the union.

    16. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but people running the MyLocation version who DO have GPS are helping those of us with Blackberry Curves that don't have built in GPS. Google is taking the GPS data, correlating it to the tower identifiers the cellphone is picking up at the time, and building a database for triangulation. Not only can they provide that data to their users, but they then could resell that data like Navteq sells driving direction data.

    17. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      If they use the miniature laser-based accelerometers used in Segways, and include them in mass production, the cost wouldn't rise too high.

    18. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you're only thinking in two dimensions. the intersection of two spheres is a circle

      --
      TIAEAE!
    19. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      I was being facetious... But let's explore that idea.

      Currently there's no good way to build an IMU that's small enough to fit in your average handset, let alone cheaply. Heck, we'd have trouble building one that'd fit in 5 handsets. Accelerometers vary greatly - you can get really rough ones like the MEMS accelerometer you see in the Wii-mote, or you can get extremely, extremely accurate ones that can maintain highly accurate positioning even without GPS assistance for extended periods of time. Clearly, for a phone you'd need something down the middle... which doesn't exist right now.

      Indoor position tracking on everyday devices is still but a dream right now. I have no doubt we will one day achieve it, but that day won't be in the near future.

    20. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Could we not use the same accelerometer built into the iPhone to detect landscape/portrait changes? Perhaps it's not extremely accurate, but I'd be interested to get my hands on an iPhone for a week or two just to code something up to try to handle inertial navigation to see what the results are.

    21. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      you're only thinking in two dimensions. the intersection of two spheres is a circle

      I don't know about you, but I don't own a helicopter.

    22. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by kevinbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Location on a phone has always been potentially very useful as a part of user context. You might not be able to use it as a turn by turn mapping guide, but what the stupid mobile operators forget is that other people could think of useful location services. Example: Travel Agent. I used to fly from Nice to London via Frankfurt a lot. My connection in Frankfurt is at 9:15. If my phone reports that I am in Frankfurt at 9:30 and the flight left at 9:15, then I missed my flight. An application could use this to automatically rebook me.

      I order a taxi from an office. Today I wait on the street because I do not know within a minute when he will arrive. With location, when the taxi enters the same cell as me, it could trigger an SMS for me to go down to see taxi. Saving me time and money.

      Wap Link: Give me the weather HERE. I remember years ago showing a friend the weather forecast on the phone. After I typed in the City, he asked why? He was right of course , the phone knew what city I was in.

      Going for a train - rush or have a cup of coffee and wait? Push the button "Next Train" and application knows you are in work not home and tell you next train from work to home. Or vice a versa.

      Too many people stupidly believe that location has no real use unless it can locate a person within meters. The granularity is fine as a basis to give contextual input to many many app.

      I could go on and on, but for 7 years the mobile operators have blown their lead in this space all because the idiot marketing people believe that if THEY cannot imagine a service no would could possibly want such a service. I had to laugh at Vodafone idiot CEO in a recent interview discussing how he "owned" location as a service and Apple did not. He owned it for 7 years and did fuck all with it.

    23. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by ngg · · Score: 1

      Probably not, but it might not give bad results for short periods of time. The resolution required to detect landscape/portrait changes is much lower than is required to perform INS functions without significant integration errors. And, on top of that, you'd also need a way to figure out which way the accelerometer axes are pointing in real space. Another possible complication is that you only need a two-axis accelerometer for landscape/portrait detection--so it's quite possible that the iPhone only has a two-axis unit. Maybe an iPhone expert knows the answer? But it would be a nifty application.

    24. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Where does it say that they do that? This would be an extremely stupid idea. They already know EXACTLY where all the towers are and how best to triangulate the signals - they don't need to collect that from Blackberry users. Are you sure someone isn't having you on? Sounds made up to me. Please link to your source.

    25. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      I think in some cases it doesn't solely use signal strength. I seem to remember reading a couple of years back that on one network, it usesd the latency of the signal to estimate your distance from the tower if you're connecting from a 3G phone (eg it effectively pings your phone and measures the delay in microseconds). The masts themselves often have 3 aerials (which is sometimes easily visible) which are focused in three different directions. This means they also know roughly which side of the mast you are standing as your signal will be a different strength on each of the three aerials.

      Combine this range and direction information together and you have the world's most primitive radar! On some networks, they claim to be able to position your phone to within 100m as long as it's in range of two masts. Even with just ONE mast visible, if the above technique is employed, they should still be able to get a reasonably accurate estimation of where you are.

    26. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my phone reports that I am in Frankfurt at 9:30 and the flight left at 9:15, then I missed my flight. An application could use this to automatically rebook me.

      Or you left your phone in Frankfurt, in which case the expense of the extra flight booking would just add insult to injury.

    27. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by datadigger · · Score: 1

      All it can go by is the signal strength as far as I know. That's so stupid.
      You are misinformed. The tower and your phone have to know the distance from eachother because your phone has to know when to start sending a packet to fill its designated timeslot and not end up in the timeslot of another user. It is all about timing, and there is a handshake between tower and handset based on roundtriptime. The path length can vary quite a bit due to reflections. GSM technology is pretty interesting.
      --
      Aphorisms don't fix code. (Bart Smaalders)
    28. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by edumacator · · Score: 1

      They aren't using triangulation. They are only using the tower that is relaying the signal. From TFA...

    29. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      It's also nice for mapping. No, seriously. If you do the map from [my location] then you only have to add the destination address. It saves one entry, which may be a big deal if you don't know your zip code or you can't see an address number (how long is Main St. anyway?).

      "Doesn't do much good if your location is a half mile away," you may say. Well it's much easier to move your starting point to your real location than it would have been to find it from scratch. You're already on the screen instead of scroll-scroll-scrolling till you find what you're looking for.

      People who say that it's not that accurate are missing the point. It's a significant improvement, and you don't have to buy anything extra to use it. I'm glad they added it.

      TW

    30. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by kevinbr · · Score: 1

      Or my plane could have crashed and I am dead but my phone survived. Whatever.

      SMS received: Did you miss your flight? Yes No
      Do you want to rebook? Yes No?

      Fixed

      I would assume that one would do a little detailed design and use cases. I was quoting a simple example.

    31. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by dwater · · Score: 1

      Nokia N95's have an accelerometer in them too, which can be had for cheap on some contracts, so I'm told. I read somewhere they're surprisingly accurate too, though I've no idea how they compare with the one in the iPhone.

      --
      Max.
    32. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by dwater · · Score: 1

      I programmed a mobile phone application, and I could get a country id, a network id, and a cell id.

      I wonder how the cell id relates to antenna. Is the antenna in the centre, or edge of a cell? Does a tower have one cell or does each of it's antennae have a separate cell?

      In any case, I look forward to being able map my application's usage on a google map (more accurately than by country).

      --
      Max.
    33. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      While the locations of cell towers are usually of public record (at least in the U.S. - there's a searchable FCC database somewhere), it probably is missing critical information needed for geolocation, such as (for GSM systems) the GSM CellID, and also a detailed coverage map of that tower (signal strength may not be easily predictable as a function of location due to obstructions and such.)

      Getting this information would require some data collection, and the easiest way (since most carriers want to force users to use some sort of for-pay service such as TeleNav and hence wouldn't give it to Google) is to collect it from users who have real GPS units in their phones.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    34. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Most cellular systems have additional information beyond signal strength for determining distance from the tower.

      For example, GSM systems assign handsets to timeslots. A "near" handset and a "far" handset in an adjacent timeslot might actually interfere with each other due to differences in travel time. I believe GSM has an adjustment factor that will advance/delay the transmission time of certain handsets to take this into account. (IIRC, this is why GSM towers have a maximum range of something like 32 km regardless of LOS or signal strength - the adjustment mechanism maxes out at this range.)

      With CDMA, the modulation scheme has a lot in common with the modulation used by GPS satellites, and allows for timing information to be extracted from the signal independent of signal strength.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    35. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      This exists for some Windows Mobile devices, in various forms.

      The best example of using "rough location" is that there are apps that will change settings on your phone based only on which tower it is talking to. This can be a multi-mile range, but for many users this is enough to automagically switch between a "home" profile and a "work" profile.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    36. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by kevinbr · · Score: 1


      http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/11/29/westminster_satlav_texting_service/

      Again, just a loose location is enough....

      "....Spend-a-penny SMS service starts flowing

      By James Sherwood [More by this author]
      29th November 2007 14:50 GMT
      If you're caught short in central London tonight then just text Westminster Council (WC), because it has launched a loo-locating texting service.

      Mobile-enabled geeks out on the pi** now need only text the word 'toilet' to 80097 and the service will text you back the street name of your closest water closet. The service is called Sat Lav and was designed by student Gail Knight.

      A spokesperson for WC told Register Hardware that its service communicates with nearby mobile phone masts to triangulate your location. Sat Lav includes the details of 40 toilets and covers 8.5 square miles of Westminster.

      We couldn't resist a try and so sent a text to Sat Lav. It's a good job we weren't bursting, because the reply took 7-10 minutes to arrive. And when it did come through, the exact location of the toilets were so vague that it would have taken us ages to find them. We'd have burst by then...

      It's not so much that Ken Livingstone has suddenly become an avid texter, but more because WC claims that 45,460 litres of urine is at risk from ending up on the city's streets, thanks to those not willing - or unable - to wait.

      The service is available now at 25p per text, a little more than spending a penny. Let's hope the money goes to building more outhouses......"

    37. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where does it say that they do that? This would be an extremely stupid idea. They already know EXACTLY where all the towers are and how best to triangulate the signals - they don't need to collect that from Blackberry users. Are you sure someone isn't having you on? Sounds made up to me. Please link to your source.

      http://www.google.com/support/mobile/bin/answer.py?answer=81873&topic=12595

      How accurate is My Location (beta)?

      Mobile towers are placed by operators throughout an area to provide coverage for their users. Each of these towers has its own individual coverage area, usually split into three non-overlapping sections known as "cells." These cells come with identification numbers, but no location information. Google takes geo-contextual information [from anonymous GPS-readings, etc] and associates this information with the cell at that location to develop a database of cell locations. Based on this information, Google uses various algorithms to approximate your location relative to the cells nearest you. The accuracy of this information depends on how big an individual cell is. Thus, areas with a denser concentration of mobile towers allow for a more accurate My Location reading. Additionally, as our database of cell locations continues to improve, so too does the accuracy and coverage of the My Location feature.

    38. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      well if we're going this far with it...if you had a helicopter, you'd have GPS onboard. Plus you're not supposed to use cell phones on helicopters I don't think. Even if it was safe, it's too loud.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    39. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Sabotage · · Score: 1

      Do you happen to have the name of any of these apps? This is exactly something I've been desiring for my WM6 phone.

    40. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by meepzorb · · Score: 1

      An IMU can only measure movement, not position. To be used for navigation, an IMU needs (1) an accurate initial calibration point (a "ground truth") and (2) occasional updates to correct for errors in measurement and integration that unavoidably occur over time.

      You can certainly use GPS for (1) and (2)... but if you already have access to accurate GPS, why use the IMU at all? (Especially since an IMU would require more power consumption than a mini GPS receiver).

    41. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I forget, but try going to http://forum.xda-developers.com/ and searching for "CellID" or "Cell ID".

      Some of the apps are basically user experiments which only work on some devices, but some threads have links to more robust commercial apps.

      (I don't use any of them myself, partly due to no need, partly because I'm one of those rare people that lives so close to work that they are probably in the same cell whether at home or at work.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    42. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you've not even mentioned location-based advertising, i.e. targetting ads at you, or away from you depending on how far away from the product/service you are and what the particular neighbourhood is like. It's the next logical step on from Google's search-based ads.

    43. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by kevinbr · · Score: 2

      Mobile Operators have had this ability for years, but they cannot decide what to do.

      The other interesting location ability is to "tag" a location with data, so people can come for example to a park, and read comments left in "space".

      again.....as mobile operators we sit on our collective ass, listening to idiots like Arun Sarin who has no real ideas how to make money off of data services.

    44. Re:Wow! This is exactly what I always wanted!!! by adisakp · · Score: 1

      The parent poster here has a history of telling people they are wrong when he personally has no clue what is going on.

      On another thread he was telling me that 160mA is less than 1W but he forgot that to get WATTS (a completely different measurement than mA) you multiply amperage by voltage and 160mA * 12 V = 1.92 W which is much greater than 1 W. The funny thing is that he provided the amperage number in his post attempting to refute me which actually showed that he was completely wrong.

      Oh well, this is slashdot and it's fun to randomly disagree with people even if you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

  3. 1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by bluemonq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, hypothetically speaking, if I had been driving to my relatives' house on, say, Thanksgiving, and I possibly took a right turn instead of a left one and ended up 3 miles away before turning back, I was, in theory, also pretty close?

    1. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by ConcreteJungle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not every invention you see started off being perfectly usable. That's what development is for. The very cellphones that one will be using this on were not exactly convenient to carry around once upon a time, were they?

    2. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, 1KM is pretty close for a non-GPS-equipped phone.

      Think about the workflow - Google Maps can automatically zoom you in to a really small area of global mapping data, and in most cases you're going to want to browse 1KM or greater anyway to have an overview of where you are, what the nearby roads are, and where you are going. You can easily zoom in and out or scroll around from there, getting to exactly what you want to view in seconds.

      The alternative is to have you sit there and type in your location, which perhaps you don't even know (but could recognize if you could see the nearby road layouts or satellite view), or to have you zoom all the way down from the continental map of the US manually over a cell connection (i.e. quite slowly).

      If you had to drive to your relatives on Thanksgiving you would have used this feature to get ballpark, and then corrected it, and then typed in a destination. Hopefully, though, you know where your relatives live :P

      Side: I just got an 8310 (Blackberry Curve), it has GPS built in and with a fix of 5 satellites it seems to be accurate to about 10 meters or less, and this feature also works with Google Maps (as well as MapQuest, TeleNav, Blackberry maps, and maybe some others I haven't tried).

    3. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Relatively speaking.

    4. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      How did your Curve come with GPS? Mine comes with the ability to pair to a Bluetooth-enabled GPS receiver, but does not include GPS functionality built in. Sad day =(

    5. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      There are several versions of the curve, the 8310 has the GPS.

    6. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Damn! Ahh, well, the joys of being an early adopter. I can always get the newer edition or just suck it up and get a Garmin bluetooth GPS module and keep it in my bag.

    7. Re:1 KM (0.6 miles) is close? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's what he's talking about -- that he expects the tech to be mature immediately.

      However, one can do expect the description to be worded a bit more truthfully.

      In this case, why not just skip the "close" part but still describe what it does? Because one can really say this isn't very close, at least for the uses I can imagine with this.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  4. Still... by E.+T.+Moonshade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not terribly useful if you're truly lost. Once they can get the triangulation between towers to work better, it'll be pretty damn slick. Until then, 'tis just a toy.

    --
    "In caelum, illuc est libertas."
    1. Re:Still... by Snowbeam · · Score: 1

      For a toy, it has been fun to use so far. Of course this is just with locations I know. The truth in the end is that there's room for a lot of improvement. Alas, for something that is free, it is pretty sweet.

      --
      I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
    2. Re:Still... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not terribly useful if you're truly lost. Define truly lost.

      If you're "truly lost" in [major city] then stop and ask someone.

      If you're "truly lost" out in the middle of nowhere, a 10 city block guesstimate from your phone is more than enough to get you back on the right path.

      For anything in between those two extremes, I can't imagine how the guesstimate won't be helpful. I mean... how lost can you be that you don't know what street you're on? And you're staring at a map.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Still... by centinall · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you do have GPS on your phone you'll find that it probably IS "useful if you're truly lost". For those that don't have GPS and until they can get the triangulation between towers to work better you might be right that it's just a toy. However, it will certain save some time bringing up a map of your general vicinity.

      See your location on the map, with or without GPS. Save time and tedious keystrokes finding where you are, what's around you, and how to get there.

      If you have a GPS-enabled device, this blue dot corresponds to your GPS location. At times, or if you do not have a GPS-enabled phone you might see the blue dot surrounded by a light blue circle (as shown on the right) to indicate uncertainty about your location.


      That article was lame and not very informative. Better link: http://www.google.com/mobile/gmm/mylocation/index.html
    4. Re:Still... by E.+T.+Moonshade · · Score: 1

      My bad, should've clarified that one. When I say 'truly lost', I mean out in the middle of nowhere - meaning you're likely out of reach of a cell tower anyway. Y'know, like 29 Palms, CA.
      Seriously though, somewhere like in the middle of a national park, where you've got heavy foliage that makes it so signal won't quite get there (disclaimer: I haven't actually been to a national park with a cell phone). If you could get an estimate to within a kilometer, that'd be cool, but from what I know of RF, you'd have to have a tower pretty close - and in that case, you could just make a phone call.

      --
      "In caelum, illuc est libertas."
    5. Re:Still... by rindeee · · Score: 1

      It is indeed very useful, if you can eyeball either sat imagery or a topo map (both of which are available from Google of course) you can easily identify exactly where you're at. The problem with doing this (normally) is two fold. First, you have to have access to the map (Google of course had solved this already). Second, you have to know what map to view, or in this case, what portion of the Earth to look at and establish you location. In this case, Google is simply pulling the right map for you...you can do the rest. Of course this isn't really comparable to a GPS, but it is quite useful in a pinch if you're someplace completely foreign to you. I'll use it.

    6. Re:Still... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Umm... how would you be accessing Google Maps if you don't have any cell coverage at all? How are they going to triangulate between towers you have no reception from?

      I think you're trying to solve an entirely different problem. ;)

    7. Re:Still... by blantonl · · Score: 1

      You pick up the phone and call someone.

      Oh wait.. uhh.... Dammit!

      --
      Lindsay Blanton
      RadioReference.com
    8. Re:Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can just ask a cannibal where you are. Duuh

    9. Re:Still... by bane2571 · · Score: 1

      What impresses me is areas where google has street view. Spend a couple minutes cruising around the map and you could get a shot of the exact spot you are standing on.
      This map for instance shows the approximate range you need to cover. Now if I was standing in front of Macy's, where in this picture would I be?
      Very cool in my opinion. That said, if you can afford data charges for google maps, you have GPS on your phone already.

    10. Re:Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, if one thinks about it - a topographic map is usually divided into 1km x 1km squares (I don't know how this is in the USA, are they 1 mile x 1 mile?). So this is the equivalent of pulling out not just the right map, but having it zoom in on the right box. That's a pretty decent system if you ask me....anyone with a brain can then map the (limited number of) features in that box to what they see, and triangulate their own position. Anyone with decent mapping skills can do this anyway without being told which of the 400 squares on the map they are in. So to me, this would be a useful feature. To anyone else, it could still be useful if they turn on their brain. It's a convenience item. That doesn't mean it has to do everything for you.

    11. Re:Still... by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Sadly, map reading now consists of 'finding the little blinky thing' on the screen.

    12. Re:Still... by redxxx · · Score: 1

      Wow, great so this isn't good for lost folks, unless they can read a map and street signs. There plenty of uses there knowing mostly where someone is would be helpful. It is more than accurate enough for "find the nearest X" applications and other stuff like location based adsense(this is google we are talking about, and they like money).

    13. Re:Still... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Just a toy my ass. This is an awesome tool. GPS(-like systems) isn't just for directions, you know. Now I can find the phone number of a restaurant, or a locksmith, or a drug store, or whatever else I might need near my current location. 1km resolution is virtually exact when I am looking for every restaurant in a 15km radius. Even 10km resolution would be good enough for some searches, maybe I want the nearest hospital or zoo.

    14. Re:Still... by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lost person calling Google (not that you can really call them, but still)

      Lost person: Hi, I'm lost in the middle of nowhere. Can you tell me how to get back to the city?
      Google: Sure, where are you?
      Lost person: I just told you...I'm in the middle of nowhere?
      Google: Sorry sir, but if you don't know where you are then I can't give you directions. I can however give you...an exciting offer from one of our featured advertisers about a book that details a journey through "The Middle of Nowhere"

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  5. 1000 metres on *average*? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Um... What's the standard deviation on that?

    While I like the sentiment, I suspect the usefulness is going to be... limited... It'll be as easy to put in the street names and such.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:1000 metres on *average*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be extremely useful. One keypress ('0') instead of typing in an address, city and state with T9 (can be pretty painful).

    2. Re:1000 metres on *average*? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      During the daytime. I do a fair amount of traveling, and street sign legibility at night is usually far less accurate than even this method.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    3. Re:1000 metres on *average*? by slart42 · · Score: 1

      My phone provider has been offering that service for a while (a "locate my phone" feature on their web site). When i tried it out, it would have an error of less then 100m in downtown Berlin. They said the service would work much more precise in dense urban areas where there are many cells then out in the countryside. Makes sense.

      But that means that the 1000 meters average figure could also be more useful then expected, if you get better approximation in urban areas (where you need it), and just a rough estimate when cruising on the highway.

  6. MapPoint? by phatvw · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe MapPoint Location Server had these same features based on GPRS/GSM available back in 2004. For a price of course :)

  7. For $200... by Eco-Mono · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given your posting record thus far, I'm gonna side with Sean Connery on this one and say that you're missing a space after that "e".

    --
    (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
    1. Re:For $200... by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      Ah, if I could have picked up on the SNL reference a few seconds sooner. :(
      Alas I did not know you were referring to his user name.

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
  8. It could be useful by xarien · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The usefulness will come from the fact that you now have a localized map of roughly where you are. As long as you think of it as a personalized map service instead of a GPS replacement service, it still quite handy

    1. Re:It could be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly: if you already know roughly where you are (or even exactly where you are), but don't know where the nearest Taco Bell is -- this is very useful. Or which freeway is closest.

      It's not useful for finding yourself if you're lost, but it is awesome for finding out where to go.

    2. Re:It could be useful by asavage · · Score: 1

      Now if only on my cellphone (samsung a920) I didn't get a permission check to access the network whenever I scroll the map it would be useful. Google's gmail application has this same problem for each message I open plus I get a runtime exception "method not implemented" whenever I start the gmail application. It works fine for some reason after I manually retype my password. Other applications don't have this problem such as with opera mini I only need to give it permission once or if it has been inactive for a few minutes.

    3. Re:It could be useful by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      The usefulness will come from the fact that you now have a localized map of roughly where you are. As long as you think of it as a personalized map service instead of a GPS replacement service, it still quite handy

      Or, you could use Google Maps as it exists right now, look at a nearby landmark, like an address or a street sign, punch that into the "Find location" field and find exactly where you are with almost no guesswork. Sure, the tech is interesting, but currently it doesn't do anything that you can't do with Google Maps as it exists right now and the ability to read road signs.

    4. Re:It could be useful by xarien · · Score: 1

      Or, you could use Google Maps as it exists right now, look at a nearby landmark, like an address or a street sign, punch that into the "Find location" field and find exactly where you are with almost no guesswork. Sure, the tech is interesting, but currently it doesn't do anything that you can't do with Google Maps as it exists right now and the ability to read road signs.

      I could also heat up my leftovers in an oven instead of a microwave. Having this feature, saves the user time and effort, which in any circumstance is more than just interesting, but useful.

    5. Re:It could be useful by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      I could also heat up my leftovers in an oven instead of a microwave. Having this feature, saves the user time and effort, which in any circumstance is more than just interesting, but useful.

      Actually, if the address is the same as the one you last put in, it requires the exact same amount of button presses to get the map centered exactly on your current position as it does to get it centered somewhere within a kilometer or two. If you've entered it before, it only takes two more button presses to get greatly increased accuracy. Entering addresses, by the way, is basically required in order to take advantage of Google Maps' turn by turn directions.

      Have you actually used Google Maps for mobile devices? It sounds like you haven't. It's a lot easier to use than you're making it out to be.

    6. Re:It could be useful by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      anything that cuts down on the amount of typing that's required on a cellphone keyboard to accomplish a task is a good thing

    7. Re:It could be useful by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Entering addresses, by the way, is basically required in order to take advantage of Google Maps' turn by turn directions. You are "basically" wrong. Google added the ability to drag and drop directions waypoints quite a while ago. As long as you can find your destination on the map you don't have to type the address, just drop the little 'pin' on it.
  9. It doesn't work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded it to my phone and I hit Zero many times and it still hasn't shown me the blue dot. Is there something special I have to do?

    1. Re:It doesn't work? by CyberSnyder · · Score: 1

      Make sure you actually have version 2.0.0. I've been trying to download it for my Treo since noon and still get the older verison even though the link says 2.0.0.

    2. Re:It doesn't work? by PayPaI · · Score: 2, Informative

      I downloaded it on my phone (samsung m500 on sprint) and while it's definitely the new version (double checked in the help/about) it says My Location isn't supported on this device. Also they changed the buttons around, it seems to only use 0-9 and the 4way directional, rather than using the button in the middle of the 4way and the * and # keys.

    3. Re:It doesn't work? by matt_martin · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it there will be no new version for PalmOS, despite the "download version 2.0 on your palm Treo 700p here" link on the site. But, you know, rumors are rumors and maybe somebody just screwed up the web site...

      --
      Lurking in the desert
    4. Re:It doesn't work? by dwater · · Score: 1

      I think it's only supported in some locations - something at the end of their little video suggested as much; "You might get an error message. If so, try again at another location nearby."

      I get the message, "Your current location is temporarily unavailable." (which made me smile).

      --
      Max.
  10. Out of beta.. by ContractualObligatio · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apple has promised to continuously update and improve upon the feature set of its inaugural mobile handset, making it more than likely that the feature will turn up once it emerges from the beta stage.


    Oh, good, once a Google feature gets out of beta iPhone users can expect support. That'll only be a couple of years, then...

    1. Re:Out of beta.. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      Oh, good, once a Google feature gets out of beta iPhone users can expect support. That'll only be a couple of years, then...
      Gmail is still in beta, the iPhone will never get support, mwahaha!
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Out of beta.. by snickkers · · Score: 1

      You've misunderstood. That sentence you've taken from TFA says that Apple are a bit slow on the uptake (not Google), and in fact Apple will likely be so slow that they won't make this feature possible on iPhones until after Google have already finished beta.

      There's nothing Google can do to make this compatible with iPhone, they have to sit around and wait for Apple to provide the functionality required.

      --
      GLORX 3:16
  11. The few posters so far really lack imagination by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it's not going to tell you your exact location. But if you need to get somewhere it can give you direct starting within 1000 feet of where you are.

    It is NOT for Geo caching, or to give you constant real time updates as you hurl down the road.
    So if you are in downtown Toronto and decide you want to check out the new book store in BF Canada, you can get a close start position on Google maps. If you can't figure it our from there, then please stop using technology.Any technology.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by R4nneko · · Score: 1

      1000m, not feet so roughly 3 times as much error. However, your point still stands, if you cannot find yourself on a localised map where you know you are within a couple of klicks of the centre, you shouldn't be using technology.

    2. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by beav007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect. According to the summary, it's within 1000m (1km, 3280 feet, 7143 linguine, 108 double decker buses, or more than 7 brontosaurii) of where you are - significantly more than 1000 feet, and much less useful.

      Free unit conversion tool

    3. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      It's also a good starting point when you bring up the map. A map of the surrounding area of 1000m x 1000m in your palm is very useful. You could hilight all the bookstores or subway stations within that area, or if you're lost, you might recognize the street name you're on at a glance.

    4. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by beav007 · · Score: 1

      The map would actually need to be circular with a radius of 1000m (or a 2000mx2000m square) just to give you a reasonable chance of being on it. Don't forget that 1000m is only an average. It could be much more than that.

    5. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by MonkeyboyITP · · Score: 1

      Well actually keeping with the theme of Google you can even use Google for the conversion;

      search: 1000 m to ft
      and your first result will be: 1 000 meters = 3 280.8399 feet

      But still you have the whole map at your disposal you should be able to at least orient yourself based on what they give you.

    6. Re:The few posters so far really lack imagination by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      Google Maps for mobile devices automatically searches with the assumption that the center of your screen is where you're looking for. The map scrolls very easily, so you can move the map to the general area where you think you are and then punch in your search. It works. I do it all time.

      You can get more exact results if you look at a street address and punch it into the "Find location" feature. The technology is cool. I think the concept of being able to automatically acquire my position without any additional gear is great, but being able to pin my location down to somewhere within a click is not all that useful. Especially when, if I'm willing to put forward slightly more effort than just starting the Google Maps app on my phone, I can narrow my position down to about 100 meters.

  12. Not Exactly Global by cybermage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's based on the deployment of Cell towers, it's not exactly a *Global* Positioning System. I think GPSs are more useful in remote areas than urban ones and probably less dangerous there too.

    I think this product might lead people into a false sense of security:

    "Hey, I think were lost out here in the middle of the Oregon woods in a blizzard. Better check the GPS on my iPhone.

    "WTF?

    "We're doomed!"

    1. Re:Not Exactly Global by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I hope you aren't referring to the case where Google maps or some other direction-giving site might have lead to the death of a well-known CNET editor.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Not Exactly Global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side, trekking in the Oregon woods in a blizzard with no other naviagational tools than an iPhone might win you a Darwin Award

    3. Re:Not Exactly Global by cybermage · · Score: 1

      I hope you aren't referring to the case where Google maps or some other direction-giving site might have lead to the death of a well-known CNET editor.

      Actually, I'm referring to exactly that. Too many people, especially otherwise smart ones, are too eager to allow technology to substitute for common sense.

  13. No, it not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's not GPS, but it comes pretty close (approximately 1000m close, on average),"

    it's even close? GPS give approx 10m in proximity.

  14. good. VZW can lick my sweaty... by Nate+Fox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was so excited to get my sexy VZW Blackberry World Edition phone cause it had GPS. To later learn that the GPS is gimped and VZW wont let it talk to 3rd party apps.

    Hopefully this gets me 'good enough' placement on the map.

    1. Re:good. VZW can lick my sweaty... by mmcuh · · Score: 1

      More like "nowhere good enough", unless you're OK with ending up one kilometer from where you wanted to go.

  15. It sorta worked by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    It found my location to "within 2400 meters". It is about 2K off actually.

    But I am impressed by the fact alone that it started zoomed right into my city. And I am connected with WiFi, not even GPRS.

    Pretty swift if you ask me.

    1. Re:It sorta worked by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      I suspect it pulls the location information out of your GPRS signal even if you are using a wifi connection for the data transfer, its probably part of the phones java API.

      Suffice to say it didn't work on my phone (The new motorola razor, despite the promise on googles page.)

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    2. Re:It sorta worked by stg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's pretty cool. I tried through WiFi (as my packet data connection is awful AND pricy), and I wasn't within the limit it drew, but about 800 meters off. That, in a minor town in Brasil.

      That is not revolutionary, but it's clearly very useful.

      And I really like that it can use my phone's GPS (which was off for the test) - Google Maps is absurdly better than Nokia Maps, as far as directions and map data goes.

    3. Re:It sorta worked by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My Blackberry Curve uses T-Mobile's HotSpot@Home to tunnel the voice and data over WiFi when available. Even though my phone showed that it was enabled (UMA icon active), MyLocation is still pulling the tower information from the GSM chipset.

    4. Re:It sorta worked by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      I think the map data is "better" because Google's maps are huge (Or so it seems: just zooming around in my neighbourhood for a bit meant over 1000 KB of data transferred). Nokia maps are meant to be stored locally on the phone, and take way less space than Google maps would. But if you have unlimited data plan, Google does seem the better choice. I haven't checked the directions on google maps yet, but considering they got their data from the same place as Nokia, I find your claim of their superiority a bit surprising.

    5. Re:It sorta worked by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't work on my N95 either.. there's an app and it shows a map position but it's at the other end of the country and pressing '0' just comes up with an error.

    6. Re:It sorta worked by M$+Mole · · Score: 1

      It found my location "within 1.7 KM"...or so it says.

      Based on where it says I am, the margin of error is actually 6.2 miles (crow-flies)...which I'm pretty sure is more than 1.7 KM.

      --
      Karma: Non-existant. Due mostly to the fact that you smell funny and nobody likes you.
    7. Re:It sorta worked by stg · · Score: 1

      They may have bought their data at the same place, but Google bought a whole lot more data, it seems...

      I've tried both again outside, with the GPS on and using WiFi. Both located where I am, but on Google Maps I get about 30 meters off my real position, with full street maps and a nice, 1.5 meter resolution satellite photo.

      On Nokia Maps, I'm a few kilometers between two roads. The whole city (population: about 120,000) isn't there.

      Given the disparity of the map sizes, I imagine the situation is much better in the US - if you use Nokia Maps Download, Brazil has 1.8MB , while the US has 1.3GB.

      I've also tried it while I was on my apartment in Sao Paulo (the biggest city in the country), and while the street maps on Nokia Maps are pretty good, Google Maps is still better - if I try my street number Nokia Maps has it a whole block off, while you can see in the sat photo that Google Maps is pointing at the real building.

      The discussion is a bit academic, though - IMHO, our packet data net is too slow, expensive and unreliable, so I'll have to mostly use Nokia Maps anyway...

  16. WARNING: Obscured Shocksite Redirect by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Add parent to lameness filter for obscured URL.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  17. For those complaining of accuracy... by the_wishbone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may not be as accurate as full-on GPS, but now you can do searches for nearby businesses...without having to type in your location. I don't know how many times I've been looking for something NEARBY and either didn't know what zip code or city I was in (keep in mind in a place like LA, something might be nearby but technically in a different city, and sometimes it wouldn't find things unless you gave it specific locations - I know this from experience). I finally resorted to doing a browser Google search because the maps app just wasn't finding stuff.
     
    I've also noticed that now, when you search without putting in a location (i.e. "pizza" instead of "pizza los angeles ca") it will search the nearby area visible on the map. With the previous version, for some reason, it kept giving me locations in the UK when I didn't specify a city/state in the US instead of just searching the area of the map that was currently visible.
     
    Too bad the "My Location" feature doesn't currently work on Sprint Touch and Mogul phones (whether this is a Google or Sprint thing, who knows...) as it says the phones aren't reporting any cell towers (you can see this in Help>About where it says "myl: N/A". Oh, well...hopefully it will work sometime in the future.

    1. Re:For those complaining of accuracy... by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I've also noticed that now, when you search without putting in a location (i.e. "pizza" instead of "pizza los angeles ca") it will search the nearby area visible on the map. With the previous version, for some reason, it kept giving me locations in the UK when I didn't specify a city/state in the US instead of just searching the area of the map that was currently visible.

      Slightly offtopic, but funny: This part of your post reminded me of William Gibson's "All Tomorrow's Parties", wherein a character gets a map of downtown Rio de Janeiro while trying to find a place to eat in SoCal using his computing glasses. It's kind of a recurring problem throughout the novel :).

    2. Re:For those complaining of accuracy... by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

      That's Sprint's fault. It doesn't work on my Verizon XV6700 either, and that's because Verizon is taking the extra effort to block tower information from my phone. How thoughtful of them. I asked at Verizon and they'll unblock it for an extra $15/mo. I rather switch away to a provider that doesn't go out of their way to remove services. That's disappointing to hear Sprint has it blocked too; I suspect it's blocked in the phone OS so replacing the OS with the base ROM might fix it.

  18. Well done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1000m is not close to GPS. But it is a good development nevertheless.
    Good job!

    I tried to do something every similiar a few years back.
    If the area has good GSM coverage, usually the handphone will be able to pick up signals from multiple "towers". With a bit of triangulation and intersection, you can get very good estimation of where you are.
    But without the telco revealing their towers location, it will not be accurate.

  19. Nor for finding Starbucks by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    "You're within 1000m of coffee. Can you smell it yet?". Thanks!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  20. Another alternative by phatvw · · Score: 1

    http://www.nav4all.com/ - I haven't tried this so I can't vouch for it, but it looks interesting and is also free.

    Note that when people say "GPS" in the context of cellphones, they are usually talking about GPRS/GSM location-based services which use celltower triangulation. There are very few cellphones that have GPS satellite antennas, although there are a few Bluetooth GPS add-on devices available.

    1. Re:Another alternative by ShmuelP · · Score: 1

      I believe that is true only for the GSM carriers. Most CDMA carriers put some GPS hardware on the phones that, together with information from the tower, can compute the position (on the provider's side).

      --
      Solution to blink tags: wrap them in another blink tag, with a javascript delay loop, so they cancel each other out
    2. Re:Another alternative by dwater · · Score: 1

      > There are very few cellphones that have GPS satellite antennas,

      Nokia have quite a few available. I tried to use the 'search by feature' facility on this site to figure out how many, but I just don't believe the results. I know there are at least 'several' though.

      Some of them also have an assisted gps feature which seems to work similarly to this new google feature, though I don't think it works at all if the phone doesn't have gps. I read somewhere that Nokia intend to implement it on all their GPS phones via firmware upgrades.

      I've also seen some phones running 'MS Windows something' with GPS too (which worked much better than the N95 I had at the time).

      Of course, that's still 'very few' in the whole 'phone' market, but it's a fast growing segment of the smartphone market.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Another alternative by dwater · · Score: 1

      FYI I'm told the A-GPS on these phones is completely different to what google are doing, so I was wrong about that.

      --
      Max.
    4. Re:Another alternative by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      I have a nokia 6110 navigator with built in GPS - it came with tomtom but its maps were pretty crap for Thailand. I installed nokia maps from smart2go and they are much better , they even have some roads marked for me in the back of beyond Laos where I am now.
      what I would like is a symbian app to allow me to use my phones gps as a bluetooth gps to connect to my handheld ( axim x50v )or laptop . there seem to be a few symbian apps around that allow me to use my phone as a data logger and then allow me to export the file into google earth and view my route - cool

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
  21. Re: It will never happen on GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike CDMA networks, you are never connected to more than one tower with GSM. GSM is an archaic piece of crap that needs to go away. Unfortunately, it is also the most widely deployed technology, so that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.

  22. sdsds by rundgren · · Score: 0, Troll

    dfdfd

  23. Source CNET article by MishgoDog · · Score: 1

    Not sure why the post linked to an appleinsider article... this is a general google maps mobile thing.

    Here's a more detailed article from cnet

    I can't wait to use it - it looks like they're using the beta to build up a database of towers around the world :)

  24. Result for me - half block off by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Working pretty well on my BB - About one half block from exact location. Pretty cool for the price.

  25. ...but it's close? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    I don't think 1 km can really be considered close to gps. GPS needs to be "close enough" to tell you when you are coming to your exit at 140 kph. I still think that you can use this for basic by hand navigation. Just look for an intersection and then at least this tool will give you a smaller square in which to search for your present actual location. Then, you can set you location and ask how to get where you need to be. By no means can this replace a real navi, but in a pinch it can save your butt.

  26. Privacy? by bhmit1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where are they getting the information about what tower you're connected to and how strong the signal is? If it's from the app running on the phone, and you selected to install the app (plus agree to a very long disclaimer) then I have fewer issues. But if they are getting the information from the phone company or from the network requests (e.g. http headers added by phone company) then I'd question if the phone company is giving away private information on their customers.

    And if they get the information from the app on the phone, I'd be curious of what api's there are to do this ourselves and if that access infringes on some kind of separation between the phone and app that users and phone companies may want (e.g. apps dialing 900 numbers or racking up charges for sms messages without your knowledge).

    (And FYI, testing this on a Sprint Treo 600 claims to download the 2.0 version, but it's really the 1.2 version after the installer runs, so it doesn't work for me yet.)

    1. Re:Privacy? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Google getting tower identifier information from the GSM chipset. You can pull it through a programming interface. BUT! The problem is, those tower identifiers have no geo-location information. So how does Google get it? Easily. The have the MyLocation Google Maps client running on GPS-enabled devices send back GPS coordinates with tower identifier information. As more and more people have the client running, Google gets a bigger database to play with. Once a significant dataset has been compiled, MyLocation data should be much more accurate (although, not as accurate as GPS).

    2. Re:Privacy? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to add, the tower identified information isn't private. The phone has this information the same as it has diagnostic information from the tower on signal strength. Just as your phone can tell the tower signal strength, the tower send back info on how well it can pick up your phone. This is why phones placed near speakers will make the speakers hum when a call is incoming. The tower is commanding the phone to ramp up it's radio to a higher power output (something it doesn't need to know while simply pulling data from the control channel on the tower).

    3. Re:Privacy? by x102output · · Score: 1

      I used to have a program on my old Nokia phone called "miniGPS". It allowed you to see cell phone tower IDs and script events based off of that. So when I would drive to school or work my phone would go into vibration mode automatically because I was always connected to the same set of tower IDs when I was on campus.

      I'm assuming this works the exact same way. Your phone obviously knows tower IDs and strength....how the hell do you think all the handing-off works.

    4. Re:Privacy? by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      Of course the phone knows that tower it's connected to, though technically all it really needs to know is what frequency has the best signal. The towers and the phone company have to keep track of what tower the phone is connected to, not necessarily the phone. But I digress, lets make the likely correct assumption that the phone knows exactly what tower it's connected to.

      The point of the post is that phone companies are very sensitive about applications running on their phones wrecking havoc on their networks. So apps tend to run in a sandbox that can't access all of the phone's antenna/transmission capabilities. I'm just wondering if google is using published API's that we all have access to, or if something worse is going on.

      Of course if I had done a little google searching, I would have found things like http://www.j2melbs.com/ that show this isn't some google evilness going on here. That being said, if an app can transmit your cell tower and signal strength to a 3rd party, how hard is it to write a stalking app for a phone that constantly records your location for someone else to view later? And do I even want to know if there is a mic api to make bugging easy?

    5. Re:Privacy? by chuck · · Score: 1

      Where are they getting the information about what tower you're connected to and how strong the signal is?


      The phone knows the cell and tower ID, and the channel/frequency. Usually those frequencies are different in different directions from the tower. You can put your phone into field test mode (something on Howard Forums should tell you how) and see it for yourself. It's really neat. The trick is to learn where those tower IDs are and what direction it throws its different frequency signals.
  27. The few posters so far really lack basic skills by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    I don't need any fancy technology to do all that. Give me a map and a street intersection and I'm there. Or just call the store for directions.

  28. 1000 metres range is incredibly useful you clods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a 1000 metre range is very useful e.g.

    Movies @ nearest cinemas
    Weather forecasts
    Traffic congestion
    Local News

    Its a clever and evil breakthrough. Telcos have been trying to monetize LBS and google come right along and do it better with user contributed data! Whats the bet google will be selling this data back to carriers in a few years

  29. How about for notebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a datacard for the notebook. This would be handy for it too.

  30. Why not use the e911 GPS chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though my phone doesn't have GPS application capabilities, it does have GPS for e911. There's a hidden service menu that has an option to enable the GPS test screen. All I have to do is enable the test screen and call the test number (922, which seems to forward to different things depending on where I am) to find out my location, velocity, altitude, etc.

    I assume that GPS navigation software uses the same chip as e911, but service providers take the opportunity to charge customers extra for it (even though it costs them essentially nothing).

  31. It's bot meant to be a GPS replacement by Jimmy_B · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The purpose of this is not to tell you where you are. It's to get you to the right map, without needing to type a location using clumsy cell-phone input. Once you're looking at a map, you can figure out where you are by looking at street signs. Think of it as a road atlas which always opens to the right page.

  32. Navizon does this on iPhone now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    google Navizon

    1. Re:Navizon does this on iPhone now by snickkers · · Score: 1

      No, navizon doesn't do this on the iPhone now.

      If you click on their website's link that says "available on iPhone now", you'll see they tell you that WiFi must be turned on for it to work. You don't need to connect to any network, it just needs to be on.

      Obviously this is because it triangulates based on WiFi hotspot locations.

      Now, navizon *can* triangulate your position based on cell towers, but that feature won't work on the iPhone because, as many have already said, the iPhone doesn't provide the functionality needed.

      Looks like Navizon and GMM have the same possibilities - triangulate by WiFi, Cell Towers, or GPS. And they both have the same restriction on iPhones.

      --
      GLORX 3:16
    2. Re:Navizon does this on iPhone now by snickkers · · Score: 1

      Sorry! GMM doesn't triangulate based on WiFi hotspots by the look of it. My main point is still valid though.

      --
      GLORX 3:16
    3. Re:Navizon does this on iPhone now by tgd · · Score: 1

      Um, no. I was using Navizon perfectly well going 70mph down the highway with not hotspots in the area.

      It uses cell towers. On the iPhone. And works.

  33. my mini review by johnjones · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK
    my review -

    GOOD

    My Location actually WORKS !
    My Location works outside of the USA (at least in the UK)
    well put together app not a resource hog on my symbian Nokia Series 60 v2 phone (e50)

    BAD

    you cant do ANYTHING with "My Location" except watch a pretty blue point on the map
    No My Location for route finding
    No traffic outside USA
    Route does not work for a found location it adds a ")" at the end for some reason.

    Nice but you need to actaully finish it or it's just a plaything

    I am curious what Database of cell locations is google using do you gut think ?
    (the phone companies often lie about locations in there headers so you have to build your own (wiggle) or use OFCOM in the uk)

    regards

    John Jones

    http://www.johnjones.me.uk/

    1. Re:my mini review by mfn · · Score: 1

      Re: the database of cell locations, on this page http://www.google.com/support/mobile/bin/answer.py?answer=81873&topic=12595/ it states the info is "from anonymous GPS-readings, etc." Maybe they had their google streets view team and google maps team drive around w/ a cell phone w/ gps. It'd be pretty trivial to write an app that polls to see which cells it currently sees and also note the current GPS location.

      Another caveat that I haven't seen mentioned, cell tower placements vary by population density, in urban areas you'll have lots of small cells to handle the load, while in more rural or less densely populated areas, the cells can get much, much larger. For example, in the SF Bay area, there's just one cell that covers the entire Bay Bridge. So your accuracy in cities is going to be much better than elsewhere.

    2. Re:my mini review by jordan314 · · Score: 1

      >you cant do ANYTHING with "My Location" except watch a pretty blue point on the map >No My Location for route finding If you click off 'use GPS location' you can both route directions from your approximate position and find local businesses. The 'use GPS location' is a misnomer but you're incorrect about the functionality.

    3. Re:my mini review by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they had their google streets view team and google maps team drive around w/ a cell phone w/ gps. It'd be pretty trivial to write an app that polls to see which cells it currently sees and also note the current GPS location.

      Even better. Google Maps is doing the reporting. GPS-capable phones are building the database for them just by running.

    4. Re:my mini review by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 1

      you cant do ANYTHING with "My Location" except watch a pretty blue point on the map
      No My Location for route finding Not how it works on my BlackBerry Pearl. On mine, it automatically focuses on where you are, and allows you to do a bunch of nifty stuff from that position:
      • Search right around where you are (say, for a train station or restaurant)
      • Get directions from your current guessed location. Could be a hair inaccurate if you're on foot, but by car, it's fine. Here in Boston, the service is realistically accurate to 200 yards or so.
      • Once you find bars or stations or whatever, you can view DETAILS like hours of operation, costs, reviews... completely full-featured information delivery
      • Easily favorite (press **) the location to remember it later or go directly there using integrated driving directions
      • The coolest to me is how I really have to provide almost no information. I search for "bars" and it pops up a bunch of red pinpoints around my location, that I can then float over to view details. I can see what's close to me, what's good, what's bad, and even if the location's a little off, I can generally figure out where I am in relation to my points of interest.
      All in all, by far the best mobile app I've ever used. I will definitely use it quite a bit. Just load the app, press 0, and then search for anything your little heart desires, and POW, there it is, all laid out for you. Call straight from the listing, so on, so forth. Really awesome.
      --
      -----[0_o]-----
      We are not amused.
  34. Re:Read more here by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stupid I know, but until slash starts cradling us with some form of protection, I wrote the following

    javascript:(function(){
    var i,x,l,h;
            for(i=0;x=document.links[i];++i){
            l=x.href.toLowerCase();
            if(l.indexOf('google')>=0 && l.indexOf('btni')>=0) {
                    x.href = x.href.replace(/btni/gi, "btnG");
                    h=document.createTextNode("[I'm Feeling unlucky]");
                    x.parentNode.insertBefore(h, x.nextSibling);
            }
    } })()

    incorporate into greasemonkey or your own standard method and forget about feeling lucky.

    Is this a google vulnerability though or just creative thinking?
    If google actually checked the link and rejected commands if invalid parameter data is present then we would land on a harmless search page no matter what.

    (incidentally, will some regex wiz work their magic on the initial link test)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  35. This seems like by shelterpaw · · Score: 1

    This seems like it will be great technology when technology catches up............. wait a minute:\

  36. Blackberry 7520 by compwizrd · · Score: 1

    Too bad google maps won't use the built in GPS on my 7520... it'll talk to a bluetooth gps receiver though.

    Though, with the below dialup speeds of the blackberry, and 8 dollar a meg transfer charges, I'm not sure I'd want to do much with google maps anyways.

    "My location" doesn't work on this unit anyways.

  37. Navizon alternative by BovineOne · · Score: 1

    http://www.navizon.com/ is another alternative that uses a community-based approach to build its database of cell tower and wifi access point locations. Users who want to use the service pay a small fee, while users who have a GPS can get paid for contributing location data.

    Since Navizon also combines wifi access points (which are generally have shorter ranges), it can theoretically narrow down your position even more accurately than relying just on cell towers.

    --
    Don't waste those cycles! Put them to use! http://www.distributed.net/
    1. Re:Navizon alternative by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Nice idea but doesn't work... as it proven by the fact that I've *never* had it give me a position even in major cities when I'm surrounded by towers, wifi etc.

      People with GPS won't use Navizon because, well, they have GPS already. People without would use it but it doesn't work because there's nobody feeding in coordinates.

      Google can do this as they have the money and leverage to get the real locations of the towers off the companies, thus bypassing the chicken and egg that navizon is trapped in.

  38. Nice alternative by dave562 · · Score: 1

    Given that Google maps only finds my location on my GPS equipped Blackberry 8800 about 25% of the time, it will be nice to have an alternative. Now if they could just get traffic information that was worth a damn and actually works consistently. I haven't been able to get traffic information for my commute for the last two days. It says "No Traffic Information Available." despite the fact that I'm in downtown Los Angeles. Trust me, there is all sorts of traffic info available... I'm sitting in it. ;)

    1. Re:Nice alternative by 787style · · Score: 1

      If you're on AT&T, It's $10 a month, and it's called TeleNav. It's pretty slick, and does turn by turn directions. And I personally think it looks better than google maps. You can get a free 30 day trial by calling AT&T.

  39. And what about the other major features? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 2, Informative

    A few other very interesting features were released this week for Google Maps... and I'm sorry that this story is all we got on /. so far. Here's a copy from the site in my sig.

    Google Maps Adds Terrain
    Google Lat Lon Blog announces the addition of terrain to their free Google Maps site. In addition to adding the Terrain button, they've removed the Hybrid button. They explain, "You may notice in this screenshot that the handy "Hybrid" button, which shows satellite images overlaid with labels and roads, seems to have gone missing. Don't worry -- this view can now be accessed by clicking the "Satellite" button and checking the "Show labels" check box that will appear under the "Satellite" button."

    New Google Maps Features Launched Including Collaborative Mapping
    In addition to the important new terrain layer announced yesterday, Google Maps received a few significant updates, first, Google Maps searches are now providing a thumbnail of the related street view photo, second, the My Maps feature somehow becomes Our Maps, allowing to collaborate directly on someone else's My Maps, this has a lot of potential of getting big, and last, you can more easily share KML and KMZ files and GeoRSS feeds through My Maps. From the Our Maps announcement: "Just click the "Collaborate" link and enter the email addresses of the people you want to invite. They'll receive an email invitation with a link to the map. Once they open the map, they should be able to edit it, as long as they are signed into a Google Account that's associated with that email address. You can also open your map to the world so anyone can edit it by selecting the "Allow anyone to edit this map" checkbox."

  40. Works on my N75 by w00d · · Score: 2, Informative

    I killed the old version I had (1.7-something), downloaded 2.0, fired it up. Nothing. "Your location is currently unavailable." Rebooted the phone, now it works great. It's showing the blue dot about half a block from my actual location. I'm well within the grey circle around the dot. Pretty awesome for not using GPS.

    1. Re:Works on my N75 by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Also works a treat on my N80. As soon as it loaded up it found me to within about 100m. I also have a bluetooth GPS receiver somewhere which I'll try later (anyone know if it works with those?)

  41. Cell Info by ehlo · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I had an Ericsson T28 (GSM), and it had a function called Cell Info.
    All of my others phones (GSM) have had it, but I only ever noticed it when I was in Denmark in 2003.
    Living in Stockholm (Sweden), I never noticed it, and turning it on did nothing - but as soon as I crossed the bridge, it would tell me exactly where I was, right under where it told me which operator I was connected to.

    (example)
    S Comviq
    Main Boulevard 3, Copenhagen

    My guess at the time was that three (or more) towers were triangulating me, and that the towers had some built in map, since it was sending me that information. My guess isn't any better today, and I haven't gotten cell info again since then, but I also haven't been back to Copenhagen.

    Pretty cool - but as far as privacy issues go.. if anyone could program a phone to ask the network - or clone that phones ID - and have the towers tell you where subscriber with phone number 123 456 789 is, that wouldn't be all to great. It also isn't impossible that people working for the operator could query this.

    Je nais sais pas.

    1. Re:Cell Info by ja · · Score: 1

      The information you see is the location of the nearest cell tower. Pretty useful information I would say, for getting a rough idea of where you just woke up!

      --

      send + more == money? ...
  42. Killer App = My Location + Business by Fungi008 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, so this is spiffy. But imagine you're a business: think of all the ridiculously profitable stuff you could do with this kind of location info (once the user grants it)?

    -- Google pushes to your phone which nearby businesses are having sales at the moment.

    -- During non-peak hours, Starbucks sends you a coupon for a half-price latte redeemable in the next 15 minutes.

    -- Capital One, knowing your buying habits, lets you know which nearby clothing stores they can get you a discount at.

    -- Match.com tells you which matches are in the area to meet up with.

    -- LinkedIn lets you know there's a consultant nearby at lunch with just the kind of Indian outsourcing experience you need.

    -- Facebook takes your location info, accidentally leaks it to a Facebook app, and Ron Paul supporters swarm your location with placards and chants.

    In other words, massively delivered location-contextual ads and services are the next big thing. This is huge!

  43. Re:Read more here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a google vulnerability though or just creative thinking? There isn't a vulnerability here, it's abusing search + I'm feeling lucky, and the long parameters are simply for obfuscation. I know some people who work at google and will bring this up with them. I'm not sure there's much they can do without breaking some other functionality, but I doubt google wants to be associated with unwanted and offensive shock redirects.

    Btw, nice greasemonkey script :)
  44. Alpha???, it sure isnt a beta. It doesn't work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't even launch on my LG Cu500 I get an "Invalid Class Can't Launch" error. Thank you for not having any quality assurance other than for your crackberries.

  45. NetMonitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia phones have a hidden menu netmonitor, which shows you not only your current cell, but also other available cells. For the cell to which you are connected, you also get a distance estimation (close to 300m), but you still don't know the direction. In most cities (at least in Europe) the cells are really small (microcells) because otherwise they would be overwhelmed with connections. So if google actually mapped the different cells and had access to this information, they should be able to do much better than 1000m.

  46. What, are you female? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    IF you can't find your own position on a map of the area less then 1km across, you SUCK. My god, even females should be able to do this.

    Hint, look around you for any landmarks, then look on the tiny area of the map you KNOW you are on thanks to this new tech and voila, you found where you are.

    If you can't even do that, find a nearby river and drown yourselve and stop being a disgrace to the species. Whatever that may be.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  47. Next iPhone will have GPS by spineboy · · Score: 1

    At least that's what I heard, so that would obviate this service.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Next iPhone will have GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What do you mean "next version"? I paid $400 for this fucking phone, the better send me an updated version if they include 3G or GPS as I'm sure as fuck not paying another $400 to upgrade to an iPhone v2.0. God damn Apple and their lame upgrades.

  48. AT&T had this years ago by GayBliss · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure AT&T had this capability several years ago. I can remember testing it out on my mobile phone, probably around 5 years ago. The only thing it was really useful for was to find a certain type of place "nearby", which means within a short drive, but it never told you what your location actually is, just what is near you. When I tested it, it seemed more accurate then I expected (or just lucky). It was recommending locations that were within a block or two of where I was, in opposite directions.

  49. Starting point is close, ending point is exact by jordan314 · · Score: 1

    I tried this on my T-mobile wing tonight and it works great. It was about 3 blocks off which is better than I expected. People seem to forget (when reviewing this before trying it) that your STARTING point is generally less important than your destination. If you got directions before you hit that fork in the road, yes you would know to go left assuming you can read directions. The directions are going to be exact and it's just a matter of finding your way to the beginning of them. Also, I'm not sure why the poster below said this functionality was nothing more than a 'pretty blue dot.' If I checked off 'use GPS location' (even though it's not technically GPS), it would give me directions to anywhere from my approximate assumed location as well as tell me local business listings such as pizza. I have a bluetooth GPS device but am much more likely to use this because it works faster than it takes the GPS to discover satellites, it uses a stronger signal source, and it doesn't need to pair to any external equipment. Looking up your location is manual, so I will still use my GPS for determining speed and distance traveled (Tracky is a great program for that), but this will pretty much replace the GPS for finding businesses and getting directions. Finally, a note that this worked for me in Chicago but did not work for my friend in Kansas City. Looks like google hasn't mapped all the cell towers yet.

  50. At least more advanced than that old Palm version by mrjb · · Score: 1

    ...which just displayed a big fat cross on the screen one line of text stating "You are here".

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  51. Just tried it - 650-750m from accurate.. by ItsIllak · · Score: 1

    OK - I just tried it out - it put me 650-750 meters from my actual location. It seems to have drawn a 1k radius around the dot indicating that you are in that general area. To be honest, this looks very useful to me - Roll on a windows mobile API for me to use it in my own apps without paying license to someone. There isn't a pizza, taxi, video store or motorway (freeway) junction that would be selected incorrectly from using this location rather than my actual one.

  52. Re:Read more here by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

    I'd say the fix is to not allow I'm Feeling Lucky searches with non-google referers. I don't really think its their problem though, so I don't expect them to do anything.

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  53. Big Brother?? by HomeLights · · Score: 0

    So will Google now use this in conjuction with giving out 'real' information about anonymous users so the Feds can find them with the GPS? Nice idea! :--(

    --
    Stop by and watch a Christmas movie, commercial or cartoon! -->http://www.XmasDVD.com
  54. Units by Benet · · Score: 1

    Driving distances in feet? Ah, Americans. I trust they're going to broaden its appeal to the rest of us!

  55. Placelab by wframe9109 · · Score: 1

    Why not use PlaceLab?

    http://placelab.org/publications/pubs/pervasive-placelab-2005-final.pdf

    "Place Lab is software providing low-cost, easy-to-use device positioning for location-enhanced computing applications. Place Lab tries to provide positioning which works worldwide, both indoors and out (unlike GPS which only works well outside). Place Lab clients can determine their location privately without constant interaction with a central service (unlike badge tracking or mobile phone location services where the service owns your location information).

    The Place Lab approach is to allow devices like notebooks, PDAs and cell phones to locate themselves by listening for radio beacons such as 802.11 access points, GSM cell phone towers, and fixed Bluetooth devices that already exist in large numbers around us in the environment. These beacons all have unique or semi-unique IDs, for example, a MAC address. Clients compute their own location by hearing one or more IDs, looking up the associated beacons' positions in a locally cached map, and estimating their own position referenced to the beacons' positions. "

  56. Tested... Does not work by eiapoce · · Score: 1

    We found your position within a 5000Mt precision. And the little tool was pretending I was somewhere in roma city center while I actually was around 6000 mt from the position. Not bad, I guess from the previuos alpha version that supposely was indicating me being actually on earth or within one satellite distance. You still need a GPS receiver for positioning. And anyway anyone heard of the mtfuxx called Galileo? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_positioning_system Doesen't the project be awaiable nowadays? Did it got a takedown notice under the DCMA?

    1. Re:Tested... Does not work by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      We found your position within a 5000Mt precision.

      Oh, it does weapons targetting as well? Neat! That's one hell of a nuke though,
      what if I only have a couple of kt-class firecrackers left?

  57. Skyhook tries to do this via WiFi by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    Thought some of you might find this interesting...

    From their site:

    Skyhook's Wi-Fi Positioning System (WPS) is the world's first location platform to use the native 802.11 radio already on a mobile device to deliver accurate positioning across the US. And soon the world.

    http://www.skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/

    Never tried it myself.

  58. ObSlashotTags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > theycantrackyou
    They can't rack you? What is this, taking away your identity and installing you in a "rack" of identical machines?

  59. Re:At least more advanced than that old Palm versi by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I had that as well back in the early 90's I think. It was accurate to the millimeter.

  60. Isn't this just "Assisted GPS?" by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    I believe Sprint has had something like this for a while now. "Sprint Family Locator" lets you see where your kids are using GPS, or, when unavailable, cell signal approximation.

    My understanding is that many GPS apps use "Assisted GPS" like this, triangulating from cell towers for location help, since traditional GPS requires a clear view of the sky and that's not always practical (you're indoors, or in an urban or actual canyon, etc).

  61. Finally catching up with Orange UK by Anaerin · · Score: 1

    WAY back when (When the Matrix was new out, and I'd just gotten my new Nokia 7110 with WAP), Orange had a service that would find local businesses/amenities based on triangulation of cell towers (As phones at the time didn't have GPS). You'd go into the WAP portal and choose "Where's the nearest", it'd ask you for the kind of service you were looking for (Restaraunt, phone, ATM etc), and would tell you where they were (Street name/number, it couldn't tell which direction you were as it was a one-time lookup). The system's accuracy was around 10 meters, and (when I left the UK) they were starting to offer turn-by-turn directions (Using SMS and triangulation), and child location monitoring using their cellphones.

  62. Treo 700p? by dep01 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any luck getting this to work on a Treo 700p? The update doesn't seem to be applying to mine :(

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  63. 5 miles out by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    I'm sat in London's West end, but it seems to think that I'm actually in East Finchley. Still needs a little work, I think.

  64. Navizon by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    There's a 3rd party app that runs on iPhone called Navizon, it does this exact same thing, and it works pretty well. As others have stated, this is not GPS, more like a neighborhood level positioner. It's also the only 3rd party iPhone app I know of that charges money for the software. Its free for a trial period, so if you have installer.app cranking, give it a shot.

    It essentially finds your location based on cell tower, then opens the google maps application with your neighborhood on the screen. Search for Peet's or whatever and it'll bring up the closest locations.

  65. AGPS (Assisted GPS) by Radon360 · · Score: 1

    Phones not equipped with an actual GPS receiver typically use something called assisted GPS. This is where the phone gets positioning information from an assistance server (typically located at the cell tower) and location is determined through some combination of tower triangulation and signal timing. Each tower has a good satellite fix and is able to convey relevant information to the handset for the purpose of determining its location (though not as accurately when compared to a GPS receiver on-board the handset).

  66. Google maps GPS not just on Helios anymore by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    Finally! I was worried that Google maps with GPS would be exclusive to Helio, and I was beginning to begrudge Google for the apparent exclusivity.

  67. Well, so far a mixed bag for me... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Installed it on my 7105t, slick.

    Since it's Beta, I won't whine about the shortcuts that don't work, key mappings that don't work, nor the interesting quirks in the map display. Overall, it's usable.

    But I was in an area where there is often only one tower in range, and My Location was off by as much as 5 miles. It was mostly off in a quadrant that was WSW to WNW. Today, in an area with two good towers and one weak one (and the weak one is my carrier, so it grabs me at all costs - I watch my bars go from 5 to 1 when I actually make a call...) and I'm located within an unmeasurable 100m. Not bad.

    My wife installed it too. She thinks it will be cool. She's a complete Luddite. We'll see.

    For now, one snap with a twist.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  68. Spot on: phones could do it for years but don't! by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    Ever since 2002/2001, I've had location aware phones: the Samsung a500, a600, and now th LG LX550 (Fusic). It has taken three successive generations of supposedly 3G phones to finally get location aware applications.

    Fuck, I only just now am getting them on my Fusic. I've wanted to know where the nearest ATM is, and how to get there WITHOUT ENTERING MY LOCATION MANUALLY, I've wanted to get turn by turn directions WITHOUT ENTERING MY LOCATION MANUALLY, I've wanted to see if I'm at the right coffee shop to meet some one, but only NOW, 6 years after I was promised the ability, do I actually have it!

    If only more people had SDKs for phones and were developing such applications...I've scoured the web for six years and only just now have I begun to find any, and their either officially sponsored by the cell service providers or Google! Where are the 3rd party apps? The independent apps? Where are all the network operator apps they promised me?

  69. Apple used to map "Middle of Nowhere" by jpellino · · Score: 1

    On their map control panel maybe Sys 7 or so. Lat 0 / Lon 0 was labeled as such on one version of the Map panel. In the Atlantic south of the western "chin"
    of Africa, IIRC.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  70. Re:Spot on: phones could do it for years but don't by kevinbr · · Score: 1

    Part of of the problem ( like in Vodafone ) is that they are content centric, not service or application centric. So a lot of Mobile operators have not developed a very good infrastructure for taking a request from an MSISN and hashing it to pass out to a third party service provider or application. We do not want to pass out MSISDN's.

    Marketing people do not give a shit about API's. Orange in Europe is the most advanced in terms of Service API's for network service like location.

    The technology has been there for a long time, but the marketing will was not there. As I said, they could only imagine location services based upon a resolution that did not exist, so they discarded it completely.

    There SHOULD have been by now a massive ecosystem of location/context/presence apps and services. Instead we get Vodafone Live!

    As I travel a lot, all i ever wanted was directions to the nearest toilet , ATM and taxi rank for each new airport.

    Now GPS phones and Google will eat our lunch on building that Ecosystem.

  71. Until Google = service provider, this is useless by Trixter · · Score: 1

    I have a non-GPS-enabled phone (a Sanyo Katana, for the curious) that I use as a GPS navigation device because I run software (Telenav) provided by my service carrier. The thing is accurate to a few meters and works by triangulating off of 3 or more cell towers. Google can't utilize this so they're limited to 1000m -- that's pretty damn useless.

  72. Re:Read more here by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed spam using I'm Feeling Lucky links? One got past GMail's filters into my inbox the other day.

  73. gps simulator by mtmmtm · · Score: 1

    I tried it, but it did not work at all (in Sweden). It downloaded 50-100 Kbyte of data for every pan-operation. That is expensive. There are better alternatives (5 times less data) at www.idevio.com // Magnus