Slashdot Mirror


Cisco Reveals Its $500 Million Router

Whitecloud writes "After 4 years of development and $500 million in costs, Cisco have a new router: the CRS-1, or Carrier Routing System. Cool features include a 40 gigabit-per-second optical interface, and the ability to cluster the boxes to act as a single router. retail starts at $450,000. Video available here." Update: 05/26 13:55 GMT by T : Sorry; I missed the previous mention of this device.

194 comments

  1. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dupe

  2. This would be interesting.. by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:This would be interesting.. by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but that post was from CmdrTaco.

      This one is from timothy.

      Completely different.

    2. Re:This would be interesting.. by Sneeka2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, yesterday they could just route 92 Tbps, today they're at 40 Gbps!

      Uhm, waitaminute...

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    3. Re:This would be interesting.. by ZioCantante · · Score: 0

      Yesterday there was a one day special offer!

      I'm sorry, you should have ran to buy the 92Tbps one, not the 40Gbps entry level one

    4. Re:This would be interesting.. by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Different numbers, 92Tbps is total fabric capacity when used in a mesh, 40Gbps is what can be done on a single interface. So this thing can route 2300 40Gbps interfaces when used in a cluster, that's more capacity than any organization can use at this time, so there is TONS of room to grow. This sounds like a good thing to use for the core of *gasp* a carrier class network which needs future expandability without downtime.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:This would be interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the difference is the fact that the fully scalable arch is 92Tbps.

      The 1 unit arch is capable of 40Tbps or 40Gbps, sorry I read the article YESTERDAY!! Oh well. It's still +10 intersting enough to make it up there again.

    6. Re:This would be interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know planned computer clusters that could use about 1/4 of that capacity in one location. Scary, but true - imagine 2000 machines with 10G ethernet interfaces...

    7. Re:This would be interesting.. by sinrakin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Note that Cisco is still using their misleading "times 2" throughput specs. Because they're full duplex they count interface twice, which makes the throughput through the box double what it truly is. I.E. if there's a unidirectional data flow with one MB/sec comes in one interface and gets routed out the other, they count that as 2 MB/sec of throughput. It's really only handling 46Tbps of throughput, and suppports 1152 40Gbps interfaces. Although that's still a lot...

    8. Re:This would be interesting.. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ewww, ethernet for clusters is just *ack*. Use something with decent latency like say Infiband.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:This would be interesting.. by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's more capacity than any organization can use at this time

      You obviously haven't seen the multi-player requirements for Half-Life 2.

    10. Re:This would be interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can see the DOD and Tier-1 ISPs having an immediate use for this. Especially with the move to IPv6, you are going to see a lot more 'centralized' routing because of the hierarchical structure of networking with IPv6. They are aiming to reduce the size of the default router table, and that means that the core routers will have to each handle a lot more traffic than before, that's not even counting future growth. For IPv6 to succeed, the top-end routers are going to have to become much more powerful and efficient.

    11. Re:This would be interesting.. by mikael · · Score: 1

      So this thing can route 2300 40Gbps interfaces when used in a cluster, that's more capacity than any organization can use at this time, so there is TONS of room to grow.

      Multiple point-to-point video conferencing between offices in a company could certainly benefit from thos capacity. How long will it be before PC's come equipped with 1 or 10 Gigabit network cards?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:This would be interesting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! Any extra bandwidth would quickly be consumed by streaming pr0n and counterstrike matches.

    13. Re:This would be interesting.. by mrokkam · · Score: 1

      Avici (http://www.avici.com) has had scalable routers for a while........ maybe not as big as Cisco.... but the underdogs rule....dont they?? their TSR has 400Gbps per interface, upto a max of 5 Tbps

    14. Re:This would be interesting.. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Point to point video can be done on as few as 2 ISDN lines (4B channels or 256kbps), and looks extremely good with 3 lines (6B or 384kbps), anything more than that is gravey. This is from my experience with Polycom units doing ITU-T H.264. At 1Gbps the limiting factor in most transactions becomes the disk subsystem of one of the hosts, and there isn't a non-multimillion dollar computer that could saturate 10Gbps for any length of time.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:This would be interesting.. by mikael · · Score: 1

      At 1Gbps the limiting factor in most transactions becomes the disk subsystem of one of the hosts, and there isn't a non-multimillion dollar computer that could saturate 10Gbps for any length of time.

      Several years ago, a prediction was made, that it would soon be quicker to use the network as a secondary memory store for swap space, rather than using local disk space. I guess this time is coming very soon. Unless of course, disk drive manufacturers start finding ways of making their products faster.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  3. Backdoors... by mobiux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they were smart enough to thoroughly check for backdoors, unchangeable passwords, and vulnerabilities before releasing it.

    1. Re:Backdoors... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes they did, and all of those backdoors, unchangable passwords and vulnerabilities were found to be within Cisco specifications.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Backdoors... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      No, that'd be another $100 million in development costs.

    3. Re:Backdoors... by forged · · Score: 1

      Wait.... Weren't these found on that russian website the other day ?

    4. Re:Backdoors... by halbritt · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, IOS has never had a backdoor or an unchangeable password other than a read-only snmp thing. There's no reason to believe that they would start here.

  4. Another benefit from Cisco by toupsie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another huge benefit of Cisco's new router is that you will be able to read Slashdot dupes even faster!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Another benefit from Cisco by wilsone8 · · Score: 1

      mmm.....Porn a million times faster...

      --
      The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do. - B.F. Skinner
  5. Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by vudufixit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And doesn't do nearly as much as this thing does.

    1. Re:Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by SnoBall · · Score: 1

      If it cost 500 million dollars, and 4 years to develop, and retails at about $450,000, don't expect many companies to buy this. I also think that that kind of router is overkill for many.

      Now, if it cost $500 dollars at retail, you can expect many more companies to buy in to such an impressive router. And like vudufixit said: the Mach 3 doesn't do nearly as much.

      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
    2. Re:Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah right. Is there really a world market for 1000 of these devices, or are Cisco expecting a loss on the router and have just produced it to keep their big clients happy?

    3. Re:Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop and doesn't do nearly as much as this thing does.

      But haven't you seen the commercials? They had to test that sucker in F-15's and space stations on male underware models while ex-Russian kiddie-porn stars fondled them to evaluate the results.

    4. Re:Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by Sdrawcab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now how exactly would you know she was an ex-kiddie-porn star, mmmhhh?

    5. Re:Gilette's Mach 3 cost $1 billion to develop... by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russian, the porn stars fondle you.

      Damn, Russia used to kick ass. Now the porn stars have to do razor commercials. Oh democracy, what hell hath thou wrought?!

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  6. How much does this thing cost again? by armando_wall · · Score: 1

    When can one expect for this baby to drop prices?

    1. Re:How much does this thing cost again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what the retail price is? I just picked up two of these bad boys that 'fell off a truck' in Brooklyn! Best $100 I ever spent, and now I can rig my old P-133 to play mp3s over the network with no lag!

  7. clustering /. by xlyz · · Score: 2, Funny

    the ability to cluster the boxes to act as a single router

    what about copy the feature on /. to cluster the dupes to act as a single thread?

    1. post
    2. post again
    3 ...
    4. profit!!

  8. interesting math by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If they spent 500M on this, and they sell for 450T, and they have a 10% profit margin (unlikely, but it's a round number) then they'd need to sell +10,000 of these boxes to make a profit. Can we really use 10,000 of these things? That's a whole heck of a lot of throughput...

    I was working at BBN when they built the worlds first gigabit router, circa 1990. At the time, they claimed that they could route the entire internet through one of their boxes. It's amazing how far we've come.

    Oh, and yes, this whole story is redundant. We did this all yesterday.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:interesting math by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can we really use 10,000 of these things

      Maybe not right this second but demand for bandwith is only going to grow, and probably more rapidly than currently, for the foreseeable future as the entire world becomes digitized and goes online

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:interesting math by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite true, but I would expect that the IP created for the HFR (Huge Fast Router) could be applied to other Cisco products in the near future with a higher product margin.

    3. Re:interesting math by liam193 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Can we really use 10,000 of these things? That's a whole heck of a lot of throughput...
      Yeah, I see where your going. It's just like memory in PCs, 640 of these is all anyone could ever use.
    4. Re:interesting math by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      If they spent 500M on this, and they sell for 450T, and they have a 10% profit margin (unlikely, but it's a round number) then they'd need to sell +10,000 of these boxes to make a profit.

      Right, but the target market for these boxes will likely have "Cisco" logos all over their networking racks. Even if they don't make money on this line, they won't have a competitor (Juniper, Nortel, etc) getting a foothold in the data center.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:interesting math by idesofmarch · · Score: 1

      They only need to sell about 1000.

    6. Re:interesting math by Derang() · · Score: 1

      They only need to sell about 1000.

      Thats assuming they make 100% profit. Of course they have to pay for materials and people to put that stuff together...so they're not making that much off each router.

    7. Re:interesting math by naelurec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It probably won't be profitable if you look at it this way. However, a lot of the R&D to develop this router will find its way into a wide range of other products.

    8. Re:interesting math by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      $450,000 is only the base price. Apparently, these things are quite scaleable, and many of them will likely cost much more than 450k.

      I don't know what their profit margin is. I'd like to know. But more than 10% wouldn't surprise me.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    9. Re:interesting math by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cisco's margins are more along the lines of 50-60% depending on the product line. I know because the wireless division was being dumped on for only having ~40% margins. Then the bubble burst and other divisions suddenly had almost no sales so those margins on increasing sales started to look not so bad =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:interesting math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Development cost 500M. There are more factors than that in cost like production, marketing, etc.

      They have to sell alot more than 10,000 to make some dough on this one.

    11. Re:interesting math by Izmunuti · · Score: 2, Informative

      $450,000 is probably for the smallest configuration that the system is available in, probably one shelf with only a couple of line cards. A full-blown system with 72 shelves, fully stocked with line cards, would probably be 10's of millions. Throw in the special room required for the massive cooling and power supply requirements of these beasts and you're talking real money.

      The margin for these monster routers is actually quite juicy.

      Iz

    12. Re:interesting math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about support and installation by CCIE's. That's gotta be worth some money.

    13. Re:interesting math by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'm picturing one of these things at the heart of a large cluster. It would significantly reduce the impact of poor information locality in a problem set.

    14. Re:interesting math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "IP" as in "Intellectual Property"? Buddy, you took a wrong turn somewhere on your way to Groklaw.

      I spent a good picosecond wondering whether Cisco was that much involved in defining the TCP/IP...

    15. Re:interesting math by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know it's so bad that I believe that a company should be able to profit from work they do, IP they create.

      Yes, I know that that is an unpopular opinion at times on Slashdot, however I'd remind you that this is a principal that the US is founded on, the concept of exclusive ownership and use (albeit for a 'limited' time).

    16. Re:interesting math by forged · · Score: 1
      Actually, I believe it is the basic, empty chassis which costs $450K...

      Individual line cards will be much more expensive. Carriers will need to buy several, perhaps even many of these to take advantage of the architecture.

      Some Catalyst 6500 and GSR line cards already retail at >$300K.

    17. Re:interesting math by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Development costs do not enter into the margin calculation. Your 10% profit margin figure is baseless.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    18. Re:interesting math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I expect list price for the line cards to be near $1000K for the oc-768 variety (although since the only offering is currently short range optics it might be somewhat less). Also note that most large customers get the "expected" 30%+ discount from list. I believe Cisco expects the "normal" deployment to be $10-50 million list. With a 50% profit, you only need to sell a few hundred to make money.

    19. Re:interesting math by Elvon+Livengood · · Score: 1
      If they spent 500M on this, and they sell for 450T, and they have a 10% profit margin (unlikely, but it's a round number) then they'd need to sell +10,000 of these boxes to make a profit.

      $450,000 is the base charge. The cost of line cards goes on top of that. For Cisco's 12000 line, single-port OC192 line cards are list priced between $150k and $325k, depending on the optics. 4-port OC48s are about the same.

      For the CSR-1, the top-end cards are 1-port OC768, 4-port OC192, and 16-port OC48. I would guess they'll charge two to four times the price of the 12000 cards, so we're now talking $300-1300k. $500k for the card does not seem unlikely. If you're a carrier, you'll want two for redundancy. Toss in another $200-300k for 10GigE cards, plus odds and ends like extra memory and service contracts, and that $450k figure is over $2.5 million and climbing. Even if you're a big customer and get a 40% discount, it's over $1.5M.

      Cisco's margins are quite big enough to accommodate 40% discounts, make no mistake. My guess is the CRS development will pay for itself with sales of 3-4000 of these routers.
  9. Link to the video... by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Presuming that Cisco use their own products, this is just about the first link to a video on /. that isn't going to be /.'d within 5 minutes of the article being posted.

    1. Re:Link to the video... by jgercken · · Score: 1

      Akamai gets the credit for that.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice what can be adequately attributed to ignorance. -Napoleon
  10. the best news about the router... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Funny

    The source code is available on the net for free!

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    1. Re:the best news about the router... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a secret plan by cisco: no one else could legally use the code, but all the hackers have it to penetrate, thus cisco products get hit by attacks, but become stronger in the process thanks to "free labour".

  11. Switches by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First Cisco revealed its revolutionary Fibre channel switch (MDS series) which so far has a lukewarm reception, since it's so radically different. Now Cisco will reveal this million dollar router.

    Is it me or is Cisco trying to jump itself back into late markets with huge marketing headliners?

    1. Re:Switches by arivanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. It is jumping in a mature market, conceding to the market demands and playing by the market rules. In fact it is the first IP vendor to do so.

      The biggest demand and the main objection to IP by all big telcos since the first days of the Internet has been that you cannot interface routers directly into the provisioning backend and that you have to keep highly qualified expensive staff to run it instead of paying a fraction of that for backend software and coasting on it for 7-9 years.

      Cisco is the first one to comply with this demand from the IP vendors, but not the last one. In fact Juniper is about to follow, others will also jump on the bandwagon.

      It is the first router to have an XML/SOAP interface that can be plugged into the provisioning/maintenance system via an industry standard for interfacing large systems so you no longer need to employ a bunch of CCXX-es to bang on keyboards. In fact it is what carriers have been asking to use MPLS for a while now and similar to what the ITU would have forced down everyone's throat anyway.

      This also means that any CCXX that is not accompanied by computing background has just dropped in value and will continue to drop in value as Cisco releases the new IOS to other devices accompanied by tools.

      I can understand them doing it. Their revenue from certs has nearly leveled now after that mad rush at the end of the boom. It is time to pick up a new revenue stream in the form of upgrades to Cisco Wors (favourite oximoron) and interfacing to carrier systems.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Switches by sphealey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The biggest demand and the main objection to IP by all big telcos since the first days of the Internet has been that you cannot interface routers directly into the provisioning backend and that you have to keep highly qualified expensive staff to run it instead of paying a fraction of that for backend software and coasting on it for 7-9 years.
      First you are going to have to convince me that the telecomm carriers have a "provisioning back end" that consists of anything more than a bunch of grade school kids in Bangledesh looking things up in ledger books. No - scratch that - back before 1980 when my county used ledger books to keep tax records for 1,000,000 properties, that system was a lot more efficient than telecomm provisioning is today.

      45 day notice for a new circuit, and they still get it wrong 80% of the time or more, requiring two or three 12 hour days on the phone and a complaint faxed directly to a Vice-President's office before anything gets done. Is that a system that should be catered to?

      sPh

    3. Re:Switches by jea6 · · Score: 1

      So, after 1/2 billion in development, I can use a GUI wizard instead of a command-line? Isn't that anathema around here?

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    4. Re:Switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an MDS9509. It's light years ahead of the competition. I'm surprised it isn't doing better, but your reasoning is probably correct.

    5. Re:Switches by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      If providers can use the new features of this system to fire with extreme predjudice all or some of the fuckups that are making it take so long to get a new circuit, then yes. It is a system that should be catered to.

      Now, I agree that telcos tend to be fucked in the head but not everyone has as much trouble getting new circuits as you do. Perhaps the trouble is in your region? Or your chair?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Switches by arivanov · · Score: 1

      1. Err... I am not in Bangladesh...
      2. I am not a kid...
      3. I used to maintain such a backend for a living in a global carrier.
      4. Get a clue

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Switches by sphealey · · Score: 1
      > Perhaps the trouble is in your region?

      I don't think so. Both me and people I have worked with have experienced this in the US Midwest, East, Mountain West, and West, and in the UK Midlands, with 10 or 15 different carriers.

      > Or your chair?

      Well, you are free to draw that conclusion ;-). But the follow-on sequence is typically

      • Installer shows up with computer-printed work order
      • Installer puts computer printout on floor and pulls spiral-bound notebook out of pocket; consults hand-written notes
      • Installer calls central office and discusses for an hour or two
      • If installer is over 50, he then uses his personal cell phone to call someone at the CO who is clearly not in the chain of command - gets circuit installed in a few more hours with a 50% chance of it actally working end-to-end
      • If installer is under 50, he/she screws with it for 2 or 3 days, and either calls in someone over 50 (see above) or tells you it is "clear to the CO" when it isn't working at all
      • And so on.
      And I have seen this again and again and again. So I don't think it is me.

      sPh

    8. Re:Switches by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > 4. Get a clue

      I hope for your sake your employer (or former employer? Hmmm) has or gets a clue about these things called "customers". Because from where I sit (i.e. the guy who approves the invoice payments) the telecomm industry hates and despises it customers even more than the airlines. And that is saying a lot. I don't care what kind of tremendous back-end technology you have or claim to have, because from the customer's perspective it is truely horrible.

      sPh

    9. Re:Switches by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      My incredulity is related to the fact that I live in California which was until recently pacific bell territory and is now SBC/Pacbell territory. Now as anyone can tell you, pacific bell has a well-earned reputation for doing shit like cross-connecting wires when there is no excuse, stealing pairs which clearly have a signal on them from one customer to give them to another, and assorted other ridiculousness. In spite of that, everyone I have worked for has managed to have data circuits installed in significantly less time than that. Admittedly it only works right on the first go about half the time but in general I see most circuits installed within three weeks and working within four :)

      I didn't mean to imply that you were the entire problem. Telcos usually have their collective heads someplace dark and moist - usually up the bosses' ass(es). (Q: What's the difference between a brown-nose and a shithead? A: Depth perception.) But, as bad as they are, your experience seems worse than the average. Maybe I've just only been exposed to the lucky people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Switches by sphealey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your milage cetainly will vary!

      Things seemed to be getting better for a while. Back in the 1998-1999-2000 time frame I had new circuits in in 3 weeks (with only 1 day on the phone!), and expansion of existing networks sometimes as fast as 10 days.

      But lately it has been 30-45 days, with the occasional 90 day @#@#!$-up. And no one at the telecomm companies seems to know what is going on.

      sPh

    11. Re:Switches by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      We just purchased 12 of the new MDS switches. The MDS9509 is out of this world. McData and Brocade will be dead in a year. See... Cisco let the market mature and then made a better product with better technology. Pretty smart if you ask me.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  12. Video available?!? by imag0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What the fuck are you gonna see in the video?

    <opening scene>
    box
    <queue the music>
    box with blinkinlights
    <musical creshendo>
    download done box on computer screen!
    <screen dissolve>
    bigass Cisco logo
    </closing scene>
    </music fades>
    call your local rep or 1-800-givemeyourfuckingbankaccount

    1. Re:Video available?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya got to give them some credit. Most of the time when you have to pay for box, it doesn't have blinking lights on it, and you have to pay before you can do your download.

    2. Re:Video available?!? by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      thanks, that brightened up my day :)

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  13. The right video URL by edyavno · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Video URL posted is outdated: that site is designed for the older browsers (Netscape 4.7) and older players used within Cisco.
    Here's the link that points to the site that has better support for Mozilla/Firefox, Linux and Mac.

    1. Re:The right video URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work with OS X :-(
      "SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
      OPERATING SYSTEM:
      Windows 98, NT, 2000, ME and XP
      or:
      Mac OS 9, 9.1, 9.2

      BROWSER:
      MS Internet Explorer 5-6Xx.
      or:
      Netscape 4.7x."
      I guess I need a downgrade.

  14. That Old Problem by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Funny

    A classic breakdown in communication between the hope-they-changed-the-passwords dept. and the like-the-$6-million-man dept.

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  15. Guess what the project was called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Gibson!

    Trust Your Technolust

  16. damn by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    retail starts at $450,000

    I have no idea how I'm going to get my wife to go for that, but maybe the 48Gb will impress her...

    1. Re:damn by spacefight · · Score: 1

      You mean, the enormous throughput will impress her .-)

    2. Re:damn by jolajolajola · · Score: 1

      I read that as "I have no idea how much I'm going to get for my wife..."

      --

      --
      The trouble with pedants is that they're always right.
    3. Re:damn by subzerorz · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can sell it to you for 10% below the list price.

      --
      Subzerorz
      More Articles
  17. It costs /what/? by damian.gerow · · Score: 1

    So, does it cost $500 Million, or $450 Thousand?

    1. Re:It costs /what/? by Malc · · Score: 1

      People around here bandy around RTFA, but you haven't even read the synopsis linking to the article properly!

      $500M to develop. Each unit costs $450K.

  18. not the true price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that the true price? Usually you have to include a bunch of other stuff, and consultants to set it up. I'm gonna guess a deployed unit will cost over half million, not counting your internal manpower cost. In twenty years these units might become common place, but who knows.

  19. 10 years? by bo0ork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Watching the video, they proudly proclaim that this product will allow a service provider to do their thing for the next ten years. Yeah. Right. With the way bandwidth-for-the-consumer is going, the ISP's are going to need petabits of routing capacity in ten years, not gigabits.

    --
    Does everything include nothing?
  20. Re:/. should get one. by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    Why do you think it's an advertisment?

    If you are selling a million dollar machine, you don't get slashdot to post about it.

    You find who has the authority to buy and who they listen to and schmooze them.

  21. This is like a rumor... by Cytlid · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that gets more embellished everytime I hear it. I think I'm gonna go mention to someone "hey, have you heard about Cisco's new 20 billion dollar router?"

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:This is like a rumor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you did it. Now were going to have a triplicate story about Cisco's $20 billion router...

  22. Re:/. should get one. by Sheepdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Naw, I'm just noticing that there are a lot more posts about products and services on /. rather than the just the technology surrounding them as of late.

  23. I subscribed for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, I don't subscribe.

    +1 Smart for me
    -1 Redundant for you

  24. Re:interesting math? by OzeBuddha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well actually, assuming every one of these routers made Cisco $450K in pure profit, and given that they have spent $500M in development, they would only need to sell just over 1,100 of these things to cover costs.

    Note that the post states that the routers start at $450K and also note that the router itself must cost something to make apart from the R&D costs, so the number of routers that Cisco must sell in order to make a profit is probably somewhere closer to 2,000 or 3,000. Perhaps they do not plan to make a profit initially, believing that the technology that they have now developed will lead to more optical switching products that will make them mega bucks in the future..

    Don't forget that the entire worldwide demand for computers was only ever supposed to be a handful..

    I'm sure that we will find something to do with multiple 40Gbps routers..

    Multi-player Network video Dance Dance Revolution EXTREME deathmatch anyone?

  25. That's great! SURVEY: by dioscaido · · Score: 0

    What would people do with such a device???

    1. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by jasoncart · · Score: 1

      Shift a whole lot of data, I'd imagine.

    2. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd drag it to the top of the cliff with a train of burros and then push it off onto the heads of people who post stupid comments on slashdot as they passed beneath. I bet that fucker weighs well over 150 lb, especially fully loaded.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally have enough bandwidth to play EQ and BF:V real-time!

    4. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by dioscaido · · Score: 1

      just in case... I was joking. The duplicate post a few days ago asked what people would do with the router. :)

    5. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      compared to the rumor about avici and their big router. their first version FELL THRU THE FLOOR (not on the ground floor) due to its weight. ha!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:That's great! SURVEY: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      An ex-coworker once told me a highly entertaining story about a tandem mainframe falling through the floor during a small fire and subsequent major flood at eastman-kodak. Apparently the system took all the wiring going to the unit with it down to the next floor - and was still operating when technicians examined the system. Very classy.

      For another, more related anecdote, look up information on the pentium prototypes melting their socket.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  26. Yeah right. by IainMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry if this has been mentioned but from zdnet:

    CRS-1, which previously had been code-named HFR for Huge Fast Router,

    Yes yes, I'm sure that while in dev the 'F' stood for 'Fast'.

    1. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      CRS-1, which previously had been code-named HFR for Huge Fast Router,

      Yes yes, I'm sure that while in dev the 'F' stood for 'Fast'.
      Just like reading the 'Fine' manual that comes with it...
    2. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right of course. There were two internal code names for different incarnations of the product, BFR and HFR.

      Big Fscking Router

      and

      Huge Fscking Router

      I like "Heiffer" myself. :-)

    3. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous generation of high end router was internally named the BFR (before marketing changed it to the GSR). BFR = "Big Fast Router". Same F replacement of course.

  27. The RIAA spin by Nonillion · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would think the RIAA/MPAA would demand that DRM be built into this device since due to its speed, contributes to piracy.

    RIAA/MPAA...... The festering boil on the buttocks of America.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:The RIAA spin by dioscaido · · Score: 1

      I like how you think.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=108808&thres ho ld=-1&commentsort=0&tid=126&tid=95&mode=thread&cid =9246638

    2. Re:The RIAA spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  28. HFR? by Atrax · · Score: 4, Funny

    > CRS-1, which previously had been code-named HFR for Huge Fast Router,

    HFR : Huge Fast Router?

    BFG 9000 : Big Funky Gun 9000

    transpose with whatever word you feel appropriate. I know what I'm going with.

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:HFR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      transpose with whatever word you feel appropriate. I know what I'm going with.

      Futuristic?

      Since it's a Cisco, I was thinking of flaky...

    2. Re:HFR? by ShelbyCobra · · Score: 1

      On a related note, my grandfather is always telling me that he already has CRS.

      CRS: Can't... Remember... Stuff...?

      --

      -ShelbyCobra

      Living life in the right side of the s-plane

  29. The HEADLINE is badly wrong by DavidinAla · · Score: 1

    I think what the previous poster was referring to is the fact that the headline on this story is worded very poorly, to put it mildly. It would be correct to refer to this as a $500 million project, but this is NOT a $500 million router. People criticize traditional media and editors, but there are plenty of times around here when we need someone with at least BASIC professional copy editing skills.

    1. Re:The HEADLINE is badly wrong by Malc · · Score: 1

      I think at this time that professional copy editing skills would be way more than necessary. Just basic skills would be enough for now ;)

  30. BBN? by p.rican · · Score: 1
    I was working at BBN when they built the worlds first gigabit router, circa 1990. At the time, they claimed that they could route the entire internet through one of their boxes. It's amazing how far we've come.


    As in Bolt, Beranek and Newman? I didn't know they were still around in 1990. Isn't that the same firm that built the first router (Honeywell516)?
    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

    1. Re:BBN? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      Yes, it's Bolt, Beranek and Newman. Or was, rather -- the name of the company officially changed to BBN some time in the mid 90's. And, they're still around, doing just fine. Various parts of the company got sold off and died (i.e. Genuity) but the R&D heart of the company is still doing very, very cool stuff.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    2. Re:BBN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're still around. They got bought by GTE, and when Verizon and GTE merged, they became Genuity. They were independent for a while, but now are part of Level(3).

    3. Re:BBN? by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      They are still there now. I work there.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
  31. Surely you could do this more cheaply... by christophersaul · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...by hooking up a few homemade Intel boxes and putting Linux on them, using the same mythical Slashdot architecture that appears to apply to every other kind of computing problem discussed here?

    1. Re:Surely you could do this more cheaply... by achesloc · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How did this idea become so pervasive in the first place? This is like the south park episode with the eat through your ass and defecate through your mouth idea.

    2. Re:Surely you could do this more cheaply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's because the half wits that populate this site can't differentiate between processing power and I/O. If a pc cpu can run faster then a router cpu for less money then the router must be a rip off. That and they've never heard any network interface other then ethernet. So, in short, ignorance.

  32. Futurepoll... "TONS of room to grow" by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > 92Tbps is total fabric capacity when used in a mesh, 40Gbps is what can be done on a single interface. So this thing can route 2300 40Gbps interfaces when used in a cluster, that's more capacity than any organization can use at this time,

    Future Slashdot Poll: Suppose you had a router that could handle 2300 40Gbps interfaces?

    • 92Tbps ought to be enough for anybody!
    • 92Tbps is insignificant compared to the power of the Slashdot effect!
    • Spoken like someone who's never seen CowboyNeal's pr0n collection.
  33. I hope... by Bull999999 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hope that Cisco didn't patent this as we all know that patents are evil. They should allow others to copy their design freely even though it costed them 500 million dollars.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  34. heh by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    I like how they say you can cluster these things together, but looking at retail value, a cluster would be way down the road for most medium-sized businesses

    1. Re:heh by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      like how they say you can cluster these things together, but looking at retail value, a cluster would be way down the road for most medium-sized businesses...

      (forgive me, my sarcasm filter is broken today)

      Medium sized businesses!?!????




      Dang, I've worked with enterprise-class systems, the most impressive of which in a worldwide corperate datacanter of a very big name......which--given the ultimately retarded proposition to buy one of these, and even more retarded resolve to actually do so--would never, ever, ever need to upgrade beyond "stock".

      I can only think of a handful of scenarios where that might actually be practical, but, for cases like that we have fibrechannel ;-p

  35. offtopic sig comment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Can you read spanish? Enrole and meet people here!

    Enrole? That's similar to enrolar (portugese: convolute, convolve, roll up, twist, twirl etc, or espanol: enroll, enlist, register, sign up)

    I think the word you want is enroll. Or, enrolar :P

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:offtopic sig comment by armando_wall · · Score: 1


      Thank you.

  36. OpenBSD on a pentium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe, we use a openbsd/pf on a pentium computer and it's fine for all our routing needs ;)

    But maybe I should propose one of these to my flatmate as a potential upgrade to our home-network...

  37. KRS-1 should sue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Microsoft won several court cases against Linspire/Lindash/Lin----/Lindows, I think the rapper has a case!

  38. It's a shame... by p.rican · · Score: 1

    that no one really knows who they are. I only remembered their significance because of a book I read last summer about the origins of the internet. I was truly amazed at how brilliant those scientists and engineers were. I wish I remembered the name of the book, it was an amazing and inspiring read. I think it was "Nerds 2.0". I should have done a review of the book for /.

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

  39. Watch it be a Longhorn Requirement :) by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will have so many extra services, Spy and DRM activities that only this sort of router will be able to handle the load. And since no current computer infrastructure could handle such demands Longhorn will have it built in so that you can participate in the new 'Make the Net Safe (for Microsoft)' campaign with your own hardware.

    Officials say that this small increase in hardware requirements is a small price to pay....

    ls

  40. "IP"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you mean Internet Protocol (default at Slashdot) or Intellectual Property (default at Groklaw)?

    Either way, I didn't understand what you mean by "IP vendor" :-)

  41. The REAL name of the router... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 4, Funny

    CRS-1, that's funny...

    Can't Route Shit

    Why didn't they think of something better?

    heh.

  42. Great - terabits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And home user still paying through the nose for a measly 1.5Mbps DSL, if they can even get 1.5Mbps to the home - just down the street from Cisco campus in Santa Clara.

    The irony.....

  43. Offtopic, But Relevant by mirio · · Score: 1, Troll

    Ok, so what's with treating corporate names as plural? Cisco have a new router? I've never seen this used when referencing other groups of people (i.e. countries). You never hear "Britain have nice cars". Why is this suddenly the style du jour on Slashdot?

    If you're talking about the corporation as an entity, shouldn't it be treated as singular?

    Seriously, could someone explain this? It's been bugging the hell out of me.

    1. Re:Offtopic, But Relevant by James4765 · · Score: 1

      Probably someone who has had one of the Brit language-police around here jump on their throat with both boots. Not a pleasant experience.

    2. Re:Offtopic, But Relevant by holt · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the British way of doing things. They figure that most companies have more than one person working for them, thus the plural.

      Hope that helps.

  44. aoeaoeaoeoae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he first TV network to utilize a not-yet-released PC game to visually re-create epic battles and tell the story of key confrontations in Roman history.
    Wireless Hot Spot Directory
    Search for Wi-Fi hot spots near you:
    Story Tools
    Story Images

    Click thumbnails for full-size image:

    See also

    * Games, Movies Tie the Knot
    * Games Close In on Citizen Kane
    * Digital Actors in Rings Can Think
    * Grab Life by the Joystick

    Today's Top 5 Stories

    * Wartime Wireless Worries Pentagon
    * Net Dissident Ends Hunger Strike
    * Kerry a Fan of Venture Capital
    * Get Ready for the Wired 40
    * Green Cars Strive to End Oil Era
    * Wired News RSS Feeds

    Breaking News

    * U.S. Warns of Al Qaeda Attack But Offers No Details
    * 'Last Samurai' Author DeWitt Reported Missing in NY
    * Iraqi Government Takes Shape But Powers Unclear
    * U.S. Troops Capture Key Aide of Rebel Iraqi Cleric
    * Singer Courtney Love Pleads Guilty to Drug Offense
    * More Breaking News
    * Wire Service Photo Gallery

    Tech Jobs Partner
    Today's the Day.

    Decisive Battles, a 13-episode, half-hour series that debuts July 17, makes use of British video-game developer The Creative Assembly's Rome: Total War PC game, which Activision will publish this fall. The real-time strategy game received an award for strategy game of the year at last year's Electronic Entertainment Expo, the video-game industry's largest trade show.

    Rome: Total War allows players to create epic battles based on meticulous research by the developers.

    Players are able to micromanage ev

  45. Don't forget the DWDM gear by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    Note that you can aggregate 64 OC-768 (40Gb/sec) circuits onto a single fiber strand with Lucen'ts LambdaXtreme Transport.

    What this means is that the next generation of fiber routing and switching gear is available and ready for deployment. Existing fiber networks will continue to increase in value while redundant dark fiber will retain its zero-dollar value status.

  46. Cisco built Steve Austin? by beatleadam · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who saw Cisco Reveals Its $500 Million Router and thought of "The Six Million Dollar Man"?

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    1. Re:Cisco built Steve Austin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. yes you are.

  47. marketability by dJOEK · · Score: 1

    will they be able to sell 1112 of these babies ?

    --
    Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
  48. Cisco by chrysalis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, Cisco needs money in order to keep coding insecure TCP/IP stacks and patent things invented by other people.

    --
    {{.sig}}
  49. easy: by ferkelparade · · Score: 1

    Slashdot have strange editors.

    --
    frotz grue
  50. Naming Inspiration by billstewart · · Score: 1
    "Crash-1" reminds me of the old "Trash-80" computers from Radio Shack.

    Or does it stand for "Can't Route Stuff"? Or ....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  51. Re:offtopic sig and Slashcode comment by billstewart · · Score: 1
    That's odd. The parent article says "Enroll", not "Enrole".
    Does this mean that Slashcode is building the display on the fly, and since the signature was updated the new version is showing?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  52. Re:offtopic sig and Slashcode comment by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Yes, your sig is appended every time from your current sig. Probably just to save a bit of space, I would guess.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  53. HFR! by HFShadow · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "CRS-1, which previously had been code-named HFR for Huge Fast Router, also is the first core router to offer 40 gigabit-per-second optical interfaces."

    Am I the only one who can see the engineers picking a different word for the F in HFR? I assume it used to stand for Huge Fucking Router before the PR guys got their hands on it.

    1. Re:HFR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a follow on to BFR - which was the 1200s

  54. Re:/. should get one. by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    Fair enough

  55. It has to be said by generationxyu · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    --
    I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
  56. Unfathomable... by daveman_1 · · Score: 1

    They need to sell more than a thousand of these just to recoup the gross development revenue, more realistically 3 times that to make a profit. Is there really such a demand for a product of this size and price?

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  57. IOS XR is QNX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The latest incarnation of IOS is actually a Cisco custom version of QNX. To the best of my knowledge Cisco is still the only organization on the planet with a source code license to QNX.

    Who says a microkernel lacks performance, hmm? QNX can do a full process-to-process context switch in under 250 nanoseconds on a 2Ghz Pentium, less for thread switches.

    A link to an interesting post from yesterday.

    You use QNX everyday without knowing it. QNX is used in the front-end networks of both Visa and Mastercard, it's used in nuclear reactor control systems, chip manufacturing, FDA approved medical equipment, and high-speed postal sorting systems.

    Not to mention... eight tightly coordinated QNX controlled robots stretch the aluminum onto the F-16's wings...

  58. SmartNet contracts by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about the Cisco SmartNet contracts. Sometimes those cost just as much as the equipment does.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  59. KRS-1 by rcha101 · · Score: 1

    CRS is going to make you jump, jump..

  60. new motto by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Slashdot - the only place where geeks will flock to watch video of a router.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  61. Re:Dupey dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whitecloud writes "After 4 years of development and $500 million in costs, Cisco have a new router: the CRS-1, or Carrier Routing System. Cool features include a 40 gigabit-per-second optical interface, and the ability to cluster the boxes to act as a single router. retail starts at $450,000. Video available here." WTF would you possibly need video of this for? A still picture should suffice. Video of what? A shiny box? Who cares about what the 450K box looks like, why would you possibly need video of it, to show a couple of red lights blinking as it 'routes'? It's not like they're going to show video of a router 'in action'.

  62. Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can bet you @$$ that this router has the built-in natural ability to target and siphon off copies of *any* desired data streams to send to your favorite three-letter-acronym US federal law enforecement agencies. And these routers will be the ones sitting at all the Internet backbone peering interchanges in every major city within a year.

  63. Don't you mean...? by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    from the like-the-$6-million-man dept.

    More like-the-$6-million-MAN

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  64. lan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (see subject)

  65. New OS too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably as significant as the new hardware is the new OS. Cisco has changed from the IOS based monolith to using a modular QNX based solution.

  66. Re:Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the funniest thing I've ever read, you bonehead moderators.