Then you're lucky, because I repeatedly hit sites that just would not look right. Not always fatal problems, but the formatting would look weird, or more commonly javascript would be messed up.
I gave up opera in favor of IE just because I got sick of pages not rendering right in opera. Yes, I know it's not opera's fault, but guess what, assigning the blame to someone else doesn't magically make opera render right.
Re:Scelson, as all spammers, is a liar
on
I, Spammer
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
It's entirely possible that AOL didn't sell the e-mail list, but the VP didn't know whether the accusation was true or not. In which case he's best off keeping his mouth shut until he finds out.
Hmmm, haven't played that, but in the first movie the "heroes" brutally killed security guards who were just doing their jobs. So it's ok to do it in the movies, but not in the game?
You write "it all was" and then accuse me of making "blanket assertions". I capitalize Leftist because I think that Leftism is a religion and Government is its God.
There's a difference between making a blanket assertion about people who comprise a large philosophical movement, and making a blanket assertion about a finite post.
The problem with your analysis is most leftists are very suspicious of government. Which you fail to address.
I'm not backing down from my claim that Leftists hate individualism. I notice you have not disputed it. I know that all leftists don't think alike.
If you're going to define "leftists" and "Leftists" separately then there's little point in arguing. I will just say leftists are more likely to respect individualism than either moderates or rightists.
As a gay man, I have little love for many right-wingers. I guess your "feelings" have led you astray once again.
I don't think so. Right-wingism is not incompatible with a gay lifestyle, and I bet if we looked at your stance on issues you'd fall in on the right side of the divider mainly.
No, I'm not taken seriously because you fundamentally disagree with me. It leads you to mock and insult rather than engage in dialog.
You said Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in homosexual men. Not only do I disagree with you, the entirety of medical science disagrees with you.
While we're at it, answer me this: does AZT prolong life of AIDS sufferers?
Yet you fail to enumerate that which you feel is either "childish" or "blather". Your attempts to intimidate me will fail.
It all was. Everything from your capitalizing of "Leftist" (usually the sign of a propagandist), to your blanket assertions ("Leftists hate individualism"--as if all "Leftists" think the same; it betrays your fundamental ignorance about what you're talking about).
The more Leftist a government is, the more they will claim to speak for "The People". For example, "The People's Republic of China". That country does not belong to "the people", it belongs to the government!
And the more democratic a government is, the more they will claim to speak for "The People". Claims are irrelevant; every country claims to speak for its people. If you look at the facts, however, you'll see that the countries that are the MOST permissive of their citizens' rights tend to moderate leftist governments.
They make that point expressly clear by the way they restrict the freedoms of their citizens.
You here are stating that I am closed-minded. I disagree; I change my mind frequently and often challenge my own point of view. And, no, I am not "right-wing". The Right disgusts me almost as much as the Left does. It's evidential of your own closed mind that if I disagree with you, then I must be right-wing.
Most "independents" are closet right-wingers. I get the feeling you are too.
Your argument totally sucks, and then you tuck your tail between your legs and run like a yellow-bellied chicken. Perhaps if you could come up with a decent argument you'd stand your ground instead of resorting to your childish invective. And, since you think I'm insane, perhaps you'd like to share with me who isolated the HIV virus and why Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in gay men.
Heh. I think your tinfoil hat is a little too tight.
And, since you think I'm insane, perhaps you'd like to share with me who isolated the HIV virus
Sure, let's share.
It's debatable whether it's been isolated. So? Doesn't disprove a thing.
and why Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in gay men
See, this is why you're not taken seriously. Kaposi's Sarcoma appears in heterosexual men as well as women. This is what happens when you get all your information from conspiracy theorist pamphlets.
And which should concern me more: the snide, childish blather that you type
YOU'RE accusing someone ELSE of childish blather? That's funny.
Your attempt to show the flaw in my logic fails. Leftists hate cars becuase they enable greater individualism.
And yet, it's the Rightists who pass the laws restricting speech. It's the Rightists who all look the same, act the same, dress the same, talk the same.
"A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this
lie creepeth from its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'. It is a lie!"
Just because Nietzsche said something doesn't make it true. Think for yourself. And if you're going to quote him, try reading the rest of his philosophy before deciding to appoint him as some sort of moral visionary.
Your attempts to intimidate me will fail. You're actually going to have to engage your brain and debate with me if you expect to have any chance of swaying me to your government gravy-train, "I know what's best for everyone" arrogance.
It's difficult to sway someone with reason away from a viewpoint that they arrived at without using reason at all. You're a right-wing sheep; nobody's going to change your mind, no matter how convincingly they disprove your erroneous statements. Judging by your.sig your sanity is in question, too, so perhaps I should just bow out of this little conversation...
Leftists hate individualism. They think people should be represented by their group, not by their own selves. They think people should be dependent on the government, not dependent on themselves. Individualism stands in the way of their big truth that all humans must embrace (or go to the gulag, as it always turns out in practice).
Hence, Leftists hate cars.
Alright, this just has to be a joke. I mean, nobody is that mind-numbingly ignorant in real life, right?
Ahh, who cares what happens to the peons. I'm safe in my hilltop mayoral mansion, surrounded by police guards, safely away from the high-crime areas, pollution, and traffic.
IF HUNGRY$="YES" THEN PRINT "BOY I'M HUNGRY!" IF HAM_PRESENCE=0 THEN SAY "I WISH I HAD HAM" IF HAM_PRESENCE=1 THEN GOTO EATHAM EATHAM: PRINT "OH BOY, HAM!" EAT(HAM$) PRINT "MMMMM, TASTY" GOTO MAIN
Wow, they used to have 20 million viewers? Then why were the shows always so lousy? I'm not just talking about the stories, I mean the animation itself?
In the MUD world, at least. MUME (among others) has been doing it for years. I'd give the address, but I'd feel bad if it was slashdotted, even though I don't play it anymore.
They have a little exhibit on that at the American Museum of the Moving Image, where they let you pan and scan a movie yourself. It instilled me a deep contempt for non-letterbox movies.
Slashdot Mirror
Then you're lucky, because I repeatedly hit sites that just would not look right. Not always fatal problems, but the formatting would look weird, or more commonly javascript would be messed up.
I gave up opera in favor of IE just because I got sick of pages not rendering right in opera. Yes, I know it's not opera's fault, but guess what, assigning the blame to someone else doesn't magically make opera render right.
A complete Unix manual.
He said he only had a month.
It's entirely possible that AOL didn't sell the e-mail list, but the VP didn't know whether the accusation was true or not. In which case he's best off keeping his mouth shut until he finds out.
If you drink anti-water, do you become thirsty?
Hmmm, haven't played that, but in the first movie the "heroes" brutally killed security guards who were just doing their jobs. So it's ok to do it in the movies, but not in the game?
Or, cron a separate process to kill the first one if it greps and sees it running.
"Likely"? Try "inevitable". There is no privacy in North Korea, so there's nothing to restrict. Don't have many computers either.
You write "it all was" and then accuse me of making "blanket assertions". I capitalize Leftist because I think that Leftism is a religion and Government is its God.
There's a difference between making a blanket assertion about people who comprise a large philosophical movement, and making a blanket assertion about a finite post.
The problem with your analysis is most leftists are very suspicious of government. Which you fail to address.
I'm not backing down from my claim that Leftists hate individualism. I notice you have not disputed it. I know that all leftists don't think alike.
If you're going to define "leftists" and "Leftists" separately then there's little point in arguing. I will just say leftists are more likely to respect individualism than either moderates or rightists.
As a gay man, I have little love for many right-wingers. I guess your "feelings" have led you astray once again.
I don't think so. Right-wingism is not incompatible with a gay lifestyle, and I bet if we looked at your stance on issues you'd fall in on the right side of the divider mainly.
No, I'm not taken seriously because you fundamentally disagree with me. It leads you to mock and insult rather than engage in dialog.
You said Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in homosexual men. Not only do I disagree with you, the entirety of medical science disagrees with you.
While we're at it, answer me this: does AZT prolong life of AIDS sufferers?
Yes.
Yet you fail to enumerate that which you feel is either "childish" or "blather". Your attempts to intimidate me will fail.
It all was. Everything from your capitalizing of "Leftist" (usually the sign of a propagandist), to your blanket assertions ("Leftists hate individualism"--as if all "Leftists" think the same; it betrays your fundamental ignorance about what you're talking about).
The more Leftist a government is, the more they will claim to speak for "The People". For example, "The People's Republic of China". That country does not belong to "the people", it belongs to the government!
And the more democratic a government is, the more they will claim to speak for "The People". Claims are irrelevant; every country claims to speak for its people. If you look at the facts, however, you'll see that the countries that are the MOST permissive of their citizens' rights tend to moderate leftist governments.
They make that point expressly clear by the way they restrict the freedoms of their citizens.
You here are stating that I am closed-minded. I disagree; I change my mind frequently and often challenge my own point of view. And, no, I am not "right-wing". The Right disgusts me almost as much as the Left does. It's evidential of your own closed mind that if I disagree with you, then I must be right-wing.
Most "independents" are closet right-wingers. I get the feeling you are too.
Your argument totally sucks, and then you tuck your tail between your legs and run like a yellow-bellied chicken. Perhaps if you could come up with a decent argument you'd stand your ground instead of resorting to your childish invective. And, since you think I'm insane, perhaps you'd like to share with me who isolated the HIV virus and why Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in gay men.
Heh. I think your tinfoil hat is a little too tight.
And, since you think I'm insane, perhaps you'd like to share with me who isolated the HIV virus
Sure, let's share.
It's debatable whether it's been isolated. So? Doesn't disprove a thing.
and why Kaposi's Sarcoma only appears in gay men
See, this is why you're not taken seriously. Kaposi's Sarcoma appears in heterosexual men as well as women. This is what happens when you get all your information from conspiracy theorist pamphlets.
And which should concern me more: the snide, childish blather that you type
.sig your sanity is in question, too, so perhaps I should just bow out of this little conversation...
YOU'RE accusing someone ELSE of childish blather? That's funny.
Your attempt to show the flaw in my logic fails. Leftists hate cars becuase they enable greater individualism.
And yet, it's the Rightists who pass the laws restricting speech. It's the Rightists who all look the same, act the same, dress the same, talk the same.
"A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'. It is a lie!"
Just because Nietzsche said something doesn't make it true. Think for yourself. And if you're going to quote him, try reading the rest of his philosophy before deciding to appoint him as some sort of moral visionary.
Your attempts to intimidate me will fail. You're actually going to have to engage your brain and debate with me if you expect to have any chance of swaying me to your government gravy-train, "I know what's best for everyone" arrogance.
It's difficult to sway someone with reason away from a viewpoint that they arrived at without using reason at all. You're a right-wing sheep; nobody's going to change your mind, no matter how convincingly they disprove your erroneous statements. Judging by your
Leftists hate individualism. They think people should be represented by their group, not by their own selves. They think people should be dependent on the government, not dependent on themselves. Individualism stands in the way of their big truth that all humans must embrace (or go to the gulag, as it always turns out in practice). Hence, Leftists hate cars.
Alright, this just has to be a joke. I mean, nobody is that mind-numbingly ignorant in real life, right?
Ahh, who cares what happens to the peons. I'm safe in my hilltop mayoral mansion, surrounded by police guards, safely away from the high-crime areas, pollution, and traffic.
Yes, the brain is coded in Qbasic.
Wow, they used to have 20 million viewers? Then why were the shows always so lousy? I'm not just talking about the stories, I mean the animation itself?
Eh, doesn't matter to me. What's the point in getting karma if you're not going to spend it.
Wow, both modded as trolls. Wonder what half-wit(s) did that, and why.
In the MUD world, at least. MUME (among others) has been doing it for years. I'd give the address, but I'd feel bad if it was slashdotted, even though I don't play it anymore.
Contrary to popular belief, a lot of people like Temple of Doom.
That I can believe.
What we find somewhat insane is the proposition that it was the best of the movies, which the parent claims.
Err, tiny minority, not majority, obviously.
It's not the media. It's everyone except for a tiny majority of people.
Guess what, society as a whole selects the language. Hacker means someone who breaks into computer systems. Deal with it.
They have a little exhibit on that at the American Museum of the Moving Image, where they let you pan and scan a movie yourself. It instilled me a deep contempt for non-letterbox movies.
That still makes more sense than some anime I've seen.
Megatokyo has used that theme as well.
Consider the amount of time I spend on pursuits like nethack, I've discovered my time really isn't worth much...