My brain and nervous system use electricity. Are those going to become computers and move online? I'm willing to consider it as long as the source is audited by multiple trusted parties.
Nowadays they don't even need to go buy a server, they can just go buy a hosted cloud instance. I recently heard a conference speaker say something like "sysadmins prepare to lose your job because the guys in the cloud are doing it right and you aren't"
"twice as likely to be subjected to unsolicited sexual advances " The problem is, a 'solicited' sexual advance means the other party was the "victim" of an unsolicited sexual advance. It's a vicious cycle.
I expect we will see more and more of the approach taken by some medical devices, where the software (vulnerable) controls are limited by analog failsafes in the machinery. Due in part to the Therac-25 incident. "Just airgap it" is an inadequate solution in many cases, or even more expensive than maintaining analog backups.
TFA is very vague, This might be better for anyone who is interested. The law applies mainly apply to ISPs and online service providers like the summary says. It doesn't sound much different to me than what Europe has, please correct me if I am wrong on that.
I don't claim to be well read on the subject, so perhaps this is old hat to others. But I hadn't heard the argument about encouraging exploration and risk taking through a universal safety net. Interesting. My first thought is that this is unlikely, at best we might see more sure fire failures like beanie baby stores. But that's the nature of this sort of exploration, there would be a lot of failures.
Sharing passwords? That's crazy, how are you supposed to re-use the same password on your bank account if you just hand it out? I won't even share my IP address on the Internet.
This is a good idea anyway, since there are several exploits in SMBv1 which were patched in the May 2017 release. i.e. after MS17-010 was released. So SMBv1 is getting a lot of extra attention, and there is still more ground for hi jinx there. I believe it is disabled by default in server 2012 R2
The vast majority of the time I'm driving short trips like to or from work. I can rent a gas car for any longer trips. I don't think the average driver is any different. Hybrid cars sell better since charging stations aren't common.
A black female lead is fine with me. In fact, I think in a true united earth future almost everyone would be darker skinned and Asian or African looking. The white Europeans appearance would be a small minority. Why not include a character who looks Chinese but was raised Norse? Anyway, what I hated about this trailer is the lead character's ridiculous eyelashes. What does an eyelash curler look like centuries in the future?
"elements of translucency and animation"....I hate it already. For a while there, it looked like MS was starting to understand that people use applications, not the OS. The only goal of the OS is to make it easy to use applications and stay out of the way otherwise. They sort of got the hint with the Vista fiasco. Looks like everyone who got it has retired and the latest shiny thing crowd is back in the saddle.
Where I live, a lot of middle income people are already selling power back into the grid via solar, so upgrading facilities isn't an issue everywhere. There are some pretty hefty tax incentives for doing it, and the entrepreneurs are in full hunt mode figuring out ways to get people into it. Mainly through various long term lease schemes where the homeowner leases the solar equipment but still retains rights to any profits from power reselling. The main factor though is lower electricity bills, and that money goes right to the leasing company.
Like so many other things, this is just an amplification by the net of things which were already there. There was never really a time of objective journalism, they have been taking sides since the invention of the printing press in China. We aren't living in a "post truth" world, it is the same old world. The only change is the massive shrieking feedback loop of the Internet.
Is that what any developer is attesting when they introduce a security improvement? The "secured" term is added by the submitter, TFA says "malware proof" which is just as bad but in a different way.
The summary adds the words "for business" to the article, apparently without justification. Yes, the preview is part of the Enterprise offerings at this point, but there's no reason not to assume the final version will be available to everyone.
Slashdot Mirror
My brain and nervous system use electricity. Are those going to become computers and move online? I'm willing to consider it as long as the source is audited by multiple trusted parties.
Thank goodness this idea is proposed by a board certified anesthesiologist and not some dilettante who has no expertise on how kids should be raised.
Jupiter
Nowadays they don't even need to go buy a server, they can just go buy a hosted cloud instance. I recently heard a conference speaker say something like "sysadmins prepare to lose your job because the guys in the cloud are doing it right and you aren't"
"twice as likely to be subjected to unsolicited sexual advances " The problem is, a 'solicited' sexual advance means the other party was the "victim" of an unsolicited sexual advance. It's a vicious cycle.
I expect we will see more and more of the approach taken by some medical devices, where the software (vulnerable) controls are limited by analog failsafes in the machinery. Due in part to the Therac-25 incident. "Just airgap it" is an inadequate solution in many cases, or even more expensive than maintaining analog backups.
TFA is very vague, This might be better for anyone who is interested. The law applies mainly apply to ISPs and online service providers like the summary says. It doesn't sound much different to me than what Europe has, please correct me if I am wrong on that.
I tried it on some of my 2021R2s with no effects.
This case ("infected by a virus"..."unleash hell") isn't covered by the proposed bill.
I don't claim to be well read on the subject, so perhaps this is old hat to others. But I hadn't heard the argument about encouraging exploration and risk taking through a universal safety net. Interesting. My first thought is that this is unlikely, at best we might see more sure fire failures like beanie baby stores. But that's the nature of this sort of exploration, there would be a lot of failures.
Sharing passwords? That's crazy, how are you supposed to re-use the same password on your bank account if you just hand it out? I won't even share my IP address on the Internet.
And the people in China are also only subservient in several key areas.
This is a good idea anyway, since there are several exploits in SMBv1 which were patched in the May 2017 release. i.e. after MS17-010 was released. So SMBv1 is getting a lot of extra attention, and there is still more ground for hi jinx there. I believe it is disabled by default in server 2012 R2
In the UK sure, they are all stressed out over Brexit.
The vast majority of the time I'm driving short trips like to or from work. I can rent a gas car for any longer trips. I don't think the average driver is any different. Hybrid cars sell better since charging stations aren't common.
My company HQ with around 1700 people has around one ambulance call per year, and that is all desk jobs.
That would be awesome, except DS9 already did the wormhole aliens perceived as gods thing. Or was that the Simpsons?
Groupon asked 1,000 U.S. parents how much time their families plan to spend on their electronic devices this summer
So a website which encourages people to be glued to the screen trawling for bargains discovers its users are glued to the screen.
A black female lead is fine with me. In fact, I think in a true united earth future almost everyone would be darker skinned and Asian or African looking. The white Europeans appearance would be a small minority. Why not include a character who looks Chinese but was raised Norse? Anyway, what I hated about this trailer is the lead character's ridiculous eyelashes. What does an eyelash curler look like centuries in the future?
"elements of translucency and animation"....I hate it already. For a while there, it looked like MS was starting to understand that people use applications, not the OS. The only goal of the OS is to make it easy to use applications and stay out of the way otherwise. They sort of got the hint with the Vista fiasco. Looks like everyone who got it has retired and the latest shiny thing crowd is back in the saddle.
Where I live, a lot of middle income people are already selling power back into the grid via solar, so upgrading facilities isn't an issue everywhere. There are some pretty hefty tax incentives for doing it, and the entrepreneurs are in full hunt mode figuring out ways to get people into it. Mainly through various long term lease schemes where the homeowner leases the solar equipment but still retains rights to any profits from power reselling. The main factor though is lower electricity bills, and that money goes right to the leasing company.
There are plenty of other reasons to mod parent down, it has nothing to do with not voting.
Like so many other things, this is just an amplification by the net of things which were already there. There was never really a time of objective journalism, they have been taking sides since the invention of the printing press in China. We aren't living in a "post truth" world, it is the same old world. The only change is the massive shrieking feedback loop of the Internet.
Is that what any developer is attesting when they introduce a security improvement? The "secured" term is added by the submitter, TFA says "malware proof" which is just as bad but in a different way.
The summary adds the words "for business" to the article, apparently without justification. Yes, the preview is part of the Enterprise offerings at this point, but there's no reason not to assume the final version will be available to everyone.