Observe the mating call of the USian libtard in its natural habitat...
Liberals, or in your words "Iibtards" do not support monopolies. It takes a real special cuck to trigger on that and snowflake all over it, but you, sir, did it proud. I am using your own special "code" because I know you won't understand a real discussion. You have to have Steve Bannon and other ultra right wing mental defectives to define your terms for you, else you are reduced to grunts and drool from your chin.
Seriously? You think your comparison is apt? As with all analogies, there are points of non-congruence Uber isn't buggies vs taxis. Uber is unregulated taxis vs regulated taxis along with exploiting their unemployed drivers. Yes. Exactly. Taxi drivers are depending on a government monopoly. I just want one them that profits me. Uber makes us all poorer. Uber doesn't hold a gun to people's heads and force them to work for the wages they pay. Do I think Uber doesn't pay enough? I do. That's why I don't drive for them.
What do you do when you get promoted to a management position in a different department and have no clue how to manage people? Do you quit, or try to do the job?
This is an excellent question. The fact that you ask it indicates that despite a lack of knowledge of the people and the product, you have a fighting chance to actually be successful. To quote someone else: "We ask kittens to fight tigers. We don't expect them to win, but we do expect them to try."
So, my advice is to just - try. At worst, it won't be as bad as a "dead hand on the helm", and at best, you might discover depths within yourself you didn't know you had. Just keep in mind these five magic words: "I was wrong. I'm sorry." Use them when needed. It's absolutely amazing what they can accomplish, and to turbo boost that, add these words "What do you see as a path forward?"
I've had a boss that was all of these. Very frustrating.
I've often wondered why folks in tech expect 24x7 access to their employees. If you work at Burger King, you don't have to put in 90 or 100 hour weeks - or if you do, it's with overtime pay. But if you're in tech, this seems to be the default expectation and don't you dare ask for overtime or even a bonus. Gosh no. Don't expect profit sharing either.
I hope you've been living comfortably on the proceeds from the lawsuit.
In the state I reside in, the employer's actions were protected by state law. This is a "right to work" state, which allows for employee termination without cause and without notice. The only limit is the number of employees that can be fired at once, and that's a federal law. It doesn't protect a group smaller than 100 people.
Thank god for living in a country where this is outright illegal.
I take it you are not a United States resident.
Most of the places in the US, an employer can fire you for no reason at all. These are called "Right to Work" states. Mostly the laws are designed to prohibit unions. The laws run the gamut from outright prohibition (in the case of federal Air Traffic Controllers) to rendering them incapable of any sort of collective bargaining or effective operation (as in the case of Teacher's Unions thorough out much of the South of the country.) These laws are promoted mostly by the conservative or right wing political spectrum. Strangely, these same groups don't normally have any objection to strong unions for Law Enforcement workers. I'm not sure why a teacher can't have an effective union but a police force can. I am very aware that for someone not steeped in this situation that it makes absolutely no sense at all.
I was accused of doing this at a former employer. I was fired for "job abandonment" and later that day some of their systems went down. Fortunately, it was easy to prove I wasn't responsible. There's no internet in the intensive care unit. (Which was why I didn't show up for work or call in sick.)
Now my medical alarm has a Pi attached that will tweet my family...and my employer.
They didn't offer to re-instate me either. Cool beans. I was about to quit anyway because they were not nice people. Always, but always, find someone that used to work somewhere and get the low down before you accept a job.
But they are entirely based in a fantasy world of projection and motivated reasoning.
My objection is based on one very very simple concept: I am not God. I don't have the ultimate authority or prurience to know when a singe cell is a "life" or not.
I do know four things;
God punishes sinners, in accordance with His mercy and the sinner's repentance.
I am not God.
Neither are you.
God is awesome. Therefore I don't hesitate to post using my long time pseudonym. Yet you post as an Anonymous Coward. Why don't I use my real name? Because I've already been shot twice by people that think abortion is murder, but don't hesitate to attempt murder themselves. I happen to loathe abortion. I happen to wish women didn't feel the need for it. But I also feel I have no right, nor any Holy Right to tell someone else how to obtain grace. I live my life in a way I hope is an example. Only God knows if it's right or not. So I'm not going to tell you that you're wrong or that you are "stupid" or that you are living in "fantasy world", only that I trust God a lot more than to assume He needs me to pass laws for force others to live His Will.
It is not for me to be the proctor of other's righteous lives - only to be and live that which I perceive to be right.
If sin is impossible, then grace is also impossible. For what good is it for people to be forced into Grace? That is an empty husk, the shell of the nut.
And if, as some believe, there is no God, then there is even less reason for me to forbid their choices.
Absolutely. But it's an informed conjecture. Actually, more of an, I don't know...opinion?
and #2 ends in a lie.
Define your terms. If the only woman's healthcare in 50 miles is a closed Planned Parenthood clinic, then it's not a lie.
Do you think I like abortion? Why? I in fact hate it and wish it was not an option some feel they need. I just happen to think it's none of my damned business to tell someone what they can't and can't have medically for a conceptus I have no involvement in. I also hate and loathe the death penalty.
Some would call abortion murder. OK. I will simply point out the Bible says murderers are sinners and God will punish them. Great. News flash: I'm not God.
Don't look now, but I'm pretty sure neither are you.
Didn't we just determine that filming officials is not merely a right, but a First Amendment right?
We did. We determined that it is a right to film government officials in public. This filming (and subsequent editing that changed the meaning of the conversation) occurred not in public and not with Government officials
I absolutely do not understand this OBSESSION with fetuses
.
It's simple, really. Rich white men (or men of any race) seldom become pregnant. If men were forced to give birth:
1. There would be no more multiple child families
2. abortion would be fully government funded (hey, old men can get Viagra on welfare, but women can't get basic health care)
3. The objection to abortion in my experience has less to do with the fetus than it does with the race for the person wanting one. Oh, they'll say it's about the fetus, but wait a bit, and talk about food stamps or such, and they'll say "If you black or brown, it's easy to get, but not for white people that really need it."
I've come to the conclusion that many conservatives (not all) are never happier than when they have their nose firmly shoved into someone elses genitals or wallet.
Oh, and if you want to flame me for my opinion, just remember that my doing so, you've moved yourself into the class I am discussing. Remember, I said "many" not "all".
1. I can have this done by the deadline 2. Oh, it's a simple change, just commit it. 3. I can adapt another routine, it'll cut the programming time 4. Your code sucks 5. My code shines 6. Don't bother with that use case, it'll never come up. 7. Our users wouldn't be that stupid. 8. Our users wouldn't be that smart. 9. It's completely debugged. 11. There are no errors in this top 10 list.
Thus observe the legions of people willing to succumb to TV preachers, EST, "Mindfulness", and "global warming".
Using that logic, then I should be covered in passenger pigeon shit while being gored by a buffalo (denying that mankind can and does change his environment.)
I remember visiting Los Angeles in the late 1970's. I was struck by how polluted and gray the sunset was conspired to a sunset off the Seychelles or in the Arctic. Beijing was so polluted and the air so thick with exhaust that I was ill for the 5 hours I was there. (in the 2010's.) Thus observe the legions of people willing to succumb to TV preachers, EST, "Mindfulness", and "global warming".
Except that TV preachers and ESP (I assume that's what you were going for) doesn't have the numbers of scientists saying it's true than climate change does. The trick of the question here is that "common" people, EG:those without training in the various sciences involved in climate change, simply lack the facility to derive the facts for themselves. They are not equipped to do so, they do not have the training to interpret the evidence if they did, and they have an invested interest in ignoring or denying those facts that require them to expend more money, more effort, or bestir themselves from the drooling, slack jawed existence of watching those self same TV Evangelists or to go get that that one lottery ticket that is their path to fame and fortune. (to turn your metaphor back on you.)
Not that I am knocking spirituality of most sorts, it is only to show that your assertion is arrant non-sense. I'm all for a path for folks to try to make themselves and their society better, even if it's a spiritual one that I can't prove. I can, with my limited science and available technology, prove that O2 is down, that CO2 CO, Ozone, and nitrogen oxides are up over the past three decades. I will grant that "parts per billion" seem infinitesimal, but it only takes a little of the wrong poison to result in mortality.
One question the climate scientists are not in agreement on his how much more will constitute a cascade point. There is one, that is known. What is not known is if it will be reached in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, or if it's already past the point of no return.
It is comforting and familiar to keep on this path. So is shooting up heroin, but no one doubts the ultimate outcome of that.
A. Call the fire department? B. Accuse the neighbor of telling you your house is on fire that "Fire is just somebody's religion!" C. Convene a study to determine if the house really is on fire, and if so, if it was due to spontaneous combustion or if there's a arsonist about? D. "Blame Liberals!" E. Post to Facebook or instagram?
Hm. I'm interested to know the metrics behind "was pretty painless".
I've heard some fairly bad horror stores from folks that run > 3,000 windows desktops. I'm not a windows guy so I don't know if the horror was self inflicted, caused by their admins not doing something right, or if the blame can be laid at Microsoft.
I will say that a OS that takes specific, non-trivial processes to not automatically and preemptively molest the install base is likely something I wound not give approval to.
I said in another thread about firefox and Java that we've come to the point where we have to take defensive measures against the very people we trust to make software tools. I feel that's asinine to be forced to come to that pass.
Hilary's thug wranglers told them to do that when they were hired
Impossible. Every body knows Trumps Russian assassins killed all of Hillery's thug wranglers right after they killed those three million Mass. residents that illegally voted in New Hampshire. That was Putin's "congratulations" present to all the Trumpanzees.
Now, for a serious question; Is there anyone at all that really thinks this? Because wow man, you dudes are supposed to be way too unhip to trip.
Please come back to Planet Consensus reality, your family misses you.
I remember when President Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers. That didn't work out well for more than a year.
I have also been a union member twice. Unfortunately, one union was run by the company, so it was a pretty shitty union for the most part. The other union was run by ex-union members and were not beholden to the company. That worked pretty well in that "silly" stuff didn't happen. If a shitty boss wanted to fire people for not kowtowing, too bad. But if someone screwed up, the shop steward and the boss delivered the pink slip together. Nobody wanted to do extra work because someone else slacked their assignment. I eventually went management in that job, and I never had a problem in 6 years with union workers. I generally had to hold back the shop steward when I knew things about the employee that he didn't (terminally ill wife, child, substance problems they were being helped with, that sort of thing.) The times I did have to terminate someone, the union guys were in agreement with me and we'd already tried multiple times to get the person back into the fold.
That said, what strikes me are the many people that say "Unions suck" that have never been in one and how frequently the throw out "get another job".
Hm. You must live in the land of good jobs, where the trees of excellent education are right there behind the bushes of golden opportunity and the river of endless paycheck. That's a sweet place to live, but one whose address I've not found.
All kidding aside, I had to drive through Austin during SXSW... Took almost 4 hours. A family member lives in Austin, about 2 miles from the grocery store. It takes an hour each way by car on days of "normal" traffic, longer if there's a traffic jam. Much faster to walk to the store. And this is Texas. We don't walk up the isle to get married - we drive.
You never once used your phone except to call for a tow truck once. Not what I said. I said: I've used it exactly once when I could not have used a VOiP or POTS.
In the SAN/NAS world, this is called bay redundancy. A few vendors have geo separation options that would meet your criteria, but network latency would be a factor just as it is with layer 2 tunneling. Openstack SWIFT has something via zones, but the complete copy is present on all three redundancy nodes as it's mirroring so that's not what you want unless you use a disk adapter that supports encryption, but that's still the full copy in one place. However, you can also set up DRBD with this, but the encryption is at the file system, not file, level. EG: Each file is encrypted with the same key/passphrase.
I would suggest looking into madm and jacking in something at the scsi device level to drive encryption.
The chances of any government seizing all 3 is zero. With RAID 5, they only need two of the three, not all three.
Also look to see if someone would be willing to be your encryption key escrow along the lines of a National Security Letter canary site. If they remove the post they have not received an NSL or a warrant, have another system that monitors that page delete the key.
The best course is to not be on the radar of law enforcement in the first place. EG: they can't seize what they don't know exists. There are many ways to hide things as small as encryption keys. DNS data exfiltration for the retrieval, using a inode marked in use but with a null directory entry, hiding it in a NVAM area, using RAID 5 with USB keys and split the custody of the USB drive, a HSM (be aware that any made in the USA or for a company in the USA will very likely have back doors), and many others.
I've said it many times, and you can check my history, that if the average American knew how much their cell phone leaked data, they would not only refuse to own one, but refuse to allow them on their property.
I don't have anything to hide. I don't do anything illegal (that I know of, but look how many laws there are, and I'm sure I break some without knowing it), but the point is that cell phone data is only used to build a case, and only vary rarely does it exonerate someone. It isn't' your friend. It's a snitch, a government informer, that you pay to spy on you.
Last, we buy these things to make our life more convenient. However, as far as I see, all it does it make it easier for Rachael with Card Services to try to scam you or for others to interrupt you. I think in the years I've owned one (shackled to me for employment, really), I've used it exactly once when I could not have used a VOiP or POTS. (The car broke down and I called for a tow truck.)
I do have to wonder what's up with these folks in DC. Odd and not a lot of facts yet.
Slashdot Mirror
Observe the mating call of the USian libtard in its natural habitat...
Liberals, or in your words "Iibtards" do not support monopolies. It takes a real special cuck to trigger on that and snowflake all over it, but you, sir, did it proud.
I am using your own special "code" because I know you won't understand a real discussion. You have to have Steve Bannon and other ultra right wing mental defectives to define your terms for you, else you are reduced to grunts and drool from your chin.
It's a real pity you can't muster an IQ over 40.
Seriously? You think your comparison is apt?
As with all analogies, there are points of non-congruence
Uber isn't buggies vs taxis. Uber is unregulated taxis vs regulated taxis along with exploiting their unemployed drivers.
Yes. Exactly. Taxi drivers are depending on a government monopoly. I just want one them that profits me.
Uber makes us all poorer.
Uber doesn't hold a gun to people's heads and force them to work for the wages they pay. Do I think Uber doesn't pay enough? I do. That's why I don't drive for them.
If I open a buggy whip factory, can we shut down the taxi drivers until they switch back to horses?
What do you do when you get promoted to a management position in a different department and have no clue how to manage people? Do you quit, or try to do the job?
This is an excellent question. The fact that you ask it indicates that despite a lack of knowledge of the people and the product, you have a fighting chance to actually be successful. To quote someone else: "We ask kittens to fight tigers. We don't expect them to win, but we do expect them to try."
So, my advice is to just - try. At worst, it won't be as bad as a "dead hand on the helm", and at best, you might discover depths within yourself you didn't know you had. Just keep in mind these five magic words:
"I was wrong. I'm sorry."
Use them when needed. It's absolutely amazing what they can accomplish, and to turbo boost that, add these words "What do you see as a path forward?"
because the broadband market is more competitive than the search engine market.
Maybe I missed that left turn at albuquerque https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
but what the heck does search engines have to do with the horrendous lack of broad band competition?
I've had a boss that was all of these. Very frustrating.
I've often wondered why folks in tech expect 24x7 access to their employees. If you work at Burger King, you don't have to put in 90 or 100 hour weeks - or if you do, it's with overtime pay. But if you're in tech, this seems to be the default expectation and don't you dare ask for overtime or even a bonus. Gosh no. Don't expect profit sharing either.
I hope you've been living comfortably on the proceeds from the lawsuit.
In the state I reside in, the employer's actions were protected by state law. This is a "right to work" state, which allows for employee termination without cause and without notice. The only limit is the number of employees that can be fired at once, and that's a federal law. It doesn't protect a group smaller than 100 people.
Thank god for living in a country where this is outright illegal.
I take it you are not a United States resident.
Most of the places in the US, an employer can fire you for no reason at all. These are called "Right to Work" states. Mostly the laws are designed to prohibit unions. The laws run the gamut from outright prohibition (in the case of federal Air Traffic Controllers) to rendering them incapable of any sort of collective bargaining or effective operation (as in the case of Teacher's Unions thorough out much of the South of the country.) These laws are promoted mostly by the conservative or right wing political spectrum. Strangely, these same groups don't normally have any objection to strong unions for Law Enforcement workers. I'm not sure why a teacher can't have an effective union but a police force can. I am very aware that for someone not steeped in this situation that it makes absolutely no sense at all.
I was accused of doing this at a former employer. I was fired for "job abandonment" and later that day some of their systems went down. Fortunately, it was easy to prove I wasn't responsible. There's no internet in the intensive care unit. (Which was why I didn't show up for work or call in sick.)
Now my medical alarm has a Pi attached that will tweet my family...and my employer.
They didn't offer to re-instate me either. Cool beans. I was about to quit anyway because they were not nice people. Always, but always, find someone that used to work somewhere and get the low down before you accept a job.
sed 's/prurience/prescience/g'
My objection is based on one very very simple concept: I am not God. I don't have the ultimate authority or prurience to know when a singe cell is a "life" or not.
I do know four things;
God punishes sinners, in accordance with His mercy and the sinner's repentance.
I am not God.
Neither are you.
God is awesome.
Therefore I don't hesitate to post using my long time pseudonym. Yet you post as an Anonymous Coward. Why don't I use my real name? Because I've already been shot twice by people that think abortion is murder, but don't hesitate to attempt murder themselves. I happen to loathe abortion. I happen to wish women didn't feel the need for it. But I also feel I have no right, nor any Holy Right to tell someone else how to obtain grace. I live my life in a way I hope is an example. Only God knows if it's right or not. So I'm not going to tell you that you're wrong or that you are "stupid" or that you are living in "fantasy world", only that I trust God a lot more than to assume He needs me to pass laws for force others to live His Will.
It is not for me to be the proctor of other's righteous lives - only to be and live that which I perceive to be right.
If sin is impossible, then grace is also impossible. For what good is it for people to be forced into Grace? That is an empty husk, the shell of the nut.
And if, as some believe, there is no God, then there is even less reason for me to forbid their choices.
Absolutely. But it's an informed conjecture. Actually, more of an, I don't know...opinion?
and #2 ends in a lie.
Define your terms. If the only woman's healthcare in 50 miles is a closed Planned Parenthood clinic, then it's not a lie.
Do you think I like abortion? Why? I in fact hate it and wish it was not an option some feel they need. I just happen to think it's none of my damned business to tell someone what they can't and can't have medically for a conceptus I have no involvement in. I also hate and loathe the death penalty.
Some would call abortion murder. OK. I will simply point out the Bible says murderers are sinners and God will punish them. Great. News flash: I'm not God.
Don't look now, but I'm pretty sure neither are you.
We did. We determined that it is a right to film government officials in public. This filming (and subsequent editing that changed the meaning of the conversation) occurred not in public and not with Government officials
.
It's simple, really. Rich white men (or men of any race) seldom become pregnant. If men were forced to give birth:
1. There would be no more multiple child families
2. abortion would be fully government funded (hey, old men can get Viagra on welfare, but women can't get basic health care)
3. The objection to abortion in my experience has less to do with the fetus than it does with the race for the person wanting one. Oh, they'll say it's about the fetus, but wait a bit, and talk about food stamps or such, and they'll say "If you black or brown, it's easy to get, but not for white people that really need it."
I've come to the conclusion that many conservatives (not all) are never happier than when they have their nose firmly shoved into someone elses genitals or wallet.
Oh, and if you want to flame me for my opinion, just remember that my doing so, you've moved yourself into the class I am discussing. Remember, I said "many" not "all".
1. I can have this done by the deadline
2. Oh, it's a simple change, just commit it.
3. I can adapt another routine, it'll cut the programming time
4. Your code sucks
5. My code shines
6. Don't bother with that use case, it'll never come up.
7. Our users wouldn't be that stupid.
8. Our users wouldn't be that smart.
9. It's completely debugged.
11. There are no errors in this top 10 list.
Using that logic, then I should be covered in passenger pigeon shit while being gored by a buffalo (denying that mankind can and does change his environment.) I remember visiting Los Angeles in the late 1970's. I was struck by how polluted and gray the sunset was conspired to a sunset off the Seychelles or in the Arctic. Beijing was so polluted and the air so thick with exhaust that I was ill for the 5 hours I was there. (in the 2010's.)
Thus observe the legions of people willing to succumb to TV preachers, EST, "Mindfulness", and "global warming".
Except that TV preachers and ESP (I assume that's what you were going for) doesn't have the numbers of scientists saying it's true than climate change does. The trick of the question here is that "common" people, EG:those without training in the various sciences involved in climate change, simply lack the facility to derive the facts for themselves. They are not equipped to do so, they do not have the training to interpret the evidence if they did, and they have an invested interest in ignoring or denying those facts that require them to expend more money, more effort, or bestir themselves from the drooling, slack jawed existence of watching those self same TV Evangelists or to go get that that one lottery ticket that is their path to fame and fortune. (to turn your metaphor back on you.)
Not that I am knocking spirituality of most sorts, it is only to show that your assertion is arrant non-sense. I'm all for a path for folks to try to make themselves and their society better, even if it's a spiritual one that I can't prove. I can, with my limited science and available technology, prove that O2 is down, that CO2 CO, Ozone, and nitrogen oxides are up over the past three decades. I will grant that "parts per billion" seem infinitesimal, but it only takes a little of the wrong poison to result in mortality.
One question the climate scientists are not in agreement on his how much more will constitute a cascade point. There is one, that is known. What is not known is if it will be reached in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, or if it's already past the point of no return.
It is comforting and familiar to keep on this path. So is shooting up heroin, but no one doubts the ultimate outcome of that.
Your house is on fire. Do you:
A. Call the fire department?
B. Accuse the neighbor of telling you your house is on fire that "Fire is just somebody's religion!"
C. Convene a study to determine if the house really is on fire, and if so, if it was due to spontaneous combustion or if there's a arsonist about?
D. "Blame Liberals!"
E. Post to Facebook or instagram?
This is absolutely fabulous! Yet another way for our unelected officials to totally ignore the electorate!
Hm. I'm interested to know the metrics behind "was pretty painless".
I've heard some fairly bad horror stores from folks that run > 3,000 windows desktops. I'm not a windows guy so I don't know if the horror was self inflicted, caused by their admins not doing something right, or if the blame can be laid at Microsoft.
I will say that a OS that takes specific, non-trivial processes to not automatically and preemptively molest the install base is likely something I wound not give approval to.
I said in another thread about firefox and Java that we've come to the point where we have to take defensive measures against the very people we trust to make software tools. I feel that's asinine to be forced to come to that pass.
Hilary's thug wranglers told them to do that when they were hired
Impossible. Every body knows Trumps Russian assassins killed all of Hillery's thug wranglers right after they killed those three million Mass. residents that illegally voted in New Hampshire. That was Putin's "congratulations" present to all the Trumpanzees.
Now, for a serious question; Is there anyone at all that really thinks this? Because wow man, you dudes are supposed to be way too unhip to trip.
Please come back to Planet Consensus reality, your family misses you.
I remember when President Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers. That didn't work out well for more than a year.
I have also been a union member twice. Unfortunately, one union was run by the company, so it was a pretty shitty union for the most part. The other union was run by ex-union members and were not beholden to the company. That worked pretty well in that "silly" stuff didn't happen. If a shitty boss wanted to fire people for not kowtowing, too bad. But if someone screwed up, the shop steward and the boss delivered the pink slip together. Nobody wanted to do extra work because someone else slacked their assignment. I eventually went management in that job, and I never had a problem in 6 years with union workers. I generally had to hold back the shop steward when I knew things about the employee that he didn't (terminally ill wife, child, substance problems they were being helped with, that sort of thing.) The times I did have to terminate someone, the union guys were in agreement with me and we'd already tried multiple times to get the person back into the fold.
That said, what strikes me are the many people that say "Unions suck" that have never been in one and how frequently the throw out "get another job".
Hm. You must live in the land of good jobs, where the trees of excellent education are right there behind the bushes of golden opportunity and the river of endless paycheck. That's a sweet place to live, but one whose address I've not found.
All kidding aside, I had to drive through Austin during SXSW... Took almost 4 hours. A family member lives in Austin, about 2 miles from the grocery store. It takes an hour each way by car on days of "normal" traffic, longer if there's a traffic jam. Much faster to walk to the store. And this is Texas. We don't walk up the isle to get married - we drive.
You never once used your phone except to call for a tow truck once.
Not what I said. I said: I've used it exactly once when I could not have used a VOiP or POTS.
In the SAN/NAS world, this is called bay redundancy. A few vendors have geo separation options that would meet your criteria, but network latency would be a factor just as it is with layer 2 tunneling.
Openstack SWIFT has something via zones, but the complete copy is present on all three redundancy nodes as it's mirroring so that's not what you want unless you use a disk adapter that supports encryption, but that's still the full copy in one place.
However, you can also set up DRBD with this, but the encryption is at the file system, not file, level. EG: Each file is encrypted with the same key/passphrase.
I would suggest looking into madm and jacking in something at the scsi device level to drive encryption.
The chances of any government seizing all 3 is zero.
With RAID 5, they only need two of the three, not all three.
Also look to see if someone would be willing to be your encryption key escrow along the lines of a National Security Letter canary site. If they remove the post they have not received an NSL or a warrant, have another system that monitors that page delete the key.
The best course is to not be on the radar of law enforcement in the first place. EG: they can't seize what they don't know exists. There are many ways to hide things as small as encryption keys. DNS data exfiltration for the retrieval, using a inode marked in use but with a null directory entry, hiding it in a NVAM area, using RAID 5 with USB keys and split the custody of the USB drive, a HSM (be aware that any made in the USA or for a company in the USA will very likely have back doors), and many others.
I've said it many times, and you can check my history, that if the average American knew how much their cell phone leaked data, they would not only refuse to own one, but refuse to allow them on their property.
I don't have anything to hide. I don't do anything illegal (that I know of, but look how many laws there are, and I'm sure I break some without knowing it), but the point is that cell phone data is only used to build a case, and only vary rarely does it exonerate someone. It isn't' your friend. It's a snitch, a government informer, that you pay to spy on you.
Last, we buy these things to make our life more convenient. However, as far as I see, all it does it make it easier for Rachael with Card Services to try to scam you or for others to interrupt you. I think in the years I've owned one (shackled to me for employment, really), I've used it exactly once when I could not have used a VOiP or POTS. (The car broke down and I called for a tow truck.)
I do have to wonder what's up with these folks in DC. Odd and not a lot of facts yet.