I don't think it's fair that it is just assumed that people will choose to do bad behind closed doors. I think the problem is the reward system is off balance. If a game truly implemented a true eco system of consequences and rewards for doing good vs evil you would see a different picture.
I, for example, played the game "Black & White" and your kingdom would morph to how you portrayed yourself. I actually was good "all the time" while I played that game. I slowly learned that the rewards for being good the whole time was limiting vs what could happen when you were evil. I only tried being evil once the reward for being good seemed to stop the gameplay.
If a game fully implemented repercussions for hitting civilians or doing evil, people would choose to do good. But when there are either no repercussions or just pure "cool eye candy" for killing people without consequence, people are really just looking to explore the dynamics of the game, they're not trying to do evil. So ultimately it comes down to the game designers making evil actions more appealing than doing good. That's the paradigm that would need to shift...
Just think, if you killed a civilian in a mission you had to sit out a round or two in multi-player... or if you had to go through an extra training course... This could also playout to be repercussions for 'friendly fire', instead of just disabling friendly fire all together. People would pay more attention to the goals of the game and stay more true to the role they're playing.
With "counter-strike", people choose (or get selected) to be on either the terrorists or counter-terrorist groups... same thing with most all multi-player games. In a way the "counter terrorists" are the good guys, and the terrorists are the bad guys... The bad guys kill the good guys here. Why not put civilians in the terrain and in the city? If a terrorist killed a civilian they would leave a blood trail behind or have to hide the body, or someone would scream and they would be easier to find, etc... There would be real repercussions for doing this. And if a 'counter-terrorist' killed a civilian by mistake or because it was a hostage or something, he would need to sit out for like 2 minutes or something before being allowed back in....
So the long and the short of it is, it's impossible to base people's decisions to do good vs evil with the games designed today. There is ONLY reward for doing anything the game lets you do. And people like to push limits to things to see what the developers created. Once they get their hands slapped for doing it, they probably won't do it again -- and if they do, they will have to work extra hard to undo the damage they had done.
Why would anyone need a framerate faster then the refresh rate of the display refresh rate you're using?
I've never understood why anyone would push a graphics card faster then the refresh rate of the display you're using. Why not just cap it off at the max refresh rate, and let the card take more time in rendering each frame.....
It seems as though there should be some sort of "dynamic rendering" option. You want the framerate to match the refresh rate of the monitor, so why can't the rendering engine decide what to spend more or less time on?
For instance, there are the core objects and lights and maps that make up the main scene, then from there there's particle engines, reflections, additional shading, etc. If the card has the capability to do 500 fps, I'd rather it focus on making a REALLY AMAZING 90Hz or 120Hz (or whatever my refresh rate is)....
And the flip side is true as well. If I'm playing a game, I'd rather it keep up with the monitor refresh rate rather then paint a pretty picture. It doesn't make sense for it to a beautiful scene while I'm getting whomped on.
The rendering engine for video games should dynamically choose what to render based on what your computer is capable of. All special effects and anti-aliasing and everythiing should be turned on when it starts up... and it should scale back the unnecessary items as it can't keep up... and throughout the game one room might have different settings on than another depending on everything going on.
My thoughts exactly. Apparently with how we got modded I'm guessing slashdotters don't share the same opinion.
I really do think this is the right move. Being on the Internet is a privilege not a right. It's like driving on the autoban. If your machine is crippled, get over in the slow lane and stay there or you will get hurt; if your machine is healthy and strong open up the pipes and let 'er rip. Most people with a droned computer won't know any difference if their being filtered and throttled. Who cares??? It fixes the rest of the world and they dont even know the difference. And if they do figure it out, even better cause they can fix their problem and have their service fully restored.
If your computer or your network is doing harm or attempt to harm a 3rd party it's just as though you punched them in the face.
I would be all for it if we could have these drones identified and kicked off the internet until they are proven decontaminated. This could be all handled at the ISP level. Maybe even just an "outbound filter" being put on these connections restricting their access down to HTTP port 80 and 443 traffic. With online web account the typical person uses gmail, yahoo mail, hotmail, facebook or some other form of email that doesn't require an email client configured. And if their email client doesn't work... who cares. They should be shut off the internet until they get their machine fixed.
Being on the internet isn't a right, it's a privilege being governed by the free market and 3rd party private companies.
A typical ISP reserves the right to drop you from service for any reason. They aren't required to keep you as a customer. I believe that greed within these entities keep this from happening. They don't want to risk reducing their customer base even 1%.
So getting back to the typic of this post, if a prescience could be set of what is considered intrusive from one machine to the next, the government could mandate ISPs to shut down these systems at the request of a 3rd party which could provide evidence that this machine is attempting to do something malicious.
If this happens then basically any machine trying to hit ports 139 or spraying ssh connections all over the internet, or smtp email all over the place, all these things could be shown as intent to harm a 3rd party and be shut down... And once it's down, they can resolve the issue and bring it back online.
I think I have an easy solution to this. I'm not an analog expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I did use modems (300 baud modem all the way up to a 56k).
If you could make a cradle where you slide the phone into it, the purchaser's phone would send it's public_key to the purchasing system, which would then send it's public_key back to the purchaser's phone -- encrypted with the purchaser's public_key. Then the purchaser's phone would send the payment information encrypted with the public_key of the purchasing system -- and the acknowledgement of successful transaction would be sent back encrypted with the purchaser's public_key, then one more final "ack" from the purchaser's device to the system saying that it received the transaction confirmation. DONE.
I don't know how much bandwidth is there between the microphone and the speakers, but instead of just relying on the 'inaudible space', why not use the whole bandwidth? They're close enough, it won't be that much of a bother if it's in the cradle. I can't imagine this to be nearly as fast as swiping a credit card. But if you consider, swiping the credit card, waiting for the authentication, then waiting for the signature, then waiting for the printing out of the receipt, etc. That whole thing can take a minute or so depending. So if this system basically made it so that your receipts are all electronic (no paper print out required when using this system), no requiring another signature to use the device, and all you have to do is slide your phone in a slot for 30 seconds to a minute to complete the transaction, it nulls out the time and makes for effective use of technology.
It might FEEL like you're waiting forever for the handshake.. but people would just need to realize what busy work they're saving themselves, and plus the store is saving a ton of headaches as well not having to keep track of the physical paper receipt signatures. The credit card processors would appreciate that as well.
To really make this "safe" as well, you could have the software on the phone require a password to be entered on the device to "unlock" the encrypted "credit card information" within the phone for 2 minutes or whatever. After that 2 minutes of you entering the password, it auto locks and requires the password to be entered again. So if you loose your phone or someone steels it, they don't knwo your password to unlock your credit card information in the phone....
Anyway, there's my free $0.02 on how to make this work.:)
Apple is moving to "iCloud" and had invested billions into a new data center promoting this initiative. This wasn't a "new idea because somebody posted an app they thought was cool so they stole it" type thing.
They had been moving this direction for a long long time. Syncing via wifi was next.
As far as the logo, they came up with the logo the same way you did. Take "iSync" + wifi + icloud brushed metallic look and bam, you have their logo. No brainer.
Syncing via wifi had been a much requested and anticipated feature. Not a fly by night ripoff idea from a Joe blow submission.
I don't think that "forking the internet" is all that bad of an idea if we want to keep it "open".
The way to fork the internet, while maintaining accessibility is through tunnels.
Basically a specific open-source secure tunnel bridge application should be created which can connect to various different portals into the "new internet", and the list of "tunnel portals" should be maintained via some peer-to-peer/signed method much like BGP but with an authoritative signature.
This way servers and websites can join the "new network" exclusively, and have a web plugin which would be able to know how to use this "new internet" and connect to sites through these portals until they're able to join this network by choice through their provider.
I would think it would help create something from the ground up on IPV6, and at the same time I would implement a new form of "sendmail protocol" which leverages encryption and a public / private key system to not allow people to send you spam unless you've added their public key to your email program. People can put their public keys on websites so if you want to send them an email you can grab their key, but unless they've added your public key to their local settings they can't get email to you.
Sure, lots of people want to be able to receive email from ANY source, to attract new business or whatever, but that's where form mail on websites is handy and also having a phone handy. You can call someone and say, "i met you at CES and want to send you an email, can you add my key?" And if they want to talk to you, they can enter your email address and grab your public key from your website. If you dont want to ever talk to anyone or have them talk to you to get emails, use a form email system on your website.
When are they going to switch to a different filesystem? The fat32 4GB file size limitations makes HD video a pain to deal with as well. Currently canon cameras stop recording when the file size reaches the maximum and the user has to see the recording light stop, and hit record again. A better interum solution would be to fill the 4GB file size, increment the filename by one, and keep going. I don't understand why they don't do that... it would be a simple firmware fix.
Ironically I have been following this topic for a while. Today EMH Classical has launched 6 of their newest and most popular recordings as exclusive iTunes releases. A classical first.
Something that everyone isn't realizing is why they are doing this. There is a positive reason behind all this.
People are more and more increasingly double or tripple or more selling a single ticket online, in person, etc. What happens when "grandma" paid top dollar to take her grandkids to a Miley cirus concert just to find out that those grandkids who have been so excited for weeks can't get in because the concert is sold out and someone already entered the building with the same "eticket"?
Ticket fraud is on the up swing. It is much more detramental to have someone physically at a venue who is not being allowed in to a concert because they find out their ticket is invalid while their kids are crying and screaming. Parents will do most anything for their kids.
I support this movement to a more secure eticket.
Something they should consider is a "re-register" process to verify a ticket is valid and switch out ownership of the ticket. I wouldn't expect anything like this in the near future as it would require a fairly extensive uplift to ticket purchasing systems.
Does your company's homepage have a flash animation or H.264 video? The acceleration is only for H.264 hardware decoding. There is no acceleration for use of adobe's proprietary animations.
Apple has provided the API's to do the hardware decoding, and Adobe has a beta called Gala which has Mac OSX Hardware Acceleration enabled.. Adobe will have a release out soon that will incorporate the hardware decoding in OSX. My guess is Adobe had to fast-track the release of 10.1 to compensate for the wide open security holes they had lingering, and weren't prepared to merge the beta and the final release trees.
Remember, when you have long term suppliers and buyers like this, you actually create a real relationship, and that relationship is worth more than just the money and product changing hands. You don't want to terminate or damage that relationship more than you have to.
Agreed, but how many people are going to be skeptical to order from newegg now due to trying to protect the relationship with the partner. Newegg might want to not reitterate whatever the supplier is saying in protecting themselves a little more. A statement like this would be more effective, "We have received a limited number of complaints from customers receiving their orders. We are immediately sending out replacement products to these customers and will investigate this situation to insure it doesn't happen again."
This wouldn't throw anybody under the bus, keep everyone at ease thinking that newegg backs their customers, and then they can work on figuring out the situation at hand.
I checked out the website and watched the comparisons of their test video vs H.264. I'm sorry but H.264 looks much richer, has more depth, has better contrast and recovers quicker when skipping through the video. OGV looks blown out out, slightly blurry, missing some richness and seems easily susceptible to blocky video.
Being in the entertainment industry the largest disconnect is that people creating entertainment products are visionaries, such as Walt Disney. Obviously he was much more visionary than many of the CEO's of today, but the concept is the same.
Things aren't always about "the money", it's more about "the experience". But to create a complete experience it requires a lot of time and resources of talented individuals which requires money from investors (also known as entertainment companies). Investors want a return on their investment (well, duh). So it requires people paying for that experience to make the effort balanced. A complete experience also requires going into a controlled environment which means leaving your house. The internet junkies of today want to experience the "complete experience" without leaving their house. So there's a HUGE disconnect.
There could probably be a system created for micro-billing of watching entertainment but there probably wouldn't be the recoup necessary to offset the investment in creating quality entertainment, but more importantly this would create lesser quality of entertainment in the end. As things would be created with the uncontrolled environment and computer screen as the target audience, the number of senses that are able to be stimulated from the experience are lessened. This format would attract people who want to capitalize on making money in that genre, but be restrictive of serious creative types to realize a whole and complete experience.
If you want to be entertained and want to continue having great art created, get off your duff and go see a movie. Throw your vote of what arts you want to see more of with your hard earned dollars. Buy the stuff you enjoy, pay to see the stuff you enjoy.
So my guess would be that, as someone new to running, you'd probably need equipment that helps you avoid injury rather than equipment that "makes you good". At least, well, that's what I'd want when I start with a sport. I certainly don't want a Formula 1 car to learn driving, the chances to kill myself are just a wee bit too high.
Well, let's think through this logically. With your ski analogy the more advanced you become the more performance you want out of your gear. Effectively what you're suggesting is to not put novices in a position to getting injured and letting them build strength.
After reading this article thoroughly you would find that running barefoot (or with a thin leather strip) is exactly like your novice ski gear. This situation induces the novice to take it slower, let the muscles develop and teach your body to absorb the impact, let your feet get stronger, etc.
Putting your feet in 'comfy cushy shoes' enables an inexperienced runner to believe he could run forever without developing those muscles and correct running style. An untrained runner puts too much impact on the heal not letting the foot and legs absorb things correctly.
So your analogy actually works in reverse from what you thought. The less advanced you are, the less "high-performance gear" you should get, exactly like in skiing.
I just want to thank you for this comment. At my university the Mac students are unbelievably dogmatic and too blinded by their love of their computers to ever concede a Windows machine might, in some instances, have an advantage for certain people.
It's very refreshing to see Mac users who actually understand that the computer you buy is simply a personal decision of which one you think is worth it. On the whole Slashdot users are pretty reasonable about it on both sides. For the people who want what Macs offer, they're great. For other people? Not so great.
I hope this mentality dissipates as I get older.
I too applaud the parent poster of these comments along with yours. I'm glad these wars are ending! FINALLY!
After all, if those idiotic moron windows users want to continue to waste their time re-installing windows on their machines every 6 months, install and maintain 6 different virus checkers and pop-up blocking softwares, and have over 50 applications nested deep in their registry to automatically start upon login and stay resident in their system tray and slowing down their machine, and be at the mercy of microsoft gods at every software update to hopefully not blow the system up, I say, go for it!
This might look like PRS is being the lame ones, but if you actually know a bloody thing about the music industry you would understand better what this really is about.
Youtube/Google makes millions upon millions of ad revenues from youtube. A clip that gets seen a lot generates more revenues. If it contains music that is 'copywritten' there should be a performance royalty associated to that clip. This is a movement to control the cash-flow of the music industry. There is no sense for Google to retain all the profit and not pay the writers and creators of the content while they rake it in.
Look at all the moving parts before slandering a group going after your "sainted" google.
Ok, so it points out a flaw with Windows 7 and Linux but completely fails to give the praise to the efforts that Apple is doing with Mac OSX and Snow Leopard!!! OSX is incorporating incredible efforts to leverage GPU and Multi-core solutions for developers. Ignoring these pieces is incredibly ignorant of the "personal computer" and "distributed computing" markets.
I want in on this lawsuit. Normally I'm a strong proponent of "you got yourself in it, get yourself out of it." But the iPhone's exclusivity on AT&T combined with AT&T requiring me to buy a 3G contract is totally anti consumer friendly.
I don't ever use the 3G network even though my phone has the capabilities. I leave it on the EDGE network because the 3G network drops too many calls.
I'd deserve to just be paying for the EDGE speeds instead of 3G speeds and be compensated for all the forced expenses of having to have a 3G premium. There's no way I would have known "going into the contact" that 3G would drop more calls.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't think it's fair that it is just assumed that people will choose to do bad behind closed doors. I think the problem is the reward system is off balance. If a game truly implemented a true eco system of consequences and rewards for doing good vs evil you would see a different picture.
I, for example, played the game "Black & White" and your kingdom would morph to how you portrayed yourself. I actually was good "all the time" while I played that game. I slowly learned that the rewards for being good the whole time was limiting vs what could happen when you were evil. I only tried being evil once the reward for being good seemed to stop the gameplay.
If a game fully implemented repercussions for hitting civilians or doing evil, people would choose to do good. But when there are either no repercussions or just pure "cool eye candy" for killing people without consequence, people are really just looking to explore the dynamics of the game, they're not trying to do evil. So ultimately it comes down to the game designers making evil actions more appealing than doing good. That's the paradigm that would need to shift ...
Just think, if you killed a civilian in a mission you had to sit out a round or two in multi-player ... or if you had to go through an extra training course... This could also playout to be repercussions for 'friendly fire', instead of just disabling friendly fire all together. People would pay more attention to the goals of the game and stay more true to the role they're playing.
With "counter-strike", people choose (or get selected) to be on either the terrorists or counter-terrorist groups... same thing with most all multi-player games. In a way the "counter terrorists" are the good guys, and the terrorists are the bad guys... The bad guys kill the good guys here. Why not put civilians in the terrain and in the city? If a terrorist killed a civilian they would leave a blood trail behind or have to hide the body, or someone would scream and they would be easier to find, etc... There would be real repercussions for doing this. And if a 'counter-terrorist' killed a civilian by mistake or because it was a hostage or something, he would need to sit out for like 2 minutes or something before being allowed back in....
So the long and the short of it is, it's impossible to base people's decisions to do good vs evil with the games designed today. There is ONLY reward for doing anything the game lets you do. And people like to push limits to things to see what the developers created. Once they get their hands slapped for doing it, they probably won't do it again -- and if they do, they will have to work extra hard to undo the damage they had done.
Why would anyone need a framerate faster then the refresh rate of the display refresh rate you're using?
I've never understood why anyone would push a graphics card faster then the refresh rate of the display you're using. Why not just cap it off at the max refresh rate, and let the card take more time in rendering each frame.....
It seems as though there should be some sort of "dynamic rendering" option. You want the framerate to match the refresh rate of the monitor, so why can't the rendering engine decide what to spend more or less time on?
For instance, there are the core objects and lights and maps that make up the main scene, then from there there's particle engines, reflections, additional shading, etc. If the card has the capability to do 500 fps, I'd rather it focus on making a REALLY AMAZING 90Hz or 120Hz (or whatever my refresh rate is)....
And the flip side is true as well. If I'm playing a game, I'd rather it keep up with the monitor refresh rate rather then paint a pretty picture. It doesn't make sense for it to a beautiful scene while I'm getting whomped on.
The rendering engine for video games should dynamically choose what to render based on what your computer is capable of. All special effects and anti-aliasing and everythiing should be turned on when it starts up ... and it should scale back the unnecessary items as it can't keep up... and throughout the game one room might have different settings on than another depending on everything going on.
My thoughts exactly. Apparently with how we got modded I'm guessing slashdotters don't share the same opinion.
I really do think this is the right move. Being on the Internet is a privilege not a right. It's like driving on the autoban. If your machine is crippled, get over in the slow lane and stay there or you will get hurt; if your machine is healthy and strong open up the pipes and let 'er rip. Most people with a droned computer won't know any difference if their being filtered and throttled. Who cares??? It fixes the rest of the world and they dont even know the difference. And if they do figure it out, even better cause they can fix their problem and have their service fully restored.
If your computer or your network is doing harm or attempt to harm a 3rd party it's just as though you punched them in the face.
I would be all for it if we could have these drones identified and kicked off the internet until they are proven decontaminated. This could be all handled at the ISP level. Maybe even just an "outbound filter" being put on these connections restricting their access down to HTTP port 80 and 443 traffic. With online web account the typical person uses gmail, yahoo mail, hotmail, facebook or some other form of email that doesn't require an email client configured. And if their email client doesn't work... who cares. They should be shut off the internet until they get their machine fixed.
Being on the internet isn't a right, it's a privilege being governed by the free market and 3rd party private companies.
A typical ISP reserves the right to drop you from service for any reason. They aren't required to keep you as a customer. I believe that greed within these entities keep this from happening. They don't want to risk reducing their customer base even 1%.
So getting back to the typic of this post, if a prescience could be set of what is considered intrusive from one machine to the next, the government could mandate ISPs to shut down these systems at the request of a 3rd party which could provide evidence that this machine is attempting to do something malicious.
If this happens then basically any machine trying to hit ports 139 or spraying ssh connections all over the internet, or smtp email all over the place, all these things could be shown as intent to harm a 3rd party and be shut down... And once it's down, they can resolve the issue and bring it back online.
If I were a cop and saw this dude.. I'd pull him over and say, "Um, let's see how this thing fairs on the freeway.."
I think I have an easy solution to this. I'm not an analog expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I did use modems (300 baud modem all the way up to a 56k).
If you could make a cradle where you slide the phone into it, the purchaser's phone would send it's public_key to the purchasing system, which would then send it's public_key back to the purchaser's phone -- encrypted with the purchaser's public_key. Then the purchaser's phone would send the payment information encrypted with the public_key of the purchasing system -- and the acknowledgement of successful transaction would be sent back encrypted with the purchaser's public_key, then one more final "ack" from the purchaser's device to the system saying that it received the transaction confirmation. DONE.
I don't know how much bandwidth is there between the microphone and the speakers, but instead of just relying on the 'inaudible space', why not use the whole bandwidth? They're close enough, it won't be that much of a bother if it's in the cradle. I can't imagine this to be nearly as fast as swiping a credit card. But if you consider, swiping the credit card, waiting for the authentication, then waiting for the signature, then waiting for the printing out of the receipt, etc. That whole thing can take a minute or so depending. So if this system basically made it so that your receipts are all electronic (no paper print out required when using this system), no requiring another signature to use the device, and all you have to do is slide your phone in a slot for 30 seconds to a minute to complete the transaction, it nulls out the time and makes for effective use of technology.
It might FEEL like you're waiting forever for the handshake.. but people would just need to realize what busy work they're saving themselves, and plus the store is saving a ton of headaches as well not having to keep track of the physical paper receipt signatures. The credit card processors would appreciate that as well.
To really make this "safe" as well, you could have the software on the phone require a password to be entered on the device to "unlock" the encrypted "credit card information" within the phone for 2 minutes or whatever. After that 2 minutes of you entering the password, it auto locks and requires the password to be entered again. So if you loose your phone or someone steels it, they don't knwo your password to unlock your credit card information in the phone....
Anyway, there's my free $0.02 on how to make this work. :)
Maybe they're the ones causing spam to exist? Wouldn't put it past them.
Um dude, seriously?
Apple is moving to "iCloud" and had invested billions into a new data center promoting this initiative. This wasn't a "new idea because somebody posted an app they thought was cool so they stole it" type thing.
They had been moving this direction for a long long time. Syncing via wifi was next.
As far as the logo, they came up with the logo the same way you did. Take "iSync" + wifi + icloud brushed metallic look and bam, you have their logo. No brainer.
Syncing via wifi had been a much requested and anticipated feature. Not a fly by night ripoff idea from a Joe blow submission.
Jam wifi & cellphone frequencies or put material on the outer walls to not allow the frequencies in.
Lame.. what about game rentals or taking it over to a friends house to play for a few hours? NO way..
I don't think that "forking the internet" is all that bad of an idea if we want to keep it "open".
The way to fork the internet, while maintaining accessibility is through tunnels.
Basically a specific open-source secure tunnel bridge application should be created which can connect to various different portals into the "new internet", and the list of "tunnel portals" should be maintained via some peer-to-peer/signed method much like BGP but with an authoritative signature.
This way servers and websites can join the "new network" exclusively, and have a web plugin which would be able to know how to use this "new internet" and connect to sites through these portals until they're able to join this network by choice through their provider.
I would think it would help create something from the ground up on IPV6, and at the same time I would implement a new form of "sendmail protocol" which leverages encryption and a public / private key system to not allow people to send you spam unless you've added their public key to your email program. People can put their public keys on websites so if you want to send them an email you can grab their key, but unless they've added your public key to their local settings they can't get email to you.
Sure, lots of people want to be able to receive email from ANY source, to attract new business or whatever, but that's where form mail on websites is handy and also having a phone handy. You can call someone and say, "i met you at CES and want to send you an email, can you add my key?" And if they want to talk to you, they can enter your email address and grab your public key from your website. If you dont want to ever talk to anyone or have them talk to you to get emails, use a form email system on your website.
When are they going to switch to a different filesystem? The fat32 4GB file size limitations makes HD video a pain to deal with as well. Currently canon cameras stop recording when the file size reaches the maximum and the user has to see the recording light stop, and hit record again. A better interum solution would be to fill the 4GB file size, increment the filename by one, and keep going. I don't understand why they don't do that... it would be a simple firmware fix.
Ironically I have been following this topic for a while. Today EMH Classical has launched 6 of their newest and most popular recordings as exclusive iTunes releases. A classical first.
http://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/emh-classical-music/id385488162
Something that everyone isn't realizing is why they are doing this. There is a positive reason behind all this.
People are more and more increasingly double or tripple or more selling a single ticket online, in person, etc. What happens when "grandma" paid top dollar to take her grandkids to a Miley cirus concert just to find out that those grandkids who have been so excited for weeks can't get in because the concert is sold out and someone already entered the building with the same "eticket"?
Ticket fraud is on the up swing. It is much more detramental to have someone physically at a venue who is not being allowed in to a concert because they find out their ticket is invalid while their kids are crying and screaming. Parents will do most anything for their kids.
I support this movement to a more secure eticket.
Something they should consider is a "re-register" process to verify a ticket is valid and switch out ownership of the ticket. I wouldn't expect anything like this in the near future as it would require a fairly extensive uplift to ticket purchasing systems.
don't communicate with people you don't want your wife finding out about. Problem solved.
Does your company's homepage have a flash animation or H.264 video? The acceleration is only for H.264 hardware decoding. There is no acceleration for use of adobe's proprietary animations.
Apple has provided the API's to do the hardware decoding, and Adobe has a beta called Gala which has Mac OSX Hardware Acceleration enabled.. Adobe will have a release out soon that will incorporate the hardware decoding in OSX. My guess is Adobe had to fast-track the release of 10.1 to compensate for the wide open security holes they had lingering, and weren't prepared to merge the beta and the final release trees.
Agreed, but how many people are going to be skeptical to order from newegg now due to trying to protect the relationship with the partner. Newegg might want to not reitterate whatever the supplier is saying in protecting themselves a little more. A statement like this would be more effective, "We have received a limited number of complaints from customers receiving their orders. We are immediately sending out replacement products to these customers and will investigate this situation to insure it doesn't happen again."
This wouldn't throw anybody under the bus, keep everyone at ease thinking that newegg backs their customers, and then they can work on figuring out the situation at hand.
I checked out the website and watched the comparisons of their test video vs H.264. I'm sorry but H.264 looks much richer, has more depth, has better contrast and recovers quicker when skipping through the video. OGV looks blown out out, slightly blurry, missing some richness and seems easily susceptible to blocky video.
Being in the entertainment industry the largest disconnect is that people creating entertainment products are visionaries, such as Walt Disney. Obviously he was much more visionary than many of the CEO's of today, but the concept is the same.
Things aren't always about "the money", it's more about "the experience". But to create a complete experience it requires a lot of time and resources of talented individuals which requires money from investors (also known as entertainment companies). Investors want a return on their investment (well, duh). So it requires people paying for that experience to make the effort balanced. A complete experience also requires going into a controlled environment which means leaving your house. The internet junkies of today want to experience the "complete experience" without leaving their house. So there's a HUGE disconnect.
There could probably be a system created for micro-billing of watching entertainment but there probably wouldn't be the recoup necessary to offset the investment in creating quality entertainment, but more importantly this would create lesser quality of entertainment in the end. As things would be created with the uncontrolled environment and computer screen as the target audience, the number of senses that are able to be stimulated from the experience are lessened. This format would attract people who want to capitalize on making money in that genre, but be restrictive of serious creative types to realize a whole and complete experience.
If you want to be entertained and want to continue having great art created, get off your duff and go see a movie. Throw your vote of what arts you want to see more of with your hard earned dollars. Buy the stuff you enjoy, pay to see the stuff you enjoy.
Well, let's think through this logically. With your ski analogy the more advanced you become the more performance you want out of your gear. Effectively what you're suggesting is to not put novices in a position to getting injured and letting them build strength.
After reading this article thoroughly you would find that running barefoot (or with a thin leather strip) is exactly like your novice ski gear. This situation induces the novice to take it slower, let the muscles develop and teach your body to absorb the impact, let your feet get stronger, etc.
Putting your feet in 'comfy cushy shoes' enables an inexperienced runner to believe he could run forever without developing those muscles and correct running style. An untrained runner puts too much impact on the heal not letting the foot and legs absorb things correctly.
So your analogy actually works in reverse from what you thought. The less advanced you are, the less "high-performance gear" you should get, exactly like in skiing.
I too applaud the parent poster of these comments along with yours. I'm glad these wars are ending! FINALLY!
After all, if those idiotic moron windows users want to continue to waste their time re-installing windows on their machines every 6 months, install and maintain 6 different virus checkers and pop-up blocking softwares, and have over 50 applications nested deep in their registry to automatically start upon login and stay resident in their system tray and slowing down their machine, and be at the mercy of microsoft gods at every software update to hopefully not blow the system up, I say, go for it!
Glad these wars are over with! Good riddance.
This might look like PRS is being the lame ones, but if you actually know a bloody thing about the music industry you would understand better what this really is about.
Youtube/Google makes millions upon millions of ad revenues from youtube. A clip that gets seen a lot generates more revenues. If it contains music that is 'copywritten' there should be a performance royalty associated to that clip. This is a movement to control the cash-flow of the music industry. There is no sense for Google to retain all the profit and not pay the writers and creators of the content while they rake it in.
Look at all the moving parts before slandering a group going after your "sainted" google.
Ok, so it points out a flaw with Windows 7 and Linux but completely fails to give the praise to the efforts that Apple is doing with Mac OSX and Snow Leopard!!! OSX is incorporating incredible efforts to leverage GPU and Multi-core solutions for developers. Ignoring these pieces is incredibly ignorant of the "personal computer" and "distributed computing" markets.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/
I want in on this lawsuit. Normally I'm a strong proponent of "you got yourself in it, get yourself out of it." But the iPhone's exclusivity on AT&T combined with AT&T requiring me to buy a 3G contract is totally anti consumer friendly.
I don't ever use the 3G network even though my phone has the capabilities. I leave it on the EDGE network because the 3G network drops too many calls.
I'd deserve to just be paying for the EDGE speeds instead of 3G speeds and be compensated for all the forced expenses of having to have a 3G premium. There's no way I would have known "going into the contact" that 3G would drop more calls.