Slashdot Mirror


5.2 Earthquake Shakes Up SF Bay Area

Joe Kaz wrote in (along with a number of other concerned folks): "There was a 5.2 Earthquake in Gilroy, CA, 70 miles south of San Francisco. The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface. It lasted for about 10 seconds, and it did seem like a long time. Everything shook for a while, and it was a little scary. No reports of damage yet. Hope everyone is ok." I've got a report from my sisters father-in-law in gilroy (the epicenter) and he barely noticed it. Nate Oostendorp noted that "My stereo shook a little" in Walnut Creek. The SF Gate story on the quake notes that there are some phones out in some small parts of San Jose. The usgs has an event monitoring page if you are interested.

587 comments

  1. didn't make it up as far by ixo111 · · Score: 1

    it didn't make it north of the GG, it seems,
    or not too far north of if it did

    1. Re:didn't make it up as far by Vexxor · · Score: 1

      We got a little shake in Hayward, but nothing big. Just another day in cali.

    2. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      felt it in Santa Rosa.. and it seem it lasted some 8 seconds overhere..

      http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/STORE/X4013336 4/ ciim_stats_1

    3. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope everyone is ok....

    4. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EARTHQUAKES will be sent by JEBUS to punish you linux using PEDERASTS!

    5. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO JAM!

    6. Re:didn't make it up as far by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Didn't feel anything in Chico California.

    7. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, for crying out loud! It's an earthquake, people. How is this "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that Matters"? There are lots of quakes all around the darn planet every freaking day, and we don't submit those to Slashdot.

      I can see where those in the SF area might be interested, but those of us who don't live on the left coast couldn't care less if a bunch of granola-munchers got shaken up. Sheesh.

      Whoever decided this was worthy needs to have their head examined.

    8. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, and I thought I was just drunk! I was at my local bar and swore that I felt something. When I told the bartender, she said she didn't feel anything and accused me of having one too many shots.

      I knew I was right, the Earth _was_ moving.

    9. Re:didn't make it up as far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Felt it in Marin City, just north of the GG.

  2. Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't feel a thing. No apparent damage. No injuries. Carry on.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    1. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      Friend was in the upper deck of the sharks game and didn't feel a thing, contrary to the AP Wire

      Makes me wonder how much we should trust the AP.

    2. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Misanthroporama · · Score: 1

      Superstring theory of matter Loki?

    3. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      My sig? Yes.
      If everything I am can be explained by this theory, then I am fundamentally no different from a rock or a star, and therefore cannot be held accountable for anything I do as I'm simply acting according to the laws of physics. If this is the case, than every little thing I do for the rest of my life can be predicted with no possible way for me to change it. Free will is meaningless, morality is useless, and I just wanna get laid.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    4. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Rakarra · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Friend was in the upper deck of the sharks game and didn't feel a thing, contrary to the AP Wire

      Maybe your friend is just hard of.. feeling. Yeah...

    5. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by plalonde2 · · Score: 1

      'cmon - it's the illusion of free will that matters, not free will itself.

    6. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that free as in speech, free as in beer, or free() as in malloc()?

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    7. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the fuck is this redundant? overrated probably, but some moderator was on crack to think it was redundant

    8. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol your funi, I laugh at you're funi.

    9. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably as much as the radio announcers at the sharks game who said "We are definitely experiencing an earthquake"

      I don't trust any media news outlet, but just because the guy couldn't tell the difference between an arena full of people stomping feet and an earthquake doesn't make the AP unreliable, untrustworthy, etc.

      I've been through both and I doubt I would have noticed it...

    10. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      How can you be so insensitive! The quake briefly delays the San Jose Sharks / Colorado Avalanche playoff game! OH THE HORROR! hehe

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    11. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2

      No, I'm deadly serious. If it had been a joke, I would have inserted a smiley.

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    12. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Notice the original poster was from New Jersey. His 'damage report' should have mentioned how bad the Devils sucked, as they were destroyed by the former Hartford Whalers. How humiliating that must have been.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    13. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Dude... Thats not the TCD dude I used to discuss UFO theory with? Sorry- Just recognised the nick.. I used to be "The Sonic"... But then I am sure there are other who would use it...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    14. Re:Damage Report from New Jersey.. by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2

      Nope.... sorry

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  3. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post :)

  4. No big deal on peninsula by aralin · · Score: 2

    On the peninsula, between SF and SJ it was barely felt. The house shook a bit, but just two fast shakes and nothing more. Definitely not making any damage and hardly waking up anyone who was already asleep.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:No big deal on peninsula by caferace · · Score: 1

      Different parts of the Peninsula felt it differently. Pretty nice roller here in San Mateo. No biggie really. After SF in '89 and LA in '71 I'm getting bored with 'em. :)

    2. Re:No big deal on peninsula by aralin · · Score: 2

      I'm just next to you in San Carlos and didn't seem any special to me. Maybe its just that I am not used to earthquakes, but if I'd be asleep I would not know there was any. Not even a picture moved...

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    3. Re:No big deal on peninsula by tftp · · Score: 2

      In Santa Clara (10 miles west from SJ) it was felt, but caused no damage or inconvenience.

  5. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...It rained today in Vancouver*.

    (*Vancouver is one of the rainiest placed in North America.)

    1. Re:In other news... by n6mod · · Score: 2

      As there is probably more rain in Vancouver, WA then there is in Vancouver, BC...

      Sorry, I couldn't resist.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    2. Re:In other news... by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      Funny that - the only earthquake injury I've ever had was from an earthquake in Vancouver BC. Mind you the broken elbow was from standing slack-jawed in the middle of an SCA heavy fighting practice trying to figure out why the ground was moving while the other fellow kept pummelling me...

      Paul

    3. Re:In other news... by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that the Vancouver to which the original poster referred *is* in North America, no matter who is represented on anyone's twenty dollar bill.
      It's just not in the U.S.A.

      Oh yeah, if you re-read his post, you'll find that he did specifically refer to NORTH America.

      Seppo fuckwit!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    4. Re:In other news... by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      Actually it is damn sunny up here in Vancouver today. Sunny and mild.

    5. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, for a few moments this morning. It's nice outside my window now. Now that it makes any difference since the weather's out there and I'm in here.

    6. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted last night, incase you have a bad memory, it rained yesterday..

    7. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Today" was monday when I posted (see the date and time of my post). It rained Monday.

  6. I Feel Your Pain by Misanthroporama · · Score: 1

    Yeah I was in the Oly, WA quake last year, that was 6.8. Those things can be crazy. Glad it wasnt a very big one.

    1. Re:I Feel Your Pain by insta · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It was a big one. It was just very deep in the earth, didn't cause much damage. If it was near the surface we would have had probably one of worst earthquakes in history. Glad we didn't.

    2. Re:I Feel Your Pain by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 3

      Dunno about everyone else, I'd say that was pretty big. Here in Seattle, I felt it in a major way even while driving 60mph (thought I had a flat tire, and when I got out and checked, I thought I was just really dizzy, that is until I heard on the news what happend). There were several buildings/walls that collapsed or were irreparably damaged. Didn't you even here about the damage to the capitol building in Olympia?

      So it wasn't huge, but it's one I'll remember for a while... certainly bigger than this whimpy one today :)

  7. ESPN by Weffs11 · · Score: 0

    Saw it on ESPN first.

  8. woo - hoo - first post by mergy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I felt it too

  9. 5.2 is not so scary by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until an earthquake's magnitude rises above 6.5, it's really not so bad.

    Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

      What's to investigate? The pile of rubble?
      Here, I shall provide you with a thorough investigation report:

      engineer1: "Shit, that was only a 5.2, and that building collapsed. I didn't even spill my coffee."

      engineer2: "Gee, sucks to be them. Oh well."

      engineer1: "Want to grab a burger?"

      engineer2: "Ok."

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    2. Re:5.2 is not so scary by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't you like to know what construction company built a collapsed building?

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:5.2 is not so scary by flewp · · Score: 2

      I was watching the Colorado and San Jose hockey game, and one of the announcers noticed it. The other thought it was from the fans on their feet when the action got intense. I didn't even see anything shake, no players fell to the ground, so it doesn't seem like anything big. Then again, it was in San Jose (not sure how far that is from Gilroy.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    4. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer to know which construction company built the ones still standing.

    5. Re:5.2 is not so scary by yomahz · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Until an earthquake's magnitude rises above 6.5, it's really not so bad.

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.


      Not true... there are so many more factors to take into consideration when it comes to earthquakes. The depth, the type (rollers are much worse), the distance, etc.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    6. Re:5.2 is not so scary by cybercomm · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you like to know what construction company built a collapsed building?

      Yeah...steal_your_money_and_run Cheapo-INC. Though i believe that there is a standard for building high-rises (i think they have to be capable of withstanding 6.5 on richter scale). Someone correct me if im wrong. =P

      --
      Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    7. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention the geography and geology of the location. Reflections off large underground rock formations and "liquifaction" are a couple of the more serious problems during an earthquake.

    8. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Peyna · · Score: 2

      The problem with the building codes is old buildings. Like the building I live in right now could in no way be built today the way it stands, but they can't make them tear it down or force them to spend millions of dollars to bring it up to code either.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except a building that fails to survive a 5.2 earthquake is likely a termite-infested tool shed that was held together with scotch tape.

      Honestly, even during the 7.2 Loma Praeta quake we had when I was in Junior High, I got up, stood in the doorway, went "Woo hoo!" and then sat down again and continued playing Curse of the Azure Bonds on my 286.

      Good times...

      -DG

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    10. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if is the same company?

    11. Re:5.2 is not so scary by smokinburt · · Score: 0

      damn i remember playing curse of the azure bonds on my 8088...that game ruled. took fucking forever to load and then load your saved game. i would do it before i went to school though so it would be all ready when i got home. damn i was a geek.

    12. Re:5.2 is not so scary by DirtyJ · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. During the time I lived in California, it seemed (probably just due to faulty memory) like most of the earthquakes occurred at night, and I would generally not even wake up unless they registered maybe 5.5 or so. I never heard about real earthquake damage until the Loma Prieta quake of 1989. I lived in Los Gatos at the time - just a few miles from the epicenter. That one scared the bejesus out of people. Damage, loss of life... it was no fun at all. Anyway, a 5.2 shouldn't matter in California; it might matter someplace like Mexico City. To a Californian, a 5.2 is just a cheap substitute for a kid's amusement park ride - a mild, momentary thrill. Your biggest concern is not spilling your cappucino. Still - I'm glad to hear that people (at least a few /.ers) are okay.

    13. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

      Must be made out of breadsticks, paint, and shellac.

    14. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well then were proper fucked, arent we?

    15. Re:5.2 is not so scary by linzeal · · Score: 1

      32.6 miles by highsway, even mother nature has to obey the laws of the California Highway Patrol.

    16. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      They had a 5.7 in the East Midlands of the UK in the 1950's. A child in Derby was injured by a falling chimney. So the idea of Slashdot getting excited by a 5.2 in California - slow day is it?

    17. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      Buildings that cannot withstand a 5.2 earthquake should be investigated.

      That might be difficult...

    18. Re:5.2 is not so scary by paxil · · Score: 1

      Honestly, even during the 7.2 Loma Praeta quake we had when I was in Junior High, I got up, stood in the doorway, went "Woo hoo!" and then sat down again and continued playing Curse of the Azure Bonds on my 286.

      Good times...


      Asshole.

      You don't know much? do you?

    19. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      "Yeah, except a building that fails to survive a 5.2 earthquake is likely a termite-infested tool shed that was held together with scotch tape."

      I use duct tape on my termite-infested shed- no problems.

      graspee

    20. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duct tape is like the Force.
      It has a light side and a dark side
      and it holds the universe together.

      93wpm.

    21. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll try and phrase this as unflamebaitly as I can but it's meant as a legitimate question from a non-american...

      why, when the pictures are shown on TV of places in America after natural disasters (often hurricanes or earthquakes) do most of the houses appear to be made from wood?

      It seems very strange when these houses are often built places like the tornado belt that they're not made from stone or something a little more hardwearing....is this just cheap houses? am I totally wrong and wooden houses are just as strong? someone enlighten me please :)

    22. Re:5.2 is not so scary by whovian · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Los Angeles. You could feel anything magnitude 3.0 or greater because of how "liquid" the ground was.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    23. Re:5.2 is not so scary by beebware · · Score: 1

      We actually had one a few months ago hit just outside Leicester (UK East Midlands) - I think it measured around 5.6/5.7ish. I noticed the house slightly shaking but just thought it was a damn big lorry passing (ok, initally I thought it was the local quarry blasting again until I remembered that I no longer lived near one).

    24. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      So the idea of Slashdot getting excited by a 5.2 in California - slow day is it?

      Hell, the local news here got in a tizzy. Breaking "interesting" news storys ever 30 seconds to bring updates on "The Earthquake of the Century (TM)"* They made the earthquake more important than the Sharks game. :P

      * I know it wasn't, I'm making fun of how the news sensationalizes everything.

    25. Re:5.2 is not so scary by termchimp · · Score: 1

      The only mention of this event in my local paper was on the sports page. Headline: Avs Shake Sharks.

      --
      My spoon is too big!
    26. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true... there are so many more factors to take into consideration when it comes to earthquakes. The depth, the type (rollers are much worse), the distance, etc.

      ...the fire from the knocked over water heater...

    27. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Nah, the Melton Mowbray earthquake was only 4.1. You could get that by dropping a really big pie...

    28. Re:5.2 is not so scary by paploo · · Score: 1

      Haha. Like the time I was at UCSB, and there was a quake (can't remember how big, but it seems like it was a 5) right off the coast. I woke up to my bed shaking. I rolled over and fell asleep again before the thing ended.

    29. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it IS the earthquake of the century... in California... (Knock on wood) that may change in a few months/years, but for a century that's only 17 months old it's absolutely "the earthquake of the century in California."

    30. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      The depth

      There was a 8+ quake deep under Bolivia, so deep (hundreds of miles, IIRC) that no significant damage occurred, except to the then-current theory about deep quakes :)

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    31. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Taeolas · · Score: 1

      Hmm, funny, I'm in Monterey and I was watching TV and it didn't seem any of the stations reacted much. The two fox stations I get didn't even mention it till 30 minutes after the fact and they were showing the news at the time! (NBC and ABC broke in about 20 minutes after with a quick message but that was about it till their local newscasts)

    32. Re:5.2 is not so scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone correct me if im wrong. =P

      You're wrong.

  10. Nothing to see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move along....

    (Lame Officer Barbrady)

  11. Monterey Bay by sprinklerhead · · Score: 1

    I felt it here in Monterey. News said it was based just NW of Gilroy.

    1. Re:Monterey Bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The news was wrong (like that's a surprise.. they were originally reporting that the quake occured 30 minutes before it actually did).
      Check USGS. It was SOUTH west.

  12. I live in Cupertino by smaug195 · · Score: 1

    Felt nothing, my sister felt it a bit. I still remember my third night in the US I was living in Santa Barbara, and the '94 LA Quake happened. Suffice to say I was scared shitless(Israel and Russia are not earthquake hot zones). Now I rarely notice those 4 and 5 richter ones.

    1. Re:I live in Cupertino by Dicky · · Score: 2
      Israel and Russia are not earthquake hot zones

      I hate to tell you, but parts of Israel are somewhat earthquake-prone. I lived in Jerusalem for a few months back in 94/95, and I apparently slept through an earthquake which woke up my 3 room-mates. Not a big one, but bigger than we tend to get here in the UK :-) Wasn't there a big earthquake in the 1920s which caused a lot of damage in S'fat? What do you think the Jordan valley is, if not a fault line?

      And Russia is so mind-bogglingly big that I bet there are some areas which are hot zones...

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
  13. I missed it by ungulation · · Score: 0

    I live near Palo Alto (think Stanford), and my whole family felt it, but i missed it... oh well .

  14. Rough Road by hoffmang · · Score: 1

    The road around my house in Woodside is so rough that I thought it was a pothole....

  15. Is this a joke? by dingo · · Score: 1

    Firstly accept my humble appologies if you have lost property or been hurt. However from the sound of it this is a bit of a joke.
    My stereo shook a bit
    and the guy at the epicenter who didnt notice.
    IMHO I dont think this should qualify as a /. story.

    --
    The Borg assimilated my race & all I got was this lousy T-shirt
    1. Re:Is this a joke? by rhizome · · Score: 2

      The shaking radiates in waves from the epicenter (which is deep in the earth, to boot), so there is rarely as much shaking at the epicenter as in surrounding cities. It's just that common epicenters get the side effect of skewed roads and cracked foundations from the fault motion. :)

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    2. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that it is late at night with not many other stories possible it seems to be a worthy /. story. Its nice to see that /. cares enough for when something happens they'll say it even if its just a bunch of people waking up in the middle of the night going wtf.... oh well I am awake whats on /. oohhh thats what that was hmm I thought I farted in my sleep again....

    3. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if its just a bunch of people waking up in the middle of the night going wtf....

      Ever heard of time zones? The local time of the earthquake was 10:00pm.

  16. i havent felt a good quake... by andrewtea · · Score: 1

    since the big san francisco one in.....90 something?...and i was in tahoe..now that was interesting..

    --

    admit defeat, live in decline, be the victim of our own design

    1. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      1989. 1991 was the Oakland hills fire. The 89 quake was near Santa Cruz. Its easy to think of it as a SF quake, but if it really was centered in SF there would have have been a decent amount of damage. Some brick buildings near the epicenter were very much damaged or destroyed. The Cypress structure, a two mile long stretch of double-decker freeway collapsed in Oakland. It was 6.9 or 7.1 depending on the source.

    2. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      See, that's the difference. Loma Prieta wasn't under a major urban area. Northridge was sitting right under some of the most highly developed real estate in So Cal.

      In '94, I was 3 miles away from Ground Zero.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was relatively far from SF. I live closer to the epicenter than SF and there was no real damage (uhh, something non-fragile fell over) done to my place in '89, but supposedly SF's Marina district was built on landfill which "amplified" the wave.

    4. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by fehlschlag · · Score: 1
      As has already been said, it was '89 in Loma Prieta.

      Interestingly, the shock wave hardly affected San Jose, but hit SF much harder. Some descriptions at the time mentioned things like the wave bouncing off some geo layer underneath SJ and combining with the surface wave when they both reached SF. Seems far fetched, but it was a bit scary nonetheless.

      I had Giants season tickets and was prepping for game 3 of the World Series. Sitting on the upper deck, near 1st plate, 3" Casio LCD TV in lap for the pre-game show (and replays).

      Suddenly, a sound started rising, much like the engine sound of a Cessna plane, and a piece of plaster appeared on my lap where the TV used to be. Needless to say, I looked up (thinking I'm under open sky). I saw I was under the edge of the stadium wall which was built with an inward bend, and a loud speaker moving back and forth about a foot in each direction.

      Once I quickly discerned it would not be easy to catch if the speaker if it fell, I jumped a few benches toward the middle. After the trembling was over, the crowd yelled, as if it was a sign the A's would get their's for whipping the Giants 2 games in a row (sadly, the Giants were swept the next 2 games once the postponed games restarted).

      There was no electricity, no news casts, a cloud of smoke was visible toward the City over the far edge of the stadium, rumors started circulating about the Bay Bridge having collapsed (partially true), the City being on fire (also partially true).

      I still have that little TV and the piece of plaster - interesting relics with a story.

    5. Re:i havent felt a good quake... by vsync64 · · Score: 1

      Dave Dravecky wrote about the earthquake. He was playing at the time.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  17. Fun ride in Mountain View by shutton · · Score: 1

    Lots of side-to-side shaking. 'Bout time we had some quake action out here. I moved from Indiana because I never saw any of the tornados I was promised, and the SF bay had been largely disappointing 'til now...

    --
    -Scott Hutton
    1. Re:Fun ride in Mountain View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I'm in mountain view also, having moved from kansas 5 years ago. Never did see a tornado. Didn't one hit mountain view a couple years back?

      Anyway, this was the first one I felt. Kinda cool. It barely crossed the threshold of me assuming it was just my upstairs neighbors getting a little roudy.

    2. Re:Fun ride in Mountain View by ostone · · Score: 1

      Another one out here in mountain view. It seemed to be about 30 seconds to me. I wonder what this did in morgan hill (just north of Gilroy)

      --
      Remove *your pants* to send me email.
    3. Re:Fun ride in Mountain View by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      I certainly felt it, too.

      I first felt a slow rolling motion, then suddenly a more severe rolling motion. It lasted about 25 seconds or so. If you live on relatively soft land (like I do), you certainly will feel it.

    4. Re:Fun ride in Mountain View by SDF-7 · · Score: 1

      Well, I live just a bit west of Morgan Hill. I was already awake when it hit since our cats and dog were going nuts -- you can debate if they sensed the quake coming if you like... they _always_ run around like nut cases between 9-11pm :)

      At any rate - being a transplant from the East Coast, I really wasn't sure it _was_ a quake until I saw the news this morning. The house quivered and shook a bit as if there had been a really strong gust of wind (one 'larger' one, then a more minor shake). My first instinct was to look for the thunderstorm... my second for the plane causing the sonic boom.

      No damage - didn't even knock over a ladder leaning against the house outside.

      According to my wife (she watched the local news this morning):

      South San Jose had 1 house burn down - apparently a gas line to the furnace snapped and ignited.

      Gilroy shops are going to have 'Earthquake sales' - dubious reasons except for glass shops and the Gilroy Wal*Mart -- the quake set off the sprinklers there... you can imagine what that does to the clothing sections..

  18. Who the fuck gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5.2 is nothing, this is not news worthy. Not news for nerds, not stuff that matters.

  19. I didn't even notice... by BobTheBooser · · Score: 1

    guess it didnt reach australia

  20. strange...lets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just twenty seconds after the earthquake, an elderly man in china watched as his car was severely damaged by an unexplained explosion.
    =p

    1. Re:strange...lets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent up. That's damn funny!

  21. Oh, just a 5.2? by hackman · · Score: 5, Funny

    No worries, seen worse. Be a good Californian and go back to bed.

    Heh. Course I live in Oregon now so I bet if they had a 5.2 out here everyone would be out on the street talking about how scared they were.

    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    1. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by steve_l · · Score: 1

      So oregon folk are soft are they? ask anyone who has been in portland for long enough will tell you what it is like to have volcano go off 50 or so miles away with the energy of a 30 megaton event. Some fabs I know out there built post mount saint helens are now specced to handle the weight of a metre or so of volcanic ash on their roof...

    2. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be a good Californian and go back to bed.

      don't forget to pick up your welfare check first!

    3. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another little thing. If you look in the earthquake literature, there's significant evidence that the Pacific Northwest sees bigger earthquakes than the San Andreas fault generates. Apparently Seattle gets magnitude 9 earthquakes (I bet that's a lot bigger energy release than Mount Saint Helens) about every few hundred to thousand years.

    4. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      So oregon folk are soft are they?

      Drove home to Seattle from San Fran just yesterday (lucky?) and I distinctly remember saying as I passed through Oregon, "What the fuck? These pussies have a 55mph speed limit!" So yes, Oregonians are soft.

      But I suppose you can't be softer than Seattle in a snowstorm -- the whole city breaks down in a god damn eighth of an inch.

    5. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah and there long past due...

      Then again there is 92 % chance of 8+ quake to occur in the many faults just south of SF within the next 10 years. (also long past due for a big quake)

      --
      Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    6. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I suppose you can't be softer than Seattle in a snowstorm -- the whole city breaks down in a god damn eighth of an inch

      Sounds like San Diego when there's a drizzle, or those other days where it just gets dark and cloudy and it doesn't rain at all. Nothing like sitting in traffic for an extra hour and a half 'cuz there's a few clouds in the sky...

      Totally agreed on the Oregonians, btw.

    7. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What the fuck? These pussies have a 55mph speed limit!"

      You should get your glasses checked. The limit is 65.

      But you're right about the snow. When I moved to Portland from Minnesota, I remember our first "snowfall" well. It was literally 1/8 inch. My siblings and I trudged to school as usual to find no one there. It didn't even occur to us to check if it was a snow day.

    8. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Course I live in Oregon now so I bet if they had a 5.2 out here everyone would be out on the street talking about how scared they were.

      There was a 6.8 near Olympia, WA on 2/28/2001, and that's EXACTLY what happened in Portland, despite there being almost no damage whatsoever.

      Of course, given the descriptions I've read, it sounds like the 6.8 was felt strong in Portland than that 5.2 was in Silicon Valley (it was felt as far away as SLC and San Francisco), but still. No damage, lots of crazies.

      And, of course, it caused a lot of damage in Seattle and Olympia, yet got no slashdot story. Go figure.

    9. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by kolding · · Score: 1

      I live in Oregon, and work in one of those lovely Intel buildings (designed to Oregon design codes, rather than California) and the Olympia quake produced quite a good rolling here. Lasted quite a while too. Felt to be greater than a 5, but we're over 100 miles from the epicenter.

      Being a California native myself, it didn't feel like much to me. However, it was great fun to watch the guy from Bulgaria react, not to mention the guy from Utah. I don't think they were used to having the earth move beneath their feet.

    10. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by KillboyPHD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Course I live in Oregon now so I bet if they had a 5.2 out here everyone would be out on the street talking about how scared they were.

      Course, they do that when the sun comes out too...

      --
      Bah weep granah, weep ninny bong!
    11. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by GNUpilo · · Score: 1

      This quake is actually good news: it's better to free energy little by little than to have it all in one big shake. It's the difference between slowly opening a shaken soda, and opening it at once.

    12. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      The limit is 65

      On parts of I-5 near the California border, it's 55 or 50. Granted, these parts are in the mountains, but going 75 in Cali and dropping 20 on the same roads seems strange.

    13. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by hylo · · Score: 1

      >Be a good Californian and go back to bed.
      >Heh. Course I live in Oregon now

      You bring your laws and energy crisis and your smog and you leave the earthquakes behind. Welcome to Califoregon.

      Im going to get Mt Hood to pop your azz.

    14. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      In England we have similar phrases about people from Birmingham.

    15. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      75 in N. Cali? Bless your heart. I average about 95mph from Yreka to the Oregon border.

    16. Re:Oh, just a 5.2? by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      I'm talking about the limit :) I made the trip from San Fran to Seattle in 12 hours including lunch and dinner, if that's any indication of how little the limit means to me.

  22. Little earthquakes are good... by Mailloop+Trooper · · Score: 1

    ... they shake loose the dust from the processor fan so you don't have to vacuum as often!

  23. Northridge by HR+Pufnstuf · · Score: 1

    The aftershocks days after the Northridge quake of '94 were registering 5.2. I've always thought (since I am completely nuts and want to experience an earthquake) that 5.2 would be about the perfect strength for a first time quake. It's enough to rattle you but death is not likely.

    1. Re:Northridge by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative
      A 5.2 *is* enough to cause serious damage to buildings and a good chance of death, if you're in an area with a building code that doesn't require construction that is earthquake-safe.

      Fortunately in California the building code does require this, so a 5.2 isn't likely to be a problem unless you happen to be very close or at a point where the P-waves and S-waves reinforce.

    2. Re:Northridge by HR+Pufnstuf · · Score: 1

      I did mention I was completely nuts didn't I? When I was six, a 'small' tornado hit my block. We were sitting in our living room and the storm started shaking our house. I ran to our sliding glass door (I mentioned I was only six) to see debris flying within yards of where I stood. What I was watching was the tornado taking the roof off the house one house North of the house directly behind ours. The roof was set down in the backyard of our neighbors two houses to our North. The debris was so thinck all I could see was the stuff flying around in our neighbors to the North backyard and only about half way across so I did not get to see the roof of the other house getting tossed, but I remember the sounds and the swirls.

  24. Why? by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Okay, forget karma or what not for a second. Honestly, why is this on slashdot? I'm not sure I approve of reporting minor earthquakes in San Francisco when I know hundreds of people die every day or so in huge catastrophes across the world. I'm an American, but I'm a little sick of this American-centric view of what's important. Either all minor disasters get reported, or none of them.

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you forget it is not within your domain to "approve" or "disapprove". So, shut the fuck up.

  25. Here in south san jose.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I absolutely swear to God that this happened 20 seconds after I smoked a joint. I thought the goddamn police were busting my door in to come after me. I broke down, and started throwing things everywhere.

    Seriously, that really happened, and I'm glad I wasn't halucinating.

  26. Parochial Rant Approaching! by Debillitatus · · Score: 2
    This is why the East Coast kicks all the ass in the world, really.

    Ok, flamebait aside, I still find it amazing that people can deal with this stuff on a regular basis. I've been through quakes a few times, and I have absolutely no desire to repeat the experience.

    How on earth do all you Californians deal with it? I would be heading out on the next flight.

    Give me nor-easters and rude subway drivers any day...;-)

    --

    Come on, give it up, that's

    1. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every 50 years we get a major earthquake. Usually, there's rarely ever any injuries (especially as our buildings are very very well prepared).

      Every other year, you get a major blizzard, hurricane, or tornado.

      Furthermore, in Japan, they get 8.0s and 9.0s every 10 years, people at the top of their skyscrapers and sliding around on the floor.

      "Hey, Mato, quit shaking my chair."
      "Er, that was an earthquake."
      "Oh, sorry about the accusation"

      and that's that :)

    2. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not from the northeast. No one from the Northeast would refer to a subway operator as a "driver."

    3. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by n6mod · · Score: 2

      It's simple. The east coast sucks for one fundamental reason. Your oceans are broken. Here on the proper coast, the sun sets over the ocean. This is one of those romantice devices that chicks go for. (Oh, wait, this is /. Never mind.)

      I'm told that the sun rises over the oceans on that coast, but I've never been up that early.

      Besides, you had a 5.0 near Plattsburgh last month, so save the "we don't have earthquakes" crap.

      (And no, I won't claim we don't have tornados here. We do. There was one a few years ago that destroyed a couple of hot tubs. ;)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    4. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by corebreech · · Score: 2

      No way to know whether they're rude or not either, unless, like, they run you over or something.

    5. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jchang · · Score: 1

      Ok, flamebait aside, I still find it amazing that people can deal with this stuff on a regular basis.

      It all comes down to what kind of natural disaster you prefer. You have to deal with hurricanes and floods in the east coast, tornados in the midwest, and snowstorms in the north. A lot of people don't like the fact that earthquakes come with no warning. However, I prefer that to the constant warnings for hurricanes that always turn at the last minute, as always happened when I grew up in Texas. Call me unrational if you will...

    6. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm let's see: great weather, beautiful scenery, laid back people, jobs.

      For about 30 million people, these are worth a little shake every six months.

      Every place has pros and cons. It's just how you weigh the parameters on your personal scale.

    7. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you mean the northeast coast, since south of the Carolinas there are hurricanes. Not to mention that the summers are humid as hell from what I hear. Ours are just hot, but dry. Don't you have to worry about blizzards, too? I don't recall reading about Boise getting snowed in for two weeks at a time.

    8. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by wdr1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it?

      When I grew up in the Midwest, it was Severe Thunderstorms, Snow Storms, Floods, and Tornados.

      If I lived on the East Coast, I'd worry about Hurricanes.

      I live on the West Coast and it's Earthquakes.

      Pick your poison.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    9. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      For all of the ranting I see about how on this coast you have to deal with this problem, and yadda yadda yadda, I feel that I should mention that in Pittsburgh - a beautiful city with a wonderful, kind, and funny speaking people - the worst we have to deal with are icy steps.

      The first tornado of the century happened on Mount Wa(r)shington, and scattered a bunch of roof tiles. Our last earthquake was in 1983, and nobody noticed - it was a 0.7, the biggest we've had since the Richter scale was invented. The rivers flood, but we're a very hilly city, so that means we lose about 20 feet of docks every 10 years or so. Our idea of a hurricane is a big fat drunk Yinzer (if you've been here, you know what a Yinzer is.)

      There's no truth the the idea that everywhere has weather problems of serious magnitude. Stop living on coasts, on plains, on fault lines, and near volcanoes, and you're free. Hilly inland cities in stable mountains are pretty sweet. And if it isn't in the mountain tops (*cough* Colorado *cough*) or in Albany somewhere, you don't have to deal with ridiculous snow, either.

      Hell, if it weren't for all the people from Ohio that live there, Cleveland would be pretty swag, too.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    10. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by yomahz · · Score: 2

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it? I would be heading out on the next flight.

      I just yawn and go back to sleep :)

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    11. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

      We get some earthquakes too. I got awoken one morning a few weeks ago here in Toronto by an quake centred near Montreal (I think).

    12. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Rakarra · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      This is why the East Coast kicks all the ass in the world, really.

      Yeah, those blizzards and hurricanes must be great fun.

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it?

      How? Because they almost never happen. The last major one in the Bay Area was in 1989. Before that? Probably the one by Eureka in 1922. The last to do a major amount of damage? 1906. Every one since the 1989 quake has been just a tiny little rumbling.

      Trivial. Folks who don't live here sometimes seem under the impression that we're constantly shutting down due to earthquakes. Fact is, in northern California, you're probably only going to be in a major quake once in your life.

      On the other hand, I was a little nervous when I worked on the second floor of a building in San Francisco that was made of 50-year old unreinforced brick.

      Fun fact: California gets a bad earthquake rap, but 10 of the 15 largest earthquakes recorded in the US (including the top 8) were in Alaska. The greatest recorded earthquake in the contiguous United States was located in Missouri, not a place that usually comes to mind when one thinks "earthquake."

    13. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by esvoboda · · Score: 1

      I live in the SF Bay Area. I'd suggest that the closest analogy for an East Coast person to understand is thunder and lightening. Perhaps once a year we get what you folks would call a real thunderstorm. To see lightning or hear thunder is a fantastic curiosity for me. I admit that because it's so unusual an experience for me, I get a little paranoid, even nervous, during a thunderstorm. I know it's irrational. It's hard for me to imagine having to go through this with any regularity like many folks in other parts of the country. I'm sure I'd get used to it if it wasn't such a novelty for me. I also stepped in real snow (not just barely-there powder) for the first time at the age of 31. I travel a lot both domestically and abroad, but I just never seem to be anywhere when it's snowing.

      It must be a slow news day on Slashdot. I was in a cafe here near San Jose when this 5.2 quake hit. I was reading a book at the time and I thought I felt someone nudging my chair but I wasn't sure. I had to ask the guy next to me if he felt something. He said yes. The other guy next to him thought we were joking. That's how minor this one was.

    14. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      The greatest recorded earthquake in the contiguous United States was located in Missouri, not a place that usually comes to mind when one thinks "earthquake."
      New Madrid quake, estimated to be an 8.0. It apparently rang church bells as far away as Boston, MA. Read more about it here.

      As far as this one went, it rattled the house a bit here in Oakland (~60 miles NNE of Gilroy), which rattled the cats more than a little.

    15. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jackal! · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      West Coast: Some minor shaking every year. Every few decades a few people get hurt.

      East Coast: Hurricanes, Blizzards, Nor'easters EVERY FUCKING YEAR. Hundreds killed EVERY FUCKING YEAR.

      Still prefer the East Coast?

      --

      Who moderates the meta-moderators?

    16. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen lightening during a snow storm? Now that's a bizarre one.

      Happens about once or twice a year in the upper Midwest. (think southern Canada)

    17. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      As a person from the midwest, you don't get much warning about tornados either. Especially when there are a ton of severe storms all the time, you can very well head to the basement for each one. Many people in the midwest live too far from tornado sirens as well. Tornados are pretty fickle too.

      --
      What?
    18. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Give me a break. The few times you NY guys have quakes, the network news anchors are all over it like the end of the world. I've seen them do that for a 3.3. A BLOODY 3.3 fer G-d's sake! Out here, for a 3.3, we say, "OK, who farted?"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    19. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Besides... the safest place to be in an earthquake is somewhere else (obviously). But... if you can't be somewhere else, L.A. (and the SF Bay area) are probably the best places to be. They know quakes are coming, the building codes take that into account. Buildings in CA are designed to hold up to quakes... They may be broken afterwards, but they don't fall down on top of you. We learned our lesson back in '71.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    20. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by kmellis · · Score: 1
      Mid-continental quakes are far more intense, and far more rare, than edge quakes.

      The New Madrid quake was enormous -- it changed the course of the Mississippi river. If the same quake occured today, the damage and loss of life throughout the region would be enormous.

      Something similar can be said about Washington/British Columbia coastal areas: they're less likely to experience earthquakes than some of the more active zones, but there's also a possibility for a high magnititude quake. In both cases, it's because the more active areas are active -- and thus releasing strain gradually, instead of all at once in a cataclysmic event.

    21. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by rmgrotkierii · · Score: 1

      Besides, you had a 5.0 near Plattsburgh last month, so save the "we don't have earthquakes" crap.

      yea, it was awesome for me down here in Rochester, my monitor started to shake a lil, and first thing I thought was "AWESOME my first quake", then I waited for more aftershocks or something... blah. I also agree that our ocean is broken. I'd rather see a sunset. :/

      --
      Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
    22. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by linzeal · · Score: 1
      There is a bit of difference between a hurricane and an earthqauke. You can usually see hurricanes coming. People that are trully afraid can take precautions or just leave. A lot of people that die in hurricanes did not take the time to "batten down the hatches" and stay inside.

      An earthquake you can only prepare for. You can over-engineer tall office buildings but only retrofit older ones, which will never be as dependably safe. Most people are going to be on those older buildings when it hits. You can lay seismographs from here to eternity but you will still only begin to understand the shape of the fault and what it is going to do.

      The big one is still coming.

    23. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      Indeed, 3.3 is nothing to talk about considering the Richter scale is logarithmic. The British band Madness managed to record 4.5 on the Richter scale with their 1992 reunion concert!

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    24. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post!

      I'm moving back to the Burgh area from Cali later this month. Thanks for reminding me of all the "high points" of the local culture. Yinzers and Mt. Warshington... :)

      I'll be living with the rednecks about 40 miles SE though...

      To make a generalization (I know they're bad and often wrong) in response to the "grandparent?" post, it seems like all the east coasters are afraid of earthquakes and all the west coasters are afraid of hurricanes and tornadoes. Having lived in both places, the thing I'm most afraid of is some redneck with a shotgun (east coast) and liberals (west coast)

    25. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by whovian · · Score: 1

      When I grew up in the Midwest, it was Severe Thunderstorms, Snow Storms, Floods, and Tornados.

      What about drought? Don't forget the drought...!

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    26. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      Hurricanes rarely even come near the northeast. And you have a good week of prior notice before they land. When I lived in Cali we had mudslides, wildfires, earthquakes, riots, and the occasional typhoon heading in from the Pacific. I live in Florida and I'll take sunny skies and the occasional cat-3 hurricane over that any day.

    27. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by ozbird · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Pick your poison.

      That about sums up Australia - deadly poisonous snakes, spiders, jellyfish etc. (Unfortunately, not deadly enough to rid us of "The Crocodile Hunter"...)

    28. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is why the East Coast kicks all the ass in the world, really.

      This is why I'll never live on the East Coast. The East Coast is prone to earthquakes as well. It just hasn't had a large one in recent history (at least since our European ancestors invaded North America.

      Which means that buildings all along the eastern seaboard are not built to withstand major seismic events.

      Which means that when a > 6.5 finally hits New England (and it will, it's just a matter of time), all those brick & timber buildings built on landfill in Boston & New York & everywhere in between will crumble and burn.

      This isn't an East Coast rant--I love New England--but I fear the day that the big earthquake hits it.

    29. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Earthquakes, fires, mud slides, riots, traffic snarls, and liberal legislation. Yep, it's hard to live in California.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    30. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      Every one since the 1989 quake has been just a tiny little rumbling.

      To Northern CA'ians, I guess that's true. But to us in sunny Southern CA, 1992 Landers quake(s; there were 2 strong jolts) was very intense, and let us not forget the building collapsing, death causing 1994 Northridge quake.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    31. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by n6mod · · Score: 2

      I was wondering if Rochester felt that one. When I went to RIT ('90-92), Loma Prieta was fresh in everyone's minds, and I was constantly asked about it. As if surviving that quake somehow defined my existence.

      Nice to know they have a data point now. ;)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    32. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is from Indiana, moved here to CA. When I ask what she thinks about quakes, she starts telling me stories about tornados, and having to spend oh about a week each summer in the basement due to tornado warnings.

      Then there are stories about being caught on the road in blizzards, and the list of items midwesterners have to keep in their cars just in case.

      Needless to say quakes do not faze her.

    33. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jafac · · Score: 2

      don't forget the killer bees and high-speed car chases.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    34. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by jafac · · Score: 2

      Even worse, east-coast cities, and Chicago and Milwaukee all have the distinction of being laid out backwards. Body of water to the East of downtown, Suburbs to the West.
      Such that, commuters have to drive Eastward towards the city in the morning, blinding morning sunlight in their eyes, and then turn around and drive Westwards towards the suburbs in the evenings.

      It's gotta do some nasty things to one's stress levels trying to drive rush hour twice a day blinded by low angle sunlight.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    35. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      It's the cheese!

    36. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm from Florida. The sun sets over the Gulf. And the water's warm enough not to shrivel your equipment. No earthquakes. Very few hurricanes. Lots o' babes.

      Now I'm in California. The water is freezing, the earth doesn't stay where it should, and the people are rude. sigh. Still lots o' babes, though, so not all bad.

    37. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      Yeah, those blizzards and hurricanes must be great fun.

      You don't get strong blizzards and hurricanes in the same places. Hurricanes require warm climates. And blizzards don't damage buildings much if at all - stay inside and you are fine. Dealing with a blizzard is a cakewalk.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    38. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by rmgrotkierii · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      Well there is a fault line near Brockport [about 10 miles south-west of me], but it hasn't been active in a long while. And well, I am just glad noone was hurt by the 'quake here last month. :)

      --
      Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
    39. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The biggest natural disaster in LA isn't the earthquakes. It's the idiotic notion of trying to get an arid desert to suppport such a large population. Thus you have erosion problems up the yin-yang on the occasions where it does rain and people lose their yards in mudslides, and you have to pipe in every last drop out of the Colorado River, hundreds of miles away, so the river doesn't even reach the coast in Mexico anymore.

      Anyone living in a freakin' desert should *not* waste water on having a nice green lawn. If you didn't want sand and sgraggly scrub brush for your yard, you shouldn't have chosen to live where that's what the climate tends to produce.

      Still prefer the East coast? Nah, but I prefer that part of the West Coast that actually has a livable temperate climate, essentially everything north of San Fran is okay. And there you start to get the *really* fun natural disasters - a few thousand or so years of nothing and then BAM, the top of one of the Cascade Mountains literally explodes. (Mt Saint Helens wasn't that unique an event for the area. It's the standard pattern for how those volcanoes tend to go. Terrifying, but it leaves behind the most beautiful landscape imaginable after the area recovers. Ever seen Crater Lake?)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    40. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by phossie · · Score: 1

      i don't know, i'd disagree. i have always smelled them coming (OH), and the sky does tend to turn that sickly greenish color. you've *got* to know something's wrong when that happens. usually 30 min of warning. i'm much less worried by tornadoes than earthquakes.

      there's not a damn thing you can do about an earthquake, comparatively. granted, i wierdly predicted this one the night before (i'm in SF), but still...

      --

      [|]
    41. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth do all you Californians deal with it? I would be heading out on the next flight.

      I was at a lecture by Richter some years back. He was asked "What's the most frequent question you get about earthquakes?" He said it was "Where in the US do I have the least chance of being in one?" His answer -- "Florida and South Dakota. What's your attitude about hurricanes and tornadoes?"

    42. Re:Parochial Rant Approaching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me unrational if you will...

      Hi, Unrational.

  27. I know what caused the quake... by corebreech · · Score: 1

    Those Israelis who were caught running explosives probably dumped their cargo somewhere around Northern Cal, where it blew up, and triggered some kind of post-Nevada-testing-site showdown with the San Andreas Fault.

    Or something like that.

    1. Re:I know what caused the quake... by servanya · · Score: 2, Funny

      WOW....I felt it here in Portland, OR.
      Wait a sec...no, that was just my g/f rolling out of bed. Nevermind.

    2. Re:I know what caused the quake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, how big is that girlfriend of yours?

    3. Re:I know what caused the quake... by t · · Score: 1, Funny

      my condolences on your gf's weight problem.

    4. Re:I know what caused the quake... by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

      so you're in bed with your girlfriend browsing slashdot? that's called addiction. no wonder she rolled out of bed.

      --

      visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
  28. in hayward by JDAustin · · Score: 0

    Felt it here in Hayward (yes, one of the armpits of the bay area, but hey, its better then San Leandro). Didn't seem much more then a 4, much less a 5.

    1. Re:in hayward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work in Hayward. I drove over the same fucking potholes for three years. But hey, at least Hayward is a designated "Hate-Free Zone" whose high schools have a gay prom.

  29. Reporting your observations by zavyman · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you felt the quake, or if you were in the area and didn't feel it, be sure to record your observations here so that the data can be displayed and analyzed.

    It's amazing to see 700 responses be recorded in about 20 some minutes, and more data just helps the cause of the USGS. It was minor up here near the bay, but hey, it was my first :) You can access the current map as well.

    1. Re:Reporting your observations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that POOR server!

    2. Re:Reporting your observations by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      You think that's amazing...wait 'til you're at +5 Informative.

  30. earthquake preparadness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, this makes me really glad I bought that $3500 bio-terrorism survival kit back in october...

  31. Sunnyvale by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    We're about 40 miles from the epicenter here. It was kind of long, which was the only worrying thing about it. When it doesn't stop right away, you worry that it's going to get worse before it stops.

    But really, amplitude-wise it was no great shakes.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Sunnyvale by zephc · · Score: 2

      I too am in sunnyvale, and i heard the TV sitting here on my desk shaking just a little, but didn't feel it in my seat

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    2. Re:Sunnyvale by alargeduck · · Score: 1

      Also in sunnyvale. The house just sorta shook, i though "WTF?" to myself, an went back to /.

      Kinda dissapointing actually, nothing even fell down.

  32. Yeah but.... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    ...you EXPECT that kind of thing in CA, we had a 5.2 here in the NY/VT area (I'm in VT) back in April. Now ofcourse I had no goddamn idea what it was, I thought it was a bomb or something! I mean, you don't exactly put 'Vermont' and 'Earthquake' together in your head, now do you?

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  33. report your experiences to the USGS by molo · · Score: 5, Informative


    http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/shake/ca/STORE/X4013 33 64/ciim_form.html

    Go there if you are in the area of the quake. Report what you felt. Don't make shit up, don't troll the USGS.

    I felt some moderate shaking. Biggest quake I've ever been in, but I just moved to Palo Alto from New York. Neat, but scary.

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:report your experiences to the USGS by yomahz · · Score: 4, Funny


      Go there if you are in the area of the quake. Report what you felt. Don't make shit up, don't troll the USGS


      Hmmm.. you just told the trolls on /. not to go troll the USGS. I feel sorry for those guys tonight :) Smooth move.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    2. Re:report your experiences to the USGS by nettdata · · Score: 5, Funny

      I felt some moderate shaking.

      Don't worry... I've felt some shaky moderation myself.

      Oh, wait...

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    3. Re:report your experiences to the USGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SALT LAKE CITY 84118 V 1
      PHOENIX 85032 IV 1
      SAINT LOUIS 63102 VIII 1
      CHICAGO 60601 II 1
      NASHVILLE 37209 I 1

      Why do people think this is funny?
      "HA! I look like a moron now!"
      Yeah, that's good.

  34. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dog Bites Man.

    This poster's name secretly replaced by Folgers Crystals

  35. Hmm... by Hallucinosis · · Score: 1

    I don't think I've seen Slashdot report on any similarly significant earthquakes before... What's changed?

    Is Slashdot now a general news site, or will the reporting be random based on who has been personally effected by it?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. is ./....it's not a news site and it's not important. Stop thinking there is any legitimate reason for anything here. Believe me, you'll sleep better when you stop thinking there is any substance associated with this site. Think more along the lines of the 'information' you get from reading the scrawls on the bathroom wall in a truck stop.

    2. Re:Hmm... by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

      There's been no mention of much more significant quakes that actually killed people, like the one in Gujerat last year which was 6.9 on the Richter Scale. I guess /. is doing it's bit to live up to American stereotypes.

    3. Re:Hmm... by esvoboda · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is simply targeting its coverage to its technical audience. Much of the readership is either based in the SF Bay Area or directly affected by what happens there. That isn't as true for Gujerat, thus something happening in Gujerat is not as newsworthy for this site. For a site like CNN, with a broader scope, it would be a different story entirely.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Hallucinosis · · Score: 1

      Hehe... yeah, I must admit the news was actually relevant to me as I do live in Orinda, about 15 minutes out of S.F., but I didn't actually feel it.

      I think I was listening to my music a wee bit too loud.

    5. Re:Hmm... by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

      CNN aren't much better. I remember about 6 years ago. A hurricane came in over Myrtle Beach in the Carolinas. They had people down there giving live coverage for 12 before until 24 hours after. It was the big news story of the week. Nobody died. A number of people had their lives temporarily distrupted. Most who had property damaged would have been able to claim on their insurance and get on with their lives. CNN didn't breathe one word about the typhoon that hit Bangladesh at the same time, killing many, and making many many more homeless. So CNN lives up to everybody's stereotypes about Americans. But I ask you this, how significant is the /. central CA posse? 70%? 40%? I bet it is a lot lot less. And anyway, your comment about Gujerat not being newsworthy for this site just exemplifies stereotypes about selfishness, self-centredness, self obssiossion and lack of care for one's fellow humans. You must be an American.

    6. Re:Hmm... by noodle-of-moria · · Score: 1
      Hey, the quake in Taiwan made huge news too, after all they supply the best mobos (IMO) and RAM prices really sucked afterwards. And I didn't hear about any silly hurricane out in NC...

      You're right, if foriegn news makes it here it will most likely be about an industrialized country, but first we get to hear about really banal events here that only kill through nausea.

    7. Re:Hmm... by esvoboda · · Score: 1

      >But I ask you this, how significant is the /. central CA posse? 70%? 40%? I bet it is a lot lot less.

      I bet it's significantly greater than the Gujerat posse. Also, based on the large number of posts from local folks here in the Bay Area, there seems to be significant interest in this story.

      >You must be an American.

      Yes, I'm lucky.

    8. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, we'll put it in news for nerds perspective for you.

      Silicon valley needs water. Silicon valley gets water from reservoirs near Yosemite. Local papers have run stories about the pipelines and how shoddy they are. They claim you can pull the bolts out by hand and they haven't been inspected in decades. One good earthquake could take out most of the bay area's fresh water supply for months.

      Sounds like a Bond movie.

    9. Re:Hmm... by esvoboda · · Score: 1

      I see you are from Canada. I was watching your Canadian TV network the other day on cable. I couldn't believe it. Most of the stories were about events that took place in Canada. That just exemplifies stereotypes about Canadians, that they care more about their own country than what happens to folks in other countries. They are SO self-centered! There are murders happening on the streets of Buenos Aires and Manilla and Canadian TV shrugs that off, instead choosing to use airtime to cover lifestyle stories and such. Shocking!
      When I hear of folks suffering outside the U.S. due to a natural disaster or whatever, of course I am saddened. I am sure as much as you are. Please don't insult me like that without doing your homework.
      I laugh at your ignorance.

    10. Re:Hmm... by esvoboda · · Score: 1

      By the way, I mean no insult to our Canadian brothers. We all prioritize our news as we see fit. America does not have a monopoly on this. Open up any sampling of international news web sites and you will see biases towards their readership's target audience.

    11. Re:Hmm... by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 1

      I'm not originally from Canada. I don't watch their local news as it seems modelled on the American style - dull, cat stick in tree stories. It's not quite as low quality though. I've lived in the US, so I know first hand, and I still occasionally run in to Channel 4 from Detroit - ahhhh. CBC is a bit better. If you ever get to watch BBC World, it has news broadcasts more in line with what I expect. News that matters, not news that no matter how insignificant, made it because it's local. Don't tell me that's because it's an international channel - CNN is too, and anyway, those are same as the national broadcasts in the UK. That tells you something when a national broadcast is good enough for international broadcasting too. And, let's be honest, a 5.2 Richter earthquake in CA isn't even big news there in the grand scheme of things, and should warrant nothing more than brief mention towards the end of news broadcast.

  36. WOW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this "stuff that matters"? So a few people in California were shaken for like 20 seconds. HOLY SHIT!

    This site has really gone downhill. I remember just a few short years ago, there were still a few decent stories being posted.

    1. Re:WOW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      downhill? You're too kind...this site started in the sewer and it's all downhill from there.

  37. It was felt at the hockey game by Erbo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Fox Sports Net broadcasters John Kelly and Peter McNab sure felt that one from the broadcast booth of the Compaq Center (soon to be the "HP Pavilion") in San Jose, where the Colorado Avalanche were dueling with the San Jose Sharks in a hotly-contested playoff game (Game 6, Sharks led series 3-2).

    The quake hit in the 3rd period, while the Avs and Sharks were tied 1-1 (both goals having come in the 2nd, within 30 seconds of one another). It may have jolted the announcers, but it sure didn't faze goaltenders Evgeni Nabokov or Patrick Roy, who never let anything through in that period. The game was finally decided in OT, on a goal by Avs forward Peter "The Great" Forsberg, winning the game 2-1 and sending the series back to Pepsi Center in Denver for Game 7.

    GO AVS!

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
    1. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At the end of the period, they played "Whole lotta shakin' going on" over the PA system. Or maybe that was the baseball game...


      WEAK. Here in SF Mission, I didn't feel a thing, though my roommate felt it in the other room. When are we going to get a real earthquake? I've been waiting two years to be able to mail friends and family, "I'm feeling a little shaken, but ok." *rimshot*

    2. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, the world is offically ending. A sports post got modded up..

    3. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by jeavis · · Score: 1
      Erbo writes:
      Fox Sports Net broadcasters John Kelly and Peter McNab sure felt that one from the broadcast booth of the Compaq Center (soon to be the "HP Pavilion") in San Jose, ...
      Steve Levy on ESPN wouldn't shut up about it, as though the Bay Area had never had an earthquake before.
    4. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Actually that's Fox Sports Net broadcasters Randy Hahn and Drew Remenda to the uncultured swine of Colorado. And the Avs wouldn't be nearly as close as they are if referees could actually call interference these days.

      Too bad I need to root for the sharks now that Phila keeps sucking ass.

    5. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering the poor officiating that has been going on, and that forberg has been routinly muged by the sharks, it helps explain why avalanche did not win this in 4 games

    6. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      :P

      Bite Me!

      Go Sharks!

    7. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Wildcat+J · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but it was probably one of those hits that Nolan laid on Kasparitis that they were really feeling.

      Strangely, on the same day an Avalanche win followed an earthquake, Montreal got rocked like a Hurricane. Natural disasters for everyone!

      -J

    8. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to remember Kasparitis tossing Nolan over onto his ass a couple of times through the game.
      I'm kinda disapointed that Forsberg didn;t go for a swim after that goal.

      After all everyone knows the shark tank is filled with goldfish.

    9. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Erbo · · Score: 1
      No, I'm thinking of the guys who do the Avs commentary for Fox Sports Rocky Mountains (both on cable and locally on UPN 20). Fox Sports West probably has different guys.

      Eric

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    10. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by Erbo · · Score: 1

      Kasparitis just ducked at the right time, letting Nolan sail over his back and flat onto the ice. Sometimes that's all it takes. (It was reminiscent of that attempted hit on Foote by Deadmarsh during Game 5 of the L.A. series, where Foote just stepped aside and let Deadmarsh run himself head-first into the boards. He missed Games 6 and 7 as a result.)

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    11. Re:It was felt at the hockey game by vsync64 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the refs kept skating in front of the Avs whenever they had the puck. My gf and I both noticed it.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  38. USGS info... by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

    ...here and here

    --
    Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  39. 5.2 aint nothin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from someone who lived in California, and lived through the "Big One" (Or at least my "I survived the Big One" mug says so), I'd say you're whining too much sissy man. I slept through a 4.8 in San Martin, I was in a hammock, I probably had a good time! Anyway, what I'm getting at, is no one bothered to post anything about *our* earthquake. It was 6.8. And we sure felt it. It didn't shake my stereo a little and get posted on slashdot, it got made fun of on Leno for good reason! We're still repairing damages, I want my bridge back. Yeah ...

  40. Go!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the Slashdot effect rates on the Richter scale?

  41. Yup, I felt it too by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am in Foster City, 75 km away from the Epicenter. Yup, I felt it. First thing I did was to shout "Sweetieeee, wake up!" to my husband who has *just* gone to sleep. But it only lasted for 10 secs or so, so it was not too bad.

    In Greece I've seen worse that this quake.

    And in fact, I was feeling like it would be a quake today. In Greece, (older) people have three things to undedify earthquakes that are going to happen in the next few hours:
    1. If the climate is unsusally dryly hot and it feels weird to your.. ears (there is an unusual sound of silence, a low pitch sound that masks the other small sounds). It is a different sort of heat. It is like humid heat, but very dry at the same time. I can't explain it better in words, sorry.
    2. If for some weird reason, while you just sit somewhere fine and daddy, your ear just "blocks", like it does when water gets inside when you are in the bath or something.
    3. If the dogs just bark all day, and no matter what you do to them, they just don't stop barking.

    At least these are the ways older people in Greece get a clue about nature's surprises.

    1. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Vess+V. · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yup, I felt it. First thing I did was to shout "Sweetieeee, wake up!" to my husband who has *just* gone to sleep. But it only lasted for 10 secs or so, so it was not too bad.

      Heh heh... gotta love out-of-context excerpts.

    2. Re:Yup, I felt it too by n6mod · · Score: 2

      2. If for some weird reason, while you just sit somewhere fine and daddy, your ear just "blocks", like it does when water gets inside when you are in the bath or something.

      Funny you mention this. Especially on the way home, I had a hell of a time keeping my ears cleared. I just blamed it on allergies. ;)

      Of course, I'm still having trouble, so either it is allergies, or that was just a foreshock...

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:Yup, I felt it too by cronik · · Score: 0
      As a resident of Redwood Shores I must comment that living on landfill makes the whole quake experience more fun. As long as the ground dosen'tdecide to liquify, it spreads out the shock a bit, felt like someone shaking a car a bit. Hell, in '89 we broke a glass, (my mom nearly had a heart attack) of course, who knows what will happen next time but it was a 5.2 BFD.

      and I'm nearly asleep so aplogies for the rambling speach

      --
      Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
    4. Re:Yup, I felt it too by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Were you the first internet posting of this? i read your post in the previous forum. Seems like it had 'just' happened. I was curious and went to try and find info but there wasn't any record until at least 10 minutes later.

      Just curious. Funny if you happened to be the first.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 2

      Yes, I was replying to a Slashdot comment when the earthquake happened... :o)
      Five minutes later, I was commenting again here on Slashdot, reporting the earthquake. :)

    6. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. If the dogs just bark all day, and no matter what you do to them, they just don't stop barking.

      Yeah, this is pretty scary. I killed all the dogs and they still bark at night. I knew shit will happen....

    7. Re:Yup, I felt it too by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      "Re:GnuSTEP and Carbon (Score:2)
      by Eugenia Loli (eloli@hotmail.com) on Monday May 13, @09:27PM

      Yes, weird, isn't it? I mean, I loaded Slashdot just before I go to bed tonight...

      Well, it seems I won't be going to bed soon. A pretty intensive earthquake happened just 75 Khm away from our place, 5 minutes after the story went live. Preliminary reports say that it was 5.2 Richter..."

      for the record... ;-p

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    8. Re:Yup, I felt it too by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Does something stink in here? That was bad... but made me laugh anyways. ;-D

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    9. Re:Yup, I felt it too by thanq · · Score: 1
      3. If the dogs just bark all day, and no matter what you do to them, they just don't stop barking.

      I have my neighbor's dogs barking all day and half the night, and we have never had any earthquakes in Oregon.

      Ahhh...... I guess the Greek dogs are a special model, or maybe the US dogs are just not tuned up.

    10. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our California dog sleeps right through quakes.

      He only barks if someone's chihuahua walks on "his" property.

    11. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dogs also bark at strange odors. Bathed lately? Oh, your Oregonian...

    12. Re:Yup, I felt it too by bgspence · · Score: 1

      One of our dogs, the smart one, barked a couple of seconds before the quake. Then they both ran around a bit after it was over.

      We are on landfill in San Leandro right on the bay. It lasted about 8 seconds and was a significantly mild one. Enough to really notice, but not move anything around.

    13. Re:Yup, I felt it too by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      I have also noticed those, and related "warning" effects, including:

      * Stepping outside, and noticing an absence of birdsong.
      * Stepping outside, and noticing a sensation of silent ambiance, probably brought on by a marked lack of typical background noises (birds, dogs barking, crickets chirping, etc.)
      * Pets behaving in an odd and unexpected fashion, such as racing throughout the house or hiding for extended periods of time.
      * A faint smell of Sulfur in the air or carried on the breeze.
      * A very low-level hum or buzz, like distant thunder, but of a sufficiently low frequency that you are almost unable to hear it or feel it.
      * Seemingly odd or unusual cloud formations in the sky.
      * A "disquieted" feeling, or feelings of tension or anticipation, for which you have no explanation. Often felt by others in the area.
      * Most of the earthquakes I remember being in as a kid struck at night.
      * Most of the earthquakes I remember being in as a kid struck during, or shortly after, a rainstorm.

    14. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking hate you you cunt bitch. You fucking loser asshole who doesnt like alcohol? I read your fuck tard bitch website.

      You know. Its funny. I see you get trolled. I trolled and I normally don't. You are the stupidest fucker I have ever seen. I feel compelled to SHIT on you.

      I feel so stupid, that your porky fat greek bitch self made me respond, but I had to.

      Fuck you. Your code sucks, there is more holes in it than a GREEK whorehouse, where you were concieved.

      I fucking hate you pig bitch. You fat whore slut, you fucking bitch cunt rat assed pigfucking tool whore.

      You suck at english, your code sucks, you are FUCKING UGLY, FUGLY, and your husband is a fuck shit. I hate you.

      Get out of here. No, not the US. Its people like you who make it easy for me to find a job. No, I mean GET OUT of slashdot. YOU FUCK. Dont post here. I hate you.

      FUCK OFF and DIE. BITCH. FAT GREEK PIG.

    15. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other dog he wasn't referring to, the dumb one, was in fact none other than Eugenia Loli.

      Sir, can I ask how what it's like to own a fat, smelly greek dog?

      Meowmix.

    16. Re:Yup, I felt it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this comment will be posted for posterity with a +1 threshold account in several days to ensure that it's archived. good day. Meowmix, we will contact you.

  42. Technical Info by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1
    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  43. Oh, Please... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    I was lying in bed (In Capitola, east of Santa Cruz) and the building shook a for about 15 seconds. Big deal. 5.2 is nothing. What's more fascinating is that this rates an article on Slashdot. I'm going to sleep now, ok? Shall I post an article on that?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. Slashdot before CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I received this news via Slashdot and checked CNN's webpage, who has no word of it. And people say that Slashdot is slow.....not in this case at least....

    1. Re:Slashdot before CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you'll be checking ./ for news on everything from now on. ...dupe...

    2. Re:Slashdot before CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Asia, listening to KPIG on the net, and they told me about it long before /. did...you people need to get out more... I mean, slamming CNN for not keeping pace with a chat room...how lame is that?

      I can imagine these bowler eye'd drones reloading ./ over and over and over...waiting for news.

      Try sticking your head out the window. The weather comes in many forms.

    3. Re:Slashdot before CNN? by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      CNN has it under the US section. It's not a large enough story to make it to the front page.

  45. Nate is in Walnut Creek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I'm in Danville! Let's get together sometime and bump sausages!

    1. Re:Nate is in Walnut Creek? by oldzoot · · Score: 2

      WalNut Crik???? Danville????
      I am in Antioch, but kindly leave my sausage alone.... ;)

      --
      enough is too much
  46. Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother was hit in the head by large falling pieces of the ceiling during the earthquake. They just took him to the hospital. The paramedics are saying that they haven't seen an injury this bad for a long time.

    If you are so inclined, please remember him in your prayers.

    1. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right...and while he goes to the hospital, you head for the keyboard to share your 'tragedy' with a trough full of AC's.

      Nice try....not

    2. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you dude.

    3. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indignation. Nice touch, but it would have been better to wait a bit longer. We know you're just sitting there in hopes of getting someone to bite.

      An inept attempt at furthering what is clearly a troll.

      Try this...ask for opinions on head trauma...survival rates, that sort of thing. If you could describe the tension in your Mom's voice, that would be great...then, tell us he's better...then, post breaking news about how he's made a turn for the worse.

      If you need to put an edge on it, tell us how his dog is waiting for him at the door...

    4. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely don't know what your problem is dude.

      I am home because my mom left me and my sister here while she followed the ambulance to the hospital.

    5. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, asking for prayers and then telling someone 'fuck you', just doesn't quite reflect the image of a latchkey child wondering if his sibling is in danger, reaching out to stangers on /., no less.

      Try again.

    6. Re:Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now, hours later, with no reported injuries to anyone....you're coming off as a bonafide fraud. I guess doing it here is better than dialing 911 and wasting their time.

  47. Safe kraton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always nice to be on a safe kraton. No earthquakes above 4.5 on the Richter Scale in more than 2,000,000,000 years. Where? The Fennoscandian peninsula! Where people don't have earthquakes, tornadoes, volcanoes, and drive Volvo.

  48. quake.usgs.gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't this be a game server? :)

  49. Is this by doubtless · · Score: 2, Funny

    a news for nerds? or a slow news day? or maybe another evidence for the stranglets? hee-hee

    --
    geek page at KY speaks
    1. Re:Is this by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, Mr. Compassion, this is news *HAPPENING* to nerds, stuff that matters to a whole lot of techies living in that area.

      Clues for sale, $.25

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Is this by WowTIP · · Score: 1

      Should we show our compassion for how their jolts were shaken?

      Feels like chrisd threw in the monitoring page just to justify it as news for nerds. If you can prove that SF bay area has the highest amount of nerds/capita in the world, then I might consider this "news for nerds".

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
  50. Watch It! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the BIG one comes, all the land east of the San Andreas (or mebbe Hayward) Fault will slide off into the Atlantic. Betcha wish ya were in sunny ... uh ... cool and windy (and often foggy during the summer) Santa Cruz, eh? :-)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Watch It! by WalletBoy · · Score: 1
      >When the BIG one comes, all the land east of the San Andreas (or mebbe Hayward) Fault will slide off into the Atlantic.
      Bring it on, I've got some timeshares in Marina Del Lex and Otisburg that'll skyrocket in value.
    2. Re:Watch It! by calvrak · · Score: 1
      I'm actually in Santa Cruz and it was really strong!

      I jumped up out of my chair (I was programming, you see) and ran one step in all directions, like a bumblebee trapped in a bottle trying to get out, and finally dove under my bed. This was the strongest quake I've felt since the 1989 earthquake and while it was unexpected (of course) it was really cool. The quake lasted long enough (15 seconds maybe) for me to actually realize what was going on and I watched as my computer case rocked back and forth. Wow!

      After the quake was over, I went out into the hall and saw one of the exchange students standing there in a daze.

      "What happened?" she asked.
      "We just had an earthquake," I replied.
      Smiling and giggling, she went back to her room.

      It was only a 5.2-magnitude quake, but it felt much stronger for me than the 1989 quake because I'm a lot closer to the epicenter this time. (I was around Walnut Creek in 1989, which is about 70 miles away, vs now, where I'm maybe 20 miles away)

    3. Re:Watch It! by ArchTangent · · Score: 1

      I'm in Santa Cruz too.

      We thought it was our new subwoofer turned up too loud for a few seconds. Heh.

    4. Re:Watch It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened?" she asked.
      "We just had an earthquake," I replied.
      Smiling and giggling, she went back to her room.


      How come you didn't try to fuck her?

    5. Re:Watch It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I remember most about /my/ earthqauke experience (the Olympia, WA quake last year) was that in about 12 hours you will be REALLY FUCKING SICK of hearing the same story 8,000 times.

      "I thought a big truck was driving by at first" and/or "I think my speakers were up too loud at first" etc.

      I was sick of it after a few hours, but some people didn't seem to get tired of telling their story for weeks. Boring motherfuckers.

    6. Re:Watch It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great minds think alike.

    7. Re:Watch It! by unovox · · Score: 1

      At least it was courteous enough to shake between numbers at the Brad Mehldau concert last night at Kuumbwa. The drummer was a bit freaked.

      --

      "everyone's different....I am the same"
    8. Re:Watch It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's because you're in Olympia, WA. Where the men are men and the sheep run scared. Anything to make the sheep run away quicker is big news up there.

  51. It's raining strangelets!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this a joke? 5.2, especially for californians, is nothing!

    why this warrants a post on slashdot is beyond me

  52. Silicon Valley + Earthquakes = trouble by Radiohead · · Score: 1

    I felt the quake here in Capitola - about 20 miles from the epicenter. I've been through several quakes in the last 12 years here (including the '89 Loma Prieta) and this was strong enough to kick off my internal "oh shit" alarm and have me standing up in doorway.

    What's the relevance to slashdot? Folks, Silicon Valley is smack in the middle of prime earthquake country (remember Superman-the movie?) It's easy to forget how a major quake in Santa Clara county could damage the tech industry here, but a minor earthquake like this is going to have folks in the area thinking about it.

    1. Re:Silicon Valley + Earthquakes = trouble by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      You've been in California long enough to know we get our share of earthquakes, a lot of which are minor (ie, THIS ONE). News worthy? Sure, people want to know what happened. Slashdot worthy? Not at all. It was a 5.0, nothing special at all!

      You know, I've heard someone once got shot in Silicon Valley.. someone should look up the story and post it on /., because Linus is in the Silicon Valley, and next time that someone could be Linus that gets shot, and then we'd all be fucked. And everyone knows, if it gets posted to /. then we'll all somehow magically be prepared for it be cause we were "thinking about it."

      Chop chop, get submitting!

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Silicon Valley + Earthquakes = trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was enough that it woke me up. I was in the doorway because it lasted so long and wasn't awake enough to register how bad it might get.

      Of course, I'm also in south San Jose about 20 miles from the epicenter.

      I've felt worse and less in Seattle (not including the recent big one).

      I moved here in 2000.

      It was funny as hell when it was in the middle of the Sharks game (hockey: stanley cup).

  53. A More Official Way of Measuring... by IronTek · · Score: 1

    "How bad was it," I asked.

    As a friend of mine in San Jose put it, "um...nothing fell from the bookcases."

    Who needs the Richter Scale with that kind of scientific observation?!

    1. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by dgerman · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there is an earthquake scale based on these types of observations. It is called Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. An earthquake that tosses books from a bookshelf is said to be intensity VI (Moderate). See http://www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/doc/mmi.html for the full scale.

    2. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      That's hardly quantifiable.

      I propose a system that takes the average distance from San Francisco at which all those who uttered an expletive during the quake were born.

      Thus, if three guys from Jersey and one guy from L.A. all say "holy fuck" in the middle of a quake, it doesn't rate as highly as a quake which gets a "shit shit shit" from a Nevadan and a couple from Santa Cruz.

      Me, I gave it a "whoa", but that "whoa" has a Georgia compensation factor attached to it.

    3. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      The Intensity Scale is a far better measurement of the actual effects of an earthquake than the richter scale. The richter scale is simply a measurement of wave size, which may or may not have anything to do with damage/loss of life. The Intensity Scale gives factors such as the geography of the area some weight, and helps to determine how a 5.2 can kill 10,000 people in one place and no one somewhere else, even with the same constructed buildings.

      If you can come up with a better way to quantify that, let me know.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      This has nothing the fuck at all to do with earthquakes but how the fuck are you going to account for potty mouth motherfuckers in your fucked-up earthquake rating system?

      By the way i think it's a good system, in spite of the above comment. Last quake I was in (seattle last year) was easy for me, I was at home. Later that day I talked to a guy who was IN A MOVING ELEVATOR when it hit. He probably would have scored off the chart on your rating system. Meanwhile my girlfriend was teaching a room full of high school kids, some of whom starting PRAYING OUT LOUD TO JESUS. So you would have to factor in "suddenly becomes religious" to your Earthquake-induced Utterances Serverity Descriptor.

    5. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Sorry, dude, but someone from LA is just as qualified as an SF'ian, and probably more qualified than a Nevadan. Or didn't you hear of Long Beach '33, Sylmar '71, Whittier Narrows '87, or Northridge '94?

      Fscking Bay Area elitists.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:A More Official Way of Measuring... by dangermouse · · Score: 2

      Okay, it's time for Fun with Basic Math!

      Even if you consider someone from LA to be equivalent to someone from SF, at a rough estimate you've got (2*2500+1*0)/3 = 1667 miles on the LA/NJ side and (2*70+1*500)/3 = 213 miles on the Santa Cruz/NV side.

      And for the record, I vaguely remember some of the quakes you mentioned, but only because you mentioned them; I'm from Georgia. So your "Bay Area elitist" snub sort of falls flat. Sue me for not being hip to your quake scene.

  54. sister felt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we all know what your sister felt. You need to keep your family matters off here, lest you want several jibes at the topic.....

  55. think again by g4dget · · Score: 1

    The East Coast is prone to earthquakes as well. Even New Jersey and New York. Have a look here. There are regions on the East Coast that are even more susceptible, and unlike the West Coast, the East Coast is almost completely unprepared for even a moderate earthquake.

  56. what da!? by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

    I remembered that on 1989 june earthquake in San Francisco I was near general hospital and when i was just about to cross the street i saw this bus bouncing up and down like heck and i was like "what the heck?? am i seeing things??"

    --
    http://www.palmzone.net
    1. Re:what da!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called hydraulics and if you were from LA you'd be used to seeing them.

  57. Felt it in SoMa by 1984 · · Score: 2

    Apparently there have actually been four events. First one was an "Is this an earthquake?" That gave way directly to the 5.2 shake, which lasted a few seconds before diminishing. Whole-building motion, and you could feeling the building twisting and deforming. But no apparent damage, and subsided quickly.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Maps/US2/ 36 . 8.-123.-121.html

    Couple of aftershocks (they say) but they were much lighter, at around 2.5, and weren't felt here (at least, not by me in a quiet apartment...)

  58. 5.2 Earthquake Shakes Up SF Bay Area by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    NOooooooo! Not the SourceForge Bay Area!!! i hope my projects are backed up

  59. Shook Borland up a Bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're about 30 miles from Gilroy, it shook pretty good. I was in k-mart and they had ice chests stacked against the walls up to the ceiling infront of the checkout counters and they swayed back and forth for about 2 minutes after the shaking stopped... Kmart is definitely NOT earthquake friendly...

    Everythings fine here tho... no worries - it was a baby quake

  60. not much by coreyb · · Score: 1

    They didn't even stop the hockey game, eh?

  61. What if it was Ice Hockey? by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

    According to the news they said there was a hockey playoff game going on when the earthquake happened..hmm..i wonder what would happen if it was Ice Hockey and if the quake is strong enough would it crack some of the Ice?

    --
    http://www.palmzone.net
    1. Re:What if it was Ice Hockey? by DeeKayWon · · Score: 2
      Number one, it was ice hockey. It was game 6 of the Colorado/San Jose series.

      Number two, of course if the ice was damaged severely enough, the game would be suspended and postponed.

    2. Re:What if it was Ice Hockey? by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

      The announcers initially thought the tremor was caused by the crowd cheering. Seriously is this newsworthy... Plattsburgh, NY had a 5.0 less then a month ago http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/02_EVENTS/EQ_02 0420/

    3. Re:What if it was Ice Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and then they would all drown. Good riddance.

  62. Earthquake 5.2 by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2

    Earthquake 5.2 - the new Linux disto of choice!

  63. -1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh...so what? It doesn't sound like it was all that powerful. A story on 9/11 I can understand, but a moderate earthquake? When did /. switch to general news?

    1. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This earthquake happened in the San Francisco Bay Area, a place in which nerds are known to gather. Thus it is relevant.

    2. Re:-1 Offtopic by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

      San Francisco has a lot of servers around..including the big Compaq server, so hey, i mean it is something worth posting..

      --
      http://www.palmzone.net
  64. 5.2 is news? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    Young folk of today don't know what an earthquake is. A 5.2 is about enough so that everyone feels it, and maybe a shaky brick chimney or two will fall down at the epicenter. In my day (circa 1994) we had REAL earthquakes. Bridges fell! Bridges over water, mind you! And buildings! Dern whippersnappers are so starved for news they'll make a story about a 5.2! Honestly, folks, there's got to be something else going on!

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  65. Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We Mac users are certainly glad all you Cupertinoians are safe. And Apple as well.

  66. Random! by sulli · · Score: 2
    really, you have a five digit uid and you didn't know that?

    Actually I think it's pretty damn interesting. The article poll too (an underutilized feature in slashdot, imho).

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  67. NHL Sharks Game by cdf12345 · · Score: 2

    I was just watching ESPN, and they're like "We've had an earthquake and we'll be back for the third period. The game was almost over.

    Glad to see that not even earthquakes will stop a hockey game!

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  68. Santa Cruz mountains by dszd0g · · Score: 1

    It shook for about 10 seconds here. I am in the green area (Moderate, light damage) on the USGS map (already filled out the survey). We got a few things knocked off the edge of counters, and a stain glass window that sitting a window sill fell and broke. It should have been secured. I can't say no damage, but it was pretty light none the less. The only thing these little ones really do for me is hope that the epicenter isn't really bad.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  69. Or was it a strangelet? by shird · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised the strangelet story wasn't mentioned as a related link. With the epicenter 4 miles below the surface it may rule them out (?) though. I didn't feel anything down here in Australia, but it could've come out somewhere else. :)

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
    1. Re:Or was it a strangelet? by ddubois · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. Makes me wonder... I thought it was a Urban Legend: never heard about this before. but then...

  70. I felt it in Marin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a few shakes, maybe a couple of seconds.

  71. First time for me. by lowlymortal · · Score: 1

    I have moved into the Valley since the last 3 years and this was the first time that I felt a shake. It was scary enough for me. I live smack in the middle of the Valley in Mountain View.

    On the lighter side of things, I wish our economy was even close to something like this. :)

  72. OT: Article Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I voted in the poll, and it now tells me I've already voted on the page (can't vote again). interesting enhancement!

  73. Chris' first time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee Chris... was this your first earthquake?

    5.2 is really nothing to write home about.

  74. Don't click that USGS link by harvardian · · Score: 2

    First thing I thought when I saw the story was "ooh, I'll click on the event monitoring page." Then, as the page took a while to load up, I suddenly realized that idiots like me were slashdotting a very important resource.

    1. Re:Don't click that USGS link by stan7826 · · Score: 1

      I'm the system geek for the USGS earthquake web servers, and the quake.wr.usgs.gov site was slow last night. The site is served through Akamai EdgeSuite, but the origin servers were on their knees. Turns out there is a Perl cgi that displays real-time seismograms, and everyone dogpiled on that. Do you have any idea what 200+ separate instances of Perl running simultaneously on a 1997 Sun Netra looks like? It's not pretty. On the other hand, the 'Did you feel it' questionnaires are processed by a pair of Athlons running FreeBSD and mod_perl, and they had no problem processing the now-17,000+ incoming questionnaires.

      Earthquakes provide their own Slashdot Effect on our servers. I wrote an article about this a few years ago after our server got squashed the first time. Web Servers, Earthquakes, and the Slashdot Effect

      We're not using Squid any more since we signed up with Akamai, but we still get big traffic spikes whenever the ground shakes. I have a collection of them at http://bort.gps.caltech.edu/spikes/

  75. Once again, the Gummint websites rule by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    I've been checking that USGS earthquake page since I moved to California a couple of years ago. The only two website worth reading these days are the CDC and the USGS. I'm proud of my tax money going to provide such in-depth time wasting. Carry on, beloved Federal agencies.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  76. :-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :-) by asa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was the perfect earthquake for an earthquake virgin like me. It was just strong enough to know that it wasn't my imagination but not so strong that anyone got hurt or any property got damaged. I'm in Redwood City, CA and it was a thrilling experience.

    --Asa

  77. John Katz? by _bobs.pizza_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anybody else out there read this story late at night and see "John Katz" instead of "Joe Kaz", and wonder why he didn't post the story himself? Of course, even in my bleary-eyed state I knew it wasn't Katz posting, as it was only a paragraph of text.

  78. Fun! by Shabazz · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who enjoys
    earthquakes. They are by far the coolest natural disaster. You never know if it's gonna go big, or just peter off. Very, very exciting stuff. Also, you have no advanced warning. It's not like all those weather ones, where you can feel it coming. More like volcano's in that regard.

    Sure it sucks when a really big one hits. But I've been here 25 years and in that time, there's been one damage causing quake in norcal and one in socal. Not too bad. Hardly not enough to live in fear. Shit, lots of things can kill you, and happen more often that once every twenty years.

    Plus they remind me of that scene from 12 Monkeys, where Brad Pitt says "when my father gets angry, the ground shakes!"

  79. How it felt to me. by juuri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off I live in one of the super windy portions of the San Francisco. Wind funnels down market and the various hills so that I experience regular wind blasts.

    This was just like a normal wind blast, in that my huge windows pushed in and the pressure changed in the room. Then instead of slowly going back out like normal the windows shot out REALLY changing the air pressure in the room. It was at this point that I realized it wasn't just a normal blast of wind. Then the TV shook, the shelves moved and the windows came back at me.

    Basically it felt to me like a roller coaster... gentle turn (rolling sensation), jolt (hard turn), roll, roll, and a sigh as it was over. Stuff shook but nothing too special and nothing was broke. I also happen to live in a new building designed to handle big earthquakes.

    The cool thing was looking out my windows and watching the city light up as everyone turned on their lights and went to their own windows.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  80. Seattle next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently there have been a series of mostly minor quakes around the world the past couple of weeks. Related or coincidence?

    1. Re:Seattle next? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      There are hundreds upon hundreds of mild quakes every single day. If the usgs website calms down, go take a look at them all.

      --
      What?
  81. didn't seem so bad by tigerknight · · Score: 1

    On the 4th floor at the oracle campus in redwood city, just a little jiggle and some folk are freakin out.

    Geeze.. I must really be jaded :]

    1. Re:didn't seem so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, oracle people are just stupid.

      Unbreakable my ass....

  82. Giants KNBR Announcer beat slashdot to the story.. by i_am_pythonite · · Score: 1

    Giants announcer Jon Miller mentioned his "chair shook" during the broadcast of the Giants vs. Braves game. Jon seems fine (*sigh*) and even better news, Giants beat the Braves 7-6 in 11 innings.

  83. well by loconet · · Score: 1

    seems hotmail servers are in SF and got hit cause i cant check my freakin email! =(

    --
    [alk]
  84. Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom called from the hospital and says that he's lost a lot of blood. He's not responding to any stimuli. Part of his skull has been cracked.

    He's going in for surgery now.

    I never thought it would be like this.

  85. Just California Weather by rossz · · Score: 2

    This is not news. It happens all the time. The only thing exciting about it is watching the reaction of the tourists.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  86. Felt like Loma Prieta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in 1989 when the Loma Prieta earthquake struck, I was a freshman at UC Santa Cruz -- about 7 miles from the epicenter. That was a strong earthquake (~7.1). I'll never forget the way the plaster on the ceiling started floating down (or the roof tiles, for that matter).

    This is eq is about the closest in feeling to what I remember Loma Prieta being like. Maybe it's because the building I'm in is built over sand (Sunset dist, SF), but it felt pretty strong, and book cases and that kind of stuff definitely were moving around a bit.

    Heh, it's kind of funny; I was watching them demolish the tower of De Young museum earlier today, and someone said "wouldn't it be cool if we had an earthquake right now?" Someone must have been listening =)

  87. "Did the earth move for you too, honey?" by n9fzx · · Score: 1
    The Earthquake Experience varies greatly depending on where you are at the time. If you're up in the hills, particularly the granite outcroppings in San Mateo county, you'll barely feel a thing. On the other hand, if you're down in the flats, especially east of Highway 101, even a little 3.0 will get your attention. I was out in the "bay alluvial mud flats" part of Palo Alto for the 1989 quake, had these three foot waves in my waterbed. Something to keep in mind if you're investing in an oh-my-stars-that's-expensive house out here.

    Right now, Caltrain is running at Restricted Speed south of Redwood Junction, I'm listening to the dispatcher dish out track-n-time as the track and bridges get inspected...

    --
    ...-.-
    1. Re:"Did the earth move for you too, honey?" by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Sort of like my geology teacher told me. All the geologists in CA live up in the granite on the mountains and what not. Everyone else lives out on mud and silt, so when the earthquakes come, they sure feel it.

      This is why St. Louis is really a bad place to live, it's all mud and silt around the Mississippi, and a prime place for an earthquake (was a real big one there about 100 years ago maybe?). If a major earthquake happened there, the ground is so unstable that it would probably level the city.

      Basically just repeating what you said, it's not the strength of the earthquake, but what's under you that determines how much damage is done.

      --
      What?
  88. call me when california is an island otherwise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO CARES !!!!!

    it doesnt really matter to anybody. its not news for nerds unless redmond fell into a volcanic molten pit and satan himself took bill gates back to the murky pits of hell. god. this is almost as bad as john katz! joe kaz. hah. nice pseudonym

  89. "California's been good to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hope to God it don't fall into the sea."

    T. Petty

    ====== Flash!
    If this month is 'earthquake awareness' month, next month is 'rubble awareness' month. Ho...baby! Look out for that building!

  90. whatever by madHomer · · Score: 1

    Why the hell is this on Slashdot?

    The quake was small and it was short. For the most part, California is built to withstand these things. I think the above average blizard in New England causes more damage.

    If the quake was 30+ seconds, was greater than a 6, or if this took place in Boston, NY or another non-earthquake place, it probably would be newsworthy.

    The one interesting thing is that a postseason sporting event (SJ Sharks vs. CO Avalanche) was in progress during the quake. Remember the last time that happened?

    At 5:04 Oct 17, 1989, the pregame show was on for the world series which had the Giants vs. A's. Oh wait. This is slashdot.

    The Sharks and the Avalanche are hockey teams.

    The [SF] Giants and A's are baseball teams. At the end of the season, two teams play against each other. This is called the world series.

  91. Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many years back, we had a 7.4 earthquake followed by a 6.5 aftershock, and many other aftershocks of decreasing intensity. The death count? One person who had a heart attack because of it.

    Everyone will like to say that they're more devastating when they are in heavily populated areas. That's completely untrue. They're more devestating when they are in areas where buildings are made extremely cheaply. I had a very large TV jump off of a table and about 5 feet across the room. I had a set of shelves with quite a load on them shake so hard that they damaged the wally they were up against. And in all of that, not a single bit of structural damage. Not a single bridge needed the slightest of repairs (and we've got plenty of those).

    Then, a year later, a 6.4 earthquake hits Los Angeles, dozens of people die, several bridges collapse, and buildings collapse. It's simple folks. If you live somewhere that every contractor is cutting corners, even a small quake will destroy everything in sight.

    I'd been through a hurricane when I was living back east. I'd rather have 8.0 earthquakes every week, than a hurricane once a decade. Hell, earthquakes really don't do any significant damage. If you were driving, you wouldn't even know that there was an earthquake.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by DietFluffy · · Score: 1

      Many years back, we had a 7.4 earthquake followed by a 6.5 aftershock, and many other aftershocks of decreasing intensity. The death count? One person who had a heart attack because of it.

      Everyone will like to say that they're more devastating when they are in heavily populated areas. That's completely untrue. They're more devestating when they are in areas where buildings are made extremely cheaply. I had a very large TV jump off of a table and about 5 feet across the room. I had a set of shelves with quite a load on them shake so hard that they damaged the wally they were up against. And in all of that, not a single bit of structural damage. Not a single bridge needed the slightest of repairs (and we've got plenty of those).

      Then, a year later, a 6.4 earthquake hits Los Angeles, dozens of people die, several bridges collapse, and buildings collapse. It's simple folks. If you live somewhere that every contractor is cutting corners, even a small quake will destroy everything in sight.


      please tell us which earthquakes you are refering to. I hope you're not talking about loma prieta and northridge respectively. Loma Prieta took 63 lives and caused $6-10 Billion in property damage, including the Bay Bridge. The Northridge quake in LA took about the same number of lives and caused upwards of $10 Billion in property damage. If you can't find good building contractors in SF and LA, where can you find them?

    2. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Congats, you get your wish.

      I was speaking of nothridge in fact, but I have no idea about the Loma Prieta quake you refer to.

      In fact, your very uninformed post prompted me to do a slight bit of research. The quake I was refering to is the Landers Calif. quake in 1992. I found out that according to the USGS the earthquake was in fact a 7.6, and the aftershock a 6.7. The death toll was not 1, but in fact 3. Property damage was 92 million, which is a far cry from the $10 Billion caused by the SMALL northridge quake (but that was my whole point in the first place).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by Dahan · · Score: 2

      Landers is out in the desert and isn't a densely populated area. I don't think you can compare damage to Northridge or Loma Prieta--there probably isn't $10 billion worth of stuff out there to damage :P (and do you mean you don't know what the Loma Prieta quake is? If so, I'd say you're very uninformed yourself...)

    4. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Landers is out in the desert and isn't a densely populated area.


      Did you even READ my first post? I specifically addressed this fact.

      We may not have as many buildings as LA or SF, but we've still got plenty of them. We have several bridges in this area as well. Just because it's not as dense, doesn't mean the differences should be as broad. Practically no damage to any buildings in a 7.6 quake, and just about every building within 50 miles damaged in the Northridge quake. But again, I shouldn't need to say this. I already covered this, as you should know.

      As for not knowing about the Loma Prieta quake, that only means I didn't identify the quake with the name. But, if it makes you feel better you are welcome to throw around baseless insults. Of course, you are the one who thought I was refering to a 1989 & 1994 quake as 'a year apart'.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by Dahan · · Score: 2
      We may not have as many buildings as LA or SF, but we've still got plenty of them.

      Yup, plenty of buildings around there. A real bustling place it is.

      Of course, you are the one who thought I was refering to a 1989 & 1994 quake as 'a year apart'.

      Where did I do that? I think you're the one who's not doing the reading.

    6. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Well, first off I don't live in Landers, I do live rather nearby. The majority of the damage in the ridgcrest quake wasn't near the epicenter anyhow, but that's besides the point.

      Where did I do that?


      Me: Then, a year later, a 6.4 earthquake hits Los Angeles

      You: I hope you're not talking about loma prieta and northridge respectively.

      Well, post whatever reply you wish. I'm getting rather tired of the conversation. I'll be happy to let you have the last word...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by jafac · · Score: 2

      I live in Landers, and that quake knocked my pickup truck off it's cinder blocks.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Can't understand the hysteria by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The Richter scale is not the only factor in how damaging an earthquake is to the buildings in the area. Saying that a 6.5 quake must necessarily be easier to build for than a 7.4 quake isn't true.

      The magnitude of a quake is only one single measure. There's also measures of what the waveform looks like. Saying a 7.4 earthquake is always more damaging than a 6.5 is like saying a 74 decibel sound is always more deafening than a 65 decibel sound. (even if one is a low-pitch drone almost outside your hearing range and the other is a high-pitched crying baby.)

      The LA quakes and the SF quakes tend not to have the same "pitch", so to speak.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  92. I understand how you feel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are looking forward to hearing about other insidents like this:
    3 relatives of yours got sunburned after exposing their noses for 15 minutes, it rained somewhere and two people didn't have omprellas and other shocking news.
    (for some places in this world (scientists now believe that USA is not alone in this planet) small earthquakes are normal situation, as well as rain, sun, cold, worm, traffic jam, births, cinema etc ...)

    1. Re:I understand how you feel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 5.2 can kill people in the right places, it just depends where the earthquake is, what kind of ground you've got, and how well your buildings are built

  93. AGAIN by dangermouse · · Score: 1
    This is getting ridiculous.


    Fie, Slashdot, fie!

  94. Here's a better title by xant · · Score: 5, Funny

    5.2 Earthquake Barely Nudges San Francisco

    Are we going to start reporting heavy rainfall in Hawaii next?

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Here's a better title by wdavies · · Score: 2

      F*ck, certainly that tropical rainstorm last night coming back from the WWW11 in Honolulu was more scary !!!

      I was at the Sharks/Avs game and didn't feel a thing -- indistinguishable from the general crowd cheering effect - or maybe I was just concentrating on the game too much.

      Winton

    2. Re:Here's a better title by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      I agree, when an earthquake happens, it might as well have snowed in Russia for the purposes of it being "news" for nerds. This article AND resulting posts are a waste of bandwidth and flamebait.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    3. Re:Here's a better title by Surak · · Score: 1

      In related news, it will cold and wet in Redmond today.:)

    4. Re:Here's a better title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, new? Geeks don't live in Hawaii, the women arn't nerdy enough!

  95. I felt it : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At an IHOP in Cupertino, around closing time.

    It was very mild over here, but we still felt it.

  96. earthquake in san francisco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think god is just trying to destroy the place like how he destroyed Sodom.

  97. dumb as a post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone looking for proof that hockey fan's seats don't fold all the way down need look no further.

    Somewhere, a village is missing an idiot.

  98. Long but moderate shaking in the East Bay by Flat5 · · Score: 1

    Just felt it. Moderate shaking but seemed to last a long time and built up before subsiding.

    Not looking forward to the big one!

    Flat5

  99. Story Time by Monkelectric · · Score: 5, Funny
    please reply with your funny earthquake stories :)

    here's mine, northridge earthquake, I dont remember exactly the date, but I wsa playing Wing Commander I or II, I dont remember which, and I had *just* blown up some huge ass ship, a carrier I think -> My speakers are blasting the sound of the ship exploding, and at that percise moment the earthquake begins, and as the ground begins to rumble Im thinking, "holy shit thats a great sound effect", then I realize whats going on and dash to the doorframe where your supposed to be in an earthquake. I think I ended up loosing the level to, got attacked while my ship was unmanned :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Story Time by alargeduck · · Score: 1

      Legend says that my 8th grade science teacher "caused" the 89 quake. He was telling a class about earthquakes, and said something along the lines of "we could have an earthquake right now," hit a desk with his fist, and right at that moment the ground started shaking...

    2. Re:Story Time by ajayrockrock · · Score: 1
      Here's my story:

      I was watching TV when one of the Northridge aftershocks hit and the lights were swaying and the anchors were freakin' out. A few seconds later, my living room started to roll up and down!! It only took a few seconds for that aftershock to travel 50 miles from Los Angeles all the way to Riverside.

      later,
      ajay

    3. Re:Story Time by sconeu · · Score: 2

      , northridge earthquake, I dont remember exactly the date

      17 Jan 1994, 0431 PST.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Story Time by DirtyJ · · Score: 1

      'Legend' is probably right. If I recall correctly, that quake occurred somewhere around 5:00pm, so school would have been out. Still, it makes a good story, so I won't tell anyone if you won't...

    5. Re:Story Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had two situations where i've been like 'whoa' -- one was when I was a young kid and was watching Star Wars on VHS. Right as the Death Star was exploding, my entire house began to shake, and being the young kid I was... I thought the Death Star being destroyed must be a real event and started looking out my window towards the sky. Then my mom rushes into the living room all freaked out telling me to get away from the window.

      Heh, second time was during the 87 and I was at a friend's house watching him play Bionic Commando on his Amiga (wow what awesome graphics we used to think). I'd never really seen computer games, I always played on a console up till that point... anyway... as soon as he beats the first level and the machine goes 'boom boom' and shakes etc... earthquake started and *I* freaked out, thinking it was his computer system's speakers for a second. He, on the other hand, jumped under his computer desk quite fast. heh.

    6. Re:Story Time by plaidfishes · · Score: 1

      Melbourne 1987

      Sleeping in a youth hostel, about 15 people in one big room. A very small earthquake (5.1) hit at about dawn. Long rocking motion gently awoke the tiered travelers. Then everyone was wide awake as 2 New Yawkers, a Swede and 5 Germans everyone had thought dead of alcohol poisoning launched out of the doors and windows screaming. Wearing mostly nothing. Leaving a Californian and 6 Japanese to get up and try to capture these poor panic souls and explain earthquakes to them in languages we did not have in common.

      The ensuing level of bizareness I leave to your imaginations.

    7. Re:Story Time by Mr.+Spleen · · Score: 1

      "...ended up loosing the level to, got attacked..."

      Looks like the quake knocked an "o" from "too" into "lose" even if you aren't in the bayarea. Unless you are in the bayarea, in which case it still knocked it around.

      And yes, bayarea is one word. At least it's often pronounced that way by the native population.
      =)

      Mr. Spleen

    8. Re:Story Time by jelson · · Score: 1

      [I] dash to the doorframe where your supposed to be in an earthquake

      Actually, that is a myth (#5). Hide under a table next time.

    9. Re:Story Time by isorox · · Score: 2

      got attacked while my ship was unmanned :)

      Damn those kilrathi! Do they have no honor?

    10. Re:Story Time by bike_head · · Score: 1

      (swtiching to old timer voice) "Well I've been living in and around the Bay Area for over 35 years. 5.0 Hah, I don't even wake up from my nap for that!"

      Actually my wierdest 'quake story happened in the mid to late 70's. I had come home from school and was watching the "3:30 movie" on KGO (7). That day it happened to be a particularly bad film about a town in the middle of the desert that is eventually swallowed up by a massive earthquake. This climactic scene happens in the last 5 minutes of the show, just around 4:45pm. Sure enough, exactly when the fictional town is sinking, a small (5.0) quake hits, centered relatively close to where I lived (San Mateo).

      At 5:00pm the news starts "No we didn't install new special effects, that really was an earthquake !"

      I wish I could remember the movie title.

    11. Re:Story Time by kolding · · Score: 1

      Back in college, I was in one of the highrise dorms in Berkeley when a 5.x hit nearby. I was up on the 5th floor at the time, and after it finished, the RA came running out of the bathroom, saying "What am I supposed to do, I was on the crapper".

      During the same quake, a friend of mine was in flagrante delecto with her boyfriend at the time. Said it was the first time the earth moved for her.

    12. Re:Story Time by freakinPsycho · · Score: 2

      I was sitting at my desk at home when this struck. Unfortunatly, my desk isn't the most stable thing. I'm a ways from the epicenter (~40 miles or so, SF) but the building definatly shook (it doesn't help that I'm in the top floor).

      First reaction: Steady the monitors!

      --
      "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
      - Alexandar Woolcot
    13. Re:Story Time by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      During the '89 quake in the Bay Area, I was walking across my front lawn, coming home from high school. Ground starts rolling, I look to the street and see cars rocking back and forth, bumping into each other. Normal earthquake stuff.

      The fun part was my cat. He had been running across the lawn to greet me, and when the earthquake hit, he tried to LEAVE THE EARTH. He must have bounced five feet into the air, repeatedly, during the whole quake and for a while afterwards. It was the funniest thing I have ever seen.

      Doug

    14. Re:Story Time by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      At UCLA, the chemistry and geology buildings are adjacent. When I was a grad student in chemistry, a monitor was set up in the hall that showed recent nearby earthquakes, essentially what you can get online from the USGS now. A significant aftershock of the Northridge quake hit, and several graduate students (and I) RAN to watch it come up on the screen, and cheered when it did. We also learned not to trust the instant locator algorithm too much, because they moved it away from the initial location later.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  100. Seismograph data is up by Animats · · Score: 2
    The Rapid Instrumental Intensity Map for this event is up (after some initial problems causing the wrong map area to be displayed). Note that in addition to the epicenter near Gilroy, there was some additional activity near Palo Alto. The intensity values indicate that little to no damage should be expected. I'm in Palo Alto, and the effects were very minor.

    There's an EDIS Bulletin on the quake, but it's a routine report, with a priority too low to generate an E-mail message from EDIS. No indications of any significant emergencies to be dealt with.

    Press reports indicate that several plates fell down at a china outlet store in Gilroy, and a coffee pot was damaged at the Gilroy Rodeway Inn.

    For some reason, phone service in San Jose was affected. Unclear why.

  101. Just Silly... by groupthink · · Score: 1

    An earthquake in San Francisco who'd have thunkit! I'm in Sunnyvale, of Wargames fame, closer to Gilroy than San Francisco is... I was walking for a cup of coffee, and didn't even feel it.

  102. In San Jose: Building Shakes, Kids Outside Scream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About to connect the firewire coord to the camera to do some DV editing, and the window shades start to rattle. Thought it was the wind blowing hard. The shades kept rattling, and I started to get concerned about the strength of the wind. Then the walls and everything else start shaking and wobbling and I realize it is a quake. The kids who were playing outside in the street start screaming. Shit! Move to the doorway. Do I have food stored? Nothing falling/crashing yet. Then it stops. 7 seconds or so stretched out to a minute.

    Cool ;-)

  103. earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by mjh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I normally occupy the East Coast, but I'm traveling on businesss, and an earthquake is a strange experience for me. But I definately felt it. Basically, from up here on the 7th floor, in Walnut Creek, it felt like someone took the room and was rocking it back and forth. The amount of motion was very small, and very gentle. But the fact that the entire room was moving was very strange and disquieting.

    I've often said, as an east coaster, that I'd like to feel an earthquake. Well now that I have, I have two reactions.

    1. Not nearly as exciting as I'd anticipated it would be.
    2. Not nearly as calm as I'd anticipated I would be.

    IOW, I was scared more than was appropriate for the size of this thing. Thank GOD that they make the building able to survive this kind of thing. As I think about it, the fact that an 8 story building was gently rocking back and forth (probably about 1/2 inch in both directions), and didn't fall is pretty amazing.

    Want to simulate it? Have someone go up to your wheeled chair and wiggle it back and forth at a rate of about 3-4Hz. Now, imagine that the desk that you're leaning on, and the floor that you have your feet on is also moving.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    1. Re:earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by linzeal · · Score: 1
      When the 89' quake hit, the ground actually blurred like you were looking at it through a photoshop filter. It was like being ontop of a mad blender.

      Come out here to stay, we got plenty of room, in hayward. In the next 20 years you can see something perhaps 2 to 3 times more powerful than the 89' quake. It'll be fun, bring the kids.

    2. Re:earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by twinpot · · Score: 1

      In Wellington (NZ), the building move quite a lot in the frequent earthquakes (as well as in the strong winds). A favourite ploy is to look at a fixed frame of reference on your building, and watch how much the others sway - way more than 1/2"!

    3. Re:earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As I think about it, the fact that an 8 story building was gently rocking back and forth (probably about 1/2 inch in both directions), and didn't fall is pretty amazing.

      Being from the east coast, you should know that any high-rise building will sway more than 1/2 an inch in any significant wind. I'm on the 18th floor of a 40 sotrey tower, and when it gets howling outside I can feel the floor sway back and forth.

    4. Re:earthquake newbie, 7th floor hotel room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that it was 8 stories and DIDN'T fall shouldn't be amazing at all. Studies have found that if you allow a building to bend rather than be ridged, it will more likely stand rather than have even larger stresses in the building that cause it to snap.
      I was in the 5 something on the 6th floor of a dorm (aproximately 8 floors up) and it swayed. hell, there were people in the space needle at that time and it swayed a hell of a lot more than a building.

      Anyway, swayage = good, mkay?

  104. USGS is reporting a 3.2 also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Quakes/nc40 133377.htm

  105. Ob:Spoiler Warning by xrayspx · · Score: 2

    Hope Slashdot didn't ruin anyones day in CA by posting this, since we east coast people will find out so far before them.

  106. Wha? This is news? by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    5.4? This is local news, maybe.

    Hmm...well, maybe it's good news. Maybe it will delay SF getting a real killer quake.

  107. What's up with this! by rmcgehee · · Score: 1

    Three weeks ago the northeast was hit by a 5.5 earthquake, but that wasn't newsworthy for slashdot. The northeast gets a big earthquake about once every hundred years, California gets them all the time!

  108. Re:In San Jose: Building Shakes, Kids Outside Scre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the author of the book adaptation of AotC, aren't you?

  109. Proof BangBus is faked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    episode 20 - staring Alex - Find it on KaZaa or similar file sharing software.

    goto 48:20 and see a mysterious 5th person wearing an orange shirt quickly duck behind the back seat. Very hard to miss. Surprising it was not caught in the editing process.

    1. Re:Proof BangBus is faked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rofl, nice work detective. Just watched it, and you are right. Haha. Comedy.

  110. Who cares about little earthquakes in the USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Slashdot blabbing on about earth quakes...If i wanted to find out about that kind of junk? Who REALLY cares about what happens in the US!! Your all just trying to act like victims after the WTC...well guess what, no sympathy over here....when you stop carpet bombing civilians...maybe! Lets see some real news, some real good Comptuer news!! Surely some good stuff is happening!

  111. morgan hill report (10 miles north north west) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moved to california about 10 years ago, this is the first quake that I felt (or didnt feel like a big truck passing by). When it happened I happened to be peeing, ya the house shook a little but not enough to miss the pot. I realize that 5.2 is only moderate, but it was not that big of a deal. I don't understand why everybody seems to inflate the 'effect'. It seemed like 3-4 seconds to me but the news is reporting 10 or so seconds reported by people in san jose (30 miles away). News talk radio had a caller in pleasenton (60-90 miles away) saying how bad it was, while I was disaponted 10 or so miles away. What are all californians a bunch of pvssies about quakes or what?

  112. I was at the Sharks game at the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was interesting. It felt like everyone in the Arena was stomping the floor... 'cept no one was stomping. It shook for a little and that's it.

    There was more damage caused by the fight that broke out in section 224.

  113. Lame "earthquake" applet by PopCulture · · Score: 1

    In college, inspired by one of the coolest professors ever, I wrote a java applet that simulated the mechanics of the Rayleigh Wave... wave propegation thru a solid material. Its basically a (WAY oversimplified) earthquake simulator. Here you go: http://filebox.vt.edu/users/brreed/Page1.htm most the source is here: http://filebox.vt.edu/users/brreed/src/ this project was my first java applet, first exposure to java 2d, and definately a big reason i left engineering for cs...

    --

    Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
  114. Priorities by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Gilroy?

    Is the garlic okay?

    How about the motorcycles?

    --Blair
    "The only other thing they make there is trouble for politicians wanting to create a freeway to the east..."

  115. dumb ass post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Obviously this guy is not a hockey fan, dumbass. A real hockey fan would have:

    1) known that tonight was game 6 between the Avs and Sharks in San Jose.

    2) refered to the game as "hockey" not "ice hockey".

  116. Two separate quakes? by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm in San Francisco and it seemed to me that there was two separate quakes, separated by about 10 seconds.

    The first wasn't that bad, a "trembler" (for a native San Franciscan like me I guess this is up to 5 or so :)). Then another one a bit longer but about the same magnitude.

    Having experienced the 1989 quake, I was expecting a huge (main) shock after the second one (two in a row isn't good...). Nothing yet, but perhaps later tonight or even tomorrow we might get something more.

    The worst part is after a large quake and you're trying to fall sleep, but now you're senses are heightened, and you can feel every little aftershock. And while you're laying in your bed, you're looking up at the ceiling afraid it's going to fall on you the next minute (you've already calculated how much time you'll have to toss back the sheets and dive to safety). All the while, each movement you make makes you tense; you think it's another aftershock.

    I'd rather have earthquakes, though, than tornados, blizzards, or hurricanes.

    By the way, if you live in Oakland, Berkeley or Alameda, and you're paranoid... the San Andreas fault isn't predicted to let loose for quite a while. But you're sitting right on the Hayward fault and it's expected to slip "soon" meaning the next 10 - 30 years.

    1. Re:Two separate quakes? by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have earthquakes, though, than tornados, blizzards, or hurricanes.
      You're forgetting fires, mudslides, power outages...

    2. Re:Two separate quakes? by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting fires, mudslides, power outages...

      I'm not so worried about fires. The fog will put em out. ;)

      As for mudslides, there isn't any mud for blocks... I actually live in the city, and while I am lucky enough to have a real lawn and front yard, there's hardly any mud that will go sliding away.

      As for power outages, that's what a UPS is for.

    3. Re:Two separate quakes? by leviramsey · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      I'd rather have earthquakes, though, than tornados, blizzards, or hurricanes.

      What's wrong with blizzards? (apart from their DMCA stuff...) Blizzards rock, period. Start a fire, be snowed in, playing games all day. It's the life, man.

  117. please help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while some of you might think that this quake is a joke, you are wrong!! i was so scared that i urinated on my computer and broke it and also electroburned my penis off!! i need an ask slashdot right away!! how do i get 911 online?? please help me!!

  118. NEWSFLASH: Slashdot effect, 8.4 on the Richter by dan_bethe · · Score: 1
    We were sitting here in San Ramon and felt a bump. Burtonator in #infoanarchy said "WE JUST HAD AN EARTHQUAKE". Ash said, "STOP CRASHING THRU EARTH K PLZ THX". Stunned, I rushed to find an earthquake site.

    While I was trying to research the earthquake to see where it was and whether we were in immediate danger, I found that I could no longer access the site because of "Service Unavailable". Seriously disturbed at the idea of not knowing, I thought I'd read Slashdot and try the site later.

    And here I discover a Slashdot story linking to that site.

    clicking reload...

  119. Earthquake / disaster / Burning Man kit ready? by geekotourist · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you felt it- you know that feeling you had at the 14th second, as you were starting to wonder if this was a big one, thinking about those 32 remaining (or at least ambulatory) survivors of the 60 second long 1906 quake (estimated 8.3), and then it stopped... the Sharks game wasn't even interrupted. But we know that sometime over the next 30 years, it'll start up the same, and then get worse.

    So, just as daylight savings time supposedly reminds us to change our smoke detector batteries (because otherwise that annoying 'low battery' beeping always start at 4am), tiny earthquakes remind us about our earthquake kits and preparation. Includes...

    • 3+ days of food, water, clothing, tools (ability to turn off the gas if needed) flashlights etc etc.
    • especially if you're female: comfortable clothing in your car, with a good change of shoes (vs hiking in high heels)
    • knowing where your important papers and backup disks are (some sites advise having copies in a bag you can grab on the way out), and having copies in a safe / safety deposit box.
    • cell phone always charged and gas tank always at least 1/2 full

    And unless you live in Scottsdale, AZ, don't feel smug about the safety of your own location- St. Louis has had an 8.0, and New York State has seen 6.0's.

  120. AUSTRALIA by cybercomm · · Score: 1

    is the continent (and country) that is least prone to earthquakes due to the location of the teutonic plates around it. Whereas Russia has a number of earthquakes most notably towards the east but due to the sheer size and the density of the populatinon most of the small ones are probably not even documented (and due to their dire finacial situation...)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    1. Re:AUSTRALIA by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Funny
      due to the location of the teutonic plates around it


      I have this image of blond-haired, blue-eyed, continents goosestepping their way around the globe :)

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:AUSTRALIA by ross.w · · Score: 2

      That doesn't mean we don't have them, just ask anyone living in Newcastle about 12 years ago.

      Problem is, because we don't have many earthquakes, the codes aren't as strict, therefore when we DO have them, even a little one can cause damage.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  121. strangelets strike back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in San Francsisco, I definetly felt it, slight roll and low rumbling....windows shook and a picture frame (yeah, it was really poorly mounted) fell from the wall...and all i could think was "dear god, its a stranglet attack!"...now all we need is confirmation that somethings popped out of the indian ocean, and we'll have proof!

  122. Most important question by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 2

    Is the garlic crop okay? I wanna go to the garlic festival this year!

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
  123. Is this responsible? by iriefrank · · Score: 1

    The consensus here is this is a non-event. That being said, even if it is a slow news night, is it responsible to slashdot the USGS site? This is infrastructure that is useful to those affected at times like this, and there is no overwhelming interest to herding users to the USGS network.

    When your local 911 operator upgrades its systems and uses Linux, are we all to call 911 because it's all of the sudden geek chic? Should we all of the sudden be junior geologists for the USGS if there's a small tremor in the Bay Area?

    I'm not saying that linking to breaking news is a bad thing, even if thst site goes down as a result. What I am saying is that the USGS site should not be subject to overwhelming traffic for such a non-event. You say it was an event? Read the posts, even at level 2 and up. They all say the same thing.

    At the very least it should be noted to visit the USGS site now only to report info if you live in the area.

  124. I felt it -- no big deal by 2040x · · Score: 1

    Was in the living room of our house. I felt it (slight rolling motion). My wife 20' away in another room did not.

    that said. I hate earthquakes.

    GPS Coordinates (NOT) in Oakland California

  125. News reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earthquake aside, it's a bit surreal to wake up on tuesday morning (UK) and read about the quake on slashdot before the BBC or CNN has it.

  126. North Central .. OMG OUT OF CHEESE HELP HELP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Running out of cheese is the only disaster we've got up here in Wisconsin. When we hear about earthquakes in CA, floods in the south, hurricanes in FL and the east coast we just laugh and pile on more CHEESE to whatever it is that we're eating. Sure we have a tornado like.. once a year .. somewhere.. it usually wipes out a tree or something.. but.. We're all good here, nothing ever happens. Cept cheese, gotta remember the cheese. If you're eating ANYTHING without cheese on it, you're crazy! Burger without cheese = crud. Hotdog without cheese = crud. Omelette without cheese = crud. Salad without cheese = crud. Packers without cheese = well, a kickass football team without cheese :( .. What else.. Ice Cream without cheese = crud.

    BEHOLD THE POWER OF CHEESE

  127. Santa Clara by noodle-of-moria · · Score: 1

    I'm on in 3rd floor condo, the building moved around a little but probably just because it's old. That was the strongest I have felt since Loma Prieta...must have been those 6 years in Sac.

  128. Imagine... by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  129. Remember... by Rope_a_Dope · · Score: 1

    Remember that the increases on the Richter Scale are logarithmic. This means that a 6.0 is 10 times more powerful than a 5.0 (measured in amplitude). So this really is not that big of a deal, unless of course you were just putting the finishing touches on your "World's Longest domino chain", and the quake just happened to touch off the first domino.

  130. Oh yeah, and its raining here in Luxembourg!! by trellick · · Score: 2, Flamebait


    Sorry people, I don't think that a local 'weather' report is worthy of a /. report, however groundbreaking you may think it is [excuse the pun!.

    I'm as about concerned about minor quakes in the US as I sure most /. readers are concerned about rainfall in Europe.

    This is not /. news.

    trellick

    1. Re:Oh yeah, and its raining here in Luxembourg!! by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      I survived it, it'd better be news! :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  131. 5.2 doesn't mean anything without more info by jesterzog · · Score: 2

    Not true... there are so many more factors to take into consideration when it comes to earthquakes. The depth, the type (rollers are much worse), the distance, etc.

    I couldn't agree more.

    We had a 6.9 here on the 21st of August last year, and people barely felt a thing. A few months before that there was a bigger one (somewhere in the 7's) that's unfortunately rolled off the linked page. Again, not much was felt at all.

    There wasn't any notable damage in either of them. This could partly be put down to the very strict local building codes that are there in anticipation of a big Earthquake being due, but that hardly made a difference in these cases.

    5.2 doesn't mean anything. There could be a very destructive 5.2 earthquake, or all the other factors could combine to make it almost invisible.

    1. Re:5.2 doesn't mean anything without more info by twinpot · · Score: 1

      But we will likely feel the expected "big one" when it hits - the southern North Island is due for an 8.0 or greater.

      NZ building codes are very strict wrt earthquake "proofing", and a lot of pioneering work in earthquake-proofing structures was done here. All building/structures in Kobe that were built with the NZ technology escaped undamaged.

      Normally anything this small wouldn't rate a mention outside the local paper.

  132. Damage report by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

    Wrecked my Beowulf cluster, and knocked the blue led out of my VA Linux server.

    Gonna fall behind on SETI....

  133. Re:Taken from OS News posting by Eugenia 03/04/200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your post would be a lot more credible if you omitted like every 25th word to simulate your bad english.

    Actually I didn't even read it at all, isn't that awesome?

  134. Was at the shark tank in san jose by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    and we felt it during the game. We lost 2-1 on OT....damn avalanche :(

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  135. This Just In! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A substantial earthquake shook the San Francisco Bay area on Monday, sending frightened customers running from area businesses and knocking out power and phone services. There were also reports of a water shortage. It is unclear what caused the water shortage, as no water pipes were broken. However, there is speculation that the lack of power has caused a sudden surge of readers of the popular "News for nerds" website, Slashdot, to participate in an activity known to normal people as "showering."

  136. Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jane was sitting on a beach in Florida, attempting to strike up a conversation with the stunningly attractive gentleman who was reading on the sunbed beside hers.
    "Hello, sir," she said, "Do you like movies?"
    "Yes, I do," he responded, and then returned to his book.
    Jane persisted. "Do you like gardening?"
    The man again looked up from his book. "Yes, I do," he said politely before returning to his reading.
    Undaunted, Jane asked. "Do you like pussycats?" With that, the man dropped his book and pounced on Jane, pumping her as she'd never been pumped before.
    As the cloud of sand began to settle, Jane dragged herself back to a sitting position and panted, "How did you know that was what I wanted?!!"
    The man thought for a moment and replied, "How did you know my name was Katz?"

  137. I was at the San Jose Arena by shafty · · Score: 2, Funny

    watching the Sharks. At first I thought it was another "we will rock you" chant starting up, but I knew it was something big when the concrete stands began to wobble. I looked up and watched the rafter lights sway for a few seconds while hoping the tremors didn't escalate. No damage or injuries. Regretfully the refs didn't get hurt...those blind jackasses costed the Sharks the game.

  138. 6.5? No shit! by mangu · · Score: 1

    Felt several stronger ones while in Colombia. The earth moving beneath your feet is not the scariest thing in this world...

    1. Re:6.5? No shit! by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that being tailed by dark-tinted vehicles is a lot more scary than earthquakes in Colombia.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  139. You're a detriment to the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piss off or you will become a similar casualty.

    1. Re:You're a detriment to the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually have a real life? You fucking pissing LOSER.

  140. Kraton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that some kind of a lounge chair?

    1. Re:Kraton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a stackable version of milk crates. Usually made out of plastic, but known to be constructed out of reinforced cardboard.

    2. Re:Kraton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is not.

      From: http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/structure/Crusta lStructure/database/definitions.html

      Craton = A part of the Earth's crust that has attained stability, and has been little deformed for a prolonged period. As originally defined, cratons included parts of both continents and ocean basins, but modern knowledge of the ocean basins indicates that existence of cratons there is unlikely, so the term is now restricted to continental areas. The extensive central cratons of the continents, including both shields and platforms, have been called hedreocratons. Parts of the more mature Phanerozoic fold belts have now achieved, or are approaching, a cratonic condition. Also spelled: kraton.

    3. Re:Kraton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cretin.

  141. Heavy rainfall in Hawaii by jijoel · · Score: 1

    Heh, sure. ;-) There are currently five active flood warnings in Hawaii: http://www.prh.noaa.gov/hnl/pages/watchwarn.html

  142. Re:Yup, I felt it too - Ode to Greek Pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, she doesn't work. She's a lazy lay-about houseslut, collecting more fat with every passing day.

  143. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha... the same exact thing happened to me back when I was in College in LA. I took a massive bong hit, then about 5 minutes later a (small) quake hit. "Was that an earthquake? Cool!"

    The night of the Northridge quake I was up all night smoking out and watching movies (which is why I was up at 4:50 in the morning). Had no problem remembering the earthquake drills that were pounded into my brain from since I was a kid. From couch to under Pool Table in record time!

    And come to think of it... I also had more than a few hits from the bong this morning!

    The "Devil's Weed" Indeed!

  144. Re:pantyliner's post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm... cuntpaste, do you even know what industry is "just south of san francisco"? 5.2 is a tiny quake but still a concern to datacenters and their caretakers.

  145. I was playing counter-strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a CS game and suddenly stuff started shaking. It felt as if someone was shaking my chair. I was thinking to myself hmm maybe I should go outside but I didnt cause I was a CT and I was recuin the hostages :)

  146. True Story by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    LA a couple years ago, about 4AM, a long roller, centered around Joshua Tree if I recall correctly.... I had just fallen asleep in the arms of a hottie I had met the night before.... The quake woke us up and kept going, and we wound up huddling naked under the doorway scared but aroused. When the shaking finally stopped, the phone rang.

    It was my girlfriend, who called to see if I was OK.

    I've never been so fucking busted.

    1. Re:True Story by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You should of told her you thought you were going to die so you just grabbed a random girl off the street.

    2. Re:True Story by sahala · · Score: 2
      It was my girlfriend, who called to see if I was OK.

      I've never been so fucking busted.

      And how were you busted? Not that I'm condoning dishonesty, but couldn't you have just said a quick "I-am-ok-will-call-you-back-in-a-bit-so-i-can-make -sure-everything-else-is-ok"?

    3. Re:True Story by anachron · · Score: 1

      I've never been so fucking busted.

      Literally.

    4. Re:True Story by pamzella · · Score: 1

      Ha! I'm back in the Bay Area, but I remember that one. My fish tank was on a dresser I found out that night was pretty rickety, the fish tank nearly exploded. It was a smaller magnitude earthquake, especially by the time it hit LA, but it felt bigger than last night.

      Next time don't let the hottie answer the phone.

    5. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe -- never been so busted fucking.....

  147. YOU LOSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hooray for people who THINK they're fast enough for first post.
    CONGRATURATION! A DUMBASS SI YUO!

    1. Re:YOU LOSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO JAM!!

  148. The Benefits of Quakes by Gryftir · · Score: 1

    Hi,
    I was in Morgan Hill for the Quake. We live up in the hills, a few miles fron the san andreas fault, so it was pretty powerful. But in this case the quake was beneficial for me. I had broken a vase doing dishes earlier, but now I have an excuse for it.

    Oh, either thing about dogs knowing when an earthquake is about to come isn't true, or my dog is lagged because it was a few seconds into it before she started barking.

    As for being an island, Isn't that a bit passe? I mean even Trancers perhaps the worst zombie and time travel movie of all time, has a reference to the idea. Though perhaps it's what we need to start the fragmentation of America.
    Gryftir

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  149. those who made cold comments re: Tawainese quakes by NMSpaz · · Score: 1

    California huh? Isn't that where they make all that software stuff? Wow, better go buy all my software before the prices shoot up. Don't understand why they concentrate all the programmers in such a tectonically unstable area...

  150. get it right by suougibma · · Score: 1
    The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface.

    Hypocenter is where it is
    • in
    the earth. Epicenter is where it is on the
    • surface
    of the earth.
  151. 1 significant affect by martissimo · · Score: 2

    Seems some water flow patterns at the Gilroy Hot Springs may have changed a bit.

    This is a beautiful area that many people in the bay area take advantage of, and it is also a very historically significant site.

    Following WWII when Japanese-American citizens were released from internment camps many of them spent a good deal of time at Gilroy-Yamato attempting to re-enter society, bit of a overview here

    The land was recently sold to the Nature Conservancy (ie. about a month ago), but is still being ran by the seller until the conservancy is ready to take over...

    From what i understand they have some serious problems right now tonight, yes no major structures have fallen, and no lives are lost, but this is practically a sacred site to many Japanese-Americans, and a beautifull one in any case to others... would be a shame to see it suffer any ill consequences as are being reported

  152. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by linzeal · · Score: 1
    Ok, you want to go see an unpredictable tornado, or better yet a raging hurricane, oh I know lets go watch a volcano jettison magma for miles around.

    You can take it as lightly as you wish, but do realize that nature has no concept of virgin. We were just lucky this time. I'm in emmeryville and felt nothing.

  153. Mega Tsumani by uofa1993engrmath · · Score: 1

    I've been watching the Discovery Channel, and they had this bit about the La Palma island in the Canaries. They said that the western half of this island will eventually slide off into the ocean during a volcanic eruption and cause a huge wave that'll wipe about 20km of the USA's East Coast all squeaky clean.

  154. how is this 'News for Nerds' ? by dJOEK · · Score: 1

    those that live there, felt the shaking.
    the rest of us don't care.
    besides, 5.2 isn't THAT rare or anything

    yawn, a new depth for ./

    --
    Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
  155. Things to do today by Carp+Flounderson · · Score: 0, Informative

    1 - Get freaked out by earthquake and spill bong water on self.

    2 - Buy new pants that don't smell like bong water.

    --

    Color flashing, thunder crashing, dynamite machines.

  156. Oh, hello Eugenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, a self-employed pissing loser with a family, 600 acres of deeded land, several automobiles and a four-story house. What do you have? 2,000 British pounds to your name, a playstation2, some computers and a husband that picks up the tab for everything? That's what I thought, you fucking olive-picking, highboot fecal smear of a bridge troll.

    1. Re:Oh, hello Eugenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup, a self-employed pissing loser with a family, 600 acres of deeded land, several automobiles and a four-story house.

      Well, what a waste of a good fortune.

      Assuming that it were true, of course. Which is something that most of us won't do, given your guttermouth rambling and apparent poor breeding.
  157. i felt it in Santa Cruz Too - No Biggie by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 1

    My buddies and I were watching the Giants game and the bldg shoook for a few secs. Then the anncr on TV said " the earth just shook". And then at the end of the game he mentioned we had had an earthquake. I was in downtown Santa Cruz during the 1989 quake that leveled most of Santa Cruz and I'll never forget it. This one wasn't anything as strong. more like a aftershock from the 89.

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  158. OT: Brian Evenson by caca_phony · · Score: 1

    from your sig:
    --- When I found out I was nothing more than a bunch of vibrating strings, I realized 'morality' no longer had meaning.
    Brian Evenson is the shit. The Din of Celestial Birds wasn't quite as good as Altman's Tongue though. That is where your sig is from, right?

    --
    ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
    1. Re:OT: Brian Evenson by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

      Actually, I made it up on the spot. I've never heard of "The Din of Celestial Birds", nor "Altman's Tongue".

      Big books with big words scare me.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  159. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by deecha · · Score: 1

    I am at Redwood City too ! My first earthquake too !
    Same thoughts as you pal !

    ~D

  160. 5.2 Earthquake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5.2 is a bug fix of 5.1 Earthquake, where the pictures would not fall off the wall properly. I'm holding out for version 6.0 which has the new "knocking plaster off the ceiling" feature

  161. OT: your sig. (was)Damage Report from New Jersey by caca_phony · · Score: 1

    Oh, ignore my other comment on your sig. Look into the writings of Mark Twain (his later "misanthropic" period) for some good exposition of this moral stance you present (or see the bawdlerized version in the Philip Jose Farmer River World series, from the "Samuel Clemens" character). A passage from the Evenson book I thought was being quoted:

    "He did not believe that the brain was, as the Traditional view held, a soft, gray folded organ. Rather, it was a series of black and white cords stretched tightly from one side of the skull to the other, held in place by delicate hooks of bone"

    --
    ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
  162. New York by AllMightyPaul · · Score: 1

    No home page article for the 5.4 in New York a few weeks ago? An earthquake in California is an everyday occurence, but in New York! Now *that's* news!

  163. Re:pantyliner's post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hazard a guess that just about every industry is "just south of san francisco"

  164. Earth QUAKE by Konster · · Score: 1

    I live in Anchorage, Alaska, which is known for having an earthquake from time to time. :)

    My parents were attending university at the time (Alaska Methodist University, now Alaska Pacific University) when the Really Freaking Big 1964 earthquake hit.

    It was the second largest earthquake recorded in the 20th Century at 9.2. The 1960 quake in Chile was 9.5.

    The duration of the main quake was 4 minutes.

    It hit March 27 at 5:36 P.M. AST. The epicenter was some 75 miles East of Anchorage with a depth at 14 miles.

    It was felt as far north as the Yukon, as well as in Canada and Washington State.

    131 People died as a result of the earthquake, 122 of which died in the tsunami generated by the quake. Of these deaths, 115 were in Alaska (106 tsunami related deaths, 9 deaths in the city), and others as far south as California.

    The largest recorded height of the tsunami was 67 meters (!) in Shoup Bay, AK. The tsunami also destroyed some small boats and an oyster harvest in Japan. Tide gauges in Puerto Rico and Cuba (!) registered the event. Tsunami warnings were issued in the former Soviet Union. Tsunamis associated with the earthquake were estimated to travel at 447 MPH (!).

    52 aftershocks followed the main quake, the largest at magnitude 6.7. 11 other aftershocks registered at 6.0 or above. These aftershocks continued for more than a year after the main quake.

  165. Re:pantyliner's post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the industry in Taiwan, when a massive earthquake rocked the place just over a month ago. Any mention of that on Slashdot?

  166. please help me slashdot croo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm trapped in the lower deck of the SF highway, and i'm communicating to you through my wireless laptop. SF is burning right now - please send
    "the slashdot cruiser" for help!

  167. +5.2 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD UP. The funniest comment I've ever seen for a long time.

  168. GEESH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I TRIED to submit a more newsworthy story then this (3DLabs being BOUGHT by creative) and THIS makes the front page? This is BULLSHIT! Sorry it scared the pee out of ya.

  169. Broken topic by short · · Score: 1

    Why the general topic "News"? This is apparently topic "United States".

  170. So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by Vortran · · Score: 2

    My, Lord! This is a wake up call. LEAVE already. When the big one hits, it will make 9/11 look like a little bump in the road. It will affect the computer industry drastically and everyone will wail and whine like banshees.

    I love southern CA.. it's warm and beautiful! but I would NEVER live there! People.. check this: there are at least FOUR MAJOR faults running through or near the SF bay area. They WILL give way.

    Remember how upset everyone was when the bay bridge collapsed? Well.. DUH! You LIVE ON A FAULT!! and they built a major suspension bridge on a fault. Brilliant.

    When beaches are infested or contaminated, they put up a sign and a big fence around the place and people DON'T GO THERE.

    I just don't get why people aren't leaving in droves. They are living on the edge.. literally. My wife's aunt lives out there and I've asked this same thing and she admits it's foolish to stay, but can't give a rational answer for not leaving. It may cost her her life. Is it worth it?

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    1. Re:So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by macsuibhne · · Score: 1

      Uh, the bay bridge isn't a suspension bridge -- you're thinking of the Golden Gate.

      --
      -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" -- Juvenal
    2. Re:So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was not a wake-up call other than the fact it interrupted my sleep.

      Wake-up calls are the earthquakes that started happening in WA around 1995: 3s, 5s, 6s... Then the big one there hit. I had moved out of the area a year before. And that isn't even on the fault line that WA is overdue for.

      Seeing that the CA area is relatively flat, I'm not too worried. I would be far more worried if I were still in WA where the place is pretty much rolling hills, mountains and lakes on all sides. Much bigger chance of triggered landslide or house slide.

    3. Re:So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where do you live? seriously.
      The bay area is awesome. I'd never leave. There's plenty of things that can happen to you anywhere. I'll take my chances in a great place. Better to live here than somehwere I don't want to be that has severe weather, ie tornados or hurricanes or debilitating snowfall. Weather is a hazard no matter where you are. Except maybe arizona, and new mexico.

    4. Re:So Why Do People Continue to STAY There? by Vortran · · Score: 1

      Tornadoes and hurricanes can be tracked as they form and there are ways to predict them. AFAIK you cannot predict earth quakes. You can build structures that are 100% proof against tornadoes and hurricanes. You can build structures that might have a better chance of shrugging off a small earth quake, but AFAIK there's is no way to build a building that can survive falling into a chasm.

      I live in Milwaukee, WI. Not the best place in the world, to be sure.. but I don't wonder when the ground will open up and swallow my house and family.

      --
      Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  171. I live in Georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't imagine anything like that happening here. However, I can imagine every major news source being in some trailer park talking to some guy who "thought a freight train was coming" or thought "it sounded like a restart at Talladega." Atlanta is NOT part of Georgia.

  172. Oh right by AlastairMurray · · Score: 0

    That was a quake? I thought it was just my mobile on vibrate mode.

  173. who cares_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does anyone really give a shit?

  174. The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by ThomasMis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny that you should say that it's romantic for the sun to set over large bodies of water. Here on the east side of Cleveland, the coast takes a northeast bent along lake erie. Therefore, in the evening, the sun sets over the lake for us. What takes the romance out of the sun gently falling into the slow rolling waves of lake erie is the fact that the lake is so polluted with heavy metals. State health advisories are constantly posted asking that the very old, very young, and pregnant should not eat lake erie fish. Our fish have the proud distinction of being riddled with tumors. It's really sad. When you take a boat trip out to the lake erie islands, and look down into the deeper parts of the lake, it looks so clear and beautiful, it's a shame that if you dive in for a swim, it's going to do you more harm than good.

    On a more ontopic note, Cleveland had two 5 point earthquakes in my lifetime (the last one happened three years ago I think?) I must admit, neither were much to get excited about. My computer monitor shook like hell, but I just thought it was because the washer was acting up.

    --
    Check out my podcast: DreamStation.cc Video Game Show
    1. Re:The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Would that be the one we felt in Toronto as well in late '98? I was on the 10th floor of an office building and suddenly the floor was moving beneath my feet. I'd been through picture-rattlers before, but this was really cool :) All the cubicles were rocking and it felt like standing in a boat when there's gentle waves.
      The first guess we had as to what happened was that a natural gas pipe blew up in the parking garage... earthquakes just don't happen enough to be the first thing on people's minds. So someone turned on a radio, and we heard the Earthquake reported on the news. No big deal, no injuries :) Lots of fun though. :)

    2. Re:The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by dan_bethe · · Score: 1
      My computer monitor shook like hell, but I just thought it was because the washer was acting up.
      It's funny how one can assume that when they're not expecting the shake. I heard a story about a survivor of the Oklahoma City bombing, who said that she suddenly heard a loud bang, went blind, and assumed that her computer monitor had somehow exploded on her. She didn't realize that at the time, half the room was now missing.
    3. Re:The sun also sets over lake Erie.... by waynem77 · · Score: 1

      My parents lived in Cleveland in the 1960s. They went for a walk one lovely day only to discover that the Cuyahoga river had caught on fire. (Shortly thereafter, they moved to the other end of Ohio.) So there's not a doubt in my mind that you're telling the absolute truth.

      <really ot section> Greetings. I am a Browns fan living in Boston. (A real Browns fan, too... I've already tossed random detritus at someone today.) How are things back there, football-wise? And yes, I'm infuriated that Belichick followed me here.</really ot section>

  175. chrisd is now in the katz league by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A do-nothing who-cares story posting? No injuries? Little damage, if any? What kind of posting is this? Chrisd is giving Katz a run for his money.

    1. Re:chrisd is now in the katz league by Kredal · · Score: 1

      At least Katz didn't post that the Lone Gunmen were dead...

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  176. Lucky for me . . . by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    I live on the glorified sandbar, Florida.

    "Learn to swim. See you down in Arizona bay."
    Maynard James Keenan

  177. epicentre != focus by TonyJohn · · Score: 1

    Just to be a little more accurate with the terms:
    The epicentre (or epicenter if you want) was not 4.7 miles beneath the surface - the focus was. The epicentre is always a point on the surface - usually directly above the focus.

    --
    Owl tried to think of something wise to say, but couldn't.
  178. A 5.2 in California is nothing by barzok · · Score: 2

    Yet the 5.0 we had in upstate NY last month went unposted on /. We shook for almost 30 seconds.

    5.0 is a big deal around here, and anything much stronger will start doing serious damage to our non-quake-ready buildings.

  179. Epicenter vs Focus clarification by div_2n · · Score: 1

    "The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface."

    Impossible. The epicenter is the area above the earth's surface that represents the origin of the earthquake. The focus is the actual point underground where the earthquake originates.

  180. Pet grammar peeve by rarity · · Score: 1

    If "The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface", then that would be the centre (or the center, since this is the US we're talking about). The epicenter is the point on the ground directly above the center.

    Had to say it. I'm sorry. I'll go away now...

  181. Curious: Post Quake Behavior Mods by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    So, after a quake like this, are there changes in human behavior that you can notice?

    1. Vacancy rates for apartments in high rises go up?
    2. Slight net exodus of people, as measured by U-Haul 1-way rentals?
    3. Traffic slows down as drivers don't want to be "tossed" off the road, bridge?
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Curious: Post Quake Behavior Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1,2: not likely you could measure it with the current exodus going on due to lack of jobs

      3: oh please. That would be a godsend, but highly wishful thinking. I doubt more than a handful of people are even taking this quake seriously. It was small (for those that are felt) and typical. No one is going to freak and slow down. In fact, the only time the traffic here gets under 80 is during rush hour.

  182. this just in... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    3 killed in Joplin over the weekend because of sevear thunderstorms and flash flooding, Washington DC has another tornado...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  183. What is an epicenter? by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 1

    I'm so tired of people using this word incorrectly. An epicenter is "the point of the earth's surface directly above the focus of an earthquake.", not "4.7 miles below surface". Epicenters are, by definition, ON the surface. The center of the earthquake was 4.7 miles below the surface.

    Sorry for the rant, but the word "epicenter" is being misused so frequently that it's beginning to morph into a different word.

    --
    Not Found
    The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    1. Re:What is an epicenter? by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 1

      Oops, like the guy below me said. The focus of the earthquake was below the surface. He's up to speed on geology. I was merely attempting to use the English language.

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
  184. Achtung! Ist Nicht Der Loma Prieta! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    Achtung!

    Ist nicht der Loma Prieta, machen Sie nichts mit das paniken fleein. Die Erde quakken ist eine kleine bumpen in der nacht, nichts mehr. Nicht outen das fenster liepen und schkrimmen das sky ist gefallen, alzo nichts mit das auto gestuffen mit alles pozezens und zu Iowa gemoven. Just sitzen und watchen das USGS geslashdotten.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  185. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Ah, it was ok, but there was one about 2 years ago in October, 5.3 in San Juan Bautista, felt in Watsonville like a slightly drunken stagger. Pretty neat the way the earth gently heaved around for about 20 seconds then quietly stopped. This one shook things a little, but nothing was knocked over (in Capitola, 2nd floor of a townhouse [It's mine! My apartment! Back! Go find your own!]) not even a stack of about 20 pennies on a counter.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  186. Epicenter vs. Focus by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm probably not the first person to say it, but...

    "The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface."

    BUZZ! Wrong! The epicenter is by definition on the surface. The focus is what was 4.7 miles below the surface.

    Now then, why is this particular earthquake generating news (just another Californian earthquake), but the one in New York state a few weeks ago didn't?

    1. Re:Epicenter vs. Focus by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Because no one lives outside of California?

      You can't lie to me, I've seen I-80, there's no one out there.

      But seriously, in the last 3 days there have now been 5 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or greater.

      This earthquake was fun here, but a non-event where earthquakes as a whole go.

  187. no subject by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I submitted this story three weeks ago but it was rejected.

    graspee

    1. Re:no subject by guttentag · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you got it backwards. You said sky was falling. And don't think we're gonna believe you next time...

  188. focus, not epicenter by Nova · · Score: 1

    "The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface."

    Hate to be a pedant, but the _focus_ was 4.7 miles below the surface, as the focus is the absolute place of origin of an earthquake. The epicenter is the point at the surface directly above the focus.

    Sorry if someone else brought this up, I'm too lazy to wade through 400 messages :P

    Robby

  189. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard it was so bad that Jon Katz nearly fell out of Rob Malda's ass.

  190. M5's kill hundreds in central Asia by peter303 · · Score: 2

    It doesn't take much to knock down a shoddily constructed village like those you see in Afghanistan. It is a tribute to American preparedness that Loma Prieta (1989) and Northridge (1994) killed about 50 each, while similar size quakes in Japan, India and Turkey the past few years kill 5,000 - 10,000. Still we can do better.

  191. You probably been in a quake before... by thormodr · · Score: 1

    For all of those who think they've never been in even a 0x3 quake, you're probably wrong. A lot of the really weak quakes go unreported as they are too numerous and undetectable except to the department of Geology in the local university... Just my 2 cents...

  192. Wood is good by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    for earthquakes, not so good for hurricanes (or floods). Brick/stone is ok for hurricanes, rubbish for earthquakes. Reinforced concrete is good for both earthquakes and hurricanes, unless the construction company is illegally cutting corners.

    1. Re:Wood is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reinforced concrete is good for both earthquakes and hurricanes, unless the construction company is illegally cutting corners.

      So you missed the pictures of what happened to the reinforced concrete Veteran's Hospital in the SO Cal one about 20-25 years ago? (Sorry, don't remember the name of the main city affected, until a few seconds after hitting submit.)

  193. That explains it... by stubear · · Score: 2

    ...Joe Simpson and Skip Caray(the Atlanta Braves baseball announcers on TBS) mentioned they felt an earthquake during the SF Giants and Atlanta Braves game last night. Out of nowhere the two started talking about feeling the tremors and joking about the crew in the mobile prodction studio truck.

  194. Mr. Cantwell speaks by meadd00d · · Score: 1
    Who can tell me where the most-devastating earthquake in the last 200 years took place? Hmmm?

    1811, Missouri. One minute, a peaceful plain of small towns and rolling farmland. The next minute, bingo, a hellish nightmare of death and devastation. Bodies twisted and broken beyond recognition.

    Tomorrow, Section 6, of "Our Changing Planet"; Earthquakes & Cataclysms - Man's Dalliance with Death. Have a nice day...

  195. Strangelet! by Jburkholder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Any cases of *Spontaneous Human Combustion reported yet?

    *sorry, couldn't resist!

  196. Calm Down by ChickenMaster · · Score: 1
    OMG, this made slashdot? It's only a 5.2 Thats nothing. No damage, no injuries, and you wouldn't expect any from such a small quake.

    I live in Gilroy. The quake was so uneventful I went right back to bed afterwards.

    --
    To conquer death, you only have to die
    1. Re:Calm Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was damage.

      The sprinklers went off in Walmart in Gilroy.

  197. ...more moderate earthquakes... by vmxeo · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised this made it into a slashdot story, but since we're on the subject of moderate earthquakes here's a 5.1 that hit New York late last April. I didn't notice it in here the city, likely becasue I assume every ground tremor is a subway train passing underneath (Having grown up in California, it's still instinctual to dive under a table when I feel the ground shake).

    I'd much rather be in California than New York City during an earthquake. Here there's far too much masonry on buildings to withstand even a moderate earthquake safely.

  198. 'Cos why? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1

    If the USGS really needs me to tell them that things were "a bit shaky" in San Jose, I want my tax dollars back.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:'Cos why? by KORfan · · Score: 1

      The USGS probably needs you to provide information because they haven't been given very many of your tax dollars so they can't afford a dense network of sensors. What they have done is provided a means for people to submit their observations so they can at least get some data that probably gets used to judge where and how to deploy limited resources.

  199. Obviously reported by non natives by kolding · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why even bother to report a 5.2 in California? I've slept through 5.2's. It's only people from Boston who worry about earthquakes that small. Now a 5.2 in Boston(where all the buildings would probably fall down), that would be news. But a 5.2 in California, yawn. It's not worth getting out of bed for anything beneath a 6.

    1. Re:Obviously reported by non natives by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2

      Actually, there was a 5.1 last month in New York. It woke me up, and I looked out the window to see if the cars fell off the road, and then I went back to sleep. I'm really surprised that a 5.2 in CA made slashdot though, since the 5.1 I felt was not that bad, and I'm in NY where they're much less common, what with the whole lack-of-a-pacific-ring thing...

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:Obviously reported by non natives by Chokai · · Score: 1

      *shrug* All a matter of opinion I guess. After all make that a 7.5+ and it could have flattened/severely damaged Silicon Valley. Besides given the # of techies in the area I suppose it is at least somewhat news worthy for the Slashdot community. Seattle's 6.8 last year wasn't news for more than a day or two. Of course normally when ever we have an earthquake in Seattle everyone starts darting thier eyes back and forth between Puget Sound (tsunamis) and Mt. Ranier (volcano). I loved my geology classes in college, the northwest, especially Alaska is geologically fascinating and has earthquakes every couple of hundred years that make the biggest ones in California look wussy. (think 9.0 +). There are entire underwater "forests" in Washington and Oregon that simply slid into the water in a massive slide or the land simply dropped 20 feet around 400 years ago. Very cool.

    3. Re:Obviously reported by non natives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you're so cool.

      i live in a volcano! that makes me both cooler *and* smarter than you.

  200. i thought i noticed... by tellurian · · Score: 0

    i thought i noticed the essence of garlic in the air this morning...

    --
    Grid Computing News

  201. Re:No big deal on peninsula, but fun all the same by DrLlama · · Score: 1

    I'm in South San Francisco. We had a nice smooth roller here. It built and faded very smoothly and had a nice rolling motion. Got the fish tank sloshing a bit.

    We had one a couple of years ago that was a single hard jerk. The epicenter was up around Napa. What I really remember about that one is that I heard it coming a second or so before it hit. Ain't nature a marvelous thing?

    --
    Who, me?
  202. You know you've been in California too long... by Nyckname · · Score: 4, Funny

    when you not only refer to the geologists they interview on the news after earthquakes by their first names only, but you have your favorite.

    cheers

  203. Earthquake again? by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Hmm... earthquake just out side of San Francisco. Is IBM finally going to update OS/2 Warp to version 5?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  204. More like a wimpy rant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why one should soil one's underpants over a mere 5.2 quake. One might as well panic when it starts raining.

  205. The East is scary by unovox · · Score: 1

    More people have died from heat waves in the East in the last 50 years than from Earthquakes in California. Same for Tornados. More Homes have been destroyed by tornados than Earthquakes too.

    At the Brad Mehldau (an easterner) concert in Santa Cruz last night, he and his bandmates rode it out (it occured between numbers) and played on.

    A tornado could have taken the place off the map. No one was ever shaken to death by an earthquake.

    --

    "everyone's different....I am the same"
  206. The epicenter wasn't any miles below the surface by giovanino+panevino · · Score: 1
    It's incorrect to say that the epicenter was 4.7 miles below the surface. The epicenter is, by definition, on the surface. That 4.7 mile metric is the distance between the center and the epicenter.

    You Slashdotters are the last folks I'd expect to go along with the common assumption that "epicenter" is just a highfalutin' word for "center".

    Well, actually I guess these guys are.

  207. Arizona and New Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arizona and New Mexico were considered the safest places from any natural disasters in the United States.

  208. San Jose, CA by johnb10000 · · Score: 1

    That wasn't much of an earthquake. I used to live in a downstairs condo a few years ago and the woman upstairs walking would cause the walls to shake more than that earthquake.

    The Loma Prieta earthqauke was a lot more fun!

  209. Earthquake in NY and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There was an earthquake of about magnitude 5 in New York. I did a search and came up with this web site http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/. Most interesting are the photos of damage.

    I know some people in New Jersey who felt it. As for me, I slept through it. Then again, I'm sort of used to earthquakes since I went to school in the SF Bay Area.

    Speaking of earthquake and sporting events- the Loma Prieta (spelling?) quake in 1989 occured DURING the World Series, between the SF Giants and Oakland Athletics no less. That's why media accounts mentioned the SF Giants game and the SJ Sharks game.

  210. Why is this newsworthy? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    We get 5.2 quakes in CA several times a year. They're not even half as bumpy as a takeoff aboard an airliner. I felt it, and though it was rather lengthy, was not very noticable (and I'm near the epicenter).

    I was practically on top of the epicenter of the Loma Prieta quake in 1989, a 7.2 quake. Now *that's* an earthquake. Anything less than that is barely worth mentioning, especially here.

  211. Anna Ohura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like your sister's web site. Only the sibling of a gook slut could troll as poorly as you do.

    I want to see some more profanity, damnit. More links to torn-out assholes. More rips on the core Linux hackers. Boooyah!

  212. This made it to slashdot? by Nermal · · Score: 1

    Heh. I guess I'm just a jaded California. I'm in Santa Cruz, which is about 30 minutes from Gilroy. When it started shaking, my wife and just I got under the nearest doorway and hoped the monitor wouldn't fall off my desk. 10 seconds later we went back to normal life. My poor manager is from Canada and was apparently a bit more shaken up. =:)

    Perfect 'California Moment'(tm): We're sitting there, with the earth shaking back and forth, when someone a few apartments down shouts "ROCK ON!!" and the whole complex busts out cheering and laughing.

  213. epicenter, hypocenter... by potzagilla · · Score: 1

    I thought the epicenter was on the surface. The hypocenter was the point of origin, below the epicenter.

  214. Old fart was in bed already (burp) by Paracelcus · · Score: 0

    I wuz layin there an sure n begorra duh bed started shakin, thought I had gas!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  215. sorry it was my fault... by nvts-NUTS · · Score: 1
    I had flown into San Jose that morning for an interview and had eaten a burrito and refried beans for lunch. By the time I was back at the airport waiting for my return flight home the beans had started to stir.

    I really, really didn't mean to let it all out at once but I would have exploded if I didn't.

  216. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by ender- · · Score: 1

    I was also an earthquake virgin. It was a pretty easy one. The desk I was sitting at started squeaking, so I got up and stood in the doorway.
    I live about 10 miles from the epicenter [Salinas], so the shaking was definite, but mostly an easy roll.

    While I have no interest in being in a huge quake, with massive damage or loss of life, I must admit to being completely fascinated by earthquakes. I'd like to be outside for a smallish one to get a better view of the ground rolling.

    of course, I'm also kind of fascinated by tornadoes, so maybe I'm just a nut :)

    Ender

  217. News!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earthquakes in CA? Geez, c'mon! Why is this even making headlines? We had a 5.3 quake up in NY two weeks ago. That's a bit more interesting, isn't it?

  218. Avs really "rocked" by phatStrat · · Score: 1

    I was watching the Avs vs. Sharks game last night on CBC during the 3rd period when the camera started to shake slightly. The commentators (being Canadian) were going off all excited about how they had just sat through an earthquake and noted how completely indifferent the fans were as if they didn't even notice it.

  219. Earthquake Story by Peale · · Score: 2

    Okay, so when an earthquake happens in California, which is a normal thing to happen, it's posted on the front page, but when an earthquake shakes the northeast (which hasn't happened since 1983) it's not news? What's up with that?

  220. I *live* in Gilroy... by WildBill1941 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And let me tell you, that quake was big. Not as big as the Loma Prieta quake, but large, nonetheless. Looking at the USGS map at the USGS, it appears that the epicenter was in the mountains just south of our house.

    At the beginning, it felt like someone drove a semi into the side of the house. At first, I thought, "What the FSCK???", and then realized it was a quake. My pregnant wife and 2-year old daughter were on the couch with me, watching the end of Dinotopia. I grabbed the kid, stood up, and reached down to assist my wife, all the while things are falling and breaking around me. By the time I reached the archway in that room, the quake had ended, and we had LOTS of broken pictureframes and other things tossed out of cupboards.

    My office took the brunt of the quake in our home, with all my DVDs, books, and software flying off the shelves and piling itself in the middle of the room. (A strange earthquake phenonmeon - it looks like a ghost ran through the room and piled all your belongings in a huge heap.) Luckily, my computer rack remained standing, and my Linux box and Sun Ultra 5 were still humming along, with no damage. I wound up sleeping with my amateur radio and a flashlight next to the bed, just in case... And we had several aftershocks throughout the night, the most notable being about a 3.4.

    We were lucky, we didn't have any structual damage (that I can see, anyhow, I plan on having a home inspector out within the week). A neighbor down the street had his chimney collapse, the gas station across town had a column on their roof get damaged, and the Wal-Mart's sprinklers went off, dumping a quarter-inch of water on the floor there and damaging lots of merchandise.

    Anyone who makes light of earthquakes hasn't been in one that's 5.x or higher. A large quake is a true natural disaster, and something to be feared and prepared for.

    chrisd, I'd be interested to find out where your sister's father-in-law lives - there's no way you could have barely noticed this sucker if you were in my house.

    1. Re:I *live* in Gilroy... by chrisd · · Score: 2
      This will be a little vauge, but his house overlooks the basiny area about a raleys and such. It's perched at teh top of one of the smaller hills surrounding gilroy.

      His place is pretty cool, it's a wide low slung place, and when they built it, they drove 18' piles into the mountain to protect it from slides and quakes. Your experience sounds pretty wild , thugh, and not tame at all.

      One of the reasons I posted this was I Wanted to see the range of experiences that area /. readers experienced, it's fascinating the range of responses (even considering the folks who may fudge their experience for others enjoyment).

      Chrisd

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    2. Re:I *live* in Gilroy... by WildBill1941 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he's a couple miles northwest of me. I'm actually close to the "Raleys" (It's Nob Hill Foods, though - Raleys is their parent company.) - I walk there with my daughter from time to time to get fresh-baked cookies as a treat for her.

      That just shows how odd earthquake shock waves can propagate through the ground - if your sister's father-in-law lives in the hills I'm thinking of - those hills are practically solid rock, which means that the whole home moves together as one piece. I'm in the flat, on more "standard" ground, and things tend to move helter-skelter down here.

    3. Re:I *live* in Gilroy... by Banjonardo · · Score: 1

      I live in San Ramon/Danville. My mom felt it, my brother woke up, my dad felt it too. I was in the shower. Didn't really notice.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  221. Re:[Oh, just a 5.2?] Oregonian woosies by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    55mph speed limit!

    What's really condemning of Oregonian toughness (there ain't none) is that they won't let you pump your own gas at the filling station. Not sure if it's a liability issue or full-employment measure for the "well-trained" workforce (*ahem*). Almost as dumb as a Californian ban on smoking in bars...(don't get me wrong: I enjoy not being around cigarettes at restaurants but I can't imagine a bar without putrid smoke -- and how are mother's to know their sons/daughters are bar hopping without the olfactory evidence on the morning wash?)

    BTW, why does a non-event like a tiny earthrumble in SF get a frontpage story when the South Orange County fire, a mile from my house, gets no mention? Do you realize the wealth concentrated in the 5 miles surrounding this fire? There are a few areas within CA that are home to the wealth-generators making California one of the world's great economies...South Orange County has to be considered one of these areas. Yes, parts of SF area are also in this category. Perhaps SF/LA/OC news events should receive greater attention on /., considering the impact such events can have on the world of technology...and pr0n, of course. Am I rambling? There is a little bird at my window... "Hi, little bird. Join me for breakfast? I'm having an omelette. Oops."

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  222. I'm getting impatient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A measely 5.2 is all you got today? Hurry up and fall in the ocean dammit!


  223. Its all relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took my wife (California native) to see my family in Wisconsin. She was in Santa Cruz for Loma Prieta, and saw cars bouncing in the air, wires snapping, the whole earthquake horror show. She says it was no big deal.

    Driving from Milwaukee we had some impressive lightning with a little bit of rain, but not much by Midwest standards. This freaked her out, the way the bolts lit up the sky and looked like they were hitting the Earth. I wonder what she would do if hit by a real Midwest storm, 80 MPH winds, buckets of rain and thunder that you can feel in your bones.

    Every place has its disasters, and the locals are generally non chalant about them. I still expect now that all my relatives back East joke about earthquakes all the time that we'll get another New Madrid quake.

  224. The Onion by brer_rabbit · · Score: 2

    I prefer The Onion's headline for the 1906 SF earthquake:
    Earth-Quake Marks Least Gay Day In San Francisco History

  225. Interesting quake facts - personal observations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting things that happen during a quake:

    - Power tranformers short out. Makes really neat blue-green flashes off in the distance

    - Car alarms go off all at once.

    - The quake itself is very loud, like a freight train rumbling right by

    - All the lights go out (except emergency lighting). Gets very dark all the sudden at 4AM

    - The air is very dusty. Think of a quake as like shaking a rug. In the San Fernando Valley, they actually had folks with respiratory infections after the 1994 quake, due to fungus spores that were scattered about by the action.

    My version of the Richter scale:
    - 4.0 : Cable TV out
    - 5.0 : Telephone out
    - 6.0 : Electricity out

    Never felt anything more than that. I don't think the Nortridge quake quite made a 7.0

  226. Atalantic Ocean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, wrong coast. The Pacific Ocean is on your left.

    1. Re:Atalantic Ocean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, wrong half of the brain. The sense of humor is on your right.

  227. Last "big one" over a decade ago by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    The last earthquake in the Bay Area that did any noticable damage was in 1989, 13 years ago. How long ago did the last major hurricane trash the Eastern Seaboard? How long since the last tornado tore up houses/trailer parks in the midwest? Less than a year in both cases, I'll betcha.

    Actually, earthquakes are nothing -- the real killer in California is floods. Every year, several houses get major flood damage, and it's an unusual year when at least one house isn't destroyed by floods. Earthquakes are just a little harmless fun, normally.

    1. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      You are comparing disasters over a small zone to disasters over a large one, making for an unfair comparasin. You are comparing when the last disaster in JUST the SF bay area was to when the last disaster SOMEWHERE on the eastern seaboard, or SOMEWHERE in the midwest was. That's like trying to claim it's common to win the lottery because *someone* did it *somewhere*.

      Randomly pick a small zone the size of the SF bay area and compare with that. Then you will get more comparable figures. Tornadoes sweep through the Midwest all the time, but they are very small in area covered compared to an earthquake. The likelyhood that some town will lose, say, 20 houses to a tornado strike somewhere is high. The likelyhood that it will be the specific town you live in is very low. I've watched tornadoes. I've been camping outside when one went by about a mile away that I could see. (that was exciting but scary. If the wind changed direction I could have been deeply screwed. There was nowhere good to go.) But because they cover such a tiny area, I can witness one live and not actually be in it. The same isn't true of an earthquake.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    2. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      I've lived in the bay area for nearly 40 years, and in that time, I've never even met someone who has suffered in an earthquake. Loma Prieta in '89, which did a fair amount of damage (for an earthquake) knocked a couple of books off my bookshelf. And I was living less than two miles from the Cypress Freeway in Oakland, which collapsed. There were maybe a dozen earthquakes on the US west coast in the twentieth century that did enough damage to mention. Most of the damage, even in the worst ones, has come from secondary effects like fires.

      The funny thing is that even though I live on the west coast, I know more people who have been directly affected by tornadoes! (My family is from the midwest originally.)

      Actually, snow is the real killer in the midwest, just as floods are the real killer on the west coast. Earthquakes and tornadoes are more photogenic, but probably really shouldn't be a source of worry to anyone living in "danger zones". Lightning is probably more of a threat whereever you live. :)

    3. Re:Last "big one" over a decade ago by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      I've lived in the bay area for nearly 40 years, and in that time, I've never even met someone who has suffered in an earthquake.

      And I can say the same thing of tonadoes and snow and floods here in the midwest. Just like most people who witness an earthquake aren't hurt by it, most who witness bad weather aren't hurt by it. The reports you see on TV of a bit swath of damage by a tornado are the excpetion. Pick a random path of a few miles in the midwest and you are more likely to find grass and trees and feilds than houses - so most tornados don't damage people's homes. And even the few that do don't often kill many people. (There's a reason people in the Midwest tend to build houses with basements.) The only major damaging tornado I can recall in the area was back in, I think 1985 in the town of Barneveld, WI (and since that was over 150 miles from home, it only barely fits the criteria of "in the area".) That one was pretty bad - wiped out about every building in town (which was only about 120 buildings, since it was a small town, but still that's a lot of property damage all at once), But since I don't know anyone from the area, it still fits the criteria of "nobody I met has suffered" from a tornado, if you want to compare apples to apples with your disaster comparasins.

      And "deaths" from snow are actually deaths from auto accidents while the snow made the roads slippery. (Hardly anyone dies anymore from being "caught out" in the cold of a blizzard.) How many people die on California's congested freeways? I'll take a blizzard in traffic with Wisconsin drivers who know how to drive in it any day over trying to drive on roads with way more traffic than they were ever built to handle.

      (Interesting anecdote. I was visiting Louisville Kentucky on a business trip once when they had an uncharacteristic 4-inch snowfall, for which they weren't prepared. The city doesn't keep many snowplow trucks on hand since it rarely snows. I was driving in my rental car (A corsica, not a good snow car due to low ground clearance) down the freeway in the 4-inch snow at about 35 miles per hour, which I considered a prudently cautious speed given that the snow was unplowed (otherwise I would have been going faster). There was one lone snowplow out on the freeway, moving along at about 25 miles per hour. All the locals were lined up in a slow procession behind the lone snowplow. I passed the snowplow in an unplowed lane. In my cheapo rental car. The people must have thought I was nuts. I got pulled over later by a cop for driving "too fast for conditions" (I was 30 mph UNDER the speed limit, but he considered the snow to be that much of a problem). I tried explaining how a 4-inch snowfall isn't really that bad if you are used to it. You just have to look really far ahead on the road and start reacting to things you see long before you reach them. It's no different from what a semi-truck driver has to do every day. The big problem is visibility. If it's foggy or still snowing, then you have to slow down because you need to be sure your stopping distance doesn't exceed your visibility range. I said I could see plenty far ahead to stop at 35 mph. The only reason I wasn't going any faster was that the car didn't have good enough traction to accellerate more than that. I didn't dare go slower because then the car with low clearance could get stuck.

      He saw my WI driver's license, and decided not to give me a ticket, but he give me a warning and force me to go into the line of slow shmucks behind the lone snowplow. I understood what road rage meant as I was forced to sit in line behind a snowplow driver who didn't know he could go a lot faster and still be safe.

      The only trick to snow driving is to just remember that since all delta-V is effected through the friction between the tires and the road, when you have less friction, you can't effect as much delta-V. And that that applies to all directions, accellerating, decellerating, and changing your momentum vector direction (turning). Also an understanding that it is better to line up the accelleration vector with the orientation of the wheels than have it be sideways to the wheels helps. That's why you have more control when you slow down a lot before the turn and accellerate back up to speed during the turn than when you try to slow down some and then turn at a constant speed. Accellerating during the turn changes the direction of the vector so that it is closer to the way the wheels are pointed, instead of being sideways to them. Hitting the brakes while turning is actually worse than trying to turn without slowing down, since it makes the vector be perpendicular to the angled front wheels. (It's the same thing race car drivers do, but it also applies in any situation where you barely have enough friction to effect the turn). Just look a lot farther ahead on the road and remember not to make quick jerky motions (which are an attempt to do too much delta-V in one instant) and snow driving is just fine. People die driving in snow because they don't know how. Almost everyone gets into some very minor 5-10 mph fender-bender accident at some point early in their snow-driving experience and then after that they "get it" and deal with it just fine.

      And as for floods, they are sometimes quite prevelent in the midwest (remember when the mississippi river flooded?) but around here in Wisconsin they aren't a big deal. We aren't as flat as most of the midwest, so the river valleys (which are of course the lowest spots there area) can hold a lot more water before it breaks out. Plus the ground tends to be able to sponge up a lot of water.

      Also, with floods, there's no surprise about where one will strike. I have no sympathy for those who lost their homes in the Mississippi flooding that one year. None whatsoever. They were told they were building their homes in a flood plain. The geologists knew the river tends to have a major flood once every fifty years or so, and told people. I don't think the government should have bailed them out with FEMA funds. They lived there because the soil was soo rich (gee, I wonder why that is, duh), when they could have put their house a few miles away from the plot of land they farm and travelled to it only when working it, but NOOO that would have made too much sense.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  228. OT: Re:5.2 is not so scary by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

    Hey, waitaminute...'termchimp' nick, 'my spoon is too big' sig...you wouldn't happen to be an HP engineer, would you?

    --


    But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    1. Re:OT: Re:5.2 is not so scary by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      My spoon is too big!

      I'm a banana!

      It's from an animated short called "Rejected" from last year's Spike and Mike, which, unfortunately, wasn't out on the last [insert video format here] last time I checked.

      (anyway...) This got coverage, and the shaker we got in southern California a couple months ago... nothing. Not that I have anything against northern California, I used to live/work/eat/breathe/sleep there before the dot-bust. My last gig before layoffs was in Morgan Hill, right above Gilroy, oddly enough.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    2. Re:OT: Re:5.2 is not so scary by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Heh...yeah, I knew all of that - and you might want to check out the Bitter Films webpage, because you can, in fact, buy the 'Rejected' short on DVD. My friend has a copy, and also likes chimpanzees, and also occasionally reads /., which is why I posted: I think the parent post of my original post (confused? I am! :) is actually my 'Rejected'-fan, chimp-loving friend, who also coincidentally works for HP. Sorry about the confusion!

      And it's odd how certain natural disasters get coverage, while others go unmentioned. I had to say that, just to keep this somewhat on topic. :) Thanks for the info, though!

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
  229. I Thought it was a ploy... by questforme · · Score: 1

    To disrupt the Avs, some fans will do anything to win.

  230. There was a 5.2 in Quebec, Canada, 2 weeks ago by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

    In my hometown of Lennoxville/Huntingville. Why wasn't that on Slashdot? Why is this on Slashdot?

    sigh

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  231. IT WAS RAINING LIKE HELL IN HAWAII (esp Kauai) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from a "vacation" in hawaii and it was in fact raining like hell. I did not feel the earthquake (I might not anyway - 5.2 isn't that big) here in the bay area.

    So, yes, lets report on rain in Hawaii. Its very important

  232. Re:Story Time Watching Spiderman Movie by voxel · · Score: 1

    I was sitting in the theater last night watching Spider Man for the first time with my girlfriend. It was a quiet scene, nothing going on but dialog when all the sudden the theater started shaking. (AMC 20 by Great America in San Jose).

    At first I was like damn, NICE BASS!!! Then I was like wait a minute, nothing is happening in the movie.

    My next instinct was thinking "oooh shit a tornado is outside!" I am from Michigan, so thats why that makes sense. Then I thought wait a minute, I am in a concrete building reinforced with steel and it was not raining outside 30 minutes ago.

    Then I realized what was going on and everyone in the theater was freaking out. A few people left.

    The guy next to me nervously said "hey man.... was that an earthquake?". I wanted to say something smart assed like no, I just ripped a big one... but nothing came to me fast enough :P

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  233. Re:[Oh, just a 5.2?] Oregonian woosies by gotih · · Score: 1

    where's the news? the fire didn't get to any of the houses and nobody died. except for the huge amount of smoke there was nothing to see. the enormous fire (bigger than this OC fire) in the angles national forest north of LA is far bigger news.

    There are a few areas within CA that are home to the wealth-generators making California one of the world's great economies.

    and i have to take issue with your assertion that these people who have so much money (and almost lost a little due to natural disaster) deserve news coverage. I am working in the office (in foot hill ranch) of one of those 'wealth-generators' please do not mistake personal gain for wealth generation -- they are making millions by selling made-in-sweatshop-crap that people don't really need at prices 10 times what they paid for it. the wealth generators are those who made the product and get fucked up the ass every time they get paid (way less than minimum wage for an american and barely living wage in thier own country).

    --

    fear is the mind killer
  234. Cursed quake mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only id software/Activision would make Quake 5...

  235. Re:Yup, I felt it too - whatever, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sure thing Nostradamus. Tell me the lotto number or something useful. YOU fucking fool. Try selling that line of shit to the USGS.

    ASS. F.O.&D.
  236. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by heybrakywacky · · Score: 1

    Given the timing, I think I must have been in the shower, or on my way to it. It was either that, or sitting on the couch watching the Sharks game. I'm in Cupertino, and didn't feel anything. The strange thing is, my girlfriend lives less than a mile from me, and she felt it.

    I know this is going to sound kooky, but I feel disappointed that I didn't experience it.

    Oh, and I'm originally from the midwest, and tornadoes frighten and intrigue me about the same as I figure earthquakes would, if I could ever feel one! I know, that's the wrong thing to go wishing for, so I won't. ;-)

    --
    I'm sorry sandwich! --Brak
  237. Re:Yup, I felt it too - Editor in Chief ?????????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the Editor in Chief?

    You are the worst English speaker. How the hell did you get editor title? Letting a gay man rape your man-like hairy ass and he was also the boss or something?

    You are a dog. You are a cunt and a bitch. I hate you, Loli slut.

    I had to read up on you. You are a poser, a loser and a liar, a doppelganger, a fucking ridiculous person full of conjecture.

    You are also a fat pig, and are of low intelligence. I laugh at you.

    You pretend to be useful, smart attractive and interesting. You are none of these. Fucking die, please?

  238. Re:Taken from OS News posting by Eugenia 03/04/200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because let me tell you something. I haven't got a single dime for **ANY** of my work on OSNews. I do not even
    control the money of the ads. I do not own OSNews. I do OSNews reporting and work for fun. But it ain't fun anymore.


    That says it right there, stupid. I haven't got a single dime for any of my work on OSNews.

    You are an idiot, Loli. No one would actually pay you for your work because you are worth nothing.

    Baxter Meowmix.
  239. 50 miles away - and some crack by theirpuppet · · Score: 1
    I live about 50 miles or so (driving distance) from Gilroy. We felt it pretty damn good.


    I was about to get undressed for bed, and all of a sudden it felt like some heavy person was running around (I'm on the third floor of a crappy apartment complex). We (my wife and I) soon realized it was something else, an earthquake. It felt like a very stiff vertical shaking.


    I have a co-worker who lives in Gilroy, he was less than a few miles from the epicenter. He and his wife felt it big time. They also got no sleep because of the after shocks.


    Those in the Bay area who didn't feel it either smoke crack or, like my friend, were driving down the highway (one that's got enough dips in it that your car bounces around anyway) at some ungodly speed. To be felt so strongly 50 miles away, you had to feel it much closer.


    Also, I read that there was a game in San Jose, which continued uninterrupted. You gotta wonder, sports are more important than your own life, and living in California with so many quakes that you don't get concerned unless your home/building falls down. My co-worker had pictures flying off the wall, shelves flapping around like crazy..


    It's insane, and quite scary. You can't imagine what it's like until you've experienced one. And then you can't anticipate either, because they're not exactly the same each time, some are rollers some are shakers and I'm sure some just go psycho.

  240. I did feel the earthquake in SF but... by Cold_Fusion09 · · Score: 1

    ... I was to damn busy watching the Sharks games! (Which they lost.. At that point i wished it was a 7.0 earthquake so they would have stop the game)

    --
    I am Pakistani And No! I do not own a 7/11! And my NAME is not Apu! --Zuhaib
  241. Re:pantyliner's post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/09/20/2192 08 &mode=thread

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/10/18/2314 24 3&mode=thread

  242. Epicenter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There was a 5.2 Earthquake in Gilroy, CA, 70 miles south of San Francisco. The epicenter was 4.7 miles below surface


    The quake was 4.7 miles below the surface. The epicenter was in Gilroy. The prefix epi means above, thus the epicenter is the point on the earths surface that is above the quake.
  243. At the game by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

    I was next to the ESPN camera at the Sharks game. The camera guy was looking at his rig like something funny was going on. Having a lens zoomed in on the play really exacerbates the real movement of the quake. They had just dropped the puck in the CO end when it hit. No one on the ice seemed to notice. Good thing it wasn't a big one or it might have taken a light fixture falling on the ice for them to notice!
    Maybe the coolest thing was the cop behind me getting the magnitude over his radio in less than a minute. Guess the cops out here are tied pretty closely with USGS. The worst part of the evening (besides the SHarks losing) was that the nearest beer cart to my seat was selling only labatt's.

    --


    _damnit_

    It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  244. Re:[Oh, just a 5.2?] Oregonian woosies by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    with your assertion that these people who have so much money (and almost lost a little due to natural disaster) deserve news coverage. I am working in the office (in foot hill ranch) of one of those 'wealth-generators' please do not mistake personal gain for wealth generation -- they are making millions by selling made-in-sweatshop-crap that people don't really need at prices 10 times what they paid for it. the wealth generators are those who made the product and get fucked up the ass every time they get paid (way less than minimum wage for an american and barely living wage in thier own country).

    Why would you work for such a sleaze? I blame you for enabling the scum.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  245. That wasn't an Earthquake... by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    It was my McCauley http://www.mccauley.com

    Their speakers Rock, I was listening to Linkin Park, and I accidently turned the volume up to 11.

    Sorry it won't happen again.. 8')

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  246. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like to think about it this way, since i grew up with tornadoes (and this was also my first really noticeable quake): you can get away from a tornado, you've got plenty of warning most of the time, and you can see them coming. good luck doing that with an earthquake.

  247. Re::-) perfect for an earthquake virgin like me :- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The strange thing is, my girlfriend lives less than a mile from me, and she felt it.

    The Richter scale is a measure of the energy released by the earthquake. It's a single number (when sufficiently refined) for any given earthquake. The Modified Mercalli Scale, OTOH, measures the intensity as recorded at various places. For any location, (related to a given quake) it will vary by distance from epicenter, topography, substrate (bedrock, fill, alluvial fill, San Francisco bay mud, etc.), refraction effects and many other factors. Usually it's some time after a quake before enough local reports are gathered to begin mapping according to the scale. In the end, it looks like a quilt with the intensity zones (numbered I to VII, IIRC) being continuous in places and isolated in other places. Kind of like the way the intensity of thunder varies depending on whether you're line of sight (OK, hearing), other side of the hill, in a valley, etc.

  248. Re:No big deal on peninsula, but fun all the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I really remember about that one is that I heard it coming a second or so before it hit.

    Did you start meowing and running in circles?

  249. My GF's plane landed in SF5mins before the quake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess she meant it when she said she was going to shake up the town!

  250. Re:Yup, I felt it too HI FATTY ELQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name: Eugenia Loli-Queru
    Title: Editor-in-Chief
    Email: eugenia@osnews.com
    Personal website: http://www.eugenia.co.uk/
    Birthday: 24th May, 1973
    Current residence: Foster City (San Francisco Bay Area), CA, USA
    Short biography: I worked for 2 years at BeNews, serving the BeOS and its community, and before that I was contributing as a news editor for a well known Gaming news site for about 8 months and I also co-held a fan site (LandOfEden) in the early development days of Lionhead's Black'n'White. For more information about me, you can always check my homepage.
    I am Greek and english is not my native language. We do OSNews for fun (however, OSNews takes most of my time every day), so if you have a problem with my spelling and grammar either a) do not come back (spare us and save your time too) b) send me a proofread version of the article in question.
    Whining about something I can't radically improve overnight, is not an option.


    You are fat. You are stupid. You smell like a Greek pig. Your english is admittedly crappy. You are a stupid foul person. BeOS is dead. You picked a loser OS, figures as much. Fuck you for that.

    OSNews being done for fun doesn't make it suck less. Linux is for Fun, and its good. Don't do shit, fun or not, if its going to SUCK, you fucker.

    You told me not to come back to OSNews, I sure as fuck wont. IT sucks. You suck. Your writing sucks. Go abck to greasy greece. Dog.

  251. Re:Yup, I felt it too SPEECH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speech is spelled wrong in your sig.

  252. Holy anus of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredible, you're a limitless source to your own discredit! Speaking of rambling, check out your final sentence. It's completely botched, unintelligable and of no apparent relevance to your previous sentences. I find it highly amusing that you bothered to use italics while not bothering to proofread it! pls fix, thx, moron!

  253. Is this related to the article on strangelets... by aikido_kit · · Score: 1

    Since a quake just hit Taiwan, about 24 hours later, measuring 6.2? Go figure, two slashdot articles tied together...

  254. Completely OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We are all Palestinian
    How can we "all" be Palestinian if I personally don't go around blowing up school buses full of small children and then whining when I get shot? Just a thought.
  255. Re:[Oh, just a 5.2?] Oregonian woosies by gotih · · Score: 1

    (kind of late reply)

    i rarely do work for them anymore -- nothing more than the occasional db backup. no development. the company i work for develops software for clients, they are a client and we happen to work in the same building. when i started extending thier inventory software i didn't know what the business model was -- just that they had lots of inventory and needed to know where it was. I think you will find that this is not an uncommon business model.

    anyways, i am trying to find another job but i'm not having luck -- after this i don't want to work for any company whose business i disagree with. that eliminates most prospective employers. my debts will be paid off soon and then i'll jettison this job for almost anything. as long as i agree with the business practices.

    --

    fear is the mind killer
  256. Re:[Oh, just a 5.2?] Oregonian woosies by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    What do you do? Drop me an email.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  257. Looks like it was only a 4.9 by minesweeper · · Score: 1
    They've since downgraded the quake to a 4.9. Here's the report.

    It wasn't too much to get excited about. I'm in Berkeley, and my monitor jiggled side-to-side a bit, but that was it.