I had no problem installing IE8 on my XP machine. I do have one problem with IE8. It crashes.. Often.. Even when I'm just typing in a new web address it will crash on occasion. It's not my computer because I never see any other program crash including Firefox 3.X which I will often have up and running for days on end. I even tried removing IE8 and re-downloading/re-installing it and the problem still shows up.
Luckily I only use IE8 in cases where I have to use IE. Otherwise I'll just use Firefox.
But it's my understanding the immunization issue isn't about immunizing kids but about the specific immunization technique used where kids receive one shot that immunizes them against multiple diseases at once. From what I've heard no one has presented evidence that getting an immunization for a disease, waiting a few weeks and then getting immunized for another disease, presents the same risk as getting the single shot that immunizes you against multiple diseases at once.
Who says Intel isn't willing to license it? Certainly not Intel as they have stated that they were working with Nvidia on a new deal. The problem is that Nvidia thinks the new designs are covered by the old agreement and therefore Nvidia doesn't have to pay any more to use the technology of the new Intel CPU.
Intel thinks there is enough change in the I7 design that the old license agreement doesn't apply. That doesn't mean that Intel is unwilling to work out a new agreement with Nvidia for licensing the technology in the I7. The fact that they've been talking with Nvidia for so long suggests that Intel is willing to work with Nvidia but they expect to be paid for it, and Nvidia thinks they shouldn't have to pay.
As to who is right and who is wrong? I have no idea. It sounds like Intel has a good argument for the new design being different enough to abrogate the license but without reading the actual contract there's no way to know. So it's going to take the courts to figure this out.
That's not necessarily true. If you look at some sites like tvfool that show the signal strength before the switch and after the switch you can see that the strength may or may not change after the switchover. In my area there is no change after the switchover so if someone can't get a channel today they won't be able to do it after the switchover.
Or a Frys.. It's a bit odd here because until Circuit City closed up shop locally we had a MicroCenter, Frys, Circuit City and a Best Buy all within about a mile of each other. Plenty of selection.. oh, and now we have one of those HH Gregg stores to compete with CC/Best Buy on the home appliances.
I loved Catherine Tate's Donna character. She was a bit obnoxious in the Christmas special but they toned that done for the regular series and it worked out some. Some people are like you and hated the character, but it seems (from comments made over the course of the series) that most people liked her. Adric, I felt, didn't work because the acting was so poor. With a stronger actor playing the part it might have worked, but not with the person they chose to play Adric.
You can also pick up some stuff by visiting various web sites. Places that carry.. umm. less than proper material (warez, porn) I don't know how many carry them but some do and visiting them with an unprotected web browser is an invitation to getting infected. With an up to date browser and tools like Noscript and anti-virus, anti-spyware programs it's hard to get infected unless you go out of your way to do something you shouldn't do like run some executable software without checking it out first.
Gee... Never having to travel to Italy but allowed to travel the rest of the world.. Hmm. I think I can live with that...
Besides, Italy wouldn't even try to extradite these guys since I doubt the punishment if found guilty is that harsh. What's strange is that they aren't spending their time finding the people who actually did harrass the kid. It's doubtful that the child even knows about Youtube or what it means for the video to be up there so it's not like putting the video up is causing him harm.
Doing the actual harrassment is the real harm and is what should be punished.
I don't think this does much to fix racism. It's more a confirmation of what people have suspected for some time. The nation has changed. Yes, we still have racism but it's not as pervasive as it used to be. There are still people around that push it as their main agenda, but most people have moved past that. The candidacy of Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama are just confirmation that the nation has changed over time.
Not unless you have some other definition of major party because both the Republican and Democrat parties are behind these efforts. We know that Senator Biden is fully in the pockets of the MPAA so it's natural for him to support this type of effort.
If you want someone in office that will really try and fight this type of legal change you need to find new candidates. It's unlikely you'll succeed since anyone that is capable of winning needs lots of money and the people with money are the businesses.
Against FISA and telecom immunity???
You mean for FISA and telecom immunity. Yes, he started out saying he was against them but when it came time to vote he voted to pass the bill that kept FISA going and gave the telecom companies the immunity they wanted.
So this looks much like Obama's original technology statement. It starts out sounding great but when it comes time to actually start talking about what he will do things change until it finally bears little resemblance to the original plan.
Actually I think it makes perfect sense. China asked the UN to come up with a proposal. The NSA is getting involved to make sure the final proposal is something they can live with. Probably something that they can circumvent when desired. If they didn't get involved then who knows what might come out of the task force.
One thing you have to keep in mind is that even though the NSA is getting involved in formulating the response it doesn't mean that the USA will support it once the task force has a final report.
Okay, how about this.
Let's give the botnets out there your email addresses. Work related email addresses would be best. Then the bots can hit your email addresses with email for Viagra or penis enlargment or the good people of Nigeria can ask you for help in laundering some money for them. When the servers come crashing down from the millions of email messages then you can explain how no property is damaged.
Are you sure about this statement. I know that's the case in the USA but isn't there quite a bit of embryonic stem cell research going on overseas. I know when this issue was being hotly debated there would be articles posted almost daily from various scientists all over the world about the research they were doing using embryonic stem cell research. I haven't kept up with the discussion so I don't know what kind of positive results have been developed from embryonic stem cell research (which is allowed in much of the world) versus adult stem cell research. Would be interesting if someone could post some articles to a real discussion of the difference in results from the two forms of stem cell research.
If you take a look at McCain's comments on stem cell research in the fine article mentioned above you will see that he fully supports stem cell research. He's not a fan of embryonic stem cell research but he recognizes that it will happen and as such thinks it should be done under federal oversight. That goes against what you just posted.
Just make sure you aren't enamored of having beef on a regular basis if you move to India.
From what I understand while salaries for IT jobs have gone up other salaries in the country haven't tended to rise so the cost of living is quite low. So even if your salary is 1/3 lower than what it is in the USA you may find you have a better standard of living.
Senility isn't a likely problem for him. If it was going to happen there would be signs already and given his position in the Senate and his campaign I think it's a safe bet that isn't going to be an issue.
As for his likelihood to last for eight years (should he be elected to two terms) we can look at the evidence of longetivity in his family. His mother is still alive and she sure seems pretty aware of the events in the world judging by the interviews of her that I've seen. That bodes well for him to stay in good health for at least eight more years. Plus there's the fact that anyone (including Obama) could come down with some serious medical condition tomorrow even if there's been no suggestion of poor health.
I tend to discount the health issue unless there are real signs of it being an issue. With McCain all you have is that he is older, but he's run a strong campaign and criss-crossing the country meeting people at all times of the day or night tends to put a significant strain on a body. If he can make it through that process and still be going strong, which he seems to be, then I think he's in good shape should he be elected to the office of the President of the USA.
She didn't fire him. He's still at work. Someone on her staff called up and asked for him to be fired and that person was subsequently punished (I believe that person was fired) when it came out that the person had applied pressure to get the guy fired. The Governor has stated that she didn't know the pressure was being applied, but she does think the guy shouldn't have been on the job and should be fired. Since she's being honest about her feelings and she fired the person that did apply pressure to get the guy fired, I'm inclined to believe that she didn't know about it before hand.
Also isn't there a limit on where they will follow you? If a local police agency decides to follow me, will they follow me into another county? What if I drive into another state, or another country? The GPS will track you no matter where you go so it seems to be much more intrusive.
It does seem too generic. Even the author isn't clear on what it will mean and who will have to get a PI license. My reading of it suggests that anyone that reviews logs of a system looking for anything odd, including evidence of wrong doing can be required to have a PI license, since they don't exclusively say it applies to people whose main job is to investigate crimes. So a system admin who would typically review logs periodically could have to get a PI.
The interesting part of this is that technically I suppose I'm breaking Texas law at this moment. I don't live in Texas, but the web site I administrate is in hosted in Texas. Since one of the things I do regularly is look for signs of things going wrong, including people trying to hack into the system it seems that the law could apply to me (depending upon who is making the determination.)
From what the author said it's not clear what their original intent was but the law seems vague enough that it can be applied to almost anyone that works on computers.
If people are going to frame innocent people why not make it really useful like framing the MPAA/RIAA servers, or the head of the MPAA. Nothing like setting the MPAA to go after itself for copyright infringement.
However it's only a federal offense in the USA. Should someone from Russia or China or any number of other countries send DMCA notices to Youtube they are in little risk of any legal troubles.
If you really transferred that much over the course of a year then you wouldn't have had an issue on Comcast either. Even with the new limits they are discussing (250GB/month) you are looking at limits of around 3TB per year. So having a combined upload/download of about 2TB isn't going to cause you an issue on Comcast (so long as you spread your transfers fairly evenly over the course of the year.)
Slashdot Mirror
I had no problem installing IE8 on my XP machine. I do have one problem with IE8. It crashes.. Often.. Even when I'm just typing in a new web address it will crash on occasion. It's not my computer because I never see any other program crash including Firefox 3.X which I will often have up and running for days on end. I even tried removing IE8 and re-downloading/re-installing it and the problem still shows up. Luckily I only use IE8 in cases where I have to use IE. Otherwise I'll just use Firefox.
But it's my understanding the immunization issue isn't about immunizing kids but about the specific immunization technique used where kids receive one shot that immunizes them against multiple diseases at once. From what I've heard no one has presented evidence that getting an immunization for a disease, waiting a few weeks and then getting immunized for another disease, presents the same risk as getting the single shot that immunizes you against multiple diseases at once.
Who says Intel isn't willing to license it? Certainly not Intel as they have stated that they were working with Nvidia on a new deal. The problem is that Nvidia thinks the new designs are covered by the old agreement and therefore Nvidia doesn't have to pay any more to use the technology of the new Intel CPU. Intel thinks there is enough change in the I7 design that the old license agreement doesn't apply. That doesn't mean that Intel is unwilling to work out a new agreement with Nvidia for licensing the technology in the I7. The fact that they've been talking with Nvidia for so long suggests that Intel is willing to work with Nvidia but they expect to be paid for it, and Nvidia thinks they shouldn't have to pay. As to who is right and who is wrong? I have no idea. It sounds like Intel has a good argument for the new design being different enough to abrogate the license but without reading the actual contract there's no way to know. So it's going to take the courts to figure this out.
That's not necessarily true. If you look at some sites like tvfool that show the signal strength before the switch and after the switch you can see that the strength may or may not change after the switchover. In my area there is no change after the switchover so if someone can't get a channel today they won't be able to do it after the switchover.
Or a Frys.. It's a bit odd here because until Circuit City closed up shop locally we had a MicroCenter, Frys, Circuit City and a Best Buy all within about a mile of each other. Plenty of selection.. oh, and now we have one of those HH Gregg stores to compete with CC/Best Buy on the home appliances.
I loved Catherine Tate's Donna character. She was a bit obnoxious in the Christmas special but they toned that done for the regular series and it worked out some. Some people are like you and hated the character, but it seems (from comments made over the course of the series) that most people liked her. Adric, I felt, didn't work because the acting was so poor. With a stronger actor playing the part it might have worked, but not with the person they chose to play Adric.
You can also pick up some stuff by visiting various web sites. Places that carry.. umm. less than proper material (warez, porn) I don't know how many carry them but some do and visiting them with an unprotected web browser is an invitation to getting infected. With an up to date browser and tools like Noscript and anti-virus, anti-spyware programs it's hard to get infected unless you go out of your way to do something you shouldn't do like run some executable software without checking it out first.
Gee... Never having to travel to Italy but allowed to travel the rest of the world.. Hmm. I think I can live with that... Besides, Italy wouldn't even try to extradite these guys since I doubt the punishment if found guilty is that harsh. What's strange is that they aren't spending their time finding the people who actually did harrass the kid. It's doubtful that the child even knows about Youtube or what it means for the video to be up there so it's not like putting the video up is causing him harm. Doing the actual harrassment is the real harm and is what should be punished.
I don't think this does much to fix racism. It's more a confirmation of what people have suspected for some time. The nation has changed. Yes, we still have racism but it's not as pervasive as it used to be. There are still people around that push it as their main agenda, but most people have moved past that. The candidacy of Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama are just confirmation that the nation has changed over time.
Not unless you have some other definition of major party because both the Republican and Democrat parties are behind these efforts. We know that Senator Biden is fully in the pockets of the MPAA so it's natural for him to support this type of effort. If you want someone in office that will really try and fight this type of legal change you need to find new candidates. It's unlikely you'll succeed since anyone that is capable of winning needs lots of money and the people with money are the businesses.
or use this link instead http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://www.ixbt.com/video3/i0808-video.shtml&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Di3D-Speed%2B08%252708%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DTpv%26pwst%3D1 Google is handy for translating sites like this
Against FISA and telecom immunity??? You mean for FISA and telecom immunity. Yes, he started out saying he was against them but when it came time to vote he voted to pass the bill that kept FISA going and gave the telecom companies the immunity they wanted. So this looks much like Obama's original technology statement. It starts out sounding great but when it comes time to actually start talking about what he will do things change until it finally bears little resemblance to the original plan.
Actually I think it makes perfect sense. China asked the UN to come up with a proposal. The NSA is getting involved to make sure the final proposal is something they can live with. Probably something that they can circumvent when desired. If they didn't get involved then who knows what might come out of the task force. One thing you have to keep in mind is that even though the NSA is getting involved in formulating the response it doesn't mean that the USA will support it once the task force has a final report.
Okay, how about this. Let's give the botnets out there your email addresses. Work related email addresses would be best. Then the bots can hit your email addresses with email for Viagra or penis enlargment or the good people of Nigeria can ask you for help in laundering some money for them. When the servers come crashing down from the millions of email messages then you can explain how no property is damaged.
Are you sure about this statement. I know that's the case in the USA but isn't there quite a bit of embryonic stem cell research going on overseas. I know when this issue was being hotly debated there would be articles posted almost daily from various scientists all over the world about the research they were doing using embryonic stem cell research. I haven't kept up with the discussion so I don't know what kind of positive results have been developed from embryonic stem cell research (which is allowed in much of the world) versus adult stem cell research. Would be interesting if someone could post some articles to a real discussion of the difference in results from the two forms of stem cell research.
If you take a look at McCain's comments on stem cell research in the fine article mentioned above you will see that he fully supports stem cell research. He's not a fan of embryonic stem cell research but he recognizes that it will happen and as such thinks it should be done under federal oversight. That goes against what you just posted.
Just make sure you aren't enamored of having beef on a regular basis if you move to India. From what I understand while salaries for IT jobs have gone up other salaries in the country haven't tended to rise so the cost of living is quite low. So even if your salary is 1/3 lower than what it is in the USA you may find you have a better standard of living.
You shouldn't confuse people with facts.
Senility isn't a likely problem for him. If it was going to happen there would be signs already and given his position in the Senate and his campaign I think it's a safe bet that isn't going to be an issue. As for his likelihood to last for eight years (should he be elected to two terms) we can look at the evidence of longetivity in his family. His mother is still alive and she sure seems pretty aware of the events in the world judging by the interviews of her that I've seen. That bodes well for him to stay in good health for at least eight more years. Plus there's the fact that anyone (including Obama) could come down with some serious medical condition tomorrow even if there's been no suggestion of poor health. I tend to discount the health issue unless there are real signs of it being an issue. With McCain all you have is that he is older, but he's run a strong campaign and criss-crossing the country meeting people at all times of the day or night tends to put a significant strain on a body. If he can make it through that process and still be going strong, which he seems to be, then I think he's in good shape should he be elected to the office of the President of the USA.
She didn't fire him. He's still at work. Someone on her staff called up and asked for him to be fired and that person was subsequently punished (I believe that person was fired) when it came out that the person had applied pressure to get the guy fired. The Governor has stated that she didn't know the pressure was being applied, but she does think the guy shouldn't have been on the job and should be fired. Since she's being honest about her feelings and she fired the person that did apply pressure to get the guy fired, I'm inclined to believe that she didn't know about it before hand.
Also isn't there a limit on where they will follow you? If a local police agency decides to follow me, will they follow me into another county? What if I drive into another state, or another country? The GPS will track you no matter where you go so it seems to be much more intrusive.
It does seem too generic. Even the author isn't clear on what it will mean and who will have to get a PI license. My reading of it suggests that anyone that reviews logs of a system looking for anything odd, including evidence of wrong doing can be required to have a PI license, since they don't exclusively say it applies to people whose main job is to investigate crimes. So a system admin who would typically review logs periodically could have to get a PI. The interesting part of this is that technically I suppose I'm breaking Texas law at this moment. I don't live in Texas, but the web site I administrate is in hosted in Texas. Since one of the things I do regularly is look for signs of things going wrong, including people trying to hack into the system it seems that the law could apply to me (depending upon who is making the determination.) From what the author said it's not clear what their original intent was but the law seems vague enough that it can be applied to almost anyone that works on computers.
If people are going to frame innocent people why not make it really useful like framing the MPAA/RIAA servers, or the head of the MPAA. Nothing like setting the MPAA to go after itself for copyright infringement.
However it's only a federal offense in the USA. Should someone from Russia or China or any number of other countries send DMCA notices to Youtube they are in little risk of any legal troubles.
If you really transferred that much over the course of a year then you wouldn't have had an issue on Comcast either. Even with the new limits they are discussing (250GB/month) you are looking at limits of around 3TB per year. So having a combined upload/download of about 2TB isn't going to cause you an issue on Comcast (so long as you spread your transfers fairly evenly over the course of the year.)