He asks a question about "In order to read paper-based books" and you babble about how easy it is to install a second video card into his book (a book which is also apparently running Windows)!
My apologies... I have a job and must skim much if I am to have time to read Slashdot. I'm so sorry that I took the extra time to quickly make a response I thought might help the OP. In the future I will refrain from being helpful, but for now I should point out that simply adding a camera, using the software that came with it, to my suggested configuration would do the trick. Didn't think of that, did you, coward? Hell, he could just use a very large monitor that can be turned 90 degrees and set a low resolution for that monitor, again with the camera software, to accomplish the desired effect. Didn't think of that either, but let us be honest... you don't post as AC to think or be helpful. No, like the majority of AC, you are just came on here to be an worthless jackass.
I would also suggest to OP, if using the 90 degree rotated monitor, that getting a camera that can have it's image rotated as well would make using this idea easier. I also suggest a camera that is high resolution. Enlarging a low quality image can cause the letters of the text to be a bit fuzzy.
If you are using Windows (or any other OS with a built in magnifier) just get a video card that supports dual monitors,set them to be a spanned desktop, put the magnification viewer app on one and work on the other. Really, it is often as easy as buying the video card, installing it and using it's settings application. There is no generic way to give directions other then that. You'll have to use the directions from the company that made the video card for details in setting up a dual head configuration.
You can't block the doors to an abortion clinic to prevent anyone from accessing services. Typically the objective of DDOS is to prevent access to service, but in the case of just slowing it you still hit the issue of blocking. You can't legitimize blocking an abortion clinic by repeatedly lining up to talk to the receptionist. It might work for a while, but when you banned from the premise and continue to queue you'll soon be arrested. In the end it is merely the obstruction of services provided by the clinic that gets protesters arrested. Until they find a network equivalent way to stand at the side in a public area while holding and sign shouting their propaganda such attacks will, and should, remain illegal. Not that this will stop them from happening, but an attempt to legitimize this seems a bit silly. Particularly when most DDOS attacks utilize systems not owned by the attacker.
Yes, I do realize that Anonymous usually utilizes volunteers, and that is commendable. Still, when the legal fallout for their actions hits these volunteers they should be arrested (have their internet connection taken offline by their ISP for a few days, kin to 72hr max arrest w/o charge). Criminal prosecution of them seems a bit excessive, but civil lawsuits against them for losses should be applicable. This allows for a virtual version of the bad behavior we see at some physical protests while keeping the repercussions for their actions in step.
On a side note, would a mistyped domain name that shows a parody site be the online equivalent of burning an effigy? I miss the spirit Americans once had while expressing their disappointment in administration. What better says "I strongly disagree with your policies" then making a mock up of a politician and burning it in the public square whilst cheerfully pumping one's rifle, pitch fork or torch gleefully into the air?
Have him pick a small section for rewrite. Have him rewrite it. Code review. If he manages to make improvements without adding bugs let him do it a few more times. If he continues to be solid release the chain. If he fails use the reviews to teach him what he is missing, and in the process you'll gain a developer you are more confident about making changes to the code base.
I'm guessing you have never seen a circuit with an unnecessary etching in it. The "mark of the beast" as they call it, or "666", could be present in the device as such. It could potentially be present in many ways. Decades ago, when RFID technology was still on the drawing board, someone raised the idea that it could be the "mark" required to purchase goods and such, thus forcing it upon the people. As you are aware, there are already RFID tags present in devices used to perform transactions. Whether irrational or founded it really doesn't matter. Why are you so dead set on foisting your beliefs on others? That is just as irritating to me as these damned mindless zealots cramming Jesus down my throat at every turn.
In reality this should never have even been the point. The use of this technology is an invasion of privacy and at best is just an example of administration mitigating a minor inconvenience on their part by forcing a major compromise on the part of the students. They don't have to be tracked off campus for this to be so. Take going to the restroom for example. This system KNOWS if they dropped a deuce or took a tinkle! They'll have a nice history of it too. What? No RFID pickups in the bathroom? It isn't hard to figure out when students drop into that nebulous zone where the bathrooms are and use time to determine the most likely use of facilities. How about when they visit the school nurse? How tightly are they controlling this data? How long is it kept? Are policies on the use of this data written in stone or is it to be changed on a whim?
I use RFID tech for work myself, and even give a couple finger prints for door access. I accept it because I like the convenience, but some still have keys. Given that there are cameras at all entrances I somehow doubt my company would disrespect someone's religious beliefs no matter how ridiculous over such a little thing. Oddly enough we are headquartered in Texas.
I'm an agnostic... I simply can't prove the existence of whatever baseless beliefs people have. Be it of faith in God or belief that there is no god... I'm horrified how disrespectful of each other these two groups are. What we could all use is a little more consideration of other people on items that don't really concern us in the first place. For this school system that would mean implementing policy changes, perhaps decades ago, to get the same result of increased revenue by perhaps allowing someone to sign in at a classroom at any time. Yes, it might take just a tiny bit more effort on their part, but hey... they are PAID to do it. Nope, the lazy administration wasted money to implement an unnecessary system. This resulted in unnecessary litigation. Resulting in unnecessary legislation. Resulting in YOUR lost tax dollars because some little girl's right to her religious beliefs being violated and the carelessness of a lazy overpaid school administration.
Our forefathers came here to be free. While we can blame the government for what seems to be a long term assault against such freedoms their greatest ally in the cause of eroding our freedoms can all too often be found in the mirror. I don't care if you smoke pot. Don't care if you want to marry a man, woman or a horse. I don't care about anything as long as you are your only victim. I'm sure we could get along well enough if everyone could do the same, but sadly with 95% of us that is just not the case.
We have another opportunity for the flu shot fascists to espouse their message of authority over individual rights, and perhaps some of the zealots who feel these shots are an affront to their deeply held beliefs? Bring forth the flu shot pseudoscience conjecture from both sides of the debate! Please, this time, explain how your sources established a large enough pool and maintained control of subjects to avoid contamination for a proper experiment! I bet our fascists have great suggestions on how we could better control unwilling medical experiment subjects taken from the peasantry! Please, I need a good laugh.
On the bright side however, vegans can stop pretending their food actually tastes good! Oh... except those vegi burgers as they are tasty. Particularly when fried in bacon grease.;)
Yeah... I was under the impression that more hashes faster was a bad thing. That is something for which crackers tune their code, but they didn't explicitly mention password storage. Perhaps it is targeted more for checksum like usage.
Yet you might claim to wish to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. What is to you a list of gun hot spots is to a criminal a hit list of where to procure more guns for the underground. There are things you don't want listed for security reasons. I do believe this is one bit of information that would serve the public a bit more if we did not know. Generalizing the data a bit might be a good idea rather then indicating addresses and such. Also, for reasons of being safe or not so safe, I would think of the guns in my neighborhood that are not tracked as dictating more about the safety of a particular neighborhood.
On a side note, as far as mayhem inducing nut jobs are concerned, it seems we have more to worry about legally owned weapons then those in the hands of common street criminals. If you do own firearms please consider increasing the security of their storage. Often when people are facing the threat of loosing access to weapons it causes a surge in gun purchases. May I suggest a weapons safe for your knee jerk reaction this time.
As a child I was an introverted little nerd kid. My father was a police officer who retired from the department when I was four or so. We had a snub nose 38 police special in my parent's closet, loaded and unlocked, and I always knew where it was. I was taught what it was, how dangerous it was and that I wasn't to handle it without my father present.
As I grew older I of course played games. I was given a modem at one point, and on a BBS I found the anarchist's cookbook. It told me how to make all sorts of dangerous things. My father gave me gifts like pocket knives, and I was even known to play with matches!!! My uncle taught me things like mixing iodine and ammonia. My older brother taught me the value of lighter fluid and a tube of tennis balls. What you may not realize is how much interaction I had with my family on these dangerous subjects, and ultimately how I was allowed to explore things with proper supervision. Playing with fire all the while confined to the fireplace.
I once set a fire outside the home. I was caught and sent to my room. When my father came in to the room I figured I was going to get it. Instead he tossed a box of matches at my feet and asked that if I was going to burn the house down to at least let him know so he could get my mother and sister out safely. Today I own MANY guns and know how to make MANY dangerous things.
I have NEVER had a thought of hurting a bunch of people I don't know, nor anyone I do know. My favorite game is GTA and I also play some Saints Row.
I don't know why anyone ever does, and it saddens me that this keeps happening. Some firearms legislation is quite positive. Never fear a guy who has a dozen weapons, fear the person who has never had one but needs one right NOW. Putting a delay on new ownership is a VERY good idea and I support it even if it seems counter to at least the spirit of the constitution of the United States.
I think the problem stems from at least two things. First, that those who do these things feel isolated from a world of people they believe are indifferent to them or perhaps even hostile. We didn't have that feeling so long ago as communities associated with each other more closely. Technologies that keep us entertained in our home do far more damage then collaborative multi player games like Call of Duty ever will. The violence upon the imaginary has less of a negative impact then the violence in movies and seen on TV that are set upon real live actual people. These murderers are most often known as loners even when in small groups.
Second, I've come to believe that our news media takes the lion's share of blame in these acts of mayhem against the populace. They fall short of glorification, but in the end everyone knows the names of these perpetrators. They spend months rehashing this news. Nancy Grace goes on and on spewing her dramatic bile. So... wanna be famous? Well, at least infamous. Just kill a bunch of innocents... the more terrible the better! Everyone in the world will know your name! Then we'll throw a friggin pity party for your corpse going on and on about how hard your life was, poor poor you. We always seem to get copy cats after these tragedies, and I am disgusted that the media's profits increase from this coverage. They collect their blood money from the misery of the victims.
So, I ask everyone, what new gun law can we pass that would have prevented the loss of all these children? The guns were owned by the mother, legally, and for quite some time. What new restrictions on games could keep them away from someone in their 20s with an internet connection, hmmm? What legislation could we introduce that would have actually stopped this murderer? So far the only suggestion that may have has some impact was given by the NRA and mocked by the media.
I wonder how those in the media can look at themselves in the mirror in the morning. I could never be a part of that... but I guess I was just raised better..
Shhhh! You're going to ruin Nancy Grace's new show out next season, "America's Next Top Criminal".
I say erase them from history. Not even an unmarked grave. Cremation and a toilet bowl. You can put a story up on the news, just number the douche bag or something and don't throw him a pity party. I don't care about a mass murder's life, fuck him. The news media loves this stuff because it gets people to watch obsessively in horror. Every last person who works at networks that harp on this stuff line their pockets with blood money. I loathe Nancy Grace... IMHO she is a vile and worthless human being.
It will likely take proving out what causes autism to quell concerns about vaccinations. I personally believe that it is unlikely that vaccines cause autism and can only assume that it is something genetic. Perhaps it is just that we coddle people too much these days so they don't have to integrate. Maybe we just saw the worst cases as "insane" people and properly diagnose now. I do take objection to forced medication however as I believe it is unethical. Yes, it is sad that children suffer the choices made by a parent. Sadly they are too young to make an informed choice themselves. Would I vaccinate my child? Yes, of course. The benefits far outweigh the potential consequences IMHO. Do I know for certain that vaccines cause absolutely no harm? No, and nor does anyone else.
Can the driver select "My life is the most important one.", because many people would likely opt to run over a thousand baby seals if it would save their life. I'll take evasive maneuvers to save a dog or a cat, but the pelts of many squirrels and bunnies have adorned my car's undercarriage from time to time. Some however would be more upset about the damage to their bumper then the fact that Spot is now motionless at the side of the road.
Driverless cars will be a tough sell for me. One that makes up for its mistakes by deciding to kill me instead? Never. Besides, even if the owner opts for self destruction in the event of the vehicle's failure to properly manage driving safely, the manufacturer could still be found liable for wrongful death.
LOL, really living as neighbors to a people who wish to push you into the sea tends to leave one with thick skin. If I was there the only thing I would feel is sorry for the serious beat down the Palestinians begged to receive, yet again. As for their over sized bottle rockets with explosives attached, no I really can do better. The fact that you say you can’t makes me giggle a little.
I don't really support them. I just don't care about the pigeons. I do care about their right to privacy, and do see the operators of the UAV to be antagonistic trespassers. Perhaps you don't like privacy, or perhaps believe violating privacy is OK when used against a minority you do not like. Which is it Falconhell?
If I fly a drone in my neighbor girl's backyard who likes to sunbathe in the nude is that OK? Oh wait, that is obviously private property and makes me a peeping tom. Hmmm, can I fly a drone over the fence into a nudist colony then and take pictures there? Hmm... still seems wrong huh? Is it not wrong if everyone had clothes on? I mean, until I started trespassing I didn't know one way or the other.
People like this group disgust me. Likely as much as anyone who eats meat disgusts this rabid group of vegan hippies who have nothing better to do then attempt to dictate to some hunters that they shouldn't kill a bunch of rats with wings. What also disgusts me is that anyone would farm grow such vermin (outside of medical testing), but that is another discussion entirely.
I prefer VirtualBox myself, but also use VMware at work. I also recommend that you try them all. It's not a question of what is best for us, but rather what is best for you.
The customer service of their games division isn't very helpful. They owed me some SC in EQ2 and demanded a credit card to return it. I refused to hand a company with unreliable security my credit card. After MANY attempts to get them to just return the SC to my account I gave up and closed my EQ2 account. I just wont do business with them anymore. I decided not to buy a Playstation 3 over issues I've had with them and don't buy Sony electronics anymore either. They've just had too much bad press to not have outstanding customer service and expect to survive.
Funny how, IMHO, they are replacing CEO incompetence with another poor excuse for an executive.
Slashdot Mirror
RTFQ much?
He asks a question about "In order to read paper-based books" and you babble about how easy it is to install a second video card into his book (a book which is also apparently running Windows)!
My apologies... I have a job and must skim much if I am to have time to read Slashdot. I'm so sorry that I took the extra time to quickly make a response I thought might help the OP. In the future I will refrain from being helpful, but for now I should point out that simply adding a camera, using the software that came with it, to my suggested configuration would do the trick. Didn't think of that, did you, coward? Hell, he could just use a very large monitor that can be turned 90 degrees and set a low resolution for that monitor, again with the camera software, to accomplish the desired effect. Didn't think of that either, but let us be honest... you don't post as AC to think or be helpful. No, like the majority of AC, you are just came on here to be an worthless jackass.
I would also suggest to OP, if using the 90 degree rotated monitor, that getting a camera that can have it's image rotated as well would make using this idea easier. I also suggest a camera that is high resolution. Enlarging a low quality image can cause the letters of the text to be a bit fuzzy.
If you are using Windows (or any other OS with a built in magnifier) just get a video card that supports dual monitors,set them to be a spanned desktop, put the magnification viewer app on one and work on the other. Really, it is often as easy as buying the video card, installing it and using it's settings application. There is no generic way to give directions other then that. You'll have to use the directions from the company that made the video card for details in setting up a dual head configuration.
You can't block the doors to an abortion clinic to prevent anyone from accessing services. Typically the objective of DDOS is to prevent access to service, but in the case of just slowing it you still hit the issue of blocking. You can't legitimize blocking an abortion clinic by repeatedly lining up to talk to the receptionist. It might work for a while, but when you banned from the premise and continue to queue you'll soon be arrested. In the end it is merely the obstruction of services provided by the clinic that gets protesters arrested. Until they find a network equivalent way to stand at the side in a public area while holding and sign shouting their propaganda such attacks will, and should, remain illegal. Not that this will stop them from happening, but an attempt to legitimize this seems a bit silly. Particularly when most DDOS attacks utilize systems not owned by the attacker.
Yes, I do realize that Anonymous usually utilizes volunteers, and that is commendable. Still, when the legal fallout for their actions hits these volunteers they should be arrested (have their internet connection taken offline by their ISP for a few days, kin to 72hr max arrest w/o charge). Criminal prosecution of them seems a bit excessive, but civil lawsuits against them for losses should be applicable. This allows for a virtual version of the bad behavior we see at some physical protests while keeping the repercussions for their actions in step.
On a side note, would a mistyped domain name that shows a parody site be the online equivalent of burning an effigy? I miss the spirit Americans once had while expressing their disappointment in administration. What better says "I strongly disagree with your policies" then making a mock up of a politician and burning it in the public square whilst cheerfully pumping one's rifle, pitch fork or torch gleefully into the air?
Have him pick a small section for rewrite. Have him rewrite it. Code review. If he manages to make improvements without adding bugs let him do it a few more times. If he continues to be solid release the chain. If he fails use the reviews to teach him what he is missing, and in the process you'll gain a developer you are more confident about making changes to the code base.
I'm guessing you have never seen a circuit with an unnecessary etching in it. The "mark of the beast" as they call it, or "666", could be present in the device as such. It could potentially be present in many ways. Decades ago, when RFID technology was still on the drawing board, someone raised the idea that it could be the "mark" required to purchase goods and such, thus forcing it upon the people. As you are aware, there are already RFID tags present in devices used to perform transactions. Whether irrational or founded it really doesn't matter. Why are you so dead set on foisting your beliefs on others? That is just as irritating to me as these damned mindless zealots cramming Jesus down my throat at every turn.
In reality this should never have even been the point. The use of this technology is an invasion of privacy and at best is just an example of administration mitigating a minor inconvenience on their part by forcing a major compromise on the part of the students. They don't have to be tracked off campus for this to be so. Take going to the restroom for example. This system KNOWS if they dropped a deuce or took a tinkle! They'll have a nice history of it too. What? No RFID pickups in the bathroom? It isn't hard to figure out when students drop into that nebulous zone where the bathrooms are and use time to determine the most likely use of facilities. How about when they visit the school nurse? How tightly are they controlling this data? How long is it kept? Are policies on the use of this data written in stone or is it to be changed on a whim?
I use RFID tech for work myself, and even give a couple finger prints for door access. I accept it because I like the convenience, but some still have keys. Given that there are cameras at all entrances I somehow doubt my company would disrespect someone's religious beliefs no matter how ridiculous over such a little thing. Oddly enough we are headquartered in Texas.
I'm an agnostic... I simply can't prove the existence of whatever baseless beliefs people have. Be it of faith in God or belief that there is no god... I'm horrified how disrespectful of each other these two groups are. What we could all use is a little more consideration of other people on items that don't really concern us in the first place. For this school system that would mean implementing policy changes, perhaps decades ago, to get the same result of increased revenue by perhaps allowing someone to sign in at a classroom at any time. Yes, it might take just a tiny bit more effort on their part, but hey... they are PAID to do it. Nope, the lazy administration wasted money to implement an unnecessary system. This resulted in unnecessary litigation. Resulting in unnecessary legislation. Resulting in YOUR lost tax dollars because some little girl's right to her religious beliefs being violated and the carelessness of a lazy overpaid school administration.
Our forefathers came here to be free. While we can blame the government for what seems to be a long term assault against such freedoms their greatest ally in the cause of eroding our freedoms can all too often be found in the mirror. I don't care if you smoke pot. Don't care if you want to marry a man, woman or a horse. I don't care about anything as long as you are your only victim. I'm sure we could get along well enough if everyone could do the same, but sadly with 95% of us that is just not the case.
We have another opportunity for the flu shot fascists to espouse their message of authority over individual rights, and perhaps some of the zealots who feel these shots are an affront to their deeply held beliefs? Bring forth the flu shot pseudoscience conjecture from both sides of the debate! Please, this time, explain how your sources established a large enough pool and maintained control of subjects to avoid contamination for a proper experiment! I bet our fascists have great suggestions on how we could better control unwilling medical experiment subjects taken from the peasantry! Please, I need a good laugh.
Nexion
On the bright side however, vegans can stop pretending their food actually tastes good! Oh... except those vegi burgers as they are tasty. Particularly when fried in bacon grease. ;)
throw stones to get an excuse to attack Iran, and you can bet our being attacked will help keep the patriot act going for another decade.
Yeah... I was under the impression that more hashes faster was a bad thing. That is something for which crackers tune their code, but they didn't explicitly mention password storage. Perhaps it is targeted more for checksum like usage.
Yet you might claim to wish to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. What is to you a list of gun hot spots is to a criminal a hit list of where to procure more guns for the underground. There are things you don't want listed for security reasons. I do believe this is one bit of information that would serve the public a bit more if we did not know. Generalizing the data a bit might be a good idea rather then indicating addresses and such. Also, for reasons of being safe or not so safe, I would think of the guns in my neighborhood that are not tracked as dictating more about the safety of a particular neighborhood.
On a side note, as far as mayhem inducing nut jobs are concerned, it seems we have more to worry about legally owned weapons then those in the hands of common street criminals. If you do own firearms please consider increasing the security of their storage. Often when people are facing the threat of loosing access to weapons it causes a surge in gun purchases. May I suggest a weapons safe for your knee jerk reaction this time.
As a child I was an introverted little nerd kid. My father was a police officer who retired from the department when I was four or so. We had a snub nose 38 police special in my parent's closet, loaded and unlocked, and I always knew where it was. I was taught what it was, how dangerous it was and that I wasn't to handle it without my father present.
As I grew older I of course played games. I was given a modem at one point, and on a BBS I found the anarchist's cookbook. It told me how to make all sorts of dangerous things. My father gave me gifts like pocket knives, and I was even known to play with matches!!! My uncle taught me things like mixing iodine and ammonia. My older brother taught me the value of lighter fluid and a tube of tennis balls. What you may not realize is how much interaction I had with my family on these dangerous subjects, and ultimately how I was allowed to explore things with proper supervision. Playing with fire all the while confined to the fireplace.
I once set a fire outside the home. I was caught and sent to my room. When my father came in to the room I figured I was going to get it. Instead he tossed a box of matches at my feet and asked that if I was going to burn the house down to at least let him know so he could get my mother and sister out safely. Today I own MANY guns and know how to make MANY dangerous things.
I have NEVER had a thought of hurting a bunch of people I don't know, nor anyone I do know. My favorite game is GTA and I also play some Saints Row.
I don't know why anyone ever does, and it saddens me that this keeps happening. Some firearms legislation is quite positive. Never fear a guy who has a dozen weapons, fear the person who has never had one but needs one right NOW. Putting a delay on new ownership is a VERY good idea and I support it even if it seems counter to at least the spirit of the constitution of the United States.
I think the problem stems from at least two things. First, that those who do these things feel isolated from a world of people they believe are indifferent to them or perhaps even hostile. We didn't have that feeling so long ago as communities associated with each other more closely. Technologies that keep us entertained in our home do far more damage then collaborative multi player games like Call of Duty ever will. The violence upon the imaginary has less of a negative impact then the violence in movies and seen on TV that are set upon real live actual people. These murderers are most often known as loners even when in small groups.
Second, I've come to believe that our news media takes the lion's share of blame in these acts of mayhem against the populace. They fall short of glorification, but in the end everyone knows the names of these perpetrators. They spend months rehashing this news. Nancy Grace goes on and on spewing her dramatic bile. So... wanna be famous? Well, at least infamous. Just kill a bunch of innocents... the more terrible the better! Everyone in the world will know your name! Then we'll throw a friggin pity party for your corpse going on and on about how hard your life was, poor poor you. We always seem to get copy cats after these tragedies, and I am disgusted that the media's profits increase from this coverage. They collect their blood money from the misery of the victims.
So, I ask everyone, what new gun law can we pass that would have prevented the loss of all these children? The guns were owned by the mother, legally, and for quite some time. What new restrictions on games could keep them away from someone in their 20s with an internet connection, hmmm? What legislation could we introduce that would have actually stopped this murderer? So far the only suggestion that may have has some impact was given by the NRA and mocked by the media.
I wonder how those in the media can look at themselves in the mirror in the morning. I could never be a part of that... but I guess I was just raised better..
Shhhh! You're going to ruin Nancy Grace's new show out next season, "America's Next Top Criminal".
I say erase them from history. Not even an unmarked grave. Cremation and a toilet bowl. You can put a story up on the news, just number the douche bag or something and don't throw him a pity party. I don't care about a mass murder's life, fuck him. The news media loves this stuff because it gets people to watch obsessively in horror. Every last person who works at networks that harp on this stuff line their pockets with blood money. I loathe Nancy Grace... IMHO she is a vile and worthless human being.
It will likely take proving out what causes autism to quell concerns about vaccinations. I personally believe that it is unlikely that vaccines cause autism and can only assume that it is something genetic. Perhaps it is just that we coddle people too much these days so they don't have to integrate. Maybe we just saw the worst cases as "insane" people and properly diagnose now. I do take objection to forced medication however as I believe it is unethical. Yes, it is sad that children suffer the choices made by a parent. Sadly they are too young to make an informed choice themselves. Would I vaccinate my child? Yes, of course. The benefits far outweigh the potential consequences IMHO. Do I know for certain that vaccines cause absolutely no harm? No, and nor does anyone else.
Can the driver select "My life is the most important one.", because many people would likely opt to run over a thousand baby seals if it would save their life. I'll take evasive maneuvers to save a dog or a cat, but the pelts of many squirrels and bunnies have adorned my car's undercarriage from time to time. Some however would be more upset about the damage to their bumper then the fact that Spot is now motionless at the side of the road.
Driverless cars will be a tough sell for me. One that makes up for its mistakes by deciding to kill me instead? Never. Besides, even if the owner opts for self destruction in the event of the vehicle's failure to properly manage driving safely, the manufacturer could still be found liable for wrongful death.
I wouldn't want to be accused of having the smallest Wii on the block.
LOL, really living as neighbors to a people who wish to push you into the sea tends to leave one with thick skin. If I was there the only thing I would feel is sorry for the serious beat down the Palestinians begged to receive, yet again. As for their over sized bottle rockets with explosives attached, no I really can do better. The fact that you say you can’t makes me giggle a little.
The "cyber attacks" against Israel are about as impressive as Palestinian missile technology.
I don't really support them. I just don't care about the pigeons. I do care about their right to privacy, and do see the operators of the UAV to be antagonistic trespassers. Perhaps you don't like privacy, or perhaps believe violating privacy is OK when used against a minority you do not like. Which is it Falconhell?
If I fly a drone in my neighbor girl's backyard who likes to sunbathe in the nude is that OK? Oh wait, that is obviously private property and makes me a peeping tom. Hmmm, can I fly a drone over the fence into a nudist colony then and take pictures there? Hmm... still seems wrong huh? Is it not wrong if everyone had clothes on? I mean, until I started trespassing I didn't know one way or the other.
People like this group disgust me. Likely as much as anyone who eats meat disgusts this rabid group of vegan hippies who have nothing better to do then attempt to dictate to some hunters that they shouldn't kill a bunch of rats with wings. What also disgusts me is that anyone would farm grow such vermin (outside of medical testing), but that is another discussion entirely.
This will not only likely increase the quality of enforcement, but in the long term hopefully increase the public trust in their enforcement officers.
Truly great to see a department moving in this direction.
Actually that solves MANY problems.
Google can no longer claim that slogan. They gave it up when challenged by Yahoo and a few others.
I prefer VirtualBox myself, but also use VMware at work. I also recommend that you try them all. It's not a question of what is best for us, but rather what is best for you.
its name was Itanic Poulson... its name was...
The customer service of their games division isn't very helpful. They owed me some SC in EQ2 and demanded a credit card to return it. I refused to hand a company with unreliable security my credit card. After MANY attempts to get them to just return the SC to my account I gave up and closed my EQ2 account. I just wont do business with them anymore. I decided not to buy a Playstation 3 over issues I've had with them and don't buy Sony electronics anymore either. They've just had too much bad press to not have outstanding customer service and expect to survive.
Funny how, IMHO, they are replacing CEO incompetence with another poor excuse for an executive.