Let's call it what it is. Google is accepting payment from big media, in the form of reduced media licensing costs, to rank big media sites higher. While still claiming to not accept payment for ranking.
Mobile ads are very effective at clickthrough. With touch interfaces, it's far too easy to accidentally touch an ad that appears right next to something useful.
Why shouldn't a more-qualified foreigner be hired for a job? The company is willing to pay H1B fees in addition to salary that they would presumably also offer to a domestic worker. This may not help Joe American, but it does help Prasad Indian. Does Joe deserve the job more than Prasad simply because Joe was born in the US?
Now, I realize it is the US government's job to look after the interests of US citizens. But why should an individual or company favor US citizens?
From the worker's perspective, the argument goes that restrictions, even arbitrary ones, increase scarcity and therefore their value to employers. Those restrictions must feel great when you happen to fall on the employable side of the dividing line. That doesn't make them right.
How is this practical? There is more than 5% negotiating range in salary, so there isn't a real way to test or enforce this. Also, consider a job with two openings filled by one local and one foreigner. Wouldn't the local complain that the foreigner is getting paid more?
Slashdot Mirror
Why would somebody with 12+ years of C++ experience be doing web site development?
Let's call it what it is. Google is accepting payment from big media, in the form of reduced media licensing costs, to rank big media sites higher. While still claiming to not accept payment for ranking.
* According to a study sponsored by the tabacco industry.
Signature dated 6-30-11 and stamp dated July 2 2012.
Maybe it's better to have a credible CEO who says things are going poorly than an untrustworthy CEO?
So this will make it closer to an auction, which is what should have been done in the first place?
Strayer University sure mints a lot of worthless Master's degrees.
Apparently the American Cancer Society doesn't want atheist money. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brandon-g-withrow/american-cancer-society-atheist_b_1014403.html .
Reasons of space? "Cambridge University" is indeed longer than "Purdue" but the difference is less than the excuse takes.
Mobile ads are very effective at clickthrough. With touch interfaces, it's far too easy to accidentally touch an ad that appears right next to something useful.
You mean the General Services Administration. Unless there's another scandal we should know about. . .
Showrooming. Go to the local store to try it, buy online because it's cheaper that way.
I sense an influx of graduates from Bollywood Upstairs Medical College.
Your subject suggests that you are trying to import a PhD whose specialty is English.
And companies that engage in this form of tracking deserve to lose revenue.
Mod parent up! Operating systems do this thing where they let you run multiple processes. On one machine. With virtual memory.
So SpaceX paid more?
So why go after Apple?
If there's a problem with a walled garden, blame the gardener. Otherwise, don't put a wall up in the first place.
You could call it Iridium. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellation http://iridium.com/
It's all about spin. "I sentence you to 30 days of reeducation." How does that sound?
But there isn't a public benefit to the patent system.
Why shouldn't a more-qualified foreigner be hired for a job? The company is willing to pay H1B fees in addition to salary that they would presumably also offer to a domestic worker. This may not help Joe American, but it does help Prasad Indian. Does Joe deserve the job more than Prasad simply because Joe was born in the US?
Now, I realize it is the US government's job to look after the interests of US citizens. But why should an individual or company favor US citizens?
From the worker's perspective, the argument goes that restrictions, even arbitrary ones, increase scarcity and therefore their value to employers. Those restrictions must feel great when you happen to fall on the employable side of the dividing line. That doesn't make them right.
How is this practical? There is more than 5% negotiating range in salary, so there isn't a real way to test or enforce this. Also, consider a job with two openings filled by one local and one foreigner. Wouldn't the local complain that the foreigner is getting paid more?
How about paying off the national debt?
Why was the PayPal founder Peter Thiel paying for entrepreneurs to skip college and work on startup's?
So they won't have other options when it fails.