Slashdot Mirror


Sheriff Sues Craiglist For Prostitution Ads

Amerika writes "Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation,' according to Cook County, Illinois Sheriff Thomas Dart. He has announced that he's filing a lawsuit against the popular classifieds site. Craigslist says it's determined to prevent criminal activity." NewYorkCountryLawyer adds a link to the 28-page complaint (PDF), which "alleges that Craigslist maintains 21 classifications of sex-for-hire, coded as 'w4m,' 'm4m,' 'm4w,' etc." and that it has facilitated child prostitution and kidnapping and human trafficking.

695 comments

  1. w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like this game

    1. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      l0l

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    2. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by TheRedSeven · · Score: 5, Funny

      2g1c

    3. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      l4d

    4. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      H4M?

      Healthcare for musicians?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tib, tim!! M?!? T.. i.. S!!!!!!

    6. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by pohl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's hermaphrodites for Menage-a-trois

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    7. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think it's hermaphrodites for Menage-a-trois

      That would be '2in143'.

    8. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the one that makes it all work V4L

    9. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by clsours · · Score: 1

      I just lost the game.

      --
      Seagoon: Shut up Eccles!

      Eccles: Shut up Eccles!
    10. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

      Great now I have pretzel and spit all over my monitor.

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    11. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 2

      10g1c?

    12. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Y2K
      by Darlene McBride
      (Sung to the tune of Jingle Bells)

      Y2k, Y2K
      Armageddon's here
      Computers are all set to blow
      And blood will flow like beer
      Hey!

      Dig a hole
      And jump on in
      With canned food and a gun
      I don't plan to show my ass
      'til two thousand and one!

    13. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Orbijx · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is NOT Sparta.

      * Disregard if you are reading this from a location named 'Sparta'.

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    14. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's code for various genders in an orgy

    15. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know a couple of girls who can lick that up for you...

    16. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish personal sites would have sections for intersexed people. :(

    17. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by auLucifer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why stop at 1c? And oblig http://xkcd.com/467/

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    18. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      h2g2

    19. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by CecilPL · · Score: 1

      Not even on the chart.

      This chart, that is.

      Looks like 1g1c is the next most popular.

    20. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      I think it's hermaphrodites for Menage-a-trois

      That'd be H3M

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    21. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2g1c

      If you really want to mess with your head, locate 1g1c. I frikkin tops goatse. I'm still mad at my co-worker for that one...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    22. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      People make fun of Orwell's thoughtcrime, but the fact remains that there are things once seen that cannot be unseen. These things scar the viewer for life. It's best they are discussed only in general terms. Otherwise some thrillseeker might follow your obfuscated reference and be so harmed.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    23. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by anders.johansson · · Score: 1

      "y2k?" Is that when you complain about the price?

    24. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      r2d2. Did I get it right?

    25. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2g1c

      Two girls, one clown?

    26. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      no it's "Horse"

    27. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Mutant321 · · Score: 1

      2g1c

      Shortest ever post to get +5 Funny? :)

    28. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by splatter · · Score: 1

      OU812?

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    29. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by genner · · Score: 1

      H4M?

      Healthcare for musicians?

      I thought it was l33t for ham?

      Mmmmm l33t ham.

    30. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by adisakp · · Score: 1

      1m1j is much much worse than 2g1c.

    31. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by ildon · · Score: 1

      I think I saw that on a vanity plate the other day...

    32. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by anders.johansson · · Score: 1

      Tastes like chicken!

  2. So by pasha2891 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this going to get as far as the studios suing youtube?

  3. Prostitution? by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last week I ordered a hit out on a professor through craigslist. Sure the interface was ugly but service was delivered on time so I really shouldn't be complaining.

    1. Re:Prostitution? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure the interface was ugly

      Ah, so Craiglist's hopped on the Web 2.0 bandwagon finally?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Prostitution? by greg1104 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you think that interface is ugly, you should see the hookers.

    3. Re:Prostitution? by Edward+Teach · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO!

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    4. Re:Prostitution? by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Is that you Dr. Oppenheimer?

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    5. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Faggot.

    6. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having ordered whores on the craigslist, I think you have no idea how wrong you are.

    7. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HE is not the faggot, for YOU are the faggot!
      *proclaimed with finger in the air*

    8. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, that was your order?

    9. Re:Prostitution? by davidphogan74 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I found my stolen car on there, and had the local Fox affiliate cover it, so I shouldn't complaining.

      No BS, check the link from my homepage if you don't want to believe it.

      Go CraigsList!

    10. Re:Prostitution? by nametaken · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only on /. could you find people who think Craigslist looks BETTER than the Web 2.0 look. ;)

    11. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that interface is ugly, you should see the hookers.

      I'm seeing one right now, and her interface ... is ... quite ... delightfuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

    12. Re:Prostitution? by LuNa7ic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thanks a lot. Now I have to get this Sunkist off my keyboard...

      --
      *runs*
    13. Re:Prostitution? by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      You are lucky!. My Honda Civic was also stolen (the model just before yours) unfortunately she was never found.

      Seeing pictures of your car got me all teary eyed.

    14. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, between an ugly old lady and an ugly girl, I guess my choice is homosexuality.
      Conclusion: I only use Craiglist to have fun reading the sex stuff and looking at the pictures.

    15. Re:Prostitution? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've never met an ugly hooker. Plain, maybe, but not ugly. Who would pay to have sex with an ugly woman when you can get ugly ones in bars for the price of a draft beer?

      "Snake" (mentioned in a few NSFW journals) is the closest I know to an "ugly" hooker; she's the flattest chested woman I've ever met, but a bra stuffed with toilet paper fixes that. You're not going to know how flat chested she is until she's got her shirt off, and by then it's too late. And she has a hard time getting business, most guys she "dates" are shitfaced drunk first.

      It's like any other commodity, there's competetion. Ugly girls can't cut it as hookers.

    16. Re:Prostitution? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      It's like any other commodity, there's competetion. Ugly girls can't cut it as hookers.

      I don't think that could ever possibly be a true statement because different guys prefer different physical attributes.

      Case in point: there are plenty of BBW hookers who do a good business. But personally, I like skinny women, and think obese women are hideously ugly. It would be easy for me to look at the BBW hookers and ask, "How do you ever get a customer? I would not have sex with you if YOU paid ME!" But some men like their women super-sized.

      On the other hand, I've never seen the infamous Snake; but while I do not have a preference for flat-chested women, it is also not a deal-breaker for me. I could see how being flat-chested would make business kinda slow for her, though.

      I think for a lot of guys, half the thrill is "buying" the woman, so her level of attractiveness is not as important as it would be otherwise.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    17. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you see a hooker. You just show'em the tool

    18. Re:Prostitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BBQ!

  4. former state governor seeking stupid sheriff - g4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Illinois again I see we are talking about, after all. Maybe the sheriff in question is just upset because he can't get a cut of the local "action" if it's all happens online...

  5. dating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    uh oh, this is definitely going to hurt my dating game...

    1. Re:dating by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      It's not dating if you give the money to the girl directly, you know...

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    2. Re:dating by DustyShadow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yea. That's called marriage.

  6. Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Slumdog · · Score: 5, Interesting
    CNN did a piece on him, suing mortgage companies who were evicting homeowners: http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-109261

    Sheriff Dart has taken a stance against mortgage companies that are evicting renter's from homes that property owners are allowing to go into eviction. Sheriff Dart says, "Too many renters are being evicted for landlords' problems".

    1. Re:Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eviction means the act of forcibly removing someone from a property. Unless the home lives in a home it can't be evicted, can it? Repossessed OK. Someone along the line - either this corrupt prick of a sheriff or the dork who posted the story is seriously retarded.

    2. Re:Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      suing mortgage companies who were evicting homeowners ... Sheriff Dart has taken a stance against mortgage companies that are evicting renter's[1]

      Well whatever it is that serves you as a mind, make it up. Which are they?

      [1] Given that you appear to not have the faintest fucking clue what you're talking about, we'll leave aside the fact that you've ommittted the thing that a renter owns...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Slumdog · · Score: 1

      we'll leave aside the fact that you've ommittted the thing that a renter owns...

      Hey dude, i was just trying to score karma points. Can't you see?

    4. Re:Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he should look here first:

      http://www.eros-chicago.com/eros.htm

      http://www.theeroticreview.com/

      http://www.cityvibe.com/

    5. Re:Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And YOU are a fucking moron, because you hijacked the original thread.

      BAck to the slums where you belong, cum-slurper.

  7. Prostitution is not illegal... by EWAdams · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... where I live. So the Cook County Sheriff can lump it if he doesn't like it.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... where I live. So the Cook County Sheriff can lump it if he doesn't like it.

      And this has exactly what to do with him going after crime in his jurisdiction?

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    2. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      ... where I live. So the Cook County Sheriff can lump it if he doesn't like it.

      And this has exactly what to do with him going after crime in his jurisdiction?

      This is Slashdot man! Don't go bringing reality into this. What the hell were you thinking?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by nametaken · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's just grouchy since the Blues Brothers slipped through his fingers.

      Them, and those damned Illinois Nazis. I hate Illinois Nazis.

    4. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by BillyGee · · Score: 1

      Read the lawsuit, it says nothing about his jurisdiction other than to recount his submitted evidence. The sheriff is asking the court to grant a permanent injuction preventing Craigslist from "engaging in the conduct complained of herein". No mention of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, United States, etc.

      Further, in the next point, the lawsuit asks the court to order Craigslist to comply with federal, state and municipal laws related to facilitating prostitution. Fine and well, but what that would essentially mean is that for every country/state/city specific page that Craigslist has, they'd be required to specifically research what is allowed and what isn't. If you order them to do this regarding prostitution, why not regarding the sale of any service or good? After all, there are plenty of laws on the books regulating those as well, wildly different in different areas of the world/US/state.

      A silly example could be made - we all know the antiquated laws different bodies of law have on the books, or even some very specific small-town regulations. Say Madeuptown, Madeupstate has a municipal law preventing someone from owning more than 1 horse. If that person now buys 2 horses on Craigslist, it would follow that Craigslist is in violation of the court order brought on by sheriff's lawsuit (assuming he had won).

    5. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      He can use Craigslist to go after local criminals. He just shouldn't be allowed to get them to shut down a service that's legal elsewhere.

    6. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Since I moved here, I've been calling it the People's Republic of Illinois.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    7. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      And this has exactly what to do with him going after crime in his jurisdiction?

      Craigslist exist everywhere with net access not just in his jurisdiction.

      Falcon

  8. Prostitutes? by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you mean to say all those fine women I took out on dates from craigslist were hookers! I guess that would explain the black eye and lack of memory the next morning after I refused to let her "borrow" some money.

    1. Re:Prostitutes? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Funny

      That and the countless STDs.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services. Just because there's no sex doesn't mean that a service isn't erotic. Massages, BDSM (doesn't require sex), and Kama Sutra classes are some of the more frequent offerings on there.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    3. Re:Prostitutes? by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just want someone to bake erotic cakes in the nude.

    4. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the kind of stuff you mostly find on there. There are of course some more questionable postings, but mostly they're innocent stuff like private party strippers.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    5. Re:Prostitutes? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the point of erotic services without sex? That's like going to a restaurant just to smell the food.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet people flock to strip clubs to watch women dance and take off their clothes. Erotic Services with no sex are quite common.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    7. Re:Prostitutes? by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      So the Cook County Sheriff is upset that people are getting f**ked by lawyers?

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    8. Re:Prostitutes? by HuckleCom · · Score: 1

      That's probably why they take payment in some strange currency known as 'roses' ?

    9. Re:Prostitutes? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      For money you can often fuck them or the shooter girls.

    10. Re:Prostitutes? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I just want someone to bake erotic cakes in the nude.

      Just don't try to fry erotic bacon.

      --
      That is all.
    11. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      .... which are actually mostly legitimate legal services. ...

      In what imaginary land?
      As an example, check out the las vegas erotic services section:
      http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/ers/
      The closest to legitimate are the dozen or so asian massage parlors, and they are the sort of places that accept extra 'tips'.
      Plain and simple, the erotic services section, at least for las vegas, is 99% blatant prostitution.

      as a side note - I'm libertarian enough to think that prostitution should be legalized. That said, to say that craigslist doesn't have a significant amount of prostitution is factually untrue

    12. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, they go ONLY to watch, not touch. ...
      You do realize that many strip clubs have been busted for prostitution. Often strippers will take money for obvious sexual acts in so-called "VIP" rooms.

    13. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but that's a load of BS if I've ever heard it. Now, I'm not defending the lawsuit as I personally don't have a problem with it (if folks want to screw-&-rot that's their business) but as is, the erotic services section is FULL of prostitutes. Anyone who can read between the lines even a little can see that quite plainly.

      Sure there are some non-intercourse services listed but don't going blowing a fire-hose up my ass by telling me MOST of the ads aren't pay-for-sex. Cause, you know, escorts aren't prostitutes... *rolls eyes* ...good grief.

    14. Re:Prostitutes? by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, the rest of us here have only two... STDIN, STDOUT...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    15. Re:Prostitutes? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Funny

      And for when we're feeling adventurous and little dirty, we have STDERR. :-)

    16. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI since the charging now the CAS/x4x sections are filling with the prostitutes (once again!) since they no longer have the erotic services section to use.

      And AFAIK the whole shift to Erotic Services back in the early '00s were DUE to it starting to push into legit cas/x4x stuff and the users of those services requesting some other forum for erotic services to be spammed into.

    17. Re:Prostitutes? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      Not in any erotic services section of any US city that I've visited. Universally, the majority of the ads are for illegal services.
       
       

      Just because there's no sex doesn't mean that a service isn't erotic. Massages, BDSM (doesn't require sex), and Kama Sutra classes are some of the more frequent offerings on there.

      Which city is this?

    18. Re:Prostitutes? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Yet people flock to strip clubs to watch women dance and take off their clothes. Erotic Services with no sex are quite common.

      The difference being that if you actually touch the strippers, those large-muscled guys at the door will promptly come over and kick the living shit out of you. In a restaurant, you're allowed to have the food.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    19. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you lose your STDERR? Did she take yours too?

    20. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the rest of us here have only two... STDIN, STDOUT...

      You don't have STDERR?

    21. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe those are called Frostitutes.

    22. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa whoa, you forgot about STDERR!

    23. Re:Prostitutes? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Your forgot STDERR.

      Usually used for output, but if you put something in, it's probably an error.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    24. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget STDERR for the occasional bad meal

    25. Re:Prostitutes? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Yet people flock to strip clubs to watch women dance and take off their clothes. Erotic Services with no sex are quite common."

      Obviously, you are not going to the right strip clubs.

      Pretty much any of them I've ever been too...the girls will definitely do more for more money. The champagne rooms...you think those are for drinking expensive champagne???

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:Prostitutes? by cortesoft · · Score: 1

      see, the STDs occur when you try to pipe something in to the STDOUT

    27. Re:Prostitutes? by chrwei · · Score: 1

      not sure what "us" you are talking about, but the "us" I'm in has 3, STDIN, STDOUT and STDERR...

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    28. Re:Prostitutes? by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny
      You know what they call the guy who has everything, don't you?

      An incurable romantic.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    29. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unlucky catch STDERR...

    30. Re:Prostitutes? by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      which are actually mostly legitimate legal services

      Hm-m-m. What town do you live in? Check out SF or NY. Or Myrtle Beach. Or Miami. Or Dallas. Or Omaha. To list a casual sample...

      BDSM (doesn't require sex)

      You should tip more, it gets better.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    31. Re:Prostitutes? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Her black eye and lack of memory I hope ;)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    32. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think the majority of people going to strip clubs are going for more than the show? Regardless of whether or not illegal activities are going on behind closed doors, there's certainly plenty of people who just want a peep show.

      Besides... no matter what anybody tells you... there's no sex in the champagne room.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    33. Re:Prostitutes? by Migraineman · · Score: 5, Funny

      BDSM (doesn't require sex)
      You should tip more, it gets better.


      ... shouldn't it get worse?

    34. Re:Prostitutes? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      So the Cook County Sheriff is upset that people are getting f**ked by lawyers?

      I knew there was a reason I live in Cook County.

      It sure ain't for the gun laws.

    35. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um - you forgot about STDERR

    36. Re:Prostitutes? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Depends on the strip club. In some places, there *is* sex in the champagne room. You just need to cough up the coin.

    37. Re:Prostitutes? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that w4m was ever anything else other than targeted erotic services.

    38. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the club, really. I know of some clubs in S FL that do offer those services. A lot of things can be done without getting fully nude, BJ's/HJ's are quite common and some of the girls are usually available for "after-hours" parties or even parking lot romps.

      And no, not my type of thing, but who's to judge if it's 2 (or 3 or 4) consenting adults? Personally I'm a bit frightened of the things you can catch nowadays.

    39. Re:Prostitutes? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 5, Informative

      The stereotype annoys me too. I go to the clubs, and I'm personal friends with a quite a few dancers, and I've dated dancers. These girls aren't whores, and I've seen idiot customers make that mistake on many occasions. If you want to mistreat and mishandle the girls, it's not the bouncers you need to worry about. They're only going to toss you out on your ass; it's that dancer looking at you with the "fuck me" eyes, sexy smile, and the steel posted stilettos -- cause she's the one who's going to show you what she learned in kickboxing.

      Sex doesn't happen in the champagne/VIP room. And the expenses for getting back into the room *is* for house fee + champagne + whatever the girl charges for her time. It's a risky proposition for the club owners and workers to have sex on the premise. Not only that, it ruins the girls' legitimate hustle, and so it's not tolerated. A good customer can spend nearly a grand or more on a favorite girl. A $200 sex act by another girl risks that. Now, there are some clubs there sex happens on-premise. In my experience they have always been "one-on-one clubs" which aren't strip clubs in the traditional sense; or real dives -- the kinds of places where the two drink minimum comes with a free STD and you might get stabbed and robbed by one of the hookers working the crowd. Are there exceptions? Of course, but I've gone through more clubs than the typical slashdotter has linux distributions.

      And of course, there are some dancers who do "extras" but they take that business outside the club for the reasons I gave before. Strip clubs sell fantasy, and for most sensible people, fantasy is enough. Incidentally, I know more business school and law school grads who have done "extras" to make it at their workplace than dancers who have. And my former dancer girlfriend is an amazing woman with a better moral compass than most people I've met.

    40. Re:Prostitutes? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I once heard that the correct tempreture to ccok bacon is that where you can do it naked without getting hurt. (-:

    41. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly because with sex it is, for some unfathomable reason, illegal.

      "Selling is Legal. Fucking is Legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

    42. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plain and simple, the erotic services section, at least for las vegas, is 99% blatant prostitution

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

    43. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't found that to be the case very often. SOMETIMES, at some clubs, but not many. Strip clubs are too fixed in their location to misbehave too much - too easy for law enforcement to hang around and investigate.

      Note: I know very well how to find the more illicit services and do use them from time to time, but they're usually not in strip clubs.

    44. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just all working their way through medical school right?

    45. Re:Prostitutes? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Where the hell do you live? Atlanta's ers is loaded with prostitutes. Err, women/men/trannies selling time to spend with them and any sex that happens is a decision between two adults. Erotic services is a digital spot on the corner for prostitutes. Sure there are legitimate services as well but don't lie about what is on the site.

    46. Re:Prostitutes? by 87C751 · · Score: 1

      What about STDPRN? (sometimes pronounced STDPR0N)

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    47. Re:Prostitutes? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      ROFL...you fallen into the trap of believing anything a stripper tells you. I'm sure they said that they love you and think you're cute too haha...

      It's all about money. If you show up with the cash you can buy anything you want. Period.

    48. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      I think I see whats going on here. Most slashdotters can't comprehend the idea of spending that much money and not getting f**ked. They can't understand that some people pay for nude massages because the fantasy turns them on, not because they're going to get sex. Making the mistake that if you just need to tip more in the sex industry will either result in you being out more money needlessly, or getting your arse kicked.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    49. Re:Prostitutes? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      those large-muscled guys at the door will promptly come over and kick the living shit out of you

      Ah, I knew there had to be some kind of kinky sex involved at some point.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    50. Re:Prostitutes? by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Yes, well she may be stellar, but most dancers are borderline sociopaths with drug habits and daddy issues. Trust me, my sister danced for quite a while, and I've been through some clubs too.

    51. Re:Prostitutes? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      At least you still have your kidney.

    52. Re:Prostitutes? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      And of course, there are some dancers who do "extras" but they take that business outside the club for the reasons I gave before. Strip clubs sell fantasy, and for most sensible people, fantasy is enough. Incidentally, I know more business school and law school grads who have done "extras" to make it at their workplace than dancers who have. And my former dancer girlfriend is an amazing woman with a better moral compass than most people I've met.

      Um, pond scum has a better moral compass than your average lawyer/business school grad. I'd think that your average hooker does as well. My complaint is that its illegal rather than regulated. If properly regulated, then it should be fairly safe business transaction. Those dancers may be selling fantasies, but hookers see the realities. Now, if it's moral business transaction is a completely different thing, but back to one. Your average business/lawyer school ain't very moral either; they've just got some college behind them.

      That sounds like the start of a great joke, an MBA, lawyer, and hooker go to a strip club, what's the dancer's punch line?

    53. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a little of the old STIN, SDOUT...

    54. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol ... no sex. Your town's craigslist section sucks.

    55. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* vip room *cough*

    56. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well she may be stellar, but most dancers are borderline sociopaths with drug habits and daddy issues. Trust me, my sister danced for quite a while, and I've been through some clubs too.

      do you and your sister offer any extras? if so, pm me

    57. Re:Prostitutes? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      Or tasting wine without drinking it!

      Wait...

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    58. Re:Prostitutes? by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      All in the eye of the beholder...

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    59. Re:Prostitutes? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      These girls aren't whores

      If a girl is exchanging her modesty for money, that makes her a whore.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    60. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private party strippers are, almost without fail, hookers.

    61. Re:Prostitutes? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      The difference being that if you actually touch the strippers, those large-muscled guys at the door will promptly come over and kick the living shit out of you.

      You watch waaaaay too much TV.

      I have touched strippers, and have never had any interference from any bouncer. And I'm not talking about touching her elbow, either. The worst I've ever had happen to me was to have the girl tell me that if I wanted to (ahem) take her temperature, I would need to purchase a private dance.

      It helps to know before you go which clubs offer "extras". God bless the internets.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    62. Re:Prostitutes? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's right to say "most" There's still many dancers out there I haven't seen yet. But yeah, I know a lot of these sociopathic ones too. And I've been told the stories from my GF about girls tanking up throughout the day or doing drugs. Makes you wonder if it's the job itself or just them. The most sociopathic strippers I've ever met are the ones who have been doing this gig for going on a decade. They know the ins and outs of the financial side of the business and could teach a college course on it. If you ever go to stripperweb.com, there's a lot of dancers like that there. They're mostly burn-outs in my opinion. Let's face it, if they had another marketable skill that was in demand, they'd be doing that rather than risking house fees on a piss poor thursday day shift.

      But again, I've known many, many chicks with daddy issues, some that were druggies, and many that were sociopaths. Of course, I call them college freshmen. ;-)

    63. Re:Prostitutes? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Not me personally, but that's a risk that happens to many guys. The key thing to remember is that if she's seeing you off-hours, and taking days off, and living a normal life with you, and going to do normal things with you, and you're having normal discussions about the mundane things couples talk about; then she's for real. There is what's called "the hustle", and I've met some good hustlers that can really make you think you're special; but they're selling fantasy, and you're buying. That's my original point. It's fantasy, not actuality. Thus, assuming that just any stripper with perform a sex act for you cause she likes you or cause you'll tip better, is wrong.

      Yes, strippers are on autopilot when they're on the stage and circling the room. But they are human beings. It's like this chick I met today working the counter at McDonald's. She's a McDrone sure, and do I believe she really would like me to have a nice day? I doubt it, but I know she's a person capable of honest human emotions.

      Hell, even a computer scientist can show honest human emotion on occasion, so can't a stripper? *ducks*

    64. Re:Prostitutes? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      I was kinda hoping for "insightful" or "informative" moderation. [sigh]

    65. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG. I use it all the time. Does it... make me a pervert? But I didn't know...

    66. Re:Prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      So the Cook County Sheriff is upset that people are getting f**ked by lawyers?

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      So the Cook County Sheriff is upset that people are getting f**ked by lawyers?

      Cook County Sheriff is jealous because regular guys have money to spend on Erotic services-to help stimulate Obama Economic plan!!!!His wife is too fat and ugly........I can double down on this #1!!!

  9. Here we go again by meist3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another dipshit that doesn't know how infrastructure is supposed to work and what the internet is. Child prostitution ... according to American law that would include 20 y/o with 11 months and three weeks on the clock right?

    When did this idea emerge that you can sue a infrastructure for what is happening on it? This concept is new to me and doesn't make any sense. Next they'll be suing the newspapers for ads that enable people to engage in casual sex. About time someone did something about this.

    1. Re:Here we go again by meist3r · · Score: 3, Informative
      Little aftertought, after reading the ars technica update I believe this is about money.

      The Cook County Sheriff's Department is asking a federal judge to close the Erotic Services section of Craigslist, as well as reimburse the department $100,000 it has cost to pursue Craigslist-related prostitution investigations over the past year,

      Someone needs some bail-out money reaal fast. Too bad the hookers and pimps didn't pay their protection money and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business.

    2. Re:Here we go again by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone needs some bail-out money reaal fast. Too bad the hookers and pimps didn't pay their protection money and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business.

      Sounds about right. It's as if chat forums, bulletin boards, and even the regular classifieds in the newspaper hadn't been used for this purpose for *years*.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:Here we go again by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      ...and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business

      No, no you have got it wrong. These are tubes ruining your business ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    4. Re:Here we go again by derrickh · · Score: 1

      He's suing because Craigslist is seemingly encouraging the use of its service for illegal activities by having categories that are almost exclusively used for prostitution.

      Craigslist says they are doing what they can to stop the service from being used to traffic in women/men, but yet they have sections dedicated to it.

      Its as if Ebay had a specific areas for weed, cocaine, and heroin.

      D

    5. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21 to drink. 18 to sleep with. We're puritanical, but we don't make you wait that long.

    6. Re:Here we go again by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      There's an expectation that people will make reasonable measures to prevent crime. This is nothing new.

      If you have an organisation that exists entirely for criminal activities, then you can expect to be prosecuted as an accessory, and while you can often claim ignorance, there will be a highly skilled prosecutor trying to prove beyond reasonable doubt (and extremely unlikely explanations are not reasonable doubt) that you did knowingly assist.

      Not that I think Craigslist is doing this, but this is the basic principle this prosecution falls under.

    7. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newspapers don't have a dedicated prostitution section, do they?

    8. Re:Here we go again by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Age of consent in the US depends on the state, generally 16 to 18. I don't know if the same age standard applies to prostitution.

      This guy is an arrogant, sanctimonious prick posturing for the religious right and the "won't somebody think of the children" crowd. The Yellow Pages if full of "Escort" ads, and have been for years. If he were pursuing all forms of prostitution advertisement, Yellow Pages included, he would still be an arrogant, sanctimonious prick, but at least he'd be treating everyone the same.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    9. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, they have a section dedicated to "Erotic Services" which doesn't equate one-to-one to prostitution at all. For example, you can easily imagine strippers advertising there. Now, it's not *surprising* that prostitutes advertise there, but they also advertise on streets and no one sues the city for it.

      And they CERTAINLY don't have sections dedicated to human trafficking. At least not on my city's page. What city are you in!?

    10. Re:Here we go again by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its as if Ebay had a specific areas for weed, cocaine, and heroin.

      Ahh, I found my new Happy Thought ;)

    11. Re:Here we go again by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Phonebooks do.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Here we go again by sorak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Little aftertought, after reading the ars technica update I believe this is about money.

      The Cook County Sheriff's Department is asking a federal judge to close the Erotic Services section of Craigslist, as well as reimburse the department $100,000 it has cost to pursue Craigslist-related prostitution investigations over the past year,

      Umm...Shouldn't the police force be paying craigslist? Craigslist didn't create the prostitution. They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

    13. Re:Here we go again by westlake · · Score: 1
      Child prostitution ... according to American law that would include 20 y/o with 11 months and three weeks on the clock right?

      More proof that the geek doesn't have a clue about the realities of the sex trade in children.

      Chronicling The Plight Of 'Very Young Girls' [Feb 24, 2009]
      Very Young Girls

      The FBI found more than 2,800 child prostitution ads posted on craigslist, with Chicago, Illinois, in the top 10 cities for juvenile prostitution, Dart said.
      Craigslist entered into an agreement with 43 states' attorneys general in November to enact measures that impose restrictions on its Erotic Services section. The agreement called for the Web site to implement a phone verification system for listings that required ad posters to provide a real telephone number that would be called before the ad went public.
      Craigslist also imposed listing fees, requiring a credit card, for ads in the section. The proceeds were to be donated to charity.
      Dart called the fees "dirty money" and said the move was a "publicity stunt" that had little practical effect because pimps use stolen credit cards or post ads in free sections.
      Lawsuit accuses craigslist of promoting prostitution

    14. Re:Here we go again by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      Mod parent up.

      Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.
      New school: Login in to www.craiglisst.com from the comfort of the squad room, set up a date, make arrest. Rinse, repeat.

      That douchebag Sheriff should be thanking them for making it much easier for him.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    15. Re:Here we go again by skelly33 · · Score: 1

      I would think 17 years, 11 months - if you can be tried as an adult, you should be allowed to live like one.

    16. Re:Here we go again by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      New York city has had runaways being grabbed for prostitution for decades (and some just voluntarily taking up that profession), way before Craigslist. It will continue to have a problem with or without Craigslist.

    17. Re:Here we go again by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      This guy is an arrogant, sanctimonious prick posturing for the religious right

      Oh, and you were doing so well, too. Chicago is one of the most leftist cities in the country. Sorry, but the religious right are far outweighed by all the lefties there. Ever notice how often the Mayor of Chicago has been a Democrat?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    18. Re:Here we go again by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Buffalo's Artvoice has ads that look awfully like prostitution ads. They're more amusing than anything else, and help pay for this great weekly paper.

      I never really cared about prostitution though. It should be legal, but it's never appealed to me. If you have to pay for it, what's the point? And if it's just the physical sensation, I can take care of that on my own, thankyouverymuch.

    19. Re:Here we go again by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The agreement called for the Web site to implement a phone verification system for listings that required ad posters to provide a real telephone number that would be called before the ad went public. Craigslist also imposed listing fees, requiring a credit card, for ads in the section. The proceeds were to be donated to charity. Dart called the fees "dirty money" and said the move was a "publicity stunt" that had little practical effect because pimps use stolen credit cards or post ads in free sections."

      What exactly is Craigslist supposed to do about this? You'd think it was actually makeing life easier for the cops. If someone uses a stolen credit card to list their ad that should be a pretty big flag for the cops to set up a sting for that ad. If something very illegal wasn't going on they wouldn't have used a stolen card for the ad. I really don't see what more Craigslist is supposed to do other than shut down a service which is used legitimately a majority of the time. Its not the job of Craigslist to enforce the law!

      Cheers,
      Greg

      P.S. On a side note I don't know how Craigslist is going to continue to stay in business and not start charging for more listings they way they're always getting sued. I'd like to know what percentage of their costs are legal bills. I bet its way over half.

    20. Re:Here we go again by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Umm...Shouldn't the police force be paying craigslist? Craigslist didn't create the prostitution. They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      That just makes too much sense.

    21. Re:Here we go again by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      Finally, a good use for augmented reality rigs!

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    22. Re:Here we go again by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      Its as if Ebay had a specific areas for weed, cocaine, and heroin.

      oh wow,dude......could you psot theyou are el?

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    23. Re:Here we go again by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      I apologize. When I posted, my synapses were not awash in a sufficient quantity of beer to fire properly, and I inserted the wrong political base.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    24. Re:Here we go again by Kjella · · Score: 1

      When did this idea emerge that you can sue a infrastructure for what is happening on it? This concept is new to me and doesn't make any sense.

      More or less always, but it would depend on the nature of the infrastructure. A drug tunnel and a drug mule are in some ways similar to the US highway system and the US postal service, but there are also very significant differences. Willful blindness like "I don't know what they were bringing through" or "I didn't ask what I was carrying" just isn't going to make you all innocent. It works for the post office worker though, it really comes down to whether a "reasonable man" would have reason to believe he was pariticpating in or facilitating a crime.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    25. Re:Here we go again by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      That's absurd. "Erotic services" can range all over the place, and do not have to involve sex, or payment. There are many things that could be categorized as "erotic services", all of which are perfectly legal. BDSM sessions and stripping or exotic dancing come to mind.

      If I own a building and advertise it as a place where people can show up to trade things -- sort of a bazaar or flea market -- you can bet that at least a few of the people who show up will be looking to deal or score drugs. Does that mean that I, as the owner of the building, am responsible for that?

      Of course, the bigger question is why prostitution is illegal in the first place, but that's perhaps another gripe for another time.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    26. Re:Here we go again by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Child prostitution ... according to American law that would include 20 y/o with 11 months and three weeks on the clock right?

      No. Not right. Wrong. 21 is the cutoff for alcohol consumption. 18 is the age one becomes an 'adult' in America and can work in 'adult entertainment' such as topless dancing, pornography, and prostitution (in the limited areas where that business is legal). It's sad to see such clueless moderation.

      Seth

    27. Re:Here we go again by FlyingBishop · · Score: 0, Troll

      Craigslist facilitated prostitution. Just because someone in Chicago is willing to pay to sleep with someone living in Southern Wisconsin does not mean that this event will occur.

      Craigslist ensures that anyone in the greater Chicago area has unfettered access to anyone looking to provide these services. This is a far cry from some hooker standing on a street corner, and far easier to get away with.

    28. Re:Here we go again by rwyoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      That feature will be in the next rev of Google Streetview.

    29. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... according to American law that would include 20 y/o with 11 months and three weeks on the clock right?

      I take it you are not from "America". Did you mean 17 y/o ?

      When did this idea emerge that you can sue a infrastructure for what is happening on it? This concept is new to me and doesn't make any sense.

      Did you read the article? The "Erotic Services" in CL is basically nothing but prostitutes: "30 minute for 75 kisses". I'm sure they literally must mean "kisses".

      Next they'll be suing the newspapers for ads that enable people to engage in casual sex. About time someone did something about this.

      And I take it you are equally uneducated about CL. They already have a "Casual Encounters" section for basic personals with the intention of sex. Of course it is filled with nothing but spammers whereas the "Erotic Encounters" section is filled with poor whores (to be blunt).

    30. Re:Here we go again by Feanturi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Craigslist isn't just a truck you can dump a bunch of hookers on.

    31. Re:Here we go again by neBelcnU · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am SO sorry, clearly you've not been there (Chicago & its Metro area) in the last 2 decades.
      1) Wheaton, a burb, is a college town. An evangelical college town. It is one of the scariest places I've ever seen.
      2) Naperville, a burb, is the largest city in Illinois, physically gigantic, but obviously diffuse. It is almost universally conservative.

      You are correct about the mayor, but the distribution of conservative vs. liberal is sadly quite strong the wrong way. The election outcomes tend to depend on who gets out the vote, which depends on so much more than machines, fraud or money. Trust me, the random guy you meet on the street? Don't bet he's a liberal anything, much less a Democrat.

      I do not necessarily defend the GP's position, I think the sheriff's motivations are more simplistic, probably self-aggrandizement. But counting on Chicago, Cook County, or the entire metropolitan area as "liberal" is a huge mistake, and one made by liberal politicians at their peril.

    32. Re:Here we go again by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      But Craigslist keeps competing with the sheriff's wife, son, and poodle. He's just trying to shut down the international competition and avoid his family being outsourced by businessmen from Taiwan.

    33. Re:Here we go again by unitron · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation,

      'Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.

      Yeah, you'd think they wouldn't bother going after Craigslist after the failure of their earlier lawsuit against street corners.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    34. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the good Sheriff would understand the absurdity of liable infrastructure if someone sued him for allowing prostitution to occur in his city.

      It's a bit like suing roads for enabling people to speed.

    35. Re:Here we go again by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Umm...Shouldn't the police force be paying craigslist? Craigslist didn't create the prostitution. They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      No, he's upset because craigslist makes the problem obvious. They want it to stay in the shadows so that they can ignore it and not work all day. As long as citizens can complain and file reports, then they need to investigate. They may even be forced to arrest some of their best friends and favorite girls.

    36. Re:Here we go again by KORfan · · Score: 1

      I think they declared themselves an independent fiefdom years ago. They don't owe any allegiance to the Democratic party. They owe allegiance to the machine. I'll certainly agree that the mayors aren't part of the religious right, though.

    37. Re:Here we go again by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      Launching tomorrow: weedBay!
      Or whenever I get around to it...

    38. Re:Here we go again by unitron · · Score: 1

      "30 minute for 75 kisses".

      Only 24 seconds per kiss? That doesn't sound like very much fun.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    39. Re:Here we go again by jackchance · · Score: 1

      Someone needs some bail-out money reaal fast. Too bad the hookers and pimps didn't pay their protection money and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business.

      I think you hit the nail on the head.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    40. Re:Here we go again by jackchance · · Score: 1

      mod parent up : insightful AND funny

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    41. Re:Here we go again by jackchance · · Score: 1

      actually, a lot of local rags are filled with phone sex and escort services.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    42. Re:Here we go again by plover · · Score: 1

      The news said that our local police read Craigslist and bust the guys who hook up in a park down by the river. That's the way law enforcement should deal with these illegal activities: bust them when they happen. End of story.

      --
      John
    43. Re:Here we go again by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      True, although they do have a wide selection available for purchase.

    44. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the dotcom days I was involved in a business 2 business auction company. One customer requested reverse auctions so they could get their suppliers to fight for the right to sell them parts to make silicon with. That got us thinking that we'd make a huge fortune with a reverse auction drug dealing site. I want X amount of this drug @ quality, who's got it cheapest.

      We never figured out how to do such a thing legally, or at least through enough fronts to launder the money. Shame really, we wouldn't have needed the venture capitalists then.

    45. Re:Here we go again by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. That's like saying that the war in Iraq was a good thing because it concentrated terrorists in one spot. It created more terrorism just like Craigslist has created more prostitution. Before a girl had to hit rock bottom before becoming a whore (literally). Now they can do it behind their husband's back.

      I think you really misunderstand the purpose of law enforcement. It's not a business where "the more prostitutes we put in jail the better." It's a service where the less prostitutes which exist the better. If they're arresting whores left and right they don't pat themselves on the back because it means they've failed to keep the crime in check.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    46. Re:Here we go again by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      If I own a building and advertise it as a place where people can show up to trade things -- sort of a bazaar or flea market -- you can bet that at least a few of the people who show up will be looking to deal or score drugs. Does that mean that I, as the owner of the building, am responsible for that?

      Depends. If it was in Cleveland in the mid to late 90's, yeah, the city would sieze the property in a heartbeat, board it up, tear it down, then sell it to some developer who had his hand up one or more Councillman's ass.

      Your mileage may vary...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    47. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, although they do have a wide selection available for purchase.

      query=flatbed, huh? Is that trucks or hookers?

    48. Re:Here we go again by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      How can you justify your existence and expand your power if someone makes your job easier? The sheriff can't exactly ask for more money next year and more officers if he can get the job done with fewer, can he? :)

    49. Re:Here we go again by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      ssshh... don't say anything, they aren't good at math and the number sounds big. :P

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    50. Re:Here we go again by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait...

      Can we have a section specifically for doing lines of coke off a hookers ass?

      I could easily scratch that off my lifelong to-do list!

    51. Re:Here we go again by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.
      New school: Login in to www.craiglisst.com from the comfort of the squad room, set up a date, make arrest. Rinse, repeat.

      Better School: Expend police resources on *real* crimes instead.

    52. Re:Here we go again by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Recently in Phoenix, a prosecutor made a charge that asian massage parlors that were performing sex work weren't committing a victimless crime because the money from the sex work was often going to drugs and smuggling operations. To put it in context, many escorts alternately advertise themselves online as providers of erotic massages, and many work out of established massage parlors. And specific to asian massage parlors is the problem of human trafficking and sexual slavery. The smuggling talk was in reference to the problem of gun running. Maybe Illinois will try to accuse the Craigslist and the Internet of facilitating drug running since it's well-established that prostitutes spend their money on drugs and smuggled guns. :D

    53. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bid sniping has a whole new meaning...

    54. Re:Here we go again by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, thats a thought.

      *Goes of to register dbay.com*

      Imagine the feedback section. (-:

    55. Re:Here we go again by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      I can take care of that on my own, thankyouverymuch.

      Redundant, you're posting on Slashdot....

    56. Re:Here we go again by gustep12 · · Score: 1

      That's right. The article implies that because of Craigslist, prostitution has come under much closer scrutiny than before, to the tune of $100k/year in Cook County alone. Some would call this a success.

    57. Re:Here we go again by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. That's like saying that the war in Iraq was a good thing because it concentrated terrorists in one spot. It created more terrorism just like Craigslist has created more prostitution. Before a girl had to hit rock bottom before becoming a whore (literally). Now they can do it behind their husband's back.

      s/Craigslist/Emancipation/

    58. Re:Here we go again by Zemran · · Score: 1

      So they spend $100,000 on hookers "in pursuance of the investigation" and now they want their money back? What total cheaparse bums.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    59. Re:Here we go again by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      It's definitely about the money. City/County/State budgets are tight and Obama isn't taxing businesses fast enough so why not just sue business directly.

    60. Re:Here we go again by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      I would have thought "Medusa."

    61. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that Cook County is corrupt?

      That's unpossible!

    62. Re:Here we go again by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Dude if you think Wheaton is one of the scariest places you've ever seen, you lead a sheltered life.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    63. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is precisely because I haven't that I do.

    64. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Future school: Legalize it and tax it, problem solved.

    65. Re:Here we go again by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you'd think they wouldn't bother going after Craigslist after the failure of their earlier lawsuit against street corners.

      Thank you for that!

  10. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whoah, I thought those pages were just the ugly and the desperate. Man, if they're hookers, they're a whole new underclass of hookers I don't have any desire to experience. :-(

  11. I honestly did not know this. by Forge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks to this sheriff, those of us seeking prostitutes or running brothels know that Craig's list is the place to be.

    "Thank you sheriff for helping improve my business. Keeping all the young ladies on staff as busy as they can physically manage is great for business, especially in these tough economic times.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:I honestly did not know this. by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

      I agree, this lawsuit will only trigger the "Barbara Streisand Female Impersonator" Effect.

    2. Re:I honestly did not know this. by hey! · · Score: 1

      "Thank you sheriff for helping improve my business. Keeping all the young ladies on staff as busy as they can physically manage is great for business, especially in these tough economic times."

      Tough economic times?. Doesn't she mean that she is grateful that the sheriff's stimulus had caused her business to expand in hard economic times?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  12. All consentual sexual relationships are... by kannibul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All consentual sexual relationships are a form of prostitution when you get to the basics of it...be it money, food, protection...

    What about the wife that won't have sex with her husband until he does some chore?

    Isn't that prostitution?

    1. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by antibryce · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've been chasing that mythical chore for years. It doesn't exist, it's just a trap to get you to do all the yardwork.

    3. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      I agree. Imagine if you just dropped 150 bucks on a hooker and she says, "Na, I've got a headache.".

    4. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      Well I don't think either is reasonable, but maybe that's just me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chirs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK..."

      Do you really think that this is a "standard" in society? I'd like to think it isn't.

    6. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Where I live, prostitution is a normal, regulated service industry.

    7. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Funny

      The solution is to check couples for marriage certificates at the entrance of the restaurants.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    8. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Expecting men to pay for dinner and not get anything in return isn't reasonable either. Split the check and you avoid this whole issue.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK

      Nah, actually, it's not. In fact, it's kind of sad. If all it takes is a dinner--even a nice dinner--then why would she put out for you? Your employer gave you the money to spend on it, and they got that money from their customers. The chefs cooked it and the wait staff served it. You're just a cog; a replaceable middleman in the transaction. And apparently, not a very exciting one if the reason you think you're getting laid is because you have a little scratch to spend.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    10. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess. You don't get laid much.

    11. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good lord, no. You "expect" as in anticipate, not require, your date to "put out" because that is frequently the end result of a romantic evening with someone you've been romantically involved with for some time, and the date in question qualifies and the mood is right. Anything else and you're just a pig. Which is, in a way, a social standard or stereotype, but a negative one, not OK.

      Though I guess before I sound too high and mighty, I did laugh my ass off at the Family Guy spoof of the DeBeers silhouette ads with the implied bj and the tag line "Diamonds: She'll pretty much have to." Yes, we men buy things for women with the hope that it'll get us laid. But to "expect" in the sense you meant where it's equivalent to prostitution? No.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you get is a pleasant evening out with a lady. If "reasonable" to you means that you will receive sexual recompense for your outlay of dinner expense, then maybe you should just skip the dinner and buy a prostitute. They are imminently reasonable in that sense.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the other way around: Buying an expensive dinner for some chick you aren't *already* sleeping with is total chump behavior and something you should avoid doing at all costs.

    14. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "If all it takes is a dinner--even a nice dinner--then why would she put out for you?"

      This sounds like a "we know what you are, we're just negotiating the price" argument.

    15. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After my latest divorce I calculated the cost per encounter on the short marriage and discovered that a craigs-list hooker would have been significantly cheaper! Next time, I'll just rent it instead of buying it!

    16. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      That certainly wasn't my intention. I was just illustrating that if the gentleman's value-add was just that he bought a nice dinner, he's no different from anyone else who might be able to afford a dinner.

      It's one thing if there's sex because both parties desire it. But if one is expecting it because he bought dinner and the other is doing it because of the dinner, well, that doesn't say much about either party.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    17. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      What about the wife that won't have sex with her husband until he does some chore?

      Isn't that prostitution?

      No. It's a marriage that's in trouble. He only does chores for her so that he can get laid, and she only has sex so that she can get chores done by him.

      Sounds like a miserable relationship, if you ask me. And maybe the reason why so many marriages end in divorce, now.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    18. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Kneo24 · · Score: 0

      No, it's not entirely unreasonable. How often have you heard, or known girls who go out, get drunk, fuck the first guy who talks to them after they're completely annihilated, yet won't have sex on the first date, even if the guy was nice enough to prepare a wonderful evening?

      Men expect these things because we see women doing it in other avenues. The whole "not in the right state of mind" excuse is bullshit too. People are rather capable of saying "no" when they're that wasted. Instead they just choose not to. If a man is going to take his time to show actual effort and you agree to it, there should be some compensation. At the very least play the role of the cock tease and dry hump for a bit. Do something...

    19. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant? Is that the point? No. If she expects me to pay, I expect something more than just conversation in return. I can have pleasant conversation with friends who don't ask me to pick up the tab.

      The point is that equality requires a change in social customs. Right now, the social customs are designed for a woman being unable to get income for herself. But since that's not the case anymore, they are outdated.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    20. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but will that hooker clean your house and cook your dinner?

    21. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by marnues · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with your sentiment, but why are you trying to apply economics to dating? Dinner is about a lot more than eating and paying, something I think you and economics have a lot to learn about.

    22. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mcsporran · · Score: 1

      "Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK..."

      "Hi Dad ! I'm in JAIL !!!"

      These two statements are much closer than the poster suspects.

      --
      This is NOT a signature.
    23. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I don't think either is reasonable, but maybe that's just me.

      No, that's ALL homosexuals.

    24. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Split the che.... What?

      Honey, I can go to dinner by myself.

      Come to think of it...

    25. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      No, but neither did my ex wife.

    26. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      As George Carlin (RIP) said, "If selling is legal, and fucking is legal, why isn't selling fucking legal?"

      --
      Be relentless!
    27. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you get is a pleasant evening out with a lady.

      You act like girls don't want to have sex. Do you know how badly most of them would love to skip the phony dinner and go straight to bed... but guys like you make them feel ashamed so they need stupid rituals to validate the affair.

      Then you deprive them of any excitement by paying for dinner without strings attached, still on the thesis that she doesn't want cock, and shouldn't.

      Then you wonder why she went home with "that guy"... really she was only too happy to make some "gentleman" pay for her meal, and then ditch him for what was truly on her mind.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    28. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Shhhh. That's illegal. What you should do is go on craigslist and find a nice gurl who will show U what others girls wont! 100*roses for full dinner NO greeick food!

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    29. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You don't get laid much.

      Why the fuck are you saying this on slashdot?

    30. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant?

      Actually, the reason you pay a hooker is so she'll go away in an hour.

    31. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do wives still do that? I though the husband worked all day and it was the wifes job to bitch at him to do the yardwork and "help" around the house.

    32. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by tabrnaker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not going so good with the ladies eh?

      Perhaps if you start viewing woman as, you know, humans, and not masturbatory tools, you'll fare better. You might even realize that sex isn't the best thing they can provide you.

    33. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      I think Chef made the case for what makes a prostitute different from a non prostitute.

      "No, you don't pay her to stay, you pay her to leave afterwards." - Chef

    34. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is why prostitution is legal in the netherlands... you know, with everyone going dutch.

    35. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Space_Pirate_Arrr · · Score: 1

      What you get is a pleasant evening out with a lady.

      And she gets a pleasant evening out with me.

      So why should I pay for dinner again?

    36. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he thinks that an evening out with him is nice and fun too?
      He's not the only one getting a good/service here, she is as well, and signed on willingly.

      Both can pay for their share of the fun.

    37. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? What can you get from a hooker at the price of a dinner? A handjob?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    38. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      What about the wife that won't have sex with her husband until he does some chore?

      Isn't that prostitution?

      In Ohio, that would technically be prostitution. Ohio only requires that the sex be in exchange for "anything of value". Chores are certainly something of value.

      "Prostitute" is also defined in a way to not exempt a spouse. Have fun prosecuting that, though.

      However, on the husband's side of the ledger, if the wife makes the offer of sex for mowing the lawn, that is solicitation. That could raise an eyebrow from many an overzealous DA.

    39. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by metlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's why I start with the drinks. Buy a few shots of cheap tequila, and you're groovy.

    40. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      The whole "not in the right state of mind" excuse is bullshit too.

      Yeah, but not for the reason you claim.

      She knew at the outset that her drinking would cause her judgment to be impaired. She accepted that when she started drinking in the first place.

      She created the situation that lead to her impairment. Therefore, she should shoulder the responsibility for anything that occurs because of the impairment.

    41. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You don't get laid much.

      Why the fuck are you saying this on slashdot?

      He's new here. Cut him some slack already so he can really fuck up.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    42. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, the social customs are designed for a woman being unable to get income for herself. But since that's not the case anymore, they are outdated.

      But that's only one of the customs...there are others. Ten-to-one, women will spend more on clothes, hair, makeup, nails and other things that many men expect them to pay for. If splitting the check is an outdated custom, shouldn't the customs around how women make themselves attractive to men change as well?

    43. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      What about the wife that won't have sex with her husband until he does some chore?

      Isn't that prostitution?

      Please tell me you're running in the next election? You'd have my vote.

    44. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seriously, what are you going to do? Call the police?

    45. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      To make things even more confusing, consider pornography. Basically, you're paying a woman to have sex and let you tape it, which is legal.

    46. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Where do you eat dinner? McDonalds? Is a special night out Taco Bill?

      When I go out to dinner, the average bill for a two-up is $100 or so.

    47. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I must not be making myself clear; the only reason I'm applying economics is that the parent poster to my original post was doing so, and I am taking it a step farther to show how wrong it was.

      The original quote I took umbrage with was this: Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK... The bold emphasis here is mine because the implication of that expectation is that the sex is being paid for by the dinner. Even if the guy acted like a true gentleman, a real romantic, did all sorts of non-economic things to impress his date, the expectation of sex in return is debasing it to a commodity for exchange.

      It's not to say that people don't do it. I just don't choose to feel that it's acceptable behavior. I'm just about to have a son, and I'm going to do my best to teach him that he should never feel that he's entitled to get sex from someone regardless of what he's done, said or spent.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    48. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      But you still get the headache from the math!!!!

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    49. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Mod way up. This doesn't deserve a '0'.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    50. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      What kind of restaurant do you go to to end up with a $100 bill? You can take a family of 5 to a 3 stars restaurant and not spend that much..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    51. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't pay a prostitute for sex. You pay for her to go away afterwards.

    52. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You talking Washington DC and lawyers, right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    53. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you get is an *opportunity* to convince the lady that you are desirable. If you want the date to be a straightworward business transaction, stop whining and find a prostitute.

    54. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mqduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think most consensual sexual relationships are the result of people liking sex.

      --
      Property is theft.
    55. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, expecting sex because you bought her a nice dinner is not OK.

      Thought you might like to know the female point of view. If you internalize this information,
      you'll get more repeat dates.

    56. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      You always pay someway.

    57. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often have you heard, or known girls who go out, get drunk, fuck the first guy who talks to them after they're completely annihilated, yet won't have sex on the first date, even if the guy was nice enough to prepare a wonderful evening?

      Not too often. And why would you want to consider such girls in the first place, and their oh so confusing behavior? How about stick to the nicer ones and have a pleasant date that may or may not end up physically depending on both the guy's mood and the girl's? Oh wait, this is slashdot..

    58. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod parent up. It's so effin' true. There are still a lot of vestiges of the Victorian mindset, and all they do is create the negative feedback loops that keep psychotherapists in business. People need to be honest about what they want, both with others and themselves, and go about getting it in a responsible way. If nothing else, that's how I'm going to raise my daughter. At least I can break the cycle.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    59. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      lol seriously. That's base price around here (Seattle), and you can easily triple it at Canlis, quadruple it at Lampreia. However, I had better be taking Denise Milani to dinner for that.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    60. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      No, actually, this mindset allows you do to very well. You realize who to not waste your time with.

    61. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't get out much.

    62. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      You bring up a valid point, however people are still capable of making somewhat rational decisions when they are drunk. It comes down to whether or not they choose to.

    63. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Informative

      These. Now crawl back into your cardboard box. 3 stars? Please, only if they're Michelin stars.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    64. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by incer · · Score: 1

      Well, there's another custom that already changed: in the past men didn't need to look attractive as much as we do now... So if I have to be attractive, why wouldn't she?

    65. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      foreplay == chore;
      yardwork == chore;
      yardwork == foreplay;
      QED

      AC - since I am actually married.

    66. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      women will spend more on clothes, hair, makeup, nails and other things that many men expect them to pay for. If splitting the check is an outdated custom, shouldn't the customs around how women make themselves attractive to men change as well?

      A husband and wife were having a discussion about the family finances. They both agreed that it was high time to cut back on spending. The wife says "Yoou spent $20.00 on beer last week." The husband said, "Yes, but you spent $85.00 on make-up!"

      The wife said, "Why dear, that was so I could look attractive for you."

      The husband replied, "That's what the beer was for!"

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    67. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      You're not paying her for sex, you're paying her to leave after sex.

    68. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Where do you eat dinner? McDonalds? Is a special night out Taco Bill?
      When I go out to dinner, the average bill for a two-up is $100 or so.

      Where the hell are you getting raped at? I want city and place names so that I can put them on my never visit black list.

      I can go out for a family of four in the nicest place in town and still pay under $30. One of the reasons that we switched to nice places was that fast food was getting close to that price for a family anyway.

      I don't see what your complaint against Taco Bell is. In high school and most of college, Taco Bell and Subway were the best places to take a date. The only time more expensive places make sense is if you have money to burn. Girls that like wasteful guys may be impressed, but you'd be surprised at how many would rather have the money spent else where.

      Hey, I may be wrong, you may be able to lay out $100 for a date every night like I lay out $30 for family eating out every night. Most folks don't have that much income to be throwing around though.

    69. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      What A CROCK. What you're saying is that women are only good for sex. It is crap like this that makes men look like PIGS. You are a TURD.

      Thanks, but shut up now ... please!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    70. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You act like girls don't want to have sex.

      No, I'm acting like expecting that you are trading dinner for sex is chauvinistic.

      If she's into it, go for it. If she's not, acting like you got jipped means you're an asshole and should go hire a prostitute if you want an explicit barter.

      If there are "strings attached" then you think you're hiring a hooker. The absence of strings does not mean the absence of sex. What the fuck is wrong with people around here?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    71. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      No, it's not entirely unreasonable. How often have you heard, or known girls who go out, get drunk, fuck the first guy who talks to them after they're completely annihilated, yet won't have sex on the first date, even if the guy was nice enough to prepare a wonderful evening?

      Two wrongs don't make a right, and two unreasonables sure as FUCK don't make a reasonable. Yeah, sometimes the woman goes home with the prick who gets her drunk at a club instead of the nice guy who takes her out for a romantic dinner. Wow, people can exhibit irrational behavior, what a shock. If you think that makes "I bought you dinner so now you have to fuck me" reasonable, then you're off your fucking rocker.

      The whole "not in the right state of mind" excuse is bullshit too. People are rather capable of saying "no" when they're that wasted. Instead they just choose not to. If a man is going to take his time to show actual effort and you agree to it, there should be some compensation.

      Now you're just being fucking creepy. No wonder you're so fucking frustrated, you can't even get the girl who really is after the "nice guy" cus that sure as fuck ain't you, Capn Date Rape.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    72. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The cheapest sex I ever had cost me a draft beer. The most expensive cost me a house, a car, and part of my pension.

      What I want to know is, why is it legal to fuck my congressman's wife, but only of I don't pay her?

    73. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      You don't pay for sex, you hire her to have sex on video for some reality porn. Then it's legal, and a tax deduction to boot! Everybody wins.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    74. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [cue a million geeks asking where you live and when they can come visit]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    75. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by eth1 · · Score: 1

      You act like girls don't want to have sex. Do you know how badly most of them would love to skip the phony dinner and go straight to bed... but guys like you make them feel ashamed so they need stupid rituals to validate the affair.

      Then you deprive them of any excitement by paying for dinner without strings attached, still on the thesis that she doesn't want cock, and shouldn't.

      Then you wonder why she went home with "that guy"... really she was only too happy to make some "gentleman" pay for her meal, and then ditch him for what was truly on her mind.

      Damn, no mod points.

      Hell, most healthy women probably want sex MORE than men do, believe it or not. Unfortunately, most men don't understand this, and don't know how to get them turned on.

      Ironically, if you cave to an expensive meal, you prove that you can be manipulated, which is NOT attractive to a woman and actually decreases your chances of sex with her.

    76. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant? Is that the point? No. If she expects me to pay, I expect something more than just conversation in return. I can have pleasant conversation with friends who don't ask me to pick up the tab.

      LOL, did it take a lot of effort to fail to understand that badly? You ask a woman out on a date, and she accepts. She wasn't going to be hanging out with you if you didn't, if she's not already your friend, she's someone who was flattered by your interest and may be interested in return. That's the deal, a date, not a fuck-date. You go to dinner in order to find that out, to see if there's going to be anything more than dinner. There may be, there may not be (for example when she finds out what kind of chauvinist you are and what kind of woman you think she is), or there may be nothing more than the intent to go on another date in the future.

      If you expect that you're necessarily going to get more than that because you paid for dinner regardless of whether by the end of the night she'd rather hump a mule, then hire a fucking prostitute where that is in fact the deal you're getting, including her hiding her revulsion.

      The point is that equality requires a change in social customs. Right now, the social customs are designed for a woman being unable to get income for herself. But since that's not the case anymore, they are outdated.

      And you think the new social standard should be "If I pay for something, you owe me sex". Like I said, get a prostitute, and if society looks down on you then fight against that standard. Though most prostitutes that aren't complete crack ho skanks with AIDS (i.e. the kind of girl you'd ask out on a normal date) cost more than dinner at the fucking Olive Garden. So not only is the new "standard" that all women are hookers, it's that they're cheap hookers.

      Yeah, it's really hard for me to imagine why at the end of the date, the woman goes home without giving you your "due".

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    77. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly. So not only do all these pricks think that asking a girl out on a date and agreeing to pay for dinner means the girl should be their hooker, it means they think they should be cheap hookers.

      And for no reason, they're angry and upset because they never get any. Gee, maybe because the "nice" guy who is actually a complete creep isn't actually that great a catch, and this is obvious by the time dinner is over. Oh but how dare the cock tease decide they aren't worth it. They paid for dinner!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    78. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant? Is that the point? No. If she expects me to pay, I expect something more than just conversation in return.

      You don't seem to understand business. If you expect sex in exchange for dinner, you need to establish at least a verbal contract beforehand.

      Let's say I give a random stranger a bunch of flowers. Is it reasonable for me to expect him to help me with my tax return in exchange? No, because I didn't establish that exchange with him first.

      Before you go on a date, agree with the lady first about how much and what kind of sex a, say, $50 dinner buys. Then she won't assume it's a gift and you won't be disapponted at the end.

    79. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I can go out for a family of four in the nicest place in town and still pay under $30. One of the reasons that we switched to nice places was that fast food was getting close to that price for a family anyway.

      Applebee's is the nicest place in your town or what?

      Seriously though, link the site for your nice restaurant where a family of four can go and eat for $30. We'll be the judge of how nice it is.

      I'm not the OP but if you'd like I can link you to 50 restaurants in Seattle where a $100 bill is not out of the question for 2 people.

    80. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I think consensual sexual relationships can be prostitution, but I don't think it's necessarily so. FWIW, I think actual prostitution should be legal, so this isn't any squeamishness on my part talking.

      I would not, for instance, consider my relationship with my wife to be prostitution. We both work and provide for the family, we both share in the household chores. When we have sex, it's generally for the purpose of mutual satisfaction.

      If you think that's prostitution, then I think you are defining the term too broadly.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    81. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only that, but you CAN pay her to have sex with someone else if you film it! Hell, you can pay her to have sex with you if you film it. It's completely retarded.

    82. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Victoria, Australia.

    83. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Though most prostitutes that aren't complete crack ho skanks with AIDS (i.e. the kind of girl you'd ask out on a normal date) cost more than dinner at the fucking Olive Garden

      I think if you give serious consideration to all costs involved and run the numbers, you'll find that prostitutes compare favorably with traditional relationships in terms of cost.

      Try keeping track of it sometime, how much you spend on a girl before she'll have sex with you. And compare that with the cost of an attractive prostitute ($150-$250).

      Even funnier is if you keep track of it over time. My wife and I have what I consider to be a healthy sex life, but if I had to add up everything being in the relationship cost me (including kids) and divide that by the number of times we have had sex, the result would definitely suggest that hiring prostitutes instead of getting married would have been a sound financial decision.

      Remember, if it flies, floats, or fornicates, rent, don't buy. It's cheaper in the long run.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    84. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      For someone who rants about reading comprehension, you sure lack some. There are two possible alternatives when I say that the current custom of the guy always paying for dinner is outdated. Either the woman does more than eat and talk (which does include more than just sex, btw), or the woman pays for her part.

      I wasn't aware I had to spell that out.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    85. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Either the woman does more than eat and talk (which does include more than just sex, btw)

      Yeah no shit, and you either meant that to include the promise of some kind of sexual act like the person I first replied to explicitly did, in which case what I said applies, or you didn't intend to include the promise of sexual acts, in which case it falls under the category of "pleasant evening with a lady", i.e. a date, that you failed to understand in the first place.

      Yeah the woman could pay her part, that's obvious. What you need to spell out is what exactly is this "more" you talk about when you say "If she expects me to pay, I expect something more than just conversation in return" in the context of this discussion. What do you expect? What does she have to do to make you feel like you got your money's worth, huh? A game of Parcheesi?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    86. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Who caves? I don't know, maybe I'm just a gourmand, but I have tastebuds too and I've never taken a woman to restaurant I didn't want to go to myself. (At least not until I was married.)

      However I seriously doubt that odds of 'putting out' are increased by fast food. It is possible to be masculine and authoritative without being cheap.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    87. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ER, you do not know it not really OK to expect your date you put out just because you choose to buy dinner, right?

    88. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't.

      How about this, copulation or having sex with someone you're not married to has also been illegal. In those places having sex with your date would be illegal unless you two were married to each other.

      Fslcon

    89. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Where I live, prostitution is a normal, regulated service industry.

      Which is as it should be. Voluntary exchanges between willing individual adults that harm no one else should not be illegal!

      Falcon

    90. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      Two wrongs don't make a right, and two unreasonables sure as FUCK don't make a reasonable. Yeah, sometimes the woman goes home with the prick who gets her drunk at a club instead of the nice guy who takes her out for a romantic dinner. Wow, people can exhibit irrational behavior, what a shock. If you think that makes "I bought you dinner so now you have to fuck me" reasonable, then you're off your fucking rocker.

      Now you're just being fucking creepy. No wonder you're so fucking frustrated, you can't even get the girl who really is after the "nice guy" cus that sure as fuck ain't you, Capn Date Rape.

      In your hurried douche bagged replied, you're missing a key point. People tend to exhibit irrational behavior all the time and use excuses to make up for it. Why are they allowed to have that pass all the time? If you set in a situation where you're always exhibiting irrational behavior, well, people are going to expect it.

      You're also missing another point, when I mean sex, it doesn't actually have to be sex. Everyone requires some sort of return on their investment in a relationship. If the time, effort, and money invested into the relationship doesn't net you something, why bother?

      It doesn't have to be sex, it doesn't have to be second base even. Yeah, sure if the person is outright creepy, you probably don't want to waste your whole evening with them, however once you do, if you can't muster some sort of physical gratitude, it sends a lot of mixed signals, and most of them are usually the wrong signals.

      A lot of women are the type to string a guy along just because they're an easy source of free alcohol, meals, or whatever else. (And if you went out into the real world more often, you would see this.)

      I have seen many good friends fall into these traps time and time again only to get very little out of it. Let's see you waste your hard earned money, your valuable time into trying to develop something with who you thought was a nice woman, only to turn out she was more interested in using you and giving very little in return.

      The problem is that a large portion of the population doesn't know how to play the game very well. This is why they fall into these traps and get used. Once you learn how to play the game, you will have an easier time getting somewhere. You will learn who to and who not to waste your time on so you can get exactly whatever it is you're looking for.

  13. Not Craiglist's fault by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just because he found his wife in the w4mmmm section doesn't mean he can get all sue-happy:)

    1. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Funny

      One more 'm', and that would have been funny.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by Valiss · · Score: 1

      DVDA?

      --

      -Valiss
    3. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Do you realize -- considering the number of suitable orifices -- that two of those m's would have to be m4m's, and one of the others would have to be an m4*?

    4. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

    5. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by base3 · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that the Pigeonhole Principle doesn't apply in this domain?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    6. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? The bitch has hands, doesn't she?

    7. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Flying albatross - 1w5m. Triple penetration plus she jacks off the other two. Allegedly she will look like an albatross in flight.

      I only know because I ran an Assassins game where every code name was sex term: donkey punch, hoover maneuver, wolfbagging, etc.

    8. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by Doshin · · Score: 1

      Two more and it would have been a train!

  14. Just in: Sheriff sues computer maker by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Sheriff sues computer maker based on that they enable people to search Craiglist for prostitutes.

  15. Streets Department by booch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they should probably go after the Streets Department first. Prostitutes have been using the streets to solicit prostitution for centuries. And I'm almost certain that there are more prostitutes using streets than using Craigslist.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Streets Department by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to be fair, streets department rarely designate streets as the place to go if you want sex.

    2. Re:Streets Department by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      Not mine. Mine usually use hotels by the hour...

    3. Re:Streets Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the hooker business really has moved online. Craigslist gets 100s of ads per day in the bay area, somewhere around 1000 per day. There's no way that many street walkers are on the street.

      There are other dedicated websites too, CL just gets a ton of traffic.

    4. Re:Streets Department by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, streets department rarely designate streets as the place to go if you want sex.

      Of course not, that would create traffic jams.

    5. Re:Streets Department by nametaken · · Score: 1

      We can't even hold IDOT (not kidding) responsible for the truck-sized holes in our roads that we pay tons of tolls to keep in good shape. You want us to go after them for prostitution?! ;)

    6. Re:Streets Department by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Craigslist is making money from prostitution, the Streets Department isn't. If he's going to sue one or the other, he might as well go after the profiteers first.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    7. Re:Streets Department by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The third party contractors who now do a great deal of street maintenance ARE making money from the potholes in the street.... isn't that kindof the same thing?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  16. frivolous lawsuits: even the government files them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a new motivational poster:

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    [picture of Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart]

    Government approved

  17. Suing the telcos next? by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With Craigslist being a free service for anyone to post ads, isn't this somewhat like suing the telcos for allowing anybody to staple posters to their poles? (You in the back there, stop giggling!) I've seen those being used to peddle all kinds of stuff, from bicycles to kittens. Clearly they should be forced to moderate their telephone poles, right?

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
    1. Re:Suing the telcos next? by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a lot of precedent on this. I think the term for a telco in this context is a "clear channel" provider or something like that. Basically, they do not provide any sort of editorial or policing on their traffic. If you pay your bill and there's no legal reason to block a given call, you can make the call.

      I don't know how CraigsList is edited, but if there is any staff dedicating any time whatsoever--even seconds per month--to editing community messages, then they move from being "clear channel" providers to "publishers" or some such, and they are responsible for content.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:Suing the telcos next? by lordkuri · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the term for a telco in this context is a "clear channel" provider or something like that.

      The term you're looking for is Common Carrier

    3. Re:Suing the telcos next? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Grrr. Thanks. I'm clearly getting old.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    4. Re:Suing the telcos next? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I think the term for a telco in this context is a "clear channel" provider or something like that.

      Telcos have common carrier status, maybe that's what you're thinking.

      Falcon

    5. Re:Suing the telcos next? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      That is indeed the term I was trying to think of. Thank you.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  18. If you like Piña colada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using news print for sex is quite old.

  19. ByHisLogic by shareme · · Score: 2, Informative

    By his logic we should be able to sue his ass for past abuse of prisoners by his own sheriff department right? Oh BTW Cook county has had in its past the worst corruption record of any county Sheriff in the nation

    --
    Fred Grott(aka shareme) http://mobilebytes.wordpress.com
  20. That settles it by aztektum · · Score: 1

    I'm going to bring a lawsuit against every city and citizen of those cities that has active prostitutes on the streets. Afterall it's their tax dollars that created and maintain those streets, thus giving a place for prostitutes to congregate and "work".

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  21. no offense to the sheriff... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    but...
    am I the only one who finds this thing a bit amusing and ironic that the name of the Sheriff who's "jumping" to conclusions is "Dart"?

    maybe that's what his wife, ex-wife, and/or latest date said also...

  22. You think the Sheriff would love Craigslist... by jwhitener · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After all, it nicely lists all the sex providers for him to go after.

    Of course, that would be a lot of work for him. So I can understand his desire to secure society by making the location of sex providers obscure ;)

    1. Re:You think the Sheriff would love Craigslist... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      The hilarious part is demanding the $100k back he spent investigating prostitution complaints. Obviously if Craigslist didn't exist, he wouldn't have spent the $100k because he'd be ignorant of the prostitution going on.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:You think the Sheriff would love Craigslist... by kevinT · · Score: 1

      I think he wants his $100,000 back because all the people contacted through Craigslist (by his department) didn't get arrested or prosecuted!!!

      They were smart enough to post on Craigslist, they were smart enough to avoid the police, and he DIDN'T like that!!!

    3. Re:You think the Sheriff would love Craigslist... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's just Thinking Of The Children. After all if there are no ads for child sex, no children will have sex, didn't you know that??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Looks like I wont die a virgin after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Sheriff Thomas J. Dart!

  24. why stop there? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    why not the state Department of Education for teaching people how to read those ads?

    1. Re:why stop there? by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      They still do that? Sure couldn't tell by the teens working around town. Almost as bad at reading as they are at math, and people are trying to cut standardized tests because they're "too hard" for the poor kids to pass. Nowadays it's about getting them through school, making sure the school's funding doesn't get cut, and trying not to crush their self-esteem by allowing them to fail. You never know when some kid who makes Forrest Gump look like a genius is going to sue you for "mental anguish" or some other cop out because they couldn't cut it in school.

    2. Re:why stop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not the state Department of Education for teaching people how to read those ads?

      Because at least they seem to be solving that problem on their own...

  25. Not a source by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prostitutes exist with or without Craigslist; it is not a "source" and it does not create prostitutes. They'd be out walking the street if Craigslist didn't give them somewhere safe to advertise. I'd much rather keep them on the web than on my sidewalk.

    1. Re:Not a source by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Oh there are plenty on the streets of Chicago if you know where to look. Always have been, and the intertubes hasn't changed that. ...erm, not that I would know.

    2. Re:Not a source by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I'd much rather keep them on the web than on my sidewalk.

      Because you are on the web more, right?

  26. Hey Sheriff... listen to Chris Rock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey sheriff, you don't get laid in the champaign room.

  27. missing option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w4w

    1. Re:missing option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it's not missing.

  28. when did singles sites become... by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when did singles sites become the target of prostitution crack-downs? just because craigslist has a "personals" section means that it is solely for prostitution? does this mean that _everyone_ on there is soliciting or seeking prostitution?

    there is clearly a double standard toward craigslist and every other way to meet new members of the opposite (or same) gender. whether this is a double standard or not is irrelevant, this must be stopped; these pathetic knee-jerk "omg protect teh chrilden!1!!" is making me sick, it's everywhere

    1. Re:when did singles sites become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I believe that there's also an "Erotic" section over under "Services". That seems to point more strongly to an exchange of cash. My guess is that Craigslist has a pretty decent excuse there in that the term "erotic" doesn't necessarily mean prostitution. (There are strippers, massages, and so forth which are not, in general, illegal and would probably qualify.)

    2. Re:when did singles sites become... by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Informative

      The erotic services section in Craigslist is very clearly geared towards prostitution. Almost every ad offers "full service" and sets out rates as "donations." The photos are usually of nude or scantily clad women. The services they offer are usually vernacular for specific sex acts. The vast majority of the ads there are for prostitution or reviews of prostitutes.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:when did singles sites become... by inviolet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The erotic services section in Craigslist is very clearly geared towards prostitution. Almost every ad offers "full service" and sets out rates as "donations." The photos are usually of nude or scantily clad women. The services they offer are usually vernacular for specific sex acts. The vast majority of the ads there are for prostitution or reviews of prostitutes.

      Indeed. The Sheriff is correct that craigslist is carrying ads that any reasonable person would conclude are for prostitution. For sure.

      The question is, what are the Sheriff's real motivations? Law-enforcement crackdowns on prostitution are spotty at best, so why this, why now?

      The primary motivation against prostitution comes from females, who loathe it like all businesspeople loathe competition. These days success in business comes easiest to those who seize the law to ban their competition, and women-in-general have done exactly this.

      To put it another way: the presence of legal prostitutes will increase what your female partner is willing to do in bed.

      Given this, all male attacks on prostitution must be some attempt to curry favor with females. Or they've got a bad case of the Jesus.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    4. Re:when did singles sites become... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      when did singles sites become the target of prostitution crack-downs? just because craigslist has a "personals" section means that it is solely for prostitution?

      Have you ever actually been to a Craigslist site? The 'personals' are for singles, the 'services/erotic' is for prostitutes - two separate sections.
       
       

      does this mean that _everyone_ on there is soliciting or seeking prostitution?

      In the 'services/erotic' section - pretty much.
       
       

      there is clearly a double standard toward craigslist and every other way to meet new members of the opposite (or same) gender.

      No, that's not clear at all - given that Craigslist has a dedicated section specifically for escorts and prostitution.
       
       

      these pathetic knee-jerk "omg protect teh chrilden!1!!" is making me sick, it's everywhere

      The knee jerk reaction here is from someone who has plainly a) never actually visited Craigslist, and b) didn't bother to read TFA.

    5. Re:when did singles sites become... by dcam · · Score: 1

      The primary motivation against prostitution comes from females, who loathe it like all businesspeople loathe competition. These days success in business comes easiest to those who seize the law to ban their competition, and women-in-general have done exactly this.

      That is unfair. Women could loathe prostitution because it cheapens all women, not because it provides them with competition. In fact I'd say that isn't unfair, that is insulting.

      --
      meh
    6. Re:when did singles sites become... by inviolet · · Score: 1

      That is unfair. Women could loathe prostitution because it cheapens all women, not because it provides them with competition.

      That is EXACTLY what I said prostitution does.

      It lowers the market price of sexual services, which (romantic platitudes aside) is what most women trade in their relationships.

      In fact I'd say that isn't unfair, that is insulting.

      So be it. It must be tiring to be offended by such readily available observations.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    7. Re:when did singles sites become... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The primary motivation against prostitution comes from females

      Citation needed.

      Falcon

  29. I didn't know that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? I had no idea it was that easy.
    Thanks sheriff! I'll definitely pull one in your name :)

  30. Standing? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As this is a civil case, doesn't one need standing to file a suit? As I understand it, that means that the individual bringing the suit has to ask for a remedy the court can provide, which would be redress of damage. Party A can't sue B for what B did to C because A was not harmed, and therefore has no standing. In what way has craigslist damaged the sherrif, and what damages is he asking the court to redress, exactly?

    1. Re:Standing? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      As to standing, when the matter involves a public matter, such as crime or a public nuisance, the state has standing to seek judicial relief.

      IANAL, but I imagine that although the government can sue when it normally would have standing, such as when the defendant is involved in an accident with a police vehicle, the government's ability to exert its influence outside that scope relies on criminal law, not civil. Things like traffic tickets are infractions, the lowest level of criminal law. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.

    2. Re:Standing? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      I may wrong. Apparently, the government has tried to bring "public nuisance" lawsuits against private parties, though the one in question was voluntarily dismissed by the state (in my mind, probably to avoid a precedent being set by the state's defeat.) This kind of lawsuit is a terrible idea for numerous reasons.

    3. Re:Standing? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Not standing per se - erect means something else in the context.

      Sorry about the silly reply, but the weird Taliban style morality in the land of sleaze it's pretty silly in my opinion. I also think it's outright evil the way prostitutes are treated as outlaws that anyone can do anything to (eg. headline where a girl is murdered, but she was "asking for it" by being a streetwalker).

    4. Re:Standing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that the nature of his job as a senior law enforcement officer would automatically grant him standing. His job is to enforce the law for his jurisdiction.

    5. Re:Standing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy can't get protection money if the hookers aren't on the street.

      You know. To help people pay off their home loans and stuff.

      Bloody about time they legalized the whole thing. Prostitution has always existed (hell, the Bible outright says Adam sold himself out to Eve for a bloody apple, of all things), and pretending you can wish it away ain't gonna help matters at all. In the meantime, taxing and regulating it (doctor certifications, regular checkups, etc), would help both the prospective clients AND the working women/men themselves. Hard to be an abusive pimp when the government has your address and your woman goes to a doctor that just might file a report about the bruises.

      But nooo. For the sake of the women (or is it children? Kinda hard to figure that one out), let's keep them in the shadows and if some get beat up, drugged up, or killed... well, it ain't happening when we don't see it, right?

      *Mutter*

    6. Re:Standing? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if you've been following the Chris Brown/Rhianna situation (both are popular R&B singers). Chris Brown allegedly beat Rhianna to an unconscious pulp. Actually, there's no "allegedly" about it as he did in fact do it. The response on sites like MTV.com have been by and large, pro Chris Brown, with many people (surprisingly women) saying that Rhianna deserved to get beaten up. She "asked for it", she wouldn't get out of his car, she "gave him an STD" (of which there is not even anecdotal evidence of this). MTV was so stunned and saddened by the response that the network commissioned a documentary to address domestic violence. It's really only been in the last 20 years that we've acknowledged women's issues like domestic violence and sex work.

      The reality is that in the US, women don't amount to much. They have to be protected from themselves. Their worth as human beings is tied directly to their virginity and their ability to birth sons; so much of our morality laws were designed to reign in attempts by women to control their sexuality.

      Wow, that sounded very feminist of me. Ending my rant now. :D

  31. If you like penis colonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh how droll! Here I was, all ready to cheat on you and instead, I meet you ready to cheat on me! Let's write a song about it.

  32. A sheriff filing suit? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he's doing this in his official capacity, then he's way out of line. This is for the states' attorney to handle, not the sheriff's office.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  33. He didn't sue the mortgage banks by sirwired · · Score: 5, Informative

    He didn't sue the mortgage banks, he instead refused to execute eviction notices for renters that were paying rent on time.

    SirWired

    1. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      he instead refused to execute eviction notices for renters that were paying rent on time.

      Remind me what the branches of government are again?

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces? Nice lie by omission, but just because the tenant is paying rent on time doesn't mean the owner/landlord is paying the mortgage.

      Those are two entirely separate legal contracts.

      Not that I'm unsympathetic to the tenants, they should get some form of protection (even if it's just a delay until they find somewhere else) or maybe just garnish the rent direct to the bank.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He said some renters were paying their rent on time and weren't receiving proper notice of the evictions.

      He also said mortgage companies routinely failed to do something they were supposed to: identify a building's occupants before asking for an eviction.

      ...

      Banks must prove that they informed tenants of a 120-day grace period, which state law grants to allow tenants to find new housing before moving out.

      source. Not that the con talking heads bothered to mention any of these trifling little legal issues back when they proclaimed that this was some kind of activism and socialism and satanism and whatever else they could throw at it.

      The bank must follow the law, and the law states the residents of a non-owner occupied property must be notified in advance, which the poor, poor banks just couldn't be bothered to do.

      They were apparently too busy licking the boots of the fed chairman for cash to think "Hmm... renter in good standing making monthly payments, owner in bad standing not making monthly payments. Maybe we should offer them the house in exchange for them continuing to pay. The worst that could happen is they say no and move out." But that would require working for their money and if there's anything we've learned in this crash, its that the leadership of our institutions are deathly afraid of work and deserve money to fall upon them from the federal government.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the checks and balances lies in the fact that "executives" (this effectively includes sheriffs) can decline to execute. This is unusual, as there will often be political consequences, in the form of lost elections, recall efforts, or in some circumstances, impeachment, but civil or criminal consequences are exceedingly rare and apply only in certain extraordinary cases.

      And even if there are non-political consequences in a given case, you're still relying on executives to enforce those consequences.

      In the end, governments (and for that matter, business, military, or any other large organization) function because most of the time, in most of the cases, the people involved will carry out "lawful orders" even if they disagree with them. Sometimes you reach a breaking point where someone isn't willing to do that. What happens then depends on many factors, but public opinion is a often a big one.

    4. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      What about Writs of Mandamus?

      A writ of mandamus...is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law...issued by a superior court to compel a lower court or a government officer to perform mandatory or purely ministerial duties correctly.

      Couldn't the bank ask a court to compel the sheriff to execute the law?

    5. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From what I remember, the banks were not performing due diligence to make sure that the foreclosed houses were not owner occupied. If a house is occupied by a renter, there are additional steps that need to be followed. The banks did not do this, as that would require them to actually do their jobs.

    6. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Walpurgiss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Instead of letting the renters do that, or even working a deal with non leasing home owners who are behind, for months leading up to the crash almost one in every five radio commercials I heard in DeKalb IL were about people getting awesome deals on repossessed homes, with super low monthly rates.

      But if those low rates were offered to the old occupants, I bet they would not have had to move out...

      Even from a greed standpoint, that kind of crap didn't seem to make sense to me. Wouldn't it have been cheaper to cut the original owners the deal, instead of repossessing and reselling at the lower monthly rates? And paying for advertising about the low rates? /boggle

    7. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Again, you're relying on the target of the writ to comply, or on the ability and (again), willingness of someone else to enforce his compliance. And again, usually this works. Sometimes it doesn't. The law is not magical, it relies on the general assent and cooperation of people, and sometimes, people don't assent and cooperate.

      If the sheriff refuses to evict a tenant, and mass public opinion is behind him, who exactly do you expect to *make* him evict the tenant?

    8. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the sheriff refuses to evict a tenant, and mass public opinion is behind him, who exactly do you expect to *make* him evict the tenant?

      In extreme cases, the national guard. That's how the federal government forced communities in the south to integrate their schools over the popular opposition of the locals.

    9. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by radtea · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Even from a greed standpoint, that kind of crap didn't seem to make sense to me.

      It's not about greed. It's about power.

      The left have been yapping about greed for a century or more to distract you from their primary purpose: power and more power.

      The right uses "think of the children" and "national security" for the same purpose, perhaps less successfully. Certainly more people seem to notice the power-hungry aspects of the right than the equally power-hungry aspects of the left.

      None them give two pins for anyone not of their party. A plague on both their houses.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      The bank must follow the law, and the law states the residents of a non-owner occupied property must be notified in advance, which the poor, poor banks just couldn't be bothered to do.

      Does the law say that? It's mentioned in the article as one of the conditions, but that isn't the same as the law. Heard of legislating from the bench? This sounds like legislating from a donut shop. I don't see why the banks should do the notifying anyway. It should be done by the court or a delegate of it, the same way a summons is. That way there's no dispute, no scope for trickery.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Does the law say that?

      "they informed tenants of a 120-day grace period, which state law grants"

      I'd assume so.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    12. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Informative

      they should get some form of protection

      They do. State law gives them 120 days advance notice, which brings us to

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      That was the law he was enforcing, since the banks weren't giving the advance notice. When the banks agreed to do it right, he agreed to resume evictions.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    13. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, extreme cases. Refusing to evict a rent-paying tenant because a bank wants to let a house sit empty and unsold in a rapidly-shrinking economy is not such a case.

      Even if Federal interests were implicated, the Posse Comitatus and Insurrection Acts place severe restrictions on the ability of the President to use military forces (including federalized national guard units) for law enforcement. There essentially has to be an insurrection or disturbance of sufficient severity that the state cannot enforce order. Eisenhower got away with it in 1957 because the Governor of Georgia tried to use Georgia's national guard to violate the Fourteenth Amendment, giving a pretty good argument for insurrection.

      When Governor George Wallace tried to block enrollment of black students at the University of Alabama in 1963, there was no national guard involved, and the DoJ sent a Deputy Attorney General and US Marshals.

      Now, they could try using US Marshals for eviction without hitting the Posse Comitatus Act, but even then, the federal government's jurisdiction would be murky at best, particularly if there is no bankruptcy case involved. Eviction proceedings and real property rights are primarily a state matter. One could reasonably argue that the bank's Fifth Amendment rights against property being taken are being infringed, but they are receiving compensation in the form of rent, making the applicability of the Takings Clause arguable (the court would have to decide that it doesn't meet the requirement of "just compensation").

      The best argument is probably due process -- the bank isn't really getting any. But, until the bank exhausts state remedies (that is, state courts and higher law enforcement have all declined to intervene), federal courts and the President would be unlikely to involve themselves.

    14. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by jackchance · · Score: 1
      I thought the left was the "think of the children party".

      and the right was "he who has the biggest gun makes the rules" party.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    15. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by jackchance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      Are you kidding me? He is just following the example set by the rest of the law enforcement agencies in the US.

      The US (especially over the last 8 years) loves to make things illegal that a huge % of the population does and then they use selective enforcement to exercise their prejudiced, corrupt agendas.

      Need some examples:

      Picking on LGBTs
      Selective enforcement of marijuana laws (over other drugs)
      Selective enforcement of drug laws in black/latino communities
      The DMCA

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    16. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      "Hmm... renter in good standing making monthly payments, owner in bad standing not making monthly payments. Maybe we should offer them the house in exchange for them continuing to pay. The worst that could happen is they say no and move out."

      The tenants won't want to take over the loan, because it's for more than the house is worth (otherwise the owner would have sold instead of defaulting). The rent doesn't cover the mortgage, or the owner would have continued making payments (most likely an ARM that went up after rent was fixed). So there's no way to make this work other than the bank becoming landlord and renting at a loss. I guess that's just not a business the banks want to be in.

      Best case would be if the bank could make a realistic appraisal of how much the house will actually sell for in a foreclosure auction and immediately offer it to the tenants for that much before evicting them. But that would require the bank to be realistic about how much the house is actually worth now, and nobody's willing to do that yet -- everybody still dreams that this is just a temporary blip, that the real estate market will recover and we'll all be rich again.

    17. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I don't understand how it would even happen. Surely most landlords charge at LEAST enough rent to cover their payments on the property, don't they?

      How does a landlord lose a rental property (unless he can't get anyone to rent from him)?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Wow...renters have it much easier up there.

      In New Orleans...you get like 30 days notice to get out....if your not out, the cops come and throw your shit out onto the street in front of the house. Plain and simple.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not the National Guard. Nominally the Guard is controlled by the state's governor. ISTR that elements of the Army's 101st Airborne Division were called in to settle at least one integration dispute in the South.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    20. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      The next day, Woodrow Mann, the Mayor of Little Rock, asked President Eisenhower to send federal troops to enforce integration and protect the nine students. On September 24, the President ordered the 101st Airborne Division of the United States Army to Little Rock and federalized the entire 10,000 member Arkansas National Guard, taking it out of the hands of Governor Faubus. The 101st took positions immediately, and the, nine students successfully entered the school on the next day, Wednesday, September 25, 1957.

      Thanks for the correction. Now I understand why I was confused, however. My mistaken recollection was that Eisenhower simply federalized the national guard and used it directly.

    21. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      None them give two pins for anyone not contributing campaign funding to their party.

      Fixed this for ya.

      Seems American politics is openly following the Golden Rule now -- They who have the gold, buy the rules.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    22. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 1

      Vigilantes don't usually file paperwork with the court system. He's not taking the law into his own hands, he's serving his community by enforcing the law correctly. He didn't evict people from their homes because he legally didn't have to in the context that the banks hadn't contacted them -- just the landlord.

      In this case, while he's probably giving craigslist a bit much credit for the reach of their impact -- it has been used for criminal activity just like anything else that allows you to pseudo-anonymously propagate communications.

      I appreciate his sentiment and that he thinks he's doing the right thing.. but I'm pretty sure that prostitution will figure out a way to exist without craigslist if he wins. But, he won't.

      Pretty sad overall I guess. Maybe his goal is simply to call attention to it to garner the support of the people? Everyone loses except criminals.

    23. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      they should get some form of protection
      BR> They do. State law gives them 120 days advance notice, which brings us to

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      That was the law he was enforcing, since the banks weren't giving the advance notice. When the banks agreed to do it right, he agreed to resume eviction

      Well, I'm curious. Eviction warrants don't just come from nowhere. A judge has to sign the warrant, and that is after hearing the case. The case can not be heard unless proper notice has been served to the tenant. If the judge signed the eviction warrant without ensuring proper notification of the tenant and hearing the case (assuming the tenant showed up), then the judge was wrong. If the banks were going directly to the sheriff, then they had no legal standing to do so.
      I would imagine that in a lot of these situations, the mortgage itself forbade leasing the property. In those situations, I could see the bank saying "we don't allow them to rent the house, therefore there are no tenants". I don't know how that works out, that is beyond my level of expertise.
      I do know that where I live (unlike in places like Illinois), rent houses actually generate positive cash flow, and banks will often let the renters stay and farm out the maintenance to a property manager, in hopes of selling the home to an investor. It's not actually very easy to get renters out if they are paying on time. The judge will want to hear good reason for removing them, like they're putting holes in the walls or doing drugs or something. On the other hand, it is next to impossible for a renter to stay in a house if they owe money. I had to do an eviction just a few months back, and the judge said blatantly to everyone in the room, that when they call the defendants up and ask them if they owe any rent, and the defendant says "yes", then the judge would immediately find in favor of the landlord and issue an eviction warrant. Amazingly, defendants would still say "yes, but", and the judge would cut them off, finding in favor of the landlord. Eviction court is not the correct venue for complaining about the landlord not fixing stuff.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    24. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I thought the left was the "think of the children party"

      That would be both parties.

      and the right was "he who has the biggest gun makes the rules" party

      That would be foreign policy, for either party as well.

    25. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      Or the federal military (thank you Bush).

    26. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why, pray tell, would the banks (who are not upholding their end of the law) want to go to court (a place where the lawfulness of both parties is examined) in order to force somebody who they believe is not enforcing the law appropriately into doing so?

    27. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by jackchance · · Score: 1
      In all seriousness, Obama's administration seem much more interested in environment, healthcare and education, which are good for the children, than Rush Limbaugh's Republican party. All they seem to care about are guns and taxes.

      For a frightening (and funny) view of the current status of the Republican party check out Jon Stewart's coverage of the CPAC (conservative political action conference) meeting.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    28. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the land of the free you can do absolutely nothing wrong and still end up out on your arse, most other countries value the freedom to live in a house though. TBH the housing act here in the UK makes it hard enough to evict even if you're not paying a penny, but hey ho. I've never had a landlord who wasn't a lying, cheating, tax-evading piece of scum.

      --
      Nick
    29. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad? In San Francisco, if you evict a tenant you have to pay for their moving costs (up to $1,200) to move to a new place where they can hustle that new landlord.

    30. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Yes, but without his "stance" however small and not really law abiding as it may be, it
      made headlines, and now we know there IS a problem with landlords not paying the mortgage,
      when they rent and this could ultimately lead to someone in the senate to pass a bill that
      states if you are being foreclosed upon and that your tenant has paid his rent, either you reimburse his money with interest or penalties for breaking contract, as well as maybe something in the form of a seizure hold for the banks to not just swoop in and pull the rug from underneath them, maybe there could be a leniency time allotted for them to find something else.

      Point is, this at least made MORE people aware of the problem, hopefully further up the ladder then just a lowly cop.

    31. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of JFK, George Wallace and the University of Alabama?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

      Said landlord decides to just not pay the mortgage payments. That is what happened to us a little over a year ago.

      --
      "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
    33. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Except that federalized National Guard troops cannot act in a policing capacity against US citizens (nor in the capacity of forcing anyone to do anything) the national guard was called in by the STATES to quell riots, not by the feds, otherwise they couldn't do anything.

      In fact the federal gov't requested that state's REMOVE National Guard troops so that things could proceed:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Rock_Nine

    34. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Please include Tax Evasion on your list.

      The problem is that it goes both ways. Neither the (D) nor the (R) are pristine in their upholding laws.

      But Overall, I agree with your point. Just not with your selective memory and examples. ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    35. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If he refuses to follow the instructions issued by the court, he can be found in contempt and jailed. The court then works down then issues an order to the person who takes over his duties while he is in jail and so on until it reaches someone who doesn't want to go to jail. Of course if public opinion is behind him, I think it likely that the state legislature would step in before it got very far.
      An example of the limits of the power of the courts is the Cherokee "Trail of Tears". The Supreme Court ruled that The State of Georgia did not have jurisdiction over the Cherokee. The state of Georgia evicted the Cherokee from their lands anyway.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    36. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I see you've never driven in Illinois. A car will zoom past you at twice your speed, and the cop will pull YOU over.

    37. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the issue is that the owners did receive 30 day notice, but did not inform the tenants. So the tenants are sitting there, knowing they payed the rent, minding thier own business, then comes a knock at the door. Suddenly they have 5min (or whatever the time allowed is up there) to gather what they can and vacate, with no warning whatsoever.

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but thats how I understood it.

    38. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      Do you want a ticket every time a cop sees you driving 1 mph over the speed limit?

      --
      The cake is a pie
    39. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      But if those low rates were offered to the old occupants, I bet they would not have had to move out... Even from a greed standpoint, that kind of crap didn't seem to make sense to me. Wouldn't it have been cheaper to cut the original owners the deal, instead of repossessing and reselling at the lower monthly rates? And paying for advertising about the low rates?

      The issue here is that the old occupants, from the point of view of the bank, have already proven themselves to be uncreditworthy by defaulting on their mortgage. The bank would very much rather stop dealing with them, and deal with somebody with better credit.

      Now of course the problem with that is that the banks now all simultaneously want to deal with people with much better credit than they did two years ago, but they just spent a few years ruining tons of people's credit by agreeing to give them too much mortgage on overvalued collateral.

    40. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in all seriousness, you are drinking the kool-aid eight ways from Sunday. Raenex got it right, and you don't even know that you are the target of the propaganda. It only took them a week to get you calling it "Rush Limbaugh's Republican party". What a tool.

    41. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I do know that where I live (unlike in places like Illinois), rent houses actually generate positive cash flow

      If the rental property is generating positive cash flow why isn't the bank being paid?

      The judge will want to hear good reason for removing them, like they're putting holes in the walls or doing drugs or something.

      That's a good reason kicking out residents, whether owners or renters, is bad when a home is foreclosed. Many occupants can trash a building when they are evicted. Days before law enforcement show up the building can be gutted with items like stoves and refrigerators sold. Normally. er in a good economy, money can be made from buying foreclosed houses. I met some people who bought foreclosed houses, one at a tyme, who would then move into it while they rehabilitated or remodeled it. They'd then put it back on the market. Of course unless the buyer has plenty of money and can wait until the economy improves it's not a good idea to try that today.

      Falcon

  34. Service provider by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    We've seen this rhetoric before. If I post a solicitation to pay for sex on myspace, is myspace liable? No, because myspace cannot possibly have the resources to police every post made. They're a service provider, not the morality police. Likewise with Craigslist. Now, it's good community service to help the police out when it's discovered there's a higher than usual number of problems here and there, and I'd expect any responsible business owner to try to limit illegal activity... But likewise, I don't expect any reasonable police officer to believe that business owners are superhuman and can prevent crime entirely. It's about managing your risks, not eliminating them.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Service provider by raehl · · Score: 1

      If I post a solicitation to pay for sex on myspace, is myspace liable?

      If MySpace creates a specific section entitled "Sex for Money" and you post there, then yes, MySpace may be liable.

    2. Re:Service provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craigslist has always had ads for prostitutes. They created the Erotic Services section awhile back as a sort of red-light district so that people looking to buy something else wouldn't be exposed to the ads. They saw it as an improvement of their service to provide a single place to post those ads.

      And as an aside, a lot of those ads for prostitutes on CL are either put there by law enforcement as stings or as setups by criminals for robbing the client when they show up at the "ladies" place. Plus all of the bait and switch where the women look nothing like the pictures but hope that once you've driven across town to meet them, you'll just pay anyway. There are many far safer places on the web to find prostitutes if that's what you are looking for. And, no, I'm not going to name them.

    3. Re:Service provider by jackchance · · Score: 1

      There are many far safer places on the web to find prostitutes if that's what you are looking for. And, no, I'm not going to name them.

      you are a fucking AC, why won't you name them?

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    4. Re:Service provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Service provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craigslist says "erotic services"

  35. I met my girl by posting a m4w ad on craigslist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and she never paid me a dime! And we've been together 3 years now! I'm gonna sue too...

  36. Well isn't that a great use of taxpayer money by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be nice if government organizations would stop wasting money when the economy is a mess? Is there really so little real crime for them to deal with? Are all the victims so satisfied that this sheriff's department has completely solved their crimes? Exactly how many people does this sheriff's department have who aren't working on solving actual crimes with actual victims who have actually been harmed?

    I've always been under the impression that the cops are constantly understaffed, but it looks like this particular sheriff's department has people with too much time on their hands.

    1. Re:Well isn't that a great use of taxpayer money by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      I've always been under the impression that the cops are constantly understaffed, but it looks like this particular sheriff's department has people with too much time on their hands.

      Over-funded and -staffed police departments may be more common than our comrades in the FOP would have us believe, if the amount of resources many police departments squander on victimless "crimes" is any indication.

    2. Re:Well isn't that a great use of taxpayer money by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Considering that per FBI stats, the crime rate has dropped considerably in recent years... I'd say the furor over "rampant crime in the streets" is just another way for police departments to justify 1) their budgets, 2) desired increases to those budgets, and most important 3) more stringent regulation of citizens' behaviour, leading to 4) more "crime" so the cops can continue to justify their budgets.

      And funny how before the "war on drugs" a lot of people felt no need to lock their doors.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  37. Read the Complaint by dwm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wish more of the authors of these smug, dismissive comments would read the complaint.

    It makes a compelling case that the primary use of the "erotic services" section of Craigslist is prostitution, both the "consenting adults" variety and the quite non-consenting child sex slavery variety. It also cites specific cases where Craigslist was used to facilitate the abuse of child sex slaves. Is anyone here concerned with that, and that Craigslist is profiting from that traffic?

    Note that the sheriff isn't trying to shut down Craigslist; his office sent 5 letters to Craigslist asking them to better police the "erotic services" section or shut it down. According to the complaint, Craigslist refused. It would seem that the owners of Craigslist value their profits more than the lives of the children whose exploitation they benefit from.

    How often has the phrase "Think of the children" been bandied about on Slashdot with a wink and a sneer? Well, here's a case where there are actual, real, hurting children to think about. How many of you are brave enough to challenge the groupthink around here and do that? Where is the outrage that Craigslist is profiting from human traffic? Some of you need to turn in your liberal credentials at the door.

    1. Re:Read the Complaint by RancidPickle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have an issue with your line that Craigslist is profiting by this. Last I checked, not only was Craigslist free, but there are no ads.

      Why not sue magazines that have classified ads geared towards erotic services? I'd bet there are "erotic services" advertised in most major newspapers or local rags.

      I'd think that the police looking at Craigslist ads has done more for locating abused kids forced into prostitution than their "normal" investigations.

      --
      "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
      - Doctor Who
    2. Re:Read the Complaint by dwm · · Score: 1

      Again, read the complaint. The popularity of the "erotic services" section drives traffic to the site, making their employment ads more profitable. And if it's not profitable, why put up the resistance that Craigslist has to removing or better regulating the section?

    3. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I read the complaint and the allegations of increased revenue from the erotic services section are unsubstantiated. There is no evidence that directly links the visits to that particular section of craigslist to any other.

      Reading the complaint, you could be forgiven that craigslist is popular because of the erotic services. Isn't it just possible that girls choose to use that venue because craigslist itself is popular?

      By way of interest, in cities where prostitution is legal, those particular boards on craigslist are almost empty. Wonder why. Maybe the Sherrif's department could provide advice to the AG that in order to turn down the illegal prostitution, it should be legalised.

      So show me that craigslist is profiting from human traffic or is that claim just as airy as some of those in the complaint?

      Human trafficking and child abuse will exist with or without craigslist. Do you think the children on the streets in various Asian countries use craigslist to advertise themselves? I think not.

      But as another poster put it, through everyone (or almost everyone) using craigslist, it puts it in a place where the police can easily monitor it. Shut it down and it'll scatter to the four corners of the web - well until someone comes up with another site to fill in. The problem (child abuse) won't go away but the ability for law enforcement to easily catch it will.

      How about we solve this problem with chilren by addressing the problem at its source (in the home) rather than just try to treat the affects that show up elsewhere?

      Note that craigslist doesn't directly profit from advertisements, as do many other web sites, when people visit. Instead it charges people money to post in the erotic services section and has promised to donate that money to help address the problems that you are so concerned about. You could say they're taxing the adults to help the children.

    4. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hear the spectre of child prostitution ads being raised many times in this thread.

      cite one example. I peruse my local craigslist on occasion, and have even used the erotic services section quite a few times. I've never seen any child prostitution ads in there.

      If they're so prevalent, there must be some posted today? something in cache somewhere? an actual ad someone could link to and say "look, a child prostitution ad! take it off!"

      Unless I see some evidence, I'm inclined to think that the children are not as prevalent on craigslist as some would like us to think, and it's just a moral panic excuse to shut down a business run by adults, and only adults.

    5. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Craigslists job to police the postings. That would be the job of... *gasp*... the Police. The fact is that, if not for Craigslist, the Police likely would have never known about the abuse going on.

      Craigslist basically gave the Police these scumbags on a silver platter. The Police should be thanking Craigslist. So say we all.

    6. Re:Read the Complaint by Walkingshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you have some kind of evidence of child abuse (be it sexual or otherwise), then you have a prosecution. Congratulations, where does shutting down a section of craigslist come into this? Oh, you have no evidence of this actually happening, no actually damaged or hurt children? Then you're just another scare monger trying to stop the bleeding by covering it with a curtain.

      If you really want to think of the children, maybe you ought to take all this evidence you have of child abuse to a DA's office and see if you can get the ball rolling there.

      An intelligent person would want this stuff on craigslist, where it is all made into a nice easy searchable electronic database that can be easily monitored, logged, and used in court with a minimum of fuss. It looks to me like this sherrif simply doesn't understand the technology and his lawyers told him he might be able to make a quick buck suing craigslist.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    7. Re:Read the Complaint by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      The popularity of the "erotic services" section drives traffic to the site, making their employment ads more profitable.

      An effect as vague as the one you describe isn't falsifiable, and therefore isn't testable, and therefore shouldn't be actionable in any legal system I'd consider sane.

      As a character on a popular television show said, if you go back far enough, you'll end up blaming some germ for splitting in two. Claims ought to require reality, not merely plausibility.

    8. Re:Read the Complaint by feyhunde · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would seem that the owners of Craigslist value their profits more than the lives of the children whose exploitation they benefit from.

      Craigslist is pretty non-commercial. They do charge 5 bucks on the erotic services site for all of craigslist to keep down the amount of illegal content, but all of that is donated to charity. There's only a total of 24 people who work for craigslist, with all of the money that keeps it up coming from broker ads in a couple of metro areas (Bay Area, NYC, Chicago)

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    9. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, Craigslist doesn't *create* the child-sex 'slaves', it just groups them in one place. This gives the police, the people supposed to be enforcing the law, one place to look to get leads into many cases.

      Your type of post is the 'think-of-the-children' attitude that slashdotters sneer at, due to it not helping the problem (some people force children into having sex with people for money) and rather affects perfectly legitimate aspects of life as well.

    10. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      profits? You've never used craigslist, have you? It's FREE, genius.

    11. Re:Read the Complaint by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Should the phone company be charged with helping to facilitate escort/prostitution services?

      I see full page adds for escort/prostitutes in all sorts of magazines and daily newspapers.

      Once again, if enough "breakers of the law" are congregating in one place to "break the law", you'd think that the Sheriff would be stoked to have all those people in one place to investigate.

      Craigslist shouldn't have to police any of their posts. It is a method of communication that is no different than a physical billboard (besides the scope and ease of use).

    12. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you high, Craigslist is not profiting from human trafficking any more than the gas station that filled the car of the trafficker is. Or how about the isp that the people where using to post and find the children. The car company for transport the local grocery store for food for feeding the victims. All of these people have profited from the actions of these criminals. Shutting down this section of craigslist is not going to stop the criminals, they won't say "Damn well I guess we have to stop or criminal activities because we can't use craigslist anymore." They'll just use some other service instead.

    13. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So this and the responses are not entirely correct. Craigslist has taken a number of measure over the past few months to crack down on this. They ban more sexual keywords now so that if you use these your ad will not post. They then required a phone number to confirm ads placed in this section. Now they actually require a credit card and charge you $5 to post.

      So in an effort to crack down or at the very least be able to track these individuals they implemented a method that does give them some profit, though I believe they donate some or all of this to abused womans causes.

      This is not going to stop prostitution at all. Its either gonnna be here or in the streets.

      Being an avid fan of the internet and erotic services I wish this sherrif would go find some crimes with victims.

      Thanks and have a Happy Ending!

    14. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's crap and you know it. Stop asking websites to police millions of free posts. It's not the sites fault somebody did something illegal. There is a reason gun manufacturer's are not held responsible for the illegal use of their firearms - it is absolutely and completely unreasonable to expect service providers/manufactures to ensure everybody follows the law. That is the job of the police department. Craigslist DID NOT create prostitution, endorse it, facilitate it or any other illegal sex crime. Now go back to church and be at peace my sheep.

    15. Re:Read the Complaint by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      (clap clap clap clap)
      Thank you Sir, for pointing out these money grubbing craigslist scum to us. Craig Newmark is _exactly_ the cad you say he is. Part ueber-capitalist, part child molester assistance provider. He probably swims through his money bin like Scrooge McDuck. His palatial corporate "HQ" is the envy of many.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:Read the Complaint by flanders123 · · Score: 1
      Your point about human traffic notwithstanding, You should listen to your own advice and read fact 37 on page 10:

      "...The defendant does not profit from erotic services..."

      Based on Craigslist's history of ducking most avenues towards maximizing profit, I doubt money is the motivation behind their refusal to comply.

    17. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Several States Attorneys General banded together and made various threats to craigslist about the erotic services section and the prostitution advertised therein. CL agreed to regulate that section more. We all know that most ad posting on CL are free. CL instituted a $5 per ad fee for the erotic services ads. This had several unintended effects. First almost all the spam ads in the erotic services section disappeared, leaving only the real prostitute's ads. Next the therapeutic massage and casual encounters sections (still free) got flooded with ads for prostitution.

      I would say that CLs efforts in this area failed. Oddly, before, they weren't making money on these ads, and now they are. Maybe they weren't giving the sheriff his cut.

      It's too bad. Seems like a decent solution to me, I bet that this gets a lot of this stuff off the streets so it doesn't have the direct negative impact on neighborhoods (used rubbers, drug dealing, traffic from johns, etc). It also concentrates things in an easy to find place, facilitating sting operations etc. If you believe that "the oldest profession" will ever be eliminated then you aren't thinking clearly. If you think that minors weren't exploited before CL you're naive. I would think it would make the sheriff's job easier.

      I wonder if law enforcement ever went after the daily or weekly newspapers and their ads for exactly the same stuff?

    18. Re:Read the Complaint by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Oh, you have no evidence of this actually happening, no actually damaged or hurt children?

      Actually there have been numerous cases of underage prostitutes, willing and otherwise, on Craigslist.
       
       

      Then you're just another scare monger trying to stop the bleeding by covering it with a curtain.

      And you're just another ignoramous trying to pretend a problem doesn't actually exist.
       
       

      An intelligent person would want this stuff on craigslist, where it is all made into a nice easy searchable electronic database that can be easily monitored, logged, and used in court with a minimum of fuss.

      In some fantasy universe where people also want crack houses left alone in order to provide a supply of dealers to bust, and bars to serve up alcohol in drive through windows in order to create more drunks on the road. In this fantasy universe 'intelligent' people don't care about the victims, they just want criminals to bust.
       
      Here where I live we want to make things harder for criminals, not easier. We care about the victims.

    19. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Again, read the complaint. The popularity of the "erotic services" section drives traffic to the site, making their employment ads more profitable.

      Well... it's a complaint, not a finding of fact. I can complain about gnomes stealing my socks, but that doesn't mean it's likely to be a fact.

    20. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get anonymous phones from your local WalMart and anonymous credit cards (pre-paid!) from Safeway.

      Actually, some people that want to save money without it showing up in bank accounts under any name use these anonymous credit cads for "depositing" money on.

    21. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go. Away.

      The "save the children" line is getting tired.

      Where, precisely, are the responsible adults?

    22. Re:Read the Complaint by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny

      In some fantasy universe where people also want crack houses left alone in order to provide a supply of dealers to bust, and bars to serve up alcohol in drive through windows in order to create more drunks on the road. In this fantasy universe 'intelligent' people don't care about the victims, they just want criminals to bust.

      Hey, wait a second... that's not a fantasy universe, that's Wyoming.

      --
      ôó
    23. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an issue with your line that Craigslist is profiting by this. Last I checked, not only was Craigslist free, but there are no ads.

      Erotic Services is not free -- you need a credit card to post and it costs a little bit of $$. This was enacted at the request of state AG's, not to make money.

      AFAICT CL doesn't WANT this kind of stuff, but if they remove the section, the hooker ads move to another section and ruin that other section.

    24. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both the "consenting adults" variety and the quite non-consenting child sex slavery variety.

      As well as the non-consenting adult sex slavery and consenting child variety.

    25. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut it down and it'll scatter to the four corners of the web - well until someone comes up with another site to fill in. The problem (child abuse) won't go away but the ability for law enforcement to easily catch it will.

      If it isn't in the voters' faces, then the sheriff can claim that he reduced the problem, "See, no Craig's List, therefore much less (child) prostitution." If the sheriff's position is not an elected office, I'd say he's gunning for some higher elected office. And if so, this is a win-win for him: If he loses against Craig's List, he can say, "I tried to fight for your children's safety, but the courts wouldn't let me. Elect me and I'll make everything safe again!" If he wins, he can say, "I fought to keep evil internet predators from pimping your toddlers. Elect me and I can do even more!"

      Another poster pointed out that the civil suit could be his attempt at a kind of local bail out, claiming $100k in costs fighting prostitution fostered by Craig's List. That seems a reasonable alternative to ramping up his image for a future election.

      And I suppose his motivations could be exactly as stated. But I'd bet on political ambitions or "civil bail out" first.

      - T

    26. Re:Read the Complaint by binarybum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly - I'd wager that a decent percentage of the slashdot audience has probably at least browsed these ads before - nerds that wouldn't pick up chicks on the street are a huge target for this kind of business model - but be warned - you'd have to be crazy to respond to these ads. A large percentage of them are probably honeypots posted by authorities, and the government has full backdoor access to everything that goes through craigslist (thank you patriot act) including email addresses. I'd love to know the ratio of arrests to actual successful prostitution related business transactions through craigslist - I bet it's greater than one. Also, let's not forget that nearly every major city has a newspaper with an erotic personals section - this sort of thing is nothing new.

      --
      ôó
    27. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh.. what? generate more traffic for job posting ads? i don't know about you, but when i'm watching porn, i don't instantly think, i want a job right now!

      as for this child sex slave crap, i don't know about that. i frequent the craigslist erotic section a lot and i've yet to ever see soemthing like that

    28. Re:Read the Complaint by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there have been numerous cases of underage prostitutes, willing and otherwise, on Craigslist.

      Do you have any data to back this claim?

    29. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, you can find them in phone books.

    30. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that Craigslist makes it easier for the Police to do their investigations. So the Sheriff wants to push the child trafficking sex slavers further underground where they will be much more difficult to detect, track and apprehend?

      Jeebus Man! Think of the Children!

    31. Re:Read the Complaint by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Note that the sheriff isn't trying to shut down Craigslist; his office sent 5 letters to Craigslist asking them to better police the "erotic services" section or shut it down.

      The "erotic services" section? You mean the "personals" section right? The problem with the complaint of the Sheriff is that it claims that all the ads posted there are from prostitutes. And I'm sorry, but that's just not the case. Even if just 10% of them are prostitutes, and 30% you just don't know, how is Craigslist supposed to police that? Craigslist doesn't serve millions of ads, it serves billions of them.

      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/w4m/

      And then, what's next, match.com? yahoo.com? twitter.com? skype.com? AT&T? Verizon? I'm sure that those sites/services/those phones facilitate prostitution in some way as well. I've certainly be solicited by hotties wanting to be friends with me completely out of the blue on skype. Did I think those women were prostitutes? or possibly spam-bots? Sure, I did. Did I know for sure. No. What do you want? A button that says "prostitute" on each profile/ad? Do you think that would really work?

    32. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And if it's not profitable, why put up the resistance that Craigslist has to removing or better regulating the section?

      Because Craigslist doesn't exist for the sole purpose of making money. They found that charging for job listings was a good way to pay the expenses necessary to keep the site online. Other than that, at every turn, they've actively chosen to make their services free. This is a service that grew into a business organically rather than someone coming up with a business plan and hoping to become the next billionaire. Craigslist isn't like that. I've heard estimates that by simply adding AdWords to some of their pages, Craigslist could generate about $500m/yr in revenue. Yet they've chosen not to.

      In short, they're about as idealistic as you could hope to find. They've likely refused to police the section or shut it down because they don't have the resources to actively police it and they feel that they're providing a valuable service that would be difficult to find elsewhere and has significant legitimate uses. If there are people using the service entirely within what is legally allowed, why should the service have to shut down. Hell, law enforcement should be happy that such as service exists since it greatly simplifies their job...rather than having to actively search for criminals, all they have to do is monitor Craigslist.

    33. Re:Read the Complaint by unitron · · Score: 1

      i don't know about you, but when i'm watching porn, i don't instantly think, i want a job right now!

      Not even a hum job? You are kinky.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    34. Re:Read the Complaint by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      It also cites specific cases where Craigslist was used to facilitate the abuse of child sex slaves. Is anyone here concerned with that, and that Craigslist is profiting from that traffic?

      In your world, if a criminal is wearing bluejeans- then Levi is partly responsible for his crime.

      Anything can be used to facilitate anything else, and anyone can profit directly from another person's crime. The TASER corporation, for example.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    35. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God forbid the sheriff do his job and hunt the child-pimps. Taking the ads off Craigslist does not free them. You also seem to get off on the idea of child slaves, but in reality they are probably just 16-year-olds who are "slaves" because they are below the age of consent. Got to get those girls off the streets and into tight shirts waiting tables for $3/hour.

    36. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/posting_fees: "The fee for posting ads in the erotic services category is $5."

    37. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their just too lazy. Its pretty simple to bust people online, just invite them over, cops can work from home.

      Why sue Craigslist? Why not just use it against them? The anonymity goes both ways.Cops don't run down the street yelling, "hey there's strippers over here" when they want to make a bust... They send in a Undercover John. Why not sit a couple cops at computers instead of on a side road BS'ing and shooting radar. Finding children doesn't generate the same income as speeding tickets I guess. Does anyone know how easy it is to flag an article on craigslist?

      I guess thats just my liberal views talking, not me wanting to preserve the freedom of Net Neutrality...

    38. Re:Read the Complaint by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Our local 'semi-newspaper" called the Dallas Observer which has free stands at many public locations advertises questionable services like "erotic massages."

    39. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two problems here:
      1:Not reading the article. It's typical to judge a book by it's cover, but it's how we all live. Do you every time you get a burger do inspections of the area, question where they got their meat from etc? There's too much to do to go in depth on everything, including reading news. (That said you should read the article if you plan to comment on it but...)
      Though the link I clicked down to didn't mention all the details you've mentioned above.
      http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/03/sheriff-sues-craigslist-over-mass-levels-of-prostitution.ars

      2.As was mentioned in other posts, Craigslist will NOT stop ANYTHING by shutting down that section. Those ads will move to other areas of the site using codewords. (Or if pictures are allowed, pictures with steganography. A willing market finds a means.)

      As far as better policing, would you as a regular business owner want to police your customers? There's two ways to go about it. Sting like operations and making (probably reasonable) assumptions based on contents of the articles.

      Sting causes personal risk they don't want for their employees. Better regulating will cause better hiding. Adding a callback # is a good step, but perhaps CL needs a deal with phone companies to verify a number held by one party for X months to prevent cell # turnover to disguise the nature of a business.

      Still, the more restrictions are on the area, the more of the business moves elsewhere on the site.

      I don't this is so much CL valuing profits, as seeing no point in efforts that won't cause results. (And which, by driving the current "erotic" business to personals, will hurt profits in the personals sections as it gets watered down.)

      As for "Think of the Children", this is sneered about for the same reason as the old joke:
      I can always tell when you're lying.
      How?
      Your lips move.
      TotC is a /. codephrase that refers to a trojan horse (kids safety) being used to push something bad. Saying those who use the phrase don't mind child exploitation is nonsensical. Yes, the article mentioned 15 year old girls were used in some of the prostitution rings. (A detail easily missed skimming.) As far as most are concerned, that's strike 2 (or 1, depending on your view of prostitution) against those running the ring.

      It's such a well known catch-phrase (and tactic) that any slight variation will be seen as someone trying to pull something off.

      Consider what these groups you wish CL to fight are. Ordinary prostitution... fine. Child trafficking... that's a group that's probably fairly well armed, and doesn't take kindly to being exposed. Ordinary people and businesses do NOT want to tangle with these folks. We have the police to do this tangling for us BECAUSE of the risk involved.

      Those here aren't unconcerned with the plight of the children, but we know that nothing CL does will affect it. It's also not true to say CL has done nothing in way of trying to police themselves, given they have filed a few lawsuits and knocked a few people off the site. Keep in mind that being online, keeping certain people and groups off is technically impossible. You can always forge an identity. If you're already involved in illegal activity, why not pay a botnet operator to have non-blocked PCs put up your ads for you? Also, new phone #s are a dime-a-dozen.

      Where is the outrage that CL is profiting? The same place as the outrage that their phone company, also facilitating what they do is profiting off of them.

      CL is an all-purpose site, not a site for SOME things. Likewise, the phone companies connect to everyone, including NAMBLA. (I once worked at a telecommunications company who made the disturbing discovery they used us... there wasn't much we could do about it without them clearly breaking our terms of service. You can't toss people on a whim, or they can sue YOU.) We didn't keep this group because we WANTED to. The owner was the most "conservative" (or at least Republican) per

    40. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And you're just another ignoramous trying to pretend a problem doesn't actually exist.

      The problem exists on Craigslist and all other major classifieds. No realistic solution has been proposed. Just "police yourself better!" Big help.

      > In some fantasy universe where people also want crack houses left alone in order to provide a supply of dealers to bust

      Except that the primary purpose of a crackhouse is supplying crack. The purpose of this section on craigslist is a legal, if oft-hated group.

      You're building a straw man to tear apart.

      > Here where I live we want to make things harder for criminals, not easier. We care about the victims.

      Would you support tearing up the street where hookers are found, so fewer people can drive there? At the expense of local businesses? They should have run the hookers off?

      When the policeman suggests a plausible solution, Craigslist and many other classifieds will shower his was with rose petals. This would be a massive PR win. Don't confuse lack of hopping at every crazed order with being in camp with the other side.

    41. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes a compelling case? I take it you mean, that these alleged prostitution and child slavery rings operating on Craigslist are compellingly real, but not compellingly real enough for the court to issue warrants so that the sheriff can bring charges against the people involved. You know, due process and all that.

      Hypothetically, let's say you are correct and there is a booming child prostitution slave trade thriving on Craigslist. You know who else is profiting from that traffic? AT&T. They provide the phone service for the clients and pimps to communicate after the initial posting. Yahoo and Google, they provide the email addresses that are used to post and respond to email messages. Intel and AMD. Without CPUs powering computers, none of these companies could even do business. How far do you want to take this? Craigslist is a forum, a medium of communication. That's all. They aren't responsible for anything that users post, and when you consider Craigslist's revenues for personal ads ($0) combined with the volume of postings they receive, it is nowhere near reasonable to expect them to take on the responsibility of reviewing every post.

      The sheriff wants Craiglist to "better police" their users? Hmm, would it be funny or ironic if Craigslist wanted the sheriff to "better classify" the posts in question? Get it? Never mind. Just ask yourself whose -job- it is to "police" criminals. Then do my work for me please.

      If there are criminal operations using Craigslist to advertise, I would like the alleged child slaves to be found and freed, not merely have their advertisements removed from one website while their abuse continues through better-hidden channels. Seems to me that the sheriff needs to step up his game and figure out how to use Craigslist as a tool to help fight such criminals -- assuming they actually do exist.

    42. Re:Read the Complaint by nametaken · · Score: 1

      In MOST cases, Craigslist is free.

    43. Re:Read the Complaint by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      So what?

      Seriously, so what? Sex work happens. Consensual and non-consensual; and it will keep happening. Sites like Craigslist put it in the open, and it gives law enforcement the opportunity to find the worst perpetrators -- you know, the kind where we really ought to "think about the children." Law enforcement has long been following sex work sites such as The Erotic Review. Personally, I can see where vice cops would be pissed at a sheriff going off the reservation and doing something stupid like trying to prevent Craigslist from allowing such posts. The fact is, craigslist and dedicated sex work sites have served as a tool in the LE arsenal.

      As for craigslist profiting from human trafficking, it's a horrible thing. But guess what, got a kid who likes GAP or Abercrombie & Fitch? Then you've got a kid who's profiting from slave labor *and* sexual slavery. Google "Saipan exploitation". I'm not trying to be a dick. The fact is, human trafficking touches so many business transactions; it's heartbreaking. Interfering with Craigslist doesn't stop the exploitation and the crime; it merely puts it out of the eyes of the American public. And really, most Americans are content with knowing that things like this happen they just don't want to see it.

    44. Re:Read the Complaint by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Are you certain, craigslist is totally free? I've heard talk within the context of escorting about there being fees for placing ads, and about how law enforcement want payment to be made by credit card so that the poster is trackable. Just noise maybe?

    45. Re:Read the Complaint by speedtux · · Score: 1

      his office sent 5 letters to Craigslist asking them to better police the "erotic services" section or shut it down.

      Strangely enough, the job of "policing" the erotic services section is the job of the police. And if there is actual prostitution being advertised, they could spring into action.

      I don't think anything will come of this. If he has proof that there is prostitution, then the immediate question is: why haven't you done anything about the cases you could identify? And all the other ads are just ads where he suspects prostitution but can't prove it; he does not have a right to restrain that speech, even if he doesn't like it.

    46. Re:Read the Complaint by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you seriously claiming that Wyoming is real?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    47. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craigslist doesn't make any profit off of its erotic services section. (At least, not directly -- its contribution is that people will go to Craigslist, making it a bigger community but they don't have third-party ads or other revenue streams from those pages.) If you actually read up a bit Craigslist makes money by charging for job and housing postings in specific locations. The erotic services section only helps Craigslist's "good will" and general attraction to customers but it's not like they need it.

    48. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the spectre of child prostitution ads being raised many times in this thread. cite one example.

      Richmond pair convicted in San Mateo County teen prostitution case

      Local youths rescued in prostitution busts

      And they go on and on. Just search google for prostitution and craigslist. Of course, nowhere will you find in any post mention of child prostitution. Such posts would be flagged off quickly or reported and removed.

      There is a real problem, as there has always been somewhere else. It's not craigslist's fault, but there has never really been a source for prositution as comprehensive as craigslist (here in the U.S). Other sites like ASPD, Eros, Adult Friend FInder, etc are limited in many ways and charge for viewer services. It seems to me that the Cook county sheriff should be grateful to craiglist for collecting so many potential leads to illegal activity.

      Mind you, I don't think prostitution in itself should be illegal so long as all participants are willing adults, but that is often not the case and where it's not it should be stopped. The problem is the handful of puritans who want to stop consenting sex and prevent its proper outlet.

    49. Re:Read the Complaint by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      OK lets think about this. Craigslist is a community site, by and large moderated/regulated by the community. I'm sure you are familiar with the concept. Craigslist also provides links and tools for reporting human trafficking and abuse of minors. Now think about how many listings and how many cities they have. When you come up with a reasonable way to police that let us know. Also what money are they making off of these alledged posts? Before you point out that they charge money to post to the erotic services section, you should check where the money is going. "That money will be donated to charities that address human trafficking and child exploitation" http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/nov/29/craigslist-works-behind-scenes-deter-prostitution/

    50. Re:Read the Complaint by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? It's where men are men, women are scarce, and sheep are afraid....

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    51. Re:Read the Complaint by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      nerds that wouldn't pick up chicks on the street are a huge target for this kind of business model

      Springfield must be 'hooker central' because here they'll proposition YOU. Any guy here who gets busted for "solicitation of prostitution" must be a moron.

    52. Re:Read the Complaint by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Shutting down Erotic Services isn't going to help. Maybe it would have helped if they never had it in the first place, but at this point with so many people looking for that stuff thinking of Craigslist, they'd just move their ads to other sections. Which would simply increase the difficulty of enforcing any relevant laws, and would screw over the legal erotic businesses that sell their services there.

      Even stricter regulation carries a risk of this. When Erotic Services ads started to require phone verification, hooker ads in the personals sections increased dramatically.

      I'm not saying that there isn't more that Craigslist can do. There might be. But simply shutting down Erotic Services, or simply regulating it more strictly, is probably not the answer. Screws over legitimate businesses and doesn't even help the people you are trying to help and makes enforcing the law harder. If there is a solution to this, we'll need a more creative mind than someone who simply comes up with "shut down that section".

    53. Re:Read the Complaint by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I hear the spectre of child prostitution ads being raised many times in this thread. cite one example.

      Craigslist blocks/removes obviously illegal adds. However, just about all of the prostitutes that are under-age represent themselves as being old enough. So that one where she claimed to be 19? She may be 16 or 17. You can't know without tracking down every one and verifying their age. It isn't a Craigslist problem, it's a prostitution problem unrelated to how they find their customers. Oddly enough, the best way to stop it is to legalize prostitution. When it's legal and regulated, then fewer of the "undesirables" will practice it. Those "undesirables" being those with diseases, under age, or whatever else is deemed to be unsafe or unwanted. So I would assert that people against the legalization of prostitution are directly and purposefully harming children.

    54. Re:Read the Complaint by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      It makes a compelling case that the primary use of the "erotic services" section of Craigslist is prostitution, both the "consenting adults" variety and the quite non-consenting child sex slavery variety. It also cites specific cases where Craigslist was used to facilitate the abuse of child sex slaves. Is anyone here concerned with that, and that Craigslist is profiting from that traffic?

      I've never used, and only rarely visited, Craigslist so can you tell me how it is profiting? I've heard it doesn't have a fee for ads so in what way does it profit?

      Note that the sheriff isn't trying to shut down Craigslist; his office sent 5 letters to Craigslist asking them to better police the "erotic services" section or shut it down. According to the complaint, Craigslist refused.

      And did you also read where they already came to an agreement with "National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the Attorneys General of 40 states"?

      Falcon

  38. Sherriff is a moron. Grade A Moron by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    One of the hardest part of police work is FINDING the guilty people. Catching them and proving guilt is generally pretty easy. So basically, this total idiot of a sheriff discovers a shortcut to doing his job. All he has to do is to answer the ads on Craigslist. But instead of doing his job and arresting all the pros on Craigslist, this moron decides to shut down his BIGGEST WEAPON.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  39. Oh FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For fuck's sake already! First I wind up with an engineering mind I didn't ask for, second the world tells me that women hate guys with that sort of intelligence, then I'm finally given this tiny sliver of hope that there might be geeky girls who post to Craigslist looking for a date, and now you're working to take THAT from me, too?!?

    What the hell is your damn PROBLEM, Illinois? We made you your stupid smartphones so you can dick around all day on them, we made you Wikipedia so you can look up information you didn't bother learning when you had the chance, we made you Amazon.com so you can sit on your corn-fed asses and order shit online, the least you people can do is hold up your end of the deal and lay off the geeks, and you can't even do THAT right!

  40. It's who asked out whom by tekrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The person that does the asking out to dinner pays.
    After all, the other party was gracious enough to accept.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:It's who asked out whom by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You are right, that is fair.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:It's who asked out whom by WNight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's totally fair.

      But you're right, there is an expectation. And it's not wrong. If you sit around and wait to be asked you're going to be asked by people with their own goals in mind. If someone tries to woo you and you want that behavior to continue (expensive meals, etc) then you need to consider what they're looking for.

      It's pretty much like joining the host in whatever activity they have planned. You aren't required to play cards, or join their orgy, but they probably aren't going to invite you back if you didn't fit in.

    3. Re:It's who asked out whom by KORfan · · Score: 1

      I always figured it was us guys giving the women something of immediate value (dinner, etc) in exchange for putting up with our barbarian tendencies long enough for some of our better qualities to shine through and convince them that we were worth the effort needed to civilize us.

    4. Re:It's who asked out whom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      holy shit is this entire thread asperger central

    5. Re:It's who asked out whom by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      "The person that does the asking out to dinner pays."
      "You are right, that is fair."

      IOW, fair = the man pays.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    6. Re:It's who asked out whom by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      "The person that does the asking out to dinner pays."
      "You are right, that is fair."

      IOW, fair = the man pays.

      Not if the female is the one that asks. If they don't want to pay then they shouldn't ask. The least they could do is see if going dutch is alright.

      Falcon

  41. And that's only what's obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is interesting that the Sheriff's department is sueing Craigslist rather than trying to arrest someone. Obviously they're trying to skirt around the problem of it being shut down for content as this could be construed to be silencing people's free speech rights.

    Reading of the complaint, there are some interesting assertions, such as (37).

    The complaint provides a rather shocking insight into the way "middle America" thinks - that STDs are only transmitted by prostitutes. You're more likely to pickup an STD from a one-night stand from a girl at a club (because you'll take the risk and have unsafe sex) than you are with a hooker (that will most likely insist on a condom.)

    But if that section of CL is closed, the girls will just go elsewhere.

    www.adultfriendfinder, www.onlinebootycall.com, I'm sure there are other websites where girls put up personal ads and when guys contact them, the cost of a date is more than just dinner.

    Then there are other websites, such as sugardaddy.com, where it is quite obvious that the goal is prostitution (those daddies that give girls sugar want and expect more than just a smile).

    It's about time America got with the program, legalised prostitution, could therefore tax the revenue that these girls make by forcing them to work in brothels. Additionally there would be rather stringent health requirements/checks which would do a lot for sexual health in general.

    The likely side effect of the erotic services section being closed is this: girls going elsewhere - there are other web sites, such as backpage.com, cityvibe.com, etc - that carry personals for girls. They may also end up in the casual encounters section or the more normal dating area. Ads from girls looking for "generous men" or men who can "help with bills" are usually girls willing to trade sex for cash.

    The cost in health is entirely avoidable: state/local governments should be providing better (free) sex health services that also educate.

    The police are naive if they think shutting this board will make the problem go away... all that they'll be doing is pushing the problem into more corners of the internet than they can easily track. I suspect they're going to find that they're cutting off their nose to spite their faces here in pursuing this.

  42. Where are the activists? by netruner · · Score: 1

    I knew someone who was trying to use Craigslist to find a new home for her birds, and was following all of the rules posted (small "re-homing fee" - she really just wanted to be paid for the cage, the birds would have been free if she could have found someone who wouldn't put them in an undersized cage). Each time within an hour of posting, she had her posts pulled ("community moderated", or some such) for "inappropriate content". She then found out that there are a number of activists on Craigslist that censor anything having to do with "selling animals".

    I guess my friend's birds rate higher on these peoples list of priorities than child sex slaves.

    I hope that my friend's case is cited as an example of how "important" censoring happens almost immediately.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    1. Re:Where are the activists? by jcr · · Score: 1

      there are a number of activists on Craigslist that censor anything having to do with "selling animals".

      What a pack of morons.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Where are the activists? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I hope that my friend's case is cited as an example of how "important" censoring happens almost immediately.

      Important "censoring" would happen almost immediately, but for some reason people look at you funny if you ask for the keywords that identify child prostitute ads so you can report them. It seems that censorship is a double-edged sword.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Where are the activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no child sex slaves on Craigslist. The ads are generally placed by independent providers. I guarantee 98% of what you think you know about the sex business is bullshit fed to you by the media. For fuck's sake, your post is a total non sequitur. Those are some PETA fanatics at work in your friend's case. They probably don't even go to the erotic services section.

    4. Re:Where are the activists? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There's a whole group of animal rights vigilantes that patrol CL and kill any such ads, because didn't you know, it's just another "exploitation of helpless animals".

      I'm surprised there isn't a similar "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" group patrolling CL in pursuit of Naughty Ads, and trying to get them all taken off... but it would be unethical for CL to take even their token fee and then allow any random vigilante to kill your ad.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  43. It Was Good Enough For Blagojevich by lenwood · · Score: 1

    I think this is how Blagojevich was shopping for senators to replace Obama. Its what got him busted.

    --
    -Chris (aka Lenwood)
  44. I read that as... by bagboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sheriff Uses Craiglist For Prostitution Ads

  45. You Don't Pay a Prostitute for Sex by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    You pay her to leave afterward, as South Park points out.

    I don't like Craig's List because they always get my hopes up with an ad like:
    Hot young model, into S&M, Watersports and Bondage seeks bi guys and girls for total dominance
    Only to dash my hopes with the last line... No weirdos!
    *sigh*...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:You Don't Pay a Prostitute for Sex by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      what I love is when you you see the ad say "I'm looking for guys between 18-45, no older!" right after the girl describes herself as 19 and this being the first time she has ever tried the internet to find people.

      Yeaaaah...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  46. If craigslist supplies prostitutes by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    If craigslist supplies prostitutes, then the socket in my wall is a power station.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  47. Prostitutes don't appeal to me anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prostitutes generally insist on having sex with a condom. And say what you will about STDs, but I just can't reach orgasm that way. A girlfriend (or even a girl in a club) is far more likely to go bareback.

  48. WTS Flailing economy - will sue for food tokens by silentil · · Score: 1

    I'm going to create new acronyms to replace w4m, etc... women now = fish, man now = hook. fish who likes putting hooks in its mouth looking for dinner. Expect to be thrown back in the water after a kiss at the end of the encounter. Where does the stupidity end...is the economy that bad in the US that people need to make up pointless lawsuits?

  49. Re:In other countries... by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... adults with imaginary friends are given free psychiatric help.

    In the US, we give them political power.

    OK, I'll bite.

    What are you talking about? This is a story about a lawsuit. A strange lawsuit that seems to be trying to enforce criminal statutes on a tort-like theory of public nuisance. It likely won't go anywhere, since it's hard from the complaint to even make out who the aggrieved party is supposed to be. (Is the Sheriff himself harmed in some way by Craigslist's practices? I think he'll have to show that if he wants an injunction. Otherwise, if he thinks something cognizably criminal is going on he could maybe investigate and prosecute. Which he can't, so this whole thing is largely symbolic.)

    Now you come in babbling about political power for imaginary friends. I guess it's OK, though, as there seem to be enough like-minded schizophrenics to get you modded insightful. Perhaps you could move overseas, and avail yourself of some of those marvelous free services...

  50. Bummer... by Plekto · · Score: 1

    There goes the best source of free entertainment online. They always are worth at least half an hour of laughs.

  51. Has anyone read the Complaint??? by spiedrazer · · Score: 1

    I did. and it sounds like there is a very strong legal case. The laws governing the conduct of prostitution are different from those governing copywrite, so what craigslist is doing really is illegal. It is illegal to "facilitate" the commitment of illegal prostitution activities, and craigslist knows that this particular section of the website is unsed widely for just this purpose. After being presented with vast amounts of evidence of this illegal activity, they have made no effors to try to weed out the illegal activity, so the Sherrif's last resort is to sue for injunctive releif. The internet is a great tool, but that doesn't mean that it is perfect or can't be used for illegal activity.

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
    1. Re:Has anyone read the Complaint??? by KORfan · · Score: 1

      they have made no effors to try to weed out the illegal activity,

      That's why they have the "report this post button" and if you click on the racy-sounding ads that are the most recent you get a message that says it's been disabled and is being deleted. They're doing something about the ones that are blatant. Craigslist isn't a vigilante, they aren't tasked with suppressing freedom of speech because it might refer to illegal activity. Do you want to bust them because someone posts that they are 420 friendly? Has that number been declared illegal and discussion of it no longer protected?

    2. Re:Has anyone read the Complaint??? by unitron · · Score: 1

      I'm all conflicted. You got "different from" right (a rarity, these days), but not "copyright". Unless of course you were referring to the writing of copy (like ad copy), which may be governed by some laws or the other, depending upon the medium (once upon a time the FCC said no advertising lotteries on radio or TV) for which it is intended, and upon the governing jurisdiction.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Has anyone read the Complaint??? by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      From these criteria, then the Sheriff should also sue the phone company, credit card companies, and hotels that rent by the hour.

  52. amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the following amazon shopping menus:

    hookers
    cocaine
    cannabis

    please make this America again!

  53. Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you're going to sell sex, create your own currency that you can later exchange for real currency. Yakuza owned pachinko parlors in Japan have been doing this for a long time. You win "prizes" at the pachinko parlor (stuffed animals, etc...), then leave with the prizes, and go to a building a few blocks down where some friendly folks will "buy" your prizes, where each prize has a set exchange rate. These folks then "sell" the "prizes" back to the parlor.

    Everybody wins, no laws are actually "broken", it's simply an exchange of good of perceived equal value.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      What stops you from bringing in "fake" "prizes"?

    2. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by Rick+Genter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, the Yakuza?

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    3. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      The big guy with the baseball bat. Seriously, would you want to mess with the Yakuza? Don't you like your kneecaps?

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by KORfan · · Score: 1

      Your survival instinct stops you. The tokens are clearly known to be from specific pachinko parlors. You can't get your hands on fake ones. If you set up a successful operation to provide fake tokens in sufficient numbers that you hurt their income, they kill you or take other appropriate action. It's just not done. If you're enough of an outsider that you don't understand the system, you won't be able to exchange the tokens for cash in the first place, or no one will miss you when you are gone.

    5. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... the illiterate...
      You have never been to Japan, have you?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    6. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by soundguy · · Score: 1

      What stops you from bringing in "fake" "prizes"?

      A healthy respect for your own kneecaps

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    7. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      The gangsters I expect.

  54. Dipshit coward pig too scared to police REAL crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always the same false flag cry, kiddy sex. Then the classic load of bullshit, hookers.

    Oh noes, somebody is getting some pussy and head and is gonna blow their load! Evildoer!!

    Neocons and coward pigs, park your hummer in your garage and close the door and leave it running and take yourself a nice, long, deep nap there. It would raise the average IQ of the species while reducing the broken record cries of wolf to justify destroying freedom and liberty and individual responsibility and choice.

    Stupid asshat bastards.

  55. why just them by meerling · · Score: 1

    He's going to have to sue all the newspapers as well if that's all it takes... Besides, is that even legal? Aren't law enforcement supposed to arrest lawbreakers, not sue them...

  56. He should also sue the Yellow Pages. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    If he has that much time maybe he/she can sue the Yellow Page for having "Escort Services" and "Massage Services".

  57. Nuisance, anyone? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    Maintaining a house of prostitution (in the good old USA) is a nuisance. I don't see why maintaining a website of prostitution cannot be a nuisance also. I think that the Sheriff has a good theory going.

    A newspaper could be prosecuted if it knowingly promoted prostitution with prostitution want ads. Why should Craigslist be afforded more protection than a newspaper?

    If Craigslist started a listing for murderers for hire, the public would rightfully demand that it stop.

    In a free country, the people can regulate the internet. The people have the power.

    1. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Maintaining a house of prostitution (in the good old USA) is a nuisance. I don't see why maintaining a website of prostitution cannot be a nuisance also.

      It is because no website lives next door to Craigslist. Craigslist does not lower the property values of anyone's property.

      I think that the Sheriff has a good theory going.

      Think again.

    2. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just equated prostitution and murder. EPIC FAIL!!!!

      Who is being nuisanced? It's ads placed in a location you have to deliberately seek out, and the business takes place behind closed doors out of sight and out of mind of anyone not interested. These laws are a relic of Victorian era bullshit and institutionalized religion, and enabled by saps like you who never question authority.

      The people have the power.

      Well, women don't have the power to conduct certain private business behind closed doors. Along with the "tyranny of the minority" there's still good old "tyranny of the majority". But you keep on being a good little bitch. Meanwhile the politicians laugh at losers like you and fuck all the prostitutes they please using the taxes they "forgot" to pay.

    3. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Lowering property values is not an element needed to establish nuisance. Try again.

    4. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      They are both crimes, sorry. Maybe they shouldn't be, but that's the way it is.

    5. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      You don't have any ethical obligation to conform to unjust laws.

    6. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Correctamundo. But you must bear the consequences of your actions. And, if you're not willing to bear the consequences of your actions, a piece of advice: Only take on the King if you're ready to kill the King.

    7. Re:Nuisance, anyone? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Sure -- far be it from me to start prancing around selling beer in Saudi Arabia. It would be ethically sound, but not super wise as I value my own life.

      That said, I don't think the Sheriff in our example is accurately looking out for the best interests of those people whom he represents.

  58. Mostly seems to facilitate rolling Johns by smchris · · Score: 1

    If our local news stories are to be believed. But I guess like sailors pushed _out_ to sea by dolphins, you don't hear from the satisfied customers.

  59. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Your post is the exact reason that trolls exist. They know assholes like you will bite at any random bullshit they type, and they enjoy the fuck out of it.

  60. Re:In other countries... by treeves · · Score: 1

    Then again, you're the one arguing with an Anonymous Coward!

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  61. I'm no Psychiatrist, but I play one on the Intar.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The parent is alluding to the Sheriff in TFO having a deranged mental state by using a common reference, identifying with people who aren't physically present. Indeed, hallucination is a common symptom of many psychological maladies.

    User number 970820 also makes a joke using the familiar, and frequently employed motif, whereby individuals in a place of power are ridiculed by making a potentially credible complaint that the opposing party is irreparably stricken with a condition which renders them unfit to hold such power, attempting to display their behavior as evidence beyond reproach.

    Happy to help.

  62. Re:In other countries... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the Sheriff himself harmed in some way by Craigslist's practices? I think he'll have to show that if he wants an injunction....... Which he can't, so this whole thing is largely symbolic.

    I don't know about that.....maybe his wife keeps showing up in the w4m category....

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  63. I assume he's also suing AT&T?!? by Question+Mark · · Score: 1

    After all, the Yellow Pages have an "Escorts" section as well.

  64. Re:In other countries... by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Informative

    My guess, is the AC is referring to religious people when he says "people with imaginary friends", the imaginary friend indicating god.

    The AC probably jumped to the conclusion that the sheriff was on a crusade based on religious temperament.

    All in all, it was pretty easy to follow to me, if not necessarily well founded. Jumping to bad conclusions isn't really an indicator of schizophrenia, I'd think more along the lines of mania / bipolar disorder.

  65. Stupid intelligence by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Insightful

        He's stupid.

        Most people in an investigative field would BEG for lists like this.

        The posting gives probable cause. They can wire tap the numbers, and get the phone history. The secondary numbers that call common numbers give even more escorts, or escort services/pimps. Third level cross reference would then likely give him a good number of the working girls in the area, and regular clients. All of this would be legal.

        Many law enforcement agencies are using these ads to DO the busts. They'll set up a wired hotel room, and have the girls meet them there. They'll also have officers pose as the escorts, and do the same to the Johns.

        They're being spoon fed fairly reliable information. The exception would be postings by angry ex-boyfriends/husbands, who post their ex-SO picture and phone numbers. Those would be easily filtered once the phone records were given a good look over.

        I don't know what idiot thought about filing a complaint against Craigslist. They should be THANKING them. Spend a couple months gathering intelligence, and then spend a weekend on widespread busts. They'd get a significant number in the process, and the rest would be scared out of business. Any remaining ones that decided to continue marketing this way would be continued easy fish to catch.

        Do your job, and you've solved the problem. Cutting out an advertising source just pushes that element that you want to arrest into other fringe areas that you probably don't know about yet. Doing it right would get the vice squad brownie points from all over the place, and an increased budget. Just bitching about the advertising medium gets you nothing but a budget wasted on court costs.

        Stupid people.

       

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Stupid intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife was a provider at one time (that's what professional prostitutes call themselves), and professionals look at craigslist as a place for completely naive amatures. Upscale whores have an entire network of references that's actually very hard to break into. Law enforcement leaves them almost entirely alone, because the amatures on craigslist and the streetwalkers are so much easier to bust.

      My wife said she was called once by somebody who was probably a vice LEO, and she just kept to the parameters and told him without references and proper deal-handling etiquette he could go jump.

    2. Re:Stupid intelligence by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I've known some too, on a friendly, not professional basis. It's an interesting business to learn about, but not the safest out there.

      I believe the terminology varies by area, as do some of the terms. In the end it's all the same. Guy is lonely, and wants to spend time with a pretty girl. Guy leaves some money in a conspicuous place. Adult things happen. Guy leaves happy. Girl leaves happy and a little richer.

      My apologies, as I'm used to referencing proper professionals (versus street walkers) as escorts. No offense is intended.

      Myself, I see no problem with it. I don't believe it should be against the law.

      When I was in Toronto, I was in for a bit of a culture shock when I talked to some people there. Massage parlors, incall, outcall, and even "full service" strip clubs are perfectly acceptable. Toronto does not allow "street walkers". The general idea is, it's going to happen, like it or not. Be courteous. Anything that happens in the privacy of your [home|hotel|etc] between two consenting adults is exactly that.

      I was addressing it from the law enforcement side. The majority of areas in the US have laws against it, and those are enforced. If they want to enforce it, there are much easier ways to enforce it, than to shut down one of the easiest places to make a visible statement. So you've picked up all the obvious street walkers, so they don't walk the streets. The next most visible is Craigslist, or any of many numerous print advertisements that list providers of these services. There will always be some web site that carries advertisements. Hell, searching Google is the most obvious.

      **WARNING** Links NSFW! I'm writing most of this for those who are completely naive. Hey, lots of people don't know the business. I just happen to talk to a lot of people, and escorts have been some of them.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chicago+escort

      or even searching for the full deal

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chicago+escort+gfe

      Sorry, there are only over 300,000 pages for the "GirlFriend Experience" in Chicago.

      Ok, so there are about 350 postings today on http://chicago.craigslist.org/ers, and anyone who has a clue knows a decent percentage of these are duplicates, fake pictures (wrong girl shows up) or trouble (thug comes, takes your money, and laughs on the way out the door). Some are legit.

      If they legalized it, a lot of the problems would go away. Right now, if a thug instead of the shown pretty girl shows up and robs you, you can't do much about it. Try calling the police and say "I was trying to pay for an escort, but some guy came and robbed me instead!". That's a spontaneous confession, and enough to land you in jail at least for the night. Talk about adding insult to injury. If it's perfectly legal, the same phone call would get the cops to your door, and hopefully get your money back and land the thug in jail. There is a whole list of other reasons that it should be legalized, that's only one minor example.

      As I've been told many times before, it doesn't matter if it's an escort, a girlfriend, or a wife, you're always paying for sex. At least with an escort, you know the terms of what you're paying for. You will pay $x for $y hours. When the night is done, she'll leave (or you'll leave, depending on who's place it is), and you won't ever have to talk to her again unless you want to. With a girlfriend, you'll buy dinner, flowers, pay for movies, whatever, and then sex in the end isn't guaranteed. And once you're married, the guarantee is that you'll pay for the rest of your life, and sex may happen occasionally if you're lucky. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Stupid intelligence by Ashriel · · Score: 1

      Cutting out an advertising source just pushes that element that you want to arrest into other fringe areas that you probably don't know about yet.

      What makes you think this isn't the desired result? Crime doesn't exist unless arrests are made - didn't anyone ever tell you that?

      Moreover, maybe the sheriff is actually sympathetic to prostitutes. Prostitution in most states is just a misdemeanor, but Illinois has the harshest sentences (1-3 years and/or $25,000 fine). Maybe he's trying to help them not get caught (OK, I really doubt this too).

    4. Re:Stupid intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, my wife was particularly known for her GFE and had quite a few regulars.

      That's another reason why the more professional spectrum of the business uses a reference system, try the bait and switch with the thug routine and a bad reputation will develop quickly. Works both ways, everybody gets a reputation, who the good providers are and who the good clients are. And of course now it's all online too, but of course I'm not going to talk about specifics on /. I'm sure anybody who really tried could find it without much trouble.

      Bleh I hate posting anon and missing out on my karma bonus, but I'm the only one of two people who knows my wife was ever in that business, and the fallout would be huge.

    5. Re:Stupid intelligence by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      My wife has a job. Our money goes into a common pot that we both spend out of. Who is paying who for what here?

      By your logic, I'm paying her to clean the floor and she's paying me to do the dishes.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    6. Re:Stupid intelligence by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

      These are not stupid people. What you think is an oversight, or misunderstanding of the medium is not what's happening here. This is all motivated by the sherif's desire for a few minutes in the spotlight. naturally, those minutes of attention can and often will lead to $$$ in the form of interviews, possible future political campaigns, etc. afterall, we ARE talking about the dude, arent we?

      --
      Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
    7. Re:Stupid intelligence by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Doing your job is a lot of work. With Craigslist sitting there showing ads for escorts, there's no excuse for the Police to not do something.

      Which is why they want to get rid of the ads. It has nothing to do with prostitution, and everything to do with cushy government jobs.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:Stupid intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because he was dealing in absolutes, covering all men and all women on the face of the planet.

      Moron.

  66. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    nah, she keeps showing up in w4mm.

  67. Mod the AC up by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I'm no rocket scientist (okay, technically I am, but that's beside the point) but this seems to be an ideal way to create leads on local illegal activity. Would there be the same outcry if there were local Pot or Heroin ads? How long could you sell crack via Craigslist before the cops paid you a visit?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Mod the AC up by jackchance · · Score: 1

      There are ads for drugs on craigslist.
      skiing = cocaine
      420 = weed


      i don't know the codes for heroin or meth.

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
  68. Re:In other countries... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    My guess, is the AC is referring to religious people when he says "people with imaginary friends", the imaginary friend indicating god.

    The AC probably jumped to the conclusion that the sheriff was on a crusade based on religious temperament.

    Yeah, that's what I figured as well.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  69. Make a living by spiffydudex · · Score: 1

    Hey, People have to make a living somehow...
    He's a sheriff, he/she is a prostitute, both earn money.

  70. See? It's a by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    Jump ...

    To Conclusions!

    1. Re:See? It's a by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Nice try, Milton. Here's your stapler. Get back to work.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  71. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think something has triggered that AC's "Hate Christians" reflex. "Imaginary Friend" is a codeword for God or Jesus to people who hate so much that they can't let religious people be.

  72. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a nation such as the US, whose society I regard as civilized, where people are not coerced into prostitution against their will, what exactly is wrong about prostitution; and in turn, why is it illegal?

    1. Re:So what? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In a nation such as the US, whose society I regard as civilized,

      Well there you go, there's your first mistake.

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    2. Re:So what? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Civilized is relative - we still have a huge number of morality zealots out there who somehow think this is going to be the downfall of society. I strongly disagree with this point of view, but more from my libertarian "it's a private transaction between two willing parties" point of view. Regulate it if you must from a public health standpoint (mandatory STD testing, etc.), but otherwise it should absolutely be legal.

      Personally, I think we'd have a much better world if we were all just getting laid more often.

    3. Re:So what? by Ashriel · · Score: 1

      In a nation such as the US, whose society I regard as civilized, where people are not coerced into prostitution against their will, what exactly is wrong about prostitution; and in turn, why is it illegal?

      Well, on the face of things, there are two calls against prostitution in the U.S.:

      1. The religious right, while being just an extremely vocal minority, commands about 20% of the vote nationwide, and is far more powerful in the southeast and midwest. They have declared sex outside of marriage immoral, and if they could would ban consensual sex between unmarried couples, nevermind prostitution.
      2. The spread of venereal disease. On this case, there's a real issue - heavy prostitution in an area has historically always directly correlated to widespread disease.

      The real reason that there's such an outcry over prostitution, I postulate, is because women can get far better deals if they barter for sex rather than sell the service for cash. It's a direct competition to women who want to enter into relationships where the man takes care of everything and the woman just has to put out now and again. Also, there are plenty of men made uneasy over the idea that women can market sexual services; it makes them inherently self-sufficient.

      I'm not claiming the above argument is true: I'm just speculating based on the idea that humans have never been interested in what amounts to academic issues enough to act on them, but have forever directly attacked anything they could regard as competitive practices ruthlessly and rapidly.

  73. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks G&P by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Speaking of greed and power, i at first was going to insinuate that there are OTHER forces behind this:

    microsoft and churches...

    Forming an un-wholey (d)alliance. MS can't compete with Craigslist for the hearts and minds of database developers, and the various top-line churches cannot bare to compete with the parts and hinds of offerors and acceptors. So, they join forces and contract a sheriff who acts as cock-blocker and interceptor.

    Wait... i hear a deltree and a cruci *(##L&( E# (lost carrier)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  74. Regulate and tax it by evilkasper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have always found it highly questionable that something one can give away for free should be illegal to sell.. (free is relative; everyone pays for it somehow) If they regulated it (and taxed the hell out of it) it would do away with some thugs who want to be big time pimps, and through health regulations it could help reduce the spread of STD's. Just to go ahead and answer the inevitable, no it will not fix everything and there will always be those that operate outside of an established/legal system.

    1. Re:Regulate and tax it by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Interesting that many of your same arguments would work for the legalization of pot.

      I wish there was some chance we could get more of a libertarian govt in the US....go back to more strict reading of the constitution, and less govt. intrusions of adult lives.

      While I'm at it...I guess I'll also wish for a pony.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Regulate and tax it by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the government will provide one as part of it's next Economic Stimulus bill. Write your congressman today!

    3. Re:Regulate and tax it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prostitution has to be regulated to preserve the value of sex offered by amatuers in relationships. If sex is to be used as a reward when your partner does as you wish, then it makes sense to try and outlaw any other way your partner could have sex without your permission.

      Maybe I'm a little cynical though...

    4. Re:Regulate and tax it by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the government will provide one as part of it's next Economic Stimulus bill. Write your congressman today!

      No good. The PETA people will somehow try to declare horses to be free-persons, and make it illegal to ride them without their consent.

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    5. Re:Regulate and tax it by Saysys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Giving it away for free should not be legal. Sexual relations outside of the covenant of marge should be as illegal as prostitution. Eliminating the life that is formed after a sperm hits an embryo should not be legal except in self defense.

      Once you understand the fundamental end-game then the intermediary steps of not funding embryonic-stemcell research and being against prostitution come from.

    6. Re:Regulate and tax it by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      The same can be said for prostitutes.

      Aaaaaand we come full circle. So to speak.

    7. Re:Regulate and tax it by subreality · · Score: 1

      Or in the words of George Carlin:

      Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?

    8. Re:Regulate and tax it by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

      Giving it away for free should not be legal. Sexual relations outside of the covenant of marge should be as illegal as prostitution.

      Who is this "marge" and how can I get inside her covenant?

    9. Re:Regulate and tax it by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I have always found it highly questionable that something one can give away for free should be illegal to sell..

      Trying to think of a good counter example, but it's not easy... what about human organs?

    10. Re:Regulate and tax it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you capitalist!

    11. Re:Regulate and tax it by MR.Mic · · Score: 1

      If they're your organs, why shouldn't you be able to sell them?
      I am sure someone in great need of a kidney would be happy to be able to legally buy one from a healthy person that has two already.

      http://www.reason.tv/video/show/333.html

    12. Re:Regulate and tax it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because the U.S. has yet to become as secular as most countries where prostitution is legal or illegal but with little enforcement. Until we get past looking at sex from the narrow religious views that influence our laws, this won't change.

      I am pro-legalization of prostitution, and completely agree with your argument. If the government is so damned fixed on taxing and spending, and are so damned anti-prostitution, why should they care if they piss off the hookers by establishing a sin tax?

    13. Re:Regulate and tax it by park3r · · Score: 1

      The problem with legalizing marijuana is that there's no reliable test for impairment, like taking a breathalyzer for alcohol. Even blood and urine tests are not effective at proving impairment for marijuana. Until that little issue is solved, you can forget about it being legalized. At least in the US.

    14. Re:Regulate and tax it by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The problem with legalizing marijuana is that there's no reliable test for impairment, like taking a breathalyzer for alcohol. Even blood and urine tests are not effective at proving impairment for marijuana. Until that little issue is solved, you can forget about it being legalized. At least in the US.

      I don't get your argument. 'Impairment' tests for alcohol are a pretty new thing relatively speaking. There were none when prohibition was repealed. Why would such a test make a difference with legalizing marijuana?

      I think I've actually heard in CA, they are considering full blown (no pun intended) legalization to bring in tax revenue in this economic tough period.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Regulate and tax it by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Or another way of making the same argument, in the immortal words of George Carlin:
      "Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    16. Re:Regulate and tax it by park3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because even though impairment tests may be relatively new, alcohol regulations rely heavily on them. The standard has been set by these tests, so things are different now than they were during prohibition. So I don't consider the comparison to prohibition a valid argument.

    17. Re:Regulate and tax it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      In two words: frites, moutard.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Regulate and tax it by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      If the government is so damned fixed on taxing and spending, and are so damned anti-prostitution, why should they care if they piss off the hookers by establishing a sin tax?

      Don't say that - they'll probably end up taxing sex outside marriage. It's only a short step from there to increasing taxes on alcohol as a "gateway drug"...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    19. Re:Regulate and tax it by jsepeta · · Score: 0, Troll

      with the exception that smoking pot has very serious ramifications over the long-term, including loss of productivity and the desire to be productive, as well as paranoia and schizophrenic behavior.

      http://www.nida.nih.gov/infofacts/marijuana.html

      having sex with strangers at worst can give you AIDS or Syphallis, but at best can teach you how to be better at having sex (pleasing yourself & pleasing others)

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    20. Re:Regulate and tax it by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I think I've actually heard in CA, they are considering full blown (no pun intended) legalization to bring in tax revenue in this economic tough period.

      I think it is Mendencino county in CA where they estimate 2/3s of the counties GDP is tied to pot production (somewhere in the billions iirc). CA politicians want their cut much the same way the mob always gets their cut.

    21. Re:Regulate and tax it by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I think it is Mendencino county in CA where they estimate 2/3s of the counties GDP is tied to pot production (somewhere in the billions iirc). CA politicians want their cut much the same way the mob always gets their cut."

      I've been watching some news specials on Mendencino...and it is quite interesting. Pot is supposedly all of CA's #1 cash crop. The stuff being sold now legall (state laws) is for 'medicinal' purposes. What I'm hearing is...they want to expand that...to make it just plain legal (state law), and that would broaden even more the sales of legal pot....and give the state more tax revenue.

      CA already gets a pretty good cut now off the medicinal stuff....I hear they want to completely de-criminalize it...and bring in even more tax revenue.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Regulate and tax it by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "with the exception that smoking pot has very serious ramifications over the long-term, including loss of productivity and the desire to be productive, as well as paranoia and schizophrenic behavior."

      But pretty much ANY activity...done to excess has serious ramifications, no?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:Regulate and tax it by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      Just because it is legal does not mean your partner would approve. Take parts of Nevada where prostitution is legal. My wife would not be happy if I flew out there and used their services.

    24. Re:Regulate and tax it by conureman · · Score: 1

      Obfuscation and FUD are extremely profitable (e.g.: Bill Gates). Watch the Police Industry lobbyists spin the FUD, and guess where the Big Dollars really are. BTW don't forget "Tax and Regulate" gave us the BATF. Unintended consequences are a bitch.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    25. Re:Regulate and tax it by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      illegal to sell..unless you tape it.

      --
      snig
    26. Re:Regulate and tax it by genner · · Score: 1

      Interesting that many of your same arguments would work for the legalization of pot.

      I wish there was some chance we could get more of a libertarian govt in the US....go back to more strict reading of the constitution, and less govt. intrusions of adult lives.

      While I'm at it...I guess I'll also wish for a pony.

      Ponys are still legal....for now.

    27. Re:Regulate and tax it by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      check your state laws before you think that applies to all states.

    28. Re:Regulate and tax it by conureman · · Score: 1

      NIDA.
      I guess I'll ignite the flame-war here, if no one will step unto the breach. Self-serving science from the U.S. Government... Where would I begin?
        Correlation does not indicate causation, particularly regarding schizophrenia. OTOH I'm fairly certain that some normal people experience temporary Cannabis-induced paranoia, easily treated by abstinence.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    29. Re:Regulate and tax it by skarphace · · Score: 1

      Prostitution has to be regulated to preserve the value of sex offered by amatuers in relationships. If sex is to be used as a reward when your partner does as you wish, then it makes sense to try and outlaw any other way your partner could have sex without your permission.

      And you think the government should be involved in this... why?

      And if you're in a relationship where sex is used as a reward, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    30. Re:Regulate and tax it by multiOSfreak · · Score: 1

      I have always found it highly questionable that something one can give away for free should be illegal to sell.

      Reminds me of the old George Carlin line:

      Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal? :)

    31. Re:Regulate and tax it by skarphace · · Score: 1

      The problem with legalizing marijuana is that there's no reliable test for impairment, like taking a breathalyzer for alcohol. Even blood and urine tests are not effective at proving impairment for marijuana. Until that little issue is solved, you can forget about it being legalized. At least in the US.

      Even though there's no reliable test for proof, they still lock people up for DWI. No matter what you may have put in your body, if you're obviously fucked up, you shouldn't be driving. I don't see much of a problem with an officer using his judgment. There's also something to say about most people being able to be drive just fine while high(myself excluded).

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    32. Re:Regulate and tax it by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      How about children? It is legal (at least here, and I assume the US), to give your baby or child up for adoption. It is *not* legal to sell them. I would argue this is the way it *should* be.

    33. Re:Regulate and tax it by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      " have always found it highly questionable that something one can give away for free should be illegal to sell"

      That's a good point. It's one of the few things that is illegal to sell but legal to give away. Human organs are the same way, can't sell them but you can donate them and someone else can legally sell them. Very stupid if you ask me, a lot of people would be helped if you let just anyone sell their organs.

      I see why the sugardaddy websites are rising in popularity because in all reality it's the same as the CL erotic services ads, provide a service and get paid.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    34. Re:Regulate and tax it by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      The problem with legalizing marijuana is that there's no reliable test for impairment, like taking a breathalyzer for alcohol.

      I disagree. Funny pictures would be a great test... and it would make run-ins with the police fun, too.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    35. Re:Regulate and tax it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      You could train it to bite off Scott Tennerman's weiner.

    36. Re:Regulate and tax it by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Or snacks.

      The officer holds out a bag of munchies and if you can't resist, you're in the pokey.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    37. Re:Regulate and tax it by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 1

      Eliminating the life that is formed after a sperm hits an embryo should not be legal except in self defense.

      Wait... Is that how twins are formed? I never knew!

    38. Re:Regulate and tax it by Chabo · · Score: 1

      The guys from Top Gear also came up with the idea of testing for ecstasy by offering a hug. :)

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    39. Re:Regulate and tax it by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's one I never got.

      If someone's offering you 30 grand for your kidney, why is it illegal to accept? Especially when it's legal to, for example, be paid to be a surrogate mother.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    40. Re:Regulate and tax it by callinyouin · · Score: 1

      Are you really of the opinion that sexual relations outside of marriage should be regarded as criminal?
      I mean, really?
      I think I speak for about 2 billion people when I say that you are absolutely clueless.

    41. Re:Regulate and tax it by Saysys · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. But I am of the opinion that cheating on your spouse should be a criminal offense.

      Outside of marriage though, we need only the fact that the last woman you slept with can say you "raped" to keep anyone who's truly rational about their sexual encounters in-check...

      But as you said no doubt 1/3rd of the world finds the concept of monogamy beyond the reach of there personal character.

  75. Re:The Biggest Prostitute: +1, Informative by fooslacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really your defense for Socialism is "better than Bush"? Wow, I need to be king then because I'm freaking awesome compared to Bush. I hate the economic stuff going on and yes it is a creeping form of Socialism and yes I think that's bad for us unless we want to be a middle of the pack also ran country like the rest of the socialist countries in the west. I also hated the intrusive creeping government surveillance and oppression under Bush and think it was bad unless we want to be a totalitarian moralist police state. Why can't I hate both parties when they do something wackadoo?

  76. Re: h4m by Tokerat · · Score: 1

    Mmmm, bacon. ...or am I just being fat and stupid again?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  77. What kittens are illegal now? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    What kind of a nightmarish totaletarian regime has made it illegal to sell kittens? My god, it is 1984 all over again.

    Or is "kitten" some kind of slang for some sexual practice that slashdotters just don't know about (granted this includes everything from talking to a girl and up).

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What kittens are illegal now? by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you must be new to the Internet. Welcome! With a nick and sig like yours, though, I can see why you jumped to conclusions about it being a sexual reference...

      --
      The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  78. Re:In other countries... by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or more likely, he has ruined her for men so she shows up in wfw. Er, not that I ever view that section. Uh, I think I will take the fifth now.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  79. Re:In other countries... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    Yeah, no one is really being hurt by this.

    Heck, if prostitution moves entirely online, it'll be a good thing. The "bad image" caused by streetwalkers and such will go away, since the actual "marketing" of services happens invisibly online, and those involved can meet up in private.

  80. Re:I'm no Psychiatrist, but I play one on the Inta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I was alluding to the Sheriff in TFO pandering to Christian neo-Puritans by attempting to control what consenting adults do with their bodies, but I guess I was a bit too vague.

  81. There are other issues here. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Hmm... renter in good standing making monthly payments, owner in bad standing not making monthly payments. Maybe we should offer them the house in exchange for them continuing to pay. The worst that could happen is they say no and move out."

    This might work for a single-occupant building. For a multi-unit building it's not practical.

    Selling to another landlord with tenants in place might improve the value - or it might drop it. After all, with the current tenants at their current rent and payment rates the previous landlord couldn't keep the payments up. So the bank might have to clear out the existing tenants to give the building a chance to become a profitable income property.

    Wouldn't it have been cheaper to cut the original owners the deal, instead of repossessing and reselling at the lower monthly rates?

    Unintended consequence of such a policy: Essentially EVERY borrower immediately defaults to get the same deal.

    So the banks won't offer the deal to the existing owners.

    (I don't like it either: I'm an existing owner of an owner-occupied property who has kept up payments. I wanted to refinance at the crash-related lower rates. But it looks like I may have to refi with another lender to get it to happen just because of such a policy - assuming I haven't missed the window. Fortunately, keeping up the payments, having a house that's still above water, and having both a job and assets combine to give me a dandy credit rating.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:There are other issues here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, with the current tenants at their current rent and payment rates the previous landlord couldn't keep the payments up.

      That is a simplistic assumption at best, there equaliy valid explanations for a landord not making their lease payments. To get back on topic, perhaps the previous landlord was profiting a great deal from the current tenants' rent, but was spending too much money on "dates" from Craigslist.

  82. Dart is a dunce by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation'
    No, whores are the single largest source of prostitution! craigslist.com list is just their most popular advertising medium. Did people stop smoking cigarettes when they stop advertising? Take away online venues for finding customers, and whores will go back to propositioning Johns on the street. Personally, I'd rather they just advertise online, where only the people that are looking for sex-for-hire have to deal with them.
    True story: I was in Manhattan on business, walking down the street in broad daylight, when this woman in a business suit approached me and asked "Do you have the time?" I of course immediately looked at my watch, whereupon she remarked "That's not what I meant!" Call me a nerd, but no, I can't tell an office worker from a prostitute... at least not until they ask for money.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  83. Heh. by Nekomusume · · Score: 1

    I live in Vancouver. Never mind craigslist, they advertise in one of the local newspapers.

  84. And now the New new school by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.
    New school: Login in to www.craiglisst.com from the comfort of the squad room, set up a date, make arrest. Rinse, repeat.

    How about New new school:

    Make the damn thing legal, it's just sex and money in one happy exchange voluntarily entered into by both parties.

    Why is it illegal? Because some puritan has the power to decide what "[You] the people" is allowed to do? Because it's to protect the women (I'm sure there are no male prostitutes) from the dangers of the trade (yeah, PMITA prison is a step up...)? Undressing for money is fine, but undressing and doing the next logical thing is not? :-?

    1. Re:And now the New new school by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Make the damn thing legal, it's just sex and money in one happy exchange voluntarily entered into by both parties.

      Oh, absolutely agree with you there. So do most cops. So if this asshole has such a hardon for arresting hookers, nothing will ever change his mind.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  85. Sorry, Thomas Dart by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Even if the "woman" you hired off of craigslist.com turned out to have a penis, suing craigslist.com still isn't going to help you get your money back!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  86. Re:former state governor seeking stupid sheriff - by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has been several decades since I lived in Chicago. One of the duties of the Cook County Sheriff back then was to create an "organized crime" diversion whenever things were getting a little too hot for any of the fair-haired boys of the Democratic political machine in that city and state. This looks very similar.

    My guess is that this will go away as the hoo-hoo-rah over Senator Burris' lies about his relationship with the ex-Governor Blagojevich fade into obscurity. (Burris was seated in the US Senate after testifying that he had no contacts with Blagojevich's people and had not been involved in raising money for Blagojevich after he sought be appointed Senator, but he has since recanted on both points when confronted with evidence that he had in fact been doing both.) There was a move to have a special election to replace Burris in the Illinois legislature; I understand that died earlier today.

  87. Thanks by Muros · · Score: 1

    for the pointer.

  88. Big deal by UnixUnix · · Score: 1

    Aw, cheer up. The good Sheriff might have sued THE INTERNET.

  89. Good Ole George... Carlin that is by Evets · · Score: 1

    If selling is legal, and fucking is legal, why isn't selling fucking legal?

  90. Streisand Effect by unixan · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the Sheriff filing a lawsuit about it, prostitution posts on Craigslist will now receive more attention than ever before.

    --
    This signature intentionally left unblank.
  91. Why is prostitution illegal? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me why prostitution is illegal in the first place?

    1. Re:Why is prostitution illegal? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let's see:

      It's a great way to spread STDs (at rates far higher than would occur 'naturally')
      Typically the prostitue is a woman who is at the mercy of a typically stronger man - with the inevitable results.
      It 'encourages' human trafficing, pimping, etc. all of which are disruptive to a orderly society.
      It is difficult to tax (I'm sure loads of people will jump on this one)
      Aside from these reasons, it's degrading.

      Face it, prostitution is not the sort of thing that a civilized society *wishes* to tolerate. This last reason might not sit too well with your sense of morality, or freedom, but mankind has struggled for millenia trying to better the human condition, and prostitution was singled out pretty quickly as a type of behaviour with a negative contribution coefficient. Not much has changed.

    2. Re:Why is prostitution illegal? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      It's a great way to spread STDs (at rates far higher than would occur 'naturally')

      You have to prove that assertion.

      Typically the prostitue is a woman who is at the mercy of a typically stronger man - with the inevitable results.

      This is the case in life. Assault is still against the law.

      It 'encourages' human trafficing, pimping, etc. all of which are disruptive to a orderly society.

      So does the mere act of a young pretty girl walking door to door selling girl scout cookies.

      It is difficult to tax (I'm sure loads of people will jump on this one)

      So are a lot of things. A "handy man" is difficult to tax as well.

      Aside from these reasons, it's degrading.

      To whom? Being a school janitor can be pretty degrading, but it is not illegal.

      Face it, prostitution is not the sort of thing that a civilized society *wishes* to tolerate.

      Bull shit.

      This last reason might not sit too well with your sense of morality, or freedom, but mankind has struggled for millenia trying to better the human condition, and prostitution was singled out pretty quickly as a type of behaviour with a negative contribution coefficient. Not much has changed.

      Prostitution, like all moral codes about sex, spring from oppressive religions.

      I don't see a difference between a girl who sleeps with men because they *have* money and a girl who sleeps with men *for* money. It is just one is more honest about it.

      Either way, you are paying for sex.

    3. Re:Why is prostitution illegal? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Prostitution, like all moral codes about sex, spring from oppressive religions.
      This is a naive and vastly trivialized point of view. Religion - and its rules - are created by man. Yes, religion is quite frequently corrupted into little more than a power struggle, but, that doesn't invalidate all the moral codes that the religion is based upon. The history of people is inexorably intertwined with religion. The majority of the moral codes the religion prescribes are a result of people trying to live amongst each other in a way that causes the least amount of harm to them all. If you don't understand this, or refuse to acknowledge it, you are foolish.

      Prostitution is not just "paying for sex". It's not no-strings-attached sexual intercourse. There is no such thing. This is simply not how humans (or any animal for that matter) behave. The act of copulation is never done without risk for any living being. Again, if you refuse to believe this, you are delusional.

    4. Re:Why is prostitution illegal? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      This is a naive and vastly trivialized point of view. Religion - and its rules - are created by man.

      Yes, the various religions are constructs of men. his is true. It is, however, the middle eastern religions that seem to have a problem with sex. Most of the others, seem not to care.

      Yes, religion is quite frequently corrupted into little more than a power struggle, but, that doesn't invalidate all the moral codes that the religion is based upon.

      Yes, I'll consult the christian bible for the "moral" value on which I will place on my daughter when I sell her to slavery.

      The "moral codes" the bible professes have been around long before J'esus.

      The history of people is inexorably intertwined with religion

      Which people?

      Prostitution is not just "paying for sex". It's not no-strings-attached sexual intercourse.
      Then almost every young person is a prostitute. I've had plenty of NSA sex in my life. At 46 years old, I look back to my 20s and it was a lot of fun.

      There is no such thing. This is simply not how humans (or any animal for that matter) behave.
      Obviously you are not a serious study of anthropology. In fact, did you know that, in human beings, there are sperm who's job it is to destroy other sperm? It seems we have a biological history of group sex.

      The act of copulation is never done without risk for any living being. Again, if you refuse to believe this, you are delusional.

      Life is risk. What's your point. man kind has been seeking to mitigate the risk of disease and reproduction for the acts of sex since we figured out that sex produces screaming children. It is just at this day and age we've gotten a little better at it.

      any how, it begs the question, does this relate to prostitution being illegal. There are plenty of things that around which you could get a vague majority to think is immoral, but that does not mean it should be illegal.

      For instance, I bet most people would think that knowingly lying on TV news casts is immoral, but in a Florida case a few years back, FOX News won a court battle against a production team who breached a contract with FOX because what FOX wanted was known to be false. Their defense was it was not the truth. FOX countered that it had no responsibility to tell the truth, and won.

      I think publicly misrepresenting facts has a far more damaging effect on society than two adults have sex for money in a private venue.

    5. Re:Why is prostitution illegal? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of what you said above - that is interesting in itself - but not all

      I think this comment has gone too far though
      I think publicly misrepresenting facts...
      Sorry, you're completely changing the discussion. (But I don't disagree either)

  92. So... Kinko by UnixUnix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me attempt to assist authorities in prosecuting such heinous crime.

    I was at a Kinko's store happily surfing when a girl next to me asked for help. I duly assisted her in setting up her Craigslist "erotic services" ad. [She offered me her business too but I pointed out to her her ad: her hourly rate was higher than what I make consulting. That gave me a graceful way to bow out)

    Presently, after a few minutes of exposure, her ad generated responses. The entire room was treated to her loudly intoning "Yes! Yes! (Fsck) me! I love it in my (Ascii)..." Half the people in the room came to their feet, red-faced, while the other half...oh, we were stretched back in our seats laughing our heads off.

    There you have it. Guilty as charged.

  93. Why Doesn't Craigslist just drop the erotic ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why have the erotic ads at all. No money is made and they are not serving any well-defined need except enabling prostitution. Certainly there are no free speech issues involved here since nothing of import is actually being said. Seems like CL is doing this to prove some unnamed point. I simply don't get it. "Just Because" is not any kind of justification. I assume anyone arguing for the continuation of this CL "service" is either a regular user of said service to trying to make some extremely weak political argument here. The CL erotic ads simply do society no real positive service.

    After reading the Sheriff's complaint I agree with most of its premises - it costs the county hundreds of thousand of dollars per year in enforcement dollars and much of what they run across is child-prostitution and trafficking. Not easy to argue that that is a worthy cause for CL to be aiding.

  94. .... fuckin cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in! People can post stuff on the internet! Angry people want to put you in jail!

  95. Re:Why Doesn't Craigslist just drop the erotic ads by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

    Because as a general rule, things ought to be permitted by default and banned only for a damn good reason. Who are you to judge what's worthwhile?

  96. Exhibit E by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I refer to page 10 in the PDF:

    The complete postings, with nude images, are attached as Exhibit E).

    Where's "Exhibit E"? I demand that the PDF includes Exhibit E!

  97. Doesn't he know about "The Streisand Effect"? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    OMG, you can find hookers online!

    Now I know where to look. Thanks, Sheriff!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  98. Why rent payments are less than mortgage payments by becker · · Score: 1

    It's not uncommon for rent payments to be less than the mortgage in high cost areas like San Francisco. The owners are hoping to make their money on rapid property value increases. The renters are just there to keep the place occupied and help qualify for the mortgage.

    If a $700K house will be worth $800K next year, you aren't that concerned if the renters are paying $2K/month or $3K/month.

    Everything changes when the $800K house will be worth $750K next year. The owner can't sell. They would probably need to get rid of the tenants to put the house on the market, but they can't afford to pay the full mortgage when the house doesn't sell in the slow market. They can't raise the rent much, until all of the other rental properties go up as well.

  99. checking it out myself... by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    I am not picking on the Montgomery Alabama or New York City craigslist I am just using them as a example.

    Montgomery Alabama: the search for w4m in the personals section Found: 825 Displaying.

    New York City: the same personals section for w4m got a total Found: 1000 Displaying for New York City.

    I noticed that some of the ads leave nothing to the imagination. Wow these people got balls, plus a few other things too. Who knew is was so easy to "ahem" hook up. Any thing you desire is right there on craigslist.

    Did I just hear a echo here on /. ?

  100. clueless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are they clueless or are they purposely ignoring the fact that all those 'codes' w4m m4m w4w, etc... are also used in advertising for anonymous and non-paid meetings, both in newspaper personals and craigslist, also both for actual first dates and for anonymous sex, sans dating. unless they want to ban casual encounters, which they do not have the authority to do, they can't get rid of the prostitutes who hide themselves among the legal activity.

  101. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The standard procedure is for man to ask woman.

    How conveeeeenient you decide this way!

  102. Re:In other countries... by Ashriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The AC probably jumped to the conclusion that the sheriff was on a crusade based on religious temperament.

    All in all, it was pretty easy to follow to me, if not necessarily well founded.

    It's not really an improper conclusion. Show me one non-theist that believes prostitution is improper, and I'll show you a closet theist.

    Only those who believe in some imaginary divine morality have an issue with folks selling sexual services.

  103. Re:Why Doesn't Craigslist just drop the erotic ads by Saysys · · Score: 1

    Causing harm isn't the only moral question in the world! The importance of holding a society together is something you may scoff at but our level of non-violence between people groups is historically unprecedented and not likely to continue if "do no unwanted harm" is our only societal criteria for law.

    Look at the flow chart... with an average IQ of 100 exactly how many of these half-apes do you expect to be able to knowledgeably consent?

    Who's to say what does and does not cause harm? Not exercising and eating right causes harm. Not waring your seat belt causes harm.

    The libertarian mantra sounds wonderful but is so full of holes that a 7th grader would have trouble swallowing it.

  104. Re:Why Doesn't Craigslist just drop the erotic ads by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    I'll bite...

    Prostitution is illegal but erotic services are not. As long as sexual acts are not taking place, then it's erotic services.
    It's NOT my thing, and I always raise an eyebrow when I hear about it myself. However, that doesn't make it illegal prostitution in spite of my feeling of how easy it could become that in private. It's about as vague as the (somewhat continuing) 80's fiasco with weapons being killing devices and should be banned because killing is illegal.
    Of course, on that note a massage/chiropractic work/doctors visit/storage area rental could become prostitution in private, also.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  105. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about that.....maybe his wife keeps showing up in the w4m category....

    Nah, it's his twin 18yr old daughters showing up in the w(^2)4* category.

  106. Solution at hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is some food for thought. Prostitution is illegal but working in the entertainment sex industry is not(mostly). The solution to bypass most countries law is simple. You pay people to have sex and be filmed. One of the people then buys the video from you for a sum larger than the sum you've paid them. Ultimately no videos need be traded or produced. Just a solid paper trail is needed. You are no longer a client but an entertainment worker. Pretty smart hey. ;)

  107. w4m,' 'm4m,' 'm4w,' etc. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    "alleges that Craigslist maintains 21 classifications of sex-for-hire, coded as 'w4m,' 'm4m,' 'm4w,' etc." and that it has facilitated child prostitution and kidnapping and human trafficking.

    Man, I knew spam bots were bad, but next they'll be into drugs and gun running.

  108. Why doesn't he do his job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up a sting operation by phoning the numbers... how hard can it be to trick a drugged-out whore?

  109. less prostitution on CL by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Dates usually require at least dinner and a movie, often several times. That can run into the hundreds of dollars per lay. Marriage-oriented sites require even more money per lay. Craigslist ads seem to generally dispense with such monetary transfers and cut right to the chase. So, obviously, Craigslist has less prostitution than other personal sites. He should go after relationship oriented sites.

  110. A Solution to Child Sex Slavery by Ashriel · · Score: 1

    Ban the children

    It would work! Think about it: the general reaction of the government whenever there has been social misuse of a commodity has been to ban the commodity and criminalize possession of it.

    So, we just need to round up all children everywhere and lock them away in evidence lockers. Then when they reach the age of majority, we can release them for the 3-6 months it would take for the socially maladjusted adults to commit a crime, then lock them back up, this time in for-profit prisons.

    Actually, I think this would be a great solution to all social problems, plus provide the government with a productive population that is completely under control

    (To those of you who can't recognize a joke in poor taste when you see it, yes, I'm being facetious)

  111. Bonobos by speedtux · · Score: 1

    There's a little bit of prostitution in human society, but more might actually be better. Bonobo society, a society built around sex and prostitution, is a lot more peaceful than human society. We're more like chimps, we resolve conflicts through fighting.

  112. Re:In other countries... by houghi · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that.....maybe his wife keeps showing up in the w4m category....

    Not only that. She is undercutting the prices of the rest.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  113. Oh my... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Where I live, prostitution is a normal, regulated service industry.

    So how is life in Washington, DC these days?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  114. Prostitution could easily be eradicated by kanweg · · Score: 1

    If the other women were more willing. He should sue every non-prostitute-woman, I guess.

    Bert

  115. Hope he doesn't sue Slashdot too by incer · · Score: 1

    Contextual ads are a constant source of entertainment! http://www.badluck.it/imgv/cont_ads.png

  116. I'm not in his jurisdiction, nor is Craigslist. by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    He has no right to stop me advertising my prostitution services, nor any right to stop my clients reading about them, nor any right to stop Craigslist from listing them.

    Let him stop Chicago residents from reading Craigslist, if he's so worried.

    For the umpteenth time, it's the WORLD WIDE Web. Local yokels don't get to dictate how it gets used.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  117. Re:In other countries... by attackc0de · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, no one is really being hurt by this.

    Heck, if prostitution moves entirely online, it'll be a good thing. The "bad image" caused by streetwalkers and such will go away, since the actual "marketing" of services happens invisibly online, and those involved can meet up in private.

    It'll make law enforcement easier. It's far easier to track someone online that in real life, at least in the US it is.

    --
    For a nice date: call strftime(3C)
  118. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are forgetting the feminazis..

  119. Re:In other countries... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    My guess, is the AC is referring to religious people when he says "people with imaginary friends", the imaginary friend indicating god.

    No shit, Sherlock.

    I've got some dihydrogen monoxide here, but I'm struggling to find an adjective to describe it. Perhaps you can help?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  120. Re:former state governor seeking stupid sheriff - by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    I think you might be on to something...

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  121. curiouser and curiouser.... by raengler · · Score: 1

    Noting also that the Illinois legislature also passed a resolution declaring Pluto a planet, I think we've found the location of Uranus. Will the parade of crooked/stupid/clueless people coming out of Illinois ever end????

  122. Re:help? by conureman · · Score: 1

    Wet?

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  123. Re:In other countries... by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

    Well, I would argue that someone does need to step in and point out, at least to those modding 'Insightful', that parent's points are convoluted/offtopic/whathaveyou.

  124. Free Advertising by Hillyman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the release of this story will bring a whole heck of a lot more people to Craigslist looking for some company. If they didn't know they could do so before, they do now. The Sheriff has definitely made a significant contribution to their marketing campaign. I'd be interested to see the number of hits the site got before the complaint was filed vs. the number of hits after. They'll probably need to buy some new servers. I know a guy...

  125. Re:help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cold and hard?

  126. Re:In other countries... by genner · · Score: 1

    Hot and gaseous?

  127. Wrong guy, fool by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Milton didn't invent the mat. You're obviously not very good with people.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  128. MargesCovenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprisingly, I couldn't find the URL either.

  129. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cook County, Illinois Sheriff Thomas Dart has announced that he's filing lawsuits along with Johnathan E. Riches against the Chicago Yellow Pages, the Chicago Reader, the Chicago Free Press, Google, Yahoo, citysearch.com, theeroticreview.com, the Russian Mafia, Jesus Christ, The Internet, Pluto, The 1972 starting lineup of the Chicago Cubs, Fermilabs, Nikola Tesla, Cisco, Rev. Al Sharpton, The Yeti, John Dillinger, All Red Ford Mustangs, and the fibonacci number.

  130. Honey Pot :-) by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't he be using craigslist as a honey pot to catch prostitutes and johns?

  131. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 replies pointing out that he forgot stderr.

  132. The most violent area is eviction by olddotter · · Score: 1

    As a landlord I talked to local Police and Sherif Deputy's and they have said the team that sees the most violence in the department is the eviction team. Keep that in mind next time you play GTA or watch Miami Vice reruns.

  133. Sue the yellow pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should be suing the yellow page phone books too. All those "private dancer" ads, "escort service" ads... there's more to those than just dancing or "escorting" people around.

    (ewww, the captcha is "excrete" !)

  134. [citation needed] by cynical+kane · · Score: 1

    Wikipeida: Naperville is about 35 square miles, which is pretty big, but hardly 'gigantic'. In size it falls behind Joliet, Aurora, Rockford, and of course Chicago itself, which is about 230 square miles of skyscrapers, slums and sprawl.

  135. Re:Why rent payments are less than mortgage paymen by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Also, the mortgage isn't your sole expense. With insurance and property tax, I pay the equivalent of *18* mortgage payments every year, not 12 (yes, tax and insurance are that high, and I bought before the rush).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  136. Re:1g1c by conureman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm still mad at my kid for hepping me to that one.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  137. Craigslist has explained this before ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The very reason they HAVE an "erotic services" category is to dissuade people from mis-using/abusing the other categories.

    When they didn't have such a category, they started getting numerous complaints of escorts trying to offer their services in covert ways. EG. Posting ads in the real-estate category, offering "short term rental of fine tracts of land", and filling the ad with other "code words" so people seeking such a thing out would know what the ad was really implying. (Inevitably, they'd post a phone number to some voice mailbox, so they could screen the calls and only call back people who they thought really wanted an escort or prostitute.)

    You're never going to stop people from using a free service to advertise things of a sexual nature -- so better to provide proper areas for it to go. Then people who don't want to see it can easily bypass it.

  138. Price-to-rent ratios by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    I don't understand how it would even happen. Surely most landlords charge at LEAST enough rent to cover their payments on the property, don't they?

    Price-to-rent ratio is a housing market statistic that is kept regularly, and that can be used to address your question.

    Look at the chart in this blog entry. Basically, over the past few years, we had a real estate bubble that sent house prices very far up, without a proportional increase in rents. So yes, many properties bought over the past few years are being rented below the cost of the mortgage and other expenses.

  139. Old news by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    The fact that you can use Craigslist to meet prostitutes is old news. The fact that you can use Craigslist to meet prostitutes and rob them is a little newer.

    I've seen several cases about this lately.

  140. I Disagree by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    I think that like many areas of life, different locations have different local customs.

    I have no doubt that your dancer friends and girlfriends have the most rigid moral compasses, but please let me assure you that the situation you described does not apply universally. I've gone to upscale clubs (and I can name them if you care) where sex acts not only occur, they are solicited by the dancers, themselves. I've never had sex with a dancer on-premises, but that assumes a very Bill Clintonesque definition of "sex".

    There are very simple and inexpensive techniques to determine which girls follow the rules and which ones offer extras. Don't believe me? Try this:

    1. Visit a city where you know you at least have a prayer. There are some cities with zealous enforcement, and you shouldn't waste your money there.
    2. Visit a club where you know they turn at least a somewhat-blind-eye to extras. I'm not talking about sleazy, dive clubs, either (although you're right, you are more likely to have success there). There are plenty of upscale (read: hot chicks) establishments where extras are to be had. This information is simple to obtain in the age of the Internet.
    3. If you know the name of a dancer who gives extras, by all means request her. But if not, pick any dancer you find attractive. (Don't bother waiting for the dancers to come to you. It's a waste of your time.)
    4. Chat her up a bit and see if she talks dirty.
    5. Assuming she does, purchase a public-area dance from her (cost should be around $20+$5 tip).
    6. When she's grinding on you, "in the heat of the moment" caress her breasts and note her reaction. It will generally be one of 3 possibilities: a) she backs you off... I consider this a successful encounter, because you know not to waste any more money on her, and it only cost you $25 for that information. send her packing. b) she solicits you... Also a successful encounter, because you now know the "menu", or c) no reaction... this is a moderately successful outcome... you at least know she doesn't have much respect for the rules, but you don't really know how far she'll go
    7. If she didn't react to the previous step, you need to go for the pussy. Again, don't manhandle her, start your hand on her thigh and nicely, but confidently go for it. At this point she is pretty much going to have to react with a "not gonna happen", or a "you need to purchase a private dance to do that".
    8. Before you purchase that private dance, know what you want (to "take her temperature"?, for her to get you off?, oral?) and negotiate it before you buy that VIP dance. Don't take her vague implications for answers, either. This is a business transaction, and you deserve to know what you are contracting for. Also, don't be afraid to negotiate. Ask her to for a discount or, at the very least, to comp the floor dance. Hey, it's a tough economy out there!

    As I'm sure you know, these girls are experts at implying, suggesting, and taunting you with things they have no intention of delivering. The above technique cuts right through the hustle without wasting unnecessary time or money. It's better for the girl too, because it saves her the aggravation of spending any more time with a creepy guy like me.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:I Disagree by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, people who touch the girls are usually man-handled by the bouncer and thrown out on their asses.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    2. Re:I Disagree by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Sure, I get what you're saying; and you're right, it's somewhat about local customs. I've frequented clubs in large cities: Chicago, Atlanta, Orlando, Phoenix, etc. And yeah, I can name clubs where you can be pretty sure extras are being performed. It's just that from my experience, as I said, it's the seedier places where the likelihood is strong. Of course, it's an individual basis. As you said, even at high end clubs you might find some that will do it. I imagine she'd at least play her cards close to her chest and only offer extras to regulars. It is a problem for other dancers who don't perform extras. Some say it's the competition, but many more have commented that it's about the assumption that customers will make that all girls will do extras. It can create a pretty negative atmosphere quickly. Actually just today, my friend was telling me that the manager fired a girl last night on the strength of one of the local old timer dancers merely suggesting that the girl was performing extras. Considering the layout of the specific club, it's really unlikely anything happened, but then, girls do get catty.

      The techniques you mentioned are pretty sound I would say, although I don't know how often you'd get to negotiate anything about VIP while at the tables since most places (I've been to) have a 2 or 3 song max for the girls sitting. Personally, I still prefer for that stuff to be taken off-premises. It's better for the other dancers and for the club, and I won't have to worry about sitting on a "dirty" couch back in the champagne room. :D

    3. Re:I Disagree by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      In my experience, people who touch the girls are usually man-handled by the bouncer and thrown out on their asses.

      Have you ever actually witnessed this? Or do you simply watch too much television?

      I have never seen anyone roughed up by a bouncer at a strip club, and I've been to a lot of clubs. The worst that has ever happened to me using the above technique was the girl telling me I wasn't to touch her there. Like I said above, I consider this a positive outcome. I wasn't paying her $25 to touch her boobies. I was paying $25 to see if she will do real extras, and I got my answer.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:I Disagree by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree that your best shot at extras is in the seedier places. But I don't really like going to the seedier places. Personal preference.

      Regarding the girls playing their cards close to their chests (no pun intended, I'm sure), that's precisely what the above technique was meant to address (I didn't invent the technique, by the way). These girls are masters in the art of implying that they're going to give you waaay more than they actually intend to give. They string and string you along until your wallet is empty and then they leave for the next customer. Thanks, but no thanks.

      Using the above technique, you get your answer in 5 minutes, and for $25. That is a wise investment. The last thing you want to do is plunk down some major cash for VIP, only to find out all she's willing to do is give you a few floor dances in the VIP room.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    5. Re:I Disagree by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      In my experience, people who touch the girls are usually man-handled by the bouncer and thrown out on their asses.

      Have you ever actually witnessed this? Or do you simply watch too much television?

      I've not only seen that happen but have seen clubs refuse to serve another drink even to those who are not clearly drunk or belligerent. I admit it may not be like that everywhere but as with the rest of the world, strip clubs are mirrors of the rest of society.

      I have never seen anyone roughed up by a bouncer at a strip club, and I've been to a lot of clubs.

      I've seen customers escorted out, and dragged kicking and screaming, by bouncers. When I was in the military I saw other military personnel do the same, even to others in the military. One dancer I knew lived with her boyfriend and wanted to move out because he was abusive. Another dancer loaned those of us who helped her move out a gun she owned.

      Falcon

  141. Re:In other countries... by Kagura · · Score: 1

    It's not really an improper conclusion. Show me one non-theist that believes prostitution is improper, and I'll show you a closet theist.

    Only those who believe in some imaginary divine morality have an issue with folks selling sexual services.

    Who gave this genius a mod point? Having morals doesn't mean you're a theist. You may as well take it as far as "show me one non-theist that believes murder is improper, and I'll show you a closet theist."

    You're saying that since the universe is made up of quarks and leptons there is no fundamental rule that makes murder "wrong". While I'm willing to bet that's true, just because I hold the personal belief that murder is wrong doesn't mean I drew that conclusion based on what a bible says.

  142. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can be non theist, and believe that in the current social setup there is a very low probability that a prostitute really choose his or her fate freely.
    And therefore accepting to use the service of prostitutes is about the same as having sex with a person that just underwent serial rape and is not is a state to wonder about one more or not.

    And it is possible to be non theist and nevertheless think that what makes your life worth while is being free with free people.

    And in that case you will not want to visit prostitutes.

    Being afraid of ulterior ethernal punishment is not an ethical point of view.

    So ethics have nothing to do with religion.
    Wether you are theist or non theist only if you do a decision of being a decent human being because you sincerely want to be one can be ethical.

    Being afraid of cops, human or divine is not being ethical (only practical).

  143. let's generalize this scenario by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    I'm sure some people use Craigslist legitimately for dating, not for prostitution. Those who solicit sex for money are in fact breaking the law (depending on your state/city).

    On the other hand, some people use their computer to pirate music. Should we sue Dell for facilitating this?

    Some people use their cars as a vessel for doing drive-by shootings. Should we sue Ford?
    What's with the crackpot government in Illinois? Selling senator seats, saying Pluto's a planet, and now a bucktoothed sheriff suing a site for illegal activity they already strive to eliminate?

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  144. Too Expensive by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Tapping phone lines, cross-referencing numbers, wiring up hotel rooms, clogging up court dockets, etc. Don't get me wrong--it does happen from time to time--but that's an awful use of police resources, and the cops know it. When the do do it, it's just for show.

    How satisfying is it for the cop to set up an elaborate and costly sting operation to catch a provider, and have her walk away with probation or a few days of community service? Or catch a client, only to have the DA decline to prosecute, because the clients are hardly ever prosecuted?

    In the end, I don't think it would be very effective at all. In my city, the vice squad regularly patrols the streets making arrests. But yet the "commerce" continues.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  145. have you read the newspaper lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The classified ads of most national and regional newspapers are filled with that stuff. If craiglist intends to have similar service then this goes without say.

    So although what he says may be true, what he should say for clarity is: "Craigslist is 'the single largest source of clasified ads in the nation'"

    oh and I love the way people throw around 'child porn' to support a wide range of complaints.

  146. He probably looked in w4m, & showed-up at his by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not uncommon for a high-income family to be dirt poor, so the wife makes ends-meat by prostituting silently while pursuing a high-paying custom seemstress career to cover the real money coming in. In this case, the U$250K/year Shire-reeve is taking the drugs he seized and looking for a free hooker, but wound up at another house with his wife waiting for him. Somthing like that kind of happened in Colorado, where a wife was strip-dancing and escourting men just to pay U$5K/month on mortgage for a regular house with a desert view. And... then she disappeared, for no apparent reason to another country witha client that convinced her to burn her car and toss her purse to the center-divider (ahhem, three good young kids, but your husband sucked--consider the husband).

    Oh, BTW, I'm a 180lb 3-foot tall lesbian vietnamese negro midget who thinks she's beautiful and is looking for a serious relationship with only ladies that look as beautiful in a stretched-out mirror as me. Please, no men and show your picture because I know showing a picture never fools me in standing at the bus-stop for you to decide to stay-seated or jump-out in ecstasy.

  147. This cchizzo chick introduced me to Knoppix-STD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It got outdated and she packed-up to OpenBSD. I took the relationship to the next level, leaving her behind for BackTrack3 SlackWare and my life has been twattin' the flies ever since.

  148. Funny how he stumbled upon Craigsclits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could've complained about the obvious Marijuana pipes being concealed as "tobacco bongs", or the fact that someone is *trading* somthing valuable for somthing else of equal but different value. Instead, he complains about hookers. My friend, every man that ever got cheating on his wife or about to be Blackmailed has always tried to cover his tracks. Law Enforcement is the biggest RICO case in history yet to be prosecuted. Of'course he's complaining about the hookers, because after taking some of the Marijuana he stole from a poor guy trying to supplement a living, he bought himself a bong and was looking to celebrate with a hooker over it but she was about to Blackmail him; sure, he'll call in some shill assistants over in FBI to cover his ass by speaking of an unwritten (as of yet) investigation covering the times of internet Craigslist access by this dirtbag Sherriff. In the end, he'll be praised in the concealment of his horny ass while the rest of us in The Covenant get pushed back as far as Ipswich. What you don't see in this story is how it should sound in the truth: man in private capacity (off-duty Sheriff) caught soliciting hooker, turns around to protect his paycheck and official credibility by becoming on-duty Sheriff in his own complaint to dissatisfaction of Service.

    When people are in-office or out-of-office, they are all dirtbagsin disguise. It's about time someone made them into an ornament of freedom, hung high in a tree under the rEvolution Angel.

  149. the power of courts by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    An example of the limits of the power of the courts is the Cherokee "Trail of Tears". The Supreme Court ruled that The State of Georgia did not have jurisdiction over the Cherokee. The state of Georgia evicted the Cherokee from their lands anyway.

    Georgia may of been part of evicting the Cherokee but Cherokee also lived in the Carolinas, both North and South, Tennessee, and Kentucky. The Supreme Court rules against President Andrew Jackson with Chief Justice Marshall delivering the ruling. Jackson then basically told Marshall to raise his own army.

    Falcon

  150. Re:Why rent payments are less than mortgage paymen by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Everything changes when the $800K house will be worth $750K next year. The owner can't sell. They would probably need to get rid of the tenants to put the house on the market, but they can't afford to pay the full mortgage when the house doesn't sell in the slow market.

    Owners who get rid of tenants who pay on tyme are stupid. Having a building already being rented saves a buyer the money to find a new renter. Currently I live in a house that was converted to a 4 unit apartment building. My sister bought the building years ago and at the tyme all of the apartments were rented. For the tenants the only thing that changed was who they paid the rent to. When I moved in we planned on her selling me the building when I was able to qualify for the mortgage, but with the housing market crash I don't when that will be, then when I took over ownership I'd do the same thing.

    Falcon

  151. evicting tenants by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    TBH the housing act here in the UK makes it hard enough to evict even if you're not paying a penny, but hey ho.

    My sister's an owner who rents apartments in the US and it took her about 6 months to have one of her tenants evicted after they stopped paying rent. During that tyme if she hadn't been able to pay her mortgage she could have lost the building. And it's not as if the tenant tried to pay, she wasn't even looking for work.

    Falcon

  152. strip dancers by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    ROFL...you fallen into the trap of believing anything a stripper tells you. I'm sure they said that they love you and think you're cute too haha...

    It's all about money. If you show up with the cash you can buy anything you want. Period.

    You've fallen for the propaganda yourself. Once upon a long tyme ago I hanged out at a strip club and made friends with the regular workers there. We called the lady who owned and managed it Mother once we hung out there a while. The boyfriend of one dancer worked there as the DJ. I baby sat their children a few tymes. I also baby sat another dancer's, who was married, children. Her sister worked as a dancer while working on a nursing degree in college. For months a couple of tymes a month we'd have a picnic or party at someone's home or in a park. I came to realize eventually strip dancers were no different than people from many other occupations.

    As for showing up with cash and being able to buy anything, that applies in a lot of other places too. Rush Limbaugh even went doctor shopping to get his favored prescription drug.

    Falcon

  153. legality of Prostitution by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Plain and simple, the erotic services section, at least for las vegas, is 99% blatant prostitution.

    As a larger city in Nevada prostitution is illegal in Las Vega but it's legal in other parts of the state.

    Falcon

  154. law enforcement by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I think you really misunderstand the purpose of law enforcement. It's not a business where "the more prostitutes we put in jail the better." It's a service where the less prostitutes which exist the better. If they're arresting whores left and right they don't pat themselves on the back because it means they've failed to keep the crime in check.

    I think it's you who don't understand law enforcement, which exist to protect people, ie victims, from involuntary harm. In a voluntary exchange such as between a prostitute and john there is no victim.

    Prostitution used to be legal in many places in the US but puritans, moralists, and others who want to control people were able to have laws passed that made it illegal.

    Falcon

  155. end of story by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    The news said that our local police read Craigslist and bust the guys who hook up in a park down by the river. That's the way law enforcement should deal with these illegal activities: bust them when they happen.

    The best way to deal with this, prostitution, is to make it legal again. It was only because of puritans, moralists, and others who want to control people that prostitution was made illegal in much of the US. According to Northwestern University prostitution was never legal in Chicago. However it was legal in other places. The same group that was successful in getting alcohol illegal with Prohibition, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, was able to exert influence to make prostitution illegal. For instance New Orleans used to have a redlight district where it was legal.

    Falcon

  156. It's definitely about the money. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    City/County/State budgets are tight and Obama isn't taxing businesses fast enough so why not just sue business directly.

    If it were all about the money then why don't they legalize and tax prostitution?

    Falcon

  157. putting out by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Try keeping track of it sometime, how much you spend on a girl before she'll have sex with you.

    This reminds me of this creep I knew. He had this black book he carried, all of the tyme, that he'd write his date's name in the first tyme he took her out. By the third date if she wouldn't have sex with him he'd never ask her out again. And he said that right in front of their faces sometimes.

    Falcon

  158. cost of dating by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Where do you eat dinner? McDonalds? Is a special night out Taco Bill?

    When I go out to dinner, the average bill for a two-up is $100 or so.

    Maybe you can afford expensive meals but I've never paid more than about $35 per person, with entertainment such as a movie or play included. Then again I once asked a lady to go on a date to a concert and the tickets were about $70 each.

    Falcon

  159. walkiing the streets by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Prostitutes exist with or without Craigslist; it is not a "source" and it does not create prostitutes. They'd be out walking the street if Craigslist didn't give them somewhere safe to advertise. I'd much rather keep them on the web than on my sidewalk.

    Ah but prostitutes would not have to walk the streets if it were legal. They, the cheap ones, walk the streets because they have no legal place to go to practice their trade.

    Falcon

  160. Craigslist has a dedicated section specifically by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    for escorts

    So does Google, Google even has more than one section for escorts.

    Falcon

  161. That is indeed the term I was trying to think of by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I thought you might be. What many people, at least in the US, think of when it comes to "clear channel" is the broadcaster Clear Channel.

    Falcon

  162. Cook County Sheriff--desperate measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cook County Sheriff--needs to spend more time on Real criminals investigation: Sex is Healthy...p**sy is on sale in difficult time. We guys are helping stimulate our economic in a way.