utter rubbish? putin doesn't have to? clearly he thinks he does and in reality he does. In the world where his friends and marionettes hold all of the media outlets in their hands, where the so called 'justice system' is a sham (if they charge you with a crime there is 99.98% chance you will be found guilty and they consider 0.02% to be a bad failure for the state) in the world where putin hires 300,000 people into his own personal security service, where any protest on the street is met with violence, where all of the top wealthy people are his friends, relatives, former coworkers, his cooks, etc., in that world putin is only afraid of the truth coming out. The truth is that he never won any elections, that he never even participated in actual elections, that he murdered people in russia in 1998 to get his ratings up from 32% to 84% by staging fake terrorist attacks and playing on public fear. he started wars with the Ukraine after taking over Crimea, he attacked Georgia, he is responsible for various terrorist attacks around the world, he is responsible for boeing 777 shot down over Donbass, he gave the command to carry out an attack against the militants that took over the school in Beslan to prevent a local politician from actially resolving the hostage situation, his 'cook', prigozhin sent private military to fight in the Ukraine and then to die in Syria under USA fire in February 2018 (Vagner), etc. putin has a lot to fear, he is scared ending up like Kaddafi or Saddam, he knows that the mob is dangerous and that revolutions are possible. That is why he must stop the Internet from spreading any real information, that is why prigozhin has a cyber troll army poisoning any forum and conversation on line. putin and his minions are not actually stupid, he is a kgb agent, he knows what it means to poison literally and figuratively, how to cause hysteria and how to create mis information to poison the well. he is scared of the Internet quite a bit and he will not allow the Internet just to continue without massive controls in russia.
regardless of what you believe the USA will or will not do, may or may not do, what putin's regime is doing is making it possible to remove and block content that putin and anyone in power in that regime finds dangerous for their power, that is all it is.
For example hundreds or thousands of pieces of content and sites have been blocked simply because they report this story - Andrey Kostin and his much yonger lover Naili Asker-Zade, they have a daughter out of wedlock obviously because he is married to a woman he paid 6000000usd to keep quet, he has multiple yonge lovers and has kids with them and he is a givernment worker, who is paying tens of millions of dollars to his lovers. That would be millions of dillars he is stealing from the government bank he is working for.
putin doesn't care about that, his concern is holding on to power and he owns all of the main stream media outlets in the country (by proxy), so the tv and the radio is under control. What is *not* under control yet is the Internet and it is super dangerous to putin's power since millions of people can now tune into opposition channels like that of Navalny for example and they can get a dissenting point of view about putin and his puppets in parlament (duma) and his puppets in the justice system, etc. Russia is a sham of a country today and it should in fact be treated as a rogue state, because it is one. putin supports every terrorist and dictatorial regime out there, point a finger at a terrorist organization anywhere in the world today and you can be certain putin is dumping money into it and giving them weapons, providing them with infrastructure and other types of help.
I went through the list and the only thing that is relevant to me Starbucks, apparently they own the trademark in a joint way somehow, interesting.
However I believe they should be able to do this, to buy space launches and to put satellites into space that project advertising. On the other hand if somebody doesn't like those satellites they should be able to take them off the orbit with their own rockets.
As I said, hiring americans or most Europeans is like grabbing a hot potato or even a piece of lava with your hands, it is a bad idea. If I have to hire them I keep it to a bare minimum and preferably put them on comission so they get a percentage of the sale. Developers, testers, support, pms, that is best hired elsewhere. Socialism, capitalism... you know what mattets most? Being free in your life, free from the destructive actions of the collective, free from governments. The crappy economy is due to government meddling in people's lives, lets not let them meddle more.
are you prepared to face the consequence of jail time
- you just proved my point about taxes being immoral, it's slavery, imposed onto individuals by the collective, the most insidious type of slavery - systemic type.
that's not the point, whether FB shows up in that 'court' or not is irrelevant, FB will not move data to russia and russian monkey 'court' will never accept that because russian mafia government headed by the war criminal, murderer, marauder, thief putin must be able to silence any opposition.
There are a number of protests happening in russia currently or just happened in the last month in Ingushetia, Arhangelsk and other places for different reasons, the main stream bought and paid for media did not cover *any* of it, it's as if it doesn't exist. If you do cover it in russia you are now in violation of 'fake news' laws and a system like FB or any other that doesn't keep personal user information in russia on servers located in russia cannot be forced to disclose private information (real names, addresses, contacts) of people who are sharing this information.
People in russia today end up in jail for commenting on news, for 'liking' news, it's a complete sham of a 'democratic' society (and I am not for any sort of democratic elections personally, but if you are you are being hoodwinked by putin and his minions).
Russian leadership needs to be put down like the dogs they are but I think it should be best left to the russian people who should really get fed up with this nonsense at some point and put putin's head on a spike.
Why would anybody want to hire Americans in the USA? It's like grabbing a hot potatoe or even hot lava and trying to hold on to it with bare fingers,it's stupid. Hiring Americans or Europeans of any sort (except for Eastern Europeans) is going to be a mess no matter how you look at it. They want government to meddle with business in every way, they want government to steal via taxation to subsidise their lives, they want all sorts of oppressive regime tactics to be applied to companies to avoid one on one negotiations. Hiring Americans or Europeans is very dangerous and mostly stupid.
I pay my people by the hour and they have a choice to work as many hours as they want over the normal 9 a day, some take this on and some do not, many do it once every couple of weeks, sometimes I need people 7 days a week. All things considered my developers, tester, support are doing it on their own accord because I am giving them the opportunity. Over the years I only asked them to work 7 day weeks maybe 5-6 times, when it's an emergency. I say it is a great thing that the world is global and that supply and demand of labour and employment can meet outside of the normal boundaries that are imposed by nation borders.
Why do you perpetuate this lie about Henry Ford? Is it lack of knowledge or is it lack of conscience? Henry Ford paid his workers twice as much as any other employer at the time because he needed his trained and competent employees to stay working at his factories and not leave to go working somewhere with less pressure to mass produce.
His conveyor lines and mass production is what allowed him to produce more per unit of manual labour and thus to drop prices so that more people could buy his product but paying his employees more was not to make sure they could buy the cars, that's nonsense modern socialist propaganda. He hired tens of thousands of people and once they were trained they could easily leave and command the same wage anywhere else, to prevent that Ford offered compensation large enough that no other manufacturer at the time could afford it because they didn't have the scale and the means to mass produce the way he did.
So once again, is it because you do not know or is it because you want to lie that you perpetuate this BS about Ford?
ha ha, so that is a good example of a totalitarian oppressor, I would say anybody should be able to shoot anybody on sight, that way every family well being will be maximally protected.
Here is an example of a deal with the devil that deserves rigidity and must not allow any compromise including on details.
Allowing society to degenerate into collectivism, allowing everybody to vote in democratic elections even if due to their status the voters are always likely to vote for stealing from some to subsidise themselves.
Not everybody should vote, a voter should have something to lose that he or she earned that does not come from any form of government subsidy. If you run a business you should be voting. If you own land you should be voting. If you pay federal income taxes you should be voting in federal elections and if you pay state income taxes you should be voting in state elections.
You should never be allowed to vote if you are not paying income taxes / not working / are not an owner of a business / are not a land owner.
So there can be no compromise on these positions, any compromise gives power to those who should not have power because they use their power to steal.
I would ruthlessly reject any attempt at my staff unionizing as well, that's because there is no reason for developers that I hire to be a 'union', they are paid very well for where they are and what they do and I have 0 interest to talk to groups of people, if I wanted to talk to groups I would talk to governments and I hate governments.
People will negotiate with me on their own, not as groups, it sounds like coercion and oppression by groups and I won't stand for it. The greatest problem of-course is government laws created for protecting unions.
all of these taxes on work, on production, on savings, on capital, on property, on value added are horrible morally and economically. Being taxed for adding value, isn't it just great? Being taxes for working. Being taxed for saving. all of this crap ends up growing the government apparatus while stealing from individuals, which is horrible economics and morality. it is immoral to steal but it is even more stupid to steal from the productive population to redistribute to the unproductive. UBI is Marxism, from each according to his ability to each according to his need. except that our abilities are quite limited while our needs know no boundaries.
I want my vote to be known, I would never vote for a socialist, for a Marxist, for a fascist, for anybody with collectivist tendencies. So I will either not vote or vote for a libertarian or an anarcho capitalist.
I think that having a fully anonymous voting system is not really mandatory IF the government is not allowed to oppress people then anonymity is not relevant, if on the other hand the governmnet does oppress people based on their votes then their votes are irrelevant, just like in Russia, you can be oppressed for your vote and at the same time your vote is negated by all the fake votes created by the people working at the polls, so actually removing anonymity would be more beneficial for the people living under totalitarian regimes (and more dangerous as well).
As to a boss finding out about your vote, etc., good, that's how it should be. If a boss doesn't want somebody working for him/her that votes a certain way they shouldn't have to work with you (and you shouldn't have to work with them).
You believe you are funny but I think you are not. The money does not belong to the government, it is stolen from the people and the courts must not belong to the government, if they are bought then they are stolen. A court that is bought is peculiar and useless for any purpose but to serve as a puppet to some authoritarian asshole.
putin is not interested in fighting the USA or anybody who in their estimation can fight back either. putin made a mistake when he attacked the Ukraine of not attacking directly with all of his forces but using covert operations instead. If his idea was to take over large swaths of the country he should have attacked with everything back in 2014, instead he did this cover thing that he is used to doing, he is a KGB officer after all, which means a spy, doesn't know how to use an army. By now Ukraine has gathered enough strength that it actually can fight back even in case of an all out assault, don't know if they can win it but they won't just give up either, it would be extremely bloody and then putin would lose all of his current support. He still enjoys large amounts of support in the country because people's opinions are seriously shaped by propaganda, which is what all of the main stream media outlets inside the country are.
These laws are to stop the spread of real information, not of fake news. MSM companies are not even going to be held to those laws, MSM are excluded from the laws because they are centrally controlled.
So nobody has to fight Russia, the only people that should be worried live in neighbouring countries that are very small and weak and couldn't fight against a few hundred tanks if those rolled over the borders.
As to destroying itself - who knows, North Korea is a much weaker country economically speaking and it is still resisting to either the outside or the inside pressures for change. Russia has much more potential than North Korea or Iran for example.
Basically it is now illegal to do any investigative journalism based on this law because the moment you say anything about anything you can be immediately, based on a complaint from anybody actually, without any court order (no court order will be required even though in Russia courts are completely useless, bought and paid for, under complete 100% control of the government and of putin) be blocked, fined, thrown to prison.
No court order is required and the information can (and must be) immediately blocked (by all local Russian ISPs), no court order is required and a person can be fined (there is a progressive scale of fines, repeat offenders also get higher and higher fines), no court order is required but a person can be thrown into prison.
The only way to fight this in Russia is to completely disregard this law, however I believe many people will self censor instead.
Amazon increased the minimum wage, that was the idea from morons like you and Sanders, well there you go. The hourly wage went up. Where exactly are they going to get the money for it from? You don't care, Sanders doesn't care. You, idiots think that a billionaire has billions in income to give away, he does not. His wealth is in shares, he doesn't sell shares to pay wages, that is idiotic. Wages come from revenues, from sales. Sales do not magically increase just because wages go up. Sales are the same, the margins are the same, no new money appears all of a sudden because an idiotic law is passed or even political pressure is exerted upon a business.
So the same amount of money is going to be divided across the same people only at a higher rate of expense. So the hours MUST go down, that is mathematics, not even economics, simplest form of math - arithmetic.
Elizabeth Warren needs to be broken up into more competitive pieces, currently she has too much control as an entity, some of that power needs to be returned back to the people. What she is proposing is the same level of crap.
Everything sglhould be private, when everything is private then the market pressures create and provide all the needed products at various price ranges to market segments that demand these products at acceptable price points because that is how money is made by people.
salaries come out of revenues, tech companies spend money on salaries, rent, utilities, equipment and various services. So being taxed on revenue means having much less money on things that build the business. I agree that there shouldn't be personal income taxes, but this is not an either or proposition. There shouldn't be any income or profit or savings taxes, private or corporate. This is theft as all such schemes are.
no, wrong. People who are busy figuring out how to feed themselves in an economy where most still have jobs do not have time to riot, that is why businessmen are not normally found in rallies and revolutions, they are not stealing because they are busy working. This argument is tired - give them free stuff or they will cause problems. Well fuck, they are causing problems while on the dole, I say starve them half way to death, their riots will be powerless and meek.
There was discussion in parliament a while back during the riots about removing benefits for people identified as rioters (most of whom have no practical means of legal survival except a government check).
- I don't understand why they did not implement it. You live at the expense of someone and then riot against that someone you should no longer be given the means to live. Where exactly is the problem with that? The only problem is that taxes exist, governments exist and welfare exists in the first place.
Slashdot Mirror
utter rubbish? putin doesn't have to? clearly he thinks he does and in reality he does. In the world where his friends and marionettes hold all of the media outlets in their hands, where the so called 'justice system' is a sham (if they charge you with a crime there is 99.98% chance you will be found guilty and they consider 0.02% to be a bad failure for the state) in the world where putin hires 300,000 people into his own personal security service, where any protest on the street is met with violence, where all of the top wealthy people are his friends, relatives, former coworkers, his cooks, etc., in that world putin is only afraid of the truth coming out. The truth is that he never won any elections, that he never even participated in actual elections, that he murdered people in russia in 1998 to get his ratings up from 32% to 84% by staging fake terrorist attacks and playing on public fear. he started wars with the Ukraine after taking over Crimea, he attacked Georgia, he is responsible for various terrorist attacks around the world, he is responsible for boeing 777 shot down over Donbass, he gave the command to carry out an attack against the militants that took over the school in Beslan to prevent a local politician from actially resolving the hostage situation, his 'cook', prigozhin sent private military to fight in the Ukraine and then to die in Syria under USA fire in February 2018 (Vagner), etc. putin has a lot to fear, he is scared ending up like Kaddafi or Saddam, he knows that the mob is dangerous and that revolutions are possible. That is why he must stop the Internet from spreading any real information, that is why prigozhin has a cyber troll army poisoning any forum and conversation on line. putin and his minions are not actually stupid, he is a kgb agent, he knows what it means to poison literally and figuratively, how to cause hysteria and how to create mis information to poison the well. he is scared of the Internet quite a bit and he will not allow the Internet just to continue without massive controls in russia.
regardless of what you believe the USA will or will not do, may or may not do, what putin's regime is doing is making it possible to remove and block content that putin and anyone in power in that regime finds dangerous for their power, that is all it is.
For example hundreds or thousands of pieces of content and sites have been blocked simply because they report this story - Andrey Kostin and his much yonger lover Naili Asker-Zade, they have a daughter out of wedlock obviously because he is married to a woman he paid 6000000usd to keep quet, he has multiple yonge lovers and has kids with them and he is a givernment worker, who is paying tens of millions of dollars to his lovers. That would be millions of dillars he is stealing from the government bank he is working for.
putin doesn't care about that, his concern is holding on to power and he owns all of the main stream media outlets in the country (by proxy), so the tv and the radio is under control. What is *not* under control yet is the Internet and it is super dangerous to putin's power since millions of people can now tune into opposition channels like that of Navalny for example and they can get a dissenting point of view about putin and his puppets in parlament (duma) and his puppets in the justice system, etc. Russia is a sham of a country today and it should in fact be treated as a rogue state, because it is one. putin supports every terrorist and dictatorial regime out there, point a finger at a terrorist organization anywhere in the world today and you can be certain putin is dumping money into it and giving them weapons, providing them with infrastructure and other types of help.
I went through the list and the only thing that is relevant to me Starbucks, apparently they own the trademark in a joint way somehow, interesting.
However I believe they should be able to do this, to buy space launches and to put satellites into space that project advertising. On the other hand if somebody doesn't like those satellites they should be able to take them off the orbit with their own rockets.
As I said, hiring americans or most Europeans is like grabbing a hot potato or even a piece of lava with your hands, it is a bad idea. If I have to hire them I keep it to a bare minimum and preferably put them on comission so they get a percentage of the sale. Developers, testers, support, pms, that is best hired elsewhere. Socialism, capitalism... you know what mattets most? Being free in your life, free from the destructive actions of the collective, free from governments. The crappy economy is due to government meddling in people's lives, lets not let them meddle more.
are you prepared to face the consequence of jail time
- you just proved my point about taxes being immoral, it's slavery, imposed onto individuals by the collective, the most insidious type of slavery - systemic type.
that's not the point, whether FB shows up in that 'court' or not is irrelevant, FB will not move data to russia and russian monkey 'court' will never accept that because russian mafia government headed by the war criminal, murderer, marauder, thief putin must be able to silence any opposition.
There are a number of protests happening in russia currently or just happened in the last month in Ingushetia, Arhangelsk and other places for different reasons, the main stream bought and paid for media did not cover *any* of it, it's as if it doesn't exist. If you do cover it in russia you are now in violation of 'fake news' laws and a system like FB or any other that doesn't keep personal user information in russia on servers located in russia cannot be forced to disclose private information (real names, addresses, contacts) of people who are sharing this information.
People in russia today end up in jail for commenting on news, for 'liking' news, it's a complete sham of a 'democratic' society (and I am not for any sort of democratic elections personally, but if you are you are being hoodwinked by putin and his minions).
Russian leadership needs to be put down like the dogs they are but I think it should be best left to the russian people who should really get fed up with this nonsense at some point and put putin's head on a spike.
Why would anybody want to hire Americans in the USA? It's like grabbing a hot potatoe or even hot lava and trying to hold on to it with bare fingers,it's stupid. Hiring Americans or Europeans of any sort (except for Eastern Europeans) is going to be a mess no matter how you look at it. They want government to meddle with business in every way, they want government to steal via taxation to subsidise their lives, they want all sorts of oppressive regime tactics to be applied to companies to avoid one on one negotiations. Hiring Americans or Europeans is very dangerous and mostly stupid.
I pay my people by the hour and they have a choice to work as many hours as they want over the normal 9 a day, some take this on and some do not, many do it once every couple of weeks, sometimes I need people 7 days a week. All things considered my developers, tester, support are doing it on their own accord because I am giving them the opportunity. Over the years I only asked them to work 7 day weeks maybe 5-6 times, when it's an emergency. I say it is a great thing that the world is global and that supply and demand of labour and employment can meet outside of the normal boundaries that are imposed by nation borders.
Why do you perpetuate this lie about Henry Ford? Is it lack of knowledge or is it lack of conscience? Henry Ford paid his workers twice as much as any other employer at the time because he needed his trained and competent employees to stay working at his factories and not leave to go working somewhere with less pressure to mass produce.
His conveyor lines and mass production is what allowed him to produce more per unit of manual labour and thus to drop prices so that more people could buy his product but paying his employees more was not to make sure they could buy the cars, that's nonsense modern socialist propaganda. He hired tens of thousands of people and once they were trained they could easily leave and command the same wage anywhere else, to prevent that Ford offered compensation large enough that no other manufacturer at the time could afford it because they didn't have the scale and the means to mass produce the way he did.
So once again, is it because you do not know or is it because you want to lie that you perpetuate this BS about Ford?
ha ha, so that is a good example of a totalitarian oppressor, I would say anybody should be able to shoot anybody on sight, that way every family well being will be maximally protected.
another arbitrary discrimination that government engages into. what is special about exactly 1000000 ?
no, this assumes that people who will vote in elections have something real at stake, something that makes the economy run.
Here is an example of a deal with the devil that deserves rigidity and must not allow any compromise including on details.
Allowing society to degenerate into collectivism, allowing everybody to vote in democratic elections even if due to their status the voters are always likely to vote for stealing from some to subsidise themselves.
Not everybody should vote, a voter should have something to lose that he or she earned that does not come from any form of government subsidy. If you run a business you should be voting. If you own land you should be voting. If you pay federal income taxes you should be voting in federal elections and if you pay state income taxes you should be voting in state elections.
You should never be allowed to vote if you are not paying income taxes / not working / are not an owner of a business / are not a land owner.
So there can be no compromise on these positions, any compromise gives power to those who should not have power because they use their power to steal.
I would ruthlessly reject any attempt at my staff unionizing as well, that's because there is no reason for developers that I hire to be a 'union', they are paid very well for where they are and what they do and I have 0 interest to talk to groups of people, if I wanted to talk to groups I would talk to governments and I hate governments.
People will negotiate with me on their own, not as groups, it sounds like coercion and oppression by groups and I won't stand for it. The greatest problem of-course is government laws created for protecting unions.
all of these taxes on work, on production, on savings, on capital, on property, on value added are horrible morally and economically. Being taxed for adding value, isn't it just great? Being taxes for working. Being taxed for saving. all of this crap ends up growing the government apparatus while stealing from individuals, which is horrible economics and morality. it is immoral to steal but it is even more stupid to steal from the productive population to redistribute to the unproductive. UBI is Marxism, from each according to his ability to each according to his need. except that our abilities are quite limited while our needs know no boundaries.
I want my vote to be known, I would never vote for a socialist, for a Marxist, for a fascist, for anybody with collectivist tendencies. So I will either not vote or vote for a libertarian or an anarcho capitalist.
I think that having a fully anonymous voting system is not really mandatory IF the government is not allowed to oppress people then anonymity is not relevant, if on the other hand the governmnet does oppress people based on their votes then their votes are irrelevant, just like in Russia, you can be oppressed for your vote and at the same time your vote is negated by all the fake votes created by the people working at the polls, so actually removing anonymity would be more beneficial for the people living under totalitarian regimes (and more dangerous as well).
As to a boss finding out about your vote, etc., good, that's how it should be. If a boss doesn't want somebody working for him/her that votes a certain way they shouldn't have to work with you (and you shouldn't have to work with them).
You believe you are funny but I think you are not. The money does not belong to the government, it is stolen from the people and the courts must not belong to the government, if they are bought then they are stolen. A court that is bought is peculiar and useless for any purpose but to serve as a puppet to some authoritarian asshole.
putin is not interested in fighting the USA or anybody who in their estimation can fight back either. putin made a mistake when he attacked the Ukraine of not attacking directly with all of his forces but using covert operations instead. If his idea was to take over large swaths of the country he should have attacked with everything back in 2014, instead he did this cover thing that he is used to doing, he is a KGB officer after all, which means a spy, doesn't know how to use an army. By now Ukraine has gathered enough strength that it actually can fight back even in case of an all out assault, don't know if they can win it but they won't just give up either, it would be extremely bloody and then putin would lose all of his current support. He still enjoys large amounts of support in the country because people's opinions are seriously shaped by propaganda, which is what all of the main stream media outlets inside the country are.
These laws are to stop the spread of real information, not of fake news. MSM companies are not even going to be held to those laws, MSM are excluded from the laws because they are centrally controlled.
So nobody has to fight Russia, the only people that should be worried live in neighbouring countries that are very small and weak and couldn't fight against a few hundred tanks if those rolled over the borders.
As to destroying itself - who knows, North Korea is a much weaker country economically speaking and it is still resisting to either the outside or the inside pressures for change. Russia has much more potential than North Korea or Iran for example.
Russian parliament passed new laws to punish people for 'spreading fake news' and for insulting government officials, national symbols, history, etc.
Basically it is now illegal to do any investigative journalism based on this law because the moment you say anything about anything you can be immediately, based on a complaint from anybody actually, without any court order (no court order will be required even though in Russia courts are completely useless, bought and paid for, under complete 100% control of the government and of putin) be blocked, fined, thrown to prison.
No court order is required and the information can (and must be) immediately blocked (by all local Russian ISPs), no court order is required and a person can be fined (there is a progressive scale of fines, repeat offenders also get higher and higher fines), no court order is required but a person can be thrown into prison.
The only way to fight this in Russia is to completely disregard this law, however I believe many people will self censor instead.
Amazon increased the minimum wage, that was the idea from morons like you and Sanders, well there you go. The hourly wage went up. Where exactly are they going to get the money for it from? You don't care, Sanders doesn't care. You, idiots think that a billionaire has billions in income to give away, he does not. His wealth is in shares, he doesn't sell shares to pay wages, that is idiotic. Wages come from revenues, from sales. Sales do not magically increase just because wages go up. Sales are the same, the margins are the same, no new money appears all of a sudden because an idiotic law is passed or even political pressure is exerted upon a business.
So the same amount of money is going to be divided across the same people only at a higher rate of expense. So the hours MUST go down, that is mathematics, not even economics, simplest form of math - arithmetic.
Elizabeth Warren needs to be broken up into more competitive pieces, currently she has too much control as an entity, some of that power needs to be returned back to the people. What she is proposing is the same level of crap.
Everything sglhould be private, when everything is private then the market pressures create and provide all the needed products at various price ranges to market segments that demand these products at acceptable price points because that is how money is made by people.
salaries come out of revenues, tech companies spend money on salaries, rent, utilities, equipment and various services. So being taxed on revenue means having much less money on things that build the business. I agree that there shouldn't be personal income taxes, but this is not an either or proposition. There shouldn't be any income or profit or savings taxes, private or corporate. This is theft as all such schemes are.
no, wrong. People who are busy figuring out how to feed themselves in an economy where most still have jobs do not have time to riot, that is why businessmen are not normally found in rallies and revolutions, they are not stealing because they are busy working. This argument is tired - give them free stuff or they will cause problems. Well fuck, they are causing problems while on the dole, I say starve them half way to death, their riots will be powerless and meek.
There was discussion in parliament a while back during the riots about removing benefits for people identified as rioters (most of whom have no practical means of legal survival except a government check).
- I don't understand why they did not implement it. You live at the expense of someone and then riot against that someone you should no longer be given the means to live. Where exactly is the problem with that? The only problem is that taxes exist, governments exist and welfare exists in the first place.