Slashdot Mirror


BIOS-Approved PCI Cards For Laptops

derek_farn writes "First there were printers that would would only work with vendor annointed ink cartridges; now we have laptops that will only boot with vendor annointed PCI cards. Keeping a list of approved PCI cards in the bios is one way of ensuring that customers renew their maintenance contracts. How else are they going to be able to plug in a PCI card released after the last BIOS update?" My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this?

482 comments

  1. Confirm? by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this?

    How should we know? It's your laptop.

    :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Confirm? by redJag · · Score: 1

      it's a trick question.. just say yes (although it's also a good idea to turn and run, he may be clinically insane).

    2. Re:Confirm? by tyraen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Besides the fact that you didn't understand what he was asking...the end. He meant, his was older than the new ones that now have it. At least, that's all I got out of it. ;D

    3. Re:Confirm? by JavaPunk · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do we know its his laptop?

    4. Re:Confirm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides the fact that you have no sense of humor, parent understood very well what he was intending to ask but was responding to what he actually asked.

    5. Re:Confirm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How happy are you for increasing the noise here.
      stupid funny mod up - we need to be able to filter the funny mods out.
      shut up please.

    6. Re:Confirm? by soceror · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is still being performed. One of the reason is to prevent OEM/ODM use invalid parts. (I know cuz I used to work for one, Compal Electronic, Inc, Second Largest laptop manufacturer OEM/ODM). And it just happen that I was a BIOS enigineer for HP products) Cheers!

    7. Re:Confirm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can filter "Funny" out dipshit

    8. Re:Confirm? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the reason you may have been TOLD by your company, but ....do you believe them?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    9. Re:Confirm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How should we know? It's your laptop.

      Yes, but he doesn't consider himself to be a 100% reliable source of information, so he's looking for independent confirmation.

      That makes him quite a bit wiser than most Slashdotters, incidentally.

    10. Re:Confirm? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot

    11. Re:Confirm? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Go to preferences, set your "funny" modifier to -6 and then go sit down awkwardly, because sitting down must be really painful with that stick up your ass.

    12. Re:Confirm? by soceror · · Score: 1

      I was just an engineer doing what our client (HP) told us to do. We don't ask why. But from what these Taiwanese company are capable of... I am sure HP and other companies wants certain amount of control. (Heck, why do you think Intel created Portability CPU the first place... and why it is terminated now)

      For people don't know. Portability CPU is a class cpu that's closer to Desktop cpu speed. Has certain power-states enabled. Cost between Mobility and desktop cpu.

  2. Confirmation by fred911 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this"

    I'd need the serial number to confirm the age.. but we'll take your word for it.

    You have now confirmed that your laptop is 7 years old.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Confirmation by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      "Several"... not "seven"... close, but no cigar.

  3. IBM Thinkpads are the same way by explorer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My older Thinkpad T40p has a whitelist, too. Luckily the Cisco 350 mini-PCI card I needed to connect to the corporate wireless LAN is on the whitelist. IBM actually sells the Cisco card with an IBM part number.

    But forget trying to buy a random 802.11 a/b/g card and plug it in.

    1. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From what I've read this is because the FCC approval for the wireless is the combination of the card and the antenna (which is built into the screen). Obviously it's not really in IBM's (or any other manufacturer) interest to test every possible wireless card with their kit. They probably lock them to keep the FCC happy.

    2. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is common of many newer IBM laptops. They will not boot with a mini-pci card other than the Cisco 350 series or Intel installed.

      It seems like a dirty trick, but I can understand why IBM would do such a thing. Think of it as certified hardware. IBM doesn't want to answer support calls asking "how do I set up a kwang-dong-fu mini-pci a/b/g card I picked up in china?"

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by VargrX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hate to argue this, but, no. I've got a T40p, and an R40, and have plugged in all sort's of card/mini-pci based device's into them, and have not had any issue's beyond finding proper driver's for the OS that I'm using at the moment

      --
      Sometimes people just have to learn and adapt to change, it is one of the requirements of being a living thing.
    4. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      by the way, mine is an A31. AFIK, the A, T, R, and X series are all the same in this respect. The only wireless cards that will work are the Cisco and Intel cards.

      I have no idea if this applies to non-wifi cards.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    5. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seems to me that if they don't want their computer to be compatible with PCI cards, they shouldn't advertise it as being compatible with PCI cards.

      But maybe I'm crazy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your misuse of apostrophes is making my eyes bleed... Not one of them was needed :-)

    7. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah - actually, the one was needed for the contraction "I'm"

    8. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 2

      Hate to argue this, but, no. I've got a T40p, and an R40, and have plugged in all sort's of card/mini-pci based device's into them, and have not had any issue's beyond finding proper driver's for the OS that I'm using at the moment.

      Your misuse of apostrophes is making my eyes bleed... Not one of them was needed :-)
      Last I checked, the apostrophe for "I'm" is actually necessary. =]
      --

      Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

    9. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

      There's I've and I'm in there =)

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    10. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by h2odragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's an easy enough workaround for that.

    11. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled thi's.

    12. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem the parent post is describing is about plugging in miniPCI wireless cards, not the Cardbus/PCMCIA-type cards that you are describing. As another reply mentioned, IBM is doing this out of concern for the FCC certification of their laptops. The miniPCI cards use the built in antenna behind the screen, whereas the CardBus devices have independant antennas (those devices have been run through FCC certification as well). The FCC is pretty touchy about radio products, and IBM is simply trying to assure that any wireless radio + antenna combination has been tested.

    13. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Correction: it should be "Your misuse of apostrophe's is making my eye's bleed"

    14. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by dasunt · · Score: 1
      Seems to me that if they don't want their computer to be compatible with PCI cards, they shouldn't advertise it as being compatible with PCI cards.

      I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me that advertising your hardware as being compatible with PCI cards when its not compatible with PCI cards would be false advertising.

      PS: I got a laptop to sell you: Its compatible with 32-bit Cardbus cards, as long as you use only 16-bit PCMCIA cards in it. ;)

    15. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I helped a coworked buy a Thinkpad recently (sorry forgot the model). While the website said wireless was integrated, somehow we got a special model that came without the card. Ok, so we buy the same card that comes in the Thinkpad, but it doens't work. The OS can't even see it. After much trouble shooting and two replacement cards someone finnaly told us that there was a special IBM only version of this card. It looks exactly the same, but has a slightly different model number. Of course, it cost 3x as much. I think you got luck to avoid this problem.

    16. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      i thought you could write i am ... or something

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    17. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by dickens · · Score: 1

      That is perfectly acceptable 17th century english. Did you hate it as much in Stephenson's "Quicksilver"?

    18. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Zone-MR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes - this has pissed me off. I bought a 802.11b/g combo card to replace the 802.11b card in my Thinkpad T41. Little did I know that the laptop BIOS is deliberatly crippled, and refuses to boot with minipci network cards which aren't approved by IBM (often exactly the same cards, made by exactly the same manufacturers, but have a different hardware ID - a privelage you are supposed to pay 2x the price for).

      After a bit of research I managed to patch my BIOS to get around the problem - at least till I apply a BIOS update in the future.

      If I had know of this beforehand, I would have seriously considered a different laptop. The problem is there are no warnings, and the specs claim the laptop has a miniPCI slot - which would make one assume it is compatible with any card which follows the miniPCI standard.

    19. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

      Must be going by the old rule, when in doubt, apostrophe.

    20. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I think that the FCC's authorization is required only if an amplifier is also present.

    21. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The FCC regulations don't actually require what IBM does - the closest is a requirement that you not be able to use unauthorised antennae with an authorised card, which is the direct opposite of IBM's solution. The amount of the planet over which the FCC have jurisdiction is also fairly small compared to the size of IBM's market...

    22. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by eric76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mu'st agree. The mi'su'se of apo'strophe's can be 'seriou'sly annoying.

    23. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As long as we're going all out, let's do it right.

      Not: "Your misuse of apostrophe's is making my eye's bleed"

      But rather: "You're misuse of apostrophe's is making my eye's bleed"

    24. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran into this a week ago with an older IBM T30. Turns out if you google "IBM BIOS WiFi" (No quotes) You will find two ways to override this, one way involves hex-editing a BIOS image, (ick! Scary!) And the other is done via a simple program called no-1802.com. It flips a single bit in CMOS, and renders the BIOS check inert. I now have a $43 802.11G card in a laptop that IBM tells me will only support THEIR $200 802.11B card.

    25. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by hajihill · · Score: 1

      Im not sure I agree, but Ive been wrong before.

      --
      Of blankness, I know nothing.
    26. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by dingfelder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Must be going by the old rule

      Actually, the old rule is:

      If you don't have anything interesting or insightful to say about the parent post, waste everyone's time by blasting the mofo for stupid grammar rule violations :D
    27. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      I think the one in "I've" is warranted, but otherwise "me too!". As well the, superfluous, use of, comma's, gets on my nerves. What are they teaching in the schools these days?

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    28. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ;) isn't the parent just offtopic trolling by definition

    29. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've disassembled the Thinkpad BIOS and read the code myself. It scans every PCI device and flags any that have a class id starting with "02" (which signifies communication devices). Each communication device is then compared against a whitelist of PCI vendors, device IDs and subvendor information. If it's not on that list, the system will print an "1802: Unauthorized network device detected" error and stop booting. At that point, all you can do is switch off the machine. It's easy enough to fix in the BIOS - thankfully, it's even easier to fix by setting a CMOS bit that disables the check.

    30. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Seems to me that if they don't want their computer to be compatible with PCI cards, they shouldn't advertise it as being compatible with PCI cards.

      Have they EVER advertised this?

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    31. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Strange... My Thinkpad R40 wouldn't even boot with an unapproved card in it.
      I bought one from IBM that was approved for Thinkpads up to R32 first, and neither it nor one of Dell's wifi-cards, accuired from a broken laptop at my old work would work.
      Just show me an error message at the POST.
      And when I finally got one of their approved ones, I had to revert to an older bios to boot it. Had to have a specific bios at the first boot and *then* I could upgrade the bios again.

      I'm a bit curious though... What are all those mini-pci cards you've been testing?
      I've only ever seen modems and network-cards and most people are a bit shy about leting me open their laptop up so that I can test them.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    32. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Moofie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er, if it's on the spec sheet, it's advertising. If it doesn't work, it's fraud.

      Now, since I don't know which particular models are in question, I can't check. But it seems pretty cut and dried to me: If you sell me something, and it's designed to not work as advertised, you've defrauded me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    33. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by araemo · · Score: 1

      I doubt that is the whole reason.

      My compaq X1000 will accept any third party mini-PCI card..
      as long as I don't update to the newest bios, where they implement a whitelist. I'd like to add an A/b/g or at least just a G card.. since when I bought the laptop, the ONLY choice was the intel pro/wireless 2100.. B only.

    34. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a T30 and simply wanted to upgrade from 802.11b to 802.11g. IBM sells several 802.11g cards, but none of them are officially compatible with my T30. I found this odd because they are simply mini-pci cards just like my original.

      I was a little ticked at IBM because I felt there was no reason not to certify 802.11g cards with their somewhat older (2 years, and still under warranty) high-end laptops. It seemed like a cheap tactic to get us to upgrade to newer laptop offerings.

      Another problem (for those of you who own IBMs and know what I'm talking about) is that the latest versions of Access Connections won't even work without one of the newer cards! How wrong is that?

      So there I was: Stuck using 802.11b, and cut off from bug fixes/upgrads in Access Connections.

      So I decided to try 802.11g card anyway just to see what would happen after making sure I could return it to IBM if it didn't work. I installed it and immdiately got the dreaded BIOS error 1802. It said something like, "You have installed an unauthorized card in the mini-pci slot..." Dang!

      So I did a little research on Google and found other people had experienced the same problem, and that there is a list of approved cards in the BIOS. There were two workarounds: One is to modify your BIOS. The other is to set a bit high in the CMOS which keeps the check from ever being made on several machines including my beloved T30.

      The second option was far more appealing to me because it's way, way simpler, and I didn't want to have to repatch the BIOS if I ever upgraded it.

      So I ran a little 10 line 'C' program I found on the internet and viola! I'm now happily using my new 802.11g card and am finally able to make use of the latest version of Access Connections.

      I must admit I also feel a kind of gratification in at least conceptually being able to tell IBM to go f*** themselves for their silly policy decision.

    35. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      Not to mention "I've"

    36. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by bfields · · Score: 2, Informative
      Seems to me that if they don't want their computer to be compatible with PCI cards, they shouldn't advertise it as being compatible with PCI cards.

      These aren't PCI cards, they're mini-PCI--tiny little cards you have to open the case to replace. They're not that hard for a user to replace, but still I doubt this is a bullet point in the laptop advertisement in the way compatibility with PCI cards would be.

      --Bruce Fields

    37. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by dmiller · · Score: 1

      Actually it is possible, there is a magic bit in the CMOS that tells the BIOS to skip the checks. I'm happily running a Netgate Prism 2 card in my X40, after running this program (also available in OpenBSD ports/misc/tpwireless).

    38. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The last time I bought a laptop, none advertised that they were compatible with Mini-PCI cards. They all had the option of including factory installed Mini-PCI card, but none made any claim that it worked with anything other than the card that came with the system.

      I've very suprised that companies have begun to advertise otherwise, especially if they're required by the FCC to lock out untested wireless networking cards.

    39. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Please visit the following link for more information.

    40. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      No, not really.

      They want to make extra money by locking customers into vendor upgrades.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    41. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by xski · · Score: 1

      aww c'mon, give the guy a break. I mean, how bout points for trying?

    42. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      they still teach in schools?!

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    43. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by plover · · Score: 1
      That's right. He said "not one" of them is needed. There are TWO apostrophes needed in the original post, not one. Oh, and not six.

      Sigh. I can't believe I'm defending a grammar NRZI, but the NRZI was right: it hurt's to rea'd some of thi's stuf'f.

      --
      John
    44. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      You should be capitalizing the "I" in your post whenever referring to yourself.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    45. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by HugeFatty · · Score: 1
      Your misuse of apostrophes is making my eyes bleed... Not one of them was needed :-)
      You might want to get that bleeding eye thing checked out...I'm pretty sure they're not really supposed to do that, but I'm not a doctor or anything. I hope it's nothing serious.
      --


      I am clearly fatter than you.
    46. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I knew there were ways to patch the bios flash to fix this.. but I was not aware of a CMOS flag to disable the check.. can y you post more information?

    47. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so this one guy gets mooded +2 insightful, and a whole slew of karma whores and trolls get +5 funny for adding useless 's and those kinda moderators get billions of mod points, and I haven't gotten mod points in like 3 years because I modded my friend's comments up too much ;)
      WTG with the automated brain dead modererator system, you could do better handing out mod points Entirely at random. At least then people wouldn't get 'used' to having mod points every 2-3 weeks.

    48. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 4, Informative
    49. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      At least then people wouldn't get 'used' to having mod points every 2-3 weeks.

      3 weeks? I metamod daily and get mod points every 3 days!
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    50. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

      Well, the one in "I've" was okay.

      --
      "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    51. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Buran · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to write up a bookmarklet or something that posts this in cases like this. ;)

    52. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by marshall_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That and also it's not Centrino if it doesn't have cards that are built to Centrino specification.

    53. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your misspelling Yore.

    54. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by afidel · · Score: 1

      Nope, it is required for all ISM band equipment, in fact the ISM band regulations specifically forbid any type of addon amplifier.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    55. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      PS: I got a laptop to sell you: Its compatible with 32-bit Cardbus cards, as long as you use only 16-bit PCMCIA cards in it. ;)

      Actually, that was quite common seven or so years ago. I went through a lot of Micron (and some Compaq and StinkPads) laptops that did indeed have a 32-bit bus. You could use one 32 bit card OR two 16-bit cards in them, just no mix-n-matching of the two.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    56. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I understand that. If the spec sheet says it's compatible with mini-PCI cards, it should work with mini-PCI cards. If the spec sheet doesn't say that, it can be compatible with nothing in the universe.

      All I'm saying is that the computer manufacturer needs to not be picking and choosing what industry-standard hardware they're going to allow to boot.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    57. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by TheOtherKiwi · · Score: 1

      Its not necessarily just the FCC, the drivers IBM supply can provide all sorts of automation when you plug in ethernet to swap automatically between wired and wireless profiles and switch browser proxy etc...for this they need to know what is in the machine in order to turn on devices, change driver settings etc...its an ease of use thing albeit at theprice of ultimate compatbility.

      --

      -- Sig meltdown immine...
    58. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by eric76 · · Score: 1

      No amplifiers?

      Every fixed wireless operator I know of uses amplifiers.

      But the amplifiers have to be marketed and sold as part of the system. So, your "addon amplifier" is correct, but may be misleading.

    59. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think it's at all misleading, the FCC rule pertaining to this is:
      Sec. 15.204 External radio frequency power amplifiers and antenna modifications.

      (a) Except as otherwise described in paragraph (b) of this section, no person shall use, manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing, any external radio frequency power amplifier or amplifier kit intended for use with a Part 15 intentional radiator.
      (b) A transmission system consisting of an intentional radiator, an external radio frequency power amplifier, and an antenna, may be authorized, marketed and used under this part. However, when a transmission system is authorized as a system, it must always be marketed as a complete system and must always be used in the configuration in which it was authorized. An external radio frequency power amplifier shall be marketed only in the system configuration with which the amplifier is authorized and shall not be marketed as a separate product.


      Which as you noted makes exception for amplifiers that are sold as part of a certified system, but that otherwise no amplifiers can be sold for part 15 devices. So addon amplifiers are definitly a no-no and the exception is basically made for things like the amp stage in a wi-fi card, though it can technically be used to allow a large external amplifier as part of a system so long as it otherwise meets the guidlines for part 15.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    60. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by MbM · · Score: 1

      It can be bypassed rather easily on the thinkpads

      see - http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0406 .1/1048.html

      --
      - MbM
    61. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about...

      "You're mi's you's of apo's trophe's i's making my eye's blee'd"

    62. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Having read The Diamond Age, I've sworn off Stephenson. You call that an ending? Hey, Stephenson, what happened - get tired of writing or something?

    63. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well blow me - the old rule about posts correcting spelling or grammar always containing at least one error of their own is true!

    64. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Ah, you say stupid, I say no! Wrong! Totally wrong! ;-)

    65. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god damn you, don't use an apostrophe in plurals. it's 'sorts' not "sort's", and 'devices' not "device's". go here to go back to grade school:

      http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/

      grrr!!! wtf did you people learn to do this??

    66. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      god damn it, you are contradicting yourself. reformat your fucking brain, you've got too many bad blocks.

    67. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Do they explicitly say on the spec sheet that they have this capability?

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    68. Re:IBM Thinkpads are the same way by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I have absolutely no idea. Which model are we talking about?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. Question~ by tektek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this just Compaq/HP? If so, just don't buy from them?

    1. Re:Question~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shop smart, shop ACER!

    2. Re:Question~ by llefler · · Score: 1

      Interesting you should mention Toshiba. I have a 2 year old Toshiba laptop. In December I wanted to install a mini PCI wireless card so I wouldn't have to keep removing the PCCard every time I put it in it's case. But since Toshiba has already discontinued the 11b card (and hasn't released an 11g card), all I could find were outrageously expensive. So I picked up a card that was supposed to be compatible with many Toshiba's and Dells off of eBay. When I put it in my laptop, not only does it NOT work, but my laptop refuses to power up. I wrote it off as a less than compatible (or defective) mini PCI card, and figured I'd test it in my Mom's newer Compaq. Maybe hardware compatibility isn't the only thing I need to be worrying about.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  5. Yes, by all means by HarryCaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please work to undermine the Great Strength of the PC market, the open architecture.

    Brilliant move.

    They should find everyoen who supported this decision and make sure they never work in any decision-making capacity anywhere again.

    1. Re:Yes, by all means by spac3manspiff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well according to the article, all you have to do is:

      1. Hack the Bios
      2. ???
      3. Profit!!!

    2. Re:Yes, by all means by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely they were all promoted and got free shares of stock.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > never work in any decision-making capacity anywhere again. Not from the USA? If corporate and government are any indication, they've already been promoted.

    4. Re:Yes, by all means by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wasn't the Mac one of the first to do exactly the same thing? Before they adopted PCI buses, they would only work if your peripheral card had a Apple-approved (or written) BIOS ROM on it physically! That, and proprietary closed standards is primarily how they prevented the clone industry from getting it's teeth into Mac-land, IIRC.

      I'm not sure about nowadays, whether they allow random PCI cards to be inserted, I haven't heard if they will refuse to boot if you try an unapproved one.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    5. Re:Yes, by all means by DLWormwood · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Almost makes you want to buy a Mac doesn't it?

      I wonder if you'll get a +5, Troll for that...

      Seriously, Apple's always been blamed for being elitist for having a semi-closed architecture and many PC partisans took them to task for it. Now some PC manufacturers are starting to do the same.

      This is probably a sign of things to come. As computing becomes more and more dependant on the Internet to even provide basic functionality, security concerns are going to crowd out flexibility and "freedom." It's really a shame; this will only increase the barrier to entry to computing even higher than it is now. Already, classical shareware and freeware have nearly been killed by fears of viruses and spyware. (Interestingly, the Mac market's about the only place where a shareware developer can make a living from it.) There have already been opening salvos of FUD fired at the Open Source movement for not having a "certified" credential system for contributing programmers and writers. (Even non-coding projects like Wikipedia is starting to get brickbats from "established" editors and writers for not being "professional" enough.)

      The age of the garage developer is nearly, if not already, over.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    6. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, please take a moment to review this article.

    7. Re:Yes, by all means by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

      1. Hack the BIOS
      2. Get sued for distributing the hacked BIOS.
      3. Profit (not you).

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    8. Re:Yes, by all means by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Maybe IHBT, but, I have also found that Mac zealots seem to have a habit of conveniently forgetting history, on occasion.

      But thank you, anyway.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    9. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent -3, Mis-informative

      Uh, not quite. The problem has to do with the initialization code on the card. PC cards have PC bios initialization gear on them. Mac cards have openfirmware initialization kit. You can boot a Mac with PC PCI card in them, you just can't use the card until the OS loads. Same with putting a Mac ROM-ed card into a PC.

      And they didn't need proprietary closed standards. All they had to do was refuse to license Mac OS to the clone makers. There was nothing stopping anybody from making a Mac-compatible computer, aside from the lack of an operating system to ship with it

    10. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welp, parent is a mere flamebait. Please do some research then most likely mod him down.

      Apple were just incompatible (not even PCI that is) and of curse you needed their specs (just as with PCI), not some magic "BIOS ROM" (what the hell that is supposed to be).

    11. Re:Yes, by all means by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually the Mac had it's own bus called the NuBus. The Amiga had it's own expansion bus called Zorro. It has been pretty common in the PC market to have a proprietary expansion bus even the PC market tried to go to more closed system. Anyone remember microchannel and EISA? Only when the PC escaped the grip of IBM did the idea of open spec expansion bus take off.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    12. Re:Yes, by all means by goMac2500 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Parent is confused. He means Mac OS would not boot on a motherboard unless the motherboard had a Mac BIOS on it. This kept cloners from making their own motherboards (this is no longer true, a Mac ROM is no longer needed to boot Mac OS X). NuBus, which came before PCI, was created by Texas Instruments. The reason cards required a Mac ROM was because you were using the card with a Mac. There was no BIOS, and a card had to communicate with the Mac differently. It had nothing to do with lockup, just differences between the PC and Mac architectures. Current PCI cards are still in the same position. Some PCI cards that don't rely on communicating with the PC's BIOS will work fine interchangeably, like TV cards. Other cards, like graphics cards, must have a special Mac ROM on them because of architecture differences between PC and Mac motherboards (like, again, no BIOS on Mac). In short, there was no Apple lockout on expansion cards, just architecture differences. The only time I can remember Apple being anti-expansion card was when Steve Jobs was in charge the first time. He handled expansion cards by just not including the slots. Developers had to sneak them in to final machines as "debug ports".

    13. Re:Yes, by all means by grocer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends: Airport/Airport Express slots only work with Apple supplied cards. Any PCMCIA card will work, provided there is a driver. PCI cards work in G3/G4/G5 Powermacs although the PowerPC architecture must have Mac specific bios for video cards...big-endian vs. little-endian being the problem there.

    14. Re:Yes, by all means by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not flamebait, and I think you are the one that need to do the research. What do YOU call that 28-pin DIP EPROM on each and every older Mac (pre-PCI) peripheral card? It's the BIOS extensions that tell that machine how to use that particular hardware.

      Even if you had the closed, proprietary bus specs to design such a card the system wouldn't know shit from shinola about how to use it without that "Magic" BIOS ROM on the card. Maybe you call it something else, but that's what it is (was).

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    15. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BIOS ROMs are machine code, i.e. specific to the processor that is on the machine. Macs don't have X86 processors and can't execute any X86 code in the BIOS of PCI cards. They need PCI cards with PowerPC BIOS ROMS. This is a technically problem, not snooty-ness from Apple marketing.

      Any PCI card that has X86 BIOS code is locked to X86 machines only. The vendor has to come out with a different version for Macs (with PowerPC code) or Suns (with Sparc code). Most vendors don't, but that's not Apple's fault.

    16. Re:Yes, by all means by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Afaik this is BIOS-specific, you just need an open firmware-compatible ROM on the board. Since Sparc use open firmware, too, AFAIK you can use the PCI cards interchangably there (if you can find any OS drivers).

    17. Re:Yes, by all means by myov · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. You're confusing a number of things.

      Apple had an entirely different bus (NuBus, along with variations like the CommSlot, Processor Direct, etc). You physically couldn't plug another device in.

      With the move to PCI, all that's required are drivers. Sometimes vendors create different firmware so the can charge an extra $50 for the "Mac version". I have a generic D-link network card in my G3, using Apple's 8139 driver. D-link used to have a driver for it, but it's no longer on their site.

      The only application I saw that required Mac ROM's were emmulators. These were legally Apple's property so they couldn't be distributed with the program itself.

      What created the IBM clones:
      Microsoft was willing to sell their OS to anyone who wanted it. The BIOS was reverse engineered by Compaq. The other parts were off the shelf. Mix the three, and IBM loses control of their machine. It's not that IBM allowed them, they just didn't have control of the parts to say no.

      What prevented Mac clones:
      Apple used a common processor (the 68K series, later PPC), but that's about it.
      - Apple owned the ROMS. If you wanted one, you needed to get it from them, and only them.The OS wouldn't run without it.
      (I thought someone made their own clones, and was shutdown because they didn't license the ROM).
      - Apple controlled the OS. Again, you had to get it from them. The roms could have been cloned, but without an OS there wasn't much point.

      About the only way to make a Mac clone was to find a used logic board and build around that.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    18. Re:Yes, by all means by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Apple's always been blamed for being elitist for having a semi-closed architecture and many PC partisans took them to task for it. Now some PC manufacturers are starting to do the same

      And yet the Mac will accept any 'ol mini-PCI 802.11b/g card that you have drivers for. Who's more open now?

    19. Re:Yes, by all means by greed · · Score: 2, Informative
      So you needed a "declaration ROM" on a NuBus card. The same sort of thing is present in PCI as well; same with MCA and Zorro. In fact, non-PnP ISA is the only bus I can think of that DOESN'T have an on-card identity ROM of some sort. You didn't have to have drivers on the card; if you didn't, it couldn't be used until the system came up.

      But how hard was it to find out what goes in that ROM?

      A little Googling turns up NuBus is a Texas Instruments trademark of something based on an MIT design. NuBus is IEEE standard 1196; so getting data on it isn't going to be tough. (Though it probably won't be free.) A few hardware notes from Apple say, emphatically, that you had better follow the IEEE specs or you'll be in trouble on some models of Macintosh.

      Macintosh Toolbox ROM did not use a whitelist for NuBus cards based on their declaration ROM. Compliant cards were required to have that ROM so the bus could configure itself, and then the system could load suitable drivers. Again, to this day, PCI does the same thing--only it is integrated into the PCI bus controller on the card. Back in NuBus's day, integration wasn't as complete, so the NuBus controller on the card was in several chips; one of them a ROM.

    20. Re:Yes, by all means by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      EISA wasn't proprietary. ISA stood for "Industry Standard Archetecture" and the E in EISA stood for "Extended."

      I was available for all manufacturers to use, and it enjoyed limited success in the server segments until PCI eventually took it over.

      EISA wasn't as flexible as PCI, the slots were huge, and it wasn't as fast.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    21. Re:Yes, by all means by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Apple screwed several manufacturers with their clone program. They allowed companies to clone the machines, and Apple sold them the OS. When Apple realized that the clone makers were making more powerful, more upgradable, and cheaper computers then any of the Macintoshes, they stopped allowing MacOS to be installed on the clones.

      They started up a market and then crushed it. I'd have been pissed if I started a company to make these new clones with the blessing of Apple, only to have them punk out a year later!

      Who knows the real reason Apple stopped the clone market. It seems to me that if they continued to allow MacOS installations on clones, they might have lost out on hardware sales but could have been real competition for Microsoft as an OS and Software developer. Or maybe not. But the whole clone/no clone chapter in Apple's history continues to make me believe that Apple cannot be trusted - and why I won't buy a Mac. Too much control over the platform.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    22. Re:Yes, by all means by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      As another poster has already pointed out, EISA wasn't proprietary. But, MicroChannel wasn't proprietary either; IBM successfully licensed it to other companies. For example, for a long time, a lot of DEC Alphas came with microchannel.

      The clones never really licensed it for two reasons:

      a) the clone would have cost an extra $5, and
      b) people who buy PC clones would do anything to save $5.

    23. Re:Yes, by all means by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      (Even non-coding projects like Wikipedia is starting to get brickbats from "established" editors and writers for not being "professional" enough.)

      That's an entirely different issue altogether. Wikipedia is trying to present itself as truth when in fact it is merely presenting a gestalt consensus of the users (No, they are not the same thing. Reality is not subject to a democratic vote.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    24. Re:Yes, by all means by hawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple screwed several manufacturers with their clone program. They allowed companies to clone the machines, and Apple sold them the OS. When Apple realized that the clone makers were making more powerful, more upgradable, and cheaper computers then any of the Macintoshes, they stopped allowing MacOS to be installed on the clones. ...
      Who knows the real reason Apple stopped the clone market.


      The minor problem is that that just isn't true, though it is indeed the common folklore. It can file away with stealing the Lisa interface from PARC.

      Apple had a range of products, from the low to the high. THe high end had fatter margins, and is what paid for most of the R&D.

      The clone makers used apple designed motherboards (though I believe there was a single exception).

      The problem wasn't that the cloners were making faster machines than apple, but that they were paying a royalty based on the low end machines and undercutting Apple on the high end.

      Apple *did not* cancel the clone market. It demanded higher royalties for faster machines. The clone makers all refused, each and every one of them.

      It's really kind of hard to fault Apple for expecting the other machiens to share the costs of R&D . . . as it was, the relationship had become entirely one-sided (all costs & risk to apple, most profits to the cloners).

      But anyway, the short version is that Apple *did* allow cloning to continue, but none of the cloners wanted to pay their share of what it cost apple to make it possible.

      hawk

    25. Re:Yes, by all means by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
      Hmmm...well, yes, Mac's used NuBus (which came from TI, BTW,) and MCA was certainly a Blue standard, but EISA was an open standard, and was based on the ISA. (I'll leave deciphering "ISA" as an exercise for the reader.)

      Except for that swerve into MCA, IBM PC hardware was generally pretty open. The hard part was the BIOS firmware.

      In fact, this was a lesson that IBM learned from Apple -- make the hardware open, so that other companies manufacture peripheral cards for you, but keep the firmware closed so as to defeat system cloners. It worked well for the Apple ][, and it did OK with the PC too, until Phoenix knocked off the BIOS and Compaq got to work.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    26. Re:Yes, by all means by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Er...

      I distinctly remember every CARD using MCA being at least $100 more than the non-MCA equivelent at the time. Soundblasters going at $130 were showing at $250 for the MCA version no matter where you looked. It wasn't the $5 for the license on the PC side that killed it, it was the absolutely insane card pricing.

    27. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found a corporate entity to be liable for Wikipedia, establish trained professional overview of content for grammar, accuracy, typographical and editing errors, and it becomes the same as Britannica, Americana, and Encarta-both in respectability, and in slowness (unless these methods are integrated into the current system along with controls to castrate troll accounts and require approval from accounts then similarly liable for the content of anonymous alterations-excepting spelling corrections.

    28. Re:Yes, by all means by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If you have to pay to use it then it is proprietary. EISA was more open but I do not know if it was totaly open. It was killed before PCI by the Vesa Local Bus. Back then it was not many things except videocards that where too fast for ISA. EISA really only got any traction in the server segment because servers wanted SCSI back then. As they still do. Intel pushed PCI to push people to the Pentium and to get the expansion bus under their control. It did not stay their though.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    29. Re:Yes, by all means by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Regardless, remember that ISA disk controllers and video cards remained the standard long after the ISA bus was completely overwhelmed. Plenty of otherwise sane people were willing to save a couple hundred bucks off the cost of a $3,000 system, in return for totally crippled video and disk performance.

      PC clones have always been about building the cheapest possible architecture to run your old copies of MS Office (or Lotus 1-2-3).

      Things are certainly better today; but for a long time, PC compatibles were simply horrible computers.

    30. Re:Yes, by all means by Firehawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, this ties back into my old statement, but not everyone needs top line performance.. and when top of the line is running at a minimum of $4k (1992 price for a 486/33 with 8MB RAM-- I remember this specifically as a friend bought a second tier (out of four) computer from ZEOS in 1992) you cut where you can because that's a hell of a lot of money. Most of these people running Lotus 1-2-3 didn't particularly care about the video or disk controller performance because price/performance ratio-wise you saw serious dropoff at the medium-high end of the spectrum that wasn't paying off in productivity.

      I won't argue that many clones were pretty shoddily made, though.

    31. Re:Yes, by all means by myov · · Score: 1

      On top of that, the clones weren't expanding the marketshare of the Mac. Instead they were taking Mac sales away from Apple.
      (Mac users were buying them instead of an Apple Mac, rather than PC users moving to the mac). Limited marketshare can only be split so many ways.

      IIRC though, Apple bought PowerComputing which was one of the largest clone companies. Umax moved into other things (and maybe that would explain why their drivers are garbage?). Motorola these days is only concerned with cell phones (my joke about spinning off FreeScale is that now they have to actually do something!)

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    32. Re:Yes, by all means by w42w42 · · Score: 1

      A good way to do that is for every offending model/company, post it to slashdot or an appropriately public place, along with comment and a reminder of why this is *bad*. I would hope that negative publicity would cause these companies to change behavior.

    33. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the Mac one of the first to do exactly the same thing? Before they adopted PCI buses, they would only work if your peripheral card had a Apple-approved (or written) BIOS ROM on it physically! That, and proprietary closed standards is primarily how they prevented the clone industry from getting it's teeth into Mac-land, IIRC.

      I'm not sure about nowadays, whether they allow random PCI cards to be inserted, I haven't heard if they will refuse to boot if you try an unapproved one.


      In the olden days Apple used the Motorola 68k series and TI's NuBus expansion interface, instead of Intel's x86 architecture and IBM's MCA interface.

      Now days, Macs use the PowerPC CPU and Intel's PCI interface.

      This BIOS incompatibility issue is not related to "closed, proprietary standards" - the problem is that shoddy expansion card vendors make their products proprietary, not the other way around.

    34. Re:Yes, by all means by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      No, they are not the same thing. Reality is not subject to a democratic vote.

      Okay, here's the kicker...

      How can you tell the difference between consensus and truth?

      Especially when dealing with topics like history and politics, which have little to no means of objective or experimental confirmation? "History being written by the victors" doesn't apply just to war... There are many people out there who call our world "consensual reality."

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    35. Re:Yes, by all means by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      The operative term here is "that you have drivers for." Note that there are no Atheros chipset drivers, only Broadcomm if you want to add WiFi to your Mac.

      I found this out about 30 minutes too late. Grr.

    36. Re:Yes, by all means by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      No Alphas used Microchannel - you're thinking of Turbochannel.

    37. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCA was a lot more that $5.

      IBM also wanted patent cross-licences, back-royalities for ISA machines, and all sorts of other outragous garbage. Plus they were talking about making OS/2 only run on MCA machines.

      So it wasn't the cost, it was IBM's outward and blatent attempt to take control of the PC clone industry.

    38. Re:Yes, by all means by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      How can you tell the difference between consensus and truth?

      Test against the real world.


      There are many people out there who call our world "consensual reality."

      And those people are wrong. The universe actually exists, and it is not subjective.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    39. Re:Yes, by all means by ekuns · · Score: 1

      There are many people out there who call our world "consensual reality."

      So? There are people out there who say all kinds of things. There are people who don't believe the moon landing happened. I know people who believe in the New World Order and who supposedly have spoken to folks of that organization. People say all kinds of stuff. That doesn't mean there is any meaning or value to it.

      How can you tell the difference between consensus and truth?

      How about the scientific method? It doesn't work as well for things where facts are somewhat subjective (such as history or political science or psychology), but it works better than other alternatives.

    40. Re:Yes, by all means by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "MicroChannel wasn't proprietary either; IBM successfully licensed it to other companies."

      I am forced to wonder what the hell "proprietary" means in your world.

      In my world, if you have to pay a licence fee to use something then it is "proprietary".

      Indeed, the Holy Grail of producing proprietary technology is to have it accepted as a defacto standard which effectively forces all your competitors to pay you a licence fee.

      This is what IBM attempted to do with MCA.

      Fast forward to the current day and you will see that this is exactly what Microsoft are busily attempting to do with their proprietary WMA+DRM codec. If they could only convince all the punters out there to start using WMA instead of MP3 then they would be able to charge licence fees to every personal music player manufacturer on the planet.

      1) Produce proprietary technology
      2) ????
      3) Attain overwhelming market dominance and defacto standard status
      4) Charge licence fees to every device manufacturer on the planet
      5) Profit $$$

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    41. Re:Yes, by all means by fermion · · Score: 1
      which is the difference between people who know history, and people who repeat what any random fool says.

      IBM created the PC, and there were no standards because there was no standard PC, only many different machines that ran off microprocessors. IBM would not open it's specifications because it knew that such a thing would cost profit. Eventually Compaq reversed engineered the beast, won court cases, and started the creation of the modern PC standard. People who could not afford IBM would buy compaq, and the cheap OS ripoff created by MS. Byte magazine, for instance, lived well in this world of many options, and died when it became a MS world.

      In the midst of this, Apple updated it's version of the PC with the Mac. Companies were begining to standardize on the IBM PC or clone, and MS was begining to release a reasonable OS in term of DOS 3.3. It was far from clear where the market was going. The Mac was a closed appliance, but had a nifty GUI and useful ports that could, for instance, provide an instant network, something that DOS could not do. You could add stuff to the PC to get a system that had the Mac features, but that would cost more money. The Mac was competing against the Compaq and IBM, not the fly by night builders.

      Now, as standards started to develop, especially the standard that could compete in speed and quality, Apple did adopt them. They even adopted some inferior standards to compete on price.

      Today, pretty much anything can be put into a Mac. Any PCI card, and PCMCIA card, I don't know about cardbus. What one loses, as in any machine, is functionality and quality. I can't imagine how the service calls are going up now that any old memory can be stuck in a MAC. I know from personal experience of buying a cheap SCSI card that sometime being forced to buy quality product is a good thing.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    42. Re:Yes, by all means by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      IIRC though, Apple bought PowerComputing which was one of the largest clone companies.

      When you have run a company out of business, you can buy the assets and trademarks pretty cheap.

      Typical Microsoft tactics. No surprise coming from Apple.

    43. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philip K. Dick's definition: Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.

    44. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reality is not subject to a democratic vote."

      I say we vote on it. All in favor GOOBLE! GOOBLE! GOOBLE!

    45. Re:Yes, by all means by myov · · Score: 1

      I thought Apple bought them at approximately the same time they didn't renew their license. Apple probably wanted the hardware people - if they waited too long, the people would have been long gone. The shareholders made some money, some jobs were saved - would you prefer that Apple just left them to find their own way?

      I feel for the clone companies, but Apple was bleeding money. If they didn't do what they did, we would have no Apple today. The clone companies had a good deal going - low R&D expenses, high profit - at Apple's expense. Risk is part of the deal though. If Apple went under, the clones would quickly go with them. Like any franchise, you're only as strong as the parent.

      Apple needed become profitable quickly to start rebuilding and it still took years to be in a position to challenge Microsoft - OS X took an extra year for 10.0, wasn't usable until 10.1, and didn't start resembling old Macs 10.2. 10.3 was the first time they could start adding toys to a core OS. iPods, Mini's and other hardware doesn't design itself. Only over the last 2 or so years has Apple finally been moving where they need to be.

      I'm sure that if someone was to approach Apple today about licensing the machines, in a way that was profitable for both sides that they would talk (HP iPods for example). But given high R&D costs (which the clone companies weren't even paying), low margins and low volume, I can't see it happening.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    46. Re:Yes, by all means by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are no built in Atheros drivers, but a company named OrangeWare makes 3rd party drivers that they sell for $15. It sucks to have to drop the extra cash, but just letting you know in case you've already got money invested in hardware. :)

    47. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aha. But you forget that you have no possibility to learn about the universe without using subjective means. I suggest you read up on Kant a bit.

      For practical purposes, truth is consensus. All the science we do, depends on our believes. Physics believes that there are laws of nature, who are always and everywhere valid. But we have NO OBJECTIVE means to test this.

      And if I may give some personal view on it: if we have established that we cannot possibly know things about the actual universe, it is pointless to believe in it. Since there is no real evidence for it.

    48. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's a hint: science is based on consensus....

    49. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, Philip seems to believe that his faith can make his senses and brain perceive truth. He should stop believing this to face reality.

      How can you be sure that your mind or eyes are not deceiving you?

    50. Re:Yes, by all means by ekuns · · Score: 1

      here's a hint: science is based on consensus....

      In a matter of speaking, yes. Strictly speaking, yes. In that respect, everything is a matter of consensus. At that point you are so deep in philosophy that you cannot prove or disprove anything, so it's not a terribly productive place to reason from.

      That doesn't mean that reality is consensual. That is, if reality were consensual, why would scientists repeatedly measure results that disagree not only with scientific expectations, but also with popular expectations?

      Where science is useful is where it makes predictions of measurements that have not yet been made. That makes the theory disprovable. You could say that science is the set of theories that have not yet been disproven, and you would be philosophically correct. But -- except for taking potshots or being post-modern -- there isn't much you can do with such a viewpoint. At least with science there is a method for finding errors and for moving forward.

    51. Re:Yes, by all means by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      none of the cloners wanted to pay their share of what it cost apple to make it possible.

      Yeah, possible to make computers that put the emphasis on appearance and eye-candy, and cost far more than the machine need cost otherwise. If Apple wants their pound of flesh, but wants to expand their market, perhaps they should sell motherboard+cpu combos with Apple ROM. That was the primary attraction of the Mac clones - they came in PC cases.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    52. Re:Yes, by all means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony is considered flamebait? Must be an American thing.

    53. Re:Yes, by all means by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      ISA was completely overwhelmed about the time PC went faster than 8Mhz. Some people tried to push the ISA bus faster than that but things got flaky.
      The original ISA bus was even used for memory! Long before PCI the disk controllers where moving to IDE on a local bus to get around the ISA bus limitations.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    54. Re:Yes, by all means by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is MCA was a very good system. Much better than ISA or EISA! Too bad greed killed it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    55. Re:Yes, by all means by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Truth is not consensus. The premise that we can't tell what's real does NOT lead to the conclusion that whatever consensus says is the truth. "We don't know what's true" is, in fact, the exact opposite of "What consensus says is the truth, is." They are mutually exclusive claims.

      Make up your mind.


      if we have established that we cannot possibly know things about the actual universe, it is pointless to believe in it. Since there is no real evidence for it.

      Then why are you wasting your time talking to a figment of your own imagination?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  6. There's a simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can keep our own list of venders who do this... ..and don't buy from them.

    1. Re:There's a simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Amazing how an anonymous got modded up for suggesting a ban list - seeing how most people here would prefer binary drivers than none. How about the same list include vendors who don't open their hardware specs and provide closed binary-only drivers, while we're at it?

    2. Re:There's a simple solution. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really solve the problem for everybody. There will still be lots of people who will buy these laptops that don't even know about the incompatibility, or care. Maybe they are students, or parents of students, or clueless IT managers, or anyone who has seen an IBM commercial. If enough newbies buy these laptops, that manufacturers will think that their customers SUPPORT their use of the whitelist, even though anyone who cares about the industry knows that they are bad. The best solution for this industry is to make sure that these laptops DON'T EXIST!

      The only way these laptops will vanish is by an omnipresent campaign of advertising that these laptops are bad for the world. Unfortunately, that would cost a lot of money, so it seems unlikely that it will get done.

  7. What's new about this? by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

    IBM has been doing this in Thinkpads for a while (starting with the T40, I think) - mini-PCI wireless cards are whitelisted, and the PC will refuse to work with anything other than pure, 100% IBM parts.

    If you don't like it, don't buy it...

    1. Re:What's new about this? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, don't buy it...

      I'm sure IBM went out of their way to say "Hey! You can only use what we say in this computer!" to everyone who bought it so that customers could make this informed decision.

      Surely they did this, right?

    2. Re:What's new about this? by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Or, reflash your BIOS and whitelist the cards of your own choosing. ;)

    3. Re:What's new about this? by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 1

      ...the PC will refuse to work with anything other than pure, 100% IBM parts.

      Woo! Micro-channel all over again, but without the proprietary slot type! ;)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
  8. IBM too by ignavusincognitus · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is nothing new. Linux-lovin' IBM is known to do this as well,

  9. Workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    # You need an uncompressed copy of the BIOS. The easiest way to obtain this is probably to use phlash16 under DOS with the /BU option. This will write out an uncompressed copy as BIOS.BAK.
    # Find out the PCI vendor, device and subsystem IDs of your card. In Linux, doing lspci -v will tell you this.
    # Open the BIOS file in a hex editor. Find the BCPUSB header (there's an index near the start of the file that contains references to lots of BCP stuff. Ignore the one that appears here). Shortly after this is a set of PCI IDs, split up with 0s. The file is in little endian format, so the first byte in the file is the second byte of the ID. For instance, an IBM Pro/Wireless 2100 is 8086:1043 with a subsystem id of 8086:2551. This will appear as 8680431086805125. Make the modifications to suit your card.
    # Find the string EXTD. The 4 bytes after that are an additive checksum. When all the 4 byte blocks in the file are added up, they must equal 0. Change the checksum as appropriate. At some point I'll probably get round to writing a tool to do this.
    # Reflash your BIOS. Make sure that you use the /CS option to phlash16 in order to check the checksum.
    # If it's worked, your card should now work. If it hasn't, your laptop is probably dead.

    1. Re:Workaround by HermDog · · Score: 2, Funny
      # If it's worked, your card should now work. If it hasn't, your laptop is probably dead.
      In this world of ambiguous gray areas, number fudging and touchy-feely subjectivism, I find comfort that I can still definitely know that I have royally screwed something up and void my warranty while doing so.
      --
      JADBP
    2. Re:Workaround by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's an easier way. See this page for a utility that disables the check without requiring BIOS modification.

    3. Re:Workaround by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

      Its been a while since I hacked up any real-mode 8086 code, but...
      Shouldn't there be a way dump the modded BIOS into shadow RAM and execute it to test that the system doesn't crash hard with the modded BIOS before actually flashing anything? (it should look like a warm boot to the BIOS and hardware, and if it fails, just poweroff and you have your original BIOS back)
      I mean as long as the system boots well enough to be able to run the flash app, it should be safe to flash, since you can always just flash back if you screwed up something more subtle.

    4. Re:Workaround by EduardoFonseca · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it works with my Compaq R3000z. :(

    5. Re:Workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done it about a year ago. The modern HP notebooks have 2 PCI IDs - b and g from Broadcom. Atleast the IBM has about 8 PCI IDs. I decompiled it, did the fix. Then I BOTCHED the checksum. The Compaq R3000Z rebooted and I never saw any sign of light afterward. I tried to do something like "floppy boot block" boot to re-flash but finally sent it in for some "warranty work" done. (their bad bios flash fix is to replace your motherboard)

      So if enough of you do this and botch the flash and get warranty work done... maybe they will take the whitelist out. :)

    6. Re:Workaround by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. The affected HP and Compaq ones I've looked at are by Incyte, while the Thinkpad BIOSes are from Phoenix.

    7. Re:Workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an AC because of the DMCA? Just curious.

    8. Re:Workaround by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Uh, Insyde, not Incyte.

    9. Re:Workaround by JoeGTN1 · · Score: 1

      As I read it, this DOES require BIOS modification, it just does a simpler modification and it is an automated way to do it.

    10. Re:Workaround by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      No. It modifies the contents of the CMOS, not the BIOS flash. /dev/nvram doesn't provide access to BIOS code.

    11. Re:Workaround by EduardoFonseca · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? AFAIK, my BIOS is from Phoenix. I will take a look again.

  10. slightly OT: Works with Dell by kb · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can at least confirm that changing the WLAN card in my Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop (because Dell's TrueMobile stuff definitely sucks a donkey's primary sexual organ) wasn't any problem at all. But Dells are known to be pretty user-maintainable anyway ;)

    1. Re:slightly OT: Works with Dell by phauxfinnish · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid to ask, but what constitutes a donkey's secondary and tertiary sexual organs?

    2. Re:slightly OT: Works with Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that would depend on whether or not the donkey is a "playa".

    3. Re:slightly OT: Works with Dell by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      i can think of at least 4 others.. at least in Humans... i would they that they apply to all mammals though :P

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  11. oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.openbios.info/

    they need support

  12. HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by n6mod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have an old NetServer LPr that I use as a Debian server. It's built like a tank, and has been fairly reliable, save for one issue:

    Since I got it (used), it always printed a warning that non-HP DIMMs were detected, and HP's on-site warranty didn't cover problems caused by non-HP memory.

    Then two of the DIMMs failed, so I popped the lid.

    You guessed it. HP memory.

    At least the motherboard was kind enough to turn on a flashing light next to the bad DIMMS. (Seriously)

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    1. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I've never used the Netserver, but older printers like the 4m, etc have to have ram thats "encoded". Some DIMM makers do encode their ram, some (most) don't. You can do it yourself if you're handy with a soldering iron (its quite difficult though).

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by n6mod · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think there's an eeprom on the DIMM. lmsensors can read it, for instance. Never tried writing it, though.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Ah, a bit of a different situation then ... the printer ram just needs a couple pins soldered open to "encode" the chip :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by priich · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's hooked up to the smbus and used to provide timing tables to bios.
      That would be an ideal place to stash a proprierty tag.

    5. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were to look up the RAM modules required for the cheap HP desktop computer I'm using, you will find that the dealers will all try to convince you that special HP memory is required, and sell it to you at a higher price. However, I just happened to have an extra non-HP DIMM laying around and tried it in there, and as luck would have it, it fit, and it worked (and it's still in there...). So, YMMV; sometimes you're locked in, sometimes they only need to convince you that you are in order to take advantage of you.

    6. Re:HP is (in)famous for this sort of thing by n6mod · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I knew it was there, but I never knew what it was for.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. IBM has been doing it for years! by radiojock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many people who run corp laptops have found out that aleast since the T30, IBM laptops will not boot with a non IBM card, Well, if you have the utility you can put any mini-PCI card in there.... They make alot of money with there cards, so you can understand why they would do this.. What I don't hear about is apple and there slots not taking anything but "AIRPORT" cards? why is nobody bitching about that?

    1. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2, Informative

      When one of my friends comes over to visit, I've given her a Netgear MA-401 to run on her Powerbook G4. No troubles there. The only issue I've had is with drivers not being available to run the card. I solved this with a third party driver package. Linux has also had issues running certain wireless cards properly without drivers.

    2. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You don't get it my friend. Here,
      Apple = GOD
      Linux = GOD(der)
      MS = M$ = Devil ^23

      Don't say anything about Apple; too many fanboys around.

      Get with the program

    3. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...because apple does not market it as a miniPCI slot, but rather an AirPort card slot. It doesn't claim to be something that it's not - a place to plug in whatever you feel like plugging in. It's there just for the AirPort card, and nothing more.

    4. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Politburo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What I don't hear about is apple and there slots not taking anything but "AIRPORT" cards? why is nobody bitching about that?

      I think this is simply because we don't expect openness with Apple. Their hardware is generally proprietary, while PC hardware is not.

    5. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I dont know. Probably because its not a Mini-PCI slot -- its an AirPort slot!

      The MiniPCI slots on the side of the laptop will take any card you throw at it.

    6. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by radiojock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you buy a laptop, it IS proprietarty! Can you go to Fry's and just buy a laptop Mobo? or how about a case?... So, while we are at it, Why don't we just start cramming in non-standard batteries into our laptops! You buy a laptop for it's current features, not it's upgradabillity. If you want to expand it, there are USB/1394 devices that will allow you to do that.. I just went to fry's and picked up a junky 9.99 usb2.0 G adapter...

    7. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Apple incorporates a slot that is specific to AirPort. They don't advertise it as a general purpose slot.

      IBM says their slot is a PCI slot. That means I should be able to put a PCI card in it. If I can't, IBM is being deceptive.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that miniPCI is a standard. The way these things work is that any device meeting the standard should work in any device that supports the standard. That is not happening here, as devices are being arbitrarily excluded by manufacturer/model.

    9. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Probably because anybody who has an Apple is used to Apples only working with Apple peripherals. Also, what is the market share of affected Apple vs. affected HP and IBM computers?

    10. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For one thing, they don't have slots/cards for Airport in their notebooks any more: Airport Extreme is built in to every notebook they sell.

    11. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Right. I normally just expect my 2 HP printers and scanner, Lacie hard drive, Wacom tablet, Logitech mouse, and Palm pilot to not work with my Mac. I'm shocked every time one of these non-Apple peripherals works right.

      The only Apple peripheral I use at all is the keyboard that came with the machine. You're an idiot.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    12. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't limit what cards work in Powerbook mini-PCI slots, the main problem is getting a good OSX Driver for the cheap cards.

      Apple doesn't check Vendor IDs with their current Airport driver or even what bus it's connected to. Any Broadcom chipped 802.11g minipci/cardbus/PCI card works with the stock driver and is treated as if it was an Apple Airport card.

      You have to be careful looking for broadcom based cards, because the Linksys WPC54G ver 1 is broadcom based, but Linksys switched to some other chipset for the ver 2 WPC54G.

      You can buy drivers for some cards; OrangeWare make some, IOExperts makes all kinds of drivers for Macs.

    13. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      MiniPCI is a PCI SIG standard. See here.

    14. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What I don't hear about is apple and there slots not taking anything but "AIRPORT" cards?

      I'm using a Belkin 802.11g card in my Powerbook without problems and using an out-of-the-box version of OS 10.2. No third-party drivers needed. Even if I did need an additional driver, there's a difference between merely not supporting third-party products and actively preventing their use via whitelist.

      -b.

    15. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      spoken like a true PC user.

    16. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by ceesco · · Score: 1

      Except those "MiniPCI slots on the side of the laptop" are actually called PCMCIA slots. Huge difference.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig
    17. Re:IBM has been doing it for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Macs with Cardbus slots will take Cardbus cards that aren't made by Apple, and Airport slots are just that: "Airport" slots. They're not miniPCI, and have never been advertised as such.

  15. This guy is amazing: by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.paul.sladen.org/thinkpad-r31/wifi-card- pci-ids.html

    I came across his site a while back, and holy crap if he isn't hacking his BIOS to get around these limitations. (His page is linked to if you follow a link from TFA, but I figured he deserves more prominence here.)

    Interestingly, this is the same IBM (and HP, for that matter) that we have come to know and love for their help with Linux. I realize they're a big company, full of lawyers and patents and left hands unaware of what the right hand's doing, but I'm still really surprised I haven't heard about this before.

    Anyone know of a blacklist of this sort of shenanigans? I'm the sysadmin where I work, and it'd be great to know what to stay away from -- and to explain to these companies why they've lost our business.

    1. Re:This guy is amazing: by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Anyone know of a blacklist of this sort of shenanigans? I'm the sysadmin where I work, and it'd be great to know what to stay away from -- and to explain to these companies why they've lost our business.

      Yes.

      But good freaking luck trying to buy a new PC without giving any of your money to at least a half dozen of the companies on that list.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  16. We all have a BIOS by DietCoke · · Score: 1

    Mine is located up in my brain, and contains a blacklist instead of a whitelist. It's pretty straightforward in design: if a laptop must use "manufacturer-approved" devices, it is not used.

  17. Did I miss part of the linked article? by aicrules · · Score: 1

    It seems to be missing some reference links or something useful to verify what the author is stating.

    I'd like to see the whitelist for a particular model and maybe some sort of comment from HP about why before I say anything about such a list.

    Sure, HP has had trouble with compatibility before, and if this whitelist is really that restrictive, then it's a really bad thing. But I find nothing in this article that proves such.

    Anybody have some additional reference?

  18. PCI cards + Laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet, i knew i could upgrade my latitude's video card someway or another.

    1. Re:PCI cards + Laptops? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You said Latitude? Go grab a D/Dock, and throw a PCI graphics card in.

      TFA is talking about Mini-PCI, FWIW. Mini-PCI is the same protocol as PCI, but a different form factor.

  19. Not gonna stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think this is not gonna stick. Unlike printer market where only few established leaders have a cartel, PC/Laptop industry has a number of smaller players. Heck, even Walmart has its own brand! And there are so many smaller peripheral manufacturers around.

    I think it would go the way of Circuit City & Divx.

    But still, these companies think of doing such stupid things. When are they gonna learn that pissing off customers isn't good for their health?

  20. Page out of Apple's book? by TimmyDee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's too bad TFA doesn't say what kind of mini-PCI card. He probably bought some generic made-in-god-knows-where card from JustDeals or somewhere like that. Now, I'm an opponent of the direction "Trusted Computing" is going, but in this case there's something to be said for a manufacturer locking out shitty peripherals so they don't kill your system. It saves them one more support headache. Apple does the same thing. Sure, lot's of us Mac-heads bitch about it (myself included sometimes), but at the end of the day we can always brag about how plug-and-play Macs are. It looks as though PC manufacturers are following in footsteps of Apple again.

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
    1. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He probably bought some generic made-in-god-knows-where card

      Look, *all* the PC cards are made in the same giant sized factory called "Taiwan". I ran into a problem with an HP Netserver that HP blamed on my Crucial branded memory by saying only HP branded memory was good enough. Of course the solution ended up not involving the memory. Heck, HP doesn't own a memory fab; they just slap their sticker on whatever they get the best bulk rates on. In the article about the mini-PCI card, HP has no legitimate way to claim only thier PCI cards have to be used or the dang thing won't even boot. It's one thing to say 'we don't support it because you installed a third party peice' and it's completely different to actively prevent even trying.

    2. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it isn't a blacklist, it is a whitelist.

    3. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      That isn't the case. I ran into the same problem with my IBM thinkpad.

      IBM's wi-fi cards are simply Cisco Aeronet cards sold at twice the price. You can buy the exact same card, made by the same manufacturer, with the same quality - but it will refuse to work because you didn't pay IBM $30 to change the pnp id.

    4. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Intel tags each wireless card they make with a subdevice string. Each laptop manufacturer gets a different subdevice string in their cards. The only people making these cards are Intel, but HPs will only work with cards with an HP subdevice string, and IBMs with an IBM one. Now, it's possible that Intel make "better" cards for some manufacturers than others, but it's not very likely.

    5. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can put a Linksys 54mpbs wifi PCI card in any Apple Powermac and it'll detect and work as an Airport card. Likewise most USB and firewire cards will work in a G3 or G4 to extend what isn't supplied by default (this is only way to get 802.11G on a G3)

      Apple at least support third-party cards

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    6. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Name one peripheral that Apple has locked out.

    7. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      That's when you use a BLACKLIST though. What they're doing is a WHITELIST, where only people who are certified/paid up/whatever can get their components working. It's collusion.

    8. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      something to be said for a manufacturer locking out shitty peripherals

      But that's not relevant to the discussion at hand. What's going on HERE is that any non-approved peripherals are locked out, without regard to their shittiness. The reasons for non-approval have nothing to do with quality. Any card manufactured in the future, for example, is automatically locked out. (So if your card came out AFTER your laptop did - it won't work.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    9. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...in this case there's something to be said for
      > a manufacturer locking out shitty peripherals so
      > they don't kill your system. It saves them one
      > more support headache.

      Nonsense. This way they will get a call every time someone tries to use an unapproved card. Without this silliness they would only get called when someone used an unapproved device _and_ has a problem. In both cases the answer is "We don't support that card".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    10. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? Gee, I'd better take the Crucial RAM out of my iBook, wouldn't want OSX to find out the dirty little secret that I'm a cheapskate.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    11. Re:Page out of Apple's book? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have non-Apple RAM that works fine. Although I do remember that Mac firmware sometimes locks out RAM that is below spec.

  21. Simple Solution by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Capitalism provides a simple solution to this problem.

    Track down the person that made such an non-upgradable notebook and kill them in their sleep.

    Actually, maybe that's not the capitalistic way of solving it but it's likely more satisfying.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Simple Solution by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The capitalist way would be to just sell your services re-fitting/flashing BIOS's with this turned off, of course since the DMCA came into effect capitalism now comes second to campaign financing.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, that seems in line with how capitalism works in this day and age.....

    3. Re:Simple Solution by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      The captialistic solution would be to hire someone to do the killing for you. Expect to pay more for deniability.

    4. Re:Simple Solution by femto · · Score: 1
      No, that is how CORPORATIONS work in this day and age.

      Large corporations are not capitalists, as those who run them do not own the capital they control. Those who run corporations lie, trying to pass themselves off as capitalists.

      Corporations will say 'shareholders control us, shareholders own the captial, therefore we are capitalists'. This is bullshit. Basically corporations own each other, though a circle of shareholding. They are independent of capitalism, as the real shareholders (ie. people who own the majority of shares) will always be overridden by a majority of corporate shareholders.

      When was the last time you saw capitalists, the Mum and Dad investors who actually own shares, determine the outcome of a board meeting? A corner shop is capitalism. Wal-mart is oppression.

      "So, the economists observe, the corporation,
      Hath other corporations that on him sharehold;
      And these have other still to hold 'em;
      And so proceed, ad infinitum"

      (With apologies to Jonathan Swift)

      Given that those who control corporation generally do not own the capital they control, a second quote comes to mind

      Criminal: a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation.

      -- Howard Scott

  22. Junky Gateway by parasonic · · Score: 1

    I have a P4 2.2 Gateway and plugged in a Dell minipci card, no problem. I'd almost rather have one of those ibm's though...that Gateway's falling apart! (No, I didn't buy it...I inherited it.)

    1. Re:Junky Gateway by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Since the Dell card is rebranded, this shouldn't be taken as an indication that your Gateway isn't going to lock you out in the future.

  23. Non-Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Laptops have a lifespan of 2-3 years typically -- by the time this is an issue, the next generation laptops will obviate the older.

    I personally would vote with my feet. Companies who try to tie you to proprietary solutions are not on my short list of where I spend my money.

    And yes, that would include Apple.

  24. I think you aren't using a MiniPCI card by whereizben · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which is what the blogger is referring to. Those cards, if I am not mistaken, are the kind of "built-in" cards that you can install, typically under the keyboard, but that you don't remove and re-install all the time. I think you are thinking of PCMCIA cards that you take in and out all the time. And in response to what the blogger is posting, he could remove the MiniPCI card and it would boot fine, and then revert his BIOS back to his old version (unless for some reason it had some VERY critical fix) and then put his card back in and simply not do the BIOS updates unless he really, really has to. But so basically, you don't have to worry at all, me thinks :)

  25. Sucks, but what to you really expect? by VargrX · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From TFA:
    I bought a Compaq/HP nx9110 a year ago, and recently upgraded my Mini-PCI Wireless card from non-OSS friendly Broadcom 11b to an 11g card. It's an HP Laptop. According to their marketing, I shouldn't have had to buy non-HP parts to be linux compatible.

    The HP BIOS for most models of laptop now have a whitelist of allowed Mini-PCI cards that can be installed in the laptop. If your new WiFi card isn't on the (very small) list of allowed cards for that specific model of laptop, then your laptop won't boot.


    Good reason not to purchase ANY HP/Compaq product from the Carly era, isn't it. Tough break there, but when you purchase something that's supposedly 'commodity', and then realize that it has a very, very short list of 'accepted' expansion options, you've done this to yourself.

    Personally, I'm a big IBM Thinkpad fan, plug in all type's of card's into them, and as long as I have driver support, I have no issues, be it XP, Linux, or any of the BSD's (of course, this changes with what hdd I plug in the laptop at the time).
    --
    Sometimes people just have to learn and adapt to change, it is one of the requirements of being a living thing.
    1. Re:Sucks, but what to you really expect? by jcgf · · Score: 1
      You'll be happy to know that Carly is no longer with HP.

    2. Re:Sucks, but what to you really expect? by Alsee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Personally, I'm a big IBM Thinkpad fan

      Bastard. Are you aware that all Thinkpads have Trusted Computing lockdown chips inside???

      Sure it's not causing any problems yet, but every Trusted Compliant system someone buys gives them that much more market share towards the point where they will be able to start utilizing that Trusted chip lockdown system. Sure the "unapproved expansion card" problem in the story can currently be overcome by reflashing your BIOS, but if any "security" software does make use of the Trust chip then you'll find yourself locked out of your own files if you attempt this fix. The Trust chip is designed to authenticate that the BIOS (and everything else) has not been "tampered with". As the Trusted-compliant market share increases you'll start seeing software start to use this chip. The software won't run at all on a computer without this chip, and it will only run on a computer with this chip when it's in "lockdown mode".

      If anyone wants to avoid buying Trusted compliant computers here's a very incomplete list of such systems:
      ANYTHING made by Samsung. They have announced all new computers they make will be Trusted compliant.
      Motherboards: Infineon D865GRH D865GRHLK Infineon D915GUX Infineon D915GEV Infineon D925XCV
      IBM - ThinkCenter, ThinkVantage and Netvista desktops, Thinkpad laptops
      HP - dc7100 and D530 Desktops
      HP/Compaq - nc6000,nc8000,nw8000, nc4010 notebooks (all models)
      HP - iPAQ hx2750 Pocket PC
      Acer - Veriton 3600GT/7600GT ?5600GT?
      Toshiba - Tecra M2 Series
      Fujitsu - Lifebook S7010 and LifeBook E8000 series
      Fujitsu - T4000 Tablet PCs
      Fujitsu - FMV-DeskPower C90GW/C desktop PC and FMV-Biblo MG70G/ST notebook
      Bestbyte Computers - EXPERT PC 2 System
      Link Computers - Ultra P4T-2800
      Neatware - Digital Media Platform
      Link Computers - Ultra P4T/PCX PC

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  26. Incompatibility List? by DavidNWelton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a list of hardware that is not very Linux friendly here: http://www.leenooks.com/ - perhaps this stuff would make a good addition to the list.

  27. Linuxbios? by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't there a project a while back to produce a GPLed BIOS for booting Linux? Not sure how much success you'd have with a laptop, but might be worth a go? I'm sure another /.er will put me right.

    --
    "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:Linuxbios? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wasn't there a project a while back to produce a GPLed BIOS for booting Linux?

      LinuxBIOS does this. It only works on some machines. You'll note for the IBM T23, they say, "This is doable. But IBM doesn't want anyone to do it."

      Even if someone made a custom BIOS to get around the restrictions, the manufacturer would simply make future machines refuse to boot unless they contained a cryptographically signed BIOS. That in fact is the plan for Trusted Computing.

    2. Re:Linuxbios? by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      Linux did it on a few older chipsets. Not sure if they've done it on laptops but they probably don't have all the power management features, all the laptop hotkey features (since they're not standard interfaces), that the vendor BIOS would provide. Also, if you have a brand new laptop, the chipset documentation probably isn't available publicly to write your own BIOS anyway.

    3. Re:Linuxbios? by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Most laptops have very similar chipsets as desktops--Same memory controller, same PCI controller, etc. The differences usually lie in power management, but that's more a thing for the OS to worry about.

      The main reason the LinuxBIOS team hasn't done much with laptops is simply because laptops are a pain in the ass to work with. Once taken apart, it's a time consuming chore to put it back together (Take a look at the VAIO pics on their website). Worst of all, they usually have a soldered on BIOS chip which makes retail systems worthless for people wanting to tinker with their BIOS, and sadly a lot of companies don't see LinuxBIOS worthy of the hassle of sending the team special boards with a removable flash (Though companies like AMD and HP have been nice enough to donate machines with on-board JTAG debuggers for server platforms).

      It's a lot easier to do this sort of development on a normal mainboard with a flash you can remove/replace using a $2 tool from Radioshack.

  28. The credit goes to: by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
  29. Mini PCI was never intended for end users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Intel Technology Journal:
    The PCI Express Mini Card specifically targets addressing system manufacturers' needs for build-to-order (BTO) and configure-to-order (CTO) applications rather than providing a general end-user-replaceable module. This form factor has characteristics more typical of an "embedded" application including the platform integration of the media interfaces such as communications connectors or wireless antennas.
    Cisco MPI350 FAQ:
    The Cisco MPI350 cannot be sold as an aftermarket adapter because ... Regulatory certification is based on the MPI350 being coupled with a particular antenna. Although modular regulatory approvals are available, they only apply to the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), who is responsible for embedding similar antennas in different devices. Modular regulatory approval does not eliminate the restriction on aftermarket sales since the end user might embed the adapter in devices with unapproved antennas.
    Basically, these companies are using FCC regulations as an excuse for limiting Mini-PCI cards (not just on these particular laptop models, but all Mini-PCI cards in general) to OEM installation only.
    1. Re:Mini PCI was never intended for end users by SRMoore · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe what intel is saying is that mini-PCI was never intended to create commodity inter-operable parts. It was intended so that when you buy a laptop from IBM or whoever that they could give you the option of 802.11b or 802.11a or a bluetooth enable 802.11g or whatever..

      In reality that is how I've always seen the mini-PCI bus inside of a laptop. Never as a 'user upgrade' That's what the PC-Card/PCMCIA slots are for.

    2. Re:Mini PCI was never intended for end users by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      The FCC rules on transmitters are quite clear. Certifying in the unlicensed wifi area is also pretty clear, and the certification is for the combination of transmitter+antenna. The notebook vendor is doing the final integration, and is therefor bound by law, to follow the regulatory requirements.

      It's easy to bypass this problem, dont buy a notebook with intergrated wireless. If you buy one with an integrated antenna, it's going to have these restrictions. If you dont like that, dont bitch at the vendor for following regulation in manufacturing/distributing the unit, go bitch to the FCC, it's thier ruleset.

    3. Re:Mini PCI was never intended for end users by morzel · · Score: 1
      Basically, these companies are using FCC regulations as an excuse for limiting Mini-PCI cards (not just on these particular laptop models, but all Mini-PCI cards in general) to OEM installation only.
      Where did you get this information?
      AFAIK, only communication-class devices (which are regulated by the FCC) have to be certified and are whitelisted in the BIOS. This would include wifi cards, modems and possibly (not sure about this) bluetooth stuff.

      Nothing will keep you from putting your own mini-PCI card into that machine, as long as it's not a communications device or if it has been properly tested with the built-in antenna and thus whitelisted in the BIOS. If you're more daring, you can always patch the BIOS, but at that point in time you are actually breaking FCC regulations without being able to blame the laptop manufacturer.

      Besides: most (if not all) laptops that are sold don't iclude a "usable mini pci-slot" in their specifications, but just a way to upgrade the laptop with a built-in wireless network card.
      If you don't want to use the factory upgrade, just get a PC CARD or a USB dongle for wifi access (which are also properly FCC certified with their own antennae).

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    4. Re:Mini PCI was never intended for end users by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Sure they are restricted by FCC regulations not to sell a system that exceeds broadcast power limits. However that is NOT what we are talking about.

      We are talking about LOCKING ME OUT FROM BOOTING my computer if it detects a card not on IBM's "approval list". Yes *I* am bound by FCC regulations not to exceed broadcast power limits when *I* do final integration. And if I install a brand new card that will be within those limits then it doesn't matter if IBM has ever heard of that card.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  30. and the Party smiles by chalkoutline · · Score: 1

    man, it's big brother all over the place today. When I buy non-epson cartridges my printer knows and tells me I shouldn't use them (a full set of epson catridges = ~£66, non brand version are ~£16), now this is going on? the world scares me

    --
    There are 2 types of people in the world, those who find that stupid binary joke funny, and those who don't.
  31. My Dell has this problem in a roundabout fashion. by wangmaster · · Score: 1

    I have a Dell Inspiron 8500. I bought a prism54 based 802.11g card. This card has native linux support and is one of the few 802.11g devices that has drivers included in the kernel sources now. Works great. Sometime recently, I decided to get a bluetooth phone, and decided it'd be time to upgrade the laptop with the internal bluetooth module. Ordered it from Dell, and installed it, the bluetooth module (Dell TrueMobile 300) no workie. If I remove the mini-pci card, it works fine. But otherwise, the bluetooth just won't work. The only thing I can imagine that would cause this is that the mini-pci card is "Unknown" according to the BIOS and both the mini-pci wireless and bluetooth cards are supposed to be controlled by the Fn-F2 key combination. Without being able to "known" what the mini-PCI card is, it just disables the bluetooth. I decided to order a $29 intel B/G card. I'm not happy that I have to do it, but at the same time, I don't mind buying an Intel card since they have native linux drivers as well.

  32. Fortunately by Drako2 · · Score: 0

    You have the ability to purchase what you want. However, if you do decide against a HP for this reason, you really should notify HP and tell them why you decided against buying their hardware, making them realize that just like Apple's one button mouse, not all ideas are good ones.

  33. BIOS alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All the more reason to look for BIOS alternatives which will never pull these tricks:

    Linux BIOS

    It has a ways to go before it is "plug and play" unfortunately. It would be good if some Linux hardware vendors would pick this up and get this out into the real world. I would much rather buy hardware with Linux installed in the BIOS.

    1. Re:BIOS alternatives by Lifewolf · · Score: 1

      It would be good if some Linux hardware vendors would pick this up and get this out into the real world. I would much rather buy hardware with Linux installed in the BIOS.
      LinuxBIOS is available as an option in some hardware.
      --
      "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  34. Linksys knows by way2trivial · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Linksys does "mac address cloning" for ISP's that don't allow routers.

    Can anyone make the connection?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Linksys knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are talking about spoofing/cloning the PCI IDs, how, pray tell, would the OS know what the correct driver to install was? You could probably work around it, but it wouldn't be worth the time.

    2. Re:Linksys knows by temojen · · Score: 1

      I just figgured it was for the boneheaded ISPs where you have to "register" your MAC via a web based interface. So you register the MAC of a PC inside your LAN, then clone it for the router.

    3. Re:Linksys knows by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      in XP I can install any 'non compatible' driver I want on any piece of hardware.. I just untick the little "show compatible hardware" box, and choose the drivers I want...

      (yes I was talking about spoofing)

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    4. Re:Linksys knows by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, there's also a textual description of the device. So, the OS could realize that 8086:1043/8086:2551 isn't REALLY an Intel 2100B, but that it's a (let's say) Orinoco MPCI3A-20.

    5. Re:Linksys knows by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      there's also a textual description of the device

      According to the bios hack site linked to in a previous thread, the whitelist in the bios only includes the numeric IDs.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    6. Re:Linksys knows by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. The whitelist only includes the numeric IDs, so if the OS checks the textual description, it can still install the right driver, even with the wrong ID.

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. This will lead to... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This will only cause a proliferation of web-based collections of hacked BIOS'es, just like rpc1.org is now for DVD player firmwares. All the nasties hacked out for your convenience.

    For all of you about to say: "Well, that's against the DMCA...", true, but that hasn't stopped the widespread distribution of region-free hacked DVD firmware has it?

    Flash - gotta love it!

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:This will lead to... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Shutupshutupshutup before they sign the firmware you fool!

    2. Re:This will lead to... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      For all of you about to say: "Well, that's against the DMCA...", true,

      Uh, FALSE. The DMCA is bad stuff, but there is no copy prevention system involved here much less circumvented. Thus, the DMCA does not apply at all.

    3. Re:This will lead to... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Acutally, I was referring to reverse engineering, and hacking the checksums, etc., not copy protection.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    4. Re:This will lead to... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Doh!

      The DMCA says NOTHING about reverse engineering, forward engineering, hacking, cracking, baking, remote viewing, or doing anything else to systems that have nothing to do with copy prevention. DMCA is not the Don't Mess with Computers Act, it's only about copyright issues, primarily copy prevention.

    5. Re:This will lead to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the companies that tried to sell their own Lexmark compatible ink cartridges.

  37. The key word is: STANDARD by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What I don't hear about is apple and there slots not taking anything but "AIRPORT" cards? why is nobody bitching about that?
    Because Airport is completely proprietary. I don't expect to be able to put a 3rd-party card in my iBook's airport slot because there are no 3rd-party cards that would fit. On the other hand, if IBM or anyone else advertises that their laptop has a [standard] mini-PCI slot, then it damn well better actually be a mini-PCI slot! And it should work with any [standard] mini-PCI card.

    (note: this is not Apple fanboyism -- I don't complain about the proprietary slot on the lid of of my Compaq laptop either.)
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by PTBarnum · · Score: 1

      IBM, at least, does not advertise a mini-PCI slot. I'm sure if you dig deep enough you can find that information, but the main product summary in their store just says the laptop has integrated IBM or Intel WiFi.

    2. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > note: this is not Apple fanboyism -- I don't complain about the proprietary slot on the lid of of my Compaq laptop either.

      Isn't it time you complain and let them know you won't tolerate their proprietary hardware? The vendors are getting away with trusted hardware because nobody tell them they're wrong. (No, I am not talking about proprietary lids.)

    3. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's no way in hell I'd knowingly buy "Trusted" junk, but as far as I know neither the iBook nor the Compaq are "Trusted."

      In fact, the Compaq thing uses a standard USB interface, just in a weird form-factor. Sadly, I couldn't justify spending $200 (or something ridiculous like that) for a wi-fi card just to not have an antenna sticking out of the PCMCIA slot, so Compaq lost on that one.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

      The Thinkpad's that do this are advertised as "WiFi Upgradeable" or something like that. They're not advertised as having an extra mini-PCI slot. You can go to the IBM website and order a compliant "upgrade", but if you try to stick any old mini-PCI card in the machine it might not boot. Yes, it's a pain in the rear (I speak from personal experience), but IBM Thinkpads have a good reputation and one of the ways of keeping that intact is to ensure that the hardware that goes inside is also of high quality.

    5. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Informative

      As others have posted, there is nothing proprietary about that slot. The original Airport slot was a standard PCMCIA slot, with a connector for the antenna. Airport was just a rebadged Orinoco. Airport Extreme is just a MiniPCI slot using a rebadged card (maker unknown). Apple doesn't tell you it's MiniPCI for just this reason - they aren't supporting anything else in that slot.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    6. Re:The key word is: STANDARD by plj · · Score: 1

      Airport Extreme is just a MiniPCI slot using a rebadged card (maker unknown).

      It has Broadcom's chipset, which you will soon realise if you attempt to use Linux in your Mac, as Broadcom is unfortunately one of those anti-OSS WLAN chip makers.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  38. Not Boot?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats to stop you from plugging in the device after boot??

    After all windows and linux, tend to ignore what the bios says and do there own thing anyways.

    1. Re:Not Boot?? by http101 · · Score: 1

      What'll stop you in this case is that the BIOS is memory-resident in HP/Compaqs because the working BIOS is actually stored on the disk. The "BIOS Chip" on the board serves only as a shadow. This is why HP/Compaq or "HPaq" wants you to turn off your computer, press and hold the "CMOS" button inside your case (to flush the memory) and then edit your BIOS on the next boot. When you save and exit your BIOS, the new, working copy is stored on your hard drive and a mirror of it is used from memory.

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    2. Re:Not Boot?? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm.... The ritualistic release of the magick smoke from the little silicon and epoxy bits on the circuit boards, I would think.

      Only PCI sockets on really high-end machines (IBM R6000's, Sun servers, etc.) allow the PCI slots to be powered-down and hot-socketed.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    3. Re:Not Boot?? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I don't know, maybe the fact that [mini] PCI is not hot-swappable?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Not Boot?? by temojen · · Score: 1
      1. You have to take apart the laptop to get at it.
      2. Plugging in PCI cards with the computer running is likely to damage something.

      We're talking about mini-PCI cards, not PCMCIA cards.

  39. Paramoia? by taniwha · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Is it really trusted computing platform that's the reason for this? (could well be but let me play devil's advocate for a moment) - if I put my hardware designer's hat I'd worry about all sorts of issues around people installing random miniPCI cards in a laptop, esp one I was responsible for the RMAs for (power, heat, physical form factor [shorting components], RF interference to internal components, FCC etc)

    I'd want to make sure that customers weren't trashing laptops by putting in things that destroy them then quietly removing the offending card and returning them for repair.

    1. Re:Paramoia? by sweathogsparky · · Score: 1

      What do you think architecture standards are created for? As long as both vendor's products say that they comply with standards then the issue of shorting and all that is moot. All these major manufacturers (IBM, Dell, HP) create these whitelists, not for protection but for profit. What better way to boost profit, than to tell your consumers that not only do you not support third party, although standards complaint, products in your equipment, but you even go to the lengths of making sure that your equipment fails when an attempt is made to do so. Its not about relieving the headache of RMA's. Its about ensuring that your consumers keep spending there money with you.

    2. Re:Paramoia? by taniwha · · Score: 1

      well as mentioned here the mini-PCI spec isn't designed to produce cards that can just be dropped into any mini-PCI slot - it's intended for OEMs - ie people who can determine that a particular card (or combination of cards) can be plugged into a particular platform safely - that there's enough cooling, enough power, the wifi antenna isn't close enough to some trace where it will cause interference to the memory subsystem etc etc

  40. This has been going on for years. by Exluddite · · Score: 4, Funny
    I remember finding out after I bought my viewmaster that my stereoscope cards weren't compatible.

    Bastards!

    --
    What does this button do...
  41. Funny. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your post is hilarious because IBM has been known to be doing this for some time now. You ahve been fortunate to only use IBM whitelisted products so far.

    In fact your post reminds me of an incident I experienced a few years ago. I was approached and reprimanded by a WWII veteran for driving a "Jap car". At the time I was driving an Isuzu. After the man was finished reprimanding me, he jumped into his Chevrolet and drove away. I burst out laughing because the particular model of Chevrolet that he was driving was actually a re-branded Isuzu.

    1. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love when that happens.

      particulary because most "American Cars" are made in Mexico and other places.

      and those damn "foriegn cars" IE toyota etc. are made IN THE UNITED STATES.

      whenever someone says that, i tell them i drive an american, they drive a mexican car

    2. Re:Funny. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt your story...since Isuzu is not a GM company. Can you provide the model and proof that the Chevy was in fact rebranded?

      Now if you had said the Pontiac was the Chevy was the GM car...then you'd have a point (since GM likes to make the same car under 3 different brand names, for some reason..).

    3. Re:Funny. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      "since GM likes to make the same car under 3 different brand names, for some reason".

      Cost. If they made three different cars, they would have to have three different design teams, three different tooling sets, three of many things. When they make it one car with different badging and trim, they only need one of many of these things, bringing the costs down. Why have three brands? So they can take the same basic car and market it three different ways.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:Funny. by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      But the real issue at stake is that the money from your car was sent back to another country, and not kept in the country. And it's not true for a lot of foreign manufacturers, for instance VW has a plant in Mexico that makes cars for the U.S. market.

      Everyone goes where the labor is cheap.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    5. Re:Funny. by Ritchie70 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm aware of Isuzu selling the S10 (Chevy compact pickup) as an Isuzu "pup" but not aware of Chevy selling an Isuzu. Suzuki and Toyota, sure, but not Isuzu.

      What model Chevy are YOU talking about?

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    6. Re:Funny. by CdBee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isuzu is GM-linked, they work together to build Daewoos (1980s Vauxhall body put back into production with Isuzu running gear, sold as cheap cars in the UK and Europe)

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    7. Re:Funny. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      You were very fortunate to bump into that veteran, they are getting scarce. And you got a genuine WWII reprimand as well! You lucky bastard!

    8. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at one time GM owned a large percentage of Isuzu. So, the situation is very plausible.

      To the other poster: there was a factory where the union only allowed "American Cars" to park in the parking lot. The funny thing was that 4th generation Camaros (all built in Canada) were allowed, but Toyota Camrys (built in Kentucky) were not.

    9. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually IIRC the s-10 was sold under the isuzu badge as an "hombre" in the us market................. The older (pre 94) model were sold as pups

    10. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the money from your car was sent back to another country

      And the salary paid to the US company's non-US workers goes to which country? Sorry, seen enough of the whore-ing of Made-in-the-USA BS from the automive industry that I could just puke.

    11. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Somehow I doubt your story...since Isuzu is not a GM company. Can you provide the model and proof that the Chevy was in fact rebranded?

      Cripes man, do a simple Google search. The Chevy Spectrum and Isuzu I-Mark were the same car. The Geo/Chevy Storm was built by Isuzu, branded the Impulse when sold under the Isuzu name. The Chevy Luv and Isuzu P'up pickups were the same, built by Isuzu. GM and Isuzu have collaberated for years-- not surprising, as GM holds a 37.5% stake in Isuzu. GM plans to use nothing but Isuzu built engines in its diesel powered trucks.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not pee on your parade, here, but....

      Canada is on one of the American continents. And the last time I went into one of the Japenese owned plants was like going through customs (just short of having to have a passport).

      On the other hand, the whole thing is pretty damn hypocritical.

    13. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I'm aware of Isuzu selling the S10 (Chevy compact pickup) as an Isuzu "pup" but not aware of Chevy selling an Isuzu. Suzuki and Toyota, sure, but not Isuzu.

      No, the Isuzu Hombre is a Chevy S10 with different sheet metal. The Chevy Luv pickup was a rebadged Isuzu P'up. GM has sold a number of Isuzu vehicles rebadged as Chevys. This should not come as a surprise. GM holds a 37.5% stake in Isuzu.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post is sad because you didn't tell this xenophobic old aged moron to shut the fuck up and hurry up and die to make room for the next generation.

      Next time this happens to you, simply kick the white (or possibly no) haired freak in the shins and tell him to go take a flying fuck and get the hell out of your face.

    15. Re:Funny. by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      GM currently owns somewhere around 10% of Isuzu.

      Here is a brief description of some of the GM-Isuzu product sharing that has gone on, going back to the Isuzu Pup, which was imported into the US as a Chevy Luv in 1972:

      http://www.isuzu.co.jp/world/investor/fact/gm.html

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    16. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      But the real issue at stake is that the money from your car was sent back to another country, and not kept in the country.

      Hogwash. That's practically a non-issue. The nature of multinational corporations is such that the "home country" is merely the location of a few office buildings full of suits. Those few hundred suits are largely irrelevant to the local economy, and it's not like they have a big vault like Scrooge McDuck where they pour all their US dollars and hoard them. Profits go out to shareholders (in hundreds of different countries) or into capital investments (like factories). What matters is where the factories are. That's where the money is really going. Honestly, nationalist protectionism only works if you don't let foreign companies start building factories in Kentucky. At this point there's no reason to judge based on a corp's original country of incorporation beyond dimwitted adherance to outdated early 80's UAW rhetoric. Your oh-so-patriotic flag-waving redneck Chevy Suburban is built in Mexico and your dirty back-stabbing jap Toyota Camry is built in fuckin' Kentucky.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Funny. by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Yup, gotta love it when that happens, and I'm glad it's happened to people other than me. Got that one day while I was out driving around in my Honda del Sol (which, for reference, really was built in Japan). Of course I had to point out to the guy that my wife, who had her back to us most of the time, was also half Japanese... At that point he just had no idea what to say, and wandered off, as if he'd lost the war all over again.

      It's been 50 years since we beat the hell out of them, they're now what we call an "ally", buddy. Get over it.

    18. Re:Funny. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I wanted a car that was built in the US, so I bought a Honda.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    19. Re:Funny. by mutterc · · Score: 1
      ...it's not like they have a big vault like Scrooge McDuck where they pour all their US dollars and hoard them. Profits go out to shareholders (in hundreds of different countries) or into capital investments (like factories)...
      Unfortunately, our system does kind of work like a big vault.
      ...over 86 percent of the value of all stocks and mutual funds, including pensions, was held by the top 10 percent of households. In 1998, the top 1 percent of Americans owned 47.7 percent of all stock, while the bottom 80 percent owned 4.1 percent.
      (Source: http://www.osjspm.org/101_wealth.htm; if you have similar, apples-to-apples-comparable stats from a right-wing site I'd love to see them). The top 1 percent have average net worth of $3352100 or more, and the top 10 percent have average net worth $475600 or more. This means that the old "ever-increasing profits are good, because they get distributed to the shareholders, and anyone can be a shareholder" theory is full of crap. 80+% of the money will be going to really rich people, who will buy some stuff, but mostly buy stock with it (which doesn't really help anybody but brokers). This is a very inefficient way to try to 'trickle down' increasing profits to ordinary people.

      Or, more succintly, when things cost 80% less to make, they may cost comsumers 50% less. The other 30% will pad some rich guy's pocket. Even if things cost half as much, when I'm making 11% of what I made before (current programmer salary compared to 30 hours a week/$5.15 an hour, working at Wal-Mart), my life is not going to be better.

    20. Re:Funny. by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Wow there, poor little liberal got a little riled up eh?

      My "oh so patriotic flag waving redneck Chevy Suburban" is a '97 Honda Civic DX with a tape deck and manual windows. And my motorcycle is a Suzuki GSX-R600.

      None the less, buying Japanese vehicles sends the money back to Japan where the Japanese company can dictate where it gets reinvested and all profits from such reinvestments go where? Back to Japan.

      Where the factories are is only a bonus, as it means employment to that area. But what's more important are the taxes levied against the money made from sales of the product, in when the money is going back to another country, our government isn't getting as much tax money. In return, our social welfare programs (education, etc) get less money.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    21. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Wow there, poor little liberal got a little riled up eh?

      Liberal? Not a chance! I'm a gun-toting, tax-evading, small "L" libertarian Gulf War vet.

      My "oh so patriotic flag waving redneck Chevy Suburban" is a '97 Honda Civic DX with a tape deck and manual windows. And my motorcycle is a Suzuki GSX-R600.

      (shrug) I own a 94 Honda Civic, a 90 Volkswagen Vanagon, and a 67 Dodge Dart. The "patriotic/flag/redneck" thing was just to illustrate that "made by a US corp" isn't automatically a good thing.

      None the less, buying Japanese vehicles sends the money back to Japan where the Japanese company can dictate where it gets reinvested and all profits from such reinvestments go where? Back to Japan.

      But what are they reinvesting the money in? My point is, GM is investing money in factories in MEXICO, and Toyota is investing in factories in KENTUCKY. GM at one point purchased a 37.5% stake in Isuzu. That's hardly "investing at home". I don't understand why you assume that corporations only reinvest in their home countries. They're all global now. they spend money all over the dang place.

      Where the factories are is only a bonus, as it means employment to that area. But what's more important are the taxes levied against the money made from sales of the product, in when the money is going back to another country, our government isn't getting as much tax money.

      Completely untrue. Toyota Motors North America (while owned by Toyota Motor Corp, Japan) pays corporate income tax here in the US just like GM does.

      In return, our social welfare programs (education, etc) get less money.

      Wow there, poor little liberal worried about his precious government funded brainwashing factory?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    22. Re:Funny. by flossie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I once had a US-built car (a Jeep Cherokee). Never, ever, again! European or Asian, I don't care, but never again a US car. The notion of build quality just doesn't seem to apply to them.

    23. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "...it's not like they have a big vault like Scrooge McDuck where they pour all their US dollars and hoard them. Profits go out to shareholders (in hundreds of different countries) or into capital investments (like factories)..."

      Unfortunately, our system does kind of work like a big vault. ...over 86 percent of the value of all stocks and mutual funds, including pensions, was held by the top 10 percent of households. In 1998, the top 1 percent of Americans owned 47.7 percent of all stock, while the bottom 80 percent owned 4.1 percent.

      Purchasing stock is exactly the opposite of hoarding money in a vault. Anyway, I don't dispute your stats, I just wonder why you brought them up in the first place. The discussion was about Japan based multinational corps vs. US based multinational corps and how buying from one is no different than buying from the other. Rich conglomerates vs. The Rest of Us is a separate issue.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    24. Re:Funny. by SaDan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The new Duramax diesel engine was a joint venture between Isuzu and GM. I forget where they are produced.

    25. Re:Funny. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The new Duramax diesel engine was a joint venture between Isuzu and GM. I forget where they are produced.

      The GMI plant is in Ohio somewhere. Production of the engine is a joint venture, but as I understand it the design is the latest iteration from a LONG line of diesel engines from Isuzu.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    26. Re:Funny. by Matt_R · · Score: 1
      since Isuzu is not a GM company. Can you provide the model and proof that the Chevy was in fact rebranded?

      Here in Australia, we have the Holden Rodeo, which is really an Isuzu. We also have the Holden Astra/Vectra/Barina as well as the locally built Commodore (the "Monaro" coupe version is sold as the Pontiac GTO in the USA).

    27. Re:Funny. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I love it when people chew me out for driving a Nissan (built in Tennesse), when they drive some piece of crap Ford that was built in Mexico. Even when I point it out to them, they STILL don't get it. But usually, these are the same people who shop at Wal-Mart, so go figure.

    28. Re:Funny. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They're sold pretty cheap in the US, too. Now that I know where they come from, I know why they're crap...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Funny. by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Because in a some situations the American companies can't go anywhere else in the U.S. without dealing with labor unions. Notice that all of the foreign companies coming to the U.S. have opened plants in Right-To-Work states? A lot of the American companies opened shop up North and thanks to labor unions now can't escape the North and go to Right-To-Work states.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  42. *confused* by flokemon · · Score: 1

    erm, this article was a bit low on technicalities...
    any references? more details?

    i haven't actually tested any of those tcpa enabled new-ish laptops with a non vendor mini-pci card, but i've used IBM T3x's, and as far as I can remember, the "security chip" can be disabled in the BIOS.

    1. Re:*confused* by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      The Thinkpad TCPA chip has nothing to do with the BIOS whitelist for wireless cards.

  43. Obligatory by mestreBimba · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In A.D. 2005
    War was beginning.
    Captain: What happen ?
    Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
    Operator: We get signal.
    Captain: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on.
    Captain: It's you !!
    Compaq: How are you gentlemen !!
    Compaq: All your PCI DEVICES are belong to us.
    Compaq: You are on the way to destruction.
    Captain: What you say !!
    Compaq: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Compaq: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....

    --
    Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: It's PCI DEVICE, not PCI DEVICES... otherwise, it just doesn't sound right. =)

    2. Re:Obligatory by narcc · · Score: 1

      Somebody set up us the bomb.

      Shouldn't that be Somebody set up us the bios. ?

  44. Apple doesn't advertise mini-PCI by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple calls their slot an "Airport Express slot" and they call their wirless card an "Airport Express card". They've never promised that it could do anything else.

    1. Re:Apple doesn't advertise mini-PCI by myov · · Score: 1

      And on the powerbooks you get a PCMCIA/Cardbus/whatever slot as well. It's not like that works only with Airport.

      From what I understand the airport slot is a modified cardbus. Airport cards are basically lucent orinocos.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    2. Re:Apple doesn't advertise mini-PCI by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Close: Airport (vanilla, not extreme) is a modified PCMCIA (16 bit!) and the cards *ARE* basically lucent Orinocos - adapted for 16-bitness.

      AirPort Extreme otoh is industry standard mini-PCI (i remember reading about it being mini-PCI when it first shipped) and the cards use a buffalo 802.11g chipset.

      The good news is that Because they are on a normal bus (rather than a proprietary one) the drivers work on cardbus cards that use a buffalo chipset as well. :D

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  45. Can they call it mini-PCI? by SupremeChalupa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Like the CD-ROM protection schemes that made the discs nonstandard, are these laptops far enough from the device standard that they could be forbidden from using the mini-PCI brand/logo/classification?

    1. Re:Can they call it mini-PCI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem i have with your statment is that I've had more problems with coastering CDs and DVDs with Cd-Burners carrying the Compact Disc logo, than with foriegn rip-off drives that carry no logos. You see, the CD and DVD 'standard' is broken inherintly and intentionallty to prevent the copying of copy protected discs, and prevent the writing of usabale archival media. I have three CD-rw with official logos, of them only one has never coastered a disc, and is capapble of copying some copy protected discs, and it's an 8X cd-rw drive. I have 2 unlabled drives (well one has a label on it's drive tray, but I have no doubt it was faked, and they didn't pay to put it there) those two drives have full capabilities to copy most copyprotected discs, and only coaster when there is a legitimite problem that caused the coastering. Also, my one and only and legitimate DVD-purner is a total POS and has all the logos on it, it's even worse than the 20x with all the logos cd-rw drive that pissed me off so much that I had at the time sworn off any drive that carried official logos. All the logos mean, is you're paying for a POS drive that's made to the RIAA and MPAA's idea of what copyprotection should be, and in many cases, that means coaster as many discs as possible, while not being able to read 'protected discs' you're better off buying a drive that instead of paying license fees for a worthless label hired engineers to make a piece of hardware that WORKS. sure you have to reasearch the company and it's product line a little more than if you could just buy 'by label' but seriously you can't buy any hardware 'by label' all those labels and certifications mean is they paid some money to try and pull the wool over your eyes...

  46. Thank you for purchasing... by http101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Carly were still in office, she'd probably find a way to convince you that your printer is out of ink and you need to buy refills!

    Aside from that, if this under-handed marketting strategy is going to keep us from running servers/workstations, what's next - BMWs whose engines suddenly stop working because there's a Fram oil filter installed? What if I decide to use a generic dollar-store bulb in my socket instead of the "approved" Philips bulb? Based on this theory, can you imagine what would happen if I were to eat a bag of knock-off raisin bran?

    It sounds to me that this is just a marketting gimick to screw customers over and force them to buy what the manufacturer wants you to buy. God forbid I should find a better alternative to what the manufacturer wants me to buy.

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    1. Re:Thank you for purchasing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Ford GT - Eats Ferraris and shits Corvettes.
      ...and has an engine that may contain a defective rear engine crankshaft main seal, and have defective seat belts, and leak oil, coolant and steering fluid, and have a defective suspension, oh and not to mention owners are advised "not to drive their vehicle under any circumstances."
    2. Re:Thank you for purchasing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you imagine what would happen if I were to eat a bag of knock-off raisin bran?
      Um, I've done that and it ain't pretty.

    3. Re:Thank you for purchasing... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      The Ford GT - Eats Ferraris and shits Corvettes.

      Cool. What tracks do you regularly race on?

    4. Re:Thank you for purchasing... by http101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least my engine isn't shrouded in plastic, composed of styrofoam, and the chassis held together with scotch tape or gum-drops.

      The Corvette Z06 just falls off the road according to recall number 04V273000. The steering linkage simply falls apart and causes the driver to lose control of the car.

      The lower control arm ball stud/nut washers were made of defective materials and disintegrate, thus leaving the Corvette to slam down on its own wheels and at 120mph, a VERY bad thing. It may also cause the wheel to seperate completely from its attachment.

      In recall notice 04V060000, the steering column locks and due to an unchecked circuit, voltage is not read correctly and enables the Corvette to accelerate while failing to shut-off the fuel pump and the steering columns is locked in any position. If the brick wall doesn't stop you, maybe the crappy steering linkage will!

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  47. Compatibility by RaguMS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From a compatibility standpoint, this isn't a terrible idea. After all, we're talking about laptops, NOT desktop systems. Most laptop users aren't trying to stick all kinds of PCI cards in their laptops. In my experience, many laptops are only compatible with a small number of cards made by few manufacturers anyway.
    Restricting add-on cards in a laptop to approved cards will ease support issues, by assuring that a laptop will work with that card (as opposed to a support technician requiring you to remove your add-on cards before you get support). In the end, customers get a more reliable laptop with some expandability choices.

  48. Ob. /. response.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I'd want to make sure that customers weren't trashing laptops by putting in things that destroy them then quietly removing the offending card and returning them for repair.

    Oh, come now! How is this going to stop people pouring hot grits into the laptop?

  49. Excuse: FCC compliance by fabu10u$ · · Score: 1
    I haven't tested a different card in my HP tc1100 Tablet PC, but the instruction manual (or maybe I saw it in the online knowledge base?) said that the BIOS may warn about an unsupported wireless card. It claimed that the restriction was there because the machine was only certified for FCC Part 15 with certain wireless cards.

    Bull, I say. Putting a WLAN PCI card in your desktop PC doesn't change its FCC certification!

    --
    They say the mind is the first thing to ... uh, what's that saying again?
    1. Re:Excuse: FCC compliance by jeff4747 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bull, I say. Putting a WLAN PCI card in your desktop PC doesn't change its FCC certification!

      That's because the desktop PCI card comes complete with a built-in antenna. In a laptop, the antenna's built into the case and the card plugs into it.

      Because of this, it's possible to venture outside the FCC certification by using a different miniPCI card.

    2. Re:Excuse: FCC compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats dumb. Does your PCI WLAN card refuse to operate if you screw on a different antenna?

  50. So buy a Mac by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Then you don't have any choices, and the problem goes away. :-)

    Hey! I tease! I own a dual G4 and a 15" Powerbook! Calm down!

  51. This is not new by asdavis · · Score: 1

    IBM has been doing the same thing. The vendors claim that this "white-listing" of mini-pci wi-fi cards is due to certification of the card with the built-in antenna within the laptop in accordance with FCC requirements. I'm not sure that thinking is valid any longer due to regulatory changes.

    --
    TECMATIC - Intelligent Technology News
    1. Re:This is not new by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Hey! I work for Clear Channel now. We don't need no stinking FCC!

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  52. And also... by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Bluetooth cell phones that only work with approved devices.

    The electronics industry likes to talk about interoperability, but they seem to hate it in practice.

  53. confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this?

    Yes, I can confirm this. Your laptop is several years old.

  54. Minor nitpick by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

    The story summary should have said "Mini-PCI" instead of just "PCI". Yeah sure, you and I know what he meant, but it would have been clearer, and not invoked a mental image of someone trying in vain to cram a regular PCI card into a laptop.

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
    1. Re:Minor nitpick by narcc · · Score: 1

      someone trying in vain to cram a regular PCI card into a laptop.

      Yeah, don't try it -- I cut my thumb...

  55. whitelist is dumb by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    that is a dumb way to do it. if IBM wanted to make this work properly (and continue working with newer hardware) they should get hardware vendors to include a public key signature. that way, the bios only needs to know IBM's private key, instead of trying to keep a list of all hardware.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  56. Nothing to see here... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, guys, Mini-PCI is not meant to be a route for user extensibility; it was meant to be a mechanism for the vendor to add individual cards to a standard motherboard. If you want to configure a high-speed a/b/g device, go through your USB ports.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here... by CdBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However if you only have USB 1.1 (12mpbs) and Mini-PCI, an 802.11G (54mpbs) USB device is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.

      I take an interest as one of my machines is a 2000-built designer PC (AST Century City) which only has mini-PCI and USB 1.1... hoping Intel BIOS from the time doesnt have whitelisting!

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Nothing to see here... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      You got a PC with only mini-PCI, and no PMCIA? That sucks. Does it at least have firewire?

    3. Re:Nothing to see here... by CdBee · · Score: 1

      No!
      This was back in the days when USB 1.1 was regarded as high-tech...

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  57. You can use non-Apple cards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are one or two other companies that make cards that fit in those slots.

    You can also buy G4 motherboards and any part that goes into a Mac from a non-Apple vendor, you just don't hear about a lot of people doing it.

    You just can't call it a Mac :)

  58. Re:Bob to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. HP's ZD7000 does this... by kjkeefe · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried removing the broadcom wireless card in my ZD 7168cl laptop because I didn't want to use ndiswrapper and have to deal with additional troubles. So, I wanted to install a more linux friendly card like the Intel Pro 2200. I installed the card and the system got to the initial BIOS splash screen and then came to a screeching halt. It complained that an unapproved Mini-PCI card was installed and that I must remove it and reboot.

    Naive me, I called HP to see if they had a special BIOS package to get around this.

    <sarcasm>I don't know, I guess I thought HP might want to accommodate their customers' needs... Silly me. </sarcasm>

    I talked to a know-nothing tech support guy for about five minutes before I realized that he was not going to be any help. So, I simply asked him to pass on a message to his superiors that a customer was very irritated by the lack of support for linux or even simple modification of one's own computer. In response, this guy tried to explain that since the system was packaged with Windoze XP Home, that it is only supposed to run XP home because HP signed a contract with Microsoft to package this system with Windoze. I patiently explained that I understood that this system was designed for Microsoft and that they came as a package and that although that was a mistake to begin with, I simply wanted HP to stop crippling my computer by blocking 3rd party devices in the BIOS. I again asked him to simply pass on that a customer is very unhappy with the 2 grand that he paid for a hardware-blocking computer. How would you feel if you bought a car and if you didn't fill it up at a Shell gas station, it wouldn't start. Oh well, hopefully by the time I buy a new computer, linux support will be more widespread. Go IBM go!

    --
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5... That's the combination on my luggage!
  60. Similarly - drivers in hp laptop by mkw87 · · Score: 1

    Similar to this, though not "as bad", my g/f's HP laptop will not let you install drivers even from the video card manufacturer (ATI). I was confused as hell, as I am used to updating my video card drivers, that when I tried to update hers due to random crashing in a game she was playing (Sims 2) that the installer would fail every time I ran it to update the drivers, even the omega drivers failed.

    So I got to reading some forums as usual when I run into a problem of this sort and found out that the HP would only let you install the drivers that you downloaded from their site (horseshit drivers of course, even worse than ATI's)

    I found this rather inconvenient at the least, and I am sure there is a way to 'trick' the PC into letting me install new drivers (ps, if anyone knows how to install them w/o reformatting let me know, or even if a reformat and fresh install would correct it)

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  61. Broadcom + HP (Compaq) = screw end user by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I bought a Compaq Presario R3140US laptop several months ago. It has an AMD64 processor. I would like to fully take advantage of these 32 extra bits so I installed Linux (SUSE to be precise). The only problem is that it comes with a builtin Broadcom wireless chip.

    Broadcom doesn't have any linux drivers, much less 64bit linux drivers. And they also keep their card specs secret. For the longest time I was completely out of luck if I wanted to use my wireless card in 64 bit mode. (I had heard ndiswrapper would work in 32 mode with the 32bit windows drivers, but I only tried that briefly and didn't have any luck).

    Let's say you said fine, I'll just open it up and pop in another mini-pci wireless chip in there that does have support in linux. Well you're out of luck because the BIOS has a whitelist of allowed wireless cards that you can use. Any thing else and you're out of luck.

    The issue has more to due with FCC regulations than anything else though. Anything dealing with radio waves needs to be approved by the FCC. Because the wireless chip is separate from the antenna, only FCC approved combinations of chips and antennas can be used together. The reason you can use any PCMCIA card in any laptop is because the antenna and chip are together and are approved together. Although I'm sure that if HP/Compaq wanted to they could test other combinations and get them approved, I guess they just don't want to.

    Eventually Broadcom released 64bit windows drivers, and eventually the wonderful people working on ndiswrapper were able to add support for 64bit windows drivers in linux (those guys are amazing), and I got wireless working on my laptop a few weeks ago... still pissed at HP though.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    1. Re:Broadcom + HP (Compaq) = screw end user by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1
      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    2. Re:Broadcom + HP (Compaq) = screw end user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some PCMCIA WiFi cards have no antenna, and one or two jacks.

  62. Violation of PCI spec? by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    Does this violate the PCI specification? Do they still get to call it a "PCI" slot if some PCI-compliant cards with valid drivers are non-operational in it by design?

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  63. Old news... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

    Apple has been doing this with video and SCSI cards for YEARS. how is this new? All it means is that OEM's from the x86 world are becoming more proprietary. There is nothing you can do about it. Nobody complains about this on the mac so why is it a complaint on windows?

    --
    Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    1. Re:Old news... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Nobody complains about it on the Mac because few Mac users consider their computer to be something they can tinker around with and add third-party upgrades very cheaply.

      OTOH, this is pretty much the whole point of the PC market.

  64. step back by austad · · Score: 1

    Well, then why don't we just go back to the days of non-standard proprietary interfaces? Because this is essentially what this accomplishes.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  65. Its all about FCC certification by avidday · · Score: 3, Informative
    FCC certification is issued for the transmitter + antenna as a single unit. In the case of a Cardbus or conventional PCI wireless card, this is not a problem because the antenna is on the card. In a laptop with an internal mini PCI card the antenna is not on the card so the FCC certification is issued only for the manufacturers recommended wireless cards installed in the laptop with a chassis antenna. They include the white list in the BIOS to ensure that their FCC certification is not invalided by connecting an untested card to their chassis antenna.

    It sucks badly, but the current FCC rules are as much ti blame as the manufacturers are.

  66. Speaking of BIOSes... by warderz · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know how I can modify mine (Dell Latitude CPt/CPx) so that I will be able to see my 80GB drive? I mean the HDD itself works 100% but as soon as I go in the BIOS the stupid thing just freezes there trying to get the HDD parameters... No BIOS upgrade for that one from Dell. Used to work with my old 20GB one that died recently and also heard that 60GB ones are supported but apparently 80's ain't...

  67. I am a PCI Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i am a PCI card

  68. Ensuring what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is one way of ensuring that customers renew their maintenance contracts

    I'd say it's one way of ensuring I don't buy their crap^H^H^H^Hstuff. Customer organisations should stand up against this kind of stuff^H^H^H^H^Hcrap!

  69. Carla by whackco · · Score: 0

    I wonder if she has anything to do with business practice's like this?

    Before I'm flamed a troll, something like blocking 3rd party drivers isn't something just any old EVC would want to stake his career on the line for, this kind of decision would probably go all the way up the chain.

    If that is the case, it is just the exact bullshit that made her the worst CEO in the first part of this century! oh well.

  70. FCC by terminateprocess · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is also a known problem with a lot of Compaq Presario R3000 Series laptops. The have the same issue, with the non-OSS friendly Broadcom 802.11g mini-PCI cards pre-installed. Apparently, the BIOS is built to only allow that card becasue the FCC-ID for the wireless device is for the card and the internal antenna *together*. When you change the card, the system is no longer legal, according to the FCC, so they put in BIOS protection to keep you from breaking FCC rules.

    --
    int cents = 0;
    cents += 2;
  71. confirmation of laptop age by hymie3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this?

    Yeah, Timothy. I was there with you when you bought your laptop. It was around the same time that I got my iPod. It was a first generation, so, yeah, your laptop is definitely a few years old.

    You're welcome. =)

  72. The correct answer is.... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your laptop is downloading pr0n and warez from the internet, and is unresponsive when you try to get it to do something useful. I'd put it's age at about 14.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:The correct answer is.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd put it's age at about 14.

      And judging from your use of contractions incorrectly I'd put your nationality as American :-)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:The correct answer is.... by drakaan · · Score: 0, Troll
      ...and judging from your phrase of tauntings incorrectly, I'd say you grammar-checker need to run against your next post. ;)

      Quit watching Star Wars...yoda is screwing up your diction, man (I'd say "or woman", but chicks just don't watch that much Star Wars).

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    3. Re:The correct answer is.... by rainman_bc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd just like to point out that adding elipses doesn't somehow make a phrase become as sentence either. ;)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:The correct answer is.... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, judging from the fact that you disregarded a funny joke to nitpick a typo, I'd put your relationship status as 'single'.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    5. Re:The correct answer is.... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Can anyone confirm this?

    6. Re:The correct answer is.... by drakaan · · Score: 1
      I was gonna write "got nothin", until I realized that you wrote "make a phrase become as sentence". ;)

      Who's the humorless ass that modded me troll?

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  73. If this was Apple we were talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the tone here would be much different. Everyone would be saying what a genius Jobs is for controlling the hardware list to a set of known working parts.

  74. MOD PARENT UP!!! INFORMATIVE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll? How is this a Troll?

  75. Mac is OK with non-Apple cards! by SallyShears · · Score: 1

    The Airport slot in an Apple Laptop uses only Apple Airport cards, and these won't work in a PC-Card slot.

    But, other vendors' PC-Card products work fine in Mac laptops; there is no white list at boot time, as discussed in the original article.

    In particular, I use non-apple 802.11 cards of a couple of different types/vendors. I use IOXPERTS driver with an SMC removable antenna card and Apple's own drivers for a different WiFi card.

    -- Sally

  76. x1000 by exnuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It happened to me when I upgraded from an intel 2100 wireless card to an intel 2200 wireless pci card in an eight month old Compaq X1000 laptop. Rolling back to an older bios "fixed" the problem.

    More info here: http://www.x1000forums.com/index.php?showtopic=573 9

    Today's lesson: Don't buy Compaq.

    1. Re:x1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today's lesson: Don't buy Compaq.

      Yeah, Carly learned that the hard way.

  77. IBM 802.11 whitelist rationale by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 2, Informative

    My IBM TPX31 has a BIOS lock at least for 802.11 a/b/g cards (mini-PCI). I picked up a Dell 2200 card which when installed would cause the laptop to be unable to boot. A freshly updated BIOS and chipset firmware did not help this situation. I then obtained the same model card (2200 a/b/g) but IBM-branded and it worked like a charm.

    The installation in an IBM laptop of a non-whitelist card is supposed to cause it to throw some error to the screen, but mine would just hang. There are some BIOS patches in the wild which is supposed to bypass this problem, but because I didn't get the error code I was hesitant to install the hack.

    Apparently there is a pin on the mini-PCI card which the IBM onboard firmware pushes high and allows the Thinkpad's BIOS to illuminate the little "wireless signal" light on the screen base. Installing the hack mentioned above will disable this feature.

    From what I understand from reading, the reason that certain cards are whitelisted is so that RF emmissions from the laptops meet FCC regulations. If that's not the reason, it's the justification I've read.

    Luckily, my girlfriend's R30 did not have the BIOS lock-out, so the Dell a/b/g card worked just fine in her machine.

    Now if I can just find a reasonably-priced BMDC card...

  78. Re:Funny. Pontiac Sufire = Asuna= Chev Cavalier by Graemee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Example of this is Pontiac Sufire = Asuna= Chev Cavalier All three are the same car, but with different trim and styling. They all cost, last time I bought one 1998, about the same. I went for the Cav because that dealer had a model with ETS and a four speed automatic. Sometimes they market the same car with different names, the 1960's GTO was a Beaumont in Canada. It's the Chrysler Intrepid not Dodge.

  79. what problems? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    I had a toshiba laptop, and now i have a dell 9100 laptop and have never had any problems plugging in any pci cards. I have gone from older cards (cisco, linksys, intel, netgear, and more) all the way to the latest and greatest...

    W/o RTFA, it would be nice to have a whitelist in the bios (easily accesed) to show what brands/models work...and I am sure by "worked" it means without any problems (hopefully).

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  80. Wrong by jht · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No - that's not why every generic card wouldn't work in a Mac. It's because the firmware was typically processor-specific on a (PCI, AGP, etc.) card back in the day. 68k/PPC chips use a different endian mode than x86 does, and so if you didn't put appropriate firmware on the card, it wouldn't work. There are cards out there nowadays that work on both platforms just fine (for instance, a lot of ATA controllers work just fine cross-platform - same with networking cards and plenty of other stuff).

    In some cases, the card would work fine if there were an OS-specific driver for it. The vendor's decision not to write one isn't Apple's fault.

    I'm not striving for unrestrained Apple fanboydom here, but let's get real. The fact that Apple doesn't build generic x86 computers that are interchangeable doesn't make them proprietary - they've just made different architectural choices that impact what will work with their products. NuBus wasn't proprietary, for instance - it was industry standard. It just wasn't used by x86 vendors. But it was technically superior to 8/16 bit ISA, so Apple used it until it made more sense to move to PCI. They also used SCSI to gain an technical advantage over older-generation PC drive technology - there were clear speed advantages to SCSI for a long time until newer ATA implementations caught up. At which point Apple switched and lowered their costs in doing so.

    They also helped drive the move to USB, popularized Firewire, added standard Ethernet on everything before any x86 vendors, and added a dedicated slot and antenna for wireless before anyone.

    There's plenty of useful stuff to rip on Apple about without the misinformed "proprietary hardware" red herring.

    There. I feel much better now ;-)

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:Wrong by mp3phish · · Score: 2, Informative

      "They also helped drive the move to USB, popularized Firewire, added standard Ethernet on everything before any x86 vendors, and added a dedicated slot and antenna for wireless before anyone."

      They also helped drive ADC with 99$ DVI to ADC straight through adapters (all ADC is is DVI with a few pins extra for USB) When instead they could have just broke the cable out into 2 seperate connectors for a fraction of the cost, retail price, and for the sake of standards.

      This isn't the only time they drove the market into the end with proprietary connectors. Look at the DB15 monitors legacy mac's use. 15 pin but uses a different shape because they wanted to charge more. (even though it is perfectly compatible with HDDB15 VGA connectors)

      Lets not forget about their idiotic old style keyboard and mouse connectors...

      You forgot: Apple INVENTED Firewire! lol. of course they popularized it. (with that whole entire 5% of the personal computer market!)

      Your facts about the usb connectors standard are just plain wrong. Computers on windows were coming with multiple USB ports years before apple even considered putting it in there. They were too scared that firewire would fail if done so. You can add them to the list of "supported vendors" but you can't even start to talk about them pushing it into the mainstream. Intel had plenty of pull on their own for that.

      Not to mention that apple puts/has put in the past special firmware in their internal Optical drives to make sure nobody replaces it with a 3rd party one... and then won't let you use an external burner with iDVD... Nevermind that there isn't a hardware eject button for most of their drives...

      This isnt' to backup my previous post. Just to trash what you think is so awesome about apple in all their glory. Your right about one thing: Apple can do no wrong. No, they have too many fanboys to back them up.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    2. Re:Wrong by jht · · Score: 1

      Think about timing. ADC was there before DVI took off in the market - DVI monitors and cards were few and far between. Apple was trying (misguided though it was) to create a connector that did everything in a single cable. It didn't work. And after Apple realized it, they moved to DVI. They were also the first company to standardize on LCDs - which was part of why they did the ADC thing in the first place.

      The 15-pin monitor was a similar idea. Again, Apple introduced it at about the same time VGA first arrived. Unlike VGA, though, Apple built sense pins onto their video cards and used it to automatically drive monitors that recognized them at the desired resolution. Later on, the PC world discovered the VESA standard, enabling autosensing there, too - and after they did Apple joined them and moved to VGA connectors. ADB was a useful way of connecting keyboards, mice, joysticks, and the like and it allowed for daisy-chaining, auto-detection, and hot plugging. Before USB made it possible on the PC side. And once USB was out there, Apple switched over. It wasn't idiotic, it was way better than the (then) PC state-of-the-art of single-device dedicated PS/2 connectors.

      My point here is this. When Apple does something that's different, it's usually because the PC world hasn't gone there yet. If the industry matches it, they join them. ADB would still be around if the only keyboard/mouse alternative were PS/2 (single-purpose ports that can't be hot-plugged). Had DVI not become popular, we'd probably still have ADC. And I'm sure Macs would still use SCSI drives if ATA and SATA hadn't gotten good.

      USB was available on most PC's ever since the LX chipset. But it didn't have even rudimentary support until Windows 98 (I think about two devices were supported with Windows 95 OSR2). That was also about the same time Apple came out with the iMac and switched everything to USB at once. Sure, it's no big deal now, but in the PC world most systems still give you a PS/2 mouse and keyboard.

      Yeah, they use their own firmware in their own drives - wah. It's been done in the PC world, too - but Apple likes to mix their cake exactly to their recipe, and that's just the way it is. You can't easily disassemble a Powerbook, either. Is that a conspiracy?

      Oh yeah - I forgot to mention this. Apple supports a lot of external DVD burners with iDVD. They did it through an "easter egg" in earlier versions, but now they support them natively in iDVD 5. I don't miss the hardware button for ejecting discs when I'm using my Mac, because unlike on my PC I can reliably get the drive to open and close with a keystroke.

      What you've misinterpreted as "fanboyism" is something else. Apple hasn't made all infallible technical decisions. But when they do something different, it's usually because they feel they've got a better way. Not just to be proprietary. Not just to charge more. Because it's better than what the Wintel hordes were doing then. When the industry-standard way is Good Enough, they use it. As they should.

      Do you think using PowerPC processors is something they're doing because they want to charge more, too? Or is it perhaps because that was the fruit of their deal with Motorola and IBM when they wanted a migration path from 68k?

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    3. Re:Wrong by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      " Think about timing. ADC was there before DVI took off in the market"

      Sorry to inform you, but ADC came out YEARS after DVI flat pannels were already widespread. Also, dell and gateway (and I'm sure several others) were shipping DVI on all but their low end models... There is no timing issue with DVI. in fact, apple released DVI G4 computers _BEFORE_ they released ADC computers. This is not a valid argument.

      Also, apple never "standardized" on lcd monitors. They still have a CRT machine for christs sake! Not only this but G4 machines which came out with ADC did not have a monitor by default. Instead, there was a dropdown menu on their website offering either an LCD or a CRT monitor. Ask anyone who does exentive business with apple. How can you even claim that they "standardised on LCD's first" PLEASE DUDE! That is an outrageous claim. NO PC manufacturer has _EVER_ standardized on LCD's. You can still get CRT's for all of them to this day! (including Apple's)

      "The 15-pin monitor was a similar idea. Again, Apple introduced it at about the same time VGA first arrived." BZZt! Wrong again. VGA was already well defined and flooding the market way before this ever happened. It's the same thing as the ADC, only older. I'm sorry, but your alone here. you won't find too many apple heads who don't agree that ADC and DB15 were both stubborn moves by apple to force proprietary connectors.

      "and after they did[become popular] Apple joined them and moved to VGA connectors. "

      They didn't release a SINGLE HDDB15 VGA connector until the iMac with external video came out. How can you say they conformed when in fact it took them till the END of the existance of HDDB15! How can you say they switched to VGA when it became popular when it took them several YEARS to do so?

      "Yeah, they use their own firmware in their own drives - wah."

      You obviously haven't had a CD-ROM drive go out in a mac before. If it had you would know that a 20$ CDROM could fix it. but instead you have to pay 400$ because apple charges that much for their firmware'd version. I think this is fixed in OS X but in all the classic OS's this has always been a problem.

      "Apple supports a lot of external DVD burners with iDVD. They did it through an "easter egg""

      Was is "supported or was it an "easter egg"? And declaring that it works now in the new off the hself boxed iLife is a big margin from it having worked before, where all the high and dry mac customers were forced to live without DVD burning when they didn't know they had to configure their powerbooks with superdrives otherwise it wouldn't burn. Please.

      "because unlike on my PC I can reliably get the drive to open and close with a keystroke"
      Nice comeback about the button. Too bad you have to delete your cdrom drive to eject it (i mean throw it in the trash) how is that for reliability (did I forget to mention that you had to delete your flopy to eject it too?) and by the way, you obviously don't have much experience with mac's showing that you think it is reliable to hit the eject button on the keyboard and out comes a CD. Anything goes wrong with your mac (and i mean ANYTHING) software issue, bios prob, PRAM problem, and it won't eject.

      " Apple hasn't made all infallible technical decisions."

      I'm glad you admit it after defending their every mistake above. Why you defend their worst design mistakes rather than complement their best ones is beyond me. They actualy would have something going for them if their quality wasn't so piss poor.

      "But when they do something different, it's usually because they feel they've got a better way. Not just to be proprietary."

      And here comes the one true statement of the apple fanboy who wishes things were different. Go ahead, justify it to yourself like that. Steve Jobbs DROOLS over customers like yourself. I guess that is why you use their hardware and why they go after people like you.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    4. Re:Wrong by jht · · Score: 1

      You know, selective quoting can eviscerate almost any argument.

      Just FYI, the iMac with external VGA output came out in 2000 (the DV series), but Apple switched their desktops to VGA as standard back in 1998 - with the PowerBook G3 and the first PowerMac G3 (blue&white). That's about when extended resolutions beyond regular old XGA started to become common in the PC world.

      One other correction for you - VGA dates back to 1987. It was "invented" by IBM with the PS/2 series - if I recall, the introduction was in late February. The following month, Apple came out with the Macintosh II. Strangely, it used an HD-15 connector. The same one you're saying trailed the market.

      You sound like a person who hasn't used a Mac since the Bad Old Days just before PowerPC chips came about.

      And DVI was just a niche connection until the last year or so - when LCD panels finally came down in price to normal levels. ADC goes back to 2000.

      When you have to distort the space-time continuum to bash Apple is when it's a good time for a discussion to end. And I'm dropping out of this troll session now. Ciao.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    5. Re:Wrong by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      "Just FYI, the iMac with external VGA output came out in 2000 (the DV series), but Apple switched their desktops to VGA as standard back in 1998 - with the PowerBook G3 and the first PowerMac G3 (blue&white)."

      Actually, the first powerMac G3 was a beige, with DB15 in 1997! Still using DB15 in '97! They continued to ship these machines well into 1998! Still with DB15. BTW, the first PB g3 didn't have VGA either. it was with charchole keyboard. It wasn't until the black keyboard did it come out with a VGA port. This was in May 1998 that the first VGA came out on the mac.

      It wasn't until Jan 1999 that the G3 blue and white came out with a VGA port - first time ever for an Apple desktop machine to come with VGA -- just to put this into perspective, DVI had already become the dominate LCD interface by now. By the end of 1999, DVI was in consumer cards such as Matrox G400 and nVidia TNT series cards. And apple was just now getting VGA.. just in time to see it die.

      "You sound like a person who hasn't used a Mac since the Bad Old Days just before PowerPC chips came about."

      Actually, that is when I first extensively used mac's.. was with the PPC. I came in seeing proprietary firmwares in the optical drives, proprietary DB15 ports with 45$ adapters for non-apple branded monitors. etc etc. When the new apples came out I thought apple had finally outgrown that trash. Turns out they just did the same thing again.

      BTW, you are wrong about DVI. Apple used a DVI card BEFORE They shiped the ADC in their LCD lineup. You should check the facts. DVI was already popularized and in all major 3d cards, and nobody was using the older connectors in the LCD pannels for over a year by the time apple came out with ADC. It had NOTHING to do with timing. DVI had been out since 1998. ADC came out at the end of 2000 AFTER apple had already shipped DVI in large volumes.

      "And DVI was just a niche connection until the last year or so "

      Goes to show you what log you just came out from under... might that be steve jobbs terd? Because you obviously don't have a clue about DVI.. It only became "popular" to you because only 'about a year ago" did apple start using DVI... In fact, they have been shipping it since 2000 and it has been in their TiBook and all aluminum powerbooks since the begining. You might want to check your facts one more time. (not to mention that the entire PC industry had not only standardized it but flushed out all competitors by 1999).

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  81. Mini PCI RAM Disk by wkk2 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone make a mini PCI RAM Disk? I'm looking for a module with battery backup so it won't wear out like flash.

  82. Your doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your doubt is your ignorance. Off the top of my head the following vehicles were all made by Isuzu and rebadged as Chevrolet:

    Chevy LUV (Pickup)
    Chevy Spectrum
    Geo Storm
    The Silverado had a Duramax diesel option, circa 2000 that was made by Isuzu.

    There are probably many more but, I can't be bothered to look them up.

  83. Broadcom has GPL'd their drivers by kubla2000 · · Score: 2, Informative


    The author writes:

    "Oh, the horror. I bought a Compaq/HP nx9110 a year ago, and recently upgraded my Mini-PCI Wireless card from non-OSS friendly Broadcom 11b to an 11g card."

    But Broadcom have clearly GPL'd their drivers:

    http://www.broadcom.com/drivers/driver-sla.php?d ri ver=570x-Linux

    The bios-level white list is an issue but that seems an undeserved cheap-shot against Broadcom.

    1. Re:Broadcom has GPL'd their drivers by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2, Informative

      But Broadcom have clearly GPL'd their drivers:

      Their ethernet drivers, but not their wireless drivers.

      Fortunately, Linuxant has made their wrapper driver 64-bit compatible, so those of us with HP/Compaq notebooks running 64-bit Linux can use wireless, even though we have to jump through hoops to do so. (I've yet to get around to buying and setting up the driver personally.)

      I found out about the whitelist the hard way. Bought an expensive Atheros card, swapped it in, got the BIOS error message, got all the way up to HP's top-tier technicians and they had no idea why that error was there. More research found the reason in the HP Hardware Guide: HP swears the FCC made them do it. Yeah, right, then why don't eMachines/Acer/Dell/etc pull stunts like this...

      Other than that glaring fault and their inexplicable choice of the antique GeForce 440 Go GPU, the zv5000z/R3000z series notebooks make great Linux machines and they're very easy to upgrade. See R3000 Forums for more info on the series.

  84. Oh, there's a much, much easier solution. by jd · · Score: 1
    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  85. Free shareware by tepples · · Score: 1

    (Interestingly, the Mac market's about the only place where a shareware developer can make a living from it.)

    Then who pays Bram Cohen's salary for BitTorrent, a Free shareware program?

    1. Re:Free shareware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valve Software (they hired him awhile ago).

    2. Re:Free shareware by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      According to an interview with him, he supports his family from contributions on his Web site.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  86. Dell Latitude D600 / Inspiron 600m: no problem by JPamplin · · Score: 1

    Folks,

    I switch out the (incredibly not likable) Intel 2100 Mini-PCI cards for Dell 1350s all the time, and there is absolutely no problem with it.

    I think this is a vendor-specific decision, so absolutely avoid vendors that do this.

    Of course, Dell laptops are also not made as well as IBM's, so you may have a "lesser of two evils" decision to make.

    JP

  87. IBM Thinkpads have the same lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My R40 used to reject the Mini-PCI wlan card that I've shamelessly stolen from my sister's laptop ;)

    A bit googling lead me to a page with a little c program that disabled that lock by simply flipping a bit in the cmos...

    I've written a letter to IBM, asked for refund or at least a patch and told them that they should inform their clients of that matter _before_ they go and buy the hardware.
    I also pointed out that the cards available in the whitelist have bad or no linux support.
    This is now 3 Months ago and I still have no answer from them...

    I find this behaviour of hardware vendors quite annoying and all of you _owning_ such hardware should write a letter to let them know...

  88. Laptops with PCI slots? by delmoi · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know they made laptops with PCI slots.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  89. Desktops too.. sorta.. by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    My parents own a Compaq system (They bought it without consulting me first) and I decided they didn't need the ATI Radeon 9200 card as much as I did. So I tossed my old AIW in their machine and took the TV turner that came with it. I d/led the drivers from Compaq only to find out it runs some little util to detect if your machine is in fact a compaq and if not doesn't allow the drivers to install. I've been unable to locate an alternate source of drivers at this time. While I'm sure eventually I'll find a way around the issue it's just a pain in the butt.

    Eric

  90. Isn't this a lawsuit waiting to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If any manufacturer is billing their system as "PCI compatible", and yet they are not supporting ALL PCI cards, then this is false advertising, plain and simple.

    Unless I've missed where in the PCI spec it allows for a compatible BIOS check to happen.

    This is false advertising, plain and simple. And it sounds like a gold mine for the right lawyer who wants to take up a class action lawsuit.

    I'm also surprised that that PCI consortium allows their trademark to be used in such a fashion. It's like saying "Yeah, you can plug PCI cards in, but they won't work". Something I don't believe that was the intention of the PCI spec.

    1. Re:Isn't this a lawsuit waiting to happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these laptops (AFAIK) actually advertise that they are miniPCI compatible. They advertise as having integrated components but they do not advertise the interface they may use, nor do they advertise that they are upgradable by the user.

  91. bios updates by nilbog · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...Bios updates are free from HP's site. You don't need to have a service contract to get them. Go to support.hp.com and type in your model number.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:bios updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. The BIOS still locks you out of using non-approved miniPCI cards.

  92. Not only PCs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't unique to PC's. Some of the network manufacturers (particulary Cisco) are starting to do this with GBICs. The gear looks for Cisco-S/N'ed GBICs and won't bring up interfaces that aren't the proper hardware.

  93. Just mailed this out . . . by BilliamBlake · · Score: 1

    To whom it may concern:

    I was considering an IBM until I found out that IBM laptops incorporate pci "whitelists" in the bios that limit the pci hardware that can be used and prevent bootup of the laptop when non-approved cards are inserted. IBM makes very nice laptops and it is unfortunate that they come with this restriction.

    Thanks to http://slashdot.org for this information.

    Although there are two non-IBM supported workarounds, I will now be looking elsewhere for unrestricted pci capability.

    In addition, I am considering compiling a publicly accessible list of manufacturers that do this with various details and alleged reasons.

    Please forward this to the appropriate department.

    Thanks.

  94. Acer=crappy plastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acer use very poor materials, in a coulpe of years their plastic components develop cracks. Dell laptops are slightly better, but not much better.

    IBM and Fujitsu use great plastics, their laptops never crack.

    1. Re:Acer=crappy plastics by Supernoma · · Score: 1

      I have an Acer (Travelmate 274xc), the ink comes off the keyboard (replaced many times), and the paint comes off the touchpad cover(also replaced many times). Also, I have a few cracks in the case (doesn't hurt structural integrity). It also came with an SiS 650 chipset (horrible onboard video). However, if I got pissed and threw this thing out a window, they would probably replace it under warantee without question. The only thing that I have left from when I purchased this machine orginally is the hard drive and bottom of the case.

      --
      I'll Find You Peer, If It's The Last Thing I Do!!!!
  95. Mini-PCI slots were never user upgradeable by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your Mini-PCI slot was never intended to be user upgradeable. Frankly, I always assumed they wouldn't be compatible between laptop vendors, models, or nescessarily even between two laptops of the same model that came off the assembly line on different days.

    If you want to upgrade to a better wireless connection, use a PMCIA card.

    1. Re:Mini-PCI slots were never user upgradeable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the purpose of miniPCI is that the cards ARE industry standardized and can be exchanged with different parts but still be compatible with the host machine.

    2. Re:Mini-PCI slots were never user upgradeable by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Oh. I've never seen them advertised that way. Do you have any links?

  96. This reply is not offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we have the reason that many people think that Firefox is on the rise, when in reality it is doomed - that battle, and others, are already over - we only need to wait out the end game.

    Note: I have more tin foil hats than you :)

    I believe that we are approaching hardware lockout to free software. I believe that you will see more and more of this kind of thing, for seemingly acceptable reasons... but it will be Microsoft driving the whole thing.

    In 5 years, the PC you'll be able to buy will have hardware/BIOS that integrate with Longhorn (or whatever OS MS manages to ship). And you won't be able to get the information you need to run on those hardwares.

    Or maybe you'll be able to run, but you won't have access to the hardware DRM - the stuff that MS is going to use to sell the thing as if there's nothing else. Which there actually won't be, because remember, you'll be locked out.

    So where does that leave big bad Firefox? Waaay out in the cold, where IE has all that hardware integration, hardware aided security, and more.

    Good luck guys. The guy with the billions wins.

    (Gosh it's fun letting your conspiracy theories out in the light of day anonymously :) )

  97. Possibly.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    English as a third, fourth, fifth, or even sixth language depending on where you attend. Not everybody here is an American.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Possibly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I find that non-native speakers tend to get English grammar and spelling correct more often than native speakers.

    2. Re:Possibly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say you're right, but that comparing the average native English speaker to the average native speaker of any other language who happens to have learned English isn't really fair.

      Those of us who actually can spell and use proper grammar (most of the time) don't want to be associated with the idiots who can't any more than the foreign literati want to be associated wtih their own unwashed masses.

      Most of us are stupid, I'll freely admit that. Not all of us are.

      I realize that this is both offtopic and not at all what you were implying, but I do hear this quite a bit, and it stings a little each time. I know my own language, whether I'm a "stupid" American or not, thank you.

      I do regularly break a few grammar rules that I know about (when writing informally, like now). Most of them relate to the use of quotation marks, because I find their proper usage to be unintuitive. Many folks feel the same way, from what I've gathered.

      This should be modded down, but I figure it should be said somewhere, so here it is.

    3. Re:Possibly.... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      Unless you see some of my friends write in English (don't know how/whether they'll pass PET)

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    4. Re:Possibly.... by Vombatus · · Score: 1

      And not every native English speaker is American either.

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    5. Re:Possibly.... by compuserf · · Score: 1

      Having done 6 years of phone support, in the UK, I would say that someone speaking precise and accurate English is likely to be Danish or Dutch, maybe Swedish. But rarely English or North American.

    6. Re:Possibly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it seems like those that are not do a much better job of speaking than do average Americans.

  98. So you want to black-list anyone who... by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 2, Funny

    supported white-lists? Isn't that reverse-racisim?

  99. Apple didn't invent NuBus by hawk · · Score: 1

    It was already around, really. There weren't many cards for it, and I don't think that any of them ever worked on Mac, but it was a pre-existing technology nonetheless.

  100. Take the risks seriously by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
    This is probably a sign of things to come. As computing becomes more and more dependant on the Internet to even provide basic functionality, security concerns are going to crowd out flexibility and "freedom." It's really a shame; this will only increase the barrier to entry to computing even higher than it is now. Already, classical shareware and freeware have nearly been killed by fears of viruses and spyware.

    Well lets separate out cause and effect. The source of the problem here are the bastards who write spyware. The effect is that there is a trust deficit for shareware vendors. There are spyware bastards out there who are selling 'anti-spyware' that is in fact spyware. That is why Microsoft had to go and buy Giant and give away the code.

    have already been opening salvos of FUD fired at the Open Source movement for not having a "certified" credential system for contributing programmers and writers.

    Its not FUD, it is an issue that has to be taken very seriously. There is a real danger of attack and it is not possible to detect the attack using automated code inspection designed to detect bugs.

    The only architectural solution here is to take 'least privillege' seriously. UNIX and derrivatives are vulnerable here. The privillege system is binary, all or nothing. Microsoft is somewhat better off but is a long way from having the pieces joined up. Every binary (and some data files) needs to be signed and the privilleges required to run it specified as attributes.

    Microsoft has every incentive to keep the shareware for Windows market open and working, same for open source. Its all about developers, remember.

    There is a real and serious risk that a spyware ring will attempt to infiltrate a FOSS project with the aim of injecting hostile code. At the moment they seem to be content to redistribute contaminated code.

    Programmers do not like doing code reviews. It is hard enough to get them to review their own code, let alone somebody else's. Looking for a programming mistake is much easier than looking for actual malice.

    FOSS projects need to carefully monitor who is in their group, who is allowed to make code updates, who can be trusted.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Take the risks seriously by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      The only architectural solution here is to take 'least privillege' seriously. [snip] Every binary (and some data files) needs to be signed and the privilleges required to run it specified as attributes.

      A valid concern, but to be honest, I don't think there is a magic bullet for this issue. Your own parenthetical statement shows part of the problem... data and code have a very blurry boundary separating them. Data tends to have lower security to streamline communication and work flows, while code has to be given tighter security to insure only "valid" applications are used by organizational computers.

      For good and ill, technologies continually get developed to work around the loss of flexability such a regime acquires, ususally by providing code-like ability to data files that can still "bypass" the tight security. E-mail and web pages used to be data-only mediums, until client software was made to allow executable data to be embedded in it, via attachments and links at first, then interpreted scripting within data, leading to a new vector for security issues. Remember when e-mail viruses were considered a hoax? Word documents and other early productivity apps fell in a similar hole with "macros."

      Even ignoring the data/code issue, privilege assignment is as only good as an admin's sense of clairvoyance. You can't always know when a "safe" kind of file or data will turn hostile. The recent resurgence in pop-up ads and browser tracking windows on the web was due to a new capability being found in an interplay between Flash .swf files and JavaScript, fooling the algorithms many web browsers had to block them.

      There's also a huge economic liability to requiring every app to be signed in some way or another. Smaller companies will be disproportately expensed or slowed due to lack in the same legal and funding resources needed for compliance that larger firms have. This will kill off the remaining sparks of vitality and innovation in software development, since larger firms, by nature, tend to be more conservative and less prone to experiment and take risks. Those small companies who do go through certification will likely spend resources on that rather than developing quality product, encouraging the development of "certification" mills to expedite the process. When this happens, we just return full circle to security issues, but with the added economic and society burden the extra complexity in the system has added.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    2. Re:Take the risks seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only architectural solution here is to take 'least privillege' seriously. UNIX and derrivatives are vulnerable here. The privillege system is binary, all or nothing. Microsoft is somewhat better off but is a long way from having the pieces joined up.

      Explain and justify, please. In what way is UNIX security "binary"?

    3. Re:Take the risks seriously by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      For good and ill, technologies continually get developed to work around the loss of flexability such a regime acquires, ususally by providing code-like ability to data files that can still "bypass" the tight security. E-mail and web pages used to be data-only mediums, until client software was made to allow executable data to be embedded in it, via attachments and links at first, then interpreted scripting within data, leading to a new vector for security issues.

      One of the reasons I propose requiring code to state the privs it requires to run is precisely to prevent this type of excess privilege.

      I would like the ability to lock each application into its own private virtual operating system prison and only allow it out via carefully controlled channels. So Firefox might think it is being loaded C:/Program files/whatever and messing with the registry but really it isn't, its in its own private little jail cell.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  101. This is probably the real issue ... by SalesEngineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unlike a regular PCI add-in card, the miniPCI WiFi card(s) in question doesn't contain a PCI option ROM. Like VGA, SCSI or RAID cards, this option ROM configures the device before the OS loads.

    Since the option ROM isn't on the device, the ROM is stored in the system BIOS. When PCI option ROMs are stored in the BIOS, they are associated with the device's PCI "vendor ID" and "device ID". The "hack" described in an earlier post tells the BIOS to look for a different vendor/device ID (which hopefully is compatible with the embedded option ROM).

    Some network adapters require the option ROM for the OS drivers to work, and network booting requires the option ROM so the BIOS can use UNDI/PXE.

    This is a support problem from the notebook manufacturer. They only tested a few adapters, and only have room in the BIOS for one network option ROM. This has nothing to do with "trusted computing" or weird conspiracy theories. If the integrated card can't be upgraded, then USB or PCMCIA devices should be an option.

    1. Re:This is probably the real issue ... by argent · · Score: 1

      Since the option ROM isn't on the device, the ROM is stored in the system BIOS.

      Which means if you don't have a supported card, and the CARD doesn't work, you're out of luck... but that's fair.

      But that's not what has been reported.

      What's been reported is that if you don't have a supported card, THE LAPTOP REFUSES TO BOOT. So I see two options here:

      1. The reports are wrong, and you're right, and the cards aren't working, but the laptop does boot.

      2. The reports are right, and they're not just declining to configure cards they don't know about they're unreasonably locking up people's computers because they're using the "wrong" cards.

      Can you shed light on these two scenarios?

    2. Re:This is probably the real issue ... by SalesEngineer · · Score: 1

      Well, there's two different laptop stories that got merged into this thread ... HP/Compaq (HewpaQ?, Compackard?) and IBM. The original story is a blogger bitching about his HP then pointing to an IBM/Phoenix BIOS hack.

      The failure to boot on unsupported cards based on a BIOS check is probably related to this FCC certification issue (see other posts regarding integrated antennas vs. stand alone cards). Various reports say this issue can be hacked in hex, disabled in setup or bypassed with a BIOS update. So once the BIOS setup check is thwarted, the user may be able to boot but experience reduced network device functionality (driver may not load, network boot disabled, etc.).

      In reality, the FCC issue is probably the major reason for implementing the check (pesky radio waves getting in the way of my perfectly good theory). Right behind it is my option ROM theory, and the added benefit of some annoyed early adopter trading his old portable for some slim Centrino when 802.11b goes out of vogue.

      Part of the lesson is that laptop manufacturers use standards like miniPCI as a way for the assembly lines to standardize production, not as a way to standardize expansion for the end-user. With more "white box laptops" coming to the market (like the Asus I'm using right now), the trend may go to selling laptops as barebones PCs (my laptop actually has a socketed CPU that's accessible by removing one screw).

    3. Re:This is probably the real issue ... by filipvh · · Score: 1

      That's a very informative comment, but, unfortunately, at least partly incorrect:

      My HP notebook worked fine with an aftermarket upgrade to 802.11g until the very latest BIOS release. That's completely, 100%, functional and stable without any funny hacks required, until it got blocked in a BIOS update.

      I've also heard the FCC story about certification and approval, but being a cynical SOB I think it's got more to do with charging a premium for "vendor approved" product...

  102. OK then ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    ... so when I screw in a new "super-antannae" to my Linksys wireless gateway, than that would make Linksys liable????

    I guess we should expect to see proprietary patented antannae interfaces then ... huh???

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:OK then ... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact the law requires that the antenna interface be prioprietary, or at least non-standard and not easy for a random user to attach a non-tested antenna to.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  103. Show some respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WWII was a real killer, and was a war to stop a truely wicked leader. Now, we fight wars such as Vietnam and Iraq, were US leaders are simply after resources.

    1. Re:Show some respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes it has been such a hard road since we did not capture all those resources in Vietnam.

      you are a moron like your father.

    2. Re:Show some respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but you do have all that cheap labour in south korea to make your shoes/basket balls/other miscellaneous items

  104. Re:Yes, by all means(OT) by Bastian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There have already been opening salvos of FUD fired at the Open Source movement for not having a "certified" credential system for contributing programmers and writers.

    I can give anyone a certificate right now. Just give me some scrap paper and a green crayon, and I'll certify you for anything. Heck, I'll even ask you a few lame questions first to make sure you're qualified.

    And that's about how I'll feel about certificates for as long as there are VeriSign certificates for spyware companies, MCSEs, and the like.

  105. ahh, but the real fun . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    . . . comes in the domestic/import columns for CAFE regulations (fuel economy).

    My '89 Crown Victoria managed to get itself classified as an import, though it was made in Detroit & Canada. As the domestic Fords were nipping at the mpg ceiling, with tons of room in the import column, it was too tempting for them to pass up.

    "Imports" were cars with some minimum percentage (30% ?) of foreign content. The CV was close enough that it didn't take much more than a different brand of windshield wipers to get it there . . .

  106. Managed Shareware ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    ...

    I think this is where .net and Java come in. They have built in security that can shield your machine from malicious software.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  107. There was one other legal way to get a MacROM by arete · · Score: 1

    to take it out of an existing Macintosh. The first Macintosh laptops I saw were clones, from before Apple sanctioned clones. You send them a (possibly broken) desktop mac. Then sent you a mac laptop, after having moved the ROM.

    Brilliant. : )

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:There was one other legal way to get a MacROM by myov · · Score: 1

      True, but you already had bought the ROM.

      What would have been interesting is a "BYOR" machine (bring your own rom). MOve the rom from an old Mac into the new one, everything else is included. Just don't static zap them on the way.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    2. Re:There was one other legal way to get a MacROM by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      There was a Amiga add-on board that allowed you to BYOR and run Mac programs. (Pissed me off when some dirty Amigian stole all the ROMs from the Mac IIcxs in our computer lab!)

      Also, for a while there was a blackmarket which you could get rid of your "dirty" buggy ROMs for 32-bit clean ones from newer machines. Eventually there was a software fix tho.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  108. Ford, too by hawk · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, more of those sneaky fools with regulated products.

    Do you know that I can't just stick a datsun air conditioner in my ford van? Or a bmw engine?

    And if I somehow manage to do it, they claim that it voids my warranty? :)

    hawk

  109. ROMs on PCI cards in Macs by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm writing this on a G4 PowerMac into which I have retrofitted a PC version of an ATI Radeon 7000 PCI card. (I just had it lying around. Really.)

    OS X recognised it as a VGA card. It wouldn't do anything useful with it, however, as OpenFirmware didn't know what to do with VGA. (It's understandable: if you aren't tied down to ancient PC standards, why would you want to be?) I stuck the card into a PC and flashed it with the Mac ROM image, obtained from a website, and it worked perfectly.

    I also have a generic USB 2.0 PCI card in there that didn't need special treatment.

    Like the immediate parent says, it's not a lockout, but certain architectural differences require things like the graphics cards to interact differently with the host system at boot time.

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
    1. Re:ROMs on PCI cards in Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scsi cards need a mac rom to boot from

    2. Re:ROMs on PCI cards in Macs by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Any card needs drivers, wether those are drivers for your OS or drivers for your firmware...
      X86 BIOS will try to initialize a secondary BIOS on an expansion card, and the Mac's OpenFirmware will try to do something similar but obviously not compatible due to differences in both the hardware (x86 code wont run on a ppc cpu) and the software in use. This is required for any device that will be used before the OS is loaded, such as display, storage (only for the bootdrive tho), and IO devices (usb, keyboard, mouse ports etc)
      For this same reason, the MacOSX drivers for a particular piece of hardware won't work on a windows machine with the same hardware.
      I believe the Alpha machines partially got around this problem by having a bios emulator built in to the firmware.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  110. HEY! Don't call them chicks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bitches hate that.

  111. it's more like... by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    ....if you car detected something trivial like a non OEM starter and refused to crank. The car comapnies lost that one bigtime in court, at least you have the option now of an aftermarket starter or alternator, etc that will still function in your car. They are trying to rebooger it back up with the "magical computer" noise, but there's some bills in congress now to get them to stop doing that as well, to open up all the code and specs to independent mechanics, the owner and to the after market manufacturers.

    1. Re:it's more like... by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > ....if you car detected something trivial like a non OEM starter and refused to crank

      You need to preceed that with "If the federal government required all combinations of starters and engines to be approved before sale, and . . ."

      In spite of the slashdot-grade bad description, this isn't about all peripherals . . .

      hawk

    2. Re:it's more like... by hawk · · Score: 1
      [*hoping I can stop laughing long enough to psot this*]

      Got to love slashdot moderation. [*giggle*]

      Post modded "troll" by moderator who doesn't understand analogies, didn't RTFA, and didn't look at the legion of contents expalaining things. Price: -1.

      Similarly ignorant response follows.

      Followup explaining what responder would have understood had he RTFA or the other reponses moderated insightful. Price: +1.

      That the ignorant response which totally misunderstood the issue is moderated informative: Priceless.

      :)

      hawk

    3. Re:it's more like... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The California government requires certain combinations of hardware under the hood of your car. If it's not an exempt vehicle, you have to have factory or CARB-exempt (approved) parts everywhere from the air filter to the back of the catalytic converter, including any post-catalyst O2 sensor. If you want an analogy, there it is. If they were interested in our rights/privacy, it would be a tailpipe-only test.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  112. FCC Allows Mix-and-Match Wi-Fi Antennas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  113. FOAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FOAD!!!

    Your very existence may be attributable to that man. You should be thanking him instead of insulting him. For all you know he may have been a Pearl Harbor survivor. If so, he would be very justified for his feelings, what you call "xenophobic".

    I know that you are just trolling and all but; If I ever meet you, I will kick your ass!!!!!

    1. Re:FOAD by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      His feelings are not justifiable because he needs to realize that WWII ended a long time ago and that today's Japan is an ally of the US and shares many of our values. His attitude is no more justifiable than a black man berating you for slavery (asssuming you're white... replace with some other historical event if not).

    2. Re:FOAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should be thanking him instead of insulting him. For all you know he may have been a Pearl Harbor survivor. If so, he would be very justified for his feelings, what you call "xenophobic".

      Well, since you americans nuked them twice, in cities with a high civil population, I think he had the chance to have his feelings a little calmed down, I think.

    3. Re:FOAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His attitude is no more justifiable than a black man berating you for slavery (asssuming you're white...

      Big difference dimwit. The black man wasn't a slave himself. He didn't personally suffer the whip. In fact it is likely that his father and maybe even his grandfather didn't either.

      The Pearl Harbor / WWII survivor was there. He experienced the losses and the suffering first hand and has the scars/tatoos to prove it. The WWII veteran is definitely entitled to hold a grudge no matter how racist you might think he is. You have no idea! You weren't even an itch in your daddy's pants when he went through who knows what and there has never been anything even remotely like it in your lifetime.

      Do you truly think that 40 or 60 years would cause you to forgive and forget a people who tortured you for weeks, months, years? Bullshit!

      Your black man analogy might apply to the WWII veteran's son or grandson, not the veteran himself.

      Contrary to what your mother might have told you, time does not heal all wounds. The fact that it was a long time ago doesn't mean that he should forgive and forget. Does 60 years mean that we should forget the holocaust? No, it doesn't! But, 60 years does cause idiotic twits like yourself to make ridiculous claims that the holocaust never happened.

    4. Re:FOAD by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      The fact that you're incapable of making your point without spewing profanity and name-calling is enough to convince me you don't have one

  114. Magnussen Moss - Time to Sue by thelizman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Under 15 USC 50 2304 (Magnussen Moss Act), HP has violated the terms of your warranty by disallowing you from using compatible hardware. When you purchased the laptop, one of the stated features was a PCMCIA slot - theimplied warranty is that it was interoperable with aftermarket componants which conformed to the PCMCIA standard.

    In short, you have the makings of a class action lawsuit on your hands. Get the to a slimy lawyer. They'll be in the phone book under "D" for democrat.

  115. Re:Funny. Pontiac Sufire = Asuna= Chev Cavalier by Buran · · Score: 1

    It WAS the Dodge Intrepid, for a while, at least, if it isn't still. I'm not sure, though.

    For a while, you could buy Honda Odysseys rebadged as Isuzus, and Isuzu Rodeos rebadged as Hondas. A friend of mine has a Chevy Aveo hatchback, which is really a Daewoo.

    I'd still like to know what was with that guy, though. I'd probably have yelled right back at him for having a crappy domestic car (bad family experience with domestics) and asked him how the heck he felt he could justify being able to tell me what to drive.

    Have all the morals you want, asshole, but if you flap your lips at me for having different ones, yes I will call you an idiot.

    And Japanese cars don't have stellar reputations for nothing, either. Has he lived in a box all these years?

    (I drive a VW, I'm sure some idiot out there will scream at me for having a German car...)

  116. Dumb reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These laptops often still have USB ports and cardbus slots. This doesn't seem to cause any problems with support.

    Any user who goes to the trouble to replace a miniPCI card knows they are taking out SUPPORTED HARDWARE and replacing it with UNSUPPORTED HARDWARE. A user would not expect support from HP regarding the operation of an Apple iPod nor should he expect support for hardware that didn't come with the computer.

  117. Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compaq may have done that many years ago but they do not do this today. I've replaced my Compaq's harddrive without losing the BIOS information and I certianly would be able to tell if the BIOS was mucking about with my partitions.

  118. Re:Magnussen Moss - Time to Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't talking about PCMCIA cards, it's talking about mini-PCI. Learn to read before replying next time.

  119. Mini-PCI is not the same as PCI or PC Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think alot of the confusion on this thread is stemming from the difference between mini-PCI and PCI and Cardbus (PC Card).

    To be very technical about it, PCI is the protocol, electical and logical that runs between on-board chips and plug-in cards. Mini-PCI, Cardbus and the most common flavor of edge connector PC plug-in card (called the "PCI expansion card" by the specification) all use PCI to communicate.

    In pupose and form factor, the three are very different.

    The PC plug-in card is used to provided user-accessible expansion capabilites to off-the-shelf PCs.

    Somewhat similiarly, Cardbus was intended as a laptop expansion slot for after-market upgrades. Again, user servicable.

    Mini-PCI was intended to allow laptop vendors to create an easy way to avoid the regulatory headache associated with getting UL (safety) testing done on every laptop with a modem. Modems are high-voltage devices.

    It turned out that mini-PCI was also useful for making other services (NICs and Wireless) easy to add to a base laptop design at build time rather than being designed directly onto the PCB. But this connection, was never meant to be user-servicable.

    In addition to the fact that there are no fewer than three specified and incompatible flavors of Mini-PCI, sometimes vendors even run non-standard signals through the mini-PCI connector, making them even more incompatible with each other (potentially hazardously so). All of this because they were never intended as user-servicable parts. If you want to expand your laptop, that's what PC Card is for.

  120. Hello? PCMCIA Anyone? by wernst · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why is anyone getting all bent out of shape over this? The MiniPCI slot isn't intended to be user-servicable. That's what we have PCMCIA (aka PC Card) slots for. You want new technology? Just slap in a PCMCIA card and you're in business! No limitations there.


    Honestly, the things we get worked up over...

    1. Re:Hello? PCMCIA Anyone? by tweek · · Score: 1

      IBM considers it user-servicable. If you order it after the fact, they send you the mimi-pci card and the instructions on how to install it.

      The thing here is that it's really just a matter of support. IBM sells branded IBM mini-pci wireless cards for IBM laptops. I wouldn't expect them to support a Dell card for any reason whatsoever.

      Same with Dell.

      As you might have noticed from the work arounds on most websites, it's just a matter of adding the PCI ID of the new card to the BIOS.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  121. Amazing. by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

    How else are they going to be able to plug in a PCI card released after the last BIOS update?" My HP laptop is several years old; can anyone confirm this?

    By downloading the latest firmware? The last time I checked, you can download just about anyone's firmware without a "maintenance contract".

    This is what happens when you let college kids moderate an IT site.

  122. Workaround for IBM thinkpads by emj · · Score: 1
    I have a nice X40, which does this. I tried to plugin a random mini-pci just to test it and well it didn't work. I did this just to confirm that they did it there is a guy who as written about a workaround. That is a prety cool hack, from a really determined guy, it's a good read even if you don't have an Thinkpad.

    Didn't try it myself, no need. But The new thinkpads from IBM contains TCPA chips that means that theoretically it could become impossible to do those kind of hacks. This is the only goal of TCPA I don't like, the crypto stuff would IS wonderfull to have, no one can read my cryptokeys save me and those with my password.

  123. "would would" by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Is that the new thing the kids holler while swingin' their forearm above their head in circles??

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  124. Re:Similarly - drivers in hp laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I found this rather inconvenient at the least, and I am sure there is a way to 'trick' the PC into letting me install new drivers (ps, if anyone knows how to install them w/o reformatting let me know

    What OS?

  125. Re:Similarly - drivers in hp laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can 'trick' the PC with this.

  126. Been true for Apple laptops by adzoox · · Score: 1

    The Airport Extreme Card is in a mini PCI slot in all Apple laptops. The laptops will not accept any other mini PCI card.

    So - I would imagine this is ALREADY more of a driver issue than a real BIOS issue + isn't there a ROM on the Mini PCI cards telling them to look for specific pieces of hardware to interact with???

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  127. Re:Magnussen Moss - Time to Sue by thelizman · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh, well that changes everything entirely now, doesn't it... you fucking moron.

  128. Dell 600m by toaster13 · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah. If, for instance, you take the Dell/Intel branded mini-PCI card out of a 600m and replace it with one not made by the same folks it disables all wireless stuff in the bios. Granted, the "unauthorized" card still works....but due to the BIOS' involvement in the usb style bluetooth chip, bluetooth is disabled altogether. No word from dell on a fix or work around or bios flash.

  129. sure get an apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure get an apple laptop even a 2 year old one will kick ass.

  130. Re:I remember... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    > I remember back in high school, [...]
    > [...] an HP Presario.

    God DAMN, and you have a 6-digit UID?

    Jesus Christ.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  131. Silly PC Users by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    Silly PC users, powerbooks don't even have mini-pci slots!

  132. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I love giving vendors that make these stupid, idiotic choices a nice big one finger salute.

    I think it'd be great if everyone called the CEO's office and left a message for the imbeciles to leave their hardware free of restrictions. Otherwise, they'll ROT IN FUCKING HELL.

    I quit buying Dell because they think that we only need Intel. Bullshit. If IBM or someone wants to tell me that I can't use some PCI cards, they can go to hell.

  133. Re:Similarly - drivers in hp laptop by mkw87 · · Score: 1

    windows xp home, though if reformatted would be upgraded to pro

    and btw, i know an obvious fix is linux (im not stupid, and flame windows as much as the next /. er) but this computer is for her, and she does not want linux nor would that do her any good.

    i have a linux/windows machine and am happy with it, but when it comes to playing games theres not much choice other than reboot -> windows

    the video card is an integrated ATI x300, the laptop is as mention an HP, i dont remember the model number, but its about 1 year old, purchased at Best Buy, and for the reference i warned her against purchasing an HP but who am I to listen to? You know the routine ;)

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  134. I've experienced this with an HP nc4010 laptop... by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

    My boss submits the purchase requests for new IT-related equipment for our workplace, and he forgot to order wireless as an option on a couple of HP nc4010 laptops. HP sells the "HP W500" mini-PCI card (older version was W400), but I picked up a couple of Intel 802.11g mini-PCI cards. The laptops would not boot with the Intel cards installed. Boot up was stopped with a message indicating that a non-supported mini-PCI card was installed (please remove, etc....).

  135. I can barely wait, RIAA BIOS by xixax · · Score: 1

    I can see it now:

    "1802: Unauthorized audio device detected"

    And if you fiddle the BIOS, well that's DMCA.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  136. I Reported this here 9 months ago by IBitOBear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wednsday May 19, 2004 I tried to post the progenetor of this to slashdot and got rejected. In particular I bought a top-of-the-line wide-screen HP (7130 ?) laptop with Media Center et al. It kept blue-screening so after two complete re-installs of windows I went to the HP site and got the BIOS update.

    After installing the new bios the box complained that my the build-in wireless board was not kosher ("authorized" is, I beleive, the correct word) and that I would have to remove the wireless board if I wanted the laptop to boot.

    I elected not to play...

    I returned it to Frye's for a complete refund.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
  137. Re:Magnussen Moss - Time to Sue by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Get the to a slimy lawyer. They'll be in the phone book under "D" for democrat.

    Yep, it sucks but sometimes you just have to choose the lesser of two evils. Snicker.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  138. And not every by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American is a native English speaker either.

  139. Defective hardware by incabulos · · Score: 1

    If a system will not work with a known-good piece of equipment, then that system is defective and should be returned. I hope it is still under warranty.

    Its curious how shipping broken hardware seems to be a standard practice for many vendors now. As others have already said elsewhere in this thread, essentially all PC DVD drives ship broken, and need a firmware update to repair them and restore their full functionality.

    Anyone know of other PC server/laptop/desktop hardware that is commonly sold in a broken state? Excluding obvious anomalies like Xboxes that is ; brokenness is mandatory for all Microsoft products.

  140. Chipper by sepelester · · Score: 0

    Oh, so now you'll have to start "chipping" laptops the same way people rechip X-Boxes an PS2's. I can't wait until I have to subscribe to a service to be able to upgrade my desktop PC.

    I bet a certain software and OS vendor are connected to this in some way.

  141. Re:Funny. Pontiac Sufire = Asuna= Chev Cavalier by Graemee · · Score: 1

    Cars owners are like PC /Mac users. They all bought the best right. Love you're SIG. LOL The best yet.

  142. Re:Funny. Pontiac Sufire = Asuna= Chev Cavalier by Buran · · Score: 1

    Heh. I'm a Mac user and a VW driver and I love them both -- and am very happy with both, and yes, I tend to rip them apart and happily play with their innards, then cram it all back in and go on my merry way -- but if something different is right for you (linux, or a Honda, or whatnot) I'll recommend that for you instead of that Mac and that Golf.

    It's when somebody starts telling me what I shouldn't be using/driving that I get annoyed. I'm not you; you're not me. Ask me for advice but don't imperiously tell me I made the wrong choice; how do you know what I need? That's why I couldn't believe the gall of that old guy... I happen to LIKE German/Japanese cars. They've earned my respect by being good vehicles. Unlike American cars, which have earned my disdain by being pieces of crap every time my family owned one (we won't ever buy one again). And this guy thinks I should buy something that my own family has had horrible experiences with in the past just because of the badge on it? OK, fine; gonna pay for the repeated maintenance it's going to need? (don't get me started on that Oldsmobile!)

    Oh, and he probably never pays attention to the fact that a lot of "foreign" cars are built right here in the USA, by US workers, if he plans to rant about job losses. I think that's a great idea, and I hope it keeps up.

    Thanks for the sig compliment. :)