Slashdot Mirror


User: adf92343414

adf92343414's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
35
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 35

  1. Re:Ban guns on Congresswoman and Staff Gunned Down · · Score: 1
    A poster further up (not you, I realize) basically says it's irresponsible to not luck up your gun in a safe, lest it be stolen). You're saying that a home invasion is a good reason to have a gun. But what good is a gun in a safe going to do in a home invasion? Are you going to have time to get the gun before the bad guy gets to where you are? Or do you keep a gun in a safe in every room in the house, just in case? Consider the Chesire, CT home invasion murders, probably the most famous recent case:

    ...Upon their early morning arrival, [the assailants] found William Petit [,the father in the family,] sleeping on the porch. With a bat Komisarjevsky had found in the yard, he bludgeoned William and then restrained him in the basement at gun point...

    Do you plan on not sleeping, too?

  2. Re:Patent Trolling on USPTO Lets Amazon Patent the "Social Networking System" · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bzzt! Wrong. From http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#novelty :

    In order for an invention to be patentable it must be new as defined in the patent law, which provides that an invention cannot be patented if: "(a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent," or "(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country more than one year prior to the application for patent in the United States . . ."

    If the invention has been described in a printed publication anywhere in the world, or if it was known or used by others in this country before the date that the applicant made his/her invention, a patent cannot be obtained. If the invention has been described in a printed publication anywhere, or has been in public use or on sale in this country more than one year before the date on which an application for patent is filed in this country, a patent cannot be obtained. In this connection it is immaterial when the invention was made, or whether the printed publication or public use was by the inventor himself/herself or by someone else. If the inventor describes the invention in a printed publication or uses the invention publicly, or places it on sale, he/she must apply for a patent before one year has gone by, otherwise any right to a patent will be lost. The inventor must file on the date of public use or disclosure, however, in order to preserve patent rights in many foreign countries.

    Even if the subject matter sought to be patented is not exactly shown by the prior art, and involves one or more differences over the most nearly similar thing already known, a patent may still be refused if the differences would be obvious. The subject matter sought to be patented must be sufficiently different from what has been used or described before that it may be said to be nonobvious to a person having ordinary skill in the area of technology related to the invention. For example, the substitution of one color for another, or changes in size, are ordinarily not patentable.

    But hey, feel free to go ahead and make stuff up about continuous development - that'll get you an upmod, despite it being hogwash. Not that GP was completely correct - there's that one year window where somebody else can describe / publish an invention that you have been working on but haven't filed a patent for. If you can file within the year and prove you started inventing it before the other person, then you have a chance of a valid patent. But after the one year window, it doesn't matter when you started working on your invention.

    #include "ianal.h"

  3. Re:Fine Line Indeed on Apple Blindsides More AppStore Developers · · Score: 1
    To answer the question you posed:

    Apparently you don't draw it at My Frame 1.2 seeing how it's in the App store. Who is writing these articles? Google?

    From the OP:

    There is no alternative platform, despite what others may say about Android, it's immature and their app store(s) are a wild west nightmare. It really is Apple's way or the highway....

    I'll have to go with "No", it's probably not Google.

  4. Re:Bad window frame button choice on Ubuntu Gets a New Visual Identity · · Score: 1

    >>. IIRC, they actually broke that in Vista, and 7 fixed that.
    The Vista I'm running now (I know, I know -- I'll hand in my geek card later) opens the start menu even when the cursor is fully in the corner.

  5. Re:Recursive Acronym BING. on Google Considered Too Big To Fail · · Score: 1
  6. Re:Won't someone please think of the children on FBI Pushing For 2-Year Retention of Web Traffic Logs · · Score: 1
    Apache can't easily* host multiple SSL-enabled web sites with one IP address; see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts for details. I don't know if IIS or other web servers can do multiple host names with one IP address.

    * One way to work around this is to use a non-standard port (4443 instead of 443, for example).

  7. Re:Big Battle on Bing To Become Default iPhone Search? · · Score: 1

    The only thing cool about Bing is that its name could be a recursive algorithm for Bing Is Not Google. Sure, that's not where the name comes from, but it could have, in some alternate universe.

    Sent from my Google Chrome browser running on *cough*Vista*cough*.

  8. Re:Illegal in NY State on The Year of the E-Bicycle · · Score: 1

    Not if they meet the requirements of HR 727 / Public law 107-319 . See http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ319.107 which says (in part):

            ``(b) For the purpose of this section, the term `low-speed electric
    bicycle' means a two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable
    pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose
    maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a
    motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20
    mph.
            ``(c) To further protect the safety of consumers who ride low-speed
    electric bicycles, the Commission may promulgate new or amended
    requirements applicable to such vehicles as necessary and appropriate.
            ``(d) This section shall supersede any State law or requirement with
    respect to low-speed electric bicycles to the extent that such State law
    or requirement is more stringent than the Federal law or requirements
    referred to in subsection (a).''.

    SEC. 2. MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS. >

            For purposes of motor vehicle safety standards issued and enforced
    pursuant to chapter 301 of title 49, United States Code,

    [[Page 116 STAT. 2777]]

    a low-speed electric bicycle (as defined in section 38(b) of the
    Consumer Product Safety Act) shall not be considered a motor vehicle as
    defined by section 30102(6) of title 49, United States Code.

  9. Re:California's letter to Microsoft on Los Angeles Goes Google Apps With Microsoft Cash · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I was expecting either a "Profit!!!" or "Burma Shave" at the end.

  10. Re:I hate journalism on Lost Northwest Pilots Were Trying Out New Software · · Score: 1
    FTFA:

    The impromptu tutoring session apparently caused Mr. Cole and Mr. Cheney to ignore air-traffic controllers for about 90 minutes on Wednesday night, and forget to begin preparations for landing in Minneapolis. Instead, the plane flew about 110 miles to the skies over Eau Claire, Wis., as more than a dozen air-traffic controllers in three locations serving Denver and Minneapolis tried to get the pilots' attention.

    90 != 11 or 12. You don't land a plane at cruising speed.

  11. Re:A server failure? on Server Failure Destroys Sidekick Users' Backup Data · · Score: 1

    You're modded funny, but having only 1 server might have been best given their apparent system design. If failure of only 1 server is enough to cause all of your customers to lose their data, you're better off having only 1 server. For example, having 3 servers would triple the risk of system failure.

    Of course, it is rather insane to have a system where one server failure loses all your customers' data, but everybody (including, now, the Danger people) knows that.

  12. Re:The lables own the artists on Artist Not Allowed To Stream His Own Music · · Score: 1

    In this case, the guy (not Warner) owned the copyright to his own music.

  13. Re:Google is doing what the FCC should on AT&T Calls Google a Hypocrite On Net Neutrality · · Score: 1
    From an article in USA today (http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/2008-06-05-traffic-pumping-phone-carriers_N.htm):

    Rural phone companies are allowed to charge about 2 cents to 8 cents a minute to connect long-distance and wireless calls to their networks. The fees, up to 100 times higher than rates charged by large local phone companies, offset the rural companies' high costs and low call volumes.

    Sorry, but if your business's cost structure is 100x that of similar businesses (i.e., more urban phone companies), you don't deserve to have a business. The article makes clear that a bunch of scumbags got into the scam^Wbusiness to make a quick buck, then got shut down, and now the CLECs are getting in on the act. Google's in the right on this one - screw the CLECs. If the CLECs customers don't like it, find another phone company (the first C in CLEC stands for competitive, after all).

  14. Re:The perfect weed? on Alabama Wages War Against the Perfect Weed · · Score: 1

    Great blog. One problem - your form handler is broken, so I couldn't post a question on the blog. I was wondering what state you were in, so that I could estimate the cost of keeping goats over the winter in northern VT.

  15. Re:more of the same, apparantly on Microsoft Tax Dodge At Issue In Washington State · · Score: 1

    Um, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/04/1520219&tid=11 was listed in TFS (it's the "capitalism" link). No points for your detective work today.

  16. Re:not a thermal insulator and heat tax on Using the Sea To Cool Your Data Center · · Score: 1

    Is Cornell paying a tax to use Cayuga lake as a heat dump?

    I toured the Lake Source Cooling project's (http://www.utilities.cornell.edu/utl_ldlsc.html) facility a few years ago. The project's director said that the amount of heat added to the lake in one year was roughly equal to the heat absorbed by the lake in 7 seconds of sunshine. Which, if I recall from my time in Ithaca, is roughly twice the amount of annual sunshine.

  17. Re:OpenSolaris on OpenSolaris vs. Linux, For Linux Users · · Score: 1
  18. Re:What if we take away too much wind? on Wind Could Provide 100% of World Energy Needs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's problems with every method of power generation - they all remove energy from the environment.

    And then they put energy (in the form of heat) back into the environment. The only exception is the energy that results in light and other electromagnetic energy, which of course can escape the earth.

  19. Re:Follow the money on UK Gang Caught After $750K Online Music Fraud Scam · · Score: 1

    Yes, but what did you use to buy the car? Buy a car worth over $10000 USD and the dealer will have to fill out a form describing the source of the funds. I don't think private parties have to do this, though.

  20. Re:How Long Before Apple Files a Lawsuit? on Palm Pre "iTunes Hack" Detailed By DVD Jon · · Score: 1

    Not on the non-compete angle - non-compete agreements are unenforceable in California.

  21. Re:Save it for 911 on You've Dropped Your Landline — Now What? · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, no. Cell phone companies are required to allow you to call 911, but AFAIK there is no such requirement for landline companies.

  22. Re:Well played, Mr. President on US To Require That New Cars Get 42 MPG By 2016 · · Score: 1

    Would now be a bad time to mention that I ride my bike to work about 1/2 the time (excepting the winter - kind of hard to ride with snow on the ground)?

  23. Well played, Mr. President on US To Require That New Cars Get 42 MPG By 2016 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a Prius owner, I look forward to the day when I look at the cars on the road around me and say, "man, I wish I was driving one of those - they get serious mileage."

  24. Re:Clearwire already has a similar product and fas on Mobile Wi-Fi Hot Spot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beats hauling around a bulky CPE device and WiFi router everywhere.

    Did you RTFA? The article says it's similar to a triple-thick credit card. Or are you comparing the device your company makes to some heretofore unmentioned piece of hardware?

    The only downside is that WiMax coverage isn't in many markets yet.

    That's no small downside. The article you linked to says, "One big constraint, of course, is that WiMax from Sprint/Clearwire is currently limited to Baltimore and Portland, OR, but is growing this year and next to many cities." Two markets is hardly worth mentioning.

  25. Re:I want to see 'battery drop off centers' on Stimulus Could Kickstart US Battery Industry · · Score: 1