Slashdot Mirror


New Microsoft Mouse Scrolls Both Ways

Library Spoff writes "The BBC are reporting that Microsoft are bringing out a mouse that will use the scroll wheel to tilt as well as roll. The innovation means that users will be able to scroll vertically as well as horizontally without using on-screen navigation bars." How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

736 comments

  1. Apple had a similar idea! by avij · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't this pretty much the same idea that Apple had some time ago?

    --

    Follow your Euro bills at EBT
    1. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by aerojad · · Score: 1

      Aren't lots of PC innovations? :)

      --

      SecondPageMedia - Wha
    2. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by dema · · Score: 0, Troll

      No.

    3. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Vexalith · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, you mean Microsoft copied something from Apple? This is news... how?

      Am I the only one who uses a repeated backward "flick" of the finger to get through a document really quickly? If the wheel didn't have any resistance it wouldn't stop, and wouldn't be to useful.

    4. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by saskwach · · Score: 5, Informative

      IBM had this before Apple, my roommate's IBM Athlon 800 (800MHz was a new thing to Athlons when he bought it) came with one of these things.

    5. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by mattgarnsey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      woah woah woah...

      do you mean to tell me that apple has ideas and microsoft would just take them for use in microsoft products?

    6. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny
      Bungi's Mac Theory #19:
      When discussing GUI innovation, the probability that someone will say "Apple already did that" approaches infinity faster than you can say "Xerox".
    7. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by *weasel · · Score: 1, Funny

      "simpsons did it!"

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    8. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by aled · · Score: 1

      Well... NO.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    9. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      Maybe Homer's CompuGlobalHyperMeganet would have come up with this if Gate hadn't bought him out. Damn you, Bill Gates!

      Homer: "I reluctantly accept your proposal."
      Gates: "Alright boys. Buy him out!"

    10. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by antis0c · · Score: 1, Funny

      Haha what? You mean apple made an innovation to a mouse? Next to the single button whats next, the single button keyboard? I sure hope its the ESC key.

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    11. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by esnible · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM's trackpoint mouse does this and has been shipping for several years.

      http://www.pc.ibm.com/ww/healthycomputing/indev.ht ml

      I have both IBM and Microsoft mice, and I prefer the scroll wheel. It requires less effort to go really fast for short distances.

      Internet Explorer (5.5) supports horizontal scrolling with the trackpoint on the mouse, but Mozilla (1.4) does not.

    12. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry fellow troll, but that link doesn't work.

      besides, 85% of slashdot is running windows, you're targeting the wrong population over here.

    13. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, there are probabilities that are larger than 1? :)

      --

      --
      If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
    14. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Did you even look at the link?

      "....vertically, and tilted side to side for horizontal scrolling."

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I suck at teh maths =)

    16. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by li99sh79 · · Score: 1

      Haha what? You mean apple made an innovation to a mouse? Next to the single button whats next, the single button keyboard? I sure hope its the ESC key. No, it's the "Any" key. -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    17. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah - up/down & right/left are nice, but I'll be impressed when a mouse allows me to scroll into/out of the monitor. Now that would be something...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    18. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You can still approach infinity without going past 1.

      Why not. If you go from 0.1 to 0.2, you're approaching infinity as opposed to approaching 0.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    19. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      IBM's trackpoint mouse does this and has been shipping for several years.

      From the linked page: The mouse, introduced in 1984, ...

      What happened in 1984 that qualifies as the "introduction" of the mouse? Surely not the Mac, preceded by the Lisa and Xerox. Or did IBM adopt mice in 1984 (seems a bit early) and erase prior history?

    20. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Xerox? Apple already did that.

      --

      mbbac

    21. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Corollary 19.1:

      Once someone says "Apple already did that," the probability of another smartass stepping in and saying "Xerox did it before Apple" is also 1.

    22. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by hpavc · · Score: 1

      just like my labtec spaceball for my sgi, wait no this windows thing doesnt do z axis and its still a crappy mouse.

      http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF -8 &oe=UTF-8&q=labtec+spaceball&sa=N&tab= wi

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    23. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Cutriss · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Excel sports this functionality with a scroll wheel. Scrolling the wheel zooms you in and out of the spreadsheet, which helps you get to particular cells very quickly.

      Valve's Hammer Editor does the same thing. I used this extensively, as it was almost the only way to navigate levels efficiently.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    24. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Tmack · · Score: 1
      Similar to the Zoom function in Opera? Hold ctl while moving the wheel, it zooms!

      TM

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    25. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by CrowScape · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's still a "No". Basically it sounds like the Apple patent would have had a disc laid flat along the xy plane, and so would have been exactly like putting the four arrow buttons on the mouse. Microsoft takes the scroll wheel (which is along the yz plane) and gives it lateral movement. The functions of the two systems are the same, but the interface is different. Besides, at least Microsoft will actually MAKE the damn things, meanwhile Apple has yet to produce a mouse that does what's in its patent.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    26. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd love a 3D desktop where I can really layer windows and navigate the space to hide/reveal objects.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    27. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only did Apple and IBM have this feature, even the MS scroll mouse has had this for severall years, just push the scroll wheel down and you can scroll in any direction by moving the mouse.

    28. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCO - We did it firster! Times infinity!

    29. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      hold control with the scrol wheel in mozilla firebird and it changes the size of the text, it's kinda like zooming in and out.

    30. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by dioxide · · Score: 1

      we're obviously ignoring the fact that you cannot approach infinity.

      thanks for playing.

    31. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by prator · · Score: 1

      I've got one of the basic Logitech optical mice, and the sound from scrolling the wheel was starting to drive me crazy. I pulled out the spring that causes the wheel resistance. It takes a little getting used to, but I can live with it for a silent wheel.

      -prator

    32. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the thumb killing controller from the old Intellivision console game system. Looks pretty, but doesn't seem as great after about 30 minutes of use.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    33. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...I'll be impressed when a mouse allows me to scroll into/out of the monitor.

      What, exactly, would you hope to simulate with this mouse? Also, you are aware that the images displayed on the monitor are not real, right?

    34. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by jaypatrick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their one button mouse still trips me up, how in the world am i supposed to learn how to horizontal scroll? :-)

      --
      what's a sig?
    35. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > we're obviously ignoring the fact that you cannot approach infinity.

      You haven't taken Calculus yet, have you?

      >thanks for playing

      Come back after you graduate high school.

    36. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by slimak · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that you are looking for converges to rather than approaches. Things that "approach" infinity are divergent.

    37. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      presumably if they remove the stepping of the scroll wheel they will also make it acceleration-sensing like the mouse itself, so a hard flick will send you zooming through the document.

    38. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the free spinning wheel - if they remove the clicky feedback from the scroll wheel that is going to SUCK.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    39. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

      "I'll be impressed when a mouse allows me to scroll into/out of the monitor"

      One of the only things about the game Black & White that impressed me was the ability to zoom in and out of the 3d environment using the scroll wheel on your mouse. Granted I'm not a gamer.

      I remember thinking during the brief two weeks when I was playing B&W that the paradigm would be great for information navagation... a la Apple's project x of 1995...

    40. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant the odds, which are p/(1-p). That would approach infinity as p->1. Yeah, I'm sure that's what he really meant. :)

      Cheers,
      IT

      --

      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

    41. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you normalize at greater than 1

    42. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by iocat · · Score: 1
      Actually the one button mouse was a kind of "innovation" since Xerox's crazy three button mouse too hard for "the rest of us" to figure out, Apple "innovated" by removing two buttons, making the GUI accessable to millions world-wide.

      Not moving to multi-buttons mice with scroll-wheels is just being stubborn at this point, though...

      By the way, am I the only one who realizes you can already scroll horiontally with a scroll wheel by clicking it down and moving your mouse?

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    43. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of something different.

      IBM had two different mice that allowed side-scrolling: One had a little pointing stick that was pretty much identical to the sticks found on Thinkpads. They came with AS/400s, I remember, and they were horrible.

      The second type IBM offered was actually a second, horizontal wheel. It sat below the normal vertical wheel. This one also sucked.

      MS's mouse is a different approach, if I read the article correctly. It is one vertically-oriented wheel, but it also pivots side-to-side. It sounds like it's similar to the IBM 'stick' mouse in how it goes horizontal, but is very different in overall design.

      Regardless of my disdain for Microsoft, they do make good hardware. I swear by MS mice and keyboards. Too bad the bastards decided to change the arrow key layout on me. I refuse to use that new layout.

    44. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      humor ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hymr) n.

      1. The quality that makes something laughable or amusing; funniness: could not see the humor of the situation.
      2. That which is intended to induce laughter or amusement: a writer skilled at crafting humor.
      3. The ability to perceive, enjoy, or express what is amusing, comical, incongruous, or absurd. See Synonyms at wit1.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    45. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by miyako · · Score: 1

      this also works in Opera, however opera also scales the images, so you really are zooming in and out.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    46. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by saintan · · Score: 1

      well then check this out... http://www.opencroquet.org/

      --
      ****--- A fortune cookie once told me the meaning of life...so I ate it. ---****
    47. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Intellivision or Coliecocvision (sp?) I remember one of those old consoles had a controller that was kinda shaped like a tv remote. Man, now that thing was hard on the hands....

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    48. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      AFAIK that's only on Windows in IE/Mozilla Firebird/Excel/Word/Some Other Apps - e.g. no X, no Moz users.

    49. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its just because apple has focused on new ideas for most of their time in business. They might of done it faster but sure as hell didnt do it any better.

    50. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Isn't this pretty much the same idea that Apple had some time ago?

      Not really. Sounds like that patent is for the iPod shuttle control to me.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    51. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by ball-lightning · · Score: 1

      I've personally used mice like this -- that have no feedback. When I use a mouse without the feedback I usually think one thing, "cheap".

      On another note, I am not sure exactly how good this system will be. While it sounds cool, it also seems to me that after a while, it would definitely start hurting your finger

    52. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      I had a generic mouse over 5 years ago that did this and much more, this isn't news at all...

    53. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logitech has already done this. I've only seen
      their mouse configuration software for Mac OS X,
      however. I'm assuming they have the same thing
      for Windows.

    54. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by MicroBerto · · Score: 1

      You must suck at 'teh' keyboards too :)

      --
      Berto
    55. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by -padre- · · Score: 0

      guess they didnt get that patent, huh?

      --
      "hey man got a light?"
    56. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm living in a cave near the two oaks... what's yours :)?

    57. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No to be cynical, but wasn't Apple the company with only one mouse button as the standard for years and years? Real shocker that their mouse ideas never took off ;-)

    58. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Slur · · Score: 1

      Wow, a tilting disc! Isn't that exactly what the IntelliVision had?

      Currently, on Mac OS X to scroll horizontally rather than vertically you just press SHIFT while using the scroll-wheel.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    59. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by md65536 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, myself and everyone around the office have a bad habit of repeatedly flicking to navigate a document that's too long.

      Flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick.

      With less resistance you could spin the wheel (at whatever speed you want, for whatever duration you want), and then brake the wheel with your finger. I think it would be pretty useful once you got used to it?

    60. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM also does this on their Netvista mice, but instead of a scroll wheel, it's a grooved finger pad that you brush in any direction to induce up/down or side/side scrolling.

    61. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Logitech mice scroll wheel doesn't feel as nice as the MS one to me. I used to love the Logitech mice back in the 2-3 button mice, especially the 'big-foot' one.

    62. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      The intellivision had a disk, and the coleco vision had a little joystick thing. They both had a number pad above that i think. My uncle had the colecovision, and it was much easier on the thumbs than our intellivision.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    63. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by agallagh42 · · Score: 1
      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    64. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just redirect them to "c:\aux", it'll kill explorer in all windows versions.

    65. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1

      Wait for the next version of OS X, and you'll be pretty damn close...

    66. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      we're obviously ignoring the fact that you cannot approach infinity.

      Not even if you sneak up on her, real quiet like, and just taps her shoulder when she's not looking?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    67. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by tequesta · · Score: 1

      The Logitech trackballs used to have this too; you just pressed a button and the trackball became a 2D scroll ball. I always thought this was extremely nifty.

    68. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by aerique · · Score: 1
      I'm shooting a milky-way into my shorts right now[1]. Goddamn, those controllers look hot!

      [1] with credits to Mister Bill Hicks. America's greatest comedian. Remember him!

    69. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by wdebruij · · Score: 1

      Peripheral rival Logitech said that it had no plans to introduce a competing mouse that adds horizontal scrolling.

      I am actually using a Logitech Trackman Marble FX trackball that doubles as a 2d scrollweel. Unfortunately the nice people at logitech stopped making these things.

      oh, and I never got the scrolling to work in Linux, nor Mozilla under windows. Logitech also doesn't do Linux it seems.

    70. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

      they have different physical interpretations to ordinary 0,1 bounded probabilities though.

    71. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      FYI: In Konqueror, it's shift+wheel for zooming. Wheel down to zoom in, wheel up to zoom out. Not very smooth, but it works.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    72. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      This seems like a good place to give feedback to their claims.
      • The tiled + scaled down windows command (F9) is pretty cool. I think this can be applied to the age-old concept of virtual desktops (which I use extensively) in an interesting way. When looking at one virtual desktop, hit a key to zoom out to a display of some or all of your virtual desktops on a single screen, each one scaled down and arranged neatly in a grid. Then you can pick another virtual desktop and zoom back in, or maybe even work in one with the others still in view (like the split view functions of many editors, such as Emacs).
      • The fade non-app windows into the background command (F10) looks pretty useless. That's what virtual desktops are for. I don't think Apple has yet caught onto this one. Maybe it's too complex for average users to handle, in their estimation.
      • The hide all windows command (F11) is a cheap rip-off. It's been in Microsoft Windows since Windows 95! (That also has an undo minimize all command, so you can get back your previous display.) Again, this command is of highly questionable utility in the face of virtual desktops, where you just switch to an empty / new virtual desktop if you need a clear screen.

      Since I mention window-arrangement features of Windows, I should also mention that an apparently little-known product called Norton Navigator gave virtual desktops to Windows users. LiteStep did the same.

      Finally, I feel the need to mention that, in my experience, I have seen many virtual desktop systems, but the need to use a mouse to switch between them is often cumbersome. I presently use KDE, where I have bound combinations of the meta key and various other keys to do virtual desktop and window manipulation commands. The simplest of these is M-1, M-2, and so on, which quickly switch virtual desktops. More complex commands include M-s 1, M-s 2, etc, to send the focused window to the given virtual desktop. This configuration has proven to be extremely effective, even when my hand is on the mouse -- I can quickly switch desktops with my left hand on the keyboard, while my right hand is on the mouse and ready to make whatever mouse movements are needed as soon as the selected virtual desktop is displayed. This allows for a great deal of agility in the use of virtual desktops, and is a configuration I highly recommend to others.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    73. Re:Apple had a similar idea! by mink · · Score: 1

      If anyone has a history eraser button it's IBM.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. /. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From Jakob Nielsen's Top Ten Web-Design Mistakes 2002:

    3. Horizontal Scrolling

    Users hate scrolling left to right. Vertical scrolling seems to be okay, maybe because it's much more common.
    Web pages that require horizontal scrolling in standard-sized windows, such as 800x600 pixels, are particularly annoying. For some reason, many websites seem to be optimized for 805-pixel-wide browser windows, even though this resolution is pretty rare and the extra five pixels offer little relative to the annoyance of horizontal scrolling (and the space consumed by the horizontal scrollbar).

    So now why do I want this mouse?

    John.

    1. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by mikewolf · · Score: 0

      because microsoft is so innovative??

      pr0n?

    2. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by jason.hall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At first I thought as you do, but then I started thinking of wide spreadsheets where this mouse would be QUITE handy.

    3. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You want it so you can easily deal with all the jerks that don't make their webpages to size.

      Also, spreadsheets often require a lot of left/right scrolling, and if you work with them a lot this will be a big improvement. If its as easy as the mousewheel to use, I'm all for it.

      Don't hate it just because its from Microsoft. Evaluate the technology for what it is.

    4. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see this as a tool for scrolling left in web pages, but rather very handy when working with image manipulation software.

      Its definetly not a radical innovation, but it would ne a nice feature to have every once in a while.

      Also, I bet it could come in handy in games, particularly the more recent fps games, where there is more than just fire and jump to have to worry about.

    5. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by neglige · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So now why do I want this mouse?

      I asked myself the same thing a few years back when the mouse wheel was up'n'coming. Can't live without it now...

      But I guess it is easier for the finger to stretch forward and backward, rolling the wheel up and down than to move sideways. Perhaps strained pointing fingers will be the next sign for exessive computer usage (OT: I managed to hurt my hand with an old Atari 2600 joystick. Don't ask).

      --
      My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    6. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by kmak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right. Horizontal scrolling is horrible and painful...

      with that said, I work at a financial firm where we have two-three LCD's per user, and even then, sometimes, data that generates to an excel spreadsheet takes up more horizontal space than that, and requires that kind of scrolling..

      not saying it'll become a commonplace, but it surely has its applications..

      --

      I'm not the devil.. just his advocate.
    7. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      try tapping down the scroll wheel. you'll get a handy little thing that scrolls in ALL directions.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    8. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by sokeeffe · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want this if you something else other than view web pages.

      Many peoples documents, source code or whatever needs to be scrolled horizontally.

      It might not be all that original but I think it could be very worthwhile.

    9. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by FattMattP · · Score: 1
      So now why do I want this mouse?
      I want it because I do more than read web pages. I could use it for moving around in Visio documents or PDFs of networks or database schemas, Illustrator files, zoomed in Photoshop images, large spreadsheets, large PDFs of maps of the city I live in, etc.

      My Thinkpad has a feature like this where I can hold a button and use the eraser nub that normally controls the pointer to scroll around in any direction.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    10. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Atario · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So now why do I want this mouse?
      Obviously, to make it easier to read poorly-designed websites. Err...

      Seriously, though, (folks,) I do find tend to find it useful for scrolling around wide program listings or for sites whose text column is narrow enough for my browser window, but is merely offset to the right for some vertical navigation bar or advertising column.
      How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?
      I'm surprised it wasn't done years ago. I'm also surprised at the relative failure of the IBM TrackPoint (I think that's what they were called) mice -- a kind of sideways-saddle shaped version of the piezoelectric pencil-eraser-looking mice they like to put in their notebook keyboards, only where the wheel would otherwise be. I have one at work, and it's quite nice. Lots less *roll* *roll* *roll* *roll* when scrolling down a page; just pull it back a little and wait. Or pull it harder and wait less. (Did I just say that?) Anyway, it handles vertical and horizontal scrolling, which I find myself doing much more readily using that mouse. Oh, and there's a small button just past the TrackPoint thingy so you can do the equivalent of wheel-clicks.

      The shame of it is, my company has a lot of these mice around, but no one has the drivers installed, and so the TrackPoint becomes completely useless. *Sigh*
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    11. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      It's august. Besides the daily SCO update, what's going on worth a front page story?

      There's not a lot of tech news going on.

      If you didn't like this story, how many stories have you submitted today?

    12. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Because this mouse lets you deal better with Top Web Design Mistake #3.

      My God, but this troll was done exactly right. Anti-Microsoft, and with an absurdly illogical argument that looks reasonable to any Microsoft hater who only reads it fast. I only hope that you continue on with trolls that attack more interesting subjects like gender politics, race, or modern social ideology.

    13. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by FattMattP · · Score: 1
      try tapping down the scroll wheel. you'll get a handy little thing that scrolls in ALL directions.
      In what software? It didn't do anything in Photoshop.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    14. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      In the gimp, you can hold the middle button (scroll wheel) down to get a 'panning' control. Helps, but a scroll wheel would be nice.

    15. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by margycdb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe the reason this is so annoying is because we now don't have easy horizontal scrolls. If everyone buys one then websites will start being bigger horizontally so you have to scroll and then you will need it, quite likely.

      Wow, the mob mentality for mice.

    16. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by *weasel · · Score: 1

      because using the current clicky-wheel to jump into free scrolling mode is way too complicated for people... apparently.

      the only reasonable use i can conjur would be for designers/editors of large images, who either have to sidescroll great distances, or side scroll back and forth a bit.

      of course now, 'innovative' web designers will start sneaking their fixed height, purely side scroll sites into the world...

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    17. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      In Dia, as well, the side buttons on my MS Optical Intellimouse (which resolve to button events 6 & 7 in X, as per my instructions) scroll the workspace sideways.

      It's *REALLY* fucking useful.

    18. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why you want this mouse?
      Simple. Microsoft also just came out with Flight Simulator 2004 (aka FS9), and this product was really required to be able to fly with a mouse.

      Seriously, now we're only one step away from getting a clit^H^H^H^Htrackpoint on top of the mouse, like on IBM laptops. What's next? A miniature touch pad on each button?

      What I'd like to see is a mouse that's shorter and wider, that you can hold when your hand is half-closed (which is the natural position), with four buttons, one for each primary digit. Tilt your mouse 90 degrees to the left, grab it, and feel what I mean. Not all this wheel stuff and 8 hard-to-reach buttons that you really only press by accident.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    19. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Since a typical monitor can display 200+ characters on a line, I truely hope you don't need to scroll horizontally through source code!

      Source code for every programming language (aside from intentionally difficult ones) is meant as an intermediate representation to a linear list of symbols. linear. One-dimensional.

      Logically, a program is only backwards/forwards. A programmer should always be able to think of navigating through code in this way (or at an even higher level of abstaction, with a fancy IDE).

      I pity anyone who scrolls right to read the end of a long function call, and then back right to see what happens on the next line. (There's also the ROTT against deeply nesting within one function body...)

    20. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by gantrep · · Score: 1

      I tried searching for IBM Trackpoint and I think that that is the pencil-eraser type deal in the middle of laptop keyboards. I prefer those over touchpads. I would love to have a mouse with one of those in place of a scroll wheel, wow! It really is too bad they're not common. I certainly would buy one!

    21. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by pclminion · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You want it so you can easily deal with all the jerks that don't make their webpages to size.

      The only way to "deal" with these people is castration.

    22. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by mce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's not that simple.

      Most languages are written horizontally. If you need to scroll to see the end of a line (be it on the left or the right) and in doing so are no longer able to see the begining of the next line and thus immediately will have to scroll back again, you will in general very quickly decide to go read something else. Also, the fact that normal reading is done "row major" also implies that the brain is a lot more sensitive to its "anchor points" moving about horizontally than vertically, even if the left and right borders constantly remain in full sight.

    23. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      800x600 is a relic of the past. With 1024x768 being the new de-facto minimum, most prominent web design firms are designing for 1024x768 as the MINIMUM.

      This was discussed at length during the recent launch of the new version of 2advanced (warning: slashdot users may absolutely hate flash, but it's their specialty), and the consensus was basically: if your market will let you get away with designing for 1024x768, you've got more flexibility, so you might as well use it. Incidently, that site also requires a p4 or equivalent, or you won't ever see the transitions of most of the 3D rendering.

    24. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by jafac · · Score: 1

      No - it's for scrolling horizontally in the insanely designed Visual Basic code window, crowded with worthless Object Browsers, Properties viewer, project browser, immediate and watch windows, and toolbars, leaving little room for looking at your actual CODE.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    25. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Users hate scrolling left to right...So now why do I want this mouse?"

      For gaming, of course. Extra scrollwheels are quite useful in games because you can assign them to different selections. The first scroll wheel scrolls through your different weapons. The second scroll wheel scrolls through your inventory, or magic spells or whatever. It allows you to access more things quickly without needing an extra finger for toggling.

      Btw, my single-scroll-wheel Logitech MX700 (which rocks, btw) can scroll both ways with one scroll wheel. If the pointer is closer to a horizontal scroll bar, it will scroll horizontally. If it's closer to a vertical scroll bar, it scrolls vertically.

    26. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      One who believes in Jakob Nielsen could argue that when a user sees 2 scrollbars around a website, two separate parties have made errors.

      First, the web designer miscalulated of course... but then, the programmer of the web-browser neglected to correct it!

      A programmer, if he wants, can find a way to linearize any document so that the user sees it in vertically separated chunks. (How much damage this does to the semantic content of the original will vary).

      Opera already has this feature, although I'm not sure if it activates except on very narrow screens.

    27. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thats what they put a full screen mode in for.
      ALT+SHIFT+ENTER I believe.

    28. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      And lose an excuse for a bigger monitor? I THINK NOT!

    29. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by sokeeffe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Whilst I agree that scrolling though source code on a normal display may be considered unusual, think about it for another moment.

      I do a lot of my coding for my job in VB6. When in the VB IDE I have a quite a large toolbox toolbar, a debug window, a properties box, etc all open. The actual area for souce code can be quite small depending on what I'm doing. Also some of the previous programmers in my company tended to have very long source code lines when they were creating strings for display in error messages and I have to scroll quite often to get to the end of these messages.

      I know that it's hardly ideal but then again this isn't an ideal world.

    30. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      As mentioned, that feature is not as ubiquitous as the up-down function of the scroll wheel. I think this is because pressing the scroll wheel can be sent to some applications as a 3rd button press, so Windows does not automatically convert a scroll wheel press into the "scroll all directions thing" unless the program wants to.

    31. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Mysticode · · Score: 1

      I don't think most of the websites that seem to have you scroll very slightly horizontally are designed to be 805 pixels wide - in fact, they are probably designed precisely for 800 pixels wide however the designer didn't take into account the width of the vertical scroll bar and so voila, you end up with horizontal scrolling

    32. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit though, that logically, this idea loses evaluation points just because it's from Microsoft. It's no good judging MS products equally with others, that would be silly.

      I suspect that you're wondering how to come up with a coherent response to the well thought out argument
      I've offered here, so I won't be offended if you just give up now.

    33. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Your wish for a world without horizontal scroll bars is commendable. Just not pratical. Even if you could get browser compliance across the industry for text (hint: you won't), browsers sometimes display things other than text, and computers sometimes run programs other than web browsers. Hence the need for this mouse for some of us.

    34. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Arker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Just get a proper editor. Long lines should be wrapped in a way that makes that fact recognisable. Emacs, for instance, has been doing this for ages.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    35. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Just playing the devils advocate....maybe requiring horizontal scrolling is considered bad because there is no good way of doing it with typical input devices today. For instance there is no horizontal equivalent of the page-up and page-down keys, and for those of us who use mouse-wheels -- there is usually just a vertical scroll wheel. Although to be honest I think the reason vertical scrolling is ok while horizontal scrolling is not is because of the way we read (at least the way westerners read): left to right quickly, and top to bottom slowly. Scrolling as you read a long page seems reasonable, because you don't have to do it so often. I could see this mouse very useful for image viewing and editing and for occasional horizontal scrolling in a text editor because whoever wrote the code I am looking at apparently had smaller fonts or a bigger monitor. I don't see it being used nearly as often as the vertical scroller, but I still think it would be a very nice addition.

    36. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by sokeeffe · · Score: 1

      Kind of difficult to do VB programmer using emacs, wouldn't you say?

      Sometimes as a user, you are just stuck with certain tools, etc. A hardware feature like this can help if you are in a situation where you need it. To most people it'll probably be useless and maybe even annoying but if that is the case then it'll be a niche product and won't affect the mice manufacturers core product lines.

    37. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      From Jakob Nielsen's Top Ten Web-Design Mistakes 2002:

      3. Horizontal Scrolling

      Users hate scrolling left to right. Vertical scrolling seems to be okay, maybe because it's much more common.
      Web pages that require horizontal scrolling in standard-sized windows, such as 800x600 pixels, are particularly annoying. For some reason, many websites seem to be optimized for 805-pixel-wide browser windows, even though this resolution is pretty rare and the extra five pixels offer little relative to the annoyance of horizontal scrolling (and the space consumed by the horizontal scrollbar).

      So now why do I want this mouse?"


      Obviously when looking at pr0n, the pictures are sometimes larger than the browser. This will def come in handy...

      Shant's Theory #1

      The only reason why broadband exists is to download porn faster.

      --
      100% Insightful
    38. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      800x600 is a relic of the past
      ...until you turn 40 and your eyesight starts to go.
    39. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I bet it could come in handy in games, particularly the more recent fps games

      If memory servers me correctly, you could lean left and right in the original System Shock. The copyright notice on my CD copy gives the year as 1994; leaning in games isn't exactly a new idea...

    40. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      The first thing that came to mind for me was a gallery site I am working on that will use horizonal scrolling and I was happy to see that this will soon be a standard.

    41. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by satterth · · Score: 1

      Well, if you are in Excel, you can use your scroll wheel to go from side to side. Position your mouse over the horizontal scroll bar and scroll away. Notice which way it goes...

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    42. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      It's a bit harder than you portray. Source code for most programming languages is a tree, not a linear list; and text is much closer to being a linear list than a tree, so it's hard to portray source code in a text file.

      But like you say, there are ways of handling it, and they result in better code.

      But what would I know? I use a Trackpoint keyboard, so I can scroll around in any direction without even lifting my hands from the alphanumeric keys. I'm so disappointed and puzzled that those horrible touchpads so completely wiped out trackpoints.

      BTW, extra points for the first response identifying a programming language that doesn't use a tree structure internally, even conceptually. Let me give a little hint for one of the possible answers: probably more programs are written in this language every day than all the other languages combined, but normally no human writes them and no human reads them.

      -Billy

    43. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      You know, you don't actually have to leave those windows open... (I usually didn't when I was a programmer)

    44. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      Tilt your mouse 90 degrees to the left, grab it, and feel what I mean.

      You're a bastard. I actually did this. Man, was that ever comfortable! Now I am forever going to hate using my mouse, until someone comes out with the sort of mouse you're talking about...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    45. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So now why do I want this mouse?"

      Because the world isn't black & white?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    46. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Also, I bet it could come in handy in games, particularly the more recent fps games, where there is more than just fire and jump to have to worry about.

      Obviously, you aren't using any auto-aim hacks/cheats. :)

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    47. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You want it so you can easily deal with all the jerks that don't make their webpages to size.
      Yeah, I guess a hardware solution to that problem does make sense. In my case, I use a software solution that also seems to work fairly well, but might not be available to all Windows users. My web browser has Word Wrapping (TM). The browser automatically adjusts the formatting when it renders, so that the width of the window and the length of the paragraph, becomes irrelevant.

      Two solutions to one problem. Diversity is good.

    48. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Source code for most programming languages is a tree, not a linear list;

      The source code is a linearization of a tree structure which retains enough nesting data to permit the compiler to unambiguously reconstruct the tree itself.

      I personally prefer IDEs that are smart enough to be aware of the tree-nature, not just the token-list format. However, an editor which only understands the "2d character array" represenation of the code (necesitating horizontal scrolling) is the worst.

      Let me give a little hint for one of the possible answers: probably more programs are written in this language every day than all the other languages combined, but normally no human writes them and no human reads them.

      You could mean either machine code, or deoxyribonucleic acid. Both of them are low level ("compiled") programs that are linearly traversed by a stateful read-head. Humans hardly ever look at that code. However, claiming "more programs are written in this language" seems a stretch, as I don't consider an activity "writing" without an intelligence behind it.

    49. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by daveewart · · Score: 1

      Don't hate it just because its from Microsoft.

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    50. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40? try 15...

    51. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by slimak · · Score: 1

      you could get emacs for windows and edit your code in that, just use the VB IDE to build and debug.

    52. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this could be quite useful.

      Microsoft's Internet Explorer has a lot of quirks in web layout and CSS that cause web pages which should not scroll horizontally to scroll horizontally. So, essentially, they created a demand, and then filled it.

      I know it's struck me on a few pages I've designed. People ask me why it scrolls horizontally, and I answer that the web page doesn't, but their web browser does.

    53. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      works fine for me in photoshop, make sure you set up correctly

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    54. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by edgezone · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      Plus the wider things are, the more justification for buying that 21" Sony monitor to run at 1600x1200. If side scrolling were EASY, well, I wouldn't need as much of an excuse to get eliminate having to do it!

      Now I just need an excuse that requires 2048x1536 so I can justify buying that 2000$ Sony 24" monitor. :)

      --
      -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    55. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      About 30 seconds after I RTFA, I was working in Photoshop and realized that I was doing an awful lot of left/right scrolling. This thing would have been perfect...

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    56. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by sokeeffe · · Score: 1

      And lose out on features such as Intellisense, etc that just about make the process of VB programming bareable?

    57. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      If Jakob Nielsen says scrolling is bad, then THAT'S IT. I'm never scrolling again!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    58. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The Claw from Ferraro Designs is even better for FPS games. It's also fun to setup for "normal" programs like WinAMP, AutoCAD & Mozilla. Vertical, horizontal and/or diagonal scroll if you want it. It even works in Linux w/some tweaking.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    59. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Don't hate it just because its from Microsoft. Evaluate the technology for what it is.

      It isn't an innovation from Microsoft. If believe otherwise, then enjoy surfing the Microsoft-created Internet(tm).

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    60. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by devnullkac · · Score: 1
      Don't hate it just because its from Microsoft. Evaluate the technology for what it is.

      Was that your sig or just a way to sum up?

      --
      What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    61. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by gwydi0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you mean kinda like this? I think it might be interesting, also somewhat along the same lines of wacky ergonomic keyboards.

      Anyone else got links to weird "ergonomic" input device experiments?

    62. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by thung226 · · Score: 1

      From website:

      9. URL > 75 Characters

      Long URLs break the Web's social navigation because they make it virtually impossible to email a friend a recommendation to visit a Web page...

      Your link:

      http://useit.mondosearch.com/cgi-bin/MsmGo.exe?gra b_id=5186336&EXTRA_ARG=&host_id=2&page_id=147&quer y=horizontal+scrolling&hiword=HORIZONTAL+SCROLLING +HORIZONTALLY+SCROLL+SCROLLED+SCROLLER+SCROLLS+SCR OLLERS+

      --
      -n-
    63. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      (OT: I managed to hurt my hand with an old Atari 2600 joystick. Don't ask)

      Hmm.... on the Atari 800, it was Decathlon, Track & Field and Summer Games, where you had to hammer the joystick back and forth to play. I knew when Epyx brought out their own joysticks that it was a conspiracy. "Thrash your generic Atari joystick playing Summer Games? The new Epyx 500XJ is guaranteed for a million clicks!"

    64. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it is easier for Microsoft to sell everybody horizontal scroll mouses than to fix the bug in Frontpage that create Web pages that are always just wider than the browser, no matter how wide the browser view actually is.

    65. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Blinkslowly · · Score: 1

      I would love to scroll left and right in spread sheets and multi page layouts.

    66. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      You could mean either machine code, or deoxyribonucleic acid.

      Very nice guesses. But DNA isn't a computer language because it's not for computers, and machine code isn't a computer language because it's not a language. Okay, I'm being a little slippery on that last one :-). I will admit that machine language is a very, very good guess, but it's not even close to what I'm thinking of.

      The languages I'm thinking of are text-based; they are programming languages in the classical meaning of the word (although one computer historian refused to document one of these languages because its linear structure made it so different from what she considered a "true" programming language).

      However, claiming "more programs are written in this language" seems a stretch, as I don't consider an activity "writing" without an intelligence behind it.

      What does "behind it" mean to you? Obviously, someone *wants* all these programs written, enough to waste all the -- um -- display space their output takes up.

      A human can write any of these languages, including the one to which I was referring with the hint you're talking about.

      But anyhow, use any word you like if you don't like "written". Composed? "Designed" doesn't work.

      -Billy

    67. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by LimeColoredSloth · · Score: 1

      Most users hate horizontal scolling because they don't have a mouse wheel for horizontal scrolling! I used to hate vertical scrolling before there was a mouse wheel. What's also annoying are those pages that you have to scroll both directions, esp. those that you have to scroll an inch to the right, and then an inch back to the left for each line. I've seen artsy horizontal webpages before. Horizontal layout would also be a practical approach for vertically written East Asian text... oh wait, html wasn't designed with these types of layouts in mind... well... a flash plug-in could take care of that problem...

    68. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Now would be an excellent time for Slashdot's "I like wide web pages" troll to make an appearance. Where are you, man?! :-)

    69. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely understand if some pages get a little overly wide at 640x480, and I have to scroll. (My TV PC runs at this resolution, fortunately I don't browse the web much except for TV listings for ShowShifter on TitanTV.com.)

      I'm even tolerant of it happening at 800x600.

      But when I run at 1024x768, full screen browser window on my desktop's LCD monitor, I get REALLY irritated with people who code their pages to be somewhere around 1080 pixels wide. Because at that resolution, unless there is a right-hand column of ads, you just lose the last 5-10 characters of text. And man, that is a pain in the butt.

      And some of these are "professional" web pages. Like, people were paid obscene amounts of money to code them. Gah! I know they test browse on their fancy Apple Cinema Display 23" LCDs, but c'mon, try out the "average Joe" resolutions once in a while, PLEASE!

    70. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      But DNA isn't a computer language because it's not for computers, and machine code isn't a computer language because it's not a language.

      You didn't say "computer language", you said "programming language". A slippery person can claim DNA is a "program" (defining program to be "a pre-arranged sequence of actions"). You could also make silly justifications for many kinds of formalized human communication to be "programs".

      However, since you consider even assembly-code to be tree-like (I don't agree, because the "trees" making an opcode are of fixed height), you'd probably also see trees in any human language (starting with sentence-diagrams)

      A human can write any of these languages, including the one to which I was referring with the hint you're talking about.

      But anyhow, use any word you like if you don't like "written". Composed? "Designed" doesn't work.


      By the time it gets used, major software like Photoshop or Linux is machine code. But to say it was "written in machine code" is obviously incorrect. They were written in C/C++. If you're not talking about machinecode though, my comment was irrelevant.

    71. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by neglige · · Score: 1

      on the Atari 800, it was Decathlon, Track & Field and Summer Games, where you had to hammer the joystick back and forth to play

      *hem*hem* Yeah, it was a game similar to Decathlon - joystick wise. I found that you could go fastest if you put your palm on top of the stick and then just move the hand back and forth. The handwrist got less strained.

      The problem was that the old Atari joystick had sharp edges at the top, so my skin was peeled off quite nicely.

      Then I went out and invested my money in a Competition Pro. Over the years I also owned (still do own) a few of those babies! I see they are missing that particular model... guess I'll have to grab my camera and send them the pic.

      --
      My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    72. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      However, since you consider even assembly-code to be tree-like (I don't agree, because the "trees" making an opcode are of fixed height),

      A single simple opcode, perhaps. Add in the possibility for size overrides and indirect addressing and the tree gets more variable.

      But I don't believe variability is the issue; the point is that it's a tree, not that it's variable in some way.

      I'll answer my riddle, though. The language I was hinting at is Postscript, and the family of languages includes Forth, HP-RPN, Joy, and a few others. All of these languages have a linear parse, which is so simple that the term "parse" is an exaggeration. Real systems using these languages don't parse; they lex then compile.

      Postscript is the most commonly used programming language because it shares one major feature with the other languages in its family: for any two valid programs, their concatenation is also a valid program. Thus, machine-constructing a Postscript or Forth program is simple: select the functionality you want, and concatenate the programs which give that functionality.

      -Billy

    73. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Postscript is no more "written" than 386 machine code. Both are generated by a computer processing a higher-level description that is more amenable to human understanding. (Rare tinkerers can manually create the low level code, but they are abberations)

      Some aspects of postscript (or any powerful graphical description language) seem very tree-like. Particularly the system of pushing transformations onto a stack. A human reading a postscript file can visualize the tree formed by the transformation stack over time, just like a C program represents a function-call tree over time.

      On the message board you link to, I find you mention that "in order for a language to be concatenative, it must be true that any single
      program can be split at any token boundary to produce two valid programs."


      I don't see how postscript meets this criteria. I'm not an expert, but if a postscript stream ended in "pop" and you split off just that last token, you'd have an invalid program.

      (One might argue that a "stackunderflow" is just an error, and not a sign of an invalid program. But underflows are logical errors, unlike overflows which may be resource overruns, and resemble strongly an invalid program. But from a standpoint of software linguistics, {return *(int*)0;} is a valid C function body, although it cannot help but produce a logical error on execution)

    74. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously, now we're only one step away from getting a clit^H^H^H^Htrackpoint on top of the mouse, like on IBM laptops.


      Like This
    75. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of the scroll wheel being able to scroll without moving the mouse all the way down to the scroll bar? I believe you're missing the point here.

    76. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      in order for a language to be concatenative, it must be true that any single
      program can be split at any token boundary to produce two valid programs
      Valid PS program:
      [ 3 ]
      Split between the 3 and the ].
      Valid PS program:
      [ 3
      Invalid PS program:
      ]
    77. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by LaForce · · Score: 1

      How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

      I'm surprised it wasn't done years ago.


      You mean kind of like this one?

      That's the first thing I thought of when I saw this article. Personally, I don't see many people using horizontal scrolling that much. Graphics and spreadsheets might be good uses, but other than that, it would probably be yet another feature that half the planet doesn't even know how to use, like keyboard shortcut keys.

    78. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

      Try this one for USD$24.99. Or if you're in Oz, wander into the stationery section of any Big W store and buy a "GO TECH COMPUTERWARE OPTICAL MINI MOUSE" (keycode 4392347, barcode 9329555132099) for AUD$22.95.

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    79. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by Arker · · Score: 1

      It's a for instance. I'm not saying use Emacs, I'm saying use a decent editor, Emacs is an example but certainly not the only one.

      Doesn't your vb ide allow you to plug in another editor?

      The one that comes with it should be doing this to begin with, but if it doesn't, it needs to be replaced or fixed.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    80. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by satterth · · Score: 1

      No, i am not missing the point. All i did was point out that one could use the scroll wheel in a horizontal method if one was using Excel.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    81. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by peterpi · · Score: 1
      "The ultimate weapon for the single player and online gamer"

      Yep, if you find that cool then you probably are single.

      (j/k, I'm just karma whoring for 'Funny')

    82. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Postscript is no more "written" than 386 machine code. Both are generated by a computer processing a higher-level description that is more amenable to human understanding. (Rare tinkerers can manually create the low level code, but they are abberations)

      Here, I think, we have a false distinction operating. If Postscript isn't written in order to produce Postscript printouts, than neither is Lisp written when Lisp macros execute; yet that IS the common terminology.

      By the way, Postscript isn't a hard language to understand -- it's quite simple and beautiful. The higher-level representations aren't MORE amenible to human understanding, they simply allow a person possibly unskilled in Postscript to control a subset of PS.

      Some aspects of postscript (or any powerful graphical description language) seem very tree-like. Particularly the system of pushing transformations onto a stack. A human reading a postscript file can visualize the tree formed by the transformation stack over time, just like a C program represents a function-call tree over time.

      First, my point is that the /language's syntax/ isn't a tree, not that you can't express trees in the language. Second, there are many operations that form DAGs rather than trees in concatenative languages. And third, there are a few operations (frowned upon by the communities of the language, usually for intuitive reasons) which make it impossible to statically build a tree (they take their arguments dynamically).

      On the message board you link to, I find you mention that "in order for a language to be concatenative, it must be true that any single program can be split at any token boundary to produce two valid programs."

      Yes, although I will say that this is the hardest part of the definition of concatenativity to explain -- and perhaps it hasn't yet been reduced to a correct formulation. But the example you give is not an exception.

      I don't see how postscript meets this criteria. I'm not an expert, but if a postscript stream ended in "pop" and you split off just that last token, you'd have an invalid program.

      You'd have one program whose result was to leave one more item on the stack than it did before, and one program whose sole result was to remove one item from the stack. Neither of those are "invalid", although either one may fail if given the wrong data.

      Try this with C -- split an arbitrary C function in half, and create two new functions (you're allowed, of course, to avoid splitting in the middle of expressions or otherwise creating syntax errors; in C this limits you to splitting between statements, while in colorForth this rule only limits you to splitting at whitespace, and in Joy or Postscript, you can split anywhere outside of a literal or function name). Now try to compile. Unless your function takes no parameters, the result won't work; the local variables defined in one half of the function are used but not defined in the other half.

      I've allowed you to use a very restrictive rule in deciding where to "cut" the function in half. In general, I could use the rule that you have to allow your function to be cut anywhere that's not in the middle of a literal or a function name, in which case Joy and most of Postscript would be the only languages I know of which pass the test of being concatenative. (This IS actually the test I recommend.)

      And the negative results for so many other languages should not be a surprise; the entire idea of concatenativity was only recently discovered. Forth, Postscript, HP-RPN, and many others were developed for other purposes.

      One might argue that a "stackunderflow" is just an error, and not a sign of an invalid program.

      One might, but you have to recognise that the error isn't in the "pop". The error is calling the "pop" with the wrong data -- in this case, the only possible wrong data is no data at all.

      -Billy

    83. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Correct, and perhaps a hole in my choice of words for that definition. HOWEVER, I would claim that [ 3 ] in Postscript is a token, in spite of the spaces, in the same sense that "[ 3 ]" (a string) is a token in C. In C, "[ 3 ]" is a single literal string; in Postscript, [ 3 ] is a single literal list.

      Hmm, perhaps I should have used the term "lexeme" rather than "token". That way maybe people would stop asking me what I'd been tokin' (drum roll).

      Seriously, what do you think? Would "lexeme" make more sense?

      -Billy

    84. Re:/. parrotting Micro$oft product announcements? by gwydi0n · · Score: 1

      (j/k, I'm just karma whoring for 'Funny')

      No problem... I am single, and I am a gamer, and I use Linux as my primary OS.... Oh Shit! I have no life!

  3. I don't want horizontal scrolling. by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want webpages to be designed like they currently are. For people that use 800x600 or 1024x768 (like they should) there is little need to scroll horizontally.

    Let's not allow this to become commonplace. I would prefer that all information is easily seen on a single page.

    1. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's more to life than webpages.

      Some people use some sort of crazy software called a "spreadsheet" or some stuff, and it goes sideways and up and down and back and forth and all topsy turvy in a world where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should a webpage know about care about or generaly have anything to do with display size? It should be formated to work as text on an arbitray sized screen. Or no screen at all for that matter. You know I allmost wish they made the liscence to use HTML revocable upon doing stupid things like flash, animated Gif's and anything else that strayed form the purpose of delivering information to all people no matter what there encumberances are.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by billimad · · Score: 1

      I think what Bill was referring to was that if this tool becomes widespread it may encourage people to use 'bad' design practice (just because they can). God knows its happened before.

    4. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Malc · · Score: 1

      "For people that use 800x600 or 1024x768 (like they should)"/i.

      Huh? How many inches^Wfeet is your screen? I only use 80x25!

    5. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a world where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems.

      AFLAC!

    6. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by henriksh · · Score: 1
      I want webpages to be designed like they currently are. For people that use 800x600 or 1024x768 (like they should) there is little need to scroll horizontally.

      How can this be insightful? It shows a pure lack of understanding the web. Web designers should not design web pages to fit a certain resolution.

      No one with a clue about how HTML is supposed to work would say like I quoted.

    7. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by ShadeARG · · Score: 1

      What if the display data is better fit into a columnar sheet that extends to the left and right instead of up and down? What about (i)frames of this nature? While I agree that webpages should be built to scale properly, sometimes scrolling left and right is the most viable method for certain data.

    8. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the amish who surf the web will love that!

    9. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Because, of course, no one uses a computer for anything other than browsing the web. So the only consideration for the use of such a feature is webpage design.

      And of course, garcia is the setter-of-standards, not only in regards to what hardware people should use and how much information they may consider at one time, but also what level of eye sight is required.

      Yes! Death to those who may wish to have things on their screen a little larger than the great garcia decrees! Scrolling is an abomination!

      sarcasm

      Seriously, who mods this stuff 'insightful'? Yes, horizontal scrolling on web pages is a pita. However, it happens and is sometimes necessary.

      And sometimes people view things other than web pages.

    10. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      This would effectively roll the web back to 1994. Most folks don't want that.

      The web works by the 'you can't please all of the people all of the time' model... it's just not possible. So we try to accomodate 95% or so, and live with the complaints from the remaining 5%.

      It is a royal pain to design for many display types, yet most of us (professional) web geeks do. To expect us to be able to handle all clients, when the clients don't hold to standards, is not realistic.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    11. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, I mostly agree. You see, if you use more text than graphics, you can easily design for all sizes of pages. Especially with CSS. Enough said, but go to w3.org and see their site. Low on graphics, high on content. If you don't have good content, the graphics don't matter, even on a pr()n site...
      Enough said

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    12. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I want webpages to be designed like they currently are. For people that use 800x600 or 1024x768 (like they should) there is little need to scroll horizontally.

      A properly-designed webpage should flow the text in usable form in a browser window of nearly any size. If it needs the browser window to be at least a certain larger-than-usual width, it's broken.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    13. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      delivering information to all people no matter what there encumberances are.
      ... even if their encumbrances are the inability to spell or use proper grammar?

    14. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by CaptainTap · · Score: 0

      where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems
      The Simpsons.
      Give credit when you steal.

      --
      -- So now the world is a bit more stupid thanks to you.
    15. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Give credit when you steal

      Linus gave no credit when he stole SCOs code but noone gets all uppity about it.

      Besides everyone knows its from the simpsons anyways.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    16. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      No it would just mean less design and more information. Now granted I was putting out web pages back in 95. I dont think I have even seen a client that wont display information it's just they all handle the ugly tacked on formating badly.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    17. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I want horizontal scrolling so I can increase my easily readable area without buying an 80 column card.

      Jokes aside, I don't like word wrap for code and I prefer 4 line indents for readability. Which means things are quickly disappearing off to the right of my screen. I do a lot of HOME and arrow keying which would be much more succinctly done with an analog horizontal scroll. Which means I might be able to lower my resolution from UNGODLY HUGE to MIGHT NOT GIVE ME PERMANENT EYE STAIN.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    18. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      design has its place too. plain text is fine for computers, but human beings use visual cues very well, hence the popularity of the graphical web.

      We can play 'things ain't the way they used to be' all day long, but it's just mental masturbation...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    19. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 1

      They should not, but they do. As much as I hate amateur websites, I would not neglect a site that had useful information just because it was designed bad.. because that would be a little... insane.

      --

      Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    20. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by sehryan · · Score: 1

      Uh, people learn in different ways. One way is visually. Sure, to you seeing something might be redunant if you can read it, but there are some people in the world who don't work like you do, and need to see it to fully grasp a concept. Not all visual delivery systems on the web are a waste.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    21. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because it was SCO who stole linus' code and not the other way around?

    22. Re:I don't want horizontal scrolling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't see anyone holding a gun to your head, forcing you to buy one of these mice.

      See, some of us use computers for much more than just viewing web pages.

      And many of those applications scroll both horizontally and vertically.

      So, many of us will find a use for this mouse.

  4. umm by tralfamador · · Score: 4, Informative

    i already have an ibm mouse that does this. have had it for 3 years

    1. Re:umm by x311 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've had a cheap $10 PS/2 mouse that's had two scroll wheels for a few years two. I don't use the horizonatal mouse button much, but it is handy, especially working in photoshop.

    2. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but IBM's version uses that godawful nipple thingy. I hate that thing.

    3. Re:umm by SanLouBlues · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there have been several versions of the IBM ScrollPoint. I have version two which made the little joystick not a button (you get a seperate middle mouse button). That and the ability to vary scroll rate without pulling a muscle in my index finger (HOW LONG IS THIS STUPID DOC?!?!?!?) make the IBM mouse a top choice. Plus, in vim, I can scroll without pasting inadvertently. The disadvantage (other than not being a optical mouse) is that it's very diffucult to scroll one line.

    4. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. It isn't a second wheel. It's that the one wheel has tilt.

  5. I always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always knew MS "scrolled both ways" this confirms it!
    ok, mod me down, that was terrible, but if i didnt, someoen else wouldve said it!

  6. Can you still use it to click? by Trigun · · Score: 2

    Well, can you, or do we need yet another button?

    1. Re:Can you still use it to click? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 0

      YES! Buttons GOOD!! Dammit I have five fingers on my right hand and I want a mouse that uses all of them.

    2. Re:Can you still use it to click? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Obligatory Simpsons parody:
      On my mouse, I need buttons here, here, and here that activate the horn in my car. You can never seem to find the horn when you get mad while surfing the web.

    3. Re:Can you still use it to click? by |/|/||| · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard."

      It looks like you can still use it to click. Hopefully this just means that the mouse driver is mapping the middle button to alt+tab, and hopefully I can turn this "feature" off. I would die if I couldn't click my mouse wheel to upen links in new tabs in Mozilla.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
  7. and then by Tirel · · Score: 1

    after twenty years, they'll develop a mouse that scrolls in and out.

    how exciting!

    1. Re:and then by Surak · · Score: 1

      Mice already do this.

      Hold down the ctrl key in Mozilla Firebird and scroll up and down. Watch the fonts zoom in and out. :)

    2. Re:and then by SwissCheese · · Score: 1

      My IE6 does this as well. How quaint! ;)

    3. Re:and then by Tirel · · Score: 1

      yeah opera does it too, but i usually use + and -

  8. I'm waiting for the one.. by dBLiSS · · Score: 0

    that does Diagonal as well..

    --

    The Good Life
  9. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Everyone else got one 5 years ago...

  10. Apples new mouse... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    ...only scrolls to the left.

    This sounds cool though, IMO microsofts mice and keyboards are about the best on the consumer level market. Or maybe tied with logitech.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  11. Yay by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    Is Taco using the story generator again?

  12. excellent... by SpineZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    this sure will help me keep one hand free while looking at these 1600x1200 "pictures."

    1. Re:excellent... by Cryogenes · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be the wrong hand?

    2. Re:excellent... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Not if you, like most geeks, can mouse with either hand.

      Actually one day I was bored and discovered that I can type with the keyboard turned in any direction in relation to me I touch type at over 60wpm. I can also mouse left or right handed. When your used to never touching the same computer or keyboard twice 16hr/day 7d/week then you start to realize, it's more annoying to move the mouse than to use the other hand to control it...

    3. Re:excellent... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Geeks...

      You guys never considered simply batting with the other hand did you? I imagine it's a lot easier than reaching across the desk to use the mouse with your wrong hand.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:excellent... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      *sighs* some people just never get it.

      Obviously accurate mousing comes second to precision control of more delicate instruments sheesh.

  13. Something Useful! by Davak · · Score: 1

    First the optical mouse... now the side scroller! Yeah for microsoft, for once.

    Of course, if somebody would just make it illegal to have html that needed to scroll left to right... it would save us much more heartache.

    Obviously, this is gonna rock in game play...

    Davak

  14. Let me guess... by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Introducing, the Microsoft BiMouse. That Mouse that Scrolls Both Ways (tm)

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    1. Re:Let me guess... by yamcha666 · · Score: 1

      BIO DOME!

      Does that mean it goes both ways?

      I don't know. But we do!

    2. Re:Let me guess... by MrPotatoeHead · · Score: 1

      Not that there's anything wrong with that....!

  15. I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by rangek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was browsing thinkgeek and ran across this mouse. Sounds like this is old news.

    1. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bought a bunch of these cheap for work.. I've never experienced anything more annoying than that center ball, especially when you're scrolling downward. All too often downward becomes diagnal, and the scrolling stops.

      I rarely have to scroll side to side since I run my monitor at a fairly high resolution. Just another gimic!

    2. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by rangek · · Score: 1
      Just another gimic!

      Oh, yeah. I wasn't saying it was a good idea, just that it wasn't news.

      Personally, I can't even stand a scrollwheel. Just give me a plain old three button mouse, thank you very much.

    3. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      MS's mouse is a regular scroll wheel, i think, that has little microswitches that you can tilt it from side to side.

      There are plenty of "4D" mice out there, but they're all chinsy and flimsy. I've found MS and logitech to be the only mice worth using.

      But thats just one little bears opinion.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. now I see where Microsoft obtained it's idea for this mouse.

      Go figure.. Someone else invents it and Microsoft says it's our idea/product/innovation/whatever.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    5. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by sheetsda · · Score: 1

      Also of note is this, a dual wheel mouse. A friend of mine has one and loves it. (FYI, contrary to what you might think only one of the wheels also functions as a button.)

    6. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a 4D mouse for a few years, when it broke I downgraded to a normal scroll mouse and never noticed the missing horizontal wheel. I just don't seem to need it.

    7. Re:I saw this on thinkgeek just today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I can't even stand a scrollwheel. Just give me a plain old three button mouse, thank you very much.

      I love the scroll wheel. After using one for less than a day, it annoys me to shift to another mouse that doesn't have one.

      But what I hate about it is the scroll wheel being the third button - it's too easy to click the damn wheel while scrolling, or to scroll while trying to click. My current mouse has a thumb button, but I find that it gets pressed too easily while just moving the mouse, and that using the thumb is a bad substitute for a proper middle mouse button.

      I have a cake here, and I can eat it too. I want the same deal with my mouse.

  16. Sweet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. I can bind the new controls to lean left/right in FPSs. :)

    1. Re:Sweet.. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so you will be leaning left and right on every moment. If you want to lean right you select "hand granade" and throw it against the wall right in fron of you.

      Most games never use the 3rd mouse button anymore, and they shouldn't. The chance that you click it involuntarily is very high. Having 2 other directions added to this mix does not make the world a better place.

      But just maybe the implementation is good enough. The scrollwheels of the MS mice do seem to be better than those of Logitech, or most other manufacturers for that matter.

      Ah, so that's why MS was dumping mice in NL.

    2. Re:Sweet.. by Big+Smirk · · Score: 1

      Middle mouse button is reload... Except in unreal - then middle mouse == the teleporter. That which hits the fan is not evenly distributed.

      --
      TODO: create/find/steal funny sig.
  17. IBM Mouse, many years ago... by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about such a mouse, with a joystick scroll type thingy in the middle, many years ago. Old news.

    1. Re:IBM Mouse, many years ago... by teeker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have two of them. It's my favorite by far....instead of a wheel, it's got a trackpoint (eraser-thing like on some laptops) there. The trackpoint doesn't move the cursor, but it does scroll. And it works vertically and horozintally.

      If it had a 3rd button, it would be the best mouse ever.

      Wheels suck.

      --
      teeker
    2. Re:IBM Mouse, many years ago... by Feathers+McGraw · · Score: 1

      The Trackpoint is also a far superior interface to the mouse wheel even if it weren't capable of operating in two dimensions, since instead of having to repeatedly move your fingertip to turn the mouse wheel, you could simply push and hold it in the direction you wanted to scroll. I should probably see if I can snag a few more of those off of eBay before the inventory completely disappears.

    3. Re:IBM Mouse, many years ago... by Quok · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my girlfriend.. I had two of them once, but it was too much hassle. Although they have these "love buttons" that they just love to have pressed, and one of them even "scrolled both ways", if you catch my drift. Now if only she had a third nipple, she'd be the best girlfriend ever.

    4. Re:IBM Mouse, many years ago... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      If it had a 3rd button, it would be the best mouse ever.

      Have you used one?

      WTF do you think that wheel does also, besides scroll?

      Yep, 3rd button...you know, like "zoom" in quake 3 and switch weapons with mouse wheel up/down...and...OMG!! you can actually, you know, like switch weapons...get this...WHILE ZOOMING!

      Wheels suck.

      I beg to differ. See above.

      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go towel off after all that dripping sarcasm.

      KTHXBAI.

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    5. Re:IBM Mouse, many years ago... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      Ditto..

      Although it's old enough that I can't find any usable drivers for it for my Windoze box.

      The lack of a third mousebutton is the only minus.

  18. woopty fucking doo! by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0, Troll

    ok
    1] not many sites need a horizontal scroll.
    2] woopty fucking doo! if that's news for nerds, than I must not be one.

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  19. Not new... by Soluxx · · Score: 1

    My parents bought a dumbass Radio Shack mouse about 2 or 3 years ago that had a horizontal scroll wheel right under the vertical one. I think it has been used a total of 2 times.

  20. Gimme a "scroll ball" by gaj · · Score: 1

    I'd love a "scroll ball button" in place of the "scroll wheel button" I have in the middle of my TrackMan Marble Wheel. Basically it would give me two trackballs on one base, one main one for cursor control that allows for precision because it is large and doesn't click and a smaller one for scrolling that can also act as my middle mouse button (gotta have my X paste!)

  21. trackballs by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    I already have a trackball embedded in my trackball embedded in my trackball embedded in my...

    Alowing me to navigate the web in an infinity of dimensions.

  22. Who says this is for web browsers? by Schezar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Say you have a folder filled with, I don't know, mp3s. Many of them.

    Notice how the window's contents are arranged HORIZONTALLY? Seems a horizontal scroll-thingie would me mighty useful in this situation.

    Or how about wave editing? It would be nice to mouse-scroll across the waveform HORIZONTALLY.

    Just some thoughts.

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the vast majority of people use mice for web browsing. If the innovation is there to change the design of a mouse, there might be a change in the way that web pages will be designed.

      I don't ALLOW Windows to make my directories scroll horizontally.

      Up and down thank you.

    2. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      Usually when I type "ls" the output conforms to the terminal window I have open at the time.

    3. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Vexalith · · Score: 2, Informative

      When no vertical scrolling is sensible (like a wave editor) the scrollwheel should cause horizontal scrolling. I've seen this trick in quite a few apps. The point is that there's very little need for two dimensional scrolling, it's mostly an "either-or" situation.

    4. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Notice how the window's contents are arranged HORIZONTALLY? Seems a horizontal scroll-thingie would me mighty useful in this situation.

      Maybe if you're using windows explorer or something.

      In any case, a horizontal scroll wheel is completely redundant in that situation: the unused "vertical" scroll wheel should be made to scroll horizontally if the window does not require vertical scrolling.

    5. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Schezar · · Score: 1

      Well, I use CoolEdit. Vertical scrolling zooms in and out of the wave, which is highly useful. The horizontal scrollwheel would be a nice addition.

      --
      GeekNights!
      Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    6. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Pirogoeth · · Score: 1

      Actually, the files fill the window horizontally to the width of the window, then scroll vertically off the bottom. Doesn't matter how many 1000s of files are in that folder.

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    7. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      In my experience with windows explorer this is exactly what happens. If you have a window open and the contents displayed in something horrible like icon or thumbnail view the contents will be displayed either horizontally or vertically. The mouse wheel will move whichever scrollbar is present. This can also be seen in various open file dialogs that scroll horizontally instead of vertically.

    8. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Notice how the window's contents are arranged HORIZONTALLY?

      Umm, no? If you're talking about a certain operating system that rhymes with "Lindows", and you're talking about a shell called explorer.exe, try pressing ALT-v and then D. See, isn't that nice? I have to do that whenever I use a windows machine to stay sane.

    9. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      By all accounts of UI "experts", the decision to use horizontal scrolling for explorer windows was a giant UI mistake.

      Personally, I find it extremely annoying. There are good reasons for using a horizontal scrollbar (as many have mentioned - like spreadsheets), but making up for a poor UI decision is not one of them.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by moonbender · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Notice how the mouse wheel already scrolls window's contents that are arranged horizontally? At least it does that for me. I don't really see a lot of use for another wheel at least in file system explorers. I'm not sure about wave editing - maybe the same can be applied. Generally, the scrolling wheel is just that, a scrolling wheel. There's no reason why it should only be used for scrolling up and down, and conversely it's been adapted for many other uses: scrolling sideways, zooming in and out, switching items or weapons in games, and so on.

      Now I really don't mind if Microsoft "innovates" and "creates" a four-way mouse wheel - of course, it's not much of an innovation, since mice with additional means to scroll in another dimension have been around for years, but I don't mind the occasional evolutionary step, either. Apart from the first introduction of the mouse wheel (who did that, incidently?), it's been mostly evolution and not revolution for the mouse interface in the last n years, including the allegedly revolutionary step towards optical sensors.
      However, I'm a bit dubious if this will work well. Previous designs I've seen had a second wheel, some of them even had a wheel that actually rolled horizontally. I doubt they were comfortable to use, especially the last variant. (Try scrolling an imaginary horizontal wheel - not exactly comfortable.) From the sounds of the article, the existing mouse-wheel will tilt left and right, making it sound a bit similar to a coolie-hat on joysticks, maybe something like a cross between wheel and coolie-hat. Hohumm. It's better than a horizontal wheel, but it still requires horizontal finger movement, which sucks. There's also the question of accidently tilting the wheel when you only wanted to scroll or click.

      An approach I'd prefer would be a simple software solution, using one of the mice's many (superflous, IMHO) modifier buttons. One of the thumb buttons on my mouse would do very nicely: if pressed, the wheel scrolls horizontally, if not it's the typical vertical scrolling. Obviously this would only make sense in apps which routinely scroll both ways, like spreadsheets. Note that this kind of thing is already routinely done in games! Not really with sideways scrolling, but it's extremely common to have the right mouse button function as a modifier making the wheel zoom instead of scroll or toggle etc.
      Of course, this wouldn't let Microsoft sell new hardware, so I guess this doesn't appeal to them a whole lot.

      Anyway, I don't mind this. I'll try it, but I doubt I need it, so I guess I can save money by not buying a mouse with this feature. Then again, I'm sure people also said that when mouse wheels were first introduces, so what do I know. =)

      Oh and for the record, I'm using a Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer right now - fine device!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    11. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, but this is slashdot where the average user is much to stupid to use a command line. They think they're being l337 by using x windows instead of MS, but in practice it's the same thing.

    12. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Notice how the window's contents are arranged HORIZONTALLY?
      Um, no. That would be insane.

      What you're describing might have been tried in the 1960s, but today's user interface state-of-the-art, while still leaving plenty to be desired, are decades beyond anything that dumb.

    13. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I view folders, my windows are filled vertically with files.

    14. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or too stupid to know the difference between "to" and "too."

    15. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 0

      Umm - no. Under XP, in thumbnail, Tiles, detail view or icon view, the window scrolls vertically. The only way I could see horizontal scrolling is if I switch to the cludgy "List View"

    16. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      When no vertical scrolling is sensible (like a wave editor) the scrollwheel should cause horizontal scrolling.

      And to add to that the example posted above, a long list of files (in one of the ways Windows will display them). That is EXACTLY the way it works. If there is no possibility of vertical scrolling, it scrolls horizontally by default. (period)

      Personally, I still fail to see the need for this. Take KDE's Window Manager for example. If you *can* scroll both ways, just rest your cursor on the scroll bar in the direction you want to go and start wheeling. Up, down, left, right. It'll do it. One wheel.

      Perhaps MS should work on the funtionality of their OS before they start developing hardware to work around it's failings.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    17. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ew you probably use large icons and web folders dont you

      go to view and then hit details. much MUCH better

    18. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by calethix · · Score: 1

      I can't say that I've ever seen windows explorer even do that. Granted, I've never been one for the iconic view so maybe 98 did that and I just forgot but XP wraps icons at the edge of your window and then gives you a vertical scroll bar if needed.

      My assumption was that he meant if you have a detail list and your MP3s have really long file names that go outside your window. Then you would have both scroll bars and neither would be redundant. The same would apply to paint programs where the window you're working in is smaller than your image in both dimensions. I'm not sure that I would want one of these mice for that use but it may be handy in the right situation/application.
      Oh, and not that it has anything to do with the parent post but every web page should be designed to eliminate the need for side scrolling if possible because that's just a pain in the ass.

    19. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      If its only useful in gaming, that's enough.

      Any way you can add more controls to a mouse without making it unintuitive or obtrusive, thats a good thing in my books.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    20. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I can't stand that view myself. All that extraneous information that I rarely use. I would rather have more room for the names. I stick to the list view, which scrolls horizontally only. I do believe I've seen "similar" horizontal movement with Mac OS X too.

    21. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how the window's contents are arranged HORIZONTALLY?

      No, why would they be arranged orizontically when they can be simply arranged vertically?!?!?

      And why wouldn't the same wheel work horizontically for that matter?

    22. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by bombom · · Score: 1

      And did you ever try this in a windows app before bashing Mirosoft?

      Works just fine in Excel and has for years. (even works in freekin mozilla)

      --
      IOException - Can't Speak
    23. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by pokeyburro · · Score: 1

      Personally, I still fail to see the need for this. Take KDE's Window Manager for example. If you *can* scroll both ways, just rest your cursor on the scroll bar in the direction you want to go and start wheeling. Up, down, left, right. It'll do it. One wheel.

      Arrrrgh. I've never used KDE, and I can understand if KDE is trying to work around an inherent limitation here, but I would hate, hate, hate to have to position the mouse on something as small as a scrollbar, to do something as common as scrolling. It defeats the entire purpose. If I'm going to move my mouse there, I may as well drag the scrollbar. (In fact, I'm inclined to think I misunderstood what you're saying here, but that's the way it reads...)

      I've noticed a few Windows apps that scroll horizontally if you hold down the Alt key. But it seems to be only sparsely supported.

      As for scrolling horizontally instead, when vertical scrolling isn't needed - it's kinda good, and it's kinda not. It's good in that it delegates one more feature to an otherwise unusable knob, but it's bad in that it isn't completely intuitive. That is, I have to think about the translation from up-down to left-right, respectively.

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
    24. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mouse wheel is MS's invention. I remember when it came out and everyone said noone would use it. Looks like they're wrong.

    25. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is very true. If you edit a lot of home movies in a non-linear editor, this could be very handy for "scrubbing" your videos. I bought a USB metal knob (powermate) for this, but i'd be much happier if I didn't have to take my hands off the mouse to do scrubbing. A knob is really good for an enthusiast, but I see a lot of value in the tilting wheel for an occasional video editing dabbler like myself.

      I do think it may take longer for a tilting wheel to become as ubiquitous as the original wheel (the wheel was somewhat revolutionary, the tilt is only evolutionary, in my mind)

    26. Re:Who says this is for web browsers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use them. They suck. I use normal 3 (yes, three) button mice as decreed by the X-Windows gurus of time immemorial.

  23. Scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MAN AT BAR: [coughs conspicuously, smiles]
    WOMAN AT BAR: [politely but nervously smiles back]
    MAN AT BAR: My, uh, mouse goes both ways, if you know what I mean.
    WOMAN AT BAR: [begins to quietly edge away]

    1. Re:Scenario by MicroBerto · · Score: 2, Funny

      SECOND MAN AT BAR: [slowly begins to edge in]
      MAN AT BAR: [errr....]

      --
      Berto
  24. Well, by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Its high time some one comes up with better ergonomic tools than the keyboards and mice of this generation.

    As the average time we spend on these machines increases so does the damage to our fingers and wrists.

    Also a zero decible CPU and a monitor least stressful on eyes would be nice.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:Well, by double-oh+three · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think you can actually hear the CPU, your probably hearing the CPU fan. And if you are hearing the CPU it's probably ths sizzle of it melting. :-)

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    2. Re:Well, by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      Yes i did mean the fan.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:Well, by Zooka · · Score: 1

      That's an important issue, but... It's normally not the design of the mouse or keyboard that causes injury, it's the (wrong) way in which people use them. More ergonomic (and adjustable) chairs and desks are what's really needed, along with educating people (and employers) on how to set up their workspace properly. Repetitive stress injuries are a serious workplace issue. It's more than just about people being uncomfortable, it results in lower productivity and employee morale.

      The general design of the mouse and keyboard is pretty hard to replace with anything that would be more efficient. A lot of mice do seem poorly designed though. In that their size often makes them less comfortable for people without large hands.

    4. Re:Well, by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      I can hear my CPU via my fan. When my CPU usage increases, I think it's drawing more power, leaving slightly less power for the fans, and therefore making an audible change in the speed it turns. I'm talking on a time scale of milliseconds. I can hear my CPU load quite distincly.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  25. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Oh don't troll. This is actually an interesting article. Although this might not be world-shattering it is still a pretty nifty thing. The uses for a trackball in the mouse would incredible for a gamer. Imagine instead of WASD layout you could have all movement and shooting controls on one hand with the other one free for equipment managment and chatting.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Great and all, but by pschmerg · · Score: 1

    I'd like for Microsoft to bring back the old intellimice. The ones with the big Back/Forward internet buttons. The reduced sized ones they are currently selling are but mere nuisances for my sausage fingers.

  28. Already don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    All you have to do is hold down the wheel and move to the left and right. At least it works that way in Microsoft's browser...

  29. IBM has had this for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    with the track point in their mice...Here's one!

  30. Great for FPS games by int2str · · Score: 1

    Now I can finaly tilt left/right in AmercasArmy :). I've been using the scroll wheel for it, but this would be much nicer. Plus I could use the wheel to go prone and stand up instead.

    Nice!

    Cheers,
    Andre

  31. Mouse with trackball in it by Serk · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...You mean like the Tecstorm TSOTS1?

    http://www.tecstorm.co.uk/tsots1.htm

    Another link - http://www.hardwareoptions.com/merchant.mv?Screen= PROD&Store_Code=HO&Product_code=MI14032

    I'd honestly never heard of it before this article, but after reading the idea of a mouse with a trackball in it, the idea seemed intriguing, so I did a quick Google for "trackball in mouse" and found that one... Looks interesting... Anyone ever used one?

    --
    Never ask a geek why, just nod your head and slowly back away. -Rob Malda
    1. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by frozenray · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has this one:

      Typhoon "8D" Mouse

      I tried it, it works as advertised.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    2. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by edwdig · · Score: 1

      They've had them where I work for about a year. It's ok, but you have to get used to it first. When I don't use it regularly, I end up scrolling a little horizontally when I'm trying to go straight down. You have to be more deliberate with your actions - you can't just flick it really fast to scroll down.

    3. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by johnjay · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft mouse sounds better than a track-ball-in-mouse combination because fingers don't have as much range of motion side-to-side as they do when curling over a mouse wheel. Rather than having to constantly reposition your finger to scroll left or right, the tilt would enable you to simply hold in the "go right" tilt until the page had scrolled to the right as far as needed.

      Seems like the tilting mouse wheel might be the ideal combination of ergonomics and functionality.

      The other possibility I can think of is having a second left-to-right mouse wheel where your thumb would go, since the thumb moves left-to-right very easily. That might be more confusing, though. Also, you would need different mice for left- and right- handers. The tilting-wheel model would look more elegant.

    4. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've seen 4-way and 8-way trackballs in mice available. I've seen some models available at .

      The trackball is actually fully directional. When used as a scrollwheel, the direction you spin it is treated as motion in one of 4 (or 8) directions. It can also be used to control the mouse pointer, but that disables the use of the optical mouse base as a mouse.

      I've thought about getting one, but I'm waiting until it can be used as two independent mice (and driver independent). I'd think it would be good for gaming if you could control motion with the mouse and aiming/head movement with the trackball simultaneously, independently, and accurately. Be able to run any direction and fire at any other (within reason for your avatar's abilities). Running in an arc instead of predictable straight lines while still able to maintain your aim on the target.

      I've also thought about a GUI that could handle two pointers usefully. For example, instead of grabbing the edge of a window to resize it, the user could just grab two points anywhere on the window and adjust/move it that way. It would free the user from the implicit paperweight model in current GUIs.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      Anyone ever used one?

      Looking at the pictures, this is the exact same mouse sold as the IOGEAR trackball mouse and the Starlogic 8D trackball mouse. I have one sold with Startlogic's name on the box (nothing painted on it's back); I just went to Circuit City and found they are still on the shelf. (Which surprised me, since I douldn't get any response from Startlogic's e-mail address last Novemner and they don't even seem to have a website). The mouse worked OK at first, and there's even a neat feature that can switch the ball between a scroll ball and a track ball (when you can't or don't want to move the mouse). But after very little use the scroll ball movement became erratic. Someone else posting here reported the same problem with several he bought for his office.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    6. Re:Mouse with trackball in it by Arandir · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft mouse sounds better than a track-ball-in-mouse combination because fingers don't have as much range of motion side-to-side as they do when curling over a mouse wheel.

      Try using a Logitech Trackman or [cough cough] Microsoft Explorer. The trackball is under your thumb, and you get a LOT of control with it. Much more than you would a mouse. You'll need a day or two to get used to it, just like you had to get used to a mouse back in day one. But once you get the feel of it, you'll never go back.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  32. shadio rack by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

    i bought a dual scroll wheel mouse like 4-5 years ago for $6 on sale at radio shaft. even has a third button. only problem is that they dont have win2k/xp drivers for it, hehe. only works win9x.

    1. Re:shadio rack by y0bhgu0d · · Score: 1

      would that happen to be the kensiko dual scroll? i've got one of those in my closet... black, ps2, no clicks when you scroll?

    2. Re:shadio rack by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

      i dont know who actually made it, but it says radio shack on it. its white, ps2. yeah, no clicks when you scroll. i love it. still use it for my new machine. i love the smooth scrolling. also, it has the smoothest...what would i call it, ball action(hehe)? almost as good as an optical rolling across the table. best mouse ive ever had. i like it better than my 5button m$ optical usb im using now at work. cant beat $6, either.

  33. Hardly an innovation. by Feztaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to have a mouse that had two scroll wheels on it, and that was 5+ years ago. I used it for both horizontal and vertical scrolling (though it was configurable what you could actually do with it).

    Also, in some linux toolkits (gtk I believe, possibly others), you can scroll any scrollbar (no matter what direction it's in) just by putting the mouse over it and scrolling.

    For example, in gaim, if your buddy list has a horizontal scrollbar, you can scroll horizontally by putting the mouse over the horizontal scrollbar and scrolling. Even better, it doesn't even have to be a scrollbar: on the experimental bittorrent client, you can scroll the little frob that controls the maximum number of uploads this way.

    Fun stuff! I see little point in providing a hardware solution to a problem that was solved with software long, long ago.

    1. Re:Hardly an innovation. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      ROFL! The point of the scroll wheel is so that you don't have to move the mouse to the scroll bar! Your software solution does not achieve the same result which the hardware solution does, hence, a new piece of hardware.

    2. Re:Hardly an innovation. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      This is NOT TWO FUCKING WHEELS. It's one wheel that fucking tilts.

      Oh my GOD! That is SO innovative! it's the exact same fucking thing, except that the two wheels are made into ONE FROB! NO WAY!

      Moron.

    3. Re:Hardly an innovation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and why do you fucking trolls have such trouble comprehending posts?

    4. Re:Hardly an innovation. by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1
      You missed the point. GTK has full support for vertical scrolling with the mouse wheel, without needing to place the pointer over the scrollbar. What it also allows is placing the pointer over the horizontal scrollbar, and scrolling that left to right with the standard (normally vertical) mouse wheel.

      It's not a huge deal, but an improvement over the need to click-hold-drag the scrollbar nonetheless.

  34. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, Another 5 years or so and they will have the trackball.

  35. Wondering... by segment · · Score: 1
    Will this fall into one of those categories of products that are buzzwords now, google cache tomorrow...

  36. Not terribly useful. by ihummel · · Score: 1

    Unless you have a really pathetic resolution.

  37. Why ? by hariya · · Score: 1

    Do what my logitech scroll mouse on OS X does. Scroll regularly for vertical and in those rare cases, press shift to scroll horizontally.

  38. Hardware solution for a software problem by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The innovation means that users will be able to scroll vertically as well as horizontally without using on-screen navigation bars.

    Need I say more? This is a hardware solution for a software problem.

    Whats next? WWW and email buttons on my computer? How about a Windows key to get in your way every time you go to use the left control?

    When I was a windows developer (I've reformed), I got really loaded on coffee and hot chocolate mix and actually pulled the damned windows key off of my keyboard, drilled a hole in my office wall, and shoved it in there.

    OK, what is this mouse for?

    1. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by sokeeffe · · Score: 1

      When I was a windows developer (I've reformed), I got really loaded on coffee and hot chocolate mix and actually pulled the damned windows key off of my keyboard, drilled a hole in my office wall, and shoved it in there.

      Maybe you need to drink less coffee.

    2. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Maybe you need to drink less coffee.

      actually, I'm down to 16oz or less a day. I used to drink it when I was awake, no clue the actual amount.

    3. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You're right, let's all just agree with Apple that one button is enough. More controls just confuse people and lead to errors, they shouldn't be allowed to exist. This whole scroll wheel thing is an abomination in the first place, why would you need that when you can just drag a scroll bar?

      Removing the windows key is a hardware solution to a software problem. I use the windows key in Windows for Windows-R all the time. And I don't use the left control, I have it remapped to the caps lock key where it used to be. (a software solution to a hardware problem?)

      In other words, if you never need to scroll sideways, then fine, this mouse isn't for you. But that doesn't mean it's worthless, there are people who do work with sideways scrolling programs on a regular basis, shocking as it may be.

    4. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 0, Troll

      Whats so hard about ctrl+esc r?

      I have never understood the point of the windows key, at most it saves one keystroke. It provides no extra functionality.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    5. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about a Windows key to get in your way every time you go to use the left control?

      Lay off the coffee, and learn the keyboard layout. The windows key is a very well designed key, imo. Aside from providing quick access to the taskbar and start menu, the windows key shortcuts provide access to core windows functions without confusing applications or users. Win+D: Show Desktop, Win+F: Find, Win+Break: System Properties, Win+L: Lock Station, and there are several more. These shortcuts do not work using the Ctrl+Esc substitute for the Windows key.

      With respect to WWW and Email buttons, if they can be reconifigured, these buttons can serve as a keyboard quick launch bar. I had an IBM keyboard with launch buttons and volume controls and it was great until they decided not to write a Win2k driver for it.

      Human Interfaces will *always* be a hardware problem, and in many cases, will require a hardware solution. It's just the nature of the beast.

    6. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by og_sh0x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I want to see more than anything else is a utility that will turn the Windows key off for a while, and in the future I would like to see ALL games disable this button during play. The only time the Windows key annoys me is when I'm playing a game and it brings me back to desktop, where meanwhile I'm dying inside the game with no control.

    7. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Thanks dude... I have an old IBM keyboard that I love and it has no windows key. At work the windows key gets used quite often (especially Windows-E) and I didn't know what the equivalent was on a normal keyboard. (Tried Ctrl-Alt, Ctrl-Shift, Alt-Shift, but none worked) I'm gonna try out that Ctrl-Esc thing as soon as I get home!
      Thanks again!

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    8. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by minusthink · · Score: 1

      it brands windows on every major keyboard.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    9. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by dasmegabyte · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, no wonder you reformed. The windows key is the most positively useful GUI tool on the keyboard! It provides two keystroke access to many of the most common functions:

      Window-R: Run menu
      Window-S: Search menu
      Window-M: Minimize everything
      Window-E: Windows Explorer
      Window-D: Expose desktop (as in, hides windows marked always on top, for hiding porno when the boss is around)

      The window key does so much more than just open the start menu. I can't believe that you didn't think to look into it more...what kind of a developer are you that you don't do research before reacting irrationally towards a minor inconvenience?

      Oh wait. You're in IT now, aren't you?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    10. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by pavon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the scrollwheel is a good solution to what was perceived as a software problem, while internet buttons are not.

      1) Having a peice of hardware to directly perform a task is faster than using a harware device to manipulate a software control.

      2) There the amount of space available for hardware controls is limited compared to the amount of possible software controls. :.) We should pick the most often executed tasks to dedicate hardware controls to and implement the rest in hardware.

      Scrolling is something that users do very often. Compare this to launching your web browser, something I only do a dozen times a day (more if it doesn't have tabbed browsing). I probably scroll my webbrowser a dozen times each time I open a new web-browser window. When you take into account the fact that I browse many other windows as well, so see that a scrolling frequency is at least two orders of magnitude compared to launching your web browser.

      Further evidence of this difference is the fact that I am not annoyed when I have to use a computer without internet keys, but having to do without a scroll mouse is now a major inconvience, once I got used to having one.

      I would definatly put side scrolling on the list of things that ought to have optional hardware controls, as it would be invaluable for CAD and such. I don't know how effective this design for side-scrolling is - I'd have to test it. I would think a tool that let you pan freely in 2D would be more usefull for those applications. Perhaps a dedicated "pan" key or mouse button, where when you held it down, moving the mouse itself pans the document. I know there have been studies on this but I can't remember the conclusion. (and i'm certain simular things have been done in applications)

    11. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amatuer.

      Windows-R: Recycle LiteStep
      Windows-D: command prompt
      Windows-N: Notepad
      Windows-M: Mozilla
      Windows-E: Explorer
      Windows-C: Control Panel
      Windows-L: LiteStep Control Panel
      Windows-U: Shutdown
      Windows-S: Toggle VWM-sticky for active window
      Windows-Up/Down/Left/Right: Switch virtual desktops
      Windows-1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/0: Switch to specific virtual desktop

      and this all leaves Ctrl+Alt free for other things, like Ctrl+Alt+C to bring up the quick single-line command box.

    12. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by foolip · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's interresting. I hate the windows buttons too, not because they do anything, but because they remind me of that other operating system.

      In fact, I dislike them so much that just earlier today I took them off and used that stuff you use to polish wood (sorry, I'm not an english native speaker, so I don't know the word for swedish "sandpapper"). Anyway, now they're just gray buttons, so perhaps now I can bind them in fluxbox without feeling bad about pressing the evilOS-button :)

    13. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      On my Logitech mouse, if I press on the scrollwheel, the cursor turns into a four way arrow and you can pan around the document and the scroll bars will be updated automatically. Look under your mouse options in Windows to get this. For Linux, well, I don't where to go to enable this, but I remember panning in documents this way in Netscape 4.7 at my university. Didn't work in Konqueror tough, and it probably should have, but the Linux techie didn't seem to know much more than I do about Linux (which is not a lot at all), so maybe he got it wrong.

    14. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by tkittel · · Score: 1

      > sorry, I'm not an english native speaker, so I don't know the word for swedish "sandpapper"

      I think its just sandpaper.

      disclaimer:also-not-native-english-speaker

    15. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Whats next? WWW and email buttons on my computer? How about a Windows key to get in your way every time you go to use the left control?

      Believe it or not, my keyboard has buttons at the top for WWW and email....
      Now, if I could get them to work under Linux, I could hit the WWW button to bring up Firebird :P

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    16. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by danila · · Score: 1

      You don't need easy access to the so called "core" windows functions, you need access to frequently used functions. Let's see.
      Win+D - kind of useful to those people who store files/shortcuts on the desktop, though there is right-clicking on the Taskbar and Minimize all.
      Win+F - Ctrl+Esc, F3
      Win+Break - how often do normal people need access to system properties?
      Win+L - Ctrl+Alt+Del, Enter

      For me it is obvious, that the main function of the Windows key was to place MS logo on the keyboards that it didn't manufacture. Real use was an afterthought.

      P.S. I have both Windows keys and the Context Menu key ripped off all keyboards in my house and had them ripped off at work. :)

      P.P.S. Still, Windows key is not evil. What is evil is the Power Off button right above the Up arrow key (next to it, without a space in between). The person who placed it (together with Wake and Sleep keys) under the Delete/End/PgDn was a complete utter imbecilic moronic stupid stillborn ass with a brain gangrene.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    17. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by danila · · Score: 1

      My dictionary suggests "emery paper".

      disclaimer: not-native-english-speaker-as-well.

      P.S. Is there a native English speaker among slashdotters that would enlighten us? Preferably two - one from the US and one from the UK.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    18. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by archen · · Score: 1

      win r - show run dialog
      win e - open internet explorer
      win d - minimize / restore all windows
      win f - open find box
      win l - lock computer (xp only)
      win break - open system properties

      I found a nice BS keyboard once, but unfortunatly no windows key, and I go insane if I can't use the run dialog box with a keystroke since I use it so much. Eventually I got a new BS keyboard that did have one so I'm rather happy now. Mapping this in a similar way in KDE is also pretty easy.

      And once you remap your caps lock to a control key, you're ready to rock.

    19. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by jesser · · Score: 1

      Win+D is useful for dragging things from maximized windows to the desktop. I use Win+R ("run") all the time.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    20. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by jesser · · Score: 1

      I want virtual desktops that switch with Win+arrow! What did you have to install/tweak to get that? (I don't have virtual desktops at all, and I'm on WinXP.)

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    21. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use Gnome, there's a program called Acme that adds a "Multimedia Keys" option to the preferences which allows you to enable such keys.

    22. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to my dictionary (The Concise Heritage Dictionary) It is emery paper (well emery means to grind or polish so it could be an emery something).

      I'm the american but Ican't spell so please disreguard the mistakes.

      Tim

    23. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To really be safe (and sanctified) you probably should do some penance as well. Perhaps 2 dozen recitations of the GPL and 20 recitations of the GNU mission statement.

      Go forth and sin no more.

    24. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Win+D is meant as a quick minimize. This is useful as a privacy key, or just to clear everything away if you have too many things open. Also if you hit Win+D, and then hit Win+D again, your context is restored. So if you are leaving your desk you can hit Win+D, come back, hit Win+D and not have to worry about anyone seeing Slashdot open. Also remember keyboard shortcuts exist to minimize mouse use.

      Ctrl+F, F3? No that is application specific find. Win+F is Windows Find Files and Folders.

      Win+Break well maybe thats why it uses Break and not P or something. It's very useful when the mouse doesn't work, etc.

      Win+L, combines 2 keystrokes to one.

      Also there is Win+R for Run, type cmd and you're at a shell.

      Also: Win+E for (File) Explorer, Win+H for Windows Help (not same as F1, Application Help), Win+M is Minimize all (slightly different than Win+D, you cannot toggle), and apparently Win+U is Utility Manager (accessibility functions).

    25. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Eythian · · Score: 1

      Win+Break: System Properties

      There is some hidden meaning in this...I can't quite place it :)

    26. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid american here (me):

      It's sandpaper.

      Emory paper is the same thing, but emory paper is usually used in reference to emory boards for trimming nails.

    27. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      First off, it's called "sandpaper" here too. Polishing wood is usually done with a towel and hand lotion. :)

      My keyboard is technically enabled with Windows and Right-click keys, but if you press them you'll note that they don't do anything. It's quite trivial to paint some nail palish over the contacts inside if that is the desired effect.

      Opening the keyboard is non-trivial? What, you don't do that every year or two for cleaning anyhow? I always find it's time to clean the keyboard when one of these events happens:

      1. The key dirt rubs off on your fingers, rather than the other way around
      2. Insects begin to attack.
      3. A key (or more likely, several keys in a cluster) get sticky due to spilled soda/beer/coffee/other. :)
      4. You can't read the keycaps through the grime, even though they haven't worn off a bit.
      5. You can SMELL the keyboard.

      A simple pop-and-clean operation on each key may be in order, or the less effective but much faster Q-tip with alcohol. But for serious like-new cleaning, there is no substitute for ripping the whole thing completely apart. At THIS point, putting nail polish over undesired contacts is trivial.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    28. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Lay off the coffee, and learn the keyboard layout.


      Excuse me? We did, back when they had 101 keys or less! Now every newfangled thing you pick up has these damned thing on there that are completely useless to plenty of us out there.

      I have -just- become accustomed to them being on a keyboard. Two years ago I was still using a flathead screwdriver to pop them off in frustration of feeling a button that wasn't control where I thought control -could- be. I like my big control button. I don't even use my pinkies for it -- I just mash it with the base of my palm hand. That's the way I learned to use it back when it was big enough to do it that way. I can manage to do it again 100% of the time now that I'm accustomed to the smaller key.

      When in the company of vi and emacs users stating "learn the keyboard layout" is really really insulting. We know how to type without looking at the keys thank you very much.
    29. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      I found (don't really use windows much these days) that win-r (run) was the most useful shortcut by far:

      win-r cmd -> console
      win-r calc -> calculator
      win-r (paste web address) -> browser

      Still, I don't really like the idea of microsoft's logo being stuck on my keyboard. Be nice if some gnu/linux distros had it configured to do something useful by default - I don't like having useless buttons but it doesn't seem worth setting it up to do something just for myself.

    30. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by goldfndr · · Score: 1
      Actually, the next step would be putting wheels/balls under the other fingers. Why let the middle finger have all the fun? Sort of an inversion of the DataHand keyboard. Yeah, it'd be pricey, but price is no object for some people.

      There's prior art for the thumb having a wheel given some trackballs.

      I wonder if I should write up a patent...

      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    31. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, how is putting an entirely new key like that better than simply using CTRL+ALT+ the same key?

      Why couldn't Microsoft simply do CTRL+ALT+D for the desktop and CTRL+ALT+R for Run and CTRL+ALT+E for Explorer and CTRL+ALT+H for Help and CTRL+ALT+Break for system properties?

    32. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll?

      Do you have any f'ing idea what the definition of troll is?

      Offtopic? Yes.
      Redundant? Probably.
      Overrated? Undoubtedly.
      Troll? No.

    33. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      ctrl+esc brings up the start menu. R runs the first program starting with R in the start menu.

      If you want to launch explorer, I think the easiest way is to right-click the start menu and select explore. Alternatively you could create a link in your start menu that was the only one starting with E, and use the above shortcut s/r/e/i.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    34. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by danila · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+F is local find, Ctrl+Esc, F3 opens the start menu (taking focus away from your application) and then runs the global find. Try it.
      Win+Break - well, how often you mouse doesn't work? Do you think this warrants adding extra key? :) Even then, you can press Ctrl+Esc, S, C, S (a couple of times, or use arrows) and Enter.
      Win+R is not much better than Ctrl+Esc, R. One keystroke instead of two is useful only for very frequent operations (such as Ctrl+O is better than Alt+F, O, because you do it many times a day).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    35. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Eh, i like litestep, but don't have time (or the admin rights) to play around with alternative desktops.

      So i'm stuck with win"blows" 2k. At least I've been able to fend off the conspiracy to install XP on my machine.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    36. Re:Hardware solution for a software problem by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Anything for KDE?
      I prefer KDE over Gnome... no religious war, just a preference.
      Well, KDE and WindowMaker.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  39. Make programs wheel context sensitive. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    I've used a coulple of programs where, if you put the cursor over the horizontal bar, the wheel moves things in a left-right manner.

    Or is that still too much movement. Are the lusers THAT lazy?

  40. Should be great for RSI. Not. by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

    Should be great for RSI. Not. I find using the keyboard for paging feels better than that wheel over time. No serious RSI yet though.

  41. Gee, my mouse already scrolls both ways! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up and down! But seriously... it'd better either roll both ways or tilt both ways, otherwise it's not terribly intuitive.

  42. Good Idea, IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though this isn't a new idea, it is a good one, IMHO. For some reason most of the comments have been about web pages, and though not an especially useful feature for those, it would be very handy with spreadsheets, databases and graphic design tools. I use my scroll button quite a bit and would like to be able to horizontally scroll in such applications. I'm sure this feature would apply to many more apps.

  43. So now... by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

    So now when I open up those 5MP porn images I can see all of it easily without having to use two hands...yummmmmm

    --
    Sig & Below
    Yuck Fou
  44. embedding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how long until your embedded trackball has another mouse embedded in it?

  45. its physiology by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    my fingers dont do horizontal bending when on a mouse. its that simple. they bend sort of front to back when on a mouse, which is convienent for a vertical scroll, not a horizontal one.

    i do think it would work for the thumb, tho...

  46. Here's your mouse, Taco! by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    Depends on how fast you can click this link and order this mouse.

    ~Philly

  47. Finally by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

    1) Create a browser sensitive to page widening
    2) Create a mouse that scrolls widened pages
    3) PROFIT!!!

    (Sorry - I know I should be shot now)

    --
    BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
  48. Bonus Feature by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another bonus feature of this new mouse is that is only clicks Microsoft programs and products.

    For your safety, the mouse will not open any programs that Microsoft doesn't make money off of. It could be a virus.

    Furthermore, whenever you do click a Microsoft product, the mouse will waste your bandwidth be automatically connecting the internet, contacting Microsoft, and checking all your serial numbers to make sure your licenses are up to date.

    Then, if you have old software that has an update release from Microsoft, the mouse will open a browser where you can download updates (for a fee of course).

    Then to save you the hassle, the mouse will move the cursor over the Download Updates link and click for you, automatically charging your credit card.

    We hope you enjoy your new Microsoft mouse with added features. And don't forget to sign your EULA before opening the package.


    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Bonus Feature by aled · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not true. The new MS mouse allows to click on third party programs, if they are digitally signed by Microsoft.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    2. Re:Bonus Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      (Posting anonymously for fear of my employer...)

      I'm not sure where you got that information from, but for the most part it is true. Consumers have been asking for this functionality for years now, and we strive to improve the user-friendly experience. We expect a vocal minority of complaints such as yours, but OEMs and businesses will happily empty their wallets for us.

      To address your main concern though, most of the things you described are implemented in the mouse drivers. (We've been trying to get that sort of thing to be done in hardware, but it will be a longhorn time from now before the infrastructure is in place for those kinds of things) So, if someone codes up alternate drivers, your concerns may be alleviated.

      On the other hand, we are working on proprietary encryption based mouse protocols for down the road, making such drivers both harder and illegal(DMCA)to produce. We don't expect this to be common place until 2008 mind you, so you'll have to wait a few years to enjoy those new features.

    3. Re:Bonus Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, cynical

    4. Re:Bonus Feature by spungebob · · Score: 1

      Well, we're halfway there to this feature... my Intellipoint mouse already keeps trying to access the 'Net to talk to the Central Scrutinizer. Not that it ever asked my permission or gave me the option to turn it off. Thank god for sygate.

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
    5. Re:Bonus Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you say that like its a bad thing.

    6. Re:Bonus Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget to sign your EULA before opening the package.


      ...in blood...

  49. Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it come with linux and BSD drivers?

  50. Let me guess: it has a ball instead of a wheel! by notetoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    A ballsy mouse!

    1. Re:Let me guess: it has a ball instead of a wheel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, will the optical version still be a male mouse?

    2. Re:Let me guess: it has a ball instead of a wheel! by notetoi · · Score: 1

      Female... the light comes through a hole! How true!

  51. That's OURS! by SkjeggApe · · Score: 3, Funny

    HEY!!!
    SCO has the exclusive copyright on the multi-scrolling mouse. Prepared for exortion!!!!
    Oh, wait, is that you Mr. Gates? Sorry, we didn't mean to.. eh.. we just got a bit carried away, yes, we do remember, oh please let's still be friends.. it'll never, ever happen again.... sorry ....

  52. Re:Wow - how innovative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, you should have to use two hands to scroll sideways. How innovative of them.

  53. Re:Wow - how innovative! by vought · · Score: 1

    Whoops - that would be the sift key that makes my scroll wheel work horizontally, not the command key. Still, though, why put another wheel/button on the mouse if it has already been solved quite elegantly with existing input devices? Virtually everyone I notice keeps at least one key on the keyboard, so the shift key modifier seems easiest.

  54. No thank you. by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

    I have two complaints about this:

    1. It's already hard enough to "scroll" the damn things vertically without accidently "pressing" it and thats using fingers with knuckles that are the result millions of years of evolution to facilitate such tasks.

    2. This will encourage even more of those foul evil UI-nightmare horizontal scrollbars. And as I have a policy of not buying MS products that means my fingers will ache.

    1. Re:No thank you. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Ya, my mouse (and the one before it) does that too. I think it's particularly common in MSFT mice. Saying that, I do really like my MSFT mouse and keyboard.

      Heh: I have the same problem with my XBox control pad when it comes to the thumbsticks in some games. Maybe it's not the hardware. Maybe it's me?!

  55. It's out of joint. by stomv · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the reasons the scroll wheel is successful is because it's comfortable.

    Why? Your knuckles allow your finget to curl with your finger remaining parallel to the side of your hand.

    However, a side scrolling wheel requires either
    (i) an awful lot of play in your knuckles, allowing you to curl them to be non-parallel with the side of your hand, or
    (ii) bending the wrist to move your entire hand side-to-side.

    Neither is particularly comfortable, and both result in sore hand parts quite quickly. I predict that this will never be used much... too tough on the hands.

    1. Re:It's out of joint. by Memophage · · Score: 1

      If I were designing this thing (well, maybe I should), I'd put the side-scroller down on the side for my thumb. I have a Logitech wheel-mouse that has a thumb-button that I never use, but a side-scrolling wheel (or one of those little nubs that IBM has in their laptop keyboards) would be perfect down there...

    2. Re:It's out of joint. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't anyone read the article?
      I'm not picking on you personally, but everyone seems fixated on this horizontal scroll wheel.
      The wheel doesn't scroll leftright.
      It just leans that way.
      Which unless your hand is in a cast is quite easy to do.

    3. Re:It's out of joint. by belroth · · Score: 1

      It would be easier to put the horizontal scroll wheel on the side for use with the thumb.
      Actually I doubt if there were two vertically oriented wheel that it would take long to get used to scrolling horizontally with the second wheel. Some apps use the existing wheel to scroll horizontally and it's not too hard to use.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    4. Re:It's out of joint. by tgd · · Score: 1

      You should practice moving your finger side to side, as well as the traditional up and down scrolling mition. Girls find that a good skill to have.

    5. Re:It's out of joint. by stomv · · Score: 1

      Fair, I didn't read (well, I glanced).

      Even if it leans, it requires pressure in a direction that is normal to the joint... not comfortable, and stressful on the hand.

      Maybe the actual implementation is just right in terms of resistance... but I doubt it.

    6. Re:It's out of joint. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but when was the last time you did that for 8 hours straight?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:It's out of joint. by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      You what? you could also just hold your mouse so that the index finger lies over the scroll {ball|wheel} and move your index finger from side to side, pivoting around the knuckle where it joins the hand. I'd been doing this subconsciously while reading the above posts, and it seems pretty comfortable.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    8. Re:It's out of joint. by harborpirate · · Score: 1

      I think the first idea is a lot better than the second. I dislike those little IBM nubs. Mice with those already exist and you don't see too many people using those, do you? The scrollwheel is much better for the position and natural movements of the fingers when holding the mouse, IMHO.

      Since the orientation of the thumb is horizontal on the side of the mouse, the natural range of movement would work nicely with a horizontally oriented scroll wheel.

      So put a scroll wheel on the side for the thumb instead of the mouse button I never use. Though I don't scroll horizontally often, it'd be nice to have a scroll wheel when I do need it.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    9. Re:It's out of joint. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once in the summer of 1969, and again in '75.

    10. Re:It's out of joint. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      This is why the ideal place to put a side-scroll wheel is under the user's THUMB.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    11. Re:It's out of joint. by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with this. My current mouse has a little side-to-side play in the scroll wheel, and when I'm not clicking or scrolling, I rock it back and forth all the time. Sure, I'm not exerting a lot of force, but if the sideways motion is pretty easy to do, it really shouldn't be a problem.

      Doug

    12. Re:It's out of joint. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You are my hero, I worship you.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  56. I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse for a long time. It'd make working with large OrCAD and AutoCAD files alot easier.

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
    1. Re:I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If you mounted a Logitech Trackman upper on a Logitech Optical MOuse lower and hooked the upper trackball to the scroll fucntion, that would be pretty cool.

      Or it could be really dorky like those joysticks that have a second pivot halfway up the handle in addition to the pivot at the base and the hat at the top.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by Strandman · · Score: 1

      Let's hope they make it ambidextrous!

      New mouse design usually mean perfect fit for the right hand. You don't know how frustrating this is for left-handers.

    3. Re:I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Just turn your mouse upside down and hack the directions in software. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    4. Re:I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse for a long time.

      Rather than keep asking, why not just go to circuit City and buy one? I got mine last November. But the track ball operation is getting flakey.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    5. Re:I've been asking for a trackball in a mouse... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      probably you will like this:
      here
      it allows to scroll vertically/horisontally by pressing right or middle mouse buttons and moving the mouse in any app. it's opensource now - sources are here
      i've been using it very long and actually it feels as natural as a wheel.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  57. IBM did this with one of those notebook nubs by acomj · · Score: 1

    IBM had a scrolling mouse with one of those notebook pointing devices that hung out between the g and h keys on the keyboard.

    It worked well. I miss that mouse. I like the fact the harder you pushed it the faster it scrolled.

    1. Re:IBM did this with one of those notebook nubs by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I believe it was the Thinkpad 365, and likely others as well. We always referred to the pointer as the 'eraser-head pointer' when I worked for IBM.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  58. Uhm.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't it just be easier to use a trackball?

    I mean, with this new mouse you still have to move the thing around in order to move the pointer. You get full X and Y axis movement using a trackball now and it remains in the same place on your desk. You don't even need to clear your collection of empty RedBull cans in order to use it.

    Plus, its easlier to play FPS using a trackball.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Uhm.. by belroth · · Score: 1

      Acorn used to do a nice joystick where the stick gave control of the Z axis by rotating it. I know lots of current joysticks do something similar but this wasn't for games, it was a precision input device for CAD etc. IIRC it had a short stalk which rotated, mounted on a ball (like a largish trackball). It looked sort of like a safe tumbler dial mounted on a tennis ball in a neat housing. I think it had three buttons, which was common on BBC micro input devices (Acorn home computer, early 80s).

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    2. Re:Uhm.. by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      A trackball may work well for games, but it won't necessarily work as well for wide-format webpages, spreadsheets, etc. It's more difficult to move a trackball in only one direction (left/right/up/down). I think that a d-pad may be better than a trackball or tilting scroll wheel.

      On the other hand, why not put a trackball onto a trackball? Just kidding.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    3. Re:Uhm.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I use a trackball at home. I'm constantly dickering around in Photoshop, etc and have got quite good at moving the ball around with my thumb.

      Of course, a graphics tablet would be better. But I don't have any issues moving the ball in a single direction.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    4. Re:Uhm.. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      How the hell was this ever modded insightful. This is meant as an augmentation to the scrolling function of the mouse, not a replacement for the mouse/cursor movement.

    5. Re:Uhm.. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      but think of it this way...what if you can move the contents (viewable area) of a window indendent of the mouse movement. This makes sense to me for having a trackball-like device imbeded in a mouse. Much more advantageous than just a trackball or just a mouse.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    6. Re:Uhm.. by hellfire · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to come down on someone who probably doesn't deserve it, but I'm really tired of people suggesting trackballs because they are easier/better/nicer/Ownz j00r azz.

      For me, trackballs are NOT easier and they do not reduce RSI injuries any more than a good regular mouse. Or more correctly, they are not easier TO ME.

      Some people like trackballs, others like traditional mice. I prefer the latter, because the movement and motion of my arm work better with a traditional mouse. I'm faster and more productive. A trackball has me spending too much time getting the fine movement down with my fingers. I spend half of my time moving the cursor across the screen as normal, but the other half fine tuning my movement to actually center on an icon or menu because it feels so inaccurate.

      I'm also not arrogant enough to claim "traditional mouse is better you just suck at using it" so no one else should be an ass an attempt to claim the same thing about trackballs. They are just different.

      If we were sticking with creating an ideal for all consumers, computer companies should offer trackball replacements for traditional mice. That would be something very innovative. I wouldn't be surprised if some companies do already, but I don't see it happening in any big retailers myself.

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    7. Re:Uhm.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to come down on someone who probably doesn't deserve it, but I'm really tired of people suggesting trackballs because they are easier/better/nicer/Ownz j00r azz.

      That's fine. Everyone's allowed to be an ass from time to time. Note that I never said they were easier/better/nicer/0wnz j00r azz.

      For me, trackballs are NOT easier and they do not reduce RSI injuries any more than a good regular mouse. Or more correctly, they are not easier TO ME.

      However they're easier for ME, Despite the fact that my thumbs are shot (thanks to skateboarding in my youth w/o wearing wrist guards).

      I'm also not arrogant enough to claim "traditional mouse is better you just suck at using it" so no one else should be an ass an attempt to claim the same thing about trackballs. They are just different.

      At no point did I say what you're quoting. Either you need to cut down on the caffeine or you need to learn how to reply in a thread 'cause you've got me confused with someone else.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    8. Re:Uhm.. by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      "Plus, its easlier to play FPS using a trackball."

      In what world? I have a Logitech TrackMan Marble+, and it nearly impossible to keep your "eye" steady or aim properly at a moving target. Part of it has to do that it's a round ball and not a flat 2-d plane like a mouse surface.

    9. Re:Uhm.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      OMG, I find it SOOOO much easier to play UT2K3 using my MS Optical Trackball than I ever did using a conventional mouse. Maybe its my mad skillz :D

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  59. Big Deal... I have one. by Dragon218 · · Score: 1

    I have a Kingston mouse that does the exact same thing. it has two scroll wheels and it rocks my world. Although I don't use it on my windows machine, this mouse hasn't given me a single problem in the 2 years I've had it. It still has it's smooth as silk glide, where all others would have gummed up.

    --

    "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
    1. Re:Big Deal... I have one. by coreyb · · Score: 1

      I also have a mouse with two wheels that I've had since my windows days. But since switching to Linux, the horizontal wheel acts the same as the vertical one. All the info I found when I switched seemed to indicate that X wouldn't deal with more than 5 buttons. Has this changed? If so, how do I make my horizontal button different from the vertical?

  60. whats the mouse name gonna be? by not_a_george · · Score: 1

    TROLL? (Sorry, I had to!)

    --
    Linux: Helping nerds look smarter since the late 90s.
  61. Scrolls both ways by Chester+K · · Score: 1

    New Microsoft Mouse Scrolls Both Ways

    Sweet! Does this mean we'll finally get some mouse-on-mouse action?

    --

    NO CARRIER
  62. Innovative by dwyers2 · · Score: 0
    "The innovation means that users will be able to scroll horizontally as well as vertically without using on-screen navigation bars."

    And here I thought keyboards already allowed them to do this.

  63. Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the yes-i-said-it dept

    Whatever.

    Next.

  64. Trackball by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

    what are they gonna put a fricken track ball as the middle button? besides my mouse already does that if you click the middle button. not to mention that fewer and fewer webpages need to be horizontally scrolled anyways. they are probably going to charge 10 bux more for it and make ie require it to work. spooty spoot heads.

    --
    Trust Your Technolust
  65. This is news? by twifkak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it's done by M$? Because it's done via "tilting"? 4-D mice are not new.

    2 wheels
    1 wheel (presumably via kybd modifier)
    a trackball

    Move along, people, nothing to see here. Please, go back to slamming Real or something much more important.

    --
    I know you were joking, but I want my Karma, so I'm going to reiterate your post in a serious tone.
  66. ./ers missing the point... by int2str · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey guys!

    I see many replies about other mice with second scroll wheels or a built in trackball.

    This mouse let's you TILT the scroll wheel. That is the innovative part here. And personally I think that's gonna be much more usable than a second scroll wheel or a trackball on your mouse.

    Cheers,
    Andre

    1. Re:./ers missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And personally I think that's gonna be much more usable than a second scroll wheel or a trackball on your mouse.

      Care to elaborate? I thought about it and couldn't figure out why Microsoft's solution is supposed to be better.

    2. Re:./ers missing the point... by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Well, it should take up less room than a whole additional scroll wheel. Also, by having two seperate actions (tilting vs. spinning the wheel), it should help to prevent the diagonal scroll problems that crop up with trackballs.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:./ers missing the point... by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 1

      So in other words, it won't actually scroll horizontally, but instead will glide to one side or the other based on the direction of the tilt?

      --
      "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
    4. Re:./ers missing the point... by addaon · · Score: 1

      Think of the difference between Toshiba's jog wheel and Sony's jog wheel (both on their handhelds). The sony one is a real wheel, like a mouse wheel. The toshiba one doesn't actually go in circles; you pull it up or down and, while it's in that position, it scrolls. When you let go, a spring pulls it back to standard position. I actually find the toshiba one much more usable for scrolling, and wish they made a mouse with it. The only real downside is that you can't comfortable click the wheel button while scrolling on the toshiba, and your scroll speed is determined by software.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    5. Re:./ers missing the point... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Taking away the ability to click the scroll wheel as a middle button though sounds dumb to me. Personally I'd just like a lil joystick nub there that can also be clicked. Then it could still be a middle mouse button, apps that wanted to could use it to scroll either way, some apps could use it as a second mouse cursor, and games would have an easy way to let you move your point of view (head, weapon, whatever) while using the normal mousing function to move your position (body or whatever). If done right that could be nice. It sounds similar to other peoples comments of mice with laptop-like nubs in that spot but evidently (from comments) those were poorly implemented. Or for that matter I guess you could give all three mouse buttons this ability.. to make it something of a combination mouse and awesome joystick. That could be overkill though. I think lil joystick nubs would be easier to use in this way than say trackballs.. as you don't want to need to lift your finger from the surface of the button.

      (Does anyone else thing scroll wheels look lewd?)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    6. Re:./ers missing the point... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard.

      I would imagine that the driver lets you turn this feature off, and use that click as a 3rd mouse button. There is also the possibility that this mouse will have those annoying side buttons that new MS mice have.

      I say annoying side buttons because I am left handed. It is near impossible to use that MS mouse left handed and not continuously accidently click the "left side" or "back" button. I've never owned one though, so it may be possible to "get used to".

    7. Re:./ers missing the point... by syukton · · Score: 1

      I think that the scroll wheel should've been like this in the first place. Or even better; like the little eraser-looking nub that was used on laptops as a pointing device for a while. You can move it in any two-dimensional direction you want. The scroll wheel is kinda-sorta neat, sure, but what if you just had to lightly pull down on the little "nub" and hold it there to scroll down multiple pages? Sure beats repeatedly flicking at the wheel with your finger... I think that the entire moving-wheel thing is outdated; I want a mouse with no spinning parts, dammit.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    8. Re:./ers missing the point... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I guess I wonder how many buttons a mouse really needs. I like three and I like scroll wheels but do we really need five button mice with scrolling/tilting wheels? How long before we are using 101 button mice?

      I guess I'd be happy with a three button mouse where the left button (or right button for lefties) is a joystick nub that can also be clicked. That'd do everything I need without going completely crazy on buttons.

      I remember the pucks (is that still the proper term?) we used to use for CAD.. That had like a dozen buttons, worked as a mouse, and had a lil sensor that could read the symbols the puck was actually pointing at on your lil mouse-pad type of deal. That'd be a bit overkill for most uses I think.

      Of course, I'm interested in replacing my keyboard with a second mouse so that I can use combination mouse movements to stand for keystrokes also.. as well as allowing you to use both mice as mice. Like the keyboard recently feature on /. (the one that looked like boobs) but freestyle and usable with any two mice. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:./ers missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think that the entire moving-wheel thing is outdated; I want a mouse with no spinning parts, dammit.

      They're called trackpads, and they're very annoying to use...

    10. Re:./ers missing the point... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      where the left button (or right button for lefties)

      Most lefties I know, including myself, do use the left button as left, and use the middle finger to activate it. This is generally because if you share a system with right-handed users, you just move the mouse from the right side of the keyboard to the left and go on your way.

    11. Re:./ers missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'd just like a lil joystick nub there that can also be clicked.

      I think you've hit on a winner of an idea here, assuming by 'joystick nub' you're talking about one of those four-directional POV hats. I would love to be able to scroll in any direction WITHOUT having to constantly remove and shift my scroll-wheel finger.

      Also, it would make playing FPS games one-handed a breeze - move with the hat, and aim with the mouse. Enter the genre of the pornographic FPS :D

      The POV hat could be in place of the wheel (in which case, it would likely have to be a button also), or the mouse could have three normal buttons, and the pov hat could be operated by the thumb.

      I like! I want! Does anyone out there work for a company that makes mice? A quick search of google doesn't turn up anything.

    12. Re:./ers missing the point... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I mostly meant because I was suggesting something like a joystick be provided.. so I was suggesting that unlike most scroll mice that make the wheel the middle button that for a joystick like button you would probably want to use your index finger (which for righties usually is on the left mouse button). I guess you could retrain yourself to use a different finger but I'd think the index finger would tend to still be more appropiate for this kind of use. I'd rather see right/left handed models for this kind of thing.. or a way to reconfigure the buttons physically (maybe have both right and left buttons able to act as a joystick num and have a leftie/rightie switch on the bottom of the mouse?).

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  67. Crazy mouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One button mouse, two button mouse, scroll wheel, scroll wheel that clicks, now two direcition scroll wheel, Taco's suggestion of the trackball in the mouse...

    ...why not just put the whole fscking keyboard on my mouse?

    Oh, I guess they already have it.

  68. Re:Wow - how innovative! by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 1

    Most mice with a scroll wheel allow it to act as a button. When pressed you can then scroll in any direction using the mouse.

    That's not the point.

    The point is making it more efficient. Why in hell would I want to have to reach over to the keyboard and find a key when I could easily just lift a finger?

    If you don't want it, don't buy it.

    --
    "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
  69. duh by XO · · Score: 1

    THere are dual wheel mice, that have a horizontal and a vertical wheel... sheesh.

    how does this make any page of slashdot, let alone front?

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  70. Kinda like Thinkpad nipples? by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

    The little red nipple/eraser in the middle of my thinkpad keyboard allows me to scroll vertically and horizontally using the middle 'mouse' button. So... why is this news?

    I guess trackpoing is the official title, not nipple/eraser.

    1. Re:Kinda like Thinkpad nipples? by castle · · Score: 1

      I happen to have an IBM Model MO09K mouse that does what the Microsoft mouse is said to do... three buttons and a scroll in both axes. Because the middle mover nub is essentially a blue trackpoint.

      Micro$oft Innovation? No... just really good marketing...

      I really like this mouse though so the bandwagon Microsoft is jumping on is the right one in my opinion.

  71. Screech, Crash by malia8888 · · Score: 1
    From the article: The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard.

    Good news!! Joe Blow consumer can now crash his computer in a new and exciting way. I hope this mouse comes in colors.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    1. Re:Screech, Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, thanks for that post. Were you hoping for an Insightful, or Funny mod?

      You, sir, are a moron.

  72. I have had a horizontal wheel mouse for yrs| by the_archivist · · Score: 1

    so whats new! but an advert for the antichrist AARRR

    --
    while(karma less_than enough_karma){karma++}
  73. Re:Wow - how innovative! by Telex4 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wish I could do this on my Macintosh with my generic two-button scoll mouse.

    Oh, wait (holds down command key) I can scroll horizontally. In any application. With no new drivers, equipment, or fuss.

    Yay for Mac OS X, I guess. What's the big deal again?


    Why is it that whenever a company people dislike (with good reason in this case) releases some new technology, everybody jumps to show that their new technology is stupid, or redundant, or both? You can be sure that if Apple released this exact same product, people like you would be extolling its virtues.

    So yay, it's a new mouse idea, and maybe it will catch on and prove useful in some areas (like a large spreadsheet maybe, where you need horizontal scrolling and may already be employing your command key). Maybe then a company that we find agreeable will make a similar product and we can all go and buy our new dual-scrolling mouse.

  74. innovation by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    My roommate bought an optical mouse that does this one year ago, at Target. Let's hear it for innovation!

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  75. Never mind that....Ninnle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember...if it's not supported under Ninnle, it's probably not worth having.

  76. You people are boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Eraser-head poinrer you say? We always called this... well, I can't tell you what we called it because I'm at work. Use your imagination, dude!

    1. Re:You people are boring. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      What? Like 'Clit Mouse'?

      Wow. That's original.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:You people are boring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, the "nipple mouse"?

      That's a terrible word. Nipple.

  77. Interesting idea by xTown · · Score: 1

    I had the same reaction to this that I did when I first heard about the wheel mouse: "what a dumb idea. I'm never going to use it."

    Of course now, x years later, I can't live without that little wheel. It's made a huge difference in the way I use my computer, no lie. (And of course it's great in games.)

    Like anything, all it requires is a killer app.

  78. I Wonder by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    If there's any SCO code in there that MS bought from SCO...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  79. SCO sues Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...claiming they thought of this first and threatening to sue current mouse users for owning Microsoft mice.

  80. "Microsoft are" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You is good at grammar.

  81. ..and can you trackball to mouse and visa versa? by patbob · · Score: 1
    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    .. and how confused could you make others if you set it to use the trackball to mouse and the mouse to trackball?

    --
    Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
  82. IOGear by appler · · Score: 1

    IOGear already has something like this. Check it out at ThinkGeek.com: http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/keyboards /5e45/

  83. Bisexual mouse? by useosx · · Score: 1

    Tilts both ways...bats both ways. Get it?

    Sorry, it's been a long day...

  84. Coitus? by KRL · · Score: 1

    So this is like... a mouse on top of a mouse?

  85. Hmmm.... by Sedennial · · Score: 1

    So it's a bi-directional mouse that swings both ways.....interesting.....

    I wonder if we'll see discrimination lawsuits against companies that only provide uni-directional mice.

  86. ow my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That (http://www.tecstorm.co.uk/tsots1.htm) has got to be one of the worst web pages ever. Neve mind the design (I didn't even notice I was so distracted), but the whole f'in page is image squares! What kind of brainless manager found out how to use imageready or some such image slicing program and came up with that?

    Ugh.

  87. Neat, i guess by zapp · · Score: 1

    This has always been an annoyance to me, that I cannot scroll horizontally easily.

    I quickly figured out an easy remidy though... set your middle-click to pan around.

    So, while this is kinda neat... it's not a necessity.

    --
    no comment
  88. Both Ways ehh? by arose · · Score: 1

    You mean up and down?

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  89. Innovation? Nice reporting, BBC by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. That it gets reported as an 'innovation' by the BBC is a bit ridiculous.

    One more technology that Micro$oft will "invent" that really was created well before them by someone else.

    A better description would be Micro$oft is 'popularizing' or 'marketting' or 'giving a nod' to 2-axis scrolling. Certainly there is no 'innovation' here.

  90. ScrollPoint mice by ajorge · · Score: 1

    IBM has had horizontal scroll for years now.
    ScrollPoint Pro 800

  91. RTFA by mblase · · Score: 1

    I want webpages to be designed like they currently are.

    Y'know, some people actually use their computers for more than just web browsing. And there are other applications besides web browsers that use horizontal scrollbars! Strange, I know, but true.

  92. IBM Scrollpoint by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    I have one of these IBM Scrollpoint mice at work and I love the thing. I never cared for the scrollpoint as a pointing device on a laptop but it works great on a mouse for scrolling in either direction, heck if I'm looking at a large image in a browser I can even scroll diagonally. Trying to tilt the wheel on at new MS one and roll it at the same time would be more dificult I think.

  93. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Oh don't troll. This is actually an interesting article. Although this might not be world-shattering it is still a pretty nifty thing. The uses for a trackball in the mouse would incredible for a gamer. Imagine instead of WASD layout you could have all movement and shooting controls on one hand with the other one free for equipment managment and chatting.

    Troll he certainly was. Raises the "slashdot payola" accusation again. I'm assuming the answer to that question is still no?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  94. Great strategy for RMS by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    Now that mousing hand will not only have to move the mouse itself, but will also have to manipulate a "secondary" trackball-type mouse in the existing mouse with one finger. I have a feeling that people that use these mice will develop extreme pain in their middle finger...

    Maybe this will eliminate the traditional insult among FPS geeks? We'll have to invent a new one.

    Nah, I don't know about you, but I'd rather keep my middle finger. I like the WASD combination anyway, keeps the continual stress on my hands balanced.

    1. Re:Great strategy for RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Erm, should have said more in that post. What I meant was, the middle finger is going to be moving from side to side. The middle finger just isn't designed to do this type of thing over and over again in that position (i.e. the position of the scroll wheel); it could be very damaging to the hand. I know I'm going to avoid mice that utilize these like the plague. I don't want the strain of a trackball combined with the strain of a regular mouse...That's like using two mice at once; the strain on the hand will be immense. I'm talking about FPS gaming here, it might not be that large of an issue for document/website browsing.

  95. Man, everyone rips of IBM! by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    Ibm had this at least 3-4 years ago with their Scrollpoint Mouse. It's gone through a bunch of iterations, but it's always had that functionality.

    Good thing SCO didn't have this first...or did they?

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  96. Re:Innovation? Nice reporting, BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. But the Brits just discovered oral hygine so what do you expect?

  97. Not necessary... by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

    I don't need a horizontal mouse... I just turn my monitor on its side!

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  98. I've had one of these for months... by trisweb · · Score: 1

    ...on my IBM ThinkPad -- if I press the conveniently placed middle mouse button, the trackpoint turns into a multi-directional scroller. I can 'tilt' it left and right to scroll horizontally, up and down for vertically.

    --
    "!"
  99. From the article by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

    [Logitech] also questioned Microsoft's decision to stop scroll wheels clicking as they are spun back and forth

    !!!!!!!!!

    The clicky feel of the scrollwheel is the one of the finest things on this Earth! How can Microsoft even contemplate dropping that. Though Logitech has always done it better (I love my Trackman Wheel so much)

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  100. I hold in my hand by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    They exist. The one I have in my hand now (no, the other hand...) was made by a company calling themself Starlogic, although I think they went out of business even before I bought mine from Circuit City for $8 last November. Google on Starlogic, trackball and mouse and you'll get lots of hits. There's even a couple on e-bay, but be warned, like most stuff on e-bay (I.M.H.O.) this is a scam - the mouse is showing currently at 99 cents, but the bastard will charge you 12 bucks shipping to send it to you if you "win".

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  101. simulate it yourself to see if you like it by Dr.+Cockulus · · Score: 0

    since the day i got my intellimouse explorer, i've had it set to scroll up/down as i move the scroll wheel (duh), and to scroll left/right as a move the scroll wheel while holding shift. it's VERY useful, *especially* for the websites made by morons that are too wide (the morons and the sites)

  102. Re:Wow - how innovative! by loraksus · · Score: 1

    dude, I have a mouse with this "new feature" that connected through a SERIAL PORT. That alone should tell you how old this idea is.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  103. Acceptance of such a mouse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is sure to create a schism in the Church of the User Interface Designers.

  104. Unreal... by ChaoS*Penguin · · Score: 1

    Two extra bindable buttons, Wow. a horizontal scroll would kick-ass for gaming. w00t!
    I wonder though will you be able to scroll both at one? Diagonal scrolling?

  105. Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting
    IBM has sold mice with a TrackPoint placed between the buttons. This allows for you to scroll up/down and side to side. I always thought that it was hard to use as you had to exert some force to press the pointer and at the same time oppose that force to keep the mouse from moving. A scroll wheel seems more natural to me.

    /.ers lucky enough to use IBM Thinkpads can use the third mouse button to activate scrolling capability for the keyboard mounted TrackPoint. Interestingly, this works better than mouse mounted TrackPoint because you don't have to work to keep the keyboard still as you scroll.

    As others have noted elsewhere in this discussion, there isn't nearly as much use for the side to side scrolling as the up/down. It is useful for navigating spreadsheets and large graphics files.

    PS I know there is no such mod as CORRECT. However, that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be.

    1. Re:Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My compaq laptop with a synaptics trackpoint can also activate scrolling by pressing both buttons at the same time. Since virtually all non-ibm laptops with trackpoints use the synaptics trackpoint, so this feature should be available in most high-end laptops.

      Having a dedicated third button of course is the best, but its still very easy if your laptop has two large buttons instead.

    2. Re:Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by mindbooger · · Score: 1

      Well, technically only /.ers lucky enough to use Thinkpads and _unlucky_ enough to use Windows can do that. It's a function of the Windows driver. ;-)

      On a *cough* normal *cough* OS, it's just a nice, simple, loveable 3-button PS2 mouse, just like it should be in X.

      (I've got a Slackware'd Thinkpad T21)

    3. Re:Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by g0_p · · Score: 1

      IBM also sells a USB keyboard with not just the trackpoint but also the touchpad all on the keyboard (marketing jargon : UltraNav). I have always hated taking my hands off the keyboard to operate the mouse 'cos it takes some orientation time to get my fingers back on position. And I really love the trackpoint. No strain on your (already overworked?? ;-)) hand..

    4. Re:Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one, and it's going to have to become SERIOUSLY broken before i part with it. It is by far my favourite mouse ever.

      The primary thing is that i really love the scrollpoint. (although i have never been able to configure xfree86 into making it scroll sideways) When i use regular wheel mice it always pisses me off that you have to perform this tedious scroll-release-scroll-release-scroll-release to scroll a long way. with the scrollpoint, you simply apply light pressure (nothing that would come close to counteracting the force of your hand resting on the mouse/table) and release when you are satisfied. Most applications aren't designed to deal with this kind of scrolling though, you'll see some performance issues, especially in web browsers.

      Also, it is a very good mouse. mine has been performing great for about five years with semi-regular cleaning.

    5. Re:Mod parent up as CORRECT!!! by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      i think there may just be a use for that annoying thinkpad nipple thingy after all. It would make a great replacement for a scroll wheel. No moving parts, except the obligatory button. A great idea indeed!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
  106. Like the rubber thingy on the keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like those little rubber thingies in the middle of a laptop keyboard, only put it on the mouse instead.

  107. Sounds like a joystick to me.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm a joystick stuck on a mouse base.. the sort of things you dream up during a college party after you have had too much beer.

    I supposed they patented this 'innovation'..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Sounds like a joystick to me.. by Zodman · · Score: 1

      Man...I would -love- to have a little joystick where the wheel is. You know...like you get on console handsets?

      The possibilities are fantastic for gaming.

  108. This has been around for years? by Evro · · Score: 1

    I don't see why this is news. Just take a look here for oodles of dual-wheel mice. A) this is not "innovative" and B) Even if it were a new concept, why would it be on Slashdot?

    --
    rooooar
  109. Slippery little critta. by WalterDGeranios · · Score: 1

    I like the scroll wheel, but to use it as a button on some models you have to press it directly down from the very center or it will slip'n'scroll [instead of|in addition to] pressing. Adding the horizontal pivot factor in would make me a little nervous about trying to press the middle button. Like trying to jump on a balloon wearing rollerblades.

  110. Joystick better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use my scroll wheel all the time, as I'm sure most of us do, but wouldn't a "joystick" be a better solution?

    You can move it in different ways, and you don't have to "scroll, move finger to top, scroll, move finger to top..." over and over, you just hold down, or left, or right, or up. ... and I have a Logitech trackball mouse... of course the trackball is for moving the cursor, not scrolling, but meh.

  111. Thinkgeek's got one by PiGuy · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new, there's one at ThinkGeek for $17.99 from IOGear. I have it and it works fairly well, except for the fact that no Linux application recognizes horizontal scrollage. Fortunately, I still get use out of the trackball, since the mouse can switch in hardware to 'trackball' mode, where the trackball and the mouse proper switch roles. Moving the mouse up and down to scroll is a lot easier than twiddling a roller or a ball.

  112. I get the Tilt part... but, what's new about... by dukarukus · · Score: 0
    using the scroll as a third button that can accept various commands.

    The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard.
    i've got a four button mouse from a year and a half ago that will copy/paste/minimize/alt+tab... and you can set it up on any of the buttons.
  113. Slashdot Microsoft by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Wow, I'm rather impressed. So far we haven't been ablt to /. Microsoft yet. Next time Microsoft, we will get you...and your little dog too!!!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  114. Been done by IBM before by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    I have seen this feature on several mice from IBM. Essentially, they mount a large pointing stick (like the ones used on ThinkPads, only 5x the size) in place of a scroll wheel on the mouse, and you can scroll in any direction.

    IBM currently sells two mice which feature this. However, they have sold mice with this function for several years (I believe I first saw them over 5 years ago).

    This isn't new news. However, it is a great step forward, as I love the conveinence 2-dimensional scrolling provides

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  115. How about horizontal-scrolling emulation? by GiMP · · Score: 1

    It might not be a bad idea to add a toggle switch to
    utilize the vertical wheel for horizontal movement. The vertical wheel would be much easier to control than a horizontally placed wheel.

    The best thing about such an implementation would be that it can be done with modifications to the system's drivers. It could be possible to use the second button as a toggle.

    pseudocode:
    if mouse.button2 && mouse.button4:
    mouse.button6=1
    elif mouse.button2 && mouse.button5:
    mouse.button7=1

  116. Fujitsu by the_real_tigga · · Score: 1

    I have been using this mouse for over two years, and there is no stupit tilting or rolling required, you just sliiide your finger a bit.
    (Sorry for the PDF link, there was no other decent picture to be found.)

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  117. Quite usable in games by Hudjakov · · Score: 0

    Nowdays there are different weapons and different ammos. Counter-Strike will more comfortable to play.

    1. Re:Quite usable in games by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

      There are so, so many more examples which fit better, why did you pick CS?

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  118. which begs the question by hendrix69 · · Score: 1

    Who scrolls horizontally??
    Another fine product concocted without market research... Next: the Diagonal scrolling mouse.

    --
    The power of Christ compiles you!
  119. this is so useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can scroll vertically anyway, i just hold it down and move it to the right/left, just how is this 'new' idea supposed to help me out further?

  120. Mac OS X does this by jaysones · · Score: 1

    In Mac OS X, if you hold down the shift key and scroll with your mouse, it scrolls side-to-side.

  121. News? by blankmange · · Score: 1

    Why is this newsworthy? My MSMouse already scrolls horizontally -- if you click with the wheel, you get a cursor with arrows in the direction that the page is available to scroll in. This has been built into the software for at least a couple of years......

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:News? by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this is going to be in the hardware itself now. You simply tilt the mouse to the right and scroll away. No more need for the on-screen cursor thing that pops up.

  122. how long? not long... by steak · · Score: 1

    "How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?"

    a company called iogear make a mouse with a trackball for scrolling.

    www.iogear.com

    GME421

  123. New Microsoft Mouse Scrolls Both Ways by 1s44c · · Score: 1


    New Microsoft Mouse Scrolls Both Ways

    IBM are going to roger SCO to death and people really care about this stuff?

    It's not exactly groundbreaking stuff. I'll bet every third person has looked at a wheel mouse and wondered why they don't scroll left and right as well. I know I have.

    I guess this is what passes for inovation at MS.

  124. I've had a mouse with 2 scroll wheels for a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://a4tech.com/EN/product3.asp?CID=1&SCID=8&MNO =WOP-35

  125. not an innovation by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Its definetly not a radical innovation,...

    I don't see it as an innovation at all, particularly since I'm sitting here using a "Starlogic" optical mouse with a track ball built into the top that lets me scroll horizontal, vertical, or any combination of the two. I got it for 8 bucks last November at Circuit City. I think the company went under, but the devices still exist (beware extremely inflated shipping charges on e-bay).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  126. Mouse wheel that "scrolls" both ways... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

    ...legal in Hawaii and Canada.

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  127. Why go both ways when you can go all six? by Megaslow · · Score: 1

    You need this if you REALLY want to be cool :)

  128. Computer != Web Browser by misfit13b · · Score: 1

    They can do a lot more than that.

  129. Um... I have an old IBM mouse that had this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old idea. The had it as a stick and not a wheel. The mouse broke down (dang moving parts) and I started to have troubles finding drivers to support it.

    Good old MickeySoft claiming innovation off someone elses idea.

  130. I want a mouse with a joystick by chopper749 · · Score: 1

    like my thinkpad has. I hate rolling the scroll wheel over and over again.. Why can't I just push on it????

  131. EMACS is my OS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And while it supports mice, I find them to be extraneous.

  132. Typical Microsoft Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The humble computer mouse is about to move in a whole new direction"

    Come on. There have been 4D (two scroll wheels) mice for a while, and the IBM trackpoint mouse, and trackball mice.

    The IBM mice were usually made by Logitech, they are high quality.

    The only thing this shows is the skill of MS's marketing deparment in ignoring previous products completely and claiming they have something new. Yeah, it's a little different from other mice techniques to get this done, but it isn't something revolutionary.

  133. I just KNEW it! by hankaholic · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's it, Microsoft is gay.

    No, really. Their mouse goes both ways, their products have lots of loose back doors...

    --
    Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    1. Re:I just KNEW it! by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 1

      If it went both ways, it'd be bisexual. That's one happy mouse!

  134. I don't get it by spuke4000 · · Score: 1

    Why can't I just turn my mouse 90 degrees and use the wheel?

    --
    This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  135. I could have sworn by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    I worked with an IBM mouse that had a small "J" button on it, it worked in the four major directions to scroll not only up and down, but side to side as well.

    But I can't find it now so I may have been dreaming.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  136. Horizontal Scrolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on the effect that you want to achieve. I've see a few websites that have really wide formats - on purpose. It tells me that for most things, vertical scrolling is fine, but certainly don't restrict the medium ti vertical scrolling because Jakob Nielsen says most people hate scrolling left to right. There's generally two reasons for this - one is people are not used to it, and the second is that they didn't have a way to do it (since most scroll wheels only goes vertically).

    A good example of a horizontal scrolling is the image of the UNIX/LINUX genealogy.

    Why limit yourself?

  137. great grammer by kelceylehrich · · Score: 1

    The BBC IS reporting that microsoft IS.....

    1. Re:great grammer by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      you mean "great gramm a r"?

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  138. And here's the same mouse, from another brand.. by spaic · · Score: 1

    http://www.clasohlson.se/images/products/S/hi/B/32 4086_Xw2.jpg

  139. Trackball in a mouse for gaming too by two_ply · · Score: 1
    I've often wanted this (normal mouse + trackball combo) for FPS games.

    Very often in CounterStrike you come to a position where your crosshair is just -slightly- to the side of someones head, where gross wrist motion will take your aim too far to the other side to hit them. I think the ultimate combo would be a normal mouse with the sensativity cranked way up for moving and quick turning, and a trackball with a lower sensativity used for precise aiming/adjustments.

    1. Re:Trackball in a mouse for gaming too by Fesh · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I use the center wheel for weapons selection and toggling alternate fire (button 3). I get the feeling that if the wheel flopped to the left and right, I'd probably get myself fragged in those positions where my primary weapon has gone dry in a nasty firefight and I have to drop to the pistol. And a trackball seems even less useful for this...

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  140. You mean like the IBM scroll point mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.idg.co.nz/magazine/pcworld/feb98/ibmmou se.htm

  141. Trackball by Gandalf1957 · · Score: 1

    scrolling up/down and left/right - isn't that a trackball ?

  142. Scroll Ball Mouse.... by suss · · Score: 1

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    You've been able to get the Typhoon "8D Scoll Ball Mouse" here in Europe for a while now, it's a mouse with a build-in trackball.

    You can either use it as a mouse (the trackball will function as a 4-way scroll wheel) or a trackball by switching it over with middle-button left or right.

    It's cheap too, about 12 euro at lidl (budget supermarket).

  143. So what - so do others... by grims · · Score: 1

    A lot of other people have it too --
    IBM for one has this 'trackpoint' which can be used to scroll anydirection on a plane
    So does the 'Scratchpad' invention - what new does this thing offer?

  144. since it goes both ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I guess it could be described as bidirectional.

  145. foo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bar this is the way to go

  146. Parent got posted incorrectly. by mce · · Score: 1

    Sorry. It was meant to be a reply to this post

  147. terrible idea by orb_fan · · Score: 1

    I think this is a terrible idea. I think a better idea would be to change the mouse driver so that when you click and hold the middle (scroll wheel) button and move the mouse, it moves the window content.

  148. Double-balled trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather see them add a second ball to my trackball instead of a scroll-wheel. Now THAT would rock!

  149. Double wheels by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative


    I've seen mice with two wheels, one for horiz and one for vert at Best Buy.

    1. Re:Double wheels by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      I'm using one...from CompUSA

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    2. Re:Double wheels by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course if you click the wheel of any sort of wheel mouse, this lets you scroll in all directions (if the page can be horizontally scrolled). This seems to be a lot easier then having to use a trackballtype scroll device on top of the mouse. (most scrolling is up and down, easier to do with a fixed wheel then a ball that can go in any direction). Thats my .2c anyway..

    3. Re:Double wheels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article says it's a wheel that will tilt, so imagine your wheel right now. Now imagine that it tilts left and right.
      Bingo. Yeah, that's what the new mouse is.
      Not a ball in the middle of it.

    4. Re:Double wheels by owlstead · · Score: 1

      And you have to say this on the only (well, one of the few) web sites that does not have horizontal scroll bars. I think you should at least have provided an URL :)

      Warper

      IT security does it all wrapped up.

    5. Re:Double wheels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Of course if you click the wheel of any sort of wheel mouse...

      it acts like a middle button should? (and has w/ X since what? the '80s?).

  150. The best mouse will always be the RAZER BOOMSLANG by Supero100 · · Score: 1

    As good as this may all be, I will never give up my Razer Boomslang. At 1000/2000/2500 dpi, it's the best thing going for input. Sounds totally gratuitous, but for graphic design and counter-strike, I don't leave home without it.

    To read more:
    www.razerzone.com

  151. This isn't particularly innovative by psykocrime · · Score: 1

    I have an IBM Scrollpoint mouse here that I've had
    for a couple of years, that lets you scroll both horizontally and vertically, without using the on-screen navigation bars.

    Granted, it isn't exactly like the MS mouse being described, since it doesn't have a wheel, but a stick (ala the Thinkpad "J stick").... but it's hardly a huge innovation to use the wheel to scroll horizontally.

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  152. been there, done that by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I have a scroll mouse from a company called Starlogic. Waranty is useless, I could never even find the company or get a response from their e-mail address, and they had no web site, just an e-mail addreess. The photo you posted a link to shows the exact same mouse as I have, except that the photo shows some name painted on the back of the mouse, (mine is just black there). Interesting mouse, but the trackball only worked for a few months, then started getting erratic (you move one way, the page moves the wrong way at first). I see this "new" mouse claims a 3 year warranty, but I can't even avail myself of the 1 year warranty I supposedly have. I would suggest not getting a mouse from someone who's business model is to fold up the tent every and now and then and show up selling the same thing under a diferent name later.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  153. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No "In SOVIET RUSSIA the mouse scrolls you" post?

  154. This isn't new by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    My laptop's touchpad supported this for about two years now.

  155. Re:The best mouse will always be the RAZER BOOMSLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25000 dpi.. lol

    so long as there are people who believe whatevers written on the back of the box, there will always be money to made.

  156. Really? by Kickasso · · Score: 1

    Then buy one.

  157. Competition by Copid · · Score: 1

    I've always found it interesting that MS hardware is so much better than its software. It seems like that's a strong piece of evidence that it lacks sufficient competition in the software market. In hardware, MS has to contend with quality goods from established players like Logitech--companies it can't just run into the ground by changing a standard. The software world has no such established competitors to force MS to provide the same level of quality control for products like Windows.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  158. middle finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My middle finger is dextrous enough...

    all this exercise is going to make it that much easier to emote my four-letter answer to just about everything

  159. How long til you get a trackball in your mouse? by CitznFish · · Score: 1

    Let me be the first to say that male mice already have 2 balls.

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  160. Big pictures by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Bink.nu has some REALLY big pictures of the new Intellimice on their site, and there are some more reasonable-sized images at warp2search.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  161. An easier and probably lower-cost solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of embedding a trackball or a tilting wheel in your mouse, use two different mice/trackballs. My current setup has a mouse on the right and a trackball on the left so that my hands can *never* get tired from using one or the other. Adding an option so that one of them could move me within focused windows would probably be a good convenience.

    Making it a "standard convenience" to have two would open up other options for control, also. One control could move the cursor with lower sensitivity than the other, for example.

  162. Pics of the darn thing by horcy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The mouse will come in 2 flavors:
    Genuine leather and vanilla plastic

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
  163. Re:The best mouse will always be the RAZER BOOMSLA by Supero100 · · Score: 1

    You're off by an order of 10...
    I said 2,500 dpi not 25,000 dpi.

    It sounds like you're the kind of person I'd be happy to meet in an online arena - more score padding.

    Per-pixel movement at 1600x1200 makes a difference in high-end situations. If you owned one, you'd understand better. Optical mice only get 400-450 dpi.

  164. Think about the UI problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    So this is essentially (or could become soon) a trackball embedded in a mouse. But the mouse and the trackball do not agree on the sense of motion. Moving the mouse to the right moves the pointer to right, but moving the trackball to the right moves the image to the left. This sounds like a recipe for confusing users. Futhermore, the pointer position relative to the document now depends on two controls, and scrolling becomes a tricky task of managing the rolling of the trackball in a moving mouse. There are so many better UI ways to allow efficient finding of data than the double mis-direction of a trackball and mouse.

  165. wow, really innovative by dh003i · · Score: 1

    As if thousands of people didn't think of the same thing before. The next obvious logical step to most people, but it takes MS years to figure it out.

    What would really make sense is having the two buttons be button/wheels, where the left button-wheel controls up/down and the right button-wheel controls pgup/pgdn.

  166. Wireless? by phorm · · Score: 1

    While the wired version of this mouse may be cool, I'll let a few others buy the wireless before I go out and grab one. Microsoft's last venture with the "Wireless Blue Mouse" was a horrible flop... the thing ate my batteries down weekly, and wouldn't work more than 3" from the receiver (hell, sometimes right beside the receiver it didn't register clicks).

    Now, go back to the good ol' days, and MS was actually competing nicely with logitech for mice. They actually did have some good hardware then (decent keyboards too). In short, wait until a few reviews come out before you go and grab one, but don't bash it just because it's MS because they do have some decent hardware, and at least you can expect the OS to support the crazy little features it might have.

  167. me too by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    I've never experienced anything more annoying than that center ball, especially when you're scrolling downward.

    Mine was packaged as a "Starlogic" brand. 1 Year Warranty. No website for Starlogic, just an e-mail address that never responds. From the photos it's clearly the same mouse, with the only difference being mine doesn't have IOGEAR written on it's back.

    Have you figured out how to open the ball? Those two holes on the sides of the retaining ring make it look like that ring should screw off or otherwise easily remove, but I haven't been able to get mine to even try cleaning under there yet. You're not the only one who is having problems with the erratic ball scroll motion.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  168. Stupid joke by Harvey · · Score: 1

    How long until I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    Try turning the mouse over.

  169. I already HAVE something like this... by z0 · · Score: 1

    I have a mouse that I got on clearance at Staples that has both a horizontal and a vertical scroll wheel. Getting drivers for it for anything other than Win95 was a pain, and I finally found some half-@$$ ones for XP that are ok. The only reason I was disappointed with this mouse was the fact that the current software treats the horizontal scroll bar, if there is one, as a vertical bar, if that doesn't exist. Maybe this is a Windows API problem, or maybe this is a workaround for mice that only have one wheel. I would actually use the horizontal wheel if it worked in more stuff.

    I love the fact that people make a big deal out of this, and how Apple has done it before, and that maybe some others have done it before, but it's news because M$ is doing it now. At least now maybe the horizontal wheel I have might actually work, since I'll be able to just grab a usable Intellimouse driver from M$ to use on my existing mouse.

  170. ALT+scroll == history by justMichael · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you hold ALT and scroll up and down you will move through your browsers history, at least on the Mozilla family.

    1. Re:ALT+scroll == history by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      So actually we have not only the three dimensions of room to move in, we also have mice that let's us travel beyond the barriers of time!

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
  171. As a sell-out band once said... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

    ...so fu(ing what?

  172. Re:Innovation? Nice reporting, BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You dumb fuck, this is innovative. The wheel actually tilts.

  173. Ignorance + Hypocrisy != Bliss by Ho-Lee-Chow · · Score: 1

    First of all, you spelled grammar incorrectly. Check your own spelling and grammar before you criticize others, hypocrite. Secondly, the author's opening phrase "The BBC are reporting that Microsoft are..." is standard British usage. Whenever the British refer to groups, such as companies or sports teams, they always treat them as plural nouns.

    From their point of view, the American usage is incorrect. For my part, I think their way is more consistent. The American rule of thumb seems to be "if a noun sounds singular, treat it as singular; if it sounds plural, treat it as plural." For example: "The Chicago Bulls are terrible"; "Chicago is bad." Both sentences refer to the same entity, the Chicago Bulls, but the first sentence treats "Chicago Bulls" as a plural noun and the second one treats "Chicago" as a singular noun. The Brits on the other hand, would say: "The Chicago Bulls are terrible"; "Chicago are bad". It sounds funny to American/Canadian ears, but it seems more consistent to me.

    If you don't believe, just listen to British football (soccer) commentators next time you have a chance: "Manchester U are...", "Liverpool are..." ,etc.

    Before you tell me that their way is wrong, just think about which country is older, the origins of the English language, and ancestry of most Americans. Personally, I don't think either way is "incorrect". The British have one set of grammatical rules and Americans have another. Just like Americans insist on spelling "favour", "colour", etc. differently from British people and Canadians.

  174. LIES LIES LIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Malda is strictly a homo, and a bottom at that.

    That buck-toothed skank is just a beard.

  175. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the mouse scrolls YOU!!!

  176. Can already scroll horizontally in OS X... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not entirely relevant, but... I discovered in OS X that the mouse wheel scrolls horizontally if you hold the Shift key. This is very useful, and I probably prefer it to an extra mechanism on the mouse that I'll undoubtedly activate unintentionally. I don't know if this functionality exists in other OS's (though it doesn't appear to be in W2K).

  177. Microsoft Learns to use WEB BROWSER by Odie_flocon · · Score: 1

    My Co-worker has had his mouse that scrolls "Both" Ways for over a year now. I guess Microsoft say's that since this mouse was viewed using their browser they must own the patent.

  178. Microsoft invent? Apple patent? by macarmyman · · Score: 1

    I know from previous posting and links Apple applied for a patent for this type of mouse long ago. Does this mean Micro$oft will take credit for someone else's ideas as they have in the past and still.
    Consumer: would you rather have a poorly engineered mouse that has these new functions that is propietary and limited support. Or a product that is build based on a standard that numerous sources can support (ie. Open Source).
    Useability: Many of you stated and questioned the use of such a mouse... here are some ideas.
    CAD applications
    Excel (cell browsing ;-) )
    Games... (strafing for one...)
    Programming- instead of using your hand and wrist to scroll through long lines of code.

    Also Notice in all these articles (not that i have read) none of them state wether or not the mouse is instead to be stationary or laser or other form. I would like to hear more of the communities intelligent opinions on the usability and functionality of such an item and wether or not they think it will be adopted in the near or far future.

  179. IBM has the nipple mouse by leeet · · Score: 1

    That allows you to scroll up/down and left/right Maybe not as "user friendly" (it wasn't really precise) but pretty much the same idea...

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  180. IBM has had this capability for years by MeauxToo · · Score: 1

    The ScrollPoint mouse uses a TrackPoint stick rather than a roll which allows for horizontal and vertical scrolling as well as continuous scrolling with having to constantly re-roll the mouse wheel. I have had a ScrollPoint for at least 2 and half years, maybe longer ...

    P.S. I have the older a ball-based version, but the link points to the newer optical version.

  181. How long before I get a trackball embedded in my m by Jonsey · · Score: 1

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    It'll be there in 5...4...3...2...

    Whaddyamean it didn't show up? Hmm... problem must be on your side, it faxed out just fine from here.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  182. I think some existing mice could do this in theory by ortholattice · · Score: 1
    With some programming, it may be that Microsoft's present USB Notebook Optical Mouse could do this, I think. The reason is that if you scroll without pressing, the "middle" button seems not to be activated, wherease if you scroll while pressing, the "middle" button does seem to be activated. The reason I believe this is that Adobe Acrobat sometimes crashes when I press the scroll wheel while scrolling, whereas it never does if I scroll with light pressure, indicating there are two different modes.

    This is not to say I would recommend that mouse, even though when it works it's very pleasant to use. I am on my third one. The first developed a problem where the cursor would jump to the corner of the screen too frequently. The second just stopped working completely. Both were replaced for free by CompUSA. All of them had or have a problem where the cursor jumps to a corner of the screen on dark surfaces or when the surface isn't just right. (I would much prefer that they were instead programmed just to refuse move under these marginal conditions - corner jumping is a pain when you're say trying to edit an image in GIMP or Photoshop.) My third unit now sometimes just dies, even if I unplug and plug the USB connector, until I reboot my VAIO laptop. I'm not sure if it's a hardward or software problem, but it does seem to be more prone to dying when XP starts to otherwise decay (you know, frozen programs that can't be killed etc.), requiring a reboot anyway (actually a hard power down reboot, because the programs can't be killed so it will never shut down).

    Other than that, I like this little mouse.

  183. Not at all hard to use! by muchandr · · Score: 2, Informative

    These IBM mice are called ScrollPoint and they are still being made. I am using a recent optical version right now. These are my favorite mice and I had to order mine from US (those are only available here in Europe with a complete system from IBM)

    What force to counteract? When I am using a mouse, the back of my hand still touches the tabletop, so pulling this hand away by moving the same is equivalent to pulling yourself up by the ears.

    I find those mice a much better idea than the Microsoft-style wheeled mice, because:

    1. You can also scroll horizontally.

    2. If you want to keep scrolling, just push the stick into desired direction and hold. With a wheel, you have to keep scrolling. The harder you push the stick, the faster you scroll. Wheeled mice are only good for contant-speed scrolling.

    3. I still have a full-width middle button. Your typical mouse wheel is not really a very convinient button for prolonged use (say, paste in X)

    The mice are very well made and look cool, especially that blue LED backlight inside the little stick. (which is quite a bit larger and more comfortable too than the little clit they put onto laptop's keyboards)

    Overall, I'd rate the ScrollPoint as one of the most significant advancements in HCI, to which effect it also won some awards. As usual, IBM can neither hype it properly themselves, nor make the related patents properly accessible to other manufacturers.

    1. Re:Not at all hard to use! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2. If you want to keep scrolling, just push the stick into desired direction and hold. With a wheel, you have to keep scrolling. The harder you push the stick, the faster you scroll. Wheeled mice are only good for contant-speed scrolling.

      Um... if you want to scroll faster you just move your thumb faster. This is a far more natural mapping than the "joystick" ScrollPoint system.

  184. Fingerworks Keyboard already has this by Paradox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, title says it all. I just wanted to plug http://www.fingerworks.com/ for their incredibly good Touchstream Keyboards, that support very natural horisontal and vertical scrolling without taking your fingers off the home row!

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  185. in a word... Konqueror by dnaSpyDir · · Score: 1

    geez, all you need to do w/ konqueror is scroll near the bottom of a page, and it will do the horizontal mombo.

  186. Finally, Virtual Pinball ! by kneels_bore · · Score: 1

    Memo to Redmond: Get on to Pete Townsend pronto and buy the licence to Pinball Wizard. What a launch we'll have ! We'll call it Tilting at Windows

  187. FUCK HE DID IT AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    JUST the story please. We don't need to hear your uneducated and faggoty remarks Taco.

    Oh, and for those of you that are unfortunate enough to not live in the USA, faggot means REALLY GAY.

  188. This is not new by Pu'be · · Score: 1

    This is not new A4Tech mouses have had this ability for 3 years or more now. And they are good mice as well, as I have been using one for 3 years now! Go buy an A4 Mouse if this intrest you, dont buy the Microsoft one!

  189. why not by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

    why not just go the whole distance and put a nipple-maus there to act as an all-directional scrool wheel?

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    1. Re:why not by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      I have one of those. The horizontal movement stopped working for some reason, but I prefer this type for scrolling. Just apply pressure up or down and it scrolls.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  190. CAD input devices by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

    Those are called Spaceballs, oddly enough...

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
    1. Re:CAD input devices by belroth · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks. May the Schwartz be with you (I couldn't resist....)

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  191. IBM Scrollpoint II did this at least 3 years ago.. by grimani · · Score: 1

    I got one with my Aptiva freshmen year.

    Didn't really like it, but it did scroll in four directions.

    This is nothing special...

  192. So that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will have to License the mouse as opposed to purchasing it.

    Upon installation, it will need Product Activation and an internet connection.

    It will be Trusted, so you won't be able to click on those MP3s.

    For $10,000 you can see inside of it in through Sharing program for governments.

    Oh yeah, and Linux driver support: out of the question...

    Sounds like a winner to me!

  193. THIS IS NOTHING SPECIAL. by grimani · · Score: 1

    IBM Scrollpoint II did this at least 3 years ago. I got one with my Aptiva in my freshmen year of college.

    Didn't really like it, but it did scroll in four directions.

    And this is with just the middle scroller, no modifier key required, no second scroller, etc.

    So really, as others have said, THIS IS STILL NOTHING SPECIAL.

  194. An Excuse for Bad Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems to be part of the continuing trend that everything from the default Windows directory structure to the MMC interface to just about all their documentation uses an identifier that is closer to a sentence than a name.

    The help documentation (CHM files) are particularly amusing. When a help file is opened, the default size is maybe 150 or so pixels in width. Works for the first page, but once you start reading content, you find the need to go full screen to accommodate the page. Even with that, the TOC never fits.

    Could be that this the cause for this lies somewhere between accomodating user preferences (read "stupidity") to poorly thought out (read "bad") design. There are very few programs that deserve an expansive chunk of screen real estate. That said, most everything else should be made to fit without having to scroll horizontally.

  195. Welcome! by jpmorgan · · Score: 1
    ./ers missing the point...

    You must be new here.

  196. A "Grab" Button by Grincho · · Score: 1

    This is ridiculous. Scroll wheels, scroll nipples, and embedded trackballs are a tendon-pain-inducing and unnecessarily complex and kludgey way to implement a hardware interface for scrolling. I second the suggestion of this guy, who would rather have a "grab button" on his mouse. Hold down the "grab" button, and you can scroll the contents of the focused (or perhaps the under-the-mouse) content by dragging in whatever direction you like. I used to have something like this rigged on my old Mac with Scrollability (shareware) and in OS X with uControl (GPL'd). I found both solutions far more comfortable than my scroll wheel, though I'd love to see this supported more seamlessly (e.g., scroll more smoothly, work everywhere (even in graphics programs), and don't make me kludge it together with mouse-button-triggered modifier keys). After all, we already have one perfectly good tracking device; why stack another tracking device on top of it? This solution should work even on trackballs. Whadday'all think?

  197. The ultimate solution by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Here it is, shared free of charge, for the benefict of all mankind, the ultimate mouse mod:

    You grab a mouse, and you glue a joystick on top of it.
    A mostick! Or maybe a Joyouse, you choose.

    (genious or what!!!?)

  198. middle mouse button? by Pretzalzz · · Score: 1
    The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard.
    But many applications already use the middle mouse button[aka pressing down on the scroll wheel] for various functions.

    <conspiracy theory>
    Microsoft is doing this in order to make tab browsing[and/or mouse gestures] in Mozilla less appealing to consumers. If they copied the features wholesale than everyone would see that they were playing 'catch-up' and they would consequently no longer be viewed as 'innovators' so instead they are trying to break their competitors functionality. Using a mouse button to change apps also doesn't seem as clean to me as dragging the mouse off the side of the screen to get a seperate fully-setup desktop.
    </conspiracy theory>

  199. Easier solution by Teppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not just program the existing scroll wheel so that when held down, it behaves like the "hand" tool in Photoshop. Press down the middle button, and then drag the document around the window.

    1. Re:Easier solution by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why not just program the existing scroll wheel so that when held down, it behaves like the "hand" tool in Photoshop. Press down the middle button, and then drag the document around the window.

      Logitech and MS's windows mouse drivers both already have options to do that. Internet Explorer has that built in even if you don't use the driver option. And you can get the Autoscroll extension to do the same thing in Firebird. There's probably a way to do it in straight mozilla too, but I haven't tried it since Phoenix 0.5 came out :)

    2. Re:Easier solution by Jeedo · · Score: 1

      Because then you wouldnt have to buy a new mouse, all these "features" im microsoft operating systems could have been done with relative ease wit a simple upgrade to their old stuff, but thats not how microsoft functions, they want to squeeze more cash out of you instead of upgreading their old stuff.

    3. Re:Easier solution by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      this app does exactly this with right mouse button (configurable to middle)

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    4. Re:Easier solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This feature has been on Windows for years, you dope. And you don't even have to buy a Microsoft mouse, all mice with wheels will do.

    5. Re:Easier solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Intellimouse Explorer and can't find a feature in Microsoft's current driver software that emulates the "hand" tool in Photoshop. There is an "AutoScroll" feature but it's not the same thing at all. With the "hand" you keep the mouse button pressed and as you move the mouse it moves the contents of the window such that the point at which you initially clicked remains under the mouse pointer. It's as if you're pushing around a piece of paper on a desk. If you've never tried it before, Acrobat has the hand tool too.

      It's main advantage is that you can scroll in both directions quickly and precisely unlike the "AutoScroll" feature. It's main disadvantage is that you can only scroll as far as you can drag the mouse pointer - it stops scrolling either when the pointer leaves the application window or hits the edge of your screen (I haven't seen any implementations that do anything else). However one usually uses the scroll bars in this situation.

  200. Why? by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone need a bisexual mouse?

  201. Innovation [sic] by pmz · · Score: 1


    Library Spoff, please stop being a tool of Microsoft's marketing department. It is already getting old reading all the "me too" posts about mice from years ago and from a dozen manufacturers that had this same functionality.

  202. w00t - another way to get RSI by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    I do hope they've tested this sufficiently. My right arm was finished with mice 3 years ago, and (after teaching myself to become ambimoustrous like GLS) the left one is now developing twinges. I'll probably be using a graphics tablet by the time I'm 40. The human hand was not designed to work in this way!

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  203. 2D scrollbars by Tussinator · · Score: 1
    I think this would be cool:

    A 2D scroll bar widget, located at the bottom-right corner of the document where both scrollbars meet.

    It would allow 360 degree movment of the document without having to release the current scrollbar and relocate the mouse cursor to the other scrollbar.

    This widget wouldn't require a mouse upgrade either.

  204. It already exists! by Lomby · · Score: 1

    I personally own a nice optical mouse with a trackball instead of a wheel. It exists and it is called 4D Magic Ball Optical Mouse (by some kind of El-Cheapo brand).

    Nothing new on the horizon...

  205. Newegg has this mouse already. by apophenia · · Score: 0
    Newegg (sweetest comp parts store) already has mice with this feature for a mere $12.

    http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?descript ion=26-123-101

  206. I don't mean to rain on the parade... by twoslice · · Score: 1

    But I am still trying to get my Winmodem to work under linux. If the mouse is anything like a Winmodem For god sake run away from it as fast as you can....

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:I don't mean to rain on the parade... by MagicBox · · Score: 1

      I heard that the chances of a Winmodem to work under any Linux flavor, is 1/1000000. On the other hand, I have had no problem getting the MS Mice working with Linux(Actually I think I had to tweak something in Mandrake to make the IntelliEye mouse work properly). I never understood why Linux drivers do not work with Winmodems. Is it that they do not care about dial up so they do not write proper drivers, or does it have to do with hardware specifically made for Windows platforms?

      --

      The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
    2. Re:I don't mean to rain on the parade... by twoslice · · Score: 1

      Almost of the hardware is emulated in software. I think the modem actually uses the sound card to create a carrier signal...

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  207. Sweet. I just did! by chopper749 · · Score: 1
  208. name brand better than generic? by moncyb · · Score: 1

    I've have the exact opposite experience. I've bought plenty of mice, and the only ones I had problems with were MS and Logitech. The Logitech one was dead before I even used it. Yeah, I did have a non-MS, non-Logitech cheap $10 mouse (Keysonic I think) die after a year, but I considered that resonable.

    It's strange though. In my experience, it seems the cheaper brand mice seem to be more durable than the more expensive ones. Some of them may not glide as smoothly, and may be more likely to collect gunk on the rollers, but they don't seem to have as many problems. I'm using a cheapo generic optical mouse, and aside from the scroll wheel doubling as the third button, I think it's great.

  209. Doesn't it do this already? by BlankTim · · Score: 1

    All I do is hold down the scroll wheel and drag the cursor left or right.

    Works fine for me.

    --
    Just once, I'd like it if someone called me "Sir".
    Without adding, "You're creating a scene."
  210. Diagonal scrolling too! Links to IBM and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, IBM does make a mouse with a 2D mouse pointer. I own it and like it alot. It's called a "ScrollPoint" mouse. It's currently on sale for $21.

    Picture, specs, pricing

    Full Specs

    This is an optical mouse with three buttons, the center button being programmable. Mine opens up a filesystem explorer application. The "joy-knob" (I know, I know) is a rubberized stub that sticks up behind the center button. It works like a scroll wheel front-to-back, except with much less effort. It can also work as a horizontal scroll wheel.

    In fact, it can even scroll DIAGONALLY, if you so wish. Try doing that with two separate scroll wheels!

    Finally, there is a very simple and cool mouse by "Micro Innovations". It has two standard mouse buttons, a vertical scroll wheel, a horizontal scroll wheel, and also a programmable, side-mounted "thumb button". It's about $10.

    MI PD99i mouse

    pic, reviews and price

  211. Ok, I got off my lazy ass by Atario · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...and looked it up. Turns out they call it "ScrollPoint". You can see one here. Mine is an older model, and so doesn't look like that, isn't that color, and isn't optical. Still, looks like they do still make them.

    Just for the record, for a general laptop mouse, I don't particularly like those TrackPoint ones; I prefer the touchpad kind. But as a scrolly deal, it's pretty neat. I just wonder when someone will try to put a touchpad on a regular mouse.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Ok, I got off my lazy ass by gantrep · · Score: 1

      Searched for those on froogle.google.com and there are some cheap ones. Maybe I will get one.

      I don't like touchpads because I end up clicking things I don't want, and if multiple fingers are too close, the curser jitters a little and if other fingers happen to touch the pad, the cursor jumps across the screen.

      I would be willing to bet that a mouse will be made with a touch pad in it sometime. It could have some interesting uses I think.

    2. Re:Ok, I got off my lazy ass by Guylhem · · Score: 1

      Need drivers for these mice? I have such a mouse that's perfectly working with GNU/Linux, and I do still have the IBM driver CD.

      Feel free to email me. I too love that mouse and it easy to use scrollpoint. Wish I had a left handed trackball with a scrollpoint *and* 2 additional buttons for my own remapping (move to next/prev desktop). And of course that I could use it with GNU/Linux !

      Guylhem

  212. ctrl+alt+del by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think if microsoft was going to add something "innovative" to their mice they should add a ctrl+alt+del key/button to them... now THAT would come in handy a lot :)

  213. Thumbwheel by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    Actually that is not such a bad idea. Envision a wheel identical in nature to the wheel on top, but located on the side of the mouse, preferably near the base of the mouse where the thumb is when naturally at rest. Use it to scroll left / right, and click it to go back a page (the default action of the thumb button on the so-equipped mice I have used so far...)

    Maybe I need to patent that.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Thumbwheel by jonnyfivealive · · Score: 1

      hehe, i find that amusing. you get modded up for my idea. ill really kick myself if that gets out and makes money, but im not gonna do it, so go ahead. i actually does seem like it would really be handy.

    2. Re:Thumbwheel by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I didn't get modded up ... I am special and my posts start out with (Score: 2).

      No joke.

      I actually looked into patenting an idea about a year or two ago, but the costs were pretty high (like $8k - $12k in lawyers fees to write a defend-worthy patent application.) Based on the $29.5M judgement against eBay for 'Buy it now!' maybe I will rethink it though.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  214. Logitech beat them to it. by Trollificus · · Score: 1
    "The innovation means that users will be able to scroll vertically as well as horizontally without using on-screen navigation bars."

    My Logitech trackball has been doing the same thing for over 5 years now. Correction, my Logitech trackball scrolls in all eight directions, meaning it can scroll up/down and to the left/right at the same time. {=)
    I'm sure this new Microsoft mouse uses a different implementation, but the effect is the same.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  215. Well.. by njan · · Score: 1

    ..my laptop *has* four-directional scroll. Guess dell are just doing that innovative thing again.

    But seriously, how is this innovative exactly? Any major change of direction accompanied by a press release from a major company seems to be treated like some sort of computer renaissance. It's common sense at best, and fairly redundant. I don't *ever* use the four-directional scrollpad on my dell laptop. I just don't use any applications that require me to scroll left and right, except when I'm HTMLing and forgotten/chosen not to leave wordwrap on.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
  216. About time Apple did something about their mice... by muchandr · · Score: 1

    That clunky single-button of theirs is probably the reason #1 I don't want an Apple machine. (most of their other hardware and the OS are quite all right meanwhile, IMHO) I so don't buy their argument that more than one button is confusing. Most Apple programms end up using keyboard modifiers to achieve the same thing they could've done with a couple of extra buttons and that's a lot more confusing to me. I think a mouse needs as many buttons as users can tell apart by touch without looking, which is probably about 3.

    Apple just don't want to admit Microsoft beat them there on a UI-related issue, so they come up with idiotic pseudo-inventions like this new mouse just so that they could sneak in extra buttons. I figure, M$ also added a wheel mostly because they finally figured out 3 buttons were better than 2 after all, but didn't want it to look like they followed Logitech's lead. In the interest of full disclosure, my perfect mouse would be an IBM ScrollPoint, but it would have those Honeywell double legs for sensors. (allows for a fully sealed case and works on absolutely any surface) Extemely unlikely anyone will ever build such a combo, as both the ScrollPoint stick and Honeywell sensor are covered by expensive patents. :(

  217. Say What? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

    -so it's hard to portray source code in a text file.

    Are you on drugs? Pretty much every source code file I have jacked with over the past 20 years is a text file (my meager exposure to java using Visual Age for Java being the exception.) Heck if you were ambitious you could write code using copy con and if you were good it would actually compile (editing it would require an editor, of course.)

    And assembly (machine language) is pretty much linear with lots of jumping around, but I can read it (decipher is more like it) by looking at a hex dump ... at least get a general feel for what is going on, and I am human.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:Say What? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Are you on drugs? Pretty much every source code file I have jacked with over the past 20 years is a text file

      Of course. The "visual languages" tend to display the tree directly, but they're certainly no easier to manipulate -- I definitely prefer manipulating text (no statement made about the ease of programming the visual languages).

      But that doesn't impact the statement I made: [most languages are semantically trees] "so it's hard to portray source code in a text file."

      It's hard, but it's the most common way to do it, and I would say the easiest commonly available way.

      The reason it's hard is that you need 2 dimensions to display a simple tree, and text files with newlines can give you 2 dimensions; but you need one more dimension to write names and such. Since you don't have that dimension, you have to squeeze the name into the tree's space, thus making the tree distorted and hard to see.

      (Some strongly tree-structured dataflow languages have a user tradition of using single-character names, for pretty much this reason. Consider the derivatives of APL [A+, J, and K] for an example; and APL itself is almost unique in using single characters to represent very complex dataflow.)

      And now for your guess at my riddle:
      And assembly (machine language) is pretty much linear with lots of jumping around, but I can read it (decipher is more like it) by looking at a hex dump ... at least get a general feel for what is going on, and I am human.

      Very nice work, but no. Assembly language is more like a forest than a tree, much like BASIC, FORTRAN, or Perl (contrast to Scheme or ML); but it's still fundamentally tree-structured. For example, MOV AX, BX can be diagrammed with MOV at the root, AX on the left branch, and BX on the right. More complex tree parses are available, for example with indirect addressing.

      Just a clarification: I wasn't intending to convey that no human CAN read it; I was trying to claim that in most cases, no human will read it.

      -Billy

  218. Sounds like a bad by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    South Park episode.

    Ben

  219. hehe, tis aple is teh ghey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Apple's mice are REALLY teh best ... lemme count how many button it has: so ... here ...we ... have ... ... ... one ...and ... and .. and ...

  220. What a waste of front page space. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    i already have an ibm mouse that does this. have had it for 3 years

    Yeah, the first thing I thought when I used my bi-directional scrolling mouse to click on this page was, "So. Fucking. What!" El-cheapo Taiwanese manufacturer A4 has been making these mice since the 90's. Why in the hell is this on the front page as "news".

    Hey, in other news, you can combine 3 color screens in a cathode ray tubes and create a "color monitor" that makes web viewing so much more vibrant.

  221. Gaming! by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 1
    Yeah, us gamers want hat switches!

    Won't this cut into their joystick market?

  222. Not BiMouse by antimuon · · Score: 1

    A mouse with bi-scroller disorder!

    -antim

  223. "Are reporting" -- terrible grammer! by dood · · Score: 1

    Boo to the writer - "Are reporting" ??

  224. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by holt · · Score: 1

    Heh... when I first read that I thought you wrote "WSAD layout" and I wondered what IBM's dev tools had to do with gaming.

    I've been at work for too long... Bring on the weekend...

  225. Another Microsoft 'innovation' by Trogre · · Score: 1

    My A4Tech mouse simply has two scroll wheels, one for each axis and works fine, thank you very much.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  226. Impact by verloren · · Score: 1

    "How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?"

    That depends on how hard you can throw the trackball.

    Cheers, Paul

  227. A4Tech by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    Right now I'm using an A4Tech 4D++ optical mouse with two scroll wheels. They both go up and down physically, but one is set to scroll right to left when it is used. It works pretty well.

  228. My mouse has a trackball in it by Stalemate · · Score: 1

    I just have to flip it over.

  229. I had one 5 1/2 years ago... by Uatu · · Score: 1

    Back in 1997, at Comdex Fall I bought a mouse which had two scroll wheels (vertical and horizontal) preciselly for this reason: to scroll around big pictures. Not exactly the ones you imply, but I think it can solve your er... problem.

    BTW, the mouse was from A4Tech.

  230. Mice with TrackBall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Micro innovations makes a bunch of mice with built-in trackballs.

    mice

    And the "PD99I" has dual scroll-wheels too, for just $10.99

  231. Bought mine for $4 years ago. by hazzey · · Score: 1

    http://www.a4tech.com Look at their home page.

  232. IBM has sold these for years by admorgan · · Score: 1

    I have an IBM Mouse that I just love, instead of a wheel it has a tab that sticks up like the nipple mice on laptops, only contoured for a finger. The only problem I have had with it is the software does not work with Opera for some reason. It works with every other program I have except opera...

  233. best operation for pushing the wheel mouse button by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    "The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard. "

    I hate the default operation these wheel mice have for the wheel click. I prefer to assign double click to the wheel mouse. Makes moving around the desktop much faster.

  234. I scroll both ways by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

    But you don't see me bragging about it on Slashdot. Oh wait, I guess I just did. Ahem. Well, then.

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  235. BFD by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    The innovation means that users will be able to scroll vertically as well as horizontally without using on-screen navigation bars."

    BFD. I have an IBM scroll-point mouse that can do the same today. I've had this mouse since 1999.

    Innovation? Feh!

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  236. Must Be... by myside · · Score: 0

    A slow news day.

  237. Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think that the geniuses at Adobe will figure out that if the up and down arrow keys scroll up and down, the left and right arrow keys should scroll left and right?

  238. /me looks both ways :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    /me runs over to the patent office!

  239. IBM mice Had this by makapuf · · Score: 1

    I remember back in 1999 working in a client pc room where IBM mice had 2 buttons and a trackpoint on top of it. Yes, in place of the wheel, a trackpoint. Provided you had the correct driver, it worked quite well. I was disappointed (no pun intended) not to se it elsewhere.

    Is it such a bad idea or had IBM some patent on the trackpoint ?

  240. Trackballs are better than Mice by mnmn · · Score: 1


    I tried a logitech trackball about 5 years ago and never went back to mice. At home on all 3 workstations I use the new marble trackball. Instead of moving my arm, I just move three fingers. In counterstrike, I never have to pick up the mouse and with three fingers you can aim really precise. Ive seen a few other gamers use trackballs too, and good at it.

    Theyre also good with laptops. I would buy a logitech trackball embedded into the side of a laptop anytime. Not the old apple/toshiba trackballs in the center below the keyboard though.

    I know the learning curve is steep, but I have NO idea why people arent trying these.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  241. I want a mouse with eraser head by WeeGadget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want a mouse with one of those laptop eraser head thingys in it.

    Mouse moves the cursor, eraser head moves page underneath cursor.

    Also make the eraser head a button click when pressed down. Don't know what for... but sounds neat.

    Jono

    1. Re:I want a mouse with eraser head by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1

      get an IBM mouse that comes with their PC line, it's just as you want...

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  242. App switching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mice will also have a feature that lets people switch between open applications by pressing down on the scroll wheel instead of using the keyboard.

    This is amazing. This means I don't have to rest my thumb and middle finger on Alt-Tab when reading web-pages at work. Because, you know, pressing those two buttons can sure be one hell of a workout.

  243. Most scrolling mice already have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever try clicking with that center button/scrolly thing?

    What comes up?

    A small icon that looks like a compass, and allows you to scroll around your document in any direction you want.

    Since most of the scrolling people do is vertical, this is more than sufficient. It still allows users to take full advantage of the horizontal scroll features at the expense of just one click.

  244. Careful what you wish for... by verifiedCoward · · Score: 1

    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?
    ... you might get it

  245. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...where do I get a mouse with a blow-job attachment?

  246. I'm still waiting... by Trevin · · Score: 1

    ... for someone to come out with a decent quality mouse that's optical, wireless, has 3 buttons, and NO wheels!

    All of my mice at home are 3-button with no wheel because that works best with X. At the office I've had to put up with a wheel mouse, and although the scrolling comes in handy, it gets extremely annoying when I try to simply middle-click on something and it accidentally turns into two middle clicks or it scrolls past the link I was aiming for.

  247. If Good, Ditch X by teece · · Score: 1

    If I were to try one of these, and really liked it, then we would really have to begin a campaign to update or ditch the X Windows protocol. I think it is maxed out with three buttons, plus the two pretend buttons for vert. scrolling. It only allows for 5 buttons in the protocol.

    Any way around it? I already have 6 buttons on a Logitech mouse, of which only 5 are useful

    --
    -- Hello_World.c: 17 Errors, 31 Warnings
  248. We've had one of those here for over a year... by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    4D Optical Web Cruiser by iogear. Granted, it's not the exact same thing... it's far superior. Wonder why IOGear didn't get a BBC feature?

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  249. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, That doesn't even meet the minimum hardware requirements for xp, not sure about 2k...

  250. What? by jack_csk · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it enough to use something like this: http://shop.store.yahoo.com/mdionline218/a4tecgrea t4d.html It does provide you scrolling function of both left-right and up-down. Why in the world does Microsoft & Apple spend so much resource of inventing something that do the same thing?

  251. Actually, he's right by Curien · · Score: 2, Informative

    We just say it the "incorrect" way in English because "approaches infinity" and "approaches three" look pretty much the same when written in math. That doesn't make "approaches infinity" correct though; the correct terminology is "increases without bound".

    --
    It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
  252. Vote for time spent online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please go to CNN poll and vote how much time you spend online each week!

    There is a worryingly large amount of people who do not reach the bare minimum of 30 hrs per week. Vote vote vote!

    /threadjack

  253. It's not comfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never found the scroll wheel to be in a good location. Lifting just the middle finger is hard for me for some reason. I once wrote to Logitech to ask if they'd consider designing a mouse with the scroll wheel where the thumb is, which I find to be much more flexible than my middle finger.

    Maybe I just need to practice lifting my middle finger more often.

    1. Re:It's not comfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use your left finger...

      You mean there are people that scroll with their middle finger?

    2. Re:It's not comfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the forefinger? So, you take your finger off of the left button to scroll?

    3. Re:It's not comfortable by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes.

    4. Re:It's not comfortable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, exactly what I do too. Moving it from left button to wheel. Much easier for me.

  254. Innovation??? by rat7307 · · Score: 1

    I've had a Honeywell (SM3???) mouse that's had this feature for at least 4 years.

    I can't see where the innovation is.

    Can someone explain how this is news????

    --
    Burma?
  255. Sorry by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    Sorry, dude. I don't scroll that way.

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  256. My trackball already does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To scroll I just press the thumb button and the trackball then acts as a window navigator. Up, down, left, right, diagonally, and anything in between.

  257. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by saddino · · Score: 1

    That clunky single-button of theirs is probably the reason #1 I don't want an Apple machine.

    If that's really your #1 reason, then do yourself a favor, buy a Mac and then...I know this is a stretch...spend the extra $25 or so for a three button mouse. You'll be just fine, trust me. ;-)

  258. In other news... by nwf · · Score: 1

    August 7, 2003: Today the Episcopal Church voted unanimously to approve the use of the new high-tech Microsoft mouse by the church leadership. The Bishop of Virtual Space, Al Gomorrah, commented that, "We are sure that if the apostles were living today, they would be using this great new advance." He continued, "We believe that all scrolling orientations are equally valid, and thus should serve in the Church." Reports that the new mouse had been used to browse porn were rejected as, "a desperate, last minute attempt by old-school users."

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
  259. Logitech Trackball users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm... is it just me or have i been doin this for several months with my logitech trackman pro?
    just hit the top thumb button and WHAMMO the whole tracball scrolls sidways and verticly.
    i think MS is a little late...

  260. Good for FPS by Mryll · · Score: 1

    The full trackball embedded would be even better - would be nice to be able to control orientation of movement and orientation of POV independently with one hand...

  261. MS innovation wow! by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Why not just eliminate the keyboard all together, then kids will not be tempted to learn how to hack!
    This is not innovation it is just silly. Soon I will be able to mouse remote and speak into a mic, watch my Microsoft computer entertainment centre and go completely gaga brain dead, lets see another XY function to screwup hardware venders. Oh I am sure windows users will find it the next best thing since sliced bread not having to take ones hand off the mouse. Just think lf the fun you will have recoding for the interface, what a pile of crap. I am sure this will break in Open Office and most freeware, and be a pain in the arse to impliment, typical. You can bet Mozilla, and Netscape or AOL will not avail itself of the wonderful function quick enough, and wind up being criticised by MS mouse junkie morons, because of it.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:MS innovation wow! by fedux · · Score: 1

      Why not just eliminate the keyboard all together,

      You can't. How would you use windoze without CRT-ALT-DEL ?

  262. Using X events to emulate this feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seams that you could emulate this capability in a trakball by holding down a button while moving the ball left and right. It may be able to do without recompiling anything. I'm now crafty enough to know where to begin.

  263. Is ./ shifting to Windows??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me, but I think slashdot has been publishing too much windows stuff lately. Has slashdot already crossed over to the dark side?

    From people saying how to do this and that on windows, to new products, it seems that deep pockets are reaching slashdot users. I have seen lately too many references to media player, explorer, start menu, etc.

  264. Innovative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is turning something 90 degrees innovative? The word has lost all meaning...

  265. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by Deusy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    As sarcastic as the parent is, there is a point. It's not new, nor is it useful otherwise it would have been adopted by now.

    I've found a moderate use of the scroll wheel on my mouse to give me severe aching in those particular fingers. I've used mice and keyboards fairly heavily for years and suffered very little RSI. Yet as shortly after adopting a scroll wheel to scroll rather than using scroll bars - and more out of laziness than practicality since a scroll bar gives you more control over the scroll - I've found the pain so bad in my right index and middle fingers (I switched to my middle finger after it became too painful using my index finger) I've had to stop using the scroll wheel altogether.

    With the world's dominant technology force behind it, this kind of trackball-on-mouse will probably become ubiquitos. But probably not widely used.

    I suspect I'm not unique with my aversion to using the scroll wheel, given the speed with which RSI set in on my fingers. (And I'm a lad, for those of you with dirty minds - so, no, 'that' is not the cause!)

    Back to the nice scroll bars for me - which I now prefer for usability reasons since I can easily control the scrolling of a page rather than the guess work that came with using a scroll wheel.

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  266. Excellent by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Great! now i can actually use all the badly designed sites that dont render properly in one browser or another (or all of them) which means you have to scroll left and right to actually read the txt that goes off the screen! oh wait i can already do that with my keyboard..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  267. [OT] Sandpaper etc. by smcv · · Score: 1

    I'm a native UK English speaker, and I'd say "sandpaper" for the paper-with-sand-glued-on you use to smooth wood.

    If I remember correctly, emery paper is a type of harder sandpaper for use on metal (it's a while since I've done that sort of thing though, I mostly stick to software :-)

  268. IBM has... by bicho · · Score: 1

    I think I have in my hand an IBM mouse that does just that.
    (though since I left using windows on this particular machin, I don remember ifmI had to put the mouse cursor on the scrollbar or not)

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  269. Easy Solution by Arandir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before the world goes and congratulates Microsoft for putting the entire damned keyboard on the mouse, let's stop and think a bit...

    I've been using a trackball for years, and will never go back to a mouse. Recently I tried a new trackball that had a scrollwheel. It was so damned superflous it wasn't even funny. Why not just use the trackball? A little side button to click to put it into scroll mode, and then use the trackball to scroll vertically, horizontally, diagonally, or any other direction you can manage to contort.

    Frankly, today's mice have too many controls. And this is coming from a guy who demands three buttons! Don't put funky little doodads between the buttons. Don't hide wierd clicky thingies on the side or put them below the regular buttons. If people want them, sure go ahead and market them. But keep the standard pointing device simple. With a trackball and three buttons, all the controls you need are there already.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:Easy Solution by Ian-K · · Score: 1

      Off topic as per the general discussion, but relevant to mouse design:

      Trackballs are nice. Problem is, I'm left handed. So they're out of the question for me (along with the nice top-of-the-range Logitech mice...).

      Why not design something we left-handeds can use as well, instead of just making the odd product with bells and whistles?

      (it was sooo annoying that the MX700 is designed for right hand use only... are we lesser beings or something???)

      Trian

      --
      I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
  270. big deal by jrf83317 · · Score: 1

    My ibm mouse already does that.

  271. But my mouse by TCaM · · Score: 1

    scrolls to eleven!

    Thats one higher than ten!

  272. Nostalgia for the Hewlett Packard knob by tpledger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The best scrolling device I've ever used was The Knob, which was built into the keyboards of some mouseless windowless Hewlett Packard desktop machines I used in the 1980s.

    The Knob is a wheel, about 3cm in diameter, on a vertical axis, flush mounted on the keyboard. It turns very smoothly, probably on ball bearings. It controls either vertical or horizontal scrolling, depending on whether you're holding down the Shift key.

    There are two major advantages to having a whole side of The Knob exposed, rather than just a quarter of the rim (as on mouse wheels).

    First, you're making a smoother movement for long distance scrolling, because you don't have to keep moving your finger off and back onto the device.

    Second, there is an intuitive way to vary your scrolling speed: touch The Knob near its axis to go faster, or near its rim to go slower.

    Scrolling devices don't necessarily belong on the mouse!

    --
    You have received this message in error.
    1. Re:Nostalgia for the Hewlett Packard knob by Meowing · · Score: 1

      There is a thingy on the market now that almost does the same thing as your HP knob, called the Griffin Powermate. It's a wee bit expensive for what it does, but any device with a programmable blue LED can't be all bad.

  273. Trackball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a trackball on top of the mouse actually has been around for several years; I have used them at work for quite some time.

  274. Iogear mouse w/ trackball by ccnull · · Score: 1

    Here's Iogear's mouse with a trackball in the top of it. I checked it out about a year ago. It's not a bad product but the ball is so small it's difficult to maneuver precisely with it (not that there's much call for that, but anyway)...

  275. Mozilla tabbed browsing by superyooser · · Score: 1

    Good point. Losing the ability to use the scroll wheel clicker would make tabbed browsing in Mozilla less appealling. If you don't open new tabs by middle-clicking (not default; must set in Preferences), you have to right-click and select Open Link in New Tab.

    1. Re:Mozilla tabbed browsing by extropy · · Score: 1

      actually, i have a microsoft optical 5 button mouse, and i remap the 'middle click' to the thumb button. ive found its much easier to use that way in mozilla. im assume this new mouse will also have a similar thumb button.

  276. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM used to make a mouse with a little joystick,
    (like the ones you see on some laptops) in the middle button, which you could use to scroll both ways if you installed special drivers.

  277. Trackball 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a track ball on top:
    http://www.iogear.com/products/product.php?I tem=GM E421
    There is also a nonoptical version that has been around for years. 4-direction scrolling is nothing new, M$ just wants you to think so

  278. Radio Shack mouse by AvantLegion · · Score: 1

    I used to use a dual-wheel Radio Shack mouse. It was actually very cool.

  279. Pictures of it by radixvir · · Score: 1

    Its the wireless intellemouse they are talking about. supposedly the black one has a leather cushion looks badass Wireless Intellimouse

  280. Carpal Tunnel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone get carpal tunnel from the mouse wheel? I do. I can't imagine having two of them.

  281. You've been watching Hackers again by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    haven't you?

  282. IOGear mouse at ThinkGeek.com does this by webscathe · · Score: 1
    They've had it for a while at thinkgeek

    4-D Optical Mouse

    I bought it and it works ok. The horizontal scrolling tends to not work as well as it should though. For instance, when scrolling through my mp3 folder if I scroll up and down MS interprets it as side to side scrolling which works fine (view set as list) but if I scroll horizontal it scrolls 5-6 lines at a time even though it's set at 2 in the IOGear s/w. Works great in Opera though.
  283. I had a two-wheel mouse years ago by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    It was even an infrared wireless, which I thought at the time would be very cool. The fact of the matter is that IR wireless mice suck big mouse balls (it wasn't optical), having significant range and line-of-sight issues.

    Ultimately I got rid of this expensive paperweight for the reasons above, but I was very happy with the two scroll wheels. I had a choice between two models -- one where the side-to-side wheel was mounted horizontally below the vertical wheel (which is what I chose), and one which just had two vertically-mounted scroll wheels, the left one slightly above the right one so that they were on a diagonal. On either setup, you could change which wheel did which function.

    Neither wheel was clickable, which I suppose is a shortcoming we'd notice today, but that didn't bother me at all at the time.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  284. This exists for OS X by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1
    There's a nifty utility called uControl that lets you do something very similar in Mac OS X.

    On my PowerBook, I have the Function key bound such that when it's held down, the trackpad becomes a giant 2D scroller. On my desktop system, I have it configured so that pressing Control-Option-Command turns the mouse into a giant 2D scroller. I find both of these very useful, very often.

  285. XFree86 had a similar idea too... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    I'm using an AOpen Optical OpenEye Wheel Mouse O-35G, which has a second wheel. To quote the XFree86 documentation on the ZAxisMapping directive, The last example is useful for the mouse with two wheels of which the second wheel is used to generate horizontal scroll action, and the mouse which has a knob or a stick which can detect the horizontal force applied by the user. The motion of the second wheel will be mapped to the buttons N3, for the negative direction, and N4, for the positive direction. - which is what I do.

    Actually, I use the clicky (top) wheel for left-right and the non-clicky (bottom) wheel for up/down because it's too easy to click when you're pelting down a document. Even more so with Microsoft mice, so I'm betting that getting it right with their proposed mutant mouse is going to be something of an art.

    I like the AOpen because it's light, and easy for little children to use. They tend to struggle with the heavier mice. However, I've recently found an even better one, a tiny scroll-wheel optical not much larger than a matchbox. They're sold, of all places, in Big W stores (a kind of KMart-ish branch of Woolworths) here in Australia. I don't have the original packaging, so I can't tell you what they're marketed as (will reply to this with details if I get another one) but the markings on the bottom say this:

    GO TECH
    COMPUTERWARE
    Keycode: 439 2347
    Model: IA20074B
    (/) N433
    Made in China
    (the (/) being the tick-over-circle symbol).
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  286. Microsoft's keyboard innovation... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...was three times as good as that!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  287. Actually, XFree86 lets you configure such things by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    I've been using the two scroll wheels on my mouse for, well, scrolling. But maybe it would be better to configure one of the side buttons (which I don't use) as a lock and use the mouse itself for scrolling?

    Alternatively, I could use two mice... which would absolutely rock in a tank game (one mouse == tracks (wheel == engine), other == turret (wheel = elevation)).

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  288. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    The uses for a trackball in the mouse would incredible for a gamer.
    I think that I'd prefer to have one of those little pointer stick thingees that used to be situated between the G, H, and B keys on some laptops.
    That way, there'd be no finger-lifting for movement, like there is now if you use the mouse (or trackball) for movement, and you could control your speed.
    Just push with more lateral force to move faster in a particular direction.
    For non-gaming uses, push harder to scroll faster.
    This would be much better than the current method, where you click the wheel button, then move the mouse to control scrolling speed.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  289. Sigh, maybe I should have read the entire thread. by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    It appears that such a mouse already exists.
    It is discussed below.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  290. Using mouse with right AND left hand by Anonymous+Shepard · · Score: 1

    I'm right-handed, but use the mouse with my left hand, because of pain in my right hand. As this switch was a gradual process, I never reprogrammed the mouse and use it as I think you do, mostly with the hand diagonally over the mouse. It is just a matter of habit and no less natural than using the right hand. I occasionally switch back to using the right hand on the mouse and have now internalized the different right-hand and left-hand behaviours, and I no longer feel that urge to "mirror" my hand behaviour that is natural when first switching hands doing something.

    The side buttons are sometimes annoying but can usually be ignored.

    --
    I have a life. I really do. I've just chosen to ignore it.
  291. ...trackball embedded in my nose? by jamesh · · Score: 1

    well. that's what i thought it said when i first read it.

  292. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I aggree that Apple is rotten for not having more than one button. It's a total waste of space to have that long button on laptops. Also, I think it's about time that they put Link lights on their on-board NIC ports. How freaking cheep can they be? For $2,000 a machine, the least they could do is foot for a little more plastic and two LEDS. How do you get the info a link light would give you? Throught the GUI, a complete waste of time. I too would not buy a Mac, albeit a Logitec mouse would work fine. It's the company's overall philosophy that I am against.

    In sum, if it passes the "phone test", they should have it on their machine. That is, if a complete newbie understands you when you say, "Hit the left mouse button twice...", then you are good to go.

  293. Microsoft is an excellent hardware company... by Anonymous+Shepard · · Score: 1

    I have one of their mice.

    I heard they made some software as well. What was it, Microsoft Doors? Something like that.

    --
    I have a life. I really do. I've just chosen to ignore it.
  294. Uhm, there's always a keyboard. by elvstone · · Score: 1

    I think people should make their programs work with the keyboard in conjuction with the mouse. Like in Gimp you just press Control and then the wheel does horizontal scrolling. Having to many functions for one hand makes me confused. Then there's always the chap that hinted the masturbation-to-pictures value of a device like this. But I'll leave that to him.

    1. Re:Uhm, there's always a keyboard. by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Arrow Keys.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  295. like a lot of Microsoft "innovation"... by 73939133 · · Score: 1

    this isn't exactly new. Plenty of mice have either two wheels, one for horizontal and one for vertical scrolling, or they use a point stick like the IBM Scrollpoint. There are many other designs as well.

    It seems odd and not very efficient to design a mouse with a tilting wheel for horizontal scrolling; maybe that's simply to avoid the patents on all the other bidirectional scrolling mice people have developed.

  296. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    Apple just don't want to admit Microsoft beat them there on a UI-related issue
    Three-button mice were around before MS.
    It may be that the reason for the one-button mouse may have been cost, rather than a belief that more than one button is confusing.
    It's too bad that they're too stubborn to change it, now that they've been shown to be wrong.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  297. Kde does this without extra hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twist scroll button on the horizontal scrollbar and you scroll sideways. Move mouse off and it scrolls vertically.

    Quite handy.

    Derek

  298. Ha! by mschoolbus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft says they invented something...

    ...and /. believed them!!!

  299. New Microsoft Mouse Scrolls Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could scroll both ways without taking your
    hands out of typing position on mouseless CP/M
    systems from 1978 on.... True, vertical scrolling
    was more convenient than horizontal -- but ain't
    it funny how even cursor-independent vertical
    scrolling disappeared from successful mass-market
    software except in a particular company's
    mouse-oriented all-graphical "operating
    environment"? To know the history is to know how
    the Redmond Ripper acquired millions of slaves....

  300. Not correct by White+Manual · · Score: 1

    The ScrollPoint accelerates the scrolling when you keep pressing in the same direction.

    This is something you just can't do with a wheel, which tops at the speed you are able to move your finger.

    In addition, with a wheel I usually have to set the scrolling ratio to something around eight lines per tick (otherwise it takes me centuries to scroll over a couple of pages).

    With the ScrollPoint, on the other hand, I set this ratio to one or two lines per tick. The ScrollPoint scrolling is also extraordinarily smooth, and stopping at any given line is extremely accurate (with little practice).

    Even more, what you are controlling with different amounts of pressure from your finger is not the displacement, nor the speed, but the amount of acceleration itself.

    The control you can get this mouse is impossible to understand without actually trying it. The pity is it has only drivers for Windows.

    --

  301. How about two mice? by forkalsrud · · Score: 1

    A few years ago when I did a little bit of CAD related stuff I kept wondering what it would be like to have a left hand mouse in addition to the right hand one. Just imagine the possibilities of virtually grab things with two hands instead of one.

  302. What we need by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    I congratulate microsoft on their move. However, the addition of lateral scrolling on mice won't be a "killer app" like the vertical scroll. Clicking the center button by default creates a free-scroll, the rarely used method is already available.

    What I would like to see is a ergonomic (butterfly) keyboard with an integrated scroll pad. I have seen these before, but they aren't in the right place.

    Placing mouse control on the wrist-wrest is inconvenient because one must move their hand in order to get to it. I would rather keep my hands in the home keyboard position.

    Instead, I would propose moving the "lock" indicators in the center of the butterfly and replacing it with a scroll-pad. One could configure the scroll-pad in software so that it controls either scrolling, or mouse movement.

    The beauty of IBM's scroll point is that it allows one to move the cursor without removing your hands from the home-keys. With the introduction of 17" "lap-zillas", I hope that some manufacturers offer interchangeable keyboards whereby a butterfly fan can easily remove a keyboard/status light panel and replace it with an ergonomically shaped one where the touchpad is in the center instead of on the wrist-wrest.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  303. Trackball in a mouse? by cosyne · · Score: 1

    You mean like this?

  304. Nice, but wish they'd revise their trackball line by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    No trackball anywhere--and I have tried them by the bucketload--is as comfortable for me as the original Microsoft trackball from the late 90s. The subsequent models are technically better, but too big and clunky.

    Finding the original model (which was shoddily made, gets dirty fast, and is pre-USB) is almost impossible now, unfortunately...

  305. RPG-III by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Uh... doesn't triple-RPG imply three Hollerith cards across a line? Which means I need 240 characters - not counting card margins and edges - across the screen to program it.

    (-: deem g/d/r included :-)

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  306. Embedded trackball in mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn your mouse upside down. WOW! Lookee there, a trackball!

  307. OS X already does it with single wheel mice by asm0deu5 · · Score: 1

    Not sure if anyone's posted this, but in OS X, holding down Shift while using the scroll wheel causes it to scroll horizontally.. up is left, down is right.

  308. There is a webserver written in PostScript. by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Postscript is no more "written" than 386 machine code. Both are generated by a computer processing a higher-level description that is more amenable to human understanding.

    Like MS-Word's internal format, yeah, rii-ight... (-:

    Anyhoo, I'd like to see the higher-level description that produced this. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:There is a webserver written in PostScript. by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Like MS-Word's internal format, yeah, rii-ight... (-:
      Not the "internal" format. The friendly, pixelized one it displays on your screen. With the colors and fonts, and the borders and shading... You know, with the anthropomorphic paperclip on the side?

      Anyhoo, I'd like to see the higher-level description that produced this. (-:

      That's one of the "aberrations" I mentioned. Yes, some random weirdos write postscript manually. The same way that some people compose their own binary code for obselete processors.

      But the thread was talking about a language that was used millions of times per year. Manually-crafted postscript doesn't reach that level, but machine-generated PS is created a million times daily. The common variety of postscript is neither written nor read by a human.

  309. unbelievable by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Really, how hard is it to click the scrolling button and move the mouse left/right? You know that prices will be jacked up for this new mouse.

  310. You will still get CARPEL TUNNEL! by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    The scroll wheel makes my arm hurt.
    I'd like a scroll wheel for MY FOOT!

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  311. Why do think... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...all of those 40-something design engineers in places like Sony are working so hard to make three-meter LCD displays affordable? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  312. I *like* KDE's mouse features by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    The scrolling's easy to adapt to, and the middle-button-paste thing is just bonzer. Swipe console window, move mouse to browser, click, done. Swipe non-linked URL in browser, click, done. Swipe or double-click search term in browser window, Ctrl-click, searching... done. KDE rocks, never mind the resource useage. For the user, by the user, of the user. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  313. two words web racer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my very old (late ninties) web racer touch pad does that, also I had a generic compuse infrared mouse that had 2 scroll wheels one for veritcal one for horizontal. once again m$oft releases old tech as its newest innovation.

  314. Scrollware 4d by MQBS · · Score: 1

    I had a mouse a while back called the scrollware 4d, it had a vertical scroll wheel and a horizontal one below that, and the third button was by the thumb. It was useful for browsing large files or on old machines running new software. I wonder if the hooks for the horizontal scroll wheel are similar to those for vertical; if I recall correctly, everything was customizable from the control panel tab.

    Anyway, you can check out a newer model here

    --
    The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
  315. glitch in the matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?"

    Seems I have heard just this quote before about a very similar situation with Apple. I am confused now... goodnight!

  316. What a piece of news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've been using this kind of mouse for some year...

    Trust sells something similar, A4tech does, so that's nothing new. Just the same old "innovation" from Microsoft.

  317. Scroll wheel is just silly for scrolling purposes. by BFaucet · · Score: 1

    I use a program called Maya. If this program there's a 3D camera that you control by holding down alt and clicking the mouse buttons (left orbits, right zooms and middle pans.)

    It's much faster and easier to control the camera this way. Why can't this extremely easy, accurate and fast method be brought to scrolling in all programs? It's also easier on the middle finger. Better yet, why not put those thumb buttons commonly found on today's mice to practical use by making them a "scroll mode" button. Then one could use the other buttons to control the axis one scrolls on (kinda like in XSI.)

    I'm extremely disapointed in the lack of progress in mice. It's hardly changed at all since the 80's. All we have now is a light that makes it slightly more accurate (and in some cases less accurate and in a few cases unusable) another 3 buttons that are rarely put to practical use and a scroll wheel that kills one's middle finger and usually either scrolls much or too little.

    --
    -Derick
  318. I've had this for 4 years! by beef3k · · Score: 1

    My old crappy Trust "Ami Mouse Scroll Pro" had two way scrolling buttons when I bought it 4 years ago.

    Oh, and to me it's completely useless.

  319. I'm using a mouse with a trackball now.. by RobM · · Score: 1

    It's from Trust, and it was cheap either.
    The feeling of the ball is nice, and you can also "reverse" it in hardware with a key combo to use the ball for the cursor and the mouse to scroll windows :-)

    But under X 4.3 it scrolls only to the left :-p

    Ciao,
    Rob!

    --
    AniToolBox! An Open Source animation program!
  320. vertically? horizontally? by naph · · Score: 1

    i know this is a late and nitpicky post hasn't the article placed the words horizontally and vertically the wrong way round ?

    --
    "if i'd known it was harmless, i'd have killed it myself"
  321. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by muchandr · · Score: 1

    What good will it do without the application support? I expect this to be similar to Windows, which also still has useful mappings for 2 buttons only, not the middle one.

    I suppose I could map the extra buttons to common keyboard modifiers via software myself, but wouldn't that be an un-Applish procedure? I mean, an Apple user is assumed to be a total idiot :)

  322. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by muchandr · · Score: 1

    The extra diagnostic LEDs are certainly very easy to design in these days and don't even cost any extra plastic. There is a part available that integrates one or two LEDs directly into the plastic RJ45 housing. It's got to cost a bit more, but certainly gives you those LEDs at no extra design and/or space cost.

    One could argue that this is a security measure. Remember all this talk about how you can reconstruct the bit stream from a LED's blinking remotely? :)

  323. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by muchandr · · Score: 1

    Have a pity on a poor foreigner with a limited vocabulary.

  324. Trackball in me mouse... by gykh · · Score: 2, Informative
    How long before I get a trackball embedded in my mouse?

    What, you mean this old thing?
  325. Isn't this just to fix the bug where Outlook ... by tqft · · Score: 1

    doesn't have a horizontal scrollbar. Whatever version of Outlook work has lumped on us, any email you open you cannot scroll sideways. Maybe it is easier to innovate new hardware than fix Outlook.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  326. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by macwhiz · · Score: 1

    Mac OS X fully supports two-button mice with scroll wheels. There's no configuration or special drivers involved; just plug it in and go. As you'd expect, the right button calls up a contextual menu, and the scroll wheel, er, scrolls.

    On Mac OS 9, you'd need to load a driver. Most mice come with the right software. There's a popular shareware program, USB Overdrive, that will work with any USB mouse (and most other USB human-interface devices, for that matter). The driver just has to map the right click to a click with the Control key held down, which brings up the contextual menu. This feature has been in Mac OS for some time.

    Have you ever tried to help a person who isn't a computer expert over the telephone and walk them through using a two-button mouse? The majority of people who use a computer don't realize what the right button is for. The term "right-click" confuses them. You may think that it shouldn't be confusing, but the plain fact is, it is confusing to a whole lot of people. No amount of deeply-held personal belief will change that reality.

    By shipping computers with a one-button mouse, and designing the user interface so that every feature is accessible with just one button, Apple has made the system a lot more comprehensible to people who aren't into computers. The contextual menus are shortcuts, and you can use the full system without ever knowing about them. When you're ready, you can purchase an inexpensive mouse with a second button, and away you go.

    I've seen way too many Windows programs where you have to right-click to access parts of the program. Perhaps that's why the "Windows keyboard" has the almost-useless "contextual menu" key between Ctrl and Alt to the left of the spacebar, where you can hit it by accident and screw up what you were doing?

    Besides, mice are a personal thing. A mouse that's comfortable for one person is hell for another. (I'd love to meet the person that thought the original Apple USB mouse, the hockey puck, was comfortable.) It's not such a bad thing for people to buy an unbundled mouse.

  327. And this is new? by ak_man · · Score: 1

    I purchased this mouse two years ago.Programmable buttons,two scroll wheels etc.Drivers for win and mac only,though.

  328. Re:About time Apple did something about their mice by saddino · · Score: 1

    OS X has system-wide application support for multi-button mice: right button is context menu, scroll wheel does what you think, etc -- just like Windows.

    The software that came with my Logitech mouse by default sets the scroll-button click to be double-click, but everything can be customized.

    It's too bad that Apple doesn't publicize this fact -- too many people make the same mistake you did and assume your stuck with a one button mouse if you choose to buy a Mac.

  329. The other mice can too! by redog · · Score: 1

    From my experiance most "wheel" mice have functionality to press the 3rd button(wheel) and your presented with a sort of panning scroll. SO how does adding more moving parts to a mouse help? I prefer as little hand movement as possible, I propose a vim mouse!

  330. Sideways scrolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn MS at their marketing scheme again eh? Dunno about you guy but the scroll wheel on my mouse lets me press down and will scroll any ol direction I need it to. IBM IntelliMouse, P/N X06-08477. A simple click, pointer changed to either an up/down arrow (on a screen width page/document) or a 4-way arrow (larger than screen width/spreadsheet) and I can scroll at a variable speed based on how far I move the mouse left or right. So what, now I push the scroll wheel left or right now? Geez. One more reason to use Linux....at least they don't claim original thought when it is obviously not.

  331. YAY! What a mouse! by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

    Well.. It's "new" to come from microsoft. But horizontal scrollwheels have been on mice for like 6 yrs already.. and to me it sounds stupid having 2 scroll wheels A much better solution has already been made by someone.. it's called the "Star Logic 8D Optical Mouse" available from: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006BXBQ/ summitpost-20/104-5196218-4945532 On the contrary, I hate pages which are a certain "width", they should have a dynamic width. if a page opens up at a measly 1024px width on a 3200w screen, it would be extremely annoying. point is, most users need a vertical and horzontal scrolling capability in a trackball style, they just don't know it yet. And NO, none of these "software-solutions" can replace it. since the whole point is to be able to move your cursor at the same time as you scroll and maybe hold a mouse button. The "clicks" in a scrollwheel come from trying to make a cheap solution for the wheel, (when rotating, switches get hit each click) and also use less cpu.. There's no question about a stepless scroller being better (but more expensive)

  332. YAY! What a mouse! *Correction* by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

    Well.. It's "new" to come from microsoft.
    But horizontal scrollwheels have been on mice for like 6 yrs already..
    and to me it sounds stupid having 2 scroll wheels

    A much better solution has already been made by someone..
    it's called the "Star Logic 8D Optical Mouse" available from:
    8d mouse at Amazon

    On the contrary, I hate pages which are a certain "width", they should have a dynamic width.
    if a page opens up at a measly 1024px width on a 3200w screen, it would be extremely annoying.

    point is, most users need a vertical and horzontal scrolling capability in a trackball style, they just don't know it yet.
    And NO, none of these "software-solutions" can replace it, since the whole point is to be able to move your cursor at the same time as you scroll and maybe hold a mouse button.

    The "clicks" in a scrollwheel come from trying to make a cheap solution for the wheel, (when rotating, switches get hit each click) and also use less cpu..
    There's no question about a stepless scroller being better (but more expensive)

  333. Re:I'll be the first to say.... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 0

    Actually it depends.

    I have a mouse with a little nub-thingy on it at work that does that.

    It makes my finger go numb if I use it too much. :{

  334. Why not a trackball? by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    So, what don't they just put a small trackball on top of the mouse? Then you could scroll up/down/sideways/combo.

  335. Radio Shack had a mouse with two wheels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I bought one immediately, to be sure I had one.
    The second wheel moves sidewise. Has a programmable third button on the side. Never installed it, though. Wheels move smoothly, no detent. Box says 520 DPI. Reminds me of the old Textronix graphic terminal with two wheels at right angles.

    It's called the Dual-Wheel Scroll Mouse, with their catalog (?) no. 26-551. 10-digit bar code is 40293 14109.
    PS/2, M$ Intellimouse compatible. Was $10. in 1999.