In November 2009 a Man-In-the-Middle vulnerability for SSL/TLS/https was made public (CVE-2009-3555), and shortly afterwards demonstrated to be exploitable.
Isn't a vulnerability, by definition, exploitable?
I wonder if they made a more subtle alteration months ago. This defacement could scare them into spreading the (broken) bomb recipe as far and wide as possible.
This is about the GNOME Toolkit (GTK) rather than the GNOME shell itself (which doesn't run on Windows AFAIK). The Windows port allows applications like GIMP to run on Windows.
No, it's the place where you click your username out of a list (unless you run a little gconf-fu on the command line su'd as the gdm user). Does LightDM allow configuration or are users just stuck with the GUI user selection screen?
That's entirely up to the theme you're using. The default KDM theme in Debian has it typed. I think Ubuntu's default GDM theme has you select from a list.
Back during the Firefox 4 betas I sometimes used a 300Mhz P3 laptop (380ish megabytes of RAM). Firefox pegged the processor just by being open, but Chromium didn't.
Also, since this looks to be an otherwise quiet/. story, would this be an appropriate place to hash out the pronunciation of OS ("Oss" vs. "Oh-Ess"?)...
"Oh-Ess". I use "Oss" for, well, OSS.
EmEssDoss, but "Microsoft Office". Usually drop it altogether for "Windows $FOO"
EssQueElle, but I've never used it.
Slashdot Mirror
So Skype allows group of text-only for their free accounts.
Text + voice, actually. Don't know about video.
Then they would had released the thing finished, not in an early beta.
People want what they can't have. :-)
Yes. They want Brain Cheezburgers.
It's called "bending the rules". It's pretty fun to not do when you someone you don't like is demanding it.
In November 2009 a Man-In-the-Middle vulnerability for SSL/TLS/https was made public (CVE-2009-3555), and shortly afterwards demonstrated to be exploitable.
Isn't a vulnerability, by definition, exploitable?
Why is that same article linked twice?
Or it just means that there are two gamer demographics: the college-and-below age, and the retired-and-bored age.
I think I remember hearing something about that, yes.
I wonder if they made a more subtle alteration months ago. This defacement could scare them into spreading the (broken) bomb recipe as far and wide as possible.
Meh. Something about the Updater broke when I upgraded to 1.3.20. I downgraded, deleted my .wine folder, and started anew. No dice.
Wings of Liberty works fine in Wine. At least until last week or so.
Antisemitism is, first and foremost, racism. Disagreeing with Isreal's politics isn't antisemitic.
Almost exactly the same as any other lossy-vs-lossless comparison.
This is about the GNOME Toolkit (GTK) rather than the GNOME shell itself (which doesn't run on Windows AFAIK). The Windows port allows applications like GIMP to run on Windows.
GIMP Toolkit, actually.
No, it's the place where you click your username out of a list (unless you run a little gconf-fu on the command line su'd as the gdm user). Does LightDM allow configuration or are users just stuck with the GUI user selection screen?
That's entirely up to the theme you're using. The default KDM theme in Debian has it typed. I think Ubuntu's default GDM theme has you select from a list.
Tomato.
DD-WRT.
Again? That answer is just as useless to me now as it always has been.
I don't think "old stuff works" is going to be much of a selling point.
Ooops. 500 Mhz.
Back during the Firefox 4 betas I sometimes used a 300Mhz P3 laptop (380ish megabytes of RAM). Firefox pegged the processor just by being open, but Chromium didn't.
or 8.8.8.8?
Yes, actually. Speaking of which, I wonder if/when they'll get ipv6 DNS on those servers...
He's not asking what a rifle is, he's asking what "rilfes" are.
Aye, probably KDE 2.
Wayland is only in the repositories; it isn't part of the default install yet.
They could at least bring us something we haven't seen before.
Also, since this looks to be an otherwise quiet /. story, would this be an appropriate place to hash out the pronunciation of OS ("Oss" vs. "Oh-Ess"?)...
"Oh-Ess". I use "Oss" for, well, OSS.
EmEssDoss, but "Microsoft Office". Usually drop it altogether for "Windows $FOO"
EssQueElle, but I've never used it.