Outside of the West, this is all very well understood. Chinese family planning has gone far beyond eugenics and now they are rolling out genome editing.
The reality is anyone with an IQ of 100 or less is effectively economically obsolete. That is about 60% of the world's population. Part of the reason "racism" remains such a popular topic in America is differences in race IQ have become tantamount to racism. And racism is worse than child molestation or murder. Hence, no one is aware of how far advanced genetics and intelligence has come.
If it were to become common knowledge in this country that most people are born too stupid to be of economic value, the entire fabric of our society would collapse.
There is a great deal of evidence that average IQ is dropping rapidly. The one place IQ cannot be ignored is the military. Presently, 100 million Americans are too stupid to enlist in the army. If they can't join the army, what else are they good for?
I personally never had any problems with Windows Vista. But, I had a first generation dual core AMD 64-bit processor and 4 gigs of ram. It worked fine for me. To this day, I can't recall any substantive differences between Windows Vista and Windows 7. Windows 7 seemed like simply a minor upgrade to Vista.
The problem, as was always the case before the past 10 years or so, is people freaked whenever new operating systems came out.
People bitched when Windows 95 was released. What? I need 16 megabytes of ram? Windows NT needs 32 megabytes of ram? forget it. Windows XP requires 128mb of ram? NO WAY. Windows Vista requires 1 gigabyte of ram? FUCK THAT
It was founded by organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation specifically to propagandize a non-nationalist conception of money and to acclimate "the right" to this concept. The "gold standard" that libertarians champion has only existed as either part of the British Empire or as administered by the United Nations until the Nixon Shock.
It is important to understand that *no one* advocated a "free market" until the post-war era. You can always tell an economically illiterate person for claiming that is what Adam Smith advocated. It was in fact, the exact opposite.
There is a propaganda function for "free market" propaganda. It misdirects the attention of the people away from who truly has power.
Not at all. Karl Marx and Adam Smith were both writing from the perspective of liberalism, i.e. the Enlightenment. Both failed because both are predicated on the belief of the tabula rasa myth, i.e. that all humans are rational and equally capable. Today, we know that ability is entirely genetic and that it follows a bell curve distribution. The minimum required intelligence to be a productive member of society continues to move to the right, while the overall intelligence distribution mean declines due to technology removing many selective pressures.
Most likely, this article is not about that subject however. In the West, nothing is more taboo. But elsewhere, this is not the case, especially with China.
It is understandable this is a problem in the West however, given the association with National Socialism in the Third Reich.
It is funny how everyone knows exactly what this means. As always, this is purely about hatred of white men and nothing about reality. There won't be more Indians or Chinese. There will be more Blacks and Hispanics.
In the case of real money, what makes it valuable (and this has been true since the dawn of civilization) is governments demand its payment in taxes and adjudicate debts only on state currency.
Bitcoin is not money. It's more like baseball cards.
I encourage everyone to look into the Job Guarantee that is routinely advocated by those associated with the economics school known as Modern Monetary Theory. UBI will ALWAYS be controversial, as a huge segment of the population will always resist it. Whether out of envy or genuine belief, it matters naught. The Job Guarantee serves the same function, and it also helps integrate people into society.
The reality is that, due to unequal distribution of intelligence, a substantial segment of the population cannot thrive without the structure a working environment imparts. The UBI tends to appeal to the most intelligent, who are biased towards believing everyone is similar to themselves. I'm not saying that's you, but do consider it.
We don't need people to support an aging society, and the United States of America doesn't need United States of America Dollars, which only it has the sole legal right to create.
I have a Surface Book and had a Surface Pro 3. I've not experienced that problem. But, I've gone through several models of both. So I have a lot of experience.
I have a Surface Book, and previously my only experience with Microsoft hardware was joysticks, mice, and keyboards. The latter were all great. No problems.
The Surface Book is a fantastic idea, but the reliability is poor. I've gone through 2 already, and the one I have now has a line down the middle of the screen with some colors. I'm going to be back to getting a cheapo laptop in the future.
AIDS is only transferred when you fuck someone in the ass or share needles. It is VERY difficult to catch unless you are a stupid drug addict or you like to sodomize other people and not use a condom.
God, it's 2017. How are you believing queer propaganda from the 1980s? This isn't even a public health issue anymore.
It is amusing how cuckholds like yourself think. You always have to begin your conflict with another man by proving just how much smarter you are. What the fuck does biology have to do with his argument? It's amazing you wrote multiple paragraphs about condoms, which are only tangentially relevant.
There is no legitimate reason for women to have total control over a man's life because of sex. None.
It's no more complex for men than it is for women. Depo Provera works just the same way that depot testosterone. One big difference is testosterone is more fragile than estrogen, such that daily pills are not feasible. Drug companies spent 20 years and a fortune finding a way to make an oral, safe, effective form of testosterone. But we do not have the technology.
The problem is the hormones men would take have that unfortunate side effect of making you jacked and alpha. We can't have an army of pacified, effete faggots slaving away in servitude if male birth control was widely available.
I mean, seriously. Look around you. Most men don't even look like men anymore. They are entirely lacking any musculature, and they are either disgustingly obese or stick creatures.
I've stopped buying a lot of things from Amazon because the quality has just gone downhill. I've gotten obviously counterfeit vitamins, which was the last straw. This will hopefully put the shysters out of business.
Do you seriously expect us to believe that an entire field of study that is by your own admission a century old (actually older), has no value what-so-ever? Why are people giving these tests, if they predict nothing?
India has the lowest average IQ outside of Africa. If IQ can't predict whether or not people drink from the same river they shit in, what is it good for?
Slashdot Mirror
Outside of the West, this is all very well understood. Chinese family planning has gone far beyond eugenics and now they are rolling out genome editing.
The reality is anyone with an IQ of 100 or less is effectively economically obsolete. That is about 60% of the world's population. Part of the reason "racism" remains such a popular topic in America is differences in race IQ have become tantamount to racism. And racism is worse than child molestation or murder. Hence, no one is aware of how far advanced genetics and intelligence has come.
If it were to become common knowledge in this country that most people are born too stupid to be of economic value, the entire fabric of our society would collapse.
There is a great deal of evidence that average IQ is dropping rapidly. The one place IQ cannot be ignored is the military. Presently, 100 million Americans are too stupid to enlist in the army. If they can't join the army, what else are they good for?
http://www.vdare.com/posts/alm...
I personally never had any problems with Windows Vista. But, I had a first generation dual core AMD 64-bit processor and 4 gigs of ram. It worked fine for me. To this day, I can't recall any substantive differences between Windows Vista and Windows 7. Windows 7 seemed like simply a minor upgrade to Vista.
The problem, as was always the case before the past 10 years or so, is people freaked whenever new operating systems came out.
People bitched when Windows 95 was released. What? I need 16 megabytes of ram?
Windows NT needs 32 megabytes of ram? forget it.
Windows XP requires 128mb of ram? NO WAY.
Windows Vista requires 1 gigabyte of ram? FUCK THAT
It was the same story, endlessly.
Net neutrality is irrelevant today. Google, Facebook, and domain providers are engaged in far worse and nefarious activities.
It was founded by organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation specifically to propagandize a non-nationalist conception of money and to acclimate "the right" to this concept. The "gold standard" that libertarians champion has only existed as either part of the British Empire or as administered by the United Nations until the Nixon Shock.
It is important to understand that *no one* advocated a "free market" until the post-war era. You can always tell an economically illiterate person for claiming that is what Adam Smith advocated. It was in fact, the exact opposite.
There is a propaganda function for "free market" propaganda. It misdirects the attention of the people away from who truly has power.
Not at all. Karl Marx and Adam Smith were both writing from the perspective of liberalism, i.e. the Enlightenment. Both failed because both are predicated on the belief of the tabula rasa myth, i.e. that all humans are rational and equally capable. Today, we know that ability is entirely genetic and that it follows a bell curve distribution. The minimum required intelligence to be a productive member of society continues to move to the right, while the overall intelligence distribution mean declines due to technology removing many selective pressures.
Most likely, this article is not about that subject however. In the West, nothing is more taboo. But elsewhere, this is not the case, especially with China.
It is understandable this is a problem in the West however, given the association with National Socialism in the Third Reich.
What are the solutions? I am not entirely sure.
It is funny how everyone knows exactly what this means. As always, this is purely about hatred of white men and nothing about reality. There won't be more Indians or Chinese. There will be more Blacks and Hispanics.
What you are describing is actually the reason why bitcoin was created and why it is tolerated.
We are returning to a Bretton Woods system, whereby foreign exchange by private entities will be banned.
In the case of real money, what makes it valuable (and this has been true since the dawn of civilization) is governments demand its payment in taxes and adjudicate debts only on state currency.
Bitcoin is not money. It's more like baseball cards.
I encourage everyone to look into the Job Guarantee that is routinely advocated by those associated with the economics school known as Modern Monetary Theory. UBI will ALWAYS be controversial, as a huge segment of the population will always resist it. Whether out of envy or genuine belief, it matters naught. The Job Guarantee serves the same function, and it also helps integrate people into society.
The reality is that, due to unequal distribution of intelligence, a substantial segment of the population cannot thrive without the structure a working environment imparts. The UBI tends to appeal to the most intelligent, who are biased towards believing everyone is similar to themselves. I'm not saying that's you, but do consider it.
I think there is plenty of dishonesty to go around.
Because intelligence is hereditary. Hard work has nothing to do with it.
Where are you located? Those are impressive numbers; I ask out of genuine curiosity!
Bing? Really? Dude, are you ok?
How is it possible that Japan is able to manage an even older population without allowing any immigration at all?
We don't need people to support an aging society, and the United States of America doesn't need United States of America Dollars, which only it has the sole legal right to create.
I have a Surface Book and had a Surface Pro 3. I've not experienced that problem. But, I've gone through several models of both. So I have a lot of experience.
I have a Surface Book, and previously my only experience with Microsoft hardware was joysticks, mice, and keyboards. The latter were all great. No problems.
The Surface Book is a fantastic idea, but the reliability is poor. I've gone through 2 already, and the one I have now has a line down the middle of the screen with some colors. I'm going to be back to getting a cheapo laptop in the future.
AIDS is only transferred when you fuck someone in the ass or share needles. It is VERY difficult to catch unless you are a stupid drug addict or you like to sodomize other people and not use a condom.
God, it's 2017. How are you believing queer propaganda from the 1980s? This isn't even a public health issue anymore.
It is amusing how cuckholds like yourself think. You always have to begin your conflict with another man by proving just how much smarter you are. What the fuck does biology have to do with his argument? It's amazing you wrote multiple paragraphs about condoms, which are only tangentially relevant.
There is no legitimate reason for women to have total control over a man's life because of sex. None.
It's no more complex for men than it is for women. Depo Provera works just the same way that depot testosterone. One big difference is testosterone is more fragile than estrogen, such that daily pills are not feasible. Drug companies spent 20 years and a fortune finding a way to make an oral, safe, effective form of testosterone. But we do not have the technology.
The problem is the hormones men would take have that unfortunate side effect of making you jacked and alpha. We can't have an army of pacified, effete faggots slaving away in servitude if male birth control was widely available.
I mean, seriously. Look around you. Most men don't even look like men anymore. They are entirely lacking any musculature, and they are either disgustingly obese or stick creatures.
I've stopped buying a lot of things from Amazon because the quality has just gone downhill. I've gotten obviously counterfeit vitamins, which was the last straw. This will hopefully put the shysters out of business.
Do you seriously expect us to believe that an entire field of study that is by your own admission a century old (actually older), has no value what-so-ever? Why are people giving these tests, if they predict nothing?
India has the lowest average IQ outside of Africa. If IQ can't predict whether or not people drink from the same river they shit in, what is it good for?
Great post