I realize I'm feeding the troll, however I will note Microsoft don't make a C compiler, only a C++ one with historical C support: it only supports C as specified in C89, not C99 or C11. This can and does cause problems for people who try to use it to compile modern C source code.
That depends how competently you want it operated - I was taught to use one at school (both metal lathes and wood turning lathes). I was never that good it, of course.
Because ISBN numbers are also a unique identifier; they fulfil bibliographic and cataloguing functions. With an ISBN number you not only know what book is being referenced, but also which edition of that book, and what format that book was in (a book published as an eBook and as a paper book will have different ISBN number for both).
After talking to a friend in the biz, he's most likely talking about a mutated version of ARINC664 with a downlink thrown in. Which is different to Airbus's mutated version of ARINC664.
(Probably anyway; I deal with ships. We have things like IEC 61162 instead.)
There are businesses that do, but even they state it only works with companies that employ fewer than 30 people (possibly even fewer). After that it becomes too large to function correctly.
"It cost $100" was a historic reference, i.e. that's how much it cost back in the late 80s when he originally wrote and published the book. Back then it wasn't released under a free licence, it was released under a propriety one. It switched to the BSD licence (I think) sometime in the 90s.
The Schengen Area agreement also contains rules concerning police crossing international borders when in pursuit of someone; I believe they keep going, but hand over to local police on the fly.
A lot of the time, buried away inside that 100MB archive, there is just a small little drive file and its attendant meta data. It just they like giving you a thousand pieces of crap on top of it that you don't really need.
Because generally speaking the estimated time to completion is based on knowing two things: how much "stuff" you've got to do and how long the average time to do a unit of "stuff" takes.
When the process starts out you don't have enough data to actually come up with a sensible average, so the time will bounce around; as it progresses it should settle down a bit, assuming that each unit is actually approximately the same in complexity, which is an assumption that isn't always true. If you run in to a unit which takes an inordinate amount of time compared to other units your estimate goes out of the window. Compounding this is you probably don't update your ETA until after each unit has been processed.
Also the more time you spend worrying about your ETA is more time you spend not actually doing "work", so you potentially increase the amount of time it takes to complete the real task - you might not notice this on small batches, but it can become more noticeable on larger ones.
It can apply to private property as well: trespass at any premise licensed for the storage of explosives automatically becomes criminal trespass as well. I've yet to work out if that includes the homes of people who hold explosives certificates (which I used to), because that could be amusing.
I suspect you get in to a whole new arena of fun when it's a List X site.
Slashdot Mirror
And remind me who the figures of hate in the original trilogy were? Or indeed are.
You're not allowed to use a cart if you're playing in a competition, iirc. You have to walk the course.
That was pretty much going to be my response. I rather like having two 24" monitors and a decent amount of processing power.
I wouldn't enjoy writing software on a tablet very much. For, yes. On, no.
I wouldn't mind fading in to a business which made $16 billion profit last year and still employs over half-a-million people.
It depends on the publisher. All of Tor's e-books are sensibly priced and DRM free as a matter of policy.
Yes, but we also have respect for growing up.
I realize I'm feeding the troll, however I will note Microsoft don't make a C compiler, only a C++ one with historical C support: it only supports C as specified in C89, not C99 or C11. This can and does cause problems for people who try to use it to compile modern C source code.
-g?
That depends how competently you want it operated - I was taught to use one at school (both metal lathes and wood turning lathes). I was never that good it, of course.
And there's a distinct shortage of people who even know how to make charcoal.
China technically has universal military conscription, it's entirely possible he's not doing it by choice.
Because ISBN numbers are also a unique identifier; they fulfil bibliographic and cataloguing functions. With an ISBN number you not only know what book is being referenced, but also which edition of that book, and what format that book was in (a book published as an eBook and as a paper book will have different ISBN number for both).
After talking to a friend in the biz, he's most likely talking about a mutated version of ARINC664 with a downlink thrown in. Which is different to Airbus's mutated version of ARINC664.
(Probably anyway; I deal with ships. We have things like IEC 61162 instead.)
There are businesses that do, but even they state it only works with companies that employ fewer than 30 people (possibly even fewer). After that it becomes too large to function correctly.
"It cost $100" was a historic reference, i.e. that's how much it cost back in the late 80s when he originally wrote and published the book. Back then it wasn't released under a free licence, it was released under a propriety one. It switched to the BSD licence (I think) sometime in the 90s.
I believe it cost less than $100 and included the book that Tanenbaum wrote to go with it.
The Schengen Area agreement also contains rules concerning police crossing international borders when in pursuit of someone; I believe they keep going, but hand over to local police on the fly.
Top Gear hasn't been journalism for years, it's entertainment pure and simple - the shows are entirely scripted.
A lot of the time, buried away inside that 100MB archive, there is just a small little drive file and its attendant meta data. It just they like giving you a thousand pieces of crap on top of it that you don't really need.
Because generally speaking the estimated time to completion is based on knowing two things: how much "stuff" you've got to do and how long the average time to do a unit of "stuff" takes.
When the process starts out you don't have enough data to actually come up with a sensible average, so the time will bounce around; as it progresses it should settle down a bit, assuming that each unit is actually approximately the same in complexity, which is an assumption that isn't always true. If you run in to a unit which takes an inordinate amount of time compared to other units your estimate goes out of the window. Compounding this is you probably don't update your ETA until after each unit has been processed.
Also the more time you spend worrying about your ETA is more time you spend not actually doing "work", so you potentially increase the amount of time it takes to complete the real task - you might not notice this on small batches, but it can become more noticeable on larger ones.
Last time I did that at work I got told to reduce it back to one.
ShockWatch make a specific product, DropSpot, that have serial numbers printed on them. They explicitly designed for attached to transported items.
It can apply to private property as well: trespass at any premise licensed for the storage of explosives automatically becomes criminal trespass as well. I've yet to work out if that includes the homes of people who hold explosives certificates (which I used to), because that could be amusing.
I suspect you get in to a whole new arena of fun when it's a List X site.
They wouldn't have far to go; we (the British) used to sarcastically refer to the UK as the USS Great Britain for a reason...