Second installment to the popular Holy Land Times bestseller!... #201. Step 1 - Pretend you love your neighbour (but still don't get caught) Step 2 - Play with his/her dog. Step 3 - Get the dog's saliva on your sterile, latex glove wearing hands Step 4 - Go home and extract DNA Step 5 - Clone your neighbour's dog Step 6 - Collect the cloned dog's wastes Step 7 - Drop them in as many of those bins as you can Step 8 - Profit!...wait
BTW, why is this not posted under the "Yo-Dawg Rights Online" category?
But then again, he married a woman from a foreign country (Russia? I can't remember exactly but I can see some Slashdot meme spin here) without knowing her long enough, and she turned out to be a bitch (to him at least). My point is that he could've avoided the entire shenanigan altogether in the first place, so why stop at the rejection of 3 year plea.
My other point is, within the joke itself, that one's wisdom does not lie in making the right choice starting from birth, but to make a sound choice locally given the position, even though prior mistakes or stupidity may have carried one there. We are creatures of now, remorse doesn't help much.
Ah, you mean how engineers steal physicists' research papers and make money off of their ideas? Then yes literally, engineers are indeed "behind" physicists, screwing them over.
Well the release of humans' methane, however, happens at much more predictable and organized locations, when compared to livestocks. So the collection and recycling should be easy. Now if only I have a permit and £500,000 to build a special lavatory at Victoria Underground...
Corporations are profit-seeking animals. If you expect any level of morality from them, you will find it near the stockholders' buy/sell margin or on accountants' govt tax deduction page.
You have recently misspelt a common word in your exchange with other citizens. Please note that the adjective meaning "having a bearing on or connection with the matter at hand" is spelt as "relevant", not "relevent".
Please do not reply as this is an automated message. If you would wish to unsubscribe from this free service, you may appeal here.
Thank you.
Brought to you by the Grammar-Nazis Department of Federal Agency of Domestic Surveillance (FADS).
Powered by Microsoft Spelling and Grammar Check(TM)
Just look at China - they are by no means perfect, but exposure to the free market has changed them drastically.
Oh, you mean the way the CPC managed to conglomerate fortune for itself at expense of relinquishing very little power, sustain unbalanced economic growth at the cost of environmental degradation and labour abuse, arouse national sentiment to further consolidate conformity and suppress opposition, and best yet, dump products to the largest economy of the world and then become its banker, and in such way gain political leverage against all of western democracies who would now think thrice before speaking about promoting freedom in front of the giant
Then of course, you have brought a lot of change to the country by exposing it to the free market, a lot of change to the whole world too
For a publicly traded, high-profile company, having a less than expected profit is as bad as (or sometimes even worse than) losing the difference
This is not about funny math it's about super-capitalism
Don't quite agree... I don't think when you pull into the pharmacy to 'GET' a small-size condom you need to utter your license plate number to initiate a conversation & transaction with the cashier (well, in which case you'd probably avoid any conversation but just have the transaction done).
Seriously though people, do you think the corporate CXOs are really doing hardcore cost-benefit analysis when planning strategic moves like this? As long as the balance spreadsheet ends up looking good, it's all fashion. When outsourcing is in fashion, everybody do so, when utility computing is the fashion, same happens. It's about what the stock holders expect you to do (especially when competitors are doing something new).
Slashdot Mirror
I thought this would just generate a public key for the corresponding private one to form a key pair, and is good for security?
.. I thought it was because this spam ring was too big to fail and the congress bailed it out
I like it the parent post capitalizes "National Vulnerability"...
Second installment to the popular Holy Land Times bestseller! ... ...wait
#201.
Step 1 - Pretend you love your neighbour (but still don't get caught)
Step 2 - Play with his/her dog.
Step 3 - Get the dog's saliva on your sterile, latex glove wearing hands
Step 4 - Go home and extract DNA
Step 5 - Clone your neighbour's dog
Step 6 - Collect the cloned dog's wastes
Step 7 - Drop them in as many of those bins as you can
Step 8 - Profit!
BTW, why is this not posted under the "Yo-Dawg Rights Online" category?
Never attribute to malnutrition that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
So what kind of thought makes one develop hunger for insects?
So long and thanks for all the fish...
But then again, he married a woman from a foreign country (Russia? I can't remember exactly but I can see some Slashdot meme spin here) without knowing her long enough, and she turned out to be a bitch (to him at least). My point is that he could've avoided the entire shenanigan altogether in the first place, so why stop at the rejection of 3 year plea.
My other point is, within the joke itself, that one's wisdom does not lie in making the right choice starting from birth, but to make a sound choice locally given the position, even though prior mistakes or stupidity may have carried one there. We are creatures of now, remorse doesn't help much.
I mean, not only he shortened his potential jail time by producing his dead wife, he also lengthened his life expectancy by producing a dead wife.
You mean librarians should have free food and personal massages at work?
Luckally enough survived a food that covered the visible landmass. Whiping out thousands of people.
Holy (pun intended), I wonder if you wrote that Old Testament when drunk?
Ah, you mean how engineers steal physicists' research papers and make money off of their ideas? Then yes literally, engineers are indeed "behind" physicists, screwing them over.
Well the release of humans' methane, however, happens at much more predictable and organized locations, when compared to livestocks. So the collection and recycling should be easy. Now if only I have a permit and £500,000 to build a special lavatory at Victoria Underground...
Corporations are profit-seeking animals. If you expect any level of morality from them, you will find it near the stockholders' buy/sell margin or on accountants' govt tax deduction page.
If you have ever take part of a Stroop test, your ACC has been activated. In a Stroop test...
Dear Citizen,
You have recently misspelt a common word in your exchange with other citizens. Please note that the adjective meaning "having a bearing on or connection with the matter at hand" is spelt as "relevant", not "relevent".
Please do not reply as this is an automated message. If you would wish to unsubscribe from this free service, you may appeal here.
Thank you.
Brought to you by the Grammar-Nazis Department of Federal Agency of Domestic Surveillance (FADS). Powered by Microsoft Spelling and Grammar Check(TM)
Just look at China - they are by no means perfect, but exposure to the free market has changed them drastically.
Oh, you mean the way the CPC managed to conglomerate fortune for itself at expense of relinquishing very little power, sustain unbalanced economic growth at the cost of environmental degradation and labour abuse, arouse national sentiment to further consolidate conformity and suppress opposition, and best yet, dump products to the largest economy of the world and then become its banker, and in such way gain political leverage against all of western democracies who would now think thrice before speaking about promoting freedom in front of the giant
Then of course, you have brought a lot of change to the country by exposing it to the free market, a lot of change to the whole world too
For a publicly traded, high-profile company, having a less than expected profit is as bad as (or sometimes even worse than) losing the difference This is not about funny math it's about super-capitalism
Don't hug me bro!
"Dutch wives" already perform full service at a much lower price!
Well then the doctors have finally achieved longevity for all of us. This profession can officially retire.
Don't quite agree... I don't think when you pull into the pharmacy to 'GET' a small-size condom you need to utter your license plate number to initiate a conversation & transaction with the cashier (well, in which case you'd probably avoid any conversation but just have the transaction done).
So this is all smoke screen?
Seriously though people, do you think the corporate CXOs are really doing hardcore cost-benefit analysis when planning strategic moves like this? As long as the balance spreadsheet ends up looking good, it's all fashion. When outsourcing is in fashion, everybody do so, when utility computing is the fashion, same happens. It's about what the stock holders expect you to do (especially when competitors are doing something new).
Even when you search for Margaret Thatcher? Ewwwwwww......
that this car maker takes serious actions on Monday/Friday car workers and the car will be a vintage collectible much sooner than any other makes on the market?