Sure the TSA is stupid, consitution bending (at least), inconveniant, expensive, and doesn't increase security by any useful amount.
But from that we get private airways? Seriously?
So what companies would buy bits of airspace and set the rules in them? So I'd have to make deals with 20 different companies to fly a small plane between two cities? And the communication protocols and frequencies would change as I flew from one company's space to another?
I'm all for the free market, but sometimes there are some things that just aren't suited to it.
the debris cloud of Fengyun 1-C was only 17% of the trackable debris [nasa.gov] in Aug 2007:)
Are you serious? We've been getting stuff to space for 67 years (Germany's V-2 launch in 1944) and one even accounts for almost 1/5 of all trackabe debris?
Non-citizens have plenty of ways to carry out ill intent that have nothing to do with air travel, so citizenship is irrelevant in to that point.
I agree the focus on air travel security is stupid, but don't say that too loud in case they decide to inflict that on us in other areas instead of toning it down in the airports...
Terrorist killed thousands of people via hijacking an some planes. Hence a disproportionate level of scrutiny is applied to airport "security". And those attacks were also domestic flights, not via US citizens but you don't check citizenship on domestic flights anyway and there have been plenty of home grown American nut jobs too.
Yes it's stupid. But it's stupid due to the overreaction on one attack vector not because of the flights being domestic or the traveler a citizen.
And the article says "TSA *employees* identified cancer clusters possibly linked to radiation exposure." The employees? Not, like, a doctor?
Why would a doctor identify such a thing. It's the job of a statistician, given you expect random clustering to occur based on things being random in the first place.
And wouldn't the baggage xray machines be a more likely culprit. They've been around for much longer, and does the TSA bother with making sure the shielding isn't falling apart?
Of course I'm in the "oh well, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch" camp. A cancer cluster amongst Auschwitz guards also wouldn't produce large amounts of sympathy in me...
Because I point my un-rooted stock standard android phone at http://transdroid.org/latest and it will install just fine (well it'll probably prompt me with a scary dialog or require me to check "allow installation of non-Market applications" settings checkbox).
In fact I just stuck that url in the default web browser on my shitty motorola droid and up popped the normal install screen - it wants access to the SD card and full internet access.
So how do you install an app on your stock standard iphone that Apple just removed from their app store?
You would sign something putting you on the hook for hundreds of thosands of dollars without reading it? And without having someone experienced in that field read it too?
Wow, your are a much braver man than I, or a much stupider one.
So basically "the left" is an abstract grouping of things which hasn't existed in at least the last 2000 years.
So what's the point of contrasting that with something that does in fact exist ("Communist" China as it exists today seems to be your doing your "the right" thing, for example).
At some point it becomes corrupt and there's nothing that can be done short of "the people" kicking up such a stink that things are forced to be changed.
You can't control the culture, coruption is too useful and ever growing. Just look at any popular TV show/movie and how the "good guys" are presented and how taking short cuts is always a good thing...
Plus of course you get it from the top when you get someone like Nixon being elected President (it doesn't matter if you think someone else is worse, we have proof of Nixon's doings and hence he's the best example). Who are you going to blow the whistle too?
And of course Hoover's FBI were considered great buys by most people at the time.
It isn't your personal and private health care information, the patient stuff is lost in the aggregation, all they want is the prescribing doctor data.
They don't care about your health information, they want to know things like:
* Dr Phil is prescribing competing Product X 5 times as often as he prescribes our Product Y. * Dr Bill is very well respected by other physicians and prescribes our Product Z a lot.
Sure, you mightn't like what they do marketing wise with that, but it has exactly nothing to do with your personal and private health care information.
Assuming they don't do something stupid with the power negotiation communication implementation and make it require some stupid patent licenses or similar...
You can't do it with your current phone either. You just think you can and don't notice that you missed half the conversation and can't remember any of the important details.
I'm sure all of those things have a huge effect on weekly changes in crime rates.
Yes Bob, I saw is on the internet it must be true. jellomizer says that crime went down last month because of easier access to birth control and changes because more people got religion. It went up this month because people got younger and they must have removed some cameras.
And 9/11 matters so much when you are considering crime changes on a 2005-20009 time frame.
1. Ratings are 1-5, So 0.3 is 7.5% of the total scale. Not huge, but half the gap between a Pass and a Credit from my university days.
2. Way more copies have been sold on iOS than on Android, so on Android the game is reviewed more often when bought. Which is obvious in the original article, not so obvious when random snippets are pulled out of context in a summary.
And you know that the domain registrar you used didn't sell a domain to a single person/enterprise that might be suspected of a crime. And the DNS provider you use doesn't have such a customer. And the hosting provider you use doesn't have such a customer. And the data center the servers are in doesn't have such a customer. And you and any of your providers and any of their customers haven't annoyed someone enough to get setup for such a raid.
However, for a lot of the rest of us issues of size and finances mean we just lease space on a shared machine, or lease some machines, or lease some rackspace and hence have no control over the activities of nearby servers.
Also the rest of us love in a world where people make mistakes and say no-knock RAID the wrong house or seaze the wrong hardware...
Obviously. There are fewer bits in the hash then there are in the file, there must be collissions.
And yes you can construct a collission.
But good luck having two valid MP3 files of the same size give the same MD5 hash, and further luck convincing a judge you just happened to have this unlistenable too MP3 file with a colliding sum of this other popular song, and for every song on an album too.
The legal system does not need mathematical proofs of guilt. More likely than not is good enough for a civil copyright suit...
does that really make you believe that FooBar and myClass are keywords?
for_each is also not a keyword.
And yes, keywords have been added to C+11. But not lightly, and if something can be implemented without adding new keywords it'll be done without adding them.
Obviously, which is part of the reason I find it so strange to use one to argue for the other.
Sure the TSA is stupid, consitution bending (at least), inconveniant, expensive, and doesn't increase security by any useful amount.
But from that we get private airways? Seriously?
So what companies would buy bits of airspace and set the rules in them? So I'd have to make deals with 20 different companies to fly a small plane between two cities? And the communication protocols and frequencies would change as I flew from one company's space to another?
I'm all for the free market, but sometimes there are some things that just aren't suited to it.
Are you serious? We've been getting stuff to space for 67 years (Germany's V-2 launch in 1944) and one even accounts for almost 1/5 of all trackabe debris?
And you call that *only*.
Non-citizens have plenty of ways to carry out ill intent that have nothing to do with air travel, so citizenship is irrelevant in to that point.
I agree the focus on air travel security is stupid, but don't say that too loud in case they decide to inflict that on us in other areas instead of toning it down in the airports...
Terrorist killed thousands of people via hijacking an some planes. Hence a disproportionate level of scrutiny is applied to airport "security". And those attacks were also domestic flights, not via US citizens but you don't check citizenship on domestic flights anyway and there have been plenty of home grown American nut jobs too.
Yes it's stupid. But it's stupid due to the overreaction on one attack vector not because of the flights being domestic or the traveler a citizen.
Why would a doctor identify such a thing. It's the job of a statistician, given you expect random clustering to occur based on things being random in the first place.
And wouldn't the baggage xray machines be a more likely culprit. They've been around for much longer, and does the TSA bother with making sure the shielding isn't falling apart?
Of course I'm in the "oh well, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch" camp. A cancer cluster amongst Auschwitz guards also wouldn't produce large amounts of sympathy in me...
From no one. They are scanning and patting down you to protect everyone else from you.
Because I point my un-rooted stock standard android phone at http://transdroid.org/latest and it will install just fine (well it'll probably prompt me with a scary dialog or require me to check "allow installation of non-Market applications" settings checkbox).
In fact I just stuck that url in the default web browser on my shitty motorola droid and up popped the normal install screen - it wants access to the SD card and full internet access.
So how do you install an app on your stock standard iphone that Apple just removed from their app store?
You would sign something putting you on the hook for hundreds of thosands of dollars without reading it? And without having someone experienced in that field read it too?
Wow, your are a much braver man than I, or a much stupider one.
Whereas EVE has had an official market for that.
How does that make any difference to the point in question?
So basically "the left" is an abstract grouping of things which hasn't existed in at least the last 2000 years.
So what's the point of contrasting that with something that does in fact exist ("Communist" China as it exists today seems to be your doing your "the right" thing, for example).
I know how it works. It's the field I work in (on the IT end of manpulating that presciption data amongst other things...)
I suspect it's an impossible balance.
At some point it becomes corrupt and there's nothing that can be done short of "the people" kicking up such a stink that things are forced to be changed.
You can't control the culture, coruption is too useful and ever growing. Just look at any popular TV show/movie and how the "good guys" are presented and how taking short cuts is always a good thing...
Plus of course you get it from the top when you get someone like Nixon being elected President (it doesn't matter if you think someone else is worse, we have proof of Nixon's doings and hence he's the best example). Who are you going to blow the whistle too?
And of course Hoover's FBI were considered great buys by most people at the time.
Congrats, the Universe is much smaller than you think it is.
That's a really rare condition...
But that isn't what they are doing, and hence is completely irrelevant.
It isn't your personal and private health care information, the patient stuff is lost in the aggregation, all they want is the prescribing doctor data.
They don't care about your health information, they want to know things like:
* Dr Phil is prescribing competing Product X 5 times as often as he prescribes our Product Y.
* Dr Bill is very well respected by other physicians and prescribes our Product Z a lot.
Sure, you mightn't like what they do marketing wise with that, but it has exactly nothing to do with your personal and private health care information.
Assuming they don't do something stupid with the power negotiation communication implementation and make it require some stupid patent licenses or similar...
Maybe you could try reading instead of just making stuff up.
You can't do it with your current phone either. You just think you can and don't notice that you missed half the conversation and can't remember any of the important details.
Get dictionary that is less than 400 years old.
I'm sure all of those things have a huge effect on weekly changes in crime rates.
Yes Bob, I saw is on the internet it must be true. jellomizer says that crime went down last month because of easier access to birth control and changes because more people got religion. It went up this month because people got younger and they must have removed some cameras.
And 9/11 matters so much when you are considering crime changes on a 2005-20009 time frame.
Seriously are you retarded?
1. Ratings are 1-5, So 0.3 is 7.5% of the total scale. Not huge, but half the gap between a Pass and a Credit from my university days.
2. Way more copies have been sold on iOS than on Android, so on Android the game is reviewed more often when bought. Which is obvious in the original article, not so obvious when random snippets are pulled out of context in a summary.
And you know that the domain registrar you used didn't sell a domain to a single person/enterprise that might be suspected of a crime. And the DNS provider you use doesn't have such a customer. And the hosting provider you use doesn't have such a customer. And the data center the servers are in doesn't have such a customer. And you and any of your providers and any of their customers haven't annoyed someone enough to get setup for such a raid.
However, for a lot of the rest of us issues of size and finances mean we just lease space on a shared machine, or lease some machines, or lease some rackspace and hence have no control over the activities of nearby servers.
Also the rest of us love in a world where people make mistakes and say no-knock RAID the wrong house or seaze the wrong hardware...
Obviously. There are fewer bits in the hash then there are in the file, there must be collissions.
And yes you can construct a collission.
But good luck having two valid MP3 files of the same size give the same MD5 hash, and further luck convincing a judge you just happened to have this unlistenable too MP3 file with a colliding sum of this other popular song, and for every song on an album too.
The legal system does not need mathematical proofs of guilt. More likely than not is good enough for a civil copyright suit...
Why?
void functionname(FooBar &a, myClass &b)
does that really make you believe that FooBar and myClass are keywords?
for_each is also not a keyword.
And yes, keywords have been added to C+11. But not lightly, and if something can be implemented without adding new keywords it'll be done without adding them.