That's nice. I'm sure all the people currently in jail for years for minor possession will be glad to know that their filled-to-capacity prison will not be getting as many people like themselves. I bet they were getting sick of it by now.
So the old saying "there's nothing good on TV" will always remain true in the future, whether you have an analog or digital TV... there must be some physical law at work behind this... hmmm...
Now if only the penalties for stealing a person's identity, money, and ruining their credit history for years could match the penalty for having a certain flowering plant in your pocket, maybe the court system wouldn't be such a joke.
I envision each candidate's article eventually looking almost entirely like this...
==Controversies==
Some people say that [candidate X] is misrepresenting [issue A] in order to gain the approval of [group M]. However other people say that this is simply a misrepresentation of the actual issue at hand, [issue B]. However other people say both of these groups are simply resorting to partisan bickering in order to gain approval for [candidate Y], with support from [group N].
"IF I choose to respond with solutions, YOU will lie and misrepresent them, because that is your SOP."
You dare not suggest a solution for fear of me twisting it to my advantage! Someday maybe my opinion of you will matter less to the world - sadly that day is not yet at hand...
Nice diagram. Is that a fan sticking out the side of the guy's head? Should newegg add a new category for 80mm and 100mm brain cooling fans? Or maybe go water cooled for complete silence? The worst that could happen is it leaks and you finally get the shower you're long overdue for...
I'd avoid the liquid nitrogen option at this time.
So what solution do you suggest for these problems? Do nothing? Research until we know for sure (which may be never)? Eliminate polluting products altogether? Or something else?
Ahh, so until we can say for sure what is causing the ozone hole, we shouldn't bother trying to do anything about it, correct? Even if we are simply eliminating one of our pollutants? Brilliant logic.
I'm sure you'll say the same thing about global warming. Why bother trying to reduce our pollutants until we know for sure that it's even a problem caused by humans?!?! Clearly we should sit on our hands and let the world fry - at least we'll know that we couldn't definitely say for sure that it was our fault! (I'm not sure who we'd be saying it to...)
You are offtopic. We are talking about ozone depletion caused by CFC pollution, not about snails, flowers, or bunnies. It's nice that you can cite examples of human mistakes in the past. Using CFCs in our products was another stupid mistake. To say that suddenly banning CFCs was also a mistake doesn't really make much sense. Did any experts suggest alternative actions?
"What happens if the actions that you deem "overprotective" are actually detrimental in the long run?"
Yes, what an amazing coincidence that we started dumping massive amounts of CFCs into the atmosphere at the same time that the Earth suddenly started needing CFCs to maintain its present state. It's a shame that we were duped into banning CFCs - hopefully the Earth will decide it no longer needs them.
Even if you get into the trial, there's no guarantee you'll actually get the treatment. You're just as likely to get a placebo and watch your relative's health deteriorate further.
"Testing the answer against another users answer is a good idea in principle (its how they make sure no one is cheating in distributed computing projects) but giving the same answer as another user is not difficult when they are using the same algorithm."
Please RTFA. How do you propose that the same bot gets the same word twice in one sitting, let alone with the same warping and strikethrough so as to guarantee the same word is typed both times?
Obviously, this software will do squat. And obviously they'll be flooded with false positives. Assuming they still try to investigate all of these leads, they would need to increase the size of their work force - i.e. more jobs. Which is good. But does that offset all the taxpayer money going into this ultimately useless program?
Slashdot Mirror
tor with google?
Let me guess... they've discovered that Mona Lisa's face is actually a combination of the faces of Da Vinci, Jesus, Dan Brown, and Tom Hanks?
That's nice. I'm sure all the people currently in jail for years for minor possession will be glad to know that their filled-to-capacity prison will not be getting as many people like themselves. I bet they were getting sick of it by now.
So the old saying "there's nothing good on TV" will always remain true in the future, whether you have an analog or digital TV... there must be some physical law at work behind this... hmmm...
The article continues: "The USPTO immediately rejected Mr. Leahy's proposal as obvious."
Now if only the penalties for stealing a person's identity, money, and ruining their credit history for years could match the penalty for having a certain flowering plant in your pocket, maybe the court system wouldn't be such a joke.
Ahh, what an awesome show. I still occasionally yell "REBOOT!" or "GLITCH!" unexpectedly...
...although I've been yelling that for years, way before the show even came out...
... hmmm...
"a rain of methane and ethane drizzling down, filling the moon's lakes and seas."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Titan's lakes and seas are already methane or ethane. Maybe they mean "filling the moon's valleys"?
I envision each candidate's article eventually looking almost entirely like this...
==Controversies==
Some people say that [candidate X] is misrepresenting [issue A] in order to gain the approval of [group M]. However other people say that this is simply a misrepresentation of the actual issue at hand, [issue B]. However other people say both of these groups are simply resorting to partisan bickering in order to gain approval for [candidate Y], with support from [group N].
These people are all idiots LOL!!11 POOOP
"IF I choose to respond with solutions, YOU will lie and misrepresent them, because that is your SOP."
You dare not suggest a solution for fear of me twisting it to my advantage! Someday maybe my opinion of you will matter less to the world - sadly that day is not yet at hand...
In other words, you have no clue and are just trolling. You know how to disagree with everyone but can't do much more than that. Good job.
Nice diagram. Is that a fan sticking out the side of the guy's head? Should newegg add a new category for 80mm and 100mm brain cooling fans? Or maybe go water cooled for complete silence? The worst that could happen is it leaks and you finally get the shower you're long overdue for...
I'd avoid the liquid nitrogen option at this time.
So what solution do you suggest for these problems? Do nothing? Research until we know for sure (which may be never)? Eliminate polluting products altogether? Or something else?
Ahh, so until we can say for sure what is causing the ozone hole, we shouldn't bother trying to do anything about it, correct? Even if we are simply eliminating one of our pollutants? Brilliant logic.
I'm sure you'll say the same thing about global warming. Why bother trying to reduce our pollutants until we know for sure that it's even a problem caused by humans?!?! Clearly we should sit on our hands and let the world fry - at least we'll know that we couldn't definitely say for sure that it was our fault! (I'm not sure who we'd be saying it to...)
You are offtopic. We are talking about ozone depletion caused by CFC pollution, not about snails, flowers, or bunnies. It's nice that you can cite examples of human mistakes in the past. Using CFCs in our products was another stupid mistake. To say that suddenly banning CFCs was also a mistake doesn't really make much sense. Did any experts suggest alternative actions?
"What happens if the actions that you deem "overprotective" are actually detrimental in the long run?"
Yes, what an amazing coincidence that we started dumping massive amounts of CFCs into the atmosphere at the same time that the Earth suddenly started needing CFCs to maintain its present state. It's a shame that we were duped into banning CFCs - hopefully the Earth will decide it no longer needs them.
Please note: the adjective form of "civilization" is not "civilizated".
Even if you get into the trial, there's no guarantee you'll actually get the treatment. You're just as likely to get a placebo and watch your relative's health deteriorate further.
"Testing the answer against another users answer is a good idea in principle (its how they make sure no one is cheating in distributed computing projects) but giving the same answer as another user is not difficult when they are using the same algorithm."
Please RTFA. How do you propose that the same bot gets the same word twice in one sitting, let alone with the same warping and strikethrough so as to guarantee the same word is typed both times?
Check out recaptcha.net to test it out.
At least, that's what I first thought when I saw the new logo.
Hacking of Google databases might explain why Google Translator used to translate the Russian name for "Ivan the Terrible" as "Abraham Lincoln".
That sort of idiocy is on par for this state. Not surprised at all...
"The survey didn't indicate if those work taboos were committed by the same respondents, but in both cases, men were more likely to claim doing both."
Clearly this indicates that a majority of the work force in the tech sector is committed to Apple and Apple-related products.
I'm never watching any of his movies again!!!
Well, after this weekend...
Obviously, this software will do squat. And obviously they'll be flooded with false positives. Assuming they still try to investigate all of these leads, they would need to increase the size of their work force - i.e. more jobs. Which is good. But does that offset all the taxpayer money going into this ultimately useless program?