On my TX, I tried 3 different things: Installed the prc -- crashes instantly. Manually installed the advanced Midp jad and jar -- crashes instantly. Manually installed the basic midp jad and jar -- seems to work, but only with 320x320 screen. (Actually, it might be 160x160)
I use blazer on a TX - try http://slashdot.org/palm/ (didn't see a link to it anywhere, but when a site looks horrible in blazer, I usually give that type of url a shot - works ocassionaly), wide page mode, or fast mode (CSS off). Netfront is also good, but caused stability problems for me.
Has everyone forgotten that the purpose of html is that the pages look different on different devices? The idea being that the information is what's important and the device should know how to best present it (given sufficient metadata). This is the exact opposite of the purpose of pdf, which looks the same no matter what. Of course some data could benefit from having part shown always the same and other parts shown according to device, and that's what this may do.
You may be able to do that by signing up for 3 gmail accounts and using filters to forward them; there is a feature to change the "From" line. You could also use plus addressing to accomplish what you're going for.
When a measurement is given with these units, you're not actually going to use it to calculate anything, and it's usually only given with 1 significant digit, if that. So 90m, 100m, 100 yds, 120 yds - it's not going to make any difference.
This doesn't seem to do anything that letting the focus follow the mouse does. (Is that still the default behavior in KDE or Gnome?) I guess binding a key to switch between 'click to focus' and 'focus follows mouse' would do it without the eye candy.
I have to disagree with a point in the review of this one. The reviewer claims it doesn't do any "real calculus" until p. 136 or so. This is just not true - the first chapter is about sequences and series, which is "real calculus." Most calculus courses leave that until the second semester, focusing on functions on the Reals first (which this book delays). However, starting with sequences is a more natural progression from a foundational point of view, and is what is normally done in more advanced classes on the theory of calculus taken by mathematicians (and the occasional physicist and engineer).
Starting with sequences is probably a better way to understand what is actually going on, while the standard route will get you doing calculations for your physics class sooner.
Bah! Martinis are made with gin, which actually has flavor. Vodka mixes well with everything because it has no flavor. Not that there's anything wrong with a vodkatini, but its not a martini.
I also have a mouse with two wheels that I've had since my windows days. But since switching to Linux, the horizontal wheel acts the same as the vertical one. All the info I found when I switched seemed to indicate that X wouldn't deal with more than 5 buttons. Has this changed? If so, how do I make my horizontal button different from the vertical?
I for one would be glad if forwarding were harder. I really could do without getting pseudo-religious right-wing pro-bomb-the-hell-out-of-country-X email from my grandparents that's more header than text.
Strictly speaking, negative numbers can be prime, however, -x is prime if and only if x is prime, so number theorists usually just deal with the positive ones. As for "counting as factors," one has to look at the definition. An irreducible is a number (well, non-unit element of a ring) such that every factorization has a unit as one of the factors. In the integers, 1 and -1 are the units. A prime is a number such that if it divides a product, it divides one of the factors. In the integers, these come down to the same thing.
Well, once you have a language that is Turing-complete, it can do anything that any other Turing-complete language can do. Basic theorem of computer science (in the sense as a field of mathematics). And there aren't any languages (that I know of anyway) that are more than that, so yes, all languages are variations on a common theme in that anything you can do in one, you can do in another. It comes down to the question of which one is better for the task at hand.
Had you read the article, you'd have seen that this is not a research university, but a community college. There's probably not very much, if any, research going on there - that's not their mission.
Futurama (also a Matt Groening show) also has quite a few math references. The main characters go to Loew's Aleph-null plex to see a movie. I doubt too many people knew the symbol, so that one's a bit less overt than many of the Simpsons math references in the article.
Some states ban oral/anal sex. However, it's extremely rarely enforced. If memory serves, the last few times it's been enforced, the courts have struck down the laws as unconstitutional.
On my TX, I tried 3 different things:
Installed the prc -- crashes instantly.
Manually installed the advanced Midp jad and jar -- crashes instantly.
Manually installed the basic midp jad and jar -- seems to work, but only with 320x320 screen. (Actually, it might be 160x160)
Raises, not begs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
I use blazer on a TX - try http://slashdot.org/palm/ (didn't see a link to it anywhere, but when a site looks horrible in blazer, I usually give that type of url a shot - works ocassionaly), wide page mode, or fast mode (CSS off).
Netfront is also good, but caused stability problems for me.
RTFA - you click on a phone number in a web page and it calls it. Not that cutting and pasting 10 digits would be that difficult, but there it is.
Well, in Cory Doctorow's 0wnz0red, I think it did.
Has everyone forgotten that the purpose of html is that the pages look different on different devices? The idea being that the information is what's important and the device should know how to best present it (given sufficient metadata). This is the exact opposite of the purpose of pdf, which looks the same no matter what. Of course some data could benefit from having part shown always the same and other parts shown according to device, and that's what this may do.
I have a TX, and it does the same thing as your treo on the default page. Try slashdot.org/palm
You may be able to do that by signing up for 3 gmail accounts and using filters to forward them; there is a feature to change the "From" line. You could also use plus addressing to accomplish what you're going for.
When a measurement is given with these units, you're not actually going to use it to calculate anything, and it's usually only given with 1 significant digit, if that. So 90m, 100m, 100 yds, 120 yds - it's not going to make any difference.
This doesn't seem to do anything that letting the focus follow the mouse does. (Is that still the default behavior in KDE or Gnome?) I guess binding a key to switch between 'click to focus' and 'focus follows mouse' would do it without the eye candy.
I have to disagree with a point in the review of this one. The reviewer claims it doesn't do any "real calculus" until p. 136 or so. This is just not true - the first chapter is about sequences and series, which is "real calculus." Most calculus courses leave that until the second semester, focusing on functions on the Reals first (which this book delays). However, starting with sequences is a more natural progression from a foundational point of view, and is what is normally done in more advanced classes on the theory of calculus taken by mathematicians (and the occasional physicist and engineer).
Starting with sequences is probably a better way to understand what is actually going on, while the standard route will get you doing calculations for your physics class sooner.
Bah! Martinis are made with gin, which actually has flavor. Vodka mixes well with everything because it has no flavor. Not that there's anything wrong with a vodkatini, but its not a martini.
I also have a mouse with two wheels that I've had since my windows days. But since switching to Linux, the horizontal wheel acts the same as the vertical one. All the info I found when I switched seemed to indicate that X wouldn't deal with more than 5 buttons. Has this changed? If so, how do I make my horizontal button different from the vertical?
I for one would be glad if forwarding were harder. I really could do without getting pseudo-religious right-wing pro-bomb-the-hell-out-of-country-X email from my grandparents that's more header than text.
Strictly speaking, negative numbers can be prime, however, -x is prime if and only if x is prime, so number theorists usually just deal with the positive ones.
As for "counting as factors," one has to look at the definition. An irreducible is a number (well, non-unit element of a ring) such that every factorization has a unit as one of the factors. In the integers, 1 and -1 are the units.
A prime is a number such that if it divides a product, it divides one of the factors. In the integers, these come down to the same thing.
Well, once you have a language that is Turing-complete, it can do anything that any other Turing-complete language can do. Basic theorem of computer science (in the sense as a field of mathematics). And there aren't any languages (that I know of anyway) that are more than that, so yes, all languages are variations on a common theme in that anything you can do in one, you can do in another. It comes down to the question of which one is better for the task at hand.
According to frink,, that would be $10.98 today.
Had you read the article, you'd have seen that this is not a research university, but a community college. There's probably not very much, if any, research going on there - that's not their mission.
Pure (distilled) water is actually a very poor conductor. It's all the impurities in solution that make most "water" into a conductor.
I doubt it's that - what you've got there wouldn't repeat.
They didn't even stop the hockey game, eh?
Futurama (also a Matt Groening show) also has quite a few math references. The main characters go to Loew's Aleph-null plex to see a movie. I doubt too many people knew the symbol, so that one's a bit less overt than many of the Simpsons math references in the article.
Of course, most people with windows don't have paper manuals anymore anyway.
I'd be interested to see what kind of results this technique would produce using a wireless network.
Some states ban oral/anal sex. However, it's extremely rarely enforced. If memory serves, the last few times it's been enforced, the courts have struck down the laws as unconstitutional.