Slashdot Mirror


Baseball Software Can't Score What Jean Segura Did Friday

JimboFBX writes "Interesting piece of baseball history happened on Friday. Jean Segura of the Milwaukee Brewers stole second, tried to steal third too early, but made it back to second before being tagged. The problem was that teammate Ryan Braun already made it to second on the steal attempt. After tags were applied to both baserunners, Segura started trotting to the dugout before realizing that he wasn't out, Braun was, and his only option was to make it back to first. He then of course proceeded to try to steal second base again. The software for keeping the box score? Doesn't (yet) support someone running backwards on the bases. Looks like that will have to change." Here is video of the sequence.

223 comments

  1. Had this same problem with women by Cyfun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've had this same problem with women. One day you can get to second or even third base, then suddenly you're sent scrambling for first again. Wasn't sure how to score that either, but as long as you're still in the game, it's a win, right? ;)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
    1. Re:Had this same problem with women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, but there's truly no place like 'home'!

    2. Re:Had this same problem with women by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go straight to fifth base. If you get there, you win, if not, you're saved the trouble of trying for the others.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    3. Re:Had this same problem with women by balise · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      --
      John Eadie [JE46] http://www.c-art.com `one of these days the dogs aren't going to eat the dog food' - Bill Joy
    4. Re:Had this same problem with women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's fifth-, ... oh! Never mind

    5. Re:Had this same problem with women by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about what you are able to do one day vs the next... it's when you get caught trying to steal third base, and are sent scrambling back to second, only to find out that it's already occupied. Thinking you're done, you head back to the couch, only to realize that first base is still open... and there you go, safe!

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    6. Re:Had this same problem with women by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for this comment!

    7. Re:Had this same problem with women by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've had this same problem with women. One day you can get to second or even third base, then suddenly you're sent scrambling for first again.

      At least you got back to 1st base! I was accused of playing short stop when I should have been tending home plate -- I know! Makes no sense, right? That's what I said. Anyway, I held up in the dugout for the rain delay and when I finally was able to step up to bat they had called in a pinch hitter from the bullpen!

      That was a pretty foul play, but that's not even the worst of it. The guy turned out to be a catcher batting for the other team! He should have been disqualified so I rushed the mound, but thankfully a Ref was being a real friend and held me back. The managers got involved, and I found out this was more about contract politics than anything. Eventually everyone was ejected from the game for unsportsmanlike conduct.

      Now I'm out in deep left, fielding balls all by myself, again...

    8. Re:Had this same problem with women by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Or in some cases: Go straight to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    9. Re:Had this same problem with women by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Had this same problem with women by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yup, standing in there, swinging for the fences, hoping to at least get hit with the ball.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Had this same problem with women by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      We have six, you see.

      Thank you so much for that. No one does it like Flounder in space!

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    12. Re:Had this same problem with women by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Hey we've all been there man. Welcome to Slashdot Sports.
      Thanks too, I can't remember reading such an entertaining sports write-up since Jim Murray.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    13. Re:Had this same problem with women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've found that giving her some nice shoes will make her say that three times!

    14. Re:Had this same problem with women by Branciforte · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight. You make a move for third-base, but a rebuffed, then try to head back to second, but find that there is another guy already there?

      You do have an interesting love life.

    15. Re:Had this same problem with women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had this same problem with women......

      Perhaps you don't think women read these threads..... perhaps you don't really care. I want to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you did not intend to make some people uncomfortable with your comment.
      Replying about "scoring with women" could unintentionally make some people, particularly women, not feel as comfortable in replying or posting to this thread.

    16. Re:Had this same problem with women by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      No offense meant, m'lady, really. Though, without knowing your exact experiences with the males in your life, I'd suggest that that thread was pretty tame by todays standards. (I actually posted the ac 'no place like home comment'.)

      I worked many years in construction, hung out with real guys talking loosely with one another. And I've also been the only guy in a room full of women, who were talking loosely. From what I know, women are much more blatant and shocking in their talk, what I heard blew me away and made the construction guy talk I've heard seem tame. I also hear how this newer, younger generation talk about the other sex and some of it I'm quite uncomfortable with (I'm in my 50's).

      As you know, Slashdot is uncensored. Some of the comments that are way out of line get modded down real quick here, if you notice. Immature, slightly risque 5th grade comments were made, it is true. Some will find it funny, some will be offended, which is always the risk of humor. It's my opinion that there's much worse out there, and perhaps you might lighten up a little, it's a subject many people of both sexes can relate to.

  2. Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A treasury of wacky baseball rules situations, now out of print (watch out for more recent titles with the same name, chances are it's a completely different book).

    I remember getting approx. 0 percent right.

    1. Re:Reminds me of this book by SternisheFan · · Score: 0, Troll

      Weird baseball fact: If you hit an out of the park home run, you do not have to run the bases. It still counts as a run.

    2. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you sure? Can I please get a source on that?

      The following links says otherwise. (Though admittedly they are unreferenced and generally not trust-worthy).
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6

    3. Re:Reminds me of this book by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Informative
      Alright, I'm gonna have to call myself 'out' on this. Rules say you have to touch all the bases or it doesn't count. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_you_have_to_run_the_bases_if_you_hit_a_homerun

      Also, rule 5.06 applies... http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/ball_in_play_5.jsp

      I learned an urban myth as a kid, I guess. Something about Babe Ruth not having to run the bases after he hit another out, he ran them for the crowd.

    4. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have NO idea what you're talking about. Ask Robin Ventura, who hit a ball out of the park with the bases loaded, but was mobbed before he could round second base: he was officially credited with a single, known to Mets fans as "The Grand Slam Single." Game 5 1999 NLCS.

    5. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It takes real courage to admit your own mistakes. You have my respects.

    6. Re:Reminds me of this book by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Funny

      It takes real courage to admit your own mistakes. You have my respects.

      Thanks, it's my first. There was one other time in my life where I thought I made a mistake, fortunately it turned out I was wrong! :^)

    7. Re:Reminds me of this book by swalve · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Was this guy in the book? My great grand uncle.

    8. Re:Reminds me of this book by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Informative
      I couldn't click your hyperlink (I think because of the space in it) on my tablet, found it on wiki:

      The game was tied 2–2, going into the top of the 15th inning, until Mets pitcher Octavio Dotel gave up an RBI triple to Keith Lockhart, giving the Braves a 3–2 lead. In the bottom of the 15th inning, the Mets loaded the bases against Braves relief pitcher Kevin McGlinchy. Mets catcher Todd Pratt drew a bases loaded walk, tying the score 3–3.

      The next batter was Mets third baseman Robin Ventura. Ventura crushed the 2–1 pitch over the wall in right-center for an ostensible grand slam, winning the game for the Mets and driving the Mets players and fans into a frenzied celebration. Ventura, however, never reached second base as Todd Pratt, the runner who was on first, picked up Ventura in celebration. Subsequently, Ventura was mobbed by his teammates, never finishing his trot around the bases. Because he failed to touch all four bases, the hit was officially scored a single. Roger Cedeño, the runner on third at the time, was ruled the only runner to have crossed home plate before the on-field celebration began and the Mets were awarded a 4-3 victory. Thus, Ventura was only credited with a single and one RBI. As a result, there had never been an official walk-off grand slam in MLB postseason history until Nelson Cruz hit one to allow the Texas Rangers to beat the Detroit Tigers 7–3 in Game 2 of the American League Championship Series on October 10, 2011.

      And the video on MLB.com http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=13062971

    9. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your great grand uncle inspired "Take Me Out to the Ball Game". Cool!

    10. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your uncle stole first base! w00t!

      I bet BROCK didn't have that play...

    11. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      All bases have to be touched, including home plate. If the hitter is unable to make it, a pinch-runner will have to do it for him, it's happened before.
      I've also played in a game where the hitter who hit the homerun was so ecstatic that he missed first base during his homerun trot. On the next plate appearance the pitcher pitched out to first base and the previous batter was called out, so no homerun on that at-bat!

    12. Re:Reminds me of this book by sconeu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When they resumed the infamous "Pine Tar" game, several months later, Billy Martin appealed at each base, claiming that George Brett didn't touch all the bases.

      However, the umpires were ready, and had affadavits from the original umpiring crew stating that he had.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re:Reminds me of this book by sootman · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about a different player doing that a million years ago in an old "Ripley's believe it or not" book that I had. I don't remember the player's name, but it wasn't anybody well-known like Ruth. The story there was that he missed second base so he ran around again to get it. A quick Google search doesn't turn up anything.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about the link.

      Glad you took the time to check out the info.

    15. Re:Reminds me of this book by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there was that 'phantom' home run last season, after all.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    16. Re:Reminds me of this book by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      So a sport that's based on doing as little physical activity as possible for it to still count as a sport suddenly requires you to do more running than strictly necessary?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    17. Re:Reminds me of this book by kernelpanicked · · Score: 1

      Ahh Robin Ventura. Also known as the retard who tried to charge Nolan Ryan and got his ass beat by an old man. One of my fonder memories from spending a good part of my life attached to a 1st base side seat in Arlington.

      --
      Ubuntu: If at first you don't succeed, blindly slap a sudo in front of it
    18. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of golf? If you don't get a cart it has all the exercise of walking around with a backpack on.

      Lots of people get carts.

      I'm going to classify some sports in *very* rough and non-strict descending order of activity:

      - Racing (running, swimming, speed-skating, relays, skiing, luge, ....)
      - Fighting (boxing, wrestling)
      - Dancing (figure skating, synchronized swimming, diving)
      - Trying to move the same token the other guy/team is also trying to move simultaneously (football/basketball/hockey/etc.)
      - Trying to move the same token the other guy/team is also trying to move in an asynchronous manner (volleyball/tennis/etc.)
      - Accuracy (archery, bowling, curling, bocce)
      - Quantifiable, non-time based based feats (weightlifting, high-jump, long-jump, shot-put)
      - Operating something that does one of the above for you (horseracing, racecar driving, powerboating)

      There's probably some bickering over whether some of those are "real sports", but I'm certain you can find people defending all of them.

      Baseball is a bit of a hybrid of accuracy, asynchronous token-moving, and racing, in approximately that order (except for the pitcher who does much more token-moving and accordingly exercises more). The exercise profile reflects that.

    19. Re:Reminds me of this book by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      You're not allowed to use a cart if you're playing in a competition, iirc. You have to walk the course.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    20. Re:Reminds me of this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fyi hour on horseback uses up more calories that a hour cycling at the same speed.

    21. Re:Reminds me of this book by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Courage? Online? Seriously, some people.

    22. Re:Reminds me of this book by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Ryan and Ventura still appear at autograph shows together. It's a neat piece of baseball lore.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    23. Re:Reminds me of this book by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      AH! Brilliant, sir! Have all my internetz!

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    24. Re:Reminds me of this book by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      They used to tell a similar story about Marv Throneberry.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  3. (YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Even after reading the summary twice, I still have no idea what happened.
    Doesn't help that I live in Europe where we basically don't care about Baseball.

    1. Re:(YouTube) footage? by JustOK · · Score: 2

      It's exactly like soccer.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:(YouTube) footage? by thoth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Segura attempted to steal third base too early, before the pitcher delivered the ball. Thus when Braun and Segura both wound up on 2nd, only Braun was out - Segura's attempted steal wasn't legit (Segura should never have left the base) therefore Braun's position was invalid and he was tagged. I think had Segura waited he would have been tagged out, since if his steal attempt was legit then Braun's position was fine and Segura would have been invalid.

      Anyway, while going back to the dugout he realized he wasn't out, and apparently there is an loophole in the rules which allowed his to then run to the closest available base to be safe, which happened to be first.

    3. Re:(YouTube) footage? by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      This link someone else posted has a video and a much more comprehensible account of what transpired: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/jean-segura-steals-second-then-steals-first-bizarre-103642855--mlb.html

    4. Re:(YouTube) footage? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's exactly like soccer.

      No, if it was like soccer, it would have taken at least 45 minutes to happen, five yellow cards would have been given out, and three fights would have broken out in the stands for no apparent reason.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:(YouTube) footage? by peragrin · · Score: 5, Funny

      yea but the score would be the same. 2-0

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:(YouTube) footage? by polymeris · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Not the AC, but was in the same situation.

      Nomen est omen. Of course Segura finds a way to be safe.

    7. Re:(YouTube) footage? by grimJester · · Score: 1

      One guy tried to run along three sides of a square and realized he wouldn't make it. He turned back to the second corner from where he started, but that was occupied by some other guy who had come running after him. It looked like both of them were out of the game, but due to an obscure ruling he had the option of moving to the first corner.

      I know nothing about baseball either, but I think that's the main idea.

    8. Re:(YouTube) footage? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since when could they score twice in 45 minutes in soccer?

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    9. Re:(YouTube) footage? by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the untouched baserunner would have flopped to the ground clutching his shin and grimacing.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    10. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Is it against the rules for the runner to steal a base before a pitcher delivers? I find that strange because the pitcher can throw to the 2nd/1st baseman before they deliver the pitch to earn an out... why shouldn't a runner have the same opportunity ?

    11. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's just not a good idea to do from second base where a right-handed pitcher can easily see you leading off and stealing. That also depends on whether the pitcher is throwing from the wind-up or the stretch. Typically, a pitcher delivers from the stretch with runners on base, as the motion is quicker and he can more easily see runners on 1st attempting to steal.

    12. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hate replying to my own comment, but throwing from the wind-up allows for a delivery mechanic that is more powerful. More force = faster pitch = faster reaction time required to hit. That's why I like baseball - just the act of delivering a pitch has so much complexity that such slight changes can result in differentiation of game outcomes.

    13. Re:(YouTube) footage? by fermion · · Score: 5, Funny

      A professor of mine told us why he thought baseball was so frustrating. He was at a bar and a batter was just getting up to base. He went home, turned on the TV, and the same batter us still up.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know you're being funny, but Valencia scored 4 goals in the first 8 minutes of a match earlier today.

      Then they scored one goal in the remaining 82 minutes, but whatever. Football owns and you're wrong.

    15. Re:(YouTube) footage? by elashish14 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think clip is available here: http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130420&content_id=45278350&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb - you can clearly see the runner trotting off the field before he realizes that he's not out and safely reaches first.

      Also, in this year's World Baseball Classic, Italy made it to the second round (top 8 of 16) and the Netherlands reached the semifinals (top 4). Not a bad showing for the Europeans....

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    16. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When looking at the video it looks clear to me that BOTH runners were out at second! Sequra tried to steal third but was forced back to second. Braun stole second base. Because this play was not a forced run Sequra had the right to base. Both runners were tagged while they were on second base. That meant Braun was out because he was the one without the right to be there if I'm understanding the rules of baseball correctly. Now if you watch the video you'll see that Sequra got up and got tagged again while he was OFF the base. At that point he was also out. The best thing that could have been done was for them both to stay on the base and let the umpire call who was out and who had the right to the base.

      This whole issue about a loophole in the rules allowing him to go back to first is a moot point because it seems clear from the video he was not on the base when he got tagged the second time.

    17. Re:(YouTube) footage? by sk999 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is not against the rules, and I saw it happen, when Willie Davis of the Dodgers stole second against the New York Mets while the pitcher held the ball the entire time. This was way back when the Mets played in the Polo Grounds. Even thought the Mets were bad, it was still not a nice thing to do. It was one of many incidents that has led to my current mantra:

      "If the Dodgers lose, it was a good day in baseball"

    18. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I understand of the link: Segura made multiple minor league baserunning mistakes in this play.
      Segura was leading off second base and could have attempted to steal third base regardless if the pitcher threw the ball home or not, he just made his first baserunning mistake and went too early for third and saw that the pitcher could have easily thrown him out at third, so then Segura ran back to second before the pitcher could attempt to pick him off at second. Braun made it to second base, and in that situation Braun is automatically called out because two baserunners cannot occupy the same base at the same time. Segura's second baserunning mistake was when he thought he was tagged out on the play, so he started running back to the dugout. A runner more heads-up would know to just stay on second base. So Segura was still safely within the basepath when he was going back to the dugout (if he was outside of the basepath he'd be out) and was close enough to first base that the first base coach told him to get on first base and stay there. Segura possibly made a third mistake when he was never called out by an umpire, yet he still thought he was out on the play.
      Segura later attempted to steal second again, but was caught stealing second base, after he had previously stole second base in the same inning without the team batting around. Very bizarre indeed.

    19. Re:(YouTube) footage? by murdocj · · Score: 2

      Seems bizarre that Braun is standing on the bag... but he's considered "out". I mean, you can try steal any time the ball is in play, and presumably when the pitcher is getting ready to deliver the ball to the plate, it's considered "in play".

    20. Re:(YouTube) footage? by murdocj · · Score: 2

      As a San Francisco fan, any day the LA Dodgers or the Dallas Cowboys lose, it's a good day, period.

    21. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right, but the ump didn't see the second tag on Segura while he was calling Braun out. I suppose if the home-plate ump saw it, he could have over-ruled the call. The third baseman didn't need to tag Braun either because he would've been out anyways, the tagging was just for good measure.

    22. Re:(YouTube) footage? by stwf · · Score: 1

      Braun was out because you aren't allowed to pass a baserunner. So the minute they were in the same place he was out. But Segura thought he was out and started walking off the field. No one tagged him at that point though and he was near ehough to first base that by the time someone figured it out he got there before anyone tagged him.
      But then he tried to steal second again and got caught, double idiot

    23. Re:(YouTube) footage? by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think clip is available here: http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130420&content_id=45278350&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb - you can clearly see the runner trotting off the field before he realizes that he's not out and safely reaches first.

      Also, in this year's World Baseball Classic, Italy made it to the second round (top 8 of 16) and the Netherlands reached the semifinals (top 4). Not a bad showing for the Europeans....

      Wow, so one day there might be a true international baseball competition. It should be called 'The World Series'.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    24. Re:(YouTube) footage? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

      Football owns and you're wrong.

      Yes it does. Soccer, however, is kind of a funny sport.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      One guy tried to run along three sides of a square and realized he wouldn't make it. He turned back to the second corner from where he started, but that was occupied by some other guy who had come running after him. It looked like both of them were out of the game, but due to an obscure ruling he had the option of moving to the first corner. I know nothing about baseball either, but I think that's the main idea.

      Funny, but you're a little late. The naive bumpkin interpreting a sporting event shtick is at least 60 years old.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    26. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If they're playing against our national team, they can. Easily so.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You kinda sound like a friend of mine who tries hard to convince me that there are very sophisticated tactics in soccer. I can't help, it may be too subtle for me to notice. For me, soccer is 22 people who try to hit a funny colored guy by kicking a ball at him. Baseball is basically 10+ people standing around sprinkled on a field waiting for one of them finally deciding to end the suspense and throw a ball, with everyone hoping and praying that the other guy with the bat FINALLY manages to hit that ball sensibly so at least SOMETHING happens that might have the slight chance to be interesting for a change.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:(YouTube) footage? by colinrichardday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Braun is automatically called out because two baserunners cannot occupy the same base at the same time.

      Is that the Ball-y Exclusion Principle?

    29. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is wrong. It has nothing to do with WHEN Segura attempted the steal. All that matters is that he was the lead runner. The lead runner is always safe if there are 2 runners on a base and they are both tagged.

      There is no such thing as a steal not being "legit." This isn't little league.

    30. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it isn't even a vaguely esoteric rule we're talking about.

      Ah, /., how I love ye. It's hard to believe that a bunch of men could know more about Fushigi Yuugi than about baseball.

    31. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, the lead runner always has priority at a base. It didn't matter that Segura tried to steal third base, the fact that he was the lead runner and he and Braun ended up at the same base meant that when both were tagged, Braun was out. Had he passed Braun, that would have made Braun out as well.

      But Segura didn't know the rule and started to return to the dugout. But once he realized his mistake, he couldn't return to 2nd base because the fielder at 2nd had the ball and would tag him out. So he ran back to first base. He was allowed to do this since Braun was out and no one was occupying it. There is, apparently, no rule against running the bases backwards. Any runner that you pass will be out, but you're allowed to do it.

      You were close, but Segura could have simply remained on 2nd base. As the lead runner, he was entitled to it. Braun, as the tail runner, was responsible for staying behind Segura. It was Segura's ignorance of the rules that led to him stealing first. I'm actually really curious whether he was credited with a stolen base (for stealing 1st) or not and, had he been successful with the 2nd steal of 2nd base, whether he would have received credit for that stolen base too.

    32. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you want to see the tactics in soccer, just start watching the players without the ball. Their movement is where most of the tactics come into play. The player with the ball is primarily just reacting to the tactics of his teammates and the defenders.

    33. Re: (YouTube) footage? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I can be. As long as you don't try to convince me sports that consist to 99% of standing around is actually fun.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    34. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to the rule linked to in TFA, the following runner is not out until tagged.

    35. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Punto · · Score: 2
      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    36. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Besides the official warnings being referred to as "yellow cards", exactly how is that different than any random game at Yankee Stadium. ;-)

    37. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I saw that in the rules after I had posted. Alas, it hasn't always been so. So what then if the runner isn't tagged? I'd like to see that stalemate, the umpires might actually have to make a decision during the standoff while the runners stand on the base and the fielders stand in the basepath. If the runners attempt to run to the next base, they'd have to coordinate so that the first runner isn't passed by the second runner, or the second runner is out! What bloopers that would be, seems like my sister's softball games that went 49-0 and ended in the 5th inning due to the 10-run mercy rule.

    38. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by "legit". Segura would have been safe on second because he was the lead runner. The only exception is that in a force situation, a runner cannot be safe on a base he is forced off of.

      Interestingly, the ump atually called the play wrong. The whole "the software can't handle it" situation really shouldn't have happened. If you watch the replay closely (or listen to the commentators), you'll notice that Segura was actually tagged a second time right after he took his foot off second to run back to the dugout.

    39. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure exactly why the umpire called Braun out. Even if Braun and Segura had both been on second in such a way that Braun hadn't passed Segura, Braun would have still been out because only the lead runner is safe when two runners are on a base (except if the lead has been forced off that base, in which case the trailing runner is safe) and Braun had been tagged.

      I'd be interested to find out from an umpire whether Braun would have been considered to have passed Segura (as a hypothetical, I mean, where they were both in the same positions but no one tagged them). Technically, I think Braun had passed Segura, but might an umpire use his judgement in saying "well, Braun is on the outside part of the base, and Segura is on the inside, and the base line sort of turns 90 degrees, so is he really past?"

    40. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have related problem with baseball, football, and basketball. As the game reaches the conclusion, instead of becoming more exciting it usually takes longer and longer. Warm-up a new reliever, throw in a pinch hitter, run or throw out of bounds, call for time out, commit intentional fouls,... blah.

    41. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      No. It's a lot simpler than that, since you've kinda mashed the force rule (which doesn't apply here) together with base stealing into something that's incorrect. And then you said that some things were illegitimate or invalid, none of which were. In fact, ironically, you missed commenting on the only invalid action that actually took place in all of this.

      The reason Braun was out is simple: you can't steal an occupied base (see 7.01 and 7.03). Because nothing was forcing Segura to leave second base and he failed to make it to third base, he was never considered to have vacated second base. As a result, Braun had no claim to second base, so he was out as soon as he was tagged. Nothing more.

      The reason Segura could go to first was simply because it was vacant and he didn't break the rule (7.08i) that prohibits going in reverse to "confus[e] the defense or mak[e] a travesty of the game" (apparently some runners on second used to run back to first to give the runner on third a chance to steal home). Nothing more, and certainly not a rule that allows a runner to "run to the closest available base to be safe".

      Regarding Segura stealing "too early", that has nothing to do with the rules and everything to do with it being a poor judgment call on his part, since it gave the pitcher the opportunity to throw the ball to the third basemen, thus making it likely that Segura would get picked off. Had he waited until the pitcher committed to the pitch (as per your hypothetical situation), I can see three possible outcomes:
      1) The pitcher could have balked before completing the pitch, in which case Braun and Segura would be advanced automatically to second and third bases, respectively, and we would have gotten none of the excitement.

      2) The batter could have hit the ball, in which case he would have created a force play. As such, Braun would have been forced to second, who would, in turn, force Segura to third. If the same scenario that we saw then played out, Segura would be out and Braun would be safe, since Segura would have been compelled to vacate second base by the force play while Braun would be entitled to it.

      3) The batter could have not hit the ball, in which case we'd be left with the same situation that actually played out: Braun would be out since he can't advance to an occupied base.

      The only thing I haven't covered at this point is the one invalid action that actually took place: Segura was tagged out while not touching a base, but no one noticed it at the time. If you review the video, you'll see that Segura gets tagged while on second base (he's safe), Braun gets tagged while on second base (he's out since he's not entitled to be on second base), and then Segura gets tagged while not touching second base (he should be out, but isn't, since no one noticed that he wasn't touching the base). As such, the whole thing with him trotting back to first base never should have happened at all, since he was already out for the most mundane reason imaginable: he wasn't careful and got tagged while off the base.

    42. Re:(YouTube) footage? by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      No, exactly like football, the sport that actually involves the whole world when it uses the word world for the name of a competition.

    43. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Braun was out because he tried to steal an occupied base. It had nothing to do with the timing and everything to do with the fact that a base is considered occupied until:
      1) The runner on it advances (which Segura failed to do)

      2) The runner on it is declared out (which didn't happen with Segura)

      3) The runner on it is forced to vacate it (e.g. a force play, which didn't happen here)

      From a technical perspective those antics with the failed steal of third base had no impact on things, so what happened here is no different than if Segura had just stood there at second base while Braun "stole" the base he was on. Viewed in that light, it's obvious why Braun was declared out.

    44. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Considering that the word soccer originates in the country of origin for the sport (England), why is it wrong for Americans to use that name for the sport just because the English no longer use it? The word "soccer" derives from the term "Association Football" and was used originally in England to distinguish between Association Football and the various other forms of football that were still played there at the time. Since then, I believe that all other forms of football, except for Rugby, have died out in England and the English have adopted the word used by other countries that never developed any of their own versions of football and instead play the English sport. In the U.S., the word football was applied to a sport that was more popular here, so the term "soccer" continued to apply to the game played by the Association Football rules.
      American Football, Association Football, Rugby, Australian Football (and probably several other variants) are all descended from the same original English sport.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    45. Re:(YouTube) footage? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Well, in comparison to a game at Yankee Stadium, soccer is different in particular in that the soccer game involves less use of performance enhancing drugs.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    46. Re:(YouTube) footage? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      ah... thanks for the explanation. Information on Slashdot... who'd have thunk it.

    47. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Cenan · · Score: 1

      Football, as in the american version of it, owns? A bunch of armored gimps charging each other, then pause for 10 minutes for bickering or looking at video?
      I don't get how so little action can be stretched out to take that much time. Granted that's true about soccer too, which tends to be boring unless it's a national team match or international league match.
      Oh, and real men don't wear armor Rugby

      --
      ... whatever ...
    48. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soccer is different in particular in that the soccer game involves less use of performance enhancing drugs.

      True - but there is a depressingly higher amount of cosmetics in 'soccer'...

    49. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're being funny, but Valencia scored 4 goals in the first 8 minutes of a match earlier today.

      Then they scored one goal in the remaining 82 minutes, but whatever. Football owns and you're wrong.

      What KIND of football- Soccer, Rugby, or that game the Americans play?

    50. Re:(YouTube) footage? by dmgxmichael · · Score: 2

      From what I understand of the link: Segura made multiple minor league baserunning mistakes in this play. Segura was leading off second base and could have attempted to steal third base regardless if the pitcher threw the ball home or not, he just made his first baserunning mistake and went too early for third and saw that the pitcher could have easily thrown him out at third, so then Segura ran back to second before the pitcher could attempt to pick him off at second. Braun made it to second base, and in that situation Braun is automatically called out because two baserunners cannot occupy the same base at the same time.

      Braun should not be called out. Once you advance, the base is yours. The runner who was previously on the base (Segura) must advance to the next base before being tagged out. You are right about two runners not being allowed on the same base, however it is the lead runner who is to be called out when it happens. This is baseball 101, the sort of call little league umps like myself see all the time. I could give the major league umps some slack since pro players don't make such a rookie mistake hardly ever, but it still doesn't excuse the fact this is very basic rules knowledge in the game.

      Incidently, once Braun takes second, Segura can be forced out by tagging the ball at third - no need to chase him down.

      I'm amazed the major league umps missed this.

    51. Re:(YouTube) footage? by russotto · · Score: 1

      3) The batter could have not hit the ball, in which case we'd be left with the same situation that actually played out: Braun would be out since he can't advance to an occupied base.

      There is no rule against advancing to a base that another runner is entitled to. It just doesn't entitle the trailing runner to the base (so he can still be tagged out) except on a force play. Yahoo sports got that wrong; Braun was not out until tagged. So in your #3 scenario, if Segura reached third, Braun would have been safe at second regardless of whether he reached before or after Segura reached third.

    52. Re: (YouTube) footage? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't try to convince me sports that consist to 99% of standing around is actually fun.

      Like golf...

    53. Re:(YouTube) footage? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Rugby isn't intellectual like football.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    54. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god is that wrong. Any baserunner can attempt to steal at any time. What they can't do is pass another runner on the basepaths, which is what Braun did when he and Segura ended up on second together. Because he was the runner behind on the basepath, Braun was the one declared out when they were both tagged while standing on second. Segura was able to stop on first because you can run any direction on the basepaths, it's just that players very rarely choose to go backwards, as the whole point of the game is to move forwards.

    55. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soccer is a sport in need of tuning for the North American audience,
      The field is so big it takes forever for anything to happen, so it's boring.
      There are so many players on the field that there isn't any free space for plays to develop.
      Cut the field size down and remove a bunch of players, it can only help.

    56. Re:(YouTube) footage? by nebosuke · · Score: 1

      The lead runner is out only in the case of a forced run--the same is true with respect to tagging the ball at third. This was not a forced run situation as they were both stealing.

    57. Re: (YouTube) footage? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Yup. Though my boss actually didn't like it much when I asked him "Still having sex or already playing golf". Because... well, he did.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    58. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So somebody makes a mistake and you brand them an idiot? I guess that makes you an asshole.

    59. Re:(YouTube) footage? by bullgod · · Score: 1

      Funny like the World Cup includes more than two countries?

    60. Re:(YouTube) footage? by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 2

      Had to reply as it reminds me of an old joke: Whar's the difference between rugby and football ? Football is 11 players pretending they're injured, rugby is 15 players pretending they're not. ;)

      --
      while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    61. Re:(YouTube) footage? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Only the part of the world that matters

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    62. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Yes...except that I already said that. To repeat (emphasis mine):

      Because nothing was forcing Segura to leave second base and he failed to make it to third base, he was never considered to have vacated second base. As a result, Braun had no claim to second base, so he was out as soon as he was tagged. Nothing more.

      The batter could have not hit the ball, in which case we'd be left with the same situation that actually played out: Braun would be out since he can't advance to an occupied base.

      I didn't see a point in spelling out all of the details again in #3 since I had already done so previously in the post, so I merely stated that they were the same as before and then offered an abbreviated take on the details. I figured everyone would understand that he would still need to be tagged before he was out, since I had already said that before and had specified that it was the same situation.

      Your hypothetical situation also begs the interesting question of what happens if they tag Braun at second before Segura reaches third? Basically, at what point is Segura considered to have vacated second? Would Braun be out, or would Braun's state be dependent on whether Segura made it to third?

    63. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      There is, apparently, no rule against running the bases backwards.

      It turns out it is against the rules to run the bases in reverse, but only "for the purpose of confusing the defense or making a travesty of the game." In that case, the baserunner is out by Rule 7:08(i).

      However, by the same rule, if the runner is decoyed by the defense or the runner is simply confused (as Segura was), the runner can run forwards or in reverse, at his or her own risk.

      source

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    64. Re:(YouTube) footage? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      I wonder why Braun wasn't called safe (he was standing on an unoccupied 2nd base at the time that he had successfully stolen), and Seura wasn't called out (he wasn't on any base because he got caught in a rundown while failing to steal third). It seems to be the more logical outcome of that play.

      And I had no idea that you could go back to a previous base.

    65. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the Dodgers lose, it was a good day in baseball"

      As a Giants fan in the bay area - I very much concur

    66. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spanish speaker here, nice.

    67. Re:(YouTube) footage? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong. Braun was out because he was tagged while Segura was also standing on 2nd. If Segura had not been standing on the base, Braun would not have been out when he was tagged, regardless of whether Segura had made it safely to 3rd. If two runners are touching a base at the same time, only the lead runner has the right to the base, and only he is safe.

      So a situation like this is possible:

      1. Segura runs from 2nd toward 3rd.
      2. Braun reaches 2nd from 1st.
      3. A tag is applied to Braun, but he's on 2nd, so he's safe.
      4. The ball is thrown toward 3rd, but Segura is running back toward 2nd.
      5. Segura arrives at 2nd.
      6. A tag is applied to Segura. Both players are standing on 2nd. Being the lead runner, Segura is safe.
      7. A tag is applied to Braun. Being the trailing runner, he is out.

      That's actually what happened, minus step 3. Step 3 was just to illustrate that Braun is safe at 2nd until the runner ahead of him is also touching the base.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    68. Re:(YouTube) footage? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong. Braun did not pass Segura. Braun was out because he was tagged out while both players were standing on 2nd. In such a case, only the lead runner has the right to the base.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    69. Re:(YouTube) footage? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      No, Braun didn't pass Segura because he didn't try to advance to 3rd.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    70. Re:(YouTube) footage? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You're quite correct, of course. I blame it on my posting at 3AM.

      Thanks for the correction!

  4. doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Segura was out when he abandoned the bases by "trotting back to the dugout". You can't do that and come back.

    1. Re:doesn't make sense by ckblackm · · Score: 1

      He never left the base path... so he in fact, wasn't out. More info is available here: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/jean-segura-steals-second-then-steals-first-bizarre-103642855--mlb.html

    2. Re:doesn't make sense by Jorgensen · · Score: 2

      bases, trotting, dugout!? What IS this? Some sort of millitary or pig (of the oinking kind) reference? C'mon... just ONE clue would be nice!

    3. Re:doesn't make sense by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      bases, trotting, dugout!? What IS this? Some sort of millitary or pig (of the oinking kind) reference? C'mon... just ONE clue would be nice!

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=baseball+trotting+dugout

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  5. not just software.. my wetware is confused too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what would abbot & costello say about all this?

    1. Re:not just software.. my wetware is confused too by BigMike · · Score: 2

      Segura's on first.

    2. Re:not just software.. my wetware is confused too by SternisheFan · · Score: 3
      For those who never saw Abbot and Costello's "Who's on First" routine...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA4LcsyczA8

    3. Re:not just software.. my wetware is confused too by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's an updated version of it, starring Dubja and Condi.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:not just software.. my wetware is confused too by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 2

      Estás Segura?

  6. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's fucking Baseball. Seriously, not News for Nerds *or* Stuff that Matters.

    Ahem.

  7. what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... Who's on first?

    1. Re:what?? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ... Who's on first?

      I don't know.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:what?? by uberdilligaff · · Score: 1

      No, I Don't Know's on third. What's on second.

      --
      Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain. --Friederich Schiller
    3. Re:what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question still stands: Who the fuck is on first!?!?

    4. Re:what?? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      No, that's the groupee.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  8. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't agree more. +1 internets to you sir.

    I'll add that sometimes I think baseball only exists so that wannabe numerologists can get off on all the stats.

  9. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think there aren't baseball nerds?
    Why don't you list for us exactly what subjects are nerd-worthy and which aren't?

  10. Unexpected shit happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is one of the reasons you should make sure that users can manually edit things, even if they are fully automated.

    Yes, this allows users to break stuff but then it's their responsibility. More importantly it allows people to work around the system and solve unforeseen problems.

    1. Re:Unexpected shit happens by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This is actually a lesson also for people who feel the urge to install overly rigid procedures. Yes, you eliminate the "human factor" that way, but that human factor can work in your favor if you use it correctly. Of course you have to review every use of it thoroughly, but these are the "freak accident" exceptions. My security procedures actually provide for such decisions, and not only makes it the employees much happier to know that they have some "power of decision" at their disposal, it did already serve us quite well.

      One has to drop that notion that being overruled by your employee means you don't know what you're doing (ok, if it happens all the time and is justified too, you maybe are...). It means that there are constellations that you cannot foresee, and not giving the people the power to do what's necessary under such circumstances not only increases your workload to an insane level (because everything ends up on YOUR desk, often with "decide now or face dire consequences" deadlines), it frustrates your employees beyond belief.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. To write software that can score baseball by Hentes · · Score: 0, Troll

    we would need a human who understands it first.

    1. Re:To write software that can score baseball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For real. There's probably a cricket game right now that started before that game, is still going on, where the humans that are there don't really know why they're even there let alone understand it, and no one is watching on TV/internet either... That said, I strongly dislike baseball and absolutely hate cricket :)

    2. Re:To write software that can score baseball by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      Oh, so it's cricket. Hit ball; Run.

      Dear god, wait. You didn't give any indication when to stop running. Do you just keep running until the game is called on account of exhaustion? Holy Hell. No wonder there's no fat guys.

    3. Re:To write software that can score baseball by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, that's what retarded people think "understanding baseball" means. The rule book is actually littered with dozens of complications: ground rule double, infield fly rule, fourth-out rule, etc. The basics of the game are simple, but there are a lot of corner cases in unusual situations, including the one this article is talking about.

    4. Re:To write software that can score baseball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Baseball has the great advantage over cricket of being sooner ended." - George Bernard Shaw

  12. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some nerds actually enjoy the game of baseball. There is a lot of strategy and nuance that people who aren't familiar with the game don't understand, like any other recreational activity.

  13. Will it ever end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A terrorist bombing, an explosion and now this!

  14. George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by SternisheFan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Baseball is different from any other sport, very different. For instance, in most sports you score points or goals; in baseball you score runs. In most sports the ball, or object, is put in play by the offensive team; in baseball the defensive team puts the ball in play, and only the defense is allowed to touch the ball. In fact, in baseball if an offensive player touches the ball intentionally, he's out; sometimes unintentionally, he's out.

    Also: in football,basketball, soccer, volleyball, and all sports played with a ball, you score with the ball and in baseball the ball prevents you from scoring.

    In most sports the team is run by a coach; in baseball the team is run by a manager. And only in baseball does the manager or coach wear the same clothing the players do. If you'd ever seen John Madden in his Oakland Raiders uniform,you'd know the reason for this custom.

    Now, I've mentioned football. Baseball & football are the two most popular spectator sports in this country. And as such, it seems they ought to be able to tell us something about ourselves and our values.

    I enjoy comparing baseball and football:

    Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game. Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.

    Baseball is played on a diamond, in a park.The baseball park! Football is played on a gridiron, in a stadium, sometimes called Soldier Field or War Memorial Stadium.

    Baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life. Football begins in the fall, when everything's dying.

    In football you wear a helmet. In baseball you wear a cap.

    Football is concerned with downs - what down is it? Baseball is concerned with ups - who's up?

    In football you receive a penalty. In baseball you make an error.

    In football the specialist comes in to kick. In baseball the specialist comes in to relieve somebody.

    Football has hitting, clipping, spearing, piling on, personal fouls, late hitting and unnecessary roughness. Baseball has the sacrifice.

    Football is played in any kind of weather: rain, snow, sleet, hail, fog... In baseball, if it rains, we don't go out to play.

    Baseball has the seventh inning stretch. Football has the two minute warning.

    Baseball has no time limit: we don't know when it's gonna end - might have extra innings. Football is rigidly timed, and it will end even if we've got to go to sudden death.

    In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there's kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there's not too much unpleasantness. In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you're capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.

    And finally, the objectives of the two games are completely different:

    In football the object is for the quarterback, also known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy's defensive line.

    In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! - I hope I'll be safe at home! - George Carlin

    http://www.baseball-almanac.com/humor7.shtml

    George Carlin - “Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror”

    1. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by hey+hey+hey · · Score: 1

      Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game. Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.

      Nice to see I'm not the only one who likes George Carlin!

    2. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by SternisheFan · · Score: 2
      He was great, I'm gonna miss his points of view. Here's the audio on YouTube, from his records I think...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRfhbEUkg7o

    3. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying this is like Whack-Bat?

    5. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But its not Cricket!
      Also have to point out an error:

      Also: in football,basketball, soccer, volleyball, and all sports played with a ball, you score with the ball and in baseball the ball prevents you from scoring.

      (Bold added by me).
      Cricket is also a sport where the ball also prevents you from scoring.

    6. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      Point taken, sir. Europeans say they don't understand baseball, well, cricket totally baffles me! (I'm a New Yorker)

      You hit the ball, keep running between two poles until the ball is thrown back, and each time you touch a pole is a 'run', right? Does England not have the room for a proper field? Do you need the U.S. to donate some bases for you over there? And is it true you have to drink a pint before you run from a pole? I've got questions...

    7. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by QQBoss · · Score: 0

      Any game with tea breaks doesn't qualify as a sport.

      Furthermore, any game bet played while not-sober shouldn't be in the Olympics (yeah, I am looking at you, curling!).

    8. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's exactly like Whack-Bat!!! (???)

      Whack-Bat is a fictional sport in Fantastic Mr. Fox. It is played with several players. The player at whack-bat hits a flaming pinecone, runs to knock a cedar stick off a stand, the twig-runners dash back and forth, the player reaches home again, and when the pinecone burns out, the umpire calls "hotbox" and the score is divided by nine. http://fantasticmrfox.wikia.com/wiki/Whack-Bat

    9. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      No, it's auto-eroticism with respect to you: go fuck yourself.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    10. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sensitive. Go shoot something you American goon.

    11. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      Does England not have the room for a proper field

      Hilarious, because cricket grounds are *much* bigger than baseball grounds ;p

      Okay here is a deal: Explain me baseball, and I will explain you Cricket, because frankly baseball is totally whacky for me (not that cricket is any simpler, mind you...)

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    12. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by jkflying · · Score: 1

      You sort of have it. Cricket fields are actually bigger, because you can hit the ball in any direction, instead of just the 90 degrees in front of you, like baseball does. Also, instead of having 3 'strikes', if they manage to 'bowl' the ball so that it hits the 'wickets' (stick things behind the batter) the batter is out immediately. Otherwise he gets to keep on batting, so having just 2 really good batters (with everybody else terrible) on your team can win you a match.
      If they hit a 'homerun' it is known as a '6' and it gets them 6 runs. If they hit it past the boundaries but it bounces along the way it is only a '4'. Also, there are 2 people batting at all times, and either one of them can be knocked 'out' if the wicket on their side gets hit by the ball while they are beyond a sort of 'safe line'. Of course, if the ball came straight from the bowler and the batter misses it and it hits the wicket, it doesn't matter if he is inside of the safe line, he is still out.
      The bowler, when throwing, or 'bowling', the ball, has to keep his arm straight until he lets go. He can take a run-up, but he has to let go before he passes the wicket on the far side.
      Similar rules in regards to catching a ball hit by the batter before it hits the ground, if you do the batter is out. Similar rules in regards to balls which aren't thrown to the batter accurately, except for cricket they count every 'wide ball' as a run.
      There are two varieties of games, the fast-paced "50 overs" and the slower several-game matches. The slow games are finished when every team member (usually 11) have batted and are now 'out', after which it is up to the other team to try to beat the number of runs the first team got. So unlike baseball, which might have pretty even scores all the way through, in cricket the first team does all their batting, then the other team does all their batting. An "over" is 6 balls, so "50 overs" means that each team gets to face 6*50 balls and then they are out, although they can be out sooner if they run out of batters. Because of this the batters are often much more reckless and play a more aggressive game, trying to get maximum runs/ball instead of maximum runs/out. Typical scores in a cricket game might be 150 - 350 runs per team, although sometimes they get up into the 400s and obviously a hugely imbalanced match might result in even higher/lower scores. Theoretically, a non-over-limited match might never end if two good enough batters are batting.

      I think that covered most of it.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    14. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      Thanks, sounds like it would be a fun game to learn as a kid. I cheated and googled an explanation for Baseball, this is a 4 minute YouTube video with a cute girl explaining baseball...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYqCqZN5Dew

      Teams consist of nine players and take turns fielding and at batting, with the home team batting second.

      An inning consists of batters from each team taking their turn at bat until three batters are out. A game lasts nine innings, but is extended into extra innings if the scores are level.

      The fielding side consists of a pitcher, catcher, four infielders, and three outfielders.

      The pitcher throws overhand, using a variety of deliveries from a raised mound to the home plate - a distance of 60.5ft (18.4 m).

      An opposing batter attempts to hit the pitches and then get on base, while the fielders attempt to get the batter out through various plays.

      A batter who misses three legitimate pitches, or fails to swing at three judged hittable by the umpire, is out on strikes.

      But if the pitcher throws four pitches outside the strike zone, the batter obtains a base on balls, and gets a walk to first base.

      A strike is also called when the batter swings at a pitch whether it is deemed to be in the strike zone or not.

      A run is scored every time a batter becomes a runner and crosses home plate after touching each base in the prescribed order.

      When the fielding team gets their opponents' three batters (or runners) out, the teams swap roles.

      If the score is level after nine innings, play continues into extra innings until one team has scored more than the other in an equal number of turns at bat.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympics/baseball/3562135.stm

    15. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      Un-traveled American here. We have so much going on in our lives here, sometimes we forget that there's anyplace else, please forgive my naivety. I posted an explanation of baseball below the cricket explanation (below).

      Cheers, hip-hip, and all that rot to you, old bean. Cheerios! :^)

    16. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does England not have the room for a proper field

      Hilarious, because cricket grounds are *much* bigger than baseball grounds ;p

      Okay here is a deal: Explain me baseball, and I will explain you Cricket, because frankly baseball is totally whacky for me (not that cricket is any simpler, mind you...)

      In baseball the object is to iterate as many tokens as you can through a 4 slotted dequeue FIFO (implemented internally as a self referencing doubly linked list); Iteration run time is earned by the batting team by causing the hardest to solve ball sorting problems possible for the other team (most entropic ball state). The opposing team manages a counter labeled "Outs" initialized to 0 each "inning". If the counter is incremented to 3 the teams switch objectives, and a the out counter is reset. Each full iteration of a player though the buffer increments a team's "run" variable. The team with the greatest runs wins (typically by earning the most loop execution time).

      The team managing the out counter distributes themselves optimally around the field such that they'll be able to detect the ball's location within a short period of time -- AND -- so that they can sort the ball back to their prime ball holder, the "pitcher". To get a chance to increment the out counter (and thus eventually have their turn at bat, and increase their runs) the pitching team gives the batting team a chance to hit the ball (and cause the ball sorting problem). While the ball is being sorted player tokens can iterate through the FIFO buffer nodes (bases). Only one additional player can enter base queue per sorting problem created. The bases are allowed to be null (no players), and players can move in both directions around the loop.

      A pitcher must give adequate chance for the ball sorting problem to be created by passing the ball through a volume called the "strike zone" which is created by clipping the prismatic space above home plate to the vertical interval between the batter's knees and the midpoint in their chest. The midpoint is a point half way between the shoulders and top of the pants. Note: Creating an impossible planar strike zone by pulling one's pants down to the knee and bending at the waste to bring the shoulders in line is considered extremely rude "unsportsmanlike conduct". If the batter does not swing at a valid pitch then it is counted against them as a "strike". If the bat is swung at the ball and no valid sorting problem is created it is considered a strike whether the ball passed through the strike zone or not. If a batter accumulates 3 strikes it is converted to an out and their iteration is preempted. The pitcher may throw outside the strike zone to trick the player into leaping at an unfair starting condition, but if the player does not swing at such invalid pitches then they are considered unfit "balls", four such balls allows the player to automatically reach 1st base safely, and if occupied the bases will increment, possibly causing a run to be scored. This is called Walking, since there is no danger of being interrupted. Walks in the park are quite nice, but do not make for good games.

      A batter must cause a valid sorting problem with the ball within 3 attempts (swings) at valid pitches, or they lose their chance to enter the FIFO and the out counter is decremented. Valid sorting problems are those where the post-hit ball travel vector is within the area formed by rotating a ray extending from home through base 0 until it intersects base 3 (inclusive). If the valid ball is hit out of the park (or strikes the pole erected along the base lines to make the problem space visible, while above the fence) then the ball sorting problem is considered infinitely complex and the iteration queue can be emptied of all players actively in the FIFO buffer and they all count as runs -- This is called a home run. The ball sorting problem is considered too simple if the ball is caught from out of the air dir

    17. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Ah, typo bug in my description: s/decrement/increment/ -- the counters are never decremented unless they are being reset (or refs are in debug mode). This was an oversimplification anyway, not bad considering I haven't played the game in 20-odd years. Might as well take the opportunity to explain the "score glitch": A runner tried to make it to 3rd base, and another player took up residence on 2nd as the guy was chased back to 2nd base. The returning runner would have been safe -- It was up to the guy on 2nd to run back to 1st to maintain the order of the queue and 1 runner per base, but since he didn't he would have been out (considered between 1st and 2nd still -- bumped backwards in the queue by the returning runner). When the fellow who should have been safe on 2nd thought he was tagged out, he stepped off base, but then he realized the guy on 2nd wasn't in play anymore -- Not being able to return to 2nd due to the ball there, he rolled back to 1st base. A simple linked list would have handled this just fine: When they both arrived at 2nd, the guy there would have been considered as being in transit to 2nd, and when the tagger tagged them both, the score system would have marked the guy coming from 1st as out. When the safe runner made it back to 1st base without someone tagging him out, a simple linked list would have allowed this state change as well.

      I've got a sinking suspicion it was PEBSAC though, (problem exists between scoreboard and chair). Blame the computer when they mess up inputs. Doesn't seem like a very tough problem to solve. GIGO, as they say.

    18. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      WHOA! That's a..lot...of explanation

      (anybody got a tl;dr? ;p)

      Thank you for taking the time to explain this to an internet stranger, let me parse this, then I will ask any questions that I have.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    19. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      That was a good read, thanks for that!
      It would be nice if baseball could help revive the ideals of personal freedom...

    20. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Replying to undo a bad Troll mod.

      I was aiming for +15, Effin Awesome.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    21. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2

      WHOA! That's a..lot...of explanation

      (anybody got a tl;dr? ;p)

      This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains.

    22. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely brilliant. Only things missing from this masterpiece AFAIK are rules like the designated hitter and infield fly rule.

    23. Re:George Carlin: Baseball vs Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEBUG Mode Entered:
      >Players may iterate between nodes in both directions, but only under defined conditions would a player iterate in a retrograde direction. Iterating in a posigrade direction also has some limited restrictions relating to player being at Base 0 and prepared to enter the ball solving problem.
      >Bending at the waist would be unsportsmanlike conduct. Bending at the waste is unhygenic conduct.
      >If the batter loses their chance at entering the FIFO the out counter would be incremented, not decremented.
      >Infinite loop detected: No exit declaration - Only 54 total Out Counters are allowed to be incremented per game unless both sides have perfectly equal run variables, in which case cycles continue until there is variable imbalance along predefined inning conditionals. [Every baseball fan has been to games that seem to run infinitely, however, both before and after the 54 Out Counter Increment limit.]

  15. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll add that sometimes I think baseball only exists so that wannabe numerologists can get off on all the stats.

    Absolutely! And that's nerdy, and that's why this belongs on /..

    That play was one of the coolest things I've seen since Martin Prado flipped his bat away only to have it land on end:
    Bat lands on end.

  16. What is the Point of this Software? by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

    We are always going to need referees who know the rules of the game, so what purpose could this software ever serve?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:What is the Point of this Software? by tirerim · · Score: 1

      Record keeping. Did you think that it was all passed down as oral tradition?

    2. Re:What is the Point of this Software? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      What does a software package that scores a game have to do with record keeping.

      If you we were talking about record keeping we would be talking about storage, not software.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:What is the Point of this Software? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is the software that codes those records for storage. "Scoring" in baseball in this sense means compiling the records of what happened in the game, the kind of stuff you see printed in a newspaper box score and stored in game databases.

    4. Re:What is the Point of this Software? by muridae · · Score: 1

      Baseball scoring isn't just the two teams points at the end of the game. Take a look at a baseball scoresheet, it's not something that just records who got points when. Like football passing and rushing yards, receptions, completions, picks, sacks, etc, baseball records where each player ends up at the end of each play. It started simple, just tracking whether you hit a single, double, triple, home run, ground rule double, in field home run, and how many RBI for the batting team, and catches, outs, errors, strike/ball for the throwing team. It's way more complex than that now.

      If you thought the Blernsball scoresheet was complicated, you haven't looked at a real baseball one.

  17. Re:Actually, the problem is... by swilly · · Score: 1

    To quote professor Frink, "Baseball is a game played by the dextrous, but only understood by the pointdexterous."

    Unfortunately, I couldn't find a Youtube clip to link to. The episode is "MoneyBart" (Season 22, Episode 3).

  18. AND FOR THE REST OF SUMMER ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can all be bleacher bums, because, face it, it is baseball !! Strike !! Ball !! Swing (miss) !! ... Walk. Ground out. Fly out. Strike out !! Come on back, folks, we got 17 more of these !!

  19. Sure it can. Watch. * by leftie · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows what an asterisk is for.

    1. Re:Sure it can. Watch. * by swilly · · Score: 1

      To indicate that a record is somehow tainted, right?

  20. figgers it has to happen in a cubs game by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    figgers it has to happen in a cubs game when the cubs play odd stuff happens in the games.

  21. they should add more video replay when updating th by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they should add more video replay when updating the software.

  22. Better summary title... in Spanish by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    la seguridad por oscuridad

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    1. Re:Better summary title... in Spanish by TMB · · Score: 1

      Oh to have mod points... come on someone, read this one and think about it!

  23. Re:Actually, the problem is... by rockout · · Score: 1
    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  24. Baseball is statistics masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially if you don't play it.

    1. Re:Baseball is statistics masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that makes you the person who comes to Slashdot to watch folks masturbate?

  25. Re:Actually, the problem is... by tqk · · Score: 2

    ...that JimboFBX needs to get a life. It's fucking Baseball.

    The story is about the software used to score games. It appears to have a very difficult to surface bug.

    Apart from that, you're an idiot. It's a game of physics, hundred plus mile an hour fastballs through palmballs. It's Mike Scioscia "smallball" vs. the New York Yankees payroll. It's Spring training vs. World Series vs. World Baseball Classic. It's dirt poor kids in sandlots in the Dominican Republic or Venezuela making it to The Show and becoming national heroes. It's seeing Fernando Valenzuela playing against the Calgary Cannons, fighting his way back into the majors (he made it).

    Beats the crap out of shit like the NFL and NBA and there's no cheerleaders or glitzy half-time shows.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  26. Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Segura started trotting to the dugout before realizing that he wasn't out, Braun was, and his only option was to make it back to first."

    Sounds like he should be out automatically for trotting to the dugout and then going to first.

  27. Re:zzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really confused as to why this is "news". So some software doesn't support a feature? That's nice, I guess, but not very newsworthy.

  28. Re:zzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News is not written anywhere on this site, therefore anything is appropriate.

  29. Delivery by istartedi · · Score: 1

    If you haven't actually heard Carlin deliver this bit, it's merely interesting. I've heard him deliver it, and at least half the value is in his intonation. Dig up a link if you can find it. Left as an exercise to the reader.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  30. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Huh? So when is a nipple supposed to slip out of something? After all, that's why people watch that crap!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Re:Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepa by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    As someone else pointed out (and on the video), Segura stayed on the basepath.

  32. Re:Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a baserunner can be out if they're off the basepath, but Segura was still IN the basepath when he was trotting back to the dugout... and then was able to make it safely to first base when he thought he was out. The way a baseball infield is designed , the home team dugout is aligned on the right side of the field with first and second base, the visiting team is aligned on the left side of the field with second and third base. So trotting from second base to either dugout would have kept Segura within the ~6 feet wide basepath, although a baserunner can still safely go outside of the basepath depending on the situation, it's usually discretionary and the closest umpire will call the play (i.e. a runner going outside the basepath to avoid a fielder's tag would be called out for being outside the basepath, but another baserunner can go outside the basepath to avoid interfering a fielder fielding the baseball.)

  33. Re:Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepa by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    I know no one bothers to RTFA, but in this case if you WTFV you would have seen that Segura never was more than a foot or two off the base path at any time during this whole ordeal.

    He stepped slight inside the infield grass running back to 2nd, but still easily within the acceptable limits of the imaginary basepath, and he stepped a few steps off of 1st as if he was going to the dugout but was stopped by the 1st base coach.

  34. Base Case by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I had no idea you could go backwards on the bases.

    As a software engineer, I blame it on poor requirement documents and insufficient use case permutations.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Base Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't doubt that unless the software engineer was implementing a rules-based system, they would typically assume you would only go forward around the bases even if they knew technically you could go backwards.

  35. Re:Actually, the problem is... by camperdave · · Score: 2

    Sports is for jocks, the sworn enemy of nerds.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  36. Re:Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepa by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

    He never left the base path, therefor he can't be called out.

  37. Why is it a software problem or gap? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    It was stupid officiating by the umpires why would somebody assume that the score keepers or software would need to account for this? They should have correctly called them both out because they were both tagged presumably. I've watched the video but this is one of those where the officials f*d up situations. It's kind of like George Brett and the whole Pine Tar shimozzle... where they actually had to restart a game after the League office overruled the officials on the field. How do you score that one? 5-4 win for the Royals over the Yankees. I remember the vid of Brett coming barrelling out of the dugout after being called out.. It was a hilarious acting job. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrTYdlaqtxE

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Why is it a software problem or gap? by JonahsDad · · Score: 1

      It was stupid officiating by the umpires why would somebody assume that the score keepers or software would need to account for this? They should have correctly called them both out because they were both tagged presumably.

      Both were tagged when both were standing on second at the same time. By rule (7.03), the trailing runner is out.
      http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/official_rules/runner_7.jsp

    2. Re:Why is it a software problem or gap? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      So instead of being on first, he should have gotten second then I guess by reading that. Thanks for the clarification.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Why is it a software problem or gap? by JonahsDad · · Score: 1

      So instead of being on first, he should have gotten second then I guess by reading that. Thanks for the clarification.

      Based on the latest update, this is very accurate. http://espn.go.com/mlb/blog/_/name/stark_jayson/id/9196879/new-twist-milwaukee-brewers-shortstop-jean-segura-baserunning-madness Rule 7.01 (see above for link) states that

      Rule 7.01 Comment: If a runner legally acquires title to a base, and the pitcher assumes his pitching position, the runner may not return to a previously occupied base.

      Which the update article states should be interpreted as: Segura shouldn't have been allowed to go back to first, specifically because Segura was on second when the play started. Therefore, at the end of the play, Segura isn't entitled to first base.

      One could also argue that the comments about Segura being out of the baseline are accurate, given that he shouldn't have been allowed to go back to first.

      This all assumes that the new article has the correct rules interpretation. MLB hasn't stated their official position yet.

  38. Re:Actually, the problem is... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    It's a game of physics, hundred plus mile an hour fastballs through palmballs. It's Mike Scioscia "smallball" vs. the New York Yankees payroll. It's Spring training vs. World Series vs. World Baseball Classic. It's dirt poor kids in sandlots in the Dominican Republic or Venezuela making it to The Show and becoming national heroes. It's seeing Fernando Valenzuela playing against the Calgary Cannons, fighting his way back into the majors (he made it).

    Beats the crap out of shit like the NFL and NBA and there's no cheerleaders or glitzy half-time shows.

    To all that I simply reply, "Zzzzzzzzz". I feel the same about football and basketball.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  39. Play soccer* instead by PPH · · Score: 0

    Nobody needs to count anything other then goals. And that should only take a two bit field, at most.

    *Football, for all you non-USAians.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Re:Actually, the problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The news is you can crash the scoring software if you perform a move legal but bizarre.

  41. Re:Actually, the problem is... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    I'm not a baseball fan, though I can appreciate the sports difficulties having played my own fair share of sandlot games.

    Basketball I don't understand as a sport. Well, let me modify that. I understand basketball as a sport if played by people like me ... 5' 6" white guy who can't jump.

    I dont' see professional or collage basketball as a sport. Its a 'team' of people ... all of which can jump from half court and drop the ball in the goal without completely extending their arm to its full reach. Its like me calling it a sport as I stand over the trashcan and slam dunk spit balls.

    In case you haven't noticed the other sports though. Cheerleaders in pro's are pretty fucking ugly. Mostly past their prime women who haven't realized they haven't been hot for years, mostly just spackle (sorry makeup) covered dogs. College is only slightly better, there its the not completely used up whores doing it, still beat with the ugly stick, just a few years younger. Women who are actually hot don't have to become cheerleaders to get attention.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  42. The reason the software can't score it. by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

    The umps are wrong. Each runner has an entitled base. They are only safe at that base, and no others... If the runner behind you takes your base, you must advance to the next to be safe, you aren't safe anywhere else..

    The correct call, Seguro, not the runner from 1st, was out at second. The moment that runner touched 2nd base it was his, seguro's base became 3rd and he's out if tagged anywhere else on the field.

    This is very, very clearly spelled out in the rules of baseball. You can't run backwards, it's against the rules, and whoever supervises the umpires needs to pull that entire team in for review and suspension for blowing a series of calls that severely.

    1. Re:The reason the software can't score it. by russotto · · Score: 1

      The umps are wrong. Each runner has an entitled base. They are only safe at that base, and no others... If the runner behind you takes your base, you must advance to the next to be safe, you aren't safe anywhere else..

      Rule 7.01 states that "He is then entitled to [the base] until he is put out, or forced
      to vacate it for another runner legally entitled to that base."

      However, rule 7.03(a) states:

      Two runners may not occupy a base, but if, while the ball is alive, two runners are touching a base, the following runner shall be out when tagged and the preceding runner is entitled to the base, unless Rule 7.03(b) applies.

      7.03(b) applies when the following runner is forced, which wasn't the case; this was a steal. So the umps called it right.

      This is very, very clearly spelled out in the rules of baseball. You can't run backwards, it's against the rules

      I thought so too, but the baseball rules do allow for going backwards:

      Rule 7.02 In advancing, a runner shall touch first, second, third and home base in order. If forced to return, he shall retouch all bases in reverse order, unless the ball is dead under any provision of Rule 5.09. In such cases, the runner may go directly to his original base.

  43. For those of you scoring at home... by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    That play went 1-5-1-2-4

  44. he was out...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he should be out because he is tagged a second time WHEN OFF THE BASE after getting up....so it should have just been two outs

  45. Re:Actually, the problem is... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Billy Beane forever changed the game into a thinking man's vocation. Hitting, throwing, and running is still for jocks, but player value assessment has been taken over by the Bill James' school of thought. Check out the Baseball Abstract.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  46. Germany Schaefer by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1
    I'm surprised that this was allowed. Germany Schaefer was famous for stealing first base (from second base) and a rule was passed to prevent it.

    Although it was not passed until 1920, after Schaefer's death, rule 7.08i states that a player is out if "After he has acquired legal possession of a base, he runs the bases in reverse order for the purpose of confusing the defense or making a travesty of the game. The umpire shall immediately call “Time” and declare the runner out." It is often said that it was passed because of Schaefer's thefts.

  47. No head explosion here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I literally cannot understand the problem here. It's not against the rules, it is a game state that is possible and even though unlikely, that means it does not involve a logical contradiction. I didn't think the incident was whacky, outrageous, goofy, funny, or puzzling. It just was. I saw it, and though "huh. let's see what happens next". I mean this thing, it *actually* happened, so it's not physically impossible, and I can *conceive* the condition to be possible under the game rules, so it's not logically impossible, and just because some software didn't test for this case, it doesn't mean it can't be done.
     
    In fact, the simplest scoring software tracks the program by being reported to. I.e. Just tell it "someone is on second. that person is now on first". I know, because I wrote something like this in Qbasic when I was a kid. So don't tell me programmers heads exploded so much they can't figure out how to implement this condition. Do tell me that someone didn't bother to run tests to cover all possible conditions that can be generated if the game rules are allowed. Because THAT is what has happened here.

  48. sports with less walking/running than golf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    snooker, billards, darts, bowls, american bowling, ...

  49. Re:Aren't you out automatically if u go off basepa by JonahsDad · · Score: 1

    The way a baseball infield is designed , the home team dugout is aligned on the right side of the field with first and second base, the visiting team is aligned on the left side of the field with second and third base.

    In MLB, there is no requirement for home vs away dugouts. The Brewers' home dugout is by first base. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugout_(baseball)#Teams_and_ballparks_with_home_dugouts_on_the_first_base_side

  50. next question....who's on first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno - he's on second....

  51. Oh, yeah? by govett · · Score: 1

    Baseball software can't score what I did no Friday, either.

  52. Re:Actually, the problem is... by dwye · · Score: 1

    Sports is for jocks, the sworn enemy of nerds.

    But stats are for nerds, and no game is as stat-happy as baseball.

    And it is "Sports are for jocks," unless you are British, in which case, it would be "Sport is for jocks,".

    Now playing sports (except as part of required PhysEd courses) or enjoying the experience might be exclusively for jocks. That point is arguable. Rules lawyering isn't for jocks (except Wookies, who always win), as any DnD player will testify.