But for good or ill most health care is done using Humans. If it is not this then it is something else that they will manage to screw up.
If you make the workplace too simplified and foolproof, then they will just end up paying less attention overall and people will still die, just using other methods.
Sounds likes something a little training and general competence should solve. And I am guessing no matter how similar they are they are put in separate containers that are clearly labelled.
and since they are deadly if used interchangeably then and I also guessing that they are not all that similar to begin with?
I never really understood peoples problem with it. It seemed to me to at least have a better plot then many many other movies, not that that is saying all that much. So maybe it did not have a above average script, but did anyone really think that it would have one? Personally I thought Titanic was pretty stupid, and its main gimmick was also having the top graphics technology of the time, far surpassing all other films.
Personally I really enjoyed Avatar and thought it should of been longer, but then I was more interested in learning more about Pandora the world then the story.
Rape is not often performed simply because no willing parters can be found. It is more about domination of someone else the sexual pleasure. In pretty much every country prostitutes can be found, so by your logic their should be no rape in any of these countries.
I think what at least one interpretation is, is that it says that only Gods rules matter, but if someone is in the position to impose human laws then he must have the backing of god and therefore they are gods rules as well. "the powers that be are ordained of God"
But then it is obviously not obvious what "the powers that be" are.
I would define selling drugs legally as an endorsement.
Look at alcohol, a legal drug, and everyone does it. And basically if you don't then you are strange and most likely ostracized.
and we have lots and lots of alcohol related deaths and even more lives worsened by it.
not that prohibition worked for it.
But maybe being "hard on crime" should mean something a lot stronger then it currently does.
Maybe like any war innocents may get caught in the middle and all you can really do while effectively fighting the war is to try and reduce the innocent casualties.
bring in the military and do not require rock hard evidence to move against suspected drug criminals. if their is a drug den in same factory or house just launch a missile at it or surround it with tanks.
I just dont see accepting the fact that the criminals will win every time, so dont even try, is the best answer.
Not that I disagree with you but I just cannot see how the best answer to a problem is for the government to endorse doing drugs. People die all the take from taking drugs.
not that I have any viable solutions, I just wish that the police could do a better job then criminals.
It seemed to work for us Canadians, personally not putting the powers life and death into the hands of every punk on the streets just makes sense to me.
You cannot stop all murders but if you make it so that it is harder for people to kill other people then just pointing and pulling a trigger I think it is a good thing.
and sure giving less guns to citizens can make it harder to kill the leaders of the country, but do you want single/small groups of people to be able to kill the leader of their country? Their are always dissidents no matter how fair and good the rule is do, so does it make sense to give them the power to effect an entire nation? but in the end guns are no different then any other weapons conceptually, the point is were do you stop? Maybe no one should be allowed anything that is only used as a lethal/highly damaging weapon, maybe normal everyday people would be able to own automatic rifles and military explosives; Maybe they should even be allowed tactical missiles or weapons of mass destruction.
All I know is I do not want to live anywhere near anyone that has a weapon that will almost assume my death any time he chooses.
I am sure Google would of donated many many times the amount of computer cycles to curing cancer if they were asked.
I would be surprised if they really needed cycles much, it should not be hard to run some drive and get millions of people to donate their excess cycles to research. and it really does not cost that much to buy computers, if they wanted to do it themselves.
But I do not know, it is possible no one in the cancer research field has tried very hard. But in the end of the day it is not googles fault or anyone else if researchers have not made it a point to go looking for people to donate computers time.
I would tend to agree with gates that university is not really the ultimate way to got, if tons of lectures and school material will be available for everyone soon I have no idea.
Having taken around 3 years of courses at Waterloo I have only found one course with anything worth learning in it so far. and even if you are in a interesting course that does not mean that the professors know much about the content of the course, can speak english, know enough about teaching to do a good job, or care.
I would far rather watch a lecture online from a professor that is universally believed to be great at all of these things, then attend a lecture in person from a professor likely to be lacking in all of these areas.
Sure it is chat with a couple of features, but it is done in such a way as to make it very unique. Having used Wave in all its current greatness and even more amazing potential I would still state that wave is the future, or at least a program/service that has very similar features is the future.
Is create a computer virus that takes fractions of a cent from each transaction and puts it in their bank account. Absolutely nothing could go wrong with that fool proof plan.
we want more regulation so that the web will not be regulated. regulation to stop regulation, sounds stupid but it is really the only way to go about it.
I completely disagree, a lot of times free media gets put into torrents and sometimes is the only way to even get it. People that are not making money do not have the money to pay for the bandwidth to distribute to many people.
I doubt it, Aliens are constantly coming from all directions including from behind and catch up in seconds or even fractions of seconds, particularly in the harder difficulties. also constantly maintaining the optimum strategic positions relative to your teammates is a necessarily in Insane mode, and it only takes running in front of your team mate while they file a few times to kill you.
That being said it would be easier to shoot in the z dimension, in the rare instances that it is necessary. and their is nothing really nothing i have not mentioned about the game that makes FP view harder then top down. So it would be more then possible, at least at easier difficulties, but I think that insane mode would be near impossible if not totally impossible. But then some people could just be very stilled at FP squad based tactics and make it work perfectly fine, but then their are a lot more pope playing FPSes then top down shooters.
Slashdot Mirror
But for good or ill most health care is done using Humans.
If it is not this then it is something else that they will manage to screw up.
If you make the workplace too simplified and foolproof, then they will just end up paying less attention overall and people will still die, just using other methods.
Sounds likes something a little training and general competence should solve.
And I am guessing no matter how similar they are they are put in separate containers that are clearly labelled.
and since they are deadly if used interchangeably then and I also guessing that they are not all that similar to begin with?
I never really understood peoples problem with it. It seemed to me to at least have a better plot then many many other movies, not that that is saying all that much.
So maybe it did not have a above average script, but did anyone really think that it would have one? Personally I thought Titanic was pretty stupid, and its main gimmick was also having the top graphics technology of the time, far surpassing all other films.
Personally I really enjoyed Avatar and thought it should of been longer, but then I was more interested in learning more about Pandora the world then the story.
Rape is not often performed simply because no willing parters can be found. It is more about domination of someone else the sexual pleasure. In pretty much every country prostitutes can be found, so by your logic their should be no rape in any of these countries.
Well I hope they lvl up the students before letting them encounter Gilgamesh (http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Gilgamesh).
I think what at least one interpretation is, is that it says that only Gods rules matter, but if someone is in the position to impose human laws then he must have the backing of god and therefore they are gods rules as well.
"the powers that be are ordained of God"
But then it is obviously not obvious what "the powers that be" are.
I think the main difference is that I have never heard of any caffeine overdose related deaths.
I would define selling drugs legally as an endorsement.
Look at alcohol, a legal drug, and everyone does it. And basically if you don't then you are strange and most likely ostracized.
and we have lots and lots of alcohol related deaths and even more lives worsened by it.
not that prohibition worked for it.
But maybe being "hard on crime" should mean something a lot stronger then it currently does.
Maybe like any war innocents may get caught in the middle and all you can really do while effectively fighting the war is to try and reduce the innocent casualties.
bring in the military and do not require rock hard evidence to move against suspected drug criminals.
if their is a drug den in same factory or house just launch a missile at it or surround it with tanks.
I just dont see accepting the fact that the criminals will win every time, so dont even try, is the best answer.
Not that I disagree with you but I just cannot see how the best answer to a problem is for the government to endorse doing drugs. People die all the take from taking drugs.
not that I have any viable solutions, I just wish that the police could do a better job then criminals.
I do not even understand what you are talking about, how did you ever get a score of 5 insightful?
It seemed to work for us Canadians, personally not putting the powers life and death into the hands of every punk on the streets just makes sense to me.
You cannot stop all murders but if you make it so that it is harder for people to kill other people then just pointing and pulling a trigger I think it is a good thing.
and sure giving less guns to citizens can make it harder to kill the leaders of the country, but do you want single/small groups of people to be able to kill the leader of their country? Their are always dissidents no matter how fair and good the rule is do, so does it make sense to give them the power to effect an entire nation?
but in the end guns are no different then any other weapons conceptually, the point is were do you stop? Maybe no one should be allowed anything that is only used as a lethal/highly damaging weapon, maybe normal everyday people would be able to own automatic rifles and military explosives; Maybe they should even be allowed tactical missiles or weapons of mass destruction.
All I know is I do not want to live anywhere near anyone that has a weapon that will almost assume my death any time he chooses.
I am sure Google would of donated many many times the amount of computer cycles to curing cancer if they were asked.
I would be surprised if they really needed cycles much, it should not be hard to run some drive and get millions of people to donate their excess cycles to research.
and it really does not cost that much to buy computers, if they wanted to do it themselves.
But I do not know, it is possible no one in the cancer research field has tried very hard.
But in the end of the day it is not googles fault or anyone else if researchers have not made it a point to go looking for people to donate computers time.
I would tend to agree with gates that university is not really the ultimate way to got, if tons of lectures and school material will be available for everyone soon I have no idea.
Having taken around 3 years of courses at Waterloo I have only found one course with anything worth learning in it so far.
and even if you are in a interesting course that does not mean that the professors know much about the content of the course, can speak english, know enough about teaching to do a good job, or care.
I would far rather watch a lecture online from a professor that is universally believed to be great at all of these things, then attend a lecture in person from a professor likely to be lacking in all of these areas.
Accepting offered cash does not mean that was the motivation of finding the bug in the first place.
Capitalism.
Sure it is chat with a couple of features, but it is done in such a way as to make it very unique.
Having used Wave in all its current greatness and even more amazing potential I would still state that wave is the future, or at least a program/service that has very similar features is the future.
I also used it for similar purposes.
It is hands above the competition in its niche.
I was surprised how well the 3D glasses fit over my pair or seeing glasses.
Sure it is not as nice as only having one pair on, but it works
Is create a computer virus that takes fractions of a cent from each transaction and puts it in their bank account.
Absolutely nothing could go wrong with that fool proof plan.
we want more regulation so that the web will not be regulated.
regulation to stop regulation, sounds stupid but it is really the only way to go about it.
They have had this option to delete accounts for years now.
I even used it like 4 years ago.
Maybe they just moved the button that starts the process?
Why not, porn does not cause political unrest.
I expect it may actually cause the opposite.
I completely disagree, a lot of times free media gets put into torrents and sometimes is the only way to even get it.
People that are not making money do not have the money to pay for the bandwidth to distribute to many people.
for example see Pioneer One.
"In fact, it poses the potential to make the game easier for people who would've otherwise struggled with the overhead view."
I do not think their is any other way to read this quote...
I doubt it, Aliens are constantly coming from all directions including from behind and catch up in seconds or even fractions of seconds, particularly in the harder difficulties.
also constantly maintaining the optimum strategic positions relative to your teammates is a necessarily in Insane mode, and it only takes running in front of your team mate while they file a few times to kill you.
That being said it would be easier to shoot in the z dimension, in the rare instances that it is necessary.
and their is nothing really nothing i have not mentioned about the game that makes FP view harder then top down.
So it would be more then possible, at least at easier difficulties, but I think that insane mode would be near impossible if not totally impossible.
But then some people could just be very stilled at FP squad based tactics and make it work perfectly fine, but then their are a lot more pope playing FPSes then top down shooters.