From what I understand, the Koreans dominate international competitions; their games tend to be relatively short and fierce, with doesn't-look-possible micromanagement of combats being key.
Not sure why you're ruling those out. An obsolete Palmpilot (say, a Vx) with an external keyboard will fit the bill nicely, down to being a decent alarmclock, too.
You can buy inverters that will convert cig. lighter slots to 120-ungrounded, but you can't push that many amps through standard auto wiring that way...
Revelations 13:17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Obviously, by "name" read certificate, and by "number of the name" read certificate fingerprint...
It also sounds like SashXB, a sort of Javascript applet thing some IBM summer hires wrote a while back. It was a little manager app that would download current versions of various javascript GUI apps on demand.
They'll feed it into a computer program that'll sell 5k shares here and 5k there on a dozen different official and unofficial exchanges in such a way that it's not blatently obvious what's going on.
But there's no way you can disguise that sell volume on a stock with this volume; I suspect that'd do it over more than one day, and you might well see the price dropping pretty sharply...
And more to the point, you didn't actually ask before; you sent a non-registered letter to the wrong address, so we hadn't even heard of this nonsense until the court case.
Go away, don't come back, and pay us for our wasted time, please.
The distance a gun will shoot striaght up is surprisingly limited; small bullets suffer from a great deal of drag and you actually can't neglect gravity.
Handguns are a non-started; you'ld need a large, specialized anti-aircraft gun to even think about it.
Speed-of-light is a constant PITA now and has been for years. It's an issue for everything from Quake ping times to disk interfaces to memory bus design to chip design.
You're not kidding; an experienced mechanic working a bit of overtime can easily get his salary into 6-figures. It's really not far off from the IT payscale.
Doesn't matter if you wrote that particular line of code; legally, it's still derivative.
This happened with the GPLed Quake code; with the open source, certain cheats became more common. One guy started shipping a binary patch that would prevent them, and refused to release the source (which would have defeated the purpose); ID lawyers came down on him like a ton of bricks, and the patch was pulled.
If your patch+GPL software = modified GPL software, you have to abide by GPL.
If your code only uses 'external' interfaces (eg, *maybe* binary drivers, almost certainly userspace code), you're probably ok.
The question is legal, not technical. If your code makes sense as an entity seperate from the GPLed code (eg, a program/driver that could run on other OSs), it probably isn't derivative. But distributing your version of Linux as a 'diff' doesn't get you off the copyright hook.
Odds are, they won't see much. Just *try* to buy a hub (not a switch!) with more than 4 ports these days. It's a PITA if you actually do want to use ethereal to sniff outside traffic.
For freeware, you can't beat ethereal. I use it several times a week.
If you have a serious budget, check out OpNet, which can do fun things like response time breakdowns, or "how well will this app run if the client is across the country instead of next to the server," or "what happens if I have another 300 clients like this one submitting requests @ 5/minute with a poisson distribution", or "If I make the following configuration change to router X, then router Y fails, and we have a network backup running, how much interruption in the transaction will occur."
Armadillo's last two updates have been huge progress on the engine front; they seem to have the problem (mostly...) solved, although it's not clear they have enough thrust/fuel to make it with their current exact design, if they indeed have to abandon parachutes for powered landing.
OTOH, I don't think they have a full-scale vehicle even started, though a close-to-that flight tester is mostly ready for the engines.
I'd guess they're a couple months away in the absolute best case scenario.
Slashdot Mirror
Clearly, the easy solution is just to get your documents included as a filing in one of the SCO cases and let Groklaw do it.
From what I understand, the Koreans dominate international competitions; their games tend to be relatively short and fierce, with doesn't-look-possible micromanagement of combats being key.
I think his webserver could use a performance hack right about now.
And if you're on a wireless LAN?
Wrap your computer in tinfoil.
Not sure why you're ruling those out. An obsolete Palmpilot (say, a Vx) with an external keyboard will fit the bill nicely, down to being a decent alarmclock, too.
Probably no parachute is a ground safety issue; if they deploy one at that altitude, there's no telling where the thing might land.
You can buy inverters that will convert cig. lighter slots to 120-ungrounded, but you can't push that many amps through standard auto wiring that way...
Revelations 13:17
and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Obviously, by "name" read certificate, and by "number of the name" read certificate fingerprint...
They don't. Some modern non-hybrids have emissions that are just as low.
It also sounds like SashXB, a sort of Javascript applet thing some IBM summer hires wrote a while back. It was a little manager app that would download current versions of various javascript GUI apps on demand.
Management is getting POed by all these windows viruses, and the IBM name carries a lot of weight in some shops...
The stock price would crash.
They won't.
They'll feed it into a computer program that'll sell 5k shares here and 5k there on a dozen different official and unofficial exchanges in such a way that it's not blatently obvious what's going on.
But there's no way you can disguise that sell volume on a stock with this volume; I suspect that'd do it over more than one day, and you might well see the price dropping pretty sharply...
VMware type app - huh? Can you clarify?
We're starting to use VMware; so far, looks sweet, but a bit pricy for the server stuff.
And more to the point, you didn't actually ask before; you sent a non-registered letter to the wrong address, so we hadn't even heard of this nonsense until the court case.
Go away, don't come back, and pay us for our wasted time, please.
The distance a gun will shoot striaght up is surprisingly limited; small bullets suffer from a great deal of drag and you actually can't neglect gravity.
Handguns are a non-started; you'ld need a large, specialized anti-aircraft gun to even think about it.
Signals, maybe, but not information.
Speed-of-light is a constant PITA now and has been for years. It's an issue for everything from Quake ping times to disk interfaces to memory bus design to chip design.
India has a lower population density than Palo Alto; what's your point?
You're not kidding; an experienced mechanic working a bit of overtime can easily get his salary into 6-figures. It's really not far off from the IT payscale.
Doesn't matter if you wrote that particular line of code; legally, it's still derivative.
This happened with the GPLed Quake code; with the open source, certain cheats became more common. One guy started shipping a binary patch that would prevent them, and refused to release the source (which would have defeated the purpose); ID lawyers came down on him like a ton of bricks, and the patch was pulled.
No, he is correct.
If your patch+GPL software = modified GPL software, you have to abide by GPL.
If your code only uses 'external' interfaces (eg, *maybe* binary drivers, almost certainly userspace code), you're probably ok.
The question is legal, not technical. If your code makes sense as an entity seperate from the GPLed code (eg, a program/driver that could run on other OSs), it probably isn't derivative. But distributing your version of Linux as a 'diff' doesn't get you off the copyright hook.
Odds are, they won't see much. Just *try* to buy a hub (not a switch!) with more than 4 ports these days. It's a PITA if you actually do want to use ethereal to sniff outside traffic.
I have a little secret I've learned over the years that I'll share with you today, grasshopper:
Most programmers are incompetent nitwits.
For freeware, you can't beat ethereal. I use it several times a week.
If you have a serious budget, check out OpNet, which can do fun things like response time breakdowns, or "how well will this app run if the client is across the country instead of next to the server," or "what happens if I have another 300 clients like this one submitting requests @ 5/minute with a poisson distribution", or "If I make the following configuration change to router X, then router Y fails, and we have a network backup running, how much interruption in the transaction will occur."
Time to call the local sports talk radio and tell them, "Are you aware that the UN is plotting to outlaw HDTV VCRs?"
Armadillo's last two updates have been huge progress on the engine front; they seem to have the problem (mostly...) solved, although it's not clear they have enough thrust/fuel to make it with their current exact design, if they indeed have to abandon parachutes for powered landing.
OTOH, I don't think they have a full-scale vehicle even started, though a close-to-that flight tester is mostly ready for the engines.
I'd guess they're a couple months away in the absolute best case scenario.