When did World War One start? That's an excellent question: which aspect of WWI are we talking about? The first German invasion of a neighboring state? The rise of Freidrich the Great? The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand? It depends on what you mean by "World War One's start".
However, as someone who's studied any of the social sciences, you'd agree that once you accept a common definition of the start of World War One, the question has exactly one answer, and that answer is one particular time, not a sliding scale.
There's a simple way around this: stick to PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle, DB/2, or some other real database. MySQL doesn't make the grade, precisely because things like this can happen.
Look, guys, Mini-PCI is not meant to be a route for user extensibility; it was meant to be a mechanism for the vendor to add individual cards to a standard motherboard. If you want to configure a high-speed a/b/g device, go through your USB ports.
Sorry, rsidd, but your analgoy between the Dalits and the freed slaves in the US is more apt than you know. There's a clear caste boundary, and there's clear oppression of the Dalits throughout both urban and rural India. Jim Crow is alive and well there.
You should read your own article, chump -- it doesn't say what you think it says.
(Yes, I'm feeding a troll. The problem here is that it's one of those "all that is required for evil to triumph" situations -- the AC is feeding the bigotry behind anti-Indian sentiment in the US, and those people need to be answered. I don't give a shit about him, but third parties need to know that what he's lying.)
The sex ratio at birth (SRB) in Indian culture is 1.20 males to 1.0 females. The normal SRB is 1.05, which Japan, Sweden, and other Western nations have.
Those are quite reasonable figures, and quite comparable to the United States' figures. I think you're confusing the figures in India with those from the PRC.
I'm not so sure about that. They don't have a lot of relief, of course, but they do bring out a bunch of details not visible in the monocular views. The crest on the mountain, for instance, is much clearer in stereo than it is in mono.
of $80 for your new home with $80k repayable over 20 years at a fixed rate of 4.5% p.a.? I'm sure I could rustle that deal up with my compliance department.
Really? Hey, cool! Listen, I have this mortgage I hold against a bridge in Brooklyn. The borrower has been really reliable with her monthly payments -- d'you think your compliance committee would be able to see their way clear to you guys buying the loan from me? I'd sell it for, say, a third of face.
Hold on! You have not properly consulted the Flemish-speaking Walloons of east central Turkey in the constitution of your helpdesk committee commission selection commission. We will not permit the commission to commit to any commitments without first committing to comunicate with them first!
That's like saying "I broke in, so the dress code at the restaurant doesn't apply to me." That doesn't have any bearing -- if you illegally attempted to avoid seeing a EULA (which you did, even in Denmark), then you're still bound by its terms.
It is true, whether or not he was kidding. Microsoft has a lot of smart, mathematically sophisticated people who are perfectly capable of writing software to run Black-Sholes (or any of its variants) with the best of then. Microsoft's short term capital is essentially kept in a single-owner hedge fund.
even microsoft run a lot of their backend stuff on solaris and as/400 systems for instance
Not true now, and hasn't ever been true. We got rid of our last Unix box -- which ran Xenix mail -- on the main campus about eight years ago, and got rid of the last of the solaris boxes at Hotmail about three years ago.
You may not like Michael Kanellos usually, but I think he's hit the nail on the head here.
This is a bigger, hotter, less stable chip with an exotic and hard to write-for architecture. That's fine for a gaming system with a dedicated revenue stream and no competition. It's not gonna make it outside that domain.
Under the treaty which ended the Second World War, we formally assumed responsibility for the defense of Japan and (the area later known as) South Korea. We are bound to treat an attack on either of them as if it were an attack on United States territory.
Bottom line, if it's South Korea's problem, then it's ours, too.
Actually, it would be more like "There are things which might or might not be vulnerabilities. Once you observe them, though, their waveFUDtion collapses, and they become fully realized."
You really ought to go read up on North Korea before you spout nonsense like that. The DPRK is, indeed, on the other side of the world from the United States (even Hawaii and the western tip of the Aleutian islands are pretty far removed from the Korean peninsula.) However, its government definitely is not "just minding [North Korea's] own business" and arguably is "mass-murdering [North Korea's] own people".
North Korea maintains a state of war with South Korea, a democratic nation with close economic and historical ties to the US. The terms for reducing the tension for this state of war are simple and straightforward: South Korea must submit to North Korean rule. The primary target of the North Korean military threat is the city of Seoul, 10 miles from the DMZ. That's hardly "minding [North Korea's] own business".
The North Korean government has consistently pursued a policy of starving its populace to create an atmosphere of crisis inside the country. This atmosphere is extended by public murder of North Koreans who criticize the "Dear Leader" or his policies. Meanwhile, members of the North Korean armed forces and the North Korean elites eat well -- the world's largest purchaser of top-grade Cognac is Kim Jong-Il. I have always held that government organized starvation is mass murder.
The DPRK truly is inimical to western ideals as ideals. As a strong believer that those western ideals (separation of church and state, free speech, freedom of association, etc.) really are good things, I, for one, have no problem terming it an evil government.
Which one? The Google job or the Microsoft job? Pretty much, in my experience, the answers to the two questions are the same: if you can get hired by Google, you can get hired by MS, and vice versa. Microsoft pays more money, has much, much better benefits (yes, even after the cuts), and is in a place where it's cheaper to live. Google is cool, has growth potential, and is in with the Silicon Valley tech mafia. Microsoft is evil. Google is chaotic.
That works quite well for objects above about 25 Jovian masses. (In isolation, yadda yadda yadda) At that size, the body is large enough to support sustained thermonuclear fusion of species other than D+D->He3. Such bodies quickly heat up, becoming true red dwarf stars.
Object smaller than about 13 Jovian masses never exhibit any sustained fusion. Those objects are planets if they orbit a star or a stellar remnant. (They are "sub-brown dwarfs" if they don't orbit a star.)
Objects that sit between the 13 and 25 Jovian mass boundaries are in a grey area. They do exhibit sustained fusion, but only of D+D pairs. There isn't much deuterium around, though, so they don't ever heat up very much. Moreover, since they never engage in H+D->T and H+T->He3 fusion, they don't engage in the fusion reactions which are the signature of "real" stars. These are brown dwarfs -- not planets, because they do heat themselves up with fusion reactions, but not stars, either, because they don't fuse H.
Slashdot Mirror
The line "Gonna take inappropriate comma usage down to zero" doesn't scan. It would work better as "Gonna take comma splicing, down to zero".
When did World War One start? That's an excellent question: which aspect of WWI are we talking about? The first German invasion of a neighboring state? The rise of Freidrich the Great? The assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand? It depends on what you mean by "World War One's start".
However, as someone who's studied any of the social sciences, you'd agree that once you accept a common definition of the start of World War One, the question has exactly one answer, and that answer is one particular time, not a sliding scale.
Actually, it is. In the real world, statements are either true or false; there's no in between except for Schrodinger's cat.
In Soviet Russia, you aren't new here, are you?
There's a simple way around this: stick to PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle, DB/2, or some other real database. MySQL doesn't make the grade, precisely because things like this can happen.
Look, guys, Mini-PCI is not meant to be a route for user extensibility; it was meant to be a mechanism for the vendor to add individual cards to a standard motherboard. If you want to configure a high-speed a/b/g device, go through your USB ports.
Sorry, rsidd, but your analgoy between the Dalits and the freed slaves in the US is more apt than you know. There's a clear caste boundary, and there's clear oppression of the Dalits throughout both urban and rural India. Jim Crow is alive and well there.
You should read your own article, chump -- it doesn't say what you think it says.
(Yes, I'm feeding a troll. The problem here is that it's one of those "all that is required for evil to triumph" situations -- the AC is feeding the bigotry behind anti-Indian sentiment in the US, and those people need to be answered. I don't give a shit about him, but third parties need to know that what he's lying.)
Sex ratio:
at birth: 1.05 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.06 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.07 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 1.03 male(s)/female
total population: 1.07 male(s)/female (2004 est.)
Those are quite reasonable figures, and quite comparable to the United States' figures. I think you're confusing the figures in India with those from the PRC.
Sex ratio:
at birth: 1.12 male(s)/female
under 15 years: 1.13 male(s)/female
15-64 years: 1.06 male(s)/female
65 years and over: 0.91 male(s)/female
total population: 1.06 male(s)/female (2004 est.)
I'm not so sure about that. They don't have a lot of relief, of course, but they do bring out a bunch of details not visible in the monocular views. The crest on the mountain, for instance, is much clearer in stereo than it is in mono.
Hold on! You have not properly consulted the Flemish-speaking Walloons of east central Turkey in the constitution of your helpdesk committee commission selection commission. We will not permit the commission to commit to any commitments without first committing to comunicate with them first!
Not true with IIS 6.0.
That's like saying "I broke in, so the dress code at the restaurant doesn't apply to me." That doesn't have any bearing -- if you illegally attempted to avoid seeing a EULA (which you did, even in Denmark), then you're still bound by its terms.
No, no, no. That one's a fake -- you know that, don't you?
He really was talking about the Brookland Bridge -- the one down by Microsooft's Maine Campus.
It is true, whether or not he was kidding. Microsoft has a lot of smart, mathematically sophisticated people who are perfectly capable of writing software to run Black-Sholes (or any of its variants) with the best of then. Microsoft's short term capital is essentially kept in a single-owner hedge fund.
You may not like Michael Kanellos usually, but I think he's hit the nail on the head here.
This is a bigger, hotter, less stable chip with an exotic and hard to write-for architecture. That's fine for a gaming system with a dedicated revenue stream and no competition. It's not gonna make it outside that domain.
Under the treaty which ended the Second World War, we formally assumed responsibility for the defense of Japan and (the area later known as) South Korea. We are bound to treat an attack on either of them as if it were an attack on United States territory.
Bottom line, if it's South Korea's problem, then it's ours, too.
Actually, it would be more like "There are things which might or might not be vulnerabilities. Once you observe them, though, their waveFUDtion collapses, and they become fully realized."
You really ought to go read up on North Korea before you spout nonsense like that. The DPRK is, indeed, on the other side of the world from the United States (even Hawaii and the western tip of the Aleutian islands are pretty far removed from the Korean peninsula.) However, its government definitely is not "just minding [North Korea's] own business" and arguably is "mass-murdering [North Korea's] own people".
North Korea maintains a state of war with South Korea, a democratic nation with close economic and historical ties to the US. The terms for reducing the tension for this state of war are simple and straightforward: South Korea must submit to North Korean rule. The primary target of the North Korean military threat is the city of Seoul, 10 miles from the DMZ. That's hardly "minding [North Korea's] own business".
The North Korean government has consistently pursued a policy of starving its populace to create an atmosphere of crisis inside the country. This atmosphere is extended by public murder of North Koreans who criticize the "Dear Leader" or his policies. Meanwhile, members of the North Korean armed forces and the North Korean elites eat well -- the world's largest purchaser of top-grade Cognac is Kim Jong-Il. I have always held that government organized starvation is mass murder.
The DPRK truly is inimical to western ideals as ideals. As a strong believer that those western ideals (separation of church and state, free speech, freedom of association, etc.) really are good things, I, for one, have no problem terming it an evil government.
Which one? The Google job or the Microsoft job? Pretty much, in my experience, the answers to the two questions are the same: if you can get hired by Google, you can get hired by MS, and vice versa. Microsoft pays more money, has much, much better benefits (yes, even after the cuts), and is in a place where it's cheaper to live. Google is cool, has growth potential, and is in with the Silicon Valley tech mafia. Microsoft is evil. Google is chaotic.
Take your pick...
Hey, man, did you get your flying car? I heard people would be getting them by 2000 -- I must still be on the waiting list.
That works quite well for objects above about 25 Jovian masses. (In isolation, yadda yadda yadda) At that size, the body is large enough to support sustained thermonuclear fusion of species other than D+D->He3. Such bodies quickly heat up, becoming true red dwarf stars.
Object smaller than about 13 Jovian masses never exhibit any sustained fusion. Those objects are planets if they orbit a star or a stellar remnant. (They are "sub-brown dwarfs" if they don't orbit a star.)
Objects that sit between the 13 and 25 Jovian mass boundaries are in a grey area. They do exhibit sustained fusion, but only of D+D pairs. There isn't much deuterium around, though, so they don't ever heat up very much. Moreover, since they never engage in H+D->T and H+T->He3 fusion, they don't engage in the fusion reactions which are the signature of "real" stars. These are brown dwarfs -- not planets, because they do heat themselves up with fusion reactions, but not stars, either, because they don't fuse H.