I mean, come on, everyone *want's* the latest and greatest, it's just those of us who can't justify it that don't actually go out and buy them:-)
Personally I've stuck with a Matrox G450 for what seems like the longest time simply because it was the one of the first (and the best) at dual monitor display, and I *like* that - 3200x1600 displays are really nice when you've lots of editor windows open:-)
Ah well, if it does take off, guess I'll be getting an nVidea or ATI card, which means a PCI-X motherboard, might as well throw in an Athlon-64 (maybe FX), and I'll want PC3200 RAM. Damn that's an expensive desktop:-(
There's a TV show broadcast over here in the UK (on some of the cable channels) "America's Dumbest Criminals" - guess this guy'll be on soon enough. I have to admit I thought a lot of the stories were made up, but if people are going to sign their REAL NAME to an extortion demand, sheesh, perhaps people *can* be that stupid.
Well, on the up-side, it at least frees the cops' time up so they can catch criminals with at least 1 brain cell. Let's hope the feedback loop stays negative...
It looks to me as though the only real question MS can expect a favourable ruling on is question 6: 'Is there any logical connection and/or intention from the Defendant in tipifying (sic) the behavior of the Plaintiff as "drug dealer practice" with the subsequent expression made in the interview of "fear strategy"? '
Pretty much all of the other "questions" have fairly easy-to-respond to answers which will reflect badly on MS business practices, ie: the low-cost-of-entry and high-cost-of-maintenance, buy in haste, repent at leisure type. I don't think there's any relationship between this overall strategy and the FUD one though, they're just 2 distinct dodgy business practices that MS use [grin]
... there's a back-channel for people whose email is legitimately disproportionately high to have it reinstated. I'd be a mite annoyed (read: bloody furious) if I wasn't doing anything wrong, but my internet access was suddenly curtailed... I send email from home (though never in any quantity likely to raise suspicion) and I don't see why I should use NTL (whose news and mail servers are crap) over my linux gateway.
What I find more chilling is the number of people in the article who are recommending general blocking of the smtp port. Just because it makes life easier for large corporations is no excuse for using a blunt instrument where an elegant solution could be found - in this case, I think the dynamic monitoring and blocking is far more preferable. If NTL decide to block port 25, I guess I'll just have to tunnel outgoing port-25 traffic over a different (say: 2525:-) port to my co-lo machine and send from there...
Aside: The phrase 'Microsoft is working with....' always seems to send shivers down my spine these days because of the context I find it in. Sigh.
What makes me stick with Linux is the fact that when something does go wrong, there's a finite and small number of things that can generally cause the problem. I can quickly and easily narrow down what the problem is without having to understand the significance of lots of unrelated things. The 'everything is a file' mantra has some far-ranging consequences, at least IMHO, and it's the exceptions that cause most of the problems!
It helps that it's very stable, it helps that most of the config files are in ASCII, and almost always commented. It helps that there's a tremendous resource (man) available about just about every command, and of course it helps that it can be learnt piecemeal to a large extent. The K&R book starts off saying that they don't think 'C' is easily taught using a big book, that the smaller concept-driven approach works better. I think the same thing applies to unix. I don't think the same thing applies to the Win32 API. Perhaps with.NET, I don't know...
To a certain extent this preference comes from learning unix (linux) before Windows - I know more about Unix than Windows, and I like what I learnt. Unix is a programmers OS, written for them, by them. I'm at heart a programmer ergo I like Unix:-)
The old adage, "Don't fix what isn't broken" comes to mind as well - Unix has served me well in various incarnations, most recently Linux. It's not broken yet...
It seems to me that this is a rather odd strategy for a company whose main strength is marketing/PR. They don't charge for SP2, there's no revenue stream to lose, so why make more problems for yourself by not patching up vulnerabilities ? About the only positive I can see MS hoping for is that the people who are running the pirated copies of XP will now go out and buy a new copy! They've more chance of knitting fog.
What I see happening is that the 21-40 most-pirated codes rapidly displace the top-20 most-pirated codes, and everyone who cares about being up-to-date is happy with no benefit to MS. Instead, the chances they missed were:
To come over as concerned about the 'greater good' of the net at next-to-no if any cost to themselves. The opportunities for spinning the story to paint MS on the side of the angels were enormous...
To reduce the number of windows servers that are contributing to the general crap flooding through the net by patching the holes that enable hackers to 'own' the machines....
All in all, I am somewhat surprised - an uncharacteristic faux pas.
Security consultants Secunia rates the flaw as "moderately critical" and urged users to configure a strong password for the administrative Web interface or restrict access to the interface altogether.
Whereas I (owning one of these boxes) rate the flaw as a combination of 'wide open', 'come and hack me, here I am', and 'criminally stupid'. What the [insert expletive] is the point of the 'turn off remote administration' option, if it doesn't turn off remote administration ??!!
I always make sure I enter my own password into every system of mine that lets me. At least that way it's only ever *my* mistakes that will trip me up...
Looking at it logically: if hardware is 'free' (or nearly so) the only way to make money is on the software, either by subscription, by initial purchase, on services layered on top of the software/hardware, or some combination. This is all fine and dandy in the 'normal' world where people wander down to a store and buy a Windows PC or a Mac.
Look at it from the Open Source point of view - on the scale of these corporations, there's little money to be made on subscriptions without them being expensive (read: unpopular) subscriptions (eg: the redhat network has just become a lot more expensive...) so all that's left is services. It seems to me that IBM have pretty much everything going for them in that market: worldwide cover, experience, brand name, and expertise. So that's a no-no too.
Whoops, "we"'ve run out of ways to make money - so large subscription-based companies are going to look upon the OS world as nasty competition (can't be bought, can't easily be bribed - some sod will fork the code if you do, and it's at least as good as the proprietary offerings, not to mention free). Cue drum rolls, thunder and lightning, cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war!
It's going to be interesting. Patents will play out their part of course, Linux/just-about-anything will infringe on loads of patents, but we may still have IBM in our corner over that one - they've several thousand employees who work on linux for IBM, which is a significant investment... If a 400lb gorilla decides to screw you, the thing to do is befriend a decidedly asexual 800lb gorilla... Thanks IBM.
1. I've lived in London for the last 18 years, since being 18 in fact, all over from Finsbury Park to Streatham, From Acton to Walthamstow, and even in South Kensington and Victoria, which covers a large area. I've never felt particularly at risk. Ever. Admittedly I'm a 6'2 male, and I walk around with confidence in my stride but I've been in far more dangerous places than London.
2. Are you seriously telling me that you carry around with you data that you can't recover ?? No-one expects you to pray to the backup gods religiously every morning before breakfast, but seriously it's not hard to keep things at least roughly synced with a more-permanent base. Use any PC, connect 'em up and hit go, grab a coffee and it's done.
I don't expect to get mugged, but there's always the chance I'll forget to pick up my bag, or drop the portable, or some idiot will spill his pint of beer over me, or (pick some random occurrence). BACK IT UP!
[aside: I *have* heard from Ipod owners (I'm not one such) that the white earphones are in fact the cause of several muggings, and they're crap quality anyway, so I can understand ditching them. That's about the only step I'd take though, and more for quality reasons than safety ones]
My point is that Linux isn't "awkward" in this sense, it's the badly-designed remote-control interface that he's complaining about. The 'Linux-based' isn't part of the complaint, at least that's how I read it.
My take on his interpretation of 'operating system' is more in the vein of an amplifier 'operating system' or similar - it's the GUI he means.
The story-text is misleading - the author is complaining about the poor design choices in the GUI, not the OS itself, witness:
That leads us to the OS and its foibles. As we've seen with TiVo, it's possible to create a snappy user interface using Linux, a modest processor and a remote-controlled series of screens. But I have to tell you, even though this Roku interface (see graphic above) reminds you of TiVo in the vaguest of ways, it's doesn't even distantly resemble the near-perfect user experience of TiVo.
... at which point he compares it unfavourably with the TiVO experience. All seems fair enough to me.
However, it just goes to show; make a movie about a meteor hitting earth and we spend billions on searching for NEO's (near earth objects), make a movie about climate change and all of a sudden we are at risk from "Abrupt Climate Change". The planets lasted this long already, I personally am not too concerned.
Whereas I share your view (to an extent, it wasn't billions!) on the knee-jerk reactions to disaster films, it's not the planet that really has anything to care about - the moon was formed when the planet was hit by a rock, and the planet is still here. It could happen again. Anything living would be from a time after that event, of course. Anything. The planet itself is fairly resilient, even when it came close to being completely destroyed.
For those that don't know, and are therefore probably thinking "How the hell can they give it all away for free", the BBC is funded by everyone in the UK who has a TV paying a yearly fee (104 I think - I pay 8/month by direct-debit until it's paid). From the last figures I can find (on the admittedly licence-fee-hostile CAL site) the BBC has 2.8 billion pounds per year running costs ($5,000,000,000, give or take...)
There are lots of people in the UK who object to paying for the licence fee (I'm not one of them), most of whom (in my opinion) want the same quality of service (or better;-) without having to cough up the cash. Given the advantages (the BBC documentaries and wildlife programs to name but two would probably not get made in a more commercial environment) I'm fairly happy paying 8/month. Given that I'll happily blow 50 on a night out (pub & meal), it seems like good value to me...
And then of course without the constant need to please the paymasters, you can get this sort of benevolence (although I'd be willing to bet when the details come out that re-broadcasting is limited:-). You also get more (IMHO) objectivity. I trust the BBC far more than I trust most news organisations, foreign or domestic - there's a tradition of honest portrayal of news that places it up amongst the best, a tradition it lives up to, at least more often than most.
"Cocoa Applications" (excellent step-by-step guide) and "Learning Cocoa with objective C" (more focused on the language than the framework). These are both from O'Reilly and recommended by the ADC (Apple Developer Connection).
you seem to be under the impression that XML is evil because MS embrace it so heavily
I'd like to think I'm a *bit* more analytical than that! If you read the link in my post, I do say I'm a fan of XML, I just didn't think it was worth repeating...
My point is that if you establish an open standard which everyone starts to use, and people then start to add things, because they can, because XML parsers ignore what they don't understand, the whole system can become far more complicated (and therefore vulnerable) than it needs to be. I don't think this is a good thing in a system that is (a) critical to the use of the internet as a whole, and (b) responsible for helping prevent me getting spam.
Adding an 'MO' tag to complement the MX tag would nail down what you can do with it. Period. Perhaps I *am* being paranoid, but I think this would be preferable.
The combined SPF and Caller ID, which has yet to be named, will use XML (Extensible Markup Language) to let Net service providers post IP addresses in the Domain Name System, the giant database that translates alphanumeric domain names like "news.com" into numerical IP addresses for Web servers.
I have yet to see a good reason why XML is the choice for the payload. I'm not really buying the argument that it's easier to shoehorn XML into TXT fields rather than have another tag. Either way, in order to implement the proposal the MTA authors will have to do some work, and I don't think there's much to choose between the two...
I still can't really rid myself of the nagging suspicion that the extensibility of an XML-driven anti-spam system plays into the hands of 'embrace and extend' that MS has used successfully since time began...
On the other hand, getting some authentication that it really came from where it says it came from will be very useful. The corollory is that 'owning' a mail server will become a higher priority for the hacker/spammer coalitions. Look for more attacks on MX machines if this becomes widespread...
Next on the agenda - get everyone to use digitally-signed certificates:-)
Not only do they reject my story submissions (despite others getting the same thing accepted!) but they also reject my notification of a duplicate story... Oh well, that's/. for you:-)
Just say 'No'. (If you're being told, it's a different matter, of course).
It sounds to me like a damned hard job to automate (which is the only way it's not going to be a constant drain on your time), and you're being given next-to-no resources to even come up with a creative solution. Sometimes the best answer is in fact 'No' - it forces people to re-evaluate what they're asking. It comes with the danger of being sacked if it's you that's being unreasonable, of course....
Bad example, Leeds is no longer premier league (at least after this season) and they desperately need the cash due to some very dodgy management.
Er - Leeds sold Rio in July 2002, the year after they were in the most prestigious footballing competition in the world - the Champions league! At the time, they were flying high. Granted, it was Icarus-like but that was due to later seasons not at the time...
The cost of Beagle 2 varies (depending on who you ask) between 25 and 35 million pounds. Let's take an average of 30 million. The cost of the US Mars Rovers was 800 million for 2 (with savings on each because there were 2 of them). Right there is why Beagle 2 failed. Any failures in management are going to be mere perturbations on a delta-function graph - they had the best available technology, science, and equipment for the costs they could afford.
It's interesting to note that Manchester United paid 30 million for Rio Ferdinand from Leeds United (this is English Premier League Football, for those not UK based) which sort of sums up the UK attitude to space travel. We pay roughly equivalent amounts to move a footballer about 65 miles as we do to send a robot explorer to a different planet in search of life....
I think it all starts at a very early age. Sport is instinctively popular amongst kids and remains popular amongst adults. Science for kids is boring and dull (apart from Chemistry where once in a blue moon you get to blow something up). There are tables to learn, maths equations to solve, rules and laws to learn by rote. None of this is fun.
As kids become adults, they keep their inhibitions about science... Which is a more popular topic in a bar (or anywhere, really), the search for the Higgs Boson, or 'Who will win the league' ? Adults like the fact that 'hey, we went to the moon', but it's a transient 'win' for science. Within a week it's no longer important, and the mountain to climb to get back on the agenda has just got higher...
The case for the prosecution of "boring science at school" rests, M'lud.
First off - I'm a great fan of XML - as a configuration specification format, it's great and I love it. I don't however think it's the solution to every problem - the BIND format is inherently non-XML, why not (if the proposal is to specify outgoing nameservers in the same way as we currently specify incoming nameservers) simply have an MO (Outbound:-) tag with virtually the same semantics as an MX tag (obviously a different payload, though, in the same way as MS propose) ?
One of the reasons I love XML is that the configuration can later be extended without impacting on any parsers that only read version 1.0. Perhaps this *is* a good reason. Or perhaps it's a way of getting a standard out there that's easy to 'embrace and extend'. Paranoia? Perhaps.
I do think it's a nice idea though, and it will stop a lot of spam - it will also make it far more valuable to 'own' the mailserver, with all of the implications thereof...
Slashdot Mirror
Ahh dammit, I meant 3200x1280 :-(
Simon
I mean, come on, everyone *want's* the latest and greatest, it's just those of us who can't justify it that don't actually go out and buy them :-)
:-)
:-(
Personally I've stuck with a Matrox G450 for what seems like the longest time simply because it was the one of the first (and the best) at dual monitor display, and I *like* that - 3200x1600 displays are really nice when you've lots of editor windows open
Ah well, if it does take off, guess I'll be getting an nVidea or ATI card, which means a PCI-X motherboard, might as well throw in an Athlon-64 (maybe FX), and I'll want PC3200 RAM. Damn that's an expensive desktop
Simon
There's a TV show broadcast over here in the UK (on some of the cable channels) "America's Dumbest Criminals" - guess this guy'll be on soon enough. I have to admit I thought a lot of the stories were made up, but if people are going to sign their REAL NAME to an extortion demand, sheesh, perhaps people *can* be that stupid.
Well, on the up-side, it at least frees the cops' time up so they can catch criminals with at least 1 brain cell. Let's hope the feedback loop stays negative...
Simon.
[note to the humour-impaired - the above is not entirely serious...]
Simon
It looks to me as though the only real question MS can expect a favourable ruling on is question 6: 'Is there any logical connection and/or intention from the Defendant in tipifying (sic) the behavior of the Plaintiff as "drug dealer practice" with the subsequent expression made in the interview of "fear strategy"? '
Pretty much all of the other "questions" have fairly easy-to-respond to answers which will reflect badly on MS business practices, ie: the low-cost-of-entry and high-cost-of-maintenance, buy in haste, repent at leisure type. I don't think there's any relationship between this overall strategy and the FUD one though, they're just 2 distinct dodgy business practices that MS use [grin]
Simon.
... there's a back-channel for people whose email is legitimately disproportionately high to have it reinstated. I'd be a mite annoyed (read: bloody furious) if I wasn't doing anything wrong, but my internet access was suddenly curtailed... I send email from home (though never in any quantity likely to raise suspicion) and I don't see why I should use NTL (whose news and mail servers are crap) over my linux gateway.
:-) port to my co-lo machine and send from there...
....' always seems to send shivers down my spine these days because of the context I find it in. Sigh.
What I find more chilling is the number of people in the article who are recommending general blocking of the smtp port. Just because it makes life easier for large corporations is no excuse for using a blunt instrument where an elegant solution could be found - in this case, I think the dynamic monitoring and blocking is far more preferable. If NTL decide to block port 25, I guess I'll just have to tunnel outgoing port-25 traffic over a different (say: 2525
Aside: The phrase 'Microsoft is working with
Simon
What makes me stick with Linux is the fact that when something does go wrong, there's a finite and small number of things that can generally cause the problem. I can quickly and easily narrow down what the problem is without having to understand the significance of lots of unrelated things. The 'everything is a file' mantra has some far-ranging consequences, at least IMHO, and it's the exceptions that cause most of the problems!
It helps that it's very stable, it helps that most of the config files are in ASCII, and almost always commented. It helps that there's a tremendous resource (man) available about just about every command, and of course it helps that it can be learnt piecemeal to a large extent. The K&R book starts off saying that they don't think 'C' is easily taught using a big book, that the smaller concept-driven approach works better. I think the same thing applies to unix. I don't think the same thing applies to the Win32 API. Perhaps with
To a certain extent this preference comes from learning unix (linux) before Windows - I know more about Unix than Windows, and I like what I learnt. Unix is a programmers OS, written for them, by them. I'm at heart a programmer ergo I like Unix
The old adage, "Don't fix what isn't broken" comes to mind as well - Unix has served me well in various incarnations, most recently Linux. It's not broken yet...
Simon
What I see happening is that the 21-40 most-pirated codes rapidly displace the top-20 most-pirated codes, and everyone who cares about being up-to-date is happy with no benefit to MS. Instead, the chances they missed were:
All in all, I am somewhat surprised - an uncharacteristic faux pas.
Simon
Whereas I (owning one of these boxes) rate the flaw as a combination of 'wide open', 'come and hack me, here I am', and 'criminally stupid'. What the [insert expletive] is the point of the 'turn off remote administration' option, if it doesn't turn off remote administration ??!!
I always make sure I enter my own password into every system of mine that lets me. At least that way it's only ever *my* mistakes that will trip me up...
Simon
Looking at it logically: if hardware is 'free' (or nearly so) the only way to make money is on the software, either by subscription, by initial purchase, on services layered on top of the software/hardware, or some combination. This is all fine and dandy in the 'normal' world where people wander down to a store and buy a Windows PC or a Mac.
Look at it from the Open Source point of view - on the scale of these corporations, there's little money to be made on subscriptions without them being expensive (read: unpopular) subscriptions (eg: the redhat network has just become a lot more expensive...) so all that's left is services. It seems to me that IBM have pretty much everything going for them in that market: worldwide cover, experience, brand name, and expertise. So that's a no-no too.
Whoops, "we"'ve run out of ways to make money - so large subscription-based companies are going to look upon the OS world as nasty competition (can't be bought, can't easily be bribed - some sod will fork the code if you do, and it's at least as good as the proprietary offerings, not to mention free). Cue drum rolls, thunder and lightning, cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war!
It's going to be interesting. Patents will play out their part of course, Linux/just-about-anything will infringe on loads of patents, but we may still have IBM in our corner over that one - they've several thousand employees who work on linux for IBM, which is a significant investment... If a 400lb gorilla decides to screw you, the thing to do is befriend a decidedly asexual 800lb gorilla... Thanks IBM.
Simon
1. I've lived in London for the last 18 years, since being 18 in fact, all over from Finsbury Park to Streatham, From Acton to Walthamstow, and even in South Kensington and Victoria, which covers a large area. I've never felt particularly at risk. Ever. Admittedly I'm a 6'2 male, and I walk around with confidence in my stride but I've been in far more dangerous places than London.
2. Are you seriously telling me that you carry around with you data that you can't recover ?? No-one expects you to pray to the backup gods religiously every morning before breakfast, but seriously it's not hard to keep things at least roughly synced with a more-permanent base. Use any PC, connect 'em up and hit go, grab a coffee and it's done.
I don't expect to get mugged, but there's always the chance I'll forget to pick up my bag, or drop the portable, or some idiot will spill his pint of beer over me, or (pick some random occurrence). BACK IT UP!
[aside: I *have* heard from Ipod owners (I'm not one such) that the white earphones are in fact the cause of several muggings, and they're crap quality anyway, so I can understand ditching them. That's about the only step I'd take though, and more for quality reasons than safety ones]
Simon
My point is that Linux isn't "awkward" in this sense, it's the badly-designed remote-control interface that he's complaining about. The 'Linux-based' isn't part of the complaint, at least that's how I read it.
My take on his interpretation of 'operating system' is more in the vein of an amplifier 'operating system' or similar - it's the GUI he means.
Simon
Simon.
We're not talking about human beings, we're talking about virus writers :-)
:-)
(*cough*) Not that *I* would ever do anything like that
Simon
Whereas I share your view (to an extent, it wasn't billions!) on the knee-jerk reactions to disaster films, it's not the planet that really has anything to care about - the moon was formed when the planet was hit by a rock, and the planet is still here. It could happen again. Anything living would be from a time after that event, of course. Anything. The planet itself is fairly resilient, even when it came close to being completely destroyed.
Simon
Hey! We invented English, not maths...
Just checked my bank statements and it's 11 pounds/month, presumably for 11 months...
Simon
For those that don't know, and are therefore probably thinking "How the hell can they give it all away for free", the BBC is funded by everyone in the UK who has a TV paying a yearly fee (104 I think - I pay 8/month by direct-debit until it's paid). From the last figures I can find (on the admittedly licence-fee-hostile CAL site) the BBC has 2.8 billion pounds per year running costs ($5,000,000,000, give or take...)
There are lots of people in the UK who object to paying for the licence fee (I'm not one of them), most of whom (in my opinion) want the same quality of service (or better
And then of course without the constant need to please the paymasters, you can get this sort of benevolence (although I'd be willing to bet when the details come out that re-broadcasting is limited
"Cocoa Applications" (excellent step-by-step guide) and "Learning Cocoa with objective C" (more focused on the language than the framework). These are both from O'Reilly and recommended by the ADC (Apple Developer Connection).
Simon
I'd like to think I'm a *bit* more analytical than that! If you read the link in my post, I do say I'm a fan of XML, I just didn't think it was worth repeating...
My point is that if you establish an open standard which everyone starts to use, and people then start to add things, because they can, because XML parsers ignore what they don't understand, the whole system can become far more complicated (and therefore vulnerable) than it needs to be. I don't think this is a good thing in a system that is (a) critical to the use of the internet as a whole, and (b) responsible for helping prevent me getting spam.
Adding an 'MO' tag to complement the MX tag would nail down what you can do with it. Period. Perhaps I *am* being paranoid, but I think this would be preferable.
Simon.
I have yet to see a good reason why XML is the choice for the payload. I'm not really buying the argument that it's easier to shoehorn XML into TXT fields rather than have another tag. Either way, in order to implement the proposal the MTA authors will have to do some work, and I don't think there's much to choose between the two...
I still can't really rid myself of the nagging suspicion that the extensibility of an XML-driven anti-spam system plays into the hands of 'embrace and extend' that MS has used successfully since time began...
On the other hand, getting some authentication that it really came from where it says it came from will be very useful. The corollory is that 'owning' a mail server will become a higher priority for the hacker/spammer coalitions. Look for more attacks on MX machines if this becomes widespread...
Next on the agenda - get everyone to use digitally-signed certificates
Simon
Not only do they reject my story submissions (despite others getting the same thing accepted!) but they also reject my notification of a duplicate story... Oh well, that's /. for you :-)
Simon
Just say 'No'. (If you're being told, it's a different matter, of course).
It sounds to me like a damned hard job to automate (which is the only way it's not going to be a constant drain on your time), and you're being given next-to-no resources to even come up with a creative solution. Sometimes the best answer is in fact 'No' - it forces people to re-evaluate what they're asking. It comes with the danger of being sacked if it's you that's being unreasonable, of course....
Simon.
Er - Leeds sold Rio in July 2002, the year after they were in the most prestigious footballing competition in the world - the Champions league! At the time, they were flying high. Granted, it was Icarus-like but that was due to later seasons not at the time...
I think it's a great example
Simon
The cost of Beagle 2 varies (depending on who you ask) between 25 and 35 million pounds. Let's take an average of 30 million. The cost of the US Mars Rovers was 800 million for 2 (with savings on each because there were 2 of them). Right there is why Beagle 2 failed. Any failures in management are going to be mere perturbations on a delta-function graph - they had the best available technology, science, and equipment for the costs they could afford.
It's interesting to note that Manchester United paid 30 million for Rio Ferdinand from Leeds United (this is English Premier League Football, for those not UK based) which sort of sums up the UK attitude to space travel. We pay roughly equivalent amounts to move a footballer about 65 miles as we do to send a robot explorer to a different planet in search of life....
I think it all starts at a very early age. Sport is instinctively popular amongst kids and remains popular amongst adults. Science for kids is boring and dull (apart from Chemistry where once in a blue moon you get to blow something up). There are tables to learn, maths equations to solve, rules and laws to learn by rote. None of this is fun.
As kids become adults, they keep their inhibitions about science
The case for the prosecution of "boring science at school" rests, M'lud.
Simon.
First off - I'm a great fan of XML - as a configuration specification format, it's great and I love it. I don't however think it's the solution to every problem - the BIND format is inherently non-XML, why not (if the proposal is to specify outgoing nameservers in the same way as we currently specify incoming nameservers) simply have an MO (Outbound
One of the reasons I love XML is that the configuration can later be extended without impacting on any parsers that only read version 1.0. Perhaps this *is* a good reason. Or perhaps it's a way of getting a standard out there that's easy to 'embrace and extend'. Paranoia? Perhaps.
I do think it's a nice idea though, and it will stop a lot of spam - it will also make it far more valuable to 'own' the mailserver, with all of the implications thereof...
Simon.