I think that view is a bit cynical. Lucas strikes me as someone who actually enjoyed being a story teller and film maker (especially playing with new technologies). He was just smart enough to realize he could make a buck doing that, then used that as a way of getting funding to continue doing what he liked.
In SF it is also the wealthy land owners who are opposed to new housing because they believe it will weaken their investments and reduce their rental income.
But you can't teach creativity, creative innovation, nor artistic creative innovation -- that means problem solving.
Sure you can. It's not learned the same way as math or history but exposure and practice definitely can improve those skills.They are not inherent, immutable, or absolute.
I've been using Logitech hardware for quite some time now, and while it does require software (how else am I going to map the 12 buttons on my mouse) I've never had to register or login to anything.
Anyone can be the eponym for anything, there doesn't need to be a relation, Tesla cars are eponymous of the scientist, but Nikola has nothing to do with the company.
Instead of burying them in mines, turn the wood into charcoal so won't ever rot. You lose a little carbon in the process, but you end up with a much more stable product, and you can net some energy out it all too.
You don't need pairs for that to work, just a family group (not even necessarily related). For example elephants tend to stay in groups of just females to raise the relatively vulnerable young.
I agree at this point the phrase is marred by its past usage, but is there another term we should use then? Because there is a real subject of debate that has nothing to do with slavery at this point, be it about gambling, cannabis, or firearm regulations.
I wish I could remember the short story about a time in the future when they run out of original melodic sequences because everything is under copyright
It's still up to the teachers or schools to implement the lesson or not, Google isn't forcing anybody to do this it's just providing resources for those that choose to use them.
And this isn't new at all, for example look up Pepsi's use of the US's attempt at adopting the metric system to push using 2 liter bottles of soda as teaching aids ("follow the liter" campaign)
Comcast does this already with its "public" WiFi from customer's home routers
you wouldn't?
this makes sense as it is the lead up to a pair of one way bridges and traffic might need to be directed off of one and the other shared
T_D started as satire and mockery and then Poe's law (and trolls) took over and it became what it ended up as
I think that view is a bit cynical. Lucas strikes me as someone who actually enjoyed being a story teller and film maker (especially playing with new technologies). He was just smart enough to realize he could make a buck doing that, then used that as a way of getting funding to continue doing what he liked.
In SF it is also the wealthy land owners who are opposed to new housing because they believe it will weaken their investments and reduce their rental income.
But you can't teach creativity, creative innovation, nor artistic creative innovation -- that means problem solving.
Sure you can. It's not learned the same way as math or history but exposure and practice definitely can improve those skills.They are not inherent, immutable, or absolute.
It's funny you say that but part of how I learned to sew as a kid was by making ninja outfits for my action figures.
You've got it backwards, Texas was Mexican first, then invaded by white folk.
I've been using Logitech hardware for quite some time now, and while it does require software (how else am I going to map the 12 buttons on my mouse) I've never had to register or login to anything.
If you can find $5 model Ms then you should be flipping them on ebay for 20x profit
Anyone can be the eponym for anything, there doesn't need to be a relation, Tesla cars are eponymous of the scientist, but Nikola has nothing to do with the company.
Instead of burying them in mines, turn the wood into charcoal so won't ever rot. You lose a little carbon in the process, but you end up with a much more stable product, and you can net some energy out it all too.
You don't need pairs for that to work, just a family group (not even necessarily related). For example elephants tend to stay in groups of just females to raise the relatively vulnerable young.
This mistake is so prevalent I wonder if there was a misinformation campaign at some point to conflate them.
"your wise men don't know how it feels to be thick as a brick" -Jethro Tull
I agree at this point the phrase is marred by its past usage, but is there another term we should use then? Because there is a real subject of debate that has nothing to do with slavery at this point, be it about gambling, cannabis, or firearm regulations.
No more "millennials" will ever be made, production stopped a little over 15 years ago. I'm not sure what the new models are branded as yet
>"radical centrist" seems an oxymoron.
Not in a highly bi-modal system
I wish I could remember the short story about a time in the future when they run out of original melodic sequences because everything is under copyright
I'd mod you funny had I the points
How does an example of total economic failure represent a loss of individuality among its citizens?
how to you get "I killed them so they must be a Nazi" from "kill the Nazis"?
and who modded this backwards logic up?
It's still up to the teachers or schools to implement the lesson or not, Google isn't forcing anybody to do this it's just providing resources for those that choose to use them.
And this isn't new at all, for example look up Pepsi's use of the US's attempt at adopting the metric system to push using 2 liter bottles of soda as teaching aids ("follow the liter" campaign)
So you've never been in a committed relationship? that's a "non-binding" "agreement" between people (at least before they're married)