If you are wanting to pursue Computer Security, SANS is one of the best. They offer a good variety of classes, and as Smoky said, it's very practical. Personally, I've only taken their 1 week courses, but I've heard good things about their online courses. Plus, the brick and mortar classes are very fast paced, but with online you have more time to absorb the content.
The downsides? Expensive. I believe it's grad level stuff, so that's expected.
They also have certifications associated with the classes (it's a separate but affiliated with SANS). It's an additional cost, and you really have to study over your course material after the class in order to do well. www.giac.org for the certs.
But Microsoft's own data doesn't always support William's contention that piracy, and the hesitancy to use Windows Update, leads to more infected PCs. China, for example, boasted a malware infection rate -- as defined by the number of computers cleaned for each 1,000 executions of the MSRT -- of just 6.7 per thousand, significantly below the global average of 8.7 or the US's rate of 8.2. France's infection rate of 7.9 in the first half of 2009 was also below the worldwide average.
Wait a minute. We are using the MSRT stats to debunk the idea that piracy and not running Windows Updates results in more malware. MRST is usually run as a part of Windows Update...so the people not running WU don't run the tool and aren't even a part of the stats. Whether Microsoft is right or wrong, this argument is flawed.
But on a laptop, that would eat through the battery running 2 systems at once. I guess you could put one OS on standby while you use the other. Semi-fast OS switching.
Actually, I think it depends on the woman. My wife is all about thoughtful gifts. If I spent the time to make something for her, she loves it...although it certainly helps to make something she likes. For example, a bad idea would be...hmm...a hackable microcontroller-powered valentine's card.
Is this Jerry Lee Cooper guy a joke? Seriously, is he a real guy who really thinks this stuff? Linux is an app on top of WinXP? I read a couple other things he's posted...insanity. It has to be a joke. Can anyone REALLY be that misinformed?
I don't think the pirates have submarines or aircraft... yet.
Even if they did, I'm pretty sure the convoy escort could handle those.
And even if the pirates did use their ransom money to buy things like subs or aircraft, the navies would just more countermeasures. We already have anti-sub measures. Also, planes have to land somewhere. A little bit of satellite photography and a squad of jet fighters would end this.
First off, I agree completely that people need to learn to ask "why?" when it comes to these things. It's the people willing to take a new approach that often find something new.
Second, and a bit off topic, how are those theories biblical? I've never seen them in a bible.
Well, for those of us who use wireless microphones (like you see at concerts, conventions, sports stadiums, or churches), we are the ones who might get screwed. They FCC says they are putting measures in place to prevent this, but we'll have to see what happens. There will be another ruling to finalize all this.
Here's a decent summary from Shure[PDF] (they make wireless mics).
Most likely that's exactly what's happening. The crypto processors can be quite efficient with AES. With the load split between the 2 (each doing what it's best at), it's very possible to see a speed difference.
WPA and TKIP was really just a stepping stone to get people off WEP and heading toward WPA2 and AES. Wireless hardware built to run WEP didn't have the processing power to run AES (I think it needed a separate crypto processor just for AES). So they made the WPA standard run TKIP so current WEP hardware was able to use a better security setup. It was all intended to move everyone to WPA2 with AES after everyone had bought newer wireless cards and routers.
Interestingly, this means if you have hardware that only supports WEP, and the vendor doesn't offer WPA support, it's because they are too lazy to implement it (or want you to buy the new stuff). The hardware can handle it, they just need to add it to the firmware. My work had some handheld units like this. We had to buy all new units.
That does bring up a good question. Who watches the watchmen?
I know many local law enforcers (I'm not one...I just work with them) and most are very upstanding guys. But as in every group, there are, sadly, the bad apples. That's why we have Internal Affairs investigators. You could then ask, who watches them? The cycle could go on forever.
As for the officers forgetting or demanding, the lawyers around here would be all over that.
I work for a local law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition systems. I don't work in that department, but I'm familiar with the systems. A few years ago, it was still really bad, but it's made large jumps in accuracy since that time. However, we usually have humans operating the cameras and computers, so it's always double checked. Everyone who gets booked into the jail is added to the facial recognition database. Then the officers on the road can use systems in their cars to take pictures of people and find their identity (a lot of people give us fake IDs, and a lot of those people have visited us before). Also, we have to ask permission before taking someone's picture on the street.
Anyway, even at the current level of accuracy, it can't operate really well without human assistance.
My guess is the average user out there would rather use screws than a tool to pop open their iPod/iPhone. (people are more afraid of breaking them...at least the people I know)
Granted, the site you posted seems to have nice pictures included, so that might help that barrier.
On a more personal, off-topic note, I'm kind of an apple anti-fanboi, but mainly because I disagree with their approach to security. It reminds me of Microsoft 5-10 years ago, so I avoid their products anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
If you are wanting to pursue Computer Security, SANS is one of the best. They offer a good variety of classes, and as Smoky said, it's very practical. Personally, I've only taken their 1 week courses, but I've heard good things about their online courses. Plus, the brick and mortar classes are very fast paced, but with online you have more time to absorb the content.
The downsides? Expensive. I believe it's grad level stuff, so that's expected.
They also have certifications associated with the classes (it's a separate but affiliated with SANS). It's an additional cost, and you really have to study over your course material after the class in order to do well. www.giac.org for the certs.
Wait a minute. We are using the MSRT stats to debunk the idea that piracy and not running Windows Updates results in more malware. MRST is usually run as a part of Windows Update...so the people not running WU don't run the tool and aren't even a part of the stats. Whether Microsoft is right or wrong, this argument is flawed.
root@internet# shutdown -c "I'm still reading slashdot you insensitive clod!"
Calls from an ex-girlfriend? You guys get calls from a girl? But we're on Slashdot. ...Oh, wait, I get it. It's a joke!
Maybe they are restarting a regular release schedule with 0.5?
Dear Mr. AC,
I thought it prudent to let you know you are posting on Slashdot. In case you aren't familiar with Slashdot, here are some basics...
People here don't generally like Microsoft.
People here do generally like open source.
Your jedi mind tricks have no effect here.
If you need more information, I'm sure you can find it with a quick few internet searches.
Sincerely,
RPMayhem
But on a laptop, that would eat through the battery running 2 systems at once. I guess you could put one OS on standby while you use the other. Semi-fast OS switching.
Sigh...sorry about that.
Here's the correct link for 3 months ago... http://mobile.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/03/057200
And here's the one from Tuesday again... http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/10/146201
Well, we talked about the same technology on Tuesday.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/10/146201
We also talked about it back in October.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/10/146201
Actually, I think it depends on the woman. My wife is all about thoughtful gifts. If I spent the time to make something for her, she loves it...although it certainly helps to make something she likes. For example, a bad idea would be...hmm...a hackable microcontroller-powered valentine's card.
Is this Jerry Lee Cooper guy a joke? Seriously, is he a real guy who really thinks this stuff? Linux is an app on top of WinXP? I read a couple other things he's posted...insanity. It has to be a joke. Can anyone REALLY be that misinformed?
Oh wait...this is the internet isn't it?
Also, I forgot to mention, they have a Mac OS version too.
Actually, it is. The folks at CodeWeavers did it.
http://www.codeweavers.com/services/ports/chromium/
I don't think the pirates have submarines or aircraft... yet.
Even if they did, I'm pretty sure the convoy escort could handle those.
And even if the pirates did use their ransom money to buy things like subs or aircraft, the navies would just more countermeasures. We already have anti-sub measures. Also, planes have to land somewhere. A little bit of satellite photography and a squad of jet fighters would end this.
First off, I agree completely that people need to learn to ask "why?" when it comes to these things. It's the people willing to take a new approach that often find something new.
Second, and a bit off topic, how are those theories biblical? I've never seen them in a bible.
Well, for those of us who use wireless microphones (like you see at concerts, conventions, sports stadiums, or churches), we are the ones who might get screwed. They FCC says they are putting measures in place to prevent this, but we'll have to see what happens. There will be another ruling to finalize all this. Here's a decent summary from Shure[PDF] (they make wireless mics).
Most likely that's exactly what's happening. The crypto processors can be quite efficient with AES. With the load split between the 2 (each doing what it's best at), it's very possible to see a speed difference.
In short, yes, AES is more secure than TKIP.
WPA and TKIP was really just a stepping stone to get people off WEP and heading toward WPA2 and AES. Wireless hardware built to run WEP didn't have the processing power to run AES (I think it needed a separate crypto processor just for AES). So they made the WPA standard run TKIP so current WEP hardware was able to use a better security setup. It was all intended to move everyone to WPA2 with AES after everyone had bought newer wireless cards and routers.
Interestingly, this means if you have hardware that only supports WEP, and the vendor doesn't offer WPA support, it's because they are too lazy to implement it (or want you to buy the new stuff). The hardware can handle it, they just need to add it to the firmware. My work had some handheld units like this. We had to buy all new units.
I knew it! Microsoft SAM was just a cover!
Well, now I'm going to grammar nazi myself.
"That's very sad to hear."
Fixed
That's very sad to here. Thankfully, the administration here won't put up with that. If they find out, the hammer will come down.
That does bring up a good question. Who watches the watchmen?
I know many local law enforcers (I'm not one...I just work with them) and most are very upstanding guys. But as in every group, there are, sadly, the bad apples. That's why we have Internal Affairs investigators. You could then ask, who watches them? The cycle could go on forever.
As for the officers forgetting or demanding, the lawyers around here would be all over that.
I work for a local law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition systems. I don't work in that department, but I'm familiar with the systems. A few years ago, it was still really bad, but it's made large jumps in accuracy since that time. However, we usually have humans operating the cameras and computers, so it's always double checked. Everyone who gets booked into the jail is added to the facial recognition database. Then the officers on the road can use systems in their cars to take pictures of people and find their identity (a lot of people give us fake IDs, and a lot of those people have visited us before). Also, we have to ask permission before taking someone's picture on the street.
Anyway, even at the current level of accuracy, it can't operate really well without human assistance.
The problem is that Windows 7 is actually version 6.1 (last I heard this was the case).
My guess is the average user out there would rather use screws than a tool to pop open their iPod/iPhone. (people are more afraid of breaking them...at least the people I know)
Granted, the site you posted seems to have nice pictures included, so that might help that barrier.
On a more personal, off-topic note, I'm kind of an apple anti-fanboi, but mainly because I disagree with their approach to security. It reminds me of Microsoft 5-10 years ago, so I avoid their products anyway.