There isn't just one type of gold standard. Fixing and maintaining an exchange rate with gold doesn't mean that you can't increase the money supply unless you have more gold. It just means that you have to maintain the value of the dollar relative to gold.
The economy isn't a zero-sum game. If someone is doing well, they usually invest the money (hopefully being put to productive use) or they exchange their money for goods and services.
The problem is frankly monetary policy. I know, I know. I'm a crazy Ron Paul-type.
Here's what I think is going on. Since we left the gold standard, the amount of money has increased by a lot. Where newly printed money hits the system first (like Wall Street for example) those people get to use the money first and get a big benefit. By the time that money trickles down to the rest of society, all those newly printed dollars mean a loss of purchasing power and the overall value of each dollar.
Almost any chart I've seen about how workers are doing worse from a variety of different sources, the point in the chart where everything goes crazy is the early 70s. 10 years prior to Reagan, but the same time Nixon took America off the gold standard.
They would actually be more valuable broken up. Windows could still do their thing. Office could support whatever platform they wanted to. Imagine a version of Office for Mac with a comparable version of Excel and Access. SQL Server on Linux boxes.
Also, I would say there is a difference between decline and not being in your high growth phase and abnormally dominant phase.
I know of no such war, at least within Christianity and Judaism. I'm no expert on Islam so I'll let them speak for themselves.
A lot of times religion was a proxy for tribal warfare. But it's more like different tribes had different religions. But it wasn't like the Irish were dying to defend papal infallibility by and large.
My manager at a defense contractor that used the forced ranking system wanted something akin to the IRS's EZ form. I know I'm going to get ranked Satisfactory, why do I have to wast 40 hours on this process?
Fortunately, managers were humane enough in doling out the bad rankings. If it was known an employee was retiring, that person would get the bad review.
When you hoard money you generally save it instead of building a Scrooge McDuck-type swimming pool. Those investments are used for loans, etc. A low savings rate is one of the main things to get us into this mess.
It is basically an internal Twitter for a company. At least for larger companies, you have upper management giving out tweets (or yams or whatever they want to call them) until they get bored with it. Low-level employees are afraid to write anything interesting out of a fear of accidentally writing something management will get upset about. So you get to see a few boring posting from upper management and that's about it.
Take away the fear and it would be a good internal tool for a company. However, there is no barrier to entry for competitors.
Not to mention that in those new categories anything that does sell has Android on it (if it's not Apple). And why not? Why pay the Microsoft tax if you are the OEM?
My guess is that this will make the OEMs turn to Android even more.
"Those turbo-religious types that have issues with this research aren't just against it because of embryonic destruction. I tend to hear from them about things that aren't natural and that their Lord Almighty Savior of Mighty Omniscient Omnipotence (that they sometimes refer to as God) will choose when someone should die and this research interferes with His will."
As an evangelical, I can assure you that you aren't listening or you are listening to a distinct teeny, tiny minority. And by "teeny, tiny" I mean completely insignificant.
CA has high income taxes, business taxes, and sales taxes. Wouldn't the more likely scenario be that if Prop 13 hadn't been passed that CA would have really high property taxes and high taxes in all those other areas?
Slashdot Mirror
There isn't just one type of gold standard. Fixing and maintaining an exchange rate with gold doesn't mean that you can't increase the money supply unless you have more gold. It just means that you have to maintain the value of the dollar relative to gold.
The economy isn't a zero-sum game. If someone is doing well, they usually invest the money (hopefully being put to productive use) or they exchange their money for goods and services.
The problem is frankly monetary policy. I know, I know. I'm a crazy Ron Paul-type.
Here's what I think is going on. Since we left the gold standard, the amount of money has increased by a lot. Where newly printed money hits the system first (like Wall Street for example) those people get to use the money first and get a big benefit. By the time that money trickles down to the rest of society, all those newly printed dollars mean a loss of purchasing power and the overall value of each dollar.
Almost any chart I've seen about how workers are doing worse from a variety of different sources, the point in the chart where everything goes crazy is the early 70s. 10 years prior to Reagan, but the same time Nixon took America off the gold standard.
They would actually be more valuable broken up. Windows could still do their thing. Office could support whatever platform they wanted to. Imagine a version of Office for Mac with a comparable version of Excel and Access. SQL Server on Linux boxes.
Also, I would say there is a difference between decline and not being in your high growth phase and abnormally dominant phase.
I know of no such war, at least within Christianity and Judaism. I'm no expert on Islam so I'll let them speak for themselves.
A lot of times religion was a proxy for tribal warfare. But it's more like different tribes had different religions. But it wasn't like the Irish were dying to defend papal infallibility by and large.
Yes, we've seen this before. No new content yet.
My manager at a defense contractor that used the forced ranking system wanted something akin to the IRS's EZ form. I know I'm going to get ranked Satisfactory, why do I have to wast 40 hours on this process?
Fortunately, managers were humane enough in doling out the bad rankings. If it was known an employee was retiring, that person would get the bad review.
Instead of failing to meet an objective standard, this is forced quota system.
It's been used for quite some time. Language doesn't have to be completely literal. Chill out because the term isn't going away.
http://www.iem.ac.ru/EC/images/ecgod.jpg
My guess is that the problem is on Facebook's end and Michael Stonebreaker was on to something when he critiqued Facebook's database architecture: http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/
So to compensate for some of those issues, they have to go to a more responsive UI.
When you hoard money you generally save it instead of building a Scrooge McDuck-type swimming pool. Those investments are used for loans, etc. A low savings rate is one of the main things to get us into this mess.
I wholeheartedly agree.
It is basically an internal Twitter for a company. At least for larger companies, you have upper management giving out tweets (or yams or whatever they want to call them) until they get bored with it. Low-level employees are afraid to write anything interesting out of a fear of accidentally writing something management will get upset about. So you get to see a few boring posting from upper management and that's about it.
Take away the fear and it would be a good internal tool for a company. However, there is no barrier to entry for competitors.
And that was my experience with Yammer.
How much should a pill that saves my life cost?
Not to mention that in those new categories anything that does sell has Android on it (if it's not Apple). And why not? Why pay the Microsoft tax if you are the OEM?
My guess is that this will make the OEMs turn to Android even more.
Is this a Turing Test or something?
Navies, smugglers, pirates.
I had a friend working for Anderson Consulting when Enron went down. They had nothing to do with Enron.
Ok, this wins the thread. Collect your prize.
He just wants a lair in a dormant volcano. It's OK. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Look in the mirror regarding brick walls.
"Those turbo-religious types that have issues with this research aren't just against it because of embryonic destruction. I tend to hear from them about things that aren't natural and that their Lord Almighty Savior of Mighty Omniscient Omnipotence (that they sometimes refer to as God) will choose when someone should die and this research interferes with His will."
As an evangelical, I can assure you that you aren't listening or you are listening to a distinct teeny, tiny minority. And by "teeny, tiny" I mean completely insignificant.
If you want to get money from Uncle Sam, you are going to have to do what the feds want to do.
So you have two options:
1) make the tests really comprehensive so "teaching to the test" means teaching everything
2) stop accepting federal money
CA has high income taxes, business taxes, and sales taxes. Wouldn't the more likely scenario be that if Prop 13 hadn't been passed that CA would have really high property taxes and high taxes in all those other areas?
It's such a shame that you think supply and demand is fundamental.