Slashdot Mirror


Today's Children Are Officially Potty Mouths

tetrahedrassface writes "When the Sociolinguistics Symposium met earlier this month swearing scholar Timothy Jay revealed that an increase in child swearing is directly related to an increase in adult swearing. It seems that vulgarity is increasing as pop culture continues to popularize vulgarities. The blame lies with media, public figures, politicians, but mostly ourselves. From the article: 'Children as young as two are now dropping f-bombs, with researchers reporting that more kids are using profanity — and at earlier ages — than has been recorded in at least three decades.'"

449 comments

  1. Oblig. by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

    So fucking what? /sarcasm

    1. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um-um-um-um-um!

    2. Re:Oblig. by suso · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well you just confirmed that kids are dropping f-bombs. Oh wait, your slashdot id is 5 digits, you must be a teenager.

    3. Re:Oblig. by blai · · Score: 1

      No idea. My sugartit is always fucking with my kids behind my back when I'm at lameass work doing retarded shit like going on slashdot and modding trolls. She must be the balls in this case.

      --
      In soviet Russia, God creates you!
    4. Re:Oblig. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Why the sarcasm?

      I find "So fucking what?" to be a perfectly reasonable answer.

      What is the problem with kids anyone swearing? Is that person hurting anyone else in any way?

      The closest to an explanation I've heard is "I don't want my kids to hear that language". Which is as stupid an argument as can be. Your kids, your fucking problem.

    5. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the sarcasm tag?
      What's the fucking problem here?
      There is no inherently superior language and profanity is only considered bad because some backward conservatives say it is. You know, those guys that also say gay marriage and unmarried sex is bad.
      Fuck them!

    6. Re:Oblig. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just the opposite. 5 digits would indicate he's been here a long time and probably in his 30s (minimum)

      DEFINE VULGARITY

      Why is it vulgar to say "shit" but not "poo"? Or "fuck" but not "intercourse" or "sex"? Or "ass" but not "buttocks"? Or "I'm eating cow, pig, or deer" but not "I'm eating beef, pork, or venison"?

      The answer, per usual, is the fault of the French. They were the ones who declared ~900 years ago that English words are vulgar and should be avoided, in favor of French substitutes.

      Time to tell the French to sex off and shove their poo up their anuses. Let's go back to using the original English words.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Oblig. by suso · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *whoosh*

    8. Re:Oblig. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      oh noes! people are speaking freely! what a catastrophe!

      sheesh.

      It's only in the US that people care about this. Irony of freedom of speech, huh.

    9. Re:Oblig. by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I think poo going the wrong way up an anus would make a different sound.

    10. Re:Oblig. by Codename+Dutchess · · Score: 0

      It might be sarcasm, but I fully agree. Everything changes, including morals. Words are just words, the old people will die off and nobody will care what 4 letter words you choose to use.

    11. Re:Oblig. by BStroms · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have to remember that curse words are only attractive because there are people who find them offensive. If nobody blinked an eye no matter what word you used or where it was used, curse words would lose their cathartic value.

    12. Re:Oblig. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1, Troll

      I appreciate when strangers act with social disregard and disrespect as it gives me an easy opportunity to point out to my kids what not to do if you want to function in society.

      Thanks for providing the example. It saves me from embarrassing myself.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    13. Re:Oblig. by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh Belgium, not this again.

      They're words. As many bright people (including Frank Zappa and George Carlin) have pointed out, getting worked up over the words is silly. Getting worked up over the meanings, hatreds, etc behind the words is appropriate, but the words themselves are harmless.

      A big myth related to children in general is that they're innocent creatures ignorant of all things biological. They aren't, and they never really have been.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    14. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yes, for certain words to be considered taboo is pretty silly.

      Though I do think it's extremely sad when I hear parents shouting and swearing at their 2 year old kids when they are crying (makes you wonder why they're crying when their parents are treating them so nicely!). Seems like they don't have much chance of being happy in life and are just going to do the same to their own kids.

      The best/worst one around here (my workplace is right next to a rather "deprived" area), was a parent shouting "DON'T YOU FUCKING SWEAR!!" at their kid. What kind of chance do you have in life when you're being brought up dealing with that kind of logic/attitude?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Oblig. by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Vulgarity comes from the Latin, meaning basically unrefined or plebeian. Vulgar Latin is what morphed into Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Romanian. Often times the word seems to get confused with profane, which basically just means not sacred, and they both get confused with obscene.

      So, yes, traditional Anglo-Saxon words for certain things are considered vulgar, because of the Norman conquest. Its why we have the Saxon words for living animals, as they took care of the livestock, and the Norman words for the food version of same (sheep v. mutton, duck v. canard, etc).

      as to my uid, yes it's mine, yes i'm the original holder of it, but no I'm only 26. Been here a right while though.

    16. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foul language is a myth. Words are words... if you are offended by them, you are an idiot.

    17. Re:Oblig. by 2names · · Score: 1

      I heard it sounds a lot like a dolphin.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    18. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, everyone uses "curse words", just some people use more politically acceptable ones. So I don't think that's the entire answer.

      I never used to "swear", though I certainly always had words I'd use if I hurt myself or was describing a negative situation etc. Since I'm no longer religious I've started drifting to using more conventional swear words - mostly when nobody else is around, in fact, so it's not to try and shock anyone. I still wouldn't swear in front of my family because they would find it heavily offensive. The most taboo of current swear words do seem to just roll off the tongue in a nice stress relieving way. Maybe it's purely a psychological thing like you say, but I think many current swear words have gotten to be where they are today just because they are fun to say, whether socially acceptable or not.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:Oblig. by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's entirely true. As should be quite obvious, pretty much all swear words have lost much of their ability to shock as their use has become more widespread...and yet I still find an appropriately placed "damn it!" or even 'fuck!' to be quite cathartic. There are more shocking, disgusting words ('santorum' comes to mind), but I don't curse simply to gross people out, I curse, when I do, because the curse words I'm using have definitions which are in line with my current sentiment.

    20. Re:Oblig. by Creepy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think certain words carry a certain weight, and overusing them dilutes them. Fuck is a perfect example of a word that has no weight anymore (IMO) - my mom would (and did) literally wash my mouth out with soap for saying that word (shit or crap was about the best I could get away with growing up). Bloody in England had a similar path - it once was taboo to say it, now people use it constantly.

      Remember that some words are derogatory, though - nigger, bitch, cow (to a fat woman), etc - even if you don't consider them a big deal, another person might, and they may vocalize it by popping a couple of caps in you (heard of that happening more than once). Food for thought.

    21. Re:Oblig. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually it's mostly due to degradation of society. The poor are so undereducated that they use a slang that is riddled with Fbombs and other derogatory terms. Plus you have far more 15 year old-18 year old high school dropouts that have a baby than you do educated people that decided to have a child. This skews the results.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:Oblig. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I appreciate when strangers act with social disregard and disrespect as it gives me an easy opportunity to point out to my kids what not to do if you want to function in society.

      I appreciate when people teach weakness, irrationality and giving value to inane things to their chindren, as it gives mine an easy opportunity of crushing them under their heels.

    23. Re:Oblig. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most everybody I knew in college, in an exclusive Honors Program no less, swore like sailors, myself included. Sorry, but don't buy the hype that swearing is somehow correlative with education. It's not.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    24. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This whole article is a very American way of thinking. Cursing in most cultures is at worst considered a sign of low class. No one shits themselves over it. I don't understand why some people here go so ape-shit over nothing more than words. It's the same thing with sex. Damn those Puritans and their ideology.

    25. Re:Oblig. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Too bad you are teaching anachronisms which fail to account for the fact that society's functional parameters are changing as evidenced by this study itself. Ultimately your children will have a view of the world warped by these anachronisms and may be unable to eventually figure out why everybody thinks they are prissy cold fish.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    26. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how choosing not to swear and show disrespect to others is being irrational and weak...

      Yeah, lets see how far you get in life "crushing others under your heels" after you have shown others such disrespect that everybody no longer respects you...

      Who am I going to give that new promotion to given both employees perform equally? Obviously the employee who doesn't swear at me and show disrespect on a regular basis.

      Being respectful will definitely get you farther ceteris paribus.

    27. Re:Oblig. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      So who really cares?

      Everyone is cursing one way or another except very few that are taking it so serious that they probably don't have any fun either because it's a sin.

      And what is a profanity other than some word dictated by some more or less religious dude?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    28. Re:Oblig. by rrey · · Score: 1

      The answer, per usual, is the fault of the French. They were the ones who declared ~900 years ago that English words are vulgar and should be avoided, in favor of French substitutes.

      Well If that's true (I wouldn't be surprised), it can only be applied for french people, in France ... And "pig", "deer" and "cow" are not french words ... So my question is : WTF are the french are doing in this discussion ?? yes I'm French, and I'll go sex off, but for the rest I can't promise anything :)

    29. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep nigger is actually one of the strangest words today I think. It actually is a pretty cool word, ie works well in rap songs, etc, but if a white person says it, they're in trouble. The world is a very strange place.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    30. Re:Oblig. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      chindren?

      Your kids aren't going to crush mine spelling like that!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    31. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, it's actually attached to IQ. People that swear a-lot are actually very stupid. Yes you can have a PHD and still be stupid. Ann Arbor, MI is full of them. PHD's that are too stupid to drive right, too stupid to park, too stupid to have any common courtesy.

      Wait that's not stupidity, that's just being a douchebag.

      My bad.

    32. Re:Oblig. by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

      except very few that are taking it so serious that they probably don't have any fun either because it's a sin

      Wait, What? Someone who believes it sinful to use profanity (as described by webster) is incapable of having fun? You must have a very limited selection of things to occupy your time if you can't have fun without dropping f-bombs.

    33. Re:Oblig. by BStroms · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps for some people you could be right. However, I used to argue with people that there was no benefit to using actual swear words. That one could simply replace them with euphemisms, nonsense words, or just screaming Kahn. Then one would never need to worry about accidentally dropping a swear word during a job interview, or around someone's kids, either of which could have serious social and/or professional repercussions.

      However, every time I made that point, it was argued that it was the very edginess of the words that made them cathartic. It's not that they're being said to shock people, but just the knowledge that they're considered somewhat less than polite is what gives them their effect. With enough people giving me the same argument, I was eventually forced to admit there was something to it.

      That being the case, for those people at least my initial claim stands. They depend on the very people they say they despise to get the benefits of the words they're defending. Or they were just making stuff up because they didn't like admitting there was no real logical reason for their use of swear words.

    34. Re:Oblig. by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure I have plenty of fun. Originally, I didn't cuss because of the sin and parental threat of punishment. After a while, I took it as a badge of honor. But now, I see it as mostly an aspect of self-control.

      I know myself quite well and know that I have an addictive personality. In some areas of my life, I have to reign myself in or it can get out of control (I'm addicted to the Internet....but I'm not going to "fix" that). With my addictive personality, I know that were I to begin consuming alcohol, it would go beyond social drinking.....so I don't drink. I've never smoked. I've never done drugs (other than medicine). I don't gamble. I don't cuss. It isn't that I feel like I'll be doomed if I do, but I want to retain control over myself and my actions.

      Sure, it would be easy to use many of the words that have become prevelent in our entertainment (even on network TV you'll find many of them) to express emotion (because that's really how they are used, not to describe the thing the word actually represents). But instead, I choose to express that emotion with a sigh or a grunt or whatever other vocalization expresses the emotion but doesn't use any "taboo" words.

      As to my fun....well, I think I live a pretty happy life and for the most part enjoy everything I do. And I don't feel like I'm missing out by limiting my vocabulary in this one area.

    35. Re:Oblig. by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      What does stupidity have to do with "common courtesy"?

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    36. Re:Oblig. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Actually, yeah, so fucking what?

      What's the big deal? We should teach kids to speak correctly, but that means teaching them proper grammar and expanding their vocabularies. That includes all words, even those that have been categorized by the religious bastards as "bad". No, wait, specially those. Most things that the churches consider "bad" are just really fucking good.

      Why are we supposed to listen to this crackpots with an imaginary friend in the sky and an agenda to push? They are full of SHIT. And children of all ages should learn to say it properly: Religion is full of shit, Anyone trying to control my thoughts is a fucking asshole, and there is no such fucking thing as "dirty" or "sinful".

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    37. Re:Oblig. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does low 4 digit mean?

    38. Re:Oblig. by russotto · · Score: 1

      I think certain words carry a certain weight, and overusing them dilutes them.

      This is the biggest problem. We're going to have to move to new swear words. Or revive some ones.

      I'd like to nominate two:
      1) niggardly: every moron thinks it's taboo already, might as well make it so. We can back-form "niggard" from it, and use it like "asshole".
      2) Zounds: An old religious one, from "god's wounds". We can refer to it as "The Z word".

    39. Re:Oblig. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      There is as much logical reason to use swear words as any other word. They exist and have the meaning you're trying to convey.

      Replacing them with swear words in a situation where they are in fact appropriate and used seems pretty pathetic to me. Changing your discourse and vocabulary depending on the situation is required anyway.

    40. Re:Oblig. by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      t English words are vulgar and should be avoided, in favor of French substitutes.

      Time to tell the French to sex off and shove their poo up their anuses. Let's go back to using the original English words.

      If that is true, why is the French language so rich in profanity that they don't mind to use frequently?

    41. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nigger is free reign to be irrational and get back at the oppressors. Its a childish game-- I can say it but you can not! because many adults do it, then somehow many of us can't see how childish the game is.

      Jinx! now you can't say that word until I release you!

    42. Re:Oblig. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

      --With respects to George Carlin

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    43. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I better not catch any non white people using the word cracka. That is our word and I do not care if they got white friends.

    44. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Z-Word? Zombie? Burn him! Rabble, rabble, rabble!

    45. Re:Oblig. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I assign none of those traits to cursing, do you feel that cursing is a sign of strength? rationality?

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    46. Re:Oblig. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      In cultures where cursing is at worst considered a sign of low class, does society favor the lower classes or those who act like one is a member of them? In social or business structures?

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    47. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perception is reality; if the perception is that you are uneducated due to your (seeming) inability to thoughtfully express yourself, you will be subject to the biases and prejudices that others may afford to those who appear uneducated.

    48. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you just too stupid to understand how people with Ph.D.'s operate...

    49. Re:Oblig. by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Though I do think it's extremely sad when I hear parents shouting and swearing at their 2 year old kids when they are crying

      When my kid was that age, my wife and I made a point to use Spongebob swear words. Usually in situations that warranted swearing but not quite so badly as to let a real swear word slip.

      Something drops on the floor? "Barnacles!" Something doesn't quite fit? "Tartar Sauce!". etc. This was reinforced, of course, by Spongebob and his friends really using these words as real swear words in the show.

      For a while, he actually picked that up and when something didn't work he might actually yell "Barnacles" at it.

      So what now? We were openly swearing and yelling in front of him. Has the fact that they weren't "real swear words" made a difference anywhere?

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    50. Re:Oblig. by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Funny

      What does low 4 digit mean?

      That you are actually dead and your post was made by a highly evolved AI that you wrote many years ago.

    51. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, because we should all learn how to behave like children. Children never lie, after all, just as they never do anything else that we anachronistic adults tend to not tolerate from others.

      Why don't we just treat everyone like they're just big, stupid kids that never learned anything from their peers? ... Oh... wait... we didn't learn anything from our peers, we all learned what we know from our elders, or the elders of our peers... those anachronistic people who "fail to account for the fact that society's functional parameters are changing" ... those same people who have recently (as in "over the last 40+ years"), and increasingly let the children dictate what is and is not acceptable in society...

      • The school bully who thinks nothing of abusing what power he has all the way into that elected government position.
      • The child whose single major goal in life is to find and marry a person willing to care for her every need or desire...
      • The child who refuses to admit fault in the face of overwhelming evidence and numerous witnesses because he doesn't like the punishment he knew all along was going to be the result of his actions...
      • The child who doesn't care enough about any of the stuff he has because there was always another shiny and expensive new toy at the store.
      • The child who can't stand being second-best at anything who constantly belittles and degrades her peers.
      • The child who knows that money magically appears whenever he asks for it...
      • Or the one who thinks that person is funny looking...
      • Or that kid over there that likes to break things for no apparent reason...
      • Or that one who seems to think all one has to do to have their way is to scream and cry and throw a tantrum.

      Anyone who thinks that the children should be the guiding light of society should really pay attention to what children will naturally do: anything they can get away with doing, especially if they know that nobody wants them to do it.

      So, this study should instead be used to highlight the fact that more and more adults are acting like children. And instead of the claim that "pop culture is influencing children," it should be pointing out that "over-aged children seem to be behind the controls of pop culture."

    52. Re:Oblig. by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 1

      I think the trouble is that we assign value of any kind to swearing, whether negative or positive.

      If you teach your kid to say "barnacles" instead of "fuck" when his emotions are screaming "fuck!" then what have you really taught him? It's OK to swear as long as you swear in code? It's still assigning the "when I'm angry there's a special word that I use" value to the emotion, and eventually he'll find out that "fuck" is the "real" swear word and will start using it instead.

      What we as a society really need to do is to acknowledge that people experience negativity, and that it's OK to use a word to express that negativity, whether that word is "shoot" or "shit." We really have to get over this idea that certain words are harmful. If you say "shit," it's not going to effect me in the least. So naturally, I don't give a damn if you say it. And I expect the same courtesy from you.

      That said, in deference to the sensibilities of others who were raised to think of such words as offensive, I refrain from saying them when in mixed company or in the presence of children. That's part of living in a society.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    53. Re:Oblig. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      At least two of those are now very very common on broadcast TV (before 10PM).

      FX seems to generally follow the same rules as broadcast TV, so I was surprised how many times the first one was said in the first episode of "Terriers".

    54. Re:Oblig. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      It's ironic that you describe refraining from profanity as an anachronism, since the lesson to my kids is, "there's a time and a place".

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    55. Re:Oblig. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >my mom would (and did)
      >literally wash my mouth
      >out with soap

      So... while the toxic and caustic agent didn't literally remove the language from your mouth, at least you're lucky that it didn't blind you or destroy your taste buds or trachea, right?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    56. Re:Oblig. by daveime · · Score: 1

      That you can remember when Slashdot didn't suck donkey balls ?

    57. Re:Oblig. by curunir · · Score: 3, Informative

      Swearing may not be, but being able to contextually adjust your behavior is. I'd bet that everyone in your honors program was able to differentiate between situations where it's inappropriate to swear and situations where it's permissible or even expected to do so. That kind of awareness and ability to read situations is definitely something that more intelligent people do better.

      There probably is a correlation between inappropriate swearing and low education/IQ.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    58. Re:Oblig. by treeves · · Score: 1

      I don't think "poo" and "buttocks" come from French. (the words, not the things themselves, which obviously do!).

      How about eating pussy vs. eating cat? I'm not sure which of those is more offensive.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    59. Re:Oblig. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean back in the days of Jon Katz, the Matrix, Goatse and Hot Grits?

      Heh, its a picnic now that the feral ones all go and hang out on /b/

    60. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we just need some stronger swear words. I remember when I was a kid we got in trouble for saying crap or suck. Now I use those words in office meetings. I think our swear words have just been around too long. They've lost their luster. I find if I'm really mad at somebody the old words just don't do it. I have to construct hateful phrases like "I'll park my car on your fucking baby if you don't get out of my way!" No one word captures this anymore. We need somebody really spiteful to sit down and starting writing us some new curse words. It might be a good job to keep Dick Cheney entertained and out of politics, or we could crowd source it to 4chan.

    61. Re:Oblig. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Well If that's true (I wouldn't be surprised), it can only be applied for french people, in France

      No, it applies to French people, in England. The Normand invasion of 1066 pretty much set it off -- the nobility of England was dominated by French-speakers for a very long time.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    62. Re:Oblig. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I think swearing is meant to be a safety valve - a way of blowing off emotional pressure without getting violent. The problem is that if you swear constantly, the words don't have that effect any more. The only thing left is to start swinging.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    63. Re:Oblig. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Pee! Po! Belly! Bum! Drawers!

    64. Re:Oblig. by DrewfusMaximus · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does he know?

    65. Re:Oblig. by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      What does low 4 digit mean?

      That you are actually dead and your post was made by a highly evolved AI that you wrote many years ago.

      Not necessarily highly evolved. Some of us were replaced by small shell scripts.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    66. Re:Oblig. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Felgercarb! Go smurf yourself you drek-eating, mother-fracking nimnul!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    67. Re:Oblig. by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I applaud that, and, as long as you don't get bent out of shape when someone else uses profanity, I think your choice is quite laudable. I respect your choice, as long as you respect mine, which is different.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    68. Re:Oblig. by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Oh, my wife cusses like a sailor (in private.....in public, you'd barely know it). I don't have a problem with it, but choose not to. You're free to do whatever you want. (Follows my basic leanings in most things -- as long as it isn't dangerous and doesn't affect anyone else, have at it. I make a few exceptions, but in general think like that.)

    69. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fukken Bullshit! If my kids fukken swear infront of me they know thel'll get their ass handed to them, just like I don't fukken swear infront of my folks! God-fucken-damit!

    70. Re:Oblig. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Someone who believes it sinful to use profanity (as described by webster) is incapable of having fun? You must have a very limited selection of things to occupy your time if you can't have fun without dropping f-bombs.

      The issue is not whether or not one refrains from using the word "fuck", it's the reason for doing so. Someone who refrains from making certain mouth-noises on the belief that a omniscient and omnipotent King of the World is going to punish them (perhaps in some ghostly form after they die), is a person who quite likely has little idea of how to have fun, sure.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    71. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot was never good.

    72. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Not sarcasm. Really, who cares? Swear words are just words with meanings and nothing more. The fact that people take offense to mere words used without context just proves that they are idiots. At most, if a child hears a swear word, they'll repeat it. But, taking what I said before into account, who cares? What does this harm? Censorship is idiotic, and so is taking offense to certain words.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    73. Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?

      There is no 5 AM on a Friday night, there is a 5 AM on a Friday morning, in which case the question is "Why am I up so late when I have to go to work in only 4 hours?!".

    74. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how swearing is harmful at all. They're just words. Am I missing something, or is it just that the people who take offense to mere words (and expect everyone else not to say them) are, in fact, the idiots?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    75. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You still didn't explain how swearing harms anyone, or why people who want to control others by not letting them say mere words should be given the power to do so.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    76. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "I fail to see how choosing not to swear and show disrespect to others is being irrational and weak..."

      I fail to see how choosing to swear and not being offended by mere words is harmful at all. If you get offended by words, you're not going to last long. This is simply illogical.

      "Obviously the employee who doesn't swear at me and show disrespect on a regular basis."

      You can show disrespect without swearing, too. The fact that someone swore in front of you doesn't mean they disrespected you. That is just someones illogical perception of ordinary words.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    77. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      I think the better question would be: why shouldn't I swear? What does it hurt anyone? It's just a word, and if you can't handle it, you're not going to last very long, and you shouldn't be taken seriously at all. Why should I have my voice taken away just because people don't like certain words? If people stopped treating these words as 'bad', I can almost guarantee that kids would stop saying them just to be 'cool' (they're not harmful or cool).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    78. Re:Oblig. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      It's obviously a sign of virility...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    79. Re:Oblig. by Dabido · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, you are missing something.

      Calling people "idiots" is offensive. Swear words are also offensive because that's what they are supposed to be.

      If there were no offensive words, you'd never be able to offend someone who cut you off on the road or wanted to punch you in the face to prove they're tougher than you etc. In fact, if there were no offensive words, people would invent them.

      There is also context and culture and other things to consider.

      For example, when I went to school there was a "special" school across the road called Barkuma. At our school you could offend someone by calling them a Barkie (which was the term used to describe the pupils are Barkuma). It was basically the equivalent of calling them a "Retard".

      Calling someone an insult/offensive word directly is a form of one up man ship. It is a direct form of offending people.

      Using offensive words not directed at a person is an indirect form of one up man ship. It is a way to say, 'I can use these offensive words because I'm tough enough not to care whether I offend you or not.' The only course of action open to counteract that one up man ship is to either 1. Start using them yourself as a way of saying, 'I'm just as tough as you.' or 2. tell the person to stop using them, which is like telling them they're not as tough as they think they are. Any other course of action places you in a subordinate position.

      When I used to look after juvenile delinquents (when I was with the police as a civilian) they often used the same argument that they were just 'words' and as such couldn't offend. One kid insisted that the 'n' word was not offensive to black people (no Afro-Americans where I live) because it was just a word, and as such he insisted he was allowed to use it. He loved to use racist words to peoples faces (calling Chinese people "Chinkies" etc) and insisted that the problem lay with the people he offended. He also used to get beaten up a bit for constantly offending people (not just with racist slurs, but swearing at them and calling them anything he could think of). The fact that he was always in trouble for actually starting fights at schools whenever anyone called him a name was proof enough that he understood that offensive language is designed to offend and hurt peoples feelings.

      As for context, if you were to do something stupid and one of your friends called you a "F***ing D*ckh**d!" in a jovial way with a big smile on their face, they aren't trying to offend you (at least I hope not). If they saw someone they didn't like do the same thing they'd probably use the exact same words in a derogatory way in order to deliberately put that person down.

      But, in general, using offensive words are part of ordinary conversation will offend someone somewhere because it is an indirect way of putting them down. If you bruise egos, expect the person to react.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    80. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 1

      That's similar to asking why you shouldn't run around naked in public. Not saying that running around naked is wrong, but the answer should be obvious. Society just has developed a lot of weird rules about how things "should" be over time and most people never question why things should be how they are.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    81. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "Society just has developed a lot of weird rules about how things "should" be over time and most people never question why things should be how they are."

      I'm saying that it's illogical. I'm going to swear as much as I please (even though I technically don't do it that often, anyway), regardless of whether society makes up some illogical rule and states that you shouldn't say certain words for no apparent reason.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    82. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "If there were no offensive words, you'd never be able to offend someone who cut you off on the road or wanted to punch you in the face to prove they're tougher than you etc. In fact, if there were no offensive words, people would invent them."

      Uh, you completely missed my point. My point was that they are merely words (they could be classified with other 'offensive' words such as "idiot," I guess), and that censoring or banning them is completely idiotic.

      "If you bruise egos, expect the person to react."

      I didn't say otherwise. I merely said that censoring, banning, or acting like specific words shouldn't be used by certain people is completely illogical.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    83. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how illogical it is. If you go to a village full of crazy hicks who kill people for wearing pink, it's a good idea to not be wearing any pink unless you are a fully kitted out Navy SEAL or something. Swearing in front of someone's kids is likely to get you in trouble and foster ill will for no reason. I agree with you that it's illogical and stupid, and it would be nice if people could see life without looking through the lens of society's preconceptions all the time, but most people never think about this stuff logically, they are ruled by traditions and emotions.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    84. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "Swearing in front of someone's kids is likely to get you in trouble and foster ill will for no reason."

      Then I'll continue to speak out against people with such illogical beliefs, like I've been doing, and try to help them realize why it's illogical.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    85. Re:Oblig. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately some people have nothing better to do with their lives than invent things to be offended by. Why is "Swearing" even an issue? It would not exist at all without idiots wanting to be offended by it.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    86. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 1

      If you're going to choose a cause to stand up for, that one seems a bit strange. Your average mother is going to just glare at you and get her kids out of there before you have the chance to undo the result of thousands of years of societal conditioning and opinion. Or worse, I suppose you could get assaulted. I find violence far more reprehensible than swearing, but I expect some people aren't that logical.

      An old lady was angrily glaring at us out her window the other day, threatened to call the Police because we were doing Parkour (basically just balancing along a rail at that point) in the public area around the flats she lives in. I eventually forgot she was there and swore loudly at one point, it was quite amusing to hear her window slam.

      I do try to talk to people if they have problems with us doing Parkour as it's something that is worth the effort, but for the swearing thing it's really not. Even if the parents are fine with swearing, the kids themselves can get into trouble for it, etc etc etc..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    87. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "If you're going to choose a cause to stand up for, that one seems a bit strange."

      No it isn't, and it's very easy, really. You don't just walk up to people and randomly start saying that swearing is fine and explain why. You say that when the opportunity comes up (like in this article).

      "I do try to talk to people if they have problems with us doing Parkour as it's something that is worth the effort"

      It depends on what is worth it to you. To me, trying to convince someone that swearing is fine is worth it.

      Point is, I'm not going to sit back and take it, as nothing will change, then.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    88. Re:Oblig. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      interesting, on /. you have not color so I don't know whether I should taken offense at your remark.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    89. Re:Oblig. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Do you think you should take offence even if I'm asian, hispanic, or white, and no offence was intended, nor was the word directed at anyone? Why is this?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    90. Re:Oblig. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone in the honors program is able to adjust their behavior to any situation.

      Being drunk like a pig reduce most peoples ability to evaluate social appriopiateness, and they ARE college students afterall.

    91. Re:Oblig. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Perception is reality only to the simple-minded. No wise or strategic person would be so incautious as to believe everything is as it appears to be. Whole kingdoms have fallen consequent to folly of that sort.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    92. Re:Oblig. by Dabido · · Score: 1
      You missed my point. They are not 'merely words' they are specific words created to cause a reaction from people. Within certain contexts they shouldn't get used.

      TFA is about children using them. One thing children need to learn today is a bit of respect for others. Letting them swear like troopers at each other (and causing fights & spreading disharmony) or even at other people is definitely wrong, especially under certain circumstances.

      For instance, you can lose your job (in my country) if you swear at work and it is directed at someone. You can get a letter for just swearing at work if someone takes offence to it. Three letters and you lose your job. If you swear at a judge you can get into a lot of trouble for contempt of court. Technically these could be considered 'censoring' or 'banning' and the reason for the ban is because they do hurt peoples feelings.

      Do words hurt? Yes. People have been known to kill themselves over words.

      So your original statement that you 'fail to see how swearing is harmful' is the point. It can be very harmful and I gave examples of where it 'bruised egos'. The kids of today are hiding behind the very same argument that it is 'only words' and they 'can't hurt', yet when you use the same words towards them they do get hurt emotionally and react, sometimes quite violently.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    93. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "One thing children need to learn today is a bit of respect for others."

      Why can't you have respect for others and swear? If these words were considered normal, I can almost guarantee that people would stop saying them merely to be 'cool'. Respect has nothing to do with swear words. You can be disrespectful with almost any combination of words, and swear words can be used appropriately. You don't need to ban them in order to teach respect. That is not only illogical, but idiotic.

      "Do words hurt? Yes. People have been known to kill themselves over words."

      So should they be banned? No. These people are weak and likely would have killed themselves eventually, anyway.

      "The kids of today are hiding behind the very same argument that it is 'only words' and they 'can't hurt', yet when you use the same words towards them they do get hurt emotionally and react, sometimes quite violently."

      If people kill themselves over words, I suspect that they wouldn't last long, anyway. This is nothing to do with swear words, anyway, as you can insult someone without using them. Adding a few swear words into the sentence without any context isn't the last straw that will make them suicide (suicide, as in kill themselves).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    94. Re:Oblig. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Not in MY house you don't!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    95. Re:Oblig. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Wankel Rotary Engine!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    96. Re:Oblig. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to Jon Katz?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    97. Re:Oblig. by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Why can't you have respect for others and swear?

      As per my first comment. People deliberately use swear words as a form of one up man ship. Someone who does this, in particular the potty mouthed youths of today, are hardly showing any respect. I already gave an example of someone having respect for someone and using swear words (ie when your friends use them when you do something stupid). This doesn't change the fact that most kids these days need to tone down their language and stop pretending they are tougher than they are.

      If these words were considered normal, I can almost guarantee that people would stop saying them merely to be 'cool'.

      And other words would be invented to replace them that are considered offensive.

      Respect has nothing to do with swear words. You can be disrespectful with almost any combination of words, and swear words can be used appropriately.

      Respect has a lot to do with swear words. Words which were deliberately invented to be offensive are used to show a lack of respect either directly or indirectly. Yes, a person can use other words to do this, but swear words are used because they are offensive and have a greater affect in a quicker amount of time.

      You don't need to ban them in order to teach respect.

      Like I said in my last comment, you missed my point. 'Words can hurt' is the point I am making. At no time have I said anything about banning them.

      That is not only illogical, but idiotic.

      Thank you for that ad hominem attack. I will ignore it.

      So should they be banned? No. These people are weak and likely would have killed themselves eventually, anyway.

      I've never stated they should be banned. As per my last comment, my point is that words can hurt, something contrary to your argument that words can't hurt. As for people killing themselves over words, there is no evidence that suggests that all people who do such a thing are weak and would have killed themselves anyway. People have killed themselves when accused of crimes they didn't commit (or even those who did commit crimes) when public out cry against them (which is just words) becomes too great they kill themselves. In ordinary circumstances they wouldn't have if not accused of those crimes. Then there are many recorded cases of bullying at school where the kids have eventually killed themselves.

      If people kill themselves over words, I suspect that they wouldn't last long, anyway.

      See my last comment.

      This is nothing to do with swear words, anyway, as you can insult someone without using them. Adding a few swear words into the sentence without any context isn't the last straw that will make them suicide (suicide, as in kill themselves).

      Swear words carry more weight to them. Most people who drive someone to suicide through bullying with words use plenty of swear words at them. Yes, you can insult someone without swear words. My point has always been that words can hurt. I never mentioned anything about adding swear words without context. It is adding them within context that is the driving factor here, they are deliberately being used to hurt someone.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    98. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "This doesn't change the fact that most kids these days need to tone down their language and stop pretending they are tougher than they are."

      Insulting everyone for no reason? I don't like such people, but I also believe that it's freedom of speech. If they want to say such things, they shouldn't be censored or anything like that. If people kill themselves over it, well, too bad.

      "Respect has a lot to do with swear words"

      If I said "fuck" because I stubbed my toe, how exactly would that be disrespectful? If I said "you're a fucking retard" to someone, how exactly would that hold anymore "weight" than just "you're a retard"? This is the illogical perception that many people have. If they truly believe that swear words hold some magical, evil meaning that gives everything more weight and are different than the average word simply because society indoctrinated them to believe this, then that is their own fault. It's simply illogical.

      "Thank you for that ad hominem attack. I will ignore it."

      I didn't attack you, I attacked the idea.

      "As per my last comment, my point is that words can hurt, something contrary to your argument that words can't hurt."

      Well, too bad. If someone swears at someone and they kill themselves, I'll look at it exactly like this: they killed themselves. Swear words are words with meanings, just as any other word, and if people can't handle it, they'll just have to deal with it. I hold no sympathy for people who kill themselves over hearing words.

      "Most people who drive someone to suicide through bullying with words use plenty of swear words at them. Yes, you can insult someone without swear words. My point has always been that words can hurt. I never mentioned anything about adding swear words without context. It is adding them within context that is the driving factor here, they are deliberately being used to hurt someone."

      Same as above. If I want to swear, other people should either deal with it or get out, not expect everyone else to conform to their little standards because they're offended by a context-less swear word that I said when I was angry.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    99. Re:Oblig. by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Insulting everyone for no reason? I don't like such people, but I also believe that it's freedom of speech.

      Insulting people for no reason is not covered by freedom of speech, it's actually a form of harassment and people can be sued for it.

      If they want to say such things, they shouldn't be censored or anything like that. If people kill themselves over it, well, too bad.

      No, it isn't "too bad". If it is harassment, then a crime has been committed. If someone kills themselves over it then the family of the victim is entitled to sue whoever did the harassing.

      If I said "fuck" because I stubbed my toe, how exactly would that be disrespectful?

      As I said in my very first post, there is context and culture to consider. I gave an example of swear words being used whilst not being disrespectful and this is the second time I've had to repeat that. The fact that they can be used without being disrespectful is not in contention here, the fact that they can be is. My entire point from the beginning (to repeat myself again) is that you claimed words couldn't hurt and I have provided adequate examples of when they can.

      If I said "you're a fucking retard" to someone, how exactly would that hold anymore "weight" than just "you're a retard"?

      Because the swear word is being used as an adverb, and adds weight. That's what adverbs do to sentences. The fact that the word is offensive adds even more weight.

      This is the illogical perception that many people have. If they truly believe that swear words hold some magical, evil meaning that gives everything more weight and are different than the average word simply because society indoctrinated them to believe this, then that is their own fault. It's simply illogical.

      It isn't illogical. As previously stated, swear words were made to be offensive. It isn't a perceived 'magical' or 'evil meaning that offends people but specifically the meaning that they have and the fact that they are supposed to be offensive.

      As I keep saying, if the offensive words didn't exist then someone will invent them specifically so they can offend someone.

      Well, too bad. If someone swears at someone and they kill themselves, I'll look at it exactly like this: they killed themselves. Swear words are words with meanings, just as any other word, and if people can't handle it, they'll just have to deal with it. I hold no sympathy for people who kill themselves over hearing words.

      It isn't a matter of 'too bad', it is a matter of harassment. Like I keep saying, my point has always been that you are incorrect in your assumption that words can't hurt. The fact is they can be used to do that. If someone kills themselves over words aimed at them and their character then whoever was directing the words at them will face a law suit.

      Same as above. If I want to swear, other people should either deal with it or get out, not expect everyone else to conform to their little standards because they're offended by a context-less swear word that I said when I was angry.

      Straw man argument. I've never said the swear words were contextless. My first post showed that I was not talking about 'contextless' when I showed an example of swear words which were used in an inoffensive way. Like I keep coming back to, my point was that words can hurt.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    100. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "Insulting people for no reason is not covered by freedom of speech, it's actually a form of harassment and people can be sued for it."

      Wow. I don't care what the law says, that's insane. Let's ignore parts of the constitution that we don't like and make exceptions to certain parts of it! Good idea!

      "No, it isn't "too bad". If it is harassment, then a crime has been committed"

      Not in my eyes. I don't support such idiotic laws.

      "The fact that they can be used without being disrespectful is not in contention here, the fact that they can be is"

      A butter knife, pencil, and pencil can be used to stab someone. That's not what they're for, but they can be used that way.

      "is that you claimed words couldn't hurt"

      I merely claimed that words can't do any physical (real) damage to someone. Well, actually, I probably didn't word it that way, but it is what I meant, and that if someone gets so upset over mere words, our society is simply doomed to fail (while it pretty much already is, that's besides the point).

      "It isn't illogical. As previously stated, swear words were made to be offensive."

      My point was that they don't have to be. Someone could take them as a normal word, and it's simply illogical to treat them as anything other than such.

      "As I keep saying, if the offensive words didn't exist then someone will invent them specifically so they can offend someone."

      Words that offend that aren't considered swear words do exist.

      "If someone kills themselves over words aimed at them and their character then whoever was directing the words at them will face a law suit."

      Oh, no! Someone killed themselves because someone previously called them a "stupid head!" Let's arrest that meanie because he... clearly killed them, even though they killed themselves! Oh, wait, this isn't about them killing themselves, this is about the fact that the person was such a weakling that they couldn't handle words (which are unavoidable) so they killed themselves.

      Actually, I find the fact that you might be implying that people should be subjected to a law suit if they call someone some mean words highly offensive! I'm going to kill myself and hope that you're charged with harassment!

      "Straw man argument."

      This is no straw man. I wasn't assuming that you said anything related to that, but I was merely talking about people who do think that way.

      "Like I keep coming back to, my point was that words can hurt."

      I never debated that they could "hurt someones feeling," I'm merely saying that swear words shouldn't be treated as anything other than words with meanings. I don't care if they were made to offend, they are merely imaginary strings of letters that have a meaning just as any other word.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    101. Re:Oblig. by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Wow. I don't care what the law says, that's insane.

      It isn't insane and you better care what the law says.

      Let's ignore parts of the constitution that we don't like and make exceptions to certain parts of it! Good idea!

      It isn't ignoring any part of the constitution. It is enforcing the bit which says people have a right to freedom and liberty without persecution. Like I said, 'Freedom of speech' doesn't allow you to harass people. 'Freedom of speech' don't let you say anything you like to anyone at any time you like. There are still things which are not allowed under 'Freedom of speech' such as lying about people and harassing people.

      Not in my eyes. I don't support such idiotic laws.

      And this is where you are missing something. You think it is idiotic to allow people freedom to pursue their own liberty and happiness without being persecuted by others.

      A butter knife, pencil, and pencil can be used to stab someone. That's not what they're for, but they can be used that way.

      Yes, but swear words were created to offend. That is what they're there for.

      I merely claimed that words can't do any physical (real) damage to someone.

      But they can do physical harm too. Upsetting people has a physical reaction. Harass someone with enough taunting and they get physically ill.

      Someone could take them as a normal word, and it's simply illogical to treat them as anything other than such.

      How can people take them as a normal word? They were not made to be normal words. They were made to offend people and get a reaction from them. If people react to them by taking offence, then that is actually a correct reaction to them. A person will not react to being called an 'F*ck*ng *rs*H*l*' the same way as someone saying 'How do you do?'

      The words are specifically made to offend and people will react accordingly regardless.

      Words that offend that aren't considered swear words do exist.

      That doesn't make swear words any less offensive.

      I find the fact that you might be implying that people should be subjected to a law suit if they call someone some mean words highly offensive! I'm going to kill myself and hope that you're charged with harassment!

      I'm not implying that at all. The fact is that laws do exist and that lawsuits have come about because of harassment. You can be offended all you like by it, but it is the law. What is offensive is your belittling people who have been harassed to the point that they did kill themselves. You call them weaklings, but you obviously have no idea what they have been through.

      This is no straw man. I wasn't assuming that you said anything related to that, but I was merely talking about people who do think that way.

      Then you're mentioning it, why? If it wasn't part of the debate then it is irrelevant. Why mention it at all? I was very specific from the first post that I'm talking about swearing within context and culture. You think swearing are words with meanings. That's not being debated either. The problem is within certain contexts etc they are used to hurt people, and remember, not just emotionally, but they hurt people mentally and physically. They have meanings just like any other words, this is the problem, they have specific meanings which are different to any other words. They are grouped together and called 'offensive' words because that is what they are. To treat them like any other word is to place them in their context and culture. That includes contexts which are used to belittle people, harass them and other things. Within these contexts they are used to hurt people, having emotional, mental and physical responses to them. Do words hurt? Yes.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    102. Re:Oblig. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "It isn't insane and you better care what the law says."

      I believe it is. By "I don't care," I meant that just because something is legal/illegal, that doesn't make it right/wrong.

      "Like I said, 'Freedom of speech' doesn't allow you to harass people"

      If you're arresting people/charging them with crimes for no other reason than them speaking words which wouldn't actually cause any normal person to be in danger (such as yelling "fire" in a crowded place, or something), it certainly is infringing on their right to free speech. There are no exceptions in the constitution to freedom of speech, and this one is especially useless and harmful. Many people are offended by many different choices of words. People shouldn't be charged with a crime/sued simply because they said something that someone didn't like.

      "You think it is idiotic to allow people freedom to pursue their own liberty and happiness without being persecuted by others"

      That's where you're wrong. There is no right to not be offended, and to suggest that there should be one/there is one is absurd. As I said before, many people are offended by many different things for many inane reasons. If we lived in a world where offending someone meant that you were disallowing them to pursue their own "liberty and happiness without being persecuted by others," it would be an even sadder world than it is now.

      "How can people take them as a normal word? They were not made to be normal words."

      They're imaginary strings of letters with meanings. They're words. The definitions of words also change over time, and not all swear words are originally intended to be offensive. Eventually, the definition is somehow changed, or someone decided that the meaning is offensive, so therefore the word is offensive. They act on illogical emotions, nothing less.

      "I'm not implying that at all."

      Odd, because it sounded like you were saying that you were in favor of that. It still does, in fact.

      "You can be offended all you like by it, but it is the law."

      Laws can be changed. I will do everything in my power to change these idiotic laws.

      "What is offensive is your belittling people who have been harassed to the point that they did kill themselves."

      Right, these weak, oversensitive idiots would have probably killed themselves if they hadn't already had they read my comments about them. I'm offended, so I'm going to kill myself and then expect the world to blame someone other than myself for my own demise!

      "but you obviously have no idea what they have been through."

      I've been called many things, been relentlessly bullied many times in the past, and have dealt with many people who I simply didn't like. Someone calling me mean words are the least of my worries. If they're physically abusing me, then it becomes a problem.

      "Then you're mentioning it, why?"

      In case you felt that way.

      "but they hurt people mentally and physically"

      Physically? Uh, no. By definition words can only hurt someone emotionally or mentally, not physically. What they may do to themselves later doesn't mean that words themselves hurt people physically.

      "You think swearing are words with meanings. That's not being debated either."

      All right. I never meant to imply that words can never hurt someones feelings. I just don't believe in these so-called "harassment" charges that come about when someone speaks words.

      "Do words hurt? Yes."

      Not me. Deal with it.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  2. well fuck by cybrthng · · Score: 1

    what is this shit? i don't even....

    1. Re:well fuck by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

      I say we just declare that all existing swear-words are NO LONGER swears. And we just invent new ones.

      --
      Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    2. Re:well fuck by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's happened before. Both ways. Acceptable words become unacceptable, and vice versa.

    3. Re:well fuck by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      It's happened before. Both ways. Acceptable words become unacceptable, and vice versa.

      For example: "faggot". In Britain, it's a slang term for a cigarette (as in the US pre-~1900 it meant a burning piece of brush or kindling used to start a larger fire). Now it refers to male homosexuals (in the US, at least).

    4. Re:well fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the word "fag" is not intended as an insult to homosexuals, and is more commonly used nowadays in reference to a contemptible person who rides a Harley motorcycle, or "an inconsiderate douchebag"

    5. Re:well fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      southpark FTL

    6. Re:well fuck by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      No. Fag is the word for cigarette. Not faggot.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    7. Re:well fuck by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      No, "fag" refers to a cigarette in Britain; "faggot" is a sort of meatball-like dish.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:well fuck by xaxa · · Score: 1

      American TV influence means most younger Brits know the American use of "faggot", and the original meanings (kindling, or a meatball-like food) aren't very common, so I won't be surprised if the American meaning prevails in the next 5-10 years. But I won't be surprised if it drops out of fashion, either.

      "Fag", however, will probably not be displaced.

      Anyway, d'ya mind if I bum a fag, mate?

  3. At a certain point it's commonplace enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That it's not profanity anymore. Is damn considered profanity any longer. At one point that was as harsh as Fuck is today.

    1. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      According to my mom from the south, yes, Damn is a swear word. According to anyone I grew up with in new york city 30 years ago, no.

      According to my mom crap, "that sucks", "That blows" are all swear words too.

    2. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember when saying "Raspberries" was a swear war because my parents "knew" i was just substituting one bad word for another... the thought of having something to replace one dirty word was just as dirty...

    3. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by cc1984_ · · Score: 1

      That it's not profanity anymore. Is damn considered profanity any longer. At one point that was as harsh as Fuck is today.

      Bullshit

    4. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "According to my mom from the south, yes, Damn is a swear word"

      And I thought it was a technical term in theology.

    5. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by lxs · · Score: 1

      Well roger me with a wire brush and call me Brenda!

    6. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Sucks and blows were originally euphemisms for oral sex, specifically homosexual acts. Saying "he sucks" was pretty insulting back in the day.

      http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=suck

    7. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      I always hated that technique for extending the rubric of "swear word" to other words. It's idiotic. "here's a situation where you might feel a certain way. someone could swear in this situation, therefore, any utterance will be likewise deemed a swear word." when what I think they really want to say is "you shouldn't have those thoughts or feel that way."

    8. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, and so it can be either a curse (something you wish upon another) or a swear, something you grant to happen to yourself unless you make good on your oath.

    9. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      WTF does "Raspberries" stand for?

    10. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      That substitution mentality can be carried to extremes, with strange results. I used to know some Bible-thumpers who would say things like "Gloryhallelujah!" or "Thankya Jeezus!" when they stubbed their toe or smacked their finger with a hammer. I found that more offensive than just saying some expletive. It was like they were purposely rewiring their brain or something. Seriously, why would you praise God for hurting yourself? It's just bizarre.

      Other bywords I find more offensive: "poo-hole" for "asshole" and "fornicate" for "fuck."

    11. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Sucks and blows were originally euphemisms for oral sex, specifically homosexual acts. Saying "he sucks" was pretty insulting back in the day.

      So when people say "Vista sucks", they're telling me it's a good thing?

      I'm confused now.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    12. Re:At a certain point it's commonplace enough by daveime · · Score: 1

      Well it's more honest than most other religions. You know, the ones that attribute everything good htah happens to God / Jesus, and everything bad that happens to "something else". Hypocritical bastards.

  4. But by nizo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If curse words become a part of normally accepted speech, what the hell will we use for curse words then???

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Rape, murder, genocide, etc.

    2. Re:But by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      iPod, iPhone, iPad etc

    3. Re:But by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh don't worry, we humans have infinite capacity to come up with new insults, so we'll just ratchet up. so instead of calling someone an asshole you'll call them a cum guzzling fucktwit, that's all.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:But by Tigersmind · · Score: 1

      Oh don't worry, we humans have infinite capacity to come up with new insults, so we'll just ratchet up. so instead of calling someone an asshole you'll call them a cum guzzling fucktwit, that's all.

      Mod this fuckhead up.

    5. Re:But by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Why do we need curse words?

      Surely there are languages in the world that don't have such a ridiculous idea as "forbidden words". How do they get on?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BELGIUM!

      I have a feeling that it may become the rudest word in the galaxy.

    7. Re:But by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Surely there are languages in the world that don't have such a ridiculous idea as "forbidden words".

      I highly doubt that, unless you're talking about an unknown cetacean or cephalopod language. Humans are good at putting up meaningless restrictions because we know our young like to push barriers. We would rather have them say "naughty" things and feel like they've pushed a real boundary than have them do something that society abhors (crime) because it is the only barrier to push.

    8. Re:But by nizo · · Score: 1

      http://news.discovery.com/human/f-bomb-swear-curse-words-biden.html

      Also apparently Japanese does not have many/any swear words? It does have offensive words/phrases like any other language of course.

    9. Re:But by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      shut your sara palin you bloody /b/tard shitcock

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    10. Re:But by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      Mod this goddamn asshole up, too, you fucks.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    11. Re:But by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> How do they get on?

      By swearing like a mime with Tourettes.

    12. Re:But by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      l337 speak. It's officially taboo to say "LOL" rather than actually laughing.

    13. Re:But by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      If curse words become a part of normally accepted speech, what in tarnation will we use for curse words then???

      CTFY (Cleaned That For You)

    14. Re:But by g2devi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Curse words really have no purpose.

      There are two common uses of curse words:
      (1) An expression of spontaneous bad emotion.
      (2) As way of hurting someone else without really thinking.

      The first purpose already has an international language. If someone in any culture hits their hand with a hammer, they all use the same sounds whether or not they ultimately say a curse word. Curse words add no value.

      The second usage is just plain laziness. If you really want to put someone down, you should put some thought into it. For examples, take a look at all the Winston Churchill or Mark Twain put downs. They could insult you using your own opinions in such a way that you're defenseless, or make an insult sound like a complement that everyone except the person listening would understand.

    15. Re:But by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

      Also apparently Japanese does not have many/any swear words? It does have offensive words/phrases like any other language of course.

      That's ... somewhat true. I learned Japanese and there aren't exact analogues to most of the American curse words. They do, however, have "politeness levels" built into the language and I think they get the same effect by using inappropriately familiar or "downward" expressions, and there are some words that are pretty much rude in any situation. My kids like anime, and I watch some with english subs, and am amused at how many curse words they put in the subs. In the anime, they may just use a non-polite or derogatory form of the word "you" that really doesn't convey any other meaning than "you + disrespect", and the subs add in "scumbag" or "bi---" (if it's a woman). I can see their dilemma, but on the whole I think they would get the original sense across better if they didn't try to make up for the missing forms in English and just let the tone of voice and facial expression communicate that part.

      To the original point, I would say that in Japanese, a language that doesn't have many "curse words" as we think of them, there are still ways to express rudeness and socially inappropriate forms of speech that you wouldn't want your kids using. Maybe more of them, as there are more expected differences in the way children speak to adults vs the way adults speak to children.

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    16. Re:But by skine · · Score: 1

      The Power of Christ compels you!

    17. Re:But by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      This isn't entirely far from the truth. I've seen comment boards where pretty much any dirty word is allowed to fly but using 'torture' or 'rape' in a comment will bring up the 'awaiting moderation' flag.

      .

    18. Re:But by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure if swearing is a universal trait. I don't know if this is true in any other languages, but in Irish Gaelic there is no such thing as profanity. (Some people use the translation of 'kiss my ass' but that only uses the anatomically correct word for buttocks, so it's not really a swear word.) So it's interesting that after we became Anglophone we embraced swearing so vigorously. As an Irishman I have to say I'm a bit embarrassed when I hear my countrymen using the F word as an adjective for every noun.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    19. Re:But by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      If curse words become a part of normally accepted speech, what the hell will we use for curse words then???

      Smeg.

    20. Re:But by sjames · · Score: 1

      meekrob

    21. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of the N-Word, how about something like "Fourteenth Amendment Humanoid" and "Hypermotivated-Alcohol-Dehydrogenase-Impaired-Political-Liberty-Eschewing-Job-Stealing Scholarship Snatcher" for "Gook", or "Zipperhead"

    22. Re:But by bar-agent · · Score: 1
      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    23. Re:But by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first purpose already has an international language. If someone in any culture hits their hand with a hammer, they all use the same sounds whether or not they ultimately say a curse word. Curse words add no value.

      Turns out that swearing is a natural analgesic: Scientific American article on the subject

      The second usage is just plain laziness. If you really want to put someone down, you should put some thought into it.

      Thoughtless use is not the only use. Nobody could 'cleverly' refer to the case of Arkell v. Pressdram if Pressdram hadn't replied "fuck off".

    24. Re:But by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're all a bunch of wallhacking noobtubers!

    25. Re:But by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      'Sblood, you don't need any craven expletives to get across your teeth, sirrah. You apple-john, you dewberry, golly, I'd like to whip your churlish hide!

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    26. Re:But by icebraining · · Score: 1

      At least in Europe, it's way more usual in south countries, like Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy, etc, especially related to religious themes.

      Your Mother's Tongue is a very good book about profanity across European languages.

    27. Re:But by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      The Japanese language does not really have swear words, either, other than the universal "kuso" (which is like "shit".)

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    28. Re:But by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I think GP meant actual rape, murder, genocide, etc., not just the words referring to them. He was trying to argue that when language is dulled to the point that it’s inadequate, physical violence will be the only remaining way to vent... now personally I don’t think I agree with this slippery slope entirely, but like I said, I think that’s what he was arguing.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:But by AnalogBrain · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of what's taboo. You could yell 'fuck' or 'damn' in the middle of a crowd and probably not get much of a reaction. You'd get a much bigger reaction shouting racial slurs, which weren't such a big deal a couple generations ago. What offends people changes with time.

    30. Re:But by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      The second usage is just plain laziness. If you really want to put someone down, you should put some thought into it. For examples, take a look at all the Winston Churchill or Mark Twain put downs. They could insult you using your own opinions in such a way that you're defenseless, or make an insult sound like a complement that everyone except the person listening would understand.

      Ah, but if one is well known for often preferring complex put-downs, then a simple "go fuck yourself" picks up this lovely overtone of "you're not worth the minimal effort it would take to properly insult you", and may be precisely what the speaker intends...

    31. Re:But by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "If curse words become a part of normally accepted speech, what the hell will we use for curse words then???"

      Vivid expressions using words that aren't taboo. Easy enough.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    32. Re:But by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Curse words really have no purpose.

      That's a very Anglo-centric view!

      As the story goes, at some point of time Soviet Union military researchers did a study. Initial research was hinting at the fact that Soviet army would have an inherent disadvantage in battle against Americans, since Russian words are, on average, about twice as long as English words, and therefore it takes twice as much time to give an order.

      However, more detailed studies - culminating on observations "on the ground" - conclusively showed that it is not the case. Specifically, in real combat situations, Soviet officers would almost immediately switch to substituting most words with common Russian swearwords. This has an advantageous effect because the swearwords are shorter, often one syllable. Yet, to researchers' surprise, the orders thus expressed remained perfectly clear to the soldiers, with no cases of miscommunication.

      ~

    33. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curse words have no purpose, but you list two of them? You are very confused.

      There may be alternatives to using curse words, but there are alternatives to many other words, too. Should we stop using all synonyms because they have no purpose?

    34. Re:But by simplexion · · Score: 1
      How is that insightful? Let me direct you to Stephen Fry talking about this exact argument: Stephen Fry on the Joys of Swearing

      P.S. You're a dickhead.

    35. Re:But by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Right, so forbidding swear words hinders crime! That makes complete sense.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    36. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just call them fucking cheating assholes.

    37. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It scares me to think I actually understood the parent phrase. I derived meaning from it, and now I must go and blow my brains out.

  5. Duh by Joebert · · Score: 1

    No shit Sherlock !

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  6. Not really a big deal by royallthefourth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When those children are adults, it will no longer be considered profane. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Not really a big deal by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      just like when kids i the 60's would make marijuana legal when they got into politics.

      Please.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not really a big deal by operagost · · Score: 1

      They decided to put us all on prescription painkillers and psychotropics, instead.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Not really a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like when kids in the 60s made it okay to say "gosh darn" in public.

    4. Re:Not really a big deal by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      just like when kids i the 60's would make marijuana legal when they got into politics.

      Only a very small subset of them got into power. Those that did realize that it's a useful tool that's required to perpetuate their own power (through the government which needs to expand its tax base for a new layer on its Ponzi scheme programs, and so needs a failed State with a young population to annex, or else is left looking impotent and fails itself).

      The other 99% are getting old and painful and don't want to put up with the hassles of dealing illegally for an analgesic/anti-emetic.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Not really a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something wrong your sentence. I think you got enough the pot.

    6. Re:Not really a big deal by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      In case you hadn't noticed, there are ballot initiatives to do just that in California. Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) started a commission to rethink the War on Drugs. So yeah, some of those kids are in fact trying to make pot legal.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    7. Re:Not really a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i the 60's

      The whole 60's ?

    8. Re:Not really a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like when kids i the 60's would make marijuana legal when they got into politics.

      Please.

      Not everyone who grew up in the 60s smoked pot. There were some very straightlaced kids/teenagers out there.

    9. Re:Not really a big deal by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Really, it takes two generations: one to be broadly hypocritical about it, and the next to recognize the hypocrisy and be broadly rational. Luckily, some of those 60s kids are putting the measure up so us 80s kids can finally vote for it.

  7. disgraceful by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Funny

    as my toddler would say, that's fucked up!

    1. Re:disgraceful by drunkenoafoffofb3ta · · Score: 1

      My nephew (aged 3) was singing "America: Fuck Yeah" -- turns out he can operate DVD players with the Team America: World Police DVD in the drive. Mind you, I was trying to teach him the word "bollocks" from the age of 18 months... heh.

    2. Re:disgraceful by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      My sister will hate me for it but I have the same plan.

    3. Re:disgraceful by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      My son, at 2 1/2 years old, got frustrated with a puzzle at his Montesory School (they start early in Belgium). He got up, said "Aw, fuck it." and walked away.

      My wife was mortified when the teacher told her. I was proud he used it in context. :)

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    4. Re:disgraceful by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Belgium man!, Belgium!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:disgraceful by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      My nephew of 21 months will point to his junk, when asked, "Brady, where's your junk?"

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    6. Re:disgraceful by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much the same boat I'm in. My wife gets worked up sometimes about our daughter mimicking profanity (which both of us use liberally) because she's worried about keeping up appearances and what other people think. However I can't find it in myself to get upset about any uses that fit the situation. In fact, I'm on record as saying that I will not judge negatively any usage that I would accept from myself or any other adult in the same context.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:disgraceful by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Does he point at his penis or at his toys? Here's where I have a problem with the over use of swearing and slang. Americans seem more afraid of the words "penis", "vagina", and "genitalia" than with vulgarities and slag. My mother can't even say "penis" or "vagina" in a voice louder than a whisper, and she's not a prude.

    8. Re:disgraceful by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      I must say that, thankfully, I have no idea how my mother would sound saying those words.

    9. Re:disgraceful by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      He points at his penis. thanks for overthinking that, I think it's cute.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  8. Adults too. by snowraver1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Monkey see, Monkey do. I have noticed an increase in the amount of swearing that adults do too. I'm guessing also that parents aren't beating their children (spanking) or rinsing their mouth out (with liquid dish soap) as much either.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    1. Re:Adults too. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing also that parents aren't beating their children (spanking) or rinsing their mouth out (with liquid dish soap) as much either.

      Oh yes, the fantastic lesson of "If someone does something you don't want him to, harm him".

      It works wonders.

    2. Re:Adults too. by tophermeyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing I've noticed is that adults are less likely to call other adults out on profanity around children. I remember as a kid going to baseball games it was pretty unusual for someone to swear and not be called out on it. The swearing happened, as a kid I was aware of it, but I also saw the adults around me taking the time to ask the person to mind their language.

      Maybe I'm just old and cranky, but that kind of thing doesn't happen as much anymore. Adults are either a lot more tolerant or much more timid in engaging the lewd individual and asking them to stop. I miss that.

    3. Re:Adults too. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the distinction between "private" and "public" language has decreased. It used to be that vulgar words weren't used in common discourse with strangers, or in public forums, or in mixed company. These words were reserved for use with your buddies, a "men's language" if you will, and were used only rarely, or for strong effect, by women.

      A lot of these distinctions have decreased with the spread of mass-market media that depicts these words used commonly. I think this was initially a way to make movies and television shows feel more authentic and real, closer to the common language of people, with the result being that the spoken language of the US as a whole has become more common.

      I think as the words have become more common and less laden with shock value, adults concern about their children hearing or using them has diminished. So I suspect adults are just less shocked to hear others use these words in public and realize the futility of trying to prevent their children from hearing them when they are likely to hear them in movies or on television anyway.

    4. Re:Adults too. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      do too. I'm guessing also that parents aren't beating their children (spanking) or rinsing their mouth out (with liquid dish soap) as much either.

      Yeah, old fashioned family values - the cure for society's ills - NOT.

      The child grows up thinking that physical violence is normal. They'll grow up thinking the showing anger and rage is normal. Then they'll be in school and in the workforce and they'll wonder why they can't get along with others or worse, they'll end up in jail. They'll have employment problems all their life and hiring mangers will never give them feedback so they'll be going through life wondering what the fuck is wrong with everyone.

      The kid will grow up with anxiety and depression - and we wonder why anti-depressants and anti-anxiety drugs are blockbuster drugs. And hopefully, the depression will get them to seek help before they do something like climb up into a bell tower and start shooting innocent people. Of course with the stigma on mental health, the person will have to pay cash to keep the shit out of the MIB - or at least the best they can - because employers look at it and if you have a mental health history, you become unemployable.

      More than likely, the child will grow up feeling unease and purposeless while trying to fill the void with consumption (racking up the credit cards), prescription drugs and alcohol.

      You sir have spelled out the source of many of our society's ills.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    5. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes, it does. Rule of law is maintained by punishment of individuals by society through authorities.

      The problem is that many parents are inconsistent and arbitrary (that is, tyrannical) in its application.

    6. Re:Adults too. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Great! Maybe we'll all be forced to learn how to communicate instead of being shocked senseless by a word someone says.

    7. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably less stoning to death as well... we need to get back to traditional values.

    8. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does, actually. Works a lot quicker than reasoning with them.

    9. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if kids learned it from adults, where did the adults learn it from?

      maybe they learned it from the people who were adults when THEY were kids, in spite of the rose colored-glasses everyone seems to wear when thinking of past generations as opposed to "the kids these days".

      my daughter will probably learn to swear from me in spite of my best efforts to watch my own language, and i learned to swear from my dad who probably learned to swear from HIS dad, repeat repeat repeat ad nauseum

      besides, it should be the words themselves that are a big deal. when i do hear my daughter repeating a swear, i don't tell her "THAT IS A BAD WORD", i tell her that saying those kinds of things to people "isn't nice". there are always things that are nice to say and things that aren't, no matter what words are being used. if a child learns a sense of what is nice and what's not, appropriate language will follow.

    10. Re:Adults too. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Nor should they. Swearing is ok. Violence is not. Teaching a kid that physical violence is an appropriate response to language you don't like is a bad lesson.

      Personally, I wish my experience matched with the article. My GF's daughter is a damn wiener who gasps every time someone says crap. That's fucking annoying.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Adults too. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      i don't tell her "THAT IS A BAD WORD", i tell her that saying those kinds of things to people "isn't nice".

      Indeed, there's a big difference between "this fucking shitty piece of crap can suck my dick" and "suck my dick you fucking shitty piece of crap"

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Adults too. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      The child grows up thinking that physical violence is normal. They'll grow up thinking the showing anger and rage is normal.

      Just like sending criminals to jail for bad behavior teaches children that it's okay to kidnap and confine people.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:Adults too. by Lueseiseki · · Score: 1

      It's called "positive punishment", a very standard and accepted phrase in the studies of psychology and behaviorism. Does a kid that was spanked always become aggressive against his/her environment?

    14. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, the fantastic lesson of "If someone does something you don't want him to, harm him".

      It works wonders.

      I let my kid swear and teach her about situational context (e.g. at school some people will get mad if you say swear words).

      However, knowing that if you mouth off someone might just sock you in the nose is kind of a valuable lesson. It beats learning it at 16 when you mouth off and some guy decides to curb stomp you since you never learned to properly assess risk and the reactions of those around you.

      No, I've never rinsed my kid's mouth out with soap. Swear words are just words, people. Grow up.

    15. Re:Adults too. by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      parents aren't beating their children (spanking) or rinsing their mouth out (with liquid dish soap) as much either.

      You're correct- now they get a "fucking time-out" instead.

    16. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do children no favors otherwise. What happens when they grow up and steal, rape, or murder? Does the judge give them a mild scolding and a fine? Sometimes, the only thing someone understands is violence. Unfortunate, but true.

    17. Re:Adults too. by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

      slippery slope fallacy

    18. Re:Adults too. by DittoBox · · Score: 1

      Over the years I got to be quite a connoisseur of soap. My personal preference was for Lux, but I found Palmolive had a nice, piquant after-dinner flavor - heady, but with just a touch of mellow smoothness. Life Buoy, on the other hand...

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    19. Re:Adults too. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Yeah, old fashioned family values - the cure for society's ills - NOT.

      The child grows up thinking that physical violence is normal. They'll grow up thinking the showing anger and rage is normal. Then they'll be in school and in the workforce and they'll wonder why they can't get along with others or worse, they'll end up in jail [childhelp.org]. They'll have employment problems all their life and hiring mangers will never give them feedback so they'll be going through life wondering what the fuck is wrong with everyone.

      Nevertheless, any effort to correct and steer behavior requires both the carrot and the stick. I will be the first to agree that lashing out at one's child in rage is counterproductive and harmful. However, when lesser measures have failed and the child is still displaying inappropriate behavior, a spanking that is given rarely and calmly will get the message across that the child fucked up badly and is now in very serious trouble.

      Physical pain is a part of life. We use it as a correctional measure on our dogs, on our horses and on all other forms of life that we deal with and that are not capable of rational debate.

      And somewhat offtopic, a limited display of anger and rage *is* normal. Keeping it all bottled up inside is rather bad for you. Slamming a door, cursing or punching a boxing bag for a while provides a wonderful outlet.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    20. Re:Adults too. by russotto · · Score: 1

      It's called "positive punishment", a very standard and accepted phrase in the studies of psychology and behaviorism.

      Because "negative reinforcement" sounded so, well, negative?

    21. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some of that. However I realized a few years ago *ALL* kids swear. They may or may not know the right words for it.

      I did something a 3 year old didnt like once. Here is what he called me 'you are a big ... pooopy stinky ... head'. He knew exactly what swear word to use (shithead) but didnt know the word.

      His parents were very careful to not swear around him. However they used 'substitute' words around him. They still were swearing but just in a different way.

      Much like my garndma going 'oh fiddlesticks' we all know she wanted to use the f-bomb. But just substituted a friendly word.

    22. Re:Adults too. by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      A lot of these distinctions have decreased with the spread of mass-market media that depicts these words used commonly. I think this was initially a way to make movies and television shows feel more authentic and real, closer to the common language of people, with the result being that the spoken language of the US as a whole has become more common.

      Worked as a sub several years ago in a school system in Arizona. Having to collect papers from the students for the science teacher to collect after school was over...got to read several of these. I was shocked to find excessive use of profanity and very basic writing/grammar errors on almost every paper I collected. Hardly any of these students could construct a proper sentence.

      Where this is leading is to general failure for the college bound students. They can't write or express themselves without using profanity...the college professor will immediately let them know what is thought of their writing in an educational environment. When they waste their time/money...rather than the state in a public school environment...maybe...just maybe...they might figure it out. Too bad the high school teachers won't.

      The ones who don't go to college will keep wondering why the use of profanity lose them opportunities and why the police arrested them for resisting when they kept using the F-bomb over/over at the arresting officer.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    23. Re:Adults too. by natet · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the fantastic lesson of "If someone does something you don't want him to, harm him".

      It works wonders.

      Why not, it works for Mother Nature.

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    24. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "positive punishment", a very standard and accepted phrase in the studies of psychology and behaviorism. Does a kid that was spanked always become aggressive against his/her environment?

      Actually, now that you mention it, yes, that's basically it.

    25. Re:Adults too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In actuality, it did work wonders in the past, but only when the parents were responsible enough to know the difference between "discipline" and "abuse".

      Then with the last generation or two, a good number of parents DIDN'T seem to know the difference and ended up beating their kids needlessly.

      Those kids grew up thinking all such things were "abuse" and made it their mission to get into politics and other areas to outlaw it to the extreme.

      Now we're in a situation where parents can only go "I'm counting to 3!!!!" to discipline the kids.

      Unfortunately the big secret of this technique is that a growing number of kids realize that once you get to 3 there's precious little you can legally do to them anymore without leaving them the option of crying "abuse".

      And there ARE kids evil enough to fuck up the entire family when they realize the kind of power they possess.

    26. Re:Adults too. by MoriT · · Score: 1

      The difference between the public and private has also diminished as women have entered the work force. Now that many women actively seek out equal participation in the public sphere and society has realized there is no logical reason to deny them, it is no longer considered appropriate to base culture around the exclusion of women.

      As men's need to distinguish themselves from women diminishes, since being a woman is no longer considered a bad thing, these words carry less power. As they participate more in home life, the language of masculinity enters the domestic sphere. As gender stops being the primary defining factor of individuality, there is no longer the requirement for secrecy around words of power, and so children pick them up. They also, in my experience, learn to use them in context; without the forbidden aspect it isn't like you are making a point by cursing all the time.

      p.s. a "girl" is a child by definition.

    27. Re:Adults too. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Could be that we simply are tired of some busybody using "think of the children" as a trump card:

      http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=1488

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    28. Re:Adults too. by dysphorya · · Score: 1
      Ha! Good one! ;)

      For anybody wondering...

      Positive punishment = addition of a "bad thing" to shape behavior (i.e., getting slapped)
      Negative punishment = removal of a "good thing" to shape behavior (i.e., having your XBox360 taken away)
      Positive reinforcement = addition of a "good thing" to shape behavior (i.e., getting a reward of money)
      Negative reinforcement = removal of a "bad thing" to shape behavior (i.e., "we'll stop torturing you if you confess.")

  9. Slow news day by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    My grandparents said the same thing about my parents.

    1. Re:Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What is happening to our young people? They disrespect their elders, they disobey their parents. They ignore the law. They riot in the streets inflamed with wild notions. Their morals are decaying. What is to become of them?"

      -- Plato

    2. Re:Slow news day by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      "Cut your hair and get a real job! The blacksmith down the street needs an apprentice!" -- Plato's dad

    3. Re:Slow news day by lxs · · Score: 1

      Sure it was written by Plato, but he was quoting his teacher Socrates. (Who was in turn sentenced to death for corrupting the morals of the young -- go figure!)

    4. Re:Slow news day by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      As Jimmy Buffett said: "We are the people our parents warned us about"

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  10. Isn't kind of obvious? by Idbar · · Score: 1

    The more people do things, the more they think is normal, the more culturally accepted that is.

    1. Re:Isn't kind of obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... culture is evolution, we learn from each other who we are :-D

    2. Re:Isn't kind of obvious? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Everyone can see the world going to hell around them, so it would simply be misleading for kids to say "we will be burdened by the out of control debts of our predecessors" when everyone knows it's more accurate and succinct to simply say "we're fucked."

  11. Anecdote by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My nephew just turned 4 a little while back. Sadly, he has a speech impediment that has made him difficult, if not impossible, to understand until very recently. Over over the past 6 months or so his speech has improved considerable and we finally know... that the kid swears like a sailor, he's probably been swearing for years and no one ever knew it. Seriously, we're all in the kitchen and we hear "Holy shit!" come out of the living room, go in to see what's going on and he's watching Sesame Street. Obviously we tried and failed to not laugh, so I can't imagine we helped the situation any.

    1. Re:Anecdote by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's the values that Sesame Street is pushing onto the kids these days. Be happy you didn't walk onto him while he was having a joint with a couple of bitches.

      I wonder how his 'holly shit' sounded before that time: hoooueee siiiid

    2. Re:Anecdote by hrvatska · · Score: 1

      When my son was in kindergarten we were visiting my parents. Everyone was sitting around a table talking and laughing, and all of a sudden my 5 year old son says "kiss my pussy", and laughs. Everyone got quiet and looked at him. I calmly asked him why he said that, and he said the girls on the school bus said it to each other all the time and then laughed. While I explained to him that the phrase was not one he should use, and not just because it didn't apply to his anatomy, I couldn't help thinking that it was unfortunate that a harmless euphemism for a part of the body should be considered vulgar.

    3. Re:Anecdote by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      Your fault for propagating its mythical vulgarity unto him.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    4. Re:Anecdote by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Ditto. We realised our son was saying "Oh Shit" at appropriate times when he started pronouncing the S and T clearly.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  12. Don't blame the media.. by Malc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... blame the parents. The media just reflects what is acceptable to society.

    I've always wondered though why Americans get so upset about bad language and sex, but violence on TV is ok for children to watch.

    1. Re:Don't blame the media.. by r7 · · Score: 1

      The media just reflects what is acceptable to society

      No it doesn't. The media reflects what sells. Any correlation with social values is purely coincidental.

      One thing you have to keep in mind, when reading the OP, is that this is the perspective of someone who watches a lot of TV, and hangs out with other people who watch a lot of TV.

    2. Re:Don't blame the media.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What planet are you from? The media reports edge cases over and over again until it becomes so often it becomes 'normally'.
      Stop using the sex/violence false dichotomy. There separate things and the deserve different conversations.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Don't blame the media.. by zero_out · · Score: 1

      This is rather insightful. I wonder the same thing. Profanity and sexuality are considered inappropriate for children to observe, yet we consider violence to be acceptable? None of them are acceptable!

      I was in HS when South Park first began. There was this one occasion where I was fixing the computer of a family, and their 8 and 9 year old children were watching the show. Sure, I enjoyed the show, and watched it on a regular basis. At that time, I was a very different person than I am now. Spewing out profanity was second nature to me (but next month will be 10 years since I uttered a profane word). Yet even I was shocked and stunned at the lack of parenting. The parents knew very well what their kids were watching, because the kids were watching it right there in the living room while the parents were about, doing what parents do.

      My nephew who is only 4 years old, lists South Park and Family Guy among his favorite shows, right along with Sponge Bob and Dora. Unfortunately, my sister is quite possibly the most selfish and arrogant person to walk this planet, so I don't dare to criticize what she allows my nephew to watch, lest I end up with a black eye and slashed tires. All I can do is try to be a positive influence on my nephew, and provide an example of what a normal and stable life is.

    4. Re:Don't blame the media.. by wondafucka · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why blame anyone at all? What is wrong with a child swearing, other than that some adults prefer to believe a lie about children and innocence.

      The world is a dynamic place full of unfathomable joy, and unrelenting shittiness. We should have a full vocabulary and worldview to express and conceptualize this.

    5. Re:Don't blame the media.. by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      You know I always wondered why many parents were happy to watch TV/Films about murder rape torture etc. Things we really hate and would never allow our children to do.
      Yet forbid them from watching shows about/including sex. The one activity we all take great pride in doing (Slashdot meme's notwithstanding).

      The only explanation I have for this is while all parents seem to want to become grandparents some day, they don't want to become grandparents too soon.
      Or it could be linked to the negative connotation of slut, but that doesn't fully explain it with the positive connotation of stud...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    6. Re:Don't blame the media.. by qwijibo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      my sister is quite possibly the most selfish and arrogant person to walk this planet

      This is the kind of unnecessarily wordy language that confuses young kids. It's much easier and more accurate to say "my sister is a bitch" which everyone understands more clearly.

      Today's children aren't potty mouths, they're just much more efficient in their usage of words. Why sugar coat something when the efficient bad words are commonly accepted?

    7. Re:Don't blame the media.. by BlortHorc · · Score: 1

      next month will be 10 years since I uttered a profane word

      Profane?

      Really?

      Do you also keep track of how many times you ward off the devil with hand gestures?

      Oh, you do?

      Well, I'll be fucked

    8. Re:Don't blame the media.. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Those are cartoons. Cartoons are for children. Hence those are acceptable for children to watch. And learn from.

      Whoops, that's a different idiotic American attitude than the one we're talking about....

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    9. Re:Don't blame the media.. by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. The media reflects what sells. Any correlation with social values is purely coincidental.

      But isn't "what sells" a reflection of our social values? Not the social values we claim to have, but those we actually have? The stuff wouldn't sell if we didn't value it socially.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    10. Re:Don't blame the media.. by precariousgray · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      (Hint: I have attained perfect efficiency via written means as, in a single word (wow), I expressed what would formerly be several paragraphs worth of ideas.)

      You can only compress and condense so much before you begin to lose something. Claiming that calling someone a "bitch" is somehow more reasonable than actually explaining why their behavior is worthy of scorn is absurd.

      --
      not much, just being forced to manually insert line breaks into my comment
    11. Re:Don't blame the media.. by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eloquence. This is a weapon of the vocabulary knights. Not as random or as clumsy as your profanity, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age.

    12. Re:Don't blame the media.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The media just reflects what is acceptable to society

      No it doesn't. The media reflects what sells. Any correlation with social values is purely coincidental.

      One thing you have to keep in mind, when reading the OP, is that this is the perspective of someone who watches a lot of TV, and hangs out with other people who watch a lot of TV.

      No, the censors are the ones who determine what appears before the audience and what does not. The MPAA is an unaccountable body that considers views of the sex act, or even references to it, to be less acceptable than views of someone getting his head blown off. What the market actually wants has very little to do with it.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    13. Re:Don't blame the media.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      That just shows that the words have been losing power for years. At one time, a couple good swear words were very nearly as expressive of utter contempt as peeing on the person. Let's face it, some people are fully deserving of that level of contempt, but even if you chug a gallon of water, by the time it works it's way through the moment is gone.

    14. Re:Don't blame the media.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my sister is quite possibly the most selfish and arrogant person to walk this planet

      Why sugar coat something when the efficient bad words are commonly accepted?

      This is double plus good!

    15. Re:Don't blame the media.. by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people see it as an absurd tongue-in-cheek comment as opposed to a simple observation of the dumbing down of society. It just seemed like a good opportunity to illustrate how sometimes profanity can be interchangeable with the more descriptive terms.

      While I like to inquire if someone is genetically predisposed to suboptimal performance, is that likely to be understood as well as saying "are you a retard?"

    16. Re:Don't blame the media.. by BigSes · · Score: 1

      Spewing out profanity was second nature to me (but next month will be 10 years since I uttered a profane word). Yet even I was shocked and stunned at the lack of parenting.....(snip)......normal and stable life is.

      Normal and stable? Are you somekind of fucking uber-Christian or something? Sure, you don't have to swear like a sailor, but if you haven't "uttered a profane word" in nearly a decade, I would say that is far from normal. Quite an accomplishment, holy hell, does your arm hurt from patting yourself on the back? God forbid that you might say something profane to vent anger, or physical pain, if you happen to hurt yourself. You probably look at people in disgust when you hear them use profanity when you are out and about, as if you are so much better than they are. Give me a break, get off your high horse.

    17. Re:Don't blame the media.. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend has recently stopped getting her sister to watch her kid, after she found out that the sister was letting the kids watch Robot Chicken. There's bad parenting, and then there's simply not giving a flying fuck.

    18. Re:Don't blame the media.. by RailRide · · Score: 1

      Those are cartoons. Cartoons are for children. Hence those are acceptable for children to watch. And learn from.

      Just like this one. And this one

      (I'd been saving those two. Like one would save a S.B.D. :) )

      ---PCJ

    19. Re:Don't blame the media.. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I fail to recognize the problem. Are you implying they're too immature to recognize the appropriate social situations to use or not that vocabulary?

      Let me tell you: regardless of what you think, 9 year old kids aren't stupid, and they're perfectly capable of distinguish when to use them, as long as the parents themselves set the example (by not employing such vocabulary in their conversations).

      My young brother was allowed to watch FG, SP (which he disliked) and similar shows, but he never employs that vocabulary either in home or on the school, although I have heard him talk that way with his friends (who do the same, by the way).

      More disturbing than allowing 9 year olds to watch TV shows containing foul language is people who consider their children to be stupid.

    20. Re:Don't blame the media.. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Male chauvinism is a very important part of many religions; Puritanism wasn't an exception.

    21. Re:Don't blame the media.. by zero_out · · Score: 1

      You probably look at people in disgust when you hear them use profanity when you are out and about, as if you are so much better than they are. Give me a break, get off your high horse.

      I don't look down on a person if I hear them use profanity, but there certainly was a time that I would suffer from sensations of nausea when I heard someone use profanity. Now, the words and phrases stick out like bold font in print, but I no longer feel nauseated.

      To answer your other (implied) questions, I haven't used profanity to vent anger, or physical pain. The worst I have done is use (mostly) benign phrase, such as "Oh, come on!" when someone cuts me off in traffic, or a loud grunt/scream (sans actual words) when I dropped something heavy on my foot.

      I'm still working the problem of venting anger. I used to say more accusatory phrases in anger, such as "What is wrong with you?! Are you a complete moron, or just a masterful actor?!" I've found that such outbursts of anger don't help me or the person I am angry with. One day I hope to eliminate all my expressions of anger, including the annoyed sigh. That will probably take a few decades.

      You'd be surprised what aspects of your character and behavior you can change if you truly put your mind to it.

    22. Re:Don't blame the media.. by BigSes · · Score: 1

      I guess my only other question would be: Why? To what end is anger so fundamentally wrong, even at the slightest degree? Anger is part of the normal plethora of human emotions. As you said in your original post, it seemed as though you used to be more normal, so I guess it isn't an issue of upbringing. You know, "An puppy dies every time you get angry" or something to that extent. There has to be some deep-seated reason that you would want to change yourself to that degree. I'd think you would be denying yourself too much of your own humanity with no gain. Hey man, its your life, live it as you see fit. More power to you if you manage to accomplish such a goal.

    23. Re:Don't blame the media.. by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Everyone is genetically predisposed to suboptimal performance, and retardation (in either the popular or technical sense) doesn't a priori mean anything about genetics.

      Really, "retard" is interesting. First, it harkens back to the naive days when either psychometrics were meant to identify who needed more help (as opposed to who was better); or the whole "helping people" was just a smoke-screen or white-wash from the beginning.

      More interestingly, like most labels for "low intelligence", it started out as a technical term and became a slang term with a generalized meaning. Notably all of these slang terms are interchangable and seem to have a consistent, although vague, interpretation. This suggests to me that formalizations of intelligence and ability are not totally inadequate for day-to-day use (that is, they are best interpreted statistically as correlations and aggregate predictors). There are plenty of smart retards, and even though that's an apparent oxymoron, I'm pretty sure you have an idea of what I'm getting at.

      The sad thing is the lack of specificity about "retard" and its kin. Since intelligence is probably a sum total of many individual contributions (as evinced by its gaussian distribution), it's just lazy to insult someone's intelligence as opposed to singling out the specific failing contributing to the offense. (An exception can be made perhaps for those at the very end of the curve, true geniuses like von Neumann or Einstein, but I hardly think they would need to point it out). It's better and more civilized to insult those specific failings which are relevant to the offense at hand. It is more clear and provides better feedback to the fuckwit who just shat in your punch bowl.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    24. Re:Don't blame the media.. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of unnecessarily wordy language that confuses young kids.

      Do you have any? A three year old is perfectly capable of understanding just about anything you are capable of saying, provided he knows the vocabulary. How they gain vocabulary is by listening to you use words. By artificially restraining your own speech you are giving a false impression of how the language works and depriving the kid of vocabulary.

      It isn't your job to descend to the child's level when speaking. You don't even know where that level is in order to target it right. The expectation is that the child will raise himself to the level of YOUR speech.

      Otherwise we are just teaching our children to speak like dimwits. Don't even get me started on parents who talk to their 5 year old in baby talk and substitute cutesy words for common things.

    25. Re:Don't blame the media.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (but next month will be 10 years since I uttered a profane word)

      Fuck you, you Mormon prude. You shit stinks as much as the rest of us.

    26. Re:Don't blame the media.. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately idiots carry a natural immunity to it. Oh you might strike them with it, but they don't even realize they've been hit.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    27. Re:Don't blame the media.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why sugar coat something when the efficient bad words are commonly accepted?

      Making a blunt statement is easy to retort. In contrast, creating an elaborate construct which takes effort to parse, much less understand, can be a fair bit more offensive. The high art is, on one hand, making it very clear to the target that the statement is somehow offensive to them, but on the other hand, making it so that they cannot understand the precise way in which that is the case. An attempt to retort such a veiled insult often fires back, which is why people often hate it more than the blunt thing.

    28. Re:Don't blame the media.. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      my sister is quite possibly the most selfish and arrogant person to walk this planet

      It's much easier and more accurate to say "my sister is a bitch" which everyone understands more clearly.

      I disagree. When one says "Jane is a bitch", we are not being precice. Which of these do we mean?

      - she's deliberately mean to others
      - she's arrogant
      - she's selfish
      - she's inconsiderate
      - her obsession with the rules annoys everyone
      - she's someone's lackey
      - she's confident and I'm threatened by that

      All of these could be implied by "bitch" -- whether we use it about someone that cuts us off in traffic, or about the nosy busybody across the street that is measuring our grass to ensure it meets HOA regulations. Simply saying "she's a bitch" is not at all accurate enough, at least not when trying to educate a child. If Jane is a bitch, considier elaborating why at least some of the time: "Jane is inconsiderate and mean-spirited".

      "Jane's a bitch" is much easier to use, I grant, but I don't see how anyone can consider it more accurate or informative.

    29. Re:Don't blame the media.. by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Why sugar coat something when the efficient bad words are commonly accepted?

      You are right . I find sugar coated shit even more disgusting than the regular kind.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    30. Re:Don't blame the media.. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Does this weapon, if examined closely, perchance have the words "Bad motherfucker" inscribed on it?
      For identification purposes only, of course.

  13. Clarence Darrow by Jhon · · Score: 1

    I don't swear for the hell of it. Language is a poor enough means of communication. We've got to use all the words we've got. Besides, there are damn few words anybody understands -- Spencer Tracy (Inherit the Wind).

    That said, we never curse in our house. Neither have our children (age 10 and 8) other than to ask about a word they've heard.

  14. f-"bomb"? c-"bomb" by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
    • The natural act of copulation.
    • A body part possessed by around half the inhabitants of the planet.
    • A device constructed with the sole purpose of committing the mass murder and maiming of as many people as possible.

    One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just doesn't belong.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  15. Swearing is relative by RichMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Swearing is relative to a perceived base.

    On the old people stodgy baseline it is all swearing, even "boobies".
    On the young people base line "fuck" is emphasis mark.

    Language changes. Swear words are something that change quite quickly.

    1. Re:Swearing is relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boobs!
      Hiney!
      Mittens!

    2. Re:Swearing is relative by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      While the vernacular changes, the words also take on additional meaning. 20-30 years ago, "shit" was more of an exclamation than anything else. Now, it's a stand-in for nearly any noun in the language. Terms like "I don't give a shit," "I have to get my shit together," and "...and shit" weren't really as common then. Now that the term has become common, it's passed from vulgarity into common acceptance.

      The "new" cuss words showing up can also be related to the important issues in today's society. "Cunt," while being incredibly old, is referred to as the "C-word," and my perception is that "nigger" carries far more negative impact and weight than "fuck" ever did.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    3. Re:Swearing is relative by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Swear words are something that change quite quickly.

      There is some truth to that, in the sense that perception of vulgarity in certain words can seem to increase or decrease relatively rapidly with time, but on the other hand, most of the actual curse words we use are incredibly old from a linguistic perspective.

      Fuck has cognates all over the Germanic languages, and seems very close to the word futuere in Latin, so at the very least it dates to proto-Germanic with borrowing throughout Europe (hey, it's a good word!) and seems to relate to similar words in other Indo-European languages.

      Cunt similarly shows up throughout Latin (cunnus, meaning vulva, as in cunnilingus) and in various Germanic languages.

      Shit goes all the way back to proto-Indo-European and has clear Germanic cognates (Scheisse in German, etc.).

      The word "dick" is actually surprisingly modern according to Wikipedia only dating to 1890, and is one of the few ubiquitous vulgarities for human anatomy in English that seems to be so recent.

      Pussy is quite old too, from Old Saxon puse for vulva (and cognates in Old English, and Old Norse etc.).

      So historically, though humans clearly have a limitless amount of creativity when it comes to cursing, some of the basic vulgar words, especial those that refer to parts of the human body and bodily functions, have been around for quite a long time, though perceptions on which words are "proper" and which are "vulgar" for these things have undoubtedly changed.

      For the most part, in modern English we seem more likely to consider Latinate words for these things to be proper and Germanic words vulgar.

      For example, "vulva" and "vagina" are words not considered particularly vulgar or offensive, "pussy" and "cunt" are vulgar. "Feces" and "defecate" are proper terms, "shit" is vulgar. So some of these divisions likely date to 1066 and the Norman conquest of England, when the Norman invaders brought their French and Latin speaking ways to the Anglo-Saxon people of England.

    4. Re:Swearing is relative by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      As time has progressed, 'acceptable vulgarities' have changed.

      "Very" old swear words:

      * darn drat shoot nuts sex (as well as what we recognize as 'movie swear words' today, which denoted someone 'swearing like a sailor')

      "Very old" words which used to be ok/in common use:

      * nigger coon wetback spic blackie (and I'm sure others)

      Old swear words:

      * dick ass prick

      Recently antiquated vulgar/swear words (in common use):

      * fuck shit bitch cock

      "Current" vulgar/swear words:

      * nigger cunt spic wetback neocon

      As language and culture changes as a whole, so do the swear words. I remember hearing of my uncles getting their mouths washed out with soap regularly by their grandfather for saying "darn". Things once accepted are now no longer accepted, and vice versa.

      It really is kinda funny to hear kids say something like "oh man I just got hit in the cock". Where do they learn these things?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Swearing is relative by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      my perception is that "nigger" carries far more negative impact and weight than "fuck" ever did.

      Unless you are black; in my neighborhood, they use it almost like "fuck," as an emphasis mark. Sort of. The rules are complex.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    6. Re:Swearing is relative by witherby · · Score: 1

      Quality summary. Mod up +1 Interesting +1 Informative!

  16. Swearing is appropriate in extreme circumstances by BubbaDave · · Score: 1

    All that has happened is that our circumstances are now always at that extreme.

    Dave

  17. Oh, why can't the children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...please, please, think of the children!

  18. Untrue by Psicopatico · · Score: 1

    These are fucking lies, godamnit!!!

    --
    Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  19. What's the issue? by IllusionalForce · · Score: 0

    I personally cannot see the problem if people or children swear. People seem to be shocked or surprised (or pretty much anything going in that direction) when they hear a child swearing. But what's the problem? They're words. I've failed to understand the issue for years now. They're just some words that seem to have a bad karma for pretty much no reason.

    Could someone kindly tell me what the big idea is? Thanks.

    1. Re:What's the issue? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      I think it's down to respect for elders or some similar such thing. If you force kids to be less than a full citizen in as many ways as possible it helps to get them to do what they're told in other ways. It's all part of beating them down and forcing them to conform to the rules of society. Knowing what little bastards a lot of kids are like they will always push the boundaries, so you set the boundaries to be artificially narrow for them then when they probe them, they are less likely to harm themselves. If you get them used to being less than an adult then it is easier to enforce rules that don't seem to make sense to them like the fact that they're not allowed to play with daddies knives, or that they can't help mummy with that boiling pan of water, or that uncle Chris' car keys are for him only, and even though Auntie Gwen's pills look a lot like sweeties you're not allowed to taste them yourself...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  20. Maybe it's not the kids? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's their damn parents imparting an unrealistic sense of self importance in them.
    Kids today think they can do what ever they dang well please since by and large their folks allow them to. I think this translates directly into these little monsters lack of proper social etiquette and respect for anyone around them.
    It would be interesting to further break this down into geographic subsets. Since I have lived in Germany, I have noticed that most folks put the hammer down on their little ones.
    I have never had a teen or kid call me anything other than Mr.
    It all comes down to bad parenting. They should have called the article, "Most parents destroy their kids".

    1. Re:Maybe it's not the kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you babbling about?

    2. Re:Maybe it's not the kids? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Stop using what you see in the media as the example of how kids behave. The are polite and speak properly.

      Yeah, because only kids who are little followers and cow toe do you and give you imagned respect as raised by good parents.

      You don't wont kids, you want sheep.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Maybe it's not the kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cow toe" - it's always funny when someone tries to spell a word they've obviously never seen in print before.

  21. Pretty sad. by AntEater · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I find this to be a bit depressing. Generally, I view swearing as a demonstration of a lack of emotional self control or evidence of a limited vocabulary to effectively express thoughts or feelings. From the larger perspective, it reflects a general lack of civility in our society. Little kids don't choose their language, they only reflect the language of those around them. Pretty sad when the supposed parents of a small child end up teaching this at such a young age.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    1. Re:Pretty sad. by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there's a study that shows when people swear after getting hurt that it has a therapeutic effect. As in, hitting your thumb with a hammer accidentally and yelling Goddamit When you hold it in, it makes it worse. So I make a point to swear when I hurt myself, and I do feel better immediately.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Pretty sad. by Zironic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What? How?

      What difference exactly does it make if someone exclaims Fuck! instead of Custard!

      How is the latter displaying a more advanced vocabulary? And why should anyone care?

    3. Re:Pretty sad. by ifrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      effectively express thoughts or feelings

      I find that swearing is often very effective at expressing my thoughts and feelings.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    4. Re:Pretty sad. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's only a sign of a lack of emotional self control if they are raised in a culture where it's wrong. Other wise it just weak communications skills.

      If every one does it, then it's not a lack of civility.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Pretty sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I view swearing quite differently:
      Genuinely being offended by "swear" words shows a lack of understanding about how stupid many of societies conventions are.

      Think about it. Why is "excrement" or "poop" acceptable to describe the end result of egestion but somehow "crap" or "shit" is bad. taking offense means is you have been taught to have a knee jerk reaction to something.

      Apparently a larger portion of current parents don't hold with the pointless obsession of not using those words. The end result being that a larger portion of society won't care about it either. If that trend continues then the words will become a standard part of the language and thus "lose" their "offensiveness". Problem solved.

    6. Re:Pretty sad. by AntEater · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but there's nothing in the phonetic structure of the swear words that helps your thumb feel better. It's just an emotional release. Next time try yelling out the name "Elmo" instead.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    7. Re:Pretty sad. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. I just wish we Americans had more of the colorful insults of the Queen's English: http://septicscompanion.com/showcat.php?cat=insults http://www.labnol.org/internet/insult-anyone-in-shakespearean-english/7251/

    8. Re:Pretty sad. by AntEater · · Score: 1

      What difference exactly does it make if someone exclaims Fuck! instead of Custard!

      How is the latter displaying a more advanced vocabulary? And why should anyone care?

      Exclaiming either one is pretty stupid, in my opinion. The only reason anyone cares, is that swearing has generally been regarded as being offensive. It's not the collection of letters or sounds that they represent but the meaning behind those words. What purpose is there in communicating the word for intercourse/fornication/sex/whatever as an exclamation - especially using terminology that a large portion of our culture considers it to be offensive? Is the purpose to offend? What is the point?

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    9. Re:Pretty sad. by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Ever since I got a proper office job, I've tried to temper my profanity. Two things that have helped in this are a) non-English swearing (mostly French), and b) Cockney rhyming slang. I should be okay until HR hires a Francophone that knows what a berk is.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    10. Re:Pretty sad. by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I think that's the key. If people weren't offended by such language, then it would become boring to swear.

      Ironically then, the potential 'solution' to the 'problem' is for people not be offended.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    11. Re:Pretty sad. by Zironic · · Score: 1

      The point is to be an exclamation, it doesn't really matter what word you use as long as it's clear from context that it's an intensifier, swear words are good for the purpose just because people get offended by them. (They become less useful as intensifiers if you use them all the time for the same reason)

    12. Re:Pretty sad. by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Mods: toss a few Insightful points on this post.

      People that don't swear (usually for religious reasons) instead use interesting euphemisms: darn, drat, flip, gosh, sheesh, and so on. My favorite is "Oh my heck." I think they're a bunch of "gosh darn" hypocrites ... because the offense is still intended, even if the words are slightly modified so they're not "dirty" anymore.

      The point of the "naughty words" isn't the words themselves, but the offense it implies.

      Except for children. They don't know what they're saying. A 2 year old doesn't have a clue what sex is, even if they've opened their dad's porn collection. At that age, they're just imitating their parents or the media, and don't realize how offensive the terms are to others.

      I don't think this desire to imitate goes away with age. Through middle school and high school, teens experiment with swearing as a way to fit in with others. Even adults will swear more when around people that swear, and cut back when around those that don't, without even thinking about it.

    13. Re:Pretty sad. by Muros · · Score: 1

      I view swearing as a demonstration of a lack of emotional self control or evidence of a limited vocabulary to effectively express thoughts or feelings.

      Stephen Fry would beg to differ.

    14. Re:Pretty sad. by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

      the offense is still intended, even if the words are slightly modified so they're not "dirty" anymore

      Wait, what? If I change the words so they aren't "dirty", and use other "non-dirty" words, how is "offense" intended? It would seem to me the opposite would be true...an emotional release of pain or disdain or whatever is achieved, while purposefully trying *not* to offend...

    15. Re:Pretty sad. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What difference exactly does it make if someone exclaims Fuck! instead of Custard!

      If it did make any real difference, Butters wouldn't be my favorite South Park character.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:Pretty sad. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      It's just an emotional release. Next time try yelling out the name "Elmo" instead.

      I'm running this through my mental simulator, and "Elmo!" does not work half as well as "Fuck!".

      And sure enough, when reading a summary of the study, they compared the results from yelling an expletive to yelling a neutral word, and the neutral word did not work.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    17. Re:Pretty sad. by cekander · · Score: 1

      Kinda like grunting when takin a shit. For a long time I was also intrigued by that anonymous stranger grunting in the public stall. Was it necessary enough to do in public places? All I can say it, try it for yourself. There's something gratifying that you can't quite put your finger on (and probably wouldn't want to).

    18. Re:Pretty sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythbusters did this for the "No Pain, No Gain" episode.

    19. Re:Pretty sad. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      If you didn't know what it meant, can you be offended?

    20. Re:Pretty sad. by pr0f3550r · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that ifrag uses the the quote from Asimov which illustrates what is not being said here. Swearing is a form of verbal violence. Like physical violence, once it becomes common place, society will look for greater forms as time goes on. For the f-bomb to be significant, relevant, or outrageous, it must be reserved. When I say reserved I mean that the usage of it should be deplorable, despised, reproached by the majority, and shocking. That it is used pervasively causes it to become insignificant, common place, and completely inexpressive. For some, it amounts to no more than an 'um' in their speech. How then do we know when these people are really upset or expressive? I don't use that word except on rare, rare occasions. When I have, people really know that something is horribly wrong.

      If it is 'effective at expressing [his] thoughts and feelings' and it is used often then it truly the refuge for the incompetent who are ignorant of the direct, expressive and applicable terms. Manipulation of base terms is a lazy, mindless exercise. Trendy terms can change society to call things what they are not until the original meaning is utterly lost (ie. gay=happy, dope=impurity added to alter properties, fag=to work hard or toil). I personally think that both of these are damaging to humanity as a whole because it causes languages, (all languages suffer this) to drift and be too dynamic for understanding. In many cases, these new terms are language specific and lose meaning not only across languages but within dialects. This drift makes communication between people difficult and increases misunderstanding. Even for those that chase the trendier meanings, this means that the past lexicon is useless. In the case of the two year old exclaiming the f-bomb or even your expletive friend, it is unlikely that even a fraction of their issuance of that word is meant to convey fornication and unlawful carnal knowledge.

      Sure, Asimov hated violence. Violence is destructive, it changes people attitudes and behaviours and causes segregation and exclusion. It also destroys property or causes ancient pieces of art and architecture to be destroyed, diminished, or lost. It truly is a bastion for the incompetent.

      Profanity and trendy speak are a destructive form of violence too against understanding. Profanity and trendy speech can change peoples attitudes and behaviours and causes segregation and exclusion. It destroys meaning and causes the meaning of ancient writings, stories, and texts to be destroyed, diminished, or lost. These types of speech are low, ignorant, and are the bastion for the incompetent, even when expressing themselves.

    21. Re:Pretty sad. by muphin · · Score: 1

      somebodies been watching mythbusters :p

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    22. Re:Pretty sad. by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you [AntEater] are making some very baseless generalizations against those who use profanity. This antiquated/archaic idea needs to end.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  22. Re:f-"bomb"? c-"bomb" by archmcd · · Score: 1

    Bullshit.

    --
    I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
  23. Is this really a problem? by iONiUM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know how others feel, but I've never felt some sort of stigma against using swear words. The only time I refrain is when it's socially unacceptable (i.e. at a funeral) because then other people would potentially become upset towards me. At my funeral though? I'm going to encourage it. From the grave.

    1. Re:Is this really a problem? by Chatsubo · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I assign very little malice to a swear word. It's just a word, that a lot of people have decided is unacceptable, for some reason I fail to understand.

      For example: We can say sex as many times as we want on TV. But not fuck. Why not? What made the one vulgar but the other not? It seems horribly arbitrary to me...

      And why are people sad that the young generation no longer assign shock-and-horror to that word? Isn't that a good thing? We're LOSING a swear word!

      The only effect this will have is, that the word "fuck" will no longer be of any use to someone who wants to use a swear word, and it'll drop out of common usage....

      It's like the word "Bloody". For generations past, it was a HARSH curse word not to be uttered in ANY company. Now, nobody gives a fuck about it. :D

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
  24. ...like a sailor by elcheesmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's time to change the expression from curse like a sailor to curse like a 2-year old.

  25. Who the fuck cares? by dirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have never understood the stigma about swearing. They are words, just like any other. What really is the difference between saying "I took a dump" and "I took a shit"? They mean exactly the same thing, but for some reason shit is a dirty word.

    It is all about how you use words, not the words you use. You can be just as vulgar and mean without using "swear" words. Is it really less offensive for me to say "The best part of you squirted out of your father's substandard size penis and rolled down that chunk of lard your mother called a thigh" than for me to say "Holy fuck that is cool"?

    Words are just words, it's the meaning behind them that matters.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    1. Re:Who the fuck cares? by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 1

      Words are just words, it's the meaning behind them that matters.

      I agree, however I come to an entirely opposite conclusion as a result of that. Words, on their own, are utterly meaningless. They are simply light patterns when written down or sound vibrations when spoken aloud. These patterns and vibrations gain meaning only when we, as a society, deem them to have meaning.

      That's important. It's not you that determines the meaning of a word and it's certainly not me; it's the collective "we" as a society as a whole that does.

      So if "shit" and "poop" are both words for excrement, then why is one a swear and the other isn't? Because we, as a whole, decided that it was. It's as simple as that.

      The obvious question is; "who cares?". Well, by definition, almost everybody! Since we've decided what swears are, that makes their use offensive. If you tell somebody to "fuck off", it's completely understood that you are saying something with the INTENT to be offensive. Now tell that same somebody to "slag off". It means roughly the same thing (I think) but is it offensive? Maybe somewhere, but not here in the US. The recipient of your insult doesn't have the social knowledge to know if you are trying to offend them or not.

      It may well be that "we" will eventually decide that the current crop of swears aren't swears anymore. When that happens, they lose all of their offensiveness... but, honestly, we'll just come up with alternatives. We need to have some way to convey 'intent to offend' and swears are the way to do it.

    2. Re:Who the fuck cares? by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It IS the meaning behind the words that matters and that's what's been diluted in "the words" by overuse. So much that we don't even separate swears curses and vulgarities by category anymore.

      At one time, "damn you" LITERALLY meant "I sincerely hope that God Almighty recognizes your irredeemable unworthiness and condemns you to burn in Hell for all eternity" where it was understood that both parties believed there was such a place and that a soul could be sent there to scream in agony literally forever. That would be a curse. No two year old even has enough understanding of things to muster the level of contempt for another required to utter that in sincerity.

      The vulgarities were a lesser form of contempt. By using one, you were implying that the person you were speaking to was unworthy of any better. However, overuse might lead others to conclude that you yourself HAD no better and were a low person yourself. That's why parents were so adamant about their children not using vulgarities.

      Obscenities were more of the nature of the vulgarities.

      The fact that we're far more likely to hear "damn you" on television than "fuck you" is strong evidence that we've forgotten how to properly curse at all.

    3. Re:Who the fuck cares? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I have never understood the stigma about swearing.

      How do you communicate the message "We're gonna die in ten seconds" when it sounds just like your complaints about a new movie? How does someone determine that you're mad enough to punch someone? How do you insult someone when they hear those words out of your mouth every ten seconds.

      Profanity is the special ops of the linguistic world. You wouldn't waste the time of your Green Beret or Spetsnaz dude by having them spend all their time cleaning toilets. Same goes with your language. If you use the special words for everyday things, then you have no reserve for circumstances that require oomph.

    4. Re:Who the fuck cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My problem with swearing is exactly as it's used in the title of your post. Swearing tends to be used in a way that adds no meaning except through adding offensiveness(to particular people).

      "Who cares?" is an brief, clear statement of meaning. Adding "the fuck" in the middle simply adds space and vulgarity. It doesn't bother me that the words exist, or are used. It bothers me that they're used pointlessly. The value of swear words comes from their evocativeness, and through overuse, we're turning them into meaningless prepositions. Sure, some people are offended needlessly easily, but what do you gain from offending them? What value do you add to your communications?

    5. Re:Who the fuck cares? by Pandrake · · Score: 1

      "What really is the difference between saying 'I took a dump' and 'I took a shit'? They mean exactly the same thing, but for some reason shit is a dirty word."

      My (step)son completed his Freshman term last year at a private Canadian High School. For your example "dump" *is* a dirty word in that context, and if said that way he can get into as much trouble as if he had used the word "shit" (in any context). Same goes for "frig" and many other seemingly innocent words that kids are using as codewords for naughty words.

    6. Re:Who the fuck cares? by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Brings to mind the story how, Charleton Heston, you know, the guy who played Moses in The Ten Commandmandments, fought the censors to keep the line "Damn you. God damn you all to hell!" because as, he pointed out, Taylor was truly beseeching God to condemn the people who destroyed Earth to hell.

      I recall Joe Bob Briggs telling that anecdote while hosting Planet of the Apes on TNT's Monster Vision. Which, immediately after the commercial break, TNT, in their fine understanding of irony, ran the censored version that strips away all the pathos of the scene.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:Who the fuck cares? by sjames · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right for television.

  26. ASCII Filth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they learn it from Q*Bert.

  27. Need more powerful words by toxonix · · Score: 4, Funny

    These goddamn kids are diluting the strength of words. I'm going to have to get creative now. The trick I think is to combine things that multiply the strength of the words. Here are some examples of profane combinations, and please don't let the kids get wind of them:
    "Jesus Fuck!"
    "Christ's Tits!"
    "Mother of God's Firm Ass!"
    "Jesus Raped!"
    I could go on..

    1. Re:Need more powerful words by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      "Mother of God's Firm Ass!"

      There's just so much material to work with right there. That's beautiful.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    2. Re:Need more powerful words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're in a Christian mode, how about Jesus H. Christ on a crutch and his black bastard brother bart

    3. Re:Need more powerful words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not very clear - is it God's Ass that is Firm or God's Mother's Ass that is Firm?

    4. Re:Need more powerful words by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

      These goddamn kids are diluting the strength of words. I'm going to have to get creative now. The trick I think is to combine things that multiply the strength of the words.
      Here are some examples of profane combinations, and please don't let the kids get wind of them:

      "Jesus Fuck!"

      "Christ's Tits!"

      "Mother of God's Firm Ass!"

      "Jesus Raped!"

      I could go on..

      Please do. This is the most entertaining and insightful post I have seen on slashdot in a long time.

      --
      "You have liberated me from thought."
    5. Re:Need more powerful words by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      That's more in line with French-language swearing. They're usually curses dealing with the church. Try going up to Quebec and yelling out "tabernac" or "chalice of Christ" and see the reactions you get.

    6. Re:Need more powerful words by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I initially read that as (Mother of (God's Firm Ass)). I...am not sure what that says about me.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:Need more powerful words by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The adults are the ones dilluting them. The "real", original meaning of that word don't need to have anything to do with the meaning that, for most uses, adults give to those words. Same happens in other languages, the curse words are different, the real meanings are different too... and the only thing that everyone want to put there is , no strings attached.

    8. Re:Need more powerful words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, gosh-darn-frik-it-to-heck thats lame!

    9. Re:Need more powerful words by mjwx · · Score: 1

      These goddamn kids are diluting the strength of words

      Shut up, Dickwolf

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Need more powerful words by mithran8 · · Score: 1

      There is always, of course, another angle to be explored...

      --
      An object at rest cannot be stopped!
  28. Children *how* young? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

    You say children as young as two years are saying "fuck"?

    Did anybody else think of this?

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  29. Cultural effects? by Antarius · · Score: 1

    There's possibly cultural effects too. With international travel so popular, more relaxed cultures are 'tainting' the nanny-states.

    I'm from a country town in South Australia where certain sentences were just standard. Because of this, my American stepson learned his first sentence from me: "Shit, that's hot!"

    I had opened the door of the car that had been shut up in the cool Arizonan Summer Sun and been pelted with a hot gust that was in excess of 130F from inside the car. (I know it was in excess of 130F because I'd left a souvenir thermometer in there and it had burst)

    Meanwhile, my wife-at-the-time was 20-odd metres away when I made that quiet statement of fact. For the next 20 minutes, he happily exclaimed to everyone that "Shit that's hot!"

    That was ove 13 years ago and I still haven't lived it down!

  30. It's nothing but censorship by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Telling people not to swear is basically censorship. Guess what- censorship doesn't work, as aptly demonstrated by this video.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:It's nothing but censorship by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Censorship is an effort by an authority to control society. If I tell my kids not to swear, is not censorship, it is encouraging people to censor themselves. Not at all the same thing. Self-censorship is a practice of restraint that gives the individual the power to choose their language to fit the scenario. Even when media is censored to remove swear words, it is the most innocuous form of censorship. I care a great deal more about censorship of ideas than not being allowed to say "cunt" on American air waves.

  31. Kick Ass by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

    That's funny because I just watched Kick Ass last night and the little girl in that movie is definitely a potty mouth!!! Actually had me interested in watching the behind the scenes to see if they addressed the fact that they had her say such things.

  32. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker tits.

  33. Smeg! by querist · · Score: 1

    These words will always exist. People will just come up with new ones. It's been done on TV enough. (Someone should compile a list of TV swear-words.)

  34. Obviously ... by Carebears · · Score: 1

    Its because of that damn MTV and Hip-Hop!

  35. Re:f-"bomb"? c-"bomb" by thijsh · · Score: 1

    You hit the nail on it's head. What is offensive to some is only natural to others, and the other way around.
    Objectively I'm inclined to agree that 'bomb' registers higher on a natural 'offensive-scale'. But I firmly believe no word can truly be 'offensive', it's only the intent...

    I personally only take offense at people taking offense...

  36. language benefits from shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the benefit of having curse words, or "forbidden" words as someone else posted, is the power they hold. if everyone feels free to drop f bombs and such at will, then the word loses its power to express the intensity of emotion behind a good f bomb from someone normally reserved in speech. nizo hit the nail on the head.... "what the hell will we use for curse words?"

  37. We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultures by acidradio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't much of a surprise to me anymore. In previous generations we idolized decent, intelligent, articulate and educated people. Somewhere it was decided that nobody can or should have to aspire to be any of those things and we should just aim for mediocrity because EVERYONE can be mediocre!

    At least in the US I am seeing this perpetual dumbing-down of the culture (some will argue here that the US culture was pretty dumb to begin with hehehe). Instead of "dressing for success" kids now wear these pants that sag down to their knees. This is a holdover from the prison culture where clothes are baggy and ill-fitting. Reality TV idolizes people who are often foul, vulgar, have no education and oh yeah, don't have any kind of gainful employment. What do we learn from shows like The Hills or Jersey Shore? Instead of keeping rigid and tough education requirements, public schools in the US have been dumbed-down so that "everyone gets a chance." Well I have some news - in the real world, nobody gets a chance, you have to work your ass off to get anywhere.

  38. The more it is used by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    The less profane it will become, as it will be more accepted. At some point saying "fuck" in any way will cease to become a profanity.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  39. Immature. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I swear occasionally and sometimes more than I should. But I do make effort to keep it in check; for example, I never swear at work and I avoid swearing in front of my daughter. I don't have a problem with swearing, but I absolutely think it's a sign of class or lack thereof. Whenever I come across someone who's every second word is a swear they just come off as stupid like they don't care about having a good presentation. And too many people seem to have this immature notion that swearing makes you an adult.

  40. excuse use; loss of power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If swearing is becoming the norm; then profanity becomes just another word. Profanity has power only because of it's out-of-the-ordinariness. As my father-in-law told my son when he heard him repeat something he heard on the bus but did not understand -- "Save that, you may need it someday."

  41. Curse words are valuable by No+Lucifer · · Score: 1

    I think curse words are valuable, when used properly. Since they are curse words, they can carry a tremendous amount of weight. I curse very infrequently (maybe a few times a year) on purpose: if you hear me swearing, you know I am trying to convey an *intense* emotion. The people who know me know that if I use a curse word, something serious is going on. When you have everyone cursing every three seconds, yeah, it's meaningless.

    1. Re:Curse words are valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is absolutely correct. I don't have a problem with cursing, but I do think it diminishes the impact of the words when they're overused. People who curse tastefully (when they really mean it) are using those words as a shorthand to express strong emotions in a concise manner. Only when these words become banal due to overuse do we have a problem.

  42. Maybe it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So fucking what indeed.

    They are just words and social convention. Maybe were just moving to the point where swearing isn't considered bad anymore.

  43. That is Fucked Up by namhash · · Score: 1

    Words, they are just that...just words...over the years we have had many swear words that eventually are lost in time or become part of the language. It is about time to incorporate the 7 dirty words as regular everyday words that should have no more attention paid to them than any other explicative. * Shit * Piss * Fuck * Cunt * Cocksucker * Motherfucker * Tits If you are substituting words for these so called swear words, why is that any better...might as well just use the word instead of sounding semi-retarded. Fuck is not Fudge, Friggin, or what ever word is the current replacement Shit is not Shoot, Darn, Poop Really people!!! Really...how childish is that to hear words like that from an adult. If you don't use the real word, then you are missing out on how good it can feel, especially when you start to swear in other languages. Also I have a 2 year old and i give him free reign on any word he so chooses. You use your words and I will use mine...thanks!!! I love the French language. I have sampled every language, French is my favourite - fantastic language, especially to curse with. Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculé de ta mère. It's like wiping your arse with silk, I love it.

  44. A side effect of being a potty mouth. by wfstanle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do people who use foul language constantly say when they are really angry. You can't use foul language because there is no difference from the way you normally talk. I'm saying that swearing is OK but keep it to a minimum. I quickly take notice when people that rarely swear actually do swear, I know immediately that they are really ticked off.

      I once say a movie that used the F-bomb so often that it ruined the movie. The percentage of vulgarity was over half of the dialog. It was so bad that you couldn't tell if the actors were supposed to be angry.

    1. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that people who are constantly swearing in a lackluster (uncreative) fashion tend to have fairly short fuses. They have no emotional maturity and do not have the 'verbal buffer' others do.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      That was a Croatian movie I suppose? One those selected movies they swear absolutely too much so it makes them unreal and unwatchable (aside from robotic acting, no script and pretty much everything else).

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    3. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by bendodge · · Score: 1

      I quickly take notice when people that rarely swear actually do swear, I know immediately that they are really ticked off.

      Exactly. I can count the number of times I've said, "damn," out loud, and I've never used an F-bomb. The result is that if I even say, "crap," people take notice. This approach also works very well with Victorian insults. There's a quote I like:

      Profanity is a feeble mind attempting to express itself in forceful terms.

      I find that the cleaner your everyday language, the greater the effect you can produce when you need it. Calling someone a blithering idiot is far more effective than a common swear word that you hear every 5 minutes in public.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    4. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Although you have to admit, Boondock Saints did that up right, eh?

    5. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by cekander · · Score: 1

      Swearing in excess is just a phase, and by no means a mainstream habit. There will always be movies and works of art that push the extremes, just to do it. That's the point.

      Personally, I have found it's a phase. The more you swear the more you learn how to swear, and when it's appropriate. When you first start, you sound like a damned fool. Our culture at large I think reflects this same process. The worst force I see effecting swearing right now is the demonization of it, and that it is somehow worse to say certain words, as if there is a punishing god that cares. :) Worry about what you're saying (and DOING) and not how. I think america is actually doing a great job evolving in this direction.

    6. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do people who use foul language constantly say when they are really angry.

      violence?

    7. Re:A side effect of being a potty mouth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hot tub time machine? The sheer concentration of f-bombs really detracted from an otherwise funny movie.

  45. Im sorry but this is not new, history repeating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For what i know (my grandparents and its grandparents and so forth) the public/people have always been potty mouths, it was with the 'boom' of the 'media' that everything started hiding behind political correctness and hypocrisy embezling itself with 'fancy' misapropriated words/terms to try to project rightousness over thyself.

  46. fuck fuck fuck fuck penis fuckity-fuck-fuck by dawning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's just language. The notion of a "bad" word is so fucking adolescent it makes me giggle with disappointment. Why don't we have good words too? I propose "penis" be the official first "good word". Or we could all just work on something tangible..

  47. Swearing in films by feidaykin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kids swearing reminds me of a great scene in Misery. If you haven't seen the film it's worth watching, it's both intringuing horror and somewhat comical (both intentionally and unintentioally). Anyway, romance novel writer Paul Sheldon is being held captive by his insane fan Annie Wilks. She reads a manuscript for his as yet unpublished novel with a more serious tone, and this is her reaction:

    Annie Wilkes: It's the swearing, Paul. It has no nobility.
    Paul Sheldon: These are slum kids, I was a slum kid. Everybody talks like that.
    Annie Wilkes: THEY DO NOT! At the feedstore do I say, "Oh, now Wally, give me a bag of that F-in' pig feed, and a pound of that bitchly cow corn"? At the bank do I say, "Oh, Mrs. Malenger, here is one big bastard of a check, now give me some of your Christ-ing money!" THERE, LOOK THERE, NOW SEE WHAT YOU MADE ME DO!

    It's a great scene, mainly because Kathy Bates is so convincing as the mentally deranged Annie. But it does bring up the sort of cognitive dissonance about swearing. What does it really damage? From a philosophical standpoint, it's kind of odd that we humans make words that are considered taboo in the first place. Words have only the power that people give them. For example, others have already mentioned how what's acceptable has changed, and on that subject, I recall talking to my grandmother once about movies she saw when she was a kid. One of them was Gone with the Wind, and when Clark Cable uttered his famous "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" line, she said there was audible gasp in the theater. I can't even imagine the string of profanities needed to make a modern movie-going audience gasp. Actually, I think a string of profanities would have the opposite impact today, people would likely find it absurd at start laughing. So yes, language evolves, but so does society. Perhaps we've moved beyond assigning such power to words. The only exception I can think of is racial slurs, those are more offensive today to many people than they ever were in the past. It's not uncommon to find elderly folks that drop the N-word, not out of hatred or malice, but because that was just what "everyone" called black people when they were growing up. Granted, some elderly folks that use racial slurs are also racists, but it's not necessarily the case either. Things change, and not everyone can or will adapt.

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Swearing in films by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, others have already mentioned how what's acceptable has changed, and on that subject, I recall talking to my grandmother once about movies she saw when she was a kid. One of them was Gone with the Wind, and when Clark Cable uttered his famous "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" line, she said there was audible gasp in the theater. I can't even imagine the string of profanities needed to make a modern movie-going audience gasp.

      A fantasy of mine has been to travel back in time to the 30s with a re-cut version of Gone with the Wind. In that iconic scene, I'd dub over Clark Gable so he instead gives the line, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a fuck." Then I'd go to a random theater, switch out their reel with mine, and watch the fun.

      That brings me to another point: you don't need a string of profanities to make a modern movie-going audience gasp. It's all context: you write a movie like you're going for a PG rating, and then you set the audience up for a precision F-strike just as the movie gets to the height of the conflict.

    2. Re:Swearing in films by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fantasy of mine has been to travel back in time to the 30s with a re-cut version of Gone with the Wind. In that iconic scene, I'd dub over Clark Gable so he instead gives the line, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a fuck." Then I'd go to a random theater, switch out their reel with mine, and watch the fun.

      You really need to get out more. Ideally in the present time.

    3. Re:Swearing in films by sjames · · Score: 1

      The language hasn't evolved though, it's devolved. At one time it had words so powerful, saying just one of them once carried a strong enough meaning to make an entire audience gasp. It no longer has the ability to express such a sentiment at all. As you point out, even a long string of words cannot carry the level of contempt we were once able to express with a single syllable.

    4. Re:Swearing in films by ewe2 · · Score: 1

      I'd actually argue that words haven't lost their power at all, its just that the taboo moves on to different words. For example, what does the word terrorist mean to you? In different eras, we are acculturated to the power of different words depending on those words usefulness to those who wish to wield power. Paying attention to the use of words is an enlightening experience.

      --
      insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  48. the blame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame Global Warming...

  49. Speak Ye Not the Word of Curse! by sharkey · · Score: 1

    I'd rather eat a whole bucket of wet shit than another plate of meekrob. --Cartman

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  50. BFD by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    look at the bright side. at least they're using complete words and not speaking in TXT

  51. If you saw Katy Perry on Sesame Street... by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    ... you would have said it too. I think even Elmo dropped the f-bomb.

  52. Actually... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have heard that Japanese doesn't have any words that could be considered to be profane per se. At least, that's what quite a few manga scanlation translators have asserted on their posts, when they have deign to explain :D

    Instead, the Japanese seem to utilize impoliteness and rudeness. So instead of a special word like "Freddy Uncle Charlie Kent", they have a rude form of the word "YOU!", which will serve the same purpose

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Many languages are actually like that.

      Sotho is an example. While some words are considered "swearing" in parts with heavy English influence (i.e. in South Africa, all the words corresponding to English profanity), this was not traditionally the case and is still not the case in other parts (i.e. Lesotho). I'm still trying to learn the language, so I can't give much detail.

      The Japanese language, since you mentioned it, has to take into account the complex social hierarchy (which is based on Confucian ideas). Once again my Japanese is not too good, so everyone feel free to add to/correct this.

      A word such as "temee" (probably the "you" that you referred to) is considered rude not because the word itself is inherently evil, but because it does not properly reflect the relation between the status of the speaker and the addressed.

      If I'm your senior (in age, in the workplace, or in basically any other way) your calling me "temee", "omae", "kimi", "anata" or any one of a number of words used for English "you" would be a very bad idea. Each of these does, however, have situations to which they apply.

      Let's say that you and I are men, that we are very good friends, and that there is no relationship of seniority. "Omae" would fit perfectly.

      Let's say that I'm some random guy of no real importance. "Anata" would do.

      Things get even more complicated when you begin to include sarcasm. "Kisama" is a very formal form of "you". In fact, it's so formal that it is only ever used sarcastically. But you can not be sarcastic with any other word. Never. ;)

      You can see where this is going.

      As for the things normally used for swearing (religion, bodily functions, etc.), there is much truth to what you said. Example: "Kuso" may translate to "faeces" in some more formal contexts. It can also be used as an expletive ("Shit!").

      Japanese does have words for sex, but they're not really used all that much. (Despite the fact that the Japanese don't share the Victorian mindset of "sex is dirty and no-one is doing it".) Merely having euphemisms doesn't make a word streng verboten.

      Sorry for the core dump.

    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they have at least half a dozen ways to say "you" with varying levels of politeness. The bigger the gap between the expected politeness of the situation and the actual politeness of speech, the more insulting it is. That said, there are indeed some words that are very impolite regardless.

    3. Re:Actually... by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      This is mostly correct, but you neglect to mention "kuso" is often used as a prefix in order to profane a word. For example, "baba" is like "granny" but "kusobaba" is like "hag."

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    4. Re:Actually... by cekander · · Score: 1

      And that is exactly how english should be. It turns out fear and demonization are much more common in the western world, largely thanks to western religions, and as such, these ideas have shaped society. I hope it's safe to say we're finally getting over that hump. We shouldn't be ashamed of profanity or naked bodies. If they serve the purpose, let's worry about purpose, and be a more purposeful society.

    5. Re:Actually... by bluhatter · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge the only word banned from television in Japan is "manko" (can't use hiragana on Slashdot) which is similar to our "cunt". Manko also carries with it the connotation of a "fish like" smell.

      --


      bluHatter
  53. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, lookit! Gramps got a hold of the whiskey bottle again. Go back to guarding your lawn from frolicking hoodlums, you great wrinkled buffoon.

  54. Swearing has its place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a problem with "swearing" per se. But I get depressed when I see people that can't seem to form a sentence without interjecting "fuckin' this" and "fuckin' that" constantly. It makes them look like idiots, and since it _will_ offend a certain set of people, it cuts off any potential conversation with those people.

  55. It will just be another social discriminator by sapgau · · Score: 1

    Don't set your hopes too high for this to become accepted as regular speech.

    It will just be another filter to socially determine if you have "acceptable" social skills and manners compared to being part of the masses.

    Gook luck talking like that in your job interview, your client's presentation or even on your first date. Speaking like a sailor will only damage your first impression.
    Make sure you know when and to whom to say it. When in doubt speak like a prince instead.

    You might later discover that your client or your girlfriend speak worse than you BUT if they don't you could have royally f****ed up your chances.

    1. Re:It will just be another social discriminator by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Gook luck talking like that in your job interview,

      Good luck in getting a job with any Asian based/run companies.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  56. children, swearing, and role models by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    My children swear. I do not discourage this.

    What I do discourage is poor swearing. You know, dropping the F bomb every other word for giggles or because it's "fuckin' cool, man. Fuck." How unintelligent.

    You do not want your kid to be the only one who retorts insults with "yeah and you're, you're... a mean jerk!"

    Profanity is not the problem, it's its gross over-application through poor self control, as well as aggressive hostile application. The self control is the issue: people do not often think before they speak. People are also becoming less literate, so their vernacular is somewhat limited to what their environment provides as fodder.

    Swearing is natural. We, as humans, were "swearing" long before we had swear words: bang your toe and you're going to utter nonsensical shit under your breath. You may swear. In such an instance, swearing provides us a mechanism to channel lower level brain functions ("this hurts, I must respond") into a symbolic, understandable context which (in my experience) helps diffuse the lower function urges (punching the wall, punching the other person back).

    Yeah, that's right. I think I just said swearing is demonstrative of a higher brain function.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:children, swearing, and role models by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "You know, dropping the F bomb every other word for giggles or because it's "fuckin' cool, man. Fuck." How unintelligent."

      Not really unintelligent. They just feel like saying it. However, if society would stop treating these words as something 'bad', I can almost guarantee that hardly anyone would say them merely to be 'cool'.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  57. damn by IMightB · · Score: 1

    kids! Get Off my Lawn! I blame Obama.

  58. The cause is clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adults are probably using profanity a lot because they are frustrated and stressed by an economy in which middle class positions are continuing to vanish (and pay less), opportunities to achieve upward social mobility (like going to school) are failing to accomplish anything but put one in debt, and lower-class wages are failing to keep up with the cost of living.

    As the article mentions, the kids do so because the adults do so.

    1. Re:The cause is clear. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      They're using profanity because they wish to do so. It doesn't hurt anyone, so why not?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  59. Yeah, like in this board game spoof/parody video! by antdude · · Score: 1

    http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1941374

    Potty mouths from the family. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  60. Bill Hicks said by RichardDeVries · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If the word 'fuck' bothers you, I can only imagine how much fucking must bother you."

    - Bill Hicks

    --
    Error 001
    Security Scan and Virus Detection do not work with your operating system.
    1. Re:Bill Hicks said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That rather depends on who is doing the fucking.

  61. There's just one thing to say about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Belgium!

  62. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No surprise, a number of comments have been "witty" and "intelligent" exclamations of surprise (using, gasp, swear words). Yeah, didn't see that coming.

    But here's an alternative view to those who don't see what the fuss is about...

    While there is nothing wrong with most sexual conduct, body parts or scatalogical functions, do we really need these words spliced into our conversations? And if the current crop of swear words have lost their impact to shock, are we going to have to put up with more shocking, more grotesque visual imagery to get our point across?

    Adding profanities to most sentences doesn't add value and these days rarely adds weight to your point. I'd argue that the increase in swearing has resulted in a decrease in articulation.

    So why aren't we asking the question, what's the point of using these words? The dictionary is full of more interesting and descriptive words. Swearing is a complete lack of originality.

    1. Re:Yawn by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      "do we really need these words spliced into our conversations?"

      Sure, why not? You're aware that they have meanings, right? If used in the right way, why not? They don't harm anyone.

      "And if the current crop of swear words have lost their impact to shock, are we going to have to put up with more shocking, more grotesque visual imagery to get our point across?"

      That depends on how idiotic and illogical society feels on being. If it's feeling especially idiotic and illogical, it will probably decide that more words are considered profanity even though they're just words.

      "Adding profanities to most sentences doesn't add value and these days rarely adds weight to your point."

      It does if they fit in the sentence! That's like saying that using words in your sentence at all doesn't add value to it.

      "So why aren't we asking the question, what's the point of using these words?"

      Mainly because, at this time, they have actual meanings.

      "Swearing is a complete lack of originality."

      But regurgitating words that you've read in a dictionary isn't? Ha.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  63. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for
    authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
    of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their
    households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They
    contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties
    at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.

    ATTRIBUTION: Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato, according to William L.
    Patty and Louise S. Johnson, Personality and Adjustment, p. 277
    (1953)."

  64. Language by bluhatter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could somebody explain why this is a bad thing? If people take words less seriously, perhaps we'll stop making wars out of them.

    --


    bluHatter
  65. mod parent up by BetterSense · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. I think that early on, the big aversion to hearing "those words" on TV or movies was that "those words" were for a certain social audience, and probably served some importance social cohesion/in-group signalling function. I know when I was a kid, grandpa used words around me and my dad that he would NEVER use around women, girl children, or strangers. And I my dad never really cared if he found out I was using certain words around my friends, "just so long as he didn't catch me". So at the same time I gained a very diverse vocabulary and also learned when to use it.

    1. Re:mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out that men and women are subclasses of the human superclass, and the curse() method is inherited, along with nearly everything else (the exceptions being changeVoice(), menstruate(), experienceMultipleOrgasms() and the incubateHuman(Gamet sperm, Gamet egg) factory pattern).

  66. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldnt everyone then have to be mediocre at mediocrity then. The trouble is those who excel at mediocrity become the new elite and hence can no longer be considered mediocre.

  67. Creeping obscenity by teleny · · Score: 1
    Part of this is the creeping coarsening of our idioms. In an attempt to sound honest and unaffected, many common expressions over time have become "de-euphemized". For instance, what is the real ending of the expression "happy as a pig in...."? Most people nowadays will answer some word meaning "dung". The reasoning goes that pigs are dirty, and like to wallow in mud, which they are content, being lazy, to soil with their own excrement. Actually, the original version is "clover", which is one of the traditional hog feeds, along with acorns and wild spinach, something that a good segment of the population would have known up to fifty years ago. However, somewhere in the Seventies, the farmer's urbanized grandkids decided that what old Pops was saying was probably some kind of old-fangled euphemism, like the way he kept on saying "Dang!" and "Goodness gracious!" Since euphemisms were Out and obscenity was In, the current form became popular as a way to sound down-to-earth and mildly shocking.

    Another example: "A cock and bull story" used to mean "lies" or at least "inflated nonsense", a usage dating back to the early 18th century, at least. From this we get "bull session", an expression meaning a sharing of such stories, something like "shooting the breeze", whose etymology meaning "talking together for the sheer fun of it" is pretty obvious, along with it's connotations of ease, leisure, and the like. "Bullshit" for the prior expression dates only from about the 1950's and "shooting the shit" (which makes me think of using a small pile for target practice), slightly later.

    Don't get me started on donkeys, but this seems to be an unsettling trend....

    --
    teleny, friend of cats.
  68. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This isn't much of a surprise to me anymore. In previous generations we idolized decent, intelligent, articulate and educated people.

    Seems to me your biggest problem is the presumption that dropping an f-bomb means the person isn't decent, intelligent, articulate, or educated.

    My entire circle of friends has bachelor degrees or higher. All are intelligent, thoughtful, upstanding individuals. And all of them, given the right setting (say, a few drinks at a bar, or a night of brutal coding) will swear like sailors on leave.

    So... who's the unintelligent one? The one who drops the f-bomb, or the one who assumes that swearing equates to some stereotypical archetype of the lowerclass, under-educated bumpkin?

  69. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by locallyunscene · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    PRISON-culture? You're calling baggy clothes prison-culture? Wow, I hope you realize how psuedo-intellectually racist that is.

    Probably not, I'll just get off your lawn then so you can continue blaming the same young people stereotypes for what's wrong with the world today.

  70. I'm not convinced by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    There's so many holes is that story it's kinda sad:

    1- Please define profanity. Is yesterday's profanity still as much of a profanity today ? Is this black and white, or shades of gray ? Who decides that ?
    2- Do children simply talk more now, hence utter more "profanities" in total, or do they utter more "profanities" as a %age of what they say, too.
    3- Are adults aware, and have adults always been aware, of all and of the same quantity and quality of utterances by children ?

    the whole think, as is, smacks of attention whoring and speaking fees seeking.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  71. That is true of all non-European languages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....and the clue is in the word "vulgar." Vulgar language was the language of the people you had conquered. The original words that fuck and shit derive from were the normal everyday equivalents for copulation and deification. Look up the origins of "acceptable" words and their vulgar equivalents and you will see who conquered whom.

    1. Re:That is true of all non-European languages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost right.

      "Vulgar" language actually means the informal language of the common people, as opposed to the formal language of the educated elite. (Not to be pedantic, but please use a dictionary next time. I checked before correcting you.)

      What you say is true for English so-called "four-letter words" (the French conquered the Anglo-Saxons), as well as for many words in other languages, but not for every socially unacceptable word in every language.

      Counterexample: "Moer" is considered swearing in Afrikaans. The word is a shortening of "moeder" (mother) and is perfectly acceptable in Dutch (of which Afrikaans is a recent offshoot). This has nothing to do with the British annexing South Africa, as the English word "mother" was never taken up to replace it. ("Moeder" and -- more commonly -- "ma" are still used.) This in spite of the fact that the British tried very hard to make English the mandatory language of choice.

      I speculate that the real reason for the phenomenon you observed is probably that upper class people preferred to call embarrassing things like sex by foreign names* and strange euphemisms. The language of the new rulers was conveniently close at hand.

      * If you don't speak any other languages, let me explain: a word doesn't have the same emotional impact if you are not a native speaker. Lots of people around here would actually tell you "it's not really swearing if you say it in English". And they mean it.

    2. Re:That is true of all non-European languages... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A conquest is not necessary for a common word to become a swearword, quite often it happens on its own just as well. A good example is the word "whore", which was a perfectly normal word describing a prostitute - with negative connotations, mind you, but not a profanity (remember "whore of Babylon"?).

      Curiously enough, this is actually mirrored by the unrelated word with the same meaning in another language, Russian. A direct translation of "whore" to Russian would be "blyad". The word itself was also used in common speech and older lithurgical texts to mean a prostitute, and was not profane, but gradually grew to be one. Today it's one of the most common swearwords, in many cases completely disconnected from its original meaning (e.g. where an American would exclaim "oh fuck", a Russian would typically say "oh blya").

      Similar story for basic swearwords - direct translations of "fuck", "shit", "cunt" etc - which are actually the same (as far as roots go) in most Slavic languages. If you look up their etymology, it actually goes all the way back to proto-Indo-European, with the original forms in some cases being pretty much identical to modern ones. And, of course, those original roots were also perfectly normal words.

  72. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Careful, apparently highlighting the OPs bigotry could result in a -1 flamebait mod... fucking (yeah, that's right) idiot moderators...

  73. MOD PARENT UP by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was beginning to wonder if there was anyone left who actually understood the subject.

    It's kind of like that saying, "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." I posit the corollary, which I saw some time back:

    "Profanity is the inevitable linguistic crutch of the inarticulate."

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  74. profanity around children by pieceofstone · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a little depressing to me. I will curse occasionally (especially alone and in an aggravating traffic condition) but the "Who cares?" attitude bothers me. Like, when I used to hang out on Second Life, someone admitted to being a minor and thus wasn't supposed to be on the main grid but in a place for teenagers, and in response to this, the person she said this to typed out "Holy #^#@%@!" except without the Q*Bert filter. I sighed and the older (twenty-something) kept asking in whispers why, so I explained myself and she had an attitude of, well, they can hear it on so many places, so who cares whether I say it or not?" and in some other online place where a room had a set of guidelines about allowable behavior, someone who would promote the rules as long as they were particular rules she favored used the f-bomb (against the rules) on someone who was a registered minor, who immediately disconnected. I feel that whether it's common in schoolyards is beside the point and I wish strangers around children would care more.

  75. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you about the trend toward mediocrity and dumbing-down. But mediocrity also gives a kind of freedom because when you are good people do not usually leave you alone.

  76. The Other Potty Mouth by Mr_Blank · · Score: 1

    PVP Online makes comedy out of the discomfort some people feel in the presence of a potty mouth.

    Personally, my belief in free speech is strong enough that I do not care what words a person uses to express ideas. However, there are ramifications for how a person expresses those ideas; similar to how there are consequences for how society reacts to the clothes a person wears.

  77. Potty mouth... by krinderlin · · Score: 1

    All I could think about while reading the summary was that we should start passing out packs of Orbitz. ^_^ (I really seriously love those commercials.)

  78. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by neosaurus · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this is not limited to the US. American pop culture reaches more parts of the world through the media and the internet than any other culture. And somehow children all over the world take what they see happening in America to be cool and something they should follow. For example, reading and having an interest in classical music is considered nerdy and uncool in most parts of urban India.

  79. It's all Sponge Bob's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. Adult humor and kids by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Related to this, I've seen more TV-MA rated shows (The Whitest Kids Y'know, Eastbound and Down, others) that include child actors, often with the grown-ups swearing like drunken sailors and/or having "thematic" discussions with kids in the scene. I often wonder, how does this work? Do the kids actually get to see the show afterward? Do the adults use stand-in words with the kids and dub in the naughty bits later?

    Also, the standards bar has moved when it comes to humor that's considered acceptable for children. For instance there was a time in the US when any sort of toilet humor would have gotten slapped with an R rating (think Blazing Saddles) and been barred from broadcast TV and non-premium cable channels. Now jokes about farting and shit make regular appearances in kids cartoons (check out Johnny Test and Total Drama Island.) I'm no prude, but considering the impact even vanilla cartoons can have on kids when they become adults (furries, cosplay, etc.), we can expect all kinds of weirdness coming off the assembly line now.

    .

  81. It all started with the classics in the 70's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I learned this when I was 7.
    motherfuckingcocksuckingtittysmokingtwoballbitchingasshole

  82. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The OP is factually correct and does not even discuss race. Watch any documentary about gangs. The guys that started the trend tell you it comes from their lives spent in prison. You are projecting your own racism upon the comment.

  83. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    Such nonsense. The fact that someone uses some words that you don't approve of for normal use, despite the fact that they have the exact same meanings as other words that for some reason are acceptable, has very little to do with who one idolizes. Use of these subjectively unacceptable words and phrases does not in any way constitute a representation of how decent, intelligent, educated, articulate, or industrious someone is. Your argument is the same tired old chestnut about how things were better in the old days because you had to walk uphill in the snow and youngsters respected their elders.

    I'll get off your fucking lawn now, sir.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  84. Sheer unrepentant laziness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem lies in the fact that people are no longer motivated to memorize hundreds of adjectives anymore. A single, pathetic, unceremonious, four-letter word is so much easier to use than an array of seven or even ten letter ones.

  85. Deadwood by ProfanityHead · · Score: 1

    Deadwood on HBO a few years ago literally made cussing an art form.

    A must hear for all the cuss-word aficionados out there.

    1. Re:Deadwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Swearengen: Welcome to fucking Deadwood!

  86. Blame by Kenoli · · Score: 1

    The blame lies with media, public figures, politicians, but mostly ourselves.

    The implication that something bad has occurred is nonsense.
    A certain selection of words has become more common over the years, so what?

  87. Not in the movies by rainmouse · · Score: 1

    If you watch a late 80's or early 90's action film, it's likely it is riddled with constant swearing from start to finish and its almost surprising when your used to modern films which are largely devoid of swearing. That said if you play any MMO game that is simple enough for kids to play, you will likely read or hear the worst language you have ever had the misfortune to be exposed to.

    1. Re:Not in the movies by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... That said if you play any MMO game that is simple enough for kids to play, you will likely read or hear the worst language you have ever had the misfortune to be exposed to.

      I've never seen any language in an MMO I wouldn't want my children exposed to. OTOH, I've seen racism, anti-semitism, homophobia, and worst of all, incredible levels of misogyny that I would want to see anyone exposed to.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Not in the movies by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      ... That said if you play any MMO game that is simple enough for kids to play, you will likely read or hear the worst language you have ever had the misfortune to be exposed to.

      I've never seen any language in an MMO I wouldn't want my children exposed to. OTOH, I've seen racism, anti-semitism, homophobia, and worst of all, incredible levels of misogyny that I would want to see anyone exposed to.

      I routinely see what I consider to be inappropriate and unnecessary language in my MMO of choice (WoW) from people hanging out in trade chat. That's on top of the racism, anti-semitism, homophobia and misogyny you previously mentioned.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  88. Records too by umask077 · · Score: 1

    > The blame lies with media, public figures, politicians, but mostly ourselves

    Yes, and our records have secret messages to Satan when you play them backwards too.

    Look, I learned to swear way most kids did here, Public school. I don' think its more swearing. I think it is that kids are no longer afraid to do it in front of people that aren't there age.

    Swearing can be blamed on two things I think, 1: Peers 2: Parents. If I feel something is inappropriate for my children I cut them off at my end.

    On the other hand., This kind of drama over a word is really pointless anyway.

    --
    --- Always remember. 99.36% of all statistics are inaccurate.
  89. Why Swearing is Bad by Cephacles · · Score: 2, Funny

    Swearing or cursing as a habit during general discourse is a bad thing because it is a sign of both mental weakness and lack of self control. Have you heard about the study that found that dogs bark because they don't know what else to do? People curse because they can't find anything else useful to say. Sometimes it's okay, like when you hammer your finger by accident. But wolf puppies bark, and as they grow more mature they bark less or not at all. They are able to intercept the urge, they show the self control to avoid barking. As the mental capacity and self control of people increases, they will curse/swear less. As noted by the article, people are cursing and swearing more, which means it is likely their mental capacity is also diminishing. Recent studies on how Google and the constant barrage of information has a negative effect on cognition may provide a hint as to why swearing is becoming more prevalent. That's my theory.

    1. Re:Why Swearing is Bad by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Bollocks!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  90. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get with the times old timer! Its not about the sagging pants, in all about the guys in girls pants. Which is substantially more disturbing. And yup, you guessed I am on your lawn.

  91. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

    Cute, and denial is more than just a river in Egypt.

    Lawbreakers have always been popular in culture, from mafiosos, to mobsters, to cowboys, to Robin Hood, to Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves.

    Trying to rename hip-hop culture to prison culture, and then blaming it for the evils of society is not racist, but pointing out the bigotry is?

  92. Huh. More lectures from conservative old morons. by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1
    Has anyone on this board ever been to Ireland?

    Here's a fairly representative sample of an Irishperson's conversation: "I was fucking down that road as fast as I could fucking go before some eejit fuckwit in a fucking huge SUV came out of fucking nowhere. Bollockhead fucker nearly fucking killed me."

    This is bad language. Not because of the use of some arbitrary taboo word ("Fuck") but because it's lazy and vague. "Fuck" is used as an adjective, verb and noun.

    Next time some moral authoritarian tries to tell you how to speak, make them expain why their own vocabulary is so restrictive and bland.

  93. And this is bad because.... by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why this is bad. The main fear most parents have about their kids swearing is that OTHER PARENTS MIGHT FIND OUT.

    They're just words, they're extremely useful, and people just need to chill the fuck out about it.

    1. Re:And this is bad because.... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You know what the real fear is? The schools. Board of Ed idiots see swearing as an indicator of possible problems in the home. As far as they are concerned it is like a red flag and they will scrutinize the parents. It's bullshit, but it is true. Of course no parent wants to be blamed for someone else's kid being the first of his age group to use 'cunt' or whatever. There is definitely a stigma there. I'm looking forward to a time when my sons and I can curse liberally and not have hypocritical busy bodies judging us.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  94. So what? by Velorium · · Score: 1

    The real question is, does this make any difference aside from how we use language, and does it have any significant effect on how youth are growing up? Children using euphemisms to curse adults when angry allows adults to maintain their higher status. By bypassing the euphemisms, children are then enabled more "verbal power." So really, this only matters if the adult can't handle that because they're wrong from the start. I'd be much more worried about a shift in acceptability of sexual violence than this.

  95. Monkey See by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hardly a new development. Hell, my mom's got a great story about my two-year-old sister, back in the early '70s, dropping an F-bomb to a cashier at a department store in a completely happy and cheerful tone.

    Kids're always seeking to emulate older folks - it's how they learn language in the first place, after all - and it only stands to reason that if they're hearing profanity more frequently, they're going to use it, too. They may only have the slighest inkling of what the word actually means, at that age - my sister probably knew that it would elicit a reaction from the other lady, but she likely wouldn't have understood why.

    If it's a way to get attention, though, why not use it? Still seems to work, at least in some fashion, whether one is two, fifteen, or forty.

  96. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Steady gramps, don't get all worked up, you'll give yourself a heart attack!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  97. Knowing the Difference by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, I don't really care if my kids use curse words - but to have the right to do so they had better have a really good vocabulary of both polite words and so called swear words. It's all about knowing the difference. Swear words should be used intelligently and sparingly and not just spouted out continuously and randomly. Swear words have power. Use responsibly motherfuckers.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  98. So what by iswm · · Score: 1

    They're just words.

    --
    Buckethead
  99. Re:Huh. More lectures from conservative old morons by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I'm fucking Irish you fucking insensitive fucking clod.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  100. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by cekander · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes a product of prison culture, but a product of culture. People are amazing things and they're always evolving. The current fashion has been exported around the world, and some say hip hop may just be the BEST product of US culture, in that it is truly american, original and artistically appreciative. Many of the other cultures and traditions here have built on western, native, eastern, et al roots. In this case, the baggy clothes and the rap style music, it's highly american. Be proud, motherfucker.

  101. Is it really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happens all the time: the 'vulgar' words will morph, lost their vulgarity, and simply end up as flavoring in speech. OH NO our children use different speech patterns than us THE WORLD IS ENDING!!

  102. Please... by AlfaMike · · Score: 1

    Won't someone think of the fucking children?

  103. Out of the mouths of babes by evilandi · · Score: 1

    From my eldest, daughter, aged 2-3:

    "Uck's sake mummy, uck's sake" (frustration, learned from Nanny)
    "Bollocks" (just randomly said at Sunday roast dinner with my parents - thankfully they were too deaf to notice)
    "Ee's a hungry little bugger" (baby brother being guzzling milk - grandad owned up to that one)
    "Grandad, you farted, say pardon me!" (thanks again, Nanny Potty Mouth)

    But despite all the curse words, none of them were as cringeworthy as when, at her 3rd birthday party, she laid on her back, pulled up her skirt and shouted to all and sundry:

    "TICKLE MY LA-LA!"

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Out of the mouths of babes by sakasune · · Score: 1

      But despite all the curse words, none of them were as cringeworthy as when, at her 3rd birthday party, she laid on her back, pulled up her skirt and shouted to all and sundry:

      "TICKLE MY LA-LA!"

      Who taught her that?

      --
      "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
  104. Russian is the opposite with the most swears by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

    And on the opposite end of the spectrum, Russian is a swear-word rich language with the largest swear vocabulary of any language that I know of. Whereas English has its seven dirty words, Russian has entire dictionaries devoted to explaining all the swear words and phrases.

  105. Zappa had a great philosophy by shatfield · · Score: 1

    I saw an interview with Frank Zappa when I was younger, and I think he hit the nail on the head. He said (paraphrasing, it was a long time ago...) "They're only _words_! If you give them no weight, then their meaning is worthless to kids and they won't bother saying them!" What was so unbelievable was that the interviewer didn't "get it". I was maybe 20 at the time, and I most certainly did, and I think he was absolutely correct. If the parents tell the kid "Don't say the f-word, it's bad!", the kid will do it... because it's bad! Because the word has "weight". It's the human condition - kids long to be "bad", to do things that adults don't like.

    Case in point: My coworker has a 2 year old daughter, who picked up "What the Fuck!" from someone. She saw the opportunity to shock mommy and daddy one day, so she drops the F bomb. Dad cautioned mom against saying anything to the daughter at all... just to ignore it. The daughter hasn't said it since. Had they made a big deal about it... you bet they would have heard it again... even the 2 year old knows what is "bad" and wants to say it.

    --
    "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
  106. Today's adults are offically retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've said what I wanted in the title.

  107. Shakespeare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shakespeare was considered vulgar in his time.

  108. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by acidradio · · Score: 1

    You are so correct! People who are only capable of speaking in total profanity are so employable and so admirable. They are society's success stories. Yes the ghetto people in the back of the bus and on the street corner who most people choose to avoid or walk on the other side of the street from. We should teach all our children to talk like that because it is the way of the future. I hear so many doctors, professors, lawyers and other educated folk talking all ghetto or redneck all the time. It gives me total reassurance in their abilities. This has nothing to do with old age or the "past", this is a perversion of societal norms.

  109. safety not guarenteed by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    To any and all time-travelers reading :
    If ever I gain use of a time machine, you can be sure that I will devote my time to pranking every and all.
    I'm not sure if you would consider that a threat or a promise.


    You know how to reach me...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  110. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    People can speak and act differently in different circumstances. I do not act and speak the same way at work as I do at home or with friends. Where did I ever say anything about people who are only capable of speaking in total profanity? I said that just because someone uses words that YOU find profane doesn't mean they are unintelligent. This has nothing to do with ghetto people. I went to a university to earn my bachelor's and am currently pursuing a master's degree, but I'll cuss like a fucking sailor if I want to. The point I was trying to make, jackass, is that every single generation accuses the following generation of "perversion of societal norms". No shit, genius. Societal norms change when new generations emerge and start to take over the culture. The fact that you refer to it as a perversion is simply a matter of perspective, such as it has been for every single generation since civilization began.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  111. gasp! by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    belgium!

  112. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    how is it racist? OH I get it cause only non whites go to prison in your little world right?

  113. Do'h by BraksDad · · Score: 1

    Well golly gee wilikers, I'm as shocked as a June Bug at a power station.

    --
    Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  114. More to the point... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    "Some walking piece of trash just shot John F. Kennedy..."

    The first time I heard this quote, I was amazed that the speaker could so eloquently and forcefully communicate what even the strongest of swear words would not. It's not so much that swearing is offensive and vulgar, but rather so often communicates little more than the mental feebleness of the speaker. Having grown up swearing, I found myself unable to express disapproval of something without using vulgarity, and without really saying much important. I had to learn to think before I spoke, to articulate what I was trying to say, instead of merely informing everyone within earshot that I could think of nothing more discriptive, nothing more enlightening to the hearer, than a litany of profanity.

    Even though I realize some people have no moral problem with swearing, there's almost never a good reason to use it in casual conversation.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  115. Its not WHAT you say but HOW. by crovira · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who swears in French when ever he gets "hit his thumb with a hammer" upset.

    He says "FLOCONS DE MAIS!!!" which is French for "Corn Flakes!!!"

    He's an Anglo living in Québec so he doesn't really know the choice words or how Québecers can string them together into interesting and colorful expressions. :-)

    Plus swearwords really don't translate well.

    A literal transliterration (as opposed to a translation) of swearwords across almost any linguistic/cultural barrier makes for absolutely hilarious dialogue in plays.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  116. f-bomb? by arielsom · · Score: 1

    Whoever came up with the idea of using "f-bomb" to avoid using "fuck" needs to be shot

  117. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off nigger

  118. What does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it matter? Oh right, we're in a country where societies social rules and regulations are still uselessly based off of christian morals... well fuck that, I have better things to worry about than if my (or some kid's) actions please some invisible man in the sky and his annoying son.

  119. Re:We now idolize the prison and degenerate cultur by dwpro · · Score: 1

    What does your rant have to do with cursing? There are scores of intelligent, articulate, educated people that curse. Listen to that inarticulate fuckwit Christpher Hitchens for example. Then your rant goes off on some sort of entitlement society, nevermind that our hardest working folks are working low paying jobs like construction and fruit picking. Meanwhile, in the "real world", the money is made by people who have money.
     
    Pro-tip, using "hehehe" in a comment doesn't really bolster your diatribe against "dumbing down" of America. It is slightly depressing that your comment made it to a +5 rating.

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  120. No Surprise by bobcote · · Score: 1

    At work - I have noticed over the decades the increasing use of profanity and vulgarities. Im probably guilty too. I remember my first job in the 80's was at a large brokerage firm. This was back in the days when one could smoke in the office and after office parties might end up in a strip club. However, the language was not nearly as bad as it is now.

    I remember one woman ,who was a brand new Harvard MBA, when giving a presentation would use profanity, pause looking over her glasses, and wait for the shocked expressions on our faces. I overheard her boss later chastising her saying that he expected someone with her education to be able to express herself better.

    Now - I have had actually had men and women of all education levels swear in a job interview. They may have gotten the jobs but the language was a strike against them.
         

  121. What the @#$! by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

    Shit what the fuck do those pussy whipped cunt lickers know about piss, let alone linguistics? I bet some motherfucker became a cocksucker because his ma ma wouldn't let him suckle on her tits as a baby. (insert sarcasm here along with a very bad impression of Geroge Carlin)