As between you and the Microsoft installation guide [microsoft.com], updated two days ago, I'm deeming the installation guide more credible.
Prerequisites 1. Windows 10 Anniversary Update - build 14393 Available as of 8/2/2016 2. x64-based processor 3. Your PC must have an AMD/Intel x64 compatible CPU 4. You must be a member of the (free) Windows Insider Program (Preferably Fast-Ring) 5. Your PC must be running a 64-bit version of Windows 10 Anniversary Update build 14316 or later
Then I read your imgur post and have this to tell you:
1. It's not built-in functionality
2. It's in beta (as of 8/10/2016) - Bash on Ubuntu on Windows && Installation Guide. This is only available to a specific subset of Windows users (eg Windows Insiders Program).
Disclaimer: "This is the first release of Bash on Windows and it is branded "beta" deliberately - it's not yet complete! You should expect many things to work and for some things to fail! We greatly appreciate you using Bash on Windows and helping us identify the issues we need to fix in order to deliver a great experience."
You can't expect 100% compatibility with something still in beta. There are broken things and things that will be changed. Expecting Avast to work with it right now or refund you for a beta-product is unreasonable. Maybe common handles things differently than civil law in this case. I know Europe has better consumer protections in many many ways than the US, but I can't see where anyone would reasonably expect a refund or extensive support for a beta add-in when the product works perfectly with production level software (aka Win 10).
I'm in the same boat. I wasn't planning on looking for it either until I sent the story to my friend and put the gun emoji to the right of an eye roll emoji.
True but how many people do? I know it's more common in non-US countries. I commonly see people gripe about Rogers in Canada, for example.
However, for me, my cable is nearly always bundled with internet in a fashion that makes it nearly or as expensive to just have cable. I've juggled RCN, Comcast, and a few other providers over the years. Now, with RCN, even with my subsidized deal where I essentially pay taxes (thanks HOA!) and my phone for my TV package, I still probably get 3 or 4 to 1 cent in the Netflix:Cable debate. Hell the biggest reason I have cable at all is for sports. I watch far too many for my own good, but just getting the internet would boost my sports outlay considerably between the MLB/NBA/NFL packages, ESPN GO, or the bar tab I'd rack up watching my favorite out of market teams.
Birds that would be getting in the way of planes would be larger and heavier than your average drone (up to 2 lbs or so). Geese and ducks can easily make it to 15 and 5 lbs respectively. Crows can get pretty big too.
Rather than having the phone send out an amplified analog signal, if the phone sends out a simple digital stream it would use LESS - not more - power. With a dongle it would use the same amount as it does today to convert to an audio stream, but if you had battery powered headphones they could do all of the amplification (and plenty of really nice headphones already do additional application in the headphones).
Alternately what if the new audio jack provided power so you could have a set of external speakers that did use phone power to provide really good sound quality? That seems better to be than using external speakers today where I have to plug them in (though sadly most external speakers today are bluetooth).
1) It also means I can't charge it while I listen to music if I want.
2) I don't want battery powered headphones. That's another thing I have to charge
3) If I use bluetooth so I can charge my phones, the power runs down even quicker and I have another thing to charge
4) If I want to plug in my phone to external speakers, I want it charging so the battery doesn't run down or most likely I will connect via bluetooth while leaving it charged.
It will kill your battery life and/or require you to purchase a bunch of f*cking dongles to charge your phone and use the headphones at the same time. Patel's list is right on the money. Most people can't even hear well enough to differentiate between the quality of analog vs digital and don't use music with that high of a bit rate anyway. Looks like I'm gonna be limited to the iPhone SE when I finally upgrade off my 5. I don't want a huge phablet and I want a god damn headphone jack.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
It's quicker to consume text than video. Just an FYI
Note: Unabashed repost from yesterday because that was the stupidest thing I'd heard all day and work had a Trump segment on in the background
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
It's quicker to consume text than video. Just an FYI
but it's still not something anyone is gonna spend any time crackingThe misconception is that people think you can 'crack a password'.
You can't.
If you try to log on on any system and fail several times it shuts you out.
So, cracking a password is only possible if the password is stored on a system, likely hashed or encrypted, and leaks. If your system is leaking password files, then you have much bigger issues than weak passwords.
See the linkedin disaster.
Erm that's pretty much the only way I know of doing it. A few years ago before they limited login attempts (I assume), someone did break into my twitter account to spam in Russian (for boner pills apparently after I translated it). If they didn't they definitely took it offline to brute force. I know that happened to linkedin (twice) in the times I've been on it. Can't say I've bothered to change that one either.
Anything that is financially sensitive or has access to lots of personal correspondence will require a very secure password. My email password is 26 characters. My social media one is 16. My bank password is less "secure" because they don't accept quite a few characters that Google/MS/FB accept, but it's still not something anyone is gonna spend any time cracking.
Then we get to sites like my newspaper subscription or my intramural sports login. Those are just simple dictionary words I've used since I was 12. I don't give a shit if someone hacks into those accounts. By all means log in and view my mediocre playoff record.
So let's get this straight, the US running joint combat training with Ukraine -- which they do with dozens of other countries in the world -- 19 months after Russia invaded and occupied the Crimean peninsula is evidence that the US was backing Ukraine during the conflict?
To top it off, your next link produces these gems:
"This was the first outright nazi action ever undertaken by any American President. Ever. "
"The nazi United States Government today is ideologically, by its nazi actions, at war against the democratic United States that, by its democratic actions, had fought and shed blood to defeat Hitler’s Nazis in World War II. "
What the fucking are you smoking or ingesting? Pass it my way
Let me put it this way, we don't have a problem with the site.
We do have a problem of unlicensed trademark use and/or use of someone's likeness without their permission or a payout schedule. Of course anyone with a brain could have grasped that, so let's just look past that and say "YEAH FUCK THE RIGHT, MAN!"
Not one single bit, mostly because anyone who knows what WoW is knows who makes it.
If you didn't know that, I wouldn't blame you. If you did, well then you're just an idiot (or masquerading as one). Seriously why else would "Blizzard, Fan-run, server, and WoW" be in same headline?
Key evidence is always physical evidence. That's why search warrants are such an important thing. I could have evidence that your power bill tripled overnight, and show the court the increased heat signature of your house from an arial view during the same time period. However, reasonable doubt would still exist until I could present a pot plant physically pulled from your basement. Key evidence on a phone could be correspondance, pictures, and video.
That would require a search warrant for the cops per Kyllo_v._United_States. The irony of that example in this particular debate is not lost upon me and I hope it's not lost on others.
If you travel overseas, go for Global Entry. It costs the same ($100), and it includes PreCheck as a perk. As an added bonus, you get to use kiosks for passport control (never a wait) and the crew line for customs.
I routinely take 8-10 minutes total from deplaning at LAX (Bradley Terminal) to the terminal exit. A bit longer if I have to wait for checked luggage. Worth every cent.
Global Entry is definitely the way to go if you travel internationally. Flying into ATL or JFK is no longer a hassle at customs and immigration. At YVR when a cruise ship is dumping their passengers in the line is no big deal as well. GE is now $200, but many credit cards will refund the fee; even so I'd gladly pay the $200 to avoid a hour or more wait to get back in after a 10 plus hour flight. Pre-check is an added bonus, and I'm glad they are limiting the non - Preorder GE folks from using Pre. Nothing is more annoying to be in line behind someone who doesn't understand they don't need to disrobe and empty their luggage and hold up the line because they are clueless.; and then look all pissed because you toss your bag on the belt ahead of theirs and go through the metal detector.
GE also is expanding to some overseas airports as well for an extra fee. The U.K. Is one destination that would be worth the fee.
No, no it's not. Quit spreading FUD and talking out your ass
"A $100 one-time fee is required with your Global Entry application and must be paid at time of application submission"
http://www.cbp.gov/travel/trus...
Slashdot Mirror
As between you and the Microsoft installation guide [microsoft.com], updated two days ago, I'm deeming the installation guide more credible.
Prerequisites
1. Windows 10 Anniversary Update - build 14393 Available as of 8/2/2016
2. x64-based processor
3. Your PC must have an AMD/Intel x64 compatible CPU
4. You must be a member of the (free) Windows Insider Program (Preferably Fast-Ring)
5. Your PC must be running a 64-bit version of Windows 10 Anniversary Update build 14316 or later
1. It's not built-in functionality
2. It's in beta (as of 8/10/2016) - Bash on Ubuntu on Windows && Installation Guide. This is only available to a specific subset of Windows users (eg Windows Insiders Program).
Disclaimer: "This is the first release of Bash on Windows and it is branded "beta" deliberately - it's not yet complete! You should expect many things to work and for some things to fail! We greatly appreciate you using Bash on Windows and helping us identify the issues we need to fix in order to deliver a great experience."
You can't expect 100% compatibility with something still in beta. There are broken things and things that will be changed. Expecting Avast to work with it right now or refund you for a beta-product is unreasonable. Maybe common handles things differently than civil law in this case. I know Europe has better consumer protections in many many ways than the US, but I can't see where anyone would reasonably expect a refund or extensive support for a beta add-in when the product works perfectly with production level software (aka Win 10).
I'm glad you beat me to typing "NO SHIT".
Next story we're gonna get is, "If you install a database or 3rd party program, the attack vector gets larger!"
I'm in the same boat. I wasn't planning on looking for it either until I sent the story to my friend and put the gun emoji to the right of an eye roll emoji.
It's a Sophie's choice if you're a fucking moron or aren't quite sure what "Sophie's Choice" is.
True but how many people do? I know it's more common in non-US countries. I commonly see people gripe about Rogers in Canada, for example.
However, for me, my cable is nearly always bundled with internet in a fashion that makes it nearly or as expensive to just have cable. I've juggled RCN, Comcast, and a few other providers over the years. Now, with RCN, even with my subsidized deal where I essentially pay taxes (thanks HOA!) and my phone for my TV package, I still probably get 3 or 4 to 1 cent in the Netflix:Cable debate. Hell the biggest reason I have cable at all is for sports. I watch far too many for my own good, but just getting the internet would boost my sports outlay considerably between the MLB/NBA/NFL packages, ESPN GO, or the bar tab I'd rack up watching my favorite out of market teams.
Birds that would be getting in the way of planes would be larger and heavier than your average drone (up to 2 lbs or so). Geese and ducks can easily make it to 15 and 5 lbs respectively. Crows can get pretty big too.
Yes I would. Next question?
Access by hackers wasn't the issue at hand. Learn to read.
Rather than having the phone send out an amplified analog signal, if the phone sends out a simple digital stream it would use LESS - not more - power. With a dongle it would use the same amount as it does today to convert to an audio stream, but if you had battery powered headphones they could do all of the amplification (and plenty of really nice headphones already do additional application in the headphones).
Alternately what if the new audio jack provided power so you could have a set of external speakers that did use phone power to provide really good sound quality? That seems better to be than using external speakers today where I have to plug them in (though sadly most external speakers today are bluetooth).
1) It also means I can't charge it while I listen to music if I want.
2) I don't want battery powered headphones. That's another thing I have to charge
3) If I use bluetooth so I can charge my phones, the power runs down even quicker and I have another thing to charge
4) If I want to plug in my phone to external speakers, I want it charging so the battery doesn't run down or most likely I will connect via bluetooth while leaving it charged.
I've had far worse experience with my android phones and the carriers seem to never want to update/support them.
It will kill your battery life and/or require you to purchase a bunch of f*cking dongles to charge your phone and use the headphones at the same time. Patel's list is right on the money. Most people can't even hear well enough to differentiate between the quality of analog vs digital and don't use music with that high of a bit rate anyway. Looks like I'm gonna be limited to the iPhone SE when I finally upgrade off my 5. I don't want a huge phablet and I want a god damn headphone jack.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Ms Mendelsohn,
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
It's quicker to consume text than video. Just an FYI
Note: Unabashed repost from yesterday because that was the stupidest thing I'd heard all day and work had a Trump segment on in the background
Ms Mendelsohn,
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
It's quicker to consume text than video. Just an FYI
Those are generally called "countries" now.
Since when were Vince Cerf, Bob Kahn, or IEEE European?
It's a good thing no one writes these things down
but it's still not something anyone is gonna spend any time cracking The misconception is that people think you can 'crack a password'. You can't. If you try to log on on any system and fail several times it shuts you out. So, cracking a password is only possible if the password is stored on a system, likely hashed or encrypted, and leaks. If your system is leaking password files, then you have much bigger issues than weak passwords. See the linkedin disaster.
Erm that's pretty much the only way I know of doing it. A few years ago before they limited login attempts (I assume), someone did break into my twitter account to spam in Russian (for boner pills apparently after I translated it). If they didn't they definitely took it offline to brute force. I know that happened to linkedin (twice) in the times I've been on it. Can't say I've bothered to change that one either.
Anything that is financially sensitive or has access to lots of personal correspondence will require a very secure password. My email password is 26 characters. My social media one is 16. My bank password is less "secure" because they don't accept quite a few characters that Google/MS/FB accept, but it's still not something anyone is gonna spend any time cracking.
Then we get to sites like my newspaper subscription or my intramural sports login. Those are just simple dictionary words I've used since I was 12. I don't give a shit if someone hacks into those accounts. By all means log in and view my mediocre playoff record.
So let's get this straight, the US running joint combat training with Ukraine -- which they do with dozens of other countries in the world -- 19 months after Russia invaded and occupied the Crimean peninsula is evidence that the US was backing Ukraine during the conflict?
To top it off, your next link produces these gems: "This was the first outright nazi action ever undertaken by any American President. Ever. "
"The nazi United States Government today is ideologically, by its nazi actions, at war against the democratic United States that, by its democratic actions, had fought and shed blood to defeat Hitler’s Nazis in World War II. "
What the fucking are you smoking or ingesting? Pass it my way
KIDS THESE DAYS, AMIRITE?!
Prolly too busy emojiing Tinder to not text their BFFs while driving and praying for Bernie Sanders and TARP.
DAMN THEM!
Let me put it this way, we don't have a problem with the site.
We do have a problem of unlicensed trademark use and/or use of someone's likeness without their permission or a payout schedule. Of course anyone with a brain could have grasped that, so let's just look past that and say "YEAH FUCK THE RIGHT, MAN!"
Not one single bit, mostly because anyone who knows what WoW is knows who makes it.
If you didn't know that, I wouldn't blame you. If you did, well then you're just an idiot (or masquerading as one). Seriously why else would "Blizzard, Fan-run, server, and WoW" be in same headline?
Key evidence is always physical evidence. That's why search warrants are such an important thing. I could have evidence that your power bill tripled overnight, and show the court the increased heat signature of your house from an arial view during the same time period. However, reasonable doubt would still exist until I could present a pot plant physically pulled from your basement. Key evidence on a phone could be correspondance, pictures, and video.
That would require a search warrant for the cops per Kyllo_v._United_States. The irony of that example in this particular debate is not lost upon me and I hope it's not lost on others.
If you travel overseas, go for Global Entry. It costs the same ($100), and it includes PreCheck as a perk. As an added bonus, you get to use kiosks for passport control (never a wait) and the crew line for customs.
I routinely take 8-10 minutes total from deplaning at LAX (Bradley Terminal) to the terminal exit. A bit longer if I have to wait for checked luggage. Worth every cent.
Global Entry is definitely the way to go if you travel internationally. Flying into ATL or JFK is no longer a hassle at customs and immigration. At YVR when a cruise ship is dumping their passengers in the line is no big deal as well. GE is now $200, but many credit cards will refund the fee; even so I'd gladly pay the $200 to avoid a hour or more wait to get back in after a 10 plus hour flight. Pre-check is an added bonus, and I'm glad they are limiting the non - Preorder GE folks from using Pre. Nothing is more annoying to be in line behind someone who doesn't understand they don't need to disrobe and empty their luggage and hold up the line because they are clueless.; and then look all pissed because you toss your bag on the belt ahead of theirs and go through the metal detector.
GE also is expanding to some overseas airports as well for an extra fee. The U.K. Is one destination that would be worth the fee.
No, no it's not. Quit spreading FUD and talking out your ass
"A $100 one-time fee is required with your Global Entry application and must be paid at time of application submission" http://www.cbp.gov/travel/trus...