Slashdot Mirror


Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under

SicariusMan sent us a CNN story that talks about australia upholding the ban on GTA3. It's been mentioned here before, but its interesting that its gonna stick. GTA3 really is perhaps the best PS2 game out in recent memory. I'm having a PS2 resurgance of late, beating Klonoa2, MGS2, Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance, and getting hooked on Jak and Daxter and Frequency. And GTA3 is easily among the best of PS2 games. Sorry .au! At least they probably won't ban FFX!

421 comments

  1. What? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I to understand that stealing cars is illegal in Australia? How... weird.

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    1. Re:What? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      As a non-gamer (well, the last game I played seriously was UltimaII on my Apple IIe -- I was in High School) I too stared at the title for a moment while my brain entered a race condition...

      Too bad you'll be modded down, though...

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:What? by Oztun · · Score: 1

      Are you implying by playing GTA people will be encouraged to steal cars? Funny that didn't happen to me or any of my friends. Seems like there must be more contributing to car theft than video games.

    3. Re:What? by Trepidity · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Read the story title.

      "Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under"

      Meaning to any average (non-/.) person: "Stealing Cars is Still Illegal in Australia."

    4. Re:What? by Oztun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Doh!

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's not the concept of stealing cars, or such films as "Gone in 60 seconds" would be banned... It is the concept of rape, assault, etc.

    6. Re:What? by AugstWest · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tell you what, tho....

      I was speeding down the interstate the other night, passing people on the right, when i spotted a speed trap too late. I saw the cop's lights go on, and watched him looking for a space to pull onto the highway to pull me over.

      I jumped into the middle lane, then the right lane, hid behind a trailer truck, then shot off the offramp, and wandered off and hid.

      At that point, I realized I'd been playing WAY too much GTA3. It was my first reaction.

    7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the first thing I thought when I read the title. Then I thought, maybe it's a vague sexual reference? Any use of the phrase "down under" is ripe for that: "Hey babe, ready for a little 'Grand Theft Auto', 'Down Under'? Oh, it's 'Still Banned'. Darn it."

    8. Re:What? by JPS · · Score: 2

      Err, you probably mean risking your very life saving severely wounded people in the street by driving your ambulance among the gun shots?
      (And you didn't really steal the ambulance... it just happened to be there ;) )

    9. Re:What? by Flavio · · Score: 2

      Heh, I can relate.

      Once I was at the mall and saw a surveillance camera. Suddenly I had the impulse to pull out a pistol and shoot it.

      At that point I realized I'd been playing way too much System Shock II =)

      Flavio

    10. Re:What? by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still haven't found my opponent's flag. The good news is, they haven't found mine either, so the score is still 0/0.

    11. Re:What? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Are you implying by playing GTA people will be encouraged to steal cars?"

      No. Read the article headline. "Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under." The previous poster was making a joke by delibrately choosing to confuse the name of the video game "Grand Theft Auto" with the name of the actual crime "Grand Theft Auto". The joke utilizes the confusion to paint the absurd image of a news headline about the banning of something that's widely accepted as an outright criminal offense -- unlike, say, P2P filesharing, guns, or abortion, you don't have people arguing over whether or not the government should try to stop it.

    12. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it rape if you pay for it? Of course not. Then logically it boils down to simple assault.

      So by extension, any game or video with simple assault in it should be banned in Australia. So much for the Australians' beloved Mad Max/Road Warrior franchise...

    13. Re:What? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Us Metal Gear Solid fans of course have an urge to slide along the wall underneath the camera.

      graspee

    14. Re:What? by senine · · Score: 1

      I've never actually had an impulsive reaction to a real life situation based upon what I would do in a video game, but I'm constantly checking for snipers / scoping out good camping spots.

    15. Re:What? by derrickh · · Score: 2
      I was behind a slower car on the road when I floored the gas and speed by. I moved to the left lane and made a right turn at the light, hitting the apex perfectly. I expected the car to drift a couple more feet to the outside but instead the rear wheels broke traction and I almost lost control.

      Thats when I realized I was driving a Chrysler and not the Skyline GTR from GranTurismo.

      D

    16. Re:What? by dioxide · · Score: 1

      the only reason it doesnt encourage you to steal cars is because you keep dying :b

    17. Re:What? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Am I to understand that stealing cars is illegal in Australia? How... weird.

      Especially weird for a country that is famous for a song about a bum who steals sheep and then kills himself rather than get taken alive by Johnny Law. Yes, that's what Waltzing Matilda's about. And they keep talking about making it their national anthem.

  2. Gov'mint knows best by Sobrique · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what we like to see.
    Governments protecting us from playing things that are naughty.
    Thought police strike again. Anyone think that .au has seen the draconian legislation that the US and the EU have started trying to bring about and want to join in the party?

    Well, as long as you can still buy pr0n, I guess that's ok :)

  3. Wrong side of the road. by billnad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe that I can clear this up. Any single video game can integrate itself into a countrys culture. Perhaps the Aussie authoritys are worried that this will cause people to drive on the "wrong" side of the road

    1. Re:Wrong side of the road. by oddjob · · Score: 5, Funny

      You drive on the road in GTA3? I much prefer the sidewalk.

    2. Re:Wrong side of the road. by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The wrong side of the wrong? You mean, like, the sidewalk?

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    3. Re:Wrong side of the road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Any single video game can integrate itself into a countrys culture.

      Proof of this includes the obscene amount of the words "All your base are belong to us."

    4. Re:Wrong side of the road. by csteinle · · Score: 1

      The irony being, of course, that despite the fact that it is based in a fictional US city, GTA3 was developed in Leith, just outside Edinburgh, Scotland. Where we drive on the correct side of the road, like the Aussies.

    5. Re:Wrong side of the road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are afraid of people driving on the wrong side of the sidewalk?

  4. Boycott Australia by Sapho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We should all (I mean, the Western World) boycott Australia for all the censorship and banning.

    I mean, how many millions of dollars do we leave there through tourism? If we stopped going, then they would feel a drop in their income.

    And of course, we should also stop going to the theatres or renting movies like Cocodrile Dundee.

    --
    I give in to sin because I like to practice what I preach.
    1. Re:Boycott Australia by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Its sad that people even rented that pile of filth called Crapaphile DungPee, though I'm sure there is some p0rno that's a daraliction of the name that's probably good....

      as for boycotting .au stuff that'll be tough... I've already got my tickets for FOTHR...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:Boycott Australia by Xenex · · Score: 5, Informative

      "We should all (I mean, the Western World) boycott Australia for all the censorship and banning."

      Now, should I make a comment about how the (stereo)typical American that knows nothing about the rest of the world, or point out that Australia is generally considered as part of the west, at least in a political sense?

      "I mean, how many millions of dollars do we leave there through tourism? If we stopped going, then they would feel a drop in their income."

      Do you really think that international tourism hasn't dropped already? This little thing happened, something to do with planes. About 3 months ago. You may have heard about it on the TV.

      Besides, tourism may be a large industry, but it's hardly the be all and end all. And since September 11, domestic tourism has grown quite a bit...

      "And of course, we should also stop going to the theatres or renting movies like Cocodrile Dundee."

      We? The USA collective again?

      Believe me, as an Australia, I would love nothing more then for people like you to stop watching bullshit like Crocodile Dundee. That movie shows less about the 'average' Australian as a old west movie does about the 'average' American.

      While i'm at it: I have never seen a koala. I have never seen a crocodile. I have could probably count the amount of times I've seen a kangaroo with one hand.

      Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now. GTA will probably get a harsh rating under the new system. Whatever. I'd prefer to have to download a copy of some game off the internet to having a government body like the FBI installing spyware and destroying my privacy.

      All well, you've read all this now. Go back to thinking that everyone in Australia is like that pathetic Crocodile Hunter show. I guess your fantasies are more fun then the real world.

    3. Re:Boycott Australia by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      Good lord, you're going to have to pay ME to watch a movie like Crocodile Dundee. Of course, I really can't ban Mel Gibson, just because he's a damn good actor.

    4. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to thinking that everyone in Australia is like that pathetic Crocodile Hunter show.

      You mean you're not? Man, and I thought you guys were cool.

    5. Re:Boycott Australia by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now, should I make a comment about how the (stereo)typical American that knows nothing about the rest of the world, or point out that Australia is generally considered as part of the west, at least in a political sense?

      I believe you are describing the typical American. The kind that thinks we're better than the rest of the world just because we have more nukes, or something. (I'm American).

      Do you really think that international tourism hasn't dropped already? This little thing happened, something to do with planes. About 3 months ago. You may have heard about it on the TV.

      This is practically a psychosis. There are a lot of people who think you'd have to be crazy to get on a plane. Now, how many planes were there that weren't hijacked? Besides, Australia doesn't have *that* many terrorists....

      Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now. GTA will probably get a harsh rating under the new system. Whatever. I'd prefer to have to download a copy of some game off the internet to having a government body like the FBI installing spyware and destroying my privacy.

      Yes, spyware sucks. But how did this censorship get in place in the first place if it's sure to go away eventually?

      BTW, It's far more fun to pretend that you're the Crocodile Hunter than to actually watch the show. This view is popular even in America!

    6. Re:Boycott Australia by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Erm, if you're going to boycott countries for having Draconian laws, you're going to be boycotting every single country ever.

    7. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -We should all (I mean, the Western World) boycott Australia for all the censorship and banning.
      -we should also stop going to the theatres or renting movies like Cocodrile Dundee.

      Done and done!

    8. Re:Boycott Australia by TheViffer · · Score: 1


      Do you really think that international tourism hasn't dropped already? This little thing happened, something to do with planes. About 3 months ago. You may have heard about it on the TV.


      Don't be a smart ass.

      While i'm at it: I have never seen a koala. I have never seen a crocodile. I have could probably count the amount of times I've seen a kangaroo with one hand.

      Dude, that is a shame. Maybe you should try to get away from the monitor a little more and experience the great outdoors and all the Austrialia has to offer.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    9. Re:Boycott Australia by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 2

      All well, you've read all this now. Go back to thinking that everyone in Australia is like that pathetic Crocodile Hunter show. I guess your fantasies are more fun then the real world.


      Crike!

      (Oh, and I agree. How pathetic -- a show that teaches kids to respect nature and urges them to explore the world around them rather than sitting and playing video games. Silly!)

      --
      Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
    10. Re:Boycott Australia by Xenex · · Score: 2

      "Dude, that is a shame. Maybe you should try to get away from the monitor a little more and experience the great outdoors and all the Austrialia has to offer."

      I was expecting something like that. I was almost going to write something addressing that in my first post...

      But basically, I'm saying that these animals aren't exactly commonplace.

      Yes, I'm sure I could "go bush" all over the country to see all the wildlife, but to be blunt, it doesn't interest me all that much. And what difference does that make? I get outside, I go for walks all the time. That doesn't mean I should start driving over the countryside looking for native animals.

    11. Re:Boycott Australia by JimPooley · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      ...there is some p0rno...

      Call that a dick?
      (Zzziiip)
      THIS is a dick!


      BTW. If by FOTHR you mean LOTR:FOTR then that's an .NZ

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    12. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A moron using Australian slang that Australians haven't heard before, jumping on top of wild animals.

      Respect?

    13. Re:Boycott Australia by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now.

      Yeah whatever. That's why the Aussie government has already banned damn near the whole Internet by trying to make it safe for kiddies, putting the damn thing through a country-wide proxy, and countless other horror stories.

      Tell me how it's getting "overhauled" again.

    14. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >We? The USA collective again?

      Heh, ironicly GTA3 is made by brits. http://www.dma.co.uk/

    15. Re:Boycott Australia by TheViffer · · Score: 2, Funny

      That doesn't mean I should start driving over the countryside looking for native animals.

      Well .. maybe your should!

      What? No money .. no problem. I saw this in a game and thought that it was the best idea ever. First go steal a car and then for money ....

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    16. Re:Boycott Australia by pboulang · · Score: 1

      That's cause Mel was born in the United States ;)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    17. Re:Boycott Australia by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 2

      That's supposed to be Australian slang? *shrug* To me, it's just a wacky guy being wacky. I think the Subaru outback commercials have done more lasting damage to Australia by keeping Dundee around than anything the Croc hunter has done.

      And yes, he jumps on top of animals. Often to save their lives.

      Sure, it's over the top and silly melodrama. But I'd wager a bunch of kids watch nature shows now who weren't before, and you can't say that's bad.

      --
      Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
    18. Re:Boycott Australia by mupi · · Score: 0

      >I have could probably count the amount of times I've seen a kangaroo with one hand.

      Why do these kangoroos only have 1 hand? Wait a minute.. do they even have hands? aren't they more like paws or something?

    19. Re:Boycott Australia by czardonic · · Score: 1

      But basically, I'm saying that these animals aren't exactly commonplace.

      I saw koalas on several occasions at the Taronga Zoo in Sydeny. Unless you are likely to be enraptured by a motionless lump of gray fur, don't bother visiting them. From what I've heard, they have pretty nasty temperments too. Now, a platypus is an animal worth seeing.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    20. Re:Boycott Australia by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Countries like Austrailia and Canada, have a government based on the British Westminster Parliament. These parliaments often assume that their laws are the wishes of the people, but often they are not. Austrailia just got a new prime minister, and I'd assume they also got themselves a new party in the government.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    21. Re:Boycott Australia by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Yea, don't worry about it. I'm from Canada. I've never seen: polar bears or a seal. I can count on one hand the times I've seen: Beavers, moose (that aren't on the quarter), loons, etc. I have seen a good number of American Bald Eagles, but they imported them from us anyway :)

      People often don't realise how big Canada and Austrailia are. To see a polar bear, I'd have to drive ~3000km. To see a moose, well that's a little closer, about 100-200 km.. Moose and deer are quite annoying on the highways, I've nearly hit a moose, and I HAVE hit a deer. They get caught in headlights and fail to run away. Ah well...

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    22. Re:Boycott Australia by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Hey, watch it or we'll all boycott Outback Steak House! ;-)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    23. Re:Boycott Australia by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      Actually, we just got the same bloody prime minister as the last two terms - a PM who is stuck in the 50's :( Robert Menzies is his idol. And the same bloody party (although I'm not sure Labor deserved to win, I really wish the Coalition had gone). You may have noticed that the "World's Biggest Luddite" retained the IT portfolio.

      Although I must say, over the last two terms he has obviously listened to his PR people - he's wearing much better clothes now than he ever has.

      For the record, I live in John Howard's electorate, and I've voted against him personally each election I've been here.

    24. Re:Boycott Australia by havblue · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I've been boycotting them all this time and I never even noticed.

    25. Re:Boycott Australia by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      Pathetic Crocodile Hunter show!? That guy is great! He's a caring ecologist! Maybe you should get out, see a crocodile, see a koala. You are on an amazing continent, go experience it!

      re: Dundee... Ok, I agree with you there.

      --

      -pyrrho

    26. Re:Boycott Australia by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      I'm from California... amazingly, I have seen a bear, I have seen a rattle snake, I have seen Hippies.

      I'm now in Hawaii... I have seen a coconut tree, I have seen a Sea Turtle, and eels, and I plan to see a manta ray.

      I guess I'm lucky cause I'm sure I sit behind these screens as much as the rest of us.

      --

      -pyrrho

    27. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my god that my made me laugh. don't give up on this account; it's genius. the GLBA spin is sooo money. you might have to 'whore' it up to a good karma buffer first.

      what a flamefest.

      -s.

    28. Re:Boycott Australia by dadragon · · Score: 1

      We've had the same PM for the last two terms too, and then Ontario re-elected him last November to cash in on pity votes for Trudeau had just died. Why do I say Ontario re-elected him? Because his party got about four seats in the Rest of Canada (The part that isn't Quebec or Ontario).

      I live in Joe Clark's riding(our name for electorate), I voted for him. He was our PM in 1980,and is now the leader of the Tories.

      Our current PM cant speak English OR French, and is stuck with his dick in Quebec, and has the American dick stuck up his ass, I don't really like that man too much.

      Oh, our Official Opposition (Canadian Alliance) just kicked out 6 of its loudest voices in parliament, including Debora Grey.

      Grey should start her own party, I'd vote for it, I like that woman.. she's a total bitch, just what it takes to run a country.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    29. Re:Boycott Australia by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      Koalas are _EvIL_!!!!. I was once cuddling a koala which stank of shit and urine, with a hint of eucalyptus. It went schitzo at me for no reason, and nearly tore my face off. I found out the hard way that koalas are mean, stinky, animals with big claws. Now Kangaroos... they look pretty cool. You go up to one, pat it, make kangaroo noises at it, and then it rips your gut open and kicks you 10 metres. Stay away from large kangaroos. And just as your running from an insane kangaroo, face torn apart by a koala, bleeding from the massive gash the roo left, you run into some native australian plantlife... the waitawhile. It is called WaitAWhile for a reason, you know. You run into one, you'll be waiting a while before you get out. They are covered in millions of thorns and hairs that act like velcro on skin and clothes, which take hours to peel off. Your best bet is to cut the waitawhile down and keep running with it attached. To top it all off, the waitawhiles make poison ivy seem like a mild irritant... you will be itchy for months. Oh, and btw, I picked up GTA3 from an computer store a few days ago.... So somebody should tell EB that GTA3 is banned in AU, cuz you can pick it up for about $AU 100 ($US 50)

    30. Re:Boycott Australia by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      You ever notice how most of the crocs act like they are sedated? thats because they are. A Lot of the shows are just filmed at Australia Zoo. The whole show is total and utter bullshit. Some of the stuff is real, but most is set up for the benifit of Americans. Hell, most Aussies think he's a wanker.

    31. Re:Boycott Australia by czardonic · · Score: 1

      Blinky Bill, they ain't. And don't get me started on the giant spiders. . .

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    32. Re:Boycott Australia by arsaspe · · Score: 1

      Yes, while you Americans sit back and point at all this internet censorship in AU, NONE of which actually exists, the US Gov is taking away the rights of American citizins beneath there eyes. Echelon, Carnivore, Magic Lantern, all new Anti-Terrorism laws.... Ring a bell?

      "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me cast out the mote out of thine eye; and lo, the beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. " --Jesus

    33. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not joking, Outback Steakhouse is actually American. It was started up by a few guys after they saw Crocodile Dundee and they've never actually been to Australia before.

      I've been to one (I'm from .au) and much of the decorations and names aren't convincing from an Australian point of view.

      I've always wondered if Lone Star is meant to be an accurate depiction of Texas. Can anyone from around there set me straight?

    34. Re:Boycott Australia by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I couldn't possibly do without superb films like Chopper or top-notch TV entertainment like Rex Hunt's Fishing World. I wouldn't mind if there were just a FEW less aussies in London though... i mean EVERY fucking bartender? surely OZ can't be that bad that an English pub seems better?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    35. Re:Boycott Australia by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "she's a total bitch, just what it takes to run a country." you might want to read up on Margaret Thatcher's reign of terror and reconsider that view - what a fucking nightmare

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    36. Re:Boycott Australia by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      car theft is very popular in the UK, it's great fun and educational too. And the kids just love joy-riding the M25!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    37. Re:Boycott Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all those things exist on Slashdot, but not in the real world. I'm from Australia, and I can tell you that the Internet is as free (as in speech) as it has ever been here. A few kiddie-porn sites running in Australia have been shut-down, but that's illegal anyway.

      The country-wide proxy thing was pretty funny though. Bullshit, but funny.

  5. Odd thing to complain about. by Kanon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember from the earlier article that Australia was concerned about being able to hire prostitutes. Do your thing and then beat them up for the money.

    It's probably a good thing they didn't realise you can wander around, beat someone up for their money, kill the paramedic when he arrives, steal the ambulance and then mow down prostitutes by the dozen. All in the privacy of your own home!

    1. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by mekkab · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I sez to my wife "Wife, this game is great! You pick up prostitutes, have them 'do there thing', and then beat 'em up to get your money back!"

      So she sez "okay, show me!"

      So I do... and to say the least she was rather unimpressed. Millions of polygons, more ram, more space on the dvd-roms, and a creaky car is the best they could come up with?

      Wife was not offended. THIS GAME SUCKS!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by tommut · · Score: 2, Funny

      So she sez "okay, show me!"

      Was I the only one expecting the storyline to continue as such:
      So I went downtown, picked up some prostitutes, had them 'do their thing', and then beat 'em up and got my money back.

      Wife was not offended.

    3. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by banuaba · · Score: 2

      My fav thing to do is to pick up a hooker, get a hummer up to 125%, let the hooker out and then kill her and get my money back.

      It's a win-win situation. Of course, now I try to do the same thing when I pick up hookers in real life.. Quite sad, really.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    4. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, "Wife served divorce papers."

    5. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Do that, and you'll have Rufus the neighborhood pimp kicking down your door with some of the more colorful weapons in GTA3... Missile launcher? Possibly... :)

  6. Figures by Wells2k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, what do you expect. What with the major gun bans down there and all, they want to keep ideas out of the heads of the punks down there that would do this sort of thing, since none of the true law abiding citizens can protect themselves in the first place because their means of protection (guns) have been taken away from them.

    Thieves and hooligans don't care about laws when they are stealing your possessions, so why should they care about laws banning guns?

  7. Are Aussies expected to return the game? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this from the CNN article (And I've seen it before):

    The OFLC was firm on the point that the game would not allowed in Australia, saying "if you have already purchased a game you will need to contact your retailer about return procedures."

    Are people who purchased the game before the ban now expected to return it? Exactly how many Aussies are going to return what is essentially a collector's item in their country?

    1. Re:Are Aussies expected to return the game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I would return the empty case w/the return address as:

      My Retailer
      ATTN: OFLC -- Fucking Eat Me
      Address Line 1
      Australia

    2. Re:Are Aussies expected to return the game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? Just as likely to be satire if you ask me.

    3. Re:Are Aussies expected to return the game? by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Anybody who bought it with a credit card had better return it if they don't want a visit from the police.

      This is precicely why I pay cash for most things. But the days of anonymous buying are numbered, as face recognition software and in-store video cameras become more prevalent. So sadly we may someday live in a world where we actually do have to return things that are later declared illegal.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:Are Aussies expected to return the game? by thopkins · · Score: 1

      In the United States if you have something that is later declared illegal the government has to let you keep it. They can only stop the new manufacture of things, they can't take your things away. This principle is called post ex facto or something similar.

    5. Re:Are Aussies expected to return the game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not me that's for fucking sure !!! GTA3 is a great game and Richard Alston (Communications Minister who fancies himself as a bit of a Joseph Goebbels) can suck me.

      Real problem is a 3rd term conservative government.. they're running out things to censor, ban and otherwise delude themselves about.

      I'll be lining up to return my copy Monday... NOT!!

      John
      Sydney, AUS

  8. I'd be more sympathetic... by Byteme · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...if Australia didn't export beer that has already been through the kidney!

    1. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Fosters is a pretty decent beer. But then again I also like Guinness.

    2. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Fosters' is *lager*, not beer.

      You can easily tell, beer looks like cold tea but fizzy, lager looks like piss.

      Real Ale, on the other hand, is like hydraulic fluid.

    3. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Howie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Assuming you live where your whois records say, you aren't qualified to comment on other nation's beer output, I'm afraid ;-)

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    4. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fosters isn't even made in Australia.. it's made in Canada... check the side of the can...

    5. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in Australia, they make fun of Fosters, just like they make fun of that crocodile hunter guy. Or maybe they just hate him.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    6. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Thornae · · Score: 2

      ..if Australia didn't export beer that has already been through the kidney!

      Heh heh heh. Silly international person. We export that stuff because only people overseas are foolish enough to drink it. We keep our best beer for ourselves.

      Anyway, (to stay vaguely on topic) maybe this game actually got banned because you couldn't buy a decent beer in it...

      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
    7. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by styxlord · · Score: 1

      lmao ... and next thing you'll be telling me that Australians drink Fosters ... all the good brews are consumed domesticly, regardless of what quantities they are produced in ;)

    8. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Grunschev · · Score: 1

      Please don't remind me that I haven't been able to find Coopers since about 1989. Luckily, some Americans have figured out how to brew a decent beer.

    9. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only hate the croc hunter because not one of them on that entire oversized island is half as cool as that nut-job. They guy pesters poisonous snakes for fun and profit, for crying out loud!

    10. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by macom · · Score: 1
      >Heh heh heh. Silly international person. We
      >export that stuff because only people overseas
      >are foolish enough to drink it. We keep our
      >best beer for ourselves. [coopers.com.au]

      Fosters is the only Australian beer readily available in the US, it is brewed in Canada, which is why they can stick imported prominently on it. Same with Irelands Harp Lager which is also sold in the US. Fosters tastes like Bud in the US. Any country you go to, Fosters will taste like that countries favourite domestic beer. Carlton United Brewery is Australia's McDonalds or Disney.

      Coopers Pale Ale and Bitter is available in the US though not common, it is imported by a Georgia importer. It is true Australian beer as it is brewed in Australia. The other Australian beer is Sheaf Stout, it is available in World Market stores. A Reston, VA importer brings them in. Inquiries into getting VB imported have brought up nothing. Though lovers of beer might like to know that the Australian Embassy in Washington has VB.

      I miss VB, Reschs Real, Tooheys Red, Redback .....


      macom

    11. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fosters you drink in America is actually brewed in Canada, look closely at the label. Besides you can't talk about piss beer: Coors, Bud, Miller the list goes on....
      Real Aussies hate Fosters which is why they sell it overseas, no domestic market.

    12. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      You know what shagging in a boat and an american beer have in common....They are both Farking close to water :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    13. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by kuiken · · Score: 1

      nope
      over here (belgium) Fosters tastes like any foreign beer : piss but nothing like our belgium beer.

      oh and ps Stella is generaly considerd the worst beer we have by locals. except for some elcheapo
      cans you can only buy in the store but not in bars

      --

      42
    14. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't generally say that lagers looks like piss. There are dark lagers aswell, particularly in czeck-rep and germany.

    15. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by duketor · · Score: 1

      Fosters' is *lager*, not beer.

      No, Foster's is roo piss, neither lager nor beer.

      --

      Never play leapfrog with a unicorn.
    16. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      You can't generally say that lagers looks like piss. There are dark lagers aswell, particularly in czeck-rep and germany.

      Ssshhhh! Yes, *I* know that but I didn't want to confuse the Americans...

  9. It's not really that bad by rnb · · Score: 3, Informative

    After having played GTA3 for many hours straight, I'm surprised to hear of this (I missed the original article.) Sure, there's some swearing and violence, but it's not really any worse than a lot of other games that are already readily available. Does Australia have a long list of games that are banned, or is this one being set up to make an example, so to speak?

    1. Re:It's not really that bad by sgups · · Score: 1

      I haven't played the game myself but according to the original article, you could theoretically have sex with a prostitute and kill her for money. The fact that you dont have to perform this sequence to finish the game and only a deprived person would want to do this seems lost to the aussie moral police...

      --
      Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
    2. Re:It's not really that bad by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can do all sorts of depraved things in Nethack, but they probably aren't banning that. They can't!

      You can kill shopkeepers, kill succubi for their money after you finish with them, eat little kittens, and do all sorts of Unaustralian things.

      They can't censor life. So they will fail.

    3. Re:It's not really that bad by kilgore_47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, you can pick up a prostitute. Yes, you can kill (and rob) her or anyone else. Yes, if you push R2-R2-L1-R2-Left-Down-Right-Up-Left-Down-Right-Up you'll get every weapon possible, including a rocket launcher you can use to take down the police helicopter(s) that will eventually arrive. Yes, you can light people on fire with a flamethrower. Yes, when the national guard comes it is possible to steal their tank and drive around the city crushing things.

      By the fact that the game is selling, it's pretty clear that people WANT to play this kind of game. The government is supposedly there to serve the people (according to Jefferson, governments are created to protect our inalienable rights). How does taking something away serve them? The few people who are unable to tell a game from reality, and who go on GTA-style killing sprees in the real world as a result of this game, are probably lunatics anyway who would've eventually snapped anyway. Why shouldn't I (and my reality-and-games distinguishing friends) be allowed to play this game now?

      A side note, however: Lets not just focus on .AU here; this game was pulled from stores in America too and it's only back now because they've been forced to tone it down a bit.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    4. Re:It's not really that bad by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Sure, there's some swearing and violence, but it's not really any worse than a lot of other games that are already readily available

      Violence-wise and sex-wise, there's nothing really new. I think the main thing about the game is the completely open-ended world the game provides... there's literally no limit to the mayhem. If you want to do nothing but slaughter whores all day, the game will let you do that. It's completely amoral and will basically let you play whatever kind of character you like.

      After playing this game for a few weeks, I can tell you that it's a) one of the best games Iv'e ever played and b) it definitely taes depravity to a new level. :)

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    5. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Where did you get this rumor re: GTA3 in America being "toned down"? It hasn't. "Family friendly" stores such as Wal Mart, K Mart, Target, Toys Backwards R Us briefly flirted with the idea of pulling the game from shelves. When confronted with sales figures, most of the stores changed their tune.

      My local Wal Mart and Toys Backwards R Us both have considerable stocks of GTA3. My Best Buy can hardly keep the bloody game in stock.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    6. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Re: open-endedness. Why not ban the Sims too? I mean, I can wall people in in my bathroom and chuckle gleefully over their cries for help as they slowly starve to death.

      Or pause the game when a Sim is swimming, remove the ladder from the pool and then watch as they tire and drown.

      Seems to me that this sort of mayhem is much more within the reach of the average consumer (vs. obtaining rocket-propelled grenades and high-powered sniper rifles).

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    7. Re:It's not really that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just implied that it was easier to wall people into their bathroom than get a sniper rifle. Are you sure that's what you meant?

      And I for one would really like to know how to "pause", that would be useful!

    8. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      I actually meant "it's easier to acquire the tools to wall someone in than to obtain a PSG1".

      And you can "pause" by going into "Buy Mode". I belive striking the 'p' key also results in a pause of the game in its entirety.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    9. Re:It's not really that bad by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get this rumor re: GTA3 in America being "toned down"? It hasn't

      I got it (that rumor) from my buddy who's PS2 I've been playing it on.

      After a quick bit of checking online, it appears it is indeed just a rumor.

      I stand corrected. ;-)

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    10. Re:It's not really that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can kill shopkeepers, kill succubi for their money after you finish with them, eat little kittens, and do all sorts of Unaustralian things.

      The difference here is that Nethack doesn't try to render the people, things, and acts as realistically as possible. What, do you get turned on by seeing

      ..........

      ....@t....

      ..........

      followed by the words "You slide your monsterous rod into the female tourist's purse and heal 10 pts!"?

    11. Re:It's not really that bad by tenordave · · Score: 1

      > My Best Buy can hardly keep the bloody game in > stock. Wait a minute...what do you mean YOUR local wal-mart? Sorry, the 'bloody' gave it away, YOU ARE AUSTRALIAN!

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/djwatson
    12. Re:It's not really that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason that it's been pulled from Australia's shelves is because of the lack of an 'R' rating for video games. If these sort of acts were glamourised in a movie, it would be rated 'R' too.

      This doesn't have anything to do with violating rights, it is simply something caused by an outdated censorship system that is currently under review.

    13. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Or, I could have watched one too many Brit-coms. There's your answer!

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  10. Re:Worst Slashdot Article Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    agreed, what is this masturbataory BS. does he have nothing better to do than waste away his 20's in front of a video game system. christ taco, get a life, i mean that in the realest sense...you might as well tell us what you had for dinner last night while you're at it. "ps2 resurgance", god that's pathetic.

  11. you have to admit... by schatten · · Score: 1, Troll

    Its a very desensitizing game. I have it, and would actually recommend NOT buying the game unless you are over 25! But that's just my opinion on it. It is a great game, and addicting too, but just too desensitizing for most people to handle.

    1. Re:you have to admit... by Oztun · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I have to admit the world is to FUCKING sensitive is what I have to admit.

    2. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but just too desensitizing for most people to handle.

      Oh, for most people it's desensitizing, but not you? Seriously, fuck you for telling people what they can't handle. Who the hell do you think you are?

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    3. Re:you have to admit... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      So, if I were 24, you wouldn't recommend it. If I were to turn 25 the next day, you'd turn around and say it's fine?! Hmm...

    4. Re:you have to admit... by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      By that same logic there is no such thing as a beard.

      First, does one hair make a beard? (no). Do two hairs? Three?

      Eventually you will get to a number like 3000 that will be a beard. Oh? Why isn't 2999 hairs a beard?

      No beards exist.

    5. Re:you have to admit... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      "Oh, for most people it's desensitizing, but not you? Seriously, fuck you for telling people what they can't handle. Who the hell do you think you are? "

      And who the fuck are you to bitch at someone for giving his opinion? He didn't give a commandment that "all shall not play this game", he suggested something.

      I guess they don't allow opinions in your town?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:you have to admit... by geekster · · Score: 1

      And just how did you reach that magic number?
      Age is a poor way of telling if someone is mature enough to handle something. What about the 25 year old idiot who gets desensitized by it? The 50 year old?

    7. Re:you have to admit... by Lord+of+the+Files · · Score: 1

      I agree this is an issue when it comes to banning something for people below a certain age, but recommendations are different. It's up to you whether you degide to trust his recommendation, and whether you consider 25 minus a day close enough.

      --

      God does not play dice - Einstein

      Not only does God play dice, he sometimes throws them where they

    8. Re:you have to admit... by pboulang · · Score: 1

      How about if you are old enough to not get all defensive when you read something about age?

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    9. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      And who the fuck are you to bitch at someone for giving his opinion? He didn't give a commandment that "all shall not play this game", he suggested something.

      You must not understand what either of us said. He said (paraphrase) "this game is too desensitizing for most people" and I took issue with him taking upon himself what is and isn't okay for others. I didn't say he shouldn't have an opinion as you are stupidly implying, displaying a complete lack of reading comprehension.

      There's a difference between criticizing someone's opinion (which I did) and trying to judge what is appropriate for other people (which he did).

      There's a big difference between criticizing someone else's opinion (which I certainly did) and trying to say they shouldn't be allowed to express their opinion (which I certainly did not do). People such as yourself don't understand the distinction. You've got the right to express your opinion, and I've got the right to think you opinion is idiotic.

      As the famous quote goes, paraphrased loosely... "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    10. Re:you have to admit... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't take the same stance as you did on his post and your response. I read it differently. Your explanation is much clearer than your first response, and I also agree with it.

      And yes, I will defend your right to call me idiotic any day.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    11. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Stop agreeing! We're trying to have an argument here! :)

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    12. Re:you have to admit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A beard is not defined by the number of hairs on a person's face. It's not necessary for people to count hairs to tell if a certain person is wearing a beard. Some beards are bushy, others are not. Some cover the entire jawline, others cover just the chin. Whatever the number of hairs on a person's face a beard is whatever looks like a beard to the person who defines it as such.

      Maturity is not defined by age. You cannot take two people and conclude that one is more mature than the other simply by comparing birthdates.

    13. Re:you have to admit... by geekster · · Score: 1

      Hehe, yeah ok.
      But to be serious again, would you say the same thing about black people? "Don't get all definsive about color?".
      And don't say it's different, because it's about prejudging people, color, age or what ever.

    14. Re:you have to admit... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, Mr. John "Bootee"!

      Yeah, that's right, "Bootee"

      Take that, bi-otch!

      HE HE HE!

      (better?)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    15. Re:you have to admit... by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Come on! It *is* different. This is not prejudice regarding a physical attribute that differenciates portions of the populace, this is about an attribute that ALL people share.

      Would you let your 8 year old watch "Faces of Death"? I assume you would say no, because you do not want to put them into a situation where you feel they could be traumatized. It follows from the (evolution reinforced) protection of children.

      However, if my child were to put forth a reasonable and pursuasive argument as to why they should watch it, I would reconsider my earlier decision based on purely their age number. Same goes in this situation. When someone whines and complains that they are old enough, they are merely reinforcing the negative view that the world has of them.

      Same argument does NOT apply for racism, etc. I happen to KNOW what it is like to be a kid and have the naivety that comes with that particular state of being. I am in no position to judge on other attributes, and thus cannot place a different set of values than my own upon some of different race/creed/color/etc.

      I hope you get my point... there is quite a distinction between racism and agism.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    16. Re:you have to admit... by geekster · · Score: 1

      Ok, yes, you have a point. But 25 is ridiculously high. And yes, I'm below that age. I'm 21, but I do feel I can handle it.

      I enjoy playing Operation Flashpoint even though I'm opposed to the military and I enjoy doing a hit and run in GTA even though I'm opposed to violence. All I'm saying is that responsebility is a state of mind and isn't directly linked to age.

      Yes, kids are more naive I'll give you that but put any person in front of a game all day and his mind will become distorted. You learn about real life from real life. That's where the problem is IMHO.

    17. Re:you have to admit... by pboulang · · Score: 1

      So what is the complaint? That the original poster said that in *his opinion* that 25 is more appropriate? Or that that by law, you could buy this and play it three years ago?

      I think I'll simply agree with your last paragraph and add the hint that the younger you are, the more suscepable you are to this distortion.

      The original poster never said that nobody under 25 shouldn't play this, simply put that as a suggestion. Probably this was a result of him having played the game and been completely floored by the non-linearity and ability to do whatever the hell he wanted. Maybe you should be a game screener for him, you know, let him know when games are too scary ;)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

  12. Interesting Cycle... by Uttles · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean isn't Australia just a big island full of convicts? Funny how now they seem to be so strict. I wonder if someone gets arrested for having that game, are they going to ship them to the UK?

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Mondrames · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The used Australia because they ran out of room in Georgia.

    2. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because we (uk) are to full of imigrants and the bloody Afgans that you (america) won't take. (good thing i posted anon. lol)

    3. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Mondrames · · Score: 1

      Troll Huh? Looks like some people missed out on their history lessons:
      History of Colonial Georgia. Also, linking Georgia together with Australia comes the quote:
      "After the American Revolution prevented further transportation of convicts to Georgia, the British Parliament authorized removal of the criminal underclasses to the remote colony of New South Wales. A Second penal colony was soon required to accommodate the increasing convict population, and in 1803 Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania) was established for that purpose. This distant island soon became the primary Australian penal colony."

      Thanks.

    4. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about you, but I'd rather come from a land built on the backs of convicts than on the backs of slaves.

    5. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're comparing Australia to the USA, I'd point out that technically the latter is a land built on the backs of religious dissidents who kicked the asses of slave-owning convicts (in a war that admittedly had less to do with slavery than with economics), but most of whom (thank ghod) now stay south of the Line where they belong. Thank you for your time.

    6. Re:Interesting Cycle... by macom · · Score: 1
      >the British Parliament authorized removal of
      >the criminal underclasses to the remote colony
      >of New South Wales.

      Most Americans are surprised that their independance played a role in Australia's founding as a modern nation.

      Another parable between the US and Australia, when Australia's founding fathers debated in the 1880's what form Australian independance was going to take they looked to the two strongest democracies of the time, the UK and US. The system they came up with has been called the "Wash-minster mutation".


      macom

    7. Re:Interesting Cycle... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      it's a bit rich seeing as BOTH nations commited genocide on their native populations. That's the beauty of you guys being independent from Britain, we can blame you for all the horrible things we did, because we no longer includes you.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  13. Re:Worst Slashdot Article Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is MUCH better than seeing another retarded LINUX IS GOOD. or MICROSOFT IS BAD. article.

  14. Support your Aussie gamer! by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Informative

    If anyone has any friends in Australia, I recommend that you ask them if they want a copy of GTA3. If so, you should offer to buy it and mail it to them. With the surge of Christmas packages, I doubt Customs would search every package, especially if it were sent in an innocent-looking envelope.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by Sorthum · · Score: 0

      Or even slap the GTA3 disc into a CD or DVD case. If you want to be REALLY careful, you could even use a CD labeler to cover up the GTA3 logo on the CD...

    2. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by nocent · · Score: 3, Funny
      If anyone has any friends in Australia, I recommend that you ask them if they want a copy of GTA3. If so, you should offer to buy it and mail it to them. With the surge of Christmas packages, I doubt Customs would search every package, especially if it were sent in an innocent-looking envelope.

      You should buy them a new PS2 too while you're at it. Region coding for PS2 games means that they won't be able to play your US GTA3 on their Australian PS2.

    3. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by psxndc · · Score: 2
      Aside from region encoding issues, Australia uses PAL TVs, not NTSC. So even if they could decode the disc, they couldn't watch it.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    4. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by ectizen · · Score: 1

      Most, if not all, new TVs in .au these days can handle NTSC.

  15. The best and Worst Game this year! by Quizme2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ture the gamplay and replay value are pretty damn good, even a descent storyline. But, copkilling games and those with other criminal content will always attract publicity and bans. Remember "Postal". It was the same thing, at the time it had great graphics and a high replay value (especially the marching band level). Anyway, don't think for a second that this will be a negitive for the game publisher, its just an added plus to help sell the game in the US and UK. Hey, I played through GTA, Max Payne, and Spycraft. I can't say that I'm a better person for playing them. I would never want my child to come in contact with that shit just for someone else's entertainment.

    --
    "Get them before they get....
    1. Re:The best and Worst Game this year! by el_nino · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I would never want my child to come in contact with that shit just for someone else's entertainment.

      Er... Just for whom's entertainment do you play games for? I play them for my own entertainment, and I'd imagine your child would do the same.

    2. Re:The best and Worst Game this year! by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Postal was good? Maybe playing games like this DOES affect your judgement.

  16. Wow by crumbz · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Talk about a great game. I still haven't heard all of the talk show segments in the game. It is great to go on a rampage and then part the car overlooking the bay and listen to the Chatterbox FM. All we can hope for is for GTA4 to have broadband multiplay and the game would be perfect.

    As for the Aussies, they are down the path of giving up personal liberties for the "greater good". Since they banned guns thei crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "As for the Aussies, they are down the path of giving up personal liberties for the "greater good"."

      Oh, you mean like FBI spyware? Hey, wait, that was the USA...

      "Since they banned guns thei crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!"

      That is just bullshit made up by some NRA wanker in the USA to 'convince' the gullible idiots of the US to feel you need a semi-auto weapon to walk the streets. Can you provide any evidence to back up your (bullshit) claims.

      Get your heads out of your arses America. Open yours eyes to what REALLY happens in the rest of the world. Don't just make up bullshit to make your self-given title of "land of the free" seem more real.

      You have no more freedom then I do.

    2. Re:Wow by crumbz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yikes.
      Hey I like Australians, man.

      I like to think that I know what really happens in the world. Unarmed civilians are slaughtered by others. Governments look the other way while minorities are persecurted. Serbia, Croatia, Turkey, Iraq, Columbia, Uganda, Ethiopia.

      On the other hand, we have some 10,000 gun deaths a year in this country. Wonderful things such as little kids finding daddy's gun and shooting brother Jimmy, nutsos shooting up a KFC and the like.

      And by the way, you can check out the below listed sites for the "evidence". Granted they are a bit one-sided but that seems to be the nature of gun issues.

      http://members.ozemail.com.au/~confiles/

      http://www.nrawinningteam.com/auresult.html

      http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html

      I have as much freedom as I choose to have. That is why I vote at the polls, with my pocketbook and engage in civic activities. Just because I rag on Australians for pussing out on gun rights doesn't mean I don't know what is going on in the world. Both of our countries fought off the yoke of British colonialism. How do you think that was accomplished? Diplomacy with Her Majesty?

      But it is your country so do what you want with it....

    3. Re:Wow by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yap yap yap, at least we can play GTA. And as for guns, I don't know any numbers, but I was there earlier this year, and my hotel sat right across the street from a gun shop. So I don't know what that's about. But my theory on guns is this: if everybody had guns, there would be no crime. If nobody had guns, there would be no crime. But once you let the cat out of the bag, it's tough to stuff it back in. In the US, we have a saying, "Outlaw guns, and only outlaws will have guns." That's the gist of it anyway. But it makes sense to us.
      That being said, you guys do what you want, make up your own crazy laws, censor stuff you don't like, whatever. If I don't like it, I'll just not move there, and to hell with the great weather and beaches and all the BBQing and what not. If they did that here, I'd move somewhere else. I really would. Really.
      But your definition of freedom mustn't include freedom from censorship, because if it did, you wouldn't be able to say that US citizens have no more freedom than you. I'm not saying we're perfect, but GTA is a great game, and you aren't free to play it.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Australia didn't fight the British.

      One the the things stressed in the recent centenary of federation celebrations was the fact that Australia was formed with a vote, and not a war.

    5. Re:Wow by DragonPup · · Score: 2

      Speaking of banning guns, here's a quote from the Chatterbox radio station in GTA3

      Caller: ... and countries that don't have guns are unamerican.
      Lazlo(the host): I think you touch upon a good point there sir. Countries that don't have guns not American.

      Chatterbox Rocks, I pray in GTA4 they have even more Lazlo Oh, according to one of his callers, there was a Austrialian-American war, where the Aussies wired kangeroo's with explosives. :-)

      -Henry

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    6. Re:Wow by tyse · · Score: 1

      > Both of our countries fought off the yoke of
      > British colonialism. How do you think that was
      > accomplished? Diplomacy with Her Majesty?

      In the case of Australia, essentially yes. No
      war was fought, there weren't even particularly
      harsh words.

      The current Queen (still Queen of
      Australia) has even given limited support to Australia removing her as a figurehead (she's indicated it is pretty much inevitable, which is amusing because the current government doesn't feel the same way).

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These are some nice stats:

      NSW Crime

      Murder steady, just about everything else way up.

      Ban in 1996? In terms of public health interest, I don't think either position can be justified by these stats.

      ramble

      In socio-political sense,I see the laws as destructive. Certain groups in society are privileged (cops, military, rich, government), there might be perception of "us vs them" (you only need a perception!), citizen rights and responsibilities are diminished, building a client mentality with dependency, passivity, patronism, etc. Australia doesn't need any less division right now.

      /ramble

    8. Re:Wow by _dave_the_one_ · · Score: 1
      Since they banned guns thei [Australia's] crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!


      No. No, no, no.

      I hear this way too often from Americans. As I understand it, this is something your gun lobby claims? Either way, it is false. In fact, it's something that really pisses me off: the fact this is passes off as true in your country (we hear about this occasionally Down Under and lauigh our heads off, or sigh, at the fact you could beleive it and that your gun lobby is allowed to put this in advertisements and no-one tries to stop them for lying) is incredible, and the fact that a blatant troll like yours is marked +4 is even worse.

      I am an Australian citizen. Our crime rate - especially our violent crime (murder etc) rate - has fallen since the introduction of these laws.

      Please, find out for yourself, don't just go believing what your US pro-gun lobby tells you. The important thing to remember is that our laws don't stop people from owning guns, they stop you owning (for example) a sub-machine gun if you don't need a sub-machine gun. If you do... you can get it. Although, when you get down to it, there really aren't many uses for one of those apart from killing lots and lots of people.

      However, the point of this is: the statement the parent made is false. I find it hard to believe there are people who accept a statement like that as true (hey, if you don't believe what I'm saying, go research it yourself), and especially that it got modded up to +4.

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lying, stupid gun-nut loony.

      Our crime rate has dropped since gun laws were introduced, so you are either ill-informed or lying.

  17. Well well well, imagine that by Uttles · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm not on my knees polishing CmdrTacos knob so instantly I lose moderation points... who would have guessed?

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Well well well, imagine that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kathryn Thurber? *The* Carleton University slut of the century? Bwahahahaha. Cool link, man.

  18. Memories by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of Carmageddon spring to mind...

    Why does it seem automobile related destruction of life and limb garners so much censorship?
    We kill 50,000+ people a year on the streets as it is!

    For those who have seen the classic Sean Connery James Bond film "Goldfinger" there is a quote I always found amusing...

    JB: Incidently, Delta-9 nerve gas is fatal- you'll kill 45,000 people.
    GF: Ha! American motorists kill that many every 2 years!"

    Now we hit that mark in under a year...

    1. Re:Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make seatbelts law then.

      Is it that difficult?

    2. Re:Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So if someone's not smart enough to wear a seatbelt on their own, we should force them to so they can live to pass on their stupid genes? Wow, what a great idea!

      <mutter>Wasted orgasm...</mutter>

    3. Re:Memories by inburito · · Score: 2

      Nope.. official traffic related deaths are at around 35-38 thousand / year.. definetly less than 45. But yes, your point is still valid. I checked this up recently somewhere us-gov pages but can't recall the exact location..

  19. GTA3 might be illegal in .au, by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...but apparently smoking crack isn't.

  20. They *mean* well, but... by b.foster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'd just like to start out by saying that banning a freakin video game is not going to solve the world's problems, and is completely absurd.

    However, I do see where their government is going with this. It has been a disturbing trend for several decades in this country that criminals feed on the public's attention, and when the public gives much attention to criminals, it encourages people with self esteem issues to become criminals.

    That, then, is the problem with GTA: it encourages car theft. Not in the sense that a GTA player is likely to go out and steal a car, but rather that it allows a culture to slip steadily closer to a hellish society in which crime is tolerated in order to entertain the public. This is not unlike the Colosseum in ancient Rome, in which murders took place between god-fearing christians for the sake of the public's amusement. Compare this to the instant notoriety of serial killers like John Wayne Gacy, who make a killing selling paintings from prison, and you can see why the government wants to stop glorifying crime now.

    Something must be done about this morbid situation. But it doesn't involve banning games. Perhaps it is a media problem; if the government owned a few media outlets, it would be able to put writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today. That is a bit closer to socialism than we should be, but it might be better for society in the long run.

    Bill

    1. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      People are animals and will continue to act as such. Logic will never prevail over emotions because they are our instict as animals. People will continue to prey on others self esteem and exploit their fears. Unless we do enter an age of aquaris where intellect prevails, I've accepted it isn't happening in my lifetime. I hope man doesn't kill himself off before it ever happens.

      There is nothing morbid about this. It's life and it's my entertainment. Watching all the idiots of the world bounce off each other is more fun than reading slashdot. If you want to be happy adjust your own mental attitude and forget about changing things on this planet. Man will just have to evolve for himself over time and try not to make his home uninhabitable.

    2. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not a government thing, its a society thing.
      If there is a demand for 'blood, carnage and violence' then people will make games/films about it. Even if it become illegal, all you succeed in doing is creating a black market.
      Then again, maybe we should look at what makes us enjoy such things. Could it be that the human race find such things 'exciting' because at heart, many of us are still cave men? (Or women)
      Legislation is not the way forward. Legislation should be to enforce the will of the public - if they want violence, then legislating against it will simply cause them to ignore the legislation (consider the prohibition).
      I have noticed a decline in smoking recently though. Not because of laws, but because social tolerance of it has decreased. Maybe that's the way it should go.
      Perhaps we _should_ bring back the colosseum... Least then it'd be 'honest' violence.

    3. Re:They *mean* well, but... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1
      forget about changing things on this planet. Man will just have to evolve for himself over time and try not to make his home uninhabitable
      So what you're saying essentially is that you're no-longer part of the human race? If everyone had your attitude then nothing would ever change because everyone would just figure "someone else will do it". The only way to affect change is have lots of individuals (yourself included friend) come together and make it happen. To say that man will just have to evolve for himself is really foolish thinking when you realize you're a part of it.
      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    4. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter how many times someone goes on a killing spree with a flamethrower in the game, I don't think anyone will ever do it in the USA.

    5. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This only causes a problem if you can't tell the difference between reality and a game. I love killing CTs in Counter-Strike, but I know it's only a game, it's not real and if I were to go and head-shot an SAS officer, he wouldn't respawn in a few minutes.

      Computer games are great because they let you do things you wouldn't do in real life. If you have trouble differentiating, go seek help now.

    6. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 100% agree on banning a video game, I have a right to subject myself to anything I want to, and that includes video games.

      As far as moving into a more hellish society, I tend to disagree. Violence has always been apart of our life and unfortunatly always will be. Its apart of us now, with this war against bin ladden. What you haven't seen yet (maybe some of you have) is the result when you machine gun someone 100 times in the chest. That is real violence, and that is what is taking place in our society today, just that we are better shielded from it.

      Being shielded from it is a bad thing as well, because if we are truly to evolve into a better society, then we need to see exactly how bad it is, IMHO.

    7. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was feeding Christians to lions a bad thing?

    8. Re:They *mean* well, but... by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have noticed a decline in smoking recently though. Not because of laws, but because social tolerance of it has decreased. Maybe that's the way it should go.
      This is why I like Apple's iPod commercial. At the bottom of the TV it says in really small letters, "Don't steal music."
      If my friends found out I downloaded an mp3 illegaly last night, and my stature decreased with them as a result, that would be the last MP3 I EVER download. Social acceptance is the biggest influence on culture anywhere. Bigger than laws, by a long shot. Now, you have to realize that for criminals, a lot of them are social deviants. They do things not for society's attention, but...
      Well, I honestly don't know why they do these things. Murder, Grand Theft, and what not. But I really don't think it's for social acceptance. And if the law says they shouldn't, that's not too great a deterrent either. No more so, anyway. So why do they do these things? What's their reward? Because if we know what their reward is, we might be able to take it away. Maybe it's just money, which means that we can only take it away if we can catch them, which doesn't change anything.
      Sorry for rambling.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    9. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Grunschev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today

      Yeah, we've got to get back to things like Gunsmoke, where Marshall Dillon can kill one or two bad guys every week and hang out in the bar at the local whore house.

      Igor

    10. Re:They *mean* well, but... by duketor · · Score: 1

      That, then, is the problem with GTA: it encourages car theft.

      That's it exactly. Even today, thanks to my previous GTA play, I contemplated stealing my neighbour's SUV simply because you can fit more groceries in there than my sedan.

      (Oh, and also because I didn't want any blood stains on my car.)

      --

      Never play leapfrog with a unicorn.
  21. Steering Wheel wrong side... by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    All they need to do is move the steering wheel from the left side of the car to the right side of the car and mirror all the scenes so players are driving on the correct side of the road in Australia. This is completely understandable. The last thing the nation of Australia needs is a bunch of teens taught to drive on the wrong side of the road.

    On a serious note, I lived in Australia (Newtown, NSW) in 1992 for about 7 months. When watching TV, I started to notice you really didn't see violence but man 'o man did you see breasts! While I was there, the movie "Ten" w/ Bo Derek was shown on their equivilent of NBC. In America, they cut out all the nudity scenes. In Australia, they actually had more than the original movie had! Special Director's Cut for Australia. What a great country! Great beer, beautiful women and those cool, lickable toads.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Steering Wheel wrong side... by Oztun · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Sounds good to me. We need to replace all bad things in the world with beer and sex.

    2. Re:Steering Wheel wrong side... by toupsie · · Score: 2
      Is this another euphemism for breasts or have we moved past that part of your post? Sorry, I get distracted.

      No, I am talking about these toads

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    3. Re:Steering Wheel wrong side... by macom · · Score: 1
      >ou really didn't see violence but man 'o
      >man did you see breasts!

      Yes, US Television is sexually repressed. You have to order HBO to see any skin and hear any swearing. In Aus midday viewing see's plenty of breasts. I would rather see breasts than a corpse anyway.

      macom

  22. Re:The NRA Strikes again by Wells2k · · Score: 1

    No, I am not comparing video games to "real" guns. I am stating that the games we play have an effect on what we do in life.

    I remember playing games such as Carmageddon and the like for hours on end with friends, then getting into a real car later on with them and jokingly pointing out people on the streets and saying "100 points!"

    Yes, I am able to seperate a game from reality, but there are those out there that are not able to, or possibly don't want to.

    The game depicts a hooligan running around, carjacking vehicles all over the place, etc. In .au, there is a ban on guns, but as I stated in the first place, criminals don't care one iota about what is banned and what is not, because they are criminals and breaking the ban is what they do.

  23. Imports? by VisualStim · · Score: 1

    So, how does this affect importing the game into the country? Who's for making a few bucks with an eBay auction or fifty? :)

  24. Rant by ellem · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Is Natalie Portman in this game?
    Did Microsoft write this game?
    Is this game being ported to Linux?
    Is this game written in Perl?
    Does this game contain any OSDN or VA polls?
    Are there any latex clad BSD Grrls in this game?

    What the Hell is this story doing on Slashdot?

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Rant by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Taco wanted to show off what games he beat on the PS2.

      That's what happens when one person owns a site. I wish they had a "personal" topic or something.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Rant by archen · · Score: 1

      A game written in Perl for Linux by Microsoft starring Natalie Portman and the latex clad BSD Grrls... Now if MS REALLY wanted to poke the eye of the open source/Linux community, they would make this game, but force you to use MS passport to play!

    3. Re:Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Software censorship isn't geek enough for you?

  25. Seen it all before by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Duke3D was banned in Australia until 3DRealms patched it so the Adult lock couldn't be deactivated; it took a few hours at least before it was cracked, if memory serves.

    We'll ban anything you like over here, it seems...

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  26. Priorities by ITrualseO · · Score: 1

    Alright, seriously, I know that crime probably isn't very high in Australia, but I'm fairly certain that whatever form of legislative body they have 'down under' (sorry, pun necessary) could find things more important to spend working hours dealing with .

    --
    Revolution is simply evolution that has been desired enough to be created by dreamers willing to riskit's possibilities.
  27. heh by phyberop · · Score: 1

    yeah, I can understand why they banned it.
    why, only yesterday, I was out on the main roads, with my PSX pad strapped to my belt, frantically pressing the buttons in the hope that the driver would fall out of the car, and I could make a quick getaway from the cops.
    Maybe they should take a step back and realise that its only a game. It doesnt teach people to steal cars and commit crimes, that still happens even if GTA was never created. They are just keeping some people away from a quality title.

    --

    I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
  28. Secret code for GTA3 by Hougaard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ofcause they need to ban a game where you can do the following:

    Urinate:
    Walk up to a wall and press Up, Down, Up, Down, L2, R1, R2(2), Up, Down, Up, Down, Up.
    Your character will urinate on the wall. The cops will chase since it counts as vandalizing.

    Funny!

  29. different map? by eclectric · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.. mine shows australia to be quite a bit farther from Germany than "next door."

    1. Re:different map? by mcj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your map must be for the humor-impaired. :-)

  30. From a known fellon: by cavemanf16 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Hello slashdot!

    I found that GTA and GTA2, while not as graphically pleasing as GTA3 looks to be, were a wonderful addition to my skill set. Not only do I now know how to go on a "Kiiiiillll FRENZY!", but I also know how to hotwire most major makes of car, from the unimposing Ford Fiesta, to the ever-popular Tank!

    These sorts of skills are very important to an aspiring criminal mastermind, such as me. And why work so hard for a Cisco or MSCE certification? They cost so much more! For only $49.95 (before tax), you too can learn the same skill sets I now have.

    I'm just wondering if GTA3, with all it's new-fangled '3D' graphics is really worth the investment in my future. I mean, I already know how to highjack cars and kill random people. Do I really need to know how to interact with the mob? Please help me decide slashdot!

    1. Re:From a known fellon: by microsquash · · Score: 0

      Why not use that use that new skill set to change things? Go ahead and incite some riots, blow up some police, and take on the military! Eventually the goverment will be forced to its knees, and allow the game in. You on the other hand will now be a powerful crime lord IRL.

    2. Re:From a known fellon: by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

      Seriously, GTA3 is worth the cost of the ps2 _and_ the game. It is really good.
      Having completed it though, i'm going to talk about the bad bits (the good bits would take too long):

      1: Targeting - as in shooting people, is hard as hell. Maybe it's my pc-trained fingers, but i find it really difficult to do. Doesn't spoil the game, and you get more used to it eventually. It is annoying though..

      2: The Plane - in the third island, you can get a plane, which with a _lot_ of practice, you can sort of fly. If you're going to have a plane at all, why not give it wings and make it flyable?

      3: The Stadium - in the second island. I spend about half a day trying everything to jump into the stadium to no avail. Once i got onto the third island, i tried flying in - it's shit. low res, no detail, and it's not solid, so you fall through the floor and pop out just outside. aaahhh!!

      4: no motorbike! - someone mentioned this was because of difficulties with modelling the physics, but it would have been cool.

      So in conclusion, BUY IT!! you won't be disapointed, especially if you liked the first 2 1/2.. You can do everything you could in htem and a lot more, plus it's in 3d and looks beautteutaeutiful.

      On another note, has anyone collected all the hidden packages yet? what happens?

      later,

      jeff of the capeshop.

      ps. oooooo r1 l2 l1 (triangle) o (triangle) ;)

      pps. at least i think thats it..

  31. Take this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a grain of salt - there's a link to another article listed on that page - entitled "Computer games 'cause brain damage'"

    sheesh....

  32. Bad logic by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "First they ban the guns. Then it's open season on everyone and everything."

    Oh you mean like in Europe and practically in every other western democracy?

    Besides that's a "Slippery Slope" logical fallacy.

    1. Re:Bad logic by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, like the CCD monitoring on every corner, key turnover requirment, ISP record keeping...

    2. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What key turnover requirement are you talking about?

      My goverment has neither any of my physical keys, nor any electronic ones. Nor do they have he right to duplicate them. And as for CCD... well, they aren't exactly on every street corner, the only ones I've seen are in an underground section of a train station, and near the exit of the city's central post office.

      And no I don't live in the UK. I don't suppose it ever occured to most Slashdotters that some people do not live in English-speaking countries...

    3. Re:Bad logic by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      The "slippery slope" is not a logical fallacy because, repeat after me, it's not logic. It is an observation of human nature.

    4. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah! just like Nazi Germany. got rid of the guns in the 1930's then went right to the murdering in the 1940's.

      but they're the exception... right?

      right?

    5. Re:Bad logic by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 1
      It is an observation of human nature.

      So, let's be subjective and chant the gun-nut mantra instead of being logical and objective, eh?

      Well, in that case, based on my observations of the current state of human rights in Europe, I'd say that you're still wrong.

    6. Re:Bad logic by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      And the UK is a paragon of human rights then?
      Or aren't they part of Europe?

      And look at the rights vanishing Australia.

    7. Re:Bad logic by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 1
      Ok, whatever.

      I don't mind if you seriously believe that the private ownership of guns is somehow an effective deterrent against the automatic weapons, tanks, B-52s, daisy-cutters and professional soldiers. And don't give me the silly line that the soldiers wouldn't fire on fellow citizens.

      Guerilla war tactics didn't work for the Taliban and it would not work for you gun-loving "patriots" either. But hey, who cares about the logic and reality as long as you can maintain your belief in the blessed guns.

      PS. I don't mind the tin-foil hat wearing, new-world-order-conspiracy folk either as long as they keep a distance and don't try to force my kids wear tin-foil too.

    8. Re:Bad logic by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Huh? I'm not.

      I'm saying the slope is the government trying to grab more and more power at the expense of its citizens, with previous grabs desensitizing the populace to later ones. And in the general case, this seems to hold fairly consistently.

      Are you trying to say that slope doesn't exist? Guns is only one of those slopes. There are many others - Taxation, Privacy, Freedom of Speech to name a few.

    9. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you saying that because ol bin laudin can not mount a sucessful guerilla type campain against the US that it's impossible for any people to do so?

      bin laudin does not have the support of the native people of Afganistan. he is an outsider. all sucessful guerilla campains have to have the support of the local population. with that you can bring down the best army. example VIETNAM.

      all it would take is for every freedom loving person to take two "NAZI's" with them before they die. just think if the Jews had done this in Germany. it would have slowed ol hitler down and maybe they could have evan brought him down themselves, either way at least they would have died on their feet standing up for themselves. NOTE some of them did a damn good job of this, and those i respect.

      but you should go hug a tree or ban some vidio games.

    10. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind if you seriously believe that the private ownership of guns is somehow an effective deterrent against the automatic weapons, tanks, B-52s, daisy-cutters and professional soldiers. And don't give me the silly line that the soldiers wouldn't fire on fellow citizens.

      We, infact, expect you to beleive absolutely nothing. This is due, in large part, to the many of us who actualy own items like these. Excepting the B-52's, we have many millions of professional soldiers, automatic, and large explosives. This is to deter you Brits for ever wanting to take us over again, of course. This, and the martians.

      Fear the martians!!!

    11. Re:Bad logic by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's not quite a "slippery-slope" fallacy. The implication is that, if the citizens of a country have no way to form a revolution, their government will be more likely to be tyrannical.

      If the link guns->threat-of-revolution->keeping-the-gove rnment-in-line weren't implied, I'd agree with you. (Of course, the idea makes some of its own assumptions that may be argued, but that's a discussion for another day...)

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    12. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really aren't many cases of rights vanishing from Australia. Gun laws were tightened because polls showed 95% of people wanted them to be (we're not gun-nuts, unlike Americians). The internet censorship laws have fallen over, and don't really apply anymore. And the banning of GTA3 is just because our Video-Game censorship laws are outmoded, and are currently undergoing review to allow R rated games to be sold.

      Slashdotters really over-exaggerate anything to do with Australia. I live in .au, and I can say that Australia is more free and respectful of human rights than 20 years ago (although the fact that we currently have a conservative government certainly doesn't help matters).

    13. Re:Bad logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America may have loose gun-control laws, but they have resorted to a far more tyrranical form of suppressing revolution. I am referring to the xenophobic patriotism that most Americans I have met show. They are offended at any criticism of their country, and are blind to what is occuring outside their borders. One look at the American school systems that drums into student's heads the mantra: "America is superior to all other countries" shows where this patriotic zealotry comes from.

  33. UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    USA and UK ban stuff too, not just australia. Its just that its gov pressure on publishers that does it rather than pre-emptive laws.

    The Playstation had an awesome game I played a lot using a MOD chip called Thrill Kill.

    Unfortunately for the developers and fans, before that game was released Electronic Arts acquired the rights to the game by purchasing Virgin Interactive's titles, and due to the publisher's "moral obligations," the game never saw the light of day. At least, legitimately. Ebay sales of Illegal CDRs were heavy for a while. and it traded swiftly , especially after EA placed full size ads for it in trade mags, and stickers.

    And dont forget that the Movie Clockwork Orange was not played in Britain for almost 20 years in a theater! Kubrick was threatened with jail time if he allowed it by threatening to assosiate teen crime with him as the inciting party.

    The USA almost banned "Custers Last Stand" for the Atari 2600, which featured a cowboy raping a Squaw tied to a stake.

    Germany successfully banned Castle Wolfenstein 3D by ID when Compuserve tried to have it online. It got deleted off CIS.

    Australia is screwed in other ways regarding porn though.

    At least in the US I can say "Jesus is a Lie" in a video game, or depict cops having their heads blown off to score extra points.

  34. (OT) Re:Well well well, imagine that by NewWazoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Hmmm... let's think for a minute:

    Perhaps you lost your (precious) moderation points because you POSTED A REPLY TO THIS STORY???

    ... or maybe, just maybe you lost your moderation points because people don't care to hear your WHINING and your post was COMPLETELY off-topic.

    Yeah, and I bet the CIA's plotting against you, too - evidenced by the fact that you got pulled over for doing 70 in a 55, right?

    *grumblelosergrumble*

    TheNewWazoo

    1. Re:(OT) Re:Well well well, imagine that by Oztun · · Score: 2

      And all because he played GTA. It not only makes you steal cars, it makes you drive to fast too.

  35. Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, what you have is a society whose government has decided that it doesn't want video games that make carjacking and other violent mayhem seem like a fun idea.

    From a moral standpoint, that's actually kind of healthy.

    Where it starts to get iffy is when this sort of ban is actually symptomatic of a bigger problem, in which the government is trying to make their entire population goosestep and a commercial ban on violent games is only one such restriction imposed, in parallel with other restrictions like clampdowns on information or restricted free political speech.

    For instance, if the US were to ban counterstrike servers that didn't automatically put bots on the terrorist team, I'd be pretty freaked out. And you can bet this is something that will come further down the line if Ashcroft et al. don't get their powers checked.

    But I've never heard of Australia being a society with a reputation of doing this sort of thing to its population. Now, I'm not saying that this isn't happening there per se, I may just be ignorant of it, and an Aussie contribution on this issue would definitely be valuable.

    But what I'm thinking is that we shouldn't necessarily be taking this in the same vein as if a North American government were imposing such a restriction. You might disagree, but I think that the censorship is only a problem when it comes close to stifling dissent against the powers that be, as opposed to just trying to promote a little bit of morality and decency. Yes, I know that the line is easily blurred, but is it blurred here?

    Just my two cents.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Why it should bother you. Seeing as how you are showing intelligence it is my guess playing this game would not cause you to murder and steal cars. You seem to be able to identify the difference between a video game and reality.

      So it is only healthy in that it protects us from the uneducated or deranged products of society. What bothers me is that society wants to ban things rather than promote things such as education and family. I say give people personal freedoms to take their aggresions out killing fake people in a video game. Then promote education, family, and morals such as not killing people or stealing cars.

    2. Re:Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by Mr.+Sharumpe · · Score: 1

      The sad thing, to me, is not the ban or the fact that the video game exists, but the fact that people want a game like this enough for a *third* iteration. I'm not going to sit here and say that, if you want to play such a game, that there should be a law against it, but I will say that any parent that lets their kid play a game like this is being irresponsible. If you're an adult, it's your choice, but the fact that some parents will buy these games for their kids is just unconscionable. (boy, I'm sure to get flamed for that!)

      Now before you flame me, I play so-called "violent" video games - I am a huge fan of UT, Soul Calibur, Halo and others, but I am old enough to make decisions like that for myself and separate the game from reality and any emotional problems I may have (and let's face it, the kids that shoot each other in school have something out of whack). I am old enough to be responsible for my actions if a game makes me wig out and do something drastic - not that I subscribe to that theory, either. I believe that people are responsible for their own actions, and blaming things on video games or rock music is just an attempt to pass the blame. Anyway, I'm getting off-topic.

      Flame away...
      Mr. Sharumpe

      --
      -- The above comments are just my opinion. If you are going to flame me, save your time. I am fireproof.
    3. Re:Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by boof · · Score: 1

      Here's an Aussie contribution from an Aussie who has been in San Fran for 5 weeks.

      Australia generally doesn't ban much stuff. The way these things usually work is some group with too much free time will lodge a complaint with the appropriate government body and that body will have to investigate the complaint. If the group also gets the media in on it and it's a slow news day the complaint will get on the news. Then a few politicians will see it as an oppurtunity to get thier faces on the news, and the game will end up getting banned.

      It's all pretty stupid and really just political point scoring.

      I'm all for restricting and rating of games. I don't think kids should be playing this sort of stuff until they're mature enough to know the difference from right and wrong, but that's up to their parents to decide, not a few politicians or religious groups.

      Australia is actually far less restrictive with than the US seems to be. Especially when it comes to sex. Wild On on Channel E! is a prime example. They make a big deal about topless beach girls being on after the next break, so stay tuned - so you do. Then they show them so heavily pixelated that you see less skin than if they'd just left their tops on.

      It's a crazy world. I will be taking a few copies of GTA3 back to Australia now.

  36. How about movies that do the same? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What about WWII movies like Saving Private Ryan? Since they are killing surely everyone else will. If people cannot draw the distinction between reality and entertainment there is no video game, movie or anything else that will change that. The word sociopath came from those type of people. So banning something because a few (who argueably will do something wrong anyway) may take it seriously is not only stupid but a complete waste of time. By the Au's contention banning ALL violence should remove it completely from society. Didnt that work for the Taliban?

  37. Re:guys help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just split it into two parts, 1/(2^n+3^n) + (2^n)/(2^n+3^n) Both parts converge, so their sum converges too.

    Now where the fuck did get the idea that "Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under" is "Ask Slashdot for homework help"?

  38. GTA: Different perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually got bored after the first 8 or so missions then just started trashing cars. After two evenings seeing how high I could get a fire engine to jump I put it in the "finished" stack.

    Perhaps it gets more exciting later on? I retired it seeing it as a spruced up Crazy Taxi with free-form action. Anyone else feel the same way?

    1. Re:GTA: Different perspective. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Hardly. I actually rented this one and played it at night when the wifey had gone to bed (she gives me dirty looks whenever I so much as suggest we get the game). I found myself trying (unsuccessfully) not to burst out in laughter repeatedly. Every 20 minutes or so, I would think to myself "I've seen car chases like this on TV!" Or "Wow, that one would have made 'Cops' or 'America's Most Deadly Police Chases Part IX'.

      Case in point: I made the mistake of jacking a cargo van in the plain view of a police cruiser. As I fled in my (not-so-quick) new wheels, the cruiser gave chase. Attempting to pull me over, the cruiser rammed me up onto the sidewalk, where I promptly ran over a patrolman on foot. Instant second star rating. More cruisers joined the chase and, as I whipped around a corner (the doors in the rear ajar from the repeated rammings), a cruiser screeched to a halt in front of me, causing my van to ramp up over its hood and complete a barrel roll. Hood now aflame, I ditched the van and fled on foot. The four cruisers behind me disgorged their officers, who began to fire at me. However, they failed to flee the scene of my flaming wreck, which exploded, killing around 10 officers. *BAM* Three star rating.

      After that, well, it's a bit hard to flee the cops' helicopter on foot...

      It is to laugh.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  39. freedoms gone...... for the law abiding anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why ban guns if the nuts and criminals will still have them anyway. The same applies to games, this won't stop your average wAr3z d00d from getting ahold of a copy anyways.

  40. It's a joke! AND on-topic... by socokid · · Score: 0


    I think you're right.

    I can see my hand flying over my head at high speed making that "plane" sound...

  41. Its SSX by xagon7 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Lt. Taco unless there actually IS a PS2 game called FFX... then I'd be a 5 * General Bean Buritto!

    1. Re:Its SSX by lmsig · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy X. I think he thinks we are ALL PS2 addicts.

      --
      .plan!! what plan?
    2. Re:Its SSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFX == Final Fantasy X. which is also 80% of the reason I bought a PS2. For the Kids! For Christmas! Honest! the other 20% if you are curious: Tony Hawk 3, and PS compatibility (for FF9, of course) IAAL

    3. Re:Its SSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever hear of Final Fantasy X?

    4. Re:Its SSX by R3D · · Score: 1

      FFX is Final Fantasy X

    5. Re:Its SSX by Boltmeyer · · Score: 1

      There IS a PS2 game called FFX. Final Fantasy X. X means 'ten'. This makes sense if you consider the last released Final Fantasy adventure carried the number 'nine'. So, there's SSX (Snowboard Supercross) and FFX (Final Fantasy Ten). Hard to understand, numbnuts?

    6. Re:Its SSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is Final Fantasy X stupid.

    7. Re:Its SSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, duh, THERE IS. Final Fantasy X = FFX.

    8. Re:Its SSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFX, maybe you've heard of Final Fantasy? Well, this would be part 10(romand numeral X)

  42. US Gov (Post Office) Sues game "Postal" bans it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The usa quasi-gov departments such as USPS department uses lawsuits to stop games it deems too violent.

    Postal, as in "go Postal" was banned after 3 weeks in USA.

    "go postal" means "To become very angry or lose control; torage." This was certainly the case when officials got word of the PC clone title Postal, in which you must uncover a conspiracy byshooting anything that moves.
    Postal was banned in Austrailia, Brazil, Germany, Korea, The U.K., Singapore, and more.
    In the US, it went on the shelves in the in November of 1997, but was removed after only 3 weeks
    (Major retailers pulled itafter heavy pressure from the US Congress, specifically Sen. Lieberman of Connecticut).
    The company that produced the game is still being sued by the US Postal Service.

    And Thrill Kill by Electronic Arts was never distributed in USA, except illegal copies of CDRs on EBAY. Its the most violent playstation game ewver made.

  43. I can understand their concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What they need is a video game where you drive around and actually help people.

    Whoa! This lady has three bags of groceries, let me give her a lift. *bllling* - 100 points.
    Hey! This poor man is walking in the rain, have him jump in.

    Yeah, that's exactly what they need. I can just see the kids storming the stores to get them.


    +++ http://www.cowdance.com/bovine/

    1. Re:I can understand their concern. by beddess · · Score: 1

      you can do that in gta3, you can drive an ambulance and pick up wounded people, drive the firetruck and put out fires.... it's not ALL horribly antisocial.

      of course you can also steal a cop car and go vigilante

      --
      "Weasling out of work is important to learn; it is what separates humans from animals. Except for weasels."
  44. Modify the game for Australia? by imuffin · · Score: 1

    New York-based Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. said on Wednesday it plans to modify the hit criminal adventure game so that it could be sold in Australia by January.

    This will be great! I bet GTA3 will be even better when they cut out the parts that involve stealing cars and killing people!

    1. Re:Modify the game for Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they'll just get rid of the guns and cars and make you walk around punching people for money. I mean thats obviously what excites people in australia according to their government. Who needs cars?

  45. New Autralian version to come in Jan 2002 by substruo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article says that the maker of the game is trying to make a new version of the game for distribution in Australia in Jan 2002.

    How are they gonna pull that off??? Remove the guns, prostituts, organized crime, etc.... what are you left with??? Crazy Taxi????

    1. Re:New Autralian version to come in Jan 2002 by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      No crazy taxi is too violent, you have to remove driving all together, that leaves you with walking around a city where everyone is nice to you. The leather jacket must also go, and instead Barney the Dinosaur. To complement this, the entire city must be changed to barney land with barney mobiles and annoying children from acting school.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:New Autralian version to come in Jan 2002 by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 1

      They'll probably just change the blood color to green and say the "people" are actually undead zombies.

      It worked for the UK version of Carmageddon!

      --

      "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
    3. Re:New Autralian version to come in Jan 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they have to do it get it down from an 'R' rating to an 'MA' rating. It shouldn't be too hard, the 'MA' rating is fairly wide in scope (there's probably only a few little things that pushed it over into the 'R' bracket).

  46. Taco: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see you're doing your part to revitalize the economy, lardass.

    PS2 proficiency isn't going to help on your resume when you finally have to go out into the real world and get a job.

    BTW: I heard your interview on NPR. You sound just as much like a total idiot as I thought you would.

  47. Flushed CDs *don't* spin the other way by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This is a common misconception, but as with most misconceptions, it's *not* true. The Coriolis effect is not powerful enough to overcome the effect of minuscule imperfections in the structure of the sink/bathtub/toilet/whatever. Not by a long stretch.

    (If you think this is off topic, read the dept. line. If you still want to mod this down; go ahead, I can afford it. :) )

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  48. Cliche by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    If the aussies can't play violent games, then the terrorists have already won.

    1. Re:Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terrorists *already* won, dumb-ass. Just look at all the films, games etc that have been changed since sep 11, e.g. mgs2, escape from new york etc.

      p.s. rumour has it that they destroyed 2 large buildings and killed a bunch of people- big win.

    2. Re:Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the terrorists, I'm more afraid of the US govt.

  49. Earth still revolves around sun! by czth · · Score: 1

    In late breaking news, it was determined that the earth still revolves around the sun. While we have no new developments to report on this subject, we'd just like to remind you that it's still true, just like Copernicus said in 1530.

  50. Re:Worst Slashdot Article Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this?? Someone who returned to the scene of the posting?? I didnt think slasdotters ever read what they wrote. Just be Anonymous, dude! read all the postings, and occasionally take your own pee on the community fire hydrant. Why should anyone need to know who I am?

  51. Re:The NRA Strikes again by sketerpot · · Score: 1
    Yes, I am able to seperate a game from reality, but there are those out there that are not able to, or possibly don't want to.

    I think that the people who don't seperate the game from reality are already screwed up. Think of what the world would be like otherwise:

    • People running around hitting pedestrians hoping for an artistic splatter.
    • People always weilding their Snickersnee and killing shopkeepers, except for Izchak.
    • "Mommy, can I have a railgun?"

    As it is, we just have a few lunatics like this.

  52. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kubrick was threatened with jail time

    Please get your facts straight. Clockwork Orange was never banned in UK, Kubrick pulled it himself after he received death threats. It was released last year 'caus he'd like ya'know - died

  53. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Homburg · · Score: 1

    And dont forget that the Movie Clockwork Orange was not played in Britain for almost 20 years in a theater! Kubrick was threatened with jail time if he allowed it by threatening to assosiate teen crime with him as the inciting party.


    Do you have a source for this? I'd heard that Kubrick wanted the film to be withdrawn because of press campaigns trying to associate the film, and thereby him, with various violent crimes. But I don't think I've ever heard of any official pressure being put on him.

  54. GTA3 edit in US? by devross · · Score: 1

    This certainly won't get a "Score:5, Insightfull", but I was talking to some good 'ol boys at the local video game store and they said that GTA3 was going to be edited in the US. Apparently a cab drivers union objected to the middle eastern steriotype cab driver in the game. Also supposedly being edited: prostitutes and curisng. Any word on this?

    --


    If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
    1. Re:GTA3 edit in US? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Your question is a very dangerous question to ask on GTA3 or PS2 based forums. You usually get an answer like the following:

      NO!!!! NO!!!!!!! NO!!!!!! GODDAMNIT, A THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES NO!!!! THE GAME IS NOT BEING BANNED, EDITED, ALTERED OR CENSORED IN ANY WAY IN THE US!!!!!

      As you might have guessed, it's a common question. The game isn't being pulled or banned, despite what some people claim on Ebay.

    2. Re:GTA3 edit in US? by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they think about Crazy Taxi...

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    3. Re:GTA3 edit in US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, Rockstar stopped shipments on GTA3 until they can "clean" the code. Look around, do you see any on the shelves? My understanding is that they were getting heat from a number of groups.

      I have had the game and I understand why people are concerned.. it is a violent game.. but I wouldn't let a child have/play this game. I am also one of those people who don't let the TV/movies baby sit children.

      We have ratings on things for a reason... WATCH YOUR KID.

  55. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US "almost" bans something? The US doesn't ban ANYTHING unless it has child porn in it. And that's the way it should be. I hope you dumb a$$ aussies like having the government be your daddy. Wah, wah...... This is why you need a 2nd amendment. If you had one, the bastards in your government would be less likely to sell you out. Not that it helps the US mind you....

  56. Good ol' Atari 2600 porn! by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1, Funny

    The US actually cared about an ATARI 2600 game?! How can you successfully depict "a cowboy raping a squaw" without out it looking like a ASCII drawing? (Quick answer: you can't.) How can you tell it's a Squaw indian, instead of another breed? How could you tell it's even a rape scene?

    That couldn't be held up in court:

    Lawyer: "So...did you willingly draw a rape scene between a cowboy and this Squaw indian?"
    Artist: "Rape scene? What rape scene?"
    Lawyer: "This one..."
    [plays game scene]
    Artist: "That's not a rape scene. That's...uhhh...a pigeon carrying a message to Custard. Any fool could see that!"
    Lawyer: "Uhhh...well, I guess it does sorta look like that from this angle. No further questions."

    1. Re:Good ol' Atari 2600 porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was blocky and innocent enough that the Detroit News ahowed a screen capture.

      You had to use your imagination, but once told what you were looking at, your mind filled in the blanks.

      It goes down in history as the first controversial home console game.

      The first banned US coin op was death race 2000. Death Race 2000 had to be modified to put vulcan ears on the pedestrians to call them gremlins. Otherwise it was Grand Theft Auto 0.1b. I loved that game.

    2. Re:Good ol' Atari 2600 porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go pick up the recent copy of Electronic Gaming Monthly, which should have the words "Too much game!" or a derivative on the cover. Turn to the section where they cover the suckiest games of all times. Turn a few pages and you'll see an article about Custers last stand, and included is the infamous picture of the squaw being raped.

  57. Its time for America to retaliate by t_allardyce · · Score: 1, Troll

    Thats it, America must launch an all-out attack. What right to those bloody Australians think they have to run their own country with their own laws?!?! i mean the cheek!!! they should have the same laws as America. Its time for the US government to bomb COUGH i mean 'liberate' the Austrailian people from this oppressive (sic) regieme. America, together will stand for freedom - weather you like it or not :)

    No but seriously you guys, Australia has a right to rule what ever way they want, and as fun as it is to beat pigs to the ground, hit and hit them with a baseball bat, watching their limp bodies twitch in pain and then fill them with lead with bin ladens fav. weapon.. oops, i digress, its a very violent game.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  58. Arg why I oughta by MantridDronemaker · · Score: 1

    Arg why I oughta haul them out of their cars then back over them and leave the car there- then nuke the ambulance when it comes creating a chain reaction of exploding cars and flaming people running around and...OH you're talking about the game!

    Bah games are just well games...I mean does any normal person not know the difference? I wouldn't ever think of doing stuff like that in real life, same for every game, movie etc I've ever seen. Now maybe six year olds shouldn't be playing these games but will...DUH maybe their parents should be keeping an eye on what their kids are up to? And as for the people who are unbalanced and apparently 'get ideas' from watching these games there's no shortage of places for them to 'get ideas' from- how about the evening news?

  59. Inner human by mavericknet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's true, but consider this, people generally look to games and movies as an expression of fantasy or an outlet. Most humans have core interests to do illegal things. I'd prefer that people vent these interests into video games then letting them bottle up until they "snap". I've played many violent and gruesome video games and I thoroughly enjoyed the Die Hard movies, and things of the like. But I'm just a normal working guy, I don't blow things up, don't steal cars, and I pay my taxes. So I think the problem is that the people that go out of line either have chemical imbalances (natural or recreationally induced) or are in need of support from responsible people at stages in their development. Your thoughts?

  60. No, it is FFX dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Final Fantasy X

  61. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA uses civil courts to ban, rather than Penal courts.
    "Postal" was banned in Austrailia, Brazil, Germany, Korea, The U.K., Singapore, and more. In the US, it went on the shelves in the in November of 1997, but was removed after only 3 weeks
    (Major retailers pulled itafter heavy pressure from the US Congress, specifically Sen. Lieberman of Connecticut). The company that produced the game is still being sued by the US Postal Service.

  62. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riggghhhhhtttt.... sure it was "death threats"

    Ha! Think!... why would a strong vocal supporter of non-violence threaten Kubrick with violence such as Murder!?!?!

    Think!

    Kubrick was pressured by legal threats of persecution by his gov not by a lone caller... despite what the rumor mills say or claim he said.

    Remeber the many US Heavy Metal lawsuits over suicide and suggetive lyrics? Same thing goes on in UK.

  63. sooo by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    If the ban is justified, then an abnormally high percentage of people who bought the game and don't return it will steal real cars, right?

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  64. CmdrTaco selling out like Sega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abandons DC for PS2....

  65. I'll be moderated straight to hell for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, I must confess to playing, as well as enjoying, such violent games as GTA3.

    But, I must commend, yes commend, the Australian government for this latest action. I can definitely see their point in not wanting to promote such violence or desensitize anyone of the horific nature of such violence. The government will take a lot of heat for this and I admire their strength to face this heat.

    Let's face it. Society and certainly the entertainment industry has increasingly glorified this type of violence. I don't believe that people, except for a very sick few, commit such violence because of movies of video games but, I do think that they are desensitized by the constant onslaught of such violent entertainment.

    The Australian government is, contrary to the usual posts here, not significantly restricting freedom of speech or movement. They are simply restricting a single excessively violent video game that portrays socially abhorent behavior.

    The social and moral values of the free world have degraded dramatically over the years and I don't think that it is a good thing. Would your parents or grandparents have discuused killing someone as we freely and easily do on a daily basis? When last did you say, "I'm gonna kill you!"? Think about what that statement means and then tell me that you have not been desensitized? So, why then do we take amusement from beating up or killing old people?

    The people of Australia and the freeworld, for that matter, can definitely make and play higly enjoyable video games without such antisocial violence.

    Your Grandmother just got killed in a car jacking. How funny and entertaining is that?

    1. Re:I'll be moderated straight to hell for this. by OzJimbob · · Score: 1

      Government take a lot of heat??? Yeah right...the media will love them for it, the bastard uber-conservative public will love them for it. But, on the plus side. banning things has never stopped me getting my hands on them. Make me try harder, in fact.

      --
      -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
  66. Have I got a link for you! by theantix · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not in the sense that a GTA player is likely to go out and steal a car, but rather that it allows a culture to slip steadily closer to a hellish society in which crime is tolerated in order to entertain the public. This is not unlike the Colosseum in ancient Rome, in which murders took place between god-fearing christians for the sake of the public's amusement.

    [...]

    Perhaps it is a media problem; if the government owned a few media outlets, it would be able to put writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today.
    Ever heard of adequacy.org? Judging from your posting you could be a valuable contributer there. Just a thought.
    --
    501 Not Implemented
  67. Re:My life is now complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing CT has beat is his meat.

  68. There is nothing they can do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of years ago the government took their guns away too so there is no way they can revolt. Everyone knows that if you took the Americans rights to play GTA3 away you would have another civil war on your hands.

  69. Last Stand was probably renamed "Custer's Revenge" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Custer's Revenge was for the Ataris 2600,and made by a company called Mystique, it featured pornography and had a sub-goal of indian rape. I do not know if it was the original "Custers Last Stand" or not. It may have been a copycat title living off the infamy of the original.

  70. obligatory remark: by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

    if you outlaw gta3, only outlaws will have them!

  71. Better idea... by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Informative

    Offer to buy the UK version for them and mail that. The game has not been banned in the UK, the UK version is PAL and thus compatable with most Aussie TVs and the regional encoding system (for PS2 games) is set so that the UK and Australia are the same region, so people in Australia can play the UK version without problem.

    Of course, if you live in the UK then its less hassle. Or New Zealand -- I understand that many Aussies are importing from NZ.

    1. Re:Better idea... by orj · · Score: 1

      I'm a New Zealander, I own GTA3. It's not banned in NZ but god I hope some polition's kid doesn't buy this game. The game is rated here for mature audiences. And I certainly would recommend letting anyone under the age of 15 play it.

      The game really is exceptional, and I don't think that is just because of the violence. It's brilliant at a technical level. The gameplay is really addictive. I've been doing silly things like play this game from 10pm to 5am on occasion. It is really hard to drag yourself away from it. "I just gotta find and boost the Mr Whoopee van, then I'll go to bed" etc.

      If .AU has banned this game just because of the 'Hooker trick' then their censors need to be slapped. It is by far the least controversial part of the game and I can think of far more distirbing films that no doubt got a release in .AU.

      And as a poster above says, just import a NZ copy of the game.

      Later

      --
      -- Oliver Jones - Deeper Design Limited
    2. Re:Better idea... by orj · · Score: 1

      Err. That should be "wouldn't recommend letting anyone under the age of 15 play it". Not would.. My bad.

      --
      -- Oliver Jones - Deeper Design Limited
  72. Most significant aspect... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    • The OFLC was firm on the point that the game would not allowed in Australia, saying "if you have already purchased a game you will need to contact your retailer about return procedures."

    Holy fuck. That's a lovely precedent.

    And hey, we were watching that Australian cut of "Last Tango in Paris", and actually, we not think that we didn't cut enough depravity. Hand it over, you sickos.

    And that "Clockwork Orange" book, holy shit, have you seen it? I can't believe we let that through. Burn it, burn it now.

    Anyone got the National Geographic that shows the Yanomamo using drugs in a religious ceremony? Turn them in. We're thinking of the children.

    Anyone got more details on this retroactive censorship crap?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Most significant aspect... by duketor · · Score: 1

      And hey, we were watching that Australian cut of "Last Tango in Paris", and actually, we not think that we didn't cut enough depravity. Hand it over, you sickos.

      What, the butter, or the game?

      --

      Never play leapfrog with a unicorn.
  73. Communists? by snoozerdss · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it seems like the Government down there is communist. They tell you what you can and can't watch, play and do.
    Whats next?

    --
    Snoozer.
    1. Re:Communists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excerpt from page 23 of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, and Fredrich Engels:

      "Workers of the world unite! (and tell each other what they can and can't watch, play, do!)"

      Holy shit, I must have missed that last time I read that book!

      - Red Scare

    2. Re:Communists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit your a Jackass!!! Yawn another pale friendless virgin posting his snotty comments on slashdot........... what else is new.

    3. Re:Communists? by OzJimbob · · Score: 1

      Seems like someone up above me has been a victim of Uncle Sam's Famous Brainwashing. You don't know what a communist is even. "ooo! ooo! anyone who tries to ban stuff must be a commie, unlike us capitalists who support freedom!" Yeah right. Go read some bloody books.

      --
      -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
  74. Be patient by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    If you want to commit vehicular mayhem Down Unda, you'll just 'ave to wait until after the Pocksaclypse.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Be patient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish that Austrailia would ban the third Mad
      Max movie...

      (Thinking of Tina Turner)..shudder..

  75. Game Violence... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    Carmageddon II & Unreal Tournament are the only reasons quite a few people I know are still alive.....

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  76. buy it online? by kel-tor · · Score: 1

    This only ban's retailers in the country, right? Can aussies buy it online from like amazon.com or someplace? Would it need to be shipped in plain wrapping like a porno? Would it have to be smuggled into the country?

    --

    ---

  77. there is no ass by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    The ass is just the top of the legs where they connect to the rest of your body.

    There is no ass.

    No ass? Well shove this up the top of your legs then!

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  78. LOL by afxgrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since they banned guns thei crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!

    Sorry, I can't help but laugh at that statement.

    I'm also VERY interested in seeing those statistics ... I'm sure crimes related to guns have dropped dramatically. And eventhough there are less murders/deaths in a crime, the crime rate can still go up due to increases in theft, fraud, and smaller forms of crime. It all depends on how you measure crime.

    But to me that comment screams of a bullshit stat., at least you did not write a number as well...

    1. Re:LOL by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Why would crimes related to guns necessarily drop dramatically when you ban them? Criminals don't usually use registered guns anyway, that's like crashing your own registered car into a police station and trying to walk away non-chalantly.

      More often, I'd say the crime rate would stay stable after a gun ban. Crims just turn to other weapons, such as knives, to commit the crimes. Or they get guns from the thriving black market. Criminals don't suddenly develop an aversion to crime just because they can't get their hands on a gun.

      Besides, when's the last time you heard a non-bullshit stat? The gun lobby would say violent crime increases after a ban, the anti-gun types say crime decreases. Everyone places their own biased slant on the stats...

    2. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crime rates related to guns *did* drop (quite a lot) after the introduction of gun laws in Australia, so there goes your theory.

  79. Correction, Kubrick withdrew it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Kubrick himself withdrew 'A Clockwork Orange', reputedly due to copycat attacks. They did ban 'The Exorcist', another recently released but I can't imagine copycat demonic possessions. The point is that 'A Clock Orange' does not seek to glorify violence, whereas games like GTA3 make it fun. I like stealing cars and killing the pigs, its not going to make me do it, but I do get desensitised. Lets not forget that video and cinema censorship are many times more effective than games censorship (which is a joke) so maybe they feel that an outright ban is the only practical solution.

    So have the Aussies banned the Thief games too? Or is it the mindless violence that they object to? (and mindless violence has been around since the days of 'Hunt the Wumpus' et al.) And what about the 'Cannon Fodder' theme (and game)?
    (War) Never been so much fun
    (War) Never been so much fun
    Go to your brother, kill him with you gun
    Leave him lying in his uniform, dying in the sun
    (War)

  80. Down Under? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Australia always referred to as "Down Under?" Are Australians somehow inferior to Americans and Yookers?

    I mean, having the north pole at the top of the globe is only arbitrary. Who is to say the earth spins counterclockwise? Only those who never look at the globe with the south pole at top. Which is most of the northern hemisphere.

    Then again, I guess those who conquer the world get to make the roolz.

  81. Re:GTA3 edit in US? - Nope by Desus · · Score: 1

    All that yummy goodness of the middle eastern cab driver and the cursing is in the game. Personally It's not a stereotype. I live in New York. Try to find a WASP taxi driver here.
    My only beef is they took out the motorcycle from the game because the physics were too hard to render. Blah.

    Me in a Cheetah + Uzi + Game Radio > *

  82. personal liberties by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >As for the Aussies, they are down the path of
    >giving up personal liberties for the "greater
    >good". Since they banned guns theircrime rate
    >has steadily risen. Good job!

    I understand that censorship is bad and that deciding what constitutes reasonable entertainment is not the governments job. But i entirely disagree with your use of term "personal liberties" especially when referring to guns and when putting down Australia.

    The idea of civil liberties is basically that all those actions which do not cause direct harm to others should be permitted and the government does not have the right to intrude into the personal life of it's citizens. In this field the U.S. is perhaps the worse offender among democratic nations. I would draw your attention particularily to the Anti-Terrorist Bill which has been pushed through in the past few months which basically signs away the rights and liberties of every American in the name of national security.

    The right to own a video game is an issue of civil liberties. It involves deciding what you want to do in the privacy of your own home to entertain yourself.

    The right to own a handgun is not an issue of civil liberties. A handgun, unlike a videogame, is a machine made to kill human beings, it serves no other purpose. This is not a machine that anyone should be permitted to carry around with them, and you can shout about personal freedom all you want. The "right to bear arms" is a freak of American Legislation born from the fact that America is a nation founded upon a violent revolution. It is NOT a basic human right.

    And as for your figures about Australia's crime rate: The crime rate has only increased because of the number of people who have been arrested for illegally owning handguns. The number of handgun related murders has steadily decreased since the ban was instated.

    1. Re:personal liberties by crumbz · · Score: 1

      I am curious as to why you think that owning a videogame is an issue of civil liberties and owning a [hand]gun is not. I think what you mean is thus:

      1) Ownership of an object that is inherently non-lethal, not specifically designed to kill people, is an issue of civil liberties because the actions of the object do not cause direct harm to others.

      2) Ownership of an object that is inherently lethal, specifically designed to kill people, is an not an issue of civil liberties (therefore exempt)because the object [sic]is design to kill people.

      However, per your previous statement [The idea of civil liberties is basically that all those actions which do not cause direct harm to others should be permitted] owning a firearm does not violate this statement.

      I disagree with you on this premise:
      Civil liberties (specifically that the government does not have the right to intrude into the personal life of it's citizens) are predicated on the people having the freedom to exercise them.
      I.e. I can own a gun or not own a gun based on my choice. If I do not have that choice, I can vote politicians into office that affirm my right. If I do not have that choice, I can petition the people, organize strikes and other forms of civil protest. If I do not have that choice, I can take up armed struggle against my government.

      I also disagree with the context of your statement. [The "right to bear arms"...is NOT a basic human right.] This may be true, but this right is a precursor of other rights.

      At least we have the right to freely discuss this issue on slashdot and the right to disagree....

    2. Re:personal liberties by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      >I.e. I can own a gun or not own a gun based on
      >my choice. If I do not have that choice, I can
      >vote politicians into office that affirm my
      >right. If I do not have that choice, I can
      >petition the people, organize strikes and other
      >forms of civil protest. If I do not have that
      >choice, I can take up armed struggle against my
      >government.

      this is true as an example of representative democracy, not necesarrily civil liberties. You can follow the same logic to say "i can steal a car or not by my choice. if i do not have that choice , i can vote..." etc.

      I'm talking about use, not ownership when i make the distinction:

      the use of a videogame is entertainment. psychological damage, real or imagined, that stems from this entertainment is an issue to be considered by the user.

      the use of a handgun is violence. the physical damage that stems from this violence is an issue to be considered by society.

      society has the right to ban guns, not games.

      >At least we have the right to freely discuss
      >this issue on slashdot and the right to
      >disagree....

      i couldn't agree with you more. [grin]

    3. Re:personal liberties by crumbz · · Score: 1

      yea, i see your point. But you keep referring to handguns and specifically hadngun violence when I am talking about generic gun use, the vast majority is hunting/targets. On another point, the use of guns can be hunting and target practice and the use of video games is to teach children to kill. Blah blah, it is the same old saw we have heard a hundred times before. I probably shouldn't have taken the cheap shot at the Aussies but what the hell. That what the internet is for. One big happy global village.
      :)

      Later.

    4. Re:personal liberties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >This may be true, but this right is a precursor of other rights.

      Hmm. In countries founded on peace, all liberties are built on the idea that peaceful people will need/want them. (in that order)

      In the US is seems liberties are built on the idea that if they don't have them they will need to be violent.

      Or am I reading what you said wrong?

    5. Re:personal liberties by x0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right to own a handgun is not an issue of civil liberties.
      Of course it is. The US Constitition makes it so. If you want to change that, petition a representative for an amendment.

      A handgun, unlike a videogame, is a machine made to kill human beings, it serves no other purpose.
      So hunting, plinking, and more formalized competition are mis-use of a firearm? Please, just because you have an aversion to guns, spouting polemics doesn't make your viewpoint more valid.

      This is not a machine that anyone should be permitted to carry around with them, and you can shout about personal freedom all you want.
      s/personal freedom/personal defense. I have no desire to become a potential victim because of anyones perceived 'higher morals'. Being unable to run from criminals shouldn't limit my ability to go where I want, when I want. Life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness means that I am morally entitled to defend myself. If that means carrying a weapon, then I choose to do so. If you want to cower in your home 24/7 or avoid areas of your home town or city, then I pity you.

      The "right to bear arms" is a freak of American Legislation born from the fact that America is a nation founded upon a violent revolution. It is NOT a basic human right.
      That you choose to ignore that the US would not exist without that violent revolution speaks volumes. What was the alternative, asking nicely? You also choose to ignore that the English government, at that time, was opressive as well as generally bleeding the American colonies dry of both money and resources.
      You should perhaps attempt to leave the nice, warm, and fuzzy cocoon you have built for yourself and look at how other peoples live from their viewpoint.

      I suppose I should maybe have a bit of the topic in here somewhere. :)
      While I am unsure if denying the populace access to a (violent) computer game is really a civil liberties violation, it is an indicator that the government has 'Nanny State' written all over it. My personal opinion is that no government needs to step into my life and decide for me what I am capable of dealing with WRT mainstream commercial entertainmnet. I choose not to play computer games, especially games like GTAx, but I also strongly believe that it should be a personal choice, not a mandate from politicians.

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    6. Re:personal liberties by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't udnerstand I own hand guns (.38 and .22) but I have never killed anyone. There have been a few beer cans that have seen better days, but I haven't killed anyone. Kinda strange considering they have no porpous other than to kill people.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:personal liberties by cthugha · · Score: 2

      Of course it is. The US Constitition makes it so. If you want to change that, petition a representative for an amendment.

      Okay, for a start, you seem to suffer the delusion that the US Constitution has authority in Australia. I realize that a lot of Americans seem to think they have the God-given right to enforce their own values on the rest of the world (at least, that's the pretext used when using military force to protect essentially economic interests), but this is going just a tad too far.

      Secondly, your implied assertion that the US Constitution Is Always Right is just plain absurd. The US Constitution is a document drafted by human beings over two centures ago. It suffers the same drawbacks as any other document drafted by human beings: it may contain mistakes and go out of date. That's why there exists (as you point out) a mechanism to change it. Please don't make blind appeals to authority, it impresses no-one.

    8. Re:personal liberties by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      I live in a country that did ask nicely. a country which has it's independence from Britain not through blood but through patience. But I am not a patriot, I am not here to spout about how my nation is more humane or just than yours, because fundamentally i don't believe that to be true. I mention it only to point out the ridiculous stance of appealing to american authority in an issue of morals.

      My point is that regardless of what use it is put towards(self-defence, sport or crime among them), a gun is a machine made to put a hole in a human being. The other uses for it all stem from that, and i don't think anyone can lead a successful argument against that. The ethics of carrying a gun for self-defence is an entirely different matter. Keeping it's citizens safe is an important part of the governments job. Guns are an important factor in that task. I don't argue that guns can not be used for non-criminal, even non-violent, purposes. I simply argue that violence is their purpose in existing.

      There is a significant distinction between a violent product that can be used for entertainment and an entertainment product that could possibly incite people to violence.

      I am strongly against the banning of video games. It just scares me to see people twisting the valid arguments against it into arguments against gun control. Gun Control is a bird of an entirely different feather.

  83. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason why scatology videos are legal in Australia is they didn't want to upset alot of jews.

  84. Who is a "kid"? by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there's a way to test if a kid is able to distriguish between the game and reality? Slapping an age limit on it just seems unfair to me. I know some very intelligent 8 year olds, and I know some quite stupid 16 year olds.

    --
    "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    1. Re:Who is a "kid"? by Mr.+Sharumpe · · Score: 1

      It's not even so much just being able to distinguish between reality and a game. It is the idea that the anti-social behavior is slowly making its way to the 'harmless' stage - even though there is nothing harmless about carjacking, renting prostitutes, etc. Contrary to popular opinion, being smart is not all there is to making good decisions. I have a nephew that is off-the-charts smart, but he still gets into loads of trouble, because he is young. Experience counts for a lot. I sound like a geezer, though I'm not. I just think there's a difference between making obviously fictional games that are violent (blowing up aliens, shooting zombies, and kicking people in shorts and kimonos on the top of an erupting volcano) and trying to make a game out of all-to-real violence.

      I'm talking in circles, and I apologize. Some won't agree with me, and that's fine. I just wanted to share another (hopefully coherent) view on the thing.

      Mr. Sharumpe

      --
      -- The above comments are just my opinion. If you are going to flame me, save your time. I am fireproof.
  85. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Exactly. The only person to ban Clockwork Orange was Stanley Kubrick himself. This is why it only got an official release here after his death.
    Kubrick had taken cinemas to court for showing it, and was instrumental in closing down the Scala in London.

    The film was NEVER banned by HM Government, and anyone who says that it was is a know-nothing bozo.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  86. Before the opening credits... by Toliaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This game has been modified from its original version. It has been edited for content and formatted to fit your legal system."

    --
    Cheers, Toliaro
  87. Actually... by Uttles · · Score: 1

    Seeing as half of the story revolved around what games Taco has played recently, I think my post was exactly on topic.

    --

    ~ now you know
  88. OT: Coopers (was Re:I'd be more sympathetic...) by MeerCat · · Score: 2

    We keep our best beer for ourselves.

    I get my Coopers in the UK from Oddbins, and it's sometimes cheaper than the stubby price I used to pay in Australia !!

    Oh, and you can get VB too (if you're desperate) but the cans are re-printed "Victoria Beer" as they can't call it "Bitter" in the UK (it's a lager). Fosters in the UK is nothing like Aussie Fosters (well, almost nothing like - it's still piss, but different piss), but is brewed in London by Courage.

    I'm off for a hoegaarden which I can get on tap and tastes surprisingly like Coopers - now if only it was 35 degrees outside rather than 3 degrees...

    T

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:OT: Coopers (was Re:I'd be more sympathetic...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just to settle this once and for all...

      The majority of "imported" beers are brewed locally.

      Nobody is loading tankers full of beer and hauling them across the ocean. (Although that is a fun mental picture...)

      Foreign beer companies set up contracts with local brewers and bottlers to make the stuff for them, using their recipies (and sometimes their brewmasters). Since water tastes different in different parts of the world (because of varying mineral content), a pint of Samuel Adams Boston Lager brewed in Boston, MA is going to taste slightly different than a pint brewed in New Ulm, MN, (at the August Schell Brewery, one of the big suppliers of micro brew and import brand beers in the upper midwest) even though it is made exactly the same way.

      Fosters, no matter where it is brewed, always tastes like cold piss. So does Budweiser.

    2. Re:OT: Coopers (was Re:I'd be more sympathetic...) by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      The majority of "imported" beers are brewed locally.

      Except in Europe where you can't call it "Imported" unless it really is, and the country of origin must be clearly labelled. So whilst "Guinness" is brewed in London, you can also get "Guinness Export" which is the real thing, and most of the bottled beers are the real thing too. But yes, a lot of "budweiser" over here is UK brewed, but the Budvar is still the Czech original !

      even though it is made exactly the same way

      The example I gave of Fosters is interesting as UK Fosters is not even like Oz Fosters - the only thing thats supposed to be the same is the name and logo - the UK Fosters is a british lager made for the UK market and conditions, not a "copy" of the original.

      T

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
  89. See, I live in Georgia... by Uttles · · Score: 2, Funny

    and we are a bunch of convicts. I love it. It's fun. That's why I'm sad to see Australia take this stance.

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:See, I live in Georgia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is internet access in georgia? News to me.... :)

  90. GTA3 Paramedics and prostitutes by sheetsda · · Score: 2

    I don't think you can kill the paramedics, you can knock them down but not out. I've run over them 5 times and they just keep getting up after a few seconds. I guess I need to try shooting them. You can get health back by stealing the ambulence too, if you're not at full from the prostitutes, who can raise you up to 125% (pun intended).

    1. Re:GTA3 Paramedics and prostitutes by __aavonx8281 · · Score: 1

      You can kill anyone in GTA3. Most of the pedestrians are smart enough to jump out of the way though if they see you gunning for them in a car. Much more effective to hop out and blast them with the shotgun (you can get one for free by entering a patrol car, either parked or one whose occupants have already been killed)>

    2. Re:GTA3 Paramedics and prostitutes by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Naw. Just jiggle the passenger-side door, and when the cop comes running after you, run around the car in the other direction and climb in the driver's seat. Priceless!

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    3. Re:GTA3 Paramedics and prostitutes by tdunn · · Score: 1

      I think the only use of the baseball bat is to get into a police car.

  91. Seeing the difference between reality and fantasy by iGawyn · · Score: 1

    My friend visited a few weeks ago from another state, bringing his PS2 and GTA3 with him. After we spent a good 8 hours playing it and laughing hysterically, we thought the game was the greatest thing ever.

    When my friend returned, and e-mailed us the next week saying that he had won an XBox, I decided that I was going to hijack a car, GTA3 style, and come visit him. So I walked out to one of the campus parking lots with a PS2 controller, hit the "jack car" button, and waited to see myself open the door and jump in. It didn't work.

    This game crushes the hopes of college students everywhere. This is precisely why it should be banned from Australia, and the US, too.

    Gawyn

  92. My physics teacher didn't know that by codexus · · Score: 1

    He told us that water spins the other way in sinks of the southern hemisphere. I've always been skeptical that the coriolis effect could be that important on such a small scall and I've learned since then that it's just an urban legend. Funny that a physics teacher in an engineering school didn't know better.

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
  93. Banned ? They're doing pretty bad job of it :P by Linuxb0y · · Score: 1


    That's Funny, my friends GF who works @ BlockBuster Video hired this GTA3 game 4 weeks ago.

    It didn't seem hard 2 get a hold. :P

    LoLz , just make the game even more popular.

    GG AUSSIE .GOV !

  94. The BEST game would be... by mupi · · Score: 0

    I think a good idea for game makers right now is to make one where you play a terrorist. There can be special levels where you commandier aircraft and crash them into buildings.
    Now that would be cool!

    1. Re:The BEST game would be... by mupi · · Score: 0

      another good idea for a level would be one were you take hostages and then kill and torture them.

      why isn't anyone making these games? i think this genre of game is an undiscovered goldmine for someone.

  95. Best Game Ever by InstantCool · · Score: 1

    Immoral or not, I laughed my ass off when I first beat an innocent pedistrian to death with a club. It's almost so ridculous, that it's like cartoon violence. You'd have to be a freak to get off on that in real life.

    --
    InstantCool
    1. Re:Best Game Ever by mupi · · Score: 0

      Ya, we all have a bit of phychotic killer in us (a bit of bin laden or tim mcveigh) and what better way to act it out than in a realistic video game.

  96. UK police threatened Kubrick, UK banned "Wild One" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The British gov police hassled kubrick after several "copycat" crimes; in one instance a 17-year-old Dutch girl was raped in Lancashire by a gang chanting Singin' in the Rain, and in another a child was beaten by a 16-year-old boy wearing Alex's uniform of white overalls, black bowler hat and combat boots. The British gov made quite clear to Kubrick that his movie might be found to incite violence especially if the suspects claim it did under oathe. With such heavy handed tactics Kubrick aturally had to self censor... the cops did not like the movie... remember the ending?

    Britain bans all sorts of movies using one tactic or another such as Marlon Brandos teen violence movie "The Wild One" which was banned until 1968.

    Geez... glad to be in america

  97. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster claimed Kubrick did not release it . (British gov hassled him with lawsuit implied threats). You should read the post again. He did not use the word ban without putting theword in double quotes. Basically it was "banned" but in a 'de-facto' sense.

    you are the bozo. The movie was being blamed for lots of rapes.

  98. yet another level by mupi · · Score: 0

    On yet another level we could have it take place in a nursing home or baby delivery ward in a hospital and you get to take a lead pipe and beat the crap out of old people, mentally handicapped and babies. Wheeeee, fun!

  99. Remember 9.11 by codefool · · Score: 1
    I don't believe that people, except for a very sick few, commit such violence because of movies of video games but, I do think that they are desensitized by the constant onslaught of such violent entertainment.

    I disagree completely that playing violent video games does in any way desentisize the player to anything other than the video game violence. As someone who loves to blast foes to chopped liver in UT, HL, MP, etc. AND as a frequent viewer of explosion movies, I was still moved to tears by the 9.11 attrocities, as apparently was everyone else. When its real, its real.

    Having said that, I'm sure the developers of GTA3 could have found more politically correct targets to destroy than old women. Killing virtual soldiers is one thing, but there is something sick about killing virtual innocents...

    --
    "Stop whining!" - Arnold, as Mr. Kimble
    1. Re:Remember 9.11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone earlier said something about videogames being art. i agree. we don't always play videogames to simulate the experience of a Real American Hero® (even though we sometimes do). sometimes we play videogames to see how the other side lives. sometimes we don't even know why on earth we'd want to experience life through the eyes of an italian plumber eating mushrooms to gain superpowers and fighting amphibians/reptiles.

      the point is that videogames ought not always represent our best intentions/inclinations as human beings. no one ever banned a movie (or book, play, etc.) that allowed us to sympathize a little with a "bad guy," even if it didn't allow us to act as one.

      is gary oldman really a socially objectionable person because he's so great at _portraying_ them? of course not.

      SEELE 01

  100. Re:Page widener? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and your post is a fine example of that fact...

  101. Re:Page widener? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's fixed, and yes, I am now reading your funny -1 Offtopic comment right now at -1 (obviously).

  102. Like the beer commercial... by MainframeKiller · · Score: 1

    GTA3. Australian for censorship.

    --

    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!
  103. On a related note... by pdferguson · · Score: 2, Funny

    On a related note, GTA3 was finally released in Afghanistan, after Rockstar Games agreed to make a few minor modifications. The only vehicle you can choose is a beat up Toyota pickup truck with fourteen armed men in the back...

  104. OMG by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I actually started laughing so hard people came to my cube to ask what was so funny. You deserve most of the funny mod points given to responses in this article.

    (+10, Callbacks are the best humor)

    Virg

  105. Offtopic? Never played GTA3, have ya... by socokid · · Score: 0

    You would have known what the Fuzz Ball was.

    Oh well, lost humor is still funny.

  106. Plain Brown Wrappers by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    "If you outlaw gta3, only outlaws will have them!"

    Wait a minute... I thought AU was where we sent our criminals ... (USA)

    Now the pOrn sites will have GTA3 ads instead ... suddenly they seem less lame.

    --
    Commit random acts of thought. Post to /.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  107. One word... by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    ...Budwiser...

  108. Ahem, Mad Max anyone?! by Jini+Man · · Score: 1

    And this from the country that brought us Mad Max!! Tisk. Tisk!

  109. Clockwork wasn't banned in the UK by alphaseven · · Score: 1
    Clockwork Orange was never banned in the UK, Kubrick requested the film be withdrawn because his family had received death threats, (see this entry in the Kubrick faq).

    You could say that the directors cut of "Eyes Wide Shut" was censored in the US, but it wasn't by the government, it was edited because there is a conspiracty among newspapers and theatre chains to keep nc-17 films out of theatres. Public outcry was near zero over this in the US. Same thing happened to the film "American Psycho".

  110. Hehe the effect is strong. by gvonk · · Score: 1

    I find myself driving along and when i see a pedestrian, i want to jerk the wheel to the right just to hear the squish of killing them. I also meander through parking lots looking for the best car to steal. It's pretty weird.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  111. Banned Guns? No! by DonalGraeme · · Score: 2, Informative
    Since they banned guns


    Uhhh, hate to spoil your rant, but guns haven't been banned in Australia. Just certain semiautomatic types. Please explain ([1]) to me how being able to have a semiautomatic weapon as opposed to a regular gun is going to make any difference in the crime rate?


    [1] A little private joke that only Australians are going to get

    1. Re:Banned Guns? No! by crumbz · · Score: 1

      Semi-autos let you kill criminals at a higher rate with shorter reloading times.
      :0

    2. Re:Banned Guns? No! by indiechild · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, owning handguns is still legal in Australia but you have to show due cause for it, and "self-defense" is not a good enough reason to be issued a license. So basically I'm not sure who *is* allowed to own a handgun...

      Anyway in the last few years since the Port Arthur massacre the violent gun crimes rate seems to have gone up... crims get their guns on the black market anyway, like they always have.

      Basically I don't think the gun ban in Australia has made much of a difference. As you point out, criminals don't often walk around with semi-automatic rifles anyway. You can get nutters like at Port Arthur, but then we're talking about a whole different ballgame.

    3. Re:Banned Guns? No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "violent gun crimes rate" (as you call it) has actually gone down. You must have been standing on your head when you were reading the graph.

  112. Virtual Freedom by T3KL3R · · Score: 1

    Here's an article on IGN from last night.

    http://ps2.ign.com/news/40454.html

    Also, I had brought up this issue on a previous post, but I'd like to see it talked about here.

    As videogame technology grows and we see more freedom given to the player to interact with the environment in realistic ways, how will the rating systems be used?

    Take a ficticious game, for instance, where you're a boyscout helping old women across the street. Due to it's realistic physics, environments, and interactions, the player could be capable of shoving them in front of a large truck. How should this game be rated? The intention is to help the old lady, not kill her. But the player would still be capable of commiting a horrible act. Should the old lady jump over the truck to avoid a disturbing event and end up destroying the realism in the process?

    As the environments in games become more realistic, these are going to be issues we'll have to deal with.

  113. Dammit! by sulli · · Score: 1

    Why isn't this in Your Rights Online then?!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  114. I wonder - what if they made a "Terrorist" game? by falser · · Score: 1

    ... where your character is an Islamic fundamentalist and your goal is to hijack 747's and blow up buildings. The game would be very realistic: you have to break through the cockpit door and slit the throats of the pilots with lightning fast game controller speed, shoot down opposing F18's while you fly the airplane into your choice of skyscrapers, and trigger well placed bombs to kill as many innocent people as possible.

    I'm sure GTA3 is fun (GTA1 certainly was). And an airplane hijacking game might have sounded like a lot fun game before September 11th as well.

    I agree that banning a game is not a correct solution - even if such a game as this existed. I believe video games should be classified as any other form of art (film, paintings, photography), and laws should be made to ensure that any video game cannot be declared illegal no matter it's content. I have no problems with certain games being only sold to those over 21, but prohibition on video games in the name of "saving the children" is a weak argument.

  115. Only on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will a post containing the phrase "Jesus is a lie" get modded up to +5.

    I've had it. Any places on the Web where the moral community can have tech discussions?

    /. is too far gone to be saved. Adios.

    1. Re:Only on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Osama bin laden is "moral"

      So are all the pedophile priests.

      And all the people fighting holy wars.

      And you have to believe in heaven to fly a plane into a skyscraper for allah.

      Ha!

      I think if Jesus is NOT a lie, it might as well be one for humanity.

      No goblins, ghosts or gods are needed in a modern peaceful world.

      Jesus is a Lie.

    2. Re:Only on /. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Moral community? The guy is allowed to express his view. Furthermore, he wasn't even saying he believes that Jesus is a lie. He just said it was in a videogame, and made absolutely no statement about his faith or lack thereof. The Slashdot community has a lot of people of a lot of faiths in it. Our common thread is that we mostly view faith as private and personal, and that we are very tolerant of the other people on /. who have a variety of wacky views. If you can't tolerate that and insist that everybody accept Jesus, then bugger off to adequacy.org.

  116. To bring full circle, Death Race 2600 (c) MMII by mactari · · Score: 2

    Just to show how wild we can go with this thread, just this year somebody started trying to make Death Race for the 2600. No kidding.

    Post to Stellalist:
    http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/200 10 8/msg00510.html

    From that post...
    Screengrab of 2600 mock-up:
    http://www.gamedevelopers.net/deathderby/images/ sc reen1_color2.gif

    Screenshot of original (again, from above post):
    http://www.gamedevelopers.net/deathderby/images/ DE ATHRACESCREEN.GIF

    Ah, the boons of the internet.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  117. Australia knows how to ruin great games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look what the Australian company Torus did to the great Carmageddon series.

    Carmageddon I and II, were great games, and had wonderful replay value, even though a major part of the game involved running over pedestrians(and dogs).

    Because of pressure, Torus removed pedestrians from Carmageddon 3 and replaced them with zombies. Plus the gameplay and physics sucked.

    Way to ruin a franchise!

  118. I can see.. by NirishChas · · Score: 1

    Where the Austrailian Government are coming from in wanting banned. Its favourable with the vast majority of the electorate that (what they view as..) "violent crime-encouraging games" be put in their place. If I hadnt played any games, hell i'd probably agree with their decision. Its sensible in theory and for their next ballot box crusade.

  119. Custer's Last Stand by DoorFrame · · Score: 2

    Custer's Last Stand deserves to be banned. That game was AWFUL. I mean, I know atari games were all pretty repetitive with silly graphics and even sillier plotlines, but this thing made no sense.

    You played a naked Custer, and there was a naked woman on the other side of the screen. Also, there were things which I can only assume were arrows falling diagonally towards you. If they hit you, you had to go back to your side of the screen.

    Eventually you would dance your way across to the lady, and have sex with her (it wasn't clear to me that it was rape, I always thought she approving the whole transaction... I mean seriously, why was she naked to begin with?).

    Anyway, that was it. The longer you could have sex with the woman before getting show with the arrow, the higher your score.

    As I recall.

    Man, that was a stupid game. I hope nobody actually paid for that.

  120. Each country has its own "bans" by renoX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In France, you can't buy nazy items, cannot say things pro-racism..
    I'm french so I'm problably LESS aware of the things forbidden in France which are legal elsewhere..

    Is oral and anal sex still "banned" in some states of the USA?
    I've always found funny than the "land of freedom" would ban those things..

    Australia is banning a videogame ??
    What is "big news" here??

    1. Re:Each country has its own "bans" by coreyb · · Score: 1

      Some states ban oral/anal sex. However, it's extremely rarely enforced. If memory serves, the last few times it's been enforced, the courts have struck down the laws as unconstitutional.

    2. Re:Each country has its own "bans" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is oral and anal sex still "banned" in some states of the USA?
      I've always found funny than the "land of freedom" would ban those things..

      You're talking about a country largely founded by religious nuts. Of course anal sex is banned. So is living common-law (in some states). Nearly everything is still illegal in Florida.

  121. OH NOS!!1/1! by Thingily · · Score: 1

    This si badd!!1! We hd bettre ban thsi violent game or eles the kids wll thnk that they cna steal cars and kill peopel!11!!! We don't watn any kiling!11!!

  122. EverCrack must be banned too! by sherpajohn · · Score: 1
    I can identify with that...last night, when I went to the mall to do some Xmas shopping and saw some large blueskinned creatures dressed in studded leather, I could not help but gather all my magical powers around me and cast Word of Dismissal .

    Well, needless to say, those nasty orcs were done for...and I did not have to line up once to pay for my purchases. Of course, it was rather unpleasant having to slip and slide through what was left of those nasty orcs (and the remains of the rest of the shoppersand shopkeepers), but I did manage to get some nice loot from the corpses.

    Oddly enough, though I killed hundreds if not thousands, I did not get to the next level. Hmmmmm, maybe there was some negative xp gain for killing all those innocents? Damn.

    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
    1. Re:EverCrack must be banned too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnome with enlightenment?

      Don't you mean Enlightenment with GNOME?

      GNOME is sitting on top of E, not the other way around...

      Mmm, replying to .sigs

  123. Asshole Moderator by Uttles · · Score: 1

    You're right. I made a joke about it too. The moderater was wrong.

    On the other hand, I was just making a joke lightheartedly, your post seemed sort of millitant...

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Asshole Moderator by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess you remembered the tag.

      The moderators have been pretty unruly lately. Just wait till I get my hands on some moderation points...muahahaha.

  124. bears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they should make all the inhabitants of the GTA III world into grizzly bears. That would solve the problem...

  125. Bad Idea, but... by hether · · Score: 1

    I don't agree with censorship, or banning of games, books or anything else in this fashion. I believe its every person's right to play whatever the hell game they want, own what they want, read what they want, etc. without the government interfering. But... If there was one game that I would say deserved it, it would be this one. Good game-yes, fun-yeah, but it could have been just as good without a few of the overly raunchy features such as the hookers. I wish more people hated these nasty features of the game and something would be done about it naturally through the free market system. But that's not the case. Unfortunately too many of the people buying it seem really to enjoy killing old ladies and the like. Banning the game is not going to help. I hope the AU government figures out it's not their place to impose morality.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  126. Road Warrior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a country that produced a movie like "The Road Warrior" ban GTA? tRW had rape and violence to spare and served no purpose other than to entertain. And look, noone went out and started wearing leather and cussing in the early 80's.

    GTA is worse because the media is more interactive now? Puleeeze.

  127. Where are the twin towers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about social censorship? In America since the 9/11 you have all these movie makers refilming scenes that had the Twin Towers in them, eg the Spiderman trailer and Vanilla Sky. Why? Because of painful memories caused by violence. What happened to that new Arnie flick where he is a firefighter who loses his family in a building blown up by terrorists? All the posters for that have been pulled from every cinema in the US. Will it ever be released? This is censorship too in the US.

    1. Re:Where are the twin towers? by Nitroshock · · Score: 1

      Anyone can guess as to why the twin towers are edited out of movies. Sad as it is, as of 9/11 NY has no twin towers. The movies would not be accurate if they did have them.

      As for the Arnold movie, It's called "Collateral Damage". This clearly states it is to be released Feb. 08, 2002. How can you compare a ban on GTA3 in AU to the delayed release of a movie? It's not even on the same level.

  128. Yeah Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The OFLC was firm on the point that the game would not allowed in Australia, saying "if you have already purchased a game you will need to contact your retailer about return procedures"

    Yeah, like that's gonna happen.

  129. I did tech support for the original GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those games should never have existed. Talk about encouraging violent behavior! They were hypnotic. Anyway, my advice is to steal or crack a copy of the game instead of buying it if you are going to play it. The people who wrote it and produced it have no reguard for their customers whatsoever. Case in point: network gaming in GTA that never worked and never was patched.

    My $0.02

  130. What the hell are you talking about? by chaosbreather · · Score: 1

    I live in Australia. My friend bought GTA3 a week ago for his PS2, and he loves it. He did not buy a pirated copy, or import it from America, he just went down to the local computer store and bought it from a large display.

    The 'ban' on GTA3 is obviously nonexistant, probably a troll.

    --
    ...breathe the chaos in the midst of order...
  131. FOTR/LOTR from New Zealand (much prettier) by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 1

    Australia has the outback, a vast expanse of nothingness; it has beaches and rainforest too, but New Zealand has middle earth.... and a few sheep too.

  132. One cause of violent crime.. by Foniks · · Score: 1

    ..is when government bodies try to take away my right to play the games I want to. The reason that the game has not been refused classification though, is that under the OFLC's classification, no equivalent of the R rating exists for computer games in Australia. The game probably shouldn't recieve an M15+ rating cos of all that violence (I guess??). The OFLC are looking to change the laws, but what worries me is there are a lot of people lobbying to prevent an R classification for games to prevent violent games from falling in childrens hands. To be honest, I have been playing this game since it's release in Australia, and this is the first time I have thought about running down pedestrians in my car.. now where is that address of the OFLC?? BTW there where at least 10 games that were banned here, most of them were released again under appeal from the publishers - but until we get an R rating it looks likely that GTA3 will not be released again. It is also interesting to note that GTA3 was banned before it's release, but Take2 entertainment claimed that there was a breakdown in communication and thought they COULD release it..

  133. Not a very well enforced ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to be the only Aussie reading /. today, but I can tell you that if it is banned, it's not well enforced. I bought GTA3 at my local shop in Penrith, NSW, Australia about 4 weeks ago and AFAIK it's still on sale.

  134. Er GTA3 banned ? by BrendanShort · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.. I live in New South Wales.. Australia.. If this game is banned how come I can pop into my local Blockbuster and hire a copy? I think someone got something a little wrong here with this posting.....

  135. GTA3 by Beserk · · Score: 1

    err hello guys... u may wanna get your facts right, im in Australia and you can buy GTA3 here, great game too

  136. The reason is because it contains strong sexual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..references. Australia has NOT got an R18+-rating for computer games (18+ only) policy, only an MA15+ policy. This means that games with strong sexual references will not be purchasable in Australia.

  137. Linux classified? by jquirke · · Score: 1

    A little off topic, but on the lines of Australian Censorship

    I live in Australia, and recently visited a newsagent in Melbourne. In the computer section was the official shrink-wrapped Red Hat Linux 7.1 or 7.2 CD with a book, published by Red Hat.

    What disturbed me most was a sticker on the front with the Office of Film and Literature Classification logo, with the statement "This product is classified 'G' - it is suitable for all ages"

  138. What everyone is overlooking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real reason that Australia is having the version edited, is because there are no Holden commodores or Ford Falcons to steal.

    By definition, the game is useless to any australian as it stands....

  139. /. knows its banned, but do the shops? by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 2
    I live in Sydney, Australia. I've seen GTA3 at the shops, its advertised in the brochures.

    Has anyone told the storeds that GTA3 is banned, has the signal traveled from the head to the feet?

  140. Re:What? I bought it in AU, in myer.com.au by cb0y · · Score: 1

    its on sale everywhere...

    AHahahahah

  141. Our law enforcement makes up for our stupid laws by xQx · · Score: 0

    In australia:

    - It's illegal to drive over 50km/h in suburben streets ($125 fine for exceeding the limit by 15km/h or less.)
    - It's illegal to smoke pot
    - It's illegal to host anything on the internet which is offensive to the <18 viewers, without *proof* your viewers are over 18 (password protection is not enough)
    - ISPs must provide 'netnanny' or some other filtering software to users apon signup, and is 'recommended' to run a ISP based filter for inapropriate debts.
    - Australian citizens, using australian credit cards on offshore online casino's are *NOT REQUIRED* to honor any debts they rack up.
    - Carmaggeddon was banned for a number of months due to the hope^H^H^H^H fear that it will cause australians will be inspired to drive that way.
    - GTA3 is still banned due to the fear that people will learn to drive using it.
    - Our biggest telecommunications provider (Telstra) has always charged ISPs by the meg (about 13c per meg) for upstream content. Now they have introduced a 3gb cap on all broardband access in Australia.

    Fortunatly, with all these f*cked up laws, we've got a law enforcement agency who couldn't catch a cold; so any of the above laws that can't be enforced by machines (speed cameras and bandwidth calculators) ... aren't enforced unless you wave the evidence in a cops face.

    Great quote from a mate:
    Porn broker worker (in regard to a 400W HPS growlight): "Do you keep an eye on who we sell these to?"
    Head of police of [anonymous country town]: "Nah, it's about tomato season anyway isn't it?"

  142. Wow, that's scary. by Uttles · · Score: 2

    You use a bunch of big words and a tone that conveys absolute knowledge, but you're completely wrong. Amazing.

    I'm not absolutely sure of which war you speak, but I'm assuming you're referring to the war for Southern Independance (commonly referred to, and incorrectly so, as the "Civil War".) In that case, you are all wrong. As you may or may not know, owning a slave back in the 17 and 18 hundreds was the equivalent to owning a mansion or a luxury boat today. Therefore, and this is an educated estimation, about 1 to 3 percent of Southerners actually owned slaves. The war was fought by poor tenant farmers for their freedom from economic oppresion of the Union. Additionally, given the plain numbers of soldiers in each army, it was the Union who's asses were kicked, as the only way they won the war was by presenting the confederate army with more bodies than they had ammunition (which interestingly was caused by lack of support from an ungrateful nation of France in penetrating the Union's blockade.)

    As a final thought, I take back what I said about the Union not kicking the CSA's ass because in reality they did, only it wasn't on the battlfield. See, in the "war to free the slaves" the Union army burnt the major Southern cities to the ground in a terrorist act that rivals anything we've ever seen out of the Middle East, more commonly referred to as "Sherman's March." The Confederate army was very civilized and proper in thier way of waging war, in fact they neglected to use their secret submarine weapon until the war was almost over because they thought it was an unfair instrument. Therefore, I recant, the Union did kick the CSA's ass, only rather than soldier deaths, these were the deaths of hundreds of thousands of completely innocent women, children, slaves, men... normal civilians. United we stand, divided we fall... the "we" referred only to the North. My great grandparents used to tell me the story of how their parents were killed in Atlanta by the fires. Call me ignorant, call me a redneck, call me close-minded, but I think I'll stay right here South of that line, thank you very much.

    --

    ~ now you know
  143. Re:Interesting Cycle...What's Legal NOW? by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm! Well... seeing how the US is just a country
    of Pilgrims!??

    I guess the game wouldn't go down well there either! :)

    From what I read; it was the Rape-Murder bit in
    GTA3 that didn't click with the powers-that-be!

    I seem to remember a game in the 8bit era called
    Custer's Revenge that caused a lot of upset in the
    US because of IT'S Rape content, as well!

    Well, maybe Rape is to be encourged in the US now-a-days??

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  144. We need a new country by Snover · · Score: 1

    Something small but nice...maybe something artificial right near the equator in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. A place where geeks roam and there is no censoring of anything. Fiberoptic high-speed internet straight from everyone's house to the internet (server not included). No, even better, from everyone's house to a gigantic island-wide LAN! Of course, you'd get your choice of satellite or digital cable, and your operating system would only be limited to *nix, BSD, Lindows, OS/2, and pre-WindowsXP! Rather than partake in wars, we'd just have Q3A tournaments online. No taxes. Time-shared fabrication facilities and class-100 cleanrooms for citizens. Of course, everyone would have to pass a standard entry test or be exported. Immigrants? No problem! We'll just invent a REAL firewall and put it around the island! Y'know, like the Ring of Fire! Of course, you'd be allowed to bring non-technophile family members -- but only immediate family! Cloning would be legal -- we'd make a mint cloning and exporting body parts!
    Then, of course, there are lots of institutions that would want to be established there...especially some really good Chinese delivery places.

    Yep, sounds like the perfect place for me. Now all that needs to be figured is out how we're gonna get any women.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  145. Re:Boycott Australia - What do YOU mean NEW?? by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Sorry to disillusion you but we voted BACK-IN the
    former Prime Minister (+ party) largely on the
    policy he was pushing to keep us from being over-run
    by Civil Invaders!!

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  146. Re:Boycott Australia - Dangerous Roads!!! by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Actually, if one goes driving in country Australia',
    you often can't miss seeing the wildlife!!

    It tends to pile-up on the front of your car! :)

    'I well remember having a bunny zip over the road
    btwn the front and back wheel of my R75/6 some 18
    years ago near Coonabarraban!

    Many country drivers have what are called- "Bull Bars";
    in realality- Anti-Bull-Bars! :)

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  147. Re:Boycott Australia - our PBs are closer! by vortexau · · Score: 1

    My sympathies ... to see a Polar Bear (well 4, really)
    I'd only have to drive 70km to Sea World On The Gold Coast
    where they are a theme park attraction!

    Maybe, you should fit Moose-Bars ... similar to
    Australian motor vehicle Bull-Bars :)

    (I like Canadians .... they're like Americans, only
    more polite)

    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  148. Re:Boycott Australia - Its Dangerous :) by vortexau · · Score: 1

    You should have told them about the Box Jelly-Fish,
    while you were at it! :)

    I remember an American tourist at a Fauna Reserve,
    saying how cute the Kangaroos were, bemoning that
    they were being hunted and culled - NOT knowing that
    they have strong legs and sharp claws that can easilly
    disenbowel a tall man while they clutch with the
    forepaws!

    Numbers of Americans have seen an old newsreel that
    shows a Boxing Kangaroo!- THAT pose IS the one used
    in the disenboweling attack!!

    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  149. Why Toilet Bowl Water Twirls Clockwise by wideangle · · Score: 1
    From http://www.discovery.com/area/skinnyon/skinnyon970 523/skinny1.html:
    fictitious force, n. Coriolis isn't even a real force, since it doesn't make anything speed up or slow down -- it only explains why things appear to speed or slow as the world spins out from under them. This sort of impostor is known as a fictitious force.
    From http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~dvandom/Edu/new cor.html:
    Water in the sink doesn't go far enough to trigger a noticeable north/south deflection. Most often, it simply spirals down the sink the way it went into the sink, and the same is true of things like the famous "demonstration" of the Coriolis force shown at tourist traps along the Equator. Maybe there's a conspiracy to manufacture right-handed sinks in the Northern Hemisphere and left-handed sinks in the Southern Hemisphere?

    In any case, don't blame it on the Coriolis force unless your sink [or toilet] is the size of a small ocean.
  150. Re:Boycott Australia - our PBs are closer! by dadragon · · Score: 1

    I wasn't counting theme parks :) If that were the case, I'd only have to drive to the Calgary Zoo :) Kangaroos won't be too far away from them, methinks.

    If you think bars on my truck could defend me against a moose, you've never seen one. :) Being a proud member of a very agricultural family here in Canada, I've seen my share of bulls. Bulls can't jump over the fences meant to keep them where they are. Moose can, but you're not a citizen of the Great White North, so you wouldn't have known that.

    Oh, the differences between Canadians are Ameriicans go a little deeper than mannerisms. Most Canadians can tell the difference between us by our accents, word choice, canadianisms ("skronk", "chesterfield"), and various other things. To me, it's slightly more difficult than figureing ot who's the Aussi, and who's the Kiwi :)

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  151. Simple Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would prefer to live in a country where we had someting like 300 deaths due to guns last year in the US the average is about 30000 gun death a year. Now the US has 10 times as many people as Australia so if the US banned guns you would save 27000 lives. Call me wierd but I think it is worth it.

    In other words owning guns might be a nice idea if nobody actually used them to kill people. But they do. I am willing to give up the right to own a gun in order to save lives. Simple. For the greater good and all that.

  152. Oh, I know... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm not saying America doesn't suck da corporate sausage, but at least we leave our porn alone :)

  153. GTA3 banned in USA? by gunnerbunny · · Score: 1

    The Aussie ban is just the beginning. I work in a videogame store and I was informed by management that GTA3 was going through the paperwork of being pulled off shelves....the shipments are getting considerably smaller and fewer..so get it while you can!

    --
    "that which does not kill me makes me bitter" -anon