You can also get yourself a Nokia cellphone, one of those with free navigation. The maps are stored on your SD card, so no data plan required (or minimal) and you don't need to carry two devices in case of an emergency.
Perhaps some people don't care about tactile response (besides I know some people that look at the keyboard every time). I'd be more interested how does the battery plays a role when this type of keyboard is idle.
The university I work at, showed that the first bot doing DoS was a Mac. I also have a labmate that couldn't open any application and had to clean install his MacBook. I'm involved with IT, and I know they have problems, but for some reason Apple users refuse to believe it. The guy of the MacBook literally said "Wow, this looks like windows, everything is so slow, and some windows don't even open". Go figure!
I don't like it either, but since they cannot execute.exe files, I guess in theory they could be right. If customers fail to read as "We won't get the viruses from Windows, but we may get our own". I guess that's the customer's problem.
If your signal is bandlimited, you could assume the noise is white in your band of interest.But I get your point if you put for example high powered tones
I would be also interested on the distribution of the noise, more than its spectral characteristics. Many times it's easier to remove frequency shaped noise than distribution shaped noise.
Sounds great, but who's going to pay for the books? Someone will still have to pay for the books if they don't pay for the iPads. Worst case scenario, they will have to pay for the iPad AND the books. Sounds brilliant, when we all know that electronic copies of the books have a somewhat similar price to the printed ones.
On top of that, companies are not interested on hiring IT or engineering guys, they are interested on hiring CEOs! It would be a shame all those bonuses go to waste!
I don't get it. I don't see any biased result: when I google it.
In all seriousness, their algorithm works based on how many people look for something. Sometimes I use the search bar on my Firefox to look for Google (instead of using the URL bar). In any case, I'm not very surprised by the results of this search anyways. Neither from these results although I find interesting that bing doesn't show up in their own search! Of course the latter are very similar to Yahoo's results. But even Yahoo promotes itself and Google (see the "Also try:")
If running useless services and automatically installing software are deal killers, then I'd love to hear how you justify running Windows.
I don't know for you, but for me Services in Windows are the counterpart of Daemons in Unix OSs. The fact that an OS requires of those to manage some operations doesn't mean any application should be starting and running those at any time.
The answer is that most people really don't care how many services are running and their Start menu is at least 3 pages long. The only people I know who go after services and such are gamers and people with a misbehaving computer.
That's YOUR answer. The answer is that people want systems that boot fast, and run fast. Running Services or Daemons by the dozen doesn't improve any of them. So while people may actually don't care to know what services/daemons are, they actually care about the impacts on their system.
What isn't there to like about an application that wants to update itself twice a day and requires you to agree to a new EULA each time
... consumes my PC resources, wants to automatically install more software than the one I asked for (Safari, Quicktime), starts at least two services on windows that cannot be voluntarily stopped, neither set to manual (or that only run when I open iTunes).
I see your point. But there's people that doesn't necessarily have the "ultimate" programming skills on C/C++/etc. etc. That actually bring solutions to the table, but people tend to focus on having the "most optimized" solution, that normally they skip good solutions.
Well, that works well if you only want a code-monkey. There's people out there that apply to jobs different than coding, people with PhD that should do research and their qualifications are supposedly higher and specialized to sit them to write code.
Slashdot Mirror
to the article in a single page here
You can also get yourself a Nokia cellphone, one of those with free navigation. The maps are stored on your SD card, so no data plan required (or minimal) and you don't need to carry two devices in case of an emergency.
The more people do things, the more they think is normal, the more culturally accepted that is.
Wait, so did Dick Cheney move to Oregon?
he should be able to do whatever he wants to with his own property
Like, for example, crash it into a building?
What people needs is tolerance. Every person sees things in a different way, and most likely your biased towards your own beliefs.
Perhaps some people don't care about tactile response (besides I know some people that look at the keyboard every time). I'd be more interested how does the battery plays a role when this type of keyboard is idle.
That works for Apple. Why not let other companies generate buzz?
Actually, I think the purpose is to tell Apple users that fingerprint-catcher devices are good. They can use those to track bad people!
The university I work at, showed that the first bot doing DoS was a Mac. I also have a labmate that couldn't open any application and had to clean install his MacBook. I'm involved with IT, and I know they have problems, but for some reason Apple users refuse to believe it. The guy of the MacBook literally said "Wow, this looks like windows, everything is so slow, and some windows don't even open". Go figure!
I don't like it either, but since they cannot execute .exe files, I guess in theory they could be right. If customers fail to read as "We won't get the viruses from Windows, but we may get our own". I guess that's the customer's problem.
It's legal in Delaware to pass on the right (and mostly sure, it's also in UK, Hong Kong, Japan and Australia). I'd have used red lights. :)
Actually, I thought of X.25.
If your signal is bandlimited, you could assume the noise is white in your band of interest.But I get your point if you put for example high powered tones
I would be also interested on the distribution of the noise, more than its spectral characteristics. Many times it's easier to remove frequency shaped noise than distribution shaped noise.
I guess Apple convinced them that they wouldn't be able to play pr0n on their devices, yet they would be able to watch videos.
Sounds great, but who's going to pay for the books? Someone will still have to pay for the books if they don't pay for the iPads. Worst case scenario, they will have to pay for the iPad AND the books. Sounds brilliant, when we all know that electronic copies of the books have a somewhat similar price to the printed ones.
Like I needed to know how to improve my relationship with machines. What I need is a map to get out of the basement and interact with real people!
On top of that, companies are not interested on hiring IT or engineering guys, they are interested on hiring CEOs! It would be a shame all those bonuses go to waste!
I don't get it. I don't see any biased result: when I google it.
In all seriousness, their algorithm works based on how many people look for something. Sometimes I use the search bar on my Firefox to look for Google (instead of using the URL bar). In any case, I'm not very surprised by the results of this search anyways. Neither from these results although I find interesting that bing doesn't show up in their own search! Of course the latter are very similar to Yahoo's results. But even Yahoo promotes itself and Google (see the "Also try:")
If running useless services and automatically installing software are deal killers, then I'd love to hear how you justify running Windows.
I don't know for you, but for me Services in Windows are the counterpart of Daemons in Unix OSs. The fact that an OS requires of those to manage some operations doesn't mean any application should be starting and running those at any time.
The answer is that most people really don't care how many services are running and their Start menu is at least 3 pages long. The only people I know who go after services and such are gamers and people with a misbehaving computer.
That's YOUR answer. The answer is that people want systems that boot fast, and run fast. Running Services or Daemons by the dozen doesn't improve any of them. So while people may actually don't care to know what services/daemons are, they actually care about the impacts on their system.
What isn't there to like about an application that wants to update itself twice a day and requires you to agree to a new EULA each time
... consumes my PC resources, wants to automatically install more software than the one I asked for (Safari, Quicktime), starts at least two services on windows that cannot be voluntarily stopped, neither set to manual (or that only run when I open iTunes).
Seriously, why people use that software!?
You should be modded up. Gmail implemented this feature long time ago.
Now we just need to start powering processors with glucose and that's a solved problem. Next!
I see your point. But there's people that doesn't necessarily have the "ultimate" programming skills on C/C++/etc. etc. That actually bring solutions to the table, but people tend to focus on having the "most optimized" solution, that normally they skip good solutions.
Well, that works well if you only want a code-monkey. There's people out there that apply to jobs different than coding, people with PhD that should do research and their qualifications are supposedly higher and specialized to sit them to write code.