You kids make me feel really old. My first assembly language was written for the IBM 1130. It unloaded an IBM 2315 disk cartridge (512k x 16 bit word) to punched cards. It chewed up about 1/3 less cards than the IBM supplied utility, and so ran about 1/3 faster, the limiting factor being the speed of the card punch.
Absolutely. Another huge problem is skew, where dissimilar wire lengths result in signals (for example, the bits making up a word) arriving at their destination at different times. This is not a problem exclusive to integrated circuits: Seymour Cray addressed this problem in the CDC 6600 (circa 1964, discrete Si transistors) by using wires of identical lengths for interconnections. If you look for a photo of the CDC 6600 back plane, you'll readily see what I mean.
Could this not be done the same way CRTs scan a grid of pixels, just on a micro scale with higher resolution?
This reminds me of an early computer memory, the Williams tube, that enjoyed a brief period of popularity in some first generation machines. It worked by storing bits as charged spots on the phosphor face plate of an oscilloscope tube. Although access was random and fast (12 microsecond read/write cycle as implemented by the IBM 701), its refresh requirements effectively halved its performance, and it was notoriously unreliable. Positioning the electron beam was by electrostatic deflection, requiring accurate sub-microsecond switching of high voltages. IBM's implementation used precision counter-wound resistors to achieve the required control, the counter-winding preventing the resistors from also behaving like inductors. Unfortunately, the counter-winding also led to occasional electrical arcing inside the resistors, mispositioning the beam and causing the "Navajo Blanket" effect where the resulting data corruption had a visual appearance like its namesake woven blanket. Error-free operation seldom exceeded a handful of hours, and the Williams tube was quickly supplanted by magnetic core memory.
My strong suspicion is that VW is not the only auto maker up these shenanigans. I'd like to see source code placed in the hands of the appropriate regulators, along with the tools necessary to build it. Then the EPA, or their European analogs, could audit the code, build it, and compare it with the object code in randomly selected test vehicles. Obviously there would be some technical glitches to overcome to get a system like this working, but it's definitely doable and most certainly worth the effort.
Keep in mind that the Coca-Cola company had a gross profit of $28,010,000,000.00 for fiscal year 2015 with a profit margin of 66%. $120,000,000.00 in grants amounts to.042% of their gross. For them, this is cheap window dressing. Do no mistake this for good corporate citizenship.
I find it very sad that anyone would take the side of advertisers. Advertising is now, and always has been a gangrenous cultural wound; a filthy puss filled carbuncle on the ass of capitalism. Advertisements not only manipulate the ignorant and the weak minded, they actively seek to produce ignorance and weak mindedness. Whether or not it moves, plays sound, or just sits there, advertisements are an evil that should be expunged by any means necessary.
It would seem that bee deaths due to pesticide interaction should be relatively steady or steadily increasing if pesticide use is also steady
You may want to read up on how a dose-response curve works. As the dose increases, the affected population increases following a sigmoid curve (i.e., the rate of change increases).
Reminds me of the time a salesman came through and gave us a presentation for a COBOL optimizer (CAPEX, iirc). Everyplace in the script he was supposed to say "COBOL" he instead said "cobalt". Q&A was fun.
I did. Microsoft was the big dog in the world of BASIC. My second personal computer, an Apple II Plus, came with Applesoft BASIC in ROM, a Microsoft product, of which I have fond memories. Happy birthday Microsoft!
EFI was actually invented and specified by Intel. The specification for UEFI, its successor, is maintained by a consortium of manufacturers.
If you think UEFI is the baddest thing out there, check out SMM. It can be used to silently subvert any Intel-based machine going all the way back to some '386 parts.
Drivers are not employed by Uber, rather they are employed by the person whom they are giving a lift to. Uber is simply the intermediate of which the two connect to one another - much like a telephone company. On that basis alone this case will flop as Uber does not owe drivers the same duty of care that an employer would owe an employee.
You may be able to outsource the work; but, the responsibility is still yours. Hopefully the courts will see through this shell game fiction.
Saw 'Bones do this on TV. See, Spocks' brain was cut out by bimbos to run a planet-sized HVAC system. "Brain and brain, what is brain?" demanded the head bimbo when Kirk requested it back. Fortunately, 'Bones put a colander on his head and hooked the brain back up with a nerve hooker upper.
I'd like to remind David Treddinick, and any other non-US citizens contemplating similar actions, that we in the US take our intellectual property rights seriously. We believe that we and we alone enjoy the right to use or sell crackpot politicians. Unless Mr. Teddinick has a license for our technology, he's set himself up to be on the receiving end of some very strongly worded letters from our attorneys.
You kids make me feel really old. My first assembly language was written for the IBM 1130. It unloaded an IBM 2315 disk cartridge (512k x 16 bit word) to punched cards. It chewed up about 1/3 less cards than the IBM supplied utility, and so ran about 1/3 faster, the limiting factor being the speed of the card punch.
Absolutely. Another huge problem is skew, where dissimilar wire lengths result in signals (for example, the bits making up a word) arriving at their destination at different times. This is not a problem exclusive to integrated circuits: Seymour Cray addressed this problem in the CDC 6600 (circa 1964, discrete Si transistors) by using wires of identical lengths for interconnections. If you look for a photo of the CDC 6600 back plane, you'll readily see what I mean.
Could this not be done the same way CRTs scan a grid of pixels, just on a micro scale with higher resolution?
This reminds me of an early computer memory, the Williams tube, that enjoyed a brief period of popularity in some first generation machines. It worked by storing bits as charged spots on the phosphor face plate of an oscilloscope tube. Although access was random and fast (12 microsecond read/write cycle as implemented by the IBM 701), its refresh requirements effectively halved its performance, and it was notoriously unreliable. Positioning the electron beam was by electrostatic deflection, requiring accurate sub-microsecond switching of high voltages. IBM's implementation used precision counter-wound resistors to achieve the required control, the counter-winding preventing the resistors from also behaving like inductors. Unfortunately, the counter-winding also led to occasional electrical arcing inside the resistors, mispositioning the beam and causing the "Navajo Blanket" effect where the resulting data corruption had a visual appearance like its namesake woven blanket. Error-free operation seldom exceeded a handful of hours, and the Williams tube was quickly supplanted by magnetic core memory.
My strong suspicion is that VW is not the only auto maker up these shenanigans. I'd like to see source code placed in the hands of the appropriate regulators, along with the tools necessary to build it. Then the EPA, or their European analogs, could audit the code, build it, and compare it with the object code in randomly selected test vehicles. Obviously there would be some technical glitches to overcome to get a system like this working, but it's definitely doable and most certainly worth the effort.
The thing that drove me out of the commercial theaters many years ago was their insistence that I sit through ad after ad before the film. Fuck that.
Factoring out my sleepy brain, the fact remains that Coca-cola Co. is sleazy.
I'm not quite awake yet, I meant to type .042% of their gross profit.
Keep in mind that the Coca-Cola company had a gross profit of $28,010,000,000.00 for fiscal year 2015 with a profit margin of 66%. $120,000,000.00 in grants amounts to .042% of their gross. For them, this is cheap window dressing. Do no mistake this for good corporate citizenship.
I find it very sad that anyone would take the side of advertisers. Advertising is now, and always has been a gangrenous cultural wound; a filthy puss filled carbuncle on the ass of capitalism. Advertisements not only manipulate the ignorant and the weak minded, they actively seek to produce ignorance and weak mindedness. Whether or not it moves, plays sound, or just sits there, advertisements are an evil that should be expunged by any means necessary.
Probably needs both. Lean in for a kiss, and oink, what a smell.
It would seem that bee deaths due to pesticide interaction should be relatively steady or steadily increasing if pesticide use is also steady
You may want to read up on how a dose-response curve works. As the dose increases, the affected population increases following a sigmoid curve (i.e., the rate of change increases).
Reminds me of the time a salesman came through and gave us a presentation for a COBOL optimizer (CAPEX, iirc). Everyplace in the script he was supposed to say "COBOL" he instead said "cobalt". Q&A was fun.
On that score, let's not forget Xerox PARC. We all stand on the shoulders of giants.
I did. Microsoft was the big dog in the world of BASIC. My second personal computer, an Apple II Plus, came with Applesoft BASIC in ROM, a Microsoft product, of which I have fond memories. Happy birthday Microsoft!
Tomorrow, when this day o' /. bullshit is over.
I believe the term is astroturfing, i.e., when someone is paid to write commentary in support of some other entity.
Bah to that. I prefer to have stories filtered through at least two poorly informed sources and then commented on by the clueless masses.
An interesting article about Intel virtualization and the author's attempt to write a hypervisor.
EFI was actually invented and specified by Intel. The specification for UEFI, its successor, is maintained by a consortium of manufacturers.
If you think UEFI is the baddest thing out there, check out SMM. It can be used to silently subvert any Intel-based machine going all the way back to some '386 parts.
cheap on gas
As a serial bug owner, I can tell you that 18 MPG was the best you could expect.
Gatea and Zuckerberg. Yeah, I trust them about as much as I would King Leopold II of Belgium, were he still with us.
Drivers are not employed by Uber, rather they are employed by the person whom they are giving a lift to. Uber is simply the intermediate of which the two connect to one another - much like a telephone company. On that basis alone this case will flop as Uber does not owe drivers the same duty of care that an employer would owe an employee.
You may be able to outsource the work; but, the responsibility is still yours. Hopefully the courts will see through this shell game fiction.
...and the clock is running!
Saw 'Bones do this on TV. See, Spocks' brain was cut out by bimbos to run a planet-sized HVAC system. "Brain and brain, what is brain?" demanded the head bimbo when Kirk requested it back. Fortunately, 'Bones put a colander on his head and hooked the brain back up with a nerve hooker upper.
So, that's how it's done.
I'd like to remind David Treddinick, and any other non-US citizens contemplating similar actions, that we in the US take our intellectual property rights seriously. We believe that we and we alone enjoy the right to use or sell crackpot politicians. Unless Mr. Teddinick has a license for our technology, he's set himself up to be on the receiving end of some very strongly worded letters from our attorneys.