False and True are variables and you can assign one to the other.
False = True
print False
Not that anyone sane would do this in real code, but the thought is still scary.
I think you should stop caring about version numbers. They are just numbers after all. I personally prefer having small updates on something like a weekly basis allowing yourself to slowly accept changes rather than having large releases every couple of months and have a paradigm shift shoved down your throat.
Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago. I get that that's probably the same way they were designed originally, based on shitty appliances, but the appliances in the 60's were apparently a lot cooler looking:)
So, realizing they screwed up with the Dalek redesign, they decide to not have any shows about them for a while... leaving plenty of time for the new Daleks to disappear from time and the original ones to reappear. This can all be explained with a quick hand-wavey timey-wimey explanation like they usually do when things get complicated.
Then they come back looking like humans!
The Daleks Were Created by Man. They Rebelled. They Evolved. They Look and Feel Human. Some are programmed to think they are Human. There are many copies. And they have a Plan.
...to call it PlayStation 4K!
If you're company is willing to pay for it, you can get something like Coverity. On the free(as in beer) side there is CppCheck and clang.
I was always under the impression that the movie version of Tony Stark was based on Larry Ellison. Since when did Elon Musk become Iron Man?
...to get certified!
False and True are variables and you can assign one to the other. False = True print False Not that anyone sane would do this in real code, but the thought is still scary.
Especially with the fresh grad hires with BSCS degrees, there seems to be more BS than CS.
SlashBI - News for Bisexual nerds. Stuff that matter.
Searched for "come out of the closet" comments. Disappointed to find out that it was "closest".
Last time I did that, I thought to myself: "God. I can't wait to talk about this on Twitter."
Kidding.
And here's his apology from his own site.
Google should get Watson to compete with Apple's Siri.
Maybe they're comparing what an LCD screen looks like when you turn the flash on or off on your camera.
But are they the best animal packers in the world? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pApuzdUo-I
This is a better jump rope model: http://vimeo.com/25808035
I think you should stop caring about version numbers. They are just numbers after all. I personally prefer having small updates on something like a weekly basis allowing yourself to slowly accept changes rather than having large releases every couple of months and have a paradigm shift shoved down your throat.
It's going to have a GUI?
Not a surprise at all. The title *is* the article. The words in the body are nothing new.
There's this little project called Firefox that uses Mercurial. You might have heard of them.
Thank you. I change my mind. It's not a waste of science after all.
What a waste of science.
Probably more like a test.
Problem is that the redesigned Daleks look really stupid... like shitty appliances from Sharper Image or Brookstone, from a decade ago. I get that that's probably the same way they were designed originally, based on shitty appliances, but the appliances in the 60's were apparently a lot cooler looking :)
So, realizing they screwed up with the Dalek redesign, they decide to not have any shows about them for a while... leaving plenty of time for the new Daleks to disappear from time and the original ones to reappear. This can all be explained with a quick hand-wavey timey-wimey explanation like they usually do when things get complicated.
Then they come back looking like humans!
The Daleks Were Created by Man. They Rebelled. They Evolved. They Look and Feel Human. Some are programmed to think they are Human. There are many copies. And they have a Plan.
Adobe, I'm looking at you!)
There. Fixed that for you.
the bear necessities?
Me too. I've always thought it was one of those weird sex positions.