Slashdot Mirror


The Urban Geek As A Mugger Magnet?

CGP314 writes "I live in London and whenever I travel around, I feel like a huge target for muggers. Usually I take my laptop, iPod, cell phone and occasionally a PDA around with me. As with many geeks, these items hold within them far more value to me than anything I leave behind in my apartment. So I would like to know what my fellow urban geeks do to try and keep their valuables safe while traveling with them. I've switched my iPod headphones from the distinctive white to a boring black as a means of camouflage; are there any other suggestions?"

2,063 comments

  1. Feelings by Malevolyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've felt this way many-a-time during middle and high school. I used to have locks on EVERYthing to prevent my stuff from being stolen.

    --
    Your ad here.
    1. Re:Feelings by Malevolyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I just noticed that question at the end. Goes to show how reading is a good thing. I'd have to say the iPod headphone switch was a good move. But I don't think a laptop can be that easily concealed. Unless you have a cheap backpack or something, that'd about about all you can do to look inconspicuous. The most basic thing is to keep your stuff outta sight. I tried the cheap look once. It works pretty well, I must say.

      --
      Your ad here.
    2. Re:Feelings by platypibri · · Score: 5, Funny

      My solution was simple, I grew up to be a huge scary man. It's gotten me out of a lot of tight spots.

      --
      Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    3. Re:Feelings by Audiostar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unfortunately a lock doesn't do much good when you are being mugged. A guy with a pistol or knife doesn't have to do much to convince me to open a lock. Actually, all he has to do is be holding a gun or knife, and politely ask me t give him anything I have. There isn't a damn thing I own worth being shot or stabbed over. Trust me on this one, having been stabbed with a knife before, you do not want to get stabbed, anywhere, or for any reason.

    4. Re:Feelings by indian_robyn · · Score: 1

      One word: Insurance

    5. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Four words: What about my pr0n?

    6. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hey... Instead of going for the "cheap" look...

      I go for the "jock" look... with my sporty back pack - and I'm not to much of a wimpy looking guy - I lug my gear around in this. I'm usually on campus when I'm moving my gear around - so I just look like another student. Who wants to steal my books anyway?

      http://www.spireusa.com/products/ZM3.html

      Thats the backpack I use right now... :)

      As for the ipod I keep that in my pocket zipped up - black headphones, cellphone in pocket - ringer off. And just don't walk into dumb places...

      I also have insurance on my laptop which is oh so nice for a scratch or incase i need to hit someone in the face with my laptop...

      Keep all secure files on a usb-keychain which are encrpyted using personal vault ;)

    7. Re:Feelings by !3ren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for the Info, Mr. Banner!
      Now where can I find some extra gamma rays...

    8. Re:Feelings by nukebuddy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately a lock doesn't do much good when you are being mugged. A guy with a pistol or knife doesn't have to do much to convince me to open a lock.

      Hence, time delay locks were invented.

    9. Re:Feelings by cshark · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a mugging problem when I was in San Francisco. Got mugged twice before I realized that muggers are very predictable. They like their targets to be predictable as well. I found that wearing a dirty shrunken wool jacket I got from goodwill, carrying extra bags, and yelling at people that wearen't there was a great way to avoid getting mugged.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    10. Re:Feelings by outlier · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I bought a Scott e-Vest jacket. I can keep my laptop, mp3 player, PDA, a water bottle, digital camera, as well as assorted cables and other items in my pockets without any noticable bulges in the jacket. As a benefit, the jacket does a great job of distributing the weight evenly so my neck and shoulders do not get sore.

    11. Re:Feelings by MikeFM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I did that. I also dress like something between a freak and a bum and I dyed my hair blue. Anyone that hassles me I make weird comments to about aliens and my fondness for anal probes and women with three breasts.

      Amazingly this tactic really cuts back on the number of girls that go out with me too. Luckily there is an easy solution.. leave the electronics at home, dress nicer, look a lil less scary, and show off how much cash you're making at your nice geek job.

      Showing a little confidence has the interesting effect of scaring off muggers while attracting women. Be warned though, women are much more costly than muggers. Muggers generally don't move in with you and continue to drain your finances for long periods of time.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    12. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it would kinda help if you didn't look and act like this guy.

    13. Re:Feelings by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been both shot and stabbed. It's really not the big deal that tv makes it out to be. It hurts but isn't really the tragic horror that it's shown as on tv. Most muggers don't know how to use their weapons and aren't really motivated to use them. So they attack you and make a quick buck.. now they have a major criminal offense against them. Whereas if they just accept the brush off and move on to an easier target the chance is that they won't be doing any serious time. Sure, most of them aren't to bright but it's not hard to figure something so basic out. For the dumber ones you can confuse them by just acting like you didn't notice them or behaving in a insane manner. Raving about aliens and the coming end of the world is a first rate way to convince someone that it's not worth their effort to fuck with you.

      Maybe this only works if you have the right mindset though. If you're nutty enough not give a fuck if someone stabs you then you'll probably not be picked as a target by many muggers. At least not if they have been at their job very long. Give in to them and sure you might get away unscratched but you're more likely to be picked as a target and the more often you're picked as a target the more likely some asshole will ice you just for fun.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:Feelings by baxissimo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love the fact that the top hit in that google link you posted is a story about a time delay lock COMPLETELY FAILING TO DETER A CRIMINAL. :-)

    15. Re:Feelings by ahaning · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who wants to steal my books anyway?

      Me. That's some really easy money. Return stolen books, get cash. No questions.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    16. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This great advice from a guy who has been both shot and knifed...

      Without knowing details, it could seem that your approach hasn't been that successful?

    17. Re:Feelings by baxissimo · · Score: 4, Funny

      So were you shot and stabbed by muggers? If so, then remind again me why we should listen to you about how to avoid being mugged?

      Or is it a "don't make the same mistakes I made, sonny" kind of a thing?

    18. Re:Feelings by identity0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah, that's too hard for most geeks. Just do what I did: go to a tanning salon until your skin turns very, very dark.

      Of course, now the cops hassle me every time I'm out in my Mercedes...

    19. Re:Feelings by Directrix1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What if he was cradling a gun in his hands, mumbling, "Myyy preeeciousss" while he was walking around. I bet he wouldn't get mugged then.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    20. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if he were on a campus he would get mugged - by campus police for illegally carrying a firearm on a campus.

    21. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carry your own gun. I carry a nicely concealed .32, loaded with hydraschocks. Any tries to take my stuff, dies.

      If this hurts your "feelings", tough. Don't bother me, and I won't bother you.

    22. Re:Feelings by lost_n_mad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My fiance and I were mugged less than a block from our house just about three weeks ago. After having a gun pointed at me by someone I don't know all that well, I have to agree with some of your conclusions.
      I did not do what he told me to do (Getting on the ground was not an option in my mind). I walked right up to the son of a bitch and got the best look I could, then I walked away. The guy with the gun had a partner who tried to beat me up, but I've been hit harder by girls on accident.
      The point to this was, I didn't follow their script (and that's what it sounded like, a script from a real bad "gangsta" movie) and that's what kept me, my fiance, my iPod, and my money intact. The police told me I should have gone along and did what they told me, but two days before a woman was shot and killed during a mugging at the mall. She did exactly what they told her to, yet they killed her anyway.
      I see no profit in bowing down to petty tyrants with little guns, who think they can steal what's mine. Or maybe I just read too much Batman as a kid.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    23. Re:Feelings by 3l1za · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a mugging problem when I was in San Francisco. ... I found that wearing a dirty shrunken wool jacket I got from goodwill, carrying extra bags, and yelling at people that wearen't there was a great way to avoid getting mugged

      In other words, you just tried to fit in.

    24. Re:Feelings by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Steve Martin used to have a standup routine like that (sadly, I can't find any transcripts of his stuff online): get a shopping cart, fill it with garbage and push it down the sidewalk will singing loudly. Keeps muggers away.

    25. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Unfortunately a lock doesn't do much good when you are being mugged. A guy with a pistol or knife doesn't have to do much to convince me to open a lock.

      Hence, time delay locks were invented.

      • Don't piss off an idiot with a gun.
      • A shot anywhere can be fatal, and don't trust anyone to "shoot off" a lock near your body.
      • Only anchor your belongings to a body part which you don't need.
      • Stick your precious data in a tiny handheld. Suck it into your disposable laptop as needed. Give up, or drop, or toss it into his now-full-hands, your laptop quickly..and leave.
    26. Re:Feelings by princewally · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's not too far off from what I do. It's not jock-style, but it works for me.

      I'm 6'2" tall, I have long black hair, a bullring style nose ring, a scuffed black leather jacket, a motorcycle and a visible knife clipped to my pocket.

      I don't dress like I have money, and if I have to walk through a bad neighborhood, I make sure I look angry. My friends and I can walk past a gang, and they tend to part like the Red Sea.

      I'm the scariest looking sysadmin I've seen in corporate america.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    27. Re:Feelings by winwar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One of the basic rules I learned when I took a self defense course can be roughly summed up as follows: While it is better to avoid a dangerous encounter, if you are in one, do whatever it takes to get out of a dangerous situation intact. If you survive the incident unharmed, then by definition you acted correctly.

      The police statements merely prove they are morons or at least out of touch (uniformed police officers don't get mugged very often, know self defense, interact with criminals on a regular basis, and are required to carry weapons when not on duty-not typical of most of the population...). Yes, going along with the demands of a criminal may work most of the time, but if you believe differently at the time, don't follow the police advice blindly-the police aren't going to save your behind...

    28. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I trust you to only use it as protection? I don't know you, and you seem like kind of a prick, so it's just your word that I am left to go on. That isn't good enough.

    29. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. then the only problem is occasionally being sodomized by a bunch of cops with a broken broom handle.

    30. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. give the mugger your laptops, etc... then when he turns his back, shoot him in the back of the head, and get your stuff (and their wallet)

    31. Re:Feelings by ameoba · · Score: 1

      and an excellent way to get randomly beaten by rednecks, fratboys & highschoolers looking for a good time.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    32. Re:Feelings by Nahor · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm usually on campus when I'm moving my gear around - so I just look like another student. Who wants to steal my books anyway?
      Could you provide a picture of you and what campus you go to, please?
    33. Re:Feelings by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. Why don't you take his gun from him. Since, you know, you're someone special that strangers answer to you.

    34. Re:Feelings by nanun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm a dorky little Asian guy. I carry 3 knives on me and have trained in Kali and Silat for over 15 years. Not much of a problem here, thanks.

      BTW, I carry 3 knives now, but I used to carry only 2. A few years ago, I was the target of a mugging attempt. The fellow ran off with one of my knives stuck in his leg. Bummer. I liked that knife.

      --

      You mean you'll put down your rock, and I'll put down my sword and we'll try and kill each other like civilized peo
    35. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about using locks, locks can be broken.
      Get a sheet of those stickers for your printer, print out full color goatse stickers.

      Put those on all your stuff.

    36. Re:Feelings by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 5, Funny
      A .32 with that sort of load? I can imagine being able to put down a man with that. If he also happened to be strapped down to a table. . .and of weak constitution. . .and maybe anemic. . .oh and I'd have to have a few speed loaders for when I used up the first cylinder. . .

      Seriously, there is a damn fine reason why you'll never see anyone serious about self defense with such an anemic load. They don't WORK. I was in a robbery back in '99 and I was shot in the HEAD and lower back with a pretty much identical loadout. Guess what? I got up, took the gun away from the bastard and smacked him with it. A .32 no matter what you're loading into it just doesn't have stopping power (unless you throw the empty gun in which case even Superman will duck).

      --
      Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    37. Re:Feelings by pyite · · Score: 1

      To be off topic, if your sig ("Vengeance is fine") is where I think it's from, I believe you have misquoted it. The Scripture, found at Romans 12:19 says, in part, "Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord." And that, in fact, is what Indian Larry has tattooed on his neck.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    38. Re:Feelings by cshark · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you've also taken Muni. Sorry to hear. Most of us only make that mistake once.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    39. Re:Feelings by rs79 · · Score: 1

      So, Eric Raymond, how is your 380SEL anyway?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    40. Re:Feelings by Nykon · · Score: 1

      I go the same route. When i am "on the go" esp not at work, I have a backpack that has a padded section in the middle with a velcro strap. Holds my laptop, and plenty of other stuff but looks just like a backpack/small hiking pack.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    41. Re:Feelings by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny
      The fellow hobbled off with one of my knives stuck in his leg.
      Fixed that for you.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    42. Re:Feelings by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have to agree. There are very small, light 9mm pistols out there with far more stopping power. It makes no sense to pack poor calibers such as .32 and *shudder* .25. I carry a Kel-tec P11. Not the best, but reliable, good value, and it's not so squirrely that I can't perforate some punk's left ventricle when he right in front of me.

      I'd rather carry a .22 derringer under each sleeve and go all wild-west-poker-table on their ass!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    43. Re:Feelings by XryanX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you missed the joke.

    44. Re:Feelings by supermarsupial · · Score: 5, Funny

      In related news, the number of muggings attributed to victims wearing e-Vests have now overtaken those using iPods. When interviewed, a mugger was quoted as saying "Well, I get a higher return with them e-Vests. I use the included cables to tie up my victim, their PDA to take over the identity, the digicam to take pictures of the geek and their laptop to upload their photos to my blog. If I'm lucky, an iPod will be hidden somewhere as well; I got over 5,000 songs one time and 10 hours of free porn. Man, that dude was into some nasty shit. Oh, and don't forget the bottled mineral water. That's a bonus."

    45. Re:Feelings by Qacker · · Score: 0

      We have this thing in the USA called the Bill of Rights - try reading it some time.

      --
      Learn lisp today!
    46. Re:Feelings by itwerx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A .32 with that sort of load? I can imagine being able to put down a man with that.

      Do you even know what a hydro-shock load is...?

      Maybe I don't either but last I knew it was a hollow-point filled with either water or mercury (depending how lethal you wanted to be) and then sealed with wax or lead.
      Test results with a .22 fired at 1x6 pine boards:

      Normal solid round = entrance hole the size of a dime, exit the size of a nickel
      Normal hollow-point = entrance hole size of a nickel, exit the size of a quarter
      Filled hollow-point = board explodes

      (Note: These loads are highly illegal in the USA and any other NATO country!)

      Q: Anybody know another name for these?

    47. Re:Feelings by Qacker · · Score: 0

      He needs a .45 ACP I would trust nothing less.

      --
      Learn lisp today!
    48. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have never given you geeks money! What about mah leeeeegs Charlie Murphyyyyyy!

    49. Re:Feelings by Nakamiya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      being stabed hurts but the stitches cost less than a new laptop

    50. Re:Feelings by kidgenius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hydro-shock is actually legal, and different from what you said. It is hollow point, but has a rod down the center that will slam forward on impact to help the bullet continue on it's path (it adds a little extra momentum after the initial impact)

    51. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm.. ok.

    52. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I prefer my SIG P229. And I don't mind if they run off with one of my bullets.

    53. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just get a job. I bet it pays more too.

    54. Re:Feelings by eyegor · · Score: 2

      Actually, a hydroshock is a semi-jacketed hollowpoint with a lead column that assists in controlling expansion. They're pretty good loads, but they and nearly all hollowpoints don't expand well if if clothing plugs the cavity.

      Sounds like you're talking about frangible rounds. They're actually pretty safe (in that they don't over-penetrate or travel through walls very well). They're not super good at pure knockdown though. They lose mass too quickly to penetrate well. A controled expansion bullet is usually better.

      I've never heard of ANY of these rounds being loaded with mercury. I think that Glaser Safety-Slugs were filled with Teflon liquid.

      Check out this site for a good intro.

      Hollowpoints and frangible ammunition are legal in most of the USA.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    55. Re:Feelings by Demogoblin · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the UK, you are not allowed to own a gun, let alone carry one. Not even the cops carry fireamrs.

      HALT! Or I'll be forced to yell HALT again, but louder!

    56. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no profit in bowing down to petty tyrants with little guns, who think they can steal what's mine.

      Now u know why the Iraqis aren't welcoming you with open arms.

    57. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That (leaving the gadgets at home) may not be an option for some people, especially in places like San Francisco. The are homeless people living in the parks of San Francisco that have jobs that pay $20-30/hr. Why then do they live in a park? Because they don't want to share an efficiency apartment with 10 other people. The cost of living space in Frisco is obscene...

    58. Re:Feelings by paganizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you could just join your local SCA group, and always go around in period attire. they will think you are crazy, and avoid you, plus it makes it less silly looking to carry a big blade, mace, battleaxe, morning star, whatever.

      I'm not certain what London laws are concerning carrying swords; don't you have to be in one of the guilds or something to get away with it? but if that's an option.....

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    59. Re:Feelings by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

      I can't believe a comment so blatently racist got modded up that high.

    60. Re:Feelings by lost_n_mad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      As this conflict with Iraq continues on, I find myself reading more and more about MacArthur's occupation of Japan. We lost the occupation in Korea even though we won the war. Why? We never committed the time or the energy to rebuild their infrastructure. Viet Nam, similar story. Iraq is not my pigeon, but since our illustrious president has decided to drag us into it, we need to commit the resources, and the man power to mobilize Iraq to be an independent state, with an open leadership.
      As far as using my quote, I murdered no one for my money. I tortured nobody for the iPod. And I have never beaten my fiance to keep her line. Can Saddam and his regime make similar claims?

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    61. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You should read a few crime statistics and learn how to aim, or hope You never run into some who can aim. More people are killed with .22 caliber handguns than any other caliber. .22's, 25's, 32's, they are all capable of killing, perhaps not as effectively as a .45ACP or 9x19mm, but dead is dead. Compare it to the difference between a pocket knife and a hunting knife. Both will kill effectively enough. The victim of the former might take a little while longer to bleed to death, but in the end, they are just as dead.

    62. Re:Feelings by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

      The "nutty enough not to give a fuck" thing reminded me of something a friend of mine once did when someone tried to mug him (apparently dressing like you have no money and actually having no money isn't enough.)

      He took the muggers gun, while the mugger was still holding it, put it in his mouth, and said "Blow my head off."

      They didn't. Obviously, they probably weren't new to the mugging game and knew what sort of pyscho they were dealing with. /Loved the south side of Chicago

    63. Re:Feelings by eyegor · · Score: 1

      We used to make fun of .25 auto and .22 guns (bad guys might get mad if you shoot them with one).

      Most of the time when guns are used for defensive purposes, the gun is never fired. Just the fact that you have a gun is reason enough to make most bad guys back down or flee.

      Q: Which would you rather get shot with: a .25 or a 9mm?

      A: No, thank you.

      The advantage of a .25 auto is that it is centerfire and MUCH more reliable than a .22 rimfire. I've shot hundreds of .22s that would never fire, even after multiple tries. The number of centerfire cartridges that have misfired for me are far lower. .25 auto and .32 auto aren't great rounds, but they usually work and as long as you have a high quality gun that's not going to jam, they're a lot better than nothing. .380 is marginal, 9mm and .38 Special are decent rounds and .357 Magnum, .357 SIG, and .45 ACP are great rounds.

      I like my SIG 229, it's a great pistol, but it's a PITA to carry during the spring and summer. I usually carry a Beretta 85BB in .380 or my wifes Airweight (.38 Spl. Hydrashock).

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    64. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to. If you feel threatened by it, carry one yourself. If EVERYONE carried them, anyone who used a gun in anger would suddenly have 60 bullet headed their way. That sounds like a pretty good deterant to me.

    65. Re:Feelings by i+wanted+another+nam · · Score: 1

      Three words: Compact Disc Recordable

      --
      The image is a dream, the beauty is real. Can you see the difference?
    66. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do remember to wash sometimes though ?

    67. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the OP is not very intelligent.

    68. Re:Feelings by itwerx · · Score: 2, Informative

      A water/mercury filled hollowpoint would indeed be a frangible round.
      In fact, the only real difference between them and a standard hollowpoint is that the fragmentation occurs far more violently.
      An unfilled hollowpoint simply breaks apart whereas a hollowpoint filled with a non-compressible liquid A - has more kinetic energy in the first place and B - imparts a much greater percentage of that energy into the fragments.
      Mercury simply adds lethality. Even a flesh wound will introduce enough mercury into the bloodstream to cause death due to heavy metal poisoning in the relatively near future. (Not, however, soon enough to be immediately useful).
      I did a little searching and it appears that these rounds work better with lower velocity (or at least lower rate of spin) weapons.
      "Internet lore" has it that the filler liquid can vaporise due to friction at high rates of spin and cause the round to come apart either in the barrel or shortly after exiting.
      (But I'm not about to conduct any experiments to find out! :)

    69. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you offer your advice ? you have no clue. Please shut up.

    70. Re:Feelings by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Dude, if you want to avoid getting jacked, better get rid of the nose ring. Ever seen the movie The Punisher? Brutal man, brutal.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    71. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe a poster with a neo-nazi nickname like "stormshadow" has the gall to complain about the perceived racism of others.

    72. Re:Feelings by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I read a good take on dealing with criminals in an NRA-published magazine once. They had a story about a lady who was murdered by a stalker. A so-called victim's advocacy group encouraged her to leave everything to the police if he ever bothered her again. Then, the next time the stalker came around, she called the police, not wanting to confront the stalker herself.

      The author eloquently explained that she waited the rest of her life for the police to show up.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    73. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost of living space in Frisco is obscene...

      How do you know? You've obviously never been there (otherwise you wouldn't call it "Frisco").

    74. Re:Feelings by MaggieL · · Score: 1

      Kel-Tec P-11's are very nice indeed. They will accept S&W standard capacity magazines (not "high capacity", please, what abolishonist nonsense!) as an reply to the size queens who claim nothing smaller than a .45 ACP is stopworthy...just load 12 rounds and where you would have shot once with a .45, shoot twice.

      http://www.kel-tec.com
      http://www.pinkpistols.o rg

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    75. Re:Feelings by stretch0611 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm 6'2" tall, I have long black hair, a bullring style nose ring, a scuffed black leather jacket, a motorcycle and a visible knife clipped to my pocket.

      First, Kill the Nose Ring. That would be the first thing I would yank and I doubt it would feel good.

      Second, grow a little, I'm 6'11" and I'm sure that helps little more than a measly 6'2".

      Third, while I do have a black leather jacket that doesn't do a thing. It's the body underneath the jacket that matters. If you have no muscles the jacket won't help.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    76. Re:Feelings by CCIEwannabe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a friend that real life role plays. He was dressed up in his medieval armor and cloak garb waiting at a train station one day. A mugger came up to him with a 4 inch knife and said "give me your wallet". My mate stared him in the face and moved his cloak to reveal a 30 inch long sword. "I see your 4 and raise you 26". Should have seen him run.

    77. Re:Feelings by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Not even the cops carry fireamrs.

      Good. So who's gonna stop him? That makes the gun idea even better.

    78. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris: I heard if you go to a tanning salon you can get something called Melanoma.
      Peter: That's just fancy talk for sexified!

    79. Re:Feelings by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      It may be racist, but it's not prejudice. There's a big difference. Think about it.

    80. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're full of shit. Any mugger with a four inch blade to the guy knows he can gut that lamer before he can figure out how to draw a three foot fucking sword. Don't make shit up for moderated points. Or at least put some effort into your story. By the way, if I ever see a role playing homo walking around with a sword on, I'm gunna call the cops... right after i beat his lame ass.

    81. Re:Feelings by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      and show off how much cash you're making at your nice geek job.

      Heh. I was talking to the gf of one of my colleagues and when talking about how they met eachother, she actually said something like yeah, it's IT so he makes a LOT of money, as if she thought herself pretty smart for picking him.

      Talking about cool calculation....

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    82. Re:Feelings by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      I carry a .380, also loaded with hydra-shoks. Anyone ever tries to mug me, they'll get approx $5.40 + tax in the form of 12 loud banging sounds and 1080 grains (total) of lead and copper in their center body mass.

      This is based on a price of $11.25 + tax for a box of 25 hydra-shoks, which for .380 are 90-grain. This does not include the opportunity cost of the time it takes me to clean my gun later. The 12 rounds are not from an illegal magazine (or even a pre-ban high-cap magazine), simply from 2 6-round mags (one in the gun, the other easily accessible for quick changing action).

      If anyone's interested, my gun is a Kel-Tec P3AT, great for easy/lightweight concealment. I highly recommend them.

    83. Re:Feelings by nametaken · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've got an even easier one. Move to the damn suburbs. There's nothing of value in a city anyways, except for maybe a job in a neighborhood where you don't have to worry about muggers anyways. Then you go home at night to a place where you can leave your house and car unlocked with your ipod on the dash.

    84. Re:Feelings by cammoblammo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The comment's not racist. The poster was having a shot at people who are scared of blacks and cops who don't believe they can be rich.

      Just because a joke uses racial traits doesn't make it racist, or even offensive.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    85. Re:Feelings by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      I've been both shot and stabbed. It's really not the big deal that tv makes it out to be.

      That's right. Believe it or not, people actually die on TV from these things. But then, who really wants reality?

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    86. Re:Feelings by MobileC · · Score: 2, Funny

      " a motorcycle and a visible knife clipped to my pocket."

      How big is this pocket?

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    87. Re:Feelings by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      No, I was shot and stabbed by friends during rough housing. We did a lot of bad things to each other when bored. Also have been blown up, set on fire, electrocuted, knocked off a three story buildings roof onto concrete, etc. Hrm.. I'm probably a good example of why parents shouldn't tell their kids to go play outside.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    88. Re:Feelings by Clanner · · Score: 1

      True, the typical criminal probably isn't a good enough shot to drop anybody with a .32, but plenty of people have been killed by .22LR's. Let's see- just about any round that nicks your carotid or femoral artery will kill you quick enough. There's a big misconception that small caliber rounds aren't "dangerous" or "manly" enough to work as defensive rounds. If you can place your shots well, any bullet will kill some one. Maybe not right away like a .45ACP to the temple will, but they'll be dead nonetheless. Besides, a smaller caliber, lower velocity round is less likely to cause collateral damage. Do some research sometime and look up the statistics for various calibers and loads- you might be surprised.

      If you can do your end (shoot well, know how your firearm works, train often, etc.), almost anything you shoot will do its part.

      --
      The dry fish swims alone.
    89. Re:Feelings by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been threatened in lots of places and yet to have had anyone walk off with my money or having inflicted any serious damage to me. I was short and geeky as a kid and grew up in a bad neighborhood. I learned fast that assholes can tell if your afraid or not. If you are then you're a target. If you're not then not only do they not attack you but they may even take your side in a situation. I had many people who tried to beat me up that afterwards became friends and something like bodyguards. As an adult the rules haven't really changed a lot.. I just grew a lot. Being 6'6 makes a difference too. Discourages people from even trying to start shit.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    90. Re:Feelings by princewally · · Score: 1

      First, Kill the Nose Ring. That would be the first thing I would yank and I doubt it would feel good.

      It's not that easy to grab. I don't have a 3 inch ring sticking out of my nose. It's pretty small for a bullring.

      Second, grow a little, I'm 6'11" and I'm sure that helps little more than a measly 6'2".

      I'm still bigger than average, which makes an impression. I know I'm not the biggest guy in the world. I happen to be the smallest male adult in my extended family. Big(at least bigger than most muggers), angry and not the least bit nervous tend to make a difference as far as who is going to bother you for an easy buck.

      Third, while I do have a black leather jacket that doesn't do a thing. It's the body underneath the jacket that matters. If you have no muscles the jacket won't help.

      This completely misses my point. While I can generally take care of myself in most situations, I don't have to worry about the situations because I create an impression of being too much work to mug or bother.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    91. Re:Feelings by gotak · · Score: 1

      Geez anonymous cowards....

      It's just a funny story could be totally false for all we know. But who cares.

      Secondly 3 foot isn't that long. With practice you can draw a katana pretty quick and that 4 foot plus depending on your height.

    92. Re:Feelings by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I've been mugged a couple times. Both times I gave up my cash, because fuck it, what's 20 or 40 bucks anyway? Then they asked for my wallet and my cellphone.

      "No. The second you walk off, I'll cancel my cards and my phone, and the second you try to use them they'll show up stolen and you'll get arrested. And I'll have to go through the hassle of going to DMV, getting new cards, all that shit. Take the cash, walk away now and I won't even bother calling the cops on you."

      Of course, the best advice is to just avoid areas where you're likely to get mugged.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    93. Re:Feelings by Mhtsos · · Score: 2, Funny

      With practice you can draw a katana pretty quick
      With the Quick draw feat you can drow any weapon as a free action!

    94. Re:Feelings by hdparm · · Score: 1
      I happen to be the smallest male adult in my extended family.

      There's a solution! Just get couple of cousins to keep you company when you go somewhere. No need to look nervous or angry at all.

    95. Re:Feelings by Lakers · · Score: 2, Funny

      good god man, men with no guns? that's like a geek without mountain dew. It's just unnatural!

    96. Re:Feelings by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      We can't get Mountain Dew in the UK any more, either.

      They released it over here a few years ago, but it vanished about a year later. Not enough non-geeks buying it, I guess. Fortunately, we have Red Bull...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    97. Re:Feelings by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      Some police here (in the UK) carry guns. Especially in Northern Ireland. If memory serves, the UK police have a MP5 modified for single-shot.

      No guns, however, is an excellent idea: nobody's going to accidentally brutally shoot people in the head if they don't have a gun

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    98. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot

    99. Re:Feelings by m1kesm1th · · Score: 2

      Actually with a cloak and probably medieval ringmail or armour, its likely that the mugger would come off worse for wear. If the guy roleplays, its quite probably he's had experience using the sword. You are right its likely a mugger might not be as scared as a sword as the story suggests.

      Consider this for a moment, the mugger may not be experienced or be confident about his abilities. If confronted with confidence, it is likely he might turn and flee regardless. Personally the story sounds a little like something cut out of a film. I'm sure it could be possible though.

    100. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Nice friends.

    101. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, all the police I've known have espoused the attitude that if someone tries to mug you with a gun and tells you to "go somewhere quietly" with them, they're just looking to lead you to a place where they can shoot you without being noticed. You *never, ever* let someone take you somewhere to be mugged. If they want your wallet, car keys, whatever, fine, give it to them, but actually letting a mugger lead you someplace gets you dead with alarming regularity.

      On another point being made in this thread, looking scary *does* keep you out of trouble to an extent. Don't be stupid and travel alone in shifty parts of town, but if you've got clothes that make you look bigger, wear them. Look pissed off. Muggers like people who will be easy to get money from, so they want someone calm. Muggers will often let people who look like "trouble" (insane, angry, overly alert) go by knowing that someone who will be less trouble will be along shortly. If you have a long coat, keep your hands out of sight and your eyes on everything, and most muggers will decide you just might be looking for someone to shoot for yourself. Don't fail to make eye contact with everyone you pass--give them a simple nod of acknowledgement by way of greeting and keep moving. Some muggers will use any excuse to approach someone, and not only will not making eye contact may give them the idea that you haven't noticed them yet, it may lead them to accuse you of some kind of snobbery to work themselves up before making demands.

      Three last things... Never go somewhere that doesn't have at least three exits close by (an alley would be only two, one at each end so no). Never be afraid to run. ...and the most important, always consider any weapon pointed at you as a threat against your life. Never think for a moment that the weapon directed at you won't be used. Act accordingly. If someone is mugging you and things turn violent, don't hestitate to use any means necessary to disable your attacker... Disabling in this sense is inclusive of killing them. Even if things aren't violent, and they slip up and let you have something big and heavy, crack their skull with it. Better their skull than yours.

      It also helps to wear something you can easily switch around to look _less threatening_. I used to live in San Franciso, and occasionally went to a nightclub on 6th street there (where like most of the violence in the city happens), with bleached white hair, heavy denim baggy pants, black leather padded fingerless gloves, and either a well worn in biker jacket, or full length black leather trenchcoat, and usually a "hoodie" sweatshirt on under it, so my profile looks about 30% larger than normal, and it was clear I could be hiding all manner of things in my pockets. The problem with this... I couldn't get a @#$! cab to pull over to pick me up dressed like this, however, I could quickly _remove_ the trenchcoat or jacket and _wave_ it at the cabs, and they'd see I wasn't likely carrying anything to mug them with and pick me up. A last caveat, be very polite and open with policemen if you go out dressed like a lunatic who could be carrying heavy firepower. They tend to act like arseholes when they're freaked out about you. Be polite, reassure them you're no threat to them, let them search you if need be and put up with their bullshit for a few minutes and they always calm down and leave you alone. Most cops working dangerous neighborhoods are not entirely unreasonable people. Usually it'll only take you about five minutes to make 'em happy, just by keeping them talking, answering their questions, and letting them check you out carefully. They generally have no problem with people who are actively trying to avoid being mugged in the first place compared to how much they don't like people who are being dim and compensating for it by carrying concealed weapons. If you do carry a weapon, make sure it's reasonable and _legal_ (and keep documentation on you, and by the way, while you can get a carry permit fo

    102. Re:Feelings by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      If they can run after that, you must be using the 9 mm version :-)

    103. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, where do you live again?

    104. Re:Feelings by -Harlequin- · · Score: 3, Informative

      you can draw a katana pretty quick and that 4 foot plus depending on your height.

      Ok, this is wierd. I often hear people say katanas are long, but all the ones I've seen are short (~3 foot blade plus handle), and from what I've read, the correct length is the blade tip is off the ground when the arm is relaxed and the grip is at the tsuba. That means that 3 feet is a pretty decent length for a samurai-style katana (Japanese tend to be shorter than me, especially a few hundred years ago :).
      I've seen pictures of much longer ones, but these were all noted as "blades this long are etremely rare", presumably on account of them being more unweildy than the evolved length.

      Or did you mean a katana is 4 feet including the grip? (From the context, it sounds otherwise, but never trust the context :-)

      And while I agree 3 feet isn't that long, if the mugger is already up close and personal, it's still too long :). Maybe draw while rotating your body so the partly-drawn blade intercepts his knife... you never know - he might be slow and clumsy :) But it's an urban legend anyway. I've heard varients of this story from so many sources. Perhaps it actually happened, who knows, I tend to think it probably didn't.

    105. Re:Feelings by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      British police carrying firearms is being common in the big cities, and all police forces will have an Armed Response Unit. They'll also have truncheons and something Mace-like, and there are currently Taser trials being conducted.

    106. Re:Feelings by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      And if the guy hadn't posted as AC, you'd easily be able to verify the story?

    107. Re:Feelings by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You gotta wonder though what makes a mugger decide to pick on the guy all dressed up in armour. I mean, what the fuck? If a guy is walking around in public in medieval armour, what the hell else might he do? You'd have thought the mugger would go after someone more normal-looking...

    108. Re:Feelings by rking · · Score: 1

      HALT! Or I'll be forced to yell HALT again, but louder!

      As others have mentioned, there ARE armed police in the UK though we do try to keep that sort of thing to a minimum. To address the above quoted portion of your comment, however, use of firearms against someone merely for failing to halt when instructed certainly is not permissible, police or not you'd be looking at a prison sentence for that. I have difficulty believing that even in the USA the police are permitted to shoot someone for not stopping when instructed to.

    109. Re:Feelings by RoyalCheese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm.. good thing the mugger wasn't high... normal rules of behaviour can be VERY suspended.

    110. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I heard this same exact story back in 1978 while playing D&D at college. I have heard 5 (now 6) varients on it since. I think this must fall under urban legion (for we are many).

    111. Re:Feelings by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      i don't know if the same rules apply, but german military guards have to warn you three times verbally, then have to give a warning shot in the air and then can shoot you.
      shooting anything but your arms or legs will have them in great trouble, though...

      if you are armed and do something threatening, it's another story...

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    112. Re:Feelings by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 1

      I go for the "freak" look. I have long black hair, a full length slightly beat-up black trenchcoat, jet black pants, jet black shirt, black socks, black shoes. And I'm usually equipped with my mp3 player and one visible knife and a switchblade. (And old RAM chips on my keychain for posterity) :)

      --

      ----
      Ground Control to Major Tom...
    113. Re:Feelings by Lord_Byron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And then you will go to jail, "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this vicious killer gunned down the victim (otherwise known as mugger) with a totally unnecessary 6 rounds of 'cop killer'* hollowpoint bullets. Then, then! I can hardly believe the murderous intent! He stopped, paused, had time to reflect as he reloaded his weapon and again, BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG! emptied it into the helpless victim!" OK, so maybe the judge won't allow such histronics, but an enhanced lethality round won't help you in court, and if the guy isn't still a threat after you reload, maybe you should go to jail.

      And if he is still a threat after 6? Maybe you should reconsider your load & train until your shot placement is reasonable.

      Of course, better tried by 12 than carried by 6, but there is no reason to not attempt to avoid both!

      * yes, I know 'cop-killer' bullets are supposed to be armor piercing, but facts rarely play into this.

    114. Re:Feelings by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It is called warning shots. There is a whole set of procedures that have to be followed, but yes police can and do fire at fleeing suspects.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    115. Re:Feelings by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

      the UK police have a MP5 modified for single-shot.

      All MP5's have single shot. The selector switch usually goes Single, Burst, Automatic. UK Police use the Single.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    116. Re:Feelings by macmastery · · Score: 1

      There is NO connection-and you'd be fool and a communist to make one, between having a gun and shooting someone with it and NOT having a gun and NOT shooting someone.

      http://www.fountain.btinternet.co.uk/jokes/billh ic ks_relentless.html

    117. Re:Feelings by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Unless he looked like something out of the Android's Dungeon... then he would just look like a geek with lots of disposable income.

    118. Re:Feelings by rking · · Score: 1

      In the UK the police like anyone else can fire in self defence or in defence of others, but they don't get to shoot at people just for running away. I can't imagine what the justification for that could be.

    119. Re:Feelings by macmastery · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry your show on MTV got cancelled.

    120. Re:Feelings by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      Damnit, I refreshed the page and my last mod point expired. Otherwise you would have got it.

    121. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have difficulty believing that even in the USA the police are permitted to shoot someone for not stopping when instructed to.

      Even though that's supposedly true, that doesn't stop them. This happens numerous times a year, almost always to minorities. This happens across the country, from big cities to small towns. Most of the victims end up being unarmed, or if armed at all, with a small knife, and the cops usually get away with it by claiming "deadly force" was needed to protect their life based on how they saw the situation. Personally I wouldn't feel threatened by someone armed with a pocket knife who was running away from me. But, of course, we Americans love our guns and the thought of the police not carrying them would appal most. After all, if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns, and the terrorists will have already won.

      America's solution to everything is to throw more money, and more guns at problems. Funny we seem to have a lot of long-lasting problems.

    122. Re:Feelings by XCondE · · Score: 1

      http://www.spireusa.com/products/ZM3.html

      You paid US$125.00 for a backpack? What a rip-off!

    123. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mercury is also denser than water...the book Blow (basis of the movie) describes a drug dealer who drilled out .45 hollowpoints to have a huge cavity, and filled them with mercury. Supposedly it had a very dramatic terminal effect. I've never seen any real data, though.

    124. Re:Feelings by Pope · · Score: 1

      Actually, with QuickDraw you're only going to be able to wield lines, squares, circles, and round rectangles, but they sure do make for an slick GUI!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    125. Re:Feelings by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

      I thought personal vault just stores all your account info? I can't encrypt files can it?

      or do you encrypt the files with something else, and use personal vault to store the password to unlock the files in this other program?

    126. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the above poster doesn't mention is that following the mugger's retreat, a geek girl ran up to the armour-clad geek stud, stripped naked, and demanded his other sword.

      I love geek wet dreams.

    127. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking? Some kind of liberal wacky weed? If they run away from the police, they're obviously bad people and there's no telling what they may do in the future if they're not stopped now. They could even be terrorists. You just can't afford to take any chances with that kind of stuff, you know. So it's better to err on the side of public safety and shoot them if they run. Of course, terrorists and criminals will think otherwise.

    128. Re:Feelings by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Then how do you catch any crooks?

      "Halt"

      "Screw you, copper"

      "Halt, or I will blow my whistle"

      Crook gets away admist much whistle blowing.

      Crooks are like young children. Sometimes the only thing they understand is force. When a young child reaches to touch a hot stove or run out into a busy street, one must use force to stop them. At a minimum they need to be physically stopped, and a spanking might be called for to prevent them from doing it again.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    129. Re:Feelings by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Actually, in a reasonable jursidiction, one won't even go before a court for acting in self-defense. If they do, it will be very brief.

      Also, an "enhanced lethality round" as you call it can do nothing BUT help you in court. You see, if the person you shoot lives, they can cause you no end of troubles in court. If they die and you had good reason for shooting them (like you were being threatened with a knife/gun/etc), then they cannot cause you nearly so many problems.

      Another thing.... If he is still a threat after 6 rounds, he could:
      1) Be hopped up on drugs. Many people have been known to keep coming after people empty entire clips into their center body mass when they were loaded with certain drugs.
      2) Be wearing very heavy clothing, which can plug the hollowpoints and limit their expansion, lessening their effectiveness.
      3) (In the case that your target is not a mugger, but someone else shooting at you, etc) Be far enough away to make accurate aim with a very small pistol very difficult. It is much more difficult to hold a tight group at 50 ft. with a 2" barrel than it is with something like a 1911 or a decent revolver. However, a 1911 or a decent revolver is much more difficult to conceal well while carrying comfortably.

    130. Re:Feelings by gweihir · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fellow ran off with one of my knives stuck in his leg. Bummer. I liked that knife.

      Maybe he wanted to steal the knive?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    131. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally, that would make you more of a target. It's probably the knives more than the black garb.

    132. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a place as bleak and depressing as a suburban development, and that includes the middle of the ghetto.

    133. Re:Feelings by Audiostar · · Score: 1

      that all depends on where you get stabbed, and whether or not you have medical insurance. I've been stabbed in the hand, done the stitches myself and it didn't cost me a penny. On the other hand, I've been stabbed in the stomach and it was a little more pricey once it was all said and done. An ambulance ride costs close to a grand these days.

    134. Re:Feelings by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Electrocution implies death by electricity. That said, unless a ghost is writing this, I am sure you meant "I got the shit shocked out of me".

      --
      I hate sigs.
    135. Re:Feelings by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Return stolen books...

      Just to clarify, when I say "return", I mean "sell them back to a college bookstore." This was some advice that was given to me when touring the campus where I currently attend classes before I was a freshman. Your textbooks are some of the most valuable things you have on a college campus. Very easy to sell, very hard to track. So, you put some cryptic mark on a wierd page and tell that to the cops when they are stolen.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    136. Re:Feelings by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Must suck to have to mow your lawn EVERY week instead of dodging bullets. So depressing!

    137. Re:Feelings by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good leather jacket is hard to cut through. If someone pulls a knife, they will have a harder time stabbing you. Motercyclists wear leather not for style, but beacuse when they have their accident (and the honest ones admit it is when) it is the best protection you can comfortably wear.

      Not as good a midevil mail of some sort, but a lot more comfortable.

    138. Re:Feelings by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      "You mean you'll put down your rock, and I'll put down my sword and we'll try and kill each other like civilized peo"

      I for one, would be willing to take you o

    139. Re:Feelings by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      "My fiance and I were mugged less than a block from our house just about three weeks ago. After having a gun pointed at me by someone I don't know all that well, I have to agree with some of your conclusions.
      I did not do what he told me to do (Getting on the ground was not an option in my mind). I walked right up to the son of a bitch and got the best look I could, then I walked away. The guy with the gun had a partner who tried to beat me up, but I've been hit harder by girls on accident.
      The point to this was, I didn't follow their script (and that's what it sounded like, a script from a real bad "gangsta" movie) and that's what kept me, my fiance, my iPod, and my money intact. The police told me I should have gone along and did what they told me, but two days before a woman was shot and killed during a mugging at the mall. She did exactly what they told her to, yet they killed her anyway.
      I see no profit in bowing down to petty tyrants with little guns, who think they can steal what's mine. Or maybe I just read too much Batman as a kid."

      Dude, unless you are an extreme bad-ass, that type of attitude will earn you an early death. Even Bruce Lee at the top of his form would think twice before just turning his back on unknown possibly armed thugs. Give em want they want and remember every detail is a saner approach to just like 'Living' is what I am shooting for. No Wait! Bad metaphore. Bad metaphore. (Crack, Shot it. NoOOOO!)

      The idea is that no matter now good you think you are, there is somebody out there who is better. And if you are in a life and death situation, why risk it? Take my cruddy old wallet with the one valid credit card (I keep the old ones in there as a trap.) that I will be canceling as soon as I get to a phone.

      Flee, Mr. Mugger. I enjoy the fact that you did not get anything except a detailed police sketch from me. And of course I will be watching out for you in my travels, A city can be suprisingly small.

    140. Re:Feelings by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      AAAAAHHHHH! Urban Leigons! Run away!! RUN AWAY!!! The countless armies of the city approach to smite us all with their might!!!

      (Urban legends, dude. :) )

      --
      It's been a long time.
    141. Re:Feelings by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      No guns, however, is an excellent idea: nobody's going to accidentally brutally shoot people in the head if they don't have a gun


      That might be a good idea but, It is too late for no guns. Basicaly any one with an simple understanding of an internal combustion engine has the ability to create a gun. (All it is is a controled explosion propeling an object along a controled path just drop the crank shaft holding it together) with guns all gone, sreiously, only the criminals will have them.

      You can make a gun that shoots nails, uses propane, butane, hairspray and about anythign else combustable. Almost every house hold has enough stuff to fasion a crude gun. There will however be a performance hit when making them out of alternative materials. We used to make potato cannons and we even devised a repeater with an auto loader. Works simular to a gatling gun. Another fun toy was shooting tennis balls soaked in kerosene from the potato cannon. It would light up everythign then catch stuff on fire. Of course we only did it for fun and had a safe place to play with them.

      200 or more years ago, it might have been feasable but sadly not now.
    142. Re:Feelings by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      No guns, however, is an excellent idea: nobody's going to accidentally brutally shoot people in the head if they don't have a gun

      Yes: instead women (like your wife or sister) will be brutally raped, and no one can help who isn't 15 minutes away.

      Also, if no one had computers, banks wouldn't have to wory about people breaking into their computers and extorting money from them.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    143. Re:Feelings by Angus+Prune · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein, if your walking through a dodgy area try and look like you are on an errand and have somewhere to be. Don't look asthough you're going for a walk or don't know where you're going. If you look like you walk there everyday of your life and you're only going round the corner you'l be less of a target.

    144. Re:Feelings by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns, and the terrorists will have already won.

      Even more proper would be "and the terrorists already have them"

      Osama bin laden has all the powerful, repeating, long-range guns he wants. He has rocket launchers, and tiny little knifes he can use to hijack bigger weapons.

      What weapons do you own?

      Also, some problems can be solved by the application of more money and guns. The defeat of the third reich, for example.

      And don't bring up the "war" on drugs, either. I most certainly do not have the authority to regulate what molecules enter your body.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    145. Re:Feelings by tcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not certain what London laws are concerning carrying swords; don't you have to be in one of the guilds or something to get away with it? but if that's an option.....

      If you decided to wave it around in a public place, you'd be shot at by an armed response unit as if you had a gun. Also considered a deadly weapon.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
    146. Re:Feelings by tcr · · Score: 1

      You're still ahead on the generalisation stakes...

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
    147. Re:Feelings by sfsp · · Score: 1

      The story is in fact true, and happened much as described. However, the person in question was Sir Trude Lacklandia, First Lady Knight of the Society for Creative Anachronism. My wife (Lady Amanda de Spencer) and inlaws (Sir Robert and Sir Leah de Spencer) are all acquainted with her, and Lady Amanda has had the privilege of seeing the knife the scoundrel left behind. The actual line was, "I'll see your six and raise you thirty!"

      Sometimes even the urban legends have a grain of truth.

      Reminds me also of the time my wife was accosted on the campus of the University of Utah by a scoundrel with a knife, and her only armed with an umbrella. Of course, as a black belt in Kendo, she probably broke the guy's wrist with her improvised bokken...

    148. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Move to the damn suburbs. There's nothing of value in a city anyways, except for maybe a job in a neighborhood where you don't have to worry about muggers anyways. Then you go home at night to a place where you can leave your house and car unlocked with your ipod on the dash.
      Yeah, but then you have to worry about being carjacked.

      How the hell does this troll get modded as "insightful"?
    149. Re:Feelings by lost_n_mad · · Score: 1

      Nope, not a bad ass at all. I'm 6'2" and 145 lbs. But I can tell when someone is scared, and this guy was scared. My point to this was, attitude will get you out of some very bad situations (the guy who I agreed with had a similar argument). You have to judge your attacker and the extent of their intent. These dumbasses were trying to mug people were not only one block from our home, but on the same block as a police station (It's on the other side of a cemetery).
      "Take my cruddy old wallet with the one valid credit"
      Imagine if what you had in your wallet was all your food for the next week, and it would not be replaced. No credit cards, no back up funds. How serious would you take what you have in your wallet?

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    150. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this:
      http://marmot.com/products/product.php?cat= packs&s ubcat=40&style_id=D2547

      When wearing my crampons, glacier glasses and carrying an ice axe, most people don't mess with you. :) Of course, most people are also a vertical mile or so below me...

    151. Re:Feelings by paganizer · · Score: 1

      This has been bugging the hell out of me; I think I finally figured it out.

      If you are in london and a geek, wangle your way into a livery company, perhaps the Worshipful company of Information Technologists .

      Then, apply for freedom of the city of London (detailed here).

      Not ONLY does this get you escorted home if found drunk while in the traditional city (instead of presumably being arrested), it apparently gives you the right to carry a sword within the city. and you can herd your sheep across the tower bridge, or something like that.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    152. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, I just pay the kid down the street to cut my grass...

    153. Re:Feelings by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      "But I can tell when someone is scared, and this guy was scared"

      I hear what you are saying and I for the most part agree with you. However, I wish to point out that people put in scary situations tend to do irrational things that they normally would not do otherwise.

      "Imagine if what you had in your wallet was all your food for the next week"

      Come on, you can do better than this! I have been there, done that. If you are silly enough to rely on the wallet that much, you need to rethink your life's game plan.

      I personally believe in redundancy.

    154. Re:Feelings by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      While admittedly funny....

      I had some nice conversations with a guy in the air gaurd... ya know... the guy that has the dubious honor of having almost pulled a gun on a general because the idiots in the unmarked air craft (don't you love how we talk about the iraqis disguoising people as civilians when we move our generals around in unmarked civilian looking planes) didn't get proper clearance for the runway he was on when transporting said general around.

      Anyway... he was pretty soon out of training and we were talking about police and how they do their jobs. One rule he did tell me "doesn't matter what he did, if he turns to flee and is running away, you can not shoot him."

      Thats right... if a person takes of running, you call for backup and/or give chase. That sone reason cops work in teams. one gives chase, the other calls for backup, and then gives chase.

      Another interesting thing... if a cop gets in a fight with someone, his partners first job is NOT to defend him. His partners first job is to call for backup. THEN and ONLY then should he jump in.

      Anyway, plain and simple. If the suspect runs and you shoot him in the back, thats murder.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    155. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's obvious. Everyone knows that midevil (just below anthrax or letter-bomb grade evil) mail is much more effective against enemies than leather jackets.

    156. Re:Feelings by pdbaby · · Score: 1
      Also, if no one had computers, banks wouldn't have to wory about people breaking into their computers and extorting money from them.


      The problem being that guns don't have a legal use that can't be accomplished just as easily with something nonlethal (a taser, for example) or simply not walking down dark streets on your own at night.

      You simply don't need guns to stop crime
      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    157. Re:Feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're implying you should beat (or shoot?) your children, in order to teach them not to touch hot things?

      I like your thinkin' yeeehaw.

    158. Re:Feelings by modecx · · Score: 1

      A leather jacket won't do jack shit for a stabbing.

      With a bit of practice and a sharp pointed knife you could stab through a car door or kevlar armor, let alone a measly piece of leather. Leather is good for protecting against cuts and abrasions, and that's about all. It will help if your attacker is swinging, trying to CUT you, but it won't matter if he's trying to impale... And honestly, anything short of a steel plate won't help in that regard.

      Maile won't stop a thrust, either. That's why many of the thin, very sharply pointed swords were developed. You can stab right into the maile, splitting it's rings, defeating it all together. Maile is great for edged swinging weapons, though. Stops 'em cold, but it'd still hurt like hell.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    159. Re:Feelings by ducman · · Score: 1

      Definitely just add one more gadget. The Springfield XD is pretty high-tec. I personally prefer a decidedly low-tech .357 magnum, though, and the polished stainless matches my iPod!

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    160. Re:Feelings by ducman · · Score: 1

      I assume this post was meant to be funny. However, realize that sticking someone with a knife is, by definition, using deadly force--no different than shooting them with a gun. Knives are also generally considered "concealed weapons" and are subject to the same restrictions and same potential criminal penalties. Colorado law, for example, is quite clear about the fact that deadly force and concealed carry laws apply equally to any type of deadly weapon. Other states may not be as clear (IANAL), but deadly force is never limited to only a specific type of weapon.

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    161. Re:Feelings by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      The problem being that guns don't have a legal use that can't be accomplished just as easily with something nonlethal (a taser, for example)

      Bullshit. In some later posts, I read of gangs of 15 people mugging at the same time. Applying a non-lethal charge to one of them is not going to do jack. He has 14 friends there to help him. Also, a taser only has 2(!) shots available. 1 to shoot, and one more. Only. That works out to taking out, over a period of 20+ seconds, 1/7th of the attackers. Also, a taser needs to be in contact as long as possible (5+ seconds) to be effective. In five seconds, you'd be dead, if you were close enough to use that.

      Is ensuring the legitimacy of government a "legal" purpose to you?

      Are you seriously suggesting that I refrain from walking, in my country, in my city, down the roads that my tax dollars paid,for as a solution to crime? What if they take up residence in my house? Should I just leave?

      Weapons ownership is a basic human right. It does not need justification or asking someone for permission. Like free speech and the free exercise of religion, it is a fundamental right right that all humans deserve, except those that initiate hurting people. If you don't have the right of free speech, what the hell is the point of governance?

      Are you familiar with the concept of rights? I ask because I have spoken to people online who are not acquainted with the subject. Your ignorance of basic human rights suggests you are among them.

      You simply don't need guns to stop crime

      How dare you presume to tell me what I do and do not need.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    162. Re:Feelings by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      As opposed to no-brutally shooting someone in the head?

    163. Re:Feelings by pdbaby · · Score: 1
      Bullshit. In some later posts, I read of gangs of 15 people mugging at the same time. Applying a non-lethal charge to one of them is not going to do jack. He has 14 friends there to help him. ... In five seconds, you'd be dead, if you were close enough to use that.
      I can see your argument, but I don't believe that a gun is going to help you much there either: muggers are probably opportunists that will run away if anyone fights back anyhow: having a taser is probably going to make them think twice. If the attackers are serious then you're not going to stop them with a single clip of most weapons -- unless you're carrying a submachinegun. Ideally, of course, governments should be making sure that nobody has reason (or that the majority are severely punished) to mug people.

      Regardless, the number of muggings seems, to me, to be unaffected by firearms ownership. I don't have the exact figures, obviously, but I'm guessing that ratio of muggings to people are the same in the UK and the USA.

      Are you seriously suggesting that I refrain from walking, in my country, in my city, down the roads that my tax dollars paid,for as a solution to crime? What if they take up residence in my house? Should I just leave?
      If you know that muggers are n% more likely to attack you if you walk alone down a dark alley, you would be a fool to walk alone down a dark alley.
      If they take up residence in your house then you'll accomplish a lot more by calling the police. Whether you have a gun or not, you'll still need to call the police. Granted it's not a pallatable solution, but when you let people take the law into their own hands then you move towards anarchy.

      Weapons ownership is a basic human right
      I'm guessing that it doesn't say that owning a weapon is a right to all humans -- if it did, then obviously the UK wouldn't have no-guns laws.
      Also please note that you changed the issue from weapons to free speech: the issues are completely disconnected. Shooting people isn't a (legal/valid) expression of your ideas.
      P.S. I just consulted the declaration of human rights and it mentions "security of person" -- that doesn't have to mean "right to hold a gun". A gun is simply a means to retaliate against someone who has/trying to violate your rights.

      How dare you presume to tell me what I do and do not need.
      I was talking in the "human race" sense of "you": the UK police stop various types of crime without needing to use guns. I'm sure there are many other countries who prevent crime without the need for guns.

      As an aside, I live in northern ireland and it's incredibly useful to have a law against guns here: when the police raid a terrorist warehouse (or home) and find guns/ammunition/bombs/etc. then they don't need other evidence (that can be incredibly difficult and costly to obtain): they already have a basic crime that they can convict the people of (and therefore keep terrorists off our streets).

      Personally, having a handgun wouldn't make me feel safer if there's the possibility of some drunkard coming up to me holding one: for me, not having the right to bear arms is a small price to pay for the significantly reduced incidence of being threatened by arms. If someone comes up to me with a knife I can run away. If someone's holding a gun then running away isn't going to do much for me.
      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    164. Re:Feelings by Experiment-03 · · Score: 1

      I am a 100 pound 16 year old who is a common target for the type of high-school bullies who I call "pre-muggers". however, they only attack me alone once, then they collect into a group and attack me en masse. When I fight them I just get in there and when they try to slam me on the ground (which they always do) I hold on and flip over so they actually propel themselves into the pavement. Then 100 extra pounds lands on top of them. Then, the next day, multiple brutes with bandaged faces beat the snot out of me. It never fails.

      --
      People call me a nerd and think I find that insulting? Fools...
    165. Re:Feelings by nametaken · · Score: 1

      True, but I was responding to an emotional post. Poster implied that suburban areas lack so much character that they depress people on order that exceeds the fears of living in a more dangerous neighborhood. I think it's obvious that there is more value to living in the city than just jobs, but my original point still stands... if the city scares you, move.

    166. Re:Feelings by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I know you are a troll, but I'm going to respond anyway.

      No there is NO need to shoot your children, but pain is an effective motivator, would I firmly slap a 3 year old to stop him from getting 3rd degree burns, YES. would I let a 5 year old learn experientially that the stove really is HOT, Quite probably.Why the difference, Well a 3 year old doesn't have the same level of understanding of NO and HOT as a 5 year old and therefore should be protected from the HOT.

      Would I use more extreme(not abusive) levels of pain to keep my child from running across a busy street, YES. Would I talk about it first, Of course. Would we have a long talk afterwards about how I love him and don't want him dead from the big scary cars, Of course. But at some point MOST people don't learn unless it hurts.

      Some learn from talking, some learn from other people, some have to stub their own toe and burn their own fingers.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    167. Re:Feelings by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Security of person: How are you going to guarantee that without use of force?

      And how are you going to legislate away my inate right to make and use weapons?? Just looking around my desk area, I count a dozen different weapons... several pens, a mouse. a 3 hole punch, my phone, my dictionary, power cables, etc. given some time I could likely rig together something from what I have here that could propel a deadly particle... ie a gun.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    168. Re:Feelings by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen a street thug use a knife? If you are wearing any sort of protection, leather jacket, heavy denim, etc, and paying the least bit of attention you can either move inside his center of motion, or just wait for his overhead swing to go wide and take the stupid thing. Yes, getting cut hurts, but it beats getting dead.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    169. Re:Feelings by stanmann · · Score: 1

      And practice your eye contact, neither break nor make eye contact.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    170. Re:Feelings by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      Yes: If a 15-on-1 mugging is to be stopped, a taser or a small handgun is not going to be an end-all solution. I think that pulling a gun of any type (by the person being mugged) could have a hugely beneificial effect for the muggee. If the thing is to be conclusively stopped, something bigger, like a submachine gun, would be better. Better still would be a pintle-mounted heavy machine gun. I think your point is that if muggings are to be violently ended by the muggees, they are going to need the most accurate, powerful, high-capacity weapons money can buy.

      This is my point too, and if a grandmother wants to carry a $150 mac-10 that can fire full-auto, fine. If a criminal wants to "take her gun and use it against her", his chances are significantly reduced by the fact that that grandmother has a very good chance of stopping him. A mac-10 is cheap, powerful, and concealable, and the magazine could give her 20 or 40 chances to hit him.

      If you know that muggers are n% more likely to attack you if you walk alone down a dark alley, you would be a fool to walk alone down a dark alley.

      I wonder how much wearing a short skirt affects women's chances of being raped. There is probably a percentage available someplace. Ergo, they are fools for wearing those skirts, as it increases their chance of being raped.

      This is clearly BS. Women ((and men)(and the "other" genders)) have a right to wear whatever they want. If they are raped or beaten, it is the fault of the person that did it, not theirs. Likewise, statistical percentages are irrelevant here. I have a right to walk down dark alleys if I please, and if someone tries to mug me, they are at fault, not me.

      you move towards anarchy

      Anarchy would be preferable to a situation where I had to rely on police inside my own home.

      I'm guessing that it doesn't say that owning a weapon is a right to all humans -- if it did, then obviously the UK wouldn't have no-guns laws.

      I am not referring to the so-called declaration of human rights. Do you really think the unelected dictatorship of china would approve something that could even conceivably threaten it?

      Also, your statement to the effect that "if I don't have it, it must not be a right" is clearly bunk.

      Also please note that you changed the issue from weapons to free speech: the issues are completely disconnected. Shooting people isn't a (legal/valid) expression of your ideas.

      I did not "change the issue", I used a supporting example. I.E, free speech is a human right, no matter what anyone says, weapons ownership is a human right, no matter what anyone says. And since when does something have to be "an expression of your ideas" to be legal? And for that matter, remember that things are only legal because you made them legal.

      P.S. I just consulted the declaration of human rights and it mentions "security of person" -- that doesn't have to mean "right to hold a gun". A gun is simply a means to retaliate against someone who has/trying to violate your rights.

      Delightful- you have the right, but you are permitted precisely no way to ensure it or exercise it. This is akin to saying "We have free exercise of religion here- just no torahs or korans or rosaries." Sure, guns are a means of retaliation just like any other method, like courts, except the have the virtue of being portable, powerful, efficient and selective. And (effectively) instantaneous.

      ...find guns/ammunition/bombs/etc. then they don't need other evidence (that can be incredibly difficult and costly to obtain):...

      Good: They are automatically criminals, and the cops don't have to prove some kind of beurocratic red-tape formalities like "intent" or "evidence" or "guilt" to put them away. It is horriying to me that you are completely defe

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    171. Re:Feelings by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I getcha. Street thugs aren't as smart as Samurai.

      Those things still don't stop a skilled thrust--in the worst case scenario anyway.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    172. Re:Feelings by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Let's say I've had the shit shocked out of me frequently starting from about the age of three. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    173. Re:Feelings by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      ...and the UK police weapons are modified so they ONLY have single shot. *no-one* bar the military have automatic weapons in the UK.

  2. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    >"are there any other suggestions?"

    Martial arts

    btw; First post

  3. Carry a gun by cyrax777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Im not kidding get a Carry Concealed Weapon Permit.

    1. Re:Carry a gun by telstar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Im not kidding get a Carry Concealed Weapon Permit."
      • All that'll do is give the crazy soccer mom's another opportunity to blame DOOM for deaths...

    2. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wouldn't help the author, who lives in London.

    3. Re:Carry a gun by eggz128 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, good luck with that in LONDON.

    4. Re:Carry a gun by orz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's a bit hard to do that in London that it is in the US.

    5. Re:Carry a gun by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Im not kidding get a Carry Concealed Weapon Permit.

      In London???

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    6. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, fantastic. The average iPod, laptop and PDA nerd pulling a gun on a mugger might just be the only thing stupider and more likely to get someone actually killed than the average joe doing it. Try not to shoot your own foot, or better yet, do- and then slump over and make sure you don't have any more bullets to get you in trouble.

    7. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How is this flamebait? Offtopic, perhaps, because the guy is in London (so he can't get one), but I hardly think the mere mention of firearms is flamebait.

    8. Re:Carry a gun by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      London's not in the USA yet.

    9. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      England has (very famously) prosecuted a disabled man for using pepper spray for fighting off a mugger. I hardly think a concealed carry permit is even a remote possibility, seeing as how practically all firearms have been 100% banned in the country.

      The basic freedom of self defense is seriously eroded in the UK. I have to chuckle when people like to throw around "Oh, Europe is truly free compared to the US.". Sorry - if you can't even fight off a mugger with pepper spray, you're a serf. Nothing more.

    10. Re:Carry a gun by tmillard · · Score: 1

      When you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

    11. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, who needs a permit anyway?

    12. Re:Carry a gun by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Getting a gun in London is hardly a problem, provided you don't mind breaking the law. Of course if you shoot a mugger, you'd better be ready to go to jail for years...

    13. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's ignore the fact that the guy is in London and cannot carry a gun.... however, for those of us that are able to bear arms, remember:

      (1) Your gun is not a toy
      (2) Only reach for your gun as a last resort
      (3) Only shoot if absolutely necessary
      (4) If you have to shoot, shoot to kill. "Your word against his" is a lot easier when "he" is dead.

      Seriously, though, in this country (US), it is easier to deal with an "excessive force" charge as a victim than the civil suit for "lost wages and mental anguish" from your now-wounded attacker.

    14. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      What's a permit going to do? Oh, you mean get the permit so you can carry a concealed weapon. What the hell for? So you can wave it at them after they take your valuables?

      So you know, you can't shoot someone just for taking your stuff. Well, maybe you can, but then you get to spend the rest of your life in jail for killing someone. How's *that* for losing your "valuables"?

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    15. Re:Carry a gun by smallfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No, carry the gun, but never pull it out and use it. The martial arts idea has the same effect but takes a lot longer to develope. If you feel powerful you will project that in your body language and the bad guys may deside there is easier picking elsewhere. If someone does mug you, for God's sake just give them your stuff. Nobody's life is worth an iPod.

    16. Re:Carry a gun by johnatjohnytech · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state. You can if they are in the process robbing you. (Burglery sp?) If they have taken it and run off and you did nothing... Then no you cant shoot them however you can go after them :) So know the rules (they are the same rules a police officer has to follow.)

    17. Re:Carry a gun by mivok · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention that this guy is in London, where you can't get a 'carry concealed weapon permit' or whatever. Of course, you could get a Licence to carry a shotgun provided you carry it in full view and not ready to fire. The muggers wouldn't notice that and you would be perfectly safe.. ahem.

    18. Re:Carry a gun by finkployd · · Score: 1

      (1) Your gun is not a toy
      (2) Only reach for your gun as a last resort
      (3) Only shoot if absolutely necessary
      (4) If you have to shoot, shoot to kill. "Your word against his" is a lot easier when "he" is dead.

      Seriously, though, in this country (US), it is easier to deal with an "excessive force" charge as a victim than the civil suit for "lost wages and mental anguish" from your now-wounded attacker.


      This probably will get modded down, but whether you agree with it or not, he is right.

      Finkployd

    19. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well i would agree, nobodies life is worth an ipod. But a life is definatly worth the principle of it. I would gladly die or end someone elses life to protect mine and/or others. I also dispise thiefs and the such enough to end thier life if it ever becomes an opertunity. A mugging might result in loosing more then an ipod, like your life or well being. or getting raped as well. You just never know

    20. Re:Carry a gun by RabidStoat · · Score: 1
      For pete's sake, don't you know where you are .. this is /.

      Guns are in the same category as women here .. we know about their existence but they're allegedly pretty dangerous to handle and likely to cause serious injuries to the inexperienced operator.

      Personally, I wonder why you feel it necessary to carry so much around, dump the PDA or the lappy - or use a PDA that you can listen to music on.

    21. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      were I live I can threaten to use deadly force to stop a robbery.

    22. Re:Carry a gun by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Most likely the guy will be using something to intimate you into turning over your stuff. All you have to do is fear for you life and you can take his.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    23. Re:Carry a gun by darkfnord23 · · Score: 1

      Since we all have guns here in the good ol' USA, no one is ever mugged. Matt

    24. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It takes extreme myopia for someone to make this kind of statement.

      Is it really that hard to understand that the gun is a deterrent, not a 'thugicide'? The firing of a gun in self defense is literally that - self defense. When you pull a gun (hopefully after taking one or more courses in lethal force usage) you are sending a message to the criminal : this episode is over.

      90% of all self defense situations involving firearms are happily resolved without the gun being fired. That's the intention : pure deterrance with the added insurance of being able to use it in an acute emergency. That's a win for everyone.

      The image the gun control crowd loves is people simply pulling a gun at every possible instance and spraying. That's simply not consistent with reality - nor is the very silly 'it'll just get taken away from you' myth.

    25. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nobody's life is worth an iPod."

      Screw that. Not to be rude, but if you're out mugging people, you know the risks.

      I'm not going to pull punches for someone that's trying to do me harm... and I wouldn't expect anyone else to either.

      Incidentally, I've been "mugged" three times. All they wanted was my wallet, but I tend to carry cash. TIP:Learn Jeet Kune Do or some such. In the end, all three times I left - with all my possesions. None were ever seriously hurt, but I had to break the wrist of some idiot that pulled a knife.

    26. Re:Carry a gun by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      If they point a weapon or even threaten to hit you then it is self defence to shoot them. If they don't threaten your expensive gadgets aren't in danger anyway.

    27. Re:Carry a gun by gmack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So many geeks I know walk around as if the world is out to get them.. the result. This probably attracts more bullies and muggers than anything else imaginable.

      I don't know if carrying a gun will make a nervous person any more confident though. A scared person with a gun is still a scared person.

      You don't neccesarily need to feel powerful.. feeling average should be enough.

    28. Re:Carry a gun by brian728s · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you outgun lawyers, only gunners will have laws.

    29. Re:Carry a gun by Ithika · · Score: 2

      Well that's ok then, because I don't think I'll ever find myself in late 19th century America riding a stagecoach across country.

      Seriously though, what is the deal with all you pro-gun freaks? Just as soon humanity gets over its immature fascination with killing people we'll all be a whole lot better off.

    30. Re:Carry a gun by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no "right to bear arms" in the European Declaration of Human Rights. Only a right to life. And bearing arms is not considered to be compatible with that.

    31. Re:Carry a gun by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the old lady who was convicted for using her knitting needles to fight off a mugger. The poor mugger got hurt.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    32. Re:Carry a gun by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Amen. An armed populace is a secure populace. Either that or dress like a homeless man and push around your laptop, iPod, cellphone, etc. in a shopping cart filled with rubbish. It's unlikely a mugger will bother you, but you may have to fight a turf war with other homeless people. Chances are you have a Leatherman on you though since you're a geek so stab them in the throat and run away as fast as you can push your shopping cart.

      What do the rest of us do in the real world? I drive a car and all my possessions are secure in the car with a gun in the glove compartment (and CCW permit). No worries about muggers here.

    33. Re:Carry a gun by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. Self defence laws vary a lot from state to state. If you are interested in carrying a gun for protection I would advice talking to the local authorities and probably a local gun club for more information.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    34. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because its true? My fiancee would have been raped or worse if she didn't carry a gun, not a shot fired - she pulled it and the asshole ran. Those who pray on the weak do so for a reason, when your no longer an easy target most will simply bail on ya. That gun saved her life, without it who knows what would have happened. Self defense is a basic human right, ever wait on the police when their truly needed? What if your a minority? Good luck with that.

    35. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      It's been said that you should never pull a gun unless you intend to use it. I'm not sure I would want to put up the legal fight to keep myself out of jail after shooting some lowlife for taking my laptop. And believe me, my entire life is linked to my laptop.

      In Michigan (according to a poice officer friend of mine, you may roll your eyes now) you can only use deadly force if you feel that your life is in danger. You're going to have to prove that, and you might have a hard time if the other guy is dead.

      Hey, it's up to each person to make their own decision, but in today's litigious society, I would err on the side of caution and not carry a gun. I've thought about going to get a CCW in the past (Michigan loosened the laws a few years ago) and decided not to do it. I'm just not sure that I could stop myself from shooting the person who is running off with my life.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    36. Re:Carry a gun by secolactico · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I also dispise thiefs and the such enough to end thier life if it ever becomes an opertunity.

      You know, if for some reason you are ever brought to trial for homicide (accidental, unfounded or otherwise) and the DA finds this post and manages to connect it to you, you will look pretty bad in front of a jury.

      ;-) Just kidding... that was the paranoid in me running amok.

      --
      No sig
    37. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a little known fact that in Texas that you can use whatever means necessary to prevent the theft of your property. This was a hold over from the wild and wooly days of the Wicked western whereby a mans livley-hood (aka Life Literly) could be taken from him in the form of his possesions or lack of them. So its last I heard its still on the books - mental note to burglers "steal someplace else".

    38. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also have the highest rate of gun-crime in the _World_

    39. Re:Carry a gun by slipgun · · Score: 1

      Factual correction: you can still legally get a rifle in Britain with a hard-to-obtain license, a shotgun with an easy-to-obtain license, and an airgun/realistic replica/blank firer/two of the above with no license whatsoever.

      However I agree with the general sentiment of what you're saying.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    40. Re:Carry a gun by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      I don't see any terrorists coming into my house to kidnap me do you? They know Americans are armed so they can only attack places that ban guns (i.e. Washington, D.C., New York, and airplanes). Coincidence? NO!

    41. Re:Carry a gun by Thavius · · Score: 1

      No way, learn a martial art. I've been in taekwondo for the past 6 years, and have learned many good techniques against a mugging. Not only that, the confidence I display when I walk probably makes me less of a target.

      Having a gun would make you more likely to get hurt, or be on the wrong end of the law. Besides, not everyone is able to use a gun on another person. If someone felt threatened enough to draw a gun, but hesitated in following through, then the attacker would now have a gun. Guns aren't always the answer to saftey.

    42. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Short sighted eh? Yeah, well you explain to me how a *concealed* weapon deters anything. They can't see it! And if you are going to tell me that all you have to do is pull it out, you've never had a gun drawn on you before (yes, I have). It's not cool, and since the other person's gun is trained right on you, if you go for your gun, you're dead. And I have nothing against gun owenership. Own one if you want to, it doesn't bother me one way or the other.

      So, Quickdraw Magraw, you take your chances. Me? I'd rather live to see tomorrow.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    43. Re:Carry a gun by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      In civilised countries there is something called excessive force. If you blow someones brains out for pushing your shoulder your most certainly in trouble.

    44. Re:Carry a gun by riprjak · · Score: 0

      Yes, right; carry a weapon which, whilst you own and practice with, you dont use on a daily basis.

      Turn what was an insurance claim for some missing gear into a life ending experience... IDIOT!

      drawing, aiming and firing (or drawing, readying and striking with) a weapon takes far too long, particularly if you have been ambushed.

      If you want to be stupid enough to fight, learn martial arts (aikido, kung-fu or kempo are my suggestions), train HARD. In 5 years or so you will be ready; much earlier than if you choose to use weapons. For someone who actually knows what they are doing, the easiest and quickest way to arm yourself is to disarm someone else; if you dont know what you are doing, immediately surrender your gear, the mugger wants your cash and gear so they can score a hit; they know they will almost certainly not get caught but if they kill you they will be hunted...

      It is just stuff; if the data isnt backed up; its your fault not the muggers. But, for the love of sanity, do not recommend that civilians arm themselves and attempt to use those weapons in a stressful situation without proper (and by proper I mean 6 years special forces/swat training, no other humans regularly survive getting ambushed without being ready) training.

      *DO NOT* listen to this man.

      err!
      jak.

    45. Re:Carry a gun by silentbozo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Since we all have guns here in the good ol' USA, no one is ever mugged.*

      * Exceptions include California, Massachusetts, Maryland, District of Columbia, where ordinary citizens** are considered incapable of excercising good judgement with respect to their rights under the constitution.

      ** Ordinary citizens exclude prominent judges, politicians, and celebrities.

      Yes, I know that you CAN legally own concealable firearms in some of the above, but it isn't easy.

    46. Re:Carry a gun by zakath · · Score: 1

      Dude...It's spelled S A R C A S M

      --

    47. Re:Carry a gun by kahei · · Score: 0, Troll


      No, he can't -- you're confusing the English with people who have basic respect for themselves and for the concept of property belonging to a particular person rather than to whoever can grab it.

      Yes, it was flamebait, mod me down... yet there is wisdom in my words I tell you...

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    48. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      i would believe you need to know the laws pertaining to this before you ever get a CC permit. but yea, start looking in those directions.

      I would be a little worried if they let anyone have a permit without making sure they new when and when not to use it. But hey, i'm of the persuasion of the more the marier. It is loke haveing an off duty police officer every were i go. you don't know who the cop is, or if he is there, or if he isn't there.

      Just having a law allowing it, even if no permits were ever issued make me feel safer.

    49. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Again, I suspect you're being deliberately 'confused' as to what I'm saying. So I will clarify :

      I'm saying that pulling the concealed weapon is when the deterrence begins. It is not when the weapon is fired and it is definitely not when you're simply concealing it.

      Certainly, if someone already has a gun on you, pulling a gun is extremely dumb. The idea behind concealed carry is not a western quick-draw competition. That's a lovely image the gun control groups love to see invoked - but it doesn't jive with the realities of how most gun-defense situations unfold. Not even remotely. But we're not talking about those situations. We're talking about the situation where you feel things are about to go south and physical violence might take place. If you carry a weapon, you at least have the option of well, weighing your options and deciding what makes you safest.

    50. Re:Carry a gun by Ithika · · Score: 0
      The mugger has no such reservations against using deadly weapons against you.

      Ahahaha, oh yeah, that's a good one. (wipes away tears)

      Muggers using 'deadly weapons' you say. Would that be a purpose-built chib or the time-honoured bottle o' Bucky? I don't think you have the first clue what goes on in the rest of the world, do you?

      You do realise that assault with a deadly weapon is frowned upon in civilised society, don't you?

    51. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6

    52. Re:Carry a gun by Dravik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In some states he would get public praise

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    53. Re:Carry a gun by phillymacmike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, though, in this country (US), it is easier to deal with an "excessive force" charge as a victim than the civil suit for "lost wages and mental anguish" from your now-wounded attacker.

      This probably will get modded down, but whether you agree with it or not, he is right.


      But then you deal with the lost wages and mental anguish suit from the family. I go with insurance, regular backups, and give the a$$*&^% my toys. Works when your home is burglarized, too.

      -- Mike

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    54. Re:Carry a gun by dogfart · · Score: 3, Funny
      You do realise that assault with a deadly weapon is frowned upon in civilised society, don't you?

      Most of us live in the USA. That might explain it. Haven't lived in a "civilised" society yet.

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    55. Re:Carry a gun by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1
      And this was the "quote of the day" at the bottom of the page:

      Poland has gun control.

      Heh.

    56. Re:Carry a gun by bladernr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There is no "right to bear arms" in the European Declaration of Human Rights. Only a right to life. And bearing arms is not considered to be compatible with that.

      What about using arms to defend your life or the life of a family member, friend, or complete stranger?

      My elderly mother (63) lives alone, and has a gun. She would never be able to fend off an attacker using a knife or even his bare hands, but she is a great shot, and there is no doubt in my mind she is capable of defending herself.

      Removing her right to bear arms could be denying her right to life, especially in the rural area she lives in, with only a 8-5 M-F police force.

      (Obviously, we are in the US, not Europe.)

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    57. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight; some black guy walks up to your girlfriend to ask her if she knows where 4th Ave is, and the racist psycho bitch pulls out a gun and starts screaming and fumbling for the safety switch, and the guy runs off. Great society you americans live in.

    58. Re:Carry a gun by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      So why carry a gun? Just carry a replica.

    59. Re:Carry a gun by dogfart · · Score: 1
      Guns are in the same category as women here ..

      How true. Both are something that the average /. poster has only passing famliarity with, yet they both hold a profound fascination. Additionally, the average /. reader is as likely to carry a firearm as they are to get a date, both being in the realm of fantasy.

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    60. Re:Carry a gun by cowlum · · Score: 1

      Disguising your gadgets may be a good way. I have a rather expensive bike I covered in stickers and a light amount of spray-paint. I rarely bother locking it because would-be theives always take the shiny bike next to mine. A little harder to do with an i-pod though! but you could always find a way to customize you items. Many people do it to their cell phones. Whoo wants a pink cell phone with hello-kitty stickers on it other than the creator.

    61. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      You are correct, I confused your point, and I apologize.

      I'm actually for gun ownership specifically for the reasons that you stated. I just don't want to be the person having to deter someone else from irresponsibly using *their* firearm, but that's just me.

      Again, in today's litigious society, I would be doubly afraid to pull a piece. As was posted in another thread, you're almost better off killing the guy than having to battle him in court for "mental anguish". Especially over a laptop! It's not my place to speak for you or anyone else, but in my mind, it's just not worth it.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    62. Re:Carry a gun by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Thank God I'm not the average slashdot poster

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    63. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I would want to put up the legal fight to keep myself out of jail after shooting some lowlife for taking my laptop.

      That's why you don't shoot a lowlife to stop him from stealing your laptop. You shoot the lowlife to stop him from killing you.

    64. Re:Carry a gun by Ithika · · Score: 1
      What the hell are you talking about?

      Maybe because its true?

      What's true? That humanity has an immature fascination with killing people? Yes, I know that, it was my point - remember?

      My fiancee would have been raped [...] That gun saved her life, without it who knows what would have happened.

      Hold on, you just said she would have been raped! Make up your mind, do we know or not?

      Self defense is a basic human right,

      No, self-defence is not a basic human right. There are thirty articles in the universal declaration of human rights and none of them state that everyone is entitled to defend themselves from attack. See UDHR.

      ever wait on the police when their truly needed? What if your a minority? Good luck with that.

      Oh, I see... so where you come from minorities are institutionally prejudiced against are they? I can tell you that fair treatment is a human right. Maybe you should be doing something about unfair treatment of whole swathes of the population rather than waiting to blow holes in members of the public.

    65. Re:Carry a gun by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try searching for UK sites about "Tony Martin" in your favourite search engine.

      He was a farmer, so was permitted to have a gun to shoot animals, but he wasn't allowed to use it to defend himself against a burglar.

    66. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To do what? Kill someone? Probably not the someone mugging you? Are your goodies worth killing someone over? WHich is not to say that one shouldn't defend one's self... but there are plenty of non-lethal ways of getting one's point across to would-be attackers that they need to get a new line of work: martial arts, pepper spray, steel-toed boots (did you know that there are steel-toed dress shoes?), key-chain fobs of steel, and so on.
      No, guns are a bad idea, especially these days. Police (especially in major urban areas of the US) are likely to shoot first and check for permits later... especially if one is swarthy and hirsute in the facial area. Can't be too careful with them fur'ner cri'nal el'ment. They might not *gasp* even be Christian! Call that FUD if you like... but handguns are good for only one thing: killing people at close range. :)

    67. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Aside from the likelihood that replicas are probably illegal, it's a fine idea. However, if you need to use it, you're still in a bit of a spot.

      It's like crazy coloration on insects or snakes who aren't really poisonous, but want to look like those that are. Good enough until that frog tries to bite you - if you're lying he ain't gonna spit you out :)

    68. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well you explain to me how a *concealed* weapon deters anything. They can't see it!

      Exactly- they (the criminals) can't tell who is armed, and who isn't. So they decide to move to a different city (Washington DC, New York) where people DON'T have guns.

      since the other person's gun is trained right on you, if you go for your gun, you're dead.

      If you want my wallet, I have to reach around to my back pants pocket to pull it out. If I have a gun tucked into the back of my pants, I can pull that out instead and shoot you.

      Oh, and you assumed the mugger has a gun, which they may not.

    69. Re:Carry a gun by Mod+Me+God+Too · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention that this guy is in London, where you can't get a 'carry concealed weapon permit' or whatever. Of course, you could get a Licence to carry a shotgun provided you carry it in full view and not ready to fire.

      Yeah, right. In the UK posession of any gun is prohibited unless you are a sports shooter (and the caliber is very seriously limited) or you are a farmer (in which case you need a massive piece of land called a farm, impossible to find in London unless you lay a claim to Hyde Park or Clapham Common).

      --
      --

      It is not the commies, the government, the nigger, nor the corporates. It is your paranoia.
    70. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Sadly, London and its containing country have banned handguns completely. Of course, this doesn't mean that Joe Criminal can't have one, just that you can't have one. I guess the idea would be to have some kind of knife or something that is a visible deterrent... Criminals target people who strike them as easy victims. If you look confident and aware of your surroundings, you're less likely to be targetted. Keep your eyes open, constantly making observations about your environment. Of course, if you can in fact secure a handgun with the proper training and certification in the great city of London (It is a city, and not a territory or something right?) that would be great. That's certainly how I choose to do things, but then, that's a right I've been guaranteed. :-)

    71. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Re : litigiousity.

      Heck yes. I live in Illinois, where the politicians regularly try to find ways to turn me into a felon. However, even if I lived in a CCW friendly state, I'm not sure if I'd ever carry. I'd get my license for sure, but carrying - I dunno. I'm a competent shooter, and I'd certainly take a pistol defense course. But even still - guns aren't PC - all it takes is the wrong caliber, or maybe even the wrong skin color on my assailant, and I could be up a creek.

      Still, the option would be nice.

    72. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do not have to kill someone for a handgun to be effective. Any mugger, short of one who himself has a handgun, is going to stop short and find an easier victim if he sees that you have a handgun. Simply drawing and holding it at a low ready should do the trick. If not, up it comes ready to fire. If they continue at you, it would be reasonable to assume that they have intent to harm you, and then...

    73. Re:Carry a gun by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Well, it's only been 54 years since we had a king. Good to see you checking up on facts.

    74. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      Yeah, well you explain to me how a *concealed* weapon deters anything. They can't see it!


      WEll next time your at the mall, look around and count how many cops or security guards you see. Now with concealed carry counts how many potential cops are in the same place (other besides your self that are carrying. One of the deterence factors of conceeled carry is the fact that you don't know who may be a cop or may be able to interveine in the same ways. This won't deter some drug crazed looneys but it will deter a would be part time criminal. Of course if no one is around you have lost that but now if you stay around were some other people are you don't need to worrie as much.

      I have seen in new york city were someone was getting a total thrashing to the point were he was limp and nobody would even look long enough to say anything. I yelled and they ran. This was probably a gang attack and they knew no body would do anythign about it so it happened in broad daylight with about 50 people passing by. I was in a car and noticed it because people were actually walking in front of us trying to cross the street so they could go about thier ways without having to acknowlege what was going on. In a state or city with concealed carry, this definatly wouldn't have happened and when i yelled "what the hell are you doing" they knew someone would interject and they all left. Without concealed carry or people willing to do somethign about it, this is what happens.
    75. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cthulu/Cheney 2004 Compassionate, yet Evil National Sekurity!!

    76. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't shoot a lowlife to stop him from stealing your laptop. You shoot the lowlife to stop him from killing you.

      And how are you going to do that? If his gun is already out, it's over- you lose. If you pull your gun out before he makes his move, you're the bad guy.

      If someone who has a gun wants to kill you (for reasons unbeknownst to you at the time) you will be killed. If a person with a gun wants to take your laptop, he will probably take your laptop and then leave. My point is, after he turns to run, you can't shoot him- your life is no longer in danger.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    77. Re:Carry a gun by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

      There was a lot more to that case than is usually reported/quoted. Why had he knocked some of the stairs out ? Was he waiting for them ? If he was it was more like an ambush than self defence.

    78. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do NOT EVER shoot to kill. You shoot to live. Shoot to end the threat. If one shot to the chest kills him, you shot to live. If one shot goes wild and hits him in the arm and he drops his weapon (Whether that be a gun, a knife, or his fists) and retreats, then the threat is gone and you have no further business shooting. If three shots to the chest don't stop him and the threat is still there, keep shooting until there is no longer a threat. Shooting with the intention to kill is how you get in deep shit in court. In fact, one of the things a prosecuting lawyer (even in an obvious self defense shoot) will try to get you on is whether your ammunition was specifically designed to kill someone. Some of the best self defense ammunition such as "Hydra-shoks" and "Black Talon" will make the jury think that you meant to kill someone, whereas the more mundane "Gold Dot" is less scary, and less likely to be used against you even though all of them attempt to do the same thing: Expand to avoid overpenetration and harm to innocent people while transferring as much of the energy in the bullet to the target as possible.

    79. Re:Carry a gun by aldoman · · Score: 1

      So you are saying it's ok, because only 10% result in people not getting shot? Compared with 0% if neither people have a gun, I'd rather have that thanks.

    80. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Still, the option would be nice.

      Yep, and it is. Lot's of people screamed bloody murder when the CCW laws were changed in Michigan. They all said the usual FUD (more kids are going to be killed, gun violence is going to skyrocket, etc.). I don't have any figures, and I'm too lazy to check, but I can tell you that I've not seen a difference in gun violence one way or the other since the laws have been changed. I'm sure a spin could be put on it either way, but again, you're right- why not have the option?

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    81. Re:Carry a gun by Mod+Me+God+Too · · Score: 1

      An armed populace is a secure populace
      A populace contains criminals, therfore an populace is a populace containing criminals with arms.

      --
      --

      It is not the commies, the government, the nigger, nor the corporates. It is your paranoia.
    82. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Only if you're peforming some duty where your life is likely to be threatened can you carry concealed in most of these states... The possibility that criminals have any interest in unarmed civilians doing "low risk" things such as, say, living in one of those states... doesn't seem to cross any of the gun grabbers' minds...

    83. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link here test

    84. Re:Carry a gun by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      In a state or city with concealed carry, this definatly wouldn't have happened and when i yelled "what the hell are you doing" they knew someone would interject and they all left. Without concealed carry or people willing to do somethign about it, this is what happens.

      No, it's what happens when you have a group of strangers looking on - it becomes "someone else's problem". I've never heard the idea that this phenomenon only occurs in places with gun control - do you have any evidence for this assertion?

    85. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      haha that was funny.. like a guy willing to violate the law and mugg you would actually use deadly force. or even an illeagle weapon. Were do these people ge the notion that just because a crook may have no respect for one law they would violate others if it help them do the first.

      On deed is that how the other half of the world thinks?

    86. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. You're forgetting, that in 100% of the cases, someone who was in imminent physical danger caused by their assailant came out alive. It is the attacker who chose to put my life in danger. It is ludicrous to suggest that I 'restrain' myself for fear of harming this poor soul. My life is put in danger against my will.

      We're not arguing 'hey that guy is looking at me funny....BLAM BLAM BLAM'. We're arguing about a situation where you feel your life is in acute danger.

    87. Re:Carry a gun by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Ok, but the criminals don't know who is armed and who isn't *already*, yet people are still mugged everyday. Oh, wait, you're right, there's absolutely NO crime in Detroit =). (It's a joke, laugh!)

      I'll concede the point about your wallet, but who's to say that they won't take it themselves?

      And yes, I assumed the mugger has a gun. You might want to do the same depending on the situation.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    88. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dead criminal can't rob or shoot anyone else, after you've let him go because you don't want anyone to get hurt ever, anywhere.

    89. Re:Carry a gun by trewornan · · Score: 1

      I presume that you are not a resident of the UK, if you are then you're extremely ill informed about the laws. You do not have to be "a farmer" to own a shotgun. I personally know several people who own shotguns but are not farmers or sport shooters (all but one of them licensed owners). UK law merely requires that you can store the shotgun securely, do not have a criminal record, and have some kind of legitimate reason for wanting one.

    90. Re:Carry a gun by torokun · · Score: 1

      This is not legal advice. I'm not a lawyer yet, merely a lowly law student.

      You're gonna deal with lost wages anyway.

      If you have to hurt someone, the smart thing to do is just not to leave them a vegetable. Loss of enjoyment of life is a big liability. If they're dead, they don't get loss of enjoyment, usually, and they'll only get pain and suffering for the actual pain they suffered before death.

      If they survive, and can't do things they could before, and are in pain, you're looking at a lot of loss of enjoyment and pain and suffering damages. Either way, they'll probably have lost wages, unless the harm is minimal enough that they can still perform their normal job...

    91. Re:Carry a gun by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If you want my wallet, I have to reach around to my back pants pocket to pull it out. If I have a gun tucked into the back of my pants, I can pull that out instead and shoot you.

      I don't know about you, but I value my life more than my wallet. Even if I'm so skilled that they'd only be a 10% chance of the mugger shooting first, that's a huge risk as far as my life is concerned.

      Oh, and you assumed the mugger has a gun, which they may not.

      Yes, in a world where random people walk around concealing guns, I'm sure that those people going out to mug people will be totally unarmed.

    92. Re:Carry a gun by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1
      If he ambushed them in his own home, what were they doing there?

      If he anticipated their attack, and took steps to improve his chances of survival, good for him!

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    93. Re:Carry a gun by termite666 · · Score: 1

      I live in SF and yes I carry a gun .
      Why ride the Fulton 5 after dark and take the risk .The only reason the poice even come out is for parking tickets and soft crime (Smoking in Bars)
      Do I worry about getting caught HELL NO.
      We dont prosicute the criminals we catch now
      Just look at Sfs District Attny ,and you'll see what a joke this city is .
      BTW You cant even buy a gun in this city our board of stupidvisors made sure of that.
      After 41 years in the bay area its time to leave

    94. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Having the option is what seperates the free man from the serf.

      As kooky/dogmatic as that sounds, that's really yhe gist of it. How can one be free if you have to worry about 'The Man' coming down on you for merely defending yourself?

      Probably the most succinct way I've ever seen it put was : "Freedom begins with saying 'no'. "

    95. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the mugger has a weapon then you are (in most areas of the US where you could have a permit) to use the weapon. If there are multiple muggers or one mugger who is threatening physical force in a meaningful way you are justified to use the weapon. If the mugger is weaker than you and unarmed you should just shove them into the nearest wall and laugh at them (what I did the one time someone attempted to mug me, in London no less).

    96. Re:Carry a gun by mivok · · Score: 1

      What I was actually referring to is the fact that you can get a licence for a shotgun for sports shooting, but are not allowed to carry it in public unless it isn't loaded (and one or two other constraints like not concealing it). If muggers happen to be scared away by the fact that you are carrying your gun (and ipod etc..) on a pigeon shoot, all the better. I guess finding places to shoot pigeons (clay or the soft mushy variety with wings) would be hard to find in London though, so there's another idea out of the window.

    97. Re:Carry a gun by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only is an ipod not worth a life. It's only worth about 3 hours of lawyer time. If you shoot someone you'll need a lot more lawyer hours than that even if it's an obvious case of self defense. A CCW is not something to take lightly. It's one thing to use a gun to protect your life. Just don't do anything stupid like shoot a mugger fleeing with your laptop.

    98. Re:Carry a gun by termite666 · · Score: 1

      I do but no permit
      There is only 3 CCW permits issued in SF
      1 One of the 49ers ,2 Some Jewler 3,Sen Finestein who is trying to control gun laws
      It seems our elected officals dont trust us

    99. Re:Carry a gun by sysboy · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that CS spray is banned in the UK....

    100. Re:Carry a gun by trewornan · · Score: 1

      And then there's the infamous case of Tony Martin which was a complete travesty of justice.

    101. Re:Carry a gun by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      (5) You are a lot more likely to die from a gun if you own a gun than if you do not.
      (6) Stuff can be replaced. Lives can not.
      (7) If you want to be take responsibility then remember that your are responsible for every life that gun you own takes. If it gets stolen then you did not secure it well enough. If a kid gets a hold of it you did not secure it well enough.
      What gets me is the idea that it is okay to walk around with your Ipod headset one just listening to music. Why be so cut off from the rest of humanity. I can see it sitting on a train.
      When I was in London I loved all the sounds of people talking and walking around. Being cut off like that just seems... sad.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    102. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want my wallet? let be reach behind me to my back pants pocket and pull it out... oops, that wasn't my wallet, it was a gun. And I shot you before you realized it.

      My point is, after he turns to run, you can't shoot him- your life is no longer in danger.


      Duh.

      That why anyone carrying needs to be aware of their surroundings, and take necessary actions, like getting your gun out, before the mugger gets close to you.

    103. Re:Carry a gun by trewornan · · Score: 1
      In London???

      Actually you can get such a license . . . it may not be easy, but it's possible.

    104. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      God bless Texas...

    105. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      ONly evidence i can offer is my personal observations. While i will admit i have only seen someone getting beat like this in 3 different states, one was New York City new york and Columbus Ohio and the other was Springfield Missouri. In the New York scene only the stranger that wasn't afraid said any thign and the guy was hurt bad. In Missouri, After this guy started getting hit, about two thirds of the people walking by went to stop it from happening while the other third was trying to call the cops. But in springfield there were only around 25 or so people there. One person did have a CC and was an off duty police officer. Missouri does have a CC law last itme I was there.

      In the ohio scenario, they just recently passed the concealed carry law and what i saw was actually some girl getting acosted in the parking lot of eastland mall. after hearing a couple short screams, about thirty people started looking for were they came from. at that time, we (i was with 5 others) found a guy on ther ground, a girl crying and another guy with a new permit holding the suspect at bay. For some reason he didn't want to stick around for the cops so we held the attacker at bay while offering comfort to the girl and waiting for the cops to come. The girl told the cops about evrything including the guy with the gun that step in and stoped her from being abducted.

      Thats all I can offer. It is enough for me to believe and i'm sure if you were there you would too.

    106. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, yes. That's my point. Self defense is so devalued in the UK that it is illegal to pepper spray someone. It's unbelievably ludicrous that someone (a disabled man in this case, mind you) cannot even carry something to give them even a miniscule amount of protection.

    107. Re:Carry a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd be surprised

      Ken's always looking for a new way to get rid of the pigeons. If he can't starve them, he'll bring in poison, birds of prey...

    108. Re:Carry a gun by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Troll

      You do realise that assault with a deadly weapon is frowned upon in civilised society, don't you?

      Fine then. I think I probably speak for a lot of people when I say: Fuck "Civilized" society.

      I don't give a half a shit who the fuck you are. Try to take my shit I'll rip your fucking throat out because, frankly, I have niether the time nor the patience to deal with people fucking around with my hard earned items of interest and my laptop's worth more than the life of any crook that would take it. And, don't give me any of that "civilized society" bullshit, either. I'm not the one that dragged the two of us out of it, so don't give me a hard time for adapting to the new surroundings.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    109. Re:Carry a gun by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      "Either way, they'll probably have lost wages, unless the harm is minimal enough that they can still perform their normal job..."

      Their normal job being mugging people ;) ?

    110. Re:Carry a gun by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      great, thanks. so then 100% of the people who are attacked would get stabbed, beaten with a blunt object, or ganged up on.

      I'd rather the victim have a gun, so that she might be able to fend off the gangrape.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    111. Re:Carry a gun by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Cool. So when there's a struggle and you drop your gun, your attacker will have something to shoot you with. That is, of course, presuming you keep your gun in a convenient spot for such occasions (i.e., your hip holster, yeehaw!)

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    112. Re:Carry a gun by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

      I'm in CA. Here the county sheriff decides who is and is not in need of a ccw. If you live in a county (such as san bernadino) where the sheriff is a fan of the ccw, then a just reason could just be that you work nights. If you live in a county where the sheriff doesn't like ccw (like LA) then you can't even get away with a story like "I'm mugged at gun point 3 times a week."

    113. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      The real kicker in that case : one of the burglars sued the homeowner for 'loss of earnings'. I recall a case years ago in the US where a burglar entered someone's home, ended up breaking his leg in the process completely on his own, and successfully sued the homeowner.

      Yes indeed, the inmates are running the asylum.

    114. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the point of carrying a gun if not to defend oneself? If some guy jumps me in the alley, he's going to DIE, that is the point behind carrying my gun, not to "end the threat", because if I miss or only wound him he could easily pull out his own weapon and hit me back. Don't listen to this liberal leftist tool, guys, shoot to kill is the best approach.

    115. Re:Carry a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because it will double his sentence if
      caught. Illegal possession of a firearm is 5 years
      minimum, on top of 5 years for stealing someone's phone.

    116. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you telling me that since you started downloading music, you have not downloaded one song you liked enough that you would have paid for it, had you not been able to find it on the p2p networks?

      Oh, you have? Then your disregard of copyright law has deprived the music store, the record label and the artist of the compensation they were entitled to and would otherwise have received--and that sure sounds like stealing to me.

      I steal music too, but unlike you, I don't try to excuse my actions by playing semantic games. Trolling? Perhaps, but you know I'm right.

    117. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the crazy soccer moms will be less than sympathetic towards muggers.

      When you can't wrap your mind around the idea that your football-star son was, in fact, cruel enough to drive someone to launch an assault on their entire school, you tend to dissociate from reality a little, and that's where we get the "DOOM == The DEVIL" idea.

      When it's a petty criminal whose brains get blown out, not only is it okay in the minds of soccer moms, it's probably worth rewarding.

    118. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to shoot, shoot to kill.

      In a panicky situation like this, you might be better off just shooting to *hit*. If you wait to aim for a vital organ, you'll probably either be too late or miss completely.

      Unless you're well trained, in which case you don't need gun advice from /.

    119. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you give us a source of information on that 90% you mentioned?

      Please understand that I'm not questioning it, I'm also not expressing my position pro or against guns. All I want is having a reference for future use.

      BTW, I wish all slashdotters did that: include a link or the source material for our statistcs and information.
      Thanks!

    120. Re:Carry a gun by sethdelackner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am truly amazed at the careless sense of invincibility some posters have shown in this discussion. Take my sensei's advice: when someone demands your wallet, the best escape move is to slowly and calmly remove your wallet and hand it over.

      Heresay: My sensei also said that another instructor he knew tried to take down a mugger who had a knife and he ended up dead with multiple stab wounds. This would explain the development of my sensei's simpler "hand it over" technique.

    121. Re:Carry a gun by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Funny that you'd mention this. If everyone on a plane had a gun, the terrorists would never attempt to hijack any plane. In Singapore and other asian countries this is permitted and even encouraged.

      I believe a Korean jet was once hijacked..it lasted about 5 minutes. A few passengers started shooting the terrorists and it was all over within seconds. Yeah, it's dangerous as hell to shoot guns in a pressurized cabin, but I believe they were on the ground at that time.

    122. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my post before you responded? The point of carrying a gun is two fold. Both to defend yourself, and to prevent anyone from putting you in a situation where you'd need to defend yourself. That guy jumping you in the alley, in my book, may 95% of the time deserve to die, but LEGALLY (and morally in most peoples' books) as soon as he is no longer mugging you, he's no longer breaking any laws. If you shoot him in the back, shoot him while he's on the ground (and with no means of attacking you) then you are not defending yourself, and you will be charged with murder or somesuch. And... I'm a liberal leftist tool?!!! Look at my post history! I'm ALMOST as far right as can be. I own a handgun, a permit to carry it concealed (even though I carry openly), vote Bush, drink Beer, and wear boxers. However, I am apparently a little left of you, because your decision to suddenly jump all over me and suggest that my handgun, in self defense, should be used to completely obliterate and kill EVERY criminal who crosses my path regardless of whether they are a continuing threat or not... that bothers me somewhat. People like you are the ones who give owners and carriers of handguns a bad rap. Spend some time around some responsible gun carriers instead of the Counter-Strike crowd that you play with, and you'll realize that "shooting to kill" will not only get you convicted of murder, but is also overstepping your right to self defense. ALWAYS shoot to neutralize the threat if you even have to shoot to do so. If, as in the scenario you describe, you wound him and he's still holding a gun, you absolutely shoot until he has stopped moving, is fleeing (and not shooting) or has dropped the gun. However, if you MISS and he turns and runs off or stops his approach and surrenders, even in my twisted book you shouldn't shoot him anymore. Please, gun grabbers, ignore this overzealous 16 year old who wants nothing more than to own a Glock and bust a cap in someone!!

    123. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of all self defense situations involving firearms are happily resolved without the gun being fired. That's the intention : pure deterrance with the added insurance of being able to use it in an acute emergency. That's a win for everyone.

      That has been my experience. A young man decided to break into my apartment, and simply announcing my presence, pulling out my Mossberg & cocking it ended the situation very quickly. He ran out of the backdoor so quickly it was like a little brown streak. I let a round go into a ground just to give him a bit more motivation to keep running.

    124. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn Krav Maga / Haganah
      It is simple, practical, and extremely effective.
      After about 3 months of training, you will be able take control of any confrontation, even against armed opponents.

      http://fight2survive.com/
      http://www.kravmaga.c om/

      Additionally, You could get a laptop with titanium or magnesium alloy case and just beat the would-be mugger to a bloody pulp with it :)
      Just make sure Your hard drive has extra shock protection ...

    125. Re:Carry a gun by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      I highly suspect #5 is bullshit. Show me the statistic, and then explain why it's relevant. You see, gun owners may be more likely to die from gunshot wounds, but perhaps that's because gun owners are more likely to be in dangerous areas? After all, you don't buy a gun if you live in Pleasantville.

      To put it another way, if you're living in a bad part of town, you're more likely to be shot. You're also more likely to buy a gun in order to protect yourself. Thus, more gun owners will live in a bad part of town, and more gun owners will be shot. Bad statistic.

    126. Re:Carry a gun by shokk · · Score: 1

      Especially when the criminal doesn't give a crap about the European Declaration of Human Right's "right to life" and ends yours. Maybe you can use that extra life you got when you hit 10,000 points to do it right the second time and kill them instead.

      Oh wait, that's not going to happen. Maybe you should do it right the first time.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    127. Re:Carry a gun by shokk · · Score: 1

      Not an easy task in the Communist State of New Jersey, comrade.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    128. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not just get a Tazer?
      Why go thru all the effort of kicking the crap out of the guy (provided you are able) when you can just shock the crap out of him...literally!
      Few zaps from a tazer can make a person 'lose thier bowels' ...among other things...

      "how'd ya like a few joules running thru your jewels there, buddy?" ZZZZAAAPPPP!!!!!!!

    129. Re:Carry a gun by Ageless · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      (7) If you want to be take responsibility then remember that your are responsible for every life that gun you own takes. If it gets stolen then you did not secure it well enough. If a kid gets a hold of it you did not secure it well enough.

      This is complete bullshit. That is all.

    130. Re:Carry a gun by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the case of a shotgun certificate, the onus is on the police to prove that you are not suitable to possess one. The reverse is true of firearms certs, however.

    131. Re:Carry a gun by wpiman · · Score: 0

      I think the jist is to wear it out in the open. You don't want to conceal it. So you may not need a "concealed" weapons permit. Carrying a shotgun in both hands would be a good deterent. Although, you may be sniped and they'll take you weapon as well.

    132. Re:Carry a gun by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I dont own any guns that lend themselves to high survival rates. The weakest pistol round I shoot (.40 SW) is more than strong enough to incapacitate someone with a single shot. If I shot him with a softnosed rifle bullet, it would probably go through him, but whatever percent of 3000+ ftlbs of kinetic energy it leaves in his torso will still be way more than enough to throw him into shock and probably kill him.

      Consequently, the burglar will not be suing for lost wages because he will be entirely deceased, like that parrot that john cleese bought.

      I would personally never want to have to shoot a burglar or anyone else, but if someone is sneaking around in the dark in my house they have already crossed the line. In florida you dont break into a house without expecting to catch a bullet, so I would expect anyone doing so to be fairly desperate or dangerous.

    133. Re:Carry a gun by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, but thieves in denial think they aren't stealing with all kinds of crazy rationalizations.

      If it wasn't stealing, the RIAA wouldn't be getting any convictions or settlements.

    134. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, who the hell modded this lunatic "insightful"?

    135. Re:Carry a gun by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Chicago/Detroit have some of the worst firearm restrictions. It's almost as bad as Washington DC.

      There have been studies in the USA showing that states with the most 'gun control' have the worst crime rates. There have also been studies showing that passing shall-issue concealed carry decreases crime.

      Britian's crime rate exceeds that of the USA in all stats except murder. In the USA we have a real problem with gangs killing each other in the inner cities. Without that, we'd be right alongside Europe for the murder rate.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    136. Re:Carry a gun by name773 · · Score: 1

      that's sad. seriously.

    137. Re:Carry a gun by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      you can still legally get a rifle in Britain with a hard-to-obtain license, a shotgun with an easy-to-obtain license, and an airgun/realistic replica/blank firer/two of the above with no license whatsoever.

      Then why can't I own a Brocock (website seems to be down/having problems) air pistol without a license.....

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    138. Re:Carry a gun by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there are too many like him.

      Hopefully you can find a place to live where guns and ammo are hard to find to keep yourself safe from trigger-happy people.

      --
    139. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am not a gangster, merely a petty thug in training. to avoid lost wages, you track down the attacker's family after killing him, and kill them too. PROBLEM SOLVED.

    140. Re:Carry a gun by marsbarboy · · Score: 1

      you can carry your shotgun in public/in the street, provided it is unloaded in a securely locked case and you have you license on you. But concealment is different: i was advised by the police to carry the gun in a hockey stick bag so as not to attract attention.

      --
      The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
    141. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are incorrect. Those that are not farmers/sports shooters (or the odd vetinarian) can poses shotguns. I suggest you consult with your lawyer immediately.

    142. Re:Carry a gun by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Except this would be the average iPod, laptop, and PDA nerd who also had to qualify for a gun course which includes a course on gun safety.

      Anyone who took the time to get a gun would be able to shoot it.

    143. Re:Carry a gun by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      For us in non-crazy-gun-land, what is self defense ammunition?

    144. Re:Carry a gun by ameoba · · Score: 1

      At that point, wouldn't it just be easier to carry a baseball bat?

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    145. Re:Carry a gun by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copyright infringement is NOT stealing.

    146. Re:Carry a gun by Ithika · · Score: 1
      Let me see, let me see - who to believe? Oh the quandary!

      Guy on /. - my law lecturer
      My law lecturer - guy on /.

      Oh I give up, who do I believe?

    147. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, I've been "mugged" three times. All they wanted was my wallet, but I tend to carry cash. TIP:Learn Jeet Kune Do or some such. In the end, all three times I left - with all my possesions. None were ever seriously hurt, but I had to break the wrist of some idiot that pulled a knife.

      Wow, that's awfully dumb. Grab the wrists of a mugger with a knife. There's no chance whatsoever that you are so good at martial arts that that was a smart move. In fact, it's a big neon alert that you're just good enough to get lucky, and just good enough to get stabbed in the face by anyone who knows how to use a knife.

      Now please don't ever encourage anyone else to do that. Ever. Again.

    148. Re:Carry a gun by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Funny
      Re:Carry a gun (Score:3, Insightful)
      by kahei (466208)
      [snip]
      Yes, it was flamebait, mod me down... yet there is wisdom in my words I tell you...
      Behind a two way mirror, a Zookeeper brings today's visitors to see the Slashdot exhibit.

      Zookeeper: "You see children, the alpha male Slashdot specimen ensures that he will be moderated up by using reverse psychology and asking to be moderated down."
      Child: "Why would he want to do that?"
      Zookeeper: "Highly moderated comments are often regarded as the correct opinion or in some cases irrefutable fact."
      Child: "Why doesn't he just ask to be moderated up?"
      Zookeeper: "Before a moderator will use their influence to bestow such an honor on a comment, he/she must be convinced. Moderators are usually skeptical of everything. After watching the poster/moderator behavior for many years, we've observed that this reverse psychology is often very persuasive."
      Child: "Their behavior is confusing!"
      Zookeeper: "It's not unlike guild psychology and social acceptance rituals employed by the specimens in the Everquest exhibit. This way please..."
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    149. Re:Carry a gun by andreMA · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or perhaps simply appear to be armed. Wear a shoulder holster in the summer and leave your jacket unbuttoned, etc. NOTE: don't move quickly while talking to policemen

      Simply carrying yourself in a self-assured manner is useful: walk briskly, with a purpose; wear a determined look on your face.

      Mace or something makeshift (e.g., a paper packet of cayenne pepper you can rip open while still in your pocket then throw in the assailant's face) is an option too. If you do so, step in the direction of the assailant's dominant hand while doing so; shooting/stabbing "outboard" is much less accurate than "inboard"

      If you can devise a secure method of carrying it, household ammonia in the face will tend to discourage people too, as will many other common chemicals: hydrochloloric (muriatic) acid, vinegar, drain cleaner, etc. If you use any of these methods and manage to disengage, I'd recommend not contacting the police afterwards, unless there were obvious witnesses. The mugger is unlikely to report it, and hopefully learned a lesson.

    150. Re:Carry a gun by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      Heresay: My sensei also said that another instructor he knew tried to take down a mugger who had a knife and he ended up dead with multiple stab wounds. This would explain the development of my sensei's simpler "hand it over" technique.

      Okay, then what, exactly, is the purpose of martial arts? If they don't give you an edge in combat then there's no practical reason beyond exercise for learning them, right?

      I mean, learning a martial art properly (especially to the degree necessary to be able to teach it) requires a great deal of dedication, discipline, time, and effort. If it doesn't even give you an edge in combat in rough proportion to the time and effort, then it seems like a waste.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    151. Re:Carry a gun by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      Similar situation here in Missouri. We finally have a CCW law but thanks to complications, the sheriff of one county will issue them and the sheriff in the next county won't. At any rate, as you say its all about having the option.

      If/When they work out the bugs I intend to take the class and apply for the permit. Then whether I'd actually carry a weapon at any point would mainly depend upon the danger I would foresee in a location I had to go to [and there aren't many dangerous places I'd willingly go, armed or not]. About the only occasion I could imagine would be if I were called to some remote rural property I own as I once was when someone notified me that it "might have been" broken into late one night. Don't bother telling me to call the authorities -- they informed me that their job didn't include playing nursemaid or body guard for me. The Police are very good about filling out forms and picking up pieces afterward, but in no way are they responsible for keeping us safe or protecting us. That's unfortunately the way it is. You are responsible for keeping your own ass safe. Firearms don't guarantee it, but sometimes they're the best you can do.

      As has been said before, lethal force is only appropriate AS A LAST RESORT to protect your life or the life of someone else -- NEVER to protect mere property.

    152. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downloading music is stealing and those who do so are thieves. Your lame attempt at logic is transparently false.

      Nice to see some sensible moderation!

    153. Re:Carry a gun by IronChef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, one of the things a prosecuting lawyer (even in an obvious self defense shoot) will try to get you on is whether your ammunition was specifically designed to kill someone. Some of the best self defense ammunition such as "Hydra-shoks" and "Black Talon" will make the jury think that you meant to kill someone...

      A good point.

      A friend of mine has always carried what the local police carry. That way, were he ever on the stand, he would claim that he chose to use what the police used as he believed it was the best (safest, whatever) choice.

      Of course, if you end up in a civil trial, reason goes out the window and God help you.

      Obligatory Simpsons reference:

      MOE: ... luckily, I was able to shoot him in the spine, or it could have gotten real ugly.

    154. Re:Carry a gun by T0wner · · Score: 1

      So of the government statistics for gun related self defence incidences in the USA in the last 5 years according to the fact government website is:- 2.5 million incidents per year. so 10% is 250,000 where the gun is fired? Only takes 1 bullit to kill you. I do hope that your figure of 10% is a lot lower :)

    155. Re:Carry a gun by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1
      This is silly stuff really... If you outlaw weapons all that happens is that the criminals have them and the good people don't. I live near Chicago where guns are completely illegal in the city limits. Do you think these gun bans stop the crime? People die to guns in the city every day. People still get shot in the UK and the quicker you snap out of the coma the better off you will be. You cannot ignore problems like this and expect them to go away. A predator always goes in for the easy kill first and if you haven't anything to fight back with you are at their mercy. Murdered, Raped, Robbed, Stabbed, Shot.. I rather have none of the above... With a gun the assailant is going to be thinking the same thing you are... "Ohh shit!! Run!!!" Mission Accomplished. If I were a criminal I would be doing my crimes in an area where they cannot retaliate. Wouldn't you?

      Gun accidents do happen but cars kill more people, and typically in more gruesome ways. We aren't banning cars are we?

      - Mind

    156. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In London, people aren't allowed to carry guns. In the least Socialist states of the USA, people don't have to test to get a concealed carry permit.

    157. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't have a clue - the purpose of martial arts is not just to kick someone's ass. Those who learn it for that purpose alone have many hospital visits ahead of them. Read a little!

    158. Re:Carry a gun by Ithika · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you are saying is that you care not for these trappings of the modern world, this road network, electricity and telephonic communications, (the viniculture, the aquaducts,) farmed food and a legal system to protect you.

      Because "fuck civilization" man, I want to live in the stone age! I want to worry my whole life about defending myself from attackers, finding enough firewood and a dry cave without any bears in it, and hunting all my food. But hey, at least I won't have to pay all those damn commie taxes!

      The rest of the world can enjoy fine wines, home entertainment systems and silk sheets on the bed, but damn you all I DON'T LIKE CIVILISATION! I'm a real man and I can rip your throat out.

      But then again, in a world without civilised society I wouldn't get any dried frog pills...

      "be prepared for anything at any time from anybody, don't take no shit, always stand your ground. people wanna come up to me and run their mouth - guess what? i'll throw them through the fucking window... i won't think a thing of it."
      -- BBF3, Godspeed You Black Emperor!

    159. Re:Carry a gun by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, baseball isn't very popular in the U.K.. He would need to import one. Or use a cricket paddle/thing.

      Anyway, a full-size baseball bat is rather cumbersome. Someone could send him one of those miniature bats baseball stadiums sometimes give away (or sell, I forget which). I had one and those things were just waiting to be used as weapons.

    160. Re:Carry a gun by ttyp0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Personal Defense" ammunition typically refers to hollow point bullets which are designed to expand once penetrating the target. The expansion of the bullet transfers all the energy to the target causing massive damage. Non defense loads are usually FMJ (full metal jacket) which have a solid lead core. These bullets will pass straight through the target.

    161. Re:Carry a gun by grqb · · Score: 1

      God, now I have reason to kiss Canadian ground. The fact that this post is "Insightful" makes me want to throw up.

    162. Re:Carry a gun by denzo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Heresay: My sensei also said that another instructor he knew tried to take down a mugger who had a knife and he ended up dead with multiple stab wounds. This would explain the development of my sensei's simpler "hand it over" technique.
      This assumes that the generalization of 'just handing it over' is going to keep you alive. I've heard of enough cases where the mugger went ahead and killed their muggee after they handed over all their belongings. This doesn't happen all of the time (maybe even significantly less that 50%), but it happens none-the-less.

      I'd run the heck the in the opposite direction yelling for help, that should frighten 90% of your average criminals enough to flee. If they have a gun, being a moving, more-distant target will make their chances of actually hitting you drop significantly. Just look at the statistics of *trained* police officers shooting; how do you think a thug with no firearms training is going to hit you from 100+ feet away?

    163. Re:Carry a gun by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      I suppose the equally insane reply would go something like this:

      "But so long as there are more of us armed non-criminals than there are armed criminials in the populace . . ."

      But you get the idea.

    164. Re:Carry a gun by winwar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, technically you don't shoot to kill. But most shootings occur within 7 yards IIRC. So, you aim for the largest part of the body (the chest) and fire until the attacker stops. The chance of firing less than two bullets is rather small and rather foolish from a self defense perspective. If the attacker doesn't go down after two bullets, you better assume he is wearing body armor or on drugs and aim for the head/groin (depending if he has a firearm or blunt weapon). You can be shot in the heart an operate for up to 10 seconds or so (two seconds to go 20 feet-gee plenty of time for the attacker to kill me) A bullet to the head will likely be fatal and stop the attack instantly.
      If you carry a gun for self defense, you had better be prepared to kill someone. If you aren't, do yourself a favor and don't carry the weapon. If you are justified in using the weapon, by definition you are justified in using deadly force. I don't believe the poster advocated killing an attacker after the attack ended-that clearly is murder. But if you are a good shot (if you are carrying I sure hope you can shoot better than the general police force-it isn't hard) you are aiming for vital organs because it will end the threat the quickest. The attacker's fate is secondary to your own. Granted, it would suck to be judged by 12, but less than being carried by six....

    165. Re:Carry a gun by xpurple · · Score: 1

      I do this, and it works out very well.

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    166. Re:Carry a gun by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      Certainly not *always* the answer.

      On the other hand, its a lot easier to remember how to pull the trigger than how to do that neat taekwondo move you *thought* you would employ in such an instance, or won't actually work as you though.

      Another consideration might be that in such a situation you'd actually have to be in physical contact with your assailant to use taekwondo, and if it didn't work . . . uh-oh.

      With a firearm you could both produce it at the ready [enough to abort most assaults] or actually employ it forcefully while still out of his/her ability to physically remove it from your grasp.

    167. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't forget the old lady who was convicted for using her knitting needles to fight off a mugger. The poor mugger got hurt.

      When knitting needles are outlawed, only criminals will have knitting needles.

    168. Re:Carry a gun by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      Well, that *could* happen, but only if you allow the perp to get close enough to you in their attack to get their hands on you. If they're coming that fast, empty the magazine into them first -- and if they're still coming after you, then run.

    169. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The parent isn't insightful. It's off topic and a troll.

      My parents used to buy me my records. I used to borrow friends records and tape things off the radio too. Later I started buying my own, but I still borrowed an occasional CD and taped it. Then I started ripping my friends CD's, but I also bought my own as well, and loaned them out as well. Then I downloaded off Napster and others, and I still bought my own as well. Then the industry turned totally "Nazi" while swinging their legal fists, and smacking down anyone they suspected. I was repulsed by their barratry.

      I no longer buy CDs-- No matter how much I like the music. I don't have any P2P software on my Linux box either. Instead I listen to streaming ogg off the internet radio stations, or I just relax and enjoy previously purchased CD's. The music industry's "rationalisation" of it's attacks has turned me away for good. They won't get another dime from me.

      If I want to hear something new, I just make up a little tune and hum it. They can't make me pay for something I already own.

      Unless you are a performer, music doesn't put food on your table, pay your rent, get you a promotion at work, or get you a better seat in a restarant. Do the world a favor: Don't bother to support the arts. They turn against you when they don't think they're patting you down for enough cash. Stop feeding them and watch those leeches turn rabid as they foam at the mouth looking for someone to blame for their own repugnance.

      That so-called-industry deserves to die from the contempt and apathy that it bred.

    170. Re:Carry a gun by egg_green · · Score: 1
      The point of martial arts is not to have to engage in combat in the first place. They are as much a mental dicipline as a physical one. You must also learn when not to fight.

      Besides, who's to say that the other guy doesn't have martial arts training himself? That plus the knife would be a significant edge, wouldn't it?

    171. Re:Carry a gun by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 1

      He's in Britain. ALL WEAPONS are illegal, not matter how stupid that sounds to people with a drop of common sense.

    172. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, if you're a good person and you die, your life will only get better. Guns are for cowards.

    173. Re:Carry a gun by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. I seem to remember in one history book or another about WWII wherein at the end of the war, a Japanese officer was asked why after the Pearl Harbor attack the Japanese never tried to invade the thinly guarded West Coast. The officer's reply was instructive.

      He pointed out that the Japanese high command was aware that Americans were allowed gun ownership. They correctly figured that back then most [or at least a lot of] homes had firearms. They didn't want to attack a population that in and of itself represented an "armed militia" even if the whole US Army hadn't shown up yet. He made a good point.

      With all of our Homeland Security / al Qaeda concerns that is something to consider even today. Its easier to overwhelm an unarmed population.

    174. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your law lecturer is telling you that downloading copyrighted music doesn't amount to stealing, then he's playing those same semantic games behind which your parent poster is asking you to stop hiding.

      You shithead.

    175. Re:Carry a gun by raygundan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think he's more likely to be beaten to death by his english teachers.

    176. Re:Carry a gun by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      You can make wine on your own, you can also have a home entertainment center, though I doubt it would have dolby surround, unless the cave had really good acoustics. Silk sheets ? have you ever actually slept on silk sheets ? The feeling is nice, but they make your skin smell weird, and if you sweat on/in them it feels icky. you can keep your silk sheets.

      I would like someone to explain to me exactly when standing up for yourself became something that nobody should do. Next thing you know you'll be trying to convince me that my life would be better if I let the government do what it wants regardless of the effects on me. What is with this give up and lay down pansy ass crap ? If this asshole was going to kill you he would do it regardless of weather you gave up your items. Its a fucking monumental jump to go from mugging someone for a few hundered dollars worth of junk to killing someone. In the US its a jump from about 5-7 years to life in prison. Yes, the crook is aware of this. If he is mugging you he has planned this and is probably making a life out of it, so she/he is very very aware of the consequences.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    177. Re:Carry a gun by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the other posters. Whats the point if you're just going to hand over your wallet. At the very least, you can scream and act out of your mind. Demand THEIR WALLET!!!!!

      Anyone willing to stab you was likely to do it anyway.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    178. Re:Carry a gun by heybo · · Score: 1

      Yes I perfer the Colt 45 for protection of my ass and valuables. I have scared muggers away on the train by just unzipping my jacket and sticking my hand in my jacket. (No I wasn't faking either) the punks turned away and went to the next car.

      One big thing is if you don't KNOW for sure you can drop the hammer and take a life then my all means DON"T carry one. A punk will know if you are bluffing and will take you gun away from you and shoot you with you own gun. You must be willing to take a life WITHOUT hesatition.

    179. Re:Carry a gun by operagost · · Score: 1

      Oh? Hand over your wallet then. And let's go to your house and rape your wife, too. Then I'll kill you, because you have nothing left to offer me.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    180. Re:Carry a gun by ianjk · · Score: 1

      I have an alternative that has probably saved my ass a couple times...

      Carry a pack of smokes. When someone confronts you for cash, or whatever, say you are broke, can't afford a cab, and all you have is a pack of smokes, offer one, wish them a good evening and be on your way.

    181. Re:Carry a gun by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      My sensei also said that another instructor he knew tried to take down a mugger who had a knife and he ended up dead with multiple stab wounds.

      Did one of his students swear revenge and tracked down the killer and challenged him to a duel?

      I mean... I always assumed it was an unwritten rule of martial arts that when somebody kills your master you have to swear revenge on his grave.

      (yes, I'm going to hell)

      --
      No sig
    182. Re:Carry a gun by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      It takes a lot longer to whip out your gun, aim, and shoot than that. If someone is within, say 15 or 20 feet of you (that's 5 or so meters for our international friends) and running, you are, say, fucked. Even if you managed to fling your pistol out like a straight-acting Rock Hudson, chances are you'd shoot your own toes off before you'd successfully drop your attacker. It's just not as simple as "carry gun, bad guys no problem".

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    183. Re:Carry a gun by misleb · · Score: 1

      What do you think the chances are that you will get the oportunity to actually use a concealed weapon in the remote case of a mugging?

      "Pardon me, Mr. Mugger, while I get my gun out."

      No mugger worth a damn is going to give his victim the chance to use a weapon. The best policy in the case of a mugging is to give the mugger what he wants. Unless you are a woman and he want sex, of course. Then there will be some room to fight/use a weapon.

      I've been mugged. Most muggers don't want to hurt you. They just want your money. Let them have it. An iPod, your driver's licence, and some petty cash isn't worth risking your life.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    184. Re:Carry a gun by JPriest · · Score: 1
      Shoot him somewhere not fatal. What can he do, call the cops and press charges?

      "listen, I just mugged this guy and he shot me in the leg, I swear"

      It is kind of like calling the cops becase you got ripped off in a drug deal.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    185. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so trying to explain why my shotgun was loaded with 12 gague slugs will get me in trouble???

      a 44 magnum might be able to stop a felon, but a 12 gague slug will hollow out a burgular and make the scene so gruesome that it will not be an issue afterwards.

      in my house my shotgun is loaded with slugs and has a tight beam flashlight aimed properly onthe barrel with the keylock on the trigger and in a locked gun safe in my bedroom.

      if I find the need the firs thing I do is activate ALL house lighting to on. then I get my gun and go downstairs...

      if I dont know you, you will be dead if you do not INSTANTLY obey my command to lie down on the floor facing away from me with your hands behind your head.

      i WILL empty a round at your chest if you even hesitate for 1 second.

    186. Re:Carry a gun by innerspacemonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't matter if you're as good as Jackie Chan or Bruce Lee. If you get into fight with someone who holds a knife you WILL get cut (If you're good you will survive it). Having martial arts training would teach you this. Choose your battles. Your wallets not worth it.

    187. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Im not kidding get a Carry Concealed Weapon Permit.

      What are you going to do, show it to them?

    188. Re:Carry a gun by Ignatius_VI · · Score: 1

      I got a better idea.

      Throw the wallet on the ground. When he goes to pick it up, you kick him in the forehead. He'll be stunned and knocked on his ass.

      And if you carry a gun or a knife, you need to know WHEN to even attempt to use it. If you are being mugged and you don't think your gun or knife will help you win, don't even take it out. It'll only add to your misery.

      Nonetheless, getting a gun permit or carrying a knife for many people is a good idea. I'd rather have it and not need it then need it and not have it.

    189. Re:Carry a gun by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      ... and I personally know several times that number of people who have refused to hand the goods over to a mugger, not resulting in their deaths or significant injury.

      One of these people, a legally blind martial arts instructor, outfought someone 6 inches taller and 100 pounds heavier than himself.

      Another one of these people, my then 84-year-old grandfather, physically beat off three 20-something year old males who tried to rob him.

      Another one of these people -- me -- simply told the three homeboys who threatened my four friends (two of them girls) that if they touched just one person, all three would end up in hospital, courtesy of yours truly.

      Maybe you should take that as a hint, and move to a more effective martial art?

      Note I don't suggest taking on an overwhelming, resolute force. The difference is knowing when and where to take a stand.

      I may fail and fall one day, but will do so knowing I have averted my good share of wrongdoing.

    190. Re:Carry a gun by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Dude, you haven't been watching enough TV from the US :) I'm from Canada, and even *I* know that you need to buy a baseball bat and cut off 2 ft from the top! It might be easier, however, to just buy a baseball bat meant for 8 year olds - they're still wood, but eminently easier to carry.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    191. Re:Carry a gun by Dmala · · Score: 1

      It's real easy to sit behind a keyboard and talk tough. I have fortunately never had this experience, but I am quite sure the reality of it is very different from how you envision it sitting safely in your home.

      First of all, I'm thinking this idea of acting crazy you keep bringing up is a really bad idea. What purpose would it serve? If someone is threatening you with a weapon, you want to do everything you can to keep the situation calm and in control. If you start behaving erratically, you just increase the likelihood that you'll get shot, stabbed, or whatever.

      Screaming and running away is a great idea, if you have the opportunity to do it. A mugger, however, knows this and is going to do everything he can to prevent it. He'll try to get you in a place where there are no other people, and he'll try to corner you, so you have no way to run. In that situation, the only sane thing to do is hand over the wallet/PDA/iPod/whatever.

    192. Re:Carry a gun by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The original poster is in the UK. In the UK, there is no right to self defense. There may actually be some provision for self defense somewhere in their law, but from recent news stories out of the UK, anyone who successfully defends himself against an armed criminal in the UK will face stiffer penalties than the criminal.

      There are places in the US that have effectively repealed the 2nd amendment. The result has always been an *increase* in violent crime. The two states that have the lowest per capita gun crimes are Vermont and Alaska -- the two states that do not require any permit to carry a concealed handgun.

      I personally carry a gun, everywhere that it is legal (and I avoid places where I can't legally carry my gun).

      I am a Texas Certified Concealed Handgun License instructor.

    193. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in fact I carry the Gold Dots in .40s&w because of that mundane name and that's what my hometown police department use. Yet another interesting tidbit... A police officer I know in Tennesee (Or however it is spelled), responding to my ribbing that police officers are typically not very knowledgeable or handy with their side arms (I had the pleasure of watching my local P.D. "qualify"... it was sad) told me that they are only required to go to the range once every 6 months. This is supposedly because if they do shoot someone in the line of duty, the prosecuting lawyer can't claim that the police officers are "killing machines". After seeing their performance at my local range, they're more like "hollywood bad guys" than "killing machines", and that's just not right! Recently, the Virginia State Police announced that they were replacing their "worn out" sidearms here: http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0504/149133.html The interesting thing here is that they are replacing them after seven years, and, get this, 5,000 rounds. For those who don't know, 5,000 rounds is nothing. I think I hit the 4,500 mark today and I've only had mine since December. Police officers don't train very often or consume much ammunition considering the Jedi-like abilities some law makers would have you believe they have... and if it's all just because they don't want to look like "killing machines" if they have to defend themselves in court... again... wow... sad...

    194. Re:Carry a gun by ralfg33k · · Score: 1
      Sir,
      "With a firearm you could both produce it at the ready [enough to abort most assaults] or actually employ it forcefully while still out of his/her ability to physically remove it from your grasp."

      Where's that gun right now? Can you legally carry it in your place of employment, your school, or your community? As a Taekwon-Do student (we are many), I know that my weapons are always with me and always at the ready. That confidence factor radiates, and the scared punk who's looking for a victim doesn't see one in me.

      Remember, there's no time to tell Mr. Mugger, "Uh...wait a minute...let me get my handgun out, and, uh...m-kay, the safety's off now, so, uh, so you'd better back off, m-kay?" Guns are great for home defense when you're properly alerted by your dog or alarm, but unless you're a quick draw artist and qualified with that weapon, you'll only get yourself in trouble on the street.

      "On the other hand, its a lot easier to remember how to pull the trigger than how to do that neat taekwondo move you *thought* you would employ in such an instance, or won't actually work as you though."

      The real secret to any martial art lies in how hard you train, because in times of stress, you revert to your training. And you *have* training...your opponent is a nervous punk who doesn't know that, and has no clue as to what kinds of bad things are about to happen to him.

      "Another consideration might be that in such a situation you'd actually have to be in physical contact with your assailant to use taekwondo, and if it didn't work . . . uh-oh."

      As you point out, range is a consideration. However, we train to deal with that. If you think about it, range is a two-edged sword -- unless this shaky punk is leveling a fully automatic weapon or a shotgun at you, or you're in a situation where you must protect others (such as children), running away and putting as many things between you and him as you possibly can is a viable (and wise) option. If he gets close enough to eliminate that option, then I guess he learns the hard way why Taekwon-Do is used by law enforcement officers and soldiers. Much of the self-defense portion of my own training (it's one of many facets of TKD) has come from military and police instructors who are also TKD instructors.

      Get competent instruction and train hard: you'll get good exercise and learn something useful at the same time.

    195. Re:Carry a gun by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Always shoot to kill. Don't ever shoot anyone (or anything for that matter) that you do not intend to kill. If you fire the weapon 6-7 times and there's no possible way that your would be attacker could survive that then fantastic.

      Just make sure that you are suitably shaken by the entire incident and cannot for the life of you recall how many times you fired due to your frightened state.

      This way you can be certain that the only lies the grand jury hears are yours.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    196. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good advice but since he lives in the UK he can't. Handguns are banned there and have been for a few years. Right about the time that the crime rates started to go up, coincedentally.

    197. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you said may be true for shotguns but you left out some things about gun ownership in general over there. First any shotgun that holds more than 2 rounds is banned. Handguns are illegal PERIOD. Even the British olympic handgun shooting team has to go to France to practice because they can't keep or shoot their guns in their own damn country. Sig Heil!

    198. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but YOU CAN'T in the UK. RTFA.

    199. Re:Carry a gun by EvanED · · Score: 1

      If no one ever got hurt or killed while being mugged, I'd agree with you.

    200. Re:Carry a gun by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Okay, then what, exactly, is the purpose of martial arts? If they don't give you an edge in combat then there's no practical reason beyond exercise for learning them, right?

      If you're talking about something like boxing ( little B ), I would agree, but many martial arts, particularly Chinese martial arts, encompass systems of philosophy, ethics, lifestyle and religion. Physical exertion, fighting and exercise help to shape the mind, but the consummate martial artist should hope to eventually move beyond having to make their point with force.

      I don't have the book with me, but in a history of Hsing-I I recently read, the introduction mentions that a desire to learn fighting skills is not always an appropriate reason to start Boxing, because it confesses a lack of faith in ones abilities to solve problems peacefully. Whether this is naivete on the authors part, I leave to you, but I agree that the goal of a Boxing student should be personal growth, not just being able to snap someones ribs with the palm of your hand. YMMV.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    201. Re:Carry a gun by hax0r_par · · Score: 1

      not everyone on this forum lives in america, a lot of people may not have the right to carry a gun with them at all times, what then?

      --
      ~~par
    202. Re:Carry a gun by cybershadow_jp · · Score: 1

      that instructor must have had some over-confidence... feeling that he himself being an instructor and all - knowing all the techniques, etc., felt that he was capable of taking down a mugger... imo, he is one of those "mall" instructors knowing all out there, but never actually been through hell...

    203. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no, he had no right to use deadly for in the case of tresspassing or theft. Only in the face of deadly force and you exert the same.

    204. Re:Carry a gun by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually no it is not. Since most gun deaths are suicides and domestic disputes it is very true.
      The whole idea of using a gun for selfdefence is a bit silly. One you have to have it in easy reach and two you have to get it out without being shot first.
      Think about it. If you are walking down the street and someone comes up and pulls a gun on you trying to pull your own gun would most likley get you killed.
      If you have it at home and it is locked in a gun safe as it should be. You have to get it out.
      For in home protection a Dog is much better.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    205. Re:Carry a gun by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Personally I like the advice of Mrs. Potato Head in Toy Story 2.

      "Don't talk to any toys you don't know!"

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    206. Re:Carry a gun by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

      If you were to read "More Guns, Less Crime" by John Lott Jr. you would see that areas with CCW permits have a lower crime rate, at least as it pertains to person-on-person crimes (murder, rape, assault, muggings, etc).

      Cities, where the majority of muggings do occur have, typically the strictist controls on handguns in the United States. This includes DC, Philadelphia, NYC, Detroit, etc.

      If you're still not convinced by Lott's impressively documented and detailed statistical analysis, I suggest you pick up some of the work of Massad Ayoob and read the massive pile of anecdotal evidence he's collected. Me, I prefer science and empirical numbers, which is why I like Lott's work.

    207. Re:Carry a gun by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      You need a gun to act confident? How about walking with your chin up and not looking behind you every three seconds. I've lived in a variety of bad neighborhoods (I live 200 yards from a peep booth right now) and I've never even been harrassed, much less robbed. I've been offered a lot of drugs and dates, but never robbed.

      -B

    208. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European Declaration of Human Rights is obviously flawed. I'll take that into consideration when considering future jobs though.

    209. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice profiling there. The criminal who's planning to shoot you after taking your wallet is:
      a) Not really the scared type. He's probably going to enjoy a few screams.
      b) With his hand on the trigger. Your first sudden move and you're out.

    210. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Tennessee, Kentucky: "He just needed killin'" is still a valid defense.
      Thank Gods.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    211. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. i frequently carry a machine gun, and a few granades around my waist. sometimes i'll leave the granades at home say if im going to the corner store... but i always bring my trusty machine gun, which i carry with me (swat style) so everyone can see.

      i have a friend who wears strap on c4. his laptop is his life, and his data is important.. so if it is ever stolen, he just pushes a button near his sleave, and takes the mugger out. the only downside is he takes out himself and half the block.. but i mean, its better then losing the laptop.

      god bless the usa.

    212. Re:Carry a gun by TheTray · · Score: 1

      Actually he can sue you and the DA will likely press criminal charges for assualt with a deadly weapon. I am not shitting you, this happens in many cases and it's really screwed up.

      --
      -NiPs
    213. Re:Carry a gun by EvanED · · Score: 1

      How the hell are replicas illegal but the actual gun isn't?

      (This is a real question)

    214. Re:Carry a gun by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      I'd say the life of somebody who would attack another for a piece of electronics is worth it.

      Of course, thats easy to say. My strategy to protecting my belongings is to live in Canada where we all live 10 km from each other and have to use snowshoes to get around ;) In all seriousness, I choose to live in a city where muggers don't prey on people because they have nice headphones. Muggers are a rarity, the prevalent threat to one's property is a homeless person or drunk asshole asking for extra change. I defend against them buying pulling out a "no, sorry". Sometimes I walk around with a confident proactive "no, sorry" demeanor, and they don't ask... but if I had to, I would use that "no, sorry" on them.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    215. Re:Carry a gun by takshaka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shoot him somewhere not fatal. What can he do, call the cops and press charges?

      He can shoot you somewhere fatal.

    216. Re:Carry a gun by NewNole2001 · · Score: 1

      Shit like this happens all the time... Hell, at the best he would sue you...

    217. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think the chances are that you will get the oportunity to actually use a concealed weapon in the remote case of a mugging?

      The chances are quite good, actually, if you have even the slightest amount of situational awareness. Muggers don't materialize out of thin air behind you; pay attention to your environment and have a feel for who's nearby, who might pose a threat. And be prepared to take the necessary steps to defend yourself. Certain concealed carry arrangements are quicker to draw from than others as well.

      The bottom line is, cowards who refuse to defend their lives and property are helping to perpetuate criminal behavior in society at large. Think about it.

    218. Re:Carry a gun by sageo · · Score: 1

      Was I supposed to mod you up or down?

    219. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      No doubt.
      If you do make this mistake (little slow on the draw, there, bucko!) quickly go to the body. flip it over, and shoot it again so that the bullet goes in next to the exit hole, and out by the entrance hole.
      that way you won't get nailed for shooting them in the back.
      Old cop trick.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    220. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Self defense ammo (At least from the older crowd's perspective) has two basic purposes... But first... Normal, cheap, target ammunition for shooting at the range is typically "full metal jacket". This is typically a solid core of lead with a copper jacket bonded to it. I'll refer to this as FMJ. The more expensive, "self defense" ammunition is called "jacketed hollowpoint" (Though there are variations). Typically this looks just like a FMJ bullet except they're essentially hollowed out on the front, and the front isn't jacketed with copper, but is instead just exposed lead. I'll refer to this as JHP. FMJ ammunition is almost exclusively used at the shooting range, mainly because it is cheap. It goes boom, a bullet flies out, and it puts a hole in paper. That's really all anyone expects FMJ ammo to do. However, one thing you will notice if you ever try to dig up a bullet from the ground is that it travels quite a distance through the dirt. Even a low power (compared to, say, a .308win rifle) round such as a .40s&w handgun round will go 3 or 4 feet through dirt. When you dig it up, you'll find that the bullet has not deformed much at all, and is almost pristine. This is penetration. Penetration in self defense ammo is almost always a bad thing. If I shoot a BG (Bad guy) and the bullet goes through him, through three walls, and strikes an innocent someone, I'm in deep shit. That's the biggest concern with penetration. Next to that, and the physics geeks here can probably fill in the details... When a bullet passes all the way through something and keeps going, that means that not all of the energy the bullet was carrying was transferred to what was being shot at. Penetration is mostly where JHP comes in... http://www.ammolab.com/45GAP%20Test%20photo.jpg Notice bullet #19 in that picture. That's basically what an unfired JHP (Speer's Gold Dot line) looks like. The idea here is that when the bullet strikes a surface, it peels the bullet open. The impact starts the bullet flattening, and then the copper jacket gets pulled back, pulling the lad with it, mushrooming into, ideally, as flat of a chunk of lead as possible. This does a few things: It keeps the bullet from passing all the way through what's being shot at (Or the wall in case you miss) and it also transfers more of the bullet's energy to whatever it is hitting. Now, this energy transfer isn't actually what "stops" someone. It's not like it counteracts their forward momentum, because however much it pushes them around, your gun would have to recoil even more than that... But "stopping power" is actually its ability to cause sufficient trauma to stop an attacker. There are a few different kinds of trauma, the most basic of which are the "wound channel", which is the actual hole the bullet makes, and basically a fluid shockwave that disrupts the tissues around the wound channel. I'm not going to get into those gory details, but you can imagine how a flattened bullet slapping your insides at 1200 feet per second is going to do a little more damage than a much tinier bullet zipping right through. When a JHP round fully flattens and then exits, you get a very prominent "exit wound", but we don't want that bullet going any farther than it has to. Now, back to that picture I linked to.... This is a website that does tests on various ammunitions, by firing them into "ballistic gelatin", a substance that is supposed to approximate the viscosity and whatnot of a body. I assume it's cheaper than going out and buying beef brisket to shoot up. :-) All of the rounds there are fired rounds, but at the bottom, you might notice that bullet 19 is... well... not flat. The reason for this is that sometimes, things can clog a JHP bullet. If a JHP clogs with denim (As it did in that photo) then the JHP is much less likely to expand, because it doesn't have that exposed inner core. For the curious, where it says "200gr", that is the weight of the bullet. 1 grain is 0.00228571429 ounces. Grains are used for measuring the weight of

    221. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When you outgun lawyers, only gunners will have laws."

      As in "When you outlaw gunners, only lawyers will have guns."?

      But it's supposed to say "only criminals will have guns." Ergo, either lawyers are criminals, or guns are law.

    222. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Or, I can hope for laws that would punish him severely if he ever illegally obtained a firearm or killed someone out of cold blood, and that that place will allow me the right to protect myself, acknowledging that the police can not be there 24/7, but I can.

    223. Re:Carry a gun by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You can only kill someone if you are in direct threat of your life. That is, if they're trying to kill you, you may kill. Even if you *ARE* in direct threat of your life, and do kill, you may still end up in jail if you can't prove that you were actually in danger.

      I do have a concealed weapons permit, which is good in 16 states, and if I'm in one of those states, you can be willing to bet I have a hand gun close by, but I have never needed to use it.

      In many different firearms training schools, I've been taught, don't pull your weapon unless you're ready to use it. In law enforcement training, it was demonstrated for us that by the time you react to shoot, you'll probably be disarmed. The instructor picked one of the cocky students from the class (not me), and gave him the scenerio. He was told to say "bang", to indicate firing his dummy pistol. The instructor started playing the bad-ass bad guy, standing about 10 feet away, talking shit, and when the student wasn't expecting it, the instructor rushed him. The student was laying on the ground, and the instructor had the weapon by the time he said bang. "Bang what? I have your gun." A civilian without serious training would be even worse at the exercise, and in real life would be dead. You just escalated to deadly force, and the guy who only intended to mug you probably now realizes this, and will kill you.

      If I pull my weapon, the next thing I will be doing is firing. No warnings, no "should I shoot", no negotiating now that the weapon is drawn. Any thoughts of "should I be doing this" had better of happened before I made the decision to pull my weapon.

      That's why people who think they're safe because they have a gun, get themselves killed, and become part of the "homeowner killed with own weapon" statistic. People go under the mistaken impression that now that they've pulled the weapon, the other guy will back down, and quietly wait for the police to come and arrest them. This is the same guy who quietly wanted to rob you.

      Want to play it safe? Get a gun, fire a few thousand rounds with an instructor. Learn hand to hand and firearm combat. More than likely, you then realize that having a gun is probably not the solution to this.

      Personally, what I do is never look like I have anything worth taking. I normally wear a T-shirt and jeans. For years my laptop and tools were carried in a ratty satchel that I got at WalMart for $20. At times, I've carried large sums of cash of me for various reasons, but I never look like I have maybe $5 in my pocket and maybe a PB&J sandwitch in the satchel. I've been in rather bad places (white boy don't belong here parts of town) and never had any serious trouble. I've been looked up and down by prospective muggers, they're fairly easy to spot, but I don't look very interesting. Of course, I can hold my own too, so maybe I don't have the "I'm a timid victim" look to me. I'm always looking for escape paths, problems (how many attackers), sizing up the attackers, and potential weapons I or the enemy can use.

      The short list of what to do...

      1) Don't look worth mugging.
      2) Don't be anywhere that makes it easy to be attacked. Staying on main streets with lots of people is usually good.
      3) Stay very aware of your environment, but don't look like you're doing it. Like, pay attention to the fact there are two guys following you, and one standing at the end of the street.
      4) If you have the smallest suspicion that you may be in trouble, go somewhere safe.

      In Vegas once, two common street thugs started following me. They were bigger than me, and I probably wouldn't have been able to take them. It was late, there weren't many people on the street, and there were plenty of places to pull me off out of sight. So I walked into the nearest casino, and started chatting up a guard. I didn't say "Help, I'm being followed", I just started with "how's it going?" The walked right past me, and out another exi

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    224. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When knitting needles are outlawed, only criminals will have knitting needles.

      As hilarious as that is, you got the syntax wrong:

      When knitting needles are outlawed, only outlaws will have knitting needles.

    225. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      uh, no.
      well, maybe if you've only studied a cinematic martial art like taekwancrap.
      Back when I was still doing demonstrations it was part of our "show" to take live blades from members of the audience.
      unless you are being mugged by someone with a sword/gun, a good japanese style will let you survive unscratched.
      However, it's better to just toss your wallet to the ground; and after/as you do so, politely ask if you can have your wallet back after they take your cash.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    226. Re:Carry a gun by Jerf · · Score: 1

      So why carry a gun? Just carry a replica.

      For the other 10% of the time.

      If you're gun averse for one reason or another but still want to benefit, though, it's probably a good solution, along with carrying a real-but-unloaded gun. (The best replica is the real thing.) Doesn't bother me any; 90% of the time it still sends a serious wake-up call to our hopefully-would-be criminal.

      (In other words, no Tragedy of the Commons here, you're not free-riding on the "real" carriers or reducing their effectiveness. If we all carried guns but nobody knew which were real things would still be very interesting for criminals.)

    227. Re:Carry a gun by Breity · · Score: 0

      Two words, Carb Cleaner. I work on motorcycles occasionally, and lemmie tell you there is nothing quite like it to put the hurt on! 'Cept for some 6mm rusty screws...

      --
      Blame it on ElGeeko De Generico [generic geek]
    228. Re:Carry a gun by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      It depends on the jury. A lot of lawyers would be able to put a spin on it that you had such a lethal weapon in your house and could have just as easily used pepper spray or something not lethal. I'm not of that school of thought, really... but.. personally, it probably wouldn't bother me unless: A: There was evidence that he was shot while retreating (And of course, didn't have a weapon at the time) B: There was evidence that he was shot while incapacitated C: There was clearly no threat on your life or that of your loved ones Not to say that any of those things we have me screaming "GUILTY!", but... if I knew you had shot him in the back, shot him while he was on the ground, or shot some guy who simply refused to lay down and clearly didn't have a weapon.... You'd probably be in some trouble... For the most part, the tone of your post leads me to believe you haven't given much thought to how seriously sick you will feel having killed someone, even a threat on your life... You're glorifying it just a little too much for my comfort. Again... things like this: "if I dont know you, you will be dead if you do not INSTANTLY obey my command to lie down on the floor facing away from me with your hands behind your head. i WILL empty a round at your chest if you even hesitate for 1 second." disappoint me a little, as I can't always justify this kind of indiscriminant "If you don't do A, I will ALWAYS DO B!!". Normally I could cut through it, but your sounding quite extreme (and not in a good way). However, I do like the fact that you turn the house lighting on (Intruder can run away, thereby allowing the situation to fix itself, and you can positively identify whoever it is, to make sure it's not your father (or son, if I'm wrong) getting a midnight snack).

    229. Re:Carry a gun by Radworker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is one thing I have learned over the years. The military tought it to me first, NEVER threaten with a gun! If my weapon cleared leather, I would have already determined that I had need/justification to shoot. I would draw, aim center of mass and pull the trigger. Pointing a weapon that you do not intend on shooting will get you killed. I would not pull a weapon just because someone "asked" me for my wallet. If they had a weapon, THEY and not me have already escalated the level to lethal force. All fifty states allow one to respond to force with an equal force. The reason I would shoot would not be that they were attempting to mug me but, that they had treatened my life with a weapon.

    230. Re:Carry a gun by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      old being an operative word.... Someone has not been watching television (and I don't mean CSI or its knockoffs, I mean the real crime stuff). Amazing what they can do/prove nowadays....

    231. Re:Carry a gun by timmi · · Score: 2, Funny

      of course my Sensi told me to kinda lob the wallet one way, and start running the other...

    232. Re:Carry a gun by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe you're learning the wrong martial art. In aikido, we're taught how to fight someone no matter what weapon they're wielding or style they're using. The one exception would be if the guy is carrying a gun.

      It is common to tell beginners that the best solution is to give in peacefully, because (as beginners) they're likely to get themselves killed thinking that they know a martial art, hence can handle the situation. That, and when the police start asking questions, they can plausibly say, "It's not like we didn't warn them."

      A man with a knife threatening you is combat. Saying that learning a martial art means learning to move past the point where you need to fight is great and all, but there is no way on God's green earth that my sensei would give some idiot with a knife his wallet.

      If you're looking for noble Oriental philosophy, at least higher-level practitioners have mastered the self-control to decide how much they have to hurt their opponent in order to defeat them. Here in Japan, a martial art is there to act as a means to defend yourself in combat. That's why police are required to show proficiency in either kendo or judo in order to advance, and why both are taught as basic curriculum in high schools.

      In our dojo, they tell you, "If you seek spiritual enlightment, go to a temple. If you seek to learn to fight, go to war. If you seek both, you're in the right place."

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    233. Re:Carry a gun by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Im not kidding get a Carry Concealed Weapon Permit.

      I prefer a Carry Concealed BFG Permit myself, especially on days where I can't find enough rocket grenades lying around.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    234. Re:Carry a gun by Silverlock · · Score: 1

      Speaking of blaming murders, suicides, and littering on Doom... Have they moved on yet? I mean, Doom is pretty old at this point. It can't possibly be creating all that much havoc anymore. Wouldn't it be refreshing to see some deaths blamed on Unreal Tournament or something?

    235. Re:Carry a gun by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 1

      Amen brother.

      Some states (AZ) allow "open carry" without a permit. Works like a charm. Walking down the street, packin' some heat--only a fool would try to take my laptop from me. And being a true geek, I carry the latest in over-engineered polymer frames complete with an integral laser sight (can't even tell it's there).

    236. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      "For in home protection a Dog is much better"

      good point! I've got a 140 lb Akita; my kids have been trained since they could walk that if there is trouble, go to Kokko and unsnap his chain. I have absolutely no fear of anyone getting into my house from the rear portion of my yard, they WOULD die.

      However, since I can't take him with me around people (he would eat them if they looked crosseyed or got within 30 feet of my kids) I carry a pistol; in a situation where I felt my family was in danger, I would use it.
      I hardly ever go armed when I'm by myself, no matter how dangerous the area.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    237. Re:Carry a gun by glenalec · · Score: 1

      A friend of my sister was mugged in Sydney about a decade back. He handed over his wallet, but it didn't have enough, so they forced him at knife point to go home, where there was still not enough cash for them but his ATM card was, so he was then taken to make a withdrawal for them. :-/

      Three years back a friend of my brother was beaten up (again in Sydney). Not robbed. Just picked at random for a beating - not even a racial thing. He is now permanently disabled :-(

      Lets end with a positive story: Same brother -- who is a Tai-kwon-do instructor -- was being harassed by a drunk guy in a crowded bar. He automatically slipped into defensive (sp?- I don't trust what my spell checker just said) posture when the guy pushed into him. The drunk's mates very quickly were hauling the guy away with profuse apology. I hope that guy appreciated having true friends!

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    238. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      it really does depend on what calibre you are carrying.
      My family defense gun during coat weather is a ruger .44; blows GREAT BIG holes in things.
      wouldn't work with my summer gun.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    239. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to pretend nervousness and fumble it to the ground if you really want to try that one. If you throw it down defiantly the mugger may seriously injure you on general principles before bending down to get it.

      I'd me more inclined to turn tail and run rather than try for the kick. Then maybe come back later when he has pigged out on the barbituate-laced candy stick I keep in there.

    240. Re:Carry a gun by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Damn, that sucks. Remind me never to move to the UK. I really enjoy having my pre-ban M-16 with 40 round clip, AK-47, high caliber rifles of various kinds, handguns (and concealed carry permit), etc.

    241. Re:Carry a gun by olderchurch · · Score: 1
      Or perhaps simply appear to be armed. Wear a shoulder holster in the summer and leave your jacket unbuttoned, etc. NOTE: don't move quickly while talking to policemen

      This reminds me of the time I was with the military police. Whenever we needed to escort things, we needed to be armed. Since checking out your weapon from the save was a lot of hassle, we couldn't be bothered. So we ended up stuffing our side holster with an empty UZI mag and a rolled up sock. It looked real enough, but if we ever got in a situation where we needed our gun we would have been in real trouble!

      --
      Disclaimer: This opinion was created without the use of any facts
    242. Re:Carry a gun by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I can't understand why people get concealed weapon permits. Isn't it completely legal to wear a firearm in full view. e.g. holstered on your hip? That way the mugger KNOWS you have a weapon. I would bet that a known danger would be more of a deterrent.

      I really have no clue. I've never been very close to any physical violence.

    243. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake hysteria is probably not a bad tactic if you think your life is in danger either way. Puts them off guard and lowers their sense of personal danger from victum retaliation.

    244. Re:Carry a gun by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Throw the wallet on the ground. When he goes to pick it up, you kick him in the forehead. He'll be stunned and knocked on his ass.

      I've got two particular approaches in mind. :)

      The Dan Akroyd approach: *take out wallet and drop it* "I'm sorry, let me get that for you" *bend over and hit your head on the mugger's head, who is also bending over for it* "Ouch! I'm sorry, I didn't see you" *bend over again and trip over the air or something, knocking into the mugger* "Oops, I didn't see you there" etc.

      The Crocodile Dundee approach, of course:

      "That's not a knife. This is a knife."

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    245. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #5 is a load of bull. I think people just use it because they have heard it without validating where it came from.

      http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcdgaga.html

    246. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives in London. The cops don't even carry guns. Did you bother to read the question?

    247. Re:Carry a gun by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      You don't have to get up to a black belt level to learn how to handle that. But you do have to have practiced countering a knife-wielding attacker. For example, it's easy to learn this: 1) if the guy with the knife is right-handed, step to the left and grab his right wrist with your right hand from the outside. Thumb-side of your clenched fist points to his elbow. Grab that sucker hard. 2) holding tight, rotate his wrist quickly in a clockwise direction, bringing his elbow up a bit. 3) at the same time, move to your left and pull hard on his right arm, straightening it out as best as you can, then immediately, no hesitation, with your left hand, hit his elbow joint HARD from the outside, and break his elbow. Even girls can do that.

    248. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone enters your home for theft or otherwise, you do not try and second guess their intentions. If you feel your life is in the slightest bit of jeopardy, you have the right to eliminate the threat by any means required.

      If you want to get in touch with the feelings of someone who breaks in to your house, be my guest. I will enjoy reading about you on the Darwin Awards.

    249. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah,
      He can sue you and let the courts finish the job of robbing you. Besides, most "non-lethal" targets are harder to hit (like the legs and arms). Just aim for the center of mass and take the sucker out.

    250. Re:Carry a gun by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      You're correct, I liked ONE song, and I WOULD have paid for it, if only that ONE song was available. I have the right to reward the artist for the music that I think is good. Why should finance mediocrity. That's called the fucking free-market. Make lots of good songs and people will buy them. Make one good song + 13 works of crap just to make some money does not deserve recognition. If MS can be sued to bundle an internet browser with an OS, a music comapny should be sued for bundling 13 songs of crap with one good one. Just because you're brainwashed into following monopolist conventions doesn't mean the rest of us are.

    251. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or why with a concealed carry permit I can carry a loaded gun but not a knife with a 4 inch blade.

    252. Re:Carry a gun by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Except that they can prove you handled the body, that there was more than one shot and which direction, and the second shot that you are suggesting would tell them a lot too.
      The best suggestion is to not shoot someone running away from you, considering thats a crime (as opposed to protecting yourself, which is self defense when they are facing you). The only exception would be if they were running from you towards a family members room/person.
      Tampering with a body can only get you into more trouble, and forensic personnel will probably catch you if you mess with things, as stuff like that raises suspicion (remember that a gunshot at self defense range ( less than 7 meters) leaves more than a bullet hole in the victim, it leaves a clear pattern of GSR that can establish what direction they were facing when you shot them). Your suggestion is as outdated as the old one where they suggest you drag a body inside your house if you shoot an intruder just outside. And other factors such as you probably are using HP's (as you seem to know something about guns) also can explain more to investigators.
      Basically I feel about this because its crap like this that gives gunowners a bad name, trying to cover up a crime (and thats what it is) and I would hope that person gets punished, as it would be one less stupid/careless gunowner out there (which I take personally as I am a gunowner and a CCW permit holder, and the bad seeds reflect on us all).

    253. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya damn right!

    254. Re:Carry a gun by Phenris+Wolfe · · Score: 1

      I had a guy pull a knife on me one time. I calmly told him that I was going to take the knife from him, disembowel him, slice his eyes out, and leave him to scream in the dark until he died. Oddly enough, it didn't sound fun to him, so he just sort of walked away quickly after that...

    255. Re:Carry a gun by VirtuaKnight · · Score: 1

      Nobody's life is worth an iPod. ...What about the mugger's/pickpocket's?

    256. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Amen brotha!

    257. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sensei also said that another instructor he knew tried to take down a mugger who had a knife and he ended up dead with multiple stab wounds

      He sounds like a pretty crappy instructor if he cannot even take down an armed attacker 1 on 1. I wouldn't waste money learning from anybody like that.

    258. Re:Carry a gun by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Losing a civil suit is not a "conviction" of any sort.

      By definition, anything which subjects you to a lawsuit is NOT a criminal action and whether you win or lose you are NOT a criminal.

      Copyright infringment doesn't make your a thief or a criminal anymore than someone painting your house and falling off a ladder does. They are about equivelent offenses (assuming your mass duplicating and selling).

    259. Re:Carry a gun by Blackeagle_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Why bother concealing the weapon? If the mugger doesn't know have a gun until he commits himself, you may actually have to shoot someone with it. It makes much more sense to carry your weapon openly, where it can have some deterrent value.

    260. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps we get mugged because we say stuff like "my sensei" seriously, wtf, what are you ninj4 133t now?

    261. Re:Carry a gun by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would be before someone rained on the "ra ra ra", guns solve all problems, "bigger is better", ammo-comparing Americaspeak.

      I too, am more than happy to live in a country where I've never even had to CONSIDER being mugged, much less have it actually happen. Hell, walking alone downtown after a concert a couple years back after the buses shut down, I was in one of the seedier parts of the city with a few hours to waste until the morning buses, and I wasn't particularly worried wandering around.

      Sure, the street beggers and window washers are annoying, but very rarely problematic.

      I don't carry any weapons on my person or in my car, and the most dangerous things I have at home are probably kitchen utensils.

      It's really nice living somewhere where you just don't need to feel that scared...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    262. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... if he's going to shoot anyway, you still increase your chance of survival by running.

      A slim chance is still better than none :)

      Of course, if you're going to be shot anyway... may as well step forwards instead of back - get shot in the body instead of the head, get close enough to do a little damage.
      Go down fighting, huh?

    263. Re:Carry a gun by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      I would too, honestly. However, I live in the real world. And in the real world, this is NOT AN OPTION

      Given this fact, 10% sounds pretty good to me.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    264. Re:Carry a gun by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well not much comfort if he shoots you, even if you get him after it still sucks.

      In my country fortunately in general the armed robbers usually have one or two crappy gun amongst them, and the police are the ones with decent firearms. Better than the other way round where you have crooks with SMGs and the police with cheap revolvers. Armed robbery is rare. Snatch thefts from motocycles are more common - whiz past and yank the stuff off. A victim died when she fell and hit her head. But I still think it's safer than with tons of guns around.

      But trying to reduce gun ownership in the US is like trying to get the countries with nukes to disarm. It's probably too late. That said the increase in deadly weapons doesn't make things safer despite gun ownership proponents - it's just an arms race.

      Coz the deadlier the weapons available, the greater the radius of vulnerability. While you can more easily defend yourself, the attackers will have similar weapons too. It's like going back to living in a jungle with lots of predators, rather than a civilized city. With the large predators going extinct the jungles are getting pretty safe ;).

      Back to the story, if I'm a mugger I'd go for those who aren't alert - so those oblivious people listening to their ipods will make ripe targets. Usually silly to go for someone who is obviously alert even if they're only 75% of your capabilities in a fight. Predators that keep going for prey that are ready and able to fight back don't tend to do very well.

      --
    265. Re:Carry a gun by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Ah yes,

      The old DuroppuWarretenduRunnu Kung Fu move.

      Works every time...

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    266. Re:Carry a gun by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

      You know, I like Word a lot. I definitely would have bought that ONE program, if only that ONE program was available. I don't wanna buy five or six crap programs just to get Word. Word Wait... $230? Hell Naw! Seriously, though, your reasoning is flawed. When you're talking about an artist "bundling" songs, you're not really talking about the kind of monopoly MS has. No artists have a monopoly on music that you need to listen to in order to use your stereo in a semi-standard way. It's like Zeppelin used to do... They refused to have their songs played on the radio because they saw their albums as a whole as works of art. Are you gonna sue Led Zeppelin for that?

    267. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, that would makse sense in a free nation like the US (excluding the communist republic of california of course).

      but unfortunately, the person asking the question lives in england, where guns are illegal because they are a bunch of liberal pussies over there.

    268. Re:Carry a gun by JWSmythe · · Score: 1
      That depends on where you are.

      In Florida, where I know the most about the laws, you can wear it, or at least you could in the early 1980's. I think this may have changed. We were advised in 1994, during law enforcement training, in our uniform, not to carry our weapon in public.

      Actually, a link from packing.org for Florida says this:


      Open Carry On Person
      Open carry of a firearm is prohibited except in certain limited situations, such as when hunting, camping, fishing, hiking or target shooting in a lawful location. Open carry in a populated or urban area is NEVER allowed. This prohibition even applies to persons who have a Concealed Weapons License.
      NOTE: It is legal for a person to openly carry a firearm, regardless of whether or not the person has a license, at his or her home or place of business. "Home" does not include areas outside of your house or apartment, such as yards, parking areas, or common hallways. "Place of business" does not include areas outside of the business premises, such as parking areas, hallways or common areas within malls, shopping centers or office buildings; nor does it include mobile "places of business" such as motor vehicles or other forms of conveyance.


      People get nervous when you're standing in line at McDonalds, with a gun on your hip. All it takes is one other person with a gun to get nervous, then you have the makings of an incident.

      If you do carry openly, if it's legal in your state, does make for a more dangerous moment. You have a gun, and maybe they'd like to get that from you too. A free gun plus your wallet, and all it takes is one shot to the back of your head when no one is looking. The cheapest gun I own was $350, which is substantially more than I carry in my wallet most days. :)

      Carrying my weapon concealed means no one but me knows I have it, unless I'm talking to a police officer, which I will immediately volunteer that I have a concealed carry permit, and where my weapon is. There's no need for them to find out any other way, and have a reason to be concerned. If they want to disarm me and continue our conversation, that's perfectly fine with me.

      But, if I have to pull my weapon, if I don't have a damned good reason to do it, I know I'll end up in jail.

      And remember, in most states, if someone else gets hurt in an exchange, it's still your fault. That can include the little old man two blocks away having a heart attack from hearing gun shots.
      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    269. Re:Carry a gun by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm just gonna download the 2/3 songs of Zep that I like, until somebody realizes there's some sense in selling those songs individually. Also, ok so in their case, they consider their music a work of art. But can you say that all artists do? I mean surely there might be one artist out to make a quick buck? Or another artist who thinks each of his/her songs stands out individually? But they can't do anything about that if they're tied into the RIAA. they have go about it the regular way. Anybody who tries to beat the RIAA, including artists has a tough job on their hands. That's where the monopoly comes in. The RIAA decides how and when and where you can appreciate music. Is there any authority which prevents you from viewing paintings at your friend's place? Documented usage of scupltures? If we're looking at this from an Art point of view, then everything the RIAA has done has nothing to do with furthering the 'art'. And if we look at it from a commercial point of view, this is simply a case of an industry which is bullying its consumers. And only in a monopoly situation can that occur.

    270. Re:Carry a gun by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

      This is, of course, the point in the conversation that I insist that illegal activities is not the way to make yourself heard to the industry. The RIAA can just sue the pants off of you for downloading things, which doesn't really help your cause. A better answer would be to boycott RIAA record labels (yes, there are record labels that aren't part of the RIAA). Find some indie artists to enjoy, and don't give the RIAA any more of your money. They have no recourse (suing you) and you don't have to go without music while continuing to make a noble statement.

    271. Re:Carry a gun by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Just remember that shooting someone in the back is NOT neccessarily a crime, and very well may still be self-defense. If they are running away, it is certainly not self-defense. But if they are near to you, and turn, there may be any number of things they are doing which would warrant shooting them in the back. The primary BadThing they may be up to is reaching for a weapon, or turning around to look for an object to use as a weapon. I will quote someone else here (I suspect he would wish to remain anonymous, so I will respect those suspected wishes):

      "There are many, many cases where an assailant shot in the back is not 'running away'. It is 'folk forensics' that this means 'running away'. For one example, an assailant turning to retrieve a dropped weapon could easily be shot in the back. An assailant might not know where the citizen has taken cover, and is looking away from him. This is not an honor-killing in a duel, you know. This is preserving one's life, one's family's life, and their property, and property is condensed life-energy. Shooting a thug in the back is a GOOD PLAN, because it is SAFER."

    272. Re:Carry a gun by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Anyone who took the time to get a gun would be able to shoot it.

      In some states one simply walks in, hands over a certain amount of money to a clerk, fills out a form, and as soon as they pass the background check, they have a concealed carry license, and can go into any gun store and buy a gun same-day. A person could easily do this never having fired even a cap gun, much less any type of firearm. Remember every state in the US has its own set of firearms laws, especially with regards to concealed carry.

    273. Re:Carry a gun by Wog · · Score: 1

      Oh, Lord. That's even worse.

      Please. Don't shoot at somebody unless you honestly intend to end his life. That means you make the first shot count, and then empty the weapon on him. Unless you're firing a shotgun, don't fire the thing unless you're willing to fire the entire magazine.

      Going for a non-lethal shot is just putting yourself more at risk by taking more time instead of going for the central mass. Not to mention the ensuing legal battle and revenge issues that could conceivably cause problems down the road...

    274. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So please tell us what is your better martial art? I want that kind of confidence...

      Was your grandfather also a practioner of the same martial art?

    275. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I live in Europe and here you can obtain guns and so BUT it's very rare to have one. What I think is that if we all had a gun in Europe, there will be mooooooooore risk to be shot. I think that's the reason for the high rate of shots in EEUU, but if that law was abolished there, I think it wouldn't help very much because shotguns are very deep-rooted law at your society, and muggers would easily keep their ones (I recognise I haven't travelled overseas, I'm getting a conclusion from what I read of you)

    276. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) if the guy with the knife is right-handed, step to the left and grab his right wrist with your right hand from the outside.

      Ok, you have wierd arms dude. ;-)

    277. Re:Carry a gun by sql*kitten · · Score: 0

      but from recent news stories out of the UK, anyone who successfully defends himself against an armed criminal in the UK will face stiffer penalties than the criminal.

      That's correct. If you successfully defend yourself against a criminal, the police will actively help that criminal press assault charges against you. Worse, every time we experiment with arming the police, it makes no difference at all to crime figures, but a lot of innocent bystanders get gunned down. Frankly, it's hard to decide who's the bigger threat, criminals or trigger-happy cops.

      We don't really have what an American would recognize as a police force anymore. What we have are paramilitary social workers. They'll do everything they possibly can to help the criminal and blame everything on the victim or on "society". But that's what you get if you elect a Socialist government (don't blame me I vote for the Independence Party!).

    278. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Doom, you had a shotgun. In UT2004 you can have a tank. So yes, if there is a sharp upturn in tank-shootings, it will probably get blamed on UT. :-)

    279. Re:Carry a gun by garethwi · · Score: 1

      The UK aw does include the right to self defense, as long as you don't use excessive force. You are allowed to kill someone who is trying to kill you if that could be considered the only means possible of stopping them. It would be considered excessive if you killed someone who was shouting at you.

      The main problem with the UK system is that most of these laws were enacted when policemen still patrolled the streets on foot, and people felt generally safe. It's been a long long time since I last saw a British bobby walking the beat.

    280. Re:Carry a gun by Upaut · · Score: 1

      Just don't do anything stupid like shoot a mugger fleeing with your laptop.
      This is just an opinion, but few things sound as sweet as a mugger going down after being hit in the back with the sharp prongs of a tazer gun... preferably one of those M-18 advanced models. Then it is a simple little walk to the stunned (but probably not unconciouse) mugger, then get them in the back of the neck with a stunmaster 625000 (not only will this knock them out, they will probably shit themselves, a rightful punishment for trying to steal my E%^$$# laptop...) Take back electronics, take the guys wallet, then get as far away from that location before the mugger regains conciousness.

      --
      3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    281. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we see the advantages of the ban. We do not want you in London.

    282. Re:Carry a gun by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      killing people isn't permitted, ever, by anyone.
      you can get off easier when it's in self defense though.

      BUT: consider this, in the european country I live practically every male over 20 is trained in the use of an assault rifle(and various other guerilla & soldier skills) in the case shit hits the fan.

      However, I don't think that carrying a gun around would be pretty wise. The only times I've felt threated have been times I've been seriously drunk myself and thus would have been better off leaving the piece at home anyways. Carrying a gun around is for most people for psychological reasons anyways, the thing makes them feel safe or something.. Though I wouldn't really consider carrying a gun around a plus even when visiting Russia(well, if I had some bodyguards maybe for them), as if I was intending to act I would have to be faster than Lucky Luke in drawing the weapon to avoid risking getting killed on the spot.

      Shooting with an assault rifle is fun, in a fucking shooting alley, but guns are nasty: they kill off people easily when the bullet hits the wrong spot, even when the defendant didn't really mean it. They're fucking lousy as 'panic buttons', unless you consider a grenade strapped on to you as a great panic button as well.

      The "right to bear arms"(just for the sake of it) might be good in a largely unicvilised 3rd world country or a newly colonized frontier land, where there truly were no law.

      besides, you can get permits for carrying a gun(small hand guns) around if you really want. It's not a big deal, just fill out some forms(& etc) and don't have crap on your neck.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    283. Re:Carry a gun by slipgun · · Score: 1

      Because recently they amended the law so that cartridges which used a separate cartridge for each pellets (ie Brococks) were made Section 1, which means you need a firearm certificate to own one.

      So now, no doubt, all the drug dealers with Brococks that have been converted to fire .22 live ammunition will be rushing down to the police station to get a license. While Brocock go out of business.

      Abso-bloody-ridiculous. Especially considering how easy it is to get a 'real' firearm in London.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    284. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Shooting to kill was a lot more extreme than was neccesary. He could have fired some warning shots and told them to get out of his home.

    285. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The trouble is, that pepper spray could also be used as an offensive weapon for disabling a victim, and muggers are more likely to get the stuff.

    286. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you feel your life is in the slightest bit of jeopardy, you have the right to eliminate the threat by any means required.

      So it is fine to kill a neighbor who entered your house to tell you you forgot to close your door?

    287. Re:Carry a gun by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1
      A scared person with a gun is still a scared person.

      A scared person with a gun is likely the most dangerous person you will ever meet.

    288. Re:Carry a gun by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      You miss the critical point in this case, the reason he went to jail. He shot the kid in the back as he ran away, that's attempted murder not self defence.

    289. Re:Carry a gun by garyok · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tony Martin shot a 16-year old unarmed burglar in the back as he was running away. He'd already successfully defended his property, but I guess that wasn't enough for him. The jury didn't think it was enough either and found him guilty. Funny thing: the burglar's mate also got caught in the leg by a couple of bits of shot. He sued Tony Martin for "loss of earnings".

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    290. Re:Carry a gun by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      not stealing by general definition, but certainly dodging your legal responsibility to pay the licensing. 'stealing intellectual property' has become a term that basically means you are committing a crime because you did not obtain the necessary license. it's not really 'stealing' as we think of it, but its the simplest way to explain it.

    291. Re:Carry a gun by bhima · · Score: 1

      The guy said he was in London. England, being a civilized sort of place, does not allow guns.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    292. Re:Carry a gun by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      martial arts is not just about the fighting and technique, it is about control. most well trained martial artists will not use it in a fight situation unless prepared to kill (excluding sparring/recreational use) and if you know you're outgunned (literally perhaps) to use the better out (giving up the stuff) without increasing your risk by fighting an unwinnable fight.

      martial arts is mostly for working on yourself as a person, it is a way of life more than a way of fighting. in a fist fight, or perhaps a knife vs fist fight, martial arts can be very useful, but learning it is also learning how/when not to use it.

      this is all over-simplification, but is basically the point.

    293. Re:Carry a gun by varjag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it really that hard to understand that the gun is a deterrent, not a 'thugicide'?

      Drawing a gun always escalates situation. If the attacker chooses to respond, very likely one of you will end up dead or seriously wounded, with 50/50 chance. Your marksman and gun handling skills aren't really that important in such a stressful situation; if anything, actual combat experience would help, but I don't think many people have it. Are you really willing to play that lottery?

      When you pull a gun (hopefully after taking one or more courses in lethal force usage) you are sending a message to the criminal : this episode is over.

      Or, the message is: fuck, he's got a gun, shoot!

      You seem to ignore many factors: how dumb your opponent is, how much guts he have, how many of companions he got, is he on drugs...

      Never pull a gun unless you absolutely determined to use it.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    294. Re:Carry a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      The martin case was a bad example, a number of pro gun
      campaigners stated that he was not a good example of the need for self defence weapons.
      He had already lost the shotgun certificate for his original shotgun.
      He shot both of them in the back as they were running away
      He had shown to the court a degree of premeditation with regards to killing them
      He then purchased an illegal pump action shotgun on the black market, for the specific purpose of killing anyone who came to his house

      Frederick Forsyth, a well known author, and in favour of gun ownership, pointed out that, for the price of the pump action shotgun, which was illegal, he could have paid for any number of legal detterence methods. Trained dogs, high tech alarms or spent it doing up his shambles of a farm with decent locks and windows to prevent them getting in in the first place.

    295. Re:Carry a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Actually, what they got him for was that his shotgun was illegal, and he shot them in the back as they were running away.

      You are right they shouldn't have been there, but I got the distinct impression that rather than taking adequate measures to secure his property he was just looking for an excuse to shoot gypsies.

    296. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly that's true, but if your instructor is so poorly equipped that some punk with a kitchen knife took him out, then he has shamed his students and they will not admit it.

      Interesting conundrum, eh?

    297. Re:Carry a gun by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware, Tazers are not legal in the UK.

    298. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am truly amazed at the careless sense of invincibility some posters have shown in this discussion.

      Oh don't listen to them. They're geeks on the internet. It's like jocks at a sports bar...they'll stretch any tale no matter how ridiculous it sounds. No, some dude did not get shot in the head and lower back and then get up, grab the guy's gun and start beating him with it. Superman doesn't do that kind of thing. What happened was that he saw a robbery take place, and then later imagined "THAT's what I should have done!."

      Seriously, man...this is Slashdot. 99.9% of the people here would crap their pants and cry like a 10-year-old girl when faced with any sort of danger, but they sure wish they wouldn't.

    299. Re:Carry a gun by f64 · · Score: 1

      may i counter with the exact opposite advise i received from my aikido sensei?

      anectode:
      he was working in some shoddy downtown place in a rehab place for poor. on his way there a guy whips out a knife and demands his money. he gives what little money he carries in his pocket, explaining that they are likely to run into each other often since he's working at the clinic near-by,.

      couple of days later a group of people try to mug him again, one of whom was the first guy - when the original mugger recognized sensei he got the others to back down.

      moral of the story: snap the fuck out of your ego.

      of course, this approach doesn't work if your goal is to retain your money at all costs, but it will keep you out of a conflict.
      and contrary to parent poster, i would say that the spirit of aikido isn't about winning a conflict but resolving it. let in dissolve.

      my sensei was no naive person and had injured people when he thought there was no other option, and would kill in self-defence; but he would not confuse his ego with his morals. those who have trained long (imho) seem to become more ego-less than novices, and without an ego you're bound to loose money when mugged, but wont have to feel guilt about having maimed/killed someone over your wallet, nor becoming maimed/killed yourself.

      f64 : the seller of crystal meth since 1978

    300. Re:Carry a gun by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, then what, exactly, is the purpose of martial arts? If they don't give you an edge in combat then there's no practical reason beyond exercise for learning them, right?

      Oh, I'm quite sure that it gives you an edge in combat. However, the point that almost everyone replying to this post seems to have missed is that it won't make you invulnerable. Sure, it might meant that 7 times out of 10 the sensei would have kicked the mugger's ass, but those other three times the mugger manages to do enough damage with his knife that the sensei is seriously disadvantaged and then killed.

      Sure, martial arts may increase your chances, but that doesn't mean that you won't die horribly if you're unlucky.

      'course, giving over the cash is no guarantee of not dying horribly either...

    301. Re:Carry a gun by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Considering that at 25 feet I can put EVERY shot into a grouping the size of your fist, clip after clip (9mm Browning), I will never trust my life to someone else's marksmanship or lack thereof. If I have to run from someone with a gun, I won't go in a straight line for any length of time, unless I know there's cover (or a crowd) at the other end of that line. It's far too easy to lead something that is not accellerating, and is not making any effort at concealment.

      The size of the weapon would factor into it as well. Someone carrying a .22 with a barrel two and a half inches long is probably not going to hit you from more than 10 feet away, and even if they do, it is rather likely not to kill you any time soon. Also they probably don't have very many shots at their disposal. Someone holding their pistol sideways gangsta-style also is unlikely to hit anything smaller or faster than a parked car. But regardless of what they're packing, cover is safer than distance. You're far better off on the other side of a vehicle than you would be 25 feet away in plain sight, running directly away from the shooter.

      Finally, remember that gunshots generally draw a great deal of attention, so if the person confronting you can't get you with the first one or two, it's probably not in their best interests to fire at all. It's your job to make this the case.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    302. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The easiest way to get shot is to carry a gun" -- Atticus Finch

    303. Re:Carry a gun by shokk · · Score: 1

      Then again, you guys have soccer hooligans there. Could be a bad mix.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    304. Re:Carry a gun by msoya · · Score: 1

      They're not. My old next-door-neighbours used to sell them. Then the police found out, and I think they're in prison now.

    305. Re:Carry a gun by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      What about using arms to defend your life or the life of a family member, friend, or complete stranger?


      I live in Finland, and I have the right to defend myself or my loved ones, using any means necessary. That includes using lethal force, including guns. That was told me by a police-officer in my Krav Maga-class.

      Related to that, I have the right to remove any individual from my home, if he's there against my will. If he refuses to leave, I can use any methods necessary to remove the individual.

      If your mother lived in Finland, and she had a permit for her gun, she would be well within her rights to use it to defend herself. So the knee-jerk reaction of "OMG! The Europeans are at the mercy of criminals and thugs!" is just plain nonsense
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    306. Re:Carry a gun by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      killing people isn't permitted, ever, by anyone.


      YOu CAN use lethal force to protect your life or life of your loved-ones. That is a fact. Of course proving that you had to kill the assailant is going to be difficult (naturally), but the law does not prevent you from using lethal force.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    307. Re:Carry a gun by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I talked to my sensei about this subject today. He says that there's a long-standing story dating back to the Showa Period, when karate first made its way from Okinawa into Kyushu and the rest of Japan. On the mainland, judo and kendo reigned supreme; karate was new and different, and most importantly, viewed as extremely dangerous. They were also worried that this new style would corrupt the purity of their own, and that they would lose followers to it (which they did, although it's still in the minority in Japan.)

      The police then decided that two men fighting using karate should be considered not only as fighting, but actually as committing a crime, since the style was so aggressive and effective.

      However, there was no specific law to support this. The karate teachers, upon hearing about the trouble with the police, then told their students, "By no means use karate in self-defense, or in fighting, or anything outside of the dojo!" This wasn't philosophy, but a means of keeping their style from being banned in Japan.

      The subsequent urban legends and half-understood translations into Western culture you've probably already heard.

      My New Zealand aikido instructor also tells us that it's not all about ego, but he (and my Japanese instructor's) main reason for telling students not to fight on the street is because they would suck at it and get their asses kicked. "If you haven't mastered it, don't use it, because then you don't die," is the motto. Especially as someone who practices aikido, you should know that someone who has mastered the art can decide what level of pain they choose to levy on their opponent; if you're not able to practice that sort of control, you aren't quite there yet.

      When someone says, "No, I don't want to give you my wallet, and I happen to be a master in a martial art and therefore capable of doing something about it," is not ego, it's the whole damn point of learning a martial art. Martial arts were not developed in order to be nice to people (and the nasty stuff they show you when you reach san dan in aikido would make your eyes pop.)

      In short, you use a martial art as a tool. If you don't want to fight and are seeking inner peace, harmony, and a higher consciousness that is above petty things such as having a knife pointed at you, then don't study a martial art; go to the temple.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    308. Re:Carry a gun by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify what I'm saying:

      I'm tired of people like you coming along and saying "oh noes! LOL!!!!1! I'm an idiot and I don't believe in fighting back against people who have already proven they're not going to stay within the bounds of civilized society!! Please rape me anally and steal my wallet because I'm a limp-wristed pansy!!"

      There's a difference between a "civilized" society and the victim society people like you want to live in. I don't know where you nutters come from, but why don't you keep your yap shut about how to respond to a criminal of ANY kind until you've actually faced one. If you keep yipping like that you're caviar might fall out of your big, fat mouth and ruin those dainty silk sheets.

      Oh, and here's a clue Edward P. Dwinklebottom the 3rd: legal systems can't protect you if you let the crook kill you in the first place.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    309. Re:Carry a gun by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      "You don't have to get up to a black belt level to learn how to handle that. But you do have to have practiced countering a knife-wielding attacker."

      Additionally, and possibly most importantly, know when you're facing someone who knows how to fight with a knife. If the knife-wielder has taken a balanced fighting stance, with the knife held back and in a semi-relaxed grip with the blade horizontal, and the other hand out front, either run like hell, or do what he says, as it's likely he has experience/training in fighting with a blade, and any such attempt by a relatively inexperienced (or even experienced) person will likely turn out *very* badly, as an experienced/trained knife fighter is as dangerous at close quarters as someone trained and armed with a gun, maybe even more so.

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    310. Re:Carry a gun by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      You mean as opposed to the dizzying comeback you used to set me straight?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    311. Re:Carry a gun by pseudochaotic · · Score: 1

      A two way mirror? Is that like a window, or something? :)

      --
      And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
    312. Re:Carry a gun by hughk · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Active and former security forces personnel may often get a concealed-carry permit for a handgun without problems, particularly if they had been involved insomething that makes them a target (i.e., antiterrorist activities). The fact that you have left the services usually doesn't maka a difference, so they may even give you the weapon to go with it.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    313. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      I was implying that in England, where actual hanguns are illegal, it is highly likely that replicas are as well - especially if one attempts to use it threateningly. Not sure if that's the case, but if I had to make a guess I'd bet on it.

    314. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure whether to take this as a joke or not.

      What about sharp sticks? They're sure great offensive weapons - cavemen thought so! Surely a mugger will be more likely to have one of these as a tool of his trade if all else fails. Should we therefore ban sticks, sharp and otherwise?

    315. Re:Carry a gun by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's so civilized he has to ask /. how to defend himself against the violent criminals there.

    316. Re:Carry a gun by Quila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      England, being a civilized sort of place, does not allow guns.

      It's funny that all this mugging and criminals with guns only really took off after England banned guns. Really civilized.

    317. Re:Carry a gun by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Why not just carry a cane?

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    318. Re:Carry a gun by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      You are playing simantic games that a 5 year old could see through and no one is impressed. Stealing is stealing and music piracy does make you a thief. Thieves are those who use other's property against the owner's will.

    319. Re:Carry a gun by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      You are playing simantic games that a 5 year old could see through and no one is impressed. Stealing is stealing and music piracy does make you a thief. Thieves are those who use other's property against the owner's will.

      What more can I say.

    320. Re:Carry a gun by LC+Gundo · · Score: 1
      Or one of these.

      "Hope you enjoy my laptop with one freakin eye!"

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    321. Re:Carry a gun by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1
      Sorry, not true.

      Check these out

      http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvinco.html

      Heres an interesting quote from the Economist on Britains crime rate here as well.

      "BRITAIN may have slipped down many world league tables over the past few decades, but it beats all other rich countries except Australia in one activity: crime. According to a new victimisation survey of industrialised nations, people in England and Wales are at greater risk than anywhere else of having a car stolen. And apart from Australia, people who live in England and Wales are at greater risk of being assaulted, robbed, sexually attacked and having their homes burgled than are people in any other rich country."

      Heres the full story:

      http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory .cfm?Story_ID=513031

    322. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hey moron, copyright infringement IS a criminal offense in most jurisdictions, and you CAN get charged as well as sued. If you live in the U.S., see Title 17, Chapter 5 (link). Believe it or not, COPYRIGHT INFRINGERS ARE CRIMINALS.

    323. Re:Carry a gun by speedbump · · Score: 1

      I was taught that you get away if you can, but in any case you control the situation, and do not allow the assailant to do so.

      Sometimes that means you teach 'em a lesson.

    324. Re:Carry a gun by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      To oversimplify, most martial arts teach self-defense, not to street-fight every chance you get. If you're looking for a reason to fight, then you're not learning it for the right reasons or the way it's intended to be learned.

      A mugger asking you for your wallet is not reason enough to engage in combat unless you are being physically attacked or threatened, in which case there would obviously be no choice but to defend yourself. If you are a practioner of any true martial art and have reached any respectable level, there is also the chance that you can seriously, or fatally, injure someone. I personally don't believe a wallet is worth the risk of hurting myself or someone else.

      Most people who do not practice martial arts are led to believe it's all about fighting; this couldn't be further from the truth. It's more about making sure you're able to defend yourself when needed and improving your life for yourself and those around you. At least, that's the way I've seen it from my experiences as a student.

    325. Re:Carry a gun by LC+Gundo · · Score: 1
      According to these guys (in perhaps a more fitting forum for discussing this topic), you may want one of these, or one of these.

      And, if you plan on using a firearm, you'll definitely want to be wearing one of these (I gave my wife a set along with her other birthday present), 'cause you don't want to spoil those ears for all that good iPod listenin' just 'cause you deliverd the old double tap to some fool.

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    326. Re:Carry a gun by sidmystic · · Score: 1

      Yes, we yanks enjoy our freedom to defend ourselves, our families, communities, and country from goblins within and without with virtually whatever firearm we wish. We'd rather not be defenseless 'loyal subjects' like those of you in London.

      I'm sure the increase in violent crime across the UK was worth it.

    327. Re:Carry a gun by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Noun 1. thief - a criminal who takes property belonging to someone else with the intention of keeping it or selling it"

      Not only is your definition wrong, but even using your definition a copyright infringer is not a thief.

      You do know copyright'd works are not owned by the copyright holder don't you? They actually aren't even ownable.

      Works which qualify for copyright are unownable or owned by all mankind whichever way you want to look at it. Copyright is a temporary grant of limited privilages to the first person who thought the idea.

      It's impossible to steal someone's copyright, and therefore impossible for a copyright infringer to be a theif.

    328. Re:Carry a gun by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My question is this. Have you ever had to use your gun to protect your family? I really do not see the value of a gun for protection in an urban area. If you are well trained and store the gun responsibly then it is probably harmless but I doubt of much use. Of course in certain rural areas a gun can almost be required to be safe. I know people that live in Alaska, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming that have guns and need them to protect themselves and there families from wild life. My brother carries a gun and my brother in law is a SWAT team member and collects guns. I am not totally anti gun I am anti gun nuts. There is a happy middle ground. I just do not see it in an urban setting.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    329. Re:Carry a gun by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      If I want to hear something new, I just make up a little tune and hum it.

      That's a good idea.

      Don't bother to support the arts.

      It's hardly the singers and musicians grubbing for money. They make very little from album sales anyway.

    330. Re:Carry a gun by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      copyright'd

      Ah, the efficiency of abbreviation.

    331. Re:Carry a gun by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      As evidenced by missing stairs? Seems like something of a stretch to me.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    332. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Well.
      I try to not take my family into situations where defending them would be necessary; i'm sort of fanatical about it.
      On the times when it is unavoidable (cultural events in "the big city", shopping trips, school stuff), i'm armed and always scanning the area, watching for threats; I doubt very seriously if this could be mistaken by a casual attacker as a sign of vulnerabilty; I see guarding the family as a much more serious job than anything similar I have done in the military.
      I don't think most people have the ability to use a weapon effectively in self defense, but I believe a unknown percentage could be trained so that they are; combat ranges, practice, even paintball.
      But even a untrained person, I believe, should have the option of defending themselves (even if they are just going to screw it up and get themselves killed), a gun gives you an option for a desperation defense you might not have had without one.
      I have had to use force to defend my family, but it didn't come to using a firearm, or even revealing I was carrying one.
      as to "proper storage".
      proper storage is only proper if your weapon is available to you in a hurry; anything else is counterproductive and just plain stupid. If you can't reasonably trust your kids to not steal your guns and go shoot up a school, then you don't deserve to live, let alone have kids.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    333. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In aikido, we're taught how to fight someone no matter what weapon they're wielding or style they're using.


      Yeah, and how often have you actually gone up against somebody with a live blade intent on killing you?

      My aikido sensei (san-dan) gives us the same advice as the previous poster: the wallet isn't worth your life. And that isn't just because we're inexperienced: it's what he would do.


      It is common to tell beginners that the best solution is to give in peacefully, because (as beginners) they're likely to get themselves killed thinking that they know a martial art, hence can handle the situation.


      A lot of high-ranking martial arts practitioners think the same thing. My brother's aikijujutsu sensei told them, "The streets of America are littered with the bodies of black belts."

      The truth is, no matter how much time you've practiced, things in real life don't go down the way they do in a dojo. No matter how long you've been training, if you're totally confident you can avoid getting cut in a knife attack against an arbitrary attacker, you're a fool.


      Saying that learning a martial art means learning to move past the point where you need to fight is great and all, but there is no way on God's green earth that my sensei would give some idiot with a knife his wallet.


      Hey, his funeral.


      If you're looking for noble Oriental philosophy, at least higher-level practitioners have mastered the self-control to decide how much they have to hurt their opponent in order to defeat them.


      Yeah, maybe in your fantasy world, a noble high-level practitioner can execute flawless technique and leisurely dispense exactly the right amount of force (and street justice) he desires. While that's the ideal of aikido, don't count on actually being able to pull it off reliably, especially against an armed attacker and under duress.


      In our dojo, they tell you, "If you seek spiritual enlightment, go to a temple. If you seek to learn to fight, go to war. If you seek both, you're in the right place."


      In my dojo they tell us that aikido is neither fighting nor conflict. (We're not big on "spiritual enlightenment", either.) They tell us aikido is about keeping ourselves safe by blending with our attacker. "Fighting" is not the goal.
    334. Re:Carry a gun by bluGill · · Score: 1

      A gun at close range is easier to deal with than a knife. With the gun you just have to keep the arm holding it facing away from you, with a knife your efforts will get your hurt.

      A gun is a terrible close range weapon. It is such an excellent long range weapon, and so easy to learn, that you can force the situation to be to the guns advantage if you have any forewarning. When you don't have forewarning, a knife at 20 feet will beat you. At 10 feet they beat the drawn gun. (assuming the knife wielder knows how use it correctly, something that takes a long time to learn)

    335. Re:Carry a gun by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Works when your home is burglarized, too.


      Not if my loved ones are in it. Not worth risking their injury, rape, or death on the chance that the person who broke into my home is only interested in material things and has no interest in hurting anyone. (girlfriend and her two kids assuming I am at her place)

      Having said that, I have the fortune of living in a place where the bedrooms are on the second floor. So if someone were to break in and was downstairs making off with my TV, game systems, and SGI O2, I would call 911 from the upstrairs and wait (as you said, my material positions are not worth someone's life, and it is never a good idea to confront someone who is likely dangerous and running on a LOT of adrenaline ). However if he/she ended up coming up the stairs, their life is forfit.

      Finkployd

    336. Re:Carry a gun by malfunct · · Score: 1
      In the state I grew up in it was completely legal for anyone at all to carry a gun so long as it was not concealed. City law could override this, but in general you could carry any weapon so long as everyone knew you were carrying it.

      I don't think there were really that many more injuries from guns (hunting excepted of course, a group of 6 or 8 drunk men with high powered rifles makes for a less than safe outing) than other states I've been in and read the news.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    337. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      And if you carry a sharp stick that can be used as an offensive weapon, without good reason, that is also illegal.

    338. Re:Carry a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I could belive that. here in ohio, it is the same way. I was told by the police to strap my handun to my side and make sure the chamber isn't loaded when i would go target shooting while riding my motorcycle. (Usually in a car, you have to carry the gunn in a seperat location then the amunition. now the CC permits are availible that has changed somewhat.)

      I do however know of a guy who carried a bb gun into a bank and was arested and charged with creating a public pannic. It would appear common sence wasn't with him that day.

    339. Re:Carry a gun by uohcicds · · Score: 1

      burglarized. Ugh.

      The word is burgled

      --
      It's not you: I'm just this horrifically socially awkward with everybody.
    340. Re:Carry a gun by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't stealing, the RIAA wouldn't be getting any convictions or settlements

      Those jews wouldn't be in that camp if they hadn't done anything wrong. If that woman was raped, she shoulda seen it comin, it was her fault for wearing that short skirt.

      I live in the country. I know bullshit when I perceive it.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    341. Re:Carry a gun by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      When it really get to it, all law is nothing but a massive, long-lived semantic game.

      What is and is not stealing is not some kind of open and closed issue. Reasserting a much-disputed "fact" will not magically make the issue go away. Saying something is an indisputable fact, when people most certainly are disputing it is one of the stupist things possible.

      Saying something is a fact doesn't make it so. Saying something is indisputable, in an argument about that same something, is retarded.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    342. Re:Carry a gun by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      it's semantic games, idiot. If you are going to go to the trouble of posting something twice, you should at least take the trouble to spell your piss-poor arguments correctly.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    343. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! LOLOLROFLLOL!!!11ONEONE!!

      You are teh funnay!

    344. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Congratulations - you're the first person I've ever heard who seems to honestly think people should need a reason for carrying even a stick .

      Wow. What a fantastic tyrant you'd make.

      Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.

      - William Pitt

    345. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      So, am I the only person you know who thinks you should need a good reason for carrying any offensive weapon?

    346. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      You're the only person I know who will go to such extreme lengths to categorize everyday items as offensive weapons, ostensibly as a reason to prohibit them.

      Do you really live in that much acute fear every day that you need control on such a fine-grained level?

      Here's a question I love hearing the answers to : You're in a room with your child standing behind you. You're holding a loaded .357 revolver. A guy 100 pounds heavier and 6" taller than you is walking towards you with a knife saying "I'm going to kill you and your child." Would you shoot him?

    347. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Do you really live in that much acute fear every day that you need control on such a fine-grained level?

      What's fine grained? I can't think of any reason that someone would want to carry a sharp piece of wood around with them, unless they were a mugger, vampire hunter, or happened to be going camping. The restriction on my doing so therefore doesn't infringe my liberties. Nor does it infringe the liberties of the vampire hunter or the camper, since they both have a perfectly good reason to be carrying sharp pieces of wood.

      Here's a question I love hearing the answers to : You're in a room with your child standing behind you. You're holding a loaded .357 revolver. A guy 100 pounds heavier and 6" taller than you is walking towards you with a knife saying "I'm going to kill you and your child." Would you shoot him?

      Assuming I don't have the chance to pick up the kid and run away, and there was absolutely no other option, of course I'd shoot him.

      I'm not going to carry a gun around just in case though.

    348. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      What's fine grained? How about : insisting someone has a good reason for carrying around a stick. Or a real need for it. Once you start dictating what you can and cannot do based on need, you can take away anything you like. Today I'm carrying around my 20+ deadly-steel-tool Shrade multitool, despite the fact that I'm not doing any work. Should I be disallowed from doing that? Or maybe if I was just required to pre-file in triplicate the days I was planning on using it, along with a signed affadavit stating I was heading to my house to do some handyman work - that wouldn't be an infringement of my liberties, right?

      I take it you're with the security-over-freedom crowd, given your little 'The restriction on my doing so therefore doesn't infringe my liberties' sophistry.

    349. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Once you start dictating what you can and cannot do based on need, you can take away anything you like. Today I'm carrying around my 20+ deadly-steel-tool Shrade multitool, despite the fact that I'm not doing any work. Should I be disallowed from doing that?

      Nope. Presumably you're carrying around for some reason.

      Or maybe if I was just required to pre-file in triplicate the days I was planning on using it, along with a signed affadavit stating I was heading to my house to do some handyman work - that wouldn't be an infringement of my liberties, right?

      Of course it would. It would require undue inconvenience. I don't think anyone should have a right even to challenge you on it unless they have some reasonable suspicion that you may be intending to do somebody harm.

    350. Re:Carry a gun by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      To me proper storage means that no one but the owner can access it. I am less worred about a teen getting the gun and going on a rampage than I am about a toddler or small child getting it and playing with it. More than one child has died that way. The only safe way to store a gun in family enviroment is a gun safe. I do not argue the legality of carrying a gun just the wisdom. I do feel that is says something sad when you feel the need to carry a gun to school events! Man move your family out of the war zone.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    351. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Nope. Presumably you're carrying around for some reason.

      And if I wasn't? Suppose I just like carrying it around, and wore a T-shirt with black letters that said "I have no use for my multitool"?

      See, you're deliberately dodging the original point waaaaay back *.

      This guy was carrying around pepper spray. Well, what possible reason could he have for doing this, you are asking? I'm answering - to defend himself against muggers, in a place he'd already been attacked before. You say - but there's no good reason for anyone to be legally able to carry it because it can be misused!

      And then you promptly followed up with this fascinating analysis of how and when someone should be allowed to carry a stick : when he has a legit use for it.

      Do you see the sophistry yet? I'll break it down further:

      - People can be allowed to carrying potentially dangerous things (sticks, multitools, etc) when they have a good reason for doing so.

      - There is never a good reason for carrying pepper spray because it's ....drum roll....dangerous!

      Boy oh boy isn't that convenient. But getting back to that asterisk near the top of my post : the original point of discussion was that self defense in the UK is incredibly devalued. And you're happily highlighting my point with your bizarre circular logic which completely precludes the likelihood that someone should think about defending themselves.

      You said "The trouble is, that pepper spray could also be used as an offensive weapon for disabling a victim, and muggers are more likely to get the stuff.". So, your argument is that, if banned, only muggers are more likely to have it, so therefore it should be banned? What?

      Again, what it boils down to (I think) in your mind is that : If something can be misused, despite the fact that it can be used in legitimate defense of one's own person, it is proscribed.

      I admit, I'm starting to think I'm arguing with a Turing Machine that's falling apart on me.

    352. Re:Carry a gun by paganizer · · Score: 1

      There are many better ways than a gun safe if you are talking about small kids or toddlers; trigger locks would be fine, I would think. or maybe just put your gun in a place where the kids can't get to (yeah, I know, kids are amazingly resourceful, i'm not talking the top shelf of the closet here).
      the School events I was refering(?) to were things like regional music competitions, spelling bee playoffs, stuff like that; the area I LIVE in is about as safe as safe can be, with near-zero crime and a gun rack in every window.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    353. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Suppose I just like carrying it around, and wore a T-shirt with black letters that said "I have no use for my multitool"?

      Then why the hell are you carrying it around!? If I was a police officer, I'd ask you why you were carrying it. And I'd make sure I kept my eye on you if nothing else.

      This guy was carrying around pepper spray. Well, what possible reason could he have for doing this, you are asking? I'm answering - to defend himself against muggers, in a place he'd already been attacked before. You say - but there's no good reason for anyone to be legally able to carry it because it can be misused!

      And I still say there's no use at all for pepper spray, apart from as a weapon. I just don't agree that people should be carrying weapons around.

      And you're happily highlighting my point with your bizarre circular logic which completely precludes the likelihood that someone should think about defending themselves.

      No... people are entitled to defend themselves. They shouldn't use offensive weapons to do so. They can find another way.

      You said "The trouble is, that pepper spray could also be used as an offensive weapon for disabling a victim, and muggers are more likely to get the stuff.". So, your argument is that, if banned, only muggers are more likely to have it, so therefore it should be banned? What?

      Ermmmm... NO! If it is NOT banned, muggers are more likely to have it. Where do the muggers get it from if banned? If it is legally available for personal defence, then a mugger will just go to a shop and buy a can. If it is totally banned, then a mugger will have to go to greater expense to get it, which, if he could afford to do, he probably wouldn't go for such a low yield crime in the first place.

      Again, what it boils down to (I think) in your mind is that : If something can be misused, despite the fact that it can be used in legitimate defense of one's own person, it is proscribed.

      Not quite. My argument is that the potential for personal defence is not in itself a justification for making offensive weapons freely available.

      Your argument seems to be that anything that could conceivably be used to defend against muggers should be permitted, even if it is more useful to the mugger, and that banning some things that may be used as a weapon would neccesitate banning everything that could be used as a weapon.

    354. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      Then why the hell are you carrying it around!? If I was a police officer, I'd ask you why you were carrying it. And I'd make sure I kept my eye on you if nothing else. Well, then I'm sorry to say : you're insane. God forbid we get more petty tyrants like you in office.

    355. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well, then I'm sorry to say : you're insane.

      You're the one who uses a multitool as a security blanket.

    356. Re:Carry a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      You're the one who can't understand that I was using the multitool as an example of a potential 'offensive weapon' that one could conceivably have no immediate use for. We consider 'tool wielding' to be a pretty important thing for modern man, so carrying around tools that we might not need at any given moment is considered normal. However, in your bizarre little nerf world, this is impermissible.

    357. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about having no immediate use for a tool. I said "Without good reason". The fact that it may come in useful is a good reason.

      You claim that this multitool is deadly. I took that to mean that it would actually be worthwhile as a weapon. The fact that it's deadly means that if you were also acting in a suspicious manner, and a policeman saw you, I would expect him to ask why you have it. You seem to think that this is the act of a tyrant.

    358. Re:Carry a gun by $ASANY · · Score: 1
      No... people are entitled to defend themselves. They shouldn't use offensive weapons to do so. They can find another way.

      A "weapon", really a class of tool, is neither offensive nor defensive. The method of employment is. You can conduct an offense or a defense, but labeling a tool that can be used in a variety of ways as offensive or defensive is simply arbitrary. Law enforcement personnel are armed with handguns for the purpose of defending themselves. That same instrument in the hands of a law-abiding citizen doesn't suddenly change it's fundamental characteristics and change from a "defensive sidearm" to an "offensive weapon".

      Finding another way (other than using a firearm) to deal with a situation where your life is in danger is a terribly difficult. That wheelchair-bound person doesn't have a whole lot of "other ways" to employ. Neither does the woman who is a hundred pounds lighter and ten inches shorter than her attacker have many "other ways" that are as effective and proven as legally employing a firearm. Is the 80 year old man expected to fight off a 17 year-old attacker with his jujitsu skills? Or can we even expect a reasonably fit adult male to "find another way" when confronted by several other reasonably fit adult males?

      Any ethical concealed permit holder is certainly going to attempt every other possible way to deal with a situation before using his or her last resort of firing at a threat. That's what's taught in the NRA personal protection course, in Ayoob's LFI courses and every other mandated or optional training I've ever seen. And in practice, we generally see this is the case, because the law requires this behavior. But if we proscribe that last option of firing a handgun at an attacker because posession of that handgun is banned, what have we effectively done?

      We've shown that "find another option" doesn't work. If that option had been available, deadly force would not have been used. The net effect of mandating "find another option" only increases the number of dead victims, provided permit holders comply with the law.

    359. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      A "weapon", really a class of tool, is neither offensive nor defensive. The method of employment is. You can conduct an offense or a defense, but labeling a tool that can be used in a variety of ways as offensive or defensive is simply arbitrary.

      Surely any tool that is intended primarily to inflict harm is an offensive weapon. We're not labelling tools. We're labelling intent.

      . Law enforcement personnel are armed with handguns for the purpose of defending themselves.

      The baton is intended for defence. The gun is there for protection perhaps, but is still an offensive weapon.

      Finding another way (other than using a firearm) to deal with a situation where your life is in danger is a terribly difficult.

      Using a firearm to deal with a situation where your life is in danger is also difficult. Is the attacker going to wait for you to get it out?

      That wheelchair-bound person doesn't have a whole lot of "other ways" to employ.

      Nope. He's at a great disadvantage. a gun isn't going to help much either.

      Neither does the woman who is a hundred pounds lighter and ten inches shorter than her attacker have many "other ways" that are as effective and proven as legally employing a firearm.

      Run away. Fast.

      Is the 80 year old man expected to fight off a 17 year-old attacker with his jujitsu skills?

      He could avoid places where he might get mugged. Is he going to have a chance to shoot?

      Or can we even expect a reasonably fit adult male to "find another way" when confronted by several other reasonably fit adult males?

      Run away. Fast.

      But if we proscribe that last option of firing a handgun at an attacker because posession of that handgun is banned, what have we effectively done?

      Removed handguns from the the muggers?

      The net effect of mandating "find another option" only increases the number of dead victims, provided permit holders comply with the law.

      So we just have to make sure that permit holding muggers comply with the law.

    360. Re:Carry a gun by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > So, am I the only person you know who thinks you should need a good reason for carrying any offensive weapon?

      That same category includes a pen knife, OR A FORK. Yes, you are the only person I have ever met (or conversed with in some way) with such a ludicrous ideal.

    361. Re:Carry a gun by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > People are entitled to defend themselves. They shouldn't use offensive weapons to do so. They can find another way.

      Aha, proof of a troll! HE WAS CRIPPLED, YOU IDIOT. There WASN'T ANOTHER WAY to defend himself.

    362. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      What sort of a moron carries a fork around wherever they go!?

      A pen knife is not primarily used as an offensive weapon. Perhaps it could unjure someone, but generally speaking the blades are too short on them to be a lot of use as a weapon.

    363. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, Sherlock. Welcome to the postmodern world. Ultimately, it doesn't matter whether you call yourself a thief. The fact* remains that copyright infringement, of the sort we are discussing, is illegal and morally indefensible under the systems of social justice established in any society of which you could be a member.

      * You may argue there is no such thing as "fact," but upon your assertion the word loses all purpose. I reject this sort of chain-reaction reductionism and seek here to maintain at least the barest of meanings. I would also propose that it is the reader who endows text (in the analytical) with meaning, and therefore every word--including "fact"--is necessarily meaningful in any descriptive context. Of course, you are welcome to disagree.

    364. Re:Carry a gun by $ASANY · · Score: 1
      Surely any tool that is intended primarily to inflict harm is an offensive weapon. We're not labelling tools. We're labelling intent.

      Then let's talk "individual with criminal intent" instead of confusingly labelling an inanimate object with an intent. It would raise the quality of this discussion tremendously.

      The baton is intended for defence. The gun is there for protection perhaps, but is still an offensive weapon.

      No, both the baton and the sidearm are for the officer to use in defending himself and are employed in a "continum of force" policy. Since it is against virtually every police department's policy to use a firearm in non-life threatening circumstances, the baton can be employed for a threat that falls below this critical level. This nearly universal policy is widely documented, and I would urge you to google this so you can better understand what the public servants who act in your behalf do in your name. I'm surprised you weren't aware of this.

      Using a firearm to deal with a situation where your life is in danger is also difficult. Is the attacker going to wait for you to get it out?

      It certainly is, and is the reason that responsible permit holders practice safe and rapid unholstering frequently. It's far from impossible to be caught unaware, and you're certinly right that access to a firearm doesn't guarantee one's ability to use it. It doesn't in any way guarantee that it should be used in all circumstances either.

      That wheelchair-bound person doesn't have a whole lot of "other ways" to employ.

      Nope. He's at a great disadvantage. a gun isn't going to help much either.

      I have talked to permit holders who have concealed carry permits, and their experience is that it is a tremendous help. They've told me that their disability usually makes them a rather inviting target for criminals and having a firearm has made a huge difference in their quality of life. The only permit holder that I know who has ever had to point a firearm at an attacker was confined to a wheelchair. So I'd say he'd disagree with you.

      Neither does the woman who is a hundred pounds lighter and ten inches shorter than her attacker have many "other ways" that are as effective and proven as legally employing a firearm.

      Run away. Fast.

      And if you can't outrun him? I suppose it's morally superior to be raped and murdered than to shoot a rapist as a last resort? You can't possibly believe this!

      Is the 80 year old man expected to fight off a 17 year-old attacker with his jujitsu skills?

      He could avoid places where he might get mugged. Is he going to have a chance to shoot?

      If you could accurately predict where you could be attacked, and if it was socially valuable to restrict the freedom of a responsible elderly citizen in order to promote his safety, this might wash. But it's obvious that you can't predict where you might be criminally attacked, and it's dubious to think that it's prefereable to incarcerate the elderly in impossible "safety zones". Are we going to impose curfews on senior citizens? Wouldn't it make better sense to permit their ability to defend themselves from criminals?

      But if we proscribe that last option of firing a handgun at an attacker because posession of that handgun is banned, what have we effectively done?

      Removed handguns from the the muggers?

      Wonderful idea. As soon as you find a way to force criminals to obey the law, let me know.

      The net effect of mandating "find another option" only increases the number of dead victims, provided permit holders comply with the law.

      So we just have to make sure that permit holding muggers comply with the law.

      Permit holders, who have in everywhere but Vermont been subject to a background investigation by law enforcement, have not been mugging people. The instance of permit holders committing crimes while armed is so

    365. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      There WASN'T ANOTHER WAY to defend himself.

      Shout "HELP"? Avoid the area?

      Anyway, I thought this was an argument about it being illegal in general. Not about whether there could be extenuating circumstances. Should a potential mugger be allowed to have pepper spray? Would it be a lot of use for defence if someone sprayed you first?

    366. Re:Carry a gun by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      No, there are indeed such things as facts, and as long as people can agree on a meaning, (any meaning) of a word, rational argument is still possible. It is when people persist in not defining words that arguing is useless.

      See, the old "copyright infringement==stealing" thing is like the chinese I argue with online. Some actually assert "There is only one china, and taiwan is part of china. That is an indisputable fact." See, it's clearly BS.

      Copyright infringement is illegal, and almost always (like p2p/RIAA) is morally indefensible.

      However, copyright infringement is not stealing. It is copyright infringement. If they were the same thing, we'd call them the same thing.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    367. Re:Carry a gun by Ruddykins · · Score: 1
      He should just carry a can of starter fluid & a piezo-electric lighter (lights when wet).

      If setup correctly, when you press the spray, the lighter ignition is depressed at the same moment (or just after), causing a nice fireball to erupt. The fire stream (starter fluid projects pretty far) would be more than effective against any attacker. Espically after their eyebrows/facial hair was gone, their hair was on fire, and their face is beginning to burn after 1 or 2 sprays. Not pretty, but very very effective since the natural instinct when fire rushes toward your face is to retreat.

      --
      -Chad
    368. Re:Carry a gun by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > A pen knife is not primarily used as an offensive weapon

      And a stick is? You seem to be making disconnected arguments whenever it suits you.

    369. Re:Carry a gun by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Would it be a lot of use for defence if someone sprayed you first?

      If someone is beating you, you have a good idea where they are, even if blinded. Being a human, or maybe even getting a look at the mugger before he sprayed you, you have a good idea where his head should be. After that, it's a simple matter of spraying like mad, in that general direction. Better a blind victim & a blind mugger than a blind victim minus wallet/valuables and a mugger prancing happily away.

      Come on, pepper spray illegal? What a load of shit.

    370. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It is if you're carrying it around with the intention of causing harm to others.

    371. Re:Carry a gun by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      If someone is beating you, you have a good idea where they are, even if blinded. Being a human, or maybe even getting a look at the mugger before he sprayed you, you have a good idea where his head should be.

      You're expecting a lot from someone who has been temporarily blinded, in great pain, and disoriented having been attacked.

      Better a blind victim & a blind mugger than a blind victim minus wallet/valuables and a mugger prancing happily away.

      Those aren't the options I was presenting though. If the mugger can't get hold of pepper spray, then they victim will not be blinded. Personally, I quite like the fact that muggers can't get hold of the things.

    372. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to know we're basically on the same page. But I'll continue to call it stealing, and (of course) you're welcome not to.

      Consider this, however. Just last night I went out with a couple friends and struck up a conversation with some strangers at a bar. Somehow the conversation turned to "stealing" cable and satellite TV. Suddenly I remembered this Slashdot discussion, and it occurred to me that everyone knew what was meant as we said the word "stealing." Chew on that.

    373. Re:Carry a gun by torokun · · Score: 1

      Actually, he (his estate) would be able to get lost wages, because he is considered to have lost his earning potential for the rest of his life... You'd have to pay (if found liable) an amount equivalent to what he'd make in the rest of his life, discounted to present value...

    374. Re:Carry a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's hardly the singers and musicians grubbing for money. They make very little from album sales anyway.

      All the more reason to stop supporting them.

      Art in all its forms has been around longer before the advent of the RIAA and their ilk. It won't die or dissappear if you stop supporting "The Arts". In fact, it would probably become more enjoyable because it would no longer be a prepackaged product designed to remind you that you aren't worthy of being as creative as they are, and therefore need to keep paying them to produce their so-called "art".

      No thanks. I have no doubt I'll be satisfied in a world without them.

      If an "artist" wants to sell me something... OK, maybe... IF I like it. But the moment their agent(s) step in, I know it's just another piece of commercialized trash.

  4. Every geek with his protection: by konichiwa · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    Never argue with an idiot, he'll just lower you to his level and beat you with experience.
  5. not much you can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make backups and look menacing.

    Oh yeah. And leave London.

    Even living in NYC for years I never worried about this sort of stuff...

    1. Re:not much you can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. And leave London.

      Even living in NYC for years I never worried about this sort of stuff...


      Werd. NYC has really changed from the old days. Unless you are trying to buy crack on 168th Street in Harlem I don't think this is much of a problem.

    2. Re:not much you can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my point.

      Even traversing occasionally through the Bronx I never worried much (had an NY state EMT course plus some service work I did up there, periodically, sometimes at night, sometimes during daylight hours and I'M A GIRL!!).

      Now back in the late 80s, even the Upper West (say 86th & Columbus) was a lot sketchier.

      You know... pre-Rudy.

    3. Re:not much you can do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant there's not much he -- living in crime-ridden London -- could do.

  6. wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you go outside?

    1. Re:wait a minute... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Hey! Geeks go outside! I mean, you need to get groceries... and go buy new tech... and sometimes you're just crazy enough to not buy them online.

    2. Re:wait a minute... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      There are many reasons to go outside. Such as to justify purchase of one's gadgetry.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you go outside?
      in LONDON???

  7. its all about the accessories by lawngnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ditching the white earphones was a good first step - I would also suggest not using a fancy case to carry around your laptop - those leather targus bags just scream "look at me! expensive stuff here!"

    1. Re:its all about the accessories by Suburbanpride · · Score: 5, Funny
      I carry my shiny 12 inch Powerbook inside an old bag that I picked up at an army surplus store. I alwasy get strange looks whien I sit down in a coffee shop and instead of pulling out a tattered note book, I pull out a laptop.

      Recently while on a train, I had my laptop, iPod, and digital camera sitting out on my lap. Carrying $2500+ used to make me nervous, although I've gotten used to it now.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    2. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very good point about the computer case. A regular backpack (what I use) is a lottery for thieves; it could contain anything from some cheap books to an expensive laptop. A more specialized computer bag would almost certainly contain a laptop. If I were a thief, I know which one I'd try to swipe.

    3. Re:its all about the accessories by dukeisgod · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same here. I carry my 12" powerbook in my old backpack, wrapped in a big plastic bag in case it rains. Getting stuck in the rain on a motorcycle sucks bad enough, I don't need it runining $1800 worth of computer equipment.

    4. Re:its all about the accessories by badasscat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ditching the white earphones was a good first step - I would also suggest not using a fancy case to carry around your laptop - those leather targus bags just scream "look at me! expensive stuff here!"

      I would suggest not even using a bag that's *shaped* like a laptop. Use a backpack or something, that has a padded laptop area. Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement). As with any bag in the city, never let it out of your hand. But if it's not obvious you're even carrying a laptop to begin with, people will be less inclined to want to steal it.

      I have an oversized army jacket that I use for when I want to carry gadgets around without a bag. I can easily fit my PDA in there, a small digital camera, or an iPod, all without any bulge. I'm not big on those jackets made specifically for carrying gadgets around, because I mean, come on. If it's a jacket made specifically for carrying gadgets around, it's going to be obvious to any criminal that that's why you have it!

    5. Re:its all about the accessories by sp0rk173 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Definately agree. If you're young (19-30, i'd say) it also gives you that starving college student look. And dont' use one of those fancy ones with all the different pockets and compartments and whatnot. Just a regular old hiking daypack is probably best. Especially if you actually hike with it, that'll make it look nice and dingy.

    6. Re:its all about the accessories by rtconner · · Score: 1

      i read on here how someone had p2 and a p4 laptops systems. he, out of boredom probably, switched the pentium stickers. then somene robbed his house and took the p2 with the p4 sticker on it and left the other computer behind.

      its all about disguise.

      --
      023AD01("Child", "Evil");
    7. Re:its all about the accessories by The+Slashdotted · · Score: 1

      At CompUSA, I got a $25 dollar aluminum computer case that look likes it holds a gun.. cuts down on scrapes too. It's made by Vanguard. Link to a site that has the case. http://www.efunctional.com/vga-7616.html

    8. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a 6'3", 480lb ex-wrestler..."

      Dude, first off mix in a salad. Maybe miss a meal once in a while. If you're real, I'd like to take this moment to point and laugh at you(from a safe distance ofcourse). If this is a troll, well done good sir.

    9. Re:its all about the accessories by myov · · Score: 1

      Something like a Rakgear bag would work. Pick an unusual colour to further camouflage it.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    10. Re:its all about the accessories by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Your whole look is important. If I've learnt anything from computer games the best course of action would be to paint your body green, dye your hair bright red, walk around in cropped cargo pants tattered at the legs and no shirt. Also remember to grow your finger and toe nails long and jagged.

      Then should someone unruly approach you just have to crouch down and hammer punch.

      Se here if you need some further inspiration.

    11. Re:its all about the accessories by Stradenko · · Score: 2, Funny

      because something that looks like it holds a gun is a less attractive target for criminal types ...

    12. Re:its all about the accessories by metrazol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "Beat the crap out of your crap" approach works wonders. I live in LA, which is very safe (no, I've never been caught in a drive by, those mostly happen about 15 blocks over.) except for rampant minor crimes like strong arm robbery and petty thievery. My neighborhood has dozens of car break ins and at least a few strong arm robberies each week!

      Do I worry? Nope. Why not? Two reasons: My backpack w/ PowerBook, $200 CD player, and occasional pro audio gear has a hole the size of your fist in it and has seen it's fair share of hell; and b/c the last time somebody tried to strong arm me (as in, "Give me your money or else" w/ no weapon) I simply told them to go fuck themselves. They looked pissed, got in my face, then trundled off. I didn't mention the $100 in my wallet or the $500 in gear in my backpack. The time before that? (3 years earlier) I was with a friend who pulled out his wallet. I told him to put it away and told the guy I really wasn't interested in any charity work at the moment. He didn't laugh, got a touch insistant, then marched off. My friend had $200, ready to hand it over. Attitude is everything.

      Hell, the approach I love is the panhandle/strong arm routine to which I reply "Dude, if I had a fucking dollar, I'd give it to you, but do I look like I've got any money?" and stroll off whistling.

      --
      "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
    13. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London is streaming with pick-pockets. Don't wear a backpack because they're easy to root through without the wearer knowing. Only foolish tourists and foreign exchange students do that. As soon as you're on a crowded Tube platform or waiting at a busy crossing someone'll be picking through your pack's pockets. Instead, get a side bag (think courier bag, record bag, etc) that you can casually move around to the front of you when you're in crowded places.

    14. Re:its all about the accessories by The+Bod · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the bag necessarilly protects me from muggers/thieves, but my 17" HP Pavilion fits beautifully in the free bag I got at the Embedded Systems Conference several years ago in Chicago. It has "Digital DNA from Motorola" and "Embedded Systems Conference Spring" screen printed on the bag.

      The conferences have really gone downhill since the one where I got this bag. The next conference I went to they gave out cheap backpacks. The conference after that they gave out folders. I hear now that they are down to handing out plain manilla folders, or just a CD ROM with all the content on it. We need some more irrational exuberance in the stock market so Motorola can afford to hand out the fancy bags again.

    15. Re:its all about the accessories by Jodka · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement)."

      Remember to remove the laptop first.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    16. Re:its all about the accessories by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      Having been mugged at knifepoint barely two weeks ago, I can say that a crappy looking bag really helps. When asked what was in it, I just said "work!", which, given I said I was a student, satisfied him.

      Also consider having a reasonable amount of cash on you if you've got other stuff more valuable to you (like your health!). I found that once he found 90 in my wallet (my bloody birthday money) he was happy enough and so wasn't so keen to start going through my bag (that happened to contain a laptop) or beating my up any more.

    17. Re:its all about the accessories by Ayrehtek · · Score: 1

      This past fall I purchased a full-length black trenchcoat, and I can hide my PDA, cell phone, wallet, a small maglite and more within its pockets without anyone being able to tell. Plus, the coat in general gives me a better "don't mess with me" appearance. A set jaw, a purposeful gate, and sharp, alert eyes to go with it make for a nice combination that keeps unwanted people away. It's even helped to ward off the advertisers who happen to wander onto my college's campus. My black backpack blends into the coat when seen from the front, too. Too bad the coat is too heavy to wear in warmer weather.

    18. Re:its all about the accessories by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      >>"Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement)."

      >Remember to remove the laptop first.

      Ok, someone explain to me: this is "insightful"?
      Whatever happened to "sardonic humor" ?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    19. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      In case you mmissed it, moderation as funny does not increase karma. So many moderators choose insightful instead to give the author their karma points.

    20. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy - don't live in an urban sewer run by megalomaniacs (Blair, Bush, Sharon etc.).

      Both your terrorist and your mugger worries will drop to nothing quite quickly.

      And don't bother bleating about "freedom" and all that other tripe they fed you in indoctrination classes - you don't have it if you're scared to carry an iPod around.

    21. Re:its all about the accessories by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you take the laptop out before you start throwing the bag on the pavement.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    22. Re:its all about the accessories by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Insightful
      many moderators choose insightful instead to give the author their karma points.

      They should use underrated, then.

    23. Re:its all about the accessories by benspikey · · Score: 1

      What you really need is a shopping cart.. The kind you can steal at any supermarket.. Put your laptop, pda, ipod, and a bunch of newspaper and trash in it.. People, even muggers, will think your CRAZY and leave you alone. If someone tries to talk just muble jibrish like this at the top of your lungs.. WWW.SLASHDOT.COM RULEs.. rules i tell ya.. yeah yeah.. Works great!! you'll have no problems...

    24. Re:its all about the accessories by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I would also reccomend smudging your face with dirt, not shaving, and mumbling incoherantly to yourself. All these things help to further the image that you do not have anything of value worth robbing.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    25. Re:its all about the accessories by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Remember to remove the laptop first.

      I wish somebody would've told my users that.

    26. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditch the ipod all together, the music in your head will keep you entertained. At least they do for me.

    27. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't remove the laptop before you rough up the bag, that way when the laptop get stolen the supprise is going to be on them...

    28. Re:its all about the accessories by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement)."

      Remember to remove the laptop first.


      Yes, and remember folks... RAM DISK is not an installation procedure!

    29. Re:its all about the accessories by Mod+Me+God+Too · · Score: 1

      This past fall I purchased a full-length black trenchcoat... keeps unwanted people away

      Trenchcoat mafia?

      --
      --

      It is not the commies, the government, the nigger, nor the corporates. It is your paranoia.
    30. Re:its all about the accessories by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      On my wishlist is one of those bulletproof trenchcoats with big inner pockets large enough to carry a laptop. Sure, at ~$5000, they still are (and look) expensive but it'd sure cast a "don't fuck with me" air to you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    31. Re:its all about the accessories by vantango · · Score: 1

      1st rule - "Out Of Mind, Out Of Sight" Hide it or lose it. 2nd rule - "Fight Or Flee" Use the flee part when considering whether to "fight or flee". Don't try to defend yourself. You're a nerd, remember. If they chase, they draw attention to you and themselves.

    32. Re:its all about the accessories by barks · · Score: 1

      I have an oversized army jacket that I use for when I want to carry gadgets around without a bag.

      Yup, nothing let's you blend in and scare off the criminal elements than dressing like DeNiro in Taxi Driver.

    33. Re:its all about the accessories by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Nothing says Columbine louder than a pasty guy in a full length black trenchcoat.

      Don't be surprised when the cops start bugging you daily.

    34. Re:its all about the accessories by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      England sounds awesome. Remind me to come visit sometime!

    35. Re:its all about the accessories by LocoSpitz · · Score: 1

      Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement).
      Be sure to remove the laptop prior to this.

    36. Re:its all about the accessories by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      I would also suggest not using a fancy case to carry around your laptop - those leather targus bags just scream "look at me! expensive stuff here!"

      Take it a step further like I do. I'm using an plain vanilla cordura briefcase (circa pre-laptop era) with a laptop sleeve inside. From the outside there is no clue that there is a laptop in it. No 270 degree zipper, no obvious external padding, etc. While it's age shows, it's still professional enough to bring into important meetings.

      Oh yeah, it's probably not a good idea to use the briefcase with the snazzy corporate logo on it either. That just screams "Insured and likely to be just written off!"

    37. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think anything with a padded laptop area is a target for thieves. These bags are typically specially made for laptops and while they do not appear to be laptop bags, the brand will soon be associated with laptops. For example STM (www.standardtm.com.au).

    38. Re:its all about the accessories by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget "smell of urine".

      Oh, come on! Three days at a lan party, you don't want to miss the CS finals, everyone's done it!

      Haven't they?... Anyone?...

    39. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not go all the way and actually try to look like either a robber or cop.

    40. Re:its all about the accessories by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      You're gonna laugh, but I have this theory called "the big shoe theory." If you are wearing big ass shoes, big steel toed boots, you look like less of a target.

      If you look like a bit of dandy, joe idiot is going to see you, be mad that he is not you, and be motivated to attack you. Or something. Don't wear polo shirts, khaki pants, i.e. Don't look like you are a different "class" than your attacker.

      Obviously, some people are going to attack you anyway, but I've found in my experience that the way you carry yourself has a big difference in whether or not you are perceived as a target.

      I've driven around some tough Oakland neighborhoods with my Camaro filled to the brim with high-tech equipment and not felt nervous.

    41. Re:its all about the accessories by Maeve77 · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, the best accessory would be a dog. Not a big, scary dog, or a dog trained to hurt people, but a medium-sized dog like a Labrador would at least make a mugger think twice. Any dog will bark and raise hell if its person is threatened.

      I live in Savannah, GA, and I was mugged at gunpoint about three weeks ago. I know for a fact that I didn't look wealthy or have widgets of any kind on me at the time, but I was apparently a target anyway. A gun or similar only works if you can get the jump on someone. However, a dog would probably nip muggers' plans in the bud, so to speak.

      --
      Beauty will lure a man into bed, but it won't bring him back a second time, unless he's awfully young or very stupid.
    42. Re:its all about the accessories by linzeal · · Score: 1

      There was a similiar post in the Real Police Forums about a chick who lost her ipod or something. They suggested the same thing.

    43. Re:its all about the accessories by jellybear · · Score: 1

      There can only be ONE!!!! /me draws claymore

    44. Re:its all about the accessories by line-bundle · · Score: 1
      "Make sure you "rough up" the bag a bit ahead of time (just throw it around against some rocks or something, or the pavement)."

      Remember to remove the laptop first.

      Tell me where you buy your bags with a pre-installed laptop?

    45. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we just need a 'Uses MS Windows' sticker for our Linux/BSD boxen?

    46. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The voices in my head keep me entertained. Sometimes they are very rude! :-P

    47. Re:its all about the accessories by iLEZ · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe i should stop carrying my cheap books in an expensive Samsonite laptop bag? =)

      --
      You cant fight in here, its a war room!
    48. Re:its all about the accessories by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not go all the way and actually try to look like either a robber or cop.

      If you look like a robber, you'll probably get annoyed by the cops. If you look like a cop, you'll probably get annoyed by the robbers.

    49. Re:its all about the accessories by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      RAM DISK is not an installation procedure!

      That sounds like a candidate for bofh-excuses:

      RAM DISK rammed.
    50. Re:its all about the accessories by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      RAM DISK is not an installation procedure!

      My A1000 Amiga doesn't work anymore... for a similar reason... ;-)

    51. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counterstrike finals right?

    52. Re:its all about the accessories by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      I use a record bag for my laptop.

    53. Re:its all about the accessories by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      Nothing says Columbine louder than a pasty guy in a full length black trenchcoat.

      I'll just be today's loser who makes the obligatory comment that neigther of the columbine killers wore trenchcoats. Or black. Not that it really matters. Media is stronger than reality, and blue parkers are entirely forgettable :)

      Incidentally, Keanu is a pasty guy, and he looks fine in a full-length black trenchcoat. Ok, he also has the cops bugging him, but that's beside the point :-)

    54. Re:its all about the accessories by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      I would also suggest not using a fancy case to carry around your laptop - those leather targus bags just scream "look at me! expensive stuff here!"

      Not only that, they scream "DORK!" too. :(

      (They may be marketed as slick "executive" gear, but when 8 out of every 10 times you see one, it's awkwardly slung over the shoulder of someone with a stoop and bad hygene, a mental association begins to form between the two, and the "executive" marketing is overwritten with real-world experience/prejudice.)

      But if they made such a bad that failed to suck (ie, would work _well_ for a tablet pc, and be _practical_ instead of zippers out the wazoo), then I'd buy it in a heartbeat. (I have impeccable dork credentials anyway :-)

      Currently I walk around with the tablet in a beat-up old FedEX box in my backpack. Not to deter muggers, but because a old cardboard FedEX box is more practical than the crap they sell that's supposedly designed for the job. Not Impressed. But that's another rant for another day.

    55. Re:its all about the accessories by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think the "don't wear a backpack" rule applies more to those who dress like they actually have something valuable, when I lived in Paris (in the not so nice parts of the city btw) I had a cheap beat-up backpack to go along with my shoes that were held together with gaffer tape, baggy jeans that looked like I had stolen them from a bum and my hooded sweatshirt that had more holes than it should and I never had any problems with anyone trying to mug me..

      Another hint is to always look like you know exactly where you are going but that you're not in a hurry to get there, that way people assume that even if you don't speak the language you're still not some dumbass tourist or business creature. /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    56. Re:its all about the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you taking photos of on a train? Perv.

    57. Re:its all about the accessories by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Wow, and I wonder what you've been subjected too that would make you consider *THAT* as safe?

      My permanent home is in Winnipeg, and I've done stints in Waterloo (where I'm writing this from, at school), and Toronto. I have never been mugged. I have never been approached by anything remotely resembling being mugged. I only know one person who has ever been so (unsuccessfully) and the guy was drunk at the time. The closest I've come to that sort of thing is being panhandled by a street person.

      Now, I admit I do have a little of the 'starving student' look, so to speak. I carry a backpack fairly often, though I do carry an mp3 player in the open whenever I'm going somewhere. As well I try to keep myself presentable whenever possible, shaved, short hair, untorn clothing, and shoes instead of sneakers.

      If you consider that sort of thing in LA safe, well let me tell you that I've walked, more than a few times, through the downtown streets of Toronto at 2 and 3 in the morning, like I described, without the slightest fear of being 'approached'. I am not naiive enough to believe crime does not happen here, but I also know how safe our streets actually are.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    58. Re:its all about the accessories by paxmark1 · · Score: 1

      There is another side to the coin. Some guy in Mobile AL laughed when a 12 year old held him up. He was a little surprised when he got shot. Moi, when I got mugged the guy cleared his throat as I had the key in the door. He had an impecable stance with the exception that he was going for a head shot, but then mugging is partly psychological. SHIT YES, I GAVE HIM EVERYTHING. During the process both of us were not sure if I was going to live. Note - the man was raised, he never raised his voice or used any profanity to me, he just said, "I gotta have it all." Drugs do that to people. Remember, you attacker is probably not in a good frame of mind after who knows how many days caught up in the grip of whatever chemical is their choice, and craving it and has used up every other way of scoring that involves less risk to him/her. On another note, I had lived six years previous living in, helping to run and even owning for 18 months homeless shelters. I was never hit - I can read people. Some of y'all might not be as gifted in this regard. If you are not friends with people who have been in your attackers cultural milieu, you might make a mistake about how they say things. Why risk your life. Any doubt at all, give it up. Of course that is not to, well say you are coming back from church on Sunday. Some woman jumps into your car at a stop sign and is trying real hard to get you to purchase her mouth for 6 minutes and you spend 5 minutes trying to get rid of her and you end up at a place that is semi secure and when you say, "No, Out." and she replies "I've got a gun" - well if you are absolutely and totally positive she does not, well I said, "Bitch, you could get killed saying that to the wrong person." - but you had better be absolutely sure and be able to say it with a trace of smile on your face. shalom, mark

    59. Re:its all about the accessories by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Tell me where you buy your bags with a pre-installed laptop?

      When you mug someone for their laptop?

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    60. Re:its all about the accessories by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      You could also get one of those shopping carts.. Put your stuff and some decoys there, splash some WINE on it and woila.. a ghetto case-mod!

      --
      Store with salt
    61. Re:its all about the accessories by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but I doubt robbers go out of their way to hassle cops. That's pretty much a one-way street.

    62. Re:its all about the accessories by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      You're crazy. ;-)

      At least, around here, the (on-duty) cops are always being hassled by the local thugs (particularly younger, smaller ones), because the cops are the only ones who can't punch them out without getting into serious trouble. (I'm simplifying it a bit here, but you get the idea.)

    63. Re:its all about the accessories by tcr · · Score: 1

      I'll have to assume you're aiming all of this at visitors who are unmistakeable as tourists...

      I live, work, and (of course) socialise in central London, and your post seems like a huge generalisation.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  8. Look Alert by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not what you have, it's whether you look like an easy target or not. Look around as you walk, be alert, notice people and make sure they know you notice them, but don't stare. Don't slouch and stare at the ground.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Look Alert by scrotch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do what I do:
      - cut your own hair. badly.
      - get pierced a few times.
      - get a tattoo or two.
      - wear old clothes. don't wash them often.
      - use an old bag (bookbag/shoulderbag).

      Look like you might take something rather than have something taken from you. It's remarkably easy, and it helps you avoid people that judge others by their appearance...

      And never carry any weapon unless you're 100 percent confident that it couldn't be taken from you if you were surprised by four large men.

    2. Re:Look Alert by jnik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look like you might take something rather than have something taken from you. It's remarkably easy, and it helps you avoid people that judge others by their appearance...
      Except maybe police and security personnel, who are notorious about that sort of thing.

    3. Re:Look Alert by Threni · · Score: 1

      >It's not what you have, it's whether you look like an easy target or not. Look around as
      >you walk, be alert, notice people and make sure they know you notice them, but don't
      >stare. Don't slouch and stare at the ground.

      Sort of, but at the end of the day London suffers a very high level of violent crime connection with theft, and as I practically never see a policemen unless I go to central London it's not too suprising. I honestly think a lot of people don't use a lot of tech stuff as much as they would if there were no/much less risk of having it stolen. I'm not exactly paranoid but I usually have my mobile phone on silent when I'm out, so if someone phones me when I'm in a dodgy area I can just ignore it and hide even the fact that I have a phone.

    4. Re:Look Alert by H310iSe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yea, not to blame the victim but the way you hold yourself goes a long way to whether you're picked out as a target (it won't stop all the shit that may come your way but it can certainly limit it). Unfortunately I can't say what, exactly, it is that works well, but I used to walk around spanish harlem at 3 am all the time and never had any real problem. The people who lived in my place before me were mugged 3 times in 6 months. Confidence, minding your own business, and a genuine lack of fear (sometimes it helps to bringing some sort of talisman or gewgaw, like a rabbits foot or a big knife or something. Myself I found carying a 40 around was nice as it provided a) beer and b) a big heavy club).

      Lastly, know your neighborhood. A lot of crime happens close to home, if you're recognized and respected (not liked, just respected) then people will look out for you. I've had help from unexpected places on several occasions ... so be a decent bloke and your neighbors will have your back.

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    5. Re:Look Alert by Graftweed · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you nailed it. I read an essay a couple of years ago comparing our urban existence with life in the jungle, focusing especially on aggressive and criminal behaviour.

      I don't have the numbers but the essay concluded that it's not what you have on you that makes you a better target, it's how aware you are of your surroundings. Think of predators hunting a species further down the food chain. If they have to choose from a pool of available targets they will always go after the ones who present the least chance of reaction. Likewise people who are out to mug you usually notice a whole bunch of minutiae about yourself that you normally wouldn't even think about. Are you walking with your shoulders sagged, are your eyes downcast or wandering without really focusing, are your hands tucked in your pockets or are they and your arms actively working to balance your body, are you walking briskly or irregularly? So on so forth...

      Of course someone who's looking at you as a potential target doesn't analyse all this, it's mostly just instinctive or subconscious information processing. Sometimes we get so caught up on the bigger picture we forget about the small details that do have a significant impact.

    6. Re:Look Alert by Seumas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is absolutely true. I have never had problems in my own city or any other that I've been in. The key is to carry yourself with confidence and as if you know where you are, where you are going and own the place you're walking through. Unfortunately, a lot of geeks are more likely to stare at the ground or look unprepared and lacking confidence.

      I don't dress to be scary or change my appearance for this reason at all, but I'm sure that my stature has something to do with this. I'm a tall and large person who spent many years training both in wrestling and judo. Based on my size alone, people would probably defer to me rather than confront me - so the effectiveness of the "walk around confidence and like you own everything" might vary from person to person.

      I shave my head and have a goatee and usually wear all black. That, combined with my size - I walk down the street and other people excuse themselves from my way. I hope that this isn't out of fear but out of courtesy or respect that being large and confident may get you. When I'm at a bus stop or standing in line someone, I try to appear friendly and offer the occasional small-talk or make frequent eye contact with a pleasant nod or "how's it goin" when I pass people on the street, specifically because I am a bit self-concious about not wanting to come across as unfriendly and imposing to people - even strangers.

      As far as knowing your neighborhood... I have no idea where you live, but in my city, you don't really know your neighbors. I have lived in the same apartment complex for five years and I don't know any of my neighbors event hough they're about 18 inches away. Previously, I grew up in this same neighborhood for 20 years in my parents' house and only knew one neighbor out of everyone. I couldn't tell you people's names let alone anything about them. I know some places in this country are still friendly and close-knit, but I've never seen that first hand.

    7. Re:Look Alert by rishistar · · Score: 2, Informative

      And don't actually listen to your iPod so that you can hear the muggers approaching behind you.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    8. Re:Look Alert by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Except for one thing, one of the fastest growing crimes is youth on youth crime. Out in the suburbs a 15 or 16 year old is far more likely to be mugged than a 60 year old, once you get to CGP314's age (having read his weblog) his risk is far lower, it solely relies upon your actions and behaviour. Stay alert and walk like you own the place.

    9. Re:Look Alert by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

      Yours is the best post so far.
      Posture is very important. Maybe working out alittle bit is good, not to look bigger, but because it will give you confidence you can't fake. Walk normal and don't cling to your goodies. If you see a group of people ahead of you, don't walk through them or away, approach them like you might reconize one of them before looking ahead to go about your business. All this comes down to one thing, not looking like a tourist in thier neighborhood. You can't prevent trouble but you can prevent cowards who look for weakness.

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    10. Re:Look Alert by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

      two things: first buy a trench coat...black works for me... second. quit telling this guy to not carry these things...he didn't ask for what thieves wouldn't steal he asked for tips of how not to get robbed while carrying his ipod,pda.etc. any ways long sorry short is a term who's origns are blong and rambling

    11. Re:Look Alert by workingstiff · · Score: 5, Funny
      Except maybe police and security personnel, who are notorious about that sort of thing.

      Or those nice smelling individuals with the longer hair. I forget what they're called, personally, womes or something...
    12. Re:Look Alert by kale77in · · Score: 1

      1. Coin the phrase 'Mugnet', being an abbreviation of 'Mugger Magnet'
      2. Laugh kind of like Ernie from Sesame Street at your own cleverness, while walking around.
      3. Thereby give every appearance of being at least as crazy and unhinged as anyone else out there
      4. Survive your trip to work (can anyone else see where this is going?)
      5. Profit!!!

    13. Re:Look Alert by jridley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. One of the pieces of advice I saw recently in a "cycling through bad neighborhoods" page was "if someone worries you, make eye contact, just long enough to make it obvious that you could identify him if it ever came up.

      A friend of mine was in asia somewhere with his Tai Chi school, walking around sightseeing. He said he saw a handful of guys up above, in an ambush type layout. He made good, solid eye contact with the leader, looked confident and ready, and the leader waved off the group.

      There are targets walking by all the time. They'd rather take on the one that won't cause trouble. You probably shouldn't actually cause trouble if confronted, nothing is worth getting hurt over, but if they think you might, they'll just wait for the next guy.

    14. Re:Look Alert by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Back in the day, if you had a tattoo, it meant you were gonna beat the crap out of anyone who messed with you. Unfortunately, it's not like this anymore. An enormous number of people have tattoos, especially girls nowadays, and when you look at these people, most of them look like wimps.

      Seriously. Most people who look truly tough don't have any tattoos or piercings. So instead of getting your body vandalized in a sorry attempt to look tough, try eating correctly and exercising regularly, which includes running, lifting weights, and other methods of getting into really good shape. When you're buff and you look like you can kick someone's ass, people will think twice about trying to rob you.

      If it's legal in your area, you might also wear a holster and a gun. Thieves know that some PDA is worth a lot less than their lives.

    15. Re:Look Alert by nemaispuke · · Score: 1

      This guy has it right, I carried Nikon gear (in excess of $20,000) in the US and various foreign countries. If you look like you mean business, people will leave you alone. And if you look like an easy mark, well stand by!

    16. Re:Look Alert by shokk · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you're afraid of your iPod being lifted, it gives a whole new meaning to the idea of "music piracy."

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    17. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it there. Never be looking down. Keep your head up, grin like an idiot, and talk to yourself rather loudly. Feel free to make up your own words.

      Crazy = Safe.

    18. Re:Look Alert by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      this guys got a point..what you want to do is look like a mean mutha.

      Do what i do:
      Get some tattoos..well only 1 but its pretty big :)
      A scattering of facial piercing never goes astray
      Work out
      Get urself some some real long hair and a beard

      I followed the above steps and can happily say ive never been mugged in my life. They'll go and mug that scrawny little gimp in thick glasses clutching a laptop case in front of his chest and with penguin pin badges all over him

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    19. Re:Look Alert by antic · · Score: 1

      Also, instead of crossing the road to avoid people, if you're pretty sure you're facing trouble and you're walking through a residential area, walk into the front yard of the next house and knock on the door. Look like you live there or are visiting a friend. If someone comes to the door, pretend you're doing a survey or any old crap until the trouble has passed. Unless you've walked straight onto property owned by one of the troublemakers, you should get away unscathed.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    20. Re:Look Alert by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that you say you say "how's it goin'" to strangers you pass on the street. Whenever I get that from people, I don't know how to respond -- if I'm passing them by, there may not be time to say "ok" or whatever, but then again, I don't want to look unfriendly by not responding. Do you have any advice?

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    21. Re:Look Alert by IOOOOOI · · Score: 2
      if you're recognized and respected (not liked, just respected) then people will look out for you.

      That's very true... I moved into an area in Brooklyn right about the time when La Familia was turf warring with a couple other gangs, and you better believe that they would cut your belly open in a blink of the eye if they felt threatened.

      Me: White, long hair, skinny.
      Them: Puerto Rican, pissed at "The Man", carrying weapons.

      I got lots of stink eye from them (as well as other gang's members) for the first couple of months, but it was my behavior that saved my ass. Kept my head high, returned eye contact (but no staring!) and even though I was shitting my pants at times, I never let it show.

      Sooner or later, I was judged to be "safe". Once that happened, I just sort of blended into the 'hood, where still to this day exists an unspoken "cold war" mentality: If I recognize you, then you probably recognize me, so in the absence of any real issue, I'm not going to fuck with you cuz you know where to find me.

    22. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can it. Your security is worth exactly nil. I have a mohawk and I walked onto a plane with a boxcutter AFTER 9/11.

    23. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true, by the way. (I am not going to give up my credentials becasuse I plan to visit some friends in America this fall).

    24. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's remarkably easy, and it helps you avoid people that judge others by their appearance...

      As a bonus it also keeps you from ever finding gainful employment. Eventually you won't just look and smell like a bum, you'll be sleeping on the streets too.

    25. Re:Look Alert by sexecutioner · · Score: 1

      Respond first with your eyes and a smile. Then, if there's time, a quick, "not bad", "choice bro" or "good thanks mate/buddy/chief/big fella/champ/tiger/sport" will do the job just fine.

      I love it when people say G'Day to me on the street, it's a nice feeling.

    26. Re:Look Alert by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, everyone has the same rights, no matter if you look scruffy... Or Muslim...

      It's worrisome that you would be afraid to appear shady for fear of prosecution.

    27. Re:Look Alert by aralin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have several tips for the folks in large metro areas: Speedwalk: Walk faster than people around you do. Its extremly hard to pick pocket someone who walks fast and when you try it, it stands out in the crowd a lot, two people walking fast. Invisibility: If you cannot see them, they really cannot see you. If your mind actively registers a person, its five times more likely that he will notice you. Don't ask me why, its some subconscious trick, but it works. Acting upon noticing (like crossing to the other sidewalk) makes it five times more likely for the other to act upon it too. Be ordinary: Dont wear anything that stands out. That goes for clothes, bags, accessories. The more ordinary you look, the easier to be invisible. No weapons: If you carry a weapon, you get automagically an alert state of mind that transfers to people around. You sort of radiate "I'm danger" around you. Cocealed weapon is the worst you can do, since you just radiate and do not deter. Know terrain: Be sure that you know the location where you move around, know the spots where its more likely to be mugged, know where you can hide, know where to run at all times.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    28. Re:Look Alert by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      So instead of getting your body vandalized in a sorry attempt to look tough, try eating correctly and exercising regularly, which includes running, lifting weights, and other methods of getting into really good shape. When you're buff and you look like you can kick someone's ass, people will think twice about trying to rob you.

      Dude... this is Slashdot.

    29. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And never carry any weapon unless you're 100 percent confident that it couldn't be taken from you if you were surprised by four large men.


      Oh, right. If 4 tough guys might over power you and then torture you with your own weapon you are definitely better off without a weapon.


      Next you'll be telling me street people are much happier than billionaires because they don't have to worry about paying taxes ...

    30. Re:Look Alert by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      When you're afraid of your iPod being lifted, it gives a whole new meaning to the idea of "music piracy."

      This is closer to the true original meaning of "piracy".
      The proper term for what most people call "piracy" is just copyright infringement i.e. infringing on someone else's exclusive right to distribute copies of something.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    31. Re:Look Alert by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      So my habit of reading a book as I walk along is possibly not the best idea?

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    32. Re:Look Alert by glenalec · · Score: 1

      Get a big underarm holster, and carry your PDA/iPOD/phone/wallet hidden in it?

      One problem, particularly with the phone, you wouldn't want to take a call near some twitchy security people. :-/

      Go into bank/store, reach for wallet, get shot. Oh dear. Let's forget this whole idea. :-(

      Probably okay for the iPOD, I guess.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    33. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. somebody says how's it going just punch them in the fucking face. keep hitting until they fall down; then start kicking until you bore of it. helps keep muggers away too.

    34. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're not familiar with the anti-terrorism bills that Canada has been passing. You can be held without charges (Ernst Zundel has been held for 15 months without any formal charges - even though it flies in the face of habeus corpus) and deported on hearsay alone (without proof you've done anything wrong...)

    35. Re:Look Alert by hutkey · · Score: 0


      - cut your own hair. badly.
      - get pierced a few times.
      - get a tattoo or two.
      - wear old clothes. don't wash them often.
      - use an old bag (bookbag/shoulderbag).


      i thought, geeks already live this way.

    36. Re:Look Alert by moonbender · · Score: 1

      People never do that around here. I'd be totally freaked out if a stranger just asked me (the German equivalent of) "how's it goin" on the street or even on the train. Or rather, I'd spend the next day wondering how the hell that person knew me. One thing I am used to is when hiking in the alps, people always greet you (and you greet them back)... but that'd be too time-consuming in a city, anyway.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    37. Re:Look Alert by moonbender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Arms actively working to balance your body? Is that supposed to be a sign of confidence? Because it sure sounds more like a sign of a walking disability.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    38. Re:Look Alert by cobyrne · · Score: 1

      A story - I was living in a seaside resort town, it was late on a Friday night, everyone else was out getting drunk and enjoying themselves, and I was carrying two heavy bags of groceries back to the flat (bad timing).

      A group of youths decided to hassle me - call me names and brush up against me. I ran after one of them, bags and all. Don't ask me what prompted me to do that, but it worked! He ran from me, ran between two parked cars, and nearly got hit by oncoming traffic. I resumed my journey to the flat.

      One of the youths still didn't "get it". He continued to hassle me. So I just dropped my bags, pivoted on one leg, faced him, and stamped my other leg on the pavement. He ran.

      It's about confidence. It's about never ever staring at the ground as you walk. If you've always stared at the ground, just try looking around the next time that you are out. Don't look at anyone if that's too much for you. You'll pretty quickly learn and gain confidence.

    39. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's remarkably easy, and it helps you avoid people that judge others by their appearance...

      There's a difference between judging people by their appearance and avoiding people who are proud of poor hygiene.

    40. Re:Look Alert by tupambao · · Score: 1

      I agree. I used to live in a middle class surrounding but to get to my high school, I had to cross a poor run down area. Taking the bus to school would take me 45min but a walk through the area would get me to school in 15-20min depending on which way I took to school. Being lazy as I am and not wanting to wake up the 30minutes earlier I ended up walking to school most of the time. I obviously got into trouble walking through the area. I have been threatened with knives three times and been acousted by gangs ranging from 4-6 guys quite a number of times. One thing I learned through my experience is to keep my cool. I always looked focused and walked briskly...no lingering or sight seeing. Mind your own business, even if you stumble on guys beating up someone, just walk by as if it doesnt concern you. When spoken to by a gang member, answer truthfully and NEVER show any form of fear and do not stop unless asked to... do not run away either.

      The tactic that I found most effective is to get to "know" the Tony Soprano of the area but not be his subject. If he knows you (greets you by name and shakes your hand in front of a few witnesses) no one will dare lay a hand on you. I was lucky that I won a round trip to Italy while in school so the Tony Soprano in the area got to know me including most of the big bullies and muggers. But that didnt stop me getting beaten up and robbed but it did reduce them. This was an area where you loose your shoes, glasses, hat, jacket, watch and of course your wallet. You would be lucky if they left you your underwear!

      Most important is to look like you have no money on you but not too broke or the guys would use you like sport, for practice and to get the wanabees a chance to try out some new tricks on you. If possible leave your valuables at home and when you have them, carry them as inconspicuously as possible keeping your eyes open but do not look shifty and nervous. Try not to flash them around.

    41. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speedwalking is definately a good idea.
      Other than making it hard to pick your pocket. It also gives you the 'Don't Fuck with me! I don't have time for this shit!'-look. Nothing has ever been stolen from me and I've never been mugged.
      Also keeping your wallet in your front pocket helps, when you have to stand still.

    42. Re:Look Alert by gamma+male · · Score: 1
      I think the most important two of the ones you listed are: Work out, and the long hair and beard. While I've also got a scattering of piercings (my one tattoo generally isn't visible, and I doubt it would scare anyone anyways), I think they're only "scary" to people who dabble in white collar crimes.

      However, the long hair and beard gives a nice impression of size and helps make the "lizard" brain of the person viewing you think you're impressive. When that's coupled with a broad frame and arms which don't match your programming profession (if you also do it), it's enough to make anyone not horribly desparate wait for a different mark.

      On the plus side for those still in college, at nights girls might ask if you'll escort them to various places. Sure while this often (or in my case, always) was just for escort purposes, why turn down pleasant company with a cute girl? If nothing else, it's practice for one's social skills.

    43. Re:Look Alert by GQuon · · Score: 1

      And don't actually listen to your iPod so that you can hear the muggers approaching behind you.
      But keep the earplugs in regardless. (Even when switched off or with low volume.) It tells people "I'm minding my own business."

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    44. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hygiene is a capitalist conspiracy.

    45. Re:Look Alert by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Go running sometime, but don't move your arms at all. See how well that works.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    46. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or those nice smelling individuals with the longer hair. I forget what they're called...

      Hippies?

    47. Re:Look Alert by moonbender · · Score: 1

      True, but the grandparent wasn't referring to running. Or at least that was my presupposition.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    48. Re:Look Alert by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      "All the music I stole's been stolen!"

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    49. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing you cleared up the misconception he didn't seem to have.

    50. Re:Look Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing you said "A story". I wouldn't have been able to tell otherwise.

      I also wouldn't have figured out that calling you names and brushing up against you was hassling you. It's a good thing you included the words "hassle me".

      The quotes around "get it" let me figure out that you didn't mean that they received something. I'm still trying to figure out what you did mean, though; you should have included a definition of the "slang" words in parentheses.

      It's OK. I know you only insult my intelligence because you love me.

    51. Re:Look Alert by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That is just the weirdest image :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  9. I've always found that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making it appear that you have a girlfriend always seems to throw off people looking for geeks to mug.

  10. Tae Kwon Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May not be a very obvious defense, but it's effective.

    1. Re:Tae Kwon Do by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      After ten years of studying, maybe.

      Couple of months in boxing section will do more to protect you - and I'm quoting an acquaintance of mine with dan II in T.Q.D.

    2. Re:Tae Kwon Do by shokk · · Score: 1

      Most of the people winning UFC championships are neither Tae Kwon Do nor boxing experts, but the grapplers. One they have their hands on you, boxing and kicking practica goes out the window. The best fighters will cross-train, but boxing is very high on that list. Check out some Bas Rutten boxing or thai boxing CDs for some basic training...it may be just enough to quickly defuse that next confrontation.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:Tae Kwon Do by theawesome · · Score: 1

      A few comments on Tae kwon do having studied for 8 years, the best defense or offense lies in cross training as many martial arts as you can, true most people winning UFC are groundfighters but your not going to meet someone from the UFC on the st, having street experience im telling you that pick any martial art you want and become proficient in it and you will become almost unstoppable

    4. Re:Tae Kwon Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does the Q in T.Q.D. stand for ?

    5. Re:Tae Kwon Do by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      What's your point?

  11. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that's easy, add a gun to what you carry. If you're in America it's the 2nd amendment and your right... er... only your right if your're 18 and usually only if you're 21 ... and only if you pass a check, and only if you buy a certian type of gun and only with a permit... so, um carry a bat ??

  12. Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Since you're a Londoner, these aren't options for you, but they work for me:
    1. Don't be (or look like) an utter wimp.
    2. Put your valuable stuff in a bag, rather than waving your PDA, iPod, and other geek crap around in an effort to make yourself look l33t.
    3. Carry a gun, and if someone tries to rob you, blow his head clean off.
    Like I said, impossible for you, but perhaps of use to readers in the rest of the world.
    1. Re:Some ideas by gspr · · Score: 1

      Carry a gun, and if someone tries to rob you, blow his head clean off.
      Ah yes - the way to go to make the world a better place! *Sigh*

    2. Re:Some ideas by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      So, you're basically asserting that a woman raped and strangled with her own pantyhose is somehow preferable to one with a smoking gun and a rapist at her feet?

    3. Re:Some ideas by gspr · · Score: 1

      No. I suggest you re-read the question asked. We're talking robbery, no rape here.

    4. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since you're a Londoner, these aren't options for you, but they work for me:
      1. Don't be (or look like) an utter wimp
      2. Put your valuable stuff in a bag, rather than waving your PDA, iPod, and other geek crap around in an effort to make yourself look l33t.


      ...uh? May I ask why not?
    5. Re:Some ideas by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Ah, so your comment implies that, it's a-ok for women to carry a weapon to defend themselves if and only if they feel in danger of a rape.

      The point is - muggings aren't always 'why here sir, here is your cash'. They often involve physical violence. It doesn't take much to have your head caved in, or your limbs broken.

      When a mugger is staring down the barrel of a gun, statistically speaking - neither the crime happens, nor is the gun fired. The gun is the best deterrent there is - whether it's a rape or a violent mugging.

      Once you start putting qualifiers on violent crimes, innocents start to die.

    6. Re:Some ideas by StupidKatz · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're talking robbery, no rape here.

      I see your point, Sir. The next time I see someone coming at me in a threatening manner, I'll look for the placard that says "Robbery, Not Rape".

      Thanks for the tip!

    7. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to apologize on behalf of all Americans for the parent post. This is why we have an unwritten law in the U.S. stating that Texas is a foreign country, with its own distinct values and moral code (as seen above).

    8. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Some ideas by Dravik · · Score: 1

      I would say that each time a criminal is shot you have reduced the odds of another crime being committed. If you give the thief your stuff he sells it then robs somebody else. If he is caught he spends some time in jail and then robs somebody else. If he is dead then he won't rob anybody. There are 2 ways to improve an area, organization or group of people. 1. Acquire good people 2 get rid of bad people.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    10. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, boys! I know this might be a novel concept to you all but has it occured to you at all that their might be some female geeks reading here? (!!)

      I mean, you try looking bad ass when you are 1.57m (5ft.1) and blonde! You try protecting your hardware when you are already worried about protecting your ass. Consider yourselves lucky.
      I agree with most of teh advice posted here-look like you have no cash or are a poor student, put all your valuables away from easy reach (not at the top of your bag as i once learned), walk with purpose and confidence, be aware, ditch distincive hardware accessories (specialised computer bags, Ipod headphones i'm talking to you, same for creativelabs jukebox's), look crazed or really pissed off with a lot of hate in your eyes.
      If it can work for me while carrying a big laptop, a brand new 30G mp3 player and a decent (and huge) digital camera, it has got to be worth something for you guys!
      A

    11. Re:Some ideas by Feniscowles · · Score: 1

      I don't think robbers and rapists come up to you and say "Excuse me, I would like to rob/rape you" and then give you the opportunity to draw your gun.

      I have never been attacked but, from the stories of people I know who have, they take you by surprise and incapacitate you before you can react. Male victims are just hit hard from behind and searched before they can resist, female victims are often indecently assaulted - they are so 'distracted' by the hand grabbing their crotch that they can't hold on to their handbag.

      Maybe in the US they still live by the code of the Old West and say "Draw" first, but in London they just give you a swift and suprising kicking.

    12. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It occurred to me (!!) Did it occur to at all that no one cares whether you feel left out ?!?!111!!!?!!!? Especially when what you type looks moronic ? (!!)

      I mean, you try saying something that makes sense. I noticed that most geeks are worried about protecting their asses and (!!) protecting their possessions. Consider yourself unspecial (!!)
      And making a paragraph long list of the suggestions that you admit everyone else has already made and saying they work for you too - has it occurred to you that that might be a redundant waste of a post ? (!!)
      If a lot of people can use their brain to figure out that you shouldn't be posting, it has got to be worth something to you morons!
      !A

  13. Well, in a perfect world. by re-Verse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tap in to the matrix and suddenly "I know Kung-Fu

    Yeah, that would be nice.

    1. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the mugger has probobly tapped in how to rob yo' ass already

    2. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us geeks actually know a martial art or two.

      I'll use myself as an example. I took muay thai off and on for about 5 years and plan to continue again soon.

      It's not the run-of-the-mill 13 year old thugs that I'm looking out for on the street, it's the 17 year old with a 9mm.

      You really can't do anything against that from a distance.

    3. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Funny

      For the last time, no you don't.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... but how would you get the ping rates down ?

    5. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by learza · · Score: 1

      Acutally, learning how to defend yourself is a sensible step. Some basic martial arts classes or similar will teach you just enough to suprise and possibly injure your attacker long enough for you to make an escape.

      Sydneysiders might like to try Hoshin Jutsu

    6. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but then you'll just be mugged by a hacker better than you, "He knows Kung-Fu, I know 503 Service Unavailable.". Crap crap crap...

    7. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some geek you are - that was a training program, not the Matrix.

      Go watch Tron, eat Cheetos over your keyboard, and say the "Abort, Retry, .." mantra 3 times.

    8. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by OverCode@work · · Score: 1

      Yes, martial arts classes help. As a student of kung fu for about half a year, I feel much safer when I walk around Los Angeles.

      But it has nothing to do with fighting. If I were attacked, I really don't think I'd be in any state of mind to actually fight the attacker. If you get in a fight (or get mugged) in the first place, you've already lost the fight to a large degree.

      I feel safer because I'm much stronger, have better posture, and am more alert than I was before I started. As a result, I am less likely to be mugged in the first place.

      Unless you're a very experienced martial artist, to the point that strikes and blocks are a subconscious reflex, you are NOT going to be able to win against a group of random attackers. That is a very dangerous illusion that is likely to result in much greater injury than just giving the muggers what they want and taking a minor beating. Forget about heroism, unless you want to die.

      -John

    9. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!!! !! ! 5 golden manbabies 4 u sir
      u o me a new floor bcause i rolled on mine

    10. Re:Well, in a perfect world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely u mean JujitSu

  14. Wearable computers? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you think THIS is one of the reasons people have been interested in wearable computer devices? So they are less of a burden to carry around with you? Hrmmm...

    Now to clarify the question, is this guy a huge target because he carries too much crap or because he's huge?

    1. Re:Wearable computers? by BillX · · Score: 1

      Gack. I somehow read that as "insertable computing devices".

      That would keep down on the mugging, anyway..

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    2. Re:Wearable computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it will just spawn a whole new breed of muggers.

    3. Re:Wearable computers? by danny · · Score: 1
      If that happens, muggers will start chopping off parts of their victims to get the expensive hardware...

      Danny.

      --
      I have written over 900 book reviews
  15. Get a gun by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or at least a self-defense course.
    People all over the world should be given the right, nay, the duty to defend themselves with lethal force from the worthless scum of the world.
    I've been mugged several times myself, so please excuse my bitterness.

  16. Instead of prevention.... by biosx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of prevention, why not just carry something to defend yourself with? Pepper spray, pocket knife, or a kubaton.

    --
    # root is the greed of all evil #
    1. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Piggymon · · Score: 0

      Carrying around weapons seems like an excellent way of getting yourself assaulted or killed instead of just losing some stuff.

    2. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to get assaulted anyway.. might as well fight back.

    3. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because thats how you get shot.

      Bringing a knife to a gun fight, not only and old saw, but really a bad idea

    4. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the purpose of that kubaton device? It's not obvious to me how it can be used in self defense, I carry a maglite on my keyring that looks about the same size, and i dont see what that could do. any hints?

    5. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Piggymon · · Score: 0

      No, they're after your stuff, not you. Fighting back will only make it worse since you're probably outnumbered and a weak geek anyway. I don't see what good could possibly come out of fighting back except for some bullshit imaginary moral victory you can enjoy all the way to the emergency room.

    6. Re:Instead of prevention.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do you spend 90% of your time to learn how and when to use those weapons? For geek main weapon is a stuff between his\her ears - but it should be loaded.
      I travel a lot in Russia, so i invent some rules for myself.
      - Backup your data regularly, to safe place, store some minimum on a CD and on some public host ftp\http.
      - have some bucks hidden on you, enough for calling for help
      - be ready to loose your gadgets. your brain costs more.
      - Learn how to listen and communicate - nobody attacks silently, usually there is a short conversation before. If you're smart enough, you could break attackers intentions with just a few words.
      - talk to local citisens - they know local dangerous places. Usually most of local people don't want you to be robbed.
      - Learn how to run as hell. It's usefull to look at map before to know where to run and where to find help.
      - Do not show your gadgets on public. Use simple cases. I prefer some simple backpack. i put the notebook to simple envelope, and hide it to backpack - now, you can easily get it and take it to the plane. Put other gadgets, your passport, cards, coins, most metall things to a small bag, carry it with you everywhere - it will help to get trough security checks in airports and everything will be easy to find.
      - Dont't panic.

    7. Re:Instead of prevention.... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      kubaton

      Following your link and a quick cursory google search reveal... a "ninja key-chain"? I'm I supposed to stab the burglar with the pointy end?

      How effective is it as a defense weapon? Will they let me board a plane with it? Will it raise the eyebrows of security guards?

      --
      No sig
    8. Re:Instead of prevention.... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      About the same as a mag lite... in fact, in any given scenario you are better off with a maglite because Hey, you are a geek, and a maglite is typical geek carry.

      My wife has a maglite I gave her she carries everywhere. She understands the basics of how to use it. Remember, there are no Dangerous weapons, only dangerous men.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  17. make it look cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I travel with everything I own in a crummy-looking backpack. Walking around with a distinctive black laptop bag is asking for trouble. Just make yourself look like the least likely candidate to be carrying lots of technology.

    1. Re:make it look cheap by name773 · · Score: 1

      much much better than the carry guns option. bravo. this way, the "defense" is something you'd normally carry, it doesn't cost as much, and it's less nerve-racking than carrying a gun.

  18. Weigh your options... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it more important to you to have these items on you while you're out, or is it more important to you that they be safe?

    If the answer is that you must have them on you, then try to avoid "bad parts" of town and accept the fact that you're putting yourself in a dangerous position. Pray to your deity. Consider carrying a tazer.

    If the answer is that you'd rather hang on to them for the long run, leave the damn things at home.

    1. Re:Weigh your options... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Consider carrying a tazer.

      Please don't. Nothing like pissing off the guy who might very well have a gun or knife. Or is just large enough to get it from you and use it against you.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Weigh your options... by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      He said he's in the UK. If he is found in possession of an offensive weapon, he'll go to jail.

    3. Re:Weigh your options... by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      I have to agree there. If you want something, get a cheap bottle of pepper spray. It works fairly well (at the very least, you'll get their hands over their eyes while you run away), and it's not another expensive, heavy gadget to carray around.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Weigh your options... by learza · · Score: 1
      poofmeisterp makes a good point but often such devices are next to useless if you don't carry them with you. A laptop that stays on your desk, an iPod for music while working at your desk, a mobile that never leaves the office...

      By all means buy the devices, use and enjoy them. You could get unlucky but some other points in these threads might help.

    5. Re:Weigh your options... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      That's why I said "consider."

      My actual comment, while trollish, would be more like "if you don't want it stolen, don't carry it. If you carry it, pray it doesn't get stolen."

      There's not really much more to it than that. If someone wants it, they'll take it. Just hope you aren't seen by one of those people.

    6. Re:Weigh your options... by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      As I already said, the guy is unlikely to have a gun. Unlike in the US walking in the street in London does not involve an arms race.

  19. Not carrying nearly enough.... by Rahga · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll have to check the laws in your area, but at the very least, the list is missing a knife, pepper spray, brass knuckles, and a packet of instant foam... Bite into it, then the attacker, and do your best to fake rabies. :)

  20. An universal truth by E_elven · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look like you know exactly what you're doing, and that you belong exactly where you are. Don't show fear. Don't run past the sketchy neighboroughs. Don't glance around. Strut. Don't look at maps. Don't stare at people, but return their look if given one.

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    1. Re:An universal truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good advice. Act like you belong there and people will generally assume that you do.

      One thing I've found though, less focus on the "strut", if you appear cocky in the extreme, you'll just attract attention. It's an authority challenge.

      Also, maps aren't a big deal, imho. Granted, I live in Minnesota - but I've met people from *much* larger cities that compare some of the worst areas of Minneapolis and St. Paul with various other large inner city areas - unfortunately.

      They'd know too, since we all worked the same job. Process serving. Try finding your way 'round without a map if you don't know the area. ;) It's not so bad though, I've been all over ALL of the Cities. Just carry yourself like you belong there - even if you obviously don't - and you'll be alright.

    2. Re:An universal truth by Ian+Cackett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. It's all about attitude and confidence, and learning to project them both even if you don't actually *feel* confident the whole time.
      I never use my mobile whilst I'm walking. If I get a call when I'm out, I take it but I stand to one side, just so I'm aware what's going on around me. I've also got a fairly naff MP3 player. Who really wants to carry their entire music collection around with them every day in an iPod?!
      I've lived in London for ten years, travelled thousands of miles in the US by Greyhound, and spent a great deal of time in New York. I don't *feel* confident in most of those situations, but I've learned that looking pissed off is a useful way of projecting "don't come near me" at any wannabe attackers. If you've got that slight 'unknown' about you, they'll generally look elsewhere. I'd be fairly useless in any attack situation, but they don't *know* that, so I've avoided trouble to-date.

    3. Re:An universal truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't glance around. Strut. Don't look at maps. Don't stare at people, but return their look if given one.

      My method is to "scan". Cover the horizon, look straight past people like I see them but just don't give a fuck. I'm looking for real threats, not babies like them. If they try to make contact with you- same thing: "Yes, I see you. But I don't care, fag. I'm too busy for scum today." When all else fails, go Taxi Driver on their ass! Stare in the mirror and quote Travis Bickle all day!

      And say "fag" a LOT. It makes me feel like a big man.

    4. Re:An universal truth by tktk · · Score: 5, Funny
      Don't glance around. Strut.

      And have "Staying Alive" playing in the background.

    5. Re:An universal truth by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Good grief. All this talk is making me happy to live in good old suburbia USA. Say what you will, snobby city dwellers, but I go running out my front door through the high desert most evenings at dusk, look down on the pretty sparkling lights of the city, and never worry about this garbage. The gangsters are down there somewhere shooting each other, I know 'cause I see it on the news.

    6. Re:An universal truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! The USA is the safest country on earth. And we have GUNS to thank for it.

    7. Re:An universal truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that "high desert" you refer to isn't Palmdale/Lancaster. Because if it is, you will get capped soon.

    8. Re:An universal truth by rhinoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in downtown Dallas, walk around alone in the dark, ride a $1300 dollar bike all over the place, and have never had any problems at all. However, having lived in suburban "paradise" I have had a gun pulled on me twice, have been jumped once, and have been generally harassed more than a few times.

      What's the difference?

      I grew up. I look at people differently, and travel with an air of confidence. That makes a hell of a lot more of a difference than your zip code. Someone who's never actually been in a dangerous will simply never understand how much standing up straight and making sure people know you see everything going on around you makes.

      --
      The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
    9. Re:An universal truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look like you know exactly what you're doing, and that you belong exactly where you are. Don't show fear. Don't run past the sketchy neighboroughs. Don't glance around. Strut. Don't look at maps. Don't stare at people, but return their look if given one.

      HOMIE #1: Check out that pale skinny dork, he probably has a laptop on him!

      HOMIE #2: Yeah, nice vic, let's do him - Wait...Damn! He made eye contact - let's get the hell out of here!

      HOMIE #3: Shit you're right, he hasn't looked at his map yet - let's run!

    10. Re:An universal truth by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Yeah! The USA is the safest country on earth. And we have GUNS to thank for it.
      Well, what do you want me to say? Nobody I know has ever been a victim of violent crime (including mugging), and yes between me and my relatives we do own quite a few guns. In fact I got one for my 12th birthday. That is my experience, so obviously it affects my outlook. It's sad that society has slid so far downhill that kids would even think of killing each other, and now we have to argue about whether we are collectively responsible enough to hold the rights that we do.
    11. Re:An universal truth by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I've been in cities my whole life, mostly on bicycle and on foot, and I can say that I've never been scared or mugged. I've been put at more risk out in suburbia when hick cops pull guns on me than I have in ghetto neighborhoods full of junkies and hookers.

      Also, since you folks moved out of the city into those out-there-connected-by-main-street areas, there's been a lot less traffic in the city. I know that in Providence there's virtually no local traffic compared to getting out of Barrington or Bristol (affluent suburbs). I work in Milton, MA and the traffic there is worse than it is in Boston proper, excepting downtown.

      I live in a city today, not a particularly 'urban' area, but it's 'the city' and I leave my door unlocked some days, my bike has been out on the porch for almost a year sans-lock, and I leave my car windows unrolled wherever I go (it helps if they think you've got nothing worth taking).

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  21. Hide them!!! by reub2000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Nobody will steal them if they don't know you have them. Switching the headphones on the iPod was a good idea. Are you even a geek if you own an the overpriced, low battery, low sound quality item that is the iPod. Real geeks use Zen Xtra, Karma, or iRiver iHP-1x0.

  22. Idea by Have+Blue · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Don't buy a fancy bag that obviously has a laptop in it, just get some generic (or even better, old and slightly beaten up) bag and put your laptop in there, with a padded cover so it stays protected.

    1. Re:Idea by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but I think it would be funny to rig up a laptop bag with a battery inside and walk through mugger prone areas. When the mugger tries to take the bag it gives him a high voltage shock.

      Ok, maybe I have a sick sense of humor...

    2. Re:Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought a snap-jaw trap with sharpened teeth would be fun for those types that can't keep their fingers out of bag pockets.

  23. Re:Not a problem here by IAR80 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I often take a LAW with me.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  24. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is London!

    They have a communist mayor for crying out loud!

    It's a classic example of, when guns are outlawed...

    Just ask Julia Roberts, Madonna, and every other celeb in London who's been (sometimes violently) mugged.

  25. Go ahead... by Trailwalker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here in Virginia, the concealed carry permit allows one to do an imitation of Dirty Harry.

    A lead induced lobotomy cures most criminal impulses.

    In London,and those parts of the U.S. where the rights of criminals are paramount, you should at least show the thief how to operate the equipment and then thank him for helping making your trip lighter and easier.

    1. Re:Go ahead... by bucknuggets · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Here in Virginia, the concealed carry permit allows one to do an imitation of Dirty Harry.
      >A lead induced lobotomy cures most criminal impulses.

      And even more importantly - allows the user to feel like a well-hung man. Of course, this feeling is only temporary, but that's ok - because you can also buy an attack dog and suv to fend off the inevitable creeping insecurities.

      There's nothing more pathetic than a geek with a gun getting his ass completely kicked while trying to get his weapon out of his colastomy-bag-looking hip-sack. The only upside is the entertainment that it gives everyone around him lived through years of his tough-talking. Of course, the ever-so-resourceful-insecure-geek might then become even more obnoxious, by keeping his gun in his hand at all times, so that he can 'squeeze one off' before getting throttled. Luckily at that point he's almost guaranteed to get beaten to death, and end everyone else's misery.

      Seriously, every geek I've ever met that has insisted he needed a gun also lived in about the safest part of town you could ever find. Then he avoided anyplace more dangerous than a theme park. I suppose there's someone out there that actually would benefit from carrying a gun, but I have yet to meet the geek that did.

    2. Re:Go ahead... by Trailwalker · · Score: 1
      feel like a well hung man


      Thats for the 44 magnum, Glock crowd. A small .22 revolver with hollow points will suffice for personal protection. Easy to conceal, and easy to aim and use at close distance. Doesn't weigh a lot either.

      I live in a decent neighborhood, but crime, including home invasions, happens here too. Its less the neighborhood than access to interstate highways (for quick getaways) that invite crime. I encounter many strange and dubious types while at work and there's the little trips for supplies etc.

      There seems to be an assumption that one goes to areas where crime occurs. Alas, crime comes to us, and with all the psychotic individuals out there, your survival is not guaranteed even if you cooperate fully with the criminal's demands. No one lives in a world sealed off from ills of the world. Sensible precautions need to be taken. If your local government hasn't been taken over by liberals who have legislated protection for poor, deprived, not personally responsible criminals, give a little thought to protecting yourself.

      The successful use of a firearm requires a bit of practice. You at least must know which end the bullet emerges from. A gun handling course, required to get the carry permit here, is useful.

      For those with a curiosity for history, check Alexander Berkman's first use of firearms. "Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist" is his autobiography. He obtained a pistol, some ammo, and without even test firing the thing, tried to assissanate Henry Clay Frick. Botched the job.

    3. Re:Go ahead... by kpharmer · · Score: 1

      > There seems to be an assumption that one goes to areas where crime occurs. Alas, crime comes to us,
      > and with all the psychotic individuals out there, your survival is not guaranteed even if you cooperate > fully with the criminal's demands.

      That's true - but then again most neighborhoods are still very safe. I live in a little liberal tourist town right off the highway - and we have almost zero crime. Well, that's not exactly true - cars are occasionally broken into, but that's about it. Most of my neighbors leave their doors unlocked, and the only crime I've experienced in ten years is twice I've had unlocked cars rifled.

      But could I encounter a dangerous situation? Sure, though the odds are against a 'mugger'. Probably a lot more likely to get into an argument with a drunk at a bar. So, yes I could get into a dangerous situation even in my peaceful little town. But I don't think that the unlikely change of violence warrants much more than being aware of my surroundings. A gun is overkill, and would just result in most neighbors thinking I was a wacko.

  26. A true geek... by maxbang · · Score: 5, Funny

    doesn't go out. Therefore, I don't really see a problem here.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:A true geek... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Spend all of your nights building your own taser and you'll never need to go out again.

    2. Re:A true geek... by ynnaD · · Score: 1

      ..until you get mugged by the pizza delivery man.

    3. Re:A true geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home invasion is then the problem

  27. off-site backups --not just for corporations by everyplace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Living in cities with anything like a decent crime rate, I view mugging and / or damage to equipment that I carry regularly as inevitible, and plan accordingly. The data that my equipment carries far exceeds the cost of the equipment itself, so I try to keep backups of data on another machine at my house or in another location entirely.

    I will say though, I was working at a convenience store a few years ago, and got held up at gun point while developing on my powerbook. All I could think about while handing them the money from the register was to position myself in exactly the right place so that the gunman couldn't see my laptop directly behind me. Ever since that close call, I've stuck to my "guns" when it comes to regular backups.

    1. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yet another Mac-zealott willing to sacrifice his life for his Mac...

    2. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this right: You were at work, in a store, and you got held up at gunpoint whilst working on your powerbook? You know, if you hadn't been so absorbed in something your boss wasn't paying you to do, you might have noticed them come in the door and raise the alarm. I have a tip for the future: when put in charge of looking after a cash register stuffed with cash, try and stay alert on the task at hand and perhaps you won't get robbed so often.

    3. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      when put in charge of looking after a cash register stuffed with cash, try and stay alert on the task at hand and perhaps you won't get robbed so often.

      I don't see why. when a guy walks in the door and pulls a gun, there's not much you can do (unless you manage to shoot him.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 0

      Mod this up! That was hilarious :-)

    5. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by manifest37 · · Score: 1

      my question is, why were you developing at a convenience store, were you sitting int he corner drinking all the red bull they had?

    6. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I was working at a convenience store a few years ago, and got held up at gun point while developing on my powerbook

      Damn, is the job market really that bad?

    7. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming an awful lot. Maybe he had permission from his boss, and maybe the robbers didn't have big signs over their heads that said "Armed Robber." It is not unusual for late shift cashiers to do other things during their shifts, and bosses usually permit this because (1) there's nothing else to do anyhow and (2) it's one of the few perks of working late shift.

      Maybe you should try it so you would actually know what you're talking about. Or maybe you should just shut the fuck up about things you don't know anything about, dumbass.

    8. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 0, Troll

      and got held up at gun point while developing on my powerbook.

      [...]

      Ever since that close call, I've stuck to my "guns" when it comes to regular backups.


      What is it about you so-called Mac developers (who probably write Flash or Shockwave code) who don't believe in using a properly backed ups server, running at some secure hosting site, with SOURCE CONTROL SYSTEM on it?


      Every time we'd have to contract to a shop where they use macs for something, it seems like everyone just skips around with different versions of stuff on their powerbooks with no central repository for anything.


      We've made use of our source code control system (and weekly backups on ISO DVD-ROMS) mandatory in our contract, and we get a lot of pushback from Mac "developers" about this.


      On my PC, I use an encrypted filesystem, and I sync my code to a server-based maintained and backed up source-code control system. If someone steals my laptop, that's all they get. No work is lost or compromised.

    9. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by alwaystheretrading · · Score: 1

      In many cases it's not so much the value of the data or equipment that may get stolen, but what can be done with that information. Be careful of what you might have that a potential thief might use to get to your financial data. You might not directly have your bank account number on your computer but if you have your passwords to your bank accounts saved a thief could use that.

    10. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Living in cities with anything like a decent crime rate, I view mugging and / or damage to equipment that I carry regularly as inevitible, and plan accordingly

      A decent crime rate? I think you mean a not so decent crime rate, a bad crime rate, or a shitty crime rate. A place with a decent crime rate would have very few crimes.

    11. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can do this on macs too, ass. i know a lot of dumb windows and even linux users, but i don't make wild claims that everyone like them is dumb because of an observed few.

    12. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

      I try to keep backups of data on another machine at my house or in another location entirely.

      I totally agree with this. I was always a bit uncomfortable leaving my house until I got all of my automated backup systems in place. Nightly DB dumps and mail tars are encrypted in chunks and rsynced off site. Every night. Every commit to my arch repository is on two machines before I get my prompt back, in another city in about four hours, and another continent about two hours after that. One time setup, and I don't lose data from theft or damage.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
    13. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by taernim · · Score: 1

      And I wasn't even supposed to be working that day!

      (inevitable throwback to Clerks...)

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    14. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by strider_starslayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you want him to sit, during the night, for 8+ hours, when people only come in the store every ten to fifteen minutes, half of them being drunk, stones, or otherwise suspicious looking to begin with, since there comming into a convience store late at night- and somehow pick the weird freek who wants to buy 'giant-jugs-and-shit' from the guy who has a small gun in his pocket and is going to point that at you before the one goes to the porn stand and the other walks up to the register calmly like he wants to buy cigarettes and then says 'empy the register'.

      His job is simply to ring up there purchases when they come though, and hand over the money when they get held up- literally. A friend of mind woked at 7-11, and his job training included 'what to do in the event of a hold up', and do you know what it is; Hand over the money, wait until they leave and then call the cops- because doing anything else gets you killed.

      Heck maby he could have picked out the mugger, lets just say that he can- then what!?! He can see the mugger, he can see him comming, you have 15 seconds what are you going to do- trigger the alarm? To what end- either the cops are going to arrive long after he's gone, or worse- there going to arrive while he's in the store, with a gun pointed at your face while your putting cash in the bag, then he's going to get scared, and then he's going to figure out that YOU triggered some sort of silent alarm, and then he's going to mad a YOU, and scared, and have a gun; This is not a constructive situation.

      Maby you want him to have his own gun, and get into a firefight, in the convience store, over a paltry sum of $250 in the register that the owner figures will be lost to robberies as a cost of doing buisness anyway

      Let me sumarize; You have missed the point.

      The contents of the register are not worth loosing your life over, there not worth getting in a confrontation with a twitchy mugger, there not worth much at all- let the mugger have it, call the cops afterwards, and let the surveliance cameras do the rest of the work.

      --
      -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
    15. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it a Mac guy who wrote that famous article about tracking down the guys who stole his computer as soon as it was next connected to the net?

      My personal preference:

      Back up your data regularly enough that you don't lose too much if your system crashes, gets dropped or... in this case... gets stolen.

      Set it up so that, every time it connects to the net, it quietly emails you its IP address.

      Hand it the hell over, don't get hurt, and give the police the address of the guy as soon as he tries using it (or the address of whoever buys it once he sells it).

      What, you think the average mugger has a set of OS disks at home and knows how to clean up a stolen laptop before selling it on?

      My rule of thumb: The UK Criminal Injuries Compensation board puts a broken nose at about five grand. My laptop is worth about a quarter of that. In short, it's not worth getting hurt over. I'd rather just hand it over and let a little bit of intelligence catch the guy two days later.

      Sure, macho bravado about guns makes people feel better but, realistically, any sensible mugger doesn't anounce their intent from 100 yards away and give you time to get your gun. They wait until they're right beside you and, should you appear to go for a gun, knife or anything else, will lay in to you far faster than you can pull it out - whatever you may choose to believe.

      Hand it over, take care of yourself, claim on the insurance. Far more sensible.

    16. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I was working at a convenience store a few years ago, and got held up at gun point while developing on my powerbook

      Damn, is the job market really that bad?

      In a word, Yes.

    17. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by everyplace · · Score: 1

      I worked at a convenience store that was your classic "mom and pop" neighborhood convenience store. I knew 95% of the people that walked in that door, and had their cigarettes or what have you on the counter before they got to it. The fact is, my boss at the time could care less about what I was doing. He had owned the store since the 50's, and as long as it still stood he didn't care what happened.

    18. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by everyplace · · Score: 1

      First of all, there are people who do respectable things with flash code (joshua davis comes to mind). Secondly, I was developing a php/mysql social networking site, which may or may not have value depending on your opinion on such projects. The point is though, I am a) a mac developer, and b) in the second paragraph of my parent I expressed exactly what you're putting me down with.

    19. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Libraryman · · Score: 1
      You know, if you hadn't been so absorbed in something your boss wasn't paying you to do, you might have noticed them come in the door and raise the alarm. I have a tip for the future: when put in charge of looking after a cash register stuffed with cash, try and stay alert on the task at hand and perhaps you won't get robbed so often.
      Let me sumarize; You have missed the point. The contents of the register are not worth loosing your life over, there not worth getting in a confrontation with a twitchy mugger, there not worth much at all-
      Even you have missed the point a little. The contents of the register aren't even his!! If the register had $10 or $10,000 it wouldn't be worth his getting a hangnail or a little dust on his shoes. If someone else wants the money, why should he care?

      His PowerBook on the other hand . . .

    20. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true true, however my statments are meant to be blanket for all people working in convience stores- including the owners of them, who do often work cashier in order to net more profit from there investement in the store.

      Also- your employer CAN fire you for wanton disregard for the safty of the cash in the register;

    21. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. gimme a break. If you don't know your job, then the market will of course be shit.

    22. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      I'll get fired over the contents of the cash register over taking a bullet any day, thankyouverymuch.

    23. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm not surprised in the least that he wasn't interested in the laptop. If he was robbing a convenience store, he was probably pretty focussed on the cash.

      I talked to a police detective after my fiancee was burglarized, and he told me that the absolute best things to steal are

      • money
      • drugs
      • guns
      • jewelry
      Jewelry can be broken apart and resold easily, or pawned unaltered. Guns are tremendously salable on the black market in societies that curtail their legal purchase. Drugs and money, well, money's money, and often it's used to buy drugs in the first place. All these items can be concealed about the person, too---an advantage that small electronic devices share, but they're nowhere near as profitable as the above listed.

      I keep myself safe by using technology that's five years behind the curve: my laptop is a Pentium II/300 with 64MB. My WiFi AP has more horsepower.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    24. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I've got a job. But many of my friends don't. And they do know their field.

    25. Re:off-site backups --not just for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most countries (I know canada) they specifically CAN'T fire you for having preserved your own safty at company expense;

      Wanton disregard for the cash register would be like letting a 12 year old kid empty the thing while your in the can- that would probabally constitute a firing, or at least a stern talking to.

  28. Re:Not a problem here by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I totally agree, right now hoping to get a Glock 26 for CC. However, he lives in London. The UK has enacted a total gun ban, and consequently, violent crime rates have gone up. Way up. London, along with Paris, are now the crime capitals of the Western world. As a previous poster said, the best thing to do would be to leave London. I'd say not only leave London, but move to a region where self-defense isn't a crime.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  29. Yep, another CCW person weighs in. by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exercise your 2nd amendment rights and obtain a concealed carry permit. Oh, wait..

    Sorry guys, I couldn't resist, having noted that most of the early posts went the same way. I enjoy having mine. It's not the posessions so much as your life - Remember, when seconds count, help is only minutes away.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  30. Here is what you do by FS1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Don't shower for weeks on end
    2. Where cloths multiple times
    3. Find the dirtiest, nastiest bag you can to put your stuff in

    oh wait your a geek, you already do those three things.

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
    1. Re:Here is what you do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively:

      1. Don't shower for weeks on end.
      2. Wear clothes multiple times.
      3. Find the dirtiest, nastiest bag you can to put your stuff in.

      Oh wait, you're a geek. You already do those three things.

    2. Re:Here is what you do by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

      4. Profit! If you can't afford to lose it, don't carry it. And if you fall out of that window and break both your legs, don't come running to me! Scaredy cat.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    3. Re:Here is what you do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      3. Find the dirtiest, nastiest bag you can to put your stuff in

      Funny, that's what I always wind up doing when I'm drunk!

    4. Re:Here is what you do by AvantLegion · · Score: 3, Funny
      2. Where cloths multiple times

      Where cloths?

      There cloths!

    5. Re:Here is what you do by sindarin2001 · · Score: 1

      There castle!! I love that movie!

    6. Re:Here is what you do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why are you talking like that?"

      "I thought you wanted to!"

      "No!"

      "Eh, suit yourself."

  31. Common Sense by Cyphen · · Score: 1

    I use a nondescript backpack that looks more like it's for school (of course, I'm still of school age, which makes a difference), and I would suggest not walking up to people saying, "Man, I'm loaded with expensive electronics! I hope no one mugs me!"

  32. Two things by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. I've lived in London for the last 18 years, since being 18 in fact, all over from Finsbury Park to Streatham, From Acton to Walthamstow, and even in South Kensington and Victoria, which covers a large area. I've never felt particularly at risk. Ever. Admittedly I'm a 6'2 male, and I walk around with confidence in my stride but I've been in far more dangerous places than London.

    2. Are you seriously telling me that you carry around with you data that you can't recover ?? No-one expects you to pray to the backup gods religiously every morning before breakfast, but seriously it's not hard to keep things at least roughly synced with a more-permanent base. Use any PC, connect 'em up and hit go, grab a coffee and it's done.

    I don't expect to get mugged, but there's always the chance I'll forget to pick up my bag, or drop the portable, or some idiot will spill his pint of beer over me, or (pick some random occurrence). BACK IT UP!

    [aside: I *have* heard from Ipod owners (I'm not one such) that the white earphones are in fact the cause of several muggings, and they're crap quality anyway, so I can understand ditching them. That's about the only step I'd take though, and more for quality reasons than safety ones]

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Two things by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I *have* heard from Ipod owners (I'm not one such) that the white earphones are in fact the cause of several muggings, and they're crap quality anyway

      No they are not!

      I've damaged mine (apparently, they aren't waterproof, go figure), and I tried using my crappy earphones instead. Man I miss the white ones. Now I'll have to buy new ones because the crap ones really don't cut it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Two things by kahei · · Score: 1


      I've lived in London for the last 18 years, since being 18 in fact, all over from Finsbury Park to Streatham, From Acton to Walthamstow, and even in South Kensington and Victoria, which covers a large area.

      It covers a large area of cozy middle class neighborhoods, yes. I think this, rather than the confidence which I'm sure is conspicuous in your stride, accounts for the lack of hassle.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    3. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      South Ken is cosy and middle classed but I wouldn't choose to live in Finsbury Park, Streatham, Acton or Walthamstow, (though I wouldn't expect to be mugged if I did).

      A mistake some tourists seem to make is staying at hotels in King's Cross or Sherpherd's Bush. DON'T DO IT, both these places are dives with more than their fair share of 'social problems'.

    4. Re:Two things by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Get the in-ear ones, I just got a pair for my ipod, and they're much better than the bud-style ones. Not as good as a pair of B&Os or anything, but then they were only $60, not $200.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Two things by Johnno74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In shepards bush/acton you can't swing a cat without hitting 3 or 4 antiopodean backpackers (young people from SA, NZ, AU). These areas are very safe, I used to live there. Finsbury, Streatham.... well, you have a point there!

    6. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wearing headphones is not overly bright because it indicates to muggers that your hearing is diminished.
      In any urban area your situational awareness is what matters, not fscking music. Even in a crime-free area it can keep you from being a hood ornament.

    7. Re:Two things by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The white earphones are absolutely awful. I ditched mine after 4 seconds, when I realised they have no bass, crappy mid-range and worse treble. They're included with the ipod unit to make it functional out-of-the-box, but not increase the unit price (as they cost $.50 each to manufacture).

      If you think they're "good", go check out a selection at your local electronics shop - you'll soon realise how crap the white ones are.

    8. Re:Two things by Corgha · · Score: 1

      No-one expects you to pray to the backup gods religiously every morning before breakfast

      Speak for yourself.

      When my users don't pray to the backup god, "accidents" happen. And tapes are so easy to misplace.

      A prayer here, an offering there, and all can be right again.

    9. Re:Two things by Radon+Knight · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't choose to live in Finsbury Park, Streatham, Acton or Walthamstow

      It very much depends on where you live in Walthamstow. The northern part of Walthamstow (north of the Tube station), past the High street, and around the William Morris Gallery, is quite safe. I've lived there for the past three years. The local authority has recently invested around 40 mil. pounds in revamping the main square around the bus station (including rebuilding the entire bus station), and recently knocked down an entire abandoned mall, clearing it for new construction. In the past year or so, I've seen several niceish restaurants and bars open up (Celsius, for one) which indicates that the area is becoming increasingly gentrified.

      South Walthamstow, towards Leyton, gets unpleasant fast. One of the things which surprised me upon moving to London was how the desirability of neighborhoods can rapidly change within walking distance... something which is very rare in the States. One has to drive to get from Irvine to East L.A., for example.

    10. Re:Two things by Mod+Me+God+Too · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack? Ever been to East Acton, Finsbury Park (at night, or the Manor House side), got lost in the warren of estates in Streatham or any part of Walthamstow away from the village?

      These are gritty 'real' London neighbourhoods... you will struggle to find worse.

      --
      --

      It is not the commies, the government, the nigger, nor the corporates. It is your paranoia.
    11. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These are gritty 'real' London neighbourhoods... you will struggle to find worse.

      Try somewhere with an actual murder rate, like Peckham or Harlesden.

  33. I feel ya.... by Daemonik+CyCow · · Score: 0

    I know what you mean... What I do is carry myself like a thug, when I am not dressed up for work (GOD FORBID)... And when I run into the wrong type, I just let them know,w ith my eyes, my actions, my feelings, my soul, that I aint anybody they should be ***** with... It's an attitude I learned when I was homeless in the city with a $5,ooo dollar camera outfit in my backpack... And I once had a kid pull a gun out on me... You know what I did>? I looked him in the eye, gave him that (not attitude, but thought, sense, whatever)((quantumn> taht he should not touch me... and I walked right passed him. It's in the attitude. And if your still worried about your PB, well, get insurance...

  34. Uh, don't carry everything everywhere? by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    This seems obvious, but I'll bite. How about instead of taking all that crap with you by default, you *only* bring what you'll absolutely need. If you have your laptop with you, for example, do you really need your iPod? Or a PDA? Practically everyone carries a cell phone around nowadays, so I unless you have a riced out one, I don't think the cell phone is as much of a problem as the other big ticket items.

    If you must carry it all around, I suggest concealing it in a similar manner as you did with the iPod earphones. Be careful of where you flash your toys around. If, for example, you take your iPod to lunch with you, then when you get up to grab a handful of napkins, stick that sucker in your pocket, not in your bag. Be cautious, but not paranoid. And, it should go without saying, but if you're worried about muggers, don't walk around with headphones on.

  35. Probably not ideal but... by mivok · · Score: 1

    Insure everything and backup regularly. Unless you are really lucky, you will get mugged at some point (or at least you have to assume so), and there is nothing you can do to prevent it completely (although not making yourself an obvious target may lessen the risk somewhat). It's best to make sure that when it happens, it is nothing more than a minor annoyance.

    (Disclaimer - I have never been mugged, I'm merely paranoid)

  36. physical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, for those of us who don't live in Yankee doodle land (US) and can't carry guns. I suggest doing weights and cardio, then taking self defense classes. Then when I stupid bloke tries to take your stuff give it to him and tell him to take a flying F*@#.

  37. You live in Britain... by Nogeel · · Score: 1

    ... you have no right to defend yourself against a mugger so get it insured and make lots of back ups ;) (I am an American who has been living in Birmingham, UK for the past 2 years)

    1. Re:You live in Britain... by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Were you that priest who kept a derringer in his grandfather clock?

    2. Re:You live in Britain... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a Brit who's been living here all his life (29 years), and I can assure you that I most certainly do have the right to defend myself.

      The only time I might be in trouble is if it appears that either I did not believe myself to be in danger, or I used excessive or unreasonable force. Other than that, I have every right to defend myself, or those around me, if I believe there to be an imminent danger of being attacked.

  38. Don't let others know what you are carying by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just like you've done with the iPod headphones, ideally nobody should be able to tell you are carying a laptop, PDA, etc.

    I carry my laptop, PDA and minidisk player (yes, it's not an iPod, but it's still worth quite a bit) wherever I go, but because I use a regular backpack to hold everything, I'm as safe as anyone else. I use a sleeve bag for the laptop, with hard padding all around. That way in my backpack, even when surrounded by books, binders and other things, my laptop can take a fair amount of pressure without any problems. I even rode my motorcycle and my bycicle, and nothing happened (no, I did not fall, but the bumps would have cracked a less protected laptop).

    The absolute worse you can do is carry a leather Targus bag. It's as close to wearing a "Rob ME!" sticker on your back as possible.

    1. Re:Don't let others know what you are carying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If *really* want to make an impression, print aforementionned sticker with the spelling "R0|3 /\/\3".

    2. Re:Don't let others know what you are carying by B-a-Z.nl · · Score: 0

      "It's as close to wearing a "Rob ME!" sticker on your back as possible." That might actually work, if you just scare the people to thinking you're an undercover cop or something who is just waiting for someone to rob him...

  39. Insurance by 3l1za · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't say whether the laptop et al is yours or company property... so I'm assuming the former. In which case I think you can get homeowner's (alt. renter's) insurance that will cover these items.

    Then make sure you back them up periodically.

    And if there's anything sensitive on them, make sure you encrpyt it.

    That should cover all the exigencies.
    This is definitely a case of plan to fail gracefully b/c once you get tagged, it's a little out of your control...

    1. Re:Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lets make a simple theft into a homicide.
      Self-defense is not a crime, at least in the state of Georgia. See Georgia Code, Title 16, Chapter 3, Articles 21 through 23. One need not shoot a mugger to prevent the mugging. Many a carjacking/mugging/etc has been stopped dead in its tracks when the attacker saw that his target was armed.

      I will never live in a country that gives out permits for carrying a hidden weapon.
      Good.
  40. Problem? by telstar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most of the joy of gadgets is the researching, selecting, ordering, and receiving anyway ... After you get it, it's obsolete and you've already moved onto the next new thing. Think of muggers as helpers ... They clean out the old obsolete gadgets so you can research/select/order new expensive shiny gadgets.

    1. Re:Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever been mugged, stabbed, assaulted? I suspect not, but if you do, you're opinions will surely change. It is really not a laughing matter.

    2. Re:Problem? by Suburbanpride · · Score: 1

      I had a snowboard stolen recently and this was exaclt what i did. It was a good excuse to get a much nice board, one which I now keep a much better eye on.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    3. Re:Problem? by ryg0r · · Score: 0
      Think of muggers as helpers

      So you're the one that tried to relieve me of my iBook!

      --
      Karma whoring .sigs don't work
  41. weapon crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carrying a pocket knife around is a bad idea unless your Chuck Norris. Your best bet is concealing your stuff realy well. Maybe buy a cheap shoulder bag that looks like crap. Oh... and try wearing a gilly suit :p

  42. Camouflage by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Travel with a girl. They'll never identify you as a geek then!

    1. Re:Camouflage by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

      oh come on. What are the chances of this ! You might as well have told him to drive around in a tank. Besides, hiring women to wander around with you is legally questionable.

    2. Re:Camouflage by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " Travel with a girl. They'll never identify you as a geek then!"

      True for me. My spouse wears black clothes all over, together with steelcapped Doc Martens boots. Of course, it helps to be 6'2 myself, wearing cropped hair and a black outfit.

      Never had any problems, never feared having any. Should things get *really* tough, I can certainly outrun any stupid mugger.

      Best pieces of advice:

      - Don't argue with someone who carries a gun.
      - Look confident and don't shy from eye contact
      - Walk briskly
      - Don't dress like tourist
      - Separate your cash from your wallet
      - Avoid places that leave you no exit
      - Backup religiously and encrypt your data

  43. Easy solution... by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    ...have the hardware surgically implanted.

    Present-day muggers don't usually carry around X-Ray or MRI equipment, and usually don't have surgical instruments in their possession (except for organ muggers, but that's a different story).

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Easy solution... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Yeah but then it hurts in 6 months when you need a processor upgrade. Much easier if you're going for the surgery is to just get a few Terminator style upgrades - it's a one time thing and muggers will never be a problem again, no matter what you're carrying >:-)

  44. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also I suggest renting a stack of Charles Bronson movies.

  45. Re:Get a gun by fredrickleo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, learning to fight is probably the best thing to do. May I sincerely recommend Gracie Jiu Jitsu, it is an excellent style that can be used in many situations and will allow you too out manuever oponents who may be larger, stronger or faster than you, seriusly its about technique and "Gracie" is easy to learn and you can practice with your friends with out getting hurt.

    --
    Yay me! ^^
  46. Stop caring... by Sophrosyne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Life is too short to walk around worrying about muggers.
    I think this has to be the worst ask slashdot yet.

    1. Re:Stop caring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while ( parent.score 5 ){
      Parent++;
      }

    2. Re:Stop caring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Life is too short...

      I think this is what he's trying to prevent.

    3. Re:Stop caring... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      Conversely, life is too short to spend part of it working so you can buy a Laptop, iPod, cell phone and have them stolen.

    4. Re:Stop caring... by sploxx · · Score: 1

      But apparently, /.ers worry about muggers.

      Over 500 posts so far and still growing quickly, still the first entry on the front page...
      A new hall of fame entry?

      Well, I hope this post helps to reach that goal ;)

    5. Re:Stop caring... by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

      Man, you are right. It bothers me so much how most of this world lives in absolute fear of everything. And because this world lives in such fear, it usually means I need to put up with crap I shouldn't. Things like cavity checks at airports, and TWENTY FOUR SEVEN on the news that there is an imminent attack on the US by terrorists. It has been THREE years since Sept. 11th 2001, and nothing has happened. And no one better give me the "we have been preventing all the attacks" balogna.

      Hold on, my wife says someone from the FBI is at the door...

    6. Re:Stop caring... by Sethus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And life's too short to be whining about an "Ask Slashdot". I personally read these merely because some of the responces are interesting and funny. Quit griping and enjoy.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    7. Re:Stop caring... by zonix · · Score: 1

      Over 500 posts so far and still growing quickly, still the first entry on the front page... A new hall of fame entry?

      I found that interesting too. It was up around 1300 posts when I got here, and apparently not a single post about religion yet (not that I've spotted). :-)

      Things are looking good.

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    8. Re:Stop caring... by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Amen,

      all this crap about looking scruffy, and doing your best to look as if you've got nothing to steal. Fine, don't walk around public streets with your laptop open playing nethack. But man, I don't want to look like something the dog dragged through the trash.

      I act as I always have, and never have given a damn about muggers, and you know what? I've never even been approached in that manner.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  47. Four rules of thumb by halftrack · · Score: 1

    (1)Insurance and (2)backup for when shit hits the fan. And if you don't want your data to end up in the wrong hands keep it (3)encrypted. (Password + maybe separate crypto key on a thumb drive.)

    My sister recently got lifted for her video cam. It was between her feet but someone distracted her for a moment and it was gone. So to avoid getting mugged it may seem that (4)always holding on to your things may help. (E.g. when you sit down; keep your things between your legs and keep the handles in your hands or around your wrist.)

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:Four rules of thumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, if somebody's sister had a video camera between her legs, I'd be more interested in the footage than the camera... The their could've just stolen the tape!

    2. Re:Four rules of thumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of people seem to talk about insurance replacements and backups as good ways to avoid "fallout" from theft... what about those of us that do hardware hacking? I live in new york city, and ride a bike that I built myself, based on a Peugeot frame that I rescued from a recycling center (Peugeot doesn't make bikes anymore). although I would never put my life in front of the bike, theft is more of a problem for me than most...

  48. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop talking in that damn nigger language.

  49. Hit the gym every once in a while ;) by dusanv · · Score: 1

    I am pretty much as you - my PowerBook and other digital goodies always go with me and somehow I don't feel like a target. The other option is not to take a bath for a week before the trip or better yet, go to the gym for a week without taking a bath and the muggers will be afraid of you - trust me on this one.

  50. Re:Not a problem here by Q+Who · · Score: 1

    Let me guess, it is not a problem there, because you shoot targets really well in the shooting range?

    I guess it will be very entertaining when your weapon will be used against you the moment you get it out.

  51. Re:Not a problem here by Ithika · · Score: 1
    I'll think you'll find that is complete bollocks, for want of a more eloquent way of putting it. Glasgow, for example, has the highest actual murder rate and highest rate per person out of the whole country.

    My (west coast) flatmate is quite proud of the fact. :)

  52. Re:Not a problem here by name773 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    you know, i'd rather have my stuff stolen than live with shooting someone... even a crook.

  53. Look poor by forklifttruck · · Score: 1
    As someone in the same position I take my laptop around in a dull outdoor rucsac whilst wearing a fleece and jeans and don't look like I'm worth mugging.

    Another idea is to put personal/private/important data on a laptop onto and only onto a USB pen drive hidden in tiny pocket where muggers won't find it, cos equipment can be insured/replaced but that data must only be in your hands.

  54. STOP de "get a gun" madness! by dark-br · · Score: 0, Troll

    And have a look here at 40 Reasons to Support Gun Control.

    The chances are that you will not have the same experience with guns as the mugger anyways and prob. he will take your gadgets AND the gun.

    Plus carring a gun is the best way of getting shot at.

    1. Re:STOP de "get a gun" madness! by jonman_d · · Score: 1

      In case you can't read, that entire list is made up of reasons against gun control; it's just written as a parody.

    2. Re:STOP de "get a gun" madness! by Dravik · · Score: 1

      I'll point out that criminals don't tend to practice much. I've seen the videos of the Columbine kids "practice", I wish all criminals would do more of that. Then we would never have to worry about them hitting the target.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    3. Re:STOP de "get a gun" madness! by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      What crack are you on?

      "not have the same experience with guns"? I researched my two gun purchases with the same gusto that I researched what lot of Athlon 500 I wanted to overclock with. I go to the range weekly to practice putting holes in paper as accurately as I can, and as quickly as I can. I'm about to drop $800 on a multi-day training class on firearm tactics, as soon as i can fit it into my schedule. (I enjoy it, but I also view it as practical. Plus, it gets me outside occasionally :))

      The average gangbanger does not have that experience, just as the average script kiddie holding your domain hostage doesn't have the same experience as you as a sysadmin.

      Does this mean that I will definately prevail? No, but it does help my chances if I do need to draw. Hopefully I won't need to; I can give the mugger a wallet and a PDA thats already synched to my home computer, and off he goes, and I call the cops on a cell phone or payphone.

      Your assertion that carrying will get you shot is also without basis. If its concealed, how will they know, unless you draw?

      I have also found that I've become a lot more aware of my surroundings. Not because I'm itching to shoot someone, but because I really don't want to ever even get into a situation where my life is put in danger, or where I might have to take someone elses; that would hurt me emotionally and financially, even if the police deem it a clean shoot. More likely to get shot at? I'd say, less likely to ever encounter such a situation.

      p.s. funny list!

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    4. Re:STOP de "get a gun" madness! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Plus carring a gun is the best way of getting shot at.

      And people with guns at home are more likely to be shot. Never mind that people with guns at home are also more likely to be in a bad neighborhood where they're likely to be shot, gun or no.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  55. Let's meet and talk. by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd really like to help you out with this. Could we get together in person to discuss it? Please reply to this post with the time and place you want to meet, and when you come, make sure to bring all your expensive gear. I'd prefer a time late at night, and someplace out of the way and quiet. Maybe an alley?

    1. Re:Let's meet and talk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the looks of you, you're a little pussy. http://www.lightandmatter.com/area4author.html

    2. Re:Let's meet and talk. by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

      My favorite is to suggest a friendly meeting behind the "7-11, at 3am tonight... And uh... Bring your wallet."

    3. Re:Let's meet and talk. by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see you haven't been mugged by eight astronomers before. Let's just say that these scoundrels go where the sky's clearest and there aren't a lot of witnesses around.

    4. Re:Let's meet and talk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you asshole!

  56. Are you nuts? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Hey, great idea! Once you're in custody, in the back of a police car, after you've been arrested for carrying an offensive weapon your chances of being mugged drop dramatically!

    Seriously, carrying a concealed weapon that could get you a criminal record and a nice custodial sentence of your own is not the way to avoid trouble.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Are you nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be assuming that those things are illegal everywhere. They're not. Making sure you don't get in trouble for carrying self defense tools is a good idea. Telling people that any offensive weapon is obviously illegal is just trolling.

  57. I've heard one or two stories of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But come on .. what are the real statistics?

  58. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Got any evidence of these violent crime rates shooting way up in London? Or is this just another a case of 'proof by blatant assertion'? I call BS, crime rates in the UK have been going down across the board for years.

    While you're digging out crime statistics, how about some US & UK gun related death figures? Particularly interesting are those ones about how much more likely you are to get shot if you own a gun for 'your protection'...

  59. Easy Answer. by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Renter/home owner/additional insurance for your devices. Then save early, save often on something you keep at home or another safe location.

    If someone wants to take your stuff, they will. Even if you could carry a gun it'd probably just mean you'd get shot faster.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  60. Attitude Is Important by shadowcabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the cardinal rules of sneaking around is to act like you own the place you're breaking in to. That way it's very unlikely people will question you. The same goes for traveling with expensive stuff-- don't be self-conscious about it, because it will show. The trained thief knows how to discern between the guy nonchalantly walking by (who likely has nothing of value) and the guy casting panicked stares around him (who, in all likelihood, is either loaded or stoned-- money either way).

    A lot of people are advocating the carriage of weaponry, and I can't agree with that. Just act calm, like nothing on your person is worth being hassled over, and you'll be fine.

    Incidentally, I used to traipse around downtown Erie back in my college days carrying a whole hell of a lot of heavy crap-- typically college books, cell phone, Game Boy, a PDA for a brief time, and other miscellaney. I quickly learned the value of a) miniaturizing and b) wearing clothes with lots of pockets. My favorite winter coat has 10 pockets, 4 of which are positively huge. When I had all my gear in it, including gloves and hat, it must have weighed at least six pounds; I remember it would always tip over whatever rack I hung it on. Something to think about, I guess.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:Attitude Is Important by Dravik · · Score: 1

      I personally believe that you should do all you say and carry a pistol, just in case they try to rob you anyway. People driving carefully can dramatically reduce the odds of an accident, but they still wear a seat belt just in case.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    2. Re:Attitude Is Important by dborod · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the problem is one of latitude, not attitude.

      I've got an iPod, and not only do I still use the trademark white earbuds, but I also carry my ipod around in an iPod case on the strap of my bag, with the cover unflapped so I can get easy access to the controls. I've also got a 15" TiBook that I schlep around with me and have never had reason to be concerned. I live in Edmonton Alberta Canada, population 750,000.

    3. Re:Attitude Is Important by hypermike · · Score: 0

      I live in Erie, cool. Downtown Erie is pretty harmless, I work about as downtown as you can get but I have heard horror stories of how it used to be. later

      --
    4. Re:Attitude Is Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My SO lived on a (low security, admittedly) military base (country omitted, but it isn't one you'd want to mess with inside their borders) when we married. As a foreigner I am not allowed there, of course. But I lived there for 2 years anyway and never had my entrance questioned as I always just walked strait in with a nod at the guards, initially in company of my SO who was well known there, later in and out alone.

      The local plain-police whos job was to track foreigner's movements MUST have been aware of what I was doing. I occasionally noticed my tail (I actually liked them as I doubt a local mugger would get far before I was rescued) during the holidays (when all the more interesting-to-tail foreigners were away and they had nothing better to do than tag foreign english teachers) and they always had to wait outside the compound when I went in (I assume it was a juristiction issue). My school's foreign staffing person (technically part of the same group that does the tailing of foreigners) was fully aware of where I was living and why, so my openness about it may have been why I got away with it ultimately.

      Someone (may have been Douglas Adams??) suggested that to go anywhere secure you only needed to 'walk fast and carry a clipboard'.

    5. Re:Attitude Is Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people are advocating the carriage of weaponry, and I can't agree with that. Just act calm, like nothing on your person is worth being hassled over, and you'll be fine.

      You're out of your freaking mind. Around here, I've noticed two types of muggings:

      • The flash a knife/gun, say "you don't want this", and ask for the person's cash.

      • The "beat the crap of the victim and take whatever you like" technique.

      When you cooperate fully, you can expect to get hurt, as in seriously hurt, about 1 in 4 times. I've been there. It's not fun.

      Armed resistance lowers that ratio down to 1 in 8. Skill counts for a lot.

      You can be the victim.
      You can be the guy calling the ambulance.
      The choice is yours.

      As for me: I'm a bit more concerned about protecting the people I'm traveling with. My wife. My kids.

  61. incase of theft by ricochet81 · · Score: 1

    dont forget to record your serial numbers and MAC addresses and all that stuff. Not getting it stolen is priority, but having a good record of what could be stolen, especially a wifi card with a mac address some wardriver might pick up. I would image there is some kinda database for stolen wifi cards, and I would assume most thieves dont know how to change a MAC address.

    --
    Error: Id10t detected
  62. Move to Korea ! by fredrickleo · · Score: 1

    you could also move to Korea ! it's so safe here that you could pass out drunk in the street with your bag of electronics and the worst that would happen is some concerned passer-by might try to wake you up.

    --
    Yay me! ^^
  63. Re:Get a gun by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

    Yes, because laws like that are what made the world such a wonderful place.

    Sickens me so much that a slashot topic should be like this. I'm amazed we live in such a world. Having said that, I walk around London with my hands planted firmly in pockets and I hold onto my wallet for dear life. London isn't any worse than any other city though. The fact there's more people about makes it easier for pickpockets and muggers to do their work.

  64. Stay out of Hackney by DrJAKing · · Score: 1

    1. Don't listen to the people telling you to get a gun. They are clearly dumb anyway as they should have noticed you live in London and that would mean you would have to hook up with much badder people that street muggers to even get one. But mainly because the best thing to do if you get mugged is hand it over and get over it. A few bits of kit are not worth physical injury, or even worth the trouble of hurting someone else. If you can afford an ipod you can afford a decent insurance policy that would cover it, so just consider the cost of that as peace of mind.

    2. Carry your kit in a crappy bag.

    3. Walk around gesticulating wildly to the halucinations and shouting nonsense words.

    4. Stay out of Hackney.

    1. Re:Stay out of Hackney by pinny20 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I currently work in Hackney (which gets a bad rep), and take my laptop to work most days and I have had not problems at all.

  65. Stun gun by ivan1011001 · · Score: 1

    Build and carry one of these.

    --

    I was thinking of converting to paganism, but where the hell can you find sacrificial virgins these days?
  66. Tips on how to avoid being robbed by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is an excellent site, lots of free material from an expert:

    Tips on how to avoid being robbed

  67. Terminally stupid, almost by catfood · · Score: 1

    Sooooo... it was mid-1999 and I was starting on a contract with a new client in Philadelphia. They flew me in from Cleveland on Sunday night, and my hotel was right on the river. A quick check of public transit maps showed that I could catch the R1 line to Center City and then ride the Blue Line over to Second Street, with only a short walk to the river from there.

    Yeah. Right. At eleven o'clock at night. Loaded down with a laptop and travel suitcase. Under bridges and stuff, down unlit streets, not sure exactly where I was going.

    It wasn't the brightest thing I'd ever done, but I managed to get to the hotel unscathed, and it impressed the hell out of my colleagues. They knew not to mess with me. :-)

  68. Be Aware by patchmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about not using your Ipod when you're walking around? You have to be less aware of your surroundings if you're drowning out the city noise with music, and any experienced mugger is going to know it. Crank the music up and anyone can easily sneak up behind you.

    The other obvious thing is to not be obvious. Don't wear your PDA and Ipod and cell phone where it's obvious you have them. Buy a non-descript bag and carry all your stuff in that. And be sure the bag is securely attached to your person. Don't make it easy for someone to snatch and run.

    1. Re:Be Aware by RobGarth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > How about not using your Ipod when you're walking > around?

      It's a PORTABLE music player. Why the f#$% else would you have it.

    2. Re:Be Aware by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      It is unfortunate that using the device for at least one of its intended purposes increases the likelihood of someone taking it from you. The choice is obivously up to the individual. If you're concerned about getting mugged, then it would seem prudent to not wear earbuds while walking around the city.

      And, I should point out, not listening to the Ipod while walking hardly negates the benefits of its portability. You can still listen to it on the bus, the train, the subway, the library, etc., all places where the portability is a plus.

    3. Re:Be Aware by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I think people have it to show off the white headphones... which kind of makes it dangerous in wrong crowds.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Be Aware by winwar · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's feed the troll...

      Wearing headphones and listening to music reduces your awareness of your surroundings. In simple terms, you look like a victim and as a result are more likely to become one. A simple concept you should learn in any self defense course if it wasn't apparent to begin with.

      The fact that the ipod is a portable music player that allows you to listen to music while walking does not negate the fact that it makes you more likely to be attacked/mugged. How much more likely is open to debate and will of course vary.

    5. Re:Be Aware by cmackles · · Score: 1

      I have a Creative Nomad that I use in conjunction with a small FM transmitter when I'm in my car. I have never, ever plugged headphones into my Nomad because I have no reason to.

      My reasoning? I live in an area of New Orleans that has a lot of property crime (still some violent crime, but drastically less than many other parts). My friend's new Pioneer CD player was stolen from his truck not but a month ago.

      Which would be more appealing to a thief: A shiny, brand new car CD player or the factory deck? Don't think that if you have a CD changer or XM radio that they won't notice that tiny control panel, either..

      30GB Nomad: $300
      FM transmitter: $20
      Not having to worry about your car stereo getting jacked: priceless

    6. Re:Be Aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I go with the car unlocked usually, because I don't keep anything valuble in my car. I take out my Neuros, and the crappy FM radio is all that's left. And it's cheaper than a console cd player even.

    7. Re:Be Aware by glenalec · · Score: 1

      My Aunt used to leave her car unlocked in downtown Surry Hills, Sydney (where you need 1/2-inch bars on all your house windows).

      It was stolen three times.

      Always abandoned within a block - it was that bad!

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    8. Re:Be Aware by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      Portable means you can take it with you -- not that it's a good idea to wear it when walking. In fact, I'd put good money on the user manual saying not to use it when walking -- my MiniDisc player's manual does. After all, people wearing headphones while crossing the road are more likely to be hit by cars than people not wearing them.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:Be Aware by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I completely disagree with you. I wear headphones all the time to avoid trouble. You can simply ignore anyone who shouts or speaks to you as you walk past. In order to get your attention, they need to get right in front of you, which cuts out all but the most determined agressor. Many muggings start with innocent questions like "do you have the time?" or "do you have a light?", basically you can avoid getting into them.

      Of course, don't have the music on too loud, you still need to hear what's going on around you.

  69. ever see someone carry a g5 home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here in vancouver i see a lot of retard graphic designers drag their g5 home.

    peckers take em home because their offices get broken into only to get rolled outside the building.

    i say leave that shit at home. why are you carrying a laptop and an ipod around anyway?

    1. Re:ever see someone carry a g5 home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peckers take em home because their offices get broken into only to get rolled outside the building.

      Solution- buy empty G5 cases from Apple Service. Duct tape a brick or two inside to give it authentic weight. Also put some of the most explosive and/or flammable material you can procure or make inside, attached to an electrical detonator on a timer.

      Set the countdown time according to taste, close up the case, go outside, and look like a target.

      In lieu of explosives, you might consider breaking the rattles off a few rattlesnakes and putting them inside the G5 case.

    2. Re:ever see someone carry a g5 home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A barbituate-laced chocolate bar in the side pocket may be more practical. Just don't forget!

  70. Re:Get a gun by PunchMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    've been mugged several times myself, so please excuse my bitterness.

    Wow, that sucks. I've never been mugged. I don't even know anyone whose been mugged.... I don't think anyone I know knows anyone who's been mugged...

    /Canadian

    /Not saying it doesn't happen... just saying...

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  71. Re:Not a problem here by IAR80 · · Score: 1

    Try to get a weapon in Germany! But at least the crime is very low. Especialy street crime.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  72. avoid the problem by bucknuggets · · Score: 2, Informative

    you're going to get a lot of comments like:
    - learn martial arts
    - lift weights
    - grow 14 inches
    - carry a gun/knife/mace/morning star/etc
    - etc

    But seriously, the best option is avoidance:
    - avoid looking like a victim - don't carry
    things of conspicuous value
    - avoid places where you're likely to get mugged
    - stay alert - muggers seldom target people who appear very alert to their surroundings and confident

    Many years ago I used to rely on fighting to defend myself - but sometimes ended up in fights with people who had *nothing* to loose. Later on I discovered how to simply avoid the places attractive to those people and to be very alert when occasionally there. This works so much better than fighting you won't believe it.

    1. Re:avoid the problem by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Funny

      - grow 14 inches

      I keep getting e-mails about something like that, but I don't really see what it has to do with self-defense....

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  73. What a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:What a load of crap by dark-br · · Score: 1

      The NRA believes the solution to society's problems is for EVERYONE to carry a gun everywhere they go. They want more gun ownership, not less. If you believe the NRA line, you would have to have a gun in your hand every time you go to your front door to answer the doorbell. You would need to carry a gun with you every time you leave your house. The NRA claim that more gun ownership would deter crime is not too surprising when you consider that the NRA is strongly supported by the multi million dollar gun industry. The gun industry would suffer if gun control was enacted and crime decreased. If criminals have less opportunity to buy guns, then honest citizens would have fewer reasons to buy a gun. It seems that the NRA is not a good authority on the success or failure of gun control laws. When the NRA says "guns don't kill" they have the same credibility as the Tobacco Institute when they say cigarettes don't cause cancer.

      One of the most serious problems in our schools in this country today is gang violence and the increasing frequency with which children are bringing guns to school. But then again, why WOULDN'T kids bring guns to school when we've always got the National Rifle Association telling us that the only way to protect yourself against crime is to always carry a gun with you everywhere you go.

      According to an article in Newsweek magazine, some communities, to combat gang violence, have passed laws prohibiting minors from carrying guns without written parental permission. Incredibly, the NRA filed suit to overturn these laws. I have to wonder if the NRA thinks that the solution to school violence is to arm all the children to deter crime.

      Many gun control opponents claim that more gun ownership and less regulated access to guns would reduce crime. In some cities in the U.S. the gun laws have actually been relaxed in an effort to allow the public to gain more access to guns. A study was conducted by the University of Maryland where they studied the homicide rate before and after concealed gun laws were relaxed, in five cities across the U.S. In four out of five cities, the homicide rate increased. Only Portland, Oregon showed a 12 percent decrease in crime. The other 4 cities had significantly different results. The homicide rate increased 3 percent in Miami, 22 percent in Tampa, 74 percent in Jacksonville, Florida, and 43 percent in Jackson Mississippi.

      Much is made of the fact that Washington D.C. bans handguns and still has a very high homicide rate. The fact that Washington DC has a high crime rate does not disprove the merits of gun control. It is obvious that the guns are legally bought in other parts of the country where there is little or no gun controls and illegally resold in DC. But in other countries where there are uniform gun control laws across the country, they do not have this problem.

    2. Re:What a load of crap by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "One of the most serious problems in our schools in this country today is gang violence and the increasing frequency with which children are bringing guns to school. But then again, why WOULDN'T kids bring guns to school when we've always got the National Rifle Association telling us that the only way to protect yourself against crime is to always carry a gun with you everywhere you go."

      In the old days, kids brought their rifles to school without problems. I guess it's the guns fault that they're having problems today.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  74. Don't act like a victim/mark... by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
    ...because if you do, you will become one. I wander about with my laptop bag all the time. I'm fairly big, and I don't look and act like someone you could easily mug without ending up with some permanent damage.

    The key is attitude. Don't flash your shit, and don't act like you are carrying something of big value. Darkening your typical white ipod headphones is a good move. You move attention away from yourself, and as long as you keep not attracting attention, you should be relatively safe.

  75. Take Akido or Jeet Kune Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides getting your excercise (semi-important for us geeks), chicks like guys that know how to handle themselves - We need all the help we can get.

    Seriously though, I've gotten "mugged" three times. If they either don't have a gun, or is within reaching distance with one (and in a favorable position), they're just toast. Regarding knives, once you know how to handle one, an attacker generally wishes he just never brought it. :)

    Adds a whole 'nother bounce in your step due to the self-confidence boost too - at least once the shakes wear off...

  76. agreed by jockeys · · Score: 1

    In addition to the expensive company laptop, there's always a loaded P99 with 15 rounds of 9mm Hyrdashock +P on my person. Best theft deterrent I know of.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:agreed by RabidStoat · · Score: 1
      Ever had to use it ? How do you know ? This comment applies to all the other posters who are carrying concealed weapons.

      As has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread, one the best ways to not get mugged is to have some situational awareness.

      If, god forbid, your guard drops and you are confronted by someone with a gun - what are you going to do ? he (assuming it's male) presumably has it drawn and pointed at you - you reach for your gun, he shoots you. You tell him calmly that you "are carrying a weapon" - he's going to say "hand it over then" - you say "no", he shoots or he's going to say "prove it" - you reach for the gun and he shoots you. Hand over the stuff and he might run away with it - he'll want to save bullets anyway.

      My point is carrying a concealed weapon isn't the be all and end all of the situation - it's much more complicated than you make out.

    2. Re:agreed by jockeys · · Score: 1

      I never said it was the "be all end all." I agree the the best defensive tool is the one between your ears, but that doesn't mean it should be the ONLY tool at your disposal. To answer your question, no, I have not ever had to draw it, and I go to bed every night praying I never need to.

      Back when I was younger and not allowed to carry, I was assaulted by a guy with a gun. All of a sudden the 5 years of karate I had taken (at the time I thought that was enough for self defense) become instantly useless. After that, I vowed that when I was old enough I would become licensed and train until I was proficient in the use of a handgun, since it is the only good defense against another gun.

      As to what I would do if someone had a gun on me, I was taught in a tactical handgun class to toss my wallet to the guy and while he's picking it up, draw my weapon and shoot him until he stops moving. The reasoning behind this is that once you give him your wallet, he might shoot you anyway to eliminate a witness. (I might add that I live in a high crime zone and this may not be the case other places.) I'd rather not do any of this, however, and so I do what I can to avoid it... travel in groups, stay in well lit areas, not carry anything of value if I can help it, etc.

      You raise some good questions, and like many good questions, there aren't always good answers. But with some luck, I'll hopefully die an old man and never know the answers to those kinds of questions.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  77. Your figures at issue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    While you're digging out crime statistics, how about some US & UK gun related death figures? Particularly interesting are those ones about how much more likely you are to get shot if you own a gun for 'your protection'...

    Well sure, but once you factor out the people from Vest Virginia from the statistics your odds of getting hurt with your own gun are better even than having a hive of killer bees fly up your nose.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Your figures at issue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      ha.. thanks for the west virginia joke. it's been awhile since i heard on of those.

    2. Re:Your figures at issue by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      you sound like a pittsburgher, how often do you get dontown?

  78. From my experience... by SamBC · · Score: 3, Informative

    The laptop is the only magnet, and I offer a couple of pointers from my own experience, and that of people close to me:

    • Awareness of your person and surrounding - pocket-picking relies on you not paying attention. Or at least, not much attention.
    • Keep important things in zip-up and/or internal pockets, and don't allow jackets to flap
    • Use a laptop bag with a shoulder strap, and hook and arm through the strap into a pocket - prevents snatching quite well
    • Keep to areas with plenty of other people, and when waiting, especially in a less busy area, have your back right to a wall - prevents opportunism. The back to a wall thing, however, can make things worse in very empty areas, especially if you extend it to a corner.

    Really, every little helps.

    1. Re:From my experience... by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
      Use a laptop bag with a shoulder strap, and hook and arm through the strap into a pocket - prevents snatching quite well

      Even better, don't use a proper laptop bag at all. Laptop sleeves are quite affordable and can be slipped into a messenger bag or backpack without anyone knowing the wiser. Some laptop sleeves double as shoulder bags, but it's much handier (and safer) to go the pack-away route.

  79. Get some self esteem. by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    Remind yourself that the glass is half full and be smart. Do not brandish expensive equipment in public such as ipod headphones or expensive cell phones.

  80. Re:Get a gun by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    've been mugged several times myself, so please excuse my bitterness.

    Wow, that sucks. I've never been mugged. I don't even know anyone whose been mugged.... I don't think anyone I know knows anyone who's been mugged...


    Oh, and sorry for dropping your "I", it got recruited as an italicize tag.

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  81. Step 1: make back-ups by danharan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Step 2: Security through obscurity

    The headphone switch was a good first step. Next should be the laptop carrying case.

    I suggest a backpack, especially if yours is at all heavy. Something that doesn't look too snazzy is good. Worn-out looking is best, but that's not always possible and looks mighty suspicious if you're wearing a nice suit. Put the PDA in it too.

    Ok, so that's all the security by obscurity stuff. Surely we can come up with better than this- and I'm not thinking guns, pepper spray or tazers, which make it even more likely that you will get seriously injured. A lot of thieves these days don't operate alone, and they have toys too.

    Other things you might keep in mind: making all the data useless to the thieves. And how about a laptop or PDA with wireless and GPS that can report its coordinates? Would it be considered unsafe to put in your own backdoor on a system for cases of theft?

    And did I mention make back-ups?

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  82. get some sort of traking system by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    and attach it to your valubles. and if your really creative devise a way to set off a high frequency sounder or some sort of alarm

    1. Re:get some sort of traking system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then would it be wise to tell them to expect a visit from the FBI next saturday?

  83. The solution is... by Haydn+Fenton · · Score: 1

    Simple.

    Geeks will have the advantage of knowing how to create things like Stun guns out of disposable cameras, as well as countless other geeky gadgets which will come in very handy.

  84. ditto by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    I also have this issue.. and compound that with my car, a 180sx SR20DET (bright red and damned quick sports car). I hate leaving things in my car as I have no illusion as to how secure it is, and with all the gear I seem to cart around... keeping it all on me at all times just isn't going to happen.

    So I'm a target if I'm walking, driving or my car is alone... no wonder I'm a bit on the paranoid side :-P

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  85. Basic Street Smarts by answerer · · Score: 1

    Don't use bags that scream "steal me". I have my laptop in a backpack or briefcase that has a laptop sleeve. My digital camera is on my belt under my shirt/jacket and I use black Sony MDR-71 earbuds for my MP3 player.

  86. This is bullshit... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have every right to defend yourself against a mugger in Britain. As long as you use no more force than is necessary then the law is on your side.

    If someone tries to rob you then you have the right to protect yourself and apprehend them. What you don't have the right to do is kick the shit out of them because they tried to rob you.

    There's a world of difference between having no right to defend yourself and not having the right to use a mugging attempt as a reason to do an American History X on someone.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:This is bullshit... by name773 · · Score: 1

      and that really is the way you should be doing things to begin with: if it's necessary to use force, only use the amount required, but you know how it goes with americans and excess...

    2. Re:This is bullshit... by gordgekko · · Score: 3, Informative
      As long as you use no more force than is necessary then the law is on your side.

      And will the mugger give you the opportunity to calibrate your response so that it's legal?

      I say old boy, I didn't know you were carrying a bat. Mind if I fetch my cricket bat, there's a good chap?

      The fact of the matter is that the police and government actively discourage the public from defending themselves and have prosecuted numerous people for doing so, including at least two people who will spend the rest of their lives in prison.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    3. Re:This is bullshit... by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      a word to the wise for those of us on the other side of the big puddle. In a self-defence situation, it's entirely permissible to use force to defend yourself. the catch? no escalation. If they come at you with fists, you can't whip out a gun without breaking a few laws. So, the fact that i routinely (actually, habitually) carry one of these puppies is useful inasmuch as using it as it's intended (a tool) but not as a weapon against your standard grab n' run mugger. Still, it's damn handy to have around, and (regardless of legal implications) still adds a feeling of security when i find myself wandering harlem at 4 AM (which happens now and again).

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    4. Re:This is bullshit... by DaPhilistine · · Score: 1
      QUOUTE:

      The law states (in the uk) that if the antagonist is aggressive and moving forward, and you fear for your safety, you can legally pre-empitely strike the first blow in self defence

      see this book

    5. Re:This is bullshit... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I'd be nice to "play fair" with the muggers, but THEY aren't exactly playing fair by targeting bypassers in the shadows are they? It tells what a "criminal victim" society we've become that we have to ask permission of the law to defend ourselves. After all, the Law in general misses the point! Stealing is wrong because according to the "law of jungle" I've got every right to kill you for theatening me & takimg my stuff!!! The police exist not to "prevent crime" but to catch the criminals before the victim gets to them....we've become so "civilized" & "neutered" that we forget that.

    6. Re:This is bullshit... by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how the laws are in Britain, but...

      Generally most rob attempts involve threat of life or harm. With that in mind, if you're able to, you have every right to kick the shit out of the con, throw him across the street, bang him up with a couple of trash cans, and give a few swift kicks when he's in the puddle on the street. Then call the cops to pick up the banged-up body.

      Hopefully when he get released from the police station 24-hours later he'll think twice before trying to rob someone else.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    7. Re:This is bullshit... by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      "[...] use a mugging attempt as a reason to do an American History X on someone."

      Totally off-topic, but I had problems with neighbors using my yard as their pet's personal toilet... So I put up some nice signs and have had no problems since. I don't get many visitors though. :(

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    8. Re:This is bullshit... by slash.dt · · Score: 1
      Generally most rob attempts involve threat of life or harm. With that in mind, if you're able to, you have every right to kick the shit out of the con, throw him across the street, bang him up with a couple of trash cans, and give a few swift kicks when he's in the puddle on the street. Then call the cops to pick up the banged-up body.

      Hopefully when he get released from the police station 24-hours later he'll think twice before trying to rob someone else.

      Or he will find someone who is a lot smaller to pick on, or use more violence in the 'first strike'.

      Muggers often feel that society has let them down and that they are the victims. Getting arrested just adds to their persecution complex and makes them more bitter.

      I'm not saying 'Be nice to Muggers' but beating up someone (although satisfying) is only responding to the symptoms, it is not dealing with the problem.

    9. Re:This is bullshit... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      No, you have the right to ensure your personal safety. Those "few swift kicks when he's in a puddle on the street" are almost certainly excessive force even if kicking the shit out of him isn't, and so may well land you in legal trouble (and rightly so - self defence does not mean teaching them a damn good lesson).

    10. Re:This is bullshit... by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, thats not really an appropriate assesment. Suppose a mugger attempts to rob you, and further suppose you're lucky/skillful enough to punch them in the face and disarm them, kocking them to the ground in the profess. In the US, you'd have no problem if you kicked them in the head in order to knock them unconcious while you waited for the police. In the UK, however, you might face serious problems (since some would argue you should have just run like a mutha').

      So the question is this: should the system encourage or discourage behavior on the part of the victim that would enable the police to remove a criminal from the streets?

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    11. Re:This is bullshit... by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      The line is usually drawn somewhere before killing them.

      An example is the guy who saw someone breaking into his house while his family were at home. The houseowner attacked the burgalar with a knife, which the court agreed would have been fine, however what was not fine, and resulted in the man receiving a prison term, was when he followed the man into the street and stabbed him 7 times in the back after he had already been incapacitated.

    12. Re:This is bullshit... by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Anyone ignoring the law but expecting to receive protection from it is abusing the system, and as such, deserves no protection. Well, maybe not NO protection, but certainly not as much as Joe Workingman.

    13. Re:This is bullshit... by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I understand that completely. My knife of choice, however has to be the Short Ka-Bar Marine standard issue (well, the longer version is anyhow) Solid, well balanced, and stays incredibly sharp even with regular use. However, I prefer fixed blades to folding knives. (Ka-bar also makes folding knives, as well)

    14. Re:This is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law also states you may invade a random unrelated country.

    15. Re:This is bullshit... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I think I might already have pointed out that there's a difference between defending yourself and taking the law into your own hands.

      People get prosecuted, found guilty by a jury of their peers and then sentenced to lengthy prison sentences for simply defending themselves. That kind of stuff only happens to people who cross the line further than reasonable doubt will allow.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    16. Re:This is bullshit... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      so it is ok to mug someone that will fight back reguardless of what the law says, and not alright to mug the average joe working man that obeys the law?

    17. Re:This is bullshit... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      how should we deal with the problem?

    18. Re:This is bullshit... by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Sure, we could snowball this.... Mmmm... snowball... You into that? :-)

    19. Re:This is bullshit... by miu · · Score: 1
      how should we deal with the problem?

      Reform the prison system. Provide serious attempts at rehabilitation, break up prison gangs, hire better educated guards and execute habitual offenders. Someone who makes their living committing violent crimes needs to die.

      I'm not sure about the deterrent value of the death penalty, but societies cannot continue to cycle people in and out of prison and many show no willingness to change.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    20. Re:This is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not every right to defend yourself. That's a bunch of fucking shit that helps and favors the attacker. "No more force than necessary" means don't shoot the fucker after he is unconscious on the ground. And don't reload your gun. Every mugging attempt should be met with lethal force and the best way to deliver that is with a gun.

    21. Re:This is bullshit... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Care to name those two people?

      Let me guess... Tony Martin is one of those, a man who shot someone in the back who was leaving his farm.

      Proportionate response? Hardly.

      He was tried and convicted by a jury of his peers.

    22. Re:This is bullshit... by Nogeel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, hate to tell you this but The "American History X" technique is illegal in the States too (Remember the part where Edward Norton goes to jail for it?) OK, What are you allowed to defend yourself with in this country. Just about every Brit I have talked to tells me you are not allowed to use a more powerful weapon than the person attacking/robbing you. How do you plan to have a weapon on yourself that is smaller? And from that point what are you allowed to carry. Fine for the sake of argument we won't go into the fact you can't carry guns. But you are not even allowed to carry pepper spray? Are you even allowed to carry a knife? Even if you are is it fair because the odds are the person mugging you probably has more experience with one. So the average Joe who hasn't studied some form of Karate for the past 10 years is screwed and subject to the attackers every whim. For some reason I don't think this is fair? For the most part all a mugger has to do is pick anyone off the street to mug without any fear of them putting of a viable defense. Then again we are talking about a country that won't allow you to by more than what 48? aspirin (paracetamol) at a time when they are afraid you might kill yourself. It is unfortunate when a gov't feels they have to build a nanny society that protects people from themselves and protect criminals. I would be curious to see what percentage of criminals caught doing this would actually go to jail. I don't think my country is perfect, but I do think there are serious issues when you can't even carry pepper spray to defend yourself. I also don't support excess violence when defending yourself, but as long as someone has presented enough of a threat to fear for your life you have every right to neutralize the threat, but once that threat is neutralized call the cops and don't do anything else.

    23. Re:This is bullshit... by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      I believe you're confusing the victim and the criminal. If someone infringes on another's rights unjustly, then they forfeit their own rights. When a mugger tries to deprive you of life, liberty, and/or property, you have the duty to sanction them. Defending yourself is taking the law into your own hands. If you don't take the law into your own hands, then you not only risk losing life liberty and/or property, but you allow a criminal to go free. By not defending yourself you encourage crime and condone a perversion of justice.

      That kind of stuff only happens to people who cross the line further than reasonable doubt will allow.

      Really? So although a person is brandishing a weapon and threatening to harm you, you should still doubt that he (I say he because the vast majority of violent criminals are male.) won't actually do it? Victims should always be favored in a trial, simply because victims have already been deprived of their rights unjustly.

      Also, if you aren't going to defend yourself, who is? The police are not required by law to come to your aid. Even if they were, do you really think they'd arrive in time to help? A mugging takes seconds, and the nearest police car is usually at least minutes away.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    24. Re:This is bullshit... by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      and stays incredibly sharp even with regular use

      Do you get mugged _that_ often ?

    25. Re:This is bullshit... by Datafage · · Score: 1

      If the robber escaped into the street he was not incapacitated.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    26. Re:This is bullshit... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me but, I guess we are still missing what to do about the person that hasn't been caught yet and already gone to prison. The first time mugger that has managed to do it enough to be a mugger but not have the criminal record yet.

    27. Re:This is bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shot someone in the back who was leaving his farm.

      You make it sound as if he was just scrumping apples...

  87. The camera trick by TLouden · · Score: 1

    Changing a disposible camera (covered recently) into a tazer is a free (walgreens will give the used ones to you) and effective way to defend against many attackers

    --
    -Tim Louden
    1. Re:The camera trick by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      A lot of people have posted the "stun gun from a camera" idea, and I must state that not only is it ineffective, but it's a bad idea. I've made one before (for entertainment purposes >:) ) and the shock is not nearly enough to knock someone out. It will most likely aggrivate an attacker and end up causing more harm than no weapon. If you're going to carry a weapon, make it a blade or a firearm. Both are sure to act as deterrents, and they can maim/kill the attacker(s) if there is no other way to resolve the situation. Carrying a weapon can also give you a false sense of security. Don't let yourself fall into that trap.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
  88. Silly question by buss_error · · Score: 1
    As with many geeks, these items hold within them far more value to me than anything I leave behind in my apartment. So I would like to know what my fellow urban geeks do to try and keep their valuables safe while traveling with them.

    BACKUPS

    DVD burners are cheap, blank media cheaper. Anything of any sensitive nature should be on an encrypted partition.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  89. Well.. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Last time I was in London, I brought my trusty CF-41 laptop. As owners of this fine invincible laptop will know, nobody will steal it. Firstly, it looks boring. And if some brave fool did try to steal it he wouldn't get far... unless he had a forklift. The thing weighs a ton. To add to insult, it's a 25MHz 486.

    Nobody will steal this. I was wishing someone would just so I wouldn't have to carry the bloody thing around anymore. At least I got a good workout...

  90. Re:Not a problem here by donweel · · Score: 1

    I think handguns invite trouble for several reasons including colatoral damage and noise as well as possible jail time I prefer one of these:
    http://www.selfdefenseproducts.com/asp.htm

    --
    Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
  91. The answer is GLOCK! by crypto1969fl · · Score: 0

    A Concealed Carry .40cal Glock G22. Since carrying that I haven't had **ANY** problems with being mugged ;-)

    --
    --"It is insufficient to protect ourselves with laws; we need to protect ourselves with mathematics."--
    1. Re:The answer is GLOCK! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      a concealed weapon is no good against being mugged, you just have a way to fight back, carry a samurai sword on your back, then nobody will mess with you

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:The answer is GLOCK! by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      I disagree.

      Clearly, the answer is a 1911. Non of that sissy boy plastic gun stuff ;p

    3. Re:The answer is GLOCK! by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Isn't a G22 a bit big? I go for the G23 myself.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    4. Re:The answer is GLOCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on, even though they only hold 7 rounds that is more than enough to stop anyone that I have seen.

  92. May not be for you, but... by MrAndrews · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once I had kids, I got a bunch of diaper bags (for carrying great gobs of baby stuff). Graco makes a kick-ass one that has more padded pouches than I can possibly use. The good part is that it's the perfect size for my Powerbook, headphones, and various other gadgets. I keep a little portable pouch of huggies in the front (cause they're damn useful anyway), just in case I get mugged and need to convince them there's nothing of value to steal.
    I get funny looks from clients when I unpack my gear from a blue and pink bag, but ultimately everyone agrees it's a pretty foolproof way to keep unsavoury types away.

    Note: possibly not for the single geek pickin' up hot dates.
    Note on note: I crack myself up sometimes.

    1. Re:May not be for you, but... by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Question - for what are Huggies damn useful? (apart from the obvious)

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    2. Re:May not be for you, but... by gclef · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask, you probably don't want those mental images. Really.

    3. Re:May not be for you, but... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Note: possibly not for the single geek pickin' up hot dates.

      Heh heh... This is why most geeks have problems getting hot dates! What you fail to understand is that if girls think you're already taken, that makes you more valuable, and therefore, more wanted.

      In other words, if you're hanging with a bunch of guys at the local bar, you'll find it much more difficult to pick up a date than if you're there with a girl. So just go with some girl who's "just friends" with you, wait until she goes to the bathroom or something, and then go talk to that hot potential date who's there. I don't know why this works. After all, girls get pissed when you cheat on 'em, but if they think you'll dump some other girl for them, that turns 'em on. But then, girls don't make any sense anyway.

    4. Re:May not be for you, but... by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I keep a little portable pouch of huggies in the front (cause they're damn useful anyway), just in case I get mugged

      I can see how the huggies would be useful, but don't you need to put them on *before* some guy sticks a gun in your face?

    5. Re:May not be for you, but... by MrAndrews · · Score: 2, Interesting
      • they are super-absorbent, for many kinds of liquid
      • they are well padded, and can protect delicate objects
      • stacked and bound properly, they are excellent pillows
      • if you wear them on your head, you can get a few days off work pretty easily

      If you find those unusual, I suppose you aren't ready to carry around a little container of zincofax with you either.

    6. Re:May not be for you, but... by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine worked for Domino's Pizza and offered me one of their pizza delivery bags... for a price. He wanted me to give him like $20 or $30 for his trouble but I passed. I was going to sew a strap on it and use it as a backpack but I just wasn't all that into spending as much money as he wanted. Sure, looking like you're carrying a pizza vertically looks weird but it's a lot less conspicuous than me carrying around a bag with "Dell" written all over it.

    7. Re:May not be for you, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I had kids, I got a bunch of diaper bags (for carrying great gobs of baby stuff). Graco makes a kick-ass one that has more padded pouches than I can possibly use.

      Why do diaper bags have padded pouches? Diapers are soft, baby bottles are rugged plastic... are you supposed to carry the baby in there too?

    8. Re:May not be for you, but... by MrAndrews · · Score: 1

      Not officially, no.

    9. Re:May not be for you, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's my 2 cents (for the record I'm female, a geek and have studied psychology):

      The reason that women prefer a guy they see in a bar with another woman over a guy with his (male) mates is that they want a "reference". The message our subconscious minds receive is that the guy with a woman (friend OR romantic interest) must treat women well enough that he's worth spending time with. He is perceived as being a "quality" kinda guy because we trust the other woman's judgement.

    10. Re:May not be for you, but... by wuice · · Score: 1

      This is helpful and insightful advice if you are so desperate to get a woman that you're willing to manipulate them before you even meet them.

      My experience is that most geeks aren't "players," that is to say, they don't treat relationships like games. They may get into fewer relationships, but the ones they get into tend to be more meaningful. Quality over quantity. You'll thank yourself in the long run. And you'll have more respect for yourself too, as will the woman you eventally get with.

      Avoid the girls that don't make sense. 90% of the time they don't make sense because they have no clue what they want. I guarantee you that doesn't encompass all of them. The same goes for guys.

    11. Re:May not be for you, but... by dcam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Women want what they can't have. A guy with a girlfriend immediately means that he:
      1. is able to commit to some extent
      2. Capable of some sort of relationship

      --
      meh
  93. Worry less and enjoy life more? by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    In the immortal words of Bobby McFerrin, "don't worry, be happy."

    I used to live in Mexico and travelled through southern Mexico, Belize, Guatemala and Honduras with a laptop, a digital camera, and a few thousand pesos in my daypack the entire time. As an obvious foreigner, I never once had a problem. I don't know about London, but the stats I've seen for Canada indicated that only 3% of Canadians had been robbed in the 5 years previous to the study. 0.45% of of Canadians had been robbed in an incident involving a firearm. The study also found that the chances of being robbed were higher for criminals than for non-criminals. Obligatory reference.

    I realise this doesn't answer your question directly, but my point is that there are probably much better things to worry about than being robbed. Your chances of losing your gear in a car accident are higher.

    1. Re:Worry less and enjoy life more? by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      "Don't Worry, Be happy" are the immortal words of Bob Marley. :P

    2. Re:Worry less and enjoy life more? by Micah · · Score: 1

      > I used to live in Mexico and travelled through southern Mexico, Belize, Guatemala and Honduras with a laptop, a digital camera, and a few thousand pesos in my daypack the entire time.

      Yeah .... I also have a good amount of experience in Central and South America, a total of over 9 months.

      Only once have I had anything stolen ... unfortunately, that time was a couple hours ago. :( Fortunately, it was "just" a watch and they didn't look in my pockets for the cell phone and cash. I currently live in Quito, Ecuador.

  94. Move to New York... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    .. London is crap for personal security. NYC is much safer, and offers similar bad weather, traffic, and personal rights suppression. Oh, and it's cheaper to live here than in London, especially if you drive anywhere.

    Seriously, our cops are badass, they'll shove a plunger up your ass if you look at them funny. It may not be fair or nice, but it gives common criminals pause. No touchy-feely crap, no tolerance for nonsense, and the result of Giuliani-time is writ large in record-breaking crime lowering statistics. Our cops are underpaid, overstressed, lower in numbers and street strength thanks to unaddressed attrition and antiterror duties, and yet crime is _still going down_! I like to think Giuliani lanced the boil and Kelly cleaned up and made nice with the lower income 'hoods.

    Oh, and our cops have guns, and they'll shoot you even if you pull your _wallet_ out too fast, so you bet criminals are on their guard...

    If you're going to stay in London, pack your gear up and dress like a bum or go visit Boris the Blade for a nice heavy illegal revolver. Perhaps you can hit them with it.

  95. Re:Get a gun by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
    What I would like to know is, why was this marked as troll?

    Are we so conceited that an opinion like this, shared by probably 90% of the world is dismissed offhand by our 'enlightened' geek sensibilities?

    Or, perhaps it was just the word "gun" and not the content of the message that caused our moderators to act rashly.

    Either way - for shame. Geeks value discussion; not dismissal of it offhand.

  96. You guys are all INSANE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have over 20 years experience in martial arts and self defense prevention. Also keep in mind that he is in LONDON England.

    To the guy who suggested using a kubotan (for those who don't know, it is basically a 6 inch metal bar of about a half inch diameter that is often attached to your keychain) you must be insane. Unless the guy mugging you is completely physically disabled and incompetent you aren't gonna fight him off with a kubotan, especially if you're being mugged by a group of people. (which usually is the more probably situation these days)

    To all the people who suggested arming yourself with guns, MACE, and so on, once again he is in LONDON. Secondly, if you shoot a guy that just approaches you and verbally harasses you (telling you to give him your iPod), you will be the one screwed by the law. Always keep in mind when you are justified using lethal force.

    Martial arts will probably not help you in this situation as well. Chances are the guy will be armed and he will have buddies. Unless you have years of training in the RIGHT martial art you probably stand very little chance. Most people don't realize this and think that their "black belt" in Tae Kwon Do will save them. Good luck.

    Overall, your best bet is not to arm yourself or go out and learn Ninjitsu. Your best bet is to do 2 things:

    1) Practice awareness and PREVENTIVE measures. Think of it like your health. It's better to keep yourself healthy and PREVENT the clogged arteries, than it is to get to that stage and then try and tackle the problem.

    Be street smart. Don't expose all your gadgets. Maybe don't carry some of your gadgets if you don't absolutely need them. Keep them concealed and be alert all the time. Basic things like: don't walk by yourself in secluded areas at night if you feel at high risk, watch the environment you are in, and so on are always good practice. If you see suspicious people walk away from them or keep a distance, always looking for multiple exit paths to run away on.

    2) RUN. Imho one of the BEST self defense attributes after preventive measures is the ability to run long distances with great endurance, and the ability to have explosive speed. In fact, being a fast explosive and high endurance runner is probably BETTER than having 2-3 years of your standard "martial arts" training.

    If I had to pick between the runner or the martial artist surviving that type of situation, assuming the runner has the right mentality that he will NOT stand around and fight, and that he has practice good preventive measures, I would put my money on the runner. Why ? Because a lot of martial artists often try and seek situations where they can apply their "training" and this usually gets them killed. If your mentally is "get the hell outta here FAST" and you have the physical attributes to run quickly and explosively, I believe you actually have a better chance than a guy who thinks "gotta use my kung fu" and stands around to slug it out.

    1. Re:You guys are all INSANE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points, but the key word here is GEEK. Can you really imagine CowboyNeal or similar escaping on foot?

    2. Re:You guys are all INSANE by Micah · · Score: 1

      Dunno. I was just robbed of my watch tonight. I'm in a good sized Latin American capital city, and it was a bit after dark. Not a lot of people out. I was walking along, and two guys were ahead of me. When I angled my walk to the left or right in order to pass them, I could see them doing the same, following my moves, from several meters away.

      Do you think turning around and running would have been wise? I thought about it, but what if they could run faster than me? I asked my roommate, who has more experience here than I do, and he thought running would have been a bad idea.

      I can run reasonably fast, but only for a couple minutes at a time.

    3. Re:You guys are all INSANE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you doing walking on your own in a Latin American city after dark, with "not a lot of people out" ? My first tip was to be street smart, my SECOND tip was to run.

    4. Re:You guys are all INSANE by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I'm in a good sized Latin American capital city, and it was a bit after dark.

      San Jose, CR?

  97. Situational Awareness and Attitude by freebase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply put, don't be a target. Carry yourself with the attitude that you aren't anyone's target, you belong exactly where you are, and know exactly what's going down.

    Know what's going on around you at all times. Walking around any kinda of area where you could get mugged wearing any kind of earphones tells those watching that you have NO awareness of much of anything except what's right in front of you. Since you're a geek, maybe not even that.

    Use the senses you were born with... if you hear something behind you, move first, ask questions later. See something that makes the hair on your neck bristle ahead? MOVE to the other side of the street. Don't take that shortcut down the isolated alley.

    Vary your routes if you think you need to..

    Above all, be aware of what's going on, and who's around you at all times.

    --
    Sig??? I don't need no stinkin Sig!
    1. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1
      Simply put, don't be a target. Carry yourself with the attitude that you aren't anyone's target, you belong exactly where you are, and know exactly what's going down.

      I think this post and other similar ones are by far the best advice. I've travelled around the world, including most major cities in North America and Europe, without incident. I'm white, of average size and weight and the only martial arts training I've had is from watching Hollywood movies.

      That said I'm very observant and always make an effort to dress and act to blend in as much as possible in whatever environment I'm in at the time. Although I never flash around expensive toys or jewelry, I sure don't go out of my way to avoid bad neighborhoods or the like. In fact I'm insomniac and my favourite way to discover a new city is to wander around (alone) at night!

      Maybe I've just been extraordinarily lucky, but I'm convinced it's all in the attitude you project. If you think like a victim you will undoubtedly become one.

    2. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Simply put, don't be a target.

      And if you are a target, remember, the iPod and laptop are just things. If you get shot or stabbed, it would hurt much more than loosing a laptop.

      And if you are of a warrior type... remember, a 7 pound laptop (or a lighter ipod/cellphone) can seriously hurt someone if you hit their head with it.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, unless the place happens to be my parents' basement, I don't feel as if I belong. Hell, when I go outside to check the mail, even the mosquitos jump me =/

    4. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      I wish I had some mod points to give you, because this is exactly what I was thinking. So many people seem to blame the situation (and thats like complaining that the sky is blue sometimes, some people just do stuff like this), but oftentimes they share a bit of the responsibility, by blissfully walking around completely unaware of the environment around them. On a crowded street or train/bus its generally ok to have those earphones on, but in places where you are likely to encounter trouble its just plain stupid to not be aware.

    5. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      Know what's going on around you at all times. Walking around any kinda of area where you could get mugged wearing any kind of earphones tells those watching that you have NO awareness of much of anything except what's right in front of you. Since you're a geek, maybe not even that.

      Actually, if you already look like you belong in that neighbourhood (that is, like you're more likely to be the mugger than the mugging victim) then headphones can actually amplify this, you look like you feel so safe in that neighbourhood that you don't have to know what's going on around you, kind of like how you as a tourist shouldn't take ten minutes observing traffic before crossing the street, just cross the street first chance you get..

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:Situational Awareness and Attitude by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Actually, if you already look like you belong in that neighbourhood (that is, like you're more likely to be the mugger than the mugging victim) then headphones can actually amplify this

      This works if you have some big fuck-off DJing cans that look like they've had a lot of use. It does not work if you're wearing a pair of white girly iPod phones.

  98. Some other figures here by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    After a second of googling, I found this from the BBC.

    It paints kind of a mixed picture - violent crime rates up, but only because of reporting changes. At the end it does mention that gun related crimes were up only 2% last year - but around 34% the year before!! And a 48% rise in the use of imitation firearms, so you're a lot more likely to see some kind of gun, it just may not be real.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  99. Re:Not a problem here by nten · · Score: 1

    aren't those things illegal to carry? I know they are in texas at least. With a CC permit I still think you can only carry a gun, not clubs or knives > 5.5"

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  100. Odds are against a knife by Dravik · · Score: 0

    The only weapon that improves your odds is a firearm. I personally suggest a glock. With any close in weapon you can be quickly overpowered. A pistol, if practiced properly, can remove the threat before they get close enough to overpower you. You do have to maintain situational awarness to see them coming though.

    --
    The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    1. Re:Odds are against a knife by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Read about UK gun laws.

    2. Re:Odds are against a knife by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

      WRONG. I can't remember where I read this, otherwise I'd provide a link, but you have a sixty percent chance of dying getting stabbed as opposed to a ten percent getting shot. In the same thing, they talked about a martial arts expert getting stabbed before he could even pull out the sidearm he had on him. Think about it: Do you think you could pull out your gun before a knife-wielding maniac could wield his knife into your chest? Do you think he'd be more likely to strike you if he saw you reach for a gun?

  101. CHL: Concealed Handgun License by johnatjohnytech · · Score: 1

    Just be aware of your surroundings.

    It is like life/car insurance. You never want to use it. But u are glad you have it when you have to use it.

  102. Re:Not a problem here by StupidKatz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you know, i'd rather have my stuff stolen than live with shooting someone... even a crook.

    A very noble statement - potentially taking the life of another human is a very sobering situation to have to consider living with.
    As for myself, if I ever feel as if a threat to my life exists (i.e., violently accosted by a stranger), I've thought through and made my decision already...

    I'm filling the sucker full of lead. My life is more important than a would-be criminal's.

  103. Paranoid by Sinful_Shirts · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally I think you're being paranoid. Maybe you could get a stun gun or something? Or wear a shirt that says "Guns don't kill people, I kill people" That should scare the muggers away.

  104. Visit a gym? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you visit a gym now and again usually muggers will look for the weaker targets. It's all in how you carry yourself. Of course carrying a gun doesn't hurt, but for the most part that's not possible when you're traveling.

  105. How to avoid muggings by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    Don't travel in crappy areas is the best bet.

    Second good thing to do is to go to the gym and get some muscles.

    Third thing is not to act like a geek when traveling in aformentioned bad areas.

  106. Wing Chun by DaPhilistine · · Score: 1

    Go to some decent kung-fu classes, butremember! The first rule of kung-fu classes is that you don't talk about kung-fu classes! ;-) Also living in London I got mugged for the last time two years ago, and after a paticularly violent encounter I decided to do something about it. I took up wing chun & jeet kune do . I've found the result is that my awareness has improved overall and I find it al ot easier to avoid dangerous situations rather than having to defend myself in them. Additionally you also gain the confidence to deal with these situations calmly when they occur. Just applying yourself to a solid fighting technique of almost any kind teaches you so much in so many ways that you learn to find alternative routes in life, including when being mugged. Agreed as with many posts though, the first best thing to do avoid the muggers attention, wear plain clothes, lose the white earphones, walk confidently, etc...

  107. Easy-peasy... by MancDiceman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live in the UK too, but up in Manchester. I can assure you, white earphones will get you into more trouble up here than it will in London. There are guys up here who can smell an iPod from half a mile and will quite happily hurt you very badly. You're carring a 400 quid walkman. In other terms, it's exchangeable for 100 quids worth of drugs. And you, my friend, are probably a soft target.

    Firstly, question whether you need to carry all that stuff. Did you really need a PDA? Most phones these days have reasonable calendaring and bluetooth to synch with my desktop calendar (yes, I'm working on better integration for open source myself), so I use that instead. In the UK, stolen phones become worthless pieces of scrap as soon as you report them stolen, so there is no interest in taking them off you anymore. I don't feel the need to carry 20Gb of songs with me when going down the corner shop for a newspaper either, so don't feel the need for carrying an MP3 player - if I drove, or was commuting for hours every day, I might. If you're not carrying it, it can't be stolen from you. This is the best advice you're likely to get, trust me.

    Secondly, don't make it obvious what you're carrying. I carry my laptop in a regular Reebok backpack that I think I first bought when I was still at School (10 years ago). Nobody wants to steal it. I have however stood in many train stations and sat in many coffee shops and realised that with all the bags that were screaming laptop at me, if I'd been quick off my feet I could have made away with perhaps GBP 10k of hardware in less than 30 seconds. White headphones are a giveaway, like I said, so is trying to navigate your way around on a map held on your PDA.

    Thirdly, it does all come down to attitude. Act like a dick, you'll get into trouble. Act like you don't belong there, you'll get into trouble. Walk tall, confidently, and stay aware. I've lived in one of the roughest cities in Britain for years (yes, Moss Side is as bad as it sounds), and I have never, ever, ever been successfully mugged. One guy wanted my wallet once and I just laughed and walked by and he didn't come after me. I'm lucky - I'm 120Kgs, 6 foot tall, shaved head and people don't mess with me. I'm used to it. You probably don't want to look like me, and you might not look like a football hooligan. Just walk like you are, see people's body language change around you. Remember this though - if you're alone in a train carriage with a single female CHANGE THIS STANCE - responding to the environment you're in is more important than trying to act like a thug all the time.

    Lastly, don't have anything on you that you can't afford to lose. Backups are of course critical. I'm terrible at this, but when I do remember, I have between 3 and 6 copies of important data, held on kit in 3 different continents. The data I value, is data I take care to protect.

  108. RIAA uniform by IAR80 · · Score: 1

    Where a RIAA uniform and nobody will try to mug you for the iPod. You might get beat up but that is another story.

    --
    http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  109. The Real Trick Is... by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...learning to walk properly.

    There's a way of walking that just cries out "Oooh! I'm a victim! Pick me, pick me!"

    There's another way of walking that says you know where you are and what you're doing. It says you're capable and confident. And it says that you're probably not going to roll over when mugged, and probably will make it more hassle than it's worth for what little you probably have on you.

    You might find it enlightening to sit on a bench and watch the people pass by. Identify which ones look like targets, and which don't. Learn the difference.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:The Real Trick Is... by LibrePensador · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All of this is pure bullshit.

      Yes,confidence might help. A bit. If you happen to come across someone who is in serious need for his next fix, all your confidence will do you no good when in broad daylight, he pulls out a gun, puts it to your face and takes whaever you have got.

      Stop making it sound as if only all people that get mugged lack confidence. For what is worth, I have never been mugged so far and I have lived and do work in some of the most dangerous neighborhoods in America, currently in Liberty City, Florida.

      It helps that I do a ton of community work in these neighborhoods and people watch my back becasue they know me and appreciate my work.

      --
      Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
    2. Re:The Real Trick Is... by Yremogtnom · · Score: 1

      ooh ooh! TELECOMMUTE!

      --
      You are alone in the world.
    3. Re:The Real Trick Is... by Hallowed · · Score: 1

      You have never had any self defense training have you? The FIRST and most important thing is self-confidence, he is exactly right about how you carry yourself. If you carry yourself with confidence, are aware of your surroundings, and look like you are capable of putting up a fight, how does the crook know that you aren't carrying a gun yourself? If you don't look like a target, most likely you won't be.

      --

      1. When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

      2. Do not eat iPod shuffle.

    4. Re:The Real Trick Is... by darnok · · Score: 1

      > ...learning to walk properly.

      Think of the Bee Gees in that old "Stayin' Alive" music video - that's the strut you want to cultivate. "Huh huh huh huh stayin' alive, stayin' alive"

      No wait, wrong newsgroup - never mind...

    5. Re:The Real Trick Is... by centralizati0n · · Score: 1

      That really doesn't always work. I live in San Francisco, and there are a few tougher neighborhoods - and the residents profile you. I'm white. I also look younger than I am. Though I can walk past most situations, some people just think that "white people have lots of money" and go after you. You can't really escape it. Thus, pepper spray and whatnot (though if you have pepperspray, you can't threaten with it, you have to use it, or else you could escalate the situation a lot), and a general sense of how to get out of a situation helps.

    6. Re:The Real Trick Is... by winwar · · Score: 1

      The point of being confident, aware of your surroundings, etc. is to help prevent being preyed on by the opportunistic thief. The ones that look for the easy marks. If someone really wants to attack/rob you they are going to do it. The point is to reduce the odds to an acceptable level. Many people have no clue about these things.

      Somewhat akin to the safety devices in cars. They don't prevent all deaths and injuries, but you wouldn't not use them, would you?

      Finally, from your post, it sounds like you are confident, aware of your surroundings, etc. You are also known and respected and/or liked. And you haven't been mugged. I'm sure there is no correlation there at all....

    7. Re:The Real Trick Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dream on. There are NO tough neighborhoods in SF - tougher than you perhaps - but I lived there too and even the low-rent areas are full of art directors that think "tough" is a lukewarm latte.

    8. Re:The Real Trick Is... by MinusOne · · Score: 1

      > There are NO tough neighborhoods in SF

      I couldn't agree more. SF has bad neighborhoods, where I would not want to be alone on the street late at night. These neighborhoods don;t come close to bad neighborhoods I've been in in New York and Chicago. I was scared in broad daylight in the afternoon in those cities.

    9. Re:The Real Trick Is... by centralizati0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, not too bad, but what about Hunter's Point?

    10. Re:The Real Trick Is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the 'Redundant, -1' mods today? Mods! Anyone?

  110. Easy solution by JamesP · · Score: 1

    1 - replace your notebook case by a white one with pink spots.

    2 - Wear a black coat and sunglasses

    3 - Buy a ninja sword and carry it all the time.

    Problem Solved!

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  111. How to not get mugged in the 21st century by ejaw5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Replace the equipment you currently own, and/or gut out old technology and replace with new stuff:

    Laptop: Don't stroll the streets with a fancy fangled widescreen ub3r1337 laptop, but instead a tough-built IBM Thinkpad 286-DX. The integrated TrackBall is so easy to use you'll wonder why you've used mice, eraserheads and touchpads for so long!

    Instead of iPod, get a $20 Portable Cassette Player..you know..the analog audio type. Each tape can hold 90 minutes of music, which in todays terminology is about the equivalent of 22.5 songs or 112.5MB. (4mins/song, each song 5MB). Plus Cassette has NO DRM, and can store formats of CD/MP3/OGG/ACC/record/8Track in high quality stereo!

    Cell Phone: The new phones with camera, MIDI Synthesizer, tv screen, QUERTY keyboard all get in the way of its primary function..get just what you need with a large cell phone from the 80's. With all the EMF generated by this analog phone, no crook would be caught stealing one of these!

    PDA: Who needs a embedded computer that needs batteries to run when you can tote around a convienent compact notepad and pencil/pen? Your paper notepad can be backed up at any Kinko's shops or any other place with a copy machine! No more having to sync with PIM software.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      each tape holds 100+MB...hmmmm... if only there was some way to say my data to that

    2. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by CaptainCaveman_2002 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I sure hope you're using a Dvorak or other not common keyboard type... I just hate to picture somebody using a regular keyboard, yet still managing to go out of their way to mistype "qwerty" :-) --- Emoticon added for humor impaired.

    3. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ...some way to say my data to that

      There's a device you can get, called a "microphone".

    4. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by segfault7375 · · Score: 1


      Laptop: Don't stroll the streets with a fancy fangled widescreen ub3r1337 laptop, but instead a tough-built IBM Thinkpad 286-DX...

      And if the mugger isn't detered by this 15 pound behemoth, you can always beat the living shit out of him with it :)

    5. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tote around a convienent compact notepad and pencil/pen?"

      Besides that 'toting around' something is just too girlie for my liking, I also never figured out how to get that notepad+pencil combination to actually send that email to the intended recipient. It's just too complicated, you need all this envelope, stamp, and 'zip code' technology, and the delivery protocol is slow and unreliable, plus the notebook keeps forgetting the USPS server addresses to use for outgoing mail.

    6. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, stay in the twentieth.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    7. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's 21 century - get yourself a railgun, a pulse cannon, deflector shields or maybe just cloaking device.

    8. Re:How to not get mugged in the 21st century by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Cell Phone: ... get just what you need with a large cell phone from the 80's. With all the EMF generated by this analog phone, no crook would be caught stealing one of these! ------------- and currently effectively illegal* to activate (in the USA) However if you look hard enough you still can get a "just phone" cell phone (and some carriers will just about pay you to take them) *(activating a NON E-911 handset causes a ~$300.00 fine for the carrier)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  112. Make yourself bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wear a leather trench, duh. Who's gonna fuck with the trenchcoat mafia now?

  113. +3, (fill in the blank) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but I hardly think the mere mention of firearms is flamebait.

    You're new here, aren't you?

    1. Re:+3, (fill in the blank) by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      Okay, I think this joke is getting a little tired. I can't think of anything lamer than this, except maybe for that even lamer jo - NO CARRIER

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  114. You Have Been Trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT YHL HAND

  115. Best advice... by avsed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've lived in London nearly all my life, work in IT, and carry lots of geek toys (iPod, notebook, Archos mp3 player which now serves as file sharer, PDA, digital camera and mobile phone!). I've never had any trouble I couldn't handle. Here's my advice (it works, I've tested it on many occasions!):

    1) Most importantly - Never *ever* carry round something you couldn't afford to lose - that means, if you're carrying round data that is important to you - MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A COPY OF IT SOMEWHERE. If it is important to others ENCRYPT IT. I can't stress this enough - in IT, data is nearly always the most valuable asset you can carry with you.

    2) Always ALWAYS look confident, focused, and aware of your surroundings. Notice people round you, make sure they know you've noticed them, but don't be aggresive. Your stance should say "there are easier targets than me. Move along".

    3) If you do happen to find yourself in the middle of a potential conflict situation (group of youths approach and agressively ask for the time for example) react politely but firmly - don't lose your confidence or look like you can't handle yourself.

    If you find it difficult maintaining confidence walking round London, you should join a gym and/or take up a martial art - it can make a very big difference to how people percieve you.
    Finally, if you're new to London, give it time. My partner felt very threatened in San Francisco, but has no problems wondering round the worst parts of south east London on her own - it's just a question of being comfortable with your surroundings.
    Best regards,
    Dan

  116. Don't live your life in fear... by Offtopic · · Score: 1

    Go to the gym 3 days a week and work hard for an hour and study some martial art. It will repay you many times over.

  117. Re:Get a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Red Ken is quite possibly the best thing that has happened to London in a while. You get what you vote for. London has traditionally been a Labour stronghold anyway, people elected him because he gets the job done, whether you agree with his policies or not.

    As for when guns are outlawed, well the veracity of that is dubious. European nations generally have lower violent crime rates than America and much smaller gun crime rates. The difference being that you seem to think you need them, whereas strict gun legislation in our countries means we feel safe enough to travel without them.
    On the other hand if I lived in a country where every other person carried a gun I would probably want one too, thats the whole point of an arms race.

    Or it could be that you are just a violent country, Canada have a similar number of guns per head but far fewer gun crimes, and Switzerland has conscription which requires that all men between about 20 and 45 keep an assault rifle and 30 rounds of ammunition at home, yet their gun crime rates are so low they don't even maintain statistics.

    Think about this, France does what it likes, when it likes. People in France have more holidays, better food, better healthcare and still manage to be a 'relatively' significant power (either within the EU or on its own). America on the other hand, insists on rubbing the international community up the wrong way. People in America have fewer holidays, poorer quality food, and are worried that their neighbour is about to kill them!

    Who's got the better deal?

  118. Six years of Karate works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I agree w/ the parent poster - look like you know what the hell you're doing. After a string of embarrassing incidents in the US, I started taking American karate six years ago. I'm not a black belt yet (might never make it that far - too hard), and there are lots of criminals who could still kick my ass or carry a gun, but damn it helps you "walk tall." So just like a car alarm, you can still be beaten, but most likely they'll move on to the next victim instead. Bottom line? It's easier to look like you know what you're doing...when you actually do.

    I'm not saying martial arts gives you the freedom to be a macho nitwit. If someone pulls a gun, ya just give him your wallet. But I've had several smaller incidents in the last two years. Each one ended well: no hospital for either party, no court case, but I came out on top.

    It's been really hard - you're entering a completely different culture in martial arts. Cracked ribs, concussions, gigantic bruises and welts - they're just a given. If your body can take it, it's worth it.

    1. Re:Six years of Karate works for me by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      funny. in all the time i studied martial arts (kung fu) i never broke any bones in the training. bruises, welts, and the occasional pulled muscle or tendon yes, but nothing serious. if you get seriously injured during training it's because you did something REALLY poorly (unfortunately a lot of the teachers out there don't know what they're doing so it happens a lot more often than it should).

      one of the most useful things it gives you in an urban area is looking like you are not the person they want to try to roll over. barring that, joint locks (which can easily lead to broken bones in multiple locations if you want them to and all you need is to get a grip on their thumb), small focused strikes to places like the temple or throat, and strikes along nerve centers work wonderfully. it tends to freak out people when they lay a hand on you and a moment later can't feel the arm because you hit just behind the wrist and in front of the elbow on the inside of the arm.

      the most effective things to use in situations like that are often the simplest ones. of course, not looking like one punch would break you in half can help too.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  119. Maybe you are the problem by theefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say not only leave London, but move to a region where self-defense isn't a crime.

    Excuse me ?

    This is the most stupid post I've read in weeks, and I have to reply.

    First, I don't know where you have found your statistics, but if you ask anyone in the streets (take someone in Sweden or Italy if you want them to be neutral), they will tell you that they are much more afraid of violence in countries that allow people to carry weapons around (e.g. the USA) than in countries where it is not allowed, no matter what the Official Crime Rate is.

    Personnally, I've already walked alone in Paris and in its subway at night. Whereas I would not say I was totally confortable (but even here in Switzerland, you can be aggressed if you are really not lucky), it is nothing compared to the feeling I'd get if I were to walk in streets where half the people would carry guns.

    The second thing is, self-defense is not restricted to carrying guns. I'd be interested to know how many times people really defend themselves with their guns (and what is the ratio against "gun accidents" for instance). Plus, if all the "Honest People" carry guns, why wouldn't your aggressor ? Then if both have guns, who wins ? Do you start a duel in the middle of the street ?

    There are many different kind of self-defense, and weapons are probably the most stupid one (because violence triggers violence). You can learn how to defend yourself physically (kick the balls, aim at the throat or the eyes, etc). You can carry non-deadly weapons (pepper spray, etc). You can try to always be part of a small group of people. You can run (no, really).

    But don't come and tell us that deadly weapons such as guns make for a more secure, less violent city !

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Maybe you are the problem by name773 · · Score: 1

      You can run
      mod this offtopic, but that's one of my favourite responses in this situation:

      person: i can totally beat you up
      me: no you can't, i can run faster.

    2. Re:Maybe you are the problem by iJed · · Score: 1

      Amazingly there are around 15000 (yes fifteen thousand) murders in the US every year. Most of which can probably be attributed to shootings. Now the UK, where firearms are illegal, has usually under 1000 murders per year.

      If we compare this to population the US has around 290 million and the UK around 60 million. That puts the US murder rate over three times that of the UK. I think the facts speak for themselves.

    3. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Fullmetal+Edward · · Score: 1

      You have a very good point but you forget something.

      Life has no respawns, you're better off just handing over any money/items and report it to the police.

      I carry $1000 on me on a regular basis and if someone went "your money or your life", then buy buy money, hello living.

      Theres a line between sense and stupidity. If you don't stand even half a chance don't run just give it up. There's no sense in getting shot or beaten to shit for the sake of a lap top or cash when you can always get another (insurance or working again).

      --
      --- [Insert intresting Sig here]
    4. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't the people that get the permits to legally carry guns, the problem is the people that don't get the permit and carry guns. Having lived in places that allow carry and places that dont, I dont feel any less safe in the places that allow it. In fact I feel safer becaseu most people that carry would have no problem pulling out their gun to defend me if I was getting mugged.

      If you were a mugger would you mug someone knowing that you would be staring down the barrel of a gun? I know I wouldn't.

    5. Re:Maybe you are the problem by peragrin · · Score: 1

      In a country that it's illegal to own firearms, and there are still 1,000 murders? What do people die buy??? illegal weapons? stabbings?

      Murder is going to happen, all you can do is limit it. The only reason why I would not have guns taken from the people, is because every once in a while a revolution is needed. The goverment get's to big for it's briches.

      Even England has changed goverments ever the centuries.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:Maybe you are the problem by bladernr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can run (no, really).

      I'm one of the guys who always says I can run faster scared than anyone else mad.

      However, it is Memorial Day in the US. Its been 3 years since my father, who won a Purple Heart fighting on some God-forsaken hill in Korea, passed on. He didn't run. He was always smiling, humble, and, in his later years, just plain nuts (seriously, I mean the clinically diagnosed kind of crazy... maybe from the war... who knows).

      Anyway, every right we have was won on the backs of many that came before us. They stood up against great enemies and huge personal risk. Maybe standing up and saying not this time to a thug gives tribute to that. Maybe after you do that, they won't be so quick to attack the next would-be victim.

      I am against basically every law that restricts freedom, because I believe once liberties go away, they don't come back, and they were all paid for with blood. Why would I hand over my basic right to my own property to some thug?

      But don't come and tell us that deadly weapons such as guns make for a more secure, less violent city

      It is impossible to have a meaning conversation on this topic in this forum. In fact, I have no facts in front me, but, if you seriously wanted to learn, and not seek information to back up a pre-concieved notion, I would suggest a couple sources.

      1. Crime statistics per capita of the various US states that allow concealed weapons, looking at periods before and after allowing concealed weapons.
      2. Releative freemdom and corruption levels of countries as compared to private citizens rights and practical ability to own guns (if you look this up, please reply, as I would be seriously interested in the answer.
      3. In countries that have outlawed gun ownership successfully, obviously gun crime goes down, because there are less guns. But what about assults with other weapons, other violent and non-violent crimes, looking for any not-so-predictable effects (for instance, to burglers feel safer robbing houses, and so rob more, because they know the owners can't shoot them?).

      Anyway, I've always been curious about this topic, and I have yet to find a single study done by a group without some agenda (either pro-gun or anti-gun).

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    7. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if all the "Honest People" carry guns, why wouldn't your aggressor ? Then if both have guns, who wins ?

      If no one has guns, and a 5'4" is being targeted for rape by a 6'2" man, who 'wins'?

      At least, if she has a gun, she might be able to shoot him.

      because violence triggers violence ... and then you go on to say:


      defend yourself physically
      kick the balls
      aim at the throat or the eyes
      [use] pepper spray
      ... all of which will 'beget more violence'.

    8. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok.. logically speaking.

      60,000,000 divide by 1000 deaths
      equals 1 death per 60 thousand

      290,000,000 divide by 15,000 deaths
      equals 1 death per 19.3 thousand

      which place is more safe, you said?

    9. Re:Maybe you are the problem by torokun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since the absolute gun ban in the mid 90's in Britain, the burglary rate has shot up. Go check it out.

      Many states in the U.S. have liberalized their concealed carry laws over the last 10 years or so, resulting in a significant decrease in crime in those states. Studies have shown about 1/3 less violent crime on average in such states.

      Of people who get concealed carry permits, usually less than 1% later commit offenses. These people are usually well-educated and law-abiding citizens. The criminals also have guns though, even though, of course, it's illegal.

    10. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've ... walked alone in Paris."
      "There are many different kind of self-defense... You can run."


      Let me guess. You're French?

    11. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If guns are outlawed... Only outlaws will have guns.

    12. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Freedom is about choice. What you choose to do in a given situation is not necessarily what another person will choose to do. Giving away your posessions to whoever has the guts to demand them with menace is not everyones cup of tea. Your intolerance of other peoples choices is by no means a reason for other people to give up their freedom.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    13. Re:Maybe you are the problem by spiffturk · · Score: 1

      "If you try to run, I've got six little friends and they can all run faster than you can."
      -- http://imdb.com/title/tt0116367/quotes

      --
      Will

    14. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmmm... Let's suppose, for just a moment, that you will take everyone's guns away. Make it a crime to carry a gun. Ok, now take a deep breath and think about this next one before answering it: Will the thieves also give up their guns? Or will they be empowered because suddenly they are the only ones with guns? Think this one through very carefully.

      Criminals are called that because they do not obey the law. Therefore, if all law abiding citizens give up their weapons, those citizens will be without the tools of self-defense, whereas the criminals, who don't obey the law anyway, will keep their weapons for use in their crimes. Not only that, but it will embolden them, knowing that when they pull a gun on someone, that victim will not likewise pull a gun on them. However, if a criminal is fully aware that many people carry concealed weapons, that criminal might think twice before pulling a gun. And if that criminal doesn't think twice, that criminal will get shot, and Darwin's role will have played out.

      Finally, I wanted to mention one interesting thing. You said that regardless of statistics, this is how people from various countries feel when they walk around in an area where half the people carry guns. Since you said this is regardless of statistics, it shows that you either do not have the data to prove what you say, or you have that data but choose to ignore it. Furthermore, you say you'd like the ratio between how often people defend themselves with a gun and how often gun accidents occur. Once again, you do not have the numbers.

      Effectively, you are drawing conclusions from feelings and from ideas that are not backed up by facts, because, as I said, you either do not know the facts, or you choose to ignore them. This is not the scientific way to draw conclusions, nor is it the reliable way.

      Oh, and by the way, regarding all those people who might feel unsafe walking in the streets of America, where half of the people carry guns according to you, I would like to say that this is a feature, not a problem: If they feel unsafe in our dangerous streets, they might pay closer attention to their surroundings, and by doing so, avoid getting shot by that half of the population that carries guns. (And did I forget to mention that while half of the people carry guns, nearly all of those people are law abiding citizens who do not shoot those who are afraid of guns? No, I didn't mention that yet.)

      Guns are not the problem. The people who abuse them are.

      An analogy you might understand: Computers are not the problem. Those who write viruses in them are.

    15. Re:Maybe you are the problem by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I agree that guns are not good for self defense but I think learning to use a gun is a good step to learning self defense. A weapon you are afraid of and not familiar with is something you won't be able to defend yourself against.

      Really I suggest learning basics like learning to not follow a set routine, to look like you know where you're going and what you're doing, etc as the most important step to self defense. Learning basic defense or martial arts skills would be useful too.

      If you're planning on kicking a guy in the balls when he has a weapon aimed at you then you are nuts. Most attackers don't want to use their weapons. If you assault them then you could make them accidently hurt you or just piss them off whereas they would again hurt you.

      Running away from someone with a weapon is okay as long as their weapon isn't a gun. You don't want to turn your back on someone with a gun. It's hard to shoot someone with a pistol if that person can see where you're aiming and avoid the line of fire. Backing up slowly would be a better strategy. Once you get a respectable distance away then you can run. Again though, running risks just pissing off your attacker.

      Pepper spray is useless. I've sprayed myself with it lots of times. It stings but will not disable an attacker. Yet again, this will only piss off an attacker.

      Stun guns can work but require you to be close to the attacker and to be quicker than they are. You're as likely to get hurt from the exchange as they are. I'd use them as a last resort.

      Get one of those personal alarm things. They will bring attention to you and do not encourage your attacker to become violent. That combined with a general awareness of how not to become a target will serve you better than any weapon.

      Now as far as carrying weapons.. I'm for it. They are not good for preventing a quick violent crime but they can be useful for defending against psychos, terrorists, and others that are beyond reason. People trained in the proper use of weapons are less likely to be involved in a weapon related accident. Most people won't get into gun fights at the drop of a hat so the violence isn't going to be any higher. The real key is proper training in the use and handling of the weapons. Untrained idiots running around with weapons is a major threat. You have this problem when people don't train their kids in the use of these weapons but decide to buy them anyway.. or maybe their friends parents buy them.. or they find it in a park. Then you have kids blowing each others heads off by accident. A good reason to train yourself and your family in the basics of such weapons even if you intend to not keep any around.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    16. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ever used pepper-spray in a fight before, you would know that usually it is not a great tool to use when you don't have backup.

      When pepper-spray comes out, its almost impossible to prevent yourself from getting sprayed as well if there is any kind of struggle.

    17. Re:Maybe you are the problem by donnz · · Score: 1

      I just did.

      It seems you are quite wrong.

      Crime in the UK has never been linked to personal gun ownership which has always been miniscule in any case.

      Want another quote?

      "the 2002 British Crime Survey - which asks people for their first-hand experiences of crime - tells a different story. This claims that crime rates have fallen by 2 per cent over the past year, with the chances of being a victim of crime now standing at its lowest since the survey began in 1981.

      "Violent crime is only a very small proportion of overall crime in the UK but it is the type of crime that people fear most."

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    18. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can run (no, really).

      You can run, pussy. Men don't run from evil.

    19. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your opinion on stun guns and pepper spray is totally backward. Even expensive stun guns don't do much more than hurt a little. I had a friend who had a stun gun and I freaked him out by holding it to my chest and triggering it. I knew what the police learned the hard way--stun guns don't work. (tazers do work, and that's what they use). OC spray works really really well. You must have gotten sprayed with some old, cheap stuff. Because modern OC spray will put you down hard. Trust me, I know.

    20. Re:Maybe you are the problem by stiggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So instead of carrying a small "non-lethal" weapon, the criminals start carrying automatics with deadly rounds in them. You just create an arms race for the criminals and the police.

      If "honest" citizens do not carry firearms, then you know that everyone who does IS criminal and can be shot by the police.

      In America, its not the criminals you should be afraid of, its the police who shoot you and get away with it.

      "Carrying a concealed drivers licence"
      "Refusing to spit out gum"
      "Carrying a cellphone"

    21. Re:Maybe you are the problem by BrainStain · · Score: 1
      Maybe he is the solution.

      These statistics indicate people are significantly safer in states that have the right to carry concealed.

      Copied here:

      CARRYING CONCEALED FIREARMS (CCW) STATISTICS

      Violent crime rates are highest overall in states with laws severely limiting or prohibiting the carrying of concealed firearms for self-defense. (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 1992) -

      The total Violent Crime Rate is 26% higher in the restrictive states (798.3 per 100,000 pop.) than in the less restrictive states (631.6 per 100,000).

      The Homicide Rate is 49% higher in the restrictive states (10.1 per 100,000) than in the states with less restrictive CCW laws (6.8 per 100,000).

      The Robbery Rate is 58% higher in the restrictive states (289.7 per 100,000) than in the less restrictive states (183.1 per 100,000).

      The Aggravated Assault Rate is 15% higher in the restrictive states (455.9 per 100,000) than in the less restrictive states (398.3 per 100,000). Using the most recent FBI data (1992), homicide trends in the 17 states with less restrictive CCW laws compare favorably against national trends, and almost all CCW permittees are law-abiding.

      Since adopting CCW (1987), Florida's homicide rate has fallen 21% while the U.S. rate has risen 12%. From start-up 10/1/87 2/28/94 (over 6 yrs.) Florida issued 204,108 permits; only 17 (0.008%) were revoked because permittees later committed crimes (not necessarily violent) in which guns were present (not necessarily used).

      Of 14,000 CCW licensees in Oregon, only 4 (0.03%) were convicted of the criminal (not necessarily violent) use or possession of a firearm. Americans use firearms for self-defense more than 2.1 million times annually.

      By contrast, there are about 579,000 violent crimes committed annually with firearms of all types. Seventy percent of violent crimes are committed by 7% of criminals, including repeat offenders, many of whom the courts place on probation after conviction, and felons that are paroled before serving their full time behind bars.

      Two-thirds of self-protective firearms uses are with handguns.

      99.9% of self-defense firearms uses do not result in fatal shootings of criminals, an important factor ignored in certain "studies" that are used to claim that guns are more often misused than used for self-protection. Of incarcerated felons surveyed by the Department of Justice, 34% have been driven away, wounded, or captured by armed citizens; 40% have decided against committing crimes for fear their would-be victims were armed.

      OTHER CCW FACTS

      With adoption of CCW by Arizona, Tennessee and Wyoming in early 1994, 19 states have CCW laws requiring the issuance of permits to carry concealed firearms for self-defense to citizens who meet fair and reasonable state standards. Vermont, which ranks near the bottom in violent crime rates year-in and year-out, allows firearms to be carried concealed without a permit.

      In recent years NRA successfully fought for the adoption of favorable CCW laws now on the books in Florida (1987), Idaho (1990, amended 1991), Mississippi (1990), Montana (1991), and Oregon (1990). In recent legislative sessions, proposals for similar CCW laws have progressed in Alaska, Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.

      Anti-gun forces oppose CCW with a variety of arguments, ranging from deliberate misrepresentations of commonly available crime data to "studies" pretending to show that private ownership of firearms leads to death and injury rather than providing protection to the owner.

      1. Firearms ownership opponents claim that "violent crime" went up in Florida since that state enacted CCW legislation in 1987, a misleading statement for multiple reasons:

      Florida's homicide rate has declined 21% since adopting CCW in1987.

      No co

    22. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmmm... Let's suppose, for just a moment, that you will take everyone's guns away. Make it a crime to carry a gun. Ok, now take a deep breath and think about this next one before answering it: Will the thieves also give up their guns? Or will they be empowered because suddenly they are the only ones with guns? Think this one through very carefully.

      Criminals are called that because they do not obey the law. Therefore, if all law abiding citizens give up their weapons, those citizens will be without the tools of self-defense, whereas the criminals, who don't obey the law anyway, will keep their weapons for use in their crimes. Not only that, but it will embolden them, knowing that when they pull a gun on someone, that victim will not likewise pull a gun on them. However, if a criminal is fully aware that many people carry concealed weapons, that criminal might think twice before pulling a gun. And if that criminal doesn't think twice, that criminal will get shot, and Darwin's role will have played out.

      heres another situation for ya. cop pulls up some dodgy look guy and finds a gun on him. in your fantastic country, the cop can do nothing, its his right to carry a gun even if he looks like a dodgy fucker whos gonna mug your grandma the moment the cop lets him go. now wouldnt it make more sense if you actually gave the police the power to start dissolving the problem?

    23. Re:Maybe you are the problem by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      Plus, if all the "Honest People" carry guns, why wouldn't your aggressor ? Then if both have guns, who wins ? Do you start a duel in the middle of the street ? I believe in this situation, there wouldn't be any muggings. Muggers prey on the weak. If there's a good chance that they'll be shot at while trying to steal $80 out of someone's wallet, they'll move on to someplace where people don't all carry guns and are an easier target.

    24. Re:Maybe you are the problem by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, you're an idiot.

      Are you under the impression that a mugger or robber in the US is going to go through the process of legally obtaining a gun? Hell no, they get their weapons illegally just like their European counterparts.

      Most CCW permit owners in the US are responsible citizens. If they werent, they would have skipped the CCW permit step and just carried their gun anyway.

      A universal ban on handguns may make you FEEL safer, but the jury's still out on whether or not you actually ARE safer. Last I checked, nations like the UK and Germany didn't have their violent crime rates drop all that much after they banned most firearms. If your intention is to rob someone, an illegal act, what's to stop you from getting an illegal handgun? Certainly not conscience, because you're ready to commit a violent crime anyway! Here in the US, there are very few crimes committed by the legal bearer of a handgun using that weapon.

    25. Re:Maybe you are the problem by cryonv · · Score: 1

      Ditch the Gun... Bring the Dog with you... Nothing says come and get it then a full size dog with fangs bared.

    26. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about your father.

      They don't make them like that anymore.

      But hopefully the newer models are just enough.
      We're gonna need 'em.

    27. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmmm... Let's suppose, for just a moment, that you will take everyone's guns away. Make it a crime to carry a gun. Ok, now take a deep breath and think about this next one before answering it: Will the thieves also give up their guns? Or will they be empowered because suddenly they are the only ones with guns? Think this one through very carefully.

      Ok.. stop selling bullets then.

    28. Re:Maybe you are the problem by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if those criminals didn't have access to guns, there'd be no problem. You don't think those guns magically appeared in the criminals' christmas stockings, did you? They didn't - they were once legal guns. Take away the legal guns, and the illegal guns disappear too. Train your police to be as effective, if not moreso, than an armed civilian, and you've got no excuse. Don't be fooled into thinking person+gun=crime fighter. Unless that person has suitable training (which, the last time i checked, doesn't come included with the gun) they are more of a threat to themselves and their loved ones than to criminals. Being alive doesn't qualify you as someone deemed worthy of owning a device whos purpose is SOLELY to kill a person. You need to be seriously vetted to determine that, then trained to make sure you know how to use it responsibly. Look at crime statistics in the US, and compare them to other countries. I'm not just talking michael-moore-esque statistics, but entire crime statistics. You'll see the US is way up there. Guns are the problem. Inept, dumb police are more of a problem, as if they did their jobs correctly, no non-cop would need a gun. Guns don't help anyone. Certainly not if they're being used by some guy off the street. People get attracted to the power they think they have from guns. They get the whole rambo mentality going on. In real life, that doesn't lead to anything good. Just dead innocent people in the street. I know if I'm ever in trouble, the last thing I want is a gun. The first thing I want is a cop.

    29. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Will the thieves also give up their guns?

      Where do you think thieves get their guns? By banning guns, you're cutting off their biggest supply.

      As has been pointed out before: look at the correlation between gun ownership and crime. Does it bear out your argument?

    30. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that criminals feel any differently, just because they have guns and most other people don't. The reality is that criminals don't apply a rational risk/reward analysis to their chosen career.

      So a mugger with a hand gun is going to shove it up your nose and demand some money from you, regardless of any probability that you possess a gun. And why? Because they want heroin or coke, and they want it now. Or they want some cash, and they want it now.

      Your $50 handgun won't stop them doing this. They're likelier to take it off you and use it against you. You'd be better off buying $50 worth of insurance for the stuff you're likely to lose.

    31. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Nahor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hmmm... Let's suppose, for just a moment, that you will take everyone's guns away. Make it a crime to carry a gun. Ok, now take a deep breath and think about this next one before answering it: Will the thieves also give up their guns? Or will they be empowered because suddenly they are the only ones with guns? Think this one through very carefully.
      Did you think that one through? If we follow through your reasonning, what you are basically suggesting is to banish all laws because criminals don't obey them anyway.
    32. Re:Maybe you are the problem by BigChigger · · Score: 1

      "but if you ask anyone in the streets (take someone in Sweden or Italy if you want them to be neutral), they will tell you that they are much more afraid of violence in countries that allow people to carry weapons around (e.g. the USA) than in countries where it is not allowed, no matter what the Official Crime Rate is." That's the rub ain't it? That feeling they have is not based on logic - it's based on the propaganda they've been fed about guns. Even though they're safer in a weapon allowed society, they don't believe they are.

      BC

    33. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah thank you. At least some sanity!

      If someone rub me I absolutely prefer to hand over my 3000 laptop than shooting him, EVEN if I got away with it. I don't to be a murder just for trying to protect a stupid computer. There is NO way I can justify to myself that his life is worth less than my computer!

      Seriously guys, I dont WANT a gun the potentual cost is simply way too high!

      Cheerios
      Peter

    34. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I have a problem with the logic that making criminals feel threatened makes us safer.

      Crime does not disapear, no mater how many armed citizens are walking the streets. We can agree on that, right?

      Imagine life from the perspective of a criminal in such an area. You know you are robbing someone who is likely armed. How would that make you react?

      In my case, it would probably make me more jumpy. If I were mugging someone, I would be far more likely to shoot them... After all, my life would be on the line.

      Sure, you would be much safer in public places, or working at a conveince store. I don't think it would help with muggings, however.

      It's also worth pointing out that silencers are illgeal in the United States. Certainly, a silencer would give a criminal a big edge... So, why don't we see more silencers in the hands of robbers?

      IMO, if guns were illegal, the vast majority of criminals would move on to other weapons.

      FWIW, I'd rather face a criminal armed with a gun, than one armed with a sword of knife.

    35. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      In other words, you are saying that individuals should not be responsible because the government (the police is the government) will be responsible for them.

      So at two o'clock in the morning, when some murderer breaks into my house, instead of being able to pull a gun and blast the mother fucker, I am supposed to call the police and wait until they show up. Yeah, great. I feel really safe now.

      Your ideas about guns are purely theoretical and rely on a perfect world in order to work properly. Well, in a perfect world, we wouldn't have criminals, so this entire discussion wouldn't exist. But we don't live in a perfect world, and the police don't show up instantaneously, so I'm sorry to tell you this, but guns are here to stay, and THEY ARE NOT THE PROBLEM!!!

    36. Re:Maybe you are the problem by deacon · · Score: 1
      You wanted a piece of data, here it is. Vermont has no restrictions on concealed carry of handguns.

      Now look at this listing of states by crime rate. Vermont is safest at #1, righthand column.

      QED.

    37. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      As has been pointed out before: look at the correlation between gun ownership and crime. Does it bear out your argument?

      As I have pointed out before: YOU look at the correlation between gun ownership and crime. Because quite frankly, I do NOT believe that you have ever done such a thing, but I DO believe that you will not, because you're afraid that the facts don't back up your shoddy argument.

    38. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Did you think that one through? If we follow through your reasonning, what you are basically suggesting is to banish all laws because criminals don't obey them anyway.

      Nay. You misunderstood me. I am suggesting that by banning guns, we will not get rid of violent crime; I am further suggesting the converse of that: By banning guns, we will affect only the law abiding citizens who will obey that law. The criminals will not, and therefore, for YOU, the person getting mugged in the street, the law will have no practical and/or favorable effect.

      True, you might get mugged one way or the other. But don't think for a moment that by banning guns, you will take them away from crooks. The crooks will always find a way around the laws.

    39. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      The first, duh!

    40. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps numbers in countrys like germany and the UK didnt drop dramaticaly becauze they wernt all that high from the start.

      realy your comparison is flawed
      when i read the news paper and it states that there was a gun fight i'm suprised
      why you ask becauze it's rare.

      as far as i rember this year we had 3 in this part of the country. 2 in jewlry stores and one love sick basterd that shot his competitor.
      i'm talking about an area that holds about 3M people.

    41. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      FINALLY!!! Some sanity in this discussion.

      This is a known fact. Look again at the cold hard facts. Washington D.C., where guns are ILLEGAL (unless you are the government or the police), has the highest murder rate in the country. These are cold hard facts.

      The problem with a lot of people is that they let their feelings guide them in their decisions and in their political and social opinions. The trouble with feelings is that much of the time, what feels right isn't right. Maybe this would be true in a perfect world, but there is no Utopia. Except, perhaps, the reverse-Utopia of 1984 as described by George Orwell. Do we want to live in that kind of world? I certainly don't. Therefore, I make decisions based on fact, not feelings.

      Thank you for posting this refreshing tidbit of sanity, reason, and fact, in this sea of mindless emotional responses.

    42. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider this hypothetical situation. The US bans handguns and automatic weapons. The flow of guns from genuine owners to criminals stops, but the criminals keeps their guns. Without a regular supply of new guns, the relatice scarsity of guns increases, and concequently the price increases, eventually moving out of the price range of your desparate criminal. Market forces control the flow of handguns to criminals, not laws.

      In Australia we have very tightly controlled gun ownership laws. A report a few years ago said that the cost of an illeagal handgun on the black market in oz was about 5000AUD, I suppose about 3800US. The same report said that in the US, you can pay as little as 50AUD for a stolen handgun.

      Recently the government tightened laws here and bought-back and destroyed thousands of weapons that, in the light of our modern society, were considered to be dangerous. It was the nobelest act of that government, a rare demonstation of real leadership, and a great day for Australia. I hope this made illegal weapons even more expensive.

      You should see how the cops go crazy here if they hear that a handgun (singular) has passed into the hands of a criminal (singular). It will almost always make the newspapers. The same way a gun murder (singular) makes the front page. There is basically nowhere in my city where I and even my female friends don't feel safe.

      I think in many ways the US are doing the rest of the world a favor by showing where loose gun laws take you. I just feel for the people who have no choice but to participate.

    43. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Where do you think thieves get their guns? By banning guns, you're cutting off their biggest supply.

      Hmmm... This is so profound, it must be true. If so, we should apply this rule to other aspects of life. If we assert that what you say above is true, then by inductive reasoning, we can assert the following: By banning marijuana, we will eliminate the smoking of pot.

      Whoops. I guess your theory failed the first test of illegality. Do you think that's air you're breathing?

    44. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "they will tell you that they are much more afraid of violence in countries that allow people to carry weapons around (e.g. the USA) than in countries where it is not allowed, no matter what the Official Crime Rate is."

      Aside from the fact that we're talking about "feelings" (advertisers must love you folks), are these people that have actually been to the US, or are they just going by anedotal stories and talking about how they would feel if they were in the States?

      And then the next question would be "Where in the US?" Big country, widely varying state laws, etc. etc.

    45. Re:Maybe you are the problem by jokerghost · · Score: 1

      As a soldier, I can damn well say they are far more than "just enough". You may not hear about it everyday, but they are out there, busting their balls off for you.

      Just for a little more than an assertion, here's a litle proof.

      http://www.sptimes.com/2004/webspecials04/medalo fh onor/

      -Jokerghost

    46. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think half the people carry guns even in Dallas, for heaven's sake. In my state, you need a license to carry any kind of concealed weapon (even pepper spray). And you need a *reason* to get the license (private security, carry a lot of money, etc.). Maybe 1/10 of 1% carries a concealed gun.

    47. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "heres another situation for ya. cop pulls up some dodgy look guy and finds a gun on him. in your fantastic country, the cop can do nothing,"

      No, the cop then restrains the guy, takes away the gun, and then proceeds to see if the guy had a permit to have that concealed weapon. If the guy did have the permit, the first words out of his mouth as the cop approached him should have been "I'm wearing a gun." People who don't surprise police officers live longer.

      "its his right to carry a gun even if he looks like a dodgy fucker whos gonna mug your grandma the moment the cop lets him go."

      Yes, because we all know that people that look different from you should have no rights.

      "now wouldnt it make more sense if you actually gave the police the power to start dissolving the problem?"

      Personally, I'd rather have my own gun and in the process lighten their work load.

    48. Re:Maybe you are the problem by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Yes, because we all know that people that look different from you should have no rights.

      Heh. I suppose you're not a leftist-thinking liberal. Please correct me if I'm wrong about this, as I would be very surprised if you are.

      I am often shocked at how hypocritical a lot of leftists are. They often tout acceptance and toleration of different people, cultures, ideas, and whatever else. However, I have found that many leftists are quite the opposite of what they preach: If your ideas do not agree with theirs, they are the first to criticize you and put you down. This goes for guns, as it does for many other political and social topics.

      Some people just don't understand that ideas stemming from feelings (such as "let's ban guns because they're bad") are not always correct, but there are facts out there that speak for themselves. Trouble is, a lot of leftists are evidently allergic to facts.

      I like how you threw that comment back at the other poster. Funny how leftists argue that people should have the right to look like dirty slobs when walking down the street, but when the argument turns to guns, it becomes: Sure! Let the police beat them down Rodney King style and throw them in the slammer! They were probably going to commit a crime anyway! As I was saying: Toleration, as long as you agree with them.

    49. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Guppy06 · · Score: 2
      Let's replace a few words and see if your argument still holds water.

      And if those criminals didn't have access to heroin, there'd be no problem. You don't think that heroin magically appeared in the criminals' christmas stockings, did you? They didn't - it was once legal heroin. Take away the legal heroin, and the illegal heroin disappears too.

      Making contraband illegal in all instances doesn't make it go away.

      "Train your police to be as effective, if not moreso, than an armed civilian, and you've got no excuse."

      If they are more effective than an armed civillian, why shouldn't the civillians then be allowed to have guns?

      "Don't be fooled into thinking person+gun=crime fighter. Unless that person has suitable training (which, the last time i checked, doesn't come included with the gun)"

      Perhaps, but it does come with the concealed-carry permit.

      "they are more of a threat to themselves and their loved ones than to criminals."

      Which means it's their problem, not mine.

      "Being alive doesn't qualify you as someone deemed worthy of owning a device whos purpose is SOLELY to kill a person."

      You focus on the fact that guns are intended to kill people but never seem to consider that there are times when people should have their lives threatened if not taken away outright. After all, why should even the police have guns?

      There are things more important than human life, especially when you start looking at the lives of specific people.

      "Look at crime statistics in the US, and compare them to other countries. I'm not just talking michael-moore-esque statistics, but entire crime statistics. You'll see the US is way up there. Guns are the problem."

      OK, first you want me to look at real statistics, and then you want me to misuse those real statistics by assuming they show causality?

      Secondly, you seem to be forgetting (much like my national government) that the US is a union of 50 republics that still have some measure of autonomy, especially when it comes to laws and law enforcement. National laws and national law enforcement only gets involved in very specific circumstances, which means that local crime problems are just that: local. By looking at national statistics and crying for a national policy (on anything, really), what you're effectivley doing is saying that a person living in east Los Angeles and a person in rural Louisiana are living in exactly the same circumstances and have exactly the same problems (and live under exactly the same state laws). That's like saying someone living in rual Scotland and somone in a Warsaw ghetto are in exactly the same circumstances, and at least there you're more likely to pick two people that both speak English.

      "Inept, dumb police are more of a problem, as if they did their jobs correctly, no non-cop would need a gun."

      If they "did their jobs correctly" by your definition, why do the police need their guns?

      And how exactly are they supposed to do their jobs "better" when it comes to something like contraband? A concealed weapon is by definition concealed, and the only real way to keep that from happening is to not let anybody conceal anything. So what's your problem with Echelon?

      "Guns don't help anyone. Certainly not if they're being used by some guy off the street."

      If nothing else it means that guy off the street is less likely to be successfully mugged. Whether or not it ends well for the intended victim, it will make the intended mugger think a little more before trying it.

      "People get attracted to the power they think they have from guns. They get the whole rambo mentality going on."

      Are you talking about people you know who have a legally-owned handgun, or are you just going by what you see on American TV shows? Most of the people I know (friends and family) have at least one legally

    50. Re:Maybe you are the problem by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "And if those criminals didn't have access to guns, there'd be no problem. You don't think those guns magically appeared in the criminals' christmas stockings, did you? They didn't - they were once legal guns. Take away the legal guns, and the illegal guns disappear too."

      Yes, just like making marijuana illegal stopped it from showing up in the hands of criminals. (I don't want to get into a debate about if pot should or should not be illegal, I'm just going with current US law here.)

      Granted, it would *help* the problem, especially (like another poster pointed out) when you realize that if a cop saw someone with a gun they'd know immediately they weren't supposed to have it. However, there would still be plenty of people around with guns. Whether the overall violent crime deaths would increase or decrease, who knows.

    51. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always amuse me to see how some people believe they would always win at a gunfight. I was never mugged, but I'm pretty sure my chance of survival would be higher if I try to disarm a guy with my bare hands than if I reach for my gun and try to shoot him.

      Also, if I wanted to mug someone in the US, you can be pretty sure I would get a gun, draw it and be very jumpy about the guy doing anything other than raising his hands. In any other country, a knife or a baseball bat would do the trick.

      Oh... BTW... I did two years of military service and I miss my assault riffle. I'm not an anti-gun freak. It's just that I have some common sense.

    52. Re:Maybe you are the problem by EvanED · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of other reasons why Vermont has the lowest crime rate besides the allowing of concealed weapons. (And Washington with the highest for the other post in response to you.) You should look at changes in violent crime deaths and injuries from before and after certain laws were put into place. I have not done this or seen them done, so have no strong opinion on the matter.

      But overall, yes, the statistics do seem to support that states with lax gun laws have lower violent crime rates. I *did* compile some of this data once upon a time, though don't have it anymore. I took FBI statistics and the ratings from some anti-gun group that graded states from F (lax) to A (strict laws), and the overall trend was there. Not horribly strong, but it was there.

    53. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Sethus · · Score: 1

      I agree with your statement about guns not making a city secure, but your rational is wrong. While you may feel unthreatened in a place where guns are outlawed that has NOTHING to do with guns being outlawed or not-outlawed. I lived in the UK for a couple years, and I sure as hell didn't feel comfortable walking around by myself past 9 or 10 at night because 'townies' would come and kick my ass, mug me, and knife me if I didn't concent to a mugging.

      It completely depends on what sorta town your live in and the sort of people that are there. Here in a small college town, and nearby in the city of Spokane (middle/big city) I feel pretty damn safe walking around at midnight, but only in certain parts of town.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    54. Re:Maybe you are the problem by ttroutma · · Score: 1

      "You can carry non-deadly weapons (pepper spray, etc)." As I understand it you can't have pepper spray in the UK. Agreed on the physical self defense part, and of course the most important part, being alert! If this guy were in the US and not UK I'd suggest he dress like a gun nut and then no mugger would want to mess with him. They are terrified of gun nuts. Also this would give him a lot of pockets for his geek tools. Since he's in the UK, all he can do is stay alert and if somebody kills him for his stuff, tough shit.

    55. Re:Maybe you are the problem by ttroutma · · Score: 1

      " I know if I'm ever in trouble, the last thing I want is a gun. The first thing I want is a cop." Which will take how long? Depending on where you live 15 to 60 minutes? Maybe more?

    56. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would opine that if a city bans handguns, it's not going to be able to enforce that. I mean, if I can take a 10-minute bus ride out past the city limits, buy a gun there legally, then take it home, who's going to stop me?

      And of course, you're ignoring the obvious conclusion that the firearm ban was a reaction to a high crime rate, not the cause of it.

      It's a dumb argument. Kindly get a clue.

    57. Re:Maybe you are the problem by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Marijuana is relatively simple to grow. Just about anyone could do it, if they spend any time studying botanics. But how many would know how to construct a firearm from scratch? Or how about manufacturing bullets?

      Comparing guns to marijuana is comparing apples to oranges, Einstein.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    58. Re:Maybe you are the problem by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Where would those criminals get thier guns if they are outlawed? Sure, SOME guns would be smuggled in to the country regardless, but they wouldn't be anywhere as easily available to criminals as they are right now.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    59. Re:Maybe you are the problem by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Look again at the cold hard facts. Washington D.C., where guns are ILLEGAL (unless you are the government or the police), has the highest murder rate in the country. These are cold hard facts.


      Since guns are easily available elsewhere in the USA; it's a relatively simple matter to bring the to D.C.. But if the guns were also illegal elsewhere, where would those thugs get their guns? Right now they can get them outside D.C.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    60. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Alphasniper · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting a MAJOR problem with any gun laws. When "deadly weapons" are taken out of the hands of the public, the only people who have guns are the people who don't care about the law in the first place. If you ban guns, only the lawless will have them, and those are the people you have to worry about. Ahh, banning weapons, the allusion of safety.

    61. Re:Maybe you are the problem by theefer · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of something called the Cold War ...

      So if I invent a dangerous poison, you would make sure everyone has a bottle of it in its pocket so that we're sure not only "terrorists" have some ?

      --
      theefer
    62. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Well, shit.
      In the last two weeks the city I live in (Memphis) has seen a man abducted, forced to withdraw cash from an ATM and murdered.
      Twice.
      "Just give them what they want" is fine until what they want is no witnesses or to hear how loud they can make you scream.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    63. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like making marijuana illegal stopped it from showing up in the hands of criminals.

      True, but any Shmoe can grow weed in his basement or in a tabacco field. Manufacturing guns takes a bit more work.

      Basically, I'm not against the idea of owning guns, but I do belive that people should be licensed and trained to use them, and I don't understand why the NRA is against this. Especially since thier big non-political thing is gun saftey. If a cop, who has to go through a lot of training, has to worry about hitting the right target, and of having his gun taken away and used against him, how well is a civilian going to fair? If nothing else, it'll give you a better chance of hitting all those damn mexicans who are just waiting to rob your house. (/sarcasm).

    64. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      because the government (the police is the government) will be responsible for them.

      Yes, the courts have found that the police have no responsibility to protect you, unfortunatly.

      Your ideas about guns are purely theoretical and rely on a perfect world in order to work properly.

      So are yours, only twice as naive. Gun nuts seem to have this idea that if you buy a gun, you turn into a motherfucking badass who can handle any burglar or mugger with no risk to yourself or others. I got news for you sparky: if cops have to worry about hitting the right target, or having their gun taken away and used against them, how is Joe Shmoe citizen going to fair? Especially considering how much more training the cop has than you do?

      I'm not for gun control that prevents people from getting guns. I am for gun control that makes you get a license and some training on how to use the damn thing before you buy one. Now I can see why the NRA is worried about government regulation, but as their big non-political issue is gun saftey, and training and licensing would help fend off other regulation, I wish they'd quit being stubborn fools and drop their resistance to it. If a violent burglar breaks into your house, wouldn't you like to be able to shoot him before he shoots you? How about getting some training on how to respond to a robbery so don't accidently shoot your 8 year old son walking down a dark hallway because he heard a noise?

      guns are here to stay, and THEY ARE NOT THE PROBLEM!!!

      Of course their part of the problem. As are gun nuts who go home and watch Lethal Weapon or Dirty Harry and fondle themselves.

    65. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns"

      I have never ever ever, by anyone, seen a non-BS counter to that. Do you have one?

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    66. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      Your post is an illogical heap of crap. Do you actually espouse the preposterous belief that crime can be totally eliminated?

      And your bs about a "serious vetting" process to determine who, in your beleif, is qualified to protect themselves. What gives you the right to decide, that, against the will of other people? By what doctrine are you endowed with that authority? For that matter, how can anybody else (or any combination of people) decide for other people who gets to excercise a basic human right?

      Did you register your fax machine with the federal anti-samizdat bureau? We need to ensure people don't get false or misleading information. Constitution? The majority of people voted for the fax registration law. That makes it right.

      What? You refuse us entry? Well, we'll just break down the door and throw you in the gulag. Good thing you are disarmed- you might have hurt somebody.

      Dude, whoever or wherever you are, you can have my high-capacity, long-range, modern battle rifle when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

      Screw you and everything that you stand for.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    67. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine, so you prefer to be helpless to rapists and murderers and nazis.

      If your grandmother is raped in front of your eyes, reassure yourself that "the potential cost is way too high".

      And when the guy kills her afterwards, remember that you are the better man for standing by and doing nothing.

      So you don't mind you and your loved ones murdered and raped. Fine. Less stupid people to pass on their genes. I warn you, however, that I will not give up MY weapons while I still live.

      If you want my gun(s), you'll have to kill me first. And that won't be easy, especially for somebody helpless like you..

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    68. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      The NRA is opposed to registration because if the government knows who has which and how many guns who has, it can take them away.

      The NRA doesn't want guns taken away because weapons ownership is a fundamental human right, like free speech or freedom of religion.

      Also, many people do not have the time to jump through a bunch of hoops to get something. Also, should fax machines be registered because they might be used for copyright infingement?

      As for the racist innuendo, I support the individual right of ownership for all weapons to anyone. Especially cheap, powerful weapons that low-wage workers can afford. Especially concealable ones that they can carry everywhere. For that matter, poor people are the people most in danger of having their rights trampled, and are thus most likely to need weapons, should the need arise. (which they decide, not me)

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    69. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      Boo hoo, a big bad criminal might hurt me- I'd better disarm myself and my next door neighbor- that will make us safer!

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    70. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if the guns were also illegal elsewhere, where would those thugs get their guns?

      I can be anywhere in the world and back again in 72 hours. Your plan (banning guns everywhere)would require the complete cooperation of every citizen of ever country in the world.

      That seems pretty fucking ridiculous.

      Also, there are (est) 500 million guns in the world. What do you propose to do about them? Also, guns, properly stored, can last for decades. Your plan to destroy all of them is preposterous. What about the (many) countries that hate you and your country? Do you propose invading north korea to take their guns?

      And how are you going to do that without making more guns for the invasion?

      Or do you expect the communist dictator in charge of that country to just disarm himself, just because you told him to?

      For that matter, do you expect me to give up my weapons, just because you want me to?

      I warn you that the only way to do so is to kill me. And how are you going to do that, if you actually do what you say you want and destroy yours first?

      Your total lack of respect for basic human rights is disturbing.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    71. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      You know what I like about you? You actually think that what you have to say is meaningful.

    72. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      Why, isn't it meaningful? Perhaps you, Mr. I-am-so-smart, would be so kind as to tell me how, exactly, what I said is not meaningful.

      I mean, was it in a dialect of english you don't understand? Perhaps the concepts were too advanced. Maybe you were blinded by the "boo hoo" and you believed me to be an infant.

      So, do you actually have anything meaningful to say, or just cute comebacks?

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    73. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Nope. You're too much fun to take seriously.

    74. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      This has got to be the most worthless exchange I have ever been in.

      I post something, you post back alleging contradictions. I ask for evidence, you spout off some line about how funny my attitude is.

      I think I have a good idea as to what you think I am, and you are wrong. Of course, you won't actually tell me anything specific, but you'll probably reply with some non-informational crack that will likely do nothing but try and push some buttons.

      Anyway, it has been a total waste of time talking to you. Bye.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    75. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1
      Your original response was a canned argument, and wasn't really worth discussing.

      It's a response I've seen a thousand times, and it totally ignored the questions I was asking. You needed to take a deeper look at what I had to say. In doing so, you might realize that:
      • I don't think that gun control will make everyone a lot safer.
      • I don't think that mandatory armament will make us safer.
      • I don't think guns are as dangerous as people believe
      • Nor do I think that they are the end-all be-all of self defense.
      They say that the difference between a liberal and a conservative is that a liberal has never been mugged. Perhaps that's the case... I don't worry that I will be held at gunpoint. I am however, concerned about irrisponsible gun ownership.

      For what it's worth, I personally have an interest in firearms. I'd love to own a M82A1 and a FN P90 (it's a shame that the latter is so heavily controlled.)

      If you'd like to dialog, I'll be here.
    76. Re:Maybe you are the problem by torokun · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to search for too many of the sources for my statements -- I'm not writing an academic article...

      But anyway, see here, at footnote 4 near the bottom, referencing this bbc article...

    77. Re:Maybe you are the problem by donnz · · Score: 1

      Compare your links (regarding crime committed with handguns) with your original statement:

      Since the absolute gun ban in the mid 90's in Britain, the burglary rate has shot up. Go check it out.

      You are talking about different things. You don't need to write a paper, but maybe try reading an academic paper about the subject of crime as it pertains to the UK rather than quoting from "gun.org" (do you think there might be some bias there?) who are misrepresenting a news article.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    78. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      You know, I just checked back on your page to see your original post. I think I was thinking of someone else when I posted back. That's obviously no excuse, but I'd actually like to apologize.

      I don't think that "gun control" (not canned, just a habitually poorly-defined word) would make anyone even a little safer, in the long run. I look at history, and I see lots and lots of people murdered by their own governments or by their neighbors.

      Put broadly, I'm opposed to mandatory anything. I do think that if everyone, of their own free will, decided to own firearms, that that would be a good thing. I also think it would be good for people, every evening, to just join hands and sing kum bah yah. I consider them as likely as the other, but, nonetheless, both good things.

      I would be against mandatory gun ownership. I would also be against mandatory kum bah yah singing. I would also be opposed to laws banning either.

      I am glad you are, unlike many people, capable of seeing that an inanimate object is, of itself, not dangerous. Guns and ammunition are of course stored energy and discharging mechanisms and are thus more dangerous than, say, a rock, but both are capable of harm only when affected by human beings.

      I agree that guns are not the end-all be-all of defense. A gun does not automatically make a person safer. However, how is a person to get safer? My answer is to let them choose what they think they need for themselves. If a granny thinks carrying an mp5 in dark parking lots is what she wants, I do not oppose her and am against anyone who does.

      If there were devices that were be-all end-all defense weapons, usable by frightened people in the middle of the night, as well as jews when the gestapo is knocking on their doors, as well as of the populations of totalitarian countries to overthrow their governments, as well as cheap, accurate, usable against enemy invading tanks, usable at short ranges as well as long, that could be distributed quickly and efficiently by human carrying, I'd be arguing for them, not guns.

      Because the be-all end-all solution would have to be all of those things and more. However, it is precisely because guns are the closest to those goals of any other device that I am arguing for them. I can think of lots of problems with guns that are not solvable without changing the paradigm. (i.e. getting rid of easily-damaged and hard to manufacture rifled barrels.)

      I think the best thing to do, for now while a perfect solution evades human beings, is to simply allow the unrestricted ownership of all weapons, everywhere.

      I share your concerns about irresponsible ownership. My mistake earlier was in thinking that you meant "My neighbors might be able to hurt me! Oh no! I'd better take away their rights!" when in fact I think you meant something more like "I hope my dumbass next door neighbor doesn't leave his gun on the table for his kids to find before they know the safety rules."

      I share the second concern, and am utterly opposed to the first. However, I have reached the conclusion that there is no way to prevent idiots from doing something stupid and still let people protect themselves and their neighbors from the next national socialist party.

      I know that my position could result in a lot of accidents. It makes me very sad, but I see no way to avoid it- just try and let the market invent something better. For the time being, I'll stick to my guns.

      I had an interesting encounter a week or so ago. You see, I was in Wal-Mart, looking at their gun rack. (don't draw conclusions- I shop other places too). This short, stocky, latino guy kept walking back and forth and checking out the guns.

      I happened to be wearing a white shirt and tie, so the guy started talking to me, thinking I worked there. He asked me "hey, what I gotta do to get a gun?" I should note that he was pushing a stroller with twins in it, and was clearly about 20. I read the writing on the rack and told him he needed to be 18 (f

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    79. Re:Maybe you are the problem by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Illogical, hardly. There's a difference between you not understanding it and it being illogical.

      The serious vetting has to take place, as owning a gun gives someone the ability to end someone's life in a second. That power isn't for everyone. There are too many unhinged people out there. Just like we do with police, judges, pilots, soldiers and anyone else who can adversely affect anyone else in society. You are not born with the right to kill someone in seconds, if you wish. A society ceases to be a society if everyone feels the need to arm themselves.

      I'm not saying that crime can be completely removed, but a good portion of gun-related crime can be.

      When people talk about banning guns to reduce crime, people always come out with the "but they're not legal guns!" line, which is funny, as those guns were once legal, until they were stolen. If those guns weren't in the publics hands, they wouldn't have been stolen. No stolen legal guns = far far fewer illegal guns. That's not illogical, but pure logic. Go read up on "cause and effect". It's that simple. Don't say it doesn't work, as just look at the rest of the world. Places with low crime have fewer guns.

      You also have to remember that a leading factor behind the high rate of gun-related deaths is the fact that it's a convenient way to kill someone (including yourself). If you get the urge to kill someone, and you don't have a gun, it goes. If you're packing a revolver, chances are someone will get hurt. Those are facts.

      Seeing as you ended your post with "Screw you and everything that you stand for", I can see you're not in this for the logic. People like you unwittingly give my argument extra merit. thanks!

    80. Re:Maybe you are the problem by dave420 · · Score: 1
      It's very hard to grow guns in your back yard. :)

      That's the difference. Nearly all of the "illegal" guns out there were once legal. If those guns were never in public hands, they never would become illegal, hence less illegal guns.

    81. Re:Maybe you are the problem by dave420 · · Score: 1
      So, by your logic, you should be allowed a fighter jet, as you could have stopped the world trade center getting blown up. Your logic is fundamentally flawed.

      The problem with your "granny-rapist" scenario, is there's no telling you have the skills to actually do something about it. What if you iced your gran instead of the rapist? How good would that be? Exactly.

      We live in societies. Societies are there to protect us. We don't need guns, as we're not going up against bears at the 7/11, or being attacked by rabid elk on the bus.

      I never want a gun. They cause more problems than they are worth. They don't help anyone. Look at the crime in the US - if guns meant people were safer, the US would be the safest country in the world, which it clearly isn't. think about that one while you stroke your gun.

    82. Re:Maybe you are the problem by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I'm not vegan - I love steaks :-P

      I hear where you're coming from, however I don't think you're seeing the big picture. Please bear in mind I'm not arguing with you, but debating this issue. I know peoples feelings can run pretty hot over this subject :)

      Having a gun is a lot of responsibility. Police officers, soldiers and everone else who has them as part of their jobs has extensive training, and is subject to investigation every time they fire their weapon (except soldiers at war of course). Normal people don't get that training, and aren't under such scrutiny. Normal people are also less likely to come across someone who actually needs shooting. Who has the right to deem someone suitable for owning a weapon of such lethality? It certainly can't fall on that individual themselves, as it clearly affects everyone around them.

      People shouldn't need to be armed. Societies around the world have evolved beyond everyone constantly fighting for themselves, or having to defend themselves. We have police for that. We've had police for that, for years.

      And, as a matter of fact, I don't think police should be armed. If the police and normal people don't have guns, why do criminals need them? I'd be a lot happier if no-one had guns than if everyone had them. Guns kill, yet no-guns don't, so it's an easy choice.

      I'm of the opinion no-one needs to be killed, ever. If someone's tring to kill you, you only have to stop them (not kill them) to protect yourself. Criminals like that need rehabilitation, not execution.

      Maybe that's one thing you didn't think of - in the rest of the modern world it's not OK to kill anyone. No executions, nothing. For a "christian" country to be so OK with killing is hilarious.

      As for my "rambo" comment, I've interacted with plenty of armed Americans in uniform, and it's like talking to the same person - loud, arrogant, short hair, fascist attitude. Every single place I went had the same people. LAPD, airport security, immigration - all idiots with guns.

      The gun "problem" is more out of habit than rights. Americans are too used to guns to give them up. They haven't yet realised a society with no guns is a better society. After all, wouldn't you agree a society without howitzers is a better society? Or maybe chemical weapons? If people are allowed handguns, why not B2 stealth bombers, nuclear submarines, V2 rockets and flamethrowers? Does the 2nd ammendment cover those? :-P

    83. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed reading what you have to say, thanks!

      One of my primary concerns is fear. IMO, fear + firearms can be extremely dangerous. Fear tends to cloud judgment. It makes me worry about someone firing before they know the identity and nature of their target. Is that really a robber, or your kid getting a drink of water?

      Part of that concern is because I've been mistaken for a potential rapist before (Crazy old bat...) :\

      The problem with making guns available to everyone is that 'everyone' includes those who those who don't know better than to abuse a gun. I would probably support some form of mandatory training for gun owners, much like the way we require a license to drive.

      On another point, I don't think it's possible to protect freedom using force, in this day and age. Our military has training and weapons that a private citizen couldn't compete with (or afford. :)

      Look to Iraq for a perfect example. The rebels are far better armed than most Americans, yet we occupy their cities. If they have a "victory," it will be because we decide to withdraw. Had we still been using 1700s weapons, things would probably be different in Iraq.

      I believe that protecting are freedom begins now, while we still have some control of our government. Once our only option is to fight, it's probably too late to change anything.

    84. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      Your assumption that I would be arguing for the ownership of one powerful weapon but not another is untrue. I am arguing for the right of people to own whatever weapons they want. Including fighter jets.

      I'm not talking about my granny here, I'm talking about yours. Nonetheless, yeah, that would be terrible. Worse would be seeing that happen and not being able to stop it. As for skills, I am a good shot, and I'll take my chances. I would rather take that chance than be powerless.

      We live in societies. Societies are there to protect us.

      Did the society in germany in 1942 protect the jews? Did the society in cambodia in the seventies protect intellectuals?

      We don't need guns..

      Did the jews in 1942 germany (who were only alive because they hid in a basement for 2 years) need guns? Could they have used them?

      I never want a gun.

      I wonder if any jews said that in 1930.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    85. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      No, I think I understand you just fine. Your point is that:

      1. "Modern societies" have eliminated the need for weapons ownership, if there ever was such a need.
      2. People do not need guns.
      3. If normal people and cops don't have guns, criminals won't need them.
      4. Only people that have been "seriously vetted" should be allowed to own weapons.
      5. Killing someone is never justified.

      Was the weimar republic in the 1930's a "modern society"?

      After all, judges, pilots, soldiers and the like were seriously vetted. To make sure they weren't spies, murederers, jews, etc.

      How do you propose to deal with the next national socialist party, not in another country, but yours?

      If you say there won't be another, why not?

      Oh, and the second amendment to the U.S. constitution does indeed provide for the private ownership, by the people, of "arms". B2's, V2's, and flamethrowers are all clearly "arms".

      As for the cracks about my lack of ability to see logic, I see yours just fine. I think this is kind of like arguing with a kind from the middle ages would be. You say "What gives you the right to control all these people?" he says "God gave me the right." You say "Couldn't anyone say that?" he goes "No, because I'd kill them. I'm king. God me king. That gives me the right to kill anyone who says otherwise."

      See, he is being utterly logical. God made him king, and that gives him the right to do anything he wants.

      I feel like that arguing with you. I see your logic just fine. People do not have the right to own weapons, no matter what. If they disagree, kill them. People do not have the right to own weapons, and that is that. When everyone but the disarmament police is defenseless, they will naturally just give up their guns too.

      Given those axioms, I see no real way to argue with that. Hence the "Screw you and everything you stand for." I disagree totally.

      Lots and lots and lots of people have been murdered in history by their own governments and neighbors. And not ancient, history-book history, but recent history.

      There are people alive today, walking the earth, with numbers tatooed on their forearms. They were marked thus in death camps where they were to be worked as slaves until they died of exhaustion or privation or simple cruelty.

      Did the jews in bergen-belsen have the right, according to you, to kill the camp guards? How is something like the holocaust supposed to be prevented without weapons? The nazis were not convinced to stop by logic and talk of "modern societies". They stopped because people better armed and tougher and stronger came in and said "stop or die.", then killed until the germans gave up.

      I am curious. Given your logic, how should the holocaust have been stopped? (if you would have done so, given your condemnation of killing as never justified).

      And who would have been the best people to do so? The residents (jews) of germany and poland and austria, or should the people being herded into cattle cars had to rely upon the army of some foreign country, which might not have done anything?

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    86. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for splitting this into two posts. I had to run earlier.

      Regarding the M82A1: It was actually designed to destroy tanks and light armored vehicles. : )

      Unfortunatly, $7500 is a bit expensive for me as well. The Model 99 might be a better choice at $3200 or so.

    87. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      I think more training would be good.

      My problem is that word "mandatory". And "licenses". Remember that poor guy I told you about? I don't think he had time to attend a mandatory class. Or the money to do so if it was voluntary.

      Also, I have a huge problem with "licenses". I have this horrible image of these thugs showing up at a house with a checklist. "Let's see, at this location there are 2 shotguns, 3 pistols, 5 jews...". Or in having all "applications" for firearms ownership by people with islamic names being silently denied.

      This reminds me of what one other guy said. He talked about people in countries where the people are "allowed" to own weapons. Allowed by who? The people with the guns, obviously. If this is indeed a government of the people, by the people and for the people, it is the people, not the persons with the guns, who must do the allowing. The people of a country must be armed to ensure the legitimacy of it's government.

      Also, the problem with licenses and applications and such is their lack of constitutional legitimacy. Did you register your computer with the federal free speech agency? Can't have people spreading false information, you know. Who knows what anarchy we'd have if people could say anything they want! They might hurt somebody!

      The rights acknowledged in the constitution are not subject to approval by anyone else. My computer is powerful enough to break weak encryption keys. My guns can shoot through body armor. I don't see a difference.

      Once our only option is to fight, it's probably too late to change anything.

      I know. But if all guns are good for is to give a 1 in 300 chance of victory for for some freedom fighters every 400 years or so, they are worth it. And if a state gets to that point, it may indeed be too late.

      But you see, we as americans are in a special position. We can't rely on anyone but us. If the national socialits take over australia, we might help the fighters out. People being ethnically cleansed somewhere in africa (and there are, right now) can at least hope the US will show up to save the day.

      We, American citizens can rely on no help from outside. It is up to us, and us alone, to ensure the legitimacy of our government. No one can, or will, aid us.

      Once germany in got to the point where the jews went in to hiding, the jews couldn't change the system. But if every jewish family had had, say, a sten gun and 100 rounds of ammo, might the holocaust have happened? Probably. The nazis had the army, and any violent resistance would have been crushed.

      But if you had a choice as to get quietly rounded up like cattle and taken off to a death camp, or dying violently trying to resist, which would you choose? Weapons ownership, no matter how small, is the ability to try.

      It is no guarantee of success. But I'll tell you what: If thugs come on my street trying to get me or my neighbors, they'll find it most difficult.

      Which is really the point: to make it so hard for a government to enforce it's will that it is forced to justify itself through the courts.

      ====

      Yeah, I'm thinking of saving up for a model 99. They look snazzy. I was worried about the bolt action, but I just realized the thing is worthless at close range anyway- a bolt is just as good. Plus it costs half as much.

      And also, a gun in .50BMG is a much better keep-the-state-in-line weapon.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    88. Re:Maybe you are the problem by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that the majority of our people will not stand up for their rights. Even as they are robbed of their freedom they will not take a stand for fear of losing what little they have left. Until people believe that they, or those they love are going to die, I personally doubt most will fight back. :\ That goes for the Jews in pre WW2 germany as well.

      I was thinking about power, a while ago. Power comes in different forms, the main two (IMO) being strength and dependency.

      Strength is simple... If I break the law, the police step up. If they can't stop me a SWAT team gets involved. If the SWAT team fails, the military comes into play. If the military can't stop me then I have control, because I am the strongest.

      Dependency is interesting, and is more powerful than strength in my opinion. I depend on the government for protection and services. The government depends on me for taxes. The government cannot therefore, attempt to alienate the majority of it's citizens: it needs to have popular support in order to exist. If americans decided to rebel it would probably not be the majority... The majority would either be against the rebels, or unwilling to help.

      WW2 Germany did an excellent job of creating consent, by convincing it's citizens that it had their best interests in mind, that it was protecting them, and that the Jews were the cause of Germany's problems.

      Armed revolt tends to work when the rebels have outside support. I sincerely hope that if Americans ever have to revolt against our government that we would have the help of other nations.

      Regarding licenses... I don't believe that licenses should be necessary for each gun owned. I would opt more for a general class license, say: "Shotguns" "Rifles" "Automatics" and "Handguns." Owning a handgun license would permit a person to own anything from a .22 to a .50 Desert Eagle. A license would simply mean that you demonstrated the responsibility and knowledge to handle a weapon. It would not give the government specific information on what weapons you own, or that you own any at all.

      Such a system would be vague enough to make reclaiming powerful weapons from license owners about as difficult as doing a general arms search and recovery, IMO.

      Regarding your story about the man from the store... I don't think a few hours of reading and practice is too much to ask. It doesn't need to be expensive either.

      Knowledge is important, both for self defense and the safety of others. A little bit of time on a firing range as well as a basic understanding of his weapon would be very useful. How far does the shot spread? How far will it penatrate? How do I maintain this weapon?

      Time can always be made. I'm sure he has some free time he normally spends relaxing, watching TV, or with his kids. Or perhaps his wife could take responsibility for the firearm?

      It sounded like he was interested in learning. Perhaps he just needed a good reason to learn... Regardless, I think better educating gun owners is in everyone's best interests.

  120. You could... by mikael · · Score: 1

    ...wear a black suit, a black pair of sunglasses, an earphone in one ear, and a mobile phone in your hand on the opposite side. Then no-one will mess with you.

    For Winter you could wear a large thick anorak with plenty of inside pockets, and a light jacket for Summer.

    Carrying a standard sports bag with hand/should straps is probably your best way to remain inconspicuous.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  121. laptop cases by jmichaelb · · Score: 1
    I survived 18 months in Quito, Ecuador without any major losses. I had to carry my laptop and other gear daily through some areas that are not totally safe.

    The best hiding places are always in plain sight - make the item look worthless and nobody will want it. IMHO, the most important rule is to avoid using a laptop case when in unsafe areas.

    Thieves know exactly what laptop cases look like and they are very easy to swipe (the thieves run by and grab the strap which is usually just hanging on your shoulder). You can find laptop cases disguised as a regular backpack - these offer the protection of a laptop case without alerting the thieves (the one I use is made by Jansport). Plus, backpacks are difficult to steal - someone would actually have to mug you, which is relatively unlikely. Of course, spend awhile roughing it up to make it look like nothing valuable would be put in it. If nobody wants it, nobody will steal it.

  122. Oh, don't you just love ignorant ACs? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    You seem to be assuming that those things are illegal everywhere. They're not. Making sure you don't get in trouble for carrying self defense tools is a good idea. Telling people that any offensive weapon is obviously illegal is just trolling.

    No, I'm assuming nothing. I'm simply answering the question that's being asked about improving personal security in London.

    Why London? Well, the Ask Slashdot question refers to London. In fact, as I personally know the Ask Slashdotter in question (If you're reading this, CGP, hi. I'll see you on Thursday and I'll bring the DVD), I know he's referring to London, UK as opposed to any other London. And, as I know the law of the land, I'm giving specific advice that relates to his situation. Forgive me, but I has assumed that was the whole point of posting an Ask Slashdot question.

    It's a fact that possession of an offensive weapon (eg, a knife) without a legitimate reason for possession (eg, you've just bought it, or you're a chef carrying your tools from A to B) is a criminal offense in the UK. You may not have known that but now you do.

    So, although you may believe that "telling people that any offensive weapon is obviously illegal is just trolling", in this case, it isn't "just trolling", it's just answering the damn question.

    Now, Mr. I-Think-I-Know-It-All-But-Actually-I-Don't AC, go waste your time bugging someone else.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Oh, don't you just love ignorant ACs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bit of a hot-head, aren't we?

    2. Re:Oh, don't you just love ignorant ACs? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      bit of a hot-head, aren't we?

      Bit of an idiot who's too dumb to tell when he's lost the argument, aren't we?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Oh, don't you just love ignorant ACs? by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Quite right.
      Also, the key is don't escalate. In the UK you are unlikely to be mugged by a gun weilding mugger. In the UK most criminals don't carry guns as a matter of routine, instead, most guns are used in gangland killings or to settle personal scores.

    4. Re:Oh, don't you just love ignorant ACs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *BAM*

  123. i think of the used value, as i give them up by nukitsuke · · Score: 1

    I can replace my ipod on ebay for $80.
    My palm pilot is maybe $100
    Really, on any of my toys its the data that i value the most. Maybe you could buy everything used in the first place.
    Living in the city, thats how i have to think about my car. Used and Replaceable.

  124. I'm sure most of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had it happen to you in High School. Just do whatever you did back then.

  125. I bet the best way to protect a labtop would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to carry this powerbook around.

  126. A gun? LONDON by Overand · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A lot of people are suggesting this guy carry a gun. Not all countries allow this, and he specifically said he's from LONDON. England isn't exactly too keen on its citizens carrying firearms around. But oh, silly me, I forgot. There are no countries other than the US. ALL HAIL BUSH!

  127. London is paradise. by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1, Informative

    To get mugged in London you really have to ask for it. Although muggers are respectful and tend to only mug teens (for mobiles, etc) - but rarely adults! So as far as I know mugging here is rare. Unless you walk flashing an iPOD or open up the lastest laptop on notorious areas such as Stockwell (I almost got mugged there when young but screamed for attention of by-passers and the guy handed my stuff back), Peckham, Slough, Hackney, New Cross .. etc (you get the idea).
    In London you can wear wrist-watches, cool jackets and even golden necklace without fear! When it comes to serious mugging you should try Sao Paulo, Brazil - now THAT is a place that begs you being very street-wise. I use to dress-down so badly when I was last there - the muggers not only avoided me, but ran in fear of being mugged themselves :P .. Never had problems there but then again never did those obvious mistakes. Last thing shave your hair - its amazing how people avoid you when you look like a psycho skin-head.

  128. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Frenchies are a "significant power" in one place and one place only: their own minds.

    Standing army, anyone?

    Look. Bitch about the US all you want but the free world is counting on our power to get their asses out of a sling. Why? Well, because we've used it to do just that -- at no small cost to ourselves (in the form of the lives of our fathers, grandfathers, ...) -- more than once.

    Keep your brie/wine/August-off-work/socialized medicine to yourself.

    We do just fine here, thanks.

  129. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP

  130. Excuuuuuse Meeeee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Steve Martin would suggest a staged program
    leading through more and more smelly bodily
    functions. Muggers may not want a laptop that
    smells THAT bad.

  131. facts? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    London, along with Paris, are now the crime capitals of the Western world.

    I will believe that when you post a link with the numbers.

    I have friends from europe, they have never ever heard of a drive by. I knew someone who was killed in one; dropping off his date, from the wrong part of town, at the wrong time...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  132. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    England is probably not the best place to be carrying a firearm, as you'd probably have to do it illegally. Does anyone know the laws there concerning knives or other types of concealed weapons?

  133. Backpack for the laptop by Agent000 · · Score: 1

    At the start of this school year, I faced a similar predicament, knowing that I would be commuting with public transit for about 2 hours each day, through downtown and whatnot. I bought a Targus backpack that is designed for laptops (http://www.targus.com/ca/cases_notebook_backpacks .asp). Cost me about $90CDN, but it is a nice quality backpack, and does not give away the fact that I am carrying a laptop (like your average messenger bag-type laptop case might).

    Although my medium sized city is not really know for crime, I certainly have not gotten mugged yet. (except perhaps by HP Service, but that's another story altogether :)

  134. .45 ACP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add a 1911 to your backpack and learn how to use it :-P

  135. Easy. just go along with it !. by Retep+Vosnul · · Score: 0

    Thug : Gimme that..
    Me : Okee man, chill. you know what these are ?
    Thug : Dunnut care, gimme !
    Me : Okee , but realize this is a 30Gig Ipod and new G4 1Ghz iBook loaded with nice stuff.
    Thug : .. , Yeah yeah gimme.
    Me : You seem to know your stuff, let me show you expose come here.
    Thug : Ehh i..
    Me : Look I move the cursor here and ... TADA ..
    Thug : ....
    Me : and and just look at this , It's iTunes.
    Thug : .. Goh.. ehh
    Me : Look I plug in the Ipod .. there. pick a song..
    Thug : ehh..
    Me : go ahead pick one.
    Thug : . ehh ba ba
    Me : Yeah . Bad to the bone .. good one.
    Thug : .. Just gi..
    Me : Here An iSight and Imovie and Hey Say something ..
    Thug : Hi mom..
    Me : Good, and now a effect and There your face all over the Net. Nice Hotspot here.
    Thug : Hot spot ?
    Me : You want a new user account ? Look how you can switch !. Want FileVault ? Very secure !.
    Thug : Ga.. Frrpp
    Me : And here I just insert a new line of code and the compiler compiles it on the go and the new result is shown instantly !. Cool huh !.
    Thug : Fllprrrr. Kgg kgg .. IiiiIIII Nik Nik.
    Me : And You can just DROP into a shell , complete *nix environment. Look I just FTP'ed your picture to SpyMac !.
    Thug : ... Ga ggGGrrrr GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK aAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGG,

    HEY !!!!!!. WAIT. I still have to show you that you can still... use ... MS office ...... on ...
    a.. Mmm.

    Strange. O well, lets try it at a railroad station!

    --
    -- forget /. It's gone.
    1. Re:Easy. just go along with it !. by tcr · · Score: 1

      Hmm... more like :

      Me : Okee man, chi...

      THUD.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  136. Re:Pack a 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To quote those dirty Russians off Hitman 2 - "He's Pukking! (Packing)"

  137. Re:Get a gun by zulux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think anyone I know knows anyone who's been mugged...


    FWIW... England and France both have higher crime rates than either Canada or America.

    More info from England herself Here

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  138. Bummer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Does this mean that, if you are attacked by a French man, the government of your country cannot declare war on France? Bummer.

    1. Re:Bummer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Your country can't declare war on France,
      but France can surrender to your country. :)

    2. Re:Bummer. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      if you are attacked by a French man, the government of your country cannot declare war on France?

      Who needs a reason to declare war? Just make one up. And when that is laughed down, make something else up. By that point the war has started. Sounds all too familiar...

  139. Paranoia by x3ro · · Score: 1

    If you think you're going to be mugged, you're more likely to be. Chill out -- you'll be fine.

    --
    [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
  140. Re:Get a gun by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

    Wow, that sucks. I've never been mugged. I don't even know anyone whose been mugged.... I don't think anyone I know knows anyone who's been mugged... /Canadian

    A friend of mine was mugged and subsequently beaten (to death) on his way home from the mall. He had made a number of large purchases (clothes, shoes, the usual) and was jumped by 4 guys. He was walking with a guy who got scared and ran away while the attackers murdered my friend .. and for what, a pair of shoes?

    This is in Southern Ontario.. and it can happen to you. I agree with the other advice in this thread, mostly the look like you're in your element, know where you're going and what you're doing. I will add 2 more pieces of advice:

    - If doing any kind of heavy shopping, make sure you have a ride home.

    - Don't even so much as look the wrong way at anyone wearing a Blue or Red (particularly Red) bandana...

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  141. Eastpak by Novelty+Act · · Score: 1

    do a nice line in bags that have padded laptop compartments but don't look like laptop bags. I tried to get my workplace to get some a while back, but then I left.

  142. better by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Better a live serf than a dead cowboy?

    More seriously, I would never even consider moving somewhere where any fool can legally carry a concealed firearm. I spent a couple of years in the OTC when I was at Uni and can handle a firearm because I was trained to. I know how much training it takes to even attain the standard I reached. Your country seems to allow people to carry guns without any training at all.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:better by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting twist on the realities of the situation.

      Consider : your assertion is that the (unarmed) serf is less likely to come to harm than the (armed) cowboy.

      How is it you're coming to this conclusion? Why do the police carry weapons? Why do we have militaries? Is it only a matter of training that differentiates between those who should be allowed and those should be disallowed to carry firearms? If yes - well then why not allow everyone to get the training and then carry? If no - maybe you ought to do a little more research on the definition of 'serf'.

      The Magna Carta was a big step in the right direction of getting rid of the distinction between the priveleged and 'the rest of us'. Not trusting people to defend themselves is a bad step in the other direction. 'Guns' are only the tip of the iceberg of self defense issues in the UK - the situation is far worse than simply not being able own a pistol.

    2. Re:better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So live in freedom or lack there of? depends on the person i would guess. But most people i dont think have a clue as to what it takes to maintain actual freedom

    3. Re:better by yhetti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you're missing is that the average person who has a concealed carry permit (like myself) has been shooting for years. In my case, I'm 21 now and I got my first gun as a gift when I was 8. My family may be a little more gun-nutty than most (in fact, I was an internationa revolover champion when I was 14) but the fact remains that for "real" Americans, firearms are part of the culture. It's only in the last 20-30 years that guns became "bad". My father used to take his newest rifle to high school to show his friends. Blame liberals : )

    4. Re:better by Lobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Better a live serf than a dead cowboy?

      I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by six!

      --

      -------
      Bite Me Fanboy!!
    5. Re:better by Ithika · · Score: 1
      Nice one (I have mod points but I have far too much to say elsewhere in this conversation to use them).

      But thank you for that anyway. Unfortunately it's 15 where I live, not 12, but the sentiment is the same. (The idea is that there's always going to be a majority with an odd number...)

    6. Re:better by chewy_fruit_loop · · Score: 1

      "Why do the police carry weapons?" because the scum they have to deal with sometimes do, in the UK the armed police are a special division, normal officers carry pepper spray and a baton, a lot less lethal than your average American cop carrying a semi auto pistol.
      "Why do we have militaries?" because we live in countries that have differing opinions on how to live. if we all agreed on everything it might be more peaceful but we would be living in a different world, unfortunately we're all human here.... nearly.

      Magna Carta was a step in the right direction for the nobility. It was basically to stop the king for demanding war tax and service whenever he felt like it.
      a serf is someone who is in effect owned by the lord of the manor. in effect a slave. they work for the lord, they pay their wages directly to the lord (yes thats the right way around) and the lord can demand that they work for him for free for up to 6 days a week (something like that).
      brining all these historical references into a discussion is all well and fine, if you know the basis of them.

      let the flames ensue........

    7. Re:better by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      That's exactly right. In our (Western) civilization, we theoretically make no distinction between those at the top and those at the bottom.

      When government officials and 'powerful' people like Oprah, Rosie O'Donnell, and other wealthy people can afford to have submachinegun-armed security, but it is illegal for me to take a baseball bat to someone coming at me with a knife - there's a problem. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as we like to say in the US, begins with life. If it is illegal to defend my life with all I can bring to bear, then yes, I am for all intents and purposes a tax-paying serf.

    8. Re:better by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Informative
      I would never, ever consider moving somewhere where I couldn't. It just demonstrates a government's utter contempt for its citizenry. I guess we'll never be neighbors.

      As an aside, do you know how often concealed carry permit holders commit crimes compared to the rest of the population? Hardly ever. While there's not much data on actual firearms crimes committed by CCW permit holders, there is data on revocation percentages. Since permits are revoked upon conviction for any violent crime, with or without a firearm, as well as many other reasons firearms crimes are merely a subset of that already small percentage. That percentage? .5%. One half of one percent. (Accoring to this article)

    9. Re:better by scott_evil · · Score: 0

      It's 12 in Australia. There's no such thing as a majority vote either. You either have a full consensus or in extreme circumstances a 10 to 2 majority will be accepted. Being convicted by a slim majority such as 8/7 which I assume would be possible with 15 jurors as you've suggested would be a travesty of justice. If there's enough doubt in the jury for half the people to have a differing opinion it's time for a retrial...

    10. Re:better by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would never, ever consider moving somewhere where I couldn't. It just demonstrates a government's utter contempt for its citizenry. I guess we'll never be neighbors.

      Actually, it demonstrates the British government's utter consideration it has for its citizens. Neither you, nor you gun, will ever move to London.

      And when your nearest major city can get its gun related murders in a week down to England's yearly total for the whole country, then the English might start to believe the claims that a prevalence of firearms make the place safer.

    11. Re:better by bfields · · Score: 1
      Since permits are revoked upon conviction for any violent crime, with or without a firearm, as well as many other reasons firearms crimes are merely a subset of that already small percentage. That percentage? .5%. One half of one percent.

      .5% annually would be an extremely high percentage for violent crimes, so I don't think that number in itself is very useful. It'd be interesting to see more detailed statistics on those revocations.

    12. Re:better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per the FBI, in 2002 there were 1,426,325 violent offenders in the United States. That was a rate of 494.6 per 100,000. Divide by 1,000, that's .4946/100, or about 0.5%. 2002 was, of course, near the bottom of a percipitous violent crime drop. In 2001, the number was 504.4/100,000 and 2002's number is a 12.9% decline from 1998.

    13. Re:better by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      I would never, ever consider moving somewhere where I couldn't. It just demonstrates a government's utter contempt for its citizenry. I guess we'll never be neighbors.

      Quoth Homer; Do you want the King of England to come here and push you around? Do you? Huh? Do you?

      How often do you and your compatriots use your firearms to defend yourselves against, or otherwise duly influence your government? (You did well against the Patriot Act and DMCA; I must commend you)

      Now ask how often firearms are used against your fellow citizens. Your friends. Your neighbors. Your family.

      Seems to me that the 2nd amendment (an antiquity of your constitution) is just an excuse to arm yourselves against your neighbors of whom you are so afraid.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    14. Re:better by Qacker · · Score: 0
      You don't understand what the Second Amendment is about:

      Its a way to halt the spread of tyrany from the government. Taking away a populations arms always leads to mass killing and brutal rule. For england it may happen 100 years from now; but it will happen. This is why we Americans know the importance of bearing arms. Even if crime rate was to increase as more citizens carry guns(tip: it goes down) it would be a small price to pay for Liberty.

      ESR knows the importance of Liberty; why don't you?

      "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."

      -- James Madison, The Federalist Papers

      I could show you many more quotes from the founding fathers but just from this one the meaning of the second ammendment is clear!

      All gun control laws are Unconstitional!

      --
      Learn lisp today!
    15. Re:better by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by six!

      This old saying, often featured in gansta rap songs like Fabulous' Respect and X-Raided's Trial by Fury, tries to portray situations as a black and white binary opposition in which defense is a necessary action, when rather the supposed (and likely debatable) life-or-death situation could be avoided with a decrease in the proliferation of weapons altogether! Regardless, it will take a lot more than slogans to convince me that killing a man is the right thing to do in ANY situation.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    16. Re:better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or...

      If it ever comes down to a choice between you or them, send flowers.

    17. Re:better by Draeven · · Score: 1

      Consider this. I work as a cashier, and luckily enough for me, I've never been the one with a gun pointed at me being told to hand over all the cash in the register.
      But it's happened at my grocery store twice now.

      Do you honestly think that guy with the gun pointed at that cashier's head had a permit for that firearm? Yeah, right.

      The true meaning of the statement, "Make it a crime to carry a gun, and only criminals will carry guns" is not that people will become criminals by maintaining their guns. It means that the only people with guns will be those who intend to use them for criminal acts in the first place.

    18. Re:better by bfields · · Score: 1
      Per the FBI, in 2002 there were 1,426,325 violent offenders in the United States. That was a rate of 494.6 per 100,000. Divide by 1,000, that's .4946/100, or about 0.5%. 2002 was, of course, near the bottom of a percipitous violent crime drop. In 2001, the number was 504.4/100,000 and 2002's number is a 12.9% decline from 1998.

      That's the number of violent crimes reported to the FBI, which is likely more than the number of offenders, which is in turn more than the number of *convictions*, which is I believe what is relevant for revocations. The page you quote says the number of arrests in the same year was a little less than half the above number; presumably the number of convictions was less again. So the number of convictions of violent crime in that year was less than a quarter of a percent. Thus the fact that a given population has a rate of conviction of violent crimes of less than half a percent doesn't mark that population as unusual.

    19. Re:better by bfields · · Score: 1
      Consider this. I work as a cashier, and luckily enough for me, I've never been the one with a gun pointed at me being told to hand over all the cash in the register. But it's happened at my grocery store twice now. Do you honestly think that guy with the gun pointed at that cashier's head had a permit for that firearm? Yeah, right. The true meaning of the statement, "Make it a crime to carry a gun, and only criminals will carry guns" is not that people will become criminals by maintaining their guns. It means that the only people with guns will be those who intend to use them for criminal acts in the first place.

      I'm not completely sure I understand what point you're trying to make, or how it relates to the above discussion of ccw revocations as an indicator of rates of violent crimes by ccw permit holders.

      Are you arguing that whithholding of licenses will not reduce the availability of guns to criminals?

      That's not clear to me. It may be true that people who hold up grocery stores don't usually have permits to carry guns, but that doesn't necessarily mean that withholding such permits would have no effect on the availability of such guns to such people. It seems likely, for example, that a significant number of such guns could be obtained from other criminals who make it their business to buy, sell, and/or steal guns that were originally obtained legitimately.

      I haven't studied the problem at all, and can't quote any statistics; I'm just pointing out that if this is what you're trying to prove, then you need a more sophisticated argument than "guys who hold up grocery stores probably don't have ccw licenses."

      *Any* restriction on the availability of firearms is likely to lead to *some* decrease in availability (equivalantly, increase in price) of guns to criminals. I imagine that the argument you'd want to make would be that this decrease in availability is outweighed by other advantages of more permissive licensing. It would require a more detailed study of the problem to determine how such an argument would work out.

      --Bruce Fields

    20. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If it is illegal to defend my life with all I can bring to bear, then yes, I am for all intents and purposes a tax-paying serf.

      Step it up to rocket-propelled weapons. If my attacker has a tank, they would be necessary. That does not mean I am a serf for not being allowed to possess one. (FYI, I am pro-gun, but I don't think this is the best argument for it).

    21. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > it will take a lot more than slogans to convince me that killing a man is the right thing to do in ANY situation.

      and it will take a lot more than just opinions to convince me that your opinion is correct. IMO, the big problem with life-or-death situations is not that guns make it a bit easier, but that the people feel the need to enter into them at all.

    22. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > > It just demonstrates a government's utter contempt for its citizenry.
      > it demonstrates the British government's utter
      consideration it has for its citizens.

      It does neither. Gun control does one thing. It takes the power of decision out of the hands of the people, and makes the equally (or more) fallible government their stand-in parents. The power of decision is what freedom is all about. That is one good reason why guns are not banned in the U.S. The same applies to drug policy. The government wants us to believe that we are thinking for ourselves, while making sure we don't think "the wrong things". The problem is that they just attempt to manipulate us in other ways, primarily propaganda & flat-out lies -- and that is both primary parties (and some "3rd" parties too, probably).

      > Neither you, nor you gun, will ever move to London.

      So, you believe you should have the right to judge whether a person can move to your country based on his political beliefs? In that case, neither you, nor your bad teeth will ever move to New York. Of course, I don't believe that you have bad teeth, nor that you will ever come to the U.S., but what gives me the right to say you can't come here? The same right you have to say he can't go there. That is up for your country's immigration bureau to decide, not you.

      As an aside, I don't believe the government controls the media. The media makes money by promoting fear, so they are doing what the government wants, but not by force. They have the same goal -- keep people focused on anything but important issues.

    23. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > that doesn't necessarily mean that withholding such permits would have no effect on the availability of such guns to such people

      Umm, actually, yes it does. If they aren't getting permits, and the only new restriction you impose is making permits harder to get, then the number of people carrying without permit actually goes up -- they are still carrying, just not bothering to try for a permit. As if they would have before...

      > Are you arguing that whithholding of licenses will not reduce the availability of guns to criminals?

      I'm not the poster, but I feel confident that that is exactly what he means. Guns that are used consistently in crimes are generally stolen. The black market for guns would make them more valuable, but for people who are intent on carrying them, it would not be hard. You know supply & demand? As soon as guns are banned, demand skyrockets. Prices rise, and more violence occurs as a result of people wanting them much more, especially in "organized" crime. The underground arms market becomes huge, insanely tense, and very hostile.

    24. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > How often do you and your compatriots use your firearms to defend yourselves against, or otherwise duly influence your government?

      That is not the point. The point is that the government would have more power over the people if the people have no way to retaliate. If we were using guns to counteract things like PATRIOT, then you would be perfectly right in banning them. The fact that no one was shot because of it (bring on the baseless cries of military abusers) proves that we AREN'T ready to jump up and shoot anyone!

      > Now ask how often firearms are used against your fellow citizens. Your friends. Your neighbors. Your family.

      Never. Not the answer you were looking for, but it's the truth. You seem to have this idea that everyone in the U.S. owns a gun, or at least there's one on every block. There isn't. Where I live, there may be, but I live in what would probably be considered a "hick" area -- There are a lot of hunters, but they teach their children gun safety from a young age, and keep them locked away (the guns, not the kids:). They also eat what they hunt; they don't just kill a deer, chop off its head or antlers and let the rest of it rot in the field. Many of them butcher the animals & donate the meat to places like soup kitchens if it is too much for them & their families to use in a timely manner.

      Gun owners aren't barbarous, ignorant heathens -- they are people just like like you and I (I am not a gun owner, nor will I probably ever own one). If they get into an argument, they don't think about killing someone any more than we would. In fact, they may be LESS likely to kill someone than if they hadn't learned how to use one responsibly from an early age.

      Where my ideals and my reason conflict, however, is in cities. There is no reason to own a gun inside a city. However, these people have the right & ability to go hunting somewhere else, so simply banning guns in cities isn't viable either. They could keep them in some other town, but that's an unreasonable burden just to keep an unused gun out of an urban area.

    25. Re:better by bfields · · Score: 1
      > that doesn't necessarily mean that withholding such permits would have no effect on the availability of such guns to such people

      Umm, actually, yes it does. If they aren't getting permits, and the only new restriction you impose is making permits harder to get, then the number of people carrying without permit actually goes up -- they are still carrying, just not bothering to try for a permit. As if they would have before...

      You're saying that the number of guns available to criminals carrying guns will go up for the trivial reason that if everyone currently carrying a gun continues to regardless of more restrictive licensing, then more people will be classified as criminals. Well, OK, but I don't think that's what we're interested in: we're interested in the availability of guns to people who intend to commit violent crimes with them. You could argue that a further criminalization of gun ownership will cause some current peaceful gun owners to become violent criminals; perhaps, but I find it hard to believe that effect would be large.

      Ignoring that effect and assuming the supply of violent gun-desiring criminals to be constant, the change in licensing is likely to restrict somewhat the availability of guns because, even if the criminals themselves don't care about the licensing, the people who they're stealing them from may, and hence the supply of stealable guns may be restricted.

      Guns that are used consistently in crimes are generally stolen. The black market for guns would make them more valuable, but for people who are intent on carrying them, it would not be hard. You know supply & demand? As soon as guns are banned, demand skyrockets.
      Woah, think about this carefully. You're arguing that a decrease in supply (banning guns), leads to an increase of prices, which you describe as an increase in "demand". This isn't the way the terms "supply" and "demand" are used in classical economics. The econ 101 argument would be that when supply decreases, people willing to pay more will do so and others will drop out of the market.

      Depending on the inelasticity of the demand, it may be that a high proportion of the people buying guns may be willing to pay much higher prices (and/or to take much higher risks) in order to buy the same quantity of guns.

      It's not obvious to me why that proprtion must be one hundred percent (equivalently, why the demand for guns must be completely inelastic).

    26. Re:better by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You're saying that the number of guns available to criminals carrying guns will go up

      Geez, you are wrong in the first sentence. Read what I said, not what you want me to say. Basically, what I said was:
      1) There are a set number of guns out there. Hell, an increasing number
      2) X% of them (probably X >90) have permits
      3) That means (100-X)% (10?) are illegal
      4) You reduce the number of permits, and therefore the percent of guns without a matching permit goes up. See?

      > we're interested in the availability of guns to people who intend to commit violent crimes with them

      If someone can obtain something legally, they can obtain it illegally, so in a sense, that is not at all what we should be interested in. We should be interested in making these people not want to use those "illegal" guns.

      > You could argue that a further criminalization of gun ownership will cause some current peaceful gun owners to become violent criminals

      You are putting words in my mouth, I said nothing remotely close to that.

      > others will drop out of the market.

      When you are talking about (dedicated) criminals, however, they don't "drop out" of the market, they go to another source. Such as killing someone they know DOES have a gun -- like another gang, the POLICE, whoever.

      Removing guns from the hands of law-abiding citizens and "common" criminals could lower the instances of things like gunpoint holdups, where the armed person rarely has any intention of shooting, they just need some intimidation to convince the other person to hand over the moolah. These could be done with sharp sticks, but certainly wouldn't carry the same threat of death as a gun, and they know it. What WOULD increase is organized crime, gangs, etc. who can either afford to buy them, or have the resources to steal them.

  143. move by zogger · · Score: 1

    Seriously, just move. there is no joy in living scared like that.I was an urban geek for around 15 years, finally I just said ENOUGH and moved back to the country. I've had my fill of crack heads and winos and breakins and near muggings. Had an attempted carjacking before, too. Screw it, just move. MUCH nicer in the rural areas. Yes, you trade off some alleged "convenience",like there's no deli on the corner, but you get a trade of having your own big garden and chickens maybe. Stuff like that. You gain a lot, especially in "security". It's not perfect, but a heckuva lot bettah. Crime rates are orders of magnitude lower. You know your neighbors, they know you. They know what you drive, you know what they drive, any strange vehicles at someones house get noticed. If you are out walking around at night you might run into a possum or racoon or a rabbit, etc (or whatever ya'all got over in englande), but no muggers. It's not perfect, but try it anyway. You might be surprised how *nice* it is. And guess what, you CAN still be a geek! Nuthin stoppin ya!

  144. Re:Not a problem here by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    what makes him or any one else with a firearm any different then a police officer that carries a firearm? Here in order to get a CC license you have to go through the exact same background checks as well as fire arm traning as the police do.

    Would you be including the police in the same situation? will thier guns be taken away from them and used on them the first time they use them? I would like to know how you "feel" about law enforcment carrying verses the general public with the exact same training and doing well at the target range.

  145. Walk Without Music by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got an iPod, but I almost NEVER use it while walking. I tend to use it exclusively on the train or at work.

    While walking, or for that matter cycling, I prefer to be tuned-into my surroundings.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Walk Without Music by Squirrley · · Score: 0

      Not listening to music is a lot safer, from the not getting run over by the renegade car angle, especially when cycling.

      --
      Go on, be afraid. Encourage the terrorists
  146. Re:its all about the accessories QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think your 9mm is going to get stuck in all that fat before you're able to take care of any business.

  147. well he did ask in the article by cyrax777 · · Score: 2

    t. So I would like to know what my fellow urban geeks do to try and keep their valuables safe while traveling with them. and I answered it with what I do.

  148. Laptop Case by oob · · Score: 1

    I use an inconspicuous nylon Laptop/Notebook Backpack manufactured by Targus but carry smaller gadgets in internal pockets so I don't lose everything if my backpack is ripped off me.

    Most of the tech shops on Tottenham Court road sell these for baqckpacks for about 50 quid.

  149. Theft - Insurance by BMIComp · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was going to europe a few weeks ago, and having heard about several friends' cameras being stolen, I was really worried about my new Nikon D70 camera. I called up my insurance company, and asked them if there was any way I could insure my camera, and they said I could insure my $1500 camera for $30/year, which I did. So, regardless of where I have my camera, if something happens to it, being my fault or someone elses, it is covered under this insurance, which is called scheduled personal property . I don't know if they do it for smaller items, but if you have anything that's quite expensive, you might want to look into this.

    Oh, and by the way, I'm back from europe, and my camera is fine. =)

    1. Re:Theft - Insurance by RogerWilco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Europe is quite a save place, a lot less murder/robbery etc. as in the USA on average AFAIK.
      But we do get a lot of tourists, and all the mayor tourist attractions have a high pick-pocketing rate.

      - Tourists tend to stand out from the crowd (both clothing and sound (another language)
      - Their attention is focused on other things
      - They are not at home in the surrounding and therefore less able to spot something out of the ordinairy
      - Most tourists are comparitively wealthy ( they were able to travel and finance their accomodation)
      - tourists carry around expensive equipement (camera's)
      - tourists have a lot of money on them because the had to change their currency for the local one.

      A few tips I have found usefull when visiting other countries:
      - Dress like the local popupation, no shorts/t-shirt, when everybody wears a long sleeved shirt and long trousers.
      - have two wallets, one reachable with a little money, that you use when in public, and one with your passport/main stash of money, that you cary on your body beneath your clothes.
      - learn some of the local language. Being able to order your beer and pay in the local language makes a huge difference in how much you pay in a lot of places. And you do not stand out from the crown so much. And if you are lost in some african city, it helps a lot if you can ask directions (it did for me).
      - Walk like you know where you are going. Do not have maps visible on you.
      - Do not have your valuables in sight. Use a lockable backpack in preference to a shoulder bag, as it can not be grabbed as easily.

      Even with a different skin colour, if you look like you belong somewhere you are a lot less likely to become a target IMHO.

      OT.
      Oh and one last thing to think about: a lot of people in poor countries tend to think all western people are increadibly rich, because the only ones that they see are the ones that could afford the 14 day african safari with ***** service.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    2. Re:Theft - Insurance by Kvan · · Score: 1
      Use a lockable backpack in preference to a shoulder bag, as it can not be grabbed as easily.

      Or just wear the shoulder bag with the strap across your body, which is safer than a backpack since you can see your bag.

      --

      "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
      - 'K' in Men in Black.

    3. Re:Theft - Insurance by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      This does not prevent the method where they cut the strap, that's why I suggested a backback, it has at least two straps (and probably thicker/stronger too). It should be locked, but thes so should your shoulder bag, as the thief will try to steal it when you're distracted, so your eyes are not on the bag.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  150. 3 tips by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1 - Data backup. Your data is probably the most valuable thing on the equipment you carry. Back it up so you don't lose it. Encrypt it so no one else can get it if they do get your equipment.

    2 - Insurance. No matter what happens, a good insurance policy is going to be your best defense. Damage, theft, whatever, insurance can cover it.

    3 - Go armed. You may need permits, and it may be illegal in many places, but if you're serious about self defense, you should arm yourself. Criminals by and large do NOT expect to find their target armed, and if they see that you are will more than likely seek another target.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  151. Weapons by LRdM · · Score: 1

    Really big gun. Or in this case, really big knife.

  152. Store your stuff in a nondescript backpack by anglete · · Score: 1

    I use a standard backpack (you know, the type college students wear :P) with one of these to protect my laptop. It looks like im a student carying around books or a binder. Nothing suspicious. I've never had a problem.

  153. Re:Get a gun by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
    What I would like to know is, why was this marked as troll?

    There are many, many liberals on Slashdot and they've been taught to believe guns can only be used by bad people to kill good people. I see it everyday and it's quite funny to see people who on one hand will demand that we defend their right to the first ammendment, yet would love to eliminate the second. It's very strange. I guess the liberal slant comes with the territory though so if you want to read "geek" news then you have to be stereotyped as a tree-hugging hippie as well.

  154. but by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    fortunately a lot fewer than if guns were legal.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  155. No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What you want to do is to carry all your gadgets in a diaper bag. Yes, I'm serious. This is a time-tested technique. Nobody wants to steal a baby-blue or pink cute little bag full of shit.

  156. Re:Get a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fundamental difference is that in Europe people don't fear the state. The state is something that they have selected and is there to look after them, provide healthcare etc. In the US the state is seen as a negative force mainly because all it does is provide an alphabet soup of agencies who send armed agents out to meddle in the lives of the people.

    France has a standing army and a nuclear deterrent, and any nation with a permanent seat on the UN security council is a "relatively significant power".

    Now, while i'm not in favour of just handing all our sovereignty over to the EU, I'd rather Britain were a founder member of the US of E than just another state in the US of A.

  157. Glock makes nice ipod accessories by xtal · · Score: 1

    Move to a state that allows concealed carry. Learn to use your weapon appropriately.. I live in Canada where it's not a concern, but if I moved to the USA, this would be high on my list of priorities.

    YMMV.

    --
    ..don't panic
  158. Behaving erratically? by 3770 · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that behaving erratically could get you out of a tight spot.

    Now, this is only my personal theory. But what would a mugger do, if you ignore him, take your shirt off and start singing the national anthem.

    He will surely be confused. That much is for sure.

    What I haven't figured out yet (and I'm not trying to make a joke here) is, whether he will then leave you alone, or kill you.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    1. Re:Behaving erratically? by Guido+del+Confuso · · Score: 1

      Penn Jillete (of Penn & Teller) once related a story in one of his books wherein he used a milkshake for self defense. He had stopped to eat in a little greasy spoon in the middle of nowhere, and he managed to get into a little altercation with a couple of truck drivers. Basically, they told him he had a choice: he could step outside and they'd beat his ass for him, or he could stay in the diner and they'd beat his ass for him anyway. So, he picked up the milkshake he was drinking and poured it all over his head. The truckers were so confused (and, at that point, probably fairly reluctant to get all sticky) that they just backed off and left.

  159. fat? by Piranhaa · · Score: 0

    Just workout... Get contacts, wear your pants lower, don't tuck your shirt in!

  160. Martial Arts by archnerd · · Score: 1

    Learn a martial art, ideally something well suited for multiple adversaries such as Tae Kwon Do. Muggers are cowards - give them any doubt that they have the upper hand and they're likely to get scared off. Knives can be taken away from an unskilled adversary pretty easily.

    If you live in a state with permissive gun control laws and don't live on a university campus, then packing heat might be an even better solution, but that's presently outside my realm of experience.

    1. Re:Martial Arts by Yremogtnom · · Score: 1

      I've studied Taekwondo for a few years, and in that tme I've learned that one of the things muggers (thugs) seek is an easy target.

      You don't need to know martial arts... just act confident in yourself, and keep an eye on what's going on around you. You'll not look like an easy target.

      --
      You are alone in the world.
  161. To prevent iPod theft, purchase .357 magnum. by C-Diddy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh wait, you can't carry in the UK, thanks to your brilliant politicians who have decided that law-abiding citizens do not require such protections. That's why London now has a higher crime rate than NYC, and muggings continue to skyrocket. Me out.

    --
    "Me fail English? That's unpossible." - Ralph
    1. Re:To prevent iPod theft, purchase .357 magnum. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      *Imagines Leicester sq. on a saturday night around 3am with _everyone_ packing guns and booze*

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:To prevent iPod theft, purchase .357 magnum. by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      We don't require "such protections" because the vast majority of our criminals are not carrying guns. Especially since being arrested with a gun carrys a 5 year sentence on its own, no criminal is going to risk doubling a 5 year sentence for mugging by using a gun. Most guns in criminal hands in the UK are used to settle personal scores and vendettas.

  162. I was never mugged-until I forgot my own advice by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was walking home with a friend in the University district of Seattle. We had been drinking and were in a good mood. Both of us looked like the sort of scruffy characters who wouldn't have squat on them. Because I felt safe a.) because I was with a friend, and b.) because Seattle in general, and especially the U district are usually crime-free, I didn't follow my own advice. I wasn't paying attention to my environment. Six big guys jumped us. The biggest jumped out from behind a bush, leading with a fist full of quarters right to my face. I was wearing glass glasses, and a shard of glass went clean through my left eye, completely destroying it.

    Ironically, neither my friend nor I had any money on us.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I was never mugged-until I forgot my own advice by taernim · · Score: 2, Informative

      That really sucks, but the U District has the second highest crime rate, second only to parts of Central.

      While many college kids are "poor college kids"... just as many are wealthy kids sent on daddy's dime. The muggers tend to know that, especially since some of them are students themselves. :-/

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    2. Re:I was never mugged-until I forgot my own advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gang of "six big guys" hardly fits the standard meaning of the term "mugger".

      Beside, the "six big guys" were probably more interested in beating someone up than taking their money. So it sounds more like a random beating than a mugging, and nothing will protect you from that.

    3. Re:I was never mugged-until I forgot my own advice by angryelephant · · Score: 1

      Attack by two or more individuals is far more common than being attacked by a lone mugger.

    4. Re:I was never mugged-until I forgot my own advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not really individuals if they're in a group.

  163. Defense or Camo..US vs UK by ArmedGeek · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to see the difference in opinions on this from folks in US vs those in UK. I'm in the US, Texas to be specific and my geek-gear is carried in the same gear-bag as my gun, ASP baton, handcuffs, etc.

    I think of all the suggestions (barring being able to defend yourself physically), the 'attitude' suggestions tend to work the best. Believe me, if you feel like a target i guarantee you look like one too. I suggest self-defense training. Even if you never actually use physical tactics, the confidence of knowing you CAN defend yourself helps prevent you from looking like a victim.

    --ArmedGeek

    --
    Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    1. Re:Defense or Camo..US vs UK by tcr · · Score: 1

      my geek-gear is carried in the same gear-bag as my gun, ASP baton, handcuffs, etc.

      I think you must be either a cop, or a security concious fetish freak...

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  164. Think hard by DigitalSpyder · · Score: 1

    Lift weights
    Do martial arts
    Get a weapon
    Look mean.
    /end thread

  165. One way to solve it.... by Pikhq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Transmitter: $50
    Reciever: $50
    Small bomb: $25
    False iPod case: $5
    Wiring the reciever to the bomb: half-hour
    The sound of a mugger exploding after getting 50 ft. away: Priceless

    --
    echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    1. Re:One way to solve it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to avoid taking the bomb-pod on airplane travels. It could get you into trouble.

    2. Re:One way to solve it.... by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      The price of DHS agents knocking on your door: Your freedom.

    3. Re:One way to solve it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just make sure the bomb is big enough to kill him. Get into a lot more trouble from a live plaintif. :)

    4. Re:One way to solve it.... by Dumbush · · Score: 1

      You forgot: try not to kill your own dumb-self while wiring the bomb

    5. Re:One way to solve it.... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      This has happened before.
      A bank (i can't remember where) was being robbed, and the cashier put a small bomb in the bag. I feel sorry for the robber though, he put the money in his pants while he ran away.

    6. Re:One way to solve it.... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      just be nice about it. Have a piezo siren go off about 9 seconds before the bomb goes (if hes stupid enough to hold onto a screaming object....)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    7. Re:One way to solve it.... by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Murder 1 charge: 30 yrs or (if American) Death, PATRIOT ACT problems, a quick move to Jordan or Guatanamo Bay...

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    8. Re:One way to solve it.... by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      Sound of your front door being blown up because you forgot the turn the damn thing off before walking upstairs: Funny (for everyone else at least)

      Seriously, if anyone has even remotely considered this (and why are you reading this if you haven't), use one of those dye packs like a bank has. It's not hard for the officer to put out an APB for the big blue smurf and you have a lot less explaining to do to the judge.

  166. nah, get a youth league aluminum bat (no joking) by Steve_Jobs_HNIC · · Score: 1

    Just get one of these flashy bats and carry it on your back outside your backpack. Make sure the bat is a brite green or orange and is easily accessible (ah la evil-dead-shotgun) small size bats

  167. look mean. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shave your head, and wear doc marten's. you'll look like a gargoyle and riff raff will just assume you're packing a tazer, operated out of the corner of your eye.

    works for me.

  168. I was going to suggest a mean-looking dog by dogfart · · Score: 1
    But in the UK both "mean" dogs and firearms are restricted.

    Learn shotokan . Even if it is not useful for self defense it will keep you in shape and teach you physical self confidence and awareness of your surroundings.

    --

    "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

  169. Re:A gun? LONDON by rhinoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guayan, South America. If you own a hand gun in that country, you are legally required to carry it AT ALL TIMES.

    To prevent theft, of the gun.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
  170. You need to... by slashname3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Carry a +5 long sword, and good +2 dagger. Look them right in the eye, hold up a pair of dice and say "You felling lucky punk?".

    1. Re:You need to... by johnnliu · · Score: 1


      Eh, don't forget your "Dodge Bullet Kung Fu" passive skill. That, or god-like Dexterity.

    2. Re:You need to... by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Make sure it's a D4

      No dice are more deadly than a handful of D4s. Throw em' on the ground and you can't walk away barefooted.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:You need to... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      haha

      Read this far down and this is definitely the best advice yet.

    4. Re:You need to... by {8_8} · · Score: 1

      I'd like to have one of those singing, dancing +3 longswords and teach it death metal. Call me a wuss, but a large, flying animated sword taking swings at me while screaming unintelligible death metal lyrics would scare me off.

      On the other hand, I could also go for 25 strength and 25 constitution. I could take the backstab/gunshot/whatever, rip the mugger in half and regenerate.

  171. Back up data by Dark+Bard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would try to get into the habbit of backing up important files on something like a pen drive. You can easily slip it into your pocket and often the data on the computer is more valuable than the machine itself. CD and DVD burners are great but if you use a CDRW be sure to remove the disk between back ups. You don't want to be saying after it is stolen at least I backed it up only to realize the disk is still in the drive.

    1. Re:Back up data by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Good thinking! Then when someone tries to mug you, you can just stab 'em in the eye with your pen drive and run like hell!

      /me goes out to buy a pen drive

  172. Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last week a police officer was killed (stabbed by a suspect he was chasing) in the line of duty in Birmingham, UK. It was the biggest news story (front page of all papers, lead item on TV news, etc) for 24 hours.

    In the US, how many police officers would have to die in a single incident to get that level of blanket news coverage? How many are shot and killed every week?

    Yet somehow most Americans buy into the myth that Britain is a more violent society than their own? Ignorance is bliss.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Americans value liberty more than safety. (But then, to the British, perhaps safety is liberty.)

    2. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps Americans value liberty more than safety. (But then, to the British, perhaps safety is liberty.)

      Explain the USA PATRIOT Act in that context then, please.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see where your assumption that "...most Americans buy into the myth that Britain is a more violent society". Nobody said it was more violent, they simply stated that it's much harder to *legally* defend yourself there.

      By the way, police getting shot and killed here IS a big deal. No criminal wants to be labelled a cop killer. In my state (Texas) any crimes with guns involved automatically get the maximum penalty by law, and there's nothing the judge, jury, or attorneys can do to change that. If you shoot a man to death, and it's ruled as wrongful, you'll most likely get the death penalty. There is no plea bargaining or any other recourse for defense in gun crime cases here.

      Other states take a different view, but Texas has had alot of problems with gun related crimes, so the state legislature decided to take a hardline stance.

      Don't make assumptions based on what you've read or seen on TV. It's better to open yourself to discussion with those that live in the country you're making assumptions about.

    4. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you got me there.

    5. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Venotar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Weird. I don't know about you, but the standard UK stereotype in my part of the country is "stodgy if sometimes rowdy".

      Yet, when I was actually there, the level of random violence was absurd. We're talking about a country with 5th generation unemployed. I had the distinct displeasure of witnessing a "glassing" in Edinburgh. I've never seen anything like that in the US and I've been in a few tough spots.

      Admittedly, US teenagers are particularly foolish about violence. They tend to slowly work themselves up to displays of violence. Facing off, insulting each other for a while, followed by pushing and shoving until someone throws a punch. More agrressiveness ensues and then someone tries to find a way to bow out while saving face. It's like watching one of these Nature Channel specials on primate territoriality or aboriginal ritual combat.

      The US version is foolish and immature. You really shouldn't get in a fight unless you want to cause permanent damage or death. The Brits realize this, but a disproportianate number of them seem to want to cause permanent damage. Take your pick, juvenile delinquency or random acts of criminal sociopathy. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. The flip side is the Brits don't have school shootings. Mortar fire in airports, but no school shootings.

      Personally, I suspect violence is a bigger problem in the UK then in the US - in the US we're just a bit more afraid of the violence that does exist. It doesn't matter, though. In the end it's a matter of degrees.

      My personal suspicions aside, I realize that most members of most modern societies have at least some respect for the social contract. Discussions about who respects it more or who respects it least are foolish - every country has their layabouts and malcontents, people who feel powerless and don't grok reasonable escalation. Governments respond to it differently - on the one side they crush the violators (or perceived violators) under a steel boot, on the other they encourage fellow citizens to take responsibility for one another and act appropriately. Most countries try to strike a balance between the two extremes, but many definitely lean in one direction or the other. It's up to each individual to decide which approach they prefer. Trying to convince people that your preference is better is like trying to convince your roommate that blondes are superior to redheads or vice versa.

    6. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not making assumptions. It's the hundreds of Americans, many of whom will freely admit that they don't even own a passport, that I read describing Britain as a criminal's paradise everytime guns or violence is discussed on Slashdot or elsewhere that are making the assumptions.

      I've been to the US, and for more than just a couple of weeks on holiday. I've got friends and family who live there, some of whom have experienced life on both sides of the pond. None of them has ever told me anything other than what I've said here: most Americans truly do believe that Britain is a violent society, where people live in constant fear of personal violence.

      I think you've missed the subtle point I was trying to make though, which was that the "right" to walk around with a deadly weapon doesn't make you or your society safer.

      Of course policemen dying in the line of duty make the news everywhere, but it's such a common occurance in the US and such an uncommon one in Britain and the level of attention and shock that such a murder creates in each society reflects that.

      A US police officer being gunned down is a minor news story because it's an everyday event, and because a single police officer or civilian being gunned down is nothing out of the ordinary, which is reflective of the level of violence in US society.

      However, a UK police officer being stabbed and killed isn't an everyday event. In fact, it's damn rare for a British policeman to be murdered and very out of the ordinary, and, similarly, this is a reflection of the level of violence in British society.

      I'm not saying that Britain is crime-free, only that it's a safer place to live than America despite what many Americans are led to believe.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Venotar · · Score: 1

      PS:

      See this odd case - http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/34123.html

    8. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I imagine it IS a rare event for a gun-free country to have police deaths. Getting stabbed to death by a criminal is rare here as well. However, our police take no chances and wear kevlar with a square steel plate embedded in the center to protect against knife kills.

      I don't know if Britain is any safer than the US. I've lived here my whole life and have never been a victim of a 'personal crime' where I've come face to face with a possible attacker. Then again, I'm a 6' 7", 235lb man who criminals may not feel comfortable approaching. From what I can gather, personal attacks are much more common in Britain than they are here. Here, you don't get robbed, your house or car do. I can only vouch for Dallas though, which is #1 in crime in the US for large cities. Half of the problem here is a huge illegal immigrant population.

    9. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Ithika · · Score: 1
      Liberty? Oh man you lot really have been on the baaad crack today, haven't you?

      Where, exactly, does the Patriot Act come into this great American dream of liberty? Your inability to get on with other human beings of a different skin colour, article two of the human rights our US compadres so love to bring into any and all arguments. Guantanamo Bay, and article six? The seeming universal hatred of trades unions, and article 23?

      Am I beginning to make myself clear? There's no such thing as a perfect state, but the good ol' USA isn't even in the running.

    10. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      90 percent tax? "Rights taken away for generations", which "ain't gonna change"? "Dictators"?

      I guess my democratically-elected government, which has a tiered personal taxation system that has 0, 10, 25 and 40 percent tax bands (that provides me with a virtually-free education, a free health service, etc) and has a comprehensive human rights act in place must have moved out of Europe whilst I wasn't looking.

      Either that or you're an troll living in the ignorance bliss that I previously mentioned.

      Oh wait, we haven't moved an inch and we're still in Europe. I guess we know what that means then...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    11. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by mikeswi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're absolutely right. Thankfully most of the provisions of that abomination are about to expire. Hopefully it will be allowed to do so.

      It's been three years since the sept 11 attacks. Hopefully some of these idiots in Congress have actually READ the damned thing by now, something most of them did NOT do when it passed.

    12. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Ithika · · Score: 1
      I had the distinct displeasure of witnessing a "glassing" in Edinburgh. I've never seen anything like that in the US and I've been in a few tough spots.

      Really? I'm very surprised that kind of thing doesn't go on in ghettoised inner-city-slum America. Are you sure?

      I live in Edinburgh, and a lovely city it is too; but if anyone doesn't believe Begbie is a real person they're gonna get a shock. Once the people roll out of the nightclubs at three in the morning things can get pretty hairy. (Actual quote from outside Revolution: "Kick him again, he's still got some teeth!")

      Life's a hell of a lot less precious and more special than some people here realise I think. Claims by libertarians that they'd happily blow someone away for wanting to steal an iPod are just ridiculous, and show more than just a little detachment from the real world.

      Oh yeah, and redheads are better :P

    13. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I'm of average height and build. I've lived in London for 32 years and I've never been the victim of any personal crime, neither do I know anyone who has been. Furthermore, I've only ever seen one mugging in my life, and that was a purse-snatching that was over in less than five seconds.

      This is a city with a population of over 7.5 million, with millions more commuting into it every day. This isn't a cosy hamlet we're talking about, it's one of the biggest cities on the planet, with all the good and bad things that come with that tag.

      I know hundreds of people who live and work all over the city. Yet not one of them has ever been attacked in any way. Does that suggest a crime-ridden society to you?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    14. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Yea, bullshit. A quick google tells me that there were 42 police officer deaths in 1999. Not too bad for a country of nearly 300 million. The U.K. has a population of 60 million, one fifth the population of the U.S. According to the BBC there were 14 police deaths in 2002.

      The death of a police officer in the United States is NEVER a minor story. As is, I'd still rather be a police officer then a coal miner.

    15. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by miyako · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Explain the USA PATRIOT Act in that context then, please.
      Because most americans also belive that ignorance is bliss, and it seems that americans in general also belive that thought is a finite resource, the result is a lot of people who belive they are getting freedom because they are told so and refuse to exert any thought to come up with an alternate conclusion.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    16. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now we finally understand each other.

      Despite the statistics to the contrary, most of us will never be a victim of violent crime, or witness a violent crime.

    17. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I'll grant you the Patriot Act. But you seem to be implying that people outside America enjoy greater personal freedoms. Where?

      Not Spain, which is notorious for banning political parties that push for regional independence. Not France, whose restrictions on journalism have attracted the ire of the European Court on Human Rights (and let's not forget its little headscarf problem). Not Germany, which along with France bans many forms of hate speech and considers the sale of Nazi artifacts a criminal offense. Perhaps one of the Scandinavian countries? After all, they rank at the top of Reporters Sans Frontières' press freedom index. But then again, it's impossible to earn anything there without half of it being taken away by the state. Sure, we could argue about whether taxation really constitutes a violation of "liberty," but then we'd be diving straight into a moral and philosophical bog where semantics float facedown in their own slippery juices and practical justice lies forgotten, suffocating deep beneath the surface.

      When it comes to liberty, America's version surely leaves much to be desired. But you're dead wrong when you claim "the good ol' USA isn't even in the running."

      Your charge of endemic racism has merit; however, I challenge you to find a society anywhere in the world lucky enough not to count discrimination among its ills. Please don't bother citing places without significant minority populations, as even in these countries racial tensions have become disturbingly apparent, given the relative lack of interracial mixing as compared to American society: Turks in Germany, Muslims in France (that headscarf thing again), non-Japanese in Japan. Across Europe, xenophobia is becoming increasingly evident as nations open their borders to immigrants and foreign workers (remember Pim's legacy!). Things are little better elsewhere in the world; even Brazil's supposed racial harmony is largely mythical. One could argue that at least America's racial tensions are in the open, a matter of public debate--not swept under the carpet and ignored, the way they are in much of Europe and Asia.

      Ultimately, liberty is in the eye of the beholder, as is the comfortable balance between chaos and order (which I think is what you were referring to by your "perfect state" comment). Singapore can a great place to live, if you value order and discipline above the personal freedoms you'd have elsewhere. I personally wouldn't want to live there, but I'm sure that many Singaporeans find it liberating to be ensured clean sidewalks and elevators. This opinion based on having been close friends with at least three Singaporeans in my lifetime.

      Just throwing that out there.

    18. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by denzo · · Score: 1
      In the US, how many police officers would have to die in a single incident to get that level of blanket news coverage? How many are shot and killed every week?
      I don't know about those who live in the larger cities, but at least in my neck of the woods (Central Valley, California area), police officers dying in the line of duty is rare enough to get plenty of media coverage. One police officer was killed in Merced County, getting mentioned in the news for at least 4 days after the incident, then later news updates about capturing the suspect a week later, and then coverage another week later of the funeral services.

      I know this doesn't hold true for other regions or the big cities, but the U.S. is a big friggin' country with its own statistics in each state, county, city, city block, etc. I think a lot of us here in the U.S. feel reasonably safe where we live... enough to not have to think about gun violence being a problem. I mean, many more people get killed in car accidents than by violent crime... I'd rather see the reckless drivers on the road get banned from driving than see more gun control laws (remember the old cliche: if guns were outlawed, only outlaws would have guns).

    19. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ironic that it was an Englishman who said that "There are lies, damned lies and statistics".

      Last year, according to the US law enforcement website, PoliceOne.com, there were nearly 150 federal, state and local law officers killed in the US. (Incidentally, 60,000 officers were assaulted, and 20,000 suffered injuries as a result.)

      The exact number of officers that were murdered isn't given, but it's at least 56 (52 were shot to death; two suffered fatal beatings; one was stabbed to death; one was strangled). How many of the other deaths were murders isn't clear and I won't begin to speculate how many of those who were struck and killed by vehicles were hit accidentally or intentionally, etc.

      The source also states that there have been 54 consecutive years in which more than 100 law enforcement officers have been killed in the performance of duty, and that more than 1,600 officers have died in the last 10 years alone.

      (By the way, that 100+ deaths per year for 54 years completely contradicts your quick googling. Either your source is wrong or the PoliceOne.com website is wrong. Somehow, I don't think that it's the PoliceOne.com that's in error.)

      Now let's compare that data to that of the source you quoted, a BBC News story from early 2003.

      In 30 years, 70 British officers were killed in the line of duty, 14 of them in the year that you mention, 2002. However, as the story doesn't provide a breakdown, it's impossible to say how many of those deaths were accidental and how many were considered murders. Also, in the context of 30 years' worth of data, 14 deaths in one year seems like a statistical anomaly; after all, this is a fifth of all the deaths for the 30 year period.

      So, for the 30 years up to and including 2002, 70 policemen died in the UK, and during that same period at least 3,000 died in the US (of course, that figure is the lowest possible number: remember, at least 100 US police officers died every year for the last 54 years).

      And for last year, 2003, at least 56 US police officers were murdered. I'm not sure what the UK figure was (and I have looked for it) but I will bet you my life savings and all my worldly possessions that it's in single figures, probably even less than five.

      Doesn't look too good for your argument now, does it?

      The lesson here? Next time you call bullshit, at least have some proper data to back up your claim.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    20. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +2 Insightful for an argument that begins with unfounded speculation? So I can say I read somewhere on Slashdot and other mysterious places that Asians are greedy, therefore it must be true. Then I'll continue a baseless argument to the delight of the moderators.

      Props to your crack man, good game.

    21. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by bfields · · Score: 1
      In the US, how many police officers would have to die in a single incident to get that level of blanket news coverage? How many are shot and killed every week?

      I don't know about the first question, but google will answer the second. E.g., from http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/29/police.killed/ it looks like about 150 police die in the line of duty each year. From the same source, it looks like the causes are split in about half from traffic accidents and shootings, with other causes pretty negligible. So the answer to your question, it appears, is between 1 and 2 a week.

      According to http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2660885.stm, there were 14 police deaths in the UK in 2002, and this was considered high. I can't find any stastics on shooting deaths (though apparently it does happen: one example). The difference in population is a factor of about five, so the UK would seem to indeed have a comparatively lower rate.

      Obviously, in a country of almost 300 million people, there's room for a lot of stupid and unfortunate things happen all the time. I don't know quite what to make of any of these statistics.

      --Bruce Fields

    22. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by operagost · · Score: 1
      First of all, the fact is that the U.S. is larger and more populated, so the death of a police officer is unlikely to become a national event. Another fact is, you're wrong. People still talk about the murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner to this day. Unfortunately, it's usually people defending his killer, Mumia Abu Jamal.

      Such is the way of today's society, where politics is more important than compassion and justice.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      In the U.S., the number of police deaths to criminal acts (that is, *only* attributable to being killed in a felonious act) is around 50-60 per year. This is actually slightly less than the number of police officers killed due to accidental causes while on duty (70ish).

      However, annual assaults on police officers number around 60k per year.

      (Stats from the FBI.)

    24. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! The brainwashing worked. Is today "praise the queen" day, as well?

    25. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      In the US, how many police officers would have to die in a single incident to get that level of blanket news coverage? How many are shot and killed every week?

      Wow, talk about letting US's "image" get in the way of the facts. If a police officer is killed, it is major news, even here in gun-happy Arizona. In fact, the last officer killed in Arizona was hit by a drunk driver over a year ago.

      Now regular people getting killed is another matter... it always makes the news, but it happens much more often.

    26. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I ever had my wallet stolen was when I was in London... I was there for 9 days.

      Proud US citizen of 25 years.

    27. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of which country is safer, US or Britian, most Britians I have met seem to "live in fear" more than Americans.

    28. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      None of them has ever told me anything other than what I've said here: most Americans truly do believe that Britain is a violent society, where people live in constant fear of personal violence.

      Ok, fair enough. You talked to some Americans and that's what they told you.

      I am an American and I've talked to probably 10,000 Americans in my life. I have never, NEVER heard anybody voice the opinion that Britain is a "criminal paradise". That's typically how we'd describe Compton (LA), parts of New Jersey, parts of D.C., and parts of NYC.

      I did once hear that gangs in France are just as deadly as gangs in America, per capita, except that they bludgeon people to death rather than shoot them. I don't have a clue if that's even remotely correct, but it was presented as a bit of social information about gang violence.

      And despite what American movies would have you believe, it's actually not too common for American police officers to be murdered. Many are accidentially struck by cars. As another poster mentioned, the penalties for even shooting at a cop are so disproportionately strict (and rightly so) that it actually IS a deterrent.

    29. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Venotar · · Score: 1
      I think you'll find that the number of US police officers shot and killed is far lower than many people perceive - particularly if you take into account the size of the country. Police officer murder's AREN'T a daily occurance, even nationwide. The total number per year may be higher than elsewhere, but if you view it as a ratio of police killed to police employed I'd be very surprised to find the US out of whack with the rest of the western world. Especially when you consider the fact that we employ so many more per capita than smaller countries. The only numbers I can find are for the decade of the 90's and only contain statistics for the US. According to this study the highest number of "felonious police deaths" of the decade were 60 in the year 1995. The decade ended with an all time low of 34 after several years of steady decline.

      That's thirty dead in one year out of a nation of 294 million. I don't know how many police officers the US has, but I do know how many local police departments, sheriff's offices, state police agencies, and federal police forces exist within the contiguous states - 18,000. Presumably police officers themselves number in the millions. Taking into account the inevitablity of the occasional crazy, 30 seems like an amazingly reasonable number.

      Especially when you compare that to the UK. A country of about 52 million with a total of 42 police forces employing 126,000 police (25,000 of which, BTW, are employed in Greater London) had 14 police officers killed in the line of duty last year. (see numbers here and here). As best as I can tell, the problem's gotten BETTER in the US and WORSE in the UK.

      You're right that a US police officer being gunned down in, say, New Orleans isn't a nationwide news story; but that has more to do with:

      A - the size of the country and

      B - the fact that most US news is regional.

      In the US, national news only comes to the forefront during massive catastrophes (high visibility terrorist attacks, Pee Wee Herman molesting a child, presidential elections, etc). International news only gets attention during a war. In the UK, national and international news get much more play time. (The US, for instance, doesn't have a tax funded international news agency)

      My point is this - comparing crime in the UK and the US is comparing apples and oranges. Different social pressures, different sample population sizes, radically different landmass, different presumptions, different histories, utterly different beasts. The perception of people outside the environment in question is no more accurate than the perceptions of the people within the environment - they're both perceptions. Little better than opinions.

    30. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps its because I've never been to Britain, but as an Americna, I must say that I've never considered Britain to be particularly violent in any way?

    31. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must very happy then.

      The International Crime Victimisation Survey (ICVS) is the most far-reaching programme of fully standardised sample surveys looking at householders' experience of crime in different countries. The first ICVS took place in 1989, the second in 1992, the third in 1996 and the fourth in 2000. Surveys have been carried out in 24 industrialised countries since 1989, and in 46 cities in developing countries and countries in transition. This report deals with seventeen industrialised countries which took part in the 2000 ICVS.

      Overall victimisation

      The ICVS allows an overall measure of victimisation which is the percentage of people victimised once or more in the previous year by any of the eleven crimes covered by the survey. This prevalence measure is a simple but robust indicator of overall proneness to crime. The countries fall into three bands.

      Above 24% (victim of any crime in 1999): Australia, England and Wales, the Netherlands and Sweden
      20%-24%: Canada, Scotland, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, France, and USA

      Car-related crime

      The risk of having a car stolen was highest in England and Wales (2.6% of owners had a theft), Australia (2.1%), and France (1.9%). Japan, Switzerland, Catalonia, the USA, Finland, and the Netherlands show risks of 0.5% or less.

      Burglary

      The proportion of households who had a completed or attempted burglary was highest in Australia (7%), England and Wales (5%), Canada, Denmark and Belgium (all 4%).

      Theft of personal property

      Thefts of personal property will be heterogeneous in nature, but the highest risks were in Australia, Sweden, and Poland (about 5%-6% of people were victimised).

      In roughly a third of thefts, the victim was carrying what was stolen - termed 'pickpocketing'. Risks of pickpocketing were most common in Poland (4%). Risks were also comparatively high in Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Catalonia, and England and Wales (about 2%). As previous sweeps have found, risks were lowest outside Europe: in Japan, Canada, and the USA.

      Contact crime

      An overall measure of contact crime was taken as robbery, assaults with force, and sexual assaults (against women only). The highest risks were in Australia, England and Wales, Canada, Scotland and Finland: over 3% were victims. This was more than double the level in USA, Belgium, Catalonia, Portugal, and Japan (all under 2%). In Japan the risk of contact crime was especially low (0.4%).

      Robbery

      Robbery was comparatively uncommon in all countries. Risks were highest in 1999 in Poland (1.8%), England and Wales, and Australia (both 1.2%). By far the lowest risks were in Japan and Northern Ireland (0.1%).

      Sexual incidents

      Two types of sexual incidents were measured: offensive sexual behaviour and sexual assault (i.e. incidents described as rape, attempted rape or indecent assaults). For all countries combined, just over one per cent of women reported offensive sexual behaviour. The level was half that for sexual assaults.

      Women in Sweden, Finland, Australia and England and Wales were most at risk of sexual assault.

      Assaults and threats

      Taking all countries together, 3.5% were victims once or more of assaults or threats in 1999. Risks were highest in Australia, Scotland, England and Wales (about 6%) and Canada (5%).

      Trends in crime

      Generally speaking, the ICVS suggests that crime rose between 1988 and 1991, stabilised of fell in 1995, then fell back more in 1999. This is the dominant pattern in many individual countries.

      The picture in North America differs from that in Europe. Crime levels are lower than in 1988. In the three European countries with four ICVS measures (England and Wales, Finland, and the Netherlands), crime levels are still higher than in 1988. Compared to 1991, risks also fell more in N

    32. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      But then again, it's impossible to earn anything there without half of it being taken away by the state.

      Yeah, too bad we got other freedom from that such as free school from 6 years old until you're 18 years. Where if you want you can continue with higher education for free! For 3 to 5 more years depending on what your learning. Or how about free dentist help and healtcare up to age 18. Ah I feel like such a prisoner.

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    33. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      What mortar fire in airports? Never heard of it.

      Pub violence in the UK is about areas of towns. I know the areas to drink in, and which are good and bad.

      Most of it is young kids (about 16-21). Mostly, they'll give people a punch, at worst. The towns are starting to put all the pubs for kids in "zoned" areas so the police can hang around near there.

      The rest of us can drink in mostly trouble-free pubs.

    34. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that was one of the points I was trying (probably poorly) to make: liberty is in the eye of the beholder.

    35. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Very good points. I've never been outside the US and I've never been stabbed or shot, but I have been slapped up the side of my head with a large piece of a concrete bus-stop post and mugged... and darn near killed. Personally, I pose no threat to anyone unless they pose a threat to me, but I've found myself to be much more comfortable with a concealed pistol than without one. And damn a concealed carry permit; in the US that is unconstitutional. What part of the phrase, "shall not be infringed" do our idiot politicians fail to understand? We shouldn't be paying them to make laws, we should be paying them to pick up our garbage once a week. We'd still be paying most of them more than they're worth. Oh, and contrary to popular belief, my karma is really doing pretty well.

    36. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah Got your lovey-dovey sad-and-lonely. Stick your stupid slogan in, everybody sing along!

    37. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by johneee · · Score: 1

      "...but Texas has had alot of problems with gun related crimes, so the state legislature decided to take a hardline stance."

      And have gun related crimes gone down since then?

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    38. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      In a word, yes. The policy has been pretty effective. Still, there are alot of morons in a state with a population of near 21 million, and guns are ubiquitous.

      I'd quote some statistics but my coffee hasn't kicked in yet.

    39. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Dr.+Trevorkian · · Score: 1

      Those are some scary numbers until you realize how many more people live in the United States than United Kingdom.

    40. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Population of the US: ~300 million.
      Population of the UK: ~60 million.

      Five times the population with at least 100 police deaths a year vs 70 total in 30 years. Those are still scary numbers.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    41. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that this
      applies also to deaths caused by the police?

    42. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      One. And it would be news for a lot more than 24 hours, with flags at half mast for a week. It has happened. Doesn't happen often. At least in this state, which is about the size of your country. I can't comment on other states, but I assume that incident made about as much splash out of state as yours made in Spain. (and the reverse)

    43. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't have school shootings either 1 shooting every (how many years since the last?) out of a population that is 20-30 times yours isn't any more statisticly significant than your 0. (assuming it is 0, I don't know where to look that up)

    44. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is bliss huh? You should be called the pinnacle of 'Ignorance is Bliss', Mr. Pot-Kettle-Black. Police officers die in the line of duty either accidently or intentionally. Like has been said already, it's not at all small news when one is killed on duty in the US. Last year one was murdered in my local state and the state flag was lowered to half-mast in memory of the slain officer.

      More proper research would show that officers intentionally killed while on duty is not an 'everyday event', the grandparent was correct in this matter, there were IN FACT 42 law enforcement officers feloniously killed in 1999. Here you'll see the FBI's statistics of officers feloniously killed, for the years 1993-2002. For those 10 years, there were 636 total, not including 72 from the events of 9/11. The yearly low is 42, high is 80. Along with the 56 feloniously killed in 2002, there were 77 killed in duty-related accidents, so yes, it is over 100 for that year and likely also for each year as your source said. But that includes deaths accidental, not killed by an assailant with such intent. It can be a dangerous occupation after all, but you knew that. For UK stats, Google didn't reveal anything comparative. Maybe one way to compare is to divide these kinds of stats by 5 and you get UK results since the UK has 1/5 of the population of the US.

      So say that again, a law enforcement officer dies on duty and it's an everyday event, and it's minor news when it happens in the US? Please. It's rare just like it is in the UK.

      You're a Brit, yes it's ironic that an Englishman said, "There are lies, damned lies and statistics".

    45. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is bliss huh? You should be called the pinnacle of 'Ignorance is Bliss', Mr. Pot-Kettle-Black. Police officers die in the line of duty either accidently or intentionally. Like has been said already, it's not at all small news when one is killed on duty in the US. Last year one was murdered in my local state and the state flag was lowered to half-mast in memory of the slain officer.

      More proper research would show that officers intentionally killed while on duty is not an 'everyday event', the grandparent was correct in this matter, there were IN FACT 42 law enforcement officers feloniously killed in 1999. Here you'll see the FBI's statistics of officers feloniously killed, for the years 1993-2002. For those 10 years, there were 636 total, not including 72 from the events of 9/11. The yearly low is 42, high is 80. Along with the 56 feloniously killed in 2002, there were 77 killed in duty-related accidents, so yes, it is over 100 for that year and likely also for each year as your source said. But that includes deaths accidental, not killed by an assailant with such intent. It can be a dangerous occupation after all, but you knew that. For UK stats, Google didn't reveal anything comparative. Perhaps one way to compare is to divide these kinds of stats by 5 and you get UK results since the UK has 1/5 of the population of the US.

      So say that again, a law enforcement officer dies on duty and it's an everyday event, and it's minor news when it happens in the US? Please. It's rare just like it is in the UK.

      You're a Brit, yes it's ironic that an Englishman said, "There are lies, damned lies and statistics".

    46. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Yeah, too bad we got other freedom from that such as free school from 6 years old until you're 18 years.

      Does any Western country not offer that? The US certainly does, so this is an invalid point.

      Where if you want you can continue with higher education for free! For 3 to 5 more years depending on what your learning.

      Four years of tuition at a state university in the US cost me less than 30% of the salary I earned in my first year in the workplace. Put another way, I effectively paid a one-time 30% "education tax" to provide my university education. I don't have to pay that again this year, next year, or ever again. This is an invalid point.

      Or how about free dentist help and healtcare up to age 18. Ah I feel like such a prisoner.

      Dental insurance for my whole family costs about $15 per month. Healthcare for my children is less than $100 per month. So, the taxes that pay for your socialized medicine amount to less than $115 per month for a family with three children? If that's the case, then maybe we are paying too much for medicine, but I highly doubt that your program is more cost-effective than ours.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    47. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Isbiten · · Score: 1

      The point is that _anyone_ can afford it. Even if your unemployed etc.

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    48. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Last one I remember is Dunblane in 1996. 17 people were killed (although by an adult rather than other students). If This site on school sshootings is anything to go by, the chances of being shot at school do seem to be quite low wherever you are. Much lower than deaths caused by dustmites, for example.

      As an aside, I think the US only has a population around 5 times that of Great Britain.

    49. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I woke in the middle of the night last night realizing that I had confused the populationg of the UK with some other country in Europe.

    50. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I've lived in London for 32 years and I've never been the victim of any personal crime

      I've lived in the U.S. for 27 years and do not know anyone who was a victim of any violent crime either. It doesn't mean anything, just like your statement doesn't. You are one out of millions, as am I. Chances are pretty good that if you take a random person from either of our countries, they will be in the same situation.

    51. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I had the distinct displeasure of witnessing a "glassing" in Edinburgh.
      > I'm very surprised that kind of thing doesn't go on in ghettoised inner-city-slum America

      What, exactly, is that? I've never heard of that term, except for an excrutiating punishment on the male gentalia, which I can guarantee does not go on in the U.S. ghettos. However, I doubt it goes on in Edinburgh either... So what is glassing?

      I hope that doesn't just mean breaking a glass over someone's head -- otherwise it's an extremely stupid term. And who the hell thought that handing out glass containers to a roomful of drunk people was a good idea? No, in the ghettos of the US, we use plastic cups (how's that for a simple solution?). Beer bottles, yeah, but not glasses.

      Plastic bottles are even coming into style now.

    52. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Ithika · · Score: 1

      Take a low-quality pint glass like you would find in any pub, smash the rim off the bartop and proceed to ram the jagged edge so revealed full force into someone's face. It will result in you being *covered* in blood and them spending a lot of time in A&E being stitched up. And is extremely horrific. See the film Trainspotting as mentioned in my previous post for some textbook examples of the Edinburgh ned.

    53. Re:Ignorance is bliss... by Venotar · · Score: 1

      > What mortar fire in airports? Never heard of it.

      The BBC has this timeline that includes a reference to one of the three mortar attacks on Heathrow perpetrated in 1994. Apparently only one of the three attacks actually resulted in detonations within the airport, but all three attacks were launched within a relatively short time frame and under increasingly tight security.

  173. Too bad you live without rights. by novalogic · · Score: 1

    Geeks in America, or atleaste the ones I know, pack heat. I for one carry a Glock 27 .40 or a Glock 21 .45 In the state I live in, you can get permits to carry a weapon, and with a little time each week, you can feel as secure as a person can without hiring some armed body guards. But then, as I said before, too bad you live in London, where its illegal to have a plasic BB Gun, while bad guys get whatever they want. Your only hope is to let your government protect you.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Too bad you live without rights. by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, because that's what the government does in our country. Doesn't yours?

    2. Re:Too bad you live without rights. by John+Pliskin · · Score: 0

      Considering we are a government OF the PEOPLE; Yup. .9mm; I would have it no other way.

      $

    3. Re:Too bad you live without rights. by novalogic · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, no.

      In 1974 the district court in Washington DC ruled that the Police have no legal obligation to protect the public.

      In the 70's laws where passed which make guns illegal in Washington D.C. They started a government "Buy-Back" of the weapons. Turn them in or else.

      A couple months after that, 4 long time criminals invaded the home of three female roommates.

      Two of the women stayed hidden upstairs while one was caught and raped over the course of 3 hours by the men. The two called the police three times, and three times saw the police cars drive by the house and leave.

      They sued, and lost, based on the judgment I stated before.

      So no, the government doesn't have to protect you.

      --
      --
    4. Re:Too bad you live without rights. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Not really! All the police can do is show up after the fact. Once, a neighbor was getting beaten up by her live-in BF. I called 911, and it took 15 minutes for the cops to arrive. Do you know how much damage a person can do in 15 minutes? He might have killed her if I hadn't been there.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  174. Targus 'urban' backpacks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alot of people are mentioning that the leather targus bags are a 'rob me' sign. What about the newer Targus backpack that look a bit more rugged look just like a normal 'cargo' bag. How would something like this show up on a potential theifs radar? (I ask because it is currently what i use and will be doing alot of overseas traveling in the next year)

  175. Leave your iPod at home by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  176. Guns... Lots of Guns... by Randseed · · Score: 2, Funny

    A 9mm compact with loaded eight round clip. Maybe an MP5 slung around my shoulder if it's the deep inner city.

    1. Re:Guns... Lots of Guns... by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're carrying, but my 9mm compact can carry 15 rounds in the magazine. :)

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    2. Re:Guns... Lots of Guns... by monkeymanbob · · Score: 1

      Too bad he lives in London. The citizens have been disarmed there.

  177. I never got mugged by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but then I got that crazy white guy act going for me. I walked through some of the toughest streets in the nearest urban city and never got mugged once.

    Just talk to yourself a lot. Say "I got no hot water in the apartment, nobody wants to hire me, landlord wants his rent now, if one more person hassles me I am going to beat the crap out of them!" or something like that.

    Also use a beaten up old bag to carry the laptop, PDA, iPod, and other stuff in. I suggest a visit to the Army Surplus store, a camouflage bag that looks big enough to carry a few guns or rifles might just do the trick. It is all, in perception. If they perceive you as a potential victim, they will mug you. If you look and act like a poor crazy person who might be carrying a gun or two in that bag, they leave you alone.

    I suggest you use old beaten up headphones that are black, look like the ear covers are worn, and hide the iPod in a large pocket or in the bag, so it appears to be a cheaper cassette player or something. Never take it out in plain sight to complete the illusion.

    The more annoying you are, the more likely they will leave you alone. Talk about how the government is out to get you, or some shadow group, or something. If you see the muggers, yell out that they are spies here to overthrow the government and draw attention to them. They might just run away once they see how crazy you are.

    It works for me, not sure if it can work for you. Make sure you wear old clothes over good clothes and then change in a bathroom somewhere and put the old clothes into the bag.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:I never got mugged by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

      I think he's kidding... your kidding, right? Right!?

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
    2. Re:I never got mugged by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Just look at my profile to see how serious I am. :)

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:I never got mugged by sockonafish · · Score: 1

      Score:3, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot is acting like a mental patient insightful.

    4. Re:I never got mugged by zonix · · Score: 1

      If you see the muggers, yell out that they are spies here to overthrow the government and draw attention to them. They might just run away once they see how crazy you are.

      Of course this only works if you're NOT the average Police Academy Sweetchuck type of geek. :-)

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    5. Re:I never got mugged by gotw · · Score: 1

      Must say, there are other dangers though. I knew this fellow, "crazy nick". When I first met him (at a party in a squat) he told me how he got a new gold card 2 days ago and had since maxed it out with his dealer. He then proceeded to tell me how he had given up crack for 2 whole hours.

      Further stories consisted of Piers Morgan (editor of British tabloid the Daily Mirror ... sacked a few weeks ago for rubbish fake Iraqi abuse photos) giving him orgasms by remote control using mobile phone antennae. By your logic this man would be safe, you'd think. But *NO* it seems not, for later on in the night he'd fallen asleep somewhere in a ketamine haze and someone tagged him! They got out their pens and their spray paint, and did piecework all over him.

      I still have a leaflet he'd constructed on the remote orgasm thing, I'm sure that posted to the right topic it would score highly on slashdot.

  178. Re:A gun? LONDON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people are suggesting this guy carry a gun. Not all countries allow this, and he specifically said he's from LONDON. England isn't exactly too keen on its citizens carrying firearms around

    He didn't actually specify that he's from London, England though by not specifying which London, it's safe to assume that London, England is the one he meant. There are quite a few places named London but the only other one that I know of that could be considered a city is the one in Ontario, Canada. Your point would apply for London, Ontario, Canada as well.

  179. Carry a G-17 by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    And don't carry the rest of your garbage in bags that say 'I'm a laptop, steal me'.

    Use a bit of common sence, and stay out of bad areas, but always go protected.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  180. Buy a used backpack by failedlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The backback is my first suggestion. Briefcase has *target me* written all over it, since its contents are usually highly valueable.

    I suggest buying a used backback or making one looked used - from a distance - like putting tape, etc on it. The less appealing it looks, the worth of the contents inside might also seem less tempting.

    Also, hope the muggers don't read /. !!!

    1. Re:Buy a used backpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, hope the muggers don't read /. !!!

      Don't worry, we don't.

  181. low profile by dindi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. wear a used arny jacket !!
    -warm with liner isn't without, looks crappy enough, but can look stylish (eg US alpha jacket - black)

    2. use a crappy looking backpack, that hides the form of a laptop (my toshiba can be spotted in most of my backpacks ...(i have a gym and a surfer backpack, the both suck for laptop)

    3. go to the gym/martial arts stuff (i am 6.3'' and 87kilos (194pounds for all you ignorant non metrics)

    4. shave your head -or wear very short (no i am not a skinhead) but it gives a nice aggression-level-boost to the most babyfaced person ... (i also bikeride a lot and it's just better not to rot into your helmet)

    5. wear your watch upside down if you have something high tech or a rolex - so only the belt shows ..

    6. combat boots help, but even a pair of martens give a boost (the round nose ones) in the UK they are dirt chep at markets, even new (i do not like the metal insert martens - just gives you a too aggressive look, also only punks bouncers and alik wear them where i am from)

    7. don't look like a geek ... or look like a geek that might carry a remote controlled nuke in the backpack ...

    8. shout in a foreign language ... speaking hungarian (especially our tasty cursing ) seem to make some people think ...

    and if it gets tight just hand it over and run ...
    i agree an ipod or laptop does not worth getting stabbed, blinded, beaten .. or whatever ...

    here in cr i also try to keep a low profile, i keep my bike dirty, and never change decals/stickers, the shittiest it looks the most likely no one touches it....
    same with cars ... i never wash it, and try to keep it dirty (it's easy, just leave the sand in it from the beach, and throw chocolat papers and other crap on the floor)

    on the other hand I am riding hours in the middle of nowhere and i know if someone comes with a gun i just take a walk home and not try to get into troubble, on the other hand if i see the opportunity to fight i will take the slightest chance to kick the hell out whoever tries to take my stuff ...

    I know on the streets of london it is not an option, but protective gear (motocross) helps a lot in a fistfight .. i know i got into one once... and i wasn't the one who left the place running :)

    --
    is it just me or are all the car drivers are asses
    when you look from a bike :)

    1. Re:low profile by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > 8. shout in a foreign language ... speaking hungarian (especially our tasty cursing ) seem to make some people think ...

      In Europe? Good way to get yourself killed man. That Universal Bond Of Human Rights And Equality For All Mankind stuff only plays for other Europeans and foreigners who aren't in Europe. If you thought the anti-immagrant sentiments were bad in the USA, we've got nothing on Europe...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:low profile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know on the streets of london it is not an option, but protective gear (motocross) helps a lot in a fistfight .. i know i got into one once... and i wasn't the one who left the place running :)

      Sounds like you definately need a more macho nick than 'dindi'... :-)

    3. Re:low profile by dindi · · Score: 1

      ahm yep you are right in england i had bad experience being a foreigner sometimes ... eg in Coventry it was an everyday problem that students of the language school got beaten up by local foreign haters ...

      however shouting hungarian helped me outta crap in new york and in miami once, both times i was asked for money and after replying politely i was asked in a more aggressive manner .... but mumbling hungarian curses seemed to work ... maybe they thought i was nuts or something ...

      on the other hand i walked around bad parts of NY after dark with a professional looking (still) camera and i received looks, but no one really bothered ....

      same in england, I slept with a friend in front of the metro station (we got there at 3am, and till like 5 there was no transportation)

    4. Re:low profile by dindi · · Score: 1

      yep ... changing looks, going to the gym is easy, however changing a name online is a tough one ...

      I happened to invent the name, because my normal nickname was already taken back in the BBS era (it was dino)

      cheers ...

  182. STM backpacks by Bifurcati · · Score: 1

    You should check out STM backpacks. These are really excellent pieces of equipment, look really sturdy, and definitely don't scream "lots of of electronic goodes within!". Lots of pockets for phone, mp3 player, PDA, etc. They even have an opening for headphones so that you can keep your player in your backpack!

  183. Re:Get a gun by PFAK · · Score: 1

    ... I've never been mugged, and I'm canadian too ;) .. Vancouver to boot.

    --

    Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
  184. The urban geek as a mugger magnet? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1
    The Urban Geek As a Mugger Magnet?
    The urban geek sure isn't going to be a chick magnet, now is he? ;) =P
  185. Re:Not a problem here by Telex4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The UK has enacted a total gun ban, and consequently, violent crime rates have gone up.

    Aside from the general nuttiness of the rest of your post, this sentence really caught my attention.

    Very few guns have been legal in the UK for a long time. The most recent change I can remember in my lifetime was just to cut down on light handarms that "hobbyists" use and have to keep in ranges. You imply that relatively recently we went from having lots of guns to not having very many, and that there is a parallel increase in violent crimes.

    Not only has this phantom increase in violent crimes not occurred over the timescale that guns have been banned, but it's such a long time any link would be pretty difficult to make. Better reasons for increases in violent crime include such things as farcical "drug wars", real wars (afghanistan & iraq, for example) and a lack of attention on the problem.

  186. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever nice life the French can have was bought and paid for in American blood. I dare you to deny it. Sprechen sie Deutsch?

    Of course their poor little egos can't manage to admit that.

    If the Islamist invasion of France et al continues, there might need to be a second iteration of ass-saving sooner than any of us would have thought.

    You mischaracterize the state in the US.
    You also mischaracterize how people perceive the state in the US.
    Some folks prefer a socialized system akin to what you have over there; others prefer a conservative, small gov't approach.
    You mischaracterize how many people have guns.
    You mischaracterize the impact of that ownership.
    You mischaracterize the level of safety that your average Londoner feels in strolling about as versus your average New Yorker (I was just there! I know).

    Nobody's asking for your sovereignty; but your smug, complacent, & historically-ignorant commentary is a bit much to stomach.

  187. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Funny

    /. has said before that it's against security through obscurity though. Security tools should be open for all to see and trouble shoot.

    That plan won't fly here.

  188. pretty simple really by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    If someone attempts to rob me in the UK, he is much less likely to be armed than if this occured in the USA. This is because he knows that I am less likely to be armed too. I would rather be robbed by someone weilding a knife than someone pointing a gun at me. Idiots can kill with a gun. Only trained experts can use a gun to defend themselves.

    It takes ability to kill with a knife. So I get knifed? I don't fancy that but it's less scary than the idea of being shot.

    Also for all the people who suggest martial arts, I suspect martial arts would be more effective if the robber had a knife rather than a gun.

    Conclusion? It is not carrying the gun that puts one in danger. It is the scumbag knowing their victim very possibly carries one that makes them shoot first and check later.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:pretty simple really by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      That's kind of an odd conclusion. Criminals are dumb, yes. But a guy who wants to rob you for some cash, is extremely aware of the difference between robbery and 2nd degree murder. Simply put - robbers don't just gun you down to take a few hundred bucks off you. And if they were the type to do that - well, they'd certainly cut your throat or stab you in the back if a gun isn't available.

      As you say, using a knife takes skill. However, using a gun effectively at close range takes a lot less. But that is precisely the reason it is more practical for self defense. When you take a lethal force class, what they tell you is, your objective is not to -kill- your attacker, it is to -stop- him. If he is threatening your life, the point is to make that stop. Your best chance of doing this is with a gun. Contingencies for a guy who also has a gun - absolutely - as I said in another thread, you'd be crazy to pull a gun in some wacky quickdraw attempt on someone already holding you at gunpoint.

      But barring that situation (where everything is moot), a handgun is what will give you the strongest likelihood of a.) coming out of the situation alive and b.) less importantly, but still something to consider - with all your 'stuff'.

    2. Re:pretty simple really by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i find getting stabbed a lot scarier than getting shot. why do you make the assertion that it takes ability to kill with a knife?

      try this experiment: Give a marker to a 6 year old and tell him to write on you. I'll bet that you're going to come away with ink on you.

      Now imagine how hard it would be to not get stabbed or sliced by an 18 year old punk, who might also have friends with him.

      --
      -- My Sig is a P228.
    3. Re:pretty simple really by Ageless · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about that. You kick a 6 year old in the throat as he's coming towards you he's gonna drop pretty hard. Then you draw a moustache on him with the marker.

      And maybe some funny eyebrows.

    4. Re:pretty simple really by Poeir · · Score: 1

      I'm part of a local freestyle medieval combat group, which does full contact combat with foam-padded weapons. They're designed to be swung as hard as possible and not leave a bruise, so people hit hard and fast. From time to time, one will wind up unarmed, leaving one with little option than to flee or try to take an opponent's weapon. Recently, I've been trying to figure out how to do so by sparring with someone.

      It goes pretty bad. The unarmed fighter can't afford any kind of mistake, while even if the unarmed fighter gains control of the opponent's arm, he still has to actually get the weapon away and then use it. Once it's out of the opponent's hand, it's pretty easy, but getting to that phase is not a situation I ever hope to be in in real life.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  189. Coming from the US..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'ld have to suggest you add to your collection a very large and visible gun :-)

  190. Live in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you have to do is move to New York City. According to our modest mayor, we have the safest city in America (all thanks to him of course). You could walk around with a transparent suitcase full of $100s and not have a problem. Seriously though, I cannot tell you the number of times I've seen some dork on the subway with an iPod, laptop, or expensive PDA, cell, or watch. And these idiots wonder why they get mugged?!?!? If you need to carry these items around, CONCEAL them when in public (i.e. subway, bad neighborhood, etc...). Doing anything else is asking for trouble (and possibly deserving it).

    1. Re:Live in NYC by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is move to New York City. According to our modest mayor, we have the safest city in America (all thanks to him of course).

      Er, no, it's all thanks to Giuliani, Kelly, Bratton and COMPSTAT. Bloomberg is actually pretty damn humble compared to Rudy, but then again, who isn't?

      Seriously though, I cannot tell you the number of times I've seen some dork on the subway with an iPod, laptop, or expensive PDA, cell, or watch. And these idiots wonder why they get mugged?!?!?

      But in NYC, they pretty much aren't..

      If you need to carry these items around, CONCEAL them when in public (i.e. subway, bad neighborhood, etc...). Doing anything else is asking for trouble (and possibly deserving it).

      And pretty girls should wear burkhas or else they're asking to get raped.

    2. Re:Live in NYC by hirschma · · Score: 1

      Whatever the reason, NYC is truly very safe.

      I grew up in Brooklyn, and used to take the subways to go to school in Manhattan. During the course of grades 7-9, I was mugged three times, and saw several muggings. I mean, who the hell mugs an 11 year old and expects to get something good?

      I returned from living elsewhere in '95, and have never been bothered, have never seen any crime, and don't know anyone that has been victimized.

      This is only anecdotal, but I'd hazard to guess that the hype over how safe NYC is right on the money.

      At any rate, my advice for shiny toys is: get ones that you can part with. I don't have an iPod, I have an OLD PJB-100 that does the same job, although it isn't as flash. I carry a subnotebook around at all times, but it is a >$400 ebay special. My cellphone was free with a new contract. My PDA was a cheapo Zaurus. They all do the job, but I won't cry if I'm asked to part with them, although I will ask the mugger (nicely) if I can keep my SIM card from the phone :) - not for the data, to avoid the hassle of getting the old one deactivated.

  191. Re:Get a gun by Jardine · · Score: 1

    This is in Southern Ontario.. and it can happen to you.

    Want to give a hint as to the name of the city/town? Windsor? Kitchener-Waterloo? London? Someplace smaller?

  192. Ditch the headphones! by kf4lhp · · Score: 1

    Honestly, get rid of the headphones - period. If you're that worried, you need to be more aware of your surroundings, and if you can't hear what's going on or who's coming up behind you, you're just a walking target.

  193. A few alternatives by C60 · · Score: 1

    Leave your gear at home.

    1) If you're dragging a bunch of equipment to (or through) a questionable location, you need to have your head examined.

    2) Yeah yeah, it's all well and fine to be a geek, but try being realistic too. How much of that crap do you *really* need? The reason people carry a PDA is because it contains an important subset of the information contained on your laptop or main machine. Meaning that you don't need to bring a laptop with you.

    3) Swap out the iPod for an MP3 CD player, how much music do you really need? If you're carrying around a laptop, you're already carrying around a bunch of CDs as well. In fact it will probably weigh a lot less than dragging around an iPod. MP3 CD players are really cheap these days as well.

    4) If you *really* must take a laptop with you, buy a beater laptop, cover it in bumper stickers. I've got a really nice Vaio that stays at home, for those times I feel like writing code in a coffee shop, I take my old linux based Thinkpad, which underneath the dust has "Got Root?" and "I am a bad ass" stickers on it. Nobody gives it the slightest notice because it looks like a piece of crap.

    5) Learn to do without. If you're dragging all this stuff around with you for sheer entertainment value, bring a book instead. If you're not sealed away behind a mask of your own music, you might just be able to take part in a conversation with other live flesh and blood humans. In the long run, humans are more interesting anyway.

    --
    Karma: 0 (But I wield a mean +10 Vorpal Apathy)
  194. mod parent "Funny (+1 fucking hilarious)" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, seriously! I just shit myself and three others.

  195. Why stick out at all? by missing_boy · · Score: 1
    This is nice: remove all visible signs of status, so that the muggers won't steal it from you.

    Next: "how conceal your Porsche as a Hyundai Pony" and "make your Rolex look like a Timex Indiglo". Why have status symbols at all? Who'd have thought that the Chinese were right all along?! We should all just wear a green uniform! What good is consumerism, if you cannot show off your buying power?

    1. Re:Why stick out at all? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Next: "how conceal your Porsche as a Hyundai Pony" and "make your Rolex look like a Timex Indiglo".

      Guess you haven't seen the car commercial on NBC the past few months where the guy has a car-cover that makes his parked car look like an old rusted Chevy Citation?

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Why stick out at all? by name773 · · Score: 1

      What good is consumerism, if you cannot show off your buying power?
      consumerism wasn't good to begin with, and showing off is definitely not going to help that.

    3. Re:Why stick out at all? by missing_boy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just saw that ad; it's hilarious!

  196. Even better by BigChigger · · Score: 1

    Do your own piercings and tattoos. That will really make you look rough. BC

  197. I'd say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carry a gun, but given that the geniuses that run England have banned them all, it's no wonder that crime is at an all-time high in London (and with guns no less!).

    Things are to the point where only the criminals have guns, and they know it so the regular guy is just fucked. I say do the following:

    1) Petition your moronic leaders to get their heads out of their arses and allow law-abiding citizens to carry guns. It's a proven crime reducer - look at any US State which has a concealed carry law - their crime stats dropped across the board after passing those laws... The crooks sdon't know who has a gun and who doesn't...

    2) Carry whatever weapon you can. Mace, knife, collapsable asp. Someone fucks with you - mace the clown, then whack the crap out of him with the asp. If things get touchy - stick the schmuck. Just stick to the "I was in fear of my life" phrase, and make sure you kill him so he can't refute your belief.

    3) Don't look like a pushover. Actually workout. Learn how to defend yourself. Take the occasional karate or other martial arts class - it doesn't mean you can kick everyone's ass, but you'll have a better chance at survival when someone is trying to kick yours. And don't tell anyone you practice the martial arts - they'll all want to fight you...

    4) IF you can't handle any of this - then just stay home.

  198. Don't use the white iPod earphones by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've read somewhere that they're very distinctive, and you're more likely to be targetted. Switch 'em out to something black, or behind-the-head headphones or something.

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
  199. Re:Not a problem here by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1
    From the "The Economist," February 22nd, 2001, England and Wales is second after Australia for percentage of people who were a victim violent crime once or more in 1999. For car theft, England and Wales is number 1. For burglary, England and Wales is number 2.

    After handguns were banned in England in 1997, "serious violent crime rates from 1997 to 2002 averaged 29 percent higher than 1996; robbery was 24 percent higher; murders 27 percent higher. Before the law, armed robberies had fallen by 50 percent from 1993 to 1997, but as soon as handguns were banned, the robbery rate shot back up, almost back to their 1993 levels."

    "The 2000 International Crime Victimization Survey, the most recent survey done, shows that the violent crime rate in England and Australia was twice the rate in the US."

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  200. Re:A gun? LONDON by dkuntz · · Score: 1

    Yep.. the Brits are strict on guns... a lot of police dont carry their guns on a regular basis... they keep it in their car, or in their desk.

    Really, martial arts is the way to go... Hapkido (Joint manipulation/pain compliance) helps... someone grabs you, you can break their arm in about 2 seconds... someone's choking you, you can get out easily

    --
    OMG... I have a sig?
  201. Move to Canada by dborod · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the problem is one of latitude, not attitude.

    I've got an iPod, and not only do I still use the trademark white earbuds, but I also carry my ipod around in an iPod case on the strap of my bag, with the cover unflapped so I can get easy access to the controls. I've also got a 15" TiBook that I schlep around with me and have never had reason to be concerned. I live in Edmonton Alberta, population 750,000.

    1. Re:Move to Canada by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Fuck man, what's your street number and place of occupation? Why? Em.. I'm doing a survey, yeah, that's it!

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  202. Suits by sparkz · · Score: 1
    A lot of comments here along the lines of "Don't look like you're carrying anything worthwhile" - look scruffy, put it in a rucksack, etc.

    Whenever I go to London, it's normally to "The City" - where I already look "scruffy" by not wearing pinstripes and braces (that's "Suspenders to you Americans out there :-)

    Turning up unshaven at HSBC*'s office in combats, dirty t-shirt with a backpack wouldn't get the job done - the fact that I have an ID badge with a photo which looks something like me might get me into the building, but even if I convince everyone there that I have a legitimate reason to be there, I am guaranteed to get complaints (if not kicked out of the building for unprofessionalism).
    Anybody got any ideas for those of us who have to wear suits for customer visits?

    *HSBC used as an example because I've never been there

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  203. Re:A gun? LONDON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, how very insightful of you. Tell me, do you also correct people when they tell you what a whiny bitch you are? "Well technically, I'm not a bitch..."

  204. Re:Not a problem here by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm filling the sucker full of lead.

    Hey, that's your choice and I respect you for it. Personally, I'd just twist their head off.

  205. Carry a backpack by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

    Carry a backpack, a nice cheap one. It achieves part of the poor, broke student look perfectly. Students aren't usually the people getting mugged. Its the people with expensive leather electronics bags and clothes made especially for electronics. And above all, don't look like you expect someone to steal something, because that means you obviously have something of value. The whole thing is to not be a target, and look like you have nothing good.

    --
    Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  206. 357... by kantai · · Score: 1

    .357 Magnum

    Easy enough to conceal, and tends to get "the job" done.

  207. trash bag= ghetto briefcase by dj_virto · · Score: 1

    It gets funny looks at work, but I put my gadgets in a trash bag when going to and from my car in my ethnic, drug infested neighbourhood.

    Seriously though, when are we going to make a real effort to solve this problem? It's not inevitable unless we think it is. Living in the aforementioned neighbourhood in Houston, Texzs, I can tell you that for whatever reason, the cops make no serious effort to restrain the folks here from committing crimes. Allowing large parts of the city to remain human cancers, where crime is an accepted part of the culture kids grow up in, is one f-cked up way of running a society.

    1. Re:trash bag= ghetto briefcase by base3 · · Score: 1

      The cops are busy enforcing intellectual "property" laws for campaign contributors and the government has hocked future generations to pay for corporate welfare for outsourcers. The best you can do is to try to play the game and make enough money to get into a lily-white, gated community, because it's not getting any better for ordinary people anytime soon.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:trash bag= ghetto briefcase by dj_virto · · Score: 1

      We are fortunate that the progressive activists of the 1890's (+-20 years), union organisers of the 1930's, etc, etc were not as defeatist. It seems like corruption has exploitation has to get real bad for people to take action strong enough to win. Then, we coast on their achievements for s while as it seems like a nondescript bit of 'the way things have always been' rather than a conciously worked-for change.

      I do agree with you about the corporate welfare.

      Fuck tha game. I want to play a new game.

    3. Re:trash bag= ghetto briefcase by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      How 'bout an old one?

      He's got it.
      I want it.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  208. Looking like Ratso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used dress like that and go into upscale NYC shops. The sales help were on you instantly, "May we help you sir?" meaning anything but, and shadowing you like some mime doppelganger.

    1. Re:Looking like Ratso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll remember that for next time I go shopping somewhere where the salespeople generally avoid customers.

  209. Some Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing you must begin to do is ignore the media. It seems that you have become supsceptible to the fear-mongering and tyranny of Government by voicing fear of being "mugged". You must realise that what the media says, and by-proxy, the Goverment, is not necessarily true, or that insignificant truths can become exagerated in the cause of a particular political agenda.

    Secondly, I suggest that you throw away the material possessions you claim to hold so dear. None of the articles which you are fiery of losing are of any importance. They are transient luxeries designed to entertain the feeble human mind and to distract you from the more important things in life. By deliberatly cocooning yourself from the tedium of state sponsered and corporate sponsored entertainment, you can achieve social enlightement.

    Finally, although this will occur as a natural consequence of spurning these electronic trinkets; get a life. Get a girlfriend, or boyfriend if that's what you like, and start to live life as though it is worth living and not solely for the accumulation of material wealth.

    Follow this simple advice and you will soon be accepted into the pantheon of human beings and cease to be a slave, a victim of capitalist oppression.

  210. Get non-descript containers by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Getting a backpack designed for a laptop can make it appear that you're not carrying a laptop at all, whereas a standard laptop case, while it might look similar to a tote bag, is usually pretty obvious.

    Failing that, get something like the Halliburton metal laptop case. If worse comes to worse, you can swing the thing at a mugger's head and do a lot of damage to his head without damaging the laptop inside. You know, clonk him and run. Besides, a guy carrying a metal case (briefcase type) is probably less likely to get mugged than a guy carrying a leather laptop case :p

    1. Re:Get non-descript containers by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny
      metal laptop case. If worse comes to worse, you can swing the thing at a mugger's head

      "The dummy brought a briefcase to a knife fight. Lucky me, it was metal and the blood was easy to wipe off."

    2. Re:Get non-descript containers by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 3, Funny
      Besides, a guy carrying a metal case (briefcase type) is probably less likely to get mugged than a guy carrying a leather laptop case.


      You may improve it by putting a "Radioactive Material" or "Biohazard" sticker on the metal briefcase. A tested side effect is having more space around you in public transportation.

    3. Re:Get non-descript containers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And gets you sent to Cuba real quick.

    4. Re:Get non-descript containers by mcdade · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting thru airport security with that Item.

      Leads to body cavity searches on entering the airport. For people who use the item to travel, they can't really do that sort of thing anymore. Freaks people out too much.

      -b

    5. Re:Get non-descript containers by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Surely simply opening the case and showing that it is a laptop case is sufficient?

      Those of us who live outside the US probably have a bit less to fear from airport security, however.

  211. Everywhere by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Violent crime has been decreasing throughout the entire western world for decades. In fact, Texas is one of the only places in the western world where violent crime isn't decreasing. Interesting, no?

  212. You know what makes a you a muggers magnet??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Performing the massively multiplayer thumb-war in public...

  213. Re:Get a gun by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

    Maybe because no one in Canada owns anything worth stealing...

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  214. You're kidding by Micah · · Score: 1

    I *just* had a couple guys snag my watch off me while walking home. Not with a weapon that I could see, but they grabbed it and were obviously going to fight for it. Then I get home and this is the top story on Slashdot... :rolls eyes:

  215. This is not the place for the pro/anti gun debates by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

    Since so many people (myself included) are interested in the suggestion that this fella should carry a gun, I direct you to a more relevant forum: http://www.hs2000talk.com/ . This is my homepage, as I am one of those "crazy Americans with a gun", and I hate to see this guy's search for answers buried in yet another guns/no guns debate with offtopic discussion... Guns are not an option for him in London, so there doesn't need to be so much discussion on the right to bear arms here. But, if anyone is interested in taking it to another forum, try that one out, or if you want to actually have a one on one discussion on the matter, PM or email me. But come on kids, let's not drown out any valid responses to this guy's plea for help!

  216. Re:Not a problem here by Ithika · · Score: 1
    I would like to know how you "feel" about law enforcment carrying verses ...

    Oh boy, I can see it now, BBC News...

    "And finally, in an effort to curb crime using non-violent means, Metropolitan police officers will be carrying Bibles instead of firearms when dealing with armed offenders. John Brydon has more..."
    (Flick to reporter standing in rain.)
    "Thank you Jill. I'm standing here at Metropolitan Headquarters where earler this afternoon Chief Superintendant Ian Edwards unveiled new plans for a more spiritual approach to crime fighting when dealing with firearms.

    "A small squad of highly trained officers have been drilled by the finest fire-and-brimstone preachers from across the world in an effort to use the power of the Lord against the infidels."

    (Cut to Press Conference. Caption: Chief Superintendant Ian Edwards.)
    "...during the course of, uh, a volatile hostage situation key passages from the Good Lord's Book will be communicated to the, uh, offenders. The officers have been specially chosen and highly trained to choose the correct chapter and verse for each situation and to suit the psychological profile of the criminals."
    (Cut back to studio.)
    "A spokesman from the Church of England said earlier today that this is an encouraging sign of the Lord's power playing a helping hand in the lives of the most needy."
  217. Don't Forget by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    A mugger's going to judge based on what you're carrying, but also remember that he's going to avoid people that seem threatening. If you're weaving all over the sidewalk staring at the display of your (walkman | iPod | PDA), you basically look clueless, and are therefore a prime target.

    Think of this example: Mr. T walked around with a bunch of valuable jewelry around his neck. How often do you think he got mugged? So, rule of thumb... Don't dress to attract attention, hide your electronic shit, and looked ticked off as you quickly move to where you're going.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
    1. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mr. T walked around with a bunch of valuable jewelry around his neck. How often do you think he got mugged?

      So the lesson is: always have a whole TV film crew following you around and pointing a camera or two at your every move and you will be far less likely to be mugged! :-P

  218. wear a dress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just shave and youll be fine

  219. That University of Marylan study was flawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Taken from this site:

    Advocates of gun-control advocates sometimes cite a 1995 study of concealed-carry policies by three researchers from the University of Maryland. The study looked at five urban areas and found that in four of them, the handgun homicide rate rose after a concealed-carry law had been enacted. But David McDowall, one of the authors, says that the small set of data limits the conclusions to be drawn from the study. He also states that there is no evidence permit holders commit crimes. The study is a classic illustration of how changing the parameters of a "before-and-after" analysis can change the results. For each city, McDowall and his colleagues averaged the yearly crime rates from 1973 until the year before the law went into effect, and compared that figure to the average rate of all subsequent years. If, instead, we compare the year before the law went into effect with the most recent year for which we have complete data (1994), then the homicide rate declined in three of the five cities.

  220. Thoughts from a kung-fu+knife wielding mugger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi everybody, i'm the kung-fu knowing, knife and gun wielding MUGGER. I have the requisite number of piercings and a bad haircut. (To clarify the guy who owns this notebook isn't a mugger, he's a geek, i'm just using the computer that I took when I mugged him, now i'm working on moving into identity theft) .. anyway I just had to write in and say thank you to everybody who's given such great advice, it's people like you who ensure i'll be going strong. While i've never personally been mugged, I can tell you the sort of things that scare the crap out of me: 1. a remote controlled explosive device that could be placed inside the bag and detonated from a keychain. 2. iPod (or equivalent mp3 player) where the contents were nothing but people screaming in agony/being tortured, and then, at the very end of the recording a message saying "hey you, the guy who stole my mp3 player, don't sleep, because i'm criminally insane, and i'll be coming back to get my mp3 player - and we'll settle up then.). (it also helps if there's some bloody rags in the bag) 3. iPod or equivalent device that is simply lo-jacked and can be tracked by law enforcement officials. 4. a computer that contains (instead of your information) the credit card numbers and identity information for popular mob and/or high ranking federal law enforcement agents, which I might borrow. 5. poisoned twinkies, and/or other junk food. (I usually eat the food people keep in their bags). Randomly poison tempting pieces of food and/or drinks. I personally think #5 is the best, because it would kill whoever mugged you and then the police will find my body, and call you to come pickup your stuff. Anyway.. This is the sort of stuff that keeps me up at night. I don't mind telling you this stuff because like I said i'm planning on moving up to identity theft here real soon, and I can do that by simply swiping stuff out of your mailbox!

  221. Fallacy type of parent: post hoc ergo propter hoc by 3l1za · · Score: 2, Informative

    The UK murder rates are increasing, BTW (ever since that handgun ban in '97!).

    The US murder rates are decreasing.

  222. MOD UP: GAVE FACTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy asked for some numbers, and here they are.

  223. Re:A gun? LONDON by bani · · Score: 4, Funny

    in that case i suggest carrying around a loaded football fan with you at all times.

  224. Libertarians though. by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1

    With heavy libertarian leanings, the average /.er may be more likely to use guns. Or maybe that just leads to the profound fascination.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  225. Re:Get a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes I admit we owe you for your support in WW2, especially as it was so timely!

    The nice life the French have was bought and paid for with Russian blood and don't kid yourself. The USA lost 500,000 men in the entire war, both in the Pacific and Europe. Russia lost over 13 million against Germany alone.

    Likewise the European powers lost over 2 million, not including civillians.

    Furthermore, your economy only started to recover from its disasterous nosedive thanks to the start of the war and the corresponding increase in European military spending.

    And, as for the level of safety felt by most Londoners. I have lived there all my life and visited New York, and the difference in atmosphere was negligible, both were equally safe in my view, the difference being that I know that the majority of people do not carry guns;

    Fewer guns=lower probability of being shot

  226. Hide your iPod in a walkman case! by Tikaro · · Score: 1

    If you've got an old Sony Sports Walkman, you can "stealth mode" the iPod inside it. Kit is twenty bucks, and the premade case is a (waaaay overpriced, I admit it) cool hundred dollars.

    www.retropod.com

  227. Important by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    On of the best thinsg you can do is take a martial arts class and learn how to break-fall.

    Violent attacks usually start with a clothesline from behind -- you fall on your face, crushing your nose and breaking some teeth. Then you're in so much pain that you can't fight back. This goes for muggings, rapes, and good old-fashioned assaults. But if you can break your fall, you're in a much better position to defend yourself.

  228. I use the the Ford Prefect Method by Atrax · · Score: 1

    Laptop bag easily over the shoulder, thusly:

    "He carried his satchel with an easy swaying motion so that he could get a good swing at anybody who tried to take it from him without asking."

    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish, chap 4

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:I use the the Ford Prefect Method by Atrax · · Score: 1

      oops. chapter 5 actually.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  229. It's not America's fault you're being irrational. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2, Informative
    if you ask anyone in the streets . . . they will tell you that they are much more afraid of violence in countries that allow people to carry weapons around

    OK, so your hypothetical man on the street is completely ignorant. What is that supposed to prove?

    I'd be interested to know how many times people really defend themselves with their guns (and what is the ratio against "gun accidents" for instance).

    Average annual incidence of self-defense actions involving firearms, 1987-1992: 82,500 (USDOJ)

    Annual accidental fatalities involving firearms, 1993: 1543

    Unintentional firearms-related injuries, 1993: 21,385 (CDC)

    The numbers stack up pretty well, I'd say. And that's not even taking into account that the incidence of firearm-related accidents has decreased dramatically in the last decade.

  230. Just be like me by melted · · Score: 1

    6' 3", 300lbs, bald, with a beard. Sometimes I get scared when I look into the mirror. And I don't have no stinking laptop, iPod, PDA or cell phone. The only thing the mugger will get from me is trouble. :-)

    1. Re:Just be like me by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      > 6' 3", 300lbs, bald, with a beard.
      Heh. I'm 5' 11", 200lbs, very long hair and a beard.
      I also have a lazy eye, so somtimes I'm cross-eyed... I think that if you look like a complete nutcase and/or dangerous, you're less likely of being mugged.

  231. Re:A gun? LONDON by Yremogtnom · · Score: 1

    Hapkido is cool, BUT joint manipulation/pain compliance arts don't always work... especially on stoned crackheads or the double/triple jointed. If you are attacked, running & screaming are always a good idea! :)

    --
    You are alone in the world.
  232. muggers?? by hacking_4_b33r · · Score: 1

    i live in canada, the only thing people will mug you here for is booze..i walk arond with my laptop, minidisc, digital cameras all the time i just usually keep it in a discreet backpack instead of those morons who use "laptop" bags.

    --
    mmmmm beeer....
  233. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yes but the probability game is best played in the specific case; namely, it doesn't matter a whole lot to me if there is a lower probability of getting shot in GB if I'm still in the P(get_shot) == true pile; I'd rather assure that my probability is as low as possible. [selfish American!]

    Enter our beloved 4th Amendment.

    That probability goes way down with handgun ownership.

    This is true across America: communities where there are CCW laws have consistently lower crime rates.

    PS: Once we saw the Zimmerman Memo, we were in. And there you go again... if we defer til we are certain, then we get snipped at by the Euros. If we step forward where we are concerned of a gathering threat, again(!), we get sniped at by the Euros. Just. Can't. Win.

  234. Backpacks don't work. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    A group of Budhists kicked my ass and took my laptop. Worse of all they ruined my My Little Pony limited edition backpack!

  235. Screw "feeling comfortable" and fighting back... by JamieF · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't worry so much about keeping your valuables safe. Keep yourself safe, keep your data safe, and protect your investment in those valuables.

    Plenty of people have covered the "don't look like a target" angle. So let's address some other things you should do:

    Find the local police's web site and read their advice on how to avoid getting mugged. Look at their crime statistics and figure out where the *truly* dangerous parts of town are (for mugging) as opposed to the places where you currently don't feel safe.

    Get a laptop lock (if you don't have one already). Lock it to your desk at work, and to something immobile if you're at a hotel that doesn't have a safe in the room.

    Prepare for the worst. No, that doesn't mean arming yourself with all sorts of weapons. You are not your laptop's bodyguard; you don't need to take a bullet (or knife wound or whatever) for it. You can't keep it on your person at all times. What if somebody steals it from your apartment, your luggage, your desk, etc.? (You don't take it with you to the bathroom do you?) What if it gets damaged in an accident? Are you going to use your pepper spray to help you rescue it from a burning building?

    Get insurance (renter's or homeowners) and cover all your stuff. Do the math and set the deductible to a reasonable level like $250 or $500 so you're not paying a high premium just in case your iPod gets stolen. Write down the serial numbers of your equipment so that the police (and eBay, etc.) can be on the lookout for your stuff.

    Do backups periodically. An external hard drive or CD/DVD burner isn't that expensive compared to how much it would cost to replace your data. Get in the habit of backing up your valuable stuff. Don't procrastinate backups until you have the ultimate automated backup solution in place; just set aside a time every week to do it manually if that's what it takes. Get in the habit of separating your vital data that needs frequent backups from your less important data (MP3s) that don't need to be backed up constantly. Theft and damage aren't the only risks to data - hard disks WILL crap out after a few years; it's just a matter of when, and carrying them around with you everywhere puts them at additional risk due to wear and tear, unstable temperature and humidity, not-necessarily-clean power, etc.

    Use encryption where it makes sense. If somebody gets their hands on your laptop and has hours and hours to look through your files, is there anything on there that you need to protect? There probably is. The whole hard disk doesn't have to be encrypted but maybe a couple of folders do, or maybe your whole documents directory (the one that gets backed up most often and doesn't include huge files like music and movies and downloads). If you use a modern OS there is probably a really easy way to get an encrypted disk image or home directory set up that is mostly transparent when you use it.

    Look into software that helps with stolen computer recovery. There are apps that will install in a very stealthy fashion that will phone home via modem or internet to the vendor. Report your laptop stolen and when it checks in, the vendor will figure out where the laptop is (via IP or phone lookup) and contact the police. There are things you can do (such as setting a BIOS password, and setting the boot order so that the hard disk boots before the CD) to make it really difficult to reinstall the OS on the computer so that these apps have a better chance of doing their job.

  236. I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But it's almost unnecessary since muggings are nearly unheard of in florida anymore, since 90 percent of the populace can get a concealed carry permit and many CC regularly.

    Ironically, the places with the most muggings are the places with the strictest anti-handgun laws. NY, DC, LA, Chicago, Detroit and with SF catching up fast. Oh, oh oh oh and I almost forgot one.... London.

    "Shall issue" concealed carry laws are the BEST THING to happen to crime in this country within recent memory. The complete disarmament of law-abiding citizens in the UK is a terrible shame.

    1. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 1

      You do know that violent crime is WAY LOWER in England than in America? Maybe you don't have a gun to defend yourself, but the mugger (or burglar, whatever) doesn't have a gun to ROB you with.

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [nelson muntz sez:] HA HA!

      You're saying there's a good chance you might get mugged, so you feel that you have to carry around a concealed weapon?

      I live in Japan where the street crime rate is practically nil (oh, and handguns are illegal). Feeling safe because there's no crime is much better than feeling safe just because you're as powerful as the criminals.

      Guns were never a big part of the culture in the UK or Japan, so banning handguns hardly affected anyone. The cops don't even carry guns.

      In the States, guns are such a big deal that everyone gets all worked up over the right to bear arms. Too late to change that, it's part of your culture now, it's not for the rest of the world.

      SUCKS TO BE YOU!

    3. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Um, I suggest you check out

      An Article
      Another Article
      Bureau of Justice Statistics

      Especially the Crime rates from victim surveys.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    4. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan is such a wonderful and peaceful country. On the other hand, it is a very different country from the united states.

      I am constantly amazed at the discipline and self control of the Japanese people. While a depressed and desperate american might stoop to robbing people or go on a shooting spree in the workplace, a Japanese man will murder his family and then commit suicide. In America, that would be seen as strange, but not so in Japan. Apparently this happens quite often but is not counted against muder statistics. I could go on and describe how the Japanese justice system differs from ours, or how Japanese and American culture is different (you dont say!), but these should be obvious to any japanese who speaks english well enough to post on slashdot. Instead I will close this post with a taunt.

      I carry a gun because I enjoy shooting people. People like me and my anscestors are the reason Japan is a disarmed lapdog of a nation instead of the rightful ruler of East Asia. Your discipline and work ethic serve us well. And thanks for letting us use all your bases, belonging as they do, to us.

    5. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, the BoJ statistics end in 1996. The gun ban was passed in 1997. Ummm... let's ignore that link.

      Second, compare things the gun ban will actually AFFECT. I'm talking about murder by handguns, etc. The UK rate is way lower, as I said. Burglary and what not (how most people are affected) probably won't change as most burglars aren't going to rob a house when anybody's home to actually use the gun.

      It's really easy to throw around misleading statistics (as you did) but when you look at the statistics that are affected by the gun ban you'll see an entirely different picture.

      --


      No sig for you.
    6. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      You fucking moron.

      THE RATE AT WHICH CRIMES ARE COMMMITTED WITH A PARTICULAR WEAPON IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. A knife murder is just as bad as a handgun murder. A knife robbery is just as bad as a handgun robbery. The victim does not care what propelled a piece of metal into his vital organs. These are not difficult concepts for even a child to master.

      Hypothetical situation:
      Lets say you live on a tropical island:
      Further assume that 100% of all violent crimes are committed with machetes.
      Being a responsible legislature, you take the obvious course of banning all machetes.
      Violent crime goes up sharply, but the percentage of crimes committed with machetes goes down.
      People who pushed for the machete ban pat themselves on the back for having such an impact on machete violence.
      People who subsequently got robbed or murdered with non-machete weapons curse their good luck.
      More pointless bans on other machete-like implements are passed into law, with similar non-useful effects.

      This is the exact situation that keeps playing out again and again with the gun control crowd. Guns are taken away from law abiding citizens and crime goes up because criminals (guess what?) arent law abiding, by definition. Instead the police are stretched thin defending a disarmed populace and crime skyrockets while the working class suffers. Fortunately most places here are not so gullible as to beleive that gun control is a success when they see crime going up as a result.

    7. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Yes, a knife murder and gun murder are equally bad.

      BUT, and this is a big BUT (you fucking moron) a robbery with A KNIFE involved is much less likely to result in somebody dying than a robbery with A GUN involved. Get it? Or maybe you just don't care.

      And since you started calling names... "crime skyrockets while the working class suffers" what are you? A fucking commie pinko leftist bastard? (Who still holds a very right-wing view of gun control?) Since when does "the working class" have anything to do with gun control? Only working people buy guns? Rich people don't get robbed?

      --


      No sig for you.
    8. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Sorry for namecalling.

      Rich people dont have to live in rental properties with poor security or no security. Rich people can hire guards. Rich people can circumvent gun control laws (all the politicians and wealthy connected people in NY and LA have concealed handguns, which is tehnically allowed, thanks to loopholes which most people cant use).

      Even the the moderately wealthy (upper-middle-working class I guess you could say) have far fewer crime problems than the poor and working class do. We own homes with land around them and fences around that. We live in neighborhoods that the police patrol far more diligently. Have you ever tried to park in a residential neighborhood in Atherton in the bay area with a car costing less than $50k? The police will be all over you in the blink of an eye demanding identification and your reasons for being there.

      In short, the urban poor and working class need guns the most because they are the most likely to be victims of violent crime. Sadly, they are the ones most frequently denied legal access to firearms.

      If you are unarmed and surrounded, a gun and a knife are equally deadly. If you are armed and can defend yourself, you stand a much better chance of surviving if YOU have a gun. Its not about making the criminal's guns illegal, its about making the gun you defend yourself with legal. See the distinction? Its a very important one.

    9. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 1

      "If you are unarmed and surrounded, a gun and a knife are equally deadly. If you are armed and can defend yourself, you stand a much better chance of surviving if YOU have a gun."

      First of all, how often does that happen? Very rarely (except in movies, heh). Even if that DID happen the ONLY smart thing to do would be to drop the gun and give up.

      Also, people in bad neighborhoods are going to be at risk for crime whether or not guns are legal. And they can protect themselves much more safely by just calling the police. Incidents involving guns owned by either party are much more likely to result in somebody dying, which I would argue is always a bad thing.

      --


      No sig for you.
    10. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by jlanthripp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Even if that DID happen the ONLY smart thing to do would be to drop the gun and give up.

      Hypothetical situation: 7 thugs armed with knives surround me with intent to rob and kill me (because dead men can't identify their attackers to the police). My S&W revolver only holds 6 rounds. Why do they not kill me? Because the first one to attack will be the first to die. None of them wants to be the first to die.

      And they can protect themselves much more safely by just calling the police.

      Find the post in this discussion about a 1974 ruling that says the police have no obligation to defend the public from criminals.

      If I'm in a situation where my life is being immediately threatened by someone, yet somehow manage to pull out my phone and place a call to the police before I'm killed, I'll probably be put on hold for a while. If I manage to survive long enough, with the physical disadvantage of having one hand occupied holding my phone to my ear, I'll eventually get to tell some overworked dispatcher that I'm being attacked, and give them my location (if I know the address). Moving right along, I can now look forward to a 15-30 minute wait until one officer shows up to scrape my corpse up from the pavement. It should be nice and cool to the touch by then.

      Or, I could just take a second or two to shoot my attacker, then pull out the phone and call the police.

      It is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    11. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 1

      7 thugs surround you? The one behind you stabs you in the back. (AGAIN: HOW LIKELY IS THIS???)

      The police may have no obligation, but I bet it depends on certain factors (probably concerning the policeman's safety. I'm a volunteer EMT and while I have a responsibility to save your life--if I'm on duty, random people don't have that-- if my safety would be threatened I should NOT help you for a variety of reasons I won't go into now).

      Anyway, I'm talking more about burglary, etc. Not a mugging. That's going to be over so fast unless a police officer is right there nothing could be done, but that's life. And you don't have to stay on the phone, call and hang-up if you have to. Then hide and wait for the cops.

      Finally, you could "just take a second or two to shoot [your] attacker", but I doubt that would happen:

      1) What if he attacks from behind?
      2) What if you can't get to your gun quick enough?

      There's more of those logistical problems, but finally:

      What if you can't do it? I mean, you talk very easily about ending someone's life (and you would be aiming for their chest, not a great place for even one bullet to hit) but when push came to shove could you actually shoot someone? I doubt it. I'm not talking to you in specific, but let's look at soldiers, for example. Many (most?) soldiers when in war don't fire their weapon when under attack. This is a well documented phenomenon. Now, these are trained soldiers heading into combat where they KNOW they might have to shoot and kill the enemy. You are a civilian, no (specific) training in killing people, no knowledge before the situation that you might have to kill someone that day. All I'm saying is even having a gun AND the opportunity to use it may not help in any situation.

      --


      No sig for you.
    12. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
      What if you can't do it? I mean, you talk very easily about ending someone's life

      Ending a life is not, and should not be, an easy thing psychologically speaking. Anyone who can take a life casually and without regret is a psychopath, IMHO. The instinct to defend one's life, however, should overcome one's reluctance to take another's life.

      (and you would be aiming for their chest, not a great place for even one bullet to hit) but when push came to shove could you actually shoot someone? I doubt it.

      I've never had to, and hope I never have to, but should I ever have the misfortune to find myself in a situation where it's him or me, I have faith in my survival instincts. I'm comfortable with firearms, respect the power that is placed in my hand when I hold one, and am not afraid of using them. I hope the strength of will required to shoot another person when the situation calls for it is at least partially hereditary. I also hope that I have the wisdom to recognize such a situation, and more importantly, to recognize when such a situation is absent.

      The one time I've been a witness to a shooting, the shooter was my dad and the shootee was breaking into our home. We lived in a rural area, where it would have been physically impossible for the police to arrive in under 20 minutes, even if they were at the point in their regular patrol area nearest our home and drove at the fastest possible speed up the mountain the instant we called.

      Here's what happened: We heard the guy jimmying the back door. My dad took a few steps over to the coatrack where his revolver was hanging in its holster and pulled it out. He warned the man in a loud voice that he was armed, and told him to leave. The guy kept on, got the door open, and took a couple of steps into our house. My dad saw that he was holding a large knife, shot him in the chest, and called the police.

      The man turned out to be mentally unbalanced, and had a list of convictions for such offenses as burglary and attempted manslaughter. The attacker was hospitalized, then went to prison for parole violation, attempted burglary, and assault with a deadly weapon. No charges were filed against my father.

      BTW, my father worked at a nuclear power plant, and was thus forbidden to carry his revolver to work. He was killed in a mugging on his way to work one night in 1991. The police theorize that the mugger pretended to be a broken down motorist on a bridge over the Mississippi River. He stopped to help, and was shot for his trouble. The mugger got about $200 and a leather jacket.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    13. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      LOL, last time I called the police to protect myself I ended up in jail, the time before that they searched me over and over and over even though I approached them, the time before THAT they took an hour to show up.

      Now I know kids who've been murdered, and I've known kids who've killed other kids, and I can say that there's always a REASON. People generally don't get killed for no reason. From my observation, the leading reasons are:

      1. Stole from drug dealers. (stupid!)
      2. Stayed with convicted abuser after several hospital visits. (victim was 'darwined out' in my opinion)
      3. Cheating bitches.

      Generally, if you stay out of braindead situations and are aware that you aren't superman, you can bet you won't get hurt.

      The anti-gun lobby makes it hard to carry in my state, and I think it's pretty fscked-up. Especially the new law that requires those ACCUSED of domestic violence to hand their guns over. I know more guys who've been accused wrongly because of crummy cops. I don't think there's been a case recently of a person ACCUSED (not convicted) of a DV crime shooting anyone in this state.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    14. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting people is very very easy when they're attacking you. I would know this since I put a bullet in someone who tried to mug me with an almost comically big knife.

      End result: One thankfully non-critical idiot going to the hospital after deciding that continuing the mugging attempt or running away wasn't a good idea with a bullet in his side and a freaked out little guy leveling a gun at him, me going home intact without my .22 Ruger (which I never saw again).

      I'm glad I had the gun with me, but the scary thing is that I honestly don't remember drawing the gun and firing. I had popped off 3 rounds before finally stopping, and only managed to put one into the mugger. In this case it worked out okay, but had I been packing a 9mm loaded with hollow-points (for "self defense") or a .45 or something it could've been a lot worse.

      I stopped carrying a gun after that. I still own guns and target shoot, but I don't know if I want to risk jailtime because I panicked and put half a clip into someone who wanted the $20 and credit cards in my wallet.

    15. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by OzBeserk · · Score: 1

      muggings are nearly unheard of in florida
      SO I'm the unlucky statistic that makes up Florida's low mugging victim figures... and I cam all the way from Oz to get that experience
      My only concliation is the bastard who made me lie in the gutter with a gun to the back of my head is probably dead or in jail by now.

    16. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      2. Stayed with convicted abuser after several hospital visits. (victim was 'darwined out' in my opinion)
      3. Cheating bitches.

      Er.. Aren't your points one and two a bit mutually contradicting?

      Staying with a bad relationship makes you a "darwin target" and trying to find another relationship makes you a "cheating bitch"?

      So damned tired of male hierarchy violence.
    17. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      The thing a lot of the Americans posting here don't understand was that even before the handgun ban, no one carried a gun anyway. The concept of citizens armed with handguns doesn't work in the UK because people don't want to go around carrying guns as part of their day to day business. Unlike America serious violent crime was never high enough to warrant it. Before the handgun ban, almost all of the handguns were kept at gun clubs anyway. Some people in this country will go their entire life without ever seeing a gun except on TV. Even today Police do not carry guns as a matter of routine. Guns are carried by specialist armed response units trained to deal with armed criminals.

      One of the reasons for the change in gun crime is the change in criminal gun usage. Nowadays more low level criminals carry guns to settle personal scores, whereas in the past guns used to be the preserve of criminal gangs who used them mainly for gangland hits or serious armed robberies.

    18. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Uh, have you ever been to Canada? I'd much rather be in a place where no one carries guns, why? If a criminal has a gun and sticks me up, I know that he is confident that I don't have one. Why is that a good thing? Because, if someone is going to stick me up (and it happens everywhere), I rather they don't decide to not take any chances and shoot me first in case I'm carrying. Up here, if a guy wants to rob someone and has a gun, he knows there is almost no chance of being shot, that possessing a gun IS a level of force above what normal citizenry have, and they don't have to shoot.

      No matter where you go, that is what criminals will try to do. There are always people who are going to do that sort of thing, and they're going to try to do it in a way that poses the least threat to themselves. That means they need the upper hand somehow. And they ARE going to get it, one way or another. Whether that means they have to pull a knife, pull a gun, or shoot without warning. And unless you plan on going around shooting people who look at you crosswise, you aren't going to see it coming.

      And for the record, I've never been mugged, panhandled is about the worst I've seen and not for lack of trying. I only know one person who has ever experienced an attempted mugging, and that guy though that being 5 inches taller, a hundred pounds heavier, and drunk gave him enough advantage. But he was wrong.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    19. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 1

      That don't jive with the Canadian view dude.

      You *Can't* get permits to carry a handgun. Period.

      I have never, ever felt uncomfortable walking around Canadian cities. Ever.

      I do have several (registered) firearms. All rifles. If I wanted a handgun, I can get one, but I can't carry it.-- I can only go from home (along a declared route) to the range and back. The handgun needs to be double locked too (trigger and case ).

      I think that while, yes, crime happens, even here, handguns are not what everyone needs. /I am Canadian.

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    20. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to some extent, the unarmed police gain a degree of protection from gun attack. If an armed person is confronted by police, he'll probably run rather than shoot. Killing a police officer is a very serious crime, and you know they won't be firing after you, so it's not life and death yet.

      The arguments in favour of guns (armed public deters crime) have definite sense, but there are side effects in the extent to which an armed public encourages more armed criminals... a class of arms race

    21. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Things are different in your state. In my state anyone in a position to respond professionally to a medical incident MUST stop and help. That is someone who knows first aid, and is the offical person at work to go for those situations MUST stop when there is a situation that might need help. That is if you see an accident and don't stop you are breaking a law that has a little more teeth than the "good samaritan" laws that required everyone to stop.

      When this applied to me I was told it basicly ment I had to stop if there was no emergency worker there, if just one police car was on scene I could assume he had it in hand. (Unless there were bodies everywhere...) This even though my training amounts to 8 hours of first aid.

      Of course the most important point driven home to us was don't make things worse. That is if the situation isn't safe for you to get involved stay away.

      Though I agree about your question on if someone can actually kill another.

    22. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to imply that murders are so common in Canada that it wouldn't make the news if muggers were walking up to random people and killing them? Seems like Canada isn't a place I'd want to live then. I know that anyone who killed me here in the US would make the news all over.

      Truth is most areas of the world are not that dangerious.

    23. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, look faggot, you obviously DON'T get it.

      Guns are already illegal for criminals to carry and use to commit crimes. Criminalizing guns does nothing. Even if it did, it's not like criminals will obediently register their guns, or surrender them.

      This is the critical failing of gun control supporters. Banning guns does not stop criminals from having guns. Period.

    24. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Staying with a bad relationship makes you a "darwin target" and trying to find another relationship makes you a "cheating bitch"?

      Now you're just being an idiot.

      Staying in a bad relationship makes you a 'darwin target' because you lack backbone and basic self-respect. Honestly, the world's probably better without you.

      Tying to find another relationship makes you a 'cheating bitch' if you don't leave your previous relationship first. Sadly, most women (ok, and guys too) ARE cheating bitches, because they will stay in a relationship with a person they don't really want to be with until they find someone else. I guess they must be really desperate for sex or something. A piece of advice: if it's going nowhere, just do everyone a favour and end it.

    25. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      Of course, one problem with america's armed citizenry is that non-US citizens are the one group muggers can easily identify as definitely _not_ carrying a gun. So that gives them all the more incentive to go after tourists.

      I'm guessing that, since US giun laws are carried out on a state by state level, for the most part it's even pretty tough for Americans from other states to take guns when they go on holiday within the Union.

      So the upshot is, when a state like Florida brings in concealed carry laws, they may get a measure of increased safety for their own citizens, at the expense of increased risk to those from out-of-state. Good job Florida's economy doesn't rely much on tourism, then.

    26. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      Now you're just being an idiot.

      Maybe, but see my other reply for a further rationale.
      Staying in a bad relationship makes you a 'darwin target' because you lack backbone and basic self-respect. Honestly, the world's probably better without you.

      Breaking away from a bad relationship can be extremely difficult, and be made more or less difficult depending on your background.

      Saying that these persons deserve death (which they don't) won't make it any easier.
      A piece of advice: if it's going nowhere, just do everyone a favour and end it.

      It's not always that easy, especially in a threatening situation.

      (I'm reading Mimi's Last Coffee right now, which see.)
    27. Re:I concealed carry a 40 caliber firearm by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Good Samaritan laws don't require you to stop, they keep you from getting in legal trouble if you DO stop. If you're doing the best you can to save someone's life and you mess up (you only had 8 hours of training) you can't be held legally responsible for that person's death. If you did something blatantly wrong/stupid that goes out the window (like kicking them instead of giving CPR or something) you're no longer protected.

      Different laws might force you to stop and help if you have the right training (not in my state) but those aren't the Good Samaritan laws :)

      --


      No sig for you.
  237. Bit of London by salvorHardin · · Score: 1

    You neglected to mention which part of London you're spending your time in. It's a totally different ball game if you're in Hackney to when you're in Mayfair.

  238. Exercise your quads by poity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously.

    What can you do? Camouflaging your equipment isn't going to make the way you handle and treat those items any more inconspicuous.

    And trying to fight them off will get you hurt or your equipment damaged.

    You can only run, and the faster you are the better.

    Either that, or stop carrying so much expensive shit around

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  239. err stop looking like a victim by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    take the headphones OFF and look around, meeting the eyes of people around you. Awareness is the key. A mugger wants an unaware victim and generally passes on someone who seems aware of them from the start. If the eye-to-eye contact is seen as a challenge you were likely to be a target anyways and now you at least have some warning...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  240. Two things by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    Insurance and regular backups.

    --
    :wq
  241. Weighing some options ... by danwiz · · Score: 4, Interesting


    As an ex-military person, gun owner, concealed-carry permit holder, martial artist, and computer person ... yes, I have an opinion.

    First, I would say that protecting your electronics is not a good reason for carrying a gun. Protecting your life when the electronics you carry puts your life at risk, is a good reason.

    IANAL, but this is what I have learned from my gun courses.

    The primary reason for carrying a firearm is almost always for self-defense, NOT defense of property. In many of the states in the US it is not acceptable to shoot someone simply because they are robbing you. In most instances there must be a threat of bodily harm and you must be unable to safely remove yourself, back away, or escape from the situation.

    When a robber puts a gun/knife to your head and gives you instructions on how not to get hurt, the best solution is usually to comply. However, never "trust" a person who obviously doesn't care about your life. Just because you've handed over your goods does not guarantee that you won't get shot anyway. Escaping or using your firearm at the first opportunity are all viable options.

    Regarding martial arts training -

    My instructors have said that when defending your life, the primary goal is to neutralize the threat and/or remove yourself from the situation. Handing over material items to gain you that opportunity is totally acceptable.

    Although I have trained for using Karate against an armed gun/knife opponent, the techniques are neither simple nor foolproof. One of our black-belts, although he disarmed his attacker and broke the guy's collarbone and wrist, still took a 22 slug in his thigh. To complicate the matter, the criminal later accused him of using excessive force!

    That said, the best solution is to always avoid trouble.

    The NRA recently opened up their Refuse To Be A Victim! seminars to men too. The seminars "provide participants with the information needed to minimize their chances of criminal attack." And no, they don't push guns as an easy solution. The seminar is inexpensive, and the web site offers some tips to minimize your chances of criminal attack. In London, I would seek out advice from local police stations, women's groups, colleges, and self defense instructors (ie. karate, etc) as to where similar education can be obtained.

    And regarding the parent post ... some studies show that firearms are used more than 2 million times a year for personal protection, often without the need for a shot to be fired. Personally, I don't like the feeling I get walking in areas where only the criminals have guns.

    1. Re:Weighing some options ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In many of the states in the US it is not acceptable to shoot someone simply because they are robbing you."

      Actually, in most states you can shoot a robber. In fact, in Texas you can shoot a robber in the back as they are leaving your house if you don't know who they are or don't recognize them. Listen, if a robber breaks into my house he's going to end up splattered on the wall from the 12 gauge shotgun.

    2. Re:Weighing some options ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Sydney, Australia. Only criminals and police officers carry guns. The rest of us can, if we really want to, join a gun club and get a firearm license. But very few people do, and they have to keep their guns locked up. And you want a handgun? Forget it. It's almost impossible to get a license.

      We've also had a rash of gun-related crime over the past few years, as it seems that many young males regard illegal hand guns as desirable fashion accessories.

      However, despite these facts, I'm still happy to walk the streets at night, because I know I'm likelier to be struck by lightning than be shot by someone with a firearm.

      Still, I guess you won't be coming to visit, because we don't have an armed populace. Oh well.

    3. Re:Weighing some options ... by squidgyhead · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't like the feeling I get walking in areas where only the criminals have guns.

      Man, that's not nearly as bad as walking into a place where only the criminals have nuclear weapons. Wait - that's everywhere in the bleedin' world.

      Reductio ad absurdum.

  242. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my God, I'm mortified.

    2nd Amendment. 2nd Amendment.

    What with all of this privacy stuff lately in the news, I've got protection against unreasonable search and seizure on the brain.
    Please forgive.

  243. Martial Arts - Kenpo by Maksym · · Score: 1

    If one word could be used to describe Kenpo, it would be 'Overkill'. Kenpo is also known as the art of the Tiger. You wouldn't fuck with a tiger would you? I didn't think so. Kenpo is good for taking down multiple opponents fast *and* HARD . I am studying it myself. Next person to try and screw me over is going to have a broken knee and elbow as a minimum 'fee' for trying to assult me. The rest depends on what mood I'm in.

  244. In Summary by Highroller · · Score: 1

    Summarizing everything above that made sense: 1. Be aware of your surroundings. Notice people and don't look down. Be streetsmart and try to travel along routes in the safer times of the day and night. 2. Don't use an identifying bag that screams "I've got a laptop." Hide your laptop in a plain vanilla, cheap military style backpack or shoulder bag. As far as your iPod, don't use it walking around or fiddle with the buttons on the tube or anywhere else someone can see you. 3. Consider changing the image you project to the world. It's a big city and sometimes the look you wear screams "Mug me harder." Consider the shabby clothes, boots, and short hair suggestion if you travel alone. Consider studying a practical martial art like the Filipino Martial Arts (Eskrima/Arnis/Kali) or Jeet Kune Do. Check out: http://www.jkdlondon.co.uk/ . 4. Try not to carry all of your best gear with you. Consider investing in a cheap laptop for utility purposes, a low-end MP3 player, or a CD player with your own mix, etc. to tote in the worst parts of town. Good luck!

  245. Re:Carry a gun (or phaser) by salvorHardin · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're all 'teched-up' to the max, perhaps you could get yourself a phaser, which would nicely compliment your iPod, laptop, 3G phone, et cetera - as a nifty hi-tech gadget, but also doubles as a self defence device! Can you imagine the police investigation?:
    Yes officer, he was trying to steal my copy of advanced calculus... he says what? that I shot him with an alien ray-gun? Sure.... whatever!

  246. If you can afford it in the first place, by CloudDrakken · · Score: 1

    Just buy two of everything.

  247. A summary (and what I do) by Squeamish+Ossifrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure this has all been said before, but I'll try to put it in one place. This is an issue I think about a fair bit, because I'm a computer science grad student and wannabe photographer. Which is to say that I have some stuff that's worth stealing, but am also broke enough that I'd really miss it.

    1. Don't carry valuables in a way that makes them identifiable. For example, don't use computer bags, iPod cases, and whatnot. Get a protective sleeve for your laptop and toss it in an ordinary backpack. Stick your iPod (or, in my case, ancient Rio) in a pocket. A backpack crammed with expensive electronic toys looks the same as one full of books and old tin cans.

    2. Don't act or look like a good victim. Carrying yourself properly is a whole discussion in itself, so I won't even really try to cover it.

    3. Don't dress or act like you've got money. You should be above status symbols anyway, but if you're not, here's another incentive.

    4. Remember that your data's probably worth more than your equipment. Always keep good backups, especially for mobile devices. If your data is sensitive, either keep in encrypted or don't put it on portable devices in the first place.

    5. Get insurance. Find out what your homeowner's (or renter's) insurance covers, and fork over the extra for "scheduled item" coverage on your portable valuables. I do a lot of photography, and it's infinitely more relaxing to know that if something happens to my stuff, I don't have to worry. The extra cost is somewhere around a couple % of the insured value anually, and the peace of mind is worth it. Good policies even cover accidental loss and breakage, so you're protected from your own stupidity up to a point.

    6. If someone *does* mug you, just give them the damned stuff. It's not worth getting hurt over. If you've done 4 and 5, it won't even be that big a deal. But even if you haven't, it's just stuff.

    1. Re:A summary (and what I do) by gantzm · · Score: 1

      ...just give them the damned stuff.

      Ya know, if people started shooting muggers, after a while there wouldn't be any more muggers/muggings.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    2. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Having to worry about your 'customers' shooting you would tend to skew the profit/risk ratio, wouldn't it?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:A summary (and what I do) by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Yup, they'd shoot you then loot the corpse.

      Quite the improvement, so long as you're insanely fixated on physical belongings that provide you with your sole sense of self worth.

    4. Re:A summary (and what I do) by ManxStef · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mod parent up, that's an insightful post.

      Another point worth making is that backpacks, especially in crowds (such as London's Oxford Street when it's busy), are a thieves favourite. The method is known as "dipping" as it basically involves the thief dipping their hands into the backpack or pack's pockets - you won't feel this as the pack isn't close to your body (like, say, your jeans pockets is).

      NEVER put valuable items such as wallets, mobile phones, etc. in the outer pockets of a backpack: either use the "security" pocket if it has one (my Da Kine bag's got one that sits up against the small of your back and is partitioned from the main space), store them in a better location such as in the inner pocket of a zipped up jacket, or at least put them right at the bottom of the main compartment of the pack and place an item of clothing or something over the top. Common sense really, but you'd be surprise how many people don't think...

      As for cameras, taking the minimum gear necessary and making them look mucky with tape (zinc oxide apparently works well, but electrician's tape's good too) is a good idea, though you'll have trouble hiding that big white "look at me, I'm a pro!" Canon 70-200 2.8L - saying that those lenses are so solid you could probably just beat the mugger around the head with it ;)

      Oh, and a large pet dog such as a rottweiler or doberman goes remarkably far in stopping you being mugged. Who'd have thought! :)

    5. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      But there'd be a lot more people in jail on murder charges. Hint: in most places, killing someone in self-defense is only legal if you had good reason to believe that your own life was in danger.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    6. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I recently returned from Kenya, where muggers are frequently beaten to death. But there are still more muggers in Nairobi than in pretty much any other city on Earth. Go figure.

      --

      -
      Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

    7. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Python · · Score: 0
      Nonsense, you don't hand over your belongings to any little twit that comes along do you? This sort of hypocracy leads to the nonsense victim culture that made 9/11 possible. Just go along with the hijackers, just cooperate and they won't hurt you!

      Absolute rubbish. Its time that we all stopped pretending like nothing is worth losing your life over. Anytime you surrender control to another person, at the fear of your life, you run the risk of losing your life. Never, ever accept as a solution that you will just go along with a robbery, a kidnapping, a hijacking or anything else. Once you give up control, you will have no control over life. Its not about protecting your wallet, about its realizing that your attacker may have other ideas than just taking your stuff. They may not care at all about taking your stuff, but are really just looking for a mark to kidnap, rape, murder or whatever else they might have on their minds. The most foolish thing you can do is to presume to understand the intent and motives of a criminal. Never, ever, ever give up control to someone that is willing to use violence to get what they want from you. It may be the last action you ever take.

      Its dangerous, its provably dangerous and its going to get you and the people around you killed. You have a resonsibility to do more than just go weak in the knees and hand over your life to a complete stranger.

      --

      Python

    8. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Trepalium · · Score: 1
      I'd have to agree with #4 and #5. I've had my laptop stolen, and, no, I didn't keep backups of my data. It still bothers me to this day that I have lost that data. However, I did have insurance (it was cheap, about $25CDN/year at the time, it's $60 on my new one), so replacing the laptop didn't cost me anything.

      The end result was I spent about $900, got a really sweet laptop that can run Linux well, (just as my previous one did). Of course, I haven't learned my data backup lesson, and there's still data on my laptop that does not exist anywhere else. The only injuries to me, today, are the lost data, and the lost trust I could've otherwise placed in my co-workers (it was stolen at work).

      The moral of the story: Get insurance, especially if it's expensive, and easily stealable like a laptop is. Shop around for it if you must (having no deductable on your insured item is worth having), but get it.

      On an tangent (but related!) matter, does anyone have a copy of the dcerpc.net CVS and mailing list archives? This is some of the data I lost, and would like to get a copy of it again.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    9. Re:A summary (and what I do) by 0utRun · · Score: 1

      > But even if you haven't, it's just stuff.

      Yes, but it's *my* stuff.

      I'd fake them out with my iPaq (lots of flashing lights and hey, it's WinCE anyway) and then bludgeon them with my trusty Newton.

    10. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Hint: in most places, killing someone in self-defense is only legal if you had good reason to believe that your own life was in danger.

      [quote source="southpark"]he's coming right at me, *blam*[/quote]

    11. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hint: in most places, killing someone in self-defense is only legal if you had good reason to believe that your own life was in danger.

      Hint: in most places, having a gun pointed at you is good reason to believe that your life is in danger.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    12. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Flawed logic.

      The determined ones will just murder you outright if they think you're armed.

      The same sort of problem happens with three time losers. They face long prison times if they get caught, so they'll take extreme chances to prevent going back to prison. This includes murdering cops, counter clerks, and little old ladies who could identify them.

    13. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're on even footing, then by all means resist.

      If they pull a gun, take something of valuable and toss it AT THEIR FEET.

      When their eyes leave you, run like hell putting as many obstacles between you and them as possible.

      Unless they're a trained shot, they have about a 10 % chance of hitting you, compared to a virtual bullseye at close range.

      And this was instructions given to a bunch of us at a youth group self defense symposium by a veteran cop years ago.

      Still seems like good sense now.

      You can take your chances at hand to hand if you want, but a guy with a gun is just too unpredictable.

    14. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Squeamish+Ossifrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a bit off-topic, but why not. I'd e-mail you, but your address isn't listed.

      There are a few things I'd knowingly die for, and a good number more that I'd take a risk on. But my laptop's not one of them. And neither is trying to be a deterrent to muggers. So if someone's trying to take my stuff, I'll do whatever seems the safest.

      You make the good point that as a matter of self-preservation you shouldn't "give up control" or let someone put you into a dangerous situation. That's true, but you need some common sense. You seem to suggest that handing over my backpack is tantamount to handing over my life. That's just dumb. Throwing down my wallet isn't giving up control. It's giving up my wallet. I still have the same options and capabilities (well, less a few financial ones) that I had before.

      There are two different possibilities, and you need to consider both of them:

      Possibility A: The crook really just wants your stuff. They don't intend to hurt you, but might well do so if startled or threatened. Giving him/her the stuff and getting the hell out of there is probably your best bet.

      Possibility B: The crook intends to hurt you. Going along with them only helps them to do so.

      You have to figure out which it is when the situation happens. I'm not an expert, so I don't claim to know what you should do here. What I've been told, and it makes sense to me, is this: If they're asking for stuff, that's probably what they want. Being robbed is common, being assaulted out of the blue by a stranger is very rare. Put the stuff on the ground and try to leave. If they try to stop you, run if you can and fight if you have to. If the mugger tells you to do something that would weaken your position (like getting into a car, or going somewhere with them), that's a bad sign, and you should (again) run if you can and fight if you have to.

      I'm not against fighting: I'll fight for my beliefs, for the people I care about, and to protect myself. But I'm not going to fight for my laptop, my bus pass or 8 bucks in cash.

    15. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Nasarius · · Score: 0, Troll

      And how many muggers use guns? Think before you post.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    16. Re:A summary (and what I do) by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      I wasn't going to say this since the story starts in London, but the above is from the University of Oregon so I gotta add:

      7. Buy a nice handgun and get the proper permit. Do the world a favor and kill the next mugger you meet.

      This entire story is just ridiculous. How to avoid being targetted as a victim... fine, don't make it obvious you have things of value... but c'mon people, fight back! A mugger becomes very apologetic looking down the barrel of a gun.

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    17. Re:A summary (and what I do) by runen · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you should be extra careful if someone starts a fight right in front of you (or otherwise act in a very noticable way). They like to put on a good show for you while a third man dips his hand in your backpack. If you see someone acting strangly - tournaround!

    18. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      uh yeah, you get mankillers, they shoot you first and *then* steal your laptop

      kill or get killed mentality, it really does no one any good

    19. Re:A summary (and what I do) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd add to 6: blow the TNT you've stuffed the thing before you were mugged ;)

      It should not be that difficult to make a phone-bomb and to blow it (of course from a cellphone you leave home for this occassion)...

    20. Re:A summary (and what I do) by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! This is one of then first things you will learn in any basic self-defense course.

      Please, if you're really afraid of being the target of a mugging, learn how to conceal your valuables as well as learning to defend yourself. Ideally, take some basic Judo, Ju-Jitsu or Krav Maga classes.

      Knowing the slightest about self defense will help protect you
      immensely.

      IMO, grappeling based martial arts, sucs ah Judo, Ju-Jitsu and even Krav Maga (to an extent) are the best method of self defense.

      No dis-respect to the Karate, Tae Kwon Do, etc. crowds, but it's very difficult for beginners to effectively use punches and kicks as a means of defense. They're too easy to block or grab, which leaves you in a worse situation. I wouldn't want to have one of the 10th year Tae Kwon Do /.ers throwing kicks at my head, but we're not talking about 10th year students, we're talking about casual studens just trying to learn about self defense.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    21. Re:A summary (and what I do) by code+shady · · Score: 1

      You might also want to give a messenger bag a try. I have a nice Timbuk2 messenger bag, with sperate compartments and zippered pockets for a laptop, notebooks, bags of weed, etc etc. The closure is very nice, as it has two clasps that need to be undone in order to access the inside, plus velcro, plus the fact that you have to lift the flap all the way up to get inside . . makes it kinda tough for someone to open it up without you knowing.

      You can even get a little case thing to put on the main strap for you iPod, or you can just keep it in your pocket.

      But i think the best thing is that you can carry it several different ways on your body, so the bag can be as close to you or as loose and away from the body as you want it.

      great bags, i highly reccomend them.

      --
      Look out honey cause I'm usin' technology
      Ain't got time to make no apologies
    22. Re:A summary (and what I do) by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I think number 2 is probably the most important thing. If you look like someone who will remember every detail of the person's appearance and might have practiced a martial art (or know how to use a concealed weapon), they'll bet that there's a better target. That means having good posture and briefly meeting the eyes of everyone who gets close to you. I think that the real reason that people get mugged for their iPods (assuming they actually do) is that they are not only valuable, but they distract you.

    23. Re:A summary (and what I do) by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, if you leave a cell phone in your bag when it's stolen, it can be recovered based on the fact that it's a radio transmitter that is frequently triangulated. Some cell phones even have GPS to assist 911 services.

      This not only eliminates the mugger for a period of time, it recovers your stolen goods, and maybe even the goods of other people.

      Oh yeah, and it also helps contribute to a civilized society by ensuring the safety of criminals from the public.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    24. Re:A summary (and what I do) by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      As an apendum, check out the Self Defense Forums for lots of insightful discussion on all areas of self defense.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  248. Excersize by almaon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will sound a bit nuts, but I went to school in the inner city. I used to get my butt kicked on a regular basis having to go through rough neighborhoods because of the color of my skin.

    Then an old man in that neighborhood gave me some good advice:

    "Run, never walk. If you're running they'll either be too slow to react to mess with you or they'll think you're running from the cops and don't want anything to do with you"

    I tried it, it worked. The same thing is true of any other sketchy place in the world I've been.

    It'll get your lazzy hump into shape quick. Not the most practical in dress shoes, but kept my butt from being black and blue.

  249. Gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a gun. Learn how to use it. Shoot muggers in the face.

  250. Mugger problem solved by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 1

    Get a permit to carry a concieled weapon, so when he jacks your stuff and begins to run, shoot the asshole in the back some need to be taken out of the genepool anyway :D

    --
    "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
    1. Re:Mugger problem solved by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 1

      formatting sucks||||| Edit:||||| Get a permit to carry a concieled weapon, so when he jacks your stuff and begins to run, shoot the asshole in the back ||||| some need to be taken out of the genepool anyway :D ||||| "|||||" denotes a new line

      --
      "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
  251. LowePro make some nice backpacks by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've used their camera ones extensively and they are sufficiently unconspicuous that i've never had a problem.

    I'd like it a lot better if they didn't emblazon 'Pro' on the back - but you can pick that off quite easily.

    I've backpacked in quite a few countries with thousands of dollars of camera gear and had no problems - in fact i've had my leather jacket stolen (got it back from a really dodgy guy i met) but they didn't touch my bag loaded with gear.

  252. mace spray by Diabolus777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always carry my backpack around. From work to home through the subway at uneven hours. I am always alone, and in my pack I got a my digital camera, my mp3 player, sometimes my laptop.

    I live in Canada, so I am not allowed to carry weapons (anyways, a small knife is all I'd take if it was legal). But even if I never really felt treathened, I opted for a mace spray in my pockets.

    I bought one for my girlfriend too, since she works weekend evenings downtown.

    Mace is legal, light, conceilable, cheap and VERY potent. I've seen it at work and it's painful just to look at.

    The only thing I fear now is muggers attacking me with mace spray. I seriously fear it more than a knife.

    (I hope I just didn't tip some bad guys off here)

    --
    We should have been
    So much more by now
    Too dead inside
    To even know the guilt
  253. Usefulness and stealth? by koa · · Score: 1

    Good point, but are there any companies out there selling a lap-top case that "looks" like an ordinary school backpack? I don't know about you; but when I carry my laptop- my emphasis is not just on stealth to would-be theives. I am also concerned with safety of the equipment held within. A regular bag is not desinged to carry a laptop and will most likely not protect it in case of a sudden jarring or drop impact where even some cheaper cases designed to carry a laptop will.

    This sounds like a potential market idea, so let it be known that here lies prior art. (So if you patent it and sell it, I will get royalties.. *joke please dont lynch!*)

    --
    ....move along....nothing to see here....
    1. Re:Usefulness and stealth? by JeyKottalam · · Score: 1

      There exist backpack-style laptop bags out there, mostly targetting college students. I think Targus makes some.

    2. Re:Usefulness and stealth? by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      There are, but i honestly think they're a waste of money. I've had my iBook for going-on three years now, and it basically lived in my back pack. It's scratched up like all hell, but it still works fine. LIke anything else, intelligence wins out. "I've got a laptop in my backpack...maybe i shouldn't throw it, as hard as i can, into the back of my car after an 8 hour day at school."

      Of course, peace of mind does influence willingness to pay.

    3. Re:Usefulness and stealth? by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I've seen them rather often, but off-hand the only brand I can think of is L.L. Bean. I've always been a fan of their backpacks and I suspect that their laptop pouch equipped model is equally good.

      Pretty much any luggage store or college bookstore that sells backpacks will have a few that are designed specifically with a pouch for laptops.

  254. SIMPLE: Tablet PCs by shadowxtc · · Score: 1

    Who knows what they really look like? At least out of the criminal types... I've had one for two years and it's drawn very little attention.

    1. Re:SIMPLE: Tablet PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah. Some analogies:
      • carry around a faeces sample - no one wants it.
      • carry around a syringe with AIDS virus - no one wants it.
      • ...
      • carry around a tablet pc - ....

      you see where i'm going here.
  255. *shrug* by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Airsoft pellets still hurt like hell. Your only in trouble if your attacker is actually armed...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  256. Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by woodsrunner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    William S. Burroughs wrote about the way he survived the streets of Tangiers was to become invisible using a trick he learned from a Toledo mobster. I have been practicing this trick for twenty years and it works.
    The way to do it is walk slow and make sure you see everyone before they see you. By doing this, you trigger a reflex in others to not see you. I can walk past anyone this way, even people I know who are looking for me. It's wierd how effective it is.

    Also, with laptops, the bios is a good way to protect your stuff.
    Most laptops bios p/w need to be factory reset. The best one being the IBM's that send a token from the bios to the hard drive. Even if the factory resets the motherboard p/w without getting ahold of you, because the thief is sophisticated enough to replace the chip (unlikely), the hard drive data is still encrypted and un-retrievable.
    Finally, guns are for wimps.
    If you pull a gun on someone you shouldn't be ready to use it, you use it!
    BANG!
    End of story... make it a clean kill.
    If any moron pulled a gun on me, I'd kill 'em with it.

    Like prophet said -- "learn to fight without the corruption of weapons."

    1. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sadly, the tricks for avoiding muggers are in total opposition of the tricks for attracting potential mates. Do you wanna get mugged *and* fucked, or neither?

    2. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Unless said mugger is standing hehind you with one pressed against your spine. Happened to a guy I work with. He thought the same way you do. Fortunately for him, it was a paint-ball gun and the guy ran like a rabbit afterward. He ended up with two in the back and one in the side.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    3. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Biotech9 · · Score: 1

      William S. Burroughs wrote about the way he survived the streets of Tangiers was to become invisible using a trick he learned from a Toledo mobster

      Is this the book 'Junky'? Or which title is it?

    4. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To procreate or to die? A tough choice for Darwin.

    5. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you pull a gun on someone you shouldn't be ready to use it, you use it!

      Over 90% of successful self-defense cases with a firearms involve just pulling out and displaying the gun. Most muggers change their minds real quick.

      In most states, just pointing a gun at someone is considered use of lethal force, so it's not to be done lightly...but practically speaking, you're in for a whole lot less hassle if you just scare the guy away...you do, of course, have to be ready to use it if necessary.

      At close range, hold the gun in one hand, right at your side, and it won't be that easy to grab. If the guy does manage to get hold of it, there's a very simple retention trick: just fall backwards. If he hangs on, the geometry makes your arms line up, your gun point right at 'im. Boom.

      The invisibility trick sounds a lot like what I learned in some primitive wilderness survival classes.

    6. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what book was that from?

    7. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to do it is walk slow and make sure you see everyone before they see you. By doing this, you trigger a reflex in others to not see you.


      Is that some kind of corrollary to the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal strategy? Make them think you're a real dangerous frood?
    8. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a Somebody Else's Problem field ...

    9. Re:Guns are for wimps -- How to be Invisible by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

      He mentions this a few places in his fiction. Where he really lays it out is in his book of essays The Adding Machine in an essay I believe entitled L'hombre invisible. My books are in storage right now, but that whole book is like a key to unlock the rest of his novels and to understand his writing methods and vision.

  257. The simplest solutions by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Backup your data
    2) Get Insurance
    3) Profit!

    Seriously, no matter how depraved the criminal, it comes off as equally as depraved to value your iPod more than a human life -- after all, isn't that what you're ostensibly defending against -- someone who values your iPod more than YOUR life? If it really was your life they were after, that's an even trade, but clearly, what they're after is your stuff, not your life, so taking a life in order to protect your gizmo is the same trade the criminal is making.

    Get insurance, take reasonable precautions (like, maybe, don't carry around $6,500 in electro-goodies at 3:30AM in Brixton) and when someone tries to mug you, look at it as an upgrade opportunity. That's what insurance is for and it's cheaper than the lawyer it will take to keep you out of pound-me-in-the-ass-prison when the muggers family sues you for manslaughter.

    At the end of the day there's a simple equation: carry around only what you are willing to lose either by accident or by force -- essentially, nothing worth more than you'd be comfortable carrying in your wallet. If it's insured, assume you're carrying your deductible, so $10,000 in stuff is like $500 in cash. When it comes down to $500 or a human life, you'd have to be an absolute barbarian to kill for it.

    1. Re:The simplest solutions by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      Not that simple, alot of muggers will still kill their victums after they get the stuff, so if I was to take a gun with me, how am I to know if this mugger just wants my stuff, and if I give it to him we would leave, or if I was to give it to him, would he turn around and try to kill me once I got close to give him the stuff. I am luck I live in a good part of town so I don't have to carry a gun, and don't plus I don't go out after dark if I can prevent it, and if have to, I just take ID, and a CC those can have no value once I call them in stolen (which can be done fast) plus in a walet I can though so they have to chase after it, and I can run the other way when they go for it. I just thank God I never been mugged.

    2. Re:The simplest solutions by name773 · · Score: 1

      this guy has it right

    3. Re:The simplest solutions by jmv · · Score: 1

      Thanks. At least someone with some sense in here!

    4. Re:The simplest solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If material goods are not worth your life, then you possess them only by virtue of not having encountered someone with a different value system.

      Here's a different perspective: What's mine is mine. A car, a computer, a dull penny. You can't have it unless I choose to give it to you. I'll stand in front of that dull penny and protect it with my life - then it's simply self-defense. Or attempted self-defense. ;)

      I think you have it backwards. Being willing to kill someone for THEIR $500 is the act of a depraved barbarian. Being willing to kill a depraved barbarian is the lawful act of a citizen.

      KeS

      Now give me your wallet. ;)

    5. Re:The simplest solutions by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      If your life really is in danger of being ended, fine, that's justifiable manslaughter. They're going to kill you, so you kill them. A-Okay. They stole your iPod so you shot 'em in the back? Not bueno, muchacho.

    6. Re:The simplest solutions by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Bernard Goetz who got off on attempted murder but got slapped with 250 days in jail for his illegal handgun and a FORTY-THREE MILLION DOLLAR judgment in the civil suit that followed for the kid he paralyzed over five bucks.

      Worth it? You may think the law is fscked up, but those remain the stakes.

      "o/~ You gotta know when told hold 'em, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away, know when to run... o/~"

    7. Re:The simplest solutions by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      question when it starts how do you know what is going to happen?

    8. Re:The simplest solutions by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      It's called chance and a good gambler knows his odds. In the United States (by FAR the most violent northern/western country), robberies occur at a rate of 145.9:100000/year. Of those, 42.1% involve firearms and only 42.8% are street-crime. So, your chances of being mugged at gunpoint sometime this year are about 262:1,000,000. On any given day, that's 1:1,403,846. Now, murder at the hands of a stranger account for only 42% of all murders at a rate of 230:1,000,000 in any given year. Thus, on any given day, your chances of being mugged -- AND KILLED -- are 1:15,869,565. Basically one person in the combined populations of Los Angeles county and Manhattan is murdered every day. So, of the eleven people that are mugged at gunpoint out of those 15,869,565 people, one dies. If you happen to hit that 1:1,403,846 jackpot, you are still 1,100% more likely to come out alive than dead. That's how you "know what is going to happen." It's called probability. If you're basing your judgement on anything else, you are by definition being irrational.

      Have a look:
      http://www.fbi.gov/ucr

  258. Pickpockets by JazFresh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The comments here so far have concentrated on face-to-face encounters with muggers, but pickpockets are probably a bigger threat in London. If you pull out your wallet, gameboy, PDA, etc on the Tube, sooner or later someone will notice where you stashed it in your bag, get behind you on the escalator, and pilfer it. You will never know. Pickpockets are good at what they do, even some of the most streetwise Londoners I know have been pickpocketed.

    Maybe you should get one of those belt chains that were fashionable for wallets a while back, and use them for your PDA and Ipod. Use some superglue and one of those things they use to secure computers to desks if there's no other way to attach it. It won't stop muggers (and if you're too flashy about the chains, it might attract them), but it will stop pickpockets and grab-and-run thieves, including those gypsies that come up to you when you're at a restaurant with some card that explains their sob story (which is just a distraction to pour the objects on the table into their bag).

    Everyone I knew in London (myself included) has been a victim of crime there. Chances are, you'll eventually join their ranks.

    1. Re:Pickpockets by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I think an escalator would be the worst place to pickpocket. I'm on an escalator, and my headphones go dead, i go to check my mp3 player and the guy behind me is slipping it in his pocket, i'm gonna pop him one and send him tumbling down the escalator. Cant really slip off into the crowd on a moving staircase.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Pickpockets by doofusdan · · Score: 1
      > You will never know.

      Umm, someone swipes my iPod while I'm listening to it, I think I'll notice. :-)

      Point well taken about pickpocketers (don't forget the 2-person bump/spill & grab team) being FAR more of a problem than muggers.

      Same goes for car prowls. Never leave anything you want to keep in a car - especially when traveling on business at typical "business traveler with a laptop" locations.

    3. Re:Pickpockets by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I have been to Italy, and there pickpockets are much more common than muggers. I was only in Naples bfor 10 minutes before someone tried, but I had about 5 locks on my bag, so no harm done.
      I wouldn't want to pull a gun on someone in a country where the cops walk around with large calibre hand guns and Uzi (9mm) Subs.

    4. Re:Pickpockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mostly go in opposite direction, so they go down and grab your gear while you go up on an escalator. It's impossible to catch them running down because the crowd behind you is blocking you.

  259. Re:Not a problem here by Q+Who · · Score: 1

    what makes him or any one else with a firearm any different then a police officer that carries a firearm? Here in order to get a CC license you have to go through the exact same background checks as well as fire arm traning as the police do.

    Did you intend to say "exact same firearm training", but understood that would be pushing it too far?

    Here is a clue: even with the training that police officers get, the percentage of successful fire (i.e., in real situations) when done by them is about 2%.

    Oh, the joy of geeks with CC permits firing at criminals in public locations...

  260. Re:Not a problem here by shokk · · Score: 1

    Think of it another way...

    The person threatening your life had already made the decision that the situation was worth a human life. Rarely are they ever intelligent enough to understand that life may be their own. Since they are OK with that outcome, help them along their karma path.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  261. Re:Not a problem here by rnakamot · · Score: 1

    My life is more important than a would-be criminal's.

    What or who gave you the right to judge that your life is more important than anothers?

  262. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see, now its obvious youre talking out of your ass. the day Australia trumps the USA in crime stats will be the same one that duke nukem forever comes out

  263. Re:Get a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

    Except that in 1997, post Handgun ban, the total number of firearm murders was 59 with a further 628 attempted firearm murders.
    Which leaves a probability of being shot and killed in the UK of 0.000000983 percent,
    or a probability of being involved in a handgun attack at all of 0.00001145 percent.
    Which in my book spells good odds.

    The Zimmerman telegram was World War One, I was talking about World War Two.

    Concerning deferment of entry into World War Two, Germany was a major industrial power that posed a threat to a number of democratic states who were not agressors and were allies of the USA. Iraq was never really a direct threat.
    Which is not to say you were wrong to get involved. Your methods on the other hand leave a lot to be desired.

  264. You can't just SHOOT them by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    PA is shall-issue as well and in title 18, chapter 5 (concerning judicious use of deadly force) you'll see that you CANNOT use deadly force to protect moveable property...that means your iPod, laptop, et al.

    Deadly force = you're in the process of being killed.

    Deadly force != "give me your laptop, geek."

    I'm sure Florida has similar laws regarding concealed carry. No offense, but "carry a gun to shoot the evil muggers" is NOT the kind of publicity we want. It's precisely the kind of attitude the anti-gun populace wants to take away that right.

    Furthermore, why would you want to spend tens of thousands of dollars in attorney fees for when the mugger sues you for attempted murder or the family sues you for wrongful death? $50,000 plus 10 years in jail for a $900 Dell?

    Educate yourself on concealed carry before you continue this nonsense. Geeks with guns are fine...but remember that you're a geek with a gun; not John Wayne.

    1. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah sorry I should have included a whole treatise on responsible concealed carry to preempt the nitpickers. Anyway, I am aware of the distinction between shooting in defense of ones life and ones property.

      I would never even reveal I had a gun unless I was about to use it and then only in defense of my life. As for someone who asks me to give them my property, I just tell them to "fuck off." However, most robbers usually pull a weapon and then make their demands, so that leaves you back at square one, protecting your life.

      Anyway, I'm not likely to encounter such problems anytime soon since carjacking has pretty much died off in Florida (concealed carry to the rescue) and I dont travel on public transportation at this time. Pretty much burglars are my only concern and not much of one at that.

    2. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would never even reveal I had a gun unless I was about to use it and then only in defense of my life. As for someone who asks me to give them my property, I just tell them to "fuck off." However, most robbers usually pull a weapon and then make their demands, so that leaves you back at square one, protecting your life.

      So, let me get this straight. He pulls a gun, you reach for you gun, he shoots you, you die. Yeah, that's really smart.

    3. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

      Telling them to "fuck off" escalates the situation so you'll have no defense.

      Seriously man...take a course or something before you get killed or wind up in jail.

    4. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You don't nievely reach for your gun. If mugger bends over to pick something up, maybe you have time to act. If mugger has knife, you can almost certainly draw gun.

    5. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "I would never even reveal I had a gun unless I was about to use it and then only in defense of my life. As for someone who asks me to give them my property, I just tell them to "fuck off." However, most robbers usually pull a weapon and then make their demands, so that leaves you back at square one, protecting your life."

      So you start pulling your weapon while your opponent already has his one pointed at you.

      Right.

    6. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your advice will get someone killed!

      If there's an attacker within 20 feet with a drawn knife, it's a horrible idea to try to draw a concealed weapon. You'll never have it ready to fire before the attacker recognizes you are doing so, covers the 20 ft, and stabs you. They can do that fast.

    7. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      You fend the mugger off with the free arm. I dont know about you, but all the handguns I ever used could be operated with one hand.

      And say that the mugger stabs you a few times in the arm or in some non-vital area of your body. Big deal. He is going to be dead and I will go to the hospital. Bernie Goetz handled half a dozen muggers just fine with a six shot 38 caliber revolver. Unfortunately he was stupid and didnt finish them off, so he had to go to jail because of NYCs gun laws (and because he foolishly turned himself in). And then he got sued by the surviving muggers. NYC was an interesting place to live back then.

      Also, it doesnt take long to pull out a gun and flick the safety off. Its like 1-2 seconds at the most and then game over, you win.

      Sorry but after Bernie Goetz and after being mugged myself as a JHS student and known many other mugging victims I would not submit to that sort of horseshit again. Fighting back works and it works well. Ask any woman who has fended off a rapist by fighting back. Or better yet, ask any woman that didnt fight back.

      Take martial arts classes, take gun safety classes, study the law, practice often with the gun you will carry. Fight hard and fight dirty when the time comes. Poke eyes, kick groins, stab with pens, dont hesitate to shoot if you get the opportunity. The only person who can be responsible for your safety is you. The cops are just there to clean up after everything is over, they dont have a vested interest in you living or dying.

    8. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight ... a guy walks up to you and says "Gimme your fucking money." You say "fuck off" ... and that escalates the situation? Riiight. So what do you recommend, saying, "No thanks chum, I can see you're on hard times but I have some use for the money meself, actually, so I think I'll just hang onto it if it's all the same to you..."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:You can't just SHOOT them by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Either the mugger has nothing to hold me, and I start to walk away, or the mugger is using potential deadly force to keep me in place, and I shoot him. Forget talking to him, walk away if you can.

  265. Lesson From Bugs by OzRoy · · Score: 1

    For some reason this post reminded me of that bugs bunny episode where bugs and Elmer Fudd run backwards and forwards threatening each other with bigger and bigger guns until eventually bugs runs back in a wedding dress and they both get married.

    So I think the moral to this story is if you want to deter someone from mugging you, the answer isn't a gun, but cross dressing.

    I also have a serious point to the parent. Sure firing a gun in self defense is self defense. But then using a nuclear weapon is also a great way to end a war. But that doesn't make it right.

    1. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Again : Are you asserting that the woman raped and strangled with her own pantyhose is somehow superior or more desirable than the on with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet?

      We can make hand-wringy assertions about the sanctity of life all day. But at some point, that guy has decided to actively put my life at risk. If your contention that it is somehow wrong for me to stop that eventuality from occuring, even at the possible expense of the assailants life then I guess we just live on a different planet, and we'll have to be happy with that.

      This may be trite : but that kind of argument could have been used to allow the Nazis to exterminate a whole lot more than 6 million Jews, or to assert that the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising was immoral, or other such drivel.

    2. Re:Lesson From Bugs by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      No. But I am saying a knee to the balls, a finger to an eye, pepper spray to the face, any and all of those things are even better than the one with the smoking gun and a dead Anyone at Anyone's feet.

      Also FYI the Bomb was used against the Japanese not the Germans. The Germans had already lost, and the Japanese were already losing.

      It's obvious to me that no one can convince you that a gun is bad, but please remember a gun is designed for one purpose, to Kill! Not to defend. All a gun society achieves is a greater number of gun homicides, and accidental gun deaths. I very much doubt America has less rapes, and violent crimes because people 'protect' themselves with a gun, and anyone who claims otherwise is living in a fantasy world.

    3. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans had already lost, and the Japanese were already losing.

      Someone should've told the Japanese. They were so ready to lose that it took two atomic bombs to knock some sense into their leadership.

      It's obvious to me that no one can convince you that a gun is bad, but please remember a gun is designed for one purpose, to Kill! Not to defend. All a gun society achieves is a greater number of gun homicides, and accidental gun deaths. I very much doubt America has less rapes, and violent crimes because people 'protect' themselves with a gun, and anyone who claims otherwise is living in a fantasy world.

      Reality quakes at your feet.

    4. Re:Lesson From Bugs by NoData · · Score: 1

      This may be trite : but that kind of argument could have been used to allow the Nazis to exterminate a whole lot more than 6 million Jews, or to assert that the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising was immoral, or other such drivel.

      It's not that it's trite, it's just that you've exercised Godwin's Law.. Game over, man, game over.

    5. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Ok. 5'0", 95 pound woman vs. 6'2" 210 pound man. Knees, eyepoke, pepper spray gonna work? Or in this case is it just a matter of ::shrug::, can't save everyone?

      Who said anything about the bomb? Not I.

      'It's obvious to me that no one can convince you that a gun is bad'. That's an interesting statement. A gun is an inanimate object. Seems to me, the correct statement here might be 'no one can convince you a gun sometimes has a legitimate purpose'. Calling it 'good' or 'bad' is simply innacurate. The Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto sure found a legit use for one. Perhaps you have images of some crazed, frothing at the mouth NRA gun nut just looking for an excuse to plug someone? Admittedly, that's the image you're innundated with. Frankly, it's wrong.

      As for 'it's only purpose is to kill!' argument. The implication here is that simply being in the presence of a gun will cause me or someome else to become some crazy mindless killer. This indicates that you'd be afraid of me if you knew I could be carrying a gun. Why would that be? Because I have the capacity to kill you in an instant? Why, then, are you not afraid of say, one of your co-workers coming into work one day and smashing your skull in with an aluminum bat? Or picking up the bagel knife and driving into your back? Pretty easy to do on an unexpecting person. If you have reason to believe people are simply incapable of restraining themselves when they get angry - you should be afraid at every moment in your life.

      If, on the other hand, you believe people are basically good, you should feel secure around armed citizenry, just like you'd feel safe running to a police officer or a National Guardsmen in an emergency.

      Nay, I would go so far as to say you're simply hoplophobic. Irrational fear of an inanimate object, causing you to accept irrational 'truths' such as : it would be better for you and your child to die than to pull the trigger on the knife-wielding psychopath who has invaded your home.

    6. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      Ehhhhh, technically no. Godwin's law says that one party is accusing another party of being a Nazi either directly or indirectly. I was simply using the Nazi/Holocaust example as an extreme counter-example to my foe. Not in any way implying he himself is a Nazi, or Nazi-like.

      :)

    7. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      No, sorry, you are wrong.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    8. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1

      Well......dangit.

    9. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [The Japanese] were so ready to lose that it took two atomic bombs to knock some sense into their leadership.

      Just so you know, even if you later decide to pretend like you don't, the Japanese attempted vigorously to surrender after the first bomb was dropped. The Americans elected to drop the other one despite this, to really drive home their point. (It is quite a cost in Japanese civilian life just to make a point.)

    10. Re:Lesson From Bugs by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      [...] to Kill! Not to defend.

      Killing and defending are not mutually exclusive.

    11. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just nailed the difference between the US and everyone else. We also worry about what is right - the US just does whatever is neccessary to attain it's desired outcome. And it assumes its outcome is the right one.

    12. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are making an assumption that simply because a gun is pulled, it will be fired AND that some will be killed or seriously inured as result. That is not necessarily the case.

      Pointing a gun a some one is usually an effective means of encouraging them to do what you want them to do whether that is to give you their wallet, or to run away and leave you alone. Few people risk finding out if the weapon is loaded, or if the safety mechanism is disengaged, or if the person holding it even has the nerve to pull the trigger, or if it is even a real gun. Most people will take the safer coarse and comply.

      Even if the weapon is fired, it does not mean some one is going to be hit ro die. A couple years ago, a friend of mine had a disagreement with a few people at a bar. The next night, they came to his house, pushed through the front door, and beat the crap out of him. Then they said they had something for him in their car. While they when to their car, he got his gun, walked out side, fired one round into the ground, and asked what they had for him. They jumped into their car a speed off with out reveling what they had for him in the car. (Yes, that is a slightly extreme, and unusual example.)

      Additionally, Situations where one person pulls a gun, then the second person pulls a larger gun, causing the first person to run off and then return with a large gun occur in cartoons.

      Jumping from hand guns to nuclear weapons is also an absurdity. Pulling a gun on a single person, and using a weapon that any one and every nearby are two very, very different situations. And dispute was girls might say about their boy friend, no one carries a nuclear weapon in their pants ...

    13. Re:Lesson From Bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull hockey.

      Until the Emperor was the one waving the white flag, nobody's offer of surrender was valid. That's how things were in the real Japan, not the Japan of Chomsky and Zinn's imaginations.

  266. If you can handle one more electronic device... by gwoodrow · · Score: 1

    ...might I suggest also carrying this little piece of technology?

  267. Re:Not a problem here by quinkin · · Score: 1
    What or who gave you the right to judge that your life is more important than anothers?

    That would be the 9 millimeter I presume...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  268. Geographical Advice by awol · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't go south of the river. Don't go outside zone 1. If you must go outside zone one, don't take more than you can sprint with

    --
    "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    1. Re:Geographical Advice by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      It's north of the river where you really get in trouble, you're practically in Manchester.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  269. If you're a techno-geek by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

    Then you must get technology enabled clothing. Check out www.scottevest.com.

    I found this throug a friend of mine in the secret service. The best way to carry technology safely is to disguise the fact that you're carrying it.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  270. Camouflage by danberlyoung · · Score: 1
    I have a Tom Brain Cell slip case for my TiBook that then fits very neatly in my trusty old Lands' End Blue canvas bag. A whole lot less inviting than some expensive looking laptop case.

    -- Dan

  271. Actually useful tips that don't involve guns by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The thread has turned into a primer on gun control - but lets stick with geek stuff.

    First - the machine. A tip - if you have DSL or cable at home, DON'T bring it. Set up with GOTOMYPC or something of the ilk, and simply session into your home machine from where you are going. For some, this is not reasonable, they are going to sit in a cafe or what have you. But for many, consider using a remote session.

    Music - there are wireless headsets like the ones you might see at http://www.gadgetcentral.com/wm-we01_intro.html

    Wear them. Put the unit in a pants pocket or jacket pocket completely from view.

    Take a look at the latest in color blackberries and others. I saw a guy who had what I thought was this unit:
    http://www.pdagold.com/articles/detail.asp?a=155
    He had a pull out, snap together chicklet keyboard - and the thing had 802.11b wireless and he had an adapter to direct the display to an overhead projector that was in the office. It was brilliant, he hopped on the wireless network and had a 800x600 display of a remote computer via WTS in moments - with stuff he carried in his jacket pocket.

  272. Re:Not a problem here by sumdumass · · Score: 1
    yea, i did intend to say the exact same fire arms training. Thats one of the steps require to get a CC permit here. So I guess my question is, does that stand for the cops as well. The parent made a statment about
    I guess it will be very entertaining when your weapon will be used against you the moment you get it out.
    so do you think that the police will have the same problem and what make it different?

    I understand the situation about succesful fire and all. i just don't see were your weapon would be used against you.
  273. The True Answer by LinuXHaX · · Score: 1

    I agree with some of the earylier posts that dont act or anticipate being a target. A couple of times when i had to walk threw downtown Antlanta i kept my head high and looked mean, which isnt hard. But doing that i never got mugged in the 20-30 times i did it, but a couple of times the guy behind me got it, which makes me laugh.

  274. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Aikido. Let's face it, you're a geek, so:

    -you're out of shape.
    -you've got carpal tunnel.
    -you're scared of people bigger than you.

    Aikido will take care of all of those.

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      OK. I have been see your "Zerg" subject for months now. What gives?

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1
      OK. I have been see your "Zerg" subject for months now. What gives?
      BLAST! If people would stop modding me up, you'd never have noticed!
      --
      [o]_O
    3. Re:zerg by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Aikido. Let's face it, you're a geek

      Well, I think you have to be really really good at Aikido for it to be effective. It's very technical, and if a joint lock isn't applied properly it's fairly useless.

      Having said that, there's a lot of "avoidance" work, and I imagine it can help your reflexes for getting out of the way if you're attacked.

    4. Re:zerg by Jacer · · Score: 1

      Yong Moo Do is the way to go. It is a tournament that integrates Tae Kwon Do, Judo, and Hapkido. Basically, all three styles of unarmed self defense. Grappling, throwing, and punching/kicking. Also, regular sparring is essential. I was in martial arts for a long, long time, but when I first started sparring, I realized how poorly it was to put it all together effectivly. After a few years of sparring regularly, you begin to get a sort of feel for how to use what you know in a real fight. Kicking a board and kicking someone charging at you are suprisingly different.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    5. Re:zerg by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      BLAST! If people would stop modding me up, you'd never have noticed!

      True to a degree. But I read at -1. There is a whole other world at -1.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    6. Re:zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      I used to do that, but those guys are all crazy ^^;; In any case, I'm not a big fan of mandatory subject lines, I dunno...

      --
      [o]_O
  275. All well and good, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My flatmate leant me his iPod heaphones for my Walkman, you insensitive clod!

    Bastard...

  276. use a backpack Laptop bag with a belt strap by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    and have mace and a knife on you.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  277. Re:Not a problem here by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should read the entire thread before speaking ill of others.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  278. My thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Surely, you can't possibly need *all* of those gadgets on you all of the time. When travelling, check your valuables into the hotel safe (when they're not in use).

    2) Come to Canada. Pretty safe/nice here ;)

  279. Re:Get a gun by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

    What about statistics on deaths by knives, shivs, and baseball bats?

    what about the statistics showing that while murders by firearm are down, overall crime is up?

    or how about these articles that claim that gun crime is up 35%?
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1440764.stm
    h ttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2640817.stm

    Overall crime: 9.3%
    Gun crime: 35%
    Robbery: 14.5%
    Domestic burglary: 7.9%
    Drug offences: 12.3%
    Sexual offences: 18.2%
    ( Source: Home Office )

    those are pretty significant increases!

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
  280. A step in the right direction: by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

    "I've switched my iPod headphones...."

    There's nothing wrong in looking a little ratty while in a city. Wear old jeans, no watch or jewelry, a t-shirt, etc. Put the laptop in an old backpack, etc. No one need know you actually have money or possessions. I've heard too many stories about people getting killed for their car/rolex/diamonds and it just seems that looking pretty isn't worth one's life.

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  281. Well, one option's certainly out. by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

    Since you live in a country that has seen fit to disarm all potential victims and give criminals the benefit of a populace that's been rendered harmless, carrying a gun is right out.

    However, carrying a gun is only one part of self-defense, and there are many others. Ideally, a gun backs them up, but in the less-than-ideal situation you're in, there's things you can still do.

    What I would recommend is you immediately acquiring a copy of and reading Mossad Ayoob's book, The Truth About Self-Defense. It's an excellent comprehensive overview and guide on the subject. When it comes to specifics, it's more than a little bit dated, but the general stuff he goes into, like how to be observent, how to carry yourself, things to avoid, and so forth, are crucial to effective self-defense, even if you do carry a gun.

  282. Old Backpack / Eggcrate by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    You could always use an old backpack, aloung with some Eggcrate padding for your laptop. You can get Eggcrate at your local thrift store / (Wal/K) Mart, or whatever you have in your area.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  283. Some tips. by ivern76 · · Score: 1

    Never use a shoulder bag for your laptop...use a backpack that looks ordinary, yet has good inner pockets for the hardware. I keep my mp3 player in a pocket, and the only thing that's ever visible is two tiny in-ear headphones.

    So far, it's worked.

  284. NRA Sticker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nothing works better to protect valulables than a well placed NRA Sticker on your laptop bag.

  285. Self-Defense from the Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need a weapon to defend yourself, just mask your nerdy odor with some salad dressing.

  286. Re:Not a problem here by Telex4 · · Score: 1

    I did. In another post, you cite some random figures that still don't back up your case. They show:

    1993 - 1997: violent crimes fall
    1997 - 2002: violent crimes rise

    And you say that because, in 1997, certain extra restrictions were put on handguns, the crime rates rose.

    OK, well here's a crazy thought: maybe it was for some other reason? Why did crime rates fall between 1993 and 1997? Was it because gun ownership went up? No... so perhaps there's something else at work here. One leading theory tracks the figures better:

    1991 - gulf war
    1999 - kosovo
    2001 - afghanistan
    2003 - iraq

    Violent crime falls in between the wars, and rises again in the period of two major conflicts (and continues to rise during the iraq war).

    Not to mention that handgun ownership has never in recent history been widespread enough to have anything to do with the average person on the street being mugged.

  287. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, you look like a 2@.

  288. Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Great strategy, then the attacker will just shoot you, like a rabid dog.

    Definitely not a good idea. Stick with the knife, pepper spray, and brass knuckles...

  289. Neighbors by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    If you live in a place with a neighborhood watch or block watch program for heaven's sake participate. Alert neighbors with telephones make wonderful outer perimeter security.

    Being on good terms with the neighbors helps a lot during natural disasters too.

  290. criminal food chain by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    here's the paradox - legalising guns reduces crime for a little while, and then the crime grows back. Banning guns reduces crime for a little while, and then the crime grows back.

    Criminals fill a niche in the social eco system. Change the environment and they adapt, either by learning how to easily steal plentiful legal guns or learning how to easily import/make illegal guns. The only solution is to keep altering the environment to keep them in check.

    Liberalisation of gun laws followed by harsh crackdowns and buybacks, followed by liberalisation at random intervals. It kinda sucks to be you if you rely on guns as your sole form of self defence and have repeatedly spend a lot of money on a gun only to have it taken away again.

    Maybe the solution is get a friend who is a security guard and go drinking with them. When you are really good friends, get them to charge you a nominal $1 to be your "bodyguard" every now and again. Then most jurisdictions around the world will allow your friend to carry a weapon with some nominal licencing fees which will make your friend very happy, and when you go out together you get to feel like a rock star and carry heaps of expensive gear without fear.

    1. Re:criminal food chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals fill a niche in the social eco system.

      Criminals are an aberration of civilised society. Saying that criminals fill a niche in society is just plain daft, because if criminals fill a niche, then so do victims. That's like saying that some people are supposed to be victims. Under those circumstances, self-defense doesn't make sense, because a victim that defends his or her self against a criminal attack is the aberration. It would then make sense to punish the would-be victim for disrupting society.

    2. Re:criminal food chain by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Not really. If criminality was really abberant then it would periodically disappear. We as a species have tried virtually every legal system possible in our time on this blue world and no matter what laws we put in or take out, somebody breaks the ones we leave in.

      As for some people being food for criminals, and that food shouldn't fight back, I'll stretch the eco-system analogy a bit more - why do bees have stings? They don't use them to hunt with, and the beehive will most likely suffer horrific casulaties when stinging fleshy mammals in self defense. Yet they still have stings, because if there wasn't some deterrant against wholesale raiding of the soft honey containing targets then soon there would be no more victims, and no more honey for the honey eaters to eat - ecological collapse.

      The idea of a criminal food chain is repugnant to most because it does away with the old idea that there are such things as right and wrong. Instead there are only actions and outcomes.

      If you want a society where crime is less frequent, you have to create a situation where the criminals cannot figure out how to commit crime efficiently. They will eventually evolve a response and become more efficient, and then you have to adjust again. That is why there will be no end to the creation and repealment of new laws.

      On the other hand, I suppose if you want ordinary folk who could become potential victims to have a better fighting chance, you could leave conditions for them the same and have generations of training instilled in them so that their self defense is highly efficient... but then they become a part of the criminal's environment which is very predictable, and the criminals who survive and learn from the initial resistance will find some way to exploit any weakness that is systemic to the victim's defense mechanism.

    3. Re:criminal food chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do bees have stings?

      For the defense of the hive.

      the beehive will most likely suffer horrific casulaties when stinging fleshy mammals in self defense.

      No. Getting stung by a bee hurts. Getting stung by many bees can be fatal. An animal that gets stung all over its body by multiple bees isn't going to come back and take revenge on the hive for causing it pain; it's going to get far away very fast.

      The idea of a criminal food chain is repugnant to most because it does away with the old idea that there are such things as right and wrong.

      No, the idea of a criminal food chain is wrong. The existance of a criminal niche forces the existance of a victim niche. Try telling a rape victim that what happened to her was the fulfillment of her existance as a victim in society.

      God's laws set right and wrong, and those laws as well as the just laws of the land define non-aberrant behavior in society. The justice system works by trying to remove the aberrations.

    4. Re:criminal food chain by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      To any member of a food chain, all things that are edible are resources to be exploited, and all things that are able to eat you are threats to be evaded or destroyed.

      The only solution for a past or would be victim is to either make themselves inedible (increase the cost of a possible attack through legislation, situation, or repurcussions) or move up the food chain themselves until they can eat their former threats.

      Take the bees again - you are right that the bees are armed to defend the hive. Also note that they remain the food sources of bears - their many stings hurt the bears, but the act of stinging is fatal to the individual bee so the deterant is not as effective against multiple attackers as that of a wasp or a hornet's sting. (think about the person who carries a kubotan or an umbrella for self defence)

      Now one way to give the bees a good season is to vary the environment - if the bees manage to find higher structures to build hives in, they can evade the bears, until the bears learn how to knock down hives. Then if a fire sweeps through and destroys the trees, the bees can hive inside rocks, until the bears find them and the bees have to seek higher places to nest.

      For this reason, laws have to stay in flux. You cannot legalise guns and expect your problems to go away. You cannot ban guns and expect your problems to go away. You cannot institute a system of laws that says you cannot plant your fields with two different kinds of crops and expect your problems to go away.

      You must vary your laws to reflect the changing complexion of criminality, and destabilise them. Remember - the simple truth is that criminals are people who break laws, and those who break laws deliberately will attempt to figure out the easiest way to do it. Change the laws and the simple time proven methods employed by criminals will fail because the situation has changed.

      No point clawing at a tree if there is no beehive in it.

      No point trying to steal a gun that isn't legally allowed to exist in that jurisdiction.

      No point trying to lift a rock to find a hive that isn't there.

      No point trying to rape a woman who could shoot you and then get a pat on the back and a box of bullets from the local police.

      These opposing situations require mutually exclusive conditions to arise. This is why the gun debate will stagnate until somebody realises that even Jesus Christ went from an "Eye for an Eye" to "Turn the Other Cheek" back to "Gian Winepress and Bowls of Wrath" depending on what the situation needed.

      My argument is that right and wrong blind us to the actual effects of the actions of criminals and the laws we impose on them. I'm not arguing that any good can come of a criminal action, rather I am arguing that there is no such thing as good.

      Criminality, then, becomes a behaviour that we are simply trying to reduce, for reasons of our own, and sometimes to do so we have to take paradoxical measures such as turning potential victims into threats, or curtailing the rights and freedoms of honest citizens. We do these things to reduce crime, because we have no direct control over the criminals themselves, only the environment that they live in.

      If you could figure out a way to tame the bear, and make them obey your pattern of perfect laws for non-abberant behaviour in civilised society, then you would have a world free of crime - a world that could be genuinely called good.

      I am not so optimistic. There will always be criminals doing behaviours that you wish to limit. The only way to control crime is to make sure that the criminal environment becomes so confusing that nobody ever becomes very good at crime, and the price of such an enterprise must be born by the non-criminals.

  291. Learn Self Defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously. it not only will give you an advantage in a confrontation but it instills confidence in you that others can see, making you less of a target in the first place. muggers pray on the weak, not the walking can of whoop-ass.

  292. defense in getting mugged by theawesome · · Score: 1

    The ultimate defense against getting mugged is being proficient in hand to hand combat carry whatever you want, whenever you want, wherever you want (electronics wise) if you get attacked, beat the hell out of him, break 9 or 10 bones, a few arms and or legs and walk away with a smile

  293. My friend's bat is named.... by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

    The Phallus of Malice. Drunken College students at Wal-Mart dare not mess with him at 3 a.m. when he carries this. It's hilarious. They'll make a stupid comment, and he's free to mouth them off continuously because, well, he has a freakin baseball bat. It's a great equalizer.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  294. Re:Not a problem here by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    Randam figures? Or is that a euphamism for "facts that don't support my opinion?" Your "theory" is not a theory. It is an idea that so far has nothing to back it up but circumstance. Handgun ownership isn't a factor in being mugged, or other crimes? Why do the states with the least amount of gun control laws consistently have lower crime rates? In any case, you obviously are a /. troll who makes up theories and bashes facts to hide their own ignorance on any matters of policy.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  295. Re:Get a gun by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

    France

    Idea: how about carrying your wallet in the front pocket and putting a nice big wad of Brie in the back pocket. The expression on the pickpocket's face: priceless.

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  296. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody wants to steal a baby-blue or pink cute little bag full of shit.

    I don't know anyone who would want to steal a bag full of shit no matter what the color of the bag is. And if your diaper bag is full of shit, I think you need some help with what goes on the baby's butt and what you carry around.

  297. Did anyone ever answer the poster's question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For as insightful as some of the replies are to other articles, the replies to a truly serious question such as this are nothing short of thoughtless. (sorry to those of you who have posted insightful tips, i couldn't get past most of the fluff before replying myself)

    The key to protecting yourself/your belongings from theft is to minimize the reward for robbing you and maximize the time it will take to rob you.

    To minimize the reward, conceal the bling:

    1.) Keep the laptop in an unasthetic bag (nice tip, those of you that posted it).
    2.) Buy less stylish earphones (read: walkman black) for that iPod when galabanting about town. Save the white ones for the NoWax party.
    3.) Don't pull out multiple items in one location so as not to reveal everything you're holding.
    4.) Consider leaving the house with less if this is an extreme concern for you.

    Another tip for minimizing the reward is to align yourself with a more profitable target. That is, if you see a suit (or someone blinging more than you) on a train or walking down the street, walk near them and they'll become the more obvious target. This is the converse of the homely girl hanging with the truly ugly girl to make herself look pretty.

    Additionally, make eye contact with people who glance at you, particularly those you think may be following you or likely candidates to take your stuff. Portraying a sense of situational awareness makes you much less of a target. Additionally, if a wouldbe thief thinks you'll remember his face, he probably will move on to another target very quickly.

    When it comes to maximizing the time it takes to rob you, the key is to make the would be thief think it's going to be harder to rob you instead of someone else. Even the dumbest of muggers (read crack heads and tweakers) know that a target with $500 of stuff you can gaffle in 10 seconds is worth more than the $2000 target that will take a minute.

    So the obvious thing here is to stay on the beaten path in plain sight of the crowd. The less obvious things are:

    1.) Keep safety pins on your bag's zippers to serve as locks, *not* the mini luggage padlocks. Safety pins are as strong as a luggage lock but don't draw attention to the contents of the bag. This is most useful to deter pick pockets but could prevent the mugger who just goes for the contents of your bag rather than the bag itself.
    2.) Wear your laptop bag diagonally across your chest. This originated to prevent purse snatchers but is just as applicable to a long-strapped laptop bag.
    3.) Keep your iPod in your pocket. God knows what you keep in there (a knife?) and if the thief ever notices you struggling to access it, he's likely to think you'll have the same trouble when he robs you.

    Under no circumstances should anyone watching this thread ever think that carrying a firearm or other weapon is a proper solution to being mugged. The best training I've ever received was during a tactical shooting course. A student asked the best way to draw a weapon on a mugger who also was wielding a weapon and the instructor proceeded to demonstrate how to empty your pockets as quickly as possible then run the hell a way. Drawing down on an assailent with any sort of weapon is likely to result in your assailant having another weapon at their disposal *or* escalate the threat to an actual attack.

    In fact, pepper spray is a bad idea unless you've been properly trained, and typically should only be used in a truly life threatening situation. Why? Because the risk of screwing up it's usage is huge, and the only time you want to attack an attacker is when your only option is to fight back or risk physical harm.

    BTW - for those of you pinheads arguing about whether you should shoot to wound or shoot to kill, I'd recommed two things:

    1.)Please exercise the right afforded to you by the second ammendment and by no means ever own a firearm. You're going to get yourself or someone else killed.

    2.) Review the self defens

  298. look wierd. by FaerieBoy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, i live/walk through sketchy areas in San Francisco...crackheads everywhere. Crackheads and thieves do not like to fuck with wierd people...they dont like the unknown, it's a serious risk, especially when there are soo many normal looking people that are easy to predict.

    I originally started carrying a mini hello kitty doll in my side pocket for amusement purposes (i am a freak, but otherwise normal-looking). I noticed that 1) less people asked me for change 2) noone followed me 3) and random crackheads didnt try to sell me envelopes, streetsheets, or other silly items 4) if i wanted to i could pick up girls more easily, it's the whole 'he must be gay thing' :)

    looking a little wierd goes a long way.

    --
    All your preview button are belong to hello kitty.
  299. Just wondering... but... by VirtuaKnight · · Score: 1

    If everybody always suggests using a backpack to hold your laptop in, don't you think muggers will have wised up by now?

  300. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a man who's carried a diaper bag before, I would think it highly odd that a person would carry such a bag without a small child nearby. Presumably a mugger, along with the rest of society, would find it unusual also. But if you think it'll deter muggers, go ahead. For extra effect, peek inside the bag every once in a while and say, "Don't worry, honey, it'll just be a bit longer and I can let you out", that would deter a mugger.

  301. Carrying self, recognizing dangerous situations. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >All of this is pure bullshit.

    Researchers have shown videos of people walking on the street to imprisoned muggers. The researchers asked each mugger which pedestrian he would pick as a target.

    The muggers's answers were almost perfectly correlated. Like any predator they begin by sizing up their target. Like any businessman they want transactions to go smoothly. They will target people who are unaware of their surroundings and likely to freeze like a deer in the headlights.

    TWO MAJOR RULES

    1. Try to avoid the fringes of populated areas. The middle of a crowd is full of witnesses and obstacles. The deserted area far outside a crowd doesn't have enough targets. Muggers will cluster in that in-between zone.

    2. If you get an irrational feeling of danger, for no perceptible or logical reason, ACT ON IT. Your mind does tons of processing outside your conscious awareness. Don't stay in a situation because you "know" it's OK if your instincts tell you otherwise.
    Over and over, victims of violent crime report that they felt uneasy or had a hunch something was wrong before they were attacked. Those feelings come from a security mechanism with hundreds of millions of years of R&D behind it. Honor that mechanism.
    If you're out with a significant other, make a deal ahead of time that if either of you whispers "we need to leave here *now*" you'll zip out with no discussion.

  302. An Idea by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remove the tape from the middle of your glasses.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  303. Not a real geek by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    A real geek would use all those toys in his mom's basement drinking Code Red, with vi running on Fedora, and StarTrek playing on the little TV in the corner.

    If your out on the streets... your not a geek, your one of them.

  304. Except in the real world ... by MarkTina · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. you discover that you're a fat, balding computer geek who get's out of breath when climbing the stairs! The mind might be willing but the body sure as hell won't! :-)

  305. Glock 27 by joshki · · Score: 1

    and a concealed carry permit.

    --
    I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
  306. For what it's worth... by baximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If I lived somewhere and was in fear of being mugged simply by walking around the streets, I'd have two options:
    1. Move to a safer neighbourhood
    2. Don't carry all my stuff around with me
    Just a thought ;)
  307. I'll take balloons for 200 Alex. by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

    "That's not a catagory"
    "My mistake. I'll take balloons for 300 if you please!"

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  308. Entrenched Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So geeks are always white?

    1. Re:Entrenched Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of a VERY racist joke:

      What do you say when you see an eight-year-old black boy with a $300 bicycle?

      STOP, thief!!!

  309. I suggest you get a life by ttyp0 · · Score: 1

    It's not just the geeks that carry the high priced gadgets these days, it's everyone! Keep your toys as hidden as possible. Anyone with a cellphone, ipod, pda and pager hanging off their belt deserves to get robbed and beaten for being so gay. People live in so much fear these days, sad really. If something is going to happen, its going to happen regardless of how prepared you may be.

  310. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider the fatal shooting of criminals to be a public service.

  311. WRONG. by rhinoX · · Score: 1

    If you pull a gun out, you had better be using it to kill. Not only are you putting yourself, and everyone else around in GREATER danger when you pull the gun (what if he takes it), but "shooting to wound" will land you in a heap more trouble than just killing the person.

    Also, in my state in particular (Texas), if you have a concealed carry license - multiple shots are VERY MUCH looked down upon. You shoot to kill on the first shot, period.

    Guns are nothing to be lax with or about. Pulling a gun will automatically trigger the attacker's fight-or-flight, and if you don't seriously wound or kill them you may end up on the wrong end of that barrel.

    You do not shoot them three, or four times in the chest "because it didn't stop them". You shoot them once through the heart and be done with it. There's a reason that our CCL requires the holder to be certified on a particular type of gun, as well as using the SAME gun during training that they wish to carry with the license. It's required accuracy so that shoot to kill does it the first time. doing otherwise is dangerous and ignorant.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
  312. Insurance by elhedran · · Score: 1

    Just get insurance for the items you carry. doesn't cost that much. That way if you do get mugged, you can just hand the goods over knowing they will be replaced, (ok, maybe not the data, but do backups, etc). And as for all the people saying carry a gun? Oh yeah, lets make a bad situation worse why don't we? Lets make a simple theft into a homicide... I will never live in a country that gives out permits for carrying a hidden weapon.

  313. Concealed Weapon Permit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you need one of those if you don't shower and stink enough to vaporize anyone in a 10' radius?

  314. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by tensai · · Score: 1

    Nobody wants to steal a baby-blue or pink cute little bag full of shit.

    Maybe it's just me, but I always throw away the dirty diapers.

  315. Yeah.... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually got mine at Target for $30.

    It's an "Eastpak" grey canvas backpack that looks, on the outside, like any other generic backpack that'd otherwise just have schoolbooks and the like in it. But on the inside, there's a reinforced and padded sleeve for a laptop to be fastened into. It's served me well, both with and without the iBook inside, for almost four years now.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  316. BO? by emilng · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure it's not the BO they're avoiding?

    ;)

    1. Re:BO? by princewally · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be the worst way to avoid bodily harm.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
  317. get deisel- excersize! by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

    this may sound weird, but getting out and lifting weights may be a good idea, you'll look and feal built, which will also help with confidence, even if its just 20 minutes a day you'll notice an improvement

  318. He Lives in London by thelizman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He can't get a concealed carry permit. He can't legally even get a gun. The only people who can have guns there are the criminals. Not legally of course, but London is the shining example of the folly of gun control.

    Good choice though. The 27 is easily concealed and fires a powerful .40 cal round. Nothing bites more than having to riddle your attacker with 9mm or .380 shells when a double-tap of .40 cal will do the job. I just don't like the grip angle of the glocks. They're designed for European shooters who prefer the awkward low-angle grips. I'd go with a Kahr PM 4043a, myself.

  319. Reading for only 5 minutes I see... by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

    You Americans are gun crazy. Bowling for Columbine (despite it's many flaws) should be required watching for all you nuts. You did it in the arms race and you do it now...

    Simply getting a bigger weapon then your aggressor is not a solution, as your attacker will then follow suit. You may have a handgun in your purse, but your muggers will all be carrying automatics.

    Crazy...

    1. Re:Reading for only 5 minutes I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Firstly, Bowling for Columbine is a piss-poor cut-and-paste job which presents a few out-of-context quotes, pasted together for the purpose of deception. The overall effect has about as much basis in fact as Mr. Carroll's tale of Alice's adventures.

      My S&W Model 36 in .38 Special can make someone just as dead as a .44 Magnum can. It's not about who has the bigger gun, but rather who reacts faster and shoots more accurately.

    2. Re:Reading for only 5 minutes I see... by alfred+hichcock · · Score: 0

      Damn straight.

  320. Self Defense is Comprimised in the UK by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would reccomend carrying a self defense too of sorts, but the vast majority are now illegal in the UK. My best advise for a defense tool for you is a heavey metal flashlight, such as a Maglite, which can be used as a club or a fistload impact weapon. Another possibility is a very high-power flashlight such as an Arc Flashlight, which has a candlepower in excess of 33 Lumens. This is bright enough to blind a person momentarliy allowing time for escape. Also, don't use those iPod headphones, it's like wearing a big, flashing, "MUG ME" sign. Here's some more Self Defense issue with the restrictive british weapon laws in mind. A guide to Self Defense in the UK, Defending Yourself in Britain, A Guide to Expedient Weapons,

  321. Alpha Male + Fake Wallet by SlightOverdose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people only seem to consider two options- 1) Blow muggers head off 2) Give them your cash

    Heres my advice.

    The first thing to do when walking in bad areas late at night is to strut. Get yourself into the frame of mind of "I'm a sex God", and try and act like it. If you can pull it off, most men will become subservient to you. (... and woman will see this and find you attractive, regardless of how ugly you are).

    This works because you are essentially conveying the message that you are an Alpha Male, and has a huge low level psychological effect on other men. You can't fake this (as it relies on many subtle things like pheremones), but if you can get yourself into the right frame of mind it works. (Not to mention woman will start to chat YOU up)

    Chances are, most slashdot geeks have been on the receiving end of it, so you know how it affects you physically and psychologically . (In my case it helps that I'm 6'5 and work out at the gym).

    As a plan B, I carry a fake wallet around with about $10 in it and some old expired credit cards etc. Since I carry nothing else of value on me (Except my Nokia 3315, which is only worth $AU99), I can just throw the wallet a few metres away (to distract them) and run. Both partys win.

    1. Re:Alpha Male + Fake Wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing to do when walking in bad areas late at night is to strut. Get yourself into the frame of mind of "I'm a sex God", and try and act like it. If you can pull it off, most men will become subservient to you. (... and woman will see this and find you attractive, regardless of how ugly you are). Yes but don't let that strut turn into a.. mince!

    2. Re:Alpha Male + Fake Wallet by arantius · · Score: 1

      I've seen that advice (throw the wallet) before. Seems like a really bad idea to me. Surely you do not /want/ to enrage the person that is threatening you with bodily harm? Surely you do not think they will appreciate this?
      Seems to me in that situation, if I were the mugger, I'd beat the crap out of you for doing that, THEN go pick up the wallet.

      --
      Health is simply dying at the slowest rate possible.
    3. Re:Alpha Male + Fake Wallet by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

      The idea is that It distracts them long enough to make a break for it. Once you've started running they can't stab you, and very few people could hit a moving target with a pistol at more than a few yards.

      If you are a slow runner then it might not be advisable to do this. I can sprint pretty fast, and in either case, I doubt a mugger is going to want a fight with a 220 pound 6'5 man.

  322. Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lemme see if I've got this right.

    You are more offended at the idea that the parent assumed that most geeks were white than you are at the idea that by darkening one's skin, one would be less likely to be a victim?

    Bizarro.

    Maybe this'll help you sleep at night: the short answer to your question is, "yes, the vast majority geeks are Caucasian (which includes Indians) or Asian; there are very few black geeks (relatively speaking)." There are also very few female geeks (relatively speaking) but you don't hear the girls crying every time someone refers to some imagined (geeks == male) tautology.

  323. More peripherals by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1
    are there any other suggestions?

    /dev/gun



    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  324. True, your life is worth more than the crap you have, but maybe--just maybe the long term solution is to raise the bar.

    Get trained in self-defence. Lots of it.

    Get Knife. Get Trained With that!

    And finally, Move to a fucking country where you aren't scared to walk around *ever*.

    I mean, holy christ, are you really that scared? Maybe you live in the largest shithole city that in on the planet, and maybe you don't. You live your life in fear, and that ain't healthy.

    Either fix the fear by training yourself to overcome your (possible) attackers,

    == or ==

    Move somewhere where that ain't a problem. I got one word : Canada.

    Sure, there's crime here, but I've never, ever felt scared walking through any area of any City I've ever been in here.

    I've sure felt scared in US cities, but never here.

    But then, Canadians tend not to be afraid of one another.

    Feh.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    1. Re:Eh? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Man, I live in Washington, DC. Statistically, this is one friggen lethal city. I've been at gunpoint before, in Los Angeles, and believe me I offered that dude everything including a BMW. With the barrel of Glock at my temple, sitting down, fsck yeah, I'm going to play nice. Hey, my life or my car? Take the car. Incidentally, he walked with the $25 I had in my wallet. Didn't even take the leather jacket or watch I offered him -- not even the wallet itself -- let alone the BMW. So it came down to that. TWENTY-FIVE BUCKS. So, the risk of a stolen car wasn't worth it to him, so murder DEFINITELY wasn't on his agenda. Had I pulled a gun, it quickly would have made it to the #1 spot.

      I don't live in fear, I just make value judgements when threatened. Is chancing if I'm going to get shot, stabbed or beaten worth it over anything I could be carrying on me? Hardly. If the threat really is against my life, sure, but if it's 99.9% against my stuff? Please, I'd rather duke it out with the insurance carrier. That's not fear. That's just good sense. No, I don't go flinging my wallet at everyone who walks up to me, but if there really is a question of whether I'm going to get into a violent scenario, it's just not worth it.

      Most petty criminals will make the same judgement. If they get caught with your stuff, they're risking a few months jail time, or maybe a few years. If they get caught with your stuff having maimed or killed you, they'll go to prison never to return or (in the U.S.) probably fry for it. The fact is, there is very little robbery-murder. Look at the FBI uniform crime reports to see the numbers on how many robberies actually result in murder. It's practically zero. Most result in no physical harm or a rough-up. RARELY is your LIFE actually at risk, unless you level the playing field where your attacker thinks THEIR life is in jeopardy -- and you better be damned sure there isn't someone on point ready to ice your ass if you're going to use lethal force. Pulling a gun is an excellent way to convince a robber that killing you is in their best interest. You simply stand a MUCH better chance of coming out unscathed by just handing over your stuff. It just isn't a gamble in which raising the stakes is a good strategy. Ask ANY policeman and that is exactly what they will tell you.

      All that said, yeah, I've seriously considered moving to Canada -- hell, just about anywhere in the commonwealth... you know, "civilization."

  325. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then there was my friend who had his car broken into in Toronto, so the thieves could steal... a bunch of diapers that were sitting in the back seat.

  326. I do this. by NarrMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    I constantly look everywhere while I walk. I started doing this when I realized I get really bored. Keeps my occupied. The sneakiness is really funny too. I see everyone before they see me. I've walked past someone who was "in" the door of an elevator, pushed my button, they turned around, saw me, and nearly had a heart attack. They said "Where the fuck did you come from!"
    What's weird is that I can't really sneak up on someone when I want too... It only happens when I'm not actively trying.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  327. some tips from a seasoned traveler by anechoic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a touring musician and have written this bullet-point list of tips and tricks for laptop musicians for avoiding getting pick-pocketed:

    - colored backpacks = tourist or student
    this was a surprise to me but a policeman at the police station near where I was mugged said that backpacks with any sort of color on them are most prone to being pick-pocketed or stolen for some reason...the only conjecture he made was that it is mostly tourists who carry backpacks and the buyer usually chooses a colored bag so their luggage is distinctive when picking it out of a group of similar luggage (i.e., the baggage carousel at all airports)...so I sold the backpack I have (it had an orange outer shell on it) and purchased one which is pure black...more on my new backpack later...

    - NEVER wear a what's called a 'fanny-pack'
    these are packs that you wear around the waist like a belt that can hold wallets and credit cards and money...they were originally marketed to bicyclists but became popular with tourists as well...this is target #1 for pickpockets...fanny-packs = credit cards and money...don't wear them and if you own one throw it away unless you use it while bicycling...they're useless...

    - ALWAYS file a police report
    when your credit cards are stolen the thief knows full well that they have a limited amount of time to use it before the owner discovers it is missing and calls the card companies to cancel the accounts...in this period of time they usually rush into a jewelry store and buy an expensive piece of jewelry - but not too expensive where it gives them away...usually a couple of thousand Euro...and they will do this in a couple of stores until the card gets turned down...they then have purchased a booty which they then fence for cash...so it's a good bet that your card will show a purchase no matter how quick you are in reporting the card(s) stolen...an official police report will be needed to dispute any illicit charges made to your card(s)...I know it's painful to sit in a police station for hours and be treated like a criminal but it is absolutely worth it in the end...it is difficult to dispute illicit charges with most credit card companies without a police report...get one, don't even think about it...

    - distribute your valuables
    this means: don't put all your money and credit cards in one place (like your wallet) but spread them out in various hiding places (more on this later)...for example: cash, credit cards and passport should be kept in separate places in your backpack or on your person...also, hotel's have safes in the room which are free...keep valuables in different places since PP's usually operate in one quick move which means they get one chance to get at the goods and flee...

    - money belts, neck wallets and shoulder wallets
    personally I hate neck wallets...the string cuts into my neck and usually I have too much stuff to carry to keep it all in a single pouch around my neck...a passport, plane tickets, cash, credit cards, drivers license, etc. all start to weigh a lot when wearing them around your neck all day...and money belts are a pain to get to when your fumbling for money while buying a train ticket or need to present your passport in a hurry...I did some searching and I found a 'shoulder wallet' which fits like a gun holster...all your valuables are located just under your left pectoral/breast and are easily gotten to...I typically wear a T-shirt under a denim shirt so I wear the shoulder wallet over my T and under the denim shirt...when I need to get to money or passport I just reach into my shirt and grab it from a Velcro pouch under my left arm...the downside to wearing a money belt or waist wallet is that they can be pick-pocketed by experts...they just cut the back of your belt, distract you and pick up the fallen money belt...volia! a neck wallet is good but gets heavy after a while and is awkward to get to when carrying luggage since you need two hands to manipulate it...a shoulder wallet is good because you c

    1. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by juuri · · Score: 1

      Just another recommendation for the AllyCo bags. I also have the Life bag and used it extensively in "urban commuting". By far the best backpack I've ever owned and I also put a ton of research into different bags before purchasing.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    2. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I called the police to report a fraudulent charge on my credit card and an officer came to my house within 48 hours to take care of everything. This was in downtown Indianapolis, so we're not talking some small town where the cops have nothing better to do.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by hutkey · · Score: 0

      - NEVER wear a what's called a 'fanny-pack'

      wow, i didn't knew u can get a pack of 'fannies' ;)
      see 'fanny' here
      a geek would always want that! (considering the fact that he/she couldn't get it otherwise)

    4. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has travelled alot by myself, I thought I'd share some of what I do...

      - "money belts"
      i only wear one that is strapped around my waist, under any t-shirts, etc. keep a small amount of cash in pockets that are easily reached. enough for a train fair, lunch, etc. I endevour to only use your "money belt" when I'm inside a shop and need to get out a credit card. otherwise I try to never give away the location of anything that isn't visible but is important.

      - credit cards
      carry multiple and in different locations. this is a spread the risk strategy. keep your amex in your money belt, your $1000 Visa or M/C somewhere else. or maybe vice-versa.

      - camera gear
      get a tripod and carry that with you. a tripod that's more substantial than a desktop one, that is. something that you carry in your hand when you're walking (and isn't cumbersome) and can easily be used to as a weapon will give you some confidence even if it is useless as a weapon. whether or not this suggests you have more camera gear or more expensive gear than the average joe is a something to debate but I've never had issues, even when walking out late at night (after midnight) by myself around American cities.

      - dodgy neighborhoods
      just don't travel through them with anything of value on you, including laptops, etc - especially not ear buds in your ears. how are you going to hear the person you've just passed get up and start walking behind you if you're buzzing to music? this conincides with other comments of just basically being alert about who and what is around you. i think this is the single most sagely piece of advice i've seen mentioned elsewhere here and that one that can't be faulted. ...and if you're not a big scary guy, wear clothes that exagerate your appearance. if you're skinny, wear a loose fitting "puffy" jacket. can also help you stay warm :)

      do the rules change if it's hot and you're travelling by foot with stuff? how do you geek on the beach in Cuba (lets pretend that's bad for mugging) with impunity?

      some of these things go for moving around local places that are dodgy as well as those abroad. nevertheless, there are "no go" places everywhere, I'm sure (that aren't in the middle east), where no amount of advice from this forum is going to make you feel safe or keep you safe. so just be smart about life, eh?

    5. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by Cycloid+Torus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Very fine ideas.

      Just want to add one - bait money:
      - stick low value money in your pocket along with coins
      - if mugged start to hand over the "wad"
      - "nervous" is probaby "ok" as it keeps to mugger's scenario
      - get clumsy
      - drop a few coins then the wad (be sure change hits the ground with ringing sound & let paper money spread out)
      - while mugger, distracted, chases the money, get out

      If you have marked the money (specific marks or record of numbers), it can help police nail the case later.

      Fight crime! As soon as you are safe, write down what you can recall, details. Take the time to do a police report!

      --
      Lost in space at an early age. Survived the vacuum. Now rebuilding castle in air.
    6. Re:some tips from a seasoned traveler by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      A policeman lecturing on how not to be a victum suggested using a money clip, with at least a $5 bill visible on the outside. When the mugger asks for money you show him the money clip, then you toss it one way and run the other way FAST. He said the mugger doesn't want to hurt/kill you, he just wants your money, so he'll go after that and let you go.

      He had lots of other advice, too, but his mantra was that, no matter what the situation, don't be the easiest target. Lock your doors and turn on your porch light -- not that this will stop a thief, you just want him to pass by your house and break into your neighbors. Similarly, your backpack should look not worth taking, and keep an eye on it so they'll pass by yours and grab that fancy backpack next to the guy watching some babe, not his pack.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  328. don't be an idiot. by ayersrj · · Score: 1

    Along with the use a regular backpack with a sleeve and change your iPod headphones to something non-white, use common sense. You can use your iPod when walking, just don't be an idiot and walk with it in your hand out in the open. Make a playlist and keep it put away. Everytime I see someone on the street (once a day) I think about a linebacker coming around the corner and slapping it out of the persons hand and running away with it. In most places its less about being mugged, and more about having something straight up snatched right from you.

  329. Karate, Aikido, Hapkido, Jujitsu, etc... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Pick one. Walk confident. No one wants to mess with someone that will kick their ass. Acting a little crazy will help.

    Remember, predators always seek easy prey. Don't be target.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Karate, Aikido, Hapkido, Jujitsu, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 6' and I weigh 132lbs last time I checked, that's 1.81m and 62kg. I'm not exactly scary, in fact I'm so thin we make jokes about it. But I always look serious and I dress rough, the last couple of years I've been using an olive green trenchcoat from the 50's I inherited from my grandfather, tough as hell (looks like new!). The result? I'm a tall guy dressed like someone who doesn't mind getting rough, I've often noticed people crossing the street or at least staying as far away from me as possible when late at night. Also, when walking through not so good neighbourhoods, I always take the dark sidewalk and never avoid groups of people laying aroound, walking in the dark serves two purposes, to avoid being seen, and if I'm seen, I'm a large shadow in the dark... and avoiding groups is dumb, unless you run away from them you're just showing off your fear. I thought I was being followed once or twice, the easiest way is to either head for the nearest avenue, walk a block in it and then turn around, to walk into a shop (and maybe call a cab, depending on the situation), or to know the place really well so that you never walk in a place without a way out (opposite to the guy behind you, of course!). Basically it boils down to: 1. Look mean. 2. Avoid being seen. 3. Avoid having only one choice (like facing the guy). Just for the record, under the rough trenchcoat I'm rather well dressed, so once I reach my destination I take it off and I don't give a bad impression if I'm meeting someone new (in case I care, which is rare...).

  330. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you should therefore keep your laptop in a clear plastic bag?

  331. Biker garb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I found that wearing a dirty shrunken wool jacket I got from goodwill, carrying extra bags, and yelling at people that wearen't there was a great way to avoid getting mugged.

    I found that dressing like a biker scumbag, getting some tatoos, growing a goatee and copping an attitude was a great way to avoid being mugged because most people won't mess around with a biker.... except other bikers. Then the real bikers started picking on me and beat me up just because they thought it was fun to do. However, they didn't mug me.

    1. Re:Biker garb. by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Luckily for me I was born with a African American dad and a Japanese/Hawaiian mom... The combonation makes me look like a walking mugshot, not to mention the goatee and long hair. Strangely enough the only problems I have are with cops... luckily they never try to steal anything from me, they just ask lame questions and waste my time.

      That's where my Hawaii state ID comes in handy. So far it's worked in all messed up situations. It got a friend of mine out of trouble once when he was driving in L.A. and took a wrong turn into some gang's hood.

    2. Re:Biker garb. by scsi_pants · · Score: 1

      ...getting some tatoos, growing a goatee and copping an attitude was a great way to avoid being mugged

      hmm, for some reason I doubt that my tatoo of Tux on my leg will prevent too many muggings..

  332. Re:Not a problem here by elhedran · · Score: 1

    And how is what he doing different from what you are doing. I read the thread too, I didn't see anything to back up your statements. Can you reference research papers? scientific studies? are the independent? If not, then you are doing exactly what you accuse others of doing. Theres a word for people like you. Starts with a H.

  333. Don't get a gun. by burtonator · · Score: 1

    Get pepper spray. You don't kill anyone and it's a LOT cheaper.

    The worst for me is when I go into CompUSA and they try to demand searching my bags. I have a $2500 laptop... a $400 cam and a $300 PDA in there. I wonder if they will ever think I stole them ;)

  334. Safe by Poeir · · Score: 1

    Carry it all in a safe. You'll get a good workout every time you leave the house, too.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  335. You're Kidding Right? by thelizman · · Score: 1

    Self defence classes? Ya think? I'd recommend Aikido, followed by Judo. Once you've gotten reasonably proficient in either of those two, you might consider more advanced styles. Avoid Karate, Kung Fu, etc. They all have very rigid styles which are often impractical in the street. I'd recommend either Jeet Kun Do (this is the Bruce Lee school, and takes many years to master), or Kali (fillipino street style, emphasis on using sticks to deliver blows - you can buy collapsing batons that fit in your pocket, and extend with a flick of the wrist).

    Or, you could move to a country that isn't frought with violence and crime. Like America.

    1. Re:You're Kidding Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! LMAO!!!

      >>Or, you could move to a country that isn't frought with violence and crime. Like America.

  336. Re:Get a gun by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

    Lets just say that a lot of steel gets made in my town by some companies, one of which isn't particularly economically stable right now.

    --
    DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  337. Cop killer means ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    In most cases, being a cop killer means the police are more likely to wack you and get away with it. You simply do NOT kill a cop.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  338. I think everyone is missing the point by bflong · · Score: 1

    The 2nd amendment was not written to protect citizens from each other. It was written to protect the citizens from their own government should it go awry.
    They did this because of their experiences with the British government before they had to kick their ass to get their "freedom".
    What the hell happened?! :P

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    1. Re:I think everyone is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote Richard Linklater's Dazed and Confused -

      "Okay guys, one more thing, this summer when you're being inundated with all this American bicentennial Fourth Of July brouhaha, don't forget what you're celebrating, and that's the fact that a bunch of slave-owning, aristocratic, white males didn't want to pay their taxes."

  339. Pepper spray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carry a can of pepper spray and/or a knife - it's mostly useful for scaring (potential) attackers.

  340. Hide it by Lennie · · Score: 1

    for example use a 'Touchscreen BoomboxPC', there was an article about that on the frontpage for god's sake:

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/30/141421 0&mode=thread&tid=137

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
  341. Machete/Katana by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I lived in El Salvador for a few years, and down there many men carry machetes. It is a good deterrent against your average gang member or theif, but if some one else with a machete comes up to fight with you, you need to run (unless you have experience fighting). I think if I were going back again, I would learn to use a Katana and walk around with one of those. Then I wouldn't even have to be afraid of guns (think Spike vs. Vicious). Then if I get some sort of Elvish cape.....people would run in terror.

    --
    Qxe4
  342. Cultivated Insanity by lysium · · Score: 1
    The expectation of reaction is how the predator operates. Present behaviors that do not in any way match those of a potential target. In the wisdom of both Chris Rock and Neal Stephenson, acting genuinely crazy -- twitchy, muttery, squinty, lurching, or the like, will prevent all but the most unlucky of incidents. Heavy persperation and a "crazy eye" that is bulging and/or glazed, whistling a simply nursery rhyme in a psychotically repetative fashion...trully be inspirationally. Just avoid acting intoxicated, you want to be vaguely perplexing.

    Basically, act like one of those hallucinogenic frogs that every creature in the jungle knows better than to touch. The only trouble I've ever had was with truly insane vagrants, but you can always see them coming, and avoid them. Which is the whole point.

    ===--====

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  343. get some pants by hellmarch · · Score: 0

    dockers makes those tech pants with lots of hidden pockets. keep your cell and PDA in those pockets and keep your laptop in a bag that doesn't look like a computer bag. they make special backpacks that protect laptops and have room for more stuff.

  344. AMEN ... by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Our society is WAY too tolerant of bad guys. We are taught to lay down everything in the face of thugs for insurance purposes. Just think if more people on th 9/11 flights were willing to fight instead of laying down like lambs to the slaughter.

    The fact that people are EASY to rob encourages more people to become robbers. When robbers expect to be beat up half the time, they'll stop robbing.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  345. Toss him the wallet ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Then kick out his knees while he's making the catch. ;-)

    Bettter yet, carry a dummy wallet with old credit cards so you don't have to worry about losing the "real" one.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Toss him the wallet ... by Ruddykins · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding, do know what kinda butt pain I'd have if I carried TWO wallets?

      Well, on second thought, at least I'd be "balanced". :)

      --
      -Chad
  346. What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There isn't a damn thing I own worth being shot or stabbed over.

    How about your self respect? While I concur that none of my material possessions are worth my life, my self respect is more than worth my life. It's worth any mugger's life as well. I have a gun permit and thankfully I have not had to use any of my guns for self defense, I would not hesitate to do so if my life were in danger.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:What about... by phrasebook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How will you lose any of your own self respect if you hand over your possessions to avoid being injured? It's up to you whether you respect yourself or not. If another person can take it away from you - or you need a gun just to feel it - then you've got issues dude.

    2. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      How will you lose any of your own self respect if you hand over your possessions to avoid being injured?

      By losing control of one's own destiny.

      It's up to you whether you respect yourself or not.

      Regardless of if that respect is deserved.

      If another person can take it away from you - or you need a gun just to feel it - then you've got issues dude.

      If you allow yourself no more self-determination than a babe in the woods, you have issues.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:What about... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      How will you lose any of your own self respect if you hand over your possessions to avoid being injured?

      Because that means you're a coward. It means you can't stand up for yourself and protect what's yours, be it property or freedom.

      Furthermore, there's sort of a feedback effect going on. People are told to do as muggers say, so people do it. So people get mugged. So more people say "Do as the mugger tells you so you don't get hurt", and even more people get mugged. I'm sorry, but this "Be an easy target" rule is self-defeating. If you want to stop crime, or at least reduce it, then as a victim you have to fight back. If you just sit there and allow yourself to be victimized, you are not only responsible for being a pussy yourself, but for providing incentive for the criminal to go and victimize yourself, thus making you at least partially responsible for the next crime the bastard commits.

      Of course, if you want all of that hanging on your conscience because you're too chickenshit to stand up for yourself, why don't you take a walk down my street? You probably have some stuff that would come in pretty handy for me....

      OH yeah. Of course cops will tell you to be a pussy. If everybody stopped putting up with criminals, cops would be out of the job. Advising people to just lay down and take it is called "job security", for both the cops and the muggers.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you sad redneck. Not everyone lives in a trailer park you know.

    5. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be a coward than dead. My friends and family (probably) agree.

    6. Re:What about... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be a coward than dead. My friends and family (probably) agree.

      6 million Jews (and countless others) disagree with you. Bullies are not to be tolerated.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:What about... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      "By losing control of one's own destiny."

      if you go that route, who's to say it wasnt your destiny to be mugged? Maybe there was a lesson in it?

    8. Re:What about... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      You have a choice. You can take the red pill or the blue pill. The red pill (fighting back) is not for everyone, has extra risks but also extra gain. The blue pill (giving up your stuff) has less risks but more loss. Both are 'solutions' in that both have a probability of success. The red pill depends on your read of the mugger and their read of you, the blue pill has no dependencies really. In most cases you will walk away safely if you give up the goods. For the people who were shot even after doing so, those same people probably would still have been shot if they fought back. It all depends on the mugger. Personally, I'd take the better odds and less dependencies.

    9. Re:What about... by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      I like how you linked muggers to both Nazism AND terrorism in two posts.

      BEAUTIFUL!

    10. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      if you go that route, who's to say it wasnt your destiny to be mugged?

      Maybe yours is.

      Maybe there was a lesson in it?

      To learn to defend yourself. Standing up for yourself isn't an event, it's a way of life. You are either the kind of person who takes shit or your are not. Some thug in the street, or an asshole at work, no difference between them.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    11. Re:What about... by Audiostar · · Score: 1

      Well Lord Kano, fortunately my self respect doesn't fit in my wallet or on my wrist, and I don't drive it to work, so its pretty tough to steal. As my post said, I wouldn't hesitate to hand over a wallet or lapop to avoid injury. That doesn't mean I would allow someone to injure me or my family through my inaction. I own guns, I have worked security at night clubs and bars, and have been stabbed on multiple occasions. I'm not afraid of violence, I just don't think material possession warrant physical altercations.

    12. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Well Lord Kano, fortunately my self respect doesn't fit in my wallet or on my wrist, and I don't drive it to work, so its pretty tough to steal.

      Maybe you didn't read my follow-up post to an earlier response to my post, so I'll recap for you.

      The material possessions are not what I was referring to. It was the loss of self determination. To live with the knowledge that you are only living and breathing at the sufferance of a criminal.

      As my post said, I wouldn't hesitate to hand over a wallet or lapop to avoid injury.

      Would you perform a sex act on a criminal to avoid injury? There isn't much difference. Both involve being forced to do something against your will.

      I'm not afraid of violence, I just don't think material possession warrant physical altercations.

      Can you ever be sure that the mugger will just let you go after you give up everything that you are carrying? If someone is going to threaten you with bodily injury, there is a good chance that they are willing to inflict it. Especially if it's a 2 time felon who wants to make sure that you can't ID him and give him a 25 year vacation.

      As crazy as things have been getting recently, every once in a while we get a sign that common sense is not dead yet.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    13. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be a coward than dead. My friends and family (probably) agree.

      To be a coward is to endure a living death.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The red pill (fighting back) is not for everyone, has extra risks but also extra gain. The blue pill (giving up your stuff) has less risks but more loss.

      In most cases you will walk away safely if you give up the goods.

      I respectfully suggest that you have no fucking idea of what you're talking about.

      The statistics show that if you attack a robber (with a firearm) you are LESS LIKELY to be harmed while being robbed than if you comply with the demands of the robber.

      For the people who were shot even after doing so, those same people probably would still have been shot if they fought back.

      The numbers do not support your conclusion. You are LESS LIKELY to be harmed if you fight back. Do whatever you want to with your life, but at least do it with your eyes open and facts, instead of speculation, at your disposal.

      Personally, I'd take the better odds and less dependencies.

      So I guess this means you'll be getting a permit.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:What about... by Audiostar · · Score: 1

      Thats a fair rebuttal. I agree with the fact that you cannot know the outcome of the situation, and thus you must be prepared for any outcome. Perhaps what i wasn't clear about is that I personally wouldn't resort to violence until absoluetely neccessary. I would hand over a cell phone before initiating any physical actions against another. At the same time, I know that I am capable of disarming an attacker without much risk of injury because I have done it countless times. I apologize for any harshness that may have come across in my tone. After rereading my post I see that I was a bit unclear in my remarks, and I wasn't getting my point across. The pizza hut policy is just ridiculous. That deliveryman could well be dead if not for the 9mm, and yet he lost his job protecting his life, and company property and revenue. The world is a sick place friends.

    16. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The pizza hut policy is just ridiculous. That deliveryman could well be dead if not for the 9mm, and yet he lost his job protecting his life, and company property and revenue. The world is a sick place friends.

      I used to work delivery for KFC, which is owned by Pepsi, just like Pizza Hut, we were also not permitted to carry firearms while working. However one of our managers pointed out something. The regulation forbade carrying a gun, but not having one inside of our cars and not on our bodies. I was under 21 at that time so I couldn't get a gun permit anyway, but if I were to find myself working delivery today I would carry, regardless of what the company policy was.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:What about... by mino · · Score: 1
      my self respect is more than worth my life

      I'm reminded of a quote from British comedian Alexei Sayle, which of course I can't remember, but I'll paraphrase:

      The famous Spanish revolutionary 'la Pasionaria' used to say "it is better to die on your feet than live on your knees". That's rubbish. It's better to live on your knees than die in ANY position. I don't want to die at all. In fact, I'd rather spend the rest of my life face down in a bucket of shit than die even a little bit...
    18. Re:What about... by Audiostar · · Score: 1

      I've got a cc permit so I guess as long as they didn't know I had it on me I'd carry too. Especially considering that you deliver to all sorts of shady places, and you've got cash on your person, and a light on the roof of your car letting people know exactly who you are.

    19. Re:What about... by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I think you read me exactly backwards. better odds and less dependencies = giving up your stuff.

    20. Re:What about... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I think you read me exactly backwards. better odds and less dependencies = giving up your stuff.

      No, I read you right. You are incorrect. Your odds of walking away unharmed are better if you fight back.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  347. A bit confontrational, aren't we? by 3770 · · Score: 1

    The question posted would be a lot less interesting if it couldn't be generalized to other places than London.

    You walked into this seeing an argument that you thought you could win and make you feel like a great big powerful man. Don't be such a confrontationalist. And don't try to make this to an argument that you either win or loose. Discuss it and gain respect _and_ make friends.

    Now, you will read this and get upset. And you'll be wanting my head on a platter.

    Fight that.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  348. USE A DECOY by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Bring him along all the time, buy him plane tickets if necessary. But the important part is to make him EXTREMELY GEEKY. Thick glasses, pocket protectors, haircut. Let him wear the white headphones, the fake laptop and the fake PDA and the fake iPOD. The mugger magnet manifest.

    You OTOH should look like one of them uber male models that have that faraway look like you're walking down the ramp all the time, sporting the latest close-to-body-holsters that carry the concealed REAL laptop, REAL PDA, and iPOD...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  349. ACT CRAZY !!!! by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    Well done. No one wants to mess with a crazy person. Bark like a dog. Meow like a kitten. Do ANYTHING the Mel Gibson does!!!! You'll scare them.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  350. Re:Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the AC is a black female?

  351. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's something from your link :

    Criminologists believe that a note of caution needs to be introduced into analysis of the data, because of the different ways in which UN member countries record crimes.

    So FWIW, this study is not worth much.

  352. I carry a toughbook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I carry a Panasonic Toughbook (CF-M34). I carry it out in the open, clenching it tightly, strap around my hand. I'm practically _begging_ for the day when some punk comes up to me and tries to steal it -- I can't wait to just swing it around and knock the fucker out. Wouldn't hurt it at all. They certainly can't be expecting that from a laptop.

  353. This is different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't just simple theft. I wouldn't ever get the urge to, for example, shoot an embezzeling employee, or thieving roommate (though this may be different for others as the issue of violation of trust comes into play) or a shoplifter. Someone who has the nerve to rob someone in person seems a lot more boldly criminal. There's also the greater scale, the fact that they're also costing you personnal data, they should be able to forsee this risk, and they just might be willing to kill you for disobeying them.

  354. Re:Get a gun by Whyte · · Score: 1

    those are pretty significant increases!

    Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Stop spreading facts around like that, you'll damage the anti-gun rhetoric.

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  355. Re:Not a problem here by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? You would say that in the situation where a criminal has made the decision that it is acceptable to take my personal belongings and at the least threaten me, if not harm or kill me, I don't have the moral right to say "This man is willing to shed blood for this crime, it might as well be his"?

    Any person that has bought into the moral code that just taking something from someone by force is an acceptable means of getting something is expendable. That is the moral code of thieves, rapists, and murderers. Are you telling me that they have a greater right to live and act than I do?

  356. Sept 11, rape, and murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We live in a world where the thug threatening your life has two options, tell the truth or lie. he may really want your Ipod, or he may really want to mutilate and kill/rape you once he is sure that he/she can get away with it. "Just hand it over" is a good way to be sure that there is no way to save your own life if the thug happens to be lying to you and wants to have a little fun after the score.
    Rule of thumb, you didnt bring it down to a life or death situation and it is appropriate to turn the tables and offer the thug his/her life in exchange for surrender/incarceracion.

  357. BTW ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Your pack will make an EXCELLENT shield in case of a knife attack ;-) Then kick out the guys knee.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  358. Disguise compromise by KerrAvonsen · · Score: 1
    A lot of the suggestions in the class of "look like you're too poor/crazy to rob" sound good, but probably aren't practical for day-to-day living (as distinct from, say, being a tourist, where you don't have anyone to answer to). But if you've got a job with any sort of dress code, looking like a homeless person is rather ridiculous. However, looking like a Uni student probably isn't (unless one is required to wear a Suit (ugh)). Of course it's easier to get away with smart casual dress if one is a woman.

    Likewise, a compromise on the put-your-laptop-in-a-battered-backpack, would be to put your laptop in a smart, black, backpack. I have a special backpack designed for laptops, with a padded section to put the laptop into, but from the outside it doesn't scream "I have a laptop in me, mug me!". I originally got it because I was sick of the weight of lugging a laptop bag, and I found those wheely ones required me to have three hands whenever I was travelling, but I've found the side-effect of it looking like an ordinary backpack has made me more at ease when travelling overseas with my laptop. And if your work hassles you, saying that a backpack is "unprofessional", then start muttering about ergonomics, RSI and backaches and they should back off (grin). And it's amazing how much more "professional" something can look simply because it's black.

    Likewise, ditch any bags or cases that say "I am a cell phone case" and so on. When I was holidaying in New Zealand recently, I carried my digital camera in my ConDiego ID bag, because it was just big enough to put the camera in, zipped up nicely, and didn't look anything like a camera case (it hung around my neck, which was also convenient). Having a coat with lots of pockets may be sufficient for small things like cell phones or PDAs.

    --
    -=- Say it with flowers. Send a Triffid. -=-
  359. This is probably a troll by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1

    but the reason that he has the right to take the criminal's life to save his is because the criminal initiated the use of force.

  360. Keychain tools ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    There is a really nice keychain defense tool. Basially, it is a pointed cylinder with two prods coming out of the side. You can bob with the end or poke with the point. Or you can slash with your keys that hang off the end.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Keychain tools ... by cybershadow_jp · · Score: 1

      yeah... these are the stuffs in the developed countries that basically gives the criminal an edge to commit more crimes... ie., now it is illegal to carry self-defense weapons? or as it in the united states, wherein your used more force than needed (why do you gauge what is "more force"?), then you could as well be jailed while the assailant goes free... it's a crazy world out there... just come and leave in japan where it is basically safe to roam the streets at night... (^^)

  361. Dummy wallet ... by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Informative


    Keep a dummy wallet in the "obvious" place with old credit cards and a few bucks. Keep the "real" wallet safely hidden.

    If someone asks, give them your dummy.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Dummy wallet ... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Yeah... funny story... i got mugged once and pulled a ten dollar bill and two ones out of my front pocket, gave it to the guy and he left. My wallet had over a hundred in it plus check card.

      Sometimes you can get away with a 'placebo'.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Dummy wallet ... by GQuon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tips for dummy wallet:

      - Use this one, or change in your pocket, for giving any money to beggars/panhandlers. They may be theives.
      - Use it as a level 1 cache for paying. Take bills out of your hidden wallet while nobody is watching, and put them in the dummy wallet. Then use the dummy for paying. That way you won't be seen fiddling with your real wallet.
      - Expired credit cards are a nice, but may give up your game if they actually check the date of the card before leaving you alone. Wear down the expire date. Bonus if a stupid theif actually tries to use it.
      - Put some family pictures of it. Someone else's family of course. Use stock photos of not famous people.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    3. Re:Dummy wallet ... by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I'd be a little wary about that though -- a friend of mine who was mugged was patted down after he gave his wallet. If he had a second wallet, they might not react very well.

  362. Re:Get a gun by orin · · Score: 1

    Mod this post up. Criminologists are notorious for using dissimilar methods to measure crime. Saying that country A has less crime than country B assumes that people are taking the measurement in the same way. 99% of the time they are not.

  363. Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a friend that is an obscenely productive martial artist. anything happens i think i can coundt on his revenge. Also he taught me to use nunchaku and a katana. I'll still prolly give em the goods if mugged, but if necessary ill give em one for.

  364. Put It In The Trunk by SuperJames_74 · · Score: 1
    NOT gun related :-{P>

    When I'm leaving the office, and I know I'm stopping at a store on the way home, I put my gear in the trunk. I know, it's a very specific situation (you *have* an office, *and* a car trunk...), but still...

    --

    @sshatrack

  365. Ignorance [Truly must be] bliss... by Serzen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And you must be one happy individual.

    Policeman dying in the US may be a common occurance, when one considers the vast SIZE of the US, but when you view individual areas of the US, you get a whole different story.

    The area where I live is not a bustling population center, but it has a fairly large population, and as such, a fairly large police population. In the past, I'd say, six or eight years, five officers have been killed in the line of duty. Two were gunned down while serving a warrant on a drug lab and three shot to death while investigating a car that turned out to have been involved in a robbery.

    Not only did these killings make the front page of all the papers, and become the primary stories on the evening news, but they STAYED front page/top story material for about three days, and even after were not far from the spotlight as the killers were found and brought into custody. The community mourned the loss, and even helped to search for the suspects, helped to provide money to one of the widows, etc.

    Similarly (sp?), in the same six or eight years, there have been, all told, perhaps 10 homicides, and only about 12 very violent assaults. Violent crime simply does not occur with all that frequency. I live less than three hours drive from several major East Coast cities, and there's plenty of traffic from all of them through my area, so it's not as though we're isolated here, and free from criminal activity; drugs, theft and vandalism are big problems, particularly drugs, as the location makes the area a crossroads for transporting things all through the area.

    When taken as a whole, yes, the United States is rife with violent crime, but when considered per capita, I highly doubt that it's as severe a problem as you seem to think.

  366. no problem for me... by cybershadow_jp · · Score: 1

    at least for now...

    i have martial arts training for about a decade, and usually work out along with my dad and his colleagues (subordinates, etc) in the military... also been to the worst parts of the jungle (when i was a kid, i usually spend my summer with my dad "in-training")...

    also, ive been through a couple of muggers myself - and except for some knife wounds (if someone has a knife, the possibility you get wounded is about 99% - what you see in the movies are just that = movies), i manage to survive them... and to get those muggers to jail in the process...

    also, my sister works for the police force specializing in the underground - and she has been in a lot worst that i have...

    it is just that most of us right now havent been through hell that in the first sign of trouble, the go into shock and wouldnt know what to do...

  367. Re: WRONG is wrong by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

    Again... No, you are NOT using it to kill. You are NOT making a conscious effort NOT to kill, however. If that's what it takes, so be it, but you are NOT shooting to kill. The reason multiple shots are looked down upon in Texas (And everywhere else) is that in court, if you put 8 rounds into someone, you are going to appear to the jury that you most certainly meant to kill them. If you tell the jury "Yeah, I meant to kill him" you are going to be found guilty of murder or somesuch. I did NOT say to shoot to wound. HOWEVER, if you shoot an assailant, it hits him in his pelvis, shatters it, and he falls to the ground, he's no longer a threat, and you can NOT (legally) continue to shoot him. Shooting to NEUTRALIZE THE THREAT is almost always going to be a fatal shot, because in QUICKLY incapacitating an assailant, you are in effect neutralizing them. My point is that your OVERALL GOAL is not to kill anone, it is to neutralize what you believe to be a reasonable threat on your life. Again, tell ANY jury, lawyer, judge, or police officer that you were "shooting to kill", and you will go to jail, and your CCW will be revoked. I myself practice failure drills when I'm at the range. Two to the chest, and if the head is still where it was initially, one to the head. I know that if seeing the gun doesn't stop them, having it pointed at them doesn't stop them, having a round impact your chest doesn't stop them, having two rounds in their chest doesn't stop them, then I am going to have to resort to undoubtedly lethal force. It is a last resort when everything else has failed. I am not being lax about guns. I am reiterating what your intentions SHOULD be, in order to keep you from doing something stupid (kill someone who is no longer a threat) or from being charged and convicted of murder because you decided to tell everyone that your intentions were to kill someone. If your CCL instructor ever said "quick kill", "shoot to kill", or something similar, and anyone in charge of anything heard him, you can bet your ass he'd be fired, even in my favorite state of Texas. Shooting to wound or maim is most certainly dangerous. But shooting specifically to kill is illegal, and to many people immortal. You shoot to stop the threat. All I am saying is that as soon as there is no more threat, YOU STOP SHOOTING. And so do I. If you shoot your bad guy twice in the chest and he's on the ground, and then you go shoot him in the heart to make sure he's dead, any jury will say that you just murdered a man in cold blood. Shoot to live. If that requires killing someone, so be it, but if you shoot to KILL, you have the wrong frame of mind to be carrying a firearm. (Again, after having had one of these guys call me a left-wing gun grabber or some such, let me reiterate that I do have a CCW, I open carry an XD40, and I've fairly closely followed Virginia law and pertinent self defense cases all over the U.S. I'm not trying to grab anyone's guns. And I vote Bush, despite him saying he wouldn't veto the AWB if it made it to him.)

  368. Use the strap by shrewtamer · · Score: 1

    The chances of being mugged in London by someone with a gun are very remote. I'd say you weren't likely to be mugged with a firearm involved unless you had a lot of drugs.

    My top tip for protecting your laptop on the tube always sit / stand with your leg going through the shoulder strap of the bag. (Obviously don't use the laptop on the train) A snatch and grab attempt is the most likely and this will foil that.

    That's what I did when I lived in London. If somemone had pulled a knife on me I would have gone for the eyes, throat and genitals. One time when I really felt threatened I kept the power adapater for my Archos in my hand as it has quite a weight to back up the 3 pronged plugs with.

    Thank God I don't live in London anymore. Now I live in NZ....I understand that until recently NZ had a higher gun ownership rate than the US.....but its real hard to get a pistol. There's no real trouble down here in NZ, especially in the South Island no one gets mugged. A lot of people don't bother locking their doors. I came to NZ straight from London and when I went tramping used to check my laptop into the bank for them to store in their vault. They always found this very funny. I used to be worried about the security of their vaults. (Staff would give me my laptop back because they recognised me - without asking for any ID....I'd have to wait while someone got the bag out with no physical barrier between me and the vault and no evident security).

    Now I never worry about being mugged or anything like that. Also it only ever takes 10 minutes to get to work ... any more than 5 cars is a traffic jam in Dunedin. Plus I don't need to worry about salary because my pay is so amusingly low. (I'm a software engineer) But it does cover a nice house and all the rest so what the hec!

    Cheers

    Stewart

    (Never lend anyone your Boat, Gun or Chainsaw)

  369. Law should encourage ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    The law should incourage the VICTIM removing the mugger from the street. If he happens to be removed completely from the earth ... so be it.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  370. Re:Get a gun by ansimon · · Score: 1

    hmm.. interesting....

    from the article:

    "Only the Dominican Republic, New Zealand and Finland
    have higher crime rates than England and Wales."

    and now from the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs web page:

    "Although the crime rate in Finland is low compared to the U.S. and most European countries, it has increased in recent years. However, Finland remains a relatively safe environment. "
    " Street crimes, such as muggings and pickpocketing, remain relatively uncommon, but do occur. "

  371. Crime prevention via sodomy ??? by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    New Yorks finest also gunned down a completely unarmed man in the foyer of his apartment building. Is THIS a crime deterent.

    There is no excuse for sodomizing a detainee. A little rough stuff is probably in order if they get out of control. Otherwise, a man in custody is a man out of "play".

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  372. Live your life? by slicenglide · · Score: 1

    Seriously, put your white headphones back on, and start walking with your head up and confidence. It's not the fact that you carry money around your neck and in your pocket all day, I think that it is you have a victim mentality. You could get run over by a car tommorow; but you're not asking for tips to avoid being run over. If you are really worried, by some insurance for your stuff.. but really what you need is a shift in how you feel about yourself and your security. Most of the world does not get mugged every day. If you freak out over Terror Alert Codes, and are twitchy because you are affraid you will get mugged.... well then you have greater issues to deal with. Seriously, if you can find a way to just walk down the street with all your gear, and not worry about the day to day things you cannot control.. You may just find a bliss otherwise ignored.

    --
    John Walsh once found me while looking for some other kid. He was not amused.
  373. Re:Carrying self, recognizing dangerous situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "R&D".

    Hmm, so that is the new politically correct word for evolution in case of possible surrounding by religious fanaticists?

  374. Why...? by x3r0ph00l · · Score: 1

    What's a self respecting geek doing out of the house anyway?

  375. sure he would by llimllib · · Score: 1

    but it'd be the cops doing the mugging.

  376. Umbrellas ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    They're perfect. You can easily defeat a person weilding a knife.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  377. Ahhh... the Good old Days.... by macthulhu · · Score: 1

    Back before anything carried on your person could make you a suspected terrorist, I had a few different implements that saved my ass more than once. My favorite was the cattle prod I kept in my car, and occasionally under my trench coat. While only as effective as a mediocre stun-gun, the fact that it was a 24 inch long metal pipe gave a nice alternative in case the zap didn't take care of business. It was also extremely effective for clearing out keg parties when it was time for everyone to go home. My other favorites included a plain old tube sock with a few fistfuls of wood screws or a pile of D batteries in it, a fistful of 18 inch coaxial cables with frayed ends (talk about a terrifying wound!), and in one extreme case a can of oven cleaner did the trick. My geekdom wasn't what caused my need for improvised weapons, it had more to do with having a blue mohawk and being an accused satanist in a small town in the 80s... Either way, any self respecting geek should have enough extra cables laying around that they shoud be able to sufficiently arm themselves. I don't mean that pansy-ass USB shit, dig up some SCSI cables! The coax can shred the sleeve of a leather jacket pretty effectively... not that I, as a "reformed" citizen, would know anything about that... But if you want to hear a 240 defensive tackle scream like a 6 year old girl on fire, flog him once or twice with a fistful of coax. In the case of a mugger, or other armed assailant, aim for the face and neck... Nothing says "no you can't have my iPod" like ripping someone's eye out. Everyone on Slashdot likes to bitch about how expensive they are... go ahead and sell it, you won't make enough to cover your ER visit... never mind the cost of a semi convincing glass eye and plastic surgery to give you a new cheek.

    --

    Someday a real rain is gonna come...

  378. Re:Carry a Cane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cane can be just a good a baseball bat and does'nt
    look like a wepon.

  379. Mods: How is this off-topic? by simoncion · · Score: 1

    I fail to see the problem

  380. Move to Idaho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... Anywhere in Idaho, USA. Or Alaska, Whyoming, etc.

    Life is great. I can have a few beers, walk down the darkest alley I can find, pull out my iPod and cell phone and sit down with NO FEAR.

    Think about how sad it actually is that you have to live like you do.

  381. Easy by OiBoy · · Score: 1

    I easily solved this. I shaved my head, got several interesting piercings and have most of my visible body tattooed. Muggers see me coming and run away.

    --
    `fortune -o`
  382. laptop bag by wirehead78 · · Score: 1

    I carry my powerbook around in a shoulder bag I got at the Gap. It looks like something a student would use for books, but it's padded on the inside for a laptop. It's a clever design. You'd never really guess.

  383. Re:Not a problem here by ralfg33k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The criminal, by definition, has already decided that. By violating the laws of the society in which he lives, the criminal has decided that those laws are of no value. Those laws are what codify the value of life in that society. Those laws could protect him, too, but if he chooses to act outside of those laws, then that protection is forfeited (IMHO). Your statement seems to imply that it's OK for someone to go through life feeling victimized. [Sob..sniffle..sob]

    And spare me the granola-crunching b.s. about how *all* life everywhere is valuable -- go tell it to the Chinese, whose troops fired on unarmed kids in Tienamien Square, and whose policy is to off babies as they're being born when their parents exceed some gov't quota.

    Remember, this isn't about the 19-year-old who gets caught sipping a beer in a place where the drinking age is 21. We're talking about violent criminals here.

  384. Not the point ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    You don't have to DEFEAT the attacker. You only have to sting him.

    A wasp will not kill you. But most people AVOID wasps. Why ... THEY STING!!!!!

    Predators don't like to target people who FIGHT BACK!!!! If you FIGHT BACK most of them will go away. The ones who don't were probably going to hurt you ANYWAY.

    Finally, lots of people die because the DON'T FIGHT BACK. They lay down like lambs to the slaughter. I'd rather go out fighting then die like a punk. I'd rather go out fighting than live life like a lamb.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Not the point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Lots of people also get themselves killed because of their macho attitude or overconfidence in their "martial arts" training, or because the guy pulls a gun on them and blows them away, OR because the guy has buddies that show up and gangbeat them. It can work either way.

      2) Fighting back is good only if there is no other alternative, but if you have the chance to RUN and get away I would do so.

      Also, where are you getting your facts that if you fight back "MOST OF THEM WILL GO AWAY". You make it sound way too easy, because in reality it is not. If you fight back, you better beat the crap outta them and do it FAST otherwise YOU will be the one in the body bag.

      No mugger will just "give up" if you suddenly attack them unless you completely beat them down. If you "sting" them (whatever that means) you better do it to the point where they cannot hurt you anymore, which often means using excessive force.

  385. Re:Get a gun by jrf4z · · Score: 1

    At the very least, a self-defense course will give you a confident demeanor, which will probably prevent most conflicts.

  386. Colt Officers Model 1911 by fracas · · Score: 1

    To go along with my titanium laptop and chrome backed iPod I had a stainless steel 1911 built with custom ivory grips. Muggers beware.

    1. Re:Colt Officers Model 1911 by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I prefer the custom rubber grips because they offer better control. I use them on the full size Govt model. Inside the pants holster in the small of the back, no one ever knows. I'm thinking of switching to a .40 S&W for even greater knockdown power.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  387. Carry a gun - Madness by Alienation+Capitalis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You guys are all insane, just think of all the bad karma you are going to generate.

    Guns are so C20th

    Here is an idea: take all the money you would spend on the gun and training and administration and spend it on some insurance. Then IF you get mugged you get to say "here you go, enjoy the ipod, I really like the 1st track on the third album, have a nice day" and then upgrade all your gear, your laptop will be 25% faster, larger and generally better and all the crap you have been meaning to delete of the HDD for months will be gone.

    1. Re:Carry a gun - Madness by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      Damn, nice outlook and attitude to life. I like it. :)

  388. so add another accessory by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Best suggestion: don't be a victim by living in fear. If you feel afraid, you will look it, and thus you will be vulnerable to attack.

    I'd suggest getting a handgun for protection, but: it'd be stupid to pull a gun for something so incredibly un-threatening to your life. Yes, I'd recommend getting a gun as an additional accessory, but I would not suggest it be gotten for such "protection" purposes.

    Instead, I'd recommend doing the following as a preemptive protection:
    1) don't carry so much shit around. Do you really need a laptop and a PDA all the time? Truely, unplug the ipod sometime and pay attention to the world aorund you, for fuck's sake.
    2) seriously, ditch the ipod. You're creating a hazzard for those around you by not paying full attention to your environment, and the ipod alone is the largest incentive for someone to mug you, as it's got a tremendous resale value and is easy to "lose" in the market - as opposed to a laptop, which has a lot of identifying information that crooks aren't likely to know all about. on the other hand, switching to a black earbud might have been enough, provided the ipod is thoroughly concealed. after all, undercover cops, detectives, and any other number of law enforcement agents tend to have black earbuds in at any given time, so that should scare them off.
    3) (I'm saying this, thinking that the ipod only has a mono headphone, as opposed to two for stereo - if it's stereo, it's not likely to work as well. if that's the case, get a mono earbud, as then you'll be a little bit more alert and aware of your environment, which will help you not be unaware and walk into a bad situation)
    4) Don't carry the laptop around in a laptop bag. Don't. Don't. Don't. This really should be quite obvious - keep the laptop in a padded backpack. There are backpacks now made specifically for this purpose. Backpacks are also a lot easier to tote around than those awkward laptop bags.
    5) Work out. Eat healthy. If you're a fat slob, you're more likely to be mugged because you're more likely to be a a sluggish ball of lard, unable to fight back: ie, a victim. Get in shape and have some self respect.
    5) wear baggy clothes to make yourself look more bulky than you are if you're a skinny beanpole geek

    But basically: don't make yourself look like a victim. Having an ipod is a pretty good sign that you'd be a good, docile victim.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  389. Pussy!!!! by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    It all depends on physique and disposition. Though I'd rather ANYBODY fight back. If you give over your money, they might want EVEN MORE after that. This is especially relevant for women.

    The fundamental quality of ALL predators is that they're all effectively cowards. They are seeking the person LEAST likely to fight back. Most will stop their hunt if you show that you're not easy prey.

    So you must show that your not CONCERNED about your personal health. This is their edge. They will hurt you. Crazy people don't care about their health and will do anything. This doesn't fit their idea of a nice clean robbery.

    A wasp will not kill you, but you don't go out of your way to handle wasps. The STING is enough.

    The exception to this is real professional criminals. But these folks will do WHATEVER they are paid to do irregardless of wether you fight back.

    So, you might as well fight back and lower the chances of not becoming a statistic. If you're injured ... wonderful. You have a battle scar.

    I can tell you, if someone tries to rob me, one of us is going to leave severely injured. I walk with that intention. And it's likely people see that in my face.

    Finally, I'll leave you with the illusion from the Book of Five Rings. The man literally woke up every morning EXPECTING that he was going to die. That is how he freed himself. He had already let go of the Earth. He could commit himself to combat fully without fearing to lose his life.

    On a long enough timeline EVERYONE's survival rate drops to ZERO!!! We are all going to die. The question is ... how we live and whether you can be proud of the way you did.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Pussy!!!! by wuice · · Score: 1

      The experiences I've seen and heard about (I've never been mugged myself) have told me that the opposite is true, especially when a knife or a gun is involved. If you are not concerned with your own sense of self-preservation, that's fine. Most people would rather die after a long and fufilling life as opposed to getting stabbed in the kidney over a a wallet and a few pieces of plastic and paper. Most people are also smart enough not to confuse pride and machismo, which your comment, as well as your insulting subject line, is brimming with. I would never call someone a pussy for not trying to pummel a guy with a knife to your back.

      However, I do think there is something to be said about the way you carry yourself being a good instinctual clue to muggers as to who is an easier mark than others, which is why it pays not to appear meek in public, even if you are.

    2. Re:Pussy!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We are all going to die. The question is ... how we live and whether you can be proud of the way you did.
      But does that really matter? If you're dead, it's tough to be proud of the life you lived.
    3. Re:Pussy!!!! by hinterwaeldler · · Score: 0
      On a long enough timeline EVERYONE's survival rate drops to ZERO!!! We are all going to die. The question is ... how we live and whether you can be proud of the way you did.

      That's true. Dead is nothing to be afraid of, il will happen sooner or later, and once you are dead, nothing will bother you anymore.

      But are we really so selfish? Our dead does not only concern us. We have mothers, fathers, relatives and friends that we will leave behind. Think about the pain you will cause them. Imagine your son was killed by a mugger because he didn't want to hand over his wallet.

  390. Re:Not a problem here by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    "The Economist" isn't a reference? "2000 ICVS" isn't a reference? Of course, this is coming from a guy who can't spell or use proper punctuation, to say nothing of writing coherently. "are the independent" is a fine example.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  391. I wear rings by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I wear big shiny stainless steel rings to draw attention to my knuckle calluses.

    If any would-be mugger doesnt realise what those calluses mean, then he fully deserves what he gets by trying to mug me.

  392. It's a lot simpler than that. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    From someone who's lived in urban areas, usually on the wrong side of the tracks, his entire life:

    1) If you look like you think you might get mugged, it's only a matter of time until you will get mugged.

    2) If you look like you think nobody in their right mind would fscking try to mug you, nobody will ever try to mug you.

    It's that simple. Being street-wise is often as simple as looking convincingly street-wise.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:It's a lot simpler than that. by glenalec · · Score: 1

      Which is why I (from rural Australia) avoid empty places in Sydney, particularly at night, but have no worries about my young cousin (who grew up there) wandering about. She instictively knows where to go and where not and how to carry herself (even I can see that in her), while I only know my limitations in the circumstances.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    2. Re:It's a lot simpler than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent up.

      I'm a geek. I look like a geek, I talk like a geek, etc... But, my childhood was spent in a very poor neighborhood in Flint, Michigan.

      I've never been mugged, and it's not "good luck" or anything like that at all. People I hang with have been mugged, people walking down the same street as I only moments afterwards have been mugged. I'm not big (5'10") or athletic (230lbs) and I don't carry a day's growth of beard or tattoos or anything like that. Hell, I even dress like a geek.

      The trick for me is keeping my eyes up at eye level with everyone around me (or where they would be if I'm alone) and look around corners and into shadows -- not cautiously, but as if I'm surveying my domain. I put a look on my face that says "I'M GONNA FUCKING RIP OFF YOUR GODDAMNED WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT HEAD SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS, AND SHIT NAILS DOWN YOUR THROAT. ARE YOU LOOKING AT ME, SHITHEAD? DON'T FUCK WITH ME." I carry myself as if I actually mean to do it. Hands free, head up, back straight, walking with sure, solid steps. The image I'm going for is "unknown quantity of danger and trouble". Don't overdo it and look comical -- that'll make you stand out even worse than being yourself. I avoid talking if I can. If I have to talk, sound firm and use only slang that you're comfortable with (mine's hispanic gang slang c.1988 and I am a fairly fluent spanish speaker).

      Something to keep in mind though, is when you're out of your element to acknowledge the local hooligans you run across. This is *their* territory. Don't drop the act, but a little nod in their direction that says "I -- being a tough, streetwise, fight-scarred individual --recognize that you run a very nice alleyway here and bid you greetings as I pass through." The last thing you want to do is look like you're marking territory any larger than your personal space.

      People who know me, and that have seen me on the street have caught up with me later and remarked that I looked "pissed off" and offer that as an explanation of why they didn't stop to say hello. :)

      I don't know if this particular attitude can be taught. Having been around gangs and those doing the muggings when I was younger kind of imparted it naturally and (apparently) convincingly.

  393. Get a Tazer by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    A tazer is a nice option since it will generally immobilize even the burliest mugger for a few minutes at least. This will generally be enough time for you to summon the police or get the hell out of there. The problem with guns is that you generally kill or seriously injure the assailant which can leave you in a messy and expensive legal situation, even if it was self defense. Usually, unless you are under immediate threat of deadly force (it is either him or you), then it is not legally acceptable to shoot someone dead. Hell, you can be arrested in most states for merely drawing your weapon in the wrong situation and discharging a firearm in public is certain to get you arrested until you can get a lawyer, post bail, and explain yourself. Tazers take less skill to handle properly than firearms and are generally much more portable. In some places in the United States firearms are doable but if you travel and especially internationally be advised that many other countries, the UK included, take a rather dim view towards firearms and especially handguns, but a Tazer may be acceptable. Bottom line, know the rules wherever you go and do not carry your gadgets conspicuously in the open or give potential attackers the impression of naivety and fear.

  394. don't live in fear... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    ...insure your stuff...back up nightly...and encrypt sensitive data.

    Then you can walk around with your armani carry bag, proudly wearing your D&G sun glasses and your pierre cardin watch and if someone tries to mug you, just say "sure budy, here's my laptop, wallet, cash and ipod...you want fries with that?"...

    then head merrily off to your home in suburbia, make your insurance claim, restore your backups to another laptop and call all your friends to tell them about your exciting experience.

  395. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    What you want to do is to carry all your gadgets in a diaper bag. Yes, I'm serious. This is a time-tested technique. Nobody wants to steal a baby-blue or pink cute little bag full of shit.

    Not only will muggers avoid you, so will the chicks!

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  396. Re:Not a problem here by rnakamot · · Score: 1

    I do believe in the right to defend oneself. However, the point I want to bring up is that when you shoot its over (or highly likely). No second chances, no ability to undo what has been done. That person's life is over. In most cases, most people could probably live with that fact, but there are cases when you might give it a second thought.

  397. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm filling the sucker full of lead. My life is more important than a would-be criminal's.

    Yes, but that's not the choice here. It's your electronic gadgets vs. someone's life.

    You know, it's easy for anyone to be pro-firepower when one talks about their life being on the line, which is probably why people with certain attitudes about guns keep bringing it up, but that's so rarely the case. I mean, really, driving is more dangerous than just walking around town.

  398. Read Neil Gaiman's "Neverwhere" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a whole world underneath London! The people are pretty dodgy, but they have little or no clue about non-lethal gadgets.

    Of course, you'll have to develop a taste for barbecued rats, and give up all contact with the upper world, but it's a small price to pay for being able to carry your toys around in peace!

  399. Bad neighborhoods by justins · · Score: 1

    1. Learn to recognize them
    2. Avoid them when you can
    3. Limit the walking around you do in them when you can't avoid them

    This is infinitely more important than the minutia of body language or the policics of gun control which are being discussed here a lot. Maybe pointing this stuff out isn't politically correct or something. Heaven forbid we should appear elitist. (although I'd argue that recognizing where you aren't welcome is anything but)

    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  400. Dress down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I dress in a crappy jacket.
    I hide everything in crappy bags.
    I wear a Barbie hat.
    I only shave once a week.
    I am not ashamed to talk to myself in public while working out coding problems.

    I look either insane or too poor to be worth mugging.

    I have lived in the inner city for 20 years and I walk almost everywhere - even late at night.

    It works.

    1. Re:Dress down.. by squarefish · · Score: 1

      RMS, is that you?

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  401. Saw a guy on the subway with a 17" Powerbook by NickV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know this is really REALLY buried in the thread now, but nobody in NYC seems to be afraid of showing off their tech. EVERYWHERE you look you see the white ipod headphones.

    Even better.. I was riding the 7 train home from Grand Central on Thursday and I saw a guy carrying a 17" powerbook closed under his arm like a notebook. He had headphones plugged in and was listening to it I think.

    Talk about a big walkman. It's funny... nobody really worries about being mugged in most of NYC anymore.

    1. Re:Saw a guy on the subway with a 17" Powerbook by Milkyman · · Score: 1

      yeah every day i see like 6-7 ipods on my commute and just on the people near me on the subway.

    2. Re:Saw a guy on the subway with a 17" Powerbook by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      This is true in Manhattan during normal travel hours these days. Those of us who grew up in NYC in earlier years remember things a bit differently - and I didn't move here til '92 or '93, and things were already improved a lot by then. Nonetheless, back in the early and mid '90s I had a lot of friends who got mugged. And those who remember farther back will recall the time when everybody knew people who had been mugged or attacked on the subway - the 80s weren't safe in NYC.


      Even in NYC though, there are still plenty of neighborhoods I wouldn't show my tech off in, especially at night. I think the gentrification of NYC has made me "soft" about this stuff - I used to be perpetually aware, and I never had any real problems when I was in high school here. I don't remember the last time I actually had the "prickly neck" danger response in NYC - it's definitely been a while.

  402. Re: Shooting to wound by glenalec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The amount of times where the criminal has actually sued like this is huge. The informal advice was shooting to kill is cheaper because dead people can't sue you. At least not where I came from (at the time I left anyway).

    Point of interest: According to a conversation I overheard between a cop and a regular citizen in Australia, there a cop can only pull his gun from its holster if he intends to fire it and MUST shoot to kill, not wound. I believe it is to make sure criminals know exactly where they stand and to stop police using a gun for harassment/intimidation purposes. If a holster seal is broken, there is a LOT of paperwork.

    Any Aussie cops like to verify/clarify?

    --
    The man with no surname and a silly hat

    On the universe: It's bunk.
  403. Re:Screw "feeling comfortable" and fighting back.. by Yakman · · Score: 1

    You don't take it with you to the bathroom do you?

    Of course I do! That's what WiFi is for. Much more convenient then sitting down with a magazine and realising you've picked up last weeks issue that you've already read.

  404. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Elentar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Me, I usually use a backpack-cooler combo back. It's the perfect size for my Powerbook, miniDV camera, digital camera, snacks, a jacket, sunscreen and anything else you might want to lug around. The cooler insulation makes great padding for the contents, it just looks like it's got peanut butter sandwhiches in it, and I can relax a lot easier than with my pricey computer bag.

    For those who are interested, mine looks like one of the Roundabout coolers from this page:

    http://store.ca-innovations.com/merchant.ihtml?i d= 3&step=2

    I believe I picked it up at a Long's some time ago.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  405. Ugh by inxil · · Score: 1

    Every day I wear slacks and a button-up shirt. I have a shiny watch, nice shoes, and carry a brushed aluminum laptop case. Often I'm talking on or browsing the web with an expensive cell phone, and occaisionally I'll by carrying an SLR digital camera around my neck. Until now I've never worried about it. Thanks a lot.

    --

    --
    Why the hell not? Here's some SEO: Home Inspector

  406. It happened in Oakland by inertialmatrix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe someone here remembers more of the details of this case.. but I recall something similar happening in Oakland where a burglar broke into a mans house and was confronted in the living room with a knife in one hand, and stolen goods in the other. The homeowner then attacked the burglar with a bat and seriously injured the man.

    The homeowner was then arrested and faced charges of assault with a deadly weapon. The whole community was up and arms and I think the DA finally dropped the charges.

    But the parent is right.. are all the legal fee's and associated hassle really worth an ipod? I mean, by all means - if your life is in danger, protect yourself. But is it worth killing some homeless, drug addicted teenager who is trying to scare you into giving up your favorite new gizmo?

  407. Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If more States would give back the rights of its citizens to bare arms this would no longer be a topic of discussion as the thought of a crime like this would be so remote. Instead of looking at it as a problem needing to be solved your simply looking at how not to be the victim. It's cowardice in its rawest form. Seeing posts like this were some coward is just looking for ways to save his own butt makes me feel sad for those who came before him to secure his right to walk down the street without fear. For this is the man who instead of fighting to maintain that right cowers to the minute criminal element in this country just as so many conservatives cower to the emotional thinking of the liberal initiatives who rather than thinking through problems simply feel their way trough them.

    1. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, and I do realize this guy is from UK but I think the US should lead on this one as their laws are not already protected constitutionally as ours are. Texas is a good example of how this works as I walk around with an e805 with CF GPS on my waste with a cell phone and occasionally carry a laptop and I have yet to have a problem even in some rough areas because they don't know if I have a gun or not.

    2. Re:Concealed handgun by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some western states alow handguns to be worn openly. Just strap on your old six shooter Tex. Of course they limit where they can be carried just like concealed restriction: Govt buildings, any place that sells alcohol, Govt. buildings, schools.....

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    3. Re:Concealed handgun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If more States would give back the rights of its citizens to bare arms this would no longer be a topic of discussion

      I, for one, will wear a t-shirt in any state anytime I like. (Except Alaska in the winter.)

    4. Re:Concealed handgun by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      I'd rather live in a country where my iPod might have a higher chance of getting stolen (anybody got mugging stats for the UK and US?) than one where I'm more than 3 times more likely to be shot dead.

      This according to stats provided by the pro-gun lobby.

      (BTW I live in neither the US nor the UK, so this is not a "my country is better than yours" thing)

    5. Re:Concealed handgun by ctid · · Score: 1
      Oh, and I do realize this guy is from UK but I think the US should lead on this one

      Actually, if he wants to carry a gun, he should move back to the United States. Seriously.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    6. Re:Concealed handgun by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Okay.. I have to ask.. if everyone starts carrying guns, doesn't that eventually mean that muggers will just turn into shooters, who will then calmly sort through your pockets after shooting first?

    7. Re:Concealed handgun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mugged by a senator or judge. What are the chances?

    8. Re:Concealed handgun by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Give me a single statistic where the ability to carry firearms has realy lowered the crime rate, compared to places where this is not alowed.
      I always compare the numbers from the USA with those from my own country (The Netherlands) and I am astonished how much higher the crime numbers in the USA are.
      http://www.nationmaster.com for example.

      We are by no means crime free, but most crime here is pick-pocketing, tax-evasion and burglery, non violent crimes. Murder is so rare here, that most will make national news (population is about the same size as florida or new-york state (16-17 million).
      Murders -New York -907
      Murders -Netherlands -183
      Murders -Florida -1152

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    9. Re:Concealed handgun by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      It's "bear arms", as in carry weapons, not "bare arms", as in wear a sleeveless t-shirt.

    10. Re:Concealed handgun by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      No they are just afraid of armed citizens being around them. We might assert our rights as there bosses and make them do something intelligent for a change.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    11. Re:Concealed handgun by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Texas is a good example of how this works ...

      Which is why Dallas has a murder rate of around 20 per 100,000 people and Houston around 15, while London's rate is less than 3. Oh, wait...

    12. Re:Concealed handgun by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      So, on top of all the valuables the guy's already carrying, you want him to invest in an expensive piece of lethal hardware, to give the muggers an even juicier target to steal - one that, once it makes it onto the black market, will do considerably more damage than a stolen iPod.

      Either that, or you expect him to actually shoot anyone who tries to mug him. Now, I have no love for muggers - I've only been mugged once, it was unpleasant, and the bastard who did it to me deserves jail time - but I don't think he deserved a potentially fatal gunshot wound, and don't think I'd have been able to supply him with one before he pulled his knife or gun and, being a lot more desperate and with a lot less to lose than me, scared me into dropping the gun too.

    13. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Are you really that dumb as to think the implications of my statements would apply to someone of your caliber. It is merely the threat of people being armed that makes the crime less attractive. Being the obvious student of human nature that you are and oh so full of street smarts as to have been mugged before. I'm guessing this is all old hat and maybe your simply trolling but someone who is willing to mug you doesn't care about your well being and the fact that you care about his makes you an oh so easy target.

    14. Re:Concealed handgun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay.. I have to ask.. if everyone starts carrying guns, doesn't that eventually mean that muggers will just turn into shooters, who will then calmly sort through your pockets after shooting first?

      If everyone is carrying, then there's a good chance the victim might shoot back, or that an armed passerby will shoot the thug who started the confrontation.

      The two really big questions are:
      1. What law could you pass that would make someone, who is already intent on breaking the law in order to rob/beat/kill an innocent person for fun and/or profit, decide that laws against carrying or using a firearm should be followed?

      2. What right does anyone have to disarm, (by force - ie. "force of law" and fines or jail time), another person - thus preventing that person from making their own choices as to what are and are not suitable defensive weapons?

      I support the theory that only the law-abiding will disarm themselves if that's what the law requires. That leaves all the weapons and control to the criminals. I also strongly disagree with the socialist notion that an individual should be forced to rely on the state for protection. Cops can't be everywhere, and to be honest, shouldn't be everywhere. Personal responsibility begins with protecting your person - and one should be free to do just that.

    15. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Do you work for the New York Times or something? I've been trying to validate these facts using reliable sources and as of yet I have not found them. I did find overall that Texas is about 6 total murder rate. I did find in London that gun deaths were around 3 but murders most certainly were not try closer to 15 . Where are your facts from because they don't add up?

      In Texas we have a problem that inflates our numbers as well. This problem is we border with a country whose economy is not as strong as ours. This means we have jobs in Texas people from Mexico desperately want. This leads to criminals who are willing for a fee to smuggle people across the boarder. These people care nothing for human life and regularly end up leading people to their deaths. Most recently 32 died while left in a tractor trailer in 100+ degree heat. This has nothing to do with people legally owning guns and leads to inflated rates in areas such as east Texas were there are manual labor jobs that are frequently performed by illegal immigrants and in west Texas were it is much easier to get into the state.

      I would also like to add that there is a price for certain freedoms one of those is that the government trust that its citizens by an overwhelming majority are honest and law abiding. When the government looses this trust you loose freedoms and end up with the situation we are currently in. I'm not sure what the future will say about the present but I am sure that peoples wanting to protected by others is giving rise to an elite who will gladly take that position in exchange for more control over your life. To argue that this is not happening right now is simply naive.

    16. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't think this would be a problem. I think you would be better to argue the potential of so called friendly fire. Situations were a mugging is in progress and some would be good samaritan decided to help out by taking pot shots at the mugger and hitting the victim of the mugging instead.

      I think gun relation is a big issue for the United States. I believe the citizens should be allowed to own guns but how should it be determined who is not allowed to have them and how is this enforced.

      I really think the no clique "guns don't kill people, people kill people " rings more true every day. It seems there are people who think that by making guns illegal you make people more safe much like you suggested. The reality is that people who want to get a gun illegally can and people who simply want to legally defend themselves can't. Were is the logic in forcing people who are law abiding not to have the defensive protection of a gun while people who are criminal still have the offensive use of them. This makes no sense logically and makes the people who make this argument weak and the most vulnerable.

    17. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 1

      http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_02/pdf/2sectiontwo.pdf is a good place to start out looking at the US. The reality is that this is more of a regional than a country issue. However, the semantics of it are easily pushed to either side. I personally believe, through my own personal experiences and what I have read on the subject of both psychology and social sciences, that people will inevitably use whatever tools they have to reach their goals be they a handgun or hypodermic needle the dangers in the wrong hands are the same.

    18. Re:Concealed handgun by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I've been trying to validate these facts using reliable sources and as of yet I have not found them

      You can't have looked very hard. Note that in order to avoid comparing apples to oranges that I looked up the murder rates for large cities in Texas, not the state itself. If you want to compare with the UK, then by all means compare it with the state of Texas, but if you are comparing London, then you need to compare it with a comparably sized city.

      In Texas we have a problem that inflates our numbers as well. This problem is we border with a country whose economy is not as strong as ours. This means we have jobs in Texas people from Mexico desperately want. This leads to criminals who are willing for a fee to smuggle people across the boarder.

      I've noticed before that you gun nuts are quick to find excuses when your numbers are shown to not add up.

    19. Re:Concealed handgun by pauldy · · Score: 1

      I have noticed you are quick to skew the numbers, which is why I called you on it. You too are using a statistical figure t prove your point from a single city were the police force numbers 1 officer per 100 citizens, there are cameras on every major intersection in the city. It is a police state controlled with an almost Orwellian undertone. Do you still think I'm a gun nut? I think you're a nut for admiring a city that treats you as if you were a caged animal watching over your every public move. I enjoy my freedoms and I'm not about to kowtow to criminals who believe their lives are better if the people who abide by the laws don't have guns cause it makes them easier targets. This is after all your stance.

      You still never answered as to where your numbers came from, you can accuse me all day of not looking very hard but if you fail to provide the documentation your claims are baseless and without merit. Call me a nut if you will but I think your the one lacking the common sense to realize that criminals are criminals and removing the rights of law abiders does not equate to less crime.

    20. Re:Concealed handgun by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1
      The reality is that this is more of a regional than a country issue
      Are you saying stay in the rich white areas and you have next to no chance of getting shot? This is probably true, I get the impression (unsubstantiated of course) that the higher crime in the US is a result of the higher poverty there - very regional.

      that people will inevitably use whatever tools they have to reach their goals be they a handgun or hypodermic needle the dangers in the wrong hands are the same
      Lets run with this for a moment (because I believe it myself).

      In the UK, a mugger corners you with a knife, a baseball bat, or a hypodermic needle, and demands your iPod. This is a situation you will walk away from (sans iPod), or if you're an idiot end up in hospital but probably not die.

      In the US, the mugger must to do it at gunpoint as the victim could have a gun, but this is still a situation any sane person will walk away from - just hand over the iPod as the mugger is not likely to want the crime raised to murder. I think this a slightly nastier situation, but I admit this is arguable.

      What I don't understand is the Americans who immediately jump in and say this problem can be solved by letting people in the UK have guns. What they are proposing is that in the situation above - where a mugger has you at point-blank, you should attempt to draw your gun and shoot him (or scare him off). I cannot grasp how someone could advocate something so idiotic, the phrase "go darwin" springs to mind. But if they're not proposing that then how does carrying a gun solve the problem?

      Bowling for Columbine made a pretty good argument that gun control is not a solution that will work in America, but in countrys that already have it it works well, so I guess the argument is moot since the UK isn't going to change its gun laws.
  408. If I am going some where I dont trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Number one you will not find more than $50 in my wallet.

    Number two a nice walking stick note I don't need it it is a dress thing suit and a nice black walking stick with a gold trim(at the same point they use to break to display a sword).

    Please note a Knife does not matchup to a walking stick most thiefs forget it. Note it is worse than a unbrella as it also has a large head and a small point at the other end that is great to slam on someones foot close to equal to a high head it can break bones in a persons foot stoping them in there track. Or driven into the chest will kill.

    Note carrying a gun is not worth it Number one you have to draw it walking stick is already drawn. Walking stick beats knife walking stick is visiable no licence smart thief stays away stupid thief kicks walking stick before drawing weapon.(note I am not leaning on it with any force) Most case a person with a gun will draw it first by the time you draw yours you will be shot. If lucky a thief with get careless and a walking stick still wins.

    Basicly learn how to fight with a walking stick you can beat the crap out of anyone who attacks first even if they have a walking stick execpt with a gun what you will not stand a chance against unless you get lucky.

    Basic rules number one not a hidden weapon they can see so they can choose to aviod you where with a gun they can not see so they don't have the chance to pick aviod. The stick is part of the cloths I am wearing ie a suit and walking stick looks good some versions are also your seat verry handy at times. Also a suit provides a lot of internal pockets to hide stuff my hand held and my music system. Standard walkman headphones don't stand out due to leads running inside suit coat.

    Also a simple switch link mobile phone head phones to a player only hearing half the music can save time just the same.

  409. Tried and true technique by TomHoward · · Score: 1

    Speak softly and carry a big stick - Theodore Roosevelt

    --
    Do you really think I'm go to put something novel here?
  410. Re:Insightful?! by node159 · · Score: 1

    I dont know whats worse, the comment or the mod...

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  411. The question that begs to be asked... by shking · · Score: 1
    I feel like a huge target for muggers.

    Have you ever been mugged?

    Seriously. Do you know how often muggings happen where and when you travel? How big is that risk compared to where you used to live. My guess is that London is not the place where you grew up and that is why you are feel so vulnerable.

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  412. I have been mugged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been mugged and I have had a PDA stolen. I got a new PDA and a few months down the line the same guy tried to mug me. He was coming up behind me and I turned around and hit him right in the middle of the face. He fell to the ground, bled (quite a lot, that was kinda cool) and then pulled a gun. I gave him *. I live in another city now. It wasn't just him but that whole area seemed to be a shithole. I'm a pansy I know but it gets hard to write 3 PDAs off as an expense!

  413. Damn that smarts! by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Oh sure, it won't kill anybody, but it will sure make them wish they hadn't been on the recieving end. In many cases, just showing you have teeth is enough to extricate yourself from the situation. After all, the average mark they're aming for is docile and most importantly, unarmed. It may not be a potent load, but you know somewhere in the back of Petty Joe Mugger's mind he knows there is always the off chance of rolling that natural 20 when you pull the trigger. Combine that with having to explain an extranious bodily hole or two along it's accompanying pain and you have something most muggers will try to avoid.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Damn that smarts! by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      rolling that natural 20

      Oh man...I know I'm not the only (former or otherwise) D&D-player in the room. Does "natural 20" even have a meaning outside that game?

      (Mods:) Please note that I am (even) drunker than usual.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  414. What's the big deal? by Breakerofthings · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm about 6', 250 lbs.

    I've only been 'mugged' once; chased the guy for 3 miles, opened a can of whoop-ass, and performed a gen-yoo-wine citizen's arrest. (the 5-Oh actually charged the guy with resisting arrest for running from me :)

    So my advice is, be large, shave your head, and try to look mean :)

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to look mean with a Knife up your belly.

  415. Kensington Cuff? by DrStrangeLoop · · Score: 1

    i would really love to chain myself to my laptop when travelling or sleeping at a party. just connect the kensington interface to a handcuff and snap it on my wrist. i may even gain coolness by looking like the dudes from secret service who carry those infamous red-button suitcases :)

    of course, the downside would be that if someone really wants to take my gear, i could end up missing not only my laptop, but also everything from the elbow down.

  416. Smell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I used to live in New York City, and when people visited me, some of them apparently had an "aura" about them that screamed out that they were prey. Others were never messed with.

    In the beginning, at least, I was rarely able to guess which of my acquaintences were going to be constantly hassled during their visit, but it wasn't like there was a continuum of abuse: it was one way or the other.

    And it wasn't about how expensive their clothes were, or their "gear". (Unless they tried to dress in some kind of "street chic", in which case they were practically guaranteed trouble.)

    Although I am tempted to say it was "attitude", I think that it was more about that moment on the street when two people notice each other. I think it was in *how* they looked out of their eyes at the people on the street around them, *how* they noticed them, *how* they were aware of them, *how" they responded to them in that passing moment.

    I think it helps if you try to imagine that all the people around you are individuals. (I know it sounds trite, but trite can still be true.)

    After a decade of living in NYC, I got to a point where I would occasionally see someone walking down the street and instantly know that they were a "minnow". I could almost "smell" it, myself. In those cases that even I could tell, I knew these guys were heading for big trouble.

    As far as carrying weapons go, or taking martial arts classes,-- I think that the real benefit of these activities is in sensitizing you to the individuality of those around you, and to the potential for violence that they, as well as you, carry in any moment. (note: I think carrying a weapon can skew a confrontation towards violence too quickly.)

    In general, and in addition to the above, my own approach is, if you don't want to be shot by a gun, you'll increase your chances of avoiding it if you stay away from people that carry them.

    --forgotten password

  417. Mugging by dafing · · Score: 1

    Its interesting how many people have actually been mugged, here in NZ, I genuinely dont know anyone who has been assualted, let alone shot/stabbed. Just shows how different the world is.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  418. The best defense is a good offense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carry mace or pepper-spray with you or (if possible in your location/country) get a permit for a concealed handgun, and carry one. While your money/toys are never worth your life, your money and your toys are worth the life of the criminal that would take them from you.

    Have no illusions my friend, those who would take your money and invade your person have no use for witnesses. They will take your life on a whim.

    These are the odds of innocent citizens. Never be afraid to defend your yourself with all necessary force.
    --cc

  419. MONKEY POOh by cdf12345 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Less conversion time

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  420. Get a 9mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop being a woose and do what everyone else does, start packing a 9mm and get a license to conceal carry it. If you live in an area that doesn't allow that for some reason, then you might want to move away from France. Remember if you do have to shoot someone, make sure they're dead otherwise they can sue you. :)

  421. thanks for the suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now i know whom to target.

  422. The Outsiders by st0rmshadow · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the old adage from the book The Outsiders:

    "What's the best thing to be if you meet a lowlife in a dark alley?"

    "A tae kwan do black belt!"

    "No, another lowlife."

    Paraphrased of course, but anyone that's read the book probably knows the part.

  423. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I dunno.

    The 'sensitive single father type' has appeal for some.

    My 'hit' rate with approaches from females in bars went up noticably when I had a wedding ring on my finger. I sort of understand how that might work, but am not really interested in that little attachment.

  424. Re:Not a problem here by ryen · · Score: 1

    out of many of the muggings near my school (U of I, Chicago), rarely do they ever result in violence. I too would rather give up my goods than take a life. we should also worry about the societal circumstances that cause these muggers and crooks to do such things and work on fixing them. could be better parenting, school funding, what not.
    merely protecting yourself or camoflauging your equipment does nothing to prevent the act in the first place.

  425. Good advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..if your wallet is shaped like a ninja star!

  426. Re:A gun? LONDON by shrewtamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FYI....
    Most British Police don't even have gun licenses. Some British police form Armed Response Units. They obviously have guns but the only place they are publicly visible is airports. No British foot police patrol our cities with guns. The Armed Response Teams are trained for just that and I'm sure they don't leave weapons in their car which sounds really insecure.
    Armed response teams used to set off from police stations as required. Nowadays I think there are armed response teams driving around the capital in vans. They don't come out of their vans unless an armed response is actually needed - they are just there to make the response quicker. Police in a regular patrol car won't have guns.
    As far as I'm concerned there's no good reason for anyone to have a gun in town. Or a pistol anywhere.
    I am British, lived there most of my life.

  427. The List by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
    Yes, all of these are covered in other posts. This is just a summary. Posted without karma bonus.

    In descending order of desirability:

    1. Carry yourself with confidence. If you don't look like a victim, you're less likely to be one.
    2. Get in shape. Muggers go for the easy target. If you look like you can and will put up a fight, they'll find someone else to victimize.
    3. Learn to handle yourself in a bad situation. Self defense classes are available just about everywhere. This will help you with the two items above.
    4. Find out what neighborhoods are actually bad, and try to avoid them.
    5. Don't carry anything you don't need. Do you really require all that gear?
    6. Camoflage the stuff you do carry. Put your iPod in a pocket, use other-than-white earphones. Put your notebook in something that doesn't scream "Hey! I've got an expensive notebook in here!"
    7. Get a self defense device and learn to use it. Mace, pepper spray, a tazer, stun gun, etc. all qualify.
    8. You live in the UK, but for those who live in places where it's legal to carry a firearm, get a permit, get a handgun that you can use comfortably and naturally, and train with it. This should ONLY be used as a last resort, for both legal and moral reasons.
    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  428. Re: by Tlosk · · Score: 1

    So by your logic, if let's say I would buy a car that got 100 mpg in the city I would pay for one, but since they don't sell ones like that, it's ok for me to steal one of the ones they they do sell?

  429. Live in canada. by toastee · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nuff said.

    --
    - Better to speak your mind than to remain silent, or someone may speak for you.
  430. Best advice so far ! by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    It is unbeleivable how paranoid this world has become.

    I of course don't think you should be stupid, and blindly put yourself at undue risk. IE: walking in a rough neighborhood at 2 am would not be good. But then I don't think the original poster was talking about this type of situation

    When "TRAVELING"(from the original post) .. I see no reason to feel threatend at all. In general you would have some secure form of transport to the airport or (train station perhaps in europe) where in general there are quantities humans. In post 911 there is even more "security" personel at these places as well, not exactly the smartest hunting ground for a mugger.

    Paranoia is a very powerful tool, used to control the masses. Just say no

    regards

    dbcad7

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  431. SHENANIGANS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "...My then 84-year-old grandfather, physically beat off three 20-something year old males who tried to rob him.

    Another one of these people -- me -- simply told the three homeboys who threatened my four friends (two of them girls) that if they touched just one person, all three would end up in hospital, courtesy of yours truly."


    I CALL SHENANIGANS!!

    or maybe just bullshit will suffice.
    1. Re:SHENANIGANS! by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      The name Anonymous Coward has additional meaning in this particular case :p

      The stories above are all true. In the grandfather's case, he was a tough old guy who with one twist broke one of the assailant's arms. The three homeboys were simply talking tough, and were facing someone who wasn't fooled. Resolute people and stubborn bastards alike can do amazing (sometimes stupid) things. :)

    2. Re:SHENANIGANS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. Humans aren't capable of saying things like that. Nobody in history was ever brave, especially a normal person you've never heard of. And muggers are smart enough to buy magical knives that emit force fields that never fail to stop counterattacks.

  432. External pockets and item recovery by xixax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend had his iPAQ lifted from a fancy backpack whilst riding on a crowded bus. Mostly because all those external pockets are so easy to open up without being noticed (compared to rummaging through all the other junk in the typical back pack).

    Because he had marked the iPAQ with his name and other distinguishing features, and because he took the time to visit a few pawn shops, he was able to get his iPAQ back and the guy who stole it even got busted for it.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  433. The simplest weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are the most effective.

    Carry around large rocks. When you get mugged throw them at the mugger's head. His skull will take a bruising, or if you throw well be split open. Bye-bye mugger.

  434. Re: by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

    Obviously you didn't follow my logic very well, and used a worse analogy to boot.
    Suppose car 1 gives you 100 mpg. But it's not sold separately. It comes with two trucks and a bulldozer. Why should you be forced to pay for those additional items? You have no use for them, you don't want them, but you aren't given any option. If car 1 was sold separately you _would_ buy it, but you aren't given that choice. Simply because there are no other dealers in the market, and everybody follows this convention of bundling.
    I don't like all of Norah Jones' songs. I like one. And I like it a lot. And since I think that she did some really creative work for that ONE song, as a consumer I would signal to her to make more songs like that one by paying for _that_ one song, and not paying for the other ones that I think are crap. But I don't have that choice. I have to buy the whole 13-song CD, and pray that the next one will have good songs too. Now u have iTunes e.t.c, so this problem is partly alleviated. What about all those old songs that are not on iTunes' list? They'd need a massive database to hold every song released since 1950 (or maybe the 1800s even?). And it wouldn't be commercially viable for them to do so, no matter how cheap storage gets. Piracy is only going to go away when they finally start listening to the consumer. They're only halfway there presently.

  435. #1 Don't be a victim by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    Most criminals are cowards and they are looking for an easy mark. So stand tall and be confident while being aware of your surroundings.

    Don't listen to these other idiots here. You don't need to change your dress. Just use common sense. You can dress smart without worrying about being mugged. If you do what these people suggest, you are giving up and letting the bastards win.

    You are not going to get mugged if you appear confident and alert. If someone approaches you, look them square in the eyes. The coward muggers will turn away out of fear.

    Mind you, I have a shaved head, wear a 40 pound leather jacket and have broad shoulders. :) I probably look like a thug to some people.

    If you are scrawny, join a gym. It does wonders for appealing to the opposite sex too.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  436. theft protection for Linux laptops and PDAs by wehe · · Score: 1

    Looking for tips and tricks how to prevent Linux laptops and PDAs from being stolen or getting lost? Here is a HOWTO about Theft and Loss Protection for Linux Laptops, Notebooks and PDAs.

  437. True Geeks by MXi · · Score: 1

    True Geeks shouldn't have to walk on the streets, and face it: wearing 'phones that don't look like headies from and ipod won't make a difference because muggers will think your ipod is just a casette deck anyway, muggers not being the most technologically literate people on this planet.

    But back to true geeks.

    True geeks can only do anything significant at times that resemble binary, such as 10:10, 01:11, etc.

    Also true geeks only go to stores for products that aren't available online, and for the most part get a non-geeks to go with them.

    And finally, true geeks either are the kind of people who look homeless whenever they leave the house anyway or people who make enough money to drive cars.

    Oh, and as if you'd carry your lappy in a seperate bag. get the 3mil thick slimline bags and place them into your backpack or breifcase. unless your a femgeek who only takes a hnadbag and a laptop bag, in which case your asking to be mugged by walking around the city at night. (not trying to be offensive, but muggers generally go for women over men due to the genetic and socialogic differences that make them easier targets) I know you can't help it gals :P

    --
    The world would be a better place if...
  438. Do The Words Glock 21 Hold Any Meaning For You? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I don't care where you live or what the laws are. A nice 12-shot (with high-capacity magazine, ten standard) .45 deals with muggers very nicely.

    Just don't carry it in your laptop bag if you expect it to be snatched.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Do The Words Glock 21 Hold Any Meaning For You? by bhima · · Score: 2, Informative

      So this stratagem of yours works by insuring that the guy following it is serving the mandatory 5 years for possessing a firearm in the UK? I'm not so sure that is helpful!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Do The Words Glock 21 Hold Any Meaning For You? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Hey, muggers don't mug you when the cops are watching. So the cops won't see you shoot him, right?

      Just make sure you get the gun untraceably from a third party, and make sure you replace the firing pin, extractor, and barrel afterward. Or even just destroy the entire piece and get a new one.

      Besides, displaying the piece to the mugger is likely to result in his fleeing and you don't even have to shoot him.

      It's either get mugged or get arrested in this world - that's the reality and the result of the "rule of law".

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  439. listen asshole... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...those people had no idea that they were going to be murdered, or that by not fighting back, they would be "laying down like lambs" while thousands of others died.

    your comments suggest that the people on those flights that hit the twin towers should have known, and could have prevented the deaths of thousands if only they would not have been so "tolerant of bad guys".

    The terrorists who highjacked those flights certainly were lying, and intimidating the passengers - probably threatening the use of a bomb or the likes. It was not as if they were announcing to everyone that "Hey, myself and four others are going to uses these 1 inch razor blades and take on all 100 + of you passengers. We have plans of crashing this plane into the world trade centers and aim to kill thousands and thousands of your countrymen."

    don't be such a god damned idiot.

    1. Re:listen asshole... by Ruddykins · · Score: 1
      You listen, AC.

      What willtsmith said IS NOT AN INSULT TO THOSE WHO DIED ON 9/11. Wake up and be (at least a little) analytical instead of (so blindly) emotional. Your emotionally triggered, overzealous response is making the air unbreathable... (notice me choking on your flatulence?)

      What willtsmith is talking about is the public mentality, based on fiscal realities within the insurance industry and it's direct effect upon soceity's responses in various crisis.

      In many of the examples in this thread the muggers, assailants aren't saying "I plan on taking all your money, reaming you, and then slitting your throat in the gutter, and selling your girlfriend captive and selling her as a ______ slave." (White, Black, whatever)

      All he's saying is that the public reaction was weakened by the bending over in general that the "offical" advice has caused in the public mind, and the image given to criminals that this society in usually let you take advantage of them (for the most part).

      So no insult to the victims of 9/11, but in fact what he says further illusttrates how they were needlessly victimized by the system and issues you are aiding by your emotionally colored response. I'm simply using strong & colorful verbage to try to slap you awake to the reality of what you're propagating when you make statements like that.

      Frankly I think America is a better nation than it has been allowed to develop into, and I believe it can become a better nation than it is. And the shaping of the public mind is a KEY factor in that. Just like with children: what you let them become as children is a preview of who they'll become as adults. There are exceptions, but that's the observable rule.

      RE: 9/11, from what I can remember in literal, strategic terms, that if half of the number of the people on the planes had been more aggressive, some of them might have died, but they would have definitly been able to overwhelm the hijackers.

      But whatif's aside (you can loop(whatif) until you're dead), in countries with more aggressive policies punishing criminal acts, they DO NOT OCCUR or very little in comparison to the massive problems in America.

      Example: the guy that got caned (beaten) in Asia for tagging a car (or whatever). I bet you that caneing is effective as a punishment. And I bet that #1 not only did that boy not do that again, but #2 anyone who heard the story is bound to be much much more cautious about violating any laws in that country. My point is, that in that country the public image of the appropriate reaction in a scenario has been effectivly shaped. The same is also true in America regarding peoples reactions in crisis. Please don't be offended by what I have said: think about it.

      --
      -Chad
  440. Quit Showing Off by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    For one, don't park your ass at a Burger King in one of the worst neighborhoods in the city with your 4000 Dell XPS notebook. I see nerds on the subway with their laptops in full view doing nothing but playing Solitaire. Quit showing off, dumbasses, and you won't get jacked. Easy.

    And that goes for those telltale white headphones too.

    - IP

  441. Carry a gun by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    Learn how to use it, and decide first that you WILL use it. Get a license if you need one in your area.

    Don't shoot your gear after it's been swiped, though. I have a calculator case with a bullet hole in it. Amazingly, the calculator (TI SR-51 II) deflected the bullet, and still works.

    The armed robber does not work quite so well.

  442. Re:Carrying self, recognizing dangerous situations by khallow · · Score: 1

    Note that on slashdot, he's very unlikely to get surrounded by religious fanatics. More likely, it's one of those edgy terms like calling an old fashioned hoax a "troll". Still he has a very good point. Your body often warns you of trouble and it is the culmination of hundreds of millions of years of selection for critters that survived getting mugged.

  443. Clearly what we need here is a tech answer.... by Angostura · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I predict (well, I don't, but it is a fun idea) that once we have ubiquitous, low-cost high-speed networks the problem will be solved by re-architecting consumer devices into two parts.

    The intelligence and the guts of the device will stay at home, plugged into a docking station. You will carry the equivalent of a thin client - uniquely keyed to the the back-end which provides UI functionality only.

    Someone steals your iiPod ? no use to them, the music is streaming from home and the bit you are carrying only costs $50 and is useless without the other part.

    Going somewhere without the magic network? The two parts snap together, but the likelihood is that the places *with* the network will be the places (urban, high density) where you are most likely to be mugged.

    We've already seen similar innovation in car radio market where the little coded front panel pops off.

    OK, so it probably won't happen, but hey its a solution in the true Slashdot spirit n'est pas?

  444. A few magic words by Mondor · · Score: 1

    If a muggler will stop you at the street, with a knife or gun, smile at him, put your hand into your pocket, try to stay as close to muggler as possible, and whisper to his ear: "Allah ackbar! Before we go, I will tell you about the paradise. You will see it now, but don't be afraid...". I think that would work with an american muggler, just show more joy in your voice :)

    Also, having a rubber naturalistic grenade in a pocket might ensure muggler is thinking in a right way.

  445. Take up a sport. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take up a sport that uses a bat or racket. Get good with it or become a track star.

  446. Male Rape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember where I heard this... I think a college class... One in seven rape victims is male. (I assume a lot of that is prison rape though)

  447. Some people have a warped view of mugging by JazFresh · · Score: 1

    Judging by some of the posts on this forum, it seems the pro-gun people think a mugging goes like this:

    [Innocent Geek wanders down the street]
    Geek: "Dump-de-doo..."
    [Mugger jumps out of some bushes brandishing a knife]
    Mugger: "Aha! Your money or your life!"
    [Geek reels in shock, but quickly recovers]
    Geek: "You roustabout! Taste some of this!"
    [Geek pulls gun]
    Mugger: "Forsooth! The tables have turned! I must flee!"

    Reality check: Talk to anyone who has been mugged. It's never like how they expected it to happen.

    Often, muggers will hit you before you even know they're there. In some places, they'll just stab or shoot you without even confronting you with demands - you'll be too worried about pain and blood loss to think about fighting back, and that's the idea.

  448. Don't be an easy target by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Keep your wits about you, stop listening to music and being oblivious in dangerous environments. If it's not dangerous then yeah go on listening to music, nothing to worry about.

    Why would muggers pick on difficult targets? They'd go for easy targets.

    If it's just people looking for a way to get their next drug high, you may be able to negotiate a deal - they get money for their hit, you get to keep most of your stuff and no blood spilled. They may not even remember you - it's nothing personal - all they care about is getting their next high.

    Otherwise, if it looks real bad, take out wallet, take the cash out, drop the cash on ground and run. If he still goes for you, chuck some stuff, if he doesn't stop to collect the stuff it may be personal (or mistaken identity), good luck...

    --
  449. Road Flares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, while we're busy trying to look horrible/crazy for work, we might as well go the extra mile. Get a dozen or so road flares, wire them together, have something with a big red button on it wired to this contraption, and then strap the whole mess around your chest in a very visible fashion. Carry the red button attachment in your free hand held up high, thumb ready to press the button. Now EVERYONE will avoid you... except maybe police snipers.

  450. Hunting down criminals - Killing squads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from South America.
    Criminals here are ruthless.
    They will probably kill you, no matter if you give them money or not.
    I always had in my mind the idea of killing squads, to go and kill them before they act.
    In Brazil, ocassionaly killing squads take raids on fabelas, and kills every criminal in sight.
    I think that is a good choice, but this squads are illegal, and hard to form.
    They are like squads of 'vigilantes', they gather together, go to hunting, and disappear...

  451. Well, you could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could do what i do now, found the technique by accident, and now intend to do it the next time i get mugged.

    I was walking home from the army surplus store the other day when three guys step out from an alley and tell me to hand my stuff over. So I started my insane cackling (I am really good at that. just got to remember to start soft and quiet and then slowly let the laughter build) and pulled out the old grenade casing i picked up from the surplus store.

    You should of seen those guys' eyes when they recognized it - and their eyes widened even more when i pulled the pin. I looked at the leaders eyes, cocked my head and said softly "boom." two took off and one just stood there with a... wetness soaking his jeans.

    Ah... Good memories. If you can fake em, all's good :-)

  452. Anti-Mugging by HBSorensen · · Score: 1

    In my country, Denmark, we have quite a few problems with immigrants from the Middle East area. Being a slim guy I have had 4 attempts of mugging none of them really worked. Here's my recipy:

    1. If you can the shaved your head (works fine - I have a large dent which looks like an axe blow which scares most people) and thereby looking agressive.
    2. Look at people as if you wanted to rip out their liver but dont get direct eye contact (sets the muggers off). People will then stay away from you.
    3. Get a rucksack (preferbly Army / Khaki) and put all of the things in it.
    4. Put the cell phone on silence and vibrate.
    5. Attempt to look like something which YOU wouldn't want to meet in a black alley at night.
    6. If being mugged attempt to seem like a psycho and attacking the assailant.

    If all of the above doesn't work here are 2 final ones:

    7. Learn Martial Arts (like Wing Tsun - not pretty but highly efficient) - I broke an arm, a jaw and crushed the nose of a guy attacking me with a knife.
    8. RUN LIKE HELL!!!

    Or maybe us geeks should start mugging the muggers instead...

    Take care.

    --
    Never buy Sony CDs - they will open up your computer to anyone..
  453. Geeks aren't 'players' by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they don't treat relationships like games...

    Damn straight, I treat mine like SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS.

    I wonder how she'll react if I eat the spider instead of smiting it?

    Today I'll find out why she doesn't put some clothing items into the dryer.

    I wonder what happens if I slip a Jolly Rancher in there while I'm eating her out, will she even notice?

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Geeks aren't 'players' by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      I wonder what happens if I slip a Jolly Rancher in there while I'm eating her out, will she even notice?
      Eating her what? No, on second thoughts I don't want to know.
    2. Re:Geeks aren't 'players' by gamma+male · · Score: 1
      I wonder what happens if I slip a Jolly Rancher in there while I'm eating her out, will she even notice?

      If she notices and if she's a bit smart she'll teach you not to put sugar in there. One of the best ways to get an infection. And if she's your girlfriend, you both don't want that. Try ice; while there's no mystery of "if" she'll notice, there's lots of mystery as to just how she'll react.

    3. Re:Geeks aren't 'players' by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Actually when I did try it, it was a sugar-free candy (she was diabetic, they were handy). I did get in quite a bit of trouble though when we napped without taking it out, we both ended up covered in viscous candy-scented sex-slime. The candy oozings also irritated us both a little.

      Ice is great, as are vinyl-coated beads-on-a-string, available at a sex shop near you!

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  454. Newport Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Newport Beach (yes, teh OC!!11[0]). I move around a lot with my laptop.

    One: I am looking for a fight. I'll take every one of you on.

    Two: I am willing to die for my thinkpad. I'm suicidal anyway, just give me an excuse.

    I get the feeling I'm going to get modded troll. Oh, well. Yay, "Post Anonymously" checkbox!

    [0] I hate that show.

  455. In short. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    Get different headphones for your iPod. Don't carry what is obviously a laptop bag, carry a beat-up raggedy backpack. Act confident, but not cocky. Hold your head up high. Know your neighbors. Perform regular back-ups, not just to guard against theft, but coffee, dropping, accidental deletion, etc.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  456. Is your friend Australian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You call that a knife? This is a knife.

    1. Re:Is your friend Australian? by alaric_uk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory Simpsons quote:

      "Bart: Um, that's a spoon.
      Australian guy: Ah, I can see you've played knifey-spoony before!"

  457. Why are you carrying all of that? by foldedspace · · Score: 1

    If you have a car use that to carry stuff in. If you have a dorm room, apartment or house leave some of it behind. Do you actually use all of that stuff enough to put up with the burden of carrying it all? You can listen to a laptop the same as an iPod and you can supposedly store data on an iPod. If you have a CD burner or a portable (USB or Firewire) hard drive that's another option. Get a cheap desktop for home and leave the laptop at work. Get high speed internet access and use SSH or VPN. Pen drives, flash memory cards, etc...

    In short "carry" less stuff. I don't like to walk around with $3000 in my wallet either.

  458. Re:Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caucasian does not include Indians.

  459. Eric Raymond by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    As our fellow Geek ESR proves, you don't have to be a muggger's christmas if you're a geek.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  460. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by jred · · Score: 0

    The 'sensitive single father type' never got me shit. My daughter had lots of hot (21+) friends, though. I guess she benefitted from the 'cute 6yo kid type'...

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  461. if you buy expensive hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are seriously asking for it...

  462. Re: WRONG is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO. You are shooting to KILL. If you cannot face that fact, you should not own a gun or be allowed to touch one in non-sporting contexts.

  463. Re:Get a gun by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    this is even better since there's no brie getting smushed in a pocket

  464. Sure. by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    Move to a country that will let you carry a pistol, too.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Sure. by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Iraq - awash with weapons. South Africa - awash with weapons. Afghanistan - awash with weapons. Feel like going there?

    2. Re:Sure. by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      You can pick the worst three, but it doesn't apply to the rest. If I used your logic, I'd point to Switzerland, and say that the obvious choice is to issue a machine gun to every adult.

      The long and short of it is that if people want to fight and kill, they're going to fight and kill. I've been in "weaponless" countries, where there was as much (or more) killing than in the countries you mention. You can't stop violence with laws, you can only disarm the law-abiding people who are NOT the ones you should be worrying about.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  465. women as targets by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    My roommate likes to walk to work and she works at night. I think it annoys her a little that I insist on walking her the three miles to work and then home again when she leaves (yes, a total of ~12 miles of walking for me per night) but I really don't think it's safe for her to walk alone. She thinks that because this is an okay neighborhood and because she is pretty tough that she'd be okay but I really disagree. All women are more appealing targets because almost always they are easier targets and because even if they don't have money they have a value to most attackers (usually male). You said you were mugged with your fiance. How do you think things would have gone if she'd been alone when mugged? Is it really so sexist to think women need escorts when walking at night?

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:women as targets by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      i agree, women and men may be equals in brain (at least as an overall though men and women have different advantages/niches in general), men are on average stronger, and on average more violent/agressive. Men have a higher tendency to cause violence, and the types of men who do so tend to be the ones to do bad things to women. I hardly think sexism figures into an equation like that. We should all (men and women) admit our weaknesses and be smart, and not try and be something we're not, which could cause us great harm.

    2. Re:women as targets by Orthoepy · · Score: 1

      Um, your roommate doesn't ask you to walk with her, you think it annoys her, and you STILL do it despite her assurances that she'll be fine? Do you screen her calls and vet her friends, too? Jeebus, I'd rather be mugged once and hand over my damn iPod and my treo than deal with this kind of patronizing, controlling behavior every.single.day. There's a fine line between chivalry and jerkdom, you know. Whatever happened to advice like "carry a dummy wallet with $20, toss it at the guy and run?" That seems more sensible than "Get yerself a big ol' sword heh heh heh! That'll show 'im!"

    3. Re:women as targets by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      So you're suggestion is to go with her idea that she can defend herself against thugs, which is clearly wrong, and if she happens to get raped, beaten, or killed then just say "oops, it's not my fault I wasn't there"? Sounds like a good plan. It'd certainly be less effort on my part. Afterall it's all my imagination that a cute woman walking alone at night through mostly empty streets is a tempting target.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:women as targets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, shove it.
      Unless said roommate is exceedingly strong, trained in martial arts, etc., or is hugely world-experienced, she's prolly just suffering the normal, young person's "I'm god" complex. It's normal, but it's also potentially deadly.

      If you're female, then I might remind you that depending on the situation, they might not just mug you. I'm not a woman myself, but I think that most women would rather put up with a few overprotective friends than be raped.

    5. Re:women as targets by Orthoepy · · Score: 1

      You know, if she's an adult and legally responsible for herself (that is, hasn't been made a ward of the court or put in guardianship), you really need to back off. She's your roommate, not your daughter, and unless she's asked for your help, you don't really have a responsibility to keep her safe. Your hero mentality here is just a bit out of line, and frankly, I find it creepy.
      The really thoughtful and helpful thing for you to do here would be to suggest, or even treat her to, a self-defense class. Or at least give her a copy of "The Gift of Fear," (although that might actually set off alarm bells with her about YOU). Violent crimes are actually falling in many areas and I do believe you are overstating her risk. And again: she is responsible for herself. Treating her like a Victim In Training is weird and controlling.
      I walk, by myself, through city streets at night fairly often (and I'm talking about major cities: New York, Chicago, London). I always know what is going on around me, don't go places that look dodgy, am alert and aware, and don't wear stupid shoes. I've never been so much as hassled. It takes a lot more than just being "cute" to make yourself a target.

    6. Re:women as targets by Orthoepy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if she's just got a normal young person's "I'm god" complex or not. The point is, this guy is telling her that he knows better than she does what is good for her, which, if she hasn't asked him to take that responsibility, is just plain WRONG. As a young man, he's much more likely to be in a car accident than she is ... so she shouldn't let him drive, right? She should drive him everywhere whenever she can, because otherwise he might die, or become paralyzed, or suffer brain injury!
      Part of equal rights is equal responsibility. Women are (or should be) responsible for themselves, and this kind of misguided "chivalry" is a short step to controlling behavior, and sets off a lot of alarm bells. First it's walking her to work, and then it's telling her her clothes are too provocative, and then it's trying to separate her from her friends ... all because he "cares" and "just wants to protect her". Yeah, right.
      A guy walking twelve miles a night to escort a woman (who is not his girlfriend, sister, wife, daughter, or mother and who is annoyed by this behavior) is not "overprotective." A guy walking twelve miles a night is creepy.
      Stranger rape is a lot less common than you folks seem to think. I see a lot of "The lil' WIMMIN might get themselves RAPED!" here, which is, I have to tell you guys, pretty creepy in itself. (And it's coming from the same guys who make posts about how women are looking for rich guys and are cheating bitches, which is also ver-y creepy.) Rape is a shattering crime, but it's not the end of the world, and it's certainly not an excuse to limit women's ability to make decisions for THEMSELVES. Which is the whole point. If this guy was really concerned about his roommate, he would 1) LISTEN to her, and respect her wishes and 2) think of a way to help keep her safe without trying to take away her autonomy. Maybe they could go in on a car together, and she could drive to work, or a bike or motorcycle. Maybe they could move to an apartment closer to work. I already suggested self-defense classes. Maybe he could ASK her why she doesn't think she's at risk. (When I moved to a new neighborhood, I checked the crime statistics at the local precinct house. I found out that even though my new neighborhood LOOKED seedy, it actually had a lower crime rate across all categories than the more affluent neighborhood I was leaving. Maybe she knows something he doesn't? Maybe HE could look up the statistics for the neighborhoods she walks through, instead of just going "I'm a big strong man and I'll protect you!")

    7. Re:women as targets by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      No denying that how you think of yourself can make a large difference as to if you are put in a bad situation. I disagree though that any place is safe. You find just as many rapist and psychos in good neighborhoods as in bad. Self defense classes are a good idea, and everyone (male or female) should have them, but you're still dealing with the fact that men are overall stronger, bigger, and more aggressive. My roommate is strong and very much a tough tomboyish type of girl and certainly no pushover but I could still disable her before she could even reach me. If I can do it then I'm sure guys willing to use destructive amounts of force could do it too. I'd judge my roommate able to beat the shit out of probably 80% of guys but that still leaves a lot of creeps out there that could be a danger. If she REALLY wants to walk alone I'll let her but I try to discourage her from doing so at night. I'm not saying something will happen if she is alone.. I'm saying that the chances are considerably better that something will happen if she is alone. Is it worth taking such chances?

      And yes, I admit to being overprotective. I'm the same way with my pets and I'm sure when I have kids I'll be overprotective to them too. On the other hand I encourage taking risks that have been carefully considered and prepared for. Set yourself on fire if you want.. just learn how to do it without any permanent damage. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  466. No, it was McFerrin. by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but Bob Marley would not be caught dead singing a song that bad. It was Bobby McFerrin who was responsible for that travesty.

  467. Here's a suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave your shit at home, moron! Why do you feel the need to carry around every electronic gadget on the face of the earth?! Granted it's probably the only exercise you get lugging that stuff around, but honestly! Unplug once in a while Poindexter!

  468. don't be a pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter how many gadgets you have on you. If your clothes are clean you probably have enough pocket change on you to be worth mugging.

    So the question isn't how do you keep from being mugged. Then question is what are you gonna do when it happens. It will. Trying to avoid it is fantasy.

    I'm a fan of reverse security planning. Plan reaction first: then detection, then protection. A security plan is worthless if you haven't planned for failure. That IS the problem you're trying to solve.

    So I would reccomend a disciplined backup regimen with your gadgets encrypting the data coupled with an insurance policy. You would have to spend 20 years as a shao-lin monk to be able to fistfight your way out of the sitation and buying a gun is pointless because it's impossible to get to it when somebody surprises you from behind and puts a box cuter to your throat. It's just one more thing to steal.

    Let the insurance comapany replace your old hardware with cooler new hardware. The thiefs got cyphertext and obsolete crap. The goal is to get out of the situation safely. There's no way to 100% keep from being mugged, but you can plan such that when it happens you come out of it alive and the impact it has on your life is minimal.

  469. cool calculating women.. by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah. I find it a bit odd that women are so calculating about dating. To often even women you're close to will judge you by how much money you make. It really bothers me actually. I don't care if I'm making a lot or a little.. I don't want my work life and my income to define who I am or my relationships. Funny me for wanting to base relationships off love and respect.

    The effectiveness of flashing cash to pick up girls makes me wonder why prostitution is illegal. If a woman only goes out with you because you have money how is that any better than trading sex for cash?

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:cool calculating women.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's the women you're meeting, dummy.

    2. Re:cool calculating women.. by macmastery · · Score: 1

      If you consider male-female relations in the context of the human history instead of just the last 50 years, women generally want a good provider. Women seem drawn to not only money, but power, strength, status. Men are drawn to signs of fertility (think younger, slimmer).

      You must not be married if you think that prostitution offers the same benefits as a dating or marriage relationship.

    3. Re:cool calculating women.. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Sure historically or geneticlly it makes sense. It just amuses me that women say they want love but what they really want is money and power.

      I must be a freak.. I don't really care about younger or slimmer.. I like geek girls. I haven't figured out how that evolves.

      I've been married.. you're right.. being married is way different than prostitution. At least with the later you get something for your money. I dunno what I got from being married except bills and nagging and a woman that slept with my friends. Not that I think all marriages are that way.. gee at least I hope not. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:cool calculating women.. by sjwt · · Score: 1

      The real funny bit is that most women don't understand what the phrase "prostution is the oldest knowen profession" acctulay meens.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  470. Does English Mugging = American Mugging? by pimpin+apollo · · Score: 1

    Not to start a debate, but what's getting mugged in England like anyway?

    In America if you get mugged odds are the mugger has a gun. There's also a better than U.K. chance that the victim has a gun. That makes it a high risk proposition meaning that people who try it are more committe to finishing it. In England I'd imagine with the absence of guns [or the absence of honest people having guns], that more people'd be inclined to try mugging as a consequence.

    I'm curious if anyone from the U.K. has any opinion on the matter, or likewise if anyone from America's been robbed. I hear a lot more about pickpockets in Europe than ever happens in America, but maybe that's a consequence of not living in the middle of New York [or London].

  471. Danish patch to the universal truth by zonix · · Score: 1

    Don't stare at people, but return their look if given one.

    Be careful. I live in Denmark, and returning looks will get you in trouble with some particular minorities that happen to roam in groups. Not necesserily because they wanna mug you, maybe they might just wanna pick a fight. Don't get within arms reach - we all know the shoulder hitting trick. It's like a troll, and they're waiting for you to bite.

    It's really, really sad. I've been close twice. The last time was just a few months ago on the main pedestrian street in Copenhagen.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  472. PLEASE MUG ME!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work 80 hours a week, I have a wife who is diagnosed with mild schizophrenia, three children who are all teenagers, a boss that makes the pointy hair guy look like an astute and perceptive manager with the business sense of Warren Buffet and the understanding of Mother Theresa, I pay all my utilities one month behind, I have two car payments with interest rates over 16%, I owe over $180k in back taxes, and another $60k in medical and credit card debt. When I get off work in downtown LA at 1 a.m., I carry out my laptop and pda in a $500 briefcase with my 2-way pager and cell phone proudly displayed from my nice leather belt...

    and I pray some idiot crook tries to mug me, so I can vent some of this pent up stress, with out going to jail for murder.

  473. Re:Not a problem here by donweel · · Score: 1

    I guess legality varies on your location. I live in British Columbia I had mine taken by police but they later returned it to me. At one point they where going to issue them to bus driveres with training but it did not happen. These sort of things are usualy leagal until a bad guy uses them in a movie and a bunch of people copy this behavior.

    --
    Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
  474. Re: by SiliBelgian · · Score: 1
    Piracy is only going to go away when they finally start listening to the consumer. They're only halfway there presently.
    They're halfway there, alright. They're currently sueing their customers ;)
    --


    "Hell hath no fury like a hippo with a machine gun."
  475. An interesting thought.... by glenalec · · Score: 1

    ...but not too useful, especially to me.

    A few years back I discovered (while having an MRI for an unrelated reason) I was born with an abnormality in my brain that means any moderate-hard blow to the head is very likely to kill me pretty much instantly.

    Anyone physically asulting me could well find themselves on manslaughter charges. Assuming they are caught, of course. And it doesn't do me much good either. :-(

    --
    The man with no surname and a silly hat

    On the universe: It's bunk.
  476. Re:Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Caucasian race is a proposed race of Homo sapiens found in Europe, West and central Asia, North Africa, and in the Indian subcontinent. The defining characteristics of the race were said to be "optimized" or ideally represented by the peoples of the Caucasus region of Eastern Europe; hence the name.

  477. Re:Screw "feeling comfortable" and fighting back.. by burns210 · · Score: 1
    Use encryption where it makes sense. If somebody gets their hands on your laptop and has hours and hours to look through your files, is there anything on there that you need to protect? There probably is. The whole hard disk doesn't have to be encrypted but maybe a couple of folders do, or maybe your whole documents directory (the one that gets backed up most often and doesn't include huge files like music and movies and downloads). If you use a modern OS there is probably a really easy way to get an encrypted disk image or home directory set up that is mostly transparent when you use it.



    Just get a spare p1 server with a decent harddrive and do an rsync cron job at night. sync your home dir to a tarball or whatever and viola! constant backup...

    Load that server up with ram, and get it on dsl or cable, and you can do vnc or remote X session over ssh when you need to.

  478. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Dwonis · · Score: 1

    Obviously, walking around in body armour, with multiple armed guards and snipers covering you would be more effective, but it's also costly.

  479. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by BJH · · Score: 1

    As long as the clear plastic bag also contains a ferret on crack, yes.

  480. German or Nonexistent Objects by {8_8} · · Score: 1

    Speak in German with occasional shouting. Few languages are harsher or scarier-sounding than German, especially when spoken loudly. Try meandering from muttering to outright shouting and back.

    If in a neghborhood where foreign languages might attract unwanted attention, try this: Pick an object and assign that object a quality it does not have. Assign bonus points if the object is not something people usually walk around muttering about (colored disks, Han Solo). Subtract points if the object is something people could reasonably be walking around muttering about (keys, car, wallet, yo' mama). Start walking and begin muttering that you can't find [object]. Occasionally look around and, in the sanest voice possible, ask if anyone knows where your [object] is. Ask for directions or a guide. Achieve eye contact, then stare angrily at them because they're hiding your [object].

  481. Re: Shooting to wound by Mithrandir · · Score: 1

    Maybe other states, but given the number of people killed, certainly not Victorian cops!

    BTW, all cops, everywhere that I know (including one of my martials arts instructors, who is also one of the police defence tactics training instructors here in Washington) are taught StK. There are a lot of very good reasons for this. Primary reason is that the easiest thing to hit is the body, not the extremities. Called shooting at the center of seen mass. Go for the biggest target as if you're off by a little bit in your aim then you've still got a high probability of a hit. A shoot to wound strategy requires you aiming at a far smaller target - shoulder, leg, arm - all of which are close to impossible to hit in a real life situation.

    Other reasons why StK is mandatory is that a wacko coming at you pumped full of various substances, as well as adrenaline, is not going to feel a wound - or at least not enough to stop them from continuing in their path the attempt to hurt you. That person coming at you at full speed can easily clear a 10 metre gap between you before you get a chance to put a second round into them. Generally a police officer will not double tap, which means by the time recoil, damping and aiming again, the attacker is already on top of you and you're history.

    --
    Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
  482. kein problem. by torpor · · Score: 1

    backups. enough said.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  483. Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you really change your lifestyle (get piercings, dress like your were destitute etc.) simply as a deterrent to mugging?

    That's about as intelligent as passing laws to restrict your hard won freedoms when your country is threatened by terrorists.

    Here on Slashdot you may think you are enlightened liberals, but you are displaying all the weak responses the fools in your government are.

    I was going to say something like "move to New Zealand", but on second thoughts keep away, please.

  484. I traveled around a lot by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    and the best advice I can give you is to dress poorly, and look a little bit more on the rundown side while traveling, and for gods sake, try to avoid to look like a tourist. that doesnt help with getting laid, but helps a lot at least in the western hemisphere to be avoided by muggers.

  485. my little storry on avoiding mugging by benson+hedges · · Score: 1

    when I was a teen, i looked like your average geek - small, thin, belly, glasses, messy hair, clothes 20 years out of style, etc. i got mugged about 3 to 4 times a year, which is a lot for the place I live (vienna, austria). during the last years, i went through some strange times, which left me heavily tatooed on both arms. feeling that this looked a bit strange with my thin frame, i started some minor training which, after about a year, gave me quite nice arm muscles. also, due to some starting baldness, i shaved off my hair. what i only noticed later that, every time i went out with a sleeveless shirt, nobody shady-looking even got near me. i guess what I'm trying to say is : try to look a bit more dangerous than you maybe are. no, do not get a tatoo unless you want it, but there are some easy ways of chaning your appearance that will send the signal that you'd mean business to small-time criminals. also, i found to love cargo pants. they mostly have very deep, closable pockets, making it very hard to pickpocket you, because the thief would virtually have to dig around in your privates to get your cell phone or ipod. for my laptop, i bought a very thin backpack that I conceal beneath a jacket or shirt-over-tshirt. it has small internal compartments where i keep my palm and ibook. finally, i attached a belt to my mobile which is sewn to my pants. this might feel a bit weird at first, but not only is it a good way to prevent theft, it stops the damn thing from falling out when i run :)

    --
    Karma : Soylent Green (Mostly due to eating junk food and mocking religion)
    1. Re:my little storry on avoiding mugging by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      No insult to you, but living in Austria, you are the first person Ive heard of of being mugged in Vienna. After the first time of being mugged, you should have thought about what was going on. I think, the more dangerous look automatically comes with age, simply once you hit the 30s, you should have developed enough natural muscles (no matter if you workout or not) and one morning shave less and nobody will try to touch you. But looking more on the dangerous side can really help, no matter which country, having a bald skull is excellent in this regard, but also to look more on the bum side of life if you are on a tour helps to avoid muggers.

    2. Re:my little storry on avoiding mugging by bhima · · Score: 1
      I am amazed that you managed to get mugged more than once in Wien! I've never had any problems there (except being to drunk to ask for directions). You are some sort of statical anomaly! I live in Graz and I haven't seen a hint of crime in years.

      Whatever you do don't move to NY, NY you will probably wind up being mugged several times a day.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  486. Looking behind ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are an OSS/Free SW developer, there may be
    more reason behind it. Corporate Donations!!

  487. Grow a beard by ChrisGuest · · Score: 1

    No joke. I've lived in a lot of dodgy places and only ever been beaten up twice (both times when I didn't have a beard).
    Everybody body knows people with beards are outsiders, poor and usually crazy.
    No one ever mugged Charles Manson, did they?

  488. Not really... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no relation to pittsburg apart from having a freind that grew up there. So if that was a joke and not a question, I have to admit it was completely over my head.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  489. debianzhang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just went to china to study debianzhang with master xian and master chenping but then i never came back so do the math

  490. Re: Shooting to wound by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    Cops in America(well at least in my part of it) are also taught to shoot to kill. If it's not a situation you are willing to kill, you shouldn't shoot. The reasoning being "shooting to wound" is not reliable, and if you do it enough you're gonna kill someone by accident anyway. It's my opinion that you should not carry or draw a gun unless you are ready and willing to kill.

  491. Anecdotes by Dusabre · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm a short scrawny guy with glasses. I carry an expensive phone, PDA and credit cards.

    Couple of anecdotes:


    1) Got mugged when 16. Lost my jacket, watch and assorted to some bastards who followed me on the tram. Didn't recognize the danger signs. Now I see them (see 4).


    2) On a couple of occasions, thugs have come up to me to beat me up (on principle). On most of the occasions, they end up my 'friends' as in they left me alone after inviting for a drink/conversation. I basically learned the gift of gab and changed their perception of me. If they thought I was a rich snob, I told them I hate my boss and life. If they thought I was from a certain town, part of town, I told them I was from somewhere completely else. If they wanted to hit me on principle, I told them a sad story about my girlfriend dumping me and my grandfather's dog dying. I only got the crap kicked out of me on one occasion, when I didn't have the time to talk.


    3) After being beaten up, I got a telescoping baton. It is some scary shit and legal in many places. I got to use it a month after buying it. I was drinking in a park at night with friends. There were 4 of us. Suddenly two guys with stockings on their heads and a gun and a knife appeared and said "Your cellphones and your money". One second later, my stick was out and I was smacking the guy with the gun. Stupid. But I broke his arm. He ran off shouting that I was a fag. After getting his ass kicked and the stocking ripped from his head (I hit him a couple of times).


    4) A while ago, I was walking around with my baton, chatting on my phone. Noticed some guys walking around after me. Tried to lose them. Unsucessfully. They surrounded me and told me to give them my phone. I said "No!" and ran shouting crazy talk. They didn't follow. If I had the baton I would have beat the shit out of them.


    5) After that incident I haven't had much shit apart from a couple of situations in clubs or bars where some guy tried to go after my girl. I stare them down and tell them to go away. I'm not really scared.

    Don't be scared. Don't make yourself into a hobo (do you really want your fear to change your appearance and lifestyle). Walk around like you belong somewhere. If accosted, talk back. If you've got protection, use it. If you don't, run. If you can't, give it up.

  492. my technique by kaoshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I start to get approached by some thugs I'll call out "Hey, you got a dollar?" They usually get an annoyed look on their face and keep walking. It really works well with bums too. I had one even come up and hug me one time because he felt bad for me, lol

  493. Taser? by shin0r · · Score: 1

    You could always carry a Taser

    They are of course totally illegal in the UK, but then so is mugging.

  494. Re:amo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one of the things a prosecuting lawyer (even in an obvious self defense shoot) will try to get you on is whether your ammunition was specifically designed to kill someone.

    True. But I use hollow points because there is less chance of "over penetration", the round going through a thin wall and hurting a bystander. Police make the same claim. This excuse doesn't work for black talons....

    You are right on with the 'stop the action' angle.

  495. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > BTW, all cops, everywhere that I know

    This just begs for a response. 'Everywhere that I know' happens to also include that part of the world thats not inside the USA (yet) ?

    If it is then you are absolutely and completely wrong.

    In quite a few places in Europe, icluding the part where I happen to live (the Netherlands), police is taught to shoot to kill ONLY if they had no other options whatsoever, and are taught to STOP what is going on usign the least amount of force possible.

    Incidentely (check the CIA world fact book on it if you like) we also have:
    1. less people killed in general
    2. less people killed by police use of violence
    3. less policemen killed by violence
    4. less robbery with use of violence
    5. lower crime rate in general then the USA.

    And yes, we also have banned weapons from daily life, tho it is very well possible to have one for sports or hunting.

    Interestingly, Spain follows a lot closer the rules as they are in the USA, and also turns out having by far the highest rate of violent robberies and people gettign killed by violence of all of western EUrope (actually, only Poland and some parts of eastern EUrope come close to it, and don't surpass it yet)

    The point is that there is a statistical relationship between amount of violence and how a society deals with weapons.

    That relation nowhere shows that places that have weapons readily available to civilians are safer, rather, it shows the exact opposite.

    You may feel safer havign your conceiled gun permit, but realize it is tjust that, you FEEL safer, in fact you are not.

    I again suggest reading up a bit on the numbers, the CIA factbook is a nice patriotic source for the Americans among you who say this is all just the bs from the anti-gun lobby.

  496. .32 anemic? (was Re:Feelings) by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't count on a .32 ACP being anemic.

    It's all about shot placement, actually.

    The local police here, when armed with .32s killed more criminals than now with 9mm. Even a .22 is able to kill you.

    OTOH, there are lots of people who survived hits by .30-06 and .308 Winchester.

  497. Re:omg ror lolf by hutkey · · Score: 0

    stoled

    it's "stolen" , not "stoled", u insensitive clod!

  498. Yet more bullshit... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Tony Martin, as much as I sympathise with what he went through, didn't shoot a burglar in self-defence. He shot and killed a burglar who was running away from him in the back. Furthermore, throughout his trial he made a point of making it clear that he felt no remorse at killing him and all but said that he'd do the same thing again.

    I don't think you'd find too many juries in the US or elsewhere that would have let him walk under those circumstances.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  499. You're talking out of your backside... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    I'll just refer you to my earlier post.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  500. Non-branded bags by pmjordan · · Score: 1

    This may have been said, and it may be obvious, but use a non-branded backpack or bag. Many larger generic bags can fit a laptop, and if you're worried about protection, make a padded casing that fits your laptop, and then put that in said inconspicuous bag. You will then look like you're carrying lots of notes, books, or whatever.

  501. Martial Arts... by dallask · · Score: 2, Funny

    Im a black belt in Tukong Musel TyKuanDo, and Fifth Do in Akido... I know 3 weapons very well, knife and club defense, and carry a 5.5 ft chain with an 3 oz steal ball at the end... when used right it forms a forcefield of spinning death arround me.

    Of course, if this is too much movement for you, you can always download Kung Fu into your brain :)

    --
    The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
  502. All these suggestions are fine but... by r2vf · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I'm surpised nobody here has seen "Marathon Man." Real protection from muggers is a retractable blade concealed in the forearm's sleeve!

  503. Re: by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    so it's ok to steal the 100mpg cars from the manufactuer's lot because they dont sell them separately?

    personally i hate the riaa, and want single song purchases as much as i want to pick which cable channels i get.

    i hate the analogy to a car because a car has a ton of value in most cases and songs have so little, but when it really comes down to it, whether you steal a penny or a hundred dollar bill, its still stealing. and millions of people stealing a penny from you is a lot of money. deserved or not, they have established rights to that penny. we need to change their rights, not steal because of them.

  504. Mugger Magnet by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else picture muggers stuck to this geek and unable to get away?

  505. Re: by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

    None of you have still answered my question - why is it ok for the Music Industry to push albums on you? Why? Just because they hide behind 200 year old legislation doesn't make them paragons of virtuosity! Just because it's the law doesn't make it gospel. Stupid laws weren't meant to be obeyed, it's really that simple, and their current set of laws are behind the times. In a democracy there are laws that make sense, and laws that don't. And when the majority finds a particular bunch to be stupid, they'll simply disobey. But in this case, despite the majority disobeying, the Music Industry isn't getting it. Gay Marriages are banned, but a whole section of people who found that to be stupid, went ahead with them anyway.
    Now your next comment is going to be: "Oh so if the majority of this country condoned murder, they'd start disobeying the law against murder?" - Yes, and then that would force people to change the laws, or basically fight their case out in court justifying murder.
    Finally, yes, what we're doing is stealing. It's stealing, because that's how the current law is defined. But only in America. There are other places with less stringent copyright laws, so basically one man's thief is another man's mp3-user. Try thinking out of the box for a change. These laws were written way back when. You think they foresaw p2p or the Net? New times demand new laws, and I'm not referring to the DMCA. That's just reinforcement of the status quo.

  506. The three things to do by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    There have been two attempts in my life to mug me. The first one was quickly solved when mugger #1 (of 2) took a nasty hit into his genital area, bending over and then getting kicked in the face. The second one resulted in some bruises for me, but that mugger was good for a hospital stay afterwards. I have found three things to work:

    1. Look like you don't have a lot of valuables.
    2. Refuse to be a victim. If you get attacked, fight back. Who guarantees that after your credit/debit card is stolen, they don't make sure you don't become a witness against them? The judge? The five or seven folks that got shot in a holdup of a fast-food joint in NY city some years back? Drink your purple Kool-Aid. Muggers positively hate to get hurt. They will choose their victims accordingly.
    3. Avoid dangerous countries/places that put the criminal's rights above your own and ban guns and useful implements ontop of it. Namely the UK.
    4. Enact gun-carrying laws. If the mugger has to play Russian roulette, he won't go robbing (or raping) any longer. Just look at the Florida or Kentucky crime stats.
    5. 3 Strikes and you're in for 10 years extra. I'm not for life-long sentences, but if you have comitted your 3rd grave crime, ten years extra would probably straighten you out if that measure is coupled with some professional education so that once you get out of jail, you have some know-how and don't have to sink back into delinquency.

    A large, dangerous dog isn't bad neither, but you can't have fido everywhere you go.

  507. ditch the PDA by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    in favor of a sporty looking sidekick. Nobody runs away fast with an ass full of lead.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  508. Re:Not a problem here by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "The UK has enacted a total gun ban, and consequently, violent crime rates have gone up."

    All that can be said about the ban of handguns is that it had no effect on the level of violent crime. Not particularly surprising when most criminals don't register their guns with the police.

    The increase in violent crime is not a consequence of the ban. The rate of legal gun ownership in the UK before the ban was negligible, far lower than 1%. To claim that the increase is therefore a consequence is specious and simply shows your ignorance of the UK.

    Most of the violent and gun related crime is gang and drug related and could be solved overnight by legalising the selling and recreational use of drugs in licensed premises.

    --
    Deleted
  509. tempting to point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that it is in fact more worrying to consider the types of people posting here than it is the 'muggers' out to get you?

    By the sound of it, everyone here either knows kung-fu, carries concealed weapons, has a shaved head or is built like a brick shithouse and fancies themselves 'a bit tasty'. It's a wonder anyone gets mugged at all when you take into account the hard-cases round these parts.

    Either that or some people have been watching UFC/Matrix a couple times too many.. ;)

  510. You are my hero! by stomi · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to let you know.

  511. Only if there is a waddling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yank tourist passing by who we can fleece for a bit of spare cash.

  512. This is not correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " In the UK, you are not allowed to own a gun, let alone carry one"

    Hunting guns are most certainly allowed after you fill out the proper paperwork. Try to keep up. Thanks.

  513. Re:Get a gun by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

    And our crime rates are still lower per captia than yours. As someone else replied, the other week a policeman was stabbed in the line of duty, protecting passers by from a suspect. It was front page news here for 24 hours.
    This tells me two things,
    - Events like this are rare enough that they can take over the media for a significant period
    - The Police in this country do work to protect the people, no matter how cynical you are about their ability.

    You would probably argue that if gun laws were looser, then a passer by would have probably shot him. However, if gun laws were looser, the suspect himself would have probably been carrying a gun, hence escalating the situation.

  514. Guns for everyone ? by theefer · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't like the feeling I get walking in areas where only the criminals have guns.

    But you like the feeling you get walking in areas where everyone (criminals, honest people, kids et al) have guns ?

    It is very impressive to note the social gap between countries. Here in my country, most criminals don't have guns. They don't need them. I've several friends that have been mugged, but never with a gun. Usually, they would be threatened by a large group of people. In the very worst case, there would be a knife, but this is extreme already.

    Why's that ?

    Well, you don't need guns to attack people if people don't carry guns themselves, right ? It'd be "overkill" and "illegal", whereas it is not illegal to walk in the city in large groups.

    Now this does not solve the problem. People still get mugged. However, there are not more people getting mugged this way. Moreover, I much prefer this situation where there are no guns around at all. Maybe I can be mugged all the same, but at least I don't feel my life threatened. In the worst case, they beat the shit out of me, but there is no gun involved.

    In other (supposedly american) replies, people have said that it's all in people's minds, that you are not physically more secure in, say, Paris, than you are in, say, New York. That you only think you are. These people have not understood that this is the whole point.

    When people feel safe, they are less nervous, less violent, more secure. Life is better for everyone (even for the muggers?). And the hypothetical violence that might happen at times would not be lethal. People would be pissed off, not dead or wounded.

    Guns leads to a violence spiral that make people think guns are needed. They are not. You can walk the street in most of the countries in the world without a gun and not risk being attacked by someone with a gun.

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Guns for everyone ? by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      I'm glad where you live is such a nice, safe place for muggers to operate in large gangs.

      Weapons ownership is a basic human right. Only death can make me give it up.

      As for how safe you feel- congragulations. You are now completely at the mercy of your government, anyone with 3800USD, or any group of thugs who want your money and are willing to hurt you to get it.

      Frankly, I don't personally know anyone who has been mugged. You say several of your friends have been accosted. Were any female? Were they raped? If so, and you had been there, what would you be willing to do to stop it?

      Your city, where muggings seem to be a hell of a lot more common than where I live, (virginia) seems like a paradise for the gangs that you describe- lots of easy targets, and all you need is some friends and/or a cheap knife!

      Your tone about how much better off you are without a basic freedom is like the chinese I talk to online. They go on and on about how much better a place their country is where the government can censor anything it pleases. They say it results in a much more orderly place. Maybe it does.

      If peace is your goal, you are a fool or a liar. "Peace", meaning no fighting, has never existed, and, based on your description, doesn't now. While there is such a thing as peace, it is hypothetical. Someone, somewhere, is being raped, right now. Thousands of people were murdered yesterday.

      Being completely helpless (and forcing others to be) is the stupidest long-term plan for survival I have ever heard. We can see examples of cultures like that in the past- the dodo, anyone? My only solace in the face of your monumental stupidity is balanced only by the fact that I own weapons (and am willing to kill to keep them), and that, darwinistically, ideas and people as stupid as yourself will eventually leave the gene pool.

      Long-term, you have as much chance as the shakers- none. (The shakers didn't have sex. There aren't any more of them. No children.) Your willingness to be mugged or raped, and to force others down your short-sighted path, is evidence of poor thinking on a chamberlain-ish scale.

      Screw you and everything that you stand for.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    2. Re:Guns for everyone ? by theefer · · Score: 1

      How pathetic.

      Go back to school, watch Bowling For Columbine, open your eyes, get a brain. Anything. But don't post such contradictory, slug-IQ-ed comments again. For the sake of humanity.

      --
      theefer
    3. Re:Guns for everyone ? by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      I have seen bowling for columbine. My eyes are open. I have a brain, else I could not type.

      In what way were my comments contradictory? Perhaps you would be willing to provide specific examples. Or should I just take you at your word?

      You allege contradictions. Let's see them.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    4. Re:Guns for everyone ? by theefer · · Score: 1

      Right, as you've lowered the tone I will reply.

      You seem to have misinterpreted what I wrote. Yes, I said you didn't need lethal weapons to mug people here, because most of the citizens don't carry them around either. This does not mean there is a huge crime rate. It is actually pretty low (not enough to my taste, but it never will be, and I'm sure it is lower than in most of the countries in the world already).

      So, in a sense, it is indeed safer for the muggers because they probably won't see people defend themselves with weapons that could threaten their lives. But if you think about it, it is safer for everyone. Muggers, alright, but for the rest of the non-criminal population too.

      So if we assume that the crime-rate is about the same as the usual mean (although it is very likely to be lower), it is just the same as your city, but without anybody's life being in danger. Or very less likely to be at least.

      You are now completely at the mercy of your government

      I don't know what you mean by that. If the government want to get money from me, they raise the taxes, that's easier ;-)

      They do not "forbid me to protect my life either", since my life is not being threatened. Instead, they make sure nobody's is (or, at least, they reduce the risks).

      [China] where the government can censor anything it pleases.

      Come on. Yes, censorship in China is really extreme. But it is at least equally vicious when you don't see it, and this is what is happening right now in most "civilized" countries (USA being the most common example, but it is not absent from most central european countries either).

      Being completely helpless (and forcing others to be)

      Most animals on Earth do not carry deadly weapons and yet, they seem to survive. I do not think a gun is a natural componant of one's daily equipment. I'm really worried if you are.

      This depends on the environment. If you live in the jungle, you may have to carry a weapon even more powerful than a gun to protect your life from the environment (non-human in this example). Now if you go back to your city, you don't need that weapon anymore. But this does not mean you are helpless ; this is just unneeded.

      Guns are not needed where I live. There is no "risk 0" (despite what media try to make you think). But the environment is less violent, less filled with fear and less threatening. It's not Disneyland, but it's relatively safe. Bringing guns there would disrupt that equilibrium : if everyone ("good" and "bad" guys) carry guns, it won't lower the crime-rate, it will just raise the tension.

      Can't you accept that there exists places on Earth where guns are unneeded and unwanted ? Isn't it something worth fighting for ? Total peace is an utopia, but not pushing toward peace is the real foolishness.

      I do not think "all americans are stupid people because they stick with their guns and we can live without guns". It's all part of the global environment people live in.

      However, what is frightening is that it is so deeply anchored in people's mind that they cannot accept that normal people can live without weapons.

      Guns are not a normal evolution of a society. They are the mirror of an important socio-psychologic problem (mostly set up by the media and the government, probably not even on purpose ; cf Bowling For Columbine). I really can't see a happy ending to it if people keep pushing toward violence (guns, "holy terrorism war", etc).

      A more peaceful atmosphere is not reached thanks to weapons, but rather thanks to the acknowledgment of the problem and a strong wish to solve it.

      --
      theefer
  515. Aikido, PFS, Wand Do Kung Fu, Wing Tsun... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    One option: Learn your favourite martial arts. I recommend Aikido or Hising-I and Pakua (the prerequesites of _real_ Tai Chi) Those are cool contrasts to the usual geek stuff and you'll be suprised about the inteligent people practicing and teaching the 'inner' martial arts such as those mentioned above.
    I have an Aikido Dojo right around the corner since 6 weeks ago. Started training 3 weeks ago. Very cool. Always wanted to do that, now I finally am. Learn to be prepared to use your favourite martial arts technique in RL when troubles brewing.

    Melee Weapon MA is cool too. Dobble stick fighting (Eskrima, Dan Insentos 'Eskrido', etc.) is especially effective in beating the crap out of anybody and anything with two rather short sticks which are easy to carry around on/with your usual baggage/backpack/whatever.

    Bottom line: Get exercise and boost your self esteem. Be prepared but don't be paranoid.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  516. I tried what you suggested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and oh shit! It fried my laptop.

  517. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US has more crime because we have cool shit. No one wants to steal your goat at gun point. On a serious note, Compare violent crime rates with population and wealth(or lack of) density.

  518. Crazy Harmonica Guy by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My girlfriend tells me about the "crazy harmonica guy" who rides the same train as she does coming back from work. (She's not really sure where he's going or why, but SHE is returning from work at least.) He sits down, or stands, as circumstances dictate, but as soon as he is settled in, he pulls out a harmonica...

    and plays ONE NOTE. Polishes it, puts it away. Fifteen seconds later, he pulls it back out, plays two or three notes, looks thoughtful, and puts it away again. Repeat ad infinitum. At no point does he actually play a recognizable melody, or even more than a handful of notes, nor does he sound like he's practicing a particular technique, such as draw bends.

    Nobody ever speaks to this guy, let alone gives him any trouble. If anyone looks him straight in the eyes, out comes the harmonica, and he plays his few notes as if he were laying a curse on the one looking at him.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  519. Harlem by night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Reminds me,

    My first time ever in NYC. I went to that youth hostel advertised in my guide book, somewhere on Amsterdam Avenue. Got off at THE Amsterdam avenue stop, looked at the numbers on the buildings and decided to walk for it (a few hundred numbers? maybe a few thousand, don't remember but it didn't look like much at the time). Oh yeah, that was late at night. Must've looked like I belonged in there somehow (spanish Harlem), 'coz nothing bad happened to me... Eventhough, I was wearing the signs!!! bright blue and yellow backpack (heavy, full of clothes for a 10 day trip) passport, credit cards, etc etc... walked right passed some mean looking people i'm tellin ya... But I got away with it, somehow. Maybe I was looking so much like a potential victim that it wasn't even funny. So I got to the place eventually and god, did my feet hurt...

    Oh yeah... I do come from a small village somewhere in the north of france ;-)

  520. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot has never had, nor will it ever need, an article on "How to Avoid Women".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  521. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    I suggest you do so indeed. the Netherlands is covered with what would be considered urban area for approx 1/3d, and the population density is a lot higher on average then that of the USA. Our standard of living is indeed a little bit lower then in the USA but only marginally.

    So, in this specific case, the argument you make doesn't seem to apply really.

    Also, when makign that argument, it would eb a good idea to consider that for as far as Europe is concerned, we have more people livign on a smaller area, so the population density argument only works when you are arguing that a lower population density results in more crime.

    Additionally, when lookign within Europe, SPain has a lower population density and a lower standard of livign then the Netherlands. Criminals can easily cross the borders between states and go to a 'safer' place. Regardless, Spain has a much higher crime rate, and also a higher rate of violent crime then the rest of western EUrope.

    Btw, I'm not arguing that less weapons automatically result in less violent crime, but the opposite argument seems to hold as little truth.

    Weapons as part of daily life is a cultural thing in both the USA and SPain, and both happen to be relatively violent societies also.

    Conclusion seems simple, it has all to do with culture, and nothign whatsoever with crime.

    Then of course there is the just as valid soundign argument of needign weapons to fight a possible tyranic government..

    First of all, I'll ask you, what good will your semi automatic assault riffle do against jetfighters and attack helis? Then, I suggest you take a look at what people needed to overthrow such governments, and specifically look at the following places:
    India
    Rumania
    Russia
    Poland
    France

    In all those places (and many more) revolutions took place to overthrow tyranic governments. In all those places those revolutions succeeded, and in none of those places people had a 'right to carry arms'.

    That such a right was considered important at the time of foudning the USA is understandable, but reality has shown that the reasoning behind it is flawed by now.

  522. Re:Not a problem here by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

    Hold on,
    The Met does have guns, in fact if I remember rightly they recently bought assault rifles from Germany to deal with terrorists.
    Despite not having separation of church and state, we are a much less religious country.
    your government is significantly more theocratic.

  523. Living in a craphole I can give this advice: by elbazo · · Score: 1

    As a London dweller myself I find that just holding yourself as a 'bad man' keeps most of the muggers away. I live in Wembley which is a craphole and doing that has kept 80% of the twats away from me. The other lot were sporting for a punch up.

    When someone tries to mug me now, I just look at them with a confused face and say "Are you having a bubble" then lead on mentioning one of the big gangs family names around my area. Certainly scares the hell out of them, especially as one guy had his arm removed because he tried to mug a local gang family member.

    Also invest in a kevlar biker jacket, I own a bike so I have to wear one if I dont want my skin ripped off. Someone attacked me and put a knife into my upper shoulder and because of the kevlar it did not go through. I then preceeded to run like the wind and I still have that knife to this day :)

    My 20 pence worth

  524. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know i think that the solution is radical political and economic reform. With full employment and or a social safety net the need to mug someone may not exist. With no need to mug someone you can wear all the flashy gear you want.

    Cheers, ps first post.

  525. He's not from LA! by rbbs · · Score: 1

    This guy is in London and assmuning he doesn't work in Brixton at night he should be fine!

    I carry a Powerbook, iPod and P900 pretty much everywhere I go in London on the tube etc and i would recommend the following:

    1) Hide the earbuds (tick)
    2) Get a sleeve for your laptop and place it in an anonymous backpack - Mandarina Duck, DaKine and Boblbee (all available from Selfridges i think) all make great ones which will support a 15" laptop with plenty of padding and with room for power cords etc.
    3) Avoid obvious wallet bulges - keep your Oyster card in a loose pocket so you don't get out your wallet every time you get in or out of public transport.
    4) Walk with your head held high and walk with purpose. People with confidence automatically appear taller, bigger and far less of a target than someone shuffling around staring at their moccasins....

    and finally....

    5) For god's sake don't wear a bluetooth headset everywhere you go...people like that deserve everything they get.

    r

  526. Dark backpacks - Coloured duct tape by nuggz · · Score: 1

    I have two typical suitcases. One is black, one is blue, very generic, very difficult to pick out.

    I put a big band of tape around it as I drop it off. Then when I get my suitcase back I take it off. Almost nobody has a nice new black suitcase with a bright yellow stripe of tape running around it.

    1. Re:Dark backpacks - Coloured duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put a big band of tape around it as I drop it off. Then when I get my suitcase back I take it off. Almost nobody has a nice new black suitcase with a bright yellow stripe of tape running around it. What a good idea.. I think I will try that!

    2. Re:Dark backpacks - Coloured duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying this too!

  527. Guns and Mugging by nuggz · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to try to pull a gun during a mugging.
    If you can carry a gun, and the mugger expects it, he'll be watching.

    This then turns from a mugging to a fight for my gun.

  528. Re:Not a problem here by Telex4 · · Score: 1

    Handgun ownership in the UK. I only know two people who own guns, and they keep them at shooting ranges. Only criminals will carry handguns around with them on the streets. So handgun ownership cannot be linked to street crime in the way you suggest.

    That's why your figures are fairly random and don't support your opinion.

    As for your link between low gun control and low crime rates, you're again supposing that there's no other factors there. It'd plausible that the truth is the other way around: the states with the highest crime rates have had to implement the toughest gun controls to try to bring them down. I don't know, and you're not giving me any evidence to suggest otherwise. Your "theory" is an idea that so far has nothing to back it up but circumstance :-)

    p.s. for someone who likes pointing out spelling errors in other people's posts, you'll appreciate me telling you that it's euphemism not euphamism.

  529. Concealed weapons don't prevent mugging by nuggz · · Score: 1

    They only give you something to fight back with afterwards.
    If someone mugs you, and you try to shoot them while they are mugging you, you fight for your own gun (bad).
    If you give them your wallet, then use your gun to mug them back they might fight you for your wallet. Don't know where you are, but shooting muggers might be deemed a bit excessive.

  530. Firearms by raind · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Pack some heat....

    --
    Get up!
  531. a true geek by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

    a true geek uable to defend himself against the outside world would already have built one of these.

    personally i have always found openly carrying a knife dripping in blood seems to help.

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  532. Re:amo by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I covered that extensively in another post... thought I had at least mentioned it there. Black Talons are still JHP's, they just look and sound scarier. Kind of the EBR and other assault rifles phenomenon. :-) http://www.allsafedefense.com/images/Bullets/Talon s&XT.jpg

  533. Carrying too much stuff by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone carry all this stuff around with them in the first place? It might just be me, but isn't this a bit like a little kid dressing up in his spaceman suit before stepping off the front stoop to go play?

    The cell phone? Sure, if it's locked. The rest of it? Get a life!

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  534. Re: WRONG is wrong by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

    I'm going to say this simply, hoping that you actually read it. You are shooting to save your skin. You are shooting to neutralize the threat. Your end goal is to neutralize that threat. If that just so happens to require killing them, or you end up killing them in the process, so be it. But if you pull that gun out with the intention to KILL, and not to stop the attack, you will be a murderer in the jury's view. It's not something I'm making up, and it's a very subtle difference. I am not saying you shouldn't kill someone in self defense. I'm saying that should not be your ultimate goal. And EVERY court in this country will agree with me.

  535. Reproduction skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS is why /. is really not about chicks. You guys really don't know shit about them.
    Disclaimer: I do have a 5-year-old. And a wife.
    My biggest "chick-magnet" time was when my boy was 6mo-1yo. You carry him around in the stroller and the Big Diaper Bag and the Fischer-price toys and ta-da: they flock towards you. It's embarassing, really.
    My hunch is that is shows something about your reproductive skills, and this is the reason you should run from them (women that flock towards baby-bearing-fathers) as you would run from the plague: they (subconsiously at least) want to reproduce and see (hmmm, here is a loving father like I would like my offspring to have) and if you forget your protection it's too easy for them to say "oops, no problems, it's not like I can get preggie" ehehe.

  536. Looks help by garwain · · Score: 1

    I've found that being a 5'10 guy, weighing in at 215lbs, with a decent build works quite well. I carry my laptop and junk in an aluminum crash case, and carry it with ease. A person getting close enough to me to take my wallet, or other junk is also close enough to be hit it this weapon, which I'm sure would do some serious damage if connecting with a face... I was a wrestler in HS, weight trained in college, and have been studying kung fu since then. I was mugged once while in college, guy walked up flashed a knife at me and said to hand over my wallet. I did, however my hand containing said wallet connected with his nose, and he left quickly, and didn't bother with my offerings. On a side note, keep only a little cash in your wallet. If you are carrying a lot of cash, spread it out between your pockets. Then if you get mugged, you pull out your wallet and hand over a couple bills without loosing everything you haveon you.

  537. T-A-X-I by licklebarfe · · Score: 1

    consider a cab if you don't feel comfortable walking around with your favorite 'pro-sumer' items. I've never had to use my .40 Smurf 'n' Wessun or howitzer or *anything* on a taxi driver! it's crazy!

  538. Re:Not a problem here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can't make or buy "Slap-jacks", "Black-Jacks", or "Coshes"? Guns are noisy. Bludgeons and knives are quiet, quieter than a victim's shrieks. Only pussies and gangster kids rely on guns. I've read Dickens, I know guns aren't the main threat.

    The UK has watched too many "Dirty Harry" sets. Same thing in the US. Bic pens are lethal weapons of death. You just gotta be aware of what's going on around you, where ever you are.

    The anesthetic gas? What about the silent but deadly gas?

  539. Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    (Japanese tend to be shorter than me, especially a few hundred years ago :)

    Actually, Japanese men (especially the samurai classes, who could afford better food) were on average taller two hundred years ago than they were twenty years ago. Musashi Miyamoto, for example, was over 6' tall (Although that was more like 400 years ago). The average height of Japanese men diminished greatly during the late 19th century, a development which continued into the 1950's. Today, the average height among Japanese 20 year old men is 5'8".

    Not that it matters to your point, though :)

  540. Re:Not a problem here by Ithika · · Score: 1
    That, for the uninitiated, was an attempt at humour. I was taking the piss. The guy had spelt 'versus' wrong.

    I live in Scotland, a part of the UK. I fully realise that the Metropolitan Police can carry guns.

    America is significantly more religious than the UK, which is partly the point I was trying to make. GWB's Good vs Evil tirades would probably be laughed out of office here (I hope).

    Whilst it probably would have been funnier if I'd chosen a town in Bible-belt America it would have required more research on my part. I didn't feel a +1 Funny attempt on Slashdot at 2am merited the research required.

    Feel free to rewrite the abobve sketch if you like. I just found it funny, that's all.

    Ithika.

  541. Actually if you are a TRUE geek.. by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

    You should have a helmet mounted video camera permanently streaming video over a wireless network to a tivo (or home made tivo) which you can submit as evidence when you make your police complaint! Actually, make that TWO video cameras (one pointed forward and one pointed behind you!)

  542. Valley of the Sun by sethx9 · · Score: 1

    I live in Arizona in the US. Arizona allows anyone who is not a felon to carry a handgun as long as it is visible. Permits that allow carrying concealed firearms can be applied for. Phoenix is the fifth largest city in North America by population. I invite anyone to look at the crime stats on other major metropolitan areas and compare them to Phoenix. Can it really be a coincidence that those areas with the tightest gun control laws (Washington D.C. and New York) have the highest violent crime rates? I know this won't help the denizens of London where most of the constabulary don't even carry firearms but...

    --
    Sorry, I keep forgetting to add the tongue-in-cheek emoticon to the bottom of my posts...
    1. Re:Valley of the Sun by RoyalCheese · · Score: 1

      Can it really be a coincidence that those areas with the tightest gun control laws (Washington D.C. and New York) have the highest violent crime rates? Good point.. but what effect is there on the rates of accidental shootings and crimes of passion involving a gun - (domestic arguments, kids playing with mommy's/daddy's things, cleaning incidents, dropping incidents, things just getting overblown during an argument?) That's what I would be worried about if guns became as available in London.

    2. Re:Valley of the Sun by Alphasniper · · Score: 1

      Firearms are a give and take situation. They are alot like vaccinations. Many of us would not contest that we all need to get vaccinations, but their administration continues to kill thousands, maybe even tens of thousands a year. Guns are the same way; many people protect themselves each year with them, but some stupid morons decide to use them when they unjustified.

    3. Re:Valley of the Sun by sethx9 · · Score: 1

      For starters, every crime index report done in the US shows that more negligent discharging of firearms occurs among "trained professionals" (the police) than among the general population.

      And while it is true that murder victims are often known associates of their murderer, what is rarely reported is that the murder victims are very often criminal themselves. These are not, in most cases, average citizens losing their tempers over the outcome of a sporting event. Adam Walinsky, writing for Atlantic Monthly in July 1995, calls this idea (that murderers and their victims usually know each other) the "twenty-year fraud". In a 1993 report from the Chicago Police Department (no stranger to gun violence) it was shown that only 3% of homicides involved victims in a marital relationship with the offender and only another 3% involved blood relatives. Another statistic that skews the numbers is that only about 65% of murders are solved in the US and, by the nature of the crime, those murders resulting from domestic disputes are cleared at a much higher rate than those homicides among gang members and strangers. As for children dying from the negligent discharge of a firearm, consider this: In 1970, 2,406 Americans died from firearm accidents. By 1991 that number had fallen to only 1,441 even though the number of guns in circulation rose exponentially. In fact, between 1970 and 1991 the annual rate of fatal gun accidents was cut in half from 1.2 to 0.6 per 100,000 Americans. As of 1991 the death rate from firearms was lower than that from drowning, ingesting foreign objects, or complications from medical procedures. Should I really blow this all up by including auto fatalities?

      Those who oppose gun control, it seems to me, have a basic outlook on their fellow humans: we are too stupid and crude to be allowed to provide for our own personal protection. I disagree completely.

      --
      Sorry, I keep forgetting to add the tongue-in-cheek emoticon to the bottom of my posts...
  543. oh fuck this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You simply can't talk about self defense without ending in an discussion about firearms as long as americans are involved...

  544. History by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    The people of the UK are very grateful what your (great) grandparents did. They are very grateful that your country saw fit to allow itself to be attacked by Japan and have war declared on it by Nazi Germany. If it had not been for those two actions, the USA would have continued to simply make money out of both sides like I understand GWBs family is accused of doing.

    Cynicism aside, the whole world was involved in that war for their own benefits. The USA did not join in out of altruism. It is wonderful that they did and the world is grateful. I am not responsible for the actions of 60 years ago, neither are you. This means that we cannot take credit for them either.

    I face facts, I have been outside my country. I have spent time in Africa and the middle east and other places. The UK is a small country and the USA is a big one. China is even bigger - so what? I don't want to live there either. If you think size is important, check your spam. It will contain something for you.

    "poorly engineered cars"? I am not too keen on what I see of US cars. I will stick to something with decent suspension, build standards amd fuel consumption - probably French or Japanese.

    "time has passed" and what makes you think your time will ever come? The only thing the world wants from the USA are films. Very few people want your culture. Just to be left alone by your Pres.

    "accent" just like the USA, there is more than one accent here. Perhaps you are thinking of what used to be called 'Received Pronunciation'. That was never any more a British accent than Jimmy Carter was the source of the real US one.

    bad teeth? It's the result of not having enough therapists. See? That's why the US thinks it has good teeth. Their analysts have persuaded them that teeth are what matters.

    GATSOs? Our police use GATSOs a lot. Yours use automatic weapons a lot. I prefer GATSOs anyday!

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:History by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Our police use GATSOs a lot. Yours use automatic weapons a lot.

      You must get a lot of your knowledge about the U.S. from television & movies. Or blindly ignorant America-haters. I have never seen a police officer with an automatic weapon. They do not use them "a lot," they hardly even use them "a little." The only time an automatic weapon comes out is in a big riot (or if some people decide to live together peacefully in a cabin in the woods -- then the tanks & flamethrowers come out, but that's usually military, not the police). Even in a riot situation, they usually use rubber bullets & tear gas over automatics.

  545. SCOTTeVESTS by Scott+Jordan · · Score: 1

    Yea, best way to carry your stuff, is the SCOTTeVEST, but then again I am slightly biased. But for an independent opinion, check out August edition of Handheld Computing, which says "best of all, these trim garments don't bulge noticeably even when loaded down. ... [I]t actually works remarkably well. Most importantly, wearing your stuff in a SCOTTeVEST instead of hauling it around in a case doesn not announce your tech fetish to the world, unless you want to of course." Also, check out msn last week at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4893314 which calls the SeV one of the ten must have gadgets for business travelers. Scott

    --
    Scott Jordan, CEO www.scottevest.com
  546. Why?! by quisph · · Score: 1
    So I would like to know what my fellow urban geeks do to try and keep their valuables safe while traveling with them.
    What are you, insane? For God's sake, don't leave the house! What's the point of being a geek if you still have to go outside?

    Thanks to a combination of telecommuting, online banking, and NetGrocer, I never have to worry about muggers again.

    (Or melanoma... Or spy satellites... Or STDs.)

  547. SCOTTeVESTs by Scott+Jordan · · Score: 1

    Best way to carry your stuff, is the SCOTTeVEST, but then again I am slightly biased. But for an independent opinion, check out August edition of Handheld Computing, which says "best of all, these trim garments don't bulge noticeably even when loaded down. ... [I]t actually works remarkably well. Most importantly, wearing your stuff in a SCOTTeVEST instead of hauling it around in a case doesn not announce your tech fetish to the world, unless you want to of course." Also, check out msn last week at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4893314 which calls the SeV one of the ten must have gadgets for business travelers. Scott Scott Jordan, CEO www.scottevest.com

    --
    Scott Jordan, CEO www.scottevest.com
  548. All you need is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a T-shirt with the writing.

    I Have AIDS.

  549. Capacitance by divot2001 · · Score: 1

    Attach a flywheel to a massive capacitor and after getting the flywheel up to speed it should be able to rapidly convert kinetic energy into stored charge in the capacitor. Then you can discharge the capacitor through some kind of metal wand (with insulated handle) into the mugger's now-extra-crispy corpse.

  550. How to stop being mugged by Alphasniper · · Score: 1

    Move to one of many US states. Get a permit, carry a Desert Eagle Mark XIX, make if obvious. If you make it obvious, that says to them, Ok, I might get a round off, but if he hits me with that hand-cannon, it WILL turn me inside out! ;-)

  551. So you're saying ... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    ...the guy stole your knife.

  552. I'll clarify by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Staying with a bad relationship makes you a "darwin target" and trying to find another relationship makes you a "cheating bitch"?


    OK, I guess I have to flesh it out a bit. The girl crawled back to a man who sent her to the hospital multiple times until he went overboard one night and took a baseball bat to her skull. The other gun violence I've seen is a result of unstable and violent men being abused (yes, cheating is abusive) by their SOs.

    Staying in a bad relationship is mildly stupid, but staying in an abusive one is suicide. And there are better ways of leaving someone (especially someone who has a propensity for violence) than sleeping with their friends.

    In both of those last two cases, I think it's clearly the gunholder's fault, and they should be held responsible, but I consider it the equivalent of walking out into a crosswalk in front of a speeding truck, you're an idiot for it even though they're the ones breaking the law.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:I'll clarify by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      Ok, thanks.

      I guess I'm more annoyed with the general trend (of making the perps "invisible" while laying post-mortem verbal abuse on the victims) than any specific example, your post included. It's a more common phenomenon than you'd think, almost to the point of complete blame-shifting.

  553. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > Interestingly, Spain follows a lot closer the rules as they are in the USA

    Which rules do you mean? Which part of Spain have you been to? Mexico? Colombia? You don't seem to know what you're talking about. Just quit smoking *that*.

  554. Re: Shooting to wound by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Here in Canada I've been told it is shoot-to-kill. The reason being that if a police officer even draws their gun, they have to go through about 5 hours of paperwork and meetings to explain why they thought their life or somebody else's life was in immediate danger.

    Now the point is... if you're only allowed to draw your gun when somebody's life is in danger, how on earth could you argue that shooting some guy in the leg was appropriate?

    I think concealed weapons are generally a bad idea... it goes along the lines of "don't bring a knife to a fist fight... you might get yourself killed." If the thief finds out you have a gun, the thief might think their life is in danger... you might have no choice but to draw that gun.

  555. Re:Not a problem here by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I had a sense of humour failure. I get your joke, just failed to spot it at the time.

    WARNING: SENSE OF HUMOUR NOT FOUND

  556. Armour ... and a cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be amazed at how much a cloak can hide. If someone came up behind you, all they'd see is cloth. If you're standing still, you're not giving away that you're wearing armour. [It's the jingling that typically does it -- some people will weave leather cords through chainmail to help silence it, but if you cover it, belt it, and walk slowly, it's not too noticable in the first place.] Some armour, like ringmail, or boiled leather doesn't make a sound, if it's made well, and you've ensured you don't have metal-on-metal contact while walking about.

    The giveaway that someone is a cloak is wearing chainmail is that they'll flex their shoulders funny -- you lift up, flex your shoulders, and come back down quick -- it'll redistribute the weight or the armour across your shoulders.

  557. Re:Get a gun by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    ...that's what happens when your police force starts a lucrative donut franchise.

  558. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    Last I checked, I am allowed to carry around a knife that is clearly intended as a weaon in SPain, while I'm not in say the Netherlands. This is the country of Spain on the continent of EUrope, ha nothign to do with Mexico or Columbia really.

    In the countryside, I can walk around with a gun legally there as well, while I cannot without lots of paperwork and only within limited boundaries in the Netherlands for example.

    Is it the same as in the USA? definitely not, and if you would have cared to read, and for example go read the CIA factbook on things like crime rate, you may see that the rest of what I said is true as well according to them at least.

  559. Re: Shooting to wound by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    We are talking about a country the size of Conn.

    Then consider the history, the Dutch are a bunch of merchants and farmers. Now don't get upset, I myself am proud to be Dutch, and most of my family are midwestern farmers.

    Now the Spanish have a much more varied profession and a lot more land mass. I would maintain that the Netherlands is too small to be statistically valid. Then there is a a matter of does culture give rise to laws or does laws give rise to culture.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  560. Write "See I.D." on your credit/debit cards. by Infinity+Salad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Write 'See I.D.' on the signiture panel of your credit and debit cards. This functions both as a security measure and as a social experiment.
    First, cashiers are more likely to ask you for your ID when they see the phrase in front of them. Accordingly, someone who is not you will have a hard time using your plastic.
    Second, if you want to see just how easy it is to spend someone else's money, keep track of how often cashiers actually ask you for your ID after inspecting your card. From my own experience, it is not an encouraging amount!

    1. Re:Write "See I.D." on your credit/debit cards. by UTPinky · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but this almost NEVER works. I have this written on ALL of my credit cards, and have probably only had it checked 20-30 times in the last 5 years! One time I even bought $300 worth of books from B&N and they didn't even check it.

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  561. Re:Exercise your quads, run away. by motyl · · Score: 1

    I am amazed that you are the only one mentioning running away. It has saved me several times. It is often the most effective and least damaging (to you both) solution, especially if you are not too far away from main street or something like that. Also crying "help" while running away may get some people interesed and the mugger a bit confused. Of course it really depends where you are, what is the attitude of other people to the whole affair. If I see 2 people just talking on the street, I do nothing. If one of them yells "help!" I would call the police from a safe distance.

  562. Enamel Paint by PeterJFraser · · Score: 1

    Everything should be decorated with unique identify marks. It could be your name, a simple pattern, anything as long as it easy to describe to someone else and is indelible. It may not stop the mugging but it will stop the muggers from fencing what they stole and give you a chance of getting the equipment back. The marking also do a good job of stopping equipment from growing legs and walking away.

  563. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > Then consider the history, the Dutch are a bunch of merchants and farmers. Now don't get upset, I myself am proud to be Dutch, and most of my family are midwestern farmers.

    While generally true, the Dutch do happen to have kicked out the Spainiards while they happened to be contending the sovereignity of the Netherlands.. but generally, I agree, and all I wanted to say is that the simple reasoning of arming a population to stop crime is simply not working, it is more like there is a relation between level of violence in general and amount of weapons floating around in society, but you can quite debate which causes which.

    You could for that matter expand the statistics to include northwest europe (which has a variety of arms control laws, but generally don't allow weapons on the street and don't give out concealed gun permits to civilians, and the statistics seem to still hold.

    Ah, and theres always the nice, but little sayign bit of my own experience. While I travel the part of Europe between Greece in the south, Sweden in the north, the UK in the west, and eastern Germany in the east quite a lot, I have never once worried about someone pointing a gun at me, and it never happened. Worried about someone carryign a knife? at times, yes.

    While having lived for less then 6 months in Austin, Texas, I got a gun pointed at me once by a mugger, and saw the same happen 2 more times but not involving myself. Of course no statistics there of any value, but it does brign the argument across in a very individual way I can tell you.

  564. Be Aware by darthtuttle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been in some of the dirtholes of the US. The Mission in San Fran after midnight, down N street in DC getting lost after a show at the old 930, Alphabet city in NYC (best noodle shops), Hollywood (lived there), The Combat Zone (okay, that's not so bad anymore) and I've never been close to mugged. The worst is some guy tried to pick me up off the street.

    The secret? Be aware of what's going on around you, who's around you and walk with confidence.

    Toys aren't what attract a mugger. It's ease of target. Plus toys aren't what a mugger really wants most of the time unless you have something they really want. It's cash. Your $2k laptop is worth much less hot. Cash is always worth cash.

    --
    Darthtuttle
    Thought Architect
  565. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm.. Lower crime in the Netherlands than the US.

    Don't you guys allow the smoking of pot too?

    Last time I was stoned, I didn't really feel like commiting a crime, certainly not a violent one.

    Perhaps there is a correlation.

  566. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > Don't you guys allow the smoking of pot too?

    We indeed don't think its generally illegal to do to your own body what you feel like doing.. provided you are over 18.

    Theres some limits to that, but the general idea is quite there in practise also.

  567. More guns does NOT mean less violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the UK got one of the most strict gun laws in the world (because of the rushed reactions to the Dunblane masscacre), violent crime actually increased.
    And the country with the most lenient gun laws is not Spain, not even the US, but Switzerland, where because of the militia structure of the army, people are required to have their assault rifle (and this is not a civil, single-shot version) in their homes after the basic military service.

    Here in Germany, they like to talk about the famous "amerikanischen Verhaeltnisse" (American circumstances) when trying to explain their strict gun laws that are clearly rooted in the Nazis's attempts to restrict ownership and also in the emergency laws established by the occupants after the war.
    But they never talk about Switzerland or the nordic countries where there is a gun in most homes because of hunting, because this would not serve their scare tactics.

    1. Re:More guns does NOT mean less violence by homer_ca · · Score: 2

      Switzerland is not really a fair comparison. Rifles are used much less often than handguns to commit crimes because they're not concealable. Handgun ownership is still very low. However, having strict gun control laws doesn't make them all peaceniks. If anything, Europe has more people than the US trained in firearms because of the mandatory military service in many countries.

  568. Armour by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard similar from a friend about an indivual who was dressed in mail for an SCA meet or something similar. Walked into a 7-11 and grabbed some munchies, while the teller and other customer are looking a bit nervous. Walks up to make his order, and feels a bump from the guy beside him. Guy beside him screams, and runs out the door.

    The tell is like "That's weird, that guy was holding the place up. Give me a moment while I call the cops." So the cops come, and ask buddy about the object stuck in his side. He's was a little amazed to find a knife which had been jabbed into his side, but stuck in the armour without coming near flesh.

    I think chainmail should become standard equipment for late-night Sev drop-ins.

  569. Don't worry by phorm · · Score: 1

    As soon as the muggers see what weird crap you're into they'll probably run away and leave their own wallets to appease you...

  570. Re:Kenya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Kenya a few years ago.

    My brother-in-law, who loves living in Africa, insisted we go out at night. He drove us around in his rattle-trap volvo... and told me that if our car broke down in the middle of the night, we would be dead.

    While I was there, the post office was raided. A tourist (who was mailing post cards just prior to returning home), was mugged in the post office. He lost his luggage and $$$. 6 men with spears mugged him. To give you a bit of background, downtown Nairobi has about 4 blocks of standard american downtown, surrounded by shorterer poorer structures. They disappeared without a trace... Oh, legally, the only people allowed to carry spears are the Maasai. (They kill lions with them, you aren't a man (in Maasai culture) until you kill your first lion).

    My sis told me how proud she was of Kenyans, "They recycle everything!". They do that, because they have so little. The only really garbage is citrus rinds.

    I tried to leave the maid a $7.50 US tip for the month I stayed there, and they wouldn't let me do it. That is how much they PAID her for the month. I thought she was 20-something, she was 40-something. She has 3 kids that HER maid is looking after...out of HER salary.

    So, yah, believe that you will be killed for the contents of your wallet and clothes. What you carry on you, well, could be a YEAR's income for the muggers.

    One other thing: the beggars. Beggars in Kenya, an islamic country, are out in force on Fridays. Fridays are the traditional day of prayer, and giving alms to the poor is a pious act. Many of them are lepers who have been repeatedly beaten by the police...who are trying to deter their presence...scares the tourists to see beggars with no hands or feet begging for money.

    Greed, need and opportunity are the three elements to crime. Hmmm...I --think-- I see all three readily available in night-time Nairobi.

  571. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so sick of holier than thou shit from Nederlanders - I've walked the streets of some of the most notorious cities out there.. from Oakland to Prague to Rio, and I found Amsterdam and London to be the most troublesome of all. You can't walk more than 30 meters in Amsterdam Centrum w/o having 4 jackasses following you and trying to back you into a corner to sell you drugs or steal your bike. You want to go to a bar in London, you better be ready for some drunk xenophobe to start some shit since you don't come from their island. At least people in GB will admit that they have issues, and that they're trying to deal with them - unlike the Dutch who are convinced all of their problems are due to the Marokkanen and the Turks.

    Oh yeah, let's see - how many assassinations have their been in the EU in the last 25 months? Fucking hypocrits. I'd like to know what Pim Fortuyn thought of your CIA world factbook statistics as he lay there dying on the streets of Amsterdam. Rot op met je Nederlandse logica klootzak.

    BTW, I'm Norwegian - I fear the day that the Dutch ignorance, apathy and racism infects our land like it already has that of Danmark and Belgium.

  572. too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "most of them aren't to bright"

  573. Carry a gun on you by defile · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, right, citizens don't have that right anymore.

  574. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    =-Incidentely (check the CIA world fact book on it if you like) we also have:
    1. less people killed in general
    2. less people killed by police use of violence
    3. less policemen killed by violence
    4. less robbery with use of violence
    5. lower crime rate in general then the USA.-=

    What is the pot smoker to drunk ratio there? I bet the US has more alcholics as well.

  575. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's also legal to operate an auto after smoking pot - there is no intoxication rating for someone smoking pot for the police to use. So apparently you don't mind what you do to other people's bodies either.

  576. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    *lol*

    First of all, the Dutch have their own set of problems, so does everyone for that matter. Also I didn't say that violent crime doesn't happen here. For the rest, I've been in Norway quite a few times, and racism is no stranger there, nor is it overhere for that matter.

    The fact that the killing of Pim Fortyn made the news in the way it did is partially because it was the first political asssassination (unless you take the nazi occupation during the 2nd world war into account) in a few centuries here. Bad thing? definitely, highly exceptional? also quite definitely. Oh and if you want to refer to his death, at least get your facts straight, he was killed in a small city called Hilversum (actually considered a village by many), not in Amsterdam. Assassinations do happen in Amsterdam however, and way too often. They happen between criminals, and while I'd rather do without them alltogether, it kinda does solve a problem if they take care of themselves ;P

    What mr Fortuyn did, and what you seem to be echoing, is an old trick used by many a 'popular' dictator also, "let people feel so they don't think". You call on fears without providing any facts for them. mr. Fortuyn may have done so to call attention for real problems, and he managed in that, but its not something to play with, it stirs up forces that few have been able to control judging from past evidence.

    If you'd have read my posts a little better (but since you can't bother to logon or such, I wonder if you can bother to read the discussion a bit better before replying) you might have found that I simply object to the reasoning that getting yourself armed is gonna solve the problem of robbery, it generally just makes the thing more likely to turn violent, and if you don't agree with the example I use, fine, but come up with something better then some name calling.

  577. Crime and poverty go hand-in-hand by shario · · Score: 3, Interesting
    How about "vote for better social security", "provide work opportunities for ex-convicts" and "provide drug rehab"?

    There is a connection between poverty and crime. In many cases, mugging people is a rational choice (in economic sense, that is!).

    And if you still get mugged, give all you have.

    1. Re:Crime and poverty go hand-in-hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you still get mugged, give all you have.

      Exactly. You don't just fire one shot into them, you empty the entire magazine.

      steve

  578. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pot smokers are mostly foreigners from my experience.

    > I bet the US has more alcholics as well.

    Um, yeah, the US population is 18 times that of The Netherlands - of course there will be more alcholics. However, the per capita ratio of alcholics in The Netherlands would be higher I suspect - long, dark winters and rainy year-round would make anyone turn into an alcoholic... in fact, I think most of my friends would be considered alcoholics if they weren't Dutch, but here it is normal to drink a lot so it is probably hard to diagnose.

  579. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    Uhm no, it's not. THat there is a problem proving it in many cases doesn't make it legal.

  580. Re: Shooting to wound by Mithrandir · · Score: 1

    This just begs for a response. 'Everywhere that I know' happens to also include that part of the world thats not inside the USA (yet) ?


    Yes. I'm an aussie that has travelled extensively, and lived in both the US and UK. Courtesy of various international motorcycle lists that I frequent I know (as much as one can on some of these lists) quite a few policemen. I could easily count at least a dozen in different countries as being friends - guys I've ridden with or crashed at their place when travelling etc.

    Note your third paragraph supports exactly what I said - the Dutch police are taught StK.

    icluding the part where I happen to live (the Netherlands), police is taught to shoot to kill

    By your own words they are taught this. That's all I'm talking about - when the weapon is drawn and they are aiming it at someone, they are taught to kill with it, not to disarm, not to injure. I'm not talking about any point prior to drawing the weapon and the finger being squeezed on the trigger, just the point after that. The point that a weapon is drawn is different by country, but after that point, the training is all the same - for a very good reason.

    --
    Life is complete only for brief intervals in between toys or projects -- John Dalton
  581. be prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lift weights.
    Carry less stuff.
    Never be drunk or preoccupied in public.
    Traverse all NEW routes ahead of time at least once (never carry valuables someplace you have never been).
    Travel with buddies.
    Have a fake valuable to hand over (throw down!) while you run off.
    Always have a plan.
    Never show fear.
    Carry a weapon (loud noise maker, pepper spray, knife, roll of quarters, SOMETHING).
    Use a walking stick - heavy, solid - e.g. oak.
    Be prepared.

  582. You still must sign it by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    If it is unsigned you will be liable for any unathorized purchases made with it.

    So sign it and then write Check ID or whatever over the sig.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  583. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    They are taught how to shoot to kill, yes. They are also taught to shoot to stop a person before shooting to kill a person, and have a lot of extra explaining to do if they don't manage. So no, drawing a gun and shooting is in many cases not done to kill but to incapacitate a person.

  584. Re:Carrying self, recognizing dangerous situations by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Muggers will cluster in that in-between zone.

    I've been told once that most muggings are by opportunist transients... guys who just happen to be passing through and see an easy target.

    So one day, you might be walking down a sunny, friendly street and you'll realize that while the kid's birthday party down the road went into the house... you're all alone with that strange person who happens to be walking towards you on the sidewalk.

    About the S.O. plan, it's a good point, I always figured my girlfriend had more sense. There was this one time we were in a European city where we didn't speak the language, we were just out for a walk at night, but we were in the old city. We took a couple wrong turns and wound up on some residential streets I didn't partiuclarly like.

    She said "let's go this way"... I replied, "I'd rather not, let's just go left"... to which she said "but we've already been that way"... finally I said... "we're alone at night in a strange city, speaking English with a North American accent, and you want to go down a graffiti'd unlit alley just outside the tourist district? No, let's get back to the main strip."

    Fortunately nobody was in earshot, otherwise I'd have to weigh the odds of us two debating in the streets against just walking down the dark alley so as to not look like a victim.

    Later I reminded her that since we can barely speak the language.. we can't tell the difference between "do you want to buy some crack" and "I'll cut you to ribbons"

    My rough guidelines. 1. try not to look like a tourist or victim. 2. Unless absolutely necessary, never carry anything you'd hesitate to hand to a mugger... and if you must carry something, carry it separately from your valuables. 3. if you're in a place where you don't speak the language or have a distinct accent, avoid responding verbally to anyone asking for anything.

    Point #2 covers the geek thing. If you can't afford to lose your notebook computer/ipod/whaveever, then you probably shouldn't be carrying it with you.

    Oh, and travelling by car... never put anything in your trunk unless you're just about to move the car... and if it is really valuable, carry it with you.

  585. Two words: Rottweiler + Schutzhund by Wintermancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Muggers are looking for an easy target. Don't be one.

    Knives and guns have deterrence value, but do you really want to get into a knife fight or a gunfight? No thanks.

    If you're concerned about crime, honestly, an attack trained dog works quite well (Hard to take it work with you, or on the subway, etc.).

    Pro:
    One: Oddly enough, a lot of criminals who are not afraid of being shot or stabbed have serious reservations against being bitten. Must be the mouth full of sharp teeth and intimidating appearance.
    Two: Unlike a knife or a gun, it's next to impossible for a criminal to take the dog and use it against you. Really.

    Con:
    One: Insurance. Having an attack trained dog can prevent you from having home owners insurance due to liability concerns. Ditto for certain breeds. Shop around for an insurance provider that doesn't descriminate.
    Two: Lawsuits. Having an attack trained dog can give you more grief than shooting the bastard if the dog is used to defend yourself. Best not to admit that the dog is attack trained (train it yourself or pay for training in cash). Memorize the following: "The dog was defending me against a perceived threat. Who knew that Fluffy, my loving Rottweiler, would chew his nuts off?"

    The best bet is to not look like a victim. The dog is great deterence, though. Nasty looking folks part like the Red Sea when my wife and I are walking with our Doberman and Rottweiler. Friendliest dogs you would ever meet, but they don't know that.

  586. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Also I didn't say that violent crime doesn't happen here.

    No, you didn't say that - good for you. But you were pointing your finger at others, and people who live in glass houses should not throw stones mate. Nederlanders tend to forget about their storied history, and take the high moral ground when it suits their purposes - it is this blatant and consistent hypocrisy that I was pointing out in my post, nothing more.

    The fact that the killing of Pim Fortyn made the news in the way it did is partially because it was the first political asssassination (unless you take the nazi occupation during the 2nd world war into account) in a few centuries here.

    Pim's murder was indeed an exception, not the rule thus far in the last 50 years or so. Why do you want to leave out the 2nd world war though? I mean, damn, Germany was a fine neighbour for most of the 20th century - in fact, they were practically benevolent if you don't count the 1st and 2nd wars. Selective history can, at times, be worse than incorrect history mijn vriend. Back to the point though, I was merely using Pim's assassination to illustrate that terribly violent murders happen regardless of culture and legislation, which is what you seem to be arguing.

    Oh and if you want to refer to his death, at least get your facts straight, he was killed in a small city called Hilversum (actually considered a village by many), not in Amsterdam.

    People who have no ground on which to stand during a debate will find anything they can to divert attention from the issue at hand. You are right, Pim was murdered in Hilversum (which is basically a suburb of Amsterdam) - to be quite frank I was thinking it was Baarn while I was writing to you.

    You call on fears without providing any facts for them.

    My bad - I was reading De Telegraaf a few months back where they said that there were 80.000 stolen bikes per year in NL - you are welcome to look up that number yourself if you think I exaggerate. As far as muggings go, I have no stats for you, sorry. I only have second-hand experience as it is not uncommon for my friends to complain about having been mugged while in Amsterdam, Rotterdam, or Den Haag. This is beside the point though.

    If you'd have read my posts a little better [...] you might have found that I simply object to the reasoning that getting yourself armed is gonna solve the problem of robbery, it generally just makes the thing more likely to turn violent...

    I agree with you fully actually. My point is, again, that the Dutch tend to forget their own problems, and are quick to point out the problems of others. You guys would do well to take care of your own house before pointing out the flaws of others, just as most other countries should - you guys just need a reminder since you tend to yell so loud and so often.

    Interestingly, Spain follows a lot closer the rules as they are in the USA, and also turns out having by far the highest rate of violent robberies and people gettign killed by violence of all of western EUrope (actually, only Poland and some parts of eastern EUrope come close to it, and don't surpass it yet)

    Would you care to substantiate this claim?

  587. Hmmm... by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...flame bait. To whom? Slashdot's ultra-left wingnuts?

  588. What's Really Funny is that it is TRUE! by thelizman · · Score: 1

    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/cri_tot_cri_ca p

    Country Description Amount
    1. Dominica 112.79 per 1000 people
    2. New Zealand 108.12 per 1000 people
    3. Finland 102.15 per 1000 people
    4. Denmark 93.64 per 1000 people
    5. Chile 90.00 per 1000 people
    6. United Kingdom 86.04 per 1000 people
    7. Montserrat 83.49 per 1000 people
    8. United States 81.55 per 1000 people

  589. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > Why do you want to leave out the 2nd world war though? I mean, damn, Germany was a fine neighbour for most of the 20th century - in fact, they were practically benevolent if you don't count the 1st and 2nd wars.

    Because I regard being at war as an exceptional situation which does justify forms of violence that should normally not be tollerated?

    I am not forgetting that bit of history, but see it as a time during which special conditions were in place?

    Doing otherwise would kinda be lookign at US history and judging the chance you have on dying to a bullet from the civil war in part (longer ago, but very relecant for the history of the country)

    > I was merely using Pim's assassination to illustrate that terribly violent murders happen regardless of culture and legislation, which is what you seem to be arguing.

    No, I was arguing they happen less often in a society that tends to not tollerate weapons on the streets.

    I completely agree with your point that it happens everywhere. I take that as a given, and now want to have it happen as little as possible.

    > You guys would do well to take care of your own house before pointing out the flaws of others,

    Hmm, we seem to have a better working solution for some things, others have better working solutions for other things. It helps telling eachother about those, saves lots of re-inventing the wheel and such.

    As much as there may be some open neo-nazism in parts of scandinavia, it also seems society has a lot more effective way of rendering it powerless then quite a few other parts of Europe. Its something we should definitely be interested in for example.

    > Would you care to substantiate this claim?

    That claim is according to the CIA world factbook, that doesn't make it true of course. That said, SPain has an alltogether more violent history when looking at modern times.

    Oh, thanks for the reply, I appreciate actual discussion.

  590. Re: Shooting to wound by Long-EZ · · Score: 1
    I can't address the issue of Spain vs. the Netherlands, where you claim fewer guns results in increased safety. But I can tell you that in the United States, gun ownership has a strong corellation with reduced crime, including violent crime. The effect goes beyond the person who owns a gun and extends to the entire community, so you don't need to own a gun, just don't prohibit your neighbors from owning guns. This fact is often not understood by people who don't want to own a gun and therefore feel safer if nobody owned a gun. They're missing the rather obvious point that criminals don't obey gun laws and it isn't possible to make guns disappear by legislation. Even if it was possible, criminals would simply use other weapons.

    However, even though I believe in the right to own guns, the statistics are probably misleading. US cities with high crime rates try to solve crime problems by outlawing or restricting guns. This only makes matters worse, because criminals don't obey gun laws. All it does is disarm the victims. But these were generally high crime areas before the gun restrictions. It seems likely that high crime areas ban guns, and less true that banning guns causes high crime rates. The high crime rates generally existed in those US cities before guns were banned. But it is true that crime rates increased in US cities where guns were banned. If you were considering a career as a mugger or burglar, wouldn't you appreciate knowing your victims would be unarmed?

    The comment that a concealed weapon discovered by a mugger might cause the mugger to feel threatened and therefore more likely to act in a violent manner totally misses the point. If you think carrying a handgun will somehow bestow magical protective powers, please do not carry one. You will only supply guns to criminals. My personal solution to urban violence is to live in one of the areas that has a low crime rate. It's also an area with very reasonable gun laws. I don't carry a gun. But if I ever felt threatened enough to carry my 10 mm Glock, a mugger can feel as threatened as he likes, because he'll become aware of the fact that his victim is armed about a second before he receives two projectiles in the center of his mass, each 180 grains, with 700 foot pounds of energy.

    I've been a vegan for over 20 years out of respect for all living things. But if you threaten my life or that of someone I love, you're dead as fried chicken.

    I can't believe people accept the myth that the police will protect you. It flies in the face of all the facts. But it does fit nicely with our society's increasing need for specialization. We are increasingly hiring people to do everything we need done. There are fundamental aspects of our lives that we cannot and should not defer to others. Personal protection is one good example.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  591. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That relation nowhere shows that places that have weapons readily available to civilians are safer, rather, it shows the exact opposite.

    Switzerland?

    Swish! Two points!

  592. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > Switzerland?

    Hmm, good point. Exception to prove the rule? Obviously they have a decent way of dealing with it (and some help of conditions)

  593. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahah - your comments about the 2nd world war confused me until I realized that you were equating assassination with murder. Assassination is defined just a beetje different from murder; assassination is typically defined as a political murder. This is why we say that Mr. Fortuyn was *assassinated* instead of saying he was murdered.

    I don't know if there is an equivalent in Nederlands (maybe 'vermoorden' as apposed to 'moorden'?) - In Norwegian it is 'snikmorder' (sneaky murderer) as apposed to 'morder', but we usually use 'assassin' like most other languages.

    Here's an English definition in case you're curious.

  594. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > They're missing the rather obvious point that criminals don't obey gun laws and it isn't possible to make guns disappear by legislation. Even if it was possible, criminals would simply use other weapons.

    Robbery happens, but in a society where you can reasonably expect a person to carry a weapon, there are 2 options from the point of view of the robber:
    - victim doesn't seem to defend themselves.. easier pray.
    - victim may carry a weapon and looks like soemoen who might use it.. worse pray, and when going for it anyway, better make sure I'm first to kill.

    In a society that generally doesn't allow weapons, criminals still have them, but are a lot less likely to use them because it all of a sudden turns robbery into something that will get a lot more fanatical response and heavier punnishment.

    You are reasoning from a different culture where weapons and esp. guns have been a part of the culture for as logn as the country exists, and have served a good purpose in many different toles. There are way more guns out there, and the likelyhood of someone having one is a lot higher. That creates a different set of conditions and if you start controlling guns in such an environment, you are very likely goign to see criminals still having and using them, while law abiding citizens wont have them.. and it will take quite a while before havign managed to also make it difficult enough for criminals to use them (as opposed to possessing them).

    For what I can see, you are making the point that cities with strict gun controlls have generally a higher crimerate in the USA. Lets just assume this is true (I do not know, but it sounds likely), the questions remain, are the two actually related directly, and if so, what is cause and what is effect here.

  595. The Music Defense by soundofthemoon · · Score: 1

    While walking, or for that matter cycling, I prefer to be tuned-into my surroundings.

    You can play the music at a low enough volume that you can still be aware of what's going on around you. I like to wear earphones while walking around San Francisco because it lets me easily ignore panhandlers and other assorted freaks by pretending I can't hear them when they ask for money. iPod + shades = my own world with no intrusions. This greatly simplifies my commute, as everyone who would otherwise bother me leaves me alone. I've heard this referred to online as coccooning.

    Maybe the submitter could use a variation of this to solve his problem. :-)

  596. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, if you can't enforce it then it is for all intents and purposes legal. Besides that, I've been pulled over baked off my ass in Alkmaar and all the cops did was ask me to go for a walk for a while to sobre up... they didn't even take my stash. In fact, in Holland it's not entirely *legal* to grow or sell pot - the laws vary greatly amongst the municipalities, but even in Amsterdam most coffee shops are breaking one law or another by growing and/or importing their pot/hash; the laws are simply not enforced to the full extent that they could be. What Holland does not have is 'common law' (i think that's what it's called) like what you see in England - if they did then selling/growing/importing pot in all of Holland would be entirely legal at this point.

    I think the legal limit is 5 plants per person per house - and I think this only includes rent/mortgage paying persons - coffee shops and individuals consistently have more than this, but very rarely do you see anything done about it; hence the misperception that pot is "legal" in Holland.

  597. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > hence the misperception that pot is "legal" in Holland

    That is the rigth way of stating it indeed.
    The idea is to only enforce the law there where an actual problem exists, that concept is at times difficult to explain, but it works quite well in specific cases where you don't want to control something, only its excesses.

  598. Ironically, the places with the most muggings are by thygrrr · · Score: 1

    Yeah right! And the sun comes up because all those alarm clocks ring in the morning...

  599. Re: Shooting to wound by Long-EZ · · Score: 1

    For what I can see, you are making the point that cities with strict gun controlls have generally a higher crimerate in the USA. Lets just assume this is true (I do not know, but it sounds likely), the questions remain, are the two actually related directly, and if so, what is cause and what is effect here.

    It's true. The areas of the US with the highest crime rates have the most restrictive gun laws. Crime (both violent and nonviolent) have been declining in the US for the last nine years, despite appearances in the news media.

    As I said, I think the relationship is as follows:

    Crime increases.

    Citizens advocate gun control believing it will reduce criminals' access to guns.

    Crime increases further because all victims are now unarmed.

    I don't believe gun control causes crime by itself. I think crime is a social phenomenon with many interdependent causes. But in a high crime area, disarming the noncriminals only makes matters worse for society. Outlawing guns allows criminals to operate without concern for which of the potential victims might be armed. So even if you don't carry a gun in either case, you are still safer being unarmed in a society that allows handguns to be carried for defense.

    Guns have prevented a lot of crime, but these situations are non-events because a crime didn't occur. They are therefore not reported. Nobody records non-crimes. There is no reliable statistical information for crimes prevented, so this important fact about gun ownership usually isn't considered when enacting anti-gun laws.

    For Americans, the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution recognizes the right to bear arms. This is an integral portion of the document that is the basis for our government and legal system for a good reason. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is in no way ambiguous or open to alternative interpretations, again for a very good reason. I believe it applies as much today as it did when it was written 227 years ago.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  600. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > I believe it applies as much today as it did when it was written 227 years ago.

    I am not saying it is unimportant when seen in the light of US culture. The asker of the original question however lives in the UK, not the USA. There it would be better to apply the local culture also ;P

  601. geeklife by chigun · · Score: 1

    i live in chicago and i got mugged a few weeks ago. the dude cracked my arm with a police baton and made off with my shoulder bag. said bag contained a laptop, pda (just a zire), some law books, my cell phone, and my gba. i was pretty crushed and actually went through a state of depression where i totally avoided the city at all costs for a while. is this common? the worst part is that those items were pretty much the sum total of my possessions (besides some clothes) and i cannot afford to replace even one of them. some of my friends are chicago cops and one gave me a keychain mace and another gave me a sap (blackjack). i doubt i'd use either though, as it seems everyone and their grandmother has guns nowadays. i'd just as soon let the mugger make off with my goods rather than get shot. oh well. i miss my gba sp BIG TIME.

    --
    swanker than you
  602. Self defence? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    Try learning some self defence? I'd suggest Wing Chun, but hten I would do that since it is the style I do...

  603. Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And yes, we also have banned weapons from daily life, ...

    Please stop saying weapons when you mean firearms. Lots of things are weapons, and not just knives either.

    That relation nowhere shows that places that have weapons readily available to civilians are safer, rather, it shows the exact opposite.

    Switzerland. Don't confuse the society with the laws of that society.

    Don't deny my 78 year old mother the most effective means of defending herself against any thug that decides to kick her door in.

  604. Re:Get a gun by Jardine · · Score: 1

    Ah. The one I forgot about. The one with all the one-way streets.

  605. How about this: by 01D* · · Score: 1

    Every time you're about to get mugged -- use it as an excellent opportunity to practice your mastery of the Force:
    1) practice the mind trick at least 3 times
    2) when (if) that doesn't work, try lifting up your opponents in the air
    3) practice the trick of disappearance or super-high jumps.
    4) contemplate the loss of your posessions and give a serious consideration to The Path to the Dark Side.
    In any case the more you practice, the better you get; Thus with every single time you're mugged your skill with the Force improves - walk more dark alleys late at night!

    If nothing else, I heard that adrenalin is actually good for your health, while expensive posessions are bad for your karma.

  606. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try taking into account WHO is commiting gun crimes in the US, and against whom. I'll give you a hint--it's certain, limited demographics. The British are facing the same thing, and the French are starting as well (probably the Netherlands as well, I don't have stats). I'd like to see where you stand in another 10 years if current trends continue (falling crime in the US; rising in Europe).

    To paraphrase, political authority is intricately connected to the application of force, and violence is the ultimate application of force. It's long been true that Americans are simply not willing to relinquish to the government everything, nor trust as much in our government, as European peoples mostly are.

  607. Re: Shooting to wound by Long-EZ · · Score: 1

    I am not saying it is unimportant when seen in the light of US culture. The asker of the original question however lives in the UK, not the USA. There it would be better to apply the local culture also

    Perhaps. But I think the ideas embodied in the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution would be well applied universally. I realize the right to keep and bear arms is not recognized in all countries. Far from it. But the United States Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the US Constitution) does not grant rights. It acknowledges rights. The difference is, no government should have the ability to withhold these rights because they are not granted by any government. These are inalienable rights that exist for all free people. The 2nd Amendment recognizes the right to bear arms. The purposes are many, including personal defense, defense of a state from foreign aggression, and protection of the citizens from an oppressive or tyrranical government. The latter two reasons are why the term militia specifically appears in the 2nd Amendment. Citizens need to be able to provide a credible and effective armed deterence if needed. The 2nd Amendment does not recognize the right to hunt or target practice. The right to bear arms is not restricted to "sporting use". It seems obvious that the intention was for American citizens to be able to protect themselves adequately, even if their adversary was their federal government. Banning miltary style weapons is clearly not consistent with the 2nd Amendment.

    After more than two centuries, the United States Constitution is still a collection of radical and revolutionary ideas. It has withstood the test of time, because the ideas of liberty, freedom, and justice are timeless.

    There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap box, ballot box, jury box and ammo box. Use in that order.

    If other countries have a good method of providing for the protection of their citizens from criminals, foreign aggresors or the tyrrany of their own government, good for them. The 2nd Amendment has proven to be invaluable to US citizens in these matters, and we are reluctant to abandon the inalienable right that it recognizes.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  608. i know how u feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its very annoying i know...i try to not take out my valuables when mugger type of ppl are around...that seems to be the only solution...luking bulky doesnt count...muggers dont care how big you are...

  609. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this that disputes my original claim. Hehe.

    The only problem I have is that they go off on the "England, Japan, etc." have lower gun murder rates but they never delve into total murder rates. It's just as easy to kill someone with a knife (or glass as they like to do in England) as a gun, especially if the other person doesn't have a gun. Violence in England is pretty rampant. I would say worse than the US.

  610. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap box, ballot box, jury box and ammo box. Use in that order.

    While true, you may want to take a look at countries like India and Russia and quite a few of the european states. It was not people bearing arms that tipped over manyan oppressive government, and as said before, your assault riffle is not gonna do much good against jetfighters and attack helies.

    There are two things you shouldn't confuse. People have the inalienable right to take up arms against an oppressor. People have as much right on a life as free of violence as possible. You will have to balance those out, and your balancde is different then mine obviously.

    > If other countries have a good method of providing for the protection of their citizens from criminals, foreign aggresors or the tyrrany of their own government, good for them. The 2nd Amendment has proven to be invaluable to US citizens in these matters, and we are reluctant to abandon the inalienable right that it recognizes.

    It may do well in your culture, it may not do that well in others. The original story and question related to the UK, not to the USA.

  611. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    Who knows :) thanks for the link.

  612. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Syriloth · · Score: 1

    And in addition to the diaper bag with a laptop, carry a laptop case full of dirty diapers!

  613. Re: Shooting to wound by jrumney · · Score: 1
    But I can tell you that in the United States, gun ownership has a strong corellation with reduced crime, including violent crime.

    It is a casual, not a causal correlation though. Rural communities tend to have higher rates of gun ownership and lower rates of crime all over the world. This is only interpreted as "gun ownership reduces crime" in the minds of a few deranged gun nuts.

  614. Re:Kenya by CvD · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but Kenya is not an Islamic country. Granted, there are a lot of Muslims, especially at the coast, but the majority of Kenyans are Christians.

    For the rest you have painted a pretty good picture of Kenya. Too bad the elections last year haven't really improved anything.

    Ah well, it was fun growing up there... :-)

  615. Re: Shooting to wound by jrumney · · Score: 1
    Robbery happens, but in a society where you can reasonably expect a person to carry a weapon, there are 2 options from the point of view of the robber:
    - victim doesn't seem to defend themselves.. easier pray.
    - victim may carry a weapon and looks like soemoen who might use it.. worse pray, and when going for it anyway, better make sure I'm first to kill.

    You can add to this what tends to happen in South Africa: If you are disturbed in the process of a burglary, assume the victim has a gun and shoot them. Americans that think concealed carry laws make them safer are deluding themselves.

  616. Re:Not a problem here by jrumney · · Score: 1
    Why do the states with the least amount of gun control laws consistently have lower crime rates?

    The same reason North West Scotland has lower crime rates than South East London.

  617. H&K works for me by papercut2a · · Score: 0
    (shrug) I normally carry a concealed handgun, but then, I'm in the U.S., so I have that option.

    Whether or not I would draw it if I were being mugged would depend on circumstances (i.e., if I thought I were in danger).

  618. Re: Shooting to wound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have been choosing a poor example.

    First, regarding knifes and other non-powder arms, you aren't allowed to carry them in Spain, check again. Some of them you aren't even allowed to own.

    Second, regarding firearms, you can't carry any kind of gun either in countryside or populated areas unless you have a very special permit. Very very special. So special that I haven't known of anybody with such a permit (except policemen). You need a permit for owning weapons and you need a different one for carrying them. For sports, you must carry the thing unassembled and protected. The same applies to hunting firearms.

    But, if you're talking about carrying hunting firearms while hunting with firearms in designated hunting areas at the countryside, well, that's what hunting firearms permits are for. You can't buy a firearm unless you have the permit, and you can't get a permit if you have been convicted, or are too young, or too old, or your health (physical or mental) isn't ok, or local authorities know you have been fucking around with drugs or, in older times, just don't like you so they will find something. But anyway you can't carry one legally outside the hunting areas, and it must be kept unloaded while not hunting, and unassembled during transport.

    And regarding your analysis about political regimes, let me inform you that after the civil war finished in 1939, Franco kept people's access to weapons very, very limited during his dictatorship until 1975, and it has been kept that way (except for hunting firearms, because now you can get one regardless your political orientation, and i guess suspected leftists didn't get them too easily in old times).

    Finally, the facts, despite your crime rate, I've never (NEVER) heard a gun shot in Spain (except during hunting). And before you ask, I've lived in areas with a low crime rate and areas with a high one. I've never seen a gun out of the belt of a policeman. The law forbids them to pull the thing out until after having been pointed at first! So your crime rate, if true, because I can't find it in CIA's, must be related to something else.

    Thank you

  619. People always get the government they deserve by alizard · · Score: 1
    This is the most stupid post I've read in weeks, and I have to reply.

    Do you really think posting something orders of magnitudes dumber is good for your public reputation?

    First, I don't know where you have found your statistics,

    Probably a UK government site. Your crime stats are easily available even to those on this side of the pond. Embarrassing, aren't they?

    but if you ask anyone in the streets (take someone in Sweden or Italy if you want them to be neutral), they will tell you that they are much more afraid of violence in countries that allow people to carry weapons around (e.g. the USA) than in countries where it is not allowed, no matter what the Official Crime Rate is.

    In other words, you're telling me that EU citizens prefer to feel safe than to be safe and that they are under the delusion that feeling safe is more important. Well, a similar rationale applies to the US PATRIOT Act, which is also a stupid idea.

    But don't come and tell us that deadly weapons such as guns make for a more secure, less violent city !

    What do you have against the facts? The rational person changes his opinion to fit them.

    In the US, where concealed firearm permits are freely issued to citizen, our "Official Crime Rate" drops consistently. This information isn't secret, if you're bright enough, google is your friend. Of course, you could rationalize this by telling us the Alien Grays in Area 51 cooked the numbers, but I'm sure you can come up with a more creative tinfoil hat explanation to avoid the common-sense way to account for these numbers.

    Verifiable facts tell us that more deadly weapons in the hands of honest citizens results in safer streets. Are you telling us that there are no honest citizens in the whole of Europe? Since I know some, I would differ with you.

    Personally, I think your perceptions are based on your hanging out at the bottom of the intellectual food chain whereever you go.

    Get smarter friends.

  620. Re: Shooting to wound by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    And thank you for your rebutal with regards to SPannish law, which seems well informed. The world factbook is at www.cia.gov btw, if you want to check regardign crimerate.

  621. Re: Shooting to wound by Moridineas · · Score: 1

    While having lived for less then 6 months in Austin, Texas, I got a gun pointed at me once by a mugger, and saw the same happen 2 more times but not involving myself. Of course no statistics there of any value, but it does brign the argument across in a very individual way I can tell you.


    If we're getting into anecdotal evidence here, I've lived in North Carolina (in "the south") for my entire life, and I've seen a person wearing a gun once (not counting police officers), and never seen one fired, never been mugged, etc

  622. Let me suggest you know *nothing* of self-defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "self defence does not mean teaching them a damn good lesson"

    Having trained in some fighting arts for several years, let me suggest your attitude will likely get you killed.

    No insult, but allow me to explain.

    If someone is *attacking* you, they are by definition trying to cause you serious harm, and probably death. If you think that's exaggeration, think of someone swinging a fist at your head. If a large person does that to you barefisted, there is a decent chance you'll get a serious concussion and it may be serious enough to cause brain injury or death.

    Now keep that in mind as that fist is coming towards you. For the sake of argument, lets say that you manage to duck the punch and quickly take the attacker to the ground (lets say you've trained a bit). In your world, the fight is over. In your world, you're now dead.

    Sorry, that's the way it is. Once the fight starts, its not a like a boxing match where everyone recognizes rules. No, the moment the mugger swings it by definition becomes a fight to serious injury or death.

    So as you've swept the miscreant to the ground your work is almost finished but not quite. As your assailent reaches the ground, you would be well served to do at least two of the following three things:

    1) Break his elbom
    2) Break his wrist
    3) Break his knee
    4) Break a few ribs
    5) Crush his neck

    Excessive? Really?

    You've just knocked an angry, large man to the ground. Let me suggest you've now just pissed him off and he will not make the same mistake twice. If he gets up, he will try to kill you. No, once you have the advantage, you must press the advantage until the man is incapacitated. There is no other way at that point. This isn't Hollywood where guys go to the ground and say "OOOOF! You got me! I'll go quietly!"

    Personally, I wouldn't stop until once of us couldn't move any more. Hopefully him.

  623. Tai Kwan Do is not a martial Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it is, but it's primary taught as a sport.

    Imagine that when you spar they draw spots on each other where you're "allowed" to punch. They can't do a single throw to save their life, and they're not at all familiar with ground fighting.

    No offense, I'd be terrible at Tai Kwan Do, because my kicks are pretty limited. I respect you for your physical prowness, but I think its not well suited to self-defense.

    Judo might not be bad, but a lot of people hate the fact that you get thrown all the time.

  624. what do you mean by "karate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean Kobudo? Or something else?

  625. Never fall asleep by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    that is something I forgot to mention. People can get you when you fall asleep.

    Also don't do drugs, drugs are bad, m'kay? ;)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  626. Defend Yourself by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    Here in the States many of us carry weapons (not necessarily firearms: I carry a hefty knife, and kubotans and the like are also popular). One can't stop being a target, but one can defend oneself should someone attack. I believe that a stout stick is still legal in the UK, right? There are some very good courses on fighting with a walking-stick.

    In the Bad Old Days, folks were forced to carry large amounts of cash; with modern banking we've been able to avoid that. Now with the onset of large amounts of personal technology, we're back to carrying treasure on our persons. The solution now is the same as the solution then:-)

  627. Re:An Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then my glasses would fall in two and I'd be blind.

  628. Easy Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "don't make yourself a target." This is actually taught at self-defense classes--not to be confused with martial arts classes--and is the most practical way to avoid such danger. While this technique is most popular among teaching women how to avoid rape-by-stranger situations, this applies to all violent crimes that happen on the street by complete strangers.

    That said, I've never had to take any such class. I learned how to not be a target from my misguided childhood spent hanging around those who typically are the brutish, violent sort. I got to learn how to avoid violence by learning to understand what violent types look at as an "easy target." People who would mug you are bottom-feeders of the violent types, so they exclusively seek out this "easy target" type.

    Just don't be paranoid and worried in the way you carry yourself. I'm sure I'm not the first to say it, but I'm reiterating it as being the wisest and easiest of choices.

  629. Re: Shooting to wound by Long-EZ · · Score: 1
    I already discussed the fact that the statistic about high crime rates correlating with gun control is misleading, like most statistics bandied about in emotional discussions. I spoke quite a bit about crime existing before gun laws, so gun laws didn't cause the high crime rates. But they do disarm those who have a right to protect themselves and the people they love. Laws that restrict gun ownership also encourage crime by ensuring that all of the law abiding citizens will be unarmed victims.

    People in areas with less crime are not likely to be scared into passing gun restricting laws. They are also more accustomed to self reliance, so they are less likely to expect a police officer to protect them. Obviously the police can't protect people in sparse rural areas, but given the short time required to commit a crime, urban police are not much more effective at protecting citizens either, much less preventing crime.

    The problem is crime. Crime is perpetrated by criminals. If you want to stop crime, stop criminals. Early social intervention is probably the best way to do that, but it isn't a simple fix. Guns are not the problem. A gun is a tool. Even if it was eventually possible to eliminate guns, there would still be violent criminals. Just as regions with fewer guns have the same suicide rates, just fewer suicides using guns. Baning guns doesn't solve any problems, and can make the situation worse in areas where there is already criminal activity.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  630. Re: Shooting to wound by Long-EZ · · Score: 1

    It may do well in your culture, it may not do that well in others. The original story and question related to the UK, not to the USA.

    Despite the reputation the US has for being a shoot-from-the-hip, violence obsessed society, US crime rates have actually been decreasing for many years. That's not to say that violent crime isn't a problem anywhere in the US. There are some bad neighborhoods. They're mostly urban areas. A lot of the violence here is drug related. Some of it is gang related. But I believe that even the larger cities in the US are mostly safe.

    http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel03/ucr2002.htm

    The geek worried about being mugged in the UK may have a serious problem, at least according to this article which indicates UK crime rates have risen sharply:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3669407.stm

    I intentionally avoided sensational sources of crime data. That obviously excluded all pro-gun and anti-gun sites. Relative comparisons within a country are not useful for this discussion. I tried to find data on per capita crimes for different countries. I couldn't find any, but I know the truth is out there. (TM) I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the US has a relatively high crime rate. The reverse wouldn't surprise me too much either.

    I found an article claiming Canada's crime rate has been increasing. I've visited the Toronto area, and the Canadians I met were very nice. I know all societies have criminals, but I can't imagine Canadian criminals. We could learn a thing or two from our neighbors to the north. I wish our society was as polite. Their streets are cleaner too. That's a big plus for me, because I really hate litter. One of these days I'm going to see someone litter and it's going to make me so mad I kill them.

    It's a joke. Laugh.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  631. Re:Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serio by sjwt · · Score: 1

    Bad logic there,
    indeed there are some native Indains who are white and have been white.

    Just becase the Caucasian race is found in Place X it dose not meen that every one from place X is Caucasian.

    IIRC the Caucasians in Inda date back to 300AD.

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  632. Re: Shooting to wound by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I have to question this whole concept of 'shoot to kill'.

    I spent seven years in the UK Forces, and have been trained - and carried - both rifles and pistols. The concept of 'shooting to wound' is a fallacy from the movies, where the good guy can hold his pistol sideways in one hand and hit a moving target in the knee from fifty feet.

    We were taught simply to shoot for centre mass of the target - namely the chest area. Why? Well if you're under stress - and believe me, if you're in a firearms incident, you're under extreme stress - it's the biggest and easiest target to hit. Plus, there are nice big organs in the chest cavity.

    If you've reached the point where it is a necessity to draw your firearm, you are going to be using it - it should never be drawn unless you are certain of that - and you're going to want to ensure that you hit your target.

    Messing around trying to shoot a gun out of the bad guy's hand, you're going to miss - then you're going to die. Centre mass will stop - and likely kill. Your choice!

    --

    "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
  633. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delete the last slash on the link and that's the .PDF

  634. Zing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    State the obvious again and they'll mod you down. Somehow these mods get away with it but michael is the worst.

  635. Re:Get a gun by Quaryon · · Score: 1

    It's important to know the context of this article. One, it's generated from a quote by Oliver Letwin, a leading Conservative MP. Two, the Telegraph is notoriously pro-Consevative and anti-Labour, and these figures are being used to bash the current Labour government.

    Knowing that, it's clear to see that the paper will have taken the worst-possible interpretation of whatever figures it could find.

    Q.

  636. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    Actually, that's not true, babies are pretty good chick magnets.

    So I've heard.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  637. Re:Not a problem here by Robawesome · · Score: 1

    Or is this just another a case of 'proof by blatant assertion'? I call BS, crime rates in the UK have been going down across the board for years.

    OK, lets see some proof for your assertion that "crime rates in the UK have been going down across the board for years".

    Particularly interesting are those ones about how much more likely you are to get shot if you own a gun for 'your protection'...

    And buying a car makes you 100% more likely to get run over by your own car than before you owned one.

    BS, move along.

    --

    I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

  638. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame the comment score tops out at 5; nice work... :-)

  639. Re:Get a gun by tcr · · Score: 1

    Whatever nice life the French can have was bought and paid for in American blood. I dare you to deny it. Sprechen sie Deutsch?

    And the blood of other nations before America got off the fence to help remove a problem threating the entire world. Reminder : it started in '39, not '42.

    historically-ignorant commentary is a bit much to stomach.

    Don't tempt me.

    You mischaracterize the level of safety that your average Londoner feels in strolling about as versus your average New Yorker (I was just there! I know).

    So you're comparing your experience as a tourist (London) to your experience as a resident (NY)? Smart.

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  640. Re:Get a gun by tcr · · Score: 1

    In London, at least, new laws mean that being caught with a knife on the streets carries a mandatory custodial sentence. The cops made a big effort publicising it a little while back. Don't know how strictly it's enforced.

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  641. i think this may work, it has for me. by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    walk with a purpose.

    learn to defend yourself, akido is acceptable.

    the day may come when someone points a gun at your belly and says, "give me your back pack mother f***er." if you cannot defend yourself, then give your pack to the person, keep your mouth shut, agree to what ever happens next, and hope for the best; else it's their weapon, their problem.

  642. Technique behind drawing the Katana by FoxND001 · · Score: 1

    Actually, you bring up a good valid point concerning the length of a Katana. I study Ninjutsu, and in our classes we have addressed the topic of "what if your Katana is sheathed, while your attacker has his or her knife/sword/misc. weapon already to go and is close (within a few feet) to you?" This situation is quite problematic if the person attacking you knows the physics behind using a sword.

    Consider this - you have a Katana, you need to draw it. If your attacker is close, and he knows what he's doing, he can get to you before the sword is drawn. Furthermore, even if you do manage to get the sword partially drawn, so long as the attacker stops you from getting the sword completely out, he can render your weapon fairly useless while he is 'messing you up, up-close and personal style'. Considering that in feudal era Japan that the warrior classes typically wore their Katana, this is a situation they had to know how to deal with.

    So how did they deal with it? Simple. Either:

    1) they typically wore TWO swords, a short and a long. The short sword can be drawn VERY quickly, and can be used to deal with close up opponents. In fact, in my class we actually practice this (with wooden swords, of course!). It is pretty easy to beat the draw of a Katana with a shorter sword. Modern day equivalents are common - pocket knives are particularly effective.

    2) Back off! Putting a little distance between you and your attacker can make all the difference in the world. Give yourself time to completely draw the sword, and then cut him down if necessary.

    Note that you cannot simply rely on speed when drawing a sword to "beat them to the punch". Why - if you do, you may very well eventually come across someone who is faster and more skilled, so a little strategy goes a long way.

    Of course, if the person attacking you does NOT know how to really use a sword well, he may not even know that he can beat your draw. In that instance (like what happened to the guy in the subway), sometimes just showing him you sword is plenty. Heh - wish I could have been there to see that mugger run away like a scared child.

    My two yen.

    --
    Alex Aguila
  643. no warning shots in NYC by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1

    I don't believe they allow warning shots in NYC, the theory being that the bullets are going to hit something or someone no matter what direction you fire in. I read that the police are trained to only shoot to kill, since they would be likely to miss if they fired at arms or legs.
    Nowadays between all the police wandering around with machine guns, the national guard loitering at the train stations and Macy's, and the vast numbers of gun toting undercover police from various city state and federal agencies the only thing that makes me nervous is that the machine gun totters will get surprised by the gun toting undercover police. ( surprised person with gun = bad thing IMHO ) A few years ago I was in a restaurant when a bunch of undercover and off duty cops from different agencys drew on each other when they did not recognize each other as cops. It sounds funny now but just a few weeks before a uniformed cop had killed an undercover cop who was making an arrest on the subway, without even shouting a warning.

    1. Re:no warning shots in NYC by ducman · · Score: 1

      "Warning shots" are a dangerous myth! There is no such thing as "shooting to kill." If you fire a gun, you are using deadly force, always, by any definition.

      Nobody, ever, in any law enforcement agency is "trained to only shoot to kill." The only lawful reason to shoot someone is to stop the perpetrator from hurting or killing another person. It just so happens that the only reliable way to stop a determined attacker usually involves shooting him in a place that will probably kill him.

      In America, fortunately, most states recognize that there are justifiable reasons to use deadly force. However, you'd better have a REALLY GOOD JUSTIFICATION!

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
  644. random thoughts from a US suburban geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep a low profile--pretty much only carry my laptop with me when I'm going to/from work, avoid public transportation (that's where the sketchy people often are), live in a gated subdivision in the 'burbs, drive an SUV and park in a controlled-access parking garage at work... never had any concern about muggings/etc.

    I've traveled extensively in Europe, ridden the trains and underground/metros with no problem, but then again, I don't take my laptop or other gizmos w/ me when I'm on vacation..

  645. To procreate, die or be more selective in mating.. by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    Yes, in many ways the invisible act cuts down on your potential mates... but it culls out the shallow end of the gene pool too.

    In this example of being a mugger, we are trying to supress the instances of attracting muggers... probably something to Small Mammel Attack Response (SMAR)where predators are triggered by visual clues that indicate a weak and potential target.

    Muggers biologically are probably similar to coyotes, the urban wolf, for the human herd. At some level, they weed out the sick and weak keeping the herd healthy.

    The Wolf is invisible too. Yet they use that invisibility to their advantage in order to carefully analyze their options and pick out what they want.

    So maybe being invisible will keep you from getting hit on, the up side is it will give you an opportunity to be more selective in where you will invest your recreative energies: i.e. smart mates, not bar flies...

    For me, there is an advantage to breeding to good stock with in a solid structured relationship. The energies to raise one decent offspring is considerable and not something I want to dabble in lightly.

    Humans who breed like flowers gathering whatever seed the wind brings in end up with more genetic variety but tend to lack the stength of a solid household offer.

    Wolves, like people tend to have better breeding. Part of this is because the act of initating coupling can quickly result in death either from the bitch or her current mate. Because of this, they are fairly monogamous and have two parents raising the litter.

  646. Re:Not a problem here by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    You are exactly right on one point: In most cases, most people could probably live with that fact, but there are cases when you might give it a second thought.

    Before someone makes the choice to carry around (or use) a deadly weapon in any manner, they had best think through the potential consequences to decide if they are willing to risk taking the life of another human.

    I have, and I am. Watch out, crooks. :P

  647. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Not only will muggers avoid you, so will the chicks!

    You are so unbelievably wrong. Nothing gets the women to hit on you like a diaper bag. It's even better than walking a dog. Carrying a diaper bag shows that somewhere, some woman has declared you worthy of being a sperm donor. That's bonus one. Bonus two is that you are secure enough to help out with the child rearing.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  648. Re:No. Here's the perfect gadget bag: by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Depends on the environment. It's pretty easy to pull off at the mall. Just look inside the occasional store, and mutter things like 'how much of my money is she spending this time...' and 'I shoulda got that damned vasectomy'.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  649. And the exception by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    When I was in the Navy and stationed off the coast of Somalia, we took a couple of trips to Mombasa, Kenya for liberty. A few of us took a guided tour of some old ruins, which inevitably ended in a guided tour of the gift shops owned by the guide's buddies. When we didn't buy anything, that turned into a guided tour of a Somalian refugee camp (complete with "F YOU UNCLE SAM" and "AMERICA GO HOME" grafitti).

    We did not look like we belonged there. We glanced around a lot. We were scared as hell.

    If you can't follow your "universal rules", then a good alternative is to look much like the heavily armed Marines that you're hanging around with.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  650. It used to be a good idea pre 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to carry my laptop around in a zero haliburton case with a bio-hazard sticker on it that I obtainted from a friend. Unfortunatlely this behaviour would probably get me detained indefinately without benefit of legal counsel, even though I'm a US citizen. Now I think my brown beaten up lawyer style briefcase is probably the safest way to travel with the laptop day to day. As for the peripherals I carry them in a oversized bomber jacket with lots of pockets. I can fit a CD or two, my camera, PDA and a book without attracting attention. I also try to avoid neighborhoods that are likely to be dangerous...

  651. Can you fake it????? by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Can you fake the confidence of KNOWING you are going to fight back. If you can't convince yourself, how can you convince someone else?

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Can you fake it????? by wuice · · Score: 1

      Becuase other people don't know me as well as I know myself? And I wasn't implying that you should go around acting like you're going to fight anyone who gets too close to you. Only macho jackasses do that. More of those, the world doesn't need.

  652. Move to a city with a concealed carry option... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    And get yourself a gun you can carry comfortably.

  653. Re:Get a gun by stanmann · · Score: 1

    And don't hang out with people who won't stand by you.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  654. Phase 1: ditch the iPod by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    Really, you're creating your own problem here. Get rid of the iPod. Nothing screams out easy target like seeing someone listening to earphones. You're instantly giving up on one of your five senses (Granted, your sense of smell and touch probably won't help you defend yourself from a mugger....)

    iPod's are a muggers dream. "Hey, not only is that guy not paying attention to his surroundings, but he's also got some sort of portable media device that i can pawn. Bonus!"

    Aside from that, paying attention is your best defense. Expect to get mugged. Walk around with the sort of paranoia that comes from smoking too much weed in your friends basement while his parents are home. "Is there someone in the bushes? I don't know man!"

    And don't bother fighting back unless you've got a serious advantage. Yeah you want to fight back and bust that guys head open, but you really don't know.

    Hindsight is a bitch in those situations. You may feel like a tard for giving in, or you may end up with brain damage or a serious limp for fighting back withsomeone who has waaaay less to lose.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  655. Simple: Look crazier than they want to deal with by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    The plain truth is that most muggers are looking for a fast hit with low risk. Crazy people are far from low risk.

    When you walk along, take the godamn iPod off and just talk to yourself, quietly, or not-so-quietly.

    Twitch a little.

    Use the words "kill the bitch" often, emphasizing the word "kill" just a little bit. Exclaiming words like "FUCKERS" to noone in general adds a little spice to the monotony.

    Stop on occation and just look randomly at something REAL HARD for a while, then shamble off muttering some more.

    Hold your cellphone in your pocket and constantly twiddle with it. "What does that crazy guy got in his pocket? Test him and find out!" is not a game most petty criminals want to play.

    If you look crazier then they are, they'll leave you alone.

    and most importantly: IT'S FUN!

  656. Re:Not a problem here by shokk · · Score: 1

    out of many of the muggings near my school (U of I, Chicago), rarely do they ever result in violence


    I'm sure that's very reassuring for those few cases where people's lives have been irrevocably turned inside out. So by your count they should be happy that statistically they are in a small club when they are raped or mugged.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  657. Anti-mugging precaution by LandGator · · Score: 1

    When you care enough to send the very best - a Para-Ordinance P12-45, and a toter's card for every state I visit.

    If I can't get a card, I don't go there. Why go to a state which criminalizes self-protection?

    Every state that's implemented it has seen the rate of violent crime against innocents drop faster than before the legislation was passed, BTW.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  658. Re:Parent must be a troll; can't possibly be serio by Ruddykins · · Score: 1

    Unbelievable. Don't let Raven Alder hear you... You don't hear her crying, just the sound of flabby alpha-male geeks getting the crap beat outta them.

    --
    -Chad
  659. Re:Not a problem here by elhedran · · Score: 1

    http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/erist38.htm

  660. Re:Not a problem here by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    Ah, a real-life psychic! You don't know how long I've been waiting to meet one of your kind! ... What? You mean you can't read minds? What good are you, then?

    It sure would be nice if I knew exactly why some random stranger is choosing to assault me... maybe I should just give him my stu...!

    This just in: serial killer scores another - police baffled. More at 11.

  661. Metamod notification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever modded this "Insightful", I marked you unfair. It's Interesting and Informative, but not Insightful.

  662. let them have the laptop by mandalayx · · Score: 1

    let them have the laptop. remember, this is slashdot, where "Information Wants to be Free"

  663. Re:Get a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was recently in BC and someone tried a purse grab. Tourist areas have always got a few theives.

    That said in Oregon we have little trouble with muggers as well, or tourists, it must be all the rain.