Wrong analogy is wrong.
"and then it would prepare another meal"
That involves labor, skill, and an understanding of the culinary arts -- arguably there is an added value, even if she doesn't swallow.
A correct analogy would be: Someone would order a meal, pay for it, and then it would put it in a replicator and then(s)he would give it to you.
They are making the device identify itself as an "iPod" in iTunes. That is a trademark violation. They are tricking iTunes into using Apple's trademarked name for their product.
Apparently this guy doesn't get what the problem is. Much of the illegal downloading be it music or TV shows occurrs because there are too many hurdles for consumers to jump in order to legally purchase the content.
Bullshit. We do it because we can.
Learn to spell.
Your argument is that people who create a more desirable product equate to someone stealing another person's work.
Creation of new products is wonderful.
Theft and distribution of another person's work is wonderful too.
Only one is morally correct.
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds more like Vista. Aero = Bad copy of Aqua Explorer = Bad copy of Finder
Wrong analogy is wrong. "and then it would prepare another meal" That involves labor, skill, and an understanding of the culinary arts -- arguably there is an added value, even if she doesn't swallow. A correct analogy would be: Someone would order a meal, pay for it, and then it would put it in a replicator and then(s)he would give it to you.
It seems God knows a lot about this technology.
Sure, like giving women the right to vote and freeing the slaves, you misogynistic racist.
I think the pose contributes to the look more than Photoshop.
They are making the device identify itself as an "iPod" in iTunes. That is a trademark violation. They are tricking iTunes into using Apple's trademarked name for their product.
The problem is we are paying for Formula 1 tech but getting a Ford Focus.
Here's a photo of the billboard. Ludowici Billboard
Deep roots in Africa, you mean...
Actually, I was waiting to see if Hurricane78 thought it was funny.
Bullshit. That wasn't my point. Learn to think.
I blame Enrico Caruso.
I am sure those arguments can be made. That is what trials are for.
Apparently this guy doesn't get what the problem is. Much of the illegal downloading be it music or TV shows occurrs because there are too many hurdles for consumers to jump in order to legally purchase the content.
Bullshit. We do it because we can. Learn to spell.
Both. Next question?
This is a site for nerds and losers. Your point will elude them. Post about pr0n and overlords in the future.
So when I steal everything you own, I assume you will just settle it in civil court? That's good to know...
Your argument is that people who create a more desirable product equate to someone stealing another person's work. Creation of new products is wonderful. Theft and distribution of another person's work is wonderful too. Only one is morally correct.
He is not being prosecuted for downloading a CD. He uploaded a CD before it was released. I am happy he did it, but your post fails....
The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.
I would have thought "Medusa."
"Jobs' health" is correct.
Why don't you log on to Facebook, it's great and I'm meeting up with all these people!