Don't most big companies offer a retirement package that give money out for the life of the spouse? Sure it will not kick in as quickly as this or offer 50% unless you have paid into it for a long time, but a decade is far to short.
What? That makes no sense particularly in the binary true false answer scenario. If you are told that some celebrity you have never heard of before is dead but no proof is given (and lets assume for some reason you have no reason to either believe or disbelieve the person talking to you) then you must NOT just assume that the opposite is truth. Believing false or the opposite is no better than believing true or some arbitrary statement.
You might say it is 50-50 and cannot tell with any certainty that it is true or false. or you might say, the guy looks like his father and it looks like the kid just graduated and it looks and is logical that his father would be proud (even if that is not him) so if we had to pick true or false, well statistically true is better then false.
Ah, apparently you can only watch other people play WOW through esports channels. I do not know what the picture of them playing GoW (or some clone) is about though. But it is not a generic current gen style controller, only the xbox has ever had a controller like that with PS and Wii staying far away from it.
The problem being it is not a cellphone, it has the OS of a cell phone but is for use with a huge high def screen and have 1G RAM and a great processor. I have have my doubts that a OS designed for cellphones and tablets wil really cut it as a gaming and media center and even if it did you need developers to design for your device because if they just design for android, you are going to get a game designed for very different controls and screen size.
Scanning the KS, I think it is just a mini (decent) PC with a Xbox style controller that is designed to hook up to a TV. It looks like it is going to play PC games, since they were showing huge name titles like WOW on it already.
I am pretty sure Man is routinely able to do things other than unmake man made things. If anything, being non man made should make it easier to change, because it is a whole lot easier to change an environment than to remodel society.
I never really got why anyone cared if it was Man Made or not. If Asteroid was careening towards the earth, would anyone really care when, where, or how it was formed (above and beyond the need to learn its geology).
Yes, but that is a specific case where yo are comparing a woman who has trained on average more then you or is more genetically suited to it. If we separated everything into capability levels then not only would women not even ever make it into the top often but they would have a good chance of getting beaten in their own levels. And how do you measure skill? Why would everyone not try to get categorized in one riding lower then what they technically should be in? And if we could measure skill that closely we would not even need completions, we would already know the best person.
I believe statistically men are not just superior in strength but also marksmanship, it is supposedly linked to our hunting past. And most of the rest of those sports requires a lot of strength.
I suggest looking at the world records and the average score for all those events in both women and men and it should become obvious why they are kept separate or that they should be joined.
Well at least in the area of sports, where it is obvious that they simply cannot compete, you are left with two alternatives: Be somewhat condescending or allow women to compete in their own way.
Women are given "head starts" in pretty much every area and profession. From golfing to programming and business owning. Whether they need it because of inferiorities, bias against them, or simply do not need it. In most situations if is hard or impossible to tell; But they seem to have gotten accustomed to this, never seen a woman complain about it myself, rather the exact opposite.
Umm, there are women only maths awards. Actually there are loads and loads of women only academic awards, probably more than generic unisex ones.
Like the "Ruth Lyttle Satter Prize in Mathematics" or the "Louise Hay Award for Contributions to Mathematics Education", to name a few Maths only awards for women.
In sports it is impossible to compete. From what I understand women just can not hit a golf ball as far as a man, and I assume this is repeated in most other sports.
You could have them compete, but in many situation you would need to give the women a head start. I believe, in golf for example, women start closer to the hole. But then, what do you do with the people that straddle the gender lines?
Completely agree, as a rental place owner I can say I have never gotten anything from it but loads and loads of automated spam, and the website itself is just shit. Use Kijiji, you will find/sell/rent a whole lot faster and easier.
Completely agree, give as many intellectual arguments and mention how it did not include some specific scene important for the plot as much as you like but the movies were good and did not really change anything. The Orcs were not turned into mutants from Mars or aliens, so personally I thought a good job was done. Until given direct evidence that these movies are bad I am very much looking forward to them.
Just copied from the site, I guess it is just relatively 0%. The medical community does not seem to warn people away from kissing without protection (I do not even think there is kiss protection), but kissing does have a risk involved as well as hand holding.
Every test is like that, not medical test (or otherwise) can tell you more then a statistical chance one way or the other. But if you take the test multiple times you get a guarantee, for all intents and purposes.
And there is probably about the same percentage risk if not lower for a single unprotected act. Assuming the one pattern has aids, and it is unprotected sex: Vaginal Male >0.5% Vaginal female >1% Anal receptive >1.5% Anal (top M/F) >1% Male Oral (giving) >0.0001% Everything Else = 0
These are supposed to be best estimates by experts, but of course we could never hold studies. And if you want rough chances with a condom, I think you just times the result by 1%.
Slashdot Mirror
They just saved loads in wages and what is it going to do? push back the next complete GUI overhaul 3 months?
And why not? anyone stupid enough to invest in FB deserved to lose money, whether they were a rich or poor.
Don't most big companies offer a retirement package that give money out for the life of the spouse?
Sure it will not kick in as quickly as this or offer 50% unless you have paid into it for a long time, but a decade is far to short.
But his politics do effect nerd stuff.
Obomas and Romneys spending for NASA and general science are different.
What? That makes no sense particularly in the binary true false answer scenario. If you are told that some celebrity you have never heard of before is dead but no proof is given (and lets assume for some reason you have no reason to either believe or disbelieve the person talking to you) then you must NOT just assume that the opposite is truth. Believing false or the opposite is no better than believing true or some arbitrary statement.
You might say it is 50-50 and cannot tell with any certainty that it is true or false. or you might say, the guy looks like his father and it looks like the kid just graduated and it looks and is logical that his father would be proud (even if that is not him) so if we had to pick true or false, well statistically true is better then false.
Ah, apparently you can only watch other people play WOW through esports channels. I do not know what the picture of them playing GoW (or some clone) is about though.
But it is not a generic current gen style controller, only the xbox has ever had a controller like that with PS and Wii staying far away from it.
The problem being it is not a cellphone, it has the OS of a cell phone but is for use with a huge high def screen and have 1G RAM and a great processor. I have have my doubts that a OS designed for cellphones and tablets wil really cut it as a gaming and media center and even if it did you need developers to design for your device because if they just design for android, you are going to get a game designed for very different controls and screen size.
Scanning the KS, I think it is just a mini (decent) PC with a Xbox style controller that is designed to hook up to a TV. It looks like it is going to play PC games, since they were showing huge name titles like WOW on it already.
Wikipedia locked articles for controversial subjects. And what is more controversial than a politician come election period.
I am pretty sure Man is routinely able to do things other than unmake man made things. If anything, being non man made should make it easier to change, because it is a whole lot easier to change an environment than to remodel society.
I never really got why anyone cared if it was Man Made or not. If Asteroid was careening towards the earth, would anyone really care when, where, or how it was formed (above and beyond the need to learn its geology).
They do not seem to have any kind of objective scoring system to judge fairly.
Yes, but that is a specific case where yo are comparing a woman who has trained on average more then you or is more genetically suited to it.
If we separated everything into capability levels then not only would women not even ever make it into the top often but they would have a good chance of getting beaten in their own levels. And how do you measure skill? Why would everyone not try to get categorized in one riding lower then what they technically should be in? And if we could measure skill that closely we would not even need completions, we would already know the best person.
I believe statistically men are not just superior in strength but also marksmanship, it is supposedly linked to our hunting past.
And most of the rest of those sports requires a lot of strength.
I suggest looking at the world records and the average score for all those events in both women and men and it should become obvious why they are kept separate or that they should be joined.
Well at least in the area of sports, where it is obvious that they simply cannot compete, you are left with two alternatives: Be somewhat condescending or allow women to compete in their own way.
Women are given "head starts" in pretty much every area and profession. From golfing to programming and business owning. Whether they need it because of inferiorities, bias against them, or simply do not need it. In most situations if is hard or impossible to tell; But they seem to have gotten accustomed to this, never seen a woman complain about it myself, rather the exact opposite.
Umm, there are women only maths awards. Actually there are loads and loads of women only academic awards, probably more than generic unisex ones.
Like the "Ruth Lyttle Satter Prize in Mathematics" or the "Louise Hay Award for Contributions to Mathematics Education", to name a few Maths only awards for women.
In sports it is impossible to compete. From what I understand women just can not hit a golf ball as far as a man, and I assume this is repeated in most other sports.
You could have them compete, but in many situation you would need to give the women a head start.
I believe, in golf for example, women start closer to the hole. But then, what do you do with the people that straddle the gender lines?
Yes, but if we need to draw a line somewhere then the only real solid line in science is XX or XY. So we might as well just go with that.
and insist that everyone call you Captain.
Completely agree, as a rental place owner I can say I have never gotten anything from it but loads and loads of automated spam, and the website itself is just shit. Use Kijiji, you will find/sell/rent a whole lot faster and easier.
Completely agree, give as many intellectual arguments and mention how it did not include some specific scene important for the plot as much as you like but the movies were good and did not really change anything. The Orcs were not turned into mutants from Mars or aliens, so personally I thought a good job was done. Until given direct evidence that these movies are bad I am very much looking forward to them.
Just copied from the site, I guess it is just relatively 0%. The medical community does not seem to warn people away from kissing without protection (I do not even think there is kiss protection), but kissing does have a risk involved as well as hand holding.
Every test is like that, not medical test (or otherwise) can tell you more then a statistical chance one way or the other.
But if you take the test multiple times you get a guarantee, for all intents and purposes.
And there is probably about the same percentage risk if not lower for a single unprotected act.
Assuming the one pattern has aids, and it is unprotected sex:
Vaginal Male >0.5%
Vaginal female >1%
Anal receptive >1.5%
Anal (top M/F) >1%
Male Oral (giving) >0.0001%
Everything Else = 0
These are supposed to be best estimates by experts, but of course we could never hold studies. And if you want rough chances with a condom, I think you just times the result by 1%.
Xerox did create the modern day OS/interface... I really do not think it can be claimed otherwise.
But how will their be more money and less dept if less people are employed and therefore far less to tax?