I guess according to the description on Wikipedia "The term "video game console" is used to distinguish a machine designed for people to buy and use primarily for playing video games on a TV" - this device would be classed as a console.
What's interesting is this device allegedly runs off the shelf PC hardware, can play any PC game, allows for rival services and has no dev kit or licensing. I'm going to assume this device will have to run Windows to meet those goals. Therefore all valve have done is create a standardised PC.
I can only see this taking off if they can sell enough to keep the price down. Valve could become some serious competition to media PCs and standard games consoles.
For a given skill level, the auto is always safer because your attention is never distracted at a crucial moment.
(I've never driven an automatic) I'd argue having a manual forces you to pay more attention to the road as you have to anticipate gear changes, especially when approaching junctions. With an automatic your more likely to believe you can do something else whilst driving like holding a mobile, as you only need one hand.
I believe Google are doing to make sure that the customer knows exactly what makes a chromebook different from a standard laptop. Would you rely on a computer store to with a completely new type of device?
Also the retailer can't sell additional services, no MS Office, no anti-virus etc so they would probably try and steer the consumer into buying a standard laptop.
Obviously most people wouldn't be surprised that half those apps are dodgy, the real scary ones are the Scientific Calculator, Advanced Currency Converter as these sound like legitimate apps and you wouldn't think twice about installing them.
The only reason I got up early for school was so that I could get a couple of rounds of counter-strike in. It was also easier to get a slot on my favourite servers.
Either way some games are better on consoles (fighting, local multiplayer, driving games etc) , while other games I prefer my mouse and keyboard support (simulation, rts, fps, etc)
/quote
console != controller
You can play pc games with almost any input device you want, including xbox 360 controllers.
All major publishers have games on steam, so I'm sure they have a reasonable idea of how well their games are selling even if we don't, just looking at the steam stats can give a rough idea.
To be honest I like being able to play the latest games with the settings on full, "developments will be pretty much limited to what their creative expressions is, what the content is" is not necessarily a bad thing, its the game play vs graphics argument.
There aren't any Android tablets that are there yet, and most likely won't be until Android officially supports them and will let the official Market ship with the device.
Samsung have a tablet which looks pretty much there.
It does work, but there defiantly needs to be improvement. I was using my uni's 55mb connection, and the resolution wasn't very good, even when I selected full screen there were massive black bars round the game. The anti-aliasing needs to be turned up as well as even the cut scenes looked horrible.
Control wise the game was playable but I had major difficulty aiming with a sniper rifle.
I believe the idea is to offer instant demos to people on game sites instead of just adverts and trailers, instead of onlive's approach of buying and playing games. If this is the case I could see this being a useful service even if the quality isn't great, I'd never played Mass Effect before and this allowed me to get a taste of the game without downloading GBs of content just for a quick demo.
This law is already inplace in the UK and I'm pretty sure it hasn't harmed the industry, I don't know about CA but here its still legal to be under 18 and play the games, you just have to get your parents (or anyone over 18) to buy it for you.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes "The pirate bay seems to be down" is what you get when you visit that link.
The article mentions:
Bulk credit cards 6.5BTC
Credit card reader/writer 76.60350 BTC
M9 Tactical handgun with an illegal silencer for 225.00000 BTC
I guess according to the description on Wikipedia "The term "video game console" is used to distinguish a machine designed for people to buy and use primarily for playing video games on a TV" - this device would be classed as a console.
What's interesting is this device allegedly runs off the shelf PC hardware, can play any PC game, allows for rival services and has no dev kit or licensing. I'm going to assume this device will have to run Windows to meet those goals. Therefore all valve have done is create a standardised PC.
I can only see this taking off if they can sell enough to keep the price down. Valve could become some serious competition to media PCs and standard games consoles.
For a given skill level, the auto is always safer because your attention is never distracted at a crucial moment.
(I've never driven an automatic) I'd argue having a manual forces you to pay more attention to the road as you have to anticipate gear changes, especially when approaching junctions. With an automatic your more likely to believe you can do something else whilst driving like holding a mobile, as you only need one hand.
I believe Google are doing to make sure that the customer knows exactly what makes a chromebook different from a standard laptop.
Would you rely on a computer store to with a completely new type of device?
Also the retailer can't sell additional services, no MS Office, no anti-virus etc so they would probably try and steer the consumer into buying a standard laptop.
What about searches that were a mistake and corrected.
I admit that sometimes I use google as a spell checker and never click through to a page. I'm sure other people do this.
Surprising how much it looks like the wiiu controller. I wonder if Sony plan to have similar connectivity with the PS3.
I get a world of warcraft phising attempt once a week. Funny thing is I don't even have an account and have never played the game.
Same reliable news as usual...
The problem with this is that you can then end up creating two different systems that do the same thing, yet are not compatable.
I'm sure Microsoft did something like this when they created live mesh and skydrive.
Obviously most people wouldn't be surprised that half those apps are dodgy, the real scary ones are the Scientific Calculator, Advanced Currency Converter as these sound like legitimate apps and you wouldn't think twice about installing them.
The only reason I got up early for school was so that I could get a couple of rounds of counter-strike in. It was also easier to get a slot on my favourite servers.
Microsoft was a lot more of a gaming company than apple is. DirectX, Age of Empires, Flight Sims etc.
But I'm running chrome 8.0.552.237 so clearly chrome is numbered, they don't need to call it anything else though as its automatically updated.
I changed all mine, then forgot what I'd changed them to. Now its just a race for who sends a reset email first. Slashdot won!
Amazon has stopped hosting wikileaks http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101201/wr_nm/us_wikileaks_amazon
There are android ipod touch competitors but I am amazed that they have no access to the app market.
The archos 2.8 even has android 2.2 (8gb costs £110 currys) though only has access to archos appstore.
Either way some games are better on consoles (fighting, local multiplayer, driving games etc) , while other games I prefer my mouse and keyboard support (simulation, rts, fps, etc)
/quote
console != controller
You can play pc games with almost any input device you want, including xbox 360 controllers.
All major publishers have games on steam, so I'm sure they have a reasonable idea of how well their games are selling even if we don't, just looking at the steam stats can give a rough idea.
To be honest I like being able to play the latest games with the settings on full, "developments will be pretty much limited to what their creative expressions is, what the content is" is not necessarily a bad thing, its the game play vs graphics argument.
There aren't any Android tablets that are there yet, and most likely won't be until Android officially supports them and will let the official Market ship with the device.
Samsung have a tablet which looks pretty much there.
It does work, but there defiantly needs to be improvement.
I was using my uni's 55mb connection, and the resolution wasn't very good, even when I selected full screen there were massive black bars round the game. The anti-aliasing needs to be turned up as well as even the cut scenes looked horrible.
Control wise the game was playable but I had major difficulty aiming with a sniper rifle.
I believe the idea is to offer instant demos to people on game sites instead of just adverts and trailers, instead of onlive's approach of buying and playing games. If this is the case I could see this being a useful service even if the quality isn't great, I'd never played Mass Effect before and this allowed me to get a taste of the game without downloading GBs of content just for a quick demo.
This law is already inplace in the UK and I'm pretty sure it hasn't harmed the industry, I don't know about CA but here its still legal to be under 18 and play the games, you just have to get your parents (or anyone over 18) to buy it for you.
I would of thought .gov would be the safest domain.
The only problem is seperating drivers from passengers and public transport users.
I agree, Google seems to have changed its image search to look like Bing, unfortunately it looks alot more messy though.