Slashdot Mirror


Dell Laptops Still Exploding

bl8n8r writes "It 'looked like fireworks, which would have been cool had it not been in my house.' said Doug Brown of Columbus, Ohio. Brown, a Network Administrator, called 911 last week when the Dell 9200 laptop burst into flames in his house. Emergency response units included two pumpers, a ladder truck, a bamalance, the HAZMAT unit, and a battalion chief. When Doug phoned Dell to inquire about liability, he was asked if he had insurance. It's not clear if Doug's laptop is one of the earlier models recalled by Dell; a Macbook is cited in the article for allegedly burning down a house in Australia as well as another instance of a suspect Dell laptop burning out a pickup truck in Nevada. If the burning battery issues are going to continue to be a problem, who's going to be responsible for losses? Insurance companies, Laptop makers, Battery vendors, and consumer negligence could presumably be cited in all cases."

186 comments

  1. Any word on... by sugapablo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...what MacBook model went up in flames? (He types from his MacBook.)

    1. Re:Any word on... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      ...what MacBook model went up in flames? (He types from his MacBook.)

      With the mod points investd in me, I hereby label your post flamebait!

      But I really wouldn't

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    2. Re:Any word on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. It wa a MacBook a while ago. There may have been other factors, and it is the only known case of a MacBook turning into a bomb.

    3. Re:Any word on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidentally deleted text I think. It was an older MacBook, from a while ago. It's the only case, blah, blah.

    4. Re:Any word on... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      More than one case, apparently. Traced links back here, and other posts also seem to indicate more issues than one...

      Note, this is primarily a Sony problem, not Apple. No downmods necessary. :P
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  2. Insurance by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is what insurance is for though - the unexpected. Surely general household cover would be sufficient? As a matter of interest is it common to bill the houseowner for the fire departments response?

    1. Re:Insurance by Chirs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you can make a claim to the insurance company. Next time your insurance renewal comes up, suddenly you lose the discount for having a clean record. For myself, a claim like this would probably end up costing $2000 in deductable and increased insurance rates over the next few years.

    2. Re:Insurance by Chirs · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned in reply to another post, the insurance will certainly cover it. However, the deductable and increased insurance rates for the next 5 years or so could easily be a couple thousand dollars.

      Dell and Sony are clearly negligent here...so why should the laptop owner suffer financially?

    3. Re:Insurance by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0

      Whose insurance? If I'm walking down the street and some dozy cowboy builder drops a brick on my head, he'd better have insurance, or the homeowner should - or sure as hell I'll make sure he doesn't own that home anymore. Because I shouldn't need insurance to stroll down the street and buy a loaf of bread.

      Likewise, if someone's in the business of making laptops or components of them, they should do it properly or take it on the chin. Call it a cost of doing business. Frivolous litigation is one thing (50 million dollar pants, anyone?) - but it's not this thing.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    4. Re:Insurance by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. You turn this case over to your insurers and they then recoup the losses from Dell/battery maker/etc. You don't lose out, your insurers don't lose out, and they pay. Since the insurers have no loss then your excess and rates don't go up. Least that's how it works in the UK, I suppose the US may have a very different model.

    5. Re:Insurance by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      This is what insurance is for though - the unexpected. Surely general household cover would be sufficient? As a matter of interest is it common to bill the houseowner for the fire departments response? Point 1: Even if you have insurance, the matter of liability is always something that needs to be determined. If I have total coverage on my car, I may not care if you hit me or if I hit you, but I can assure you that my insurance company does.

      Point 2: No, it isn't. Ambulance services, yes. But not "mere" fire prevention. OTOH, the homeowner does have to foot the bill for the damage to his house.
    6. Re:Insurance by slazzy · · Score: 1

      You got it - in 2003 my basement was flooded out by a storm, I discovered that the municipality was at fault, and after some arguing they re-embers\ed the insurance company for the damages and I am left with a clean no-claims insurance record.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    7. Re:Insurance by mikerubin · · Score: 1

      Billing the homeowner I think is only done if he/she were told "Do/Don't Do That".
      ie: illegal brush burns and such, not accidents, or arson. The insurance company would have to go after Dell.

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    8. Re:Insurance by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does. Apply for a new policy. You'll be asked how many claims you've made, regardless of fault. And that number will affect your premium.

    9. Re:Insurance by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Exactly. And in the print of your insurance contract, will be the clause where you agree to do everything to help the insurance company in any litigation related thereto, including as a witness, etc.

      Reasonable enough, though.

    10. Re:Insurance by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are correct. You collect from your insurance company. They pay you, and it is now their problem as to whether they can collect from Dell. If they do, it becomes Dells problem as to whether or not they can collect from Sony. This goes down the chain until someone decides the cannot collect enough money to make it worth while, or there isn't enough responsibility left to collect from the next person down the line.

    11. Re:Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point. You turn this case over to your insurers
      Why should he have insurance in the first place? Seems youre missing the point.
    12. Re:Insurance by edittard · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are correct. You collect from your insurance company. They pay you, and it is now their problem as to whether they can collect from Dell.
      No, it's your problem, since if they can't get it from Dell they'll get it from you by trebling your premiums. In fact, they'll probably treble them in any case.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    13. Re:Insurance by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      Er because unexpected things happen? Like you know, fires and stuff like that. Or do you feel that you don't need insurance because you can always blame someone and sue them instead? Insurance is to cover against the financial loss of the unexpected - if you couldn't prove where you bought this laptop from or say you got it from a yard sale then you would be SOL without insurance cover.

    14. Re:Insurance by iocat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is common to bill the homeowner for fire services. I know this from firsthand experience in San Francisco. However, they really don't seem to care if you don't pay (eg -- they didn't turn it over to collections when I didn't). I guess you could get into a lot of debate about this, whether or not taxes should cover everything (yes, IMHO, unless you're dealing with arson, in which case the arsonist shold pay, not the resident), etc.

      My position was that since the courts have held that cities don't *have* to provide fire services (you can't sue them for not showing up, for instance) it was just voluntary on their part to show up at my place in the first place, so I figured, hey, thanks guys!

      And before you start to yell at me for karmic imabalance, when a fire-hydrant broke in front of my house and, in the process of shutting off, the fire department flooded my basement, I didn't go after them, even though they admitted I could have, so I figure we're even.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    15. Re:Insurance by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0

      I need insurance to walk down the street? Why? What am I doing that can injure myself? Seems to me the people doing things that could injure me are the ones who should have the insurance? Why should a pedestrian have vehicle collision insurance?

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  3. ban laptops from planes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    if my dell explodes on a plane, is that a suicide bombing? I'm assuming that I'd be dead, of course.

    1. Re:ban laptops from planes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a terrorist. Hey, don't give them any ideas!

    2. Re:ban laptops from planes!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      if my dell explodes on a plane, is that a suicide bombing?

      It is for the laptop.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:ban laptops from planes!!! by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      They definitely should ban laptops from planes... at least, until they can develop flying bamalances.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    4. Re:ban laptops from planes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of all these motherfucking laptops on this motherfucking plane

    5. Re:ban laptops from planes!!! by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      It is now a felony offense to attempt to carry a Dell laptop onto a plane.

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
  4. A bamalance came to my house once by solevita · · Score: 1

    It was bucking bental.

    1. Re:A bamalance came to my house once by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      Just don't try the same letter switching with 'firetruck.'

      Or 'Friar Tuck.'

      Rev. Spooner could tell you.

    2. Re:A bamalance came to my house once by guitaristx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoa-oh, blackened notebook, bam-ba-lam! Whoa-oh, blackened notebook, bam-ba-lam!

      --
      I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
    3. Re:A bamalance came to my house once by corifornia · · Score: 0

      Was that Black Betty that is tuned too? If so you rule.

      --
      crap.
    4. Re:A bamalance came to my house once by thewils · · Score: 1

      Did it go bamalama-ding-dong?

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    5. Re:A bamalance came to my house once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad battery had a short, Ba-ma-lance!
      The damn thing gone *SPLORT*, Ba-ma-lance!
      Nobody got hurt, Ba-ma-lance!
      But the house burned to dirt, Ba-ma-lance!
      KA-BOOOOOOM, bad battery, Ba-ma-lance!
      KA-BOOOOOOM, bad battery, Ba-ma-lance!

  5. Editors?!? by thehickcoder · · Score: 2, Informative

    A) What is a bamalance?
    2) This is Columbus, GA not Columbus, OH.

    1. Re:Editors?!? by dollar99 · · Score: 1

      A bamalance is either an ambulance that came from Alabama, or what a 3 year old calls the truck that takes people with boo-boo's to the Hopsital. Geeze.

    2. Re:Editors?!? by cooley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There used to be this funny audio clip circulating around of a 911 call (or a comedian pretending to make one, I can't remember which) where a guy hits a deer with his car. He puts the deer into his car (he's gonna use the meat) but it soon wakes up and kicks the shit out of him. He calls 911 from a pay-phone to request a "bambalance" (the rest of the call is equally eloquent).

      That is, I *hope* the guy is alluding to the old clip, and not seriously trying to spell "ambulance". It's possible, though, that in regards to your post above "2" answers "a"....

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    3. Re:Editors?!? by aquabat · · Score: 1

      A) What is a bamalance? "bamalance" is a slang term that refers to a bomb or hazardous material disposal truck. It looks a bit like a cross between an ambulance and an armoured car. The "bam" in "bamalance" refers to the explosive properties of a bomb being disposed of, i.e. the laptop.
      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    4. Re:Editors?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear editors,

      actually the emergency response units included... ...two plumbers, an adder truck, a bamboo lance, a fuzz mat unit and a ... ahh forget it, I really wonder how you could get that wrong.

      *ducks*

      *...and goes to bed*

    5. Re:Editors?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is a scene from the movie tommy boy

    6. Re:Editors?!? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

      You mean this one ...

    7. Re:Editors?!? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "bamalance" is a slang term that refers to a bomb or hazardous material disposal truck. It looks a bit like a cross between an ambulance and an armoured car. The "bam" in "bamalance" refers to the explosive properties of a bomb being disposed of, i.e. the laptop. You must be good at Balderdash.

      The linked page correctly spelled it as "an ambulance".
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Editors?!? by haakondahl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now I know what the rock band Ram Jam was saying.
      Whoo-oa black betty, bamalance!
      Who-ooo-oa black betty ba,alance!
      [repeats a lot]

      --
      Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    9. Re:Editors?!? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Misinterpreting song lyrics, spoken word or other language (fer chrissakes I think there's a TV game show about it now, that's how low TV has sunk) is called a mondegreen.

      This explains it better than I can: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondegreen

    10. Re:Editors?!? by lems1 · · Score: 1

      Youtube works for everybody...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stIL4I64TNo

      --
      This sig can be distributed under the LGPL license
    11. Re:Editors?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the editors of the article are confused, not slashdot. A link on the site says, "Ohio Man's Dell Laptop Bursts into Flames". But the article itself says "Georgia Man's Dell Laptop Bursts into Flames".

  6. What in the world is a bamalance? by A+non-mouse+Coward · · Score: 1

    Emergency response units included two pumpers, a ladder truck, a bamalance ... I tried to think of something funny to say here, but I was stumped ... and then I wondered "is this one of those things that seems so nonsensical that it was intended to be called something so irrational?" Then I read the article. Nope, it's just dyslexic fingers at the keyboard-- another day at Slashdot. ;)
    --
    libertarian: (n) socially liberal, financially conservative; neither left, nor right.
  7. 'bamalance"?! by solafide · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want a ride in an bamalance, myself, I'll happily have my laptop explode to get a ride.

    1. Re:'bamalance"?! by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Only in the world of the good Dr. Seuss may you ride in the bambulance.

      --
      The game.
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. It wasn't the battery by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    It's obvious the user here was overclocking his laptop.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. Re:Insurance - not the question by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

    insurance not the issue, liability is. anyway, silly of guy to call Dell and ask. You get a lawyer and you sue their incompetent labtop-firebomb building asses.

  11. Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Batteries (you know, those little packages of reactive chemicals?) have been bursting into flames ever since they were invented.

    In TFA it cites a couple of modern examples. How many laptop batteries are out there?

    Hardly a plague of battery burnin's.

    Reminds me of SARS -- you remember, that disease that killed a couple hundred people in 2003 -- which basically shut down Asia for 6 months. Everyone suddenly forgot that the regular old "flu" kills 100,000 people every single year.

    If we're gonna panic about "things that cause fatal fires" I'd be stomping on cigarette manufacturers before I went after the company that didn't even make the battery that caught on fire.

    Cue 200+ comments to the tune of "I used to trust Dell but now..."

    Can we get a new tune up in here?

    1. Re:Burst into flames != explode by ookabooka · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your logic is flawed. I certainly expect a cigarette to cause a fire, so I'm not about to leave a lit one sitting on my desk full of papers. However, I'd think it would be perfectly reasonable to let my laptop sit next to some papers. Basically, Dell's laptops have an interesting tendency to spontaneously combust. . .it's not a freak accident, and not something that all laptops do. That is the reason that this is getting so much attention, no laptop should emit a small fireworks show and then burst into flames spewing all sorts of nasty chemical fumes. . .

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:Burst into flames != explode by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      They don't explode they "vent with flame".
      The problem is that as battery density gets higher the danger from a failure gets higher. Put a dead short accros a D cell and it is no big deal. Put one across a LiION without a protection circuit and it is a big deal.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 1

      >>The problem is that as battery density gets higher the danger from a failure gets higher.

      Exactly correct. The problem is inherent in the technology.

      Couple that with trying to squeeze that battery into a poorly ventilated laptop interior (where you also gotta fit your DVD drive, your CPU, etc. etc.) and you would think we'd see these things going off like bombs every week!

      The fact that we don't is what I'm talking about...

    4. Re:Burst into flames != explode by blhack · · Score: 1

      I think that the reason that SARS only killed a couple of hundred people was that Asia got shut down for 6 months. The point was to keep the number a couple of hundred, instead of having it get to the 100,000 a year that the flu kills.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 1

      >>Your logic is flawed. I certainly expect a cigarette to cause a fire, [but not a battery]

      Your science is flawed. I certainly expect high-density batteries to cause fires. Both because they have and also because of simple, general, chemical principles, the kind we should all have learned in high school.

      The question then becomes how many fires, and what I am saying is that the numbers are currently way too low for any conclusion besides that the technology has been, historically, extremely and almost flawlessly handled by the entire industry.

    6. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 1

      >>I think that the reason that SARS only killed a couple of hundred people was that Asia got shut down for 6 months.

      Not correct, but revealing that this is what you think. Revealing in a "one more example of what I am saying about hype" kind of way.

      SARS only killed a couple of hundred because it was WAY HARDER to get SARS from another person that it is to get the yearly 'flu.

      SARS managed the trick of being fatal (like the flu) but didn't manage the trick of being horribly infectious (unlike the 'flu, which is).

    7. Re:Burst into flames != explode by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      Oh I know that laptops use harsh chemicals that can causes these fires (lithium is one interesting bugger), but then again, would you expect a car to spontaneously combust? I mean. . all that gasoline which everyone knows is flammable. My point was that it isn't unreasonable to assume that a laptop WILL NOT spontaneously ignite. Even though it certainly has the potential I think a consumer can realistically assume that there are enough safeguards in effect to make it virtually impossible. I don't know the figures for how many laptops have ignited, but if it is higher than the chances of my car/tv/cellphone spontaneously igniting then I think it's a problem.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    8. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Draek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Batteries (you know, those little packages of reactive chemicals?) have been bursting into flames ever since they were invented.

      which is another reason to use Sony's sugar-powered batteries. If the thing bursts into flames, at least you'll get a nice dose of caramel =D

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    9. Re:Burst into flames != explode by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Yes, high-capacity batteries can fail.

      But AFAIK, I have yet to hear about any catastrophic failures of HP/Compaq laptop batteries. If the Dell/Apple/etc. battery fireworks were random catastrophic failures, I would expect failure count for each manufacturer to be roughly proportional to market share... but the failures are centered around specific product runs from select manufacturers, which hints at production problems in some specific Li-ion production runs at specific production plants in more-or-less specific calendar windows.

      If each fire was an isolated and evenly distributed event, it would be written off as a product of aging. When catastrophic failures appear to affect specific products, there is reason to investigate whether or not there has been anomalous production defects or QA failure and issue a recall order to avoid major liability if more failures are to be expected.

      The battery recalls may sound alarmist but these recalls most likely happened because detailed analysis/dissection of battery samples from the to-be-recalled battery runs revealed production anomalies or unexpected degradation that explain why these batteries failed and hint that many more batteries from these runs will fail catastrophically if given enough time. Companies generally do not order recalls unless they expect massive PR backlash and extremely expensive class-action suits if they do any less.

    10. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's something all laptops have the ability to do. Do some research.

      High capacity batteries all have that capability if not charged/operated correctly.

    11. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 1

      >>would you expect a car to spontaneously combust?

      Ah, you know they do, right?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto

      Actually the analogy with the Ford Pinto is pretty exact. Read the "Safety Problems" part of that wikipedia page.

    12. Re:Burst into flames != explode by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      The pinto didn't explode under normal use but instead had a a low tolerance during a (rear-end) crash. If I fling my laptop at the wall I'd be much less surprised if it burst into flames. A more correct analogy would be a car that bursts into flames under normal use.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    13. Re:Burst into flames != explode by Howzer · · Score: 1

      Surviving minor rear-end accidents (the most common kind) without exploding is "normal use" for any definitions of the words "normal" and "use".

      Read elsewhere about even the smallest drop -- the kind your laptop would "survive" (you might even call that "normal use") -- predisposing batteries to fire.

      I'm still happy with the analogy... but remember you suggested it! :)

    14. Re:Burst into flames != explode by identity0 · · Score: 1

      ...and that was found out after the whole scare was over. Have you ever thought of decision-making with unknown variables?

      Christ, I suppose you think shutting down air traffic on 9/11/01 was stupid because there turned out to be no more hijacked planes?

  12. Does the TSA still let Dell laptops on planes? by RichMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    seriously, it looks like they are more of a proven hazard than water

    1. Re:Does the TSA still let Dell laptops on planes? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      We only ban things poor people can afford.

    2. Re:Does the TSA still let Dell laptops on planes? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Ouch, mod parent up for being so terribly right.

    3. Re:Does the TSA still let Dell laptops on planes? by bentcd · · Score: 1

      We only ban things poor people can afford. I'm pretty sure nukes are banned . . .
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
  13. Concerned... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    I just ordered a Dell Vostro 1500. My previous notebook was also a Dell and I was mailed a new battery as a part of a recall. I was under the impression that the problem had been addressed but now I'm concerned that I might have to wear a bomb proof suit while reading Slashdot from the comfort of my patio ;)

    1. Re:Concerned... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're not already wearing asbestos underwear while reading /., you're not doing it right.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Concerned... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Really, there isn't enough detail whether he had a recalled battery or not. A lot of people probably were not aware of the Sony battery recall (The batteries Dell recalled were all made by Sony.)

      The article claims it was a 9200. That model is now three generations old. The 9000 series went in numeric order as time went by - 9200, 9300, 9400, ????. 9400 (aka E1705) was the previous generation.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  14. Down South ... by wsanders · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... a 'Bamalance is a pickup truck, a 3 x 6 foot piece of plywood, two EMT's named Jethro, and a bottle of moonshine for antiseptic AND anaesthetic.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Down South ... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      and a bottle of moonshine for antiseptic AND anaesthetic.

      Funny thing is, there are groups (UN? Red Cross?) that send out Moonshine kits for that very reason.

  15. Anecdote by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

    I have a Dell Latitude D810 and when I'm playing Warcraft if I don't limit the CPU speed to 1.6Ghz or lower the CPU temp climbs to 190F (according to gnome's CPU temp monitor).
    I think this is a combination of the heat produced by the CPU and the ATI GPU, cause it doesn't get so hot when I'm not doing 3D graphics.
    The nice thing is, WoW runs pretty well at very low CPU speeds. As long as I'm not trying to run around Shattrath I can limit it to 1.06Ghz with no problems.

    (ATI x600 GPU and a 2.13Ghz Pentium M CPU)

    1. Re:Anecdote by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell Latitude D810 and when I'm playing Warcraft if I don't limit the CPU speed to 1.6Ghz or lower the CPU temp climbs to 190F (according to gnome's CPU temp monitor).
      I think this is a combination of the heat produced by the CPU and the ATI GPU, cause it doesn't get so hot when I'm not doing 3D graphics.

      That doesn't matter, dude. The CPU is made of sand. Sand won't burn no matter how hot it gets. In fact, some people use sand to put out fires. This problem is related to the batteries.

      On the other hand, I wonder how much heat from the CPU makes it to the batteries. The heat sink is usually fairly close to the battery comparment, with the exhause air port usually begin in the back (where most batteries are).
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Two things to prevent overheating on your Dell laptop.

      1 (easy) Make sure that the rubber feet have not fallen off. If they have, replace them. Don't use your machine on a soft surface - make sure there is adequate ventilation on the underneath.

      2 (more difficult). Clean out the heat exchanger. Here's how. Turn machine upside down. Remove battery and ac adapter. Remove all screws underneath. Turn machine right way up. Flip off keyboard bezel. Remove keyboard. Remove lid assembly (take care unplugging antenna cables). Remove palm rest. Remove processor heatsink (don't handle copper bit). Clean out any fluff. Reverse procedure for re-assembly. Don't over-tignten screws.

    3. Re:Anecdote by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Of course sand burns. Burning is just the chemical reaction of a material and oxygen. S+)2=SO2. Sand is used to put out fires by smothering it- physically preventing O2 from reaching the hot material.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Anecdote by Arterion · · Score: 1

      In addition to this, I think one of those little USB fan mini-desk things wouldn't be a bad idea. It would keep the laptop on a flat surface at all times, and help it with ventilation.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    5. Re:Anecdote by cnettel · · Score: 1

      You forgot the part where sand is already SO2. (But, true, not all silicon in a chip is oxidized, so the problem in the original post was the assumption that a chip is sand or quartz. But I would dobut that the die itself will burn well compared to the thermal paste or just about anything else.)

    6. Re:Anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CPU is made of^H^Hfrom sand.

      There, fixed that for you. It's actually been reduced from sand to elemental silicon.
      The CPU substrate and many of the circuit layers are made from crystalline silicon. That crystalline silicon is then doped with specific impurities to give it specific semi-conductive capabilities.

      So CPUs do burn... and turn into sand.

    7. Re:Anecdote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S is sulfur. Sulfur and oxygen do indeed combine to form interesting things. Sulfuric Acid is H2SO4. Si is silicon and I think you meant SiO2.

      This message brought to you by the Chemistry Nazis

  16. Let's be CLEAR on this by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all about the Sony batteries. It's misleading to say "Dell" or "Macbook." They (and many other makers) are using Sony batteries.

    1. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's be CLEAR. I mean, it can't be that the laptop drew too much current, or that the charger malfunctioned, or a thousand other things that can cause any battery to catch fire. And it's certainly not Dell's fault for not putting some safety circuitry in the system to shut down when the temperature started to go up. It's IMPERATIVE that we place blame solely on Sony even though there were likely dozens of factors, any one of which could have prevented the fire if were modified. After all Sony is the devil.

    2. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by arivanov · · Score: 1

      It is not just Sony it is the technology itself. It is inherently dangerous and all manufacturers so far have had recalls and safety incidents. Sony is simply the biggest manufacturer of Li-polymer cells so we get to hear about it most.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for confirming my point. Objective analysis not required. Prejudicial judgments are always better around here.

    4. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So in effect they outsourced their battery production to Sony. They're still responsible for the final product and they have chosen to continue using Sony batteries after several have exploded.

      I don't recall people having much patience for companies whose games used particularly bad DRM made by other companies, I think this falls in the same category. Similarly, If x outsources their tech support to shitty company y (to reduce costs), people will still blame x for providing shitty tech support.

      That said, the vast majority of these Dell and Macbook batteries have not exploded.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    5. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Compounding this, most /. editors and readers hate Sony (with good reason), so any time they fuck up in any department (except maybe games), you can expect to see it on the front page.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    6. Re:Let's be CLEAR on this by Mundocani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're right that there could be many causes, but given the problems in the recent past with Sony's batteries (the problem of them having metal fragments in them causing internal shorts and subsequent flame-outs), I don't think it's too much of a stretch to start out assuming the battery might be the source of the problem.

      Would over-temperature detection/shutoff prevent those shorts from destroying the battery, or is it a purely internal thing such that it would continue even if you took the battery out once it started to heat up?

  17. All I can say is... by Ub3rT3Rr0R1St · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank God no one actually had them on their lap.

    1. Re:All I can say is... by dryueh · · Score: 1
      Actually, most manufacturers, as far as I know, no longer refer to them as "laptops." "Notebooks" are the new tag for the computers that formerly sat on one's lap. I believe the change in name is to actually discourage users from using the notebooks on one's legs b/c of heat issues.

      I mean, notebooks today have a tendency to get H-O-T. Also explode.

    2. Re:All I can say is... by dryueh · · Score: 1

      No laptops for sale here.

      I got paranoid and had to take a look. You'll see, from the linked page, that Dell no longer sells laptops. Lawsuit avoided!

    3. Re:All I can say is... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      They have Linux laptops though.

      OMG, it's a plot to kill all Linux users! Quick, tell everyone you know before it's too laaaarrrghhh, my legs!

    4. Re:All I can say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently Laptop Batteries are the new Thermite or now made of thermite...


      I got a a box of harddrives I want to destroy in a totally secure way. How 'bout a two foot tall beowolf cluster of those Dell Laptops?
  18. Fragmented Drives Contributing to the Overheat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A client of mine asked me to fix his Dell laptop, which was overheating and shutting down to fix the problem. This was before the exploding batteries were in the news.

    First of all DO NOT turn off the automatic shut down of the laptop when the processor reaches a certain temperature to fix this problem.

    Deleting enough off the drive to defragment it fixed the issue and it stopped overheating. First I had to put the laptop on a metal barbeque frame so it would be cool enough and stay on long enough to defragment it.

    Kind of a scary task for your boss to give you now that I think about it... but this was months before it was on the news. I don't know if this is the same issue exactly but I wanted to bring it up.

    1. Re:Fragmented Drives Contributing to the Overheat? by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      Good point... And 7200rpm 2.5" HDs definitely put out more heat than 4200 or 5400rpm ones.

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    2. Re:Fragmented Drives Contributing to the Overheat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I bet the drive is fragmented *after* the laptop has exploded.....

    3. Re:Fragmented Drives Contributing to the Overheat? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Its a laptop - you could have just stuck the whole thing in the fridge and let it run for a couple of hours next to all the lunches you coworkers brought in and abandonned if excess heat was keeping it from defragging.

    4. Re:Fragmented Drives Contributing to the Overheat? by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd be willing to bet it has more to do with the fan optimization then the 7200 drive. Granted, they produce more heat, but the cooling system in the laptop should be able to tolerate it.

      This fellow has written some decent, small footprint software that lets a user directly manage the fans and Intel Speedstep settings on many Dell laptop models. Anyone using a Dell laptop that gets a bit warm should check it out.

      http://www.diefer.de/i8kfan/index.html

  19. just sue 'em... by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    If the burning battery issues are going to continue to be a problem, who's going to be responsible for losses? Insurance companies, Laptop makers, Battery vendors, and consumer negligence could presumably be cited in all cases.
    In these cases, it seems it would be an easy lawsuit. I would personally refuse to have my own insurance cover it as it is so clearly a product defect. And since both Dell and the battery manufacturers (Sony? Sanyo ? etc) all have deep pockets, it doesn't matter so much who to sue. Mind you, I'm not talking about a big suit, unless there were really serious damages ( I doubt it would ever go to trial, as long as the request for settlement was reasonable... In fact, I would ask (nicely but firmly) for a reasonable amount from Dell first, before taking real legal proceedings...
    1. Re:just sue 'em... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Why bother having insurance then?

      If it were me, I'd file a claim with my insurance company, and then let them go after Dell/Sony/Whoever. The whole point of having insurance is to insulate you from the expense (both monetary and temporal) of dealing with unfortunate mishaps like this.

      Believe me. The insurance company isn't going to foot the bill for your claim if somebody else is responsible. They'll fight the battle. And since you're paying them to do that, why would you do it yourself?

    2. Re:just sue 'em... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you let your insurance company handle it, you have now filed a claim, so your rates will go up, or they may drop you. The insurance company will happily reimburse you for the laptop, then sue Dell or Sony or somebody and collect from them, then raise your rates or drop you and due to the claim on your file you will have a hard time finding a reasonably priced policy now.
      Insurance is not for small piddly things. Insurance is for catastrophes where the risk of getting dropped afterwards is eclipsed by the cost of the claim.
      It probably didn't start out this way, but insurance companies pretty much are giving us the "don't file a claim" price. In other words, they will charge us X, but with the understanding that they won't actually cover any claims, or will drop us if we make one. Oh, you want to actually be covered in case of accidents? Well, that price is 3X.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:just sue 'em... by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      As other posters have pointed out, your rates go up and so on. The problem is that if the insurance company does recover their losses (and trust me, they have armies of lawyers to ensure they do), you don't see a dime of that money. So, in addition to the fact that it's "unfair" that you've got a higher insurance rate because Dell made a defective product, the insurance company is now getting money from both parties--you and Dell.

      Real fair, huh???

      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    4. Re:just sue 'em... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's fine when the only thing that got damaged was the laptop. When there is a serious amount of property damage, are you really going to wait for the outcome of a lawsuit to, say, rebuild your home?

    5. Re:just sue 'em... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well, no, that would be catastrophic enough to involve the insurance company.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:just sue 'em... by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      I assume that the situation you describe is in the US, mainly because outside of car insurance, I have not seen an insurance policy rise after a claim has been made against it, both personally and anecdotally. I seems that if insurance companies are not having to pay for small items (well items whose replacement value is greater than any excess you may be required to pay) then their cover is pretty much worthless.

      The amount you spend on contents insurance is typically enough that you cover the any one claim in a given number of years, so if you don't ever claim for items that are damaged or stolen you may as well just bank the premiums yourself. Obviously buildings insurance is a different matter you wont pay out the value of your home in insurance premiums in the 60 odd years you are likely to own it, and vehicle insurance is mandatory (at least for third party cover).

      In fact far from seeing premiums rise over a period in which claims have been made I have seen them reduce, not to mention the fact that things like travel insurance are practically free (although the cover does vary significantly). The only elements that I have seen to have an impact on premiums are environmental (living on a flood plain or on ground that has been undermined) or social (living in an area with a high burglary rate for example.). I have never heard of someone being either dropped or refused cover based on the claims that they have made (again other than with regard to vehicle insurance), I have only ever seen companies refuse to cover specific items (designer sunglasses and mobile phones for example) where the risk is deemed too high.

      Given that it is generally the same companies in the UK and in the US I wonder if the difference in approach is due to regulation, the (perceived from a UK point of view) litigious nature of the US or simply a rumour spread by insurers to reduce claims.

      Its interesting because when I was about 20 I tried to get insurance for a large amount of high value equipment that I had responsibility for but that didn't belong to me, total value of about 4k (GBP) the crux was that I had to move it around a lot and of course it was more likely to be held somewhere less secure than my home.

      I couldn't get 4k's worth of insurance and had to settle for 20k's worth of insurance, legal cover (something ridiculous like 10 million), and a large number f other bonuses (the only one I ever made use of was a discount at a national retailer..). All of that for less than the cost of replacing the cheapest piece of kit I had to insure over the 4 year period I had it.

      In short there is so much competition that the insurers seem to really try hard to get custom, including little (and fairly valueless) enticements and grander than required sounding policies, Hell I cant get contents insurance that covers less than 60k with my building cover, and that's more than 3 times the value of everything I own, in fact its more than the rebuild cost of my house (although not its market value, and that is obviously covered by my buildings insurance anyway)

  20. Insurance by HPNpilot · · Score: 1

    If you have fire insurance (homeowner's or renter's) then they should cover the laptop and any damage to your house or other belongings, subject to the deductible. The insurance company may go after (subrogate) Dell.

    Most companies play hardball and tell you to get lost, the only thing you can do is sue them, and then they will complain about people suing them. As they say, shit happens, but if it turns out the manufacturer knew, or reasonably should have known, that the batteries pose an undue hazard, they may be held liable in court. In the USA, there is basicly no more consumer protection so you are on your own. Some other countries (and a few states) will hold the manufacturer's toes to the fire (so to speak) so they may act a little more responsibly.

    IANAL and all that craziness.

  21. Huh? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Consumer negligence? How is the consumer negligent if these guys keep manufacturing batteries that go supernova? I own a low-end HP laptop, and it can get incredibly hot as well. It now has to be sent in for servicing, I suspect that the temperature eventually fried the board. It's under warranty for another couple of months, but I have to fork out over $200 for a year's extended warranty on it. For those kinds of prices, I ought to be leasing them. The growing popularity of laptops have made the manufacturers lazy. They're cutting corners, producing substandard products that are not only more prone to failure, but may very well be dangerous. They'll argue "We're trying to keep the prices down", but that's the same argument Mattel uses for using substandard Chinese factories to produce toys that can potentially poison millions of children. Frankly, I think the time has come to seriously bone-up consumer protection laws. Massive fines, the industry paying for government inspections, and the like. Manufacturers have proven incapable or unwilling to adequately protect the consumer, and we should start nailing their bottom lines severely, so that the fucking shareholders, who seem eager to profit from the crap their companies produce, aren't feeling more directly the pain. Fining Dell or Apple a few hundred million dollars the first time, and then quadruple the second time, will probably raise the price of laptops, but at least we won't be sent out overheating crap.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Huh? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Aren't MacBooks already "more expensive"?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Huh? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      When you drop a LiPo battery you are supposed to stop using it. I wonder just how many people do that?

      I bet... none.

      That's called "Consumer Negligence".

      Same with charging laptops buried int the blankets on your bed or immediately after retreiving it from the car where the temp was 140 deg... the list goes on and on and on.

      LiPo's and older Li-Ion batteries are SO amazingly unstable outside a very VERY narrow range of temps and charge states not to mention physically "fragile", they probably really shouldn't be allowed to be used by a "consumer" at all...

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  22. Re:Not just a macbook by bkr1_2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually the enclosures were designed to specifically take the heat away from the components to a [metal] frame that had a larger surface area. It felt hotter to the user but kept the components inside cooler than a plastic case would have.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  23. NiMH batteries, anybody? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    all the flameout issues are with lithium ion batteries.

    it may just be that we can't manufacture these things more than one at a time with the care required to keep all that energy density safely in the case.

    it happened to Edison, too... only I think it was something like an iron/sulfur battery they couldn't make more than one of.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  24. I hate to nitpick but- by shinehead · · Score: 1

    This happened in Columbus, GA. Not Ohio.

    1. Re:I hate to nitpick but- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you hate to..

      why did you.

      your comment adds nothing useful. you hate to do it. but you did it.

      you have some serious self control problems there. i suggest you seek professional help. you are obviously unstable if you are doing things you 'hate' when there is no reward.

      either that or just admit that you are an asshole and finding some stupid little way to correct people is how you get your kicks.

    2. Re:I hate to nitpick but- by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a important detail! ;) Evidently even the submitter did not RTFA!

      --

      Gorkman

  25. Just because Dell didn't make the battery by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because Dell didn't make the battery, doesn't mean they're not liable. Dell sold him a complete unit, which came with the battery in question (assuming he wasn't using a replacement battery, DNRFTA). Continuing the bad car analogies that roam the savage wastelands of Slashdot: if you bought a used car, under warranty, from a dealer, and a part broke that just happened to be a third-party part (happens often on used cars), would you be ok with the dealer telling you you're SOL? Yeah, I didn't think so.

    1. Re:Just because Dell didn't make the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But would you go around blaming the vendor saying things like "cars made by Toyota (or whoever) crap out"?

  26. Batteries are bombs in disguise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday a laptop is going to take a plane out. I hope I am not on it when it happens.

    1. Re:Batteries are bombs in disguise by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It already happened. Luckily, so far the airplanes have all been successfully landed despite the fire or had not taken off yet when the batteries caught fire.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  27. HAHAHAH!!! by obry2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's gotta be the funniest news title I've seen in a while... Dell Laptops Still Exploding.... hahahaha - that made my day :-P

  28. Re:Insurance - not the question by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Moon Crater, Afghanistan - Izur Abdul Bagdahallahabada carefully plugs in his newest incendiary device; a Dell 9200 laptop.

    "By the will of Allah, the infidels have provided the means of their own destruction." Bagdahallahabada says. "We must be careful, of course, that it does not burn down our own houses." he cautions. "My brother, may Allah give him dozens of greased up virgins in heaven, was using a Macbook, and it sent him, his son and a funny little fellow with half a nose flying."

    All over Afghanistan, crappy Dell laptops are being found, replacing chemical explosives and home-made gas bombs as the prime way to kill NATO forces. And it's getting worse, as this new, all-too-frightening technology is exported abroad. Just last week, three Iraqi politicians had their penises fried off when their Dell's overheated.

    "We like to install WoW on them." Bagdahallahabada explains. "We give it the infidel soldiers, who play these gay, decadent fantasy characters. We wait in the bushes, and kaboom!"

    NATO's current head of Afghan operations, Major General Sir Wilfred Ruck-sticks-oxbatten has seen it all too often. "We were enjoying a little porn at my command post, and the Mac laptop just exploded, sending shrapnel in all directions and burning off my bleedin' moustache. The chaps back in Edinborough claim they saw spikes on their seismometers.

    Indeed, exploding Dell laptops are causing another problem. The countless number of explosions are making tracking earthquakes nearly impossible. "We had a tech convention in San Francisco last week." said Dr. Bob Underwear, USGS scientist. "Christ, we thought the whole San Andreas fault was making a bee-line for Anchorage. One of my colleagues actually shit his pants, all because seventeen Dells tried to render a 3d graph in realtime."

    What the ultimate solution cannot be told. But Mr. Bagdahallahabada clearly feels there's no rush. "When all the world converts to Islam, then we'll make sure they buy HP."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  29. Bama Lance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bama Lance looks too young to be an emergency responder. http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us er.viewprofile&friendid=22573117

  30. You're joking, of course, but ... by schnipschnap · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:You're joking, of course, but ... by MikePlacid · · Score: 1

      This is 2006 article. But I definetely feel uncomfortable seeing so much laptops on each flight I take. Doubt that laptops will be banned though - what such a move would do to business travelers?

  31. A particular issue with MacBook sleep problems by THotze · · Score: 1

    This seems to be even more of a pointed issue considering the number of MacBooks that may still have problems with waking up from sleep when the MacBook is still closed.

    I don't know how many people that have MacBooks still have this issue, but I really suspect that I'm not the only one. I've got an earlier MacBook, but bought it form an Apple Store in August of last year, so its really not one of the 1st ones off the assembly line.

    Periodically, the MB will wake up and stay on while closed and in say, my bag or out on the desk, etc. etc. - enough that, based on battery drain, its got to be awake at least 1/2 the time that the MB is closed. Needless to say, this makes the MB (and everything around it) hot. I can easily see how if the MB is in a backpack or other carrying device, it could easily overheat - and thus make any battery fire issues that much more likely.

    Issues like this one - and inadequate airflow, heat dissipation issues - etc. aren't just nuisances or cosmetic given these battery issues.

    Tim

  32. I know who should pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The batteries were marked with the CE and UL logos right? These leeches on society should pay.

  33. iraq... by markowen58 · · Score: 1

    could these batteries be used as a weapon in Iraq?

  34. insurance co lawyers will be more experienced too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The insurance company lawyers are also likely to be a lot more experienced at this type of liability litigation than any you can find unless you can turn it into a class-action suit.

  35. Simple question by Zatchmort · · Score: 1

    Ok, there's something wrong with this picture. Here the guy's laptop is on fire, in the middle of his floor. He calls in 2 fire trucks, a HAZMAT team, and I forget what else. Now he said in TFA that the 911 guys overreacted, but still. Why on EARTH would he not just put it out himself, rather than calling 911? Heck, even if he didn't have an extinguisher... you beat it out with a blanket, or something. I guarantee that's less damage than the firemen will do to your house...

    1. Re:Simple question by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Because the Lithium Ion battery contains... HAZardous MATerials?

    2. Re:Simple question by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      Why? Because everyone in the United States is now trained to first call for emergency help, then to try to put out the fire only if you feel safe. I think it was a good concept gone awry. I've seen my share of household fires over the past 20 years, and either I or my wife have extinguished them by ourselves.

      1)Toaster fire a la [popular frosted toaster pastry] - extinguised with a cup of flour.
      2)Oven fire due to grease in a broiler pan - extinguished with LOTS of flour and a blanket.
      3) Microwave fire (One of the kids forgot about the "no metal rule"--I was in the bath, and at first thought they only burned some popcorn. When they opened the microwave door to put out the fire, being fueled with ample oxygen, it took off!) - I got to this one in a nick of time, and put it out by smothering the burning item with a wet hand towel after I sent one of the kids to trip the breaker.
      4) AC Adapter brick - this one was absolutely the worst. An AC adapter brick overheated, melted, and caught fire. It dripped burning plastic onto the floor, burning the linoleum in spots, and it caught surrounding materials on fire. My wife, after evacuating the kids from the house (those who were not in school), ran back in and started attacking the fire with everything she could find. Afterwards, she called me, not the fire department. While quite annoyed with her risk-taking at the time, she did save the house.

      Perhaps we've had worse luck than most regarding fire, but I'm thankful all ended well. So, yes, the laptop owner probably could have put out the fire, but courage to act in situations like that comes from being prepared and keeping a level head. I've heard too many stories of people who attempted to put out fires that should not have done so (using water on a grease fire, for example, or shooting a small extinguisher directly into a burning wastecan, sending flaming embers flying about the room). For this guy, calling 9-1-1 was probably a good call, even if their response (like this post) was overkill.

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    3. Re:Simple question by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      dude, where do you live, so I can avoid you at all costs!

    4. Re:Simple question by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should stock up on fire extinguishers... they're a little more expensive but a C-class (chemical/metal fires) would have made short work of the power brick fire or pretty much any other household fire. (A-class is usually water-based, sometimes with a foaming agent for wood/paper fires and B-class is typically CO2-based for grease fires. Both of these should be avoided against metallic fires since some burn hot enough to strip oxygen from water and CO2... speaking of batteries, lithium spontaneously ignites in the presence of water.)

    5. Re:Simple question by Z80xxc! · · Score: 1

      Well, I actually don't think he was over-reacting by calling 911. He should have gotten a fire extinguisher, put it out himself, and still called 911, just to be safe. I assume nothing other than the laptop was burning...

      I do think the FD over-reacted. They NEVER send a bamalance around here unless it's really, really a bad incident. One engine should've sufficed; a HAZMAT unit was definitely overkill. Around here, a batallion chief seems to show up at everything, I guess they'd have nothing to do otherwise. Maybe the firefighters were bored.

    6. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee that's less damage than the firemen will do to your house
      I can't speak for other departments, but in ours we're trained NOT to damage people's property unless absolutely necessary. Firefighters sometimes get worked up on adrenaline during an emergency and forget to do the obvious--like trying the door handle before chopping through the door with an axe. But good training is the remedy for that.

      As for the "overreaction," the guy called 911. It appears that the 911 dispatcher or one of the responders called in the extra help. And it looks perfectly reasonable to me. I'd definitely prefer to show up with too many responders on scene than the other way around, in case the little bitty fire turns into a raging inferno. The firefighters were there (obviously) to fight the fire. The ambulance (bamalance?) was there in case there were any injuries. The batallion chief was probably acting as Incident Commander, to coordinate the overall response and make sure none of the responders got killed because the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. All perfectly reasonable.

      The only part that seems a little odd is the HAZMAT team. Two points come to mind here:

      1. Fires in electronic equipment can produce nasty fumes and residues that ordinary firefighters are not trained to clean up (once the fire is out), and
      2. Methamphetamine labs are everywhere now, and firefighters are trained to be very, very careful around them. HAZMAT teams are part of the standard response to a meth lab. A lot of meth lab calls come from stupid meth cooks who've just caught their kitchen on fire and call 911 saying "my computer exploded" or some such excuse. And lithium is an ingredient in meth production (guess where they get it). So if the dispatcher heard "lithium" she (or he) might have erred on the side of caution and called HAZMAT thinking it was a meth lab. But in this case, law enforcement would have responded as well, and the story doesn't say whether they did or not.
    7. Re:Simple question by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Around here, a batallion chief seems to show up at everything, I guess they'd have nothing to do otherwise. Maybe the firefighters were bored. They were probably so excited about finally getting a /genuine/ fire they sent in all they had just for the hell of it. The chief might have come along just to reminisce about the one time when he, too, was called out to what actually /was/ a real fire :-)
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    8. Re:Simple question by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      A candle caught some wrapping paper on fire under the Christmas tree. Christmas trees are like gasoline when the have been up a few weeks, especially in S. California. No time for 911. Hit it with a fire extinguisher before the tree caught. A few seconds more and the whole house would have burned down.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  36. I spent some time at a Toshiba Call Center... by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    ...and we were instructed during training to *never* refer to them as Laptops, only as Notebooks, for just that issue: Toshibas tend to run hot, and the result is anything from a sweaty leg to threats of legal actions due to near-burns.

    1. Re:I spent some time at a Toshiba Call Center... by jombeewoof · · Score: 1

      I have a Toshiba laptop, and quite frequently it is on my lap.
      I've noticed that it does get a bit hot at times, but never hot enough to cause discomfort...

      well maybe after several hours, but if I'm staring at that screen for that long it's usually my eyes that hurt more than my legs.

      My laptop is usually in its intended position, right on my lap. Just like my desktop is usually on or near my desk.

      A notebook just doesn't sound right. I'll never call my computer a notebook.

      --
      Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
  37. Longing for the good old days by eneville · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a laptop that is safe to use on the lap? I think I may have posted an 'ask slashdot' some time ago asking for opinions on laptops that operate suitably cool. Back in the day I used a Compaq 6400, but the screen broke. What I'm after is something that operates relatively cold, has a good battery life, and doesn't make much noise. This would make an ideal travel companion (for when I finally get my passport that is). I'm not that bothered about how much RAM/HDD/MHz, just enough to run OOo/gvim/perl/ff2 etc.

    1. Re:Longing for the good old days by cnettel · · Score: 1

      Undervolting, underclocking both CPU and GPU, and ideally a SSD (or 4,200 or MAYBE 5,400 RPM drive) would go a long way. A metal case would probably be best as well. Yeah, you're conducting the heat more, but you're also increasing the surface area. Considering what these things together will do to the total power used (down far below 20 W, more like 10 if you dim the light enough), I think most modern machines would do.

    2. Re:Longing for the good old days by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

      Check out Itronix. They seem to be fairly safe and run nice and cool.

      --
      Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
    3. Re:Longing for the good old days by budword · · Score: 1

      It's not out yet, but it will be soon. Sorry the site uses flash (which annoys the hell out of me, but it's still a damn cool machine, I'll be buying one when it comes out myself.)

      http://event.asus.com/eeepc/

    4. Re:Longing for the good old days by MaDMvD · · Score: 1

      I've been using an IBM ThinkPad R51 for over 2 years now, with a 7,200 RPM drive and it runs extremely cool. This is, by far, the best, most stable laptop I've ever had the pleasure of working with. I will definitely consider getting a Lenovo when I do upgrade, as long as they make the same excellent products that IBM made when they produced laptops.

  38. Self Destruct Could be a Useful feature... by MrSteveSD · · Score: 2, Funny

    as long as long as you can control it, and as long as it has a cool sounding countdown.

  39. laptop battery engineering to marketing criteria by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    cheap powerful non-exploding, pick two



    Really, is it that hard to carry an additional one pound and have a safer and probably better battery in a laptop? Has society gotten that wimpy? The great race to see who can have the thinnest lightest laptop causes problems like this, along with cost cutting in quality and emphasis on bling factor. It needs to stop, maybe a few multi million dollar lawsuits might help, who knows, but there has to be something to get their attention on this generation's "pinto".. Lithium ion batts are cool tech, but they apparently need a lot more work on the stability issues and it would help if engineering dictated the size and weight and config, not marketing.

  40. You say that like it's a Bad Thing by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Personally, I like explosions.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:You say that like it's a Bad Thing by hidave · · Score: 1

      HA! I used to laugh when I would watch computers exploding on the old "STAR TREK" episodes, telling my wife, "That can't happen!" Little did I know.......

      --
      Synchronizing stop lights across the US = one less nuclear power plant
  41. How about we are all responsible. by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 1

    When did we sign the social contract that nothing we use can have a negative impact without a payout? If I'm going to have a power source that can run a full computer for several hours I'm going to have to accept that that amount of power may get out of hand. If I have a blade sharp enough to cut a steak I have to accept that it is sharp enough to cut me.

    Please, all of us, understand there are physical limitations to things and they are sometimes dangerous, and sometimes you just have to take the risk implicitly. If 6 batteries in the world caught fire that makes them about as safe as anything I've ever heard with that much power. They should be recalled if there is a reasonable expectation we can do better but I think you need to accept certain things are what they are. Fire cooks, fire kills. Chemicals react to make electricity, chemicals react period.

    1. Re:How about we are all responsible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes even the power source in my trusty phaser overloads.
      -Cap'n Kirk

    2. Re:How about we are all responsible. by Scannerman · · Score: 1

      Fair Comment, But everyone understands the concept that Knives are sharp. It is a "feature" of being a knife.

      Random chance of exploding is not a necessary feature of being a computer, and if it is I certainly don't recall it being mentioned in the Ads.

      (Just checked the Dell web page - Currently unavailable, They are obviously adding details of the exploding / firestarting features as I write.)

      People can only make sensible decisions if they are properly informed. A whole industry exists to prevent this, so blaming individuals rather than manufacturers is not reasonable. - Which is not to say you should waste too much sympathy on people who can't be bothered to try.

    3. Re:How about we are all responsible. by bentcd · · Score: 1

      Fair Comment, But everyone understands the concept that Knives are sharp. It is a "feature" of being a knife.

      Random chance of exploding is not a necessary feature of being a computer, and if it is I certainly don't recall it being mentioned in the Ads. It might just be a question of time before it sinks in (unless, of course, we manage to drastically improve the technology).

      How long until wilderness survival guides have chapters on "how to turn your laptop battery into a signal flare" and "starting a fire with your cell phone battery"? They would probably be quite useful chapters, even.

      Of course, as others have touched upon, "how to blow up an aircraft with a beowulf cluster of Dells" would be sure to be a popular article in certain circles.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    4. Re:How about we are all responsible. by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I agree with you and your parent. It is not "obvious" that batteries are dangerous, and I can appreciate that. But it should become common knowledge. A better analogy would have been gasoline. You can't tell that it's dangerous just by looking at it, but we have grown to accept the risk.

      Also, the power in a battery and gasoline is it's feature. A knife is the same, just less abstract. You can't cram huge amounts of power into small spaces, and have it ready to go at any time (gas and bats) without some risk.

    5. Re:How about we are all responsible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer battery can be estimated to be as dangerous as say, a car battery, or a microwave, or a TV. They are not supposed to explode. If household appliances or cars started exploding, you bet there'd be lawsuits. Cars have combustion engines - so I shouldn't be surprised if my car combusts, right? Should I just accept that sometimes buildings will collapse for no reason? I mean, if you can't sue for something blowing up and burning your house down, what can you sue for? Does it have to kill somebody before you can sue?

      And it's not "just the way things are." Batteries didn't use to explode until this model of laptop/battery/laptop-battery combo came out. Therefore, the manufacturer did something wrong and now laptops are exploding. Whee.

  42. Bamalance Definition aka How-to Rent a Bamalance by philam3nt · · Score: 1
    I always wondered WTF to call those things!
    I can find several sources to support this definition (I was very curious):
    From the only bamalance worker I can find

    I go to nursing school. I'd like to go caving more often but there's that problem with nursing school. I love my dog. I work on a bamalance. I try not to explode.
    Dade is most likely Florida, which means this could be a southeastern thing. Also used here, from a man claiming to be 'GA Man' ...And here, from Alabama resident JayDot (who is not doing much for his state's reputation):

    We used to call it "DFO" on the bamalance. Ask one of them's auntee "What happened to him"
    "Awwwwwwwn know, he just done fell out!"
    Or, is he from Mississippi? Either way he luvs him sum duck huntin', and apparently is a professional bamalance-riding azz-patcher! From "What Do Ya'll [sic] Do For A Living?":

    Uh....Jaydot here.....put out a house fire every now then, go to a plane crash once in awhile, and have been known to patch up a busted up azz in the back of a bamalance........
    I currently by Wesley's extra drugs.....
    Plus....I'm up 3 cases of beer on DIB bets...
    Two Wires...battin' a .1000
    Quickflow, who rides Motocross somewhere in the south, notes:

    The Bamalance is there to have extra equipment on hand for the EMT's until a transport unit arrives...most fire department has there own first respond unit. Offer them to come out for $500.00 with a unit. All fire department are looking for some type of fund raises. These trucks have all it takes to keep someone stable.
    I could not have written it all better myself. Not exactly authoritative sources, but it must be well-known enough to be used without explanation in several contexts. I have spent over 15 years living in the South (mostly southeast, too) but never noticed it at the time. However, the term is used twice by Nozzlenut on the centralpafire.com forum so maybe the term is primarily spread through Firefighters, with whom I have little experience.

    Charles
    doublerebel.com
    --

    If I had a sig, this is where it would be.
  43. dude... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    ...you're getting a desktop.

    (as a replacement)

    Right?

  44. 9 fires have already occured on planes... by MikePlacid · · Score: 1

    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/03/airl ines_batteries.html
    Federal reports indicate at least nine fires involving lithium batteries have happened on airplanes or in cargo destined for planes since 2005.

    Oh, well...

  45. Dell having MAJOR battery supply problems now? by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    For over a month I tried to get a replacement for my D820 - which isn't on the recall list.

    They told me 3 times it would go out overnight but didn't. Finally, I had a "manager" on the customer service chat swear she would get it resolved and it would ship overnight. HOWEVER, when I tried to pin her down to when it would SHIP, she wouldn't give a date at all and claimed it could take up to 8 days to get it "in the system".

    08/25/2007 03:38:40PM Agent (Khushboo Sharma): "The replacement order will be sent to you overnight."
    08/25/2007 03:38:54PM (me): "when will it be shipped?"
    08/25/2007 03:38:56PM Agent (Khushboo Sharma): "However, it will take some to get the new order number generated and get it shipped out of Dell."
    08/25/2007 03:39:08PM (me): "I need you to say, clearly, that it wil be shipped on MONDAY and will be shipped OVERNIGHT."
    08/25/2007 03:39:35PM (me): "I am not a moron. I have been duped before. Not again."
    08/25/2007 03:40:44PM Agent (Khushboo Sharma): "I can not assure you that it will ship on Monday."

    --- and it went on and on.... Finally I made them refund the money on the order, and I order the replacement from someone else who actually had them.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  46. Very apt! by rat7307 · · Score: 1
    I find the 1st link under the story very apt:

    Firehose:Dell laptops still exploding
    --
    Burma?
  47. All I can say is... by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Apparently Laptop Batteries are the new Thermite or now made of thermite...

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  48. Insurance? by AWhistler · · Score: 1

    When someone asks if you have insurance, you say YES! Then go to your renter's/home insurance agent and give them the FULL story. If they behave anything like the auto insurance industry, they will use all their legal muscle to recover costs.

    Imagine a headline saying "Dell sued for exploding battery insurance company payments" for all those users who called their insurance companies.

  49. dynamite comes in small packages too by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    With the public demanding longer and longer use times for laptops, the LiOn battery makers are going to try and squeeze more and more into a given space to meet the demand. With the tolerances for errors in battery design shrinking, it doesn't take much to set a battery pack off. Here's an idea. With every new laptop, give them a coupon for a free fire proof safe! Instead of the safe protecting the documents inside the safe, the safe will protect your HOUSE from the battery stored inside the safe. LOL.

  50. Exploding Dell LappyThingys TM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax, an exploding laptop is one of the new FEATURES we have built into every DELL we ship

  51. oh psh by VariableGHz · · Score: 1

    Give me a break, this kinda stuff never ha--!@#$!@ & #####

    [NO CARRIER]

    1. Re:oh psh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to find a better joke, I think.

  52. Flu vs SARS mortality rates. (OT) by liftphreaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The mortality rate for flu is around 0.1%. For SARS it was close to 20%. Personally I'd think that was reason enough to panic. You must be really brave. How many times have you had the flu? Care to try out SARS for a change?

    1. Re:Flu vs SARS mortality rates. (OT) by bentcd · · Score: 1

      The mortality rate for flu is around 0.1%. For SARS it was close to 20%. Personally I'd think that was reason enough to panic. We would also need to know the respective infection rates though. If flu infects 200 times more easily, then the two are about equally dangerous (which is to say, not very much). We should probably also take propagation into account, but that's about where my scant virology knowledge ends so we might as well not.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    2. Re:Flu vs SARS mortality rates. (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, Influenza has killed more people than the black plague and you say it is not very dangerous

      http://www.stanford.edu/group/virus/uda/

  53. sweet! by Kargan · · Score: 1

    This thread is already 5th on Google, 4th if you count the Slashtags link!

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bamalance&btn G=Google+Search

    How much for bamalance as an Adword??

    And, ever-helpful --

    Did you mean: bambalance

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  54. Even the Fire Department though it was dumb by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    "Way too much manpower for one little laptop," he said, but "I guess it sounded like it was more then it really was" to the 911 dispatcher.

    Was the guy making more out of this than he claims? The fire department thinks so.
  55. Jesus Christ, everyone's getting set on fire! by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Quick, take them to the poshital in a bamalance!

    --

    +++ATH0
  56. Re:laptop battery engineering to marketing criteri by bentcd · · Score: 1

    Really, is it that hard to carry an additional one pound and have a safer and probably better battery in a laptop? Has society gotten that wimpy? Intentionally carrying around a ticking time bomb and keeping it on your lap, all just to be fashionable, isn't exactly what I would call "wimpy" . . .
    --
    sigs are hazardous to your health
  57. Re:Insurance - not the question by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

    Better yet, file a claim with the insurance company and let THEM sue Dell to recoup their costs!

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  58. Stories changing... by WRX+SKy · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice that the story has now changed to a "Columbus, Georgia" man... yet the links on the linked news article still show "Columbus, Ohio"... Didn't they cover this problem in the movie Tommy Boy?

  59. Must be Dell's fault.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the headline article, it must be Dell's fault. Which is kind of strange, since he even mentions Apple laptops asploding.

    But of course Slashdot isn't going to say anything negative about their favorite monopoly.

  60. Re:Insurance - not the question by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    and when the Iranian Republican Guard starts supplying Dell laptops to the Iraqi insurgents, then by Gawd, it's time to regime change Iran!

  61. (Enter witty subject line here to satisfy form.) by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > units included two pumpers, a ladder truck, a bamalance, the HAZMAT unit, and a battalion chief

    Sounds like Paris Hilton's last Saturday night...

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  62. Re:Insurance - not the question by MightyMartian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Flamebait? I think Slashdot should pass rule forbidding those who don't recognize satire not get mod points, or karma. How does it feel to be a mental retard and a moderator?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.