Slashdot Mirror


Video Appliance For a Large Library On a Network?

devjj writes "For the past year or so I have been trying (and failing) to figure out a reasonable solution for bringing my large media library to my living room. All of my media lives on an Ubuntu server that sits on my network. It's been very reliable and it's fast enough for streaming purposes. My content is exposed via SMB. It's the living room side where I keep running into problems. I am currently using Windows 7 and XBMC, but the case is too big and noisy, I don't particularly care for Windows, and the whole thing just seems overkill. What I want is a device that can present a decent UI that the non-Slashdot crowd would be able to use, but that is still powerful enough to stream full-fidelity 1080p. I dream of a small box that can transcode video over a network, but that's probably a pipe dream. The new Apple TV would be great if it could connect to network shares. What say you, Slashdot? Is what I'm looking for possible, or should I just give in to the iTunes/Amazon/whatever juggernauts?"

516 comments

  1. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what was the question?

    1. Re:wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll is too long to read, people won't bite to troll.

    2. Re:wait... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Troll is too long to read, people won't bite to troll.

      He's posting A.C. but I think I know that guy. He was always referring to Apple as "Abble".

      Not a very good troll anyway. If you're gonna troll, you gotta at least sound reasonable at first glance, even if you're taking a position in low Earth orbit. He sounds like he's foaming at the mouth.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      use VLC to stream from your server. it runs on *nix (including OS X), and Windows.

  2. Mac Mini + Plex by drivelikejehu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you can afford it, get one of the new Mac Minis and install Plex. The new version that came out yesterday is incredibly slick. It'll do all you want.

    1. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A Mac Mini is just way too expensive to be abused as a streaming media player.

    2. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, there are significant benefits of using a full computer with software such as Plex, namely the ability to use your HTPC as a DVD Player for watching media, utilizing Satellite and Cable Tuners to serve as a DVR, rip movies to your library automatically as well as serve as a distribution hub for transcoding video for mobile devices, whether they be on your local WiFi or remote.

      However, this ultimately comes down to what your desires are.

      I for example utilize an AppleTV (jailbroken) to mount NFS shares from my file server for my bedroom setup, and then a Mac Mini for my Living Room setup.

    3. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Firehed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a heads-up, I just tried this and ended up having to return the system. There appears to be some bug with their HDMI which can cause the machine to kernel panic, apparently when powering on either the display or receiver it's plugged into*. A damn shame, as it's otherwise very well suited to that kind of use. A compact, quiet, and fairly cool system that doesn't use a whole lot of power but still has no problem playing back HD video. Hooking the tower back up to the TV just sucks, as it uses about 50x the energy** and is massively overkill for that kind of use, and is certainly not compact by any stretch of the imagination. Maybe I'll dig out an old unused laptop instead.

      * I'm not 100% sure that's the cause, but it was as close as I ever got to diagnosing the issue. And this was after exchanging the system for a full replacement. If only only happened to one machine I'd blame the hardware, but two systems with identical problems tells me something else is at play. Of course, it could be specific to my TV+receiver combo too.

      **Which only bothers me because of the power bill. Effing hippies.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by drivelikejehu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That really sucks, but I've never run into that problem and I've had this setup going for several months now (got the mini as soon as the hdmi ones were released). I'd guess it's your TV+receiver combo then - I don't have any problems with my Kuro and Pioneer something or other receiver (the mini plugs into the receiver, the receiver goes to the TV).

    5. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Siridar · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 to this. I have a slightly older mac mini (C2D, 2Gb) hooked up to my TV with a DVI>HDMI cable, using optical to my amplifier for audio. Plex decodes 1080p content fine on this setup, and squirts out DD 5.1 just fine to my amp. I splashed out and bought a Harmony One remote, which is supported in plex - right down to Logitech adding a "plex" device to the keymap of the remote. Its simple enough that anyone can sit down and use it. Its also very quiet and cool.

      The recent release (9.0) adds a few nice features, including a iphone/ipod touch app that uses the source machine to transcode video and send it out via Wifi. Apparently it will also work over 3G, but I haven't tried that.

      Seriously, if you can, do it. Its the best decision I ever made regarding my home theater system - sure, I could have gone with a "regular" PC and a mouse/keyboard setup, but I wanted a setup that my fiancee could use with a normal remote.

    6. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A Mac Mini is just way too expensive to be abused as a streaming media player.

      Or as a personal computer.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Informative

      No shit, He can get a 1080p player from WD for about $120 that'll play just about any format thrown at it, uses something like 12w, and as a bonus is small and light enough he can easily take it and a USB drive anywhere he wants.I have set up a couple of these systems for those with kids and the WD boxes are pretty solid, no noise, and make a great replacement for the family DVD player. Blowing the money on a Mac Mini (or hell any PC unless he has an old SFF P4 laying around he isn't using) for a streaming player is just nuts.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Vancorps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just installed XBMCLive on a en Eeebox, the eb1501 handled bluray level playback without an issue. It's an Atom 330 so it's already kinda dated as the 510s with Ion2 will actually handle flash in full screen without the benefit of the crappy 3d acceleration now offered in Flash 10.1. It's based on Ubuntu 9.04 so there are some issues with certain wireless controllers but it took me all of an hour start to finish to get the thing setup how I want it. That even includes being able to launch Firefox with the Launder app, coincidentally this method will work with Pandora too although sadly Netflix natively is a no go but a lot of people have Bluray players already with netflix so you just use XBMC as a uPNP client at that point and you can enjoy all the benefits. My whole setup complete with SSD so there is zero noise after the sound of pressing the button.

    9. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... Well...
      1. Every LCD TV I have owned in the past has had a VGA in port (including my current Sharp Aquos), so you could use that.
      2. There are VGA to HDMI adaptors you could use.

      (I'm not saying you should have to, just that you didn't have to return it...)
      I am using a Mac Mini for my TV needs, but it isn't one with the built in HDMI.

      Anyway if there was such an obvious bug in the HDMI, I would think it would be common knowledge by now and either everyone would be bitching, or it would be fixed - what with all the bruhaha over a minor antenna issue.

    10. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just use the minimal install option? This turns the unit into an XBMC appliance, so there isn't an OS for the end user to deal with.

      I actually put this on a CF card with a CF to IDE converter. I use the PicoPSU-120 power supply and I removed all the fans on the mobo and cards with large heat sinks. It's completely silent. However, I only use mine for music so I don't have any large graphics cards, but I'm pretty sure you can get fanless cards capable of 1080p since I have a fanless one in my desktop that runs at WQXGA.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    11. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      A 463MB update? WTF?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by yyxx · · Score: 1

      I have been using a Mac Mini for that for a while. I don't think it's a good solution. A few apps work well with a TV interface, but as a full computer, it requires quite a bit of interaction to keep it updated and working, but OS X isn't all that convenient to use on a TV. You can kind of work around that by using remote desktop. It also didn't deal well with overscan and didn't give me a full set of video modes and I never found a workaround for that. And a Mac Mini is very expensive compared to PCs, netbooks, or mini-PCs.

    13. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I personally have to second the WD TV units. I've got a WDTV Live myself, and it works wonderfully. Every once in a while (Avatar 1080p, self ripped) a HD stream can't quite make it over the wireless and I have to throw it on the little hard drive I attached to it, but other than that, these things are marvelous.

    14. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Agree.

      I have built mine out of a end-of-line Fuji-Siemens from Maplin (dead silent): http://www.maplin.co.uk/module.aspx?ModuleNo=228173&C=email-newsletter&U=09P10-3-B54LY

      and the lowest possible spec Nvidia Quadro NVS card. It is silent and can play any SD or HD content with flying colours. I will probably plug a GigE at some point and move it to the new network segment I am building which uses jumbo frames so NFS does not need to refrag.

      The UI is plain Konqueror suitably skinned to make it pretty and LIRC commanding it via xvkbd. The player is VLC. Passes the wife test. Passes the 8 year old test as well.

      Works a treat. By the way, streaming is an awful idea if you have a library. If you have access to the file you are always better off _READING_ it, not streaming it. In fact the latest generation of "streaming" is doing segment-by-segment file read and simulates streaming.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    15. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to look at these boxes.
      When you say "WD" are you refering to Western Digital or some other company?
      I'd be grateful if you could post a link.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    16. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!!

      I didn't know about this WD media player (yah, I've been living under the HighDefinition Video rock... as I have only an old CRT) and it seems quite good.

      My though is that if the original poster wants to spend some money he should buy something like this which is specifically tailored to his needs.

      However, if he wants a DIY solution using something he already has, a laptop using a low-resource Linux and running ONLY the decoding task might be a good choice...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    17. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to look at these boxes.
      When you say "WD" are you refering to Western Digital or some other company?
      I'd be grateful if you could post a link.

      Sure, this is what I did: linky

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    18. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>just about any format

      The current crop of hardware "player boxes" are almost all based around a modified DVD or blu-ray player chipset; typically one from Sigma Designs.

      These chipsets (and the accompanying "value add" SoCs that the mfg. adds to demux formats that the Sigma can't handle (e.g. MKV, OGG, AVI) and to [attempt to] transcode out-of-spec streams into something the decoder chip can handle) have _many_ limitations.

      They can only handle video that "sort of" fits inside the boundaries of H.264 4.1, audio that doesn't have too many channels or weird formats, many MKV features only work half-way (chapters, complex subtitles, you name it).

      Basically, it's like a half-assed reimplementation of mplayer. Actual ffmpeg-based players (mplayer, VLC, ffdshow+haali) have _much_ broader compatibility.

      True, this won't bother you if you're just playing back your own DVD rips that you can control, but something like 10-25% of the "content" that can be found on the wild interwebs is incompatible with these types of boxes.

      Buyer beware :)

    19. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you can afford it, get one of the new Mac Minis and install Plex [plexapp.com]. The new version that came out yesterday is incredibly slick. It'll do all you want."

      I'm always suspicious of these first posts which seem to supply just the right answer, consisting of a paid for solution which came out only yesterday. What a stroke of luck it was that the poster asked the question? Couldn't have happened at a better time. Thank the good lord for serendipity.

      Are you sure you have no connection with the poster?

      Is this not simply an unsubtle bit of astroturfing at its worst?

    20. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. WD has a box and it simply doesn't play "any format you can throw at it". I have one and it's in the closet. Total garbage. I also tried a Mvix a few years ago. Trash. A Mac Mini *will* play any format thrown at it as long as you have a couple of helpers such as Perian, Flip4Mac and VLC. I have almost 20TB of media files on a media server (10 drives total via a mix of USB 2.0 and Firewire 800) and the Mac Mini I recently bought handles everything.

    21. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by sbryant · · Score: 1

      A Mac Mini is just way too expensive to be abused as a streaming media player.

      Or as a personal computer.

      While someone modded this as 'Troll', it's unfortunately true.

      The new Mac Mini is a very nice machine, but the price is just wrong. It's even worse in Europe. It's $699 in the US. The UK price (£649) after subtracting 17.5% tax and converting to USD (rate=1.55) is $856. WTF?

      I was looking at buying a Mac Mini a couple of weeks ago. Then I called Dell, who offered me a slightly better spec'd machine for £250 ($387) less.

      The description 'way too expensive' is quite accurate. The original Mac Mini was priced well. The new one definitely isn't.

      -- Steve

    22. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Joce640k · · Score: 1
      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that utilizing sounds complex. Maybe you should simply use something and get it over with, it is much simpler.

    24. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by triple.eh · · Score: 1

      Yes, Western Digital media players.

    25. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Looking at the Dell UK site. Home/Desktop/Ultra Small Form Factor.

      There are 3 computers. The only one close to the £399 mark you mention is the Inspiron Zino HD at £369. It has only a dual core processor at 1.5GHz. (Upgradable to 1.8GHz for an extra £80 - it doesn't go any higher.)

      The Mac Mini is a dual core processor at 2.4GHz. (And the Mac's Core 2 Duo is better then the Dell's AMD Athlon 64 even at the same clock rate)
      The graphics chipset on the Mac Mini is also considerably better than that Dell.
      Though the Dell has more RAM and HD space.

      But of course the most important thing for the purchaser is the Mac runs OSX, and the Dell runs Windows. So it's no replacement.

       

    26. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      Having a DVD (or BD) drive (can you get D software for Linux yet?) is a good idea, but if he already has a streaming server set up, wouldn't it be easier to put tuners in there and stream their output to the TV (or, therefore, any other computer)?. As for ripping DVDs, that should be done on the server, if you want to watch it now, you put the DVD in; if you want to watch it later there's no real obstacle to putting the DVD into the server machine to rip it.

      Another suggestion, if OP is going to be using this as a permanent set-up (which I presume he is), set up a seperate connection between the streaming machine and the recieving machine so its regular use doesn't clog up the rest of your network (unless you have a gigabit network already, obviously).

      It sounds like what OP wants is one of the better EEEboxes, but with an optical drive. Anyone know of such a product? (vested interest: I've been wanting to set something like this up for some time.)

      --
      FGD 135
    27. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're running Ubuntu 9.04, Flash 10.1 doesn't have hardware acceleration.

      Flash hardware acceleration is only available on Windows and Mac installs at the moment.
      http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/systemreqs/#video

    28. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by jythie · · Score: 1

      What does Plex get you that using the file browser and double clicking does not?

    29. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by jythie · · Score: 1

      The poster probably (as is often the case) meant a Dell mini-tower with similar CPU/Memory/Drive.

    30. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by jythie · · Score: 1

      Having tried the 'VGA to HDMI' solution, I would not recommend it. One of the reasons there are so few of these converters on the market is they can be really picky about what is on both ends of them. My system usually got caught up in a long loop of autodetect and finally gave up. Attempts to manually set the resolution (under windows at least) never worked since the time for HDMI to settle down and accept the signal was longer then the time box for accepting.

    31. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by ixidor · · Score: 1

      i have a similar setup to op, ubuntu + samba. i have an asus o!play it plays all the files i have ripped in both .avi and .mkv, and some of the newer .flv from youtube. the only big gotcha was i had to lower the security on the samba settings. evan plays the 14gb bd rip of dark knight no hickups. and your usual pics and music etc...

    32. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Well, there are significant benefits of using a full computer with software such as Plex, namely the ability to use your HTPC as a DVD Player for watching media...

      NONE of that requires a beefy box. NONE of that requires a Mac Mini.

      Also, Plex is nothing but XBMC renamed so that the Apple fanboys can feel special.

      If you like XBMC on Windows, then try XBMC on Linux.

      Seems pretty obvious really. Any cheap nv9400 (or better) based box should do.
      The back end or the frontend can be on whatever OS you want really. XBMC runs
      pretty much on anything and all you're using the backend for is filesharing.

      If you are not running Flash, a Linux box running the cheapest ION you can find will be quite sufficient for display purposes.

      A Mac Mini will probably be overkill and will greatly increase your costs. MacOS also doesn't fully exploit GPU video acceleration features.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    33. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > What does Plex get you that using the file browser and double clicking does not?

      Easy no-nonsense/no-excuses support for every video format and combination of video and audio codecs under the sun.

      It's the same as installing VLC. Stuff "just works" and you don't have to dinker around with QT extensions or have Apple groupthink get in the way of things.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    34. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      The first link in your snarky little post is for a Television station. Really, is it so hard to link to the actual site?

      WD TV Live Plus

      You can get them for about $120 at newegg the last time I checked.

    35. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      I have an older WDTV unit (not the "Live" version; mine does not have network.) and it works very well indeed. I have it connected to a small external hard drive. Plays almost any type of audio/video file you could imagine including DVD .iso images.

    36. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Said WD box will not handle:

      Proper subtitling
      All h.264 levels / options
      All audio formats

      A full-fledged PC (with whatever fucking operating system you want) is the ONLY way to do it properly. It can also be used for many other things.

    37. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by vigiles · · Score: 1

      I have one of the WD boxes and works like a charm. HDMI Output and just plug in any external HDD, USB Stick OR USB/Firewire external CD/DVD drive and it's got a really nice easy interface with some sorting options. Have been using for Movies and Music but does pictures as well

    38. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It is nice but http://www.argosy.tw/product-detial.php?prod_id=154 does everything he asked for at less than $100. And it will hold a 2TB drive and work to move and swap media as well.

    39. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Similar to what you said, being that it's based on XBMC, Boxee is quite nice.

      I've had good luck with this on linux, though I also miss the Netflix support. :(

    40. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Use a SFF Zotac ION.. Never had any issues with it running Linux to display any content.. Low power usage..

      I Perfer to roll my own devices instead of using any of the streaming players on the market... I pay a little more but I am happy with the product in the long run as when it doesn't do something I want... It doesn't take too long before it does do what I want.

       

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    41. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh..dude? That is why we have this thing called "transcoding" that any PC made in the last 5 years can do trivially. Just pick up the free AllToAvi transcoder, which handles pretty much any funky and regular format, convert it into a standard H.264 AVI, and voila! There you go. If you have a slower single core you can simply set it before you go to bed and let it do its thing while you sleep, or with a dual core or better rig just run that puppy. Easy Peasy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    42. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Sorry Don, my bad. working the shop all day you get used to using shortcuts and forget not everybody is in on the lingo. Here you go. If you don't mind some advice, if all you need is DVD quality or are setting something up for a kid's room the $50 player with a $30 USB HDD is all you'll need, just load it with their favorite movies and shows and they're good to go.

      if you want to do the whole streaming bit this is what you'll want, as it is fully 1080p, has network by Ethernet or Wifi, and is an all around good choice. I hope that helps you out Don, enjoy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    43. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are not running Flash, a Linux box running the cheapest ION you can find will be quite sufficient for display purposes.

      Exactly...something like this would be perfect. Just install Ubuntu and XMBC.

      Of course you could also install XBMC on an Apple TV too, but that might have problems with non-H.264 content. I'd be interested to hear whether XBMC runs well on the new $99 Apple TV models, since that could be a really cheap option.

    44. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      > What does Plex get you that using the file browser and double clicking does not?

      Metadata. Being able to filter and sort by year, by genre, by actor, by director, or by whether you've watched them before or not.

      Posters and frame previews. Plot summaries for both movies and television episodes.

      Attractive graphical representations of file contents-- resolution, video codec, audio format.

      Ratings for content, and the ability to submit ratings.

      XBMC and all its forks (like Plex and Boxee) are specifically designed to give you a fundamentally different kind of experience than just looking at a list of files and then double-clicking to open.

      If none of those things are interesting (or if you're willing to go to the trouble to install your own jukebox and configure it) you're better off going with an NMT-based device like a PopcornHour or something similar. They're much less expensive, and many have options for local storage if you don't want to run a server, and can access NAS devices directly if you have any.

      If you want the metadata, but only need it on a single machine, or have a NAS and don't want to run a server, look at XBMC.

      If you want the metadata, need to access it from several different places and devices (iOS devices, Mac Mini as an HTPC) and are willing to run a server, look at Plex9.

      Another alternative is coming later this year: the Boxee box. A fork of XBMC running on a linux-based machine rather like many of the NMT devices, but $100 more than an AppleTV.

      An AppleTV is really only useful if you either already have all your content in iTunes and are prepared to keep a computer running to serve it from, or if you're happy with Apple's content rental offerings.

    45. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      As for ripping DVDs, that should be done on the server, if you want to watch it now, you put the DVD in; if you want to watch it later there's no real obstacle to putting the DVD into the server machine to rip it.

      In my opinion, I don't agree that such an activity should be performed on the server, since that requires physical access to the server. It sits out in my workshop. It also serves the rest of my family (Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, New Jersey). Having the ability to remotely rip and load data is VERY useful for a server.

      I mean, it IS a server right? It receives data, and gives data, why SHOULD you go to it when you want to rip data when you could just do that from the client?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    46. Re:Mac Mini + Plex by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Having tried the 'VGA to HDMI' solution, I would not recommend it. One of the reasons there are so few of these converters on the market is they can be really picky about what is on both ends of them. My system usually got caught up in a long loop of autodetect and finally gave up. Attempts to manually set the resolution (under windows at least) never worked since the time for HDMI to settle down and accept the signal was longer then the time box for accepting.

      There are other issues I've run into:

      My original setup was DVI-VGA(pc) to VGA(tv). I ran into issues with ghosting, audio was only passed in stereo (Samsung limitation)

      Then I went to a DVI(pc)-HDMI(tv)

      That caused a whole list of issues. My television would report to my NVIDIA card that since it was connected via HDMI, it could accept audio over HDMI (it could) So the NVIDIA card would DISABLE the analog audio on my sound card and transmit the digital audio it was receiving over the DVI connection (You CAN do that) The problem was that my video card did NOT have a digital audio in port. So it was receiving a null value for digital audio (or nothing) and therefore transmitted a null audio signal to my television.

      It was an issue with the NVIDIA drivers, and partially my Samsung TV (PN50A650). Samsung's software did NOT allow me to disable the digital audio (and therefore not report back that it could accept digital audio) and NVIDIA's drivers did not allow me to tell it to NOT attempt to send audio via the DVI/HDMI connection.

      I had to manually edit the NVIDIA driver for it to use a custom EDID to fix the audio screwup. It took me hours to figure out what was wrong, and any time I want to update drivers I'll have to manually edit them as well. NVIDIA did in one release have an option to disable the digital audio, but that option disappeared in later driver releases. (Though they aren't as bad as ATI for drivers, yet)

      In the end, I was ready to just ditch the video card altogether and purchase one that went straight from HDMI to HDMI and could accept/send audio over that link.

      I really hate the HDMI standard because it is so easy to have a glitch on one side (audio or video) which messes up the whole experience.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  3. Popcorn Hour by mewsenews · · Score: 4, Informative

    No transcoding but it plays close to all formats

    http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/

    1. Re:Popcorn Hour by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. I also use Popcorn hour, before that I used a Avel Link Player and before that a MyIhome from El Gato ALL use the Sybas software. The Popcorn Hour handles the most encodes and you can plug in multiple servers. plus it will take a BluRay and a hard drive. Also the client for it runs on PC (XP Vista Win7) Mac 10.3 and on with a G4 of around 900mhz and up or Linux. Highly recommended

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:Popcorn Hour by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just looked all over their website and I can't make head or tail of what the thing really does.

      Do I have to load data on it or is a just controller and link manager? Does it have native wireless capability (the spec pages say no, the comparison page says yes)? How many boxes do I need to handle 2 PCs , 1 dual-tuner satellite dish/PVR, a BD player, and 3 TVs?

      I will never understand why anyone tries to sell a product the customer can't visualize. I will never understand someone who buys something the seller can't explain simply.

    3. Re:Popcorn Hour by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      It plays media streamed over a network. You need one for each TV you want to use one on. It won't do anything with your dish. You can probably use any PC on the network to serve media. Wireless is a for-pay option on each of the devices they sell.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      posting anon to preserve moderations

      It's a catergory of device known as a NMT - network media tank. There are various ones, and I have a popcorn A110

      You can put a hard drive in it and store/play media from there

      You can hook a usb drive to it and store/play media from that

      It also acts a a usb device, you can plug it into a pc and use it as a usb drive

      you can plug it into a network and hook up multiple servers, either via nfs/smb or http streaming (no wifi on mine)

      It runs ftp / http so you can browse it and use it, the device it self, as a server to stream media to your PC

      It has 'web apps' built it so you can view many online video services and video/podcasts etc, (but not youtube afaik)

      It has hdmi,composite and component out for video output

      it has optical out and phono stereo for sound out (and the hdmi)

      it plays just about everything i've thrown at it, full 1080p, dvd rips, xvids, crappy phone vids

      no lagging, no jumping, seeking it very fast even on 18GB blu ray rips

      Support for various video modes, refresh rates and 24fps, progressive/interlaced.

      In terms of hooking it to your TVs think of it like a set top box - so one device per TV, unless you want to take the output and split it/distribute it.

      I got it because I was fed up of a myth tv box whirring away in the corner of the living room

      This thing (without a HD inside) is silent. And by silent i don't mean nearly silent, but actually silent, no moving parts.

      I just point it at my video share on my linux server and it plays everything.

      For movies, you may want to check out YAMJ, whichi makes it all shiny and nice (think apple TV / xbmc) but tbh I don't need any of that 'I watch, I delete'

      Also, with a HD inside you can opt to have a torrent client (transmission IIRC) which will download straight on to it for your viewing pleasure..

      for ease of use and WAF / Child AF totally recommend.

    5. Re:Popcorn Hour by kava_kicks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The popcorn is good, really good, but it is not perfect. The music playback is pretty crappy; the interface isn't fantastic; and it is a little buggy. I think it is pretty much perfect if ALL you want to do is play movies, but if you want to do more, I would use something else.

      I still prefer XBMC and after seeing a friend put it on a re-purposed Apple TV (not just jailbroken; completely overwritten), that is the way I am going.

    6. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +1 for Popcorn Hour. They make very good media streamer with great community support and add-ons.

      I use the following setup:

      Popcorn Hour A-110 hooked to wired ethernet
      Kroozbox for TV user interface
      Personal Video Database for video database management

      The way it works is I put a video file on a Samba share and run PVD from my desktop. PVD scans the share, finds the new video file(s), and populates the database with information from IMDB and posters from Amazon. Kroozbox runs on my Linux server and uses the PVD database to display the movie library information in a friendly way on the screen. The whole thing was a little tricky to initially configure but works very well. Everyone in the house was able to immediately browse and use the video library without any training (we're talking ESL grandparents here).

      I also have a WD TV Live which is decent but the interface isn't nearly as good as the setup I described above.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    7. Re:Popcorn Hour by DRMShill · · Score: 1

      I've had a Popcorn hour A110 for a couple years now. I can sum it up by saying, with the exception of anything with subtitles, it's a great appliance for playing your blu ray rips. It will understand most other formats but the UI is slow enough and basic enough that you're really not going to want to watch TV shows on it like you would with Boxee. On the flip side, I have Boxee on another screen and it's great for dealing with just about anything but Hidef. I'm running an Eeebox eb1012 which when running Powerdvd it seems to keep up with bluray rips just fine but Boxee just doesn't seem to use the hardware acceleration. Hope that was helpful.

    8. Re:Popcorn Hour by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't do Netflix Instant Streaming =(

    9. Re:Popcorn Hour by ydrol · · Score: 1

      The devices are good. The documentation is bad.
      I have 3 generations - The UI could be faster but video playback is great.
      For more info head on over to the active user forums http://networkedmediatank.com/
      The interface is a basic file browser , although there are some net applications - the new Youtube app is quite nice.

      There is also a new offical interface in development for the latest generation
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTRvlvPKmOs

      I maintain a PVR/jukebox application that runs on them that catalogs content that is automatically downloaded from "the internet". http://www.networkedmediatank.com/wiki/index.php/Oversight

      Although many enthusiasts install YAMJ a highly configurable/skinnable jukebox.
      Some more demos here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PRjJcspgjI

      You can load data on an optional internal hard drive, OR you can use it purely as a streaming front end.

      It also has usenet and torrent clients , but the network stack is a bit flaky for torrents IMO,

      They have great video playback chips but the main 'cpu' handles all other tasks, and sometimes it struggles a little of you are doing anything besides basic playback. But for the price, they are great.

    10. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Been using an A-110 for a while now, everything is streamed across a network from my media fileserver, just like the OP. Granted, I convert everything to x264-AC3 on a hot system, then dump it to the appropriate drive on the server. Once set up, the PCH is pretty brainless to use, plays cleanly, draws like, 7 watts or something absurdly low, utterly silent sans hdd. The latest hardware which would fit your needs most inexpensively, is probably the Popbox.
      Also have a 2-core Atom with an nVidia 8400GS PCI (not PCIe) playing back in a vdpau-enabled mplayer (in Linux), plays back 1080p AC3-5.1 without even breaking a sweat (average 10% CPU usage), I'm sure you could run whatever software interface works best.
      Never tried to stream a full M2TS stream across a network. Seems like a waste of fileserver space, x264-AC3 recodes (HDConvertToX + time) have always looked and sounded great on the Popcorn Hour.

    11. Re:Popcorn Hour by robwmc · · Score: 1

      I've had a popcorn hour A110 for a couple of years and can say hands down that it way out performs an Apple TV running Boxee. It can handle everything from avi to wmv and does it pretty well. It even has a bit torrent client. You can stream from a network share or copy the content to the hard drive. I'm not sure what the bit rate limits are on each format but it does a good job decoding many different formats. I'll agree that the streaming from the internet is a little quirky. They used to have a youtube channel but it no longer works. For the price, it is a good solution and there is a pretty strong community behind it.

    12. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that it can lag on high quality MKV though, since its CPU is fairly weak and it relies heavily on its dedicated decode hardware. So the demuxing part which is negligible on a normal PC has a noticeable impact. Admittedly this was from the weeaboos of /g/, so it may only happen with ultra-high quality elitist encode setting anime fansubs ...

      Personally I just use an old shuttle running XBMC on XUbuntu. Plays everything, streams, fairly low power usage, quiet fan is effectively silent (drowned out by the movie.)

    13. Re:Popcorn Hour by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Can it handle the ATSC bit stream files that get recorded from digital tuner cards? They don't say, so either that's an omission by their product design team, or it goes under some other name. MythTV handles it just fine.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    14. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an advert. What you don't say is the popcorn is buggy, often crashes, there is little support and updates are rare. Considering the mess caused my matroska turning on a hidden and useful header compression feature, which breaks almost all MKV support on these type of devices, do you really want a box from a company that has no support and updates, or community?

    15. Re:Popcorn Hour by thalassinos · · Score: 1

      I do not know about ATSC bit stream, but it handles the DVB-S TS stream produced by DVB set top boxes like Dreambox just fine.

    16. Re:Popcorn Hour by jythie · · Score: 1

      That brings up a question I have concerning these dedicated players... how do they handle multiple audio tracks or subtitles? Last time I tried asking fansub people what they use I got a 'use an old PC!'

    17. Re:Popcorn Hour by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That would be an MPEG-2 transport stream with AC-3 audio.

    18. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a Popcornhour C-200 and love it. It provides a number of media services -- play media from our network shares, access internet radio (including You-tube). You can install one or two internal hard drives for media storage and to provide working storage for the integral bittorrent client -- there are slots for a 2.5" hard drive and a 3.5" or CD/DVD/Blueray drive. We use the hard drive to provide a second copy of media files -- just in case. The C200 connects to our wired gigabit network -- which also allows it to download firmware updates directly, there appears to be no performance advantage playing from the local hard drive vs the gigabit network. What it will not do is be a distribution point for AV to other devices in the network -- as for example, if I wanted to watch live TV on my wireless laptop. The C200 is plumbed directly into our TV via HDMI. We also have a Sony DVD library for our physical disks -- I could have dumped these to disk but chose not to. Yeah, the website is fairly opaque and the support turnaround not great, but it plays pretty much everything I have thrown at it, including FLAC audio. It is simply a good player for media sourced on the internal network. Solved our problem of what to do with a huge pile of old videos that we could still view but for how long.

    19. Re:Popcorn Hour by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Subtitle: hit subtitle button on controller, then down/ down/ right/ enter One problem is multi-line subtitle /napear like this with /n instead of space. its a bug but they work and you get used to it.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    20. Re:Popcorn Hour by Son+of+Byrne · · Score: 1

      Why do I keep finding myself arguing with people who support the PCH box? Anyway, from my perspective anyway, the PCH is not ready for regular consumer use. I've posted before about my issues with the box not playing iso files properly and having trouble streaming video over the LAN.

      Basically, the PCH *can* be a network video player, but it is definitely buggy (YMMV, that's my experience).

      The PCH is *not* like a receiver that handles multiple vid signals in and delivers one signal out. It is, quite simply, a small device that runs an embedded os and spits out an HD signal. That's pretty much it.

      I wouldn't waste my money on another one (I've purchased two). Definitely go with either a pre-built silent pc set top box or one of the other recommended solutions that stick with a more traditional PC architecture. Believe me, in the end, you're going to want the extra oomph that comes from a pc, but you'll also want it to be quiet.

      That's just my opinion.

      --
      I'd happily pay you Tuesday for a biopsy today!
    21. Re:Popcorn Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using PCH A110 for quite a while now and can confirm all of this. My two big gripes with the device are:

      1. It locks up and has to be powercycled after about a month of moderate (2-3 movies a day) use, especially when using YAMJ.
      2. It does not support SUB/IDX style subtitles

      Other than that the device rocks. It would be totally more awesome if it supported multichannel hirez FLAC and had decent HDHomeRun client (there is one HDHR client, but it sucks)

    22. Re:Popcorn Hour by Skapare · · Score: 1

      MPEG-2 is the codec within the ATSC. But the ATSC stream also has other stuff, like more than one channel at a time, channel IDs, closed-caption data, program guide data sometimes, etc. Many ATSC tuner cards can deliver this bit stream in whole. The bit stream is what is delivered to the TV station 8-VSB modulator. It it what comes from the tuner's 8-VSB demodulator. Storing the whole stream takes less processor action, but required more stored space. When you play it back, you can play whatever subchannel you want.

      In addition to all this, I'm also looking for an 8-VSB RF modulator so I can feed out signals other tuners can receive. Adding QAM64 and QAM256 to that is a plus. And COFDM would also be a plus (to support DVB).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  4. O!Play by clarkn0va · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/3767/media-streamer-platforms-roundup/5 You can read a decent (although aging) round-up of your options there, or just go buy the O!Play. It plays anything that matters.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  5. WD HD Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get a Western Digital HD Live box. It's cheap, tiny, quiet and plays videos with a large variety of codecs. Also does music of course, plus Pandora, Flicker, etc.

    1. Re:WD HD Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Same with the Seagate FreeAgent Theater+(TM) HD Media Player STCEA201-RK. I picked one up last week from Newegg for $50 shipped. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148499

      They are OOS now but other places have them for about $80.

      It will stream over the network, play from any old USB HD plugged into it, or has a custom slot for a Seagate Go drive. I have mine plugged into a bridged wireless router but it also supports several $15 and under wireless USB cards. I have it connected to several Samba shares and it works fine. The interface is a little cludgy and sometimes is slow to respond but I have not noticed any issues while it is actually playing content. I have also used he Netflix streaming and it played fine, quality was comparable to my Xbox with Netflix.

      It is not perfect but damn, for under $100, it is small, silent, uses very little power, and will play 90% of audio and video formats. I've messed a little with some of the other features it has like Youtube videos, Picasa, and Flickr long enough to test them but not long enough to critique them. I never opened the included software that comes with it, I think it includes some type of sync software if you are using it with a USB HD.

      The published specs of what it can play:

      Streams Netflix
      Easily enjoy your photos, movies and music on your TV.
      HDMI connectivity and 1080p HD video playback.
      Dolby Digital and DTS audio support
      Ethernet connection for accessing shared content on your network.
      Unique docking system eliminates fumbling with cables and connections.
      Front-mounted USB port for digital cameras and additional storage devices.
      Includes sync software for PC and Mac computers.
      Intuitive user interface with DVD-style navigation.
      Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, and Mac OS X compatible.

      Supported Video Formats
      Formats: MPEG-1, MPEG-2 (VOB/ISO), MPEG-4 (DivX /Xvid), DivX HD, Xvid HD, AVI, MOV, MKV, RMVB, AVC HD, H.264, WMV9, VC-1, M2TS, TS/TP/M2T
      Subtitles: SAMI(smi), SRT and SUB
      Video resolutions: NTSC 480i/480p, PAL 576i/576p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p

      Supported Audio Formats
      AAC, MP3, Dolby Digital, DTS, ASF, FLAC, WMA, LPCM, ADPCM, WAV, OGG
      Playlist: M3U, PLS

      Supported Photo Formats
      JPEG files up to 20 megapixels, BMP, GIF, PNG, TIFF

      Output
      Video: Composite, Component, HDMI 1.3
      Audio: Stereo, Optical S/PDIF, HDMI 1.3
      Interface: 1x USB 2.0 at front, 1x USB 2.0 at back
      Network: Ethernet 10/100 mbps

      Official webpage
      http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?name=STCEA201-RK-fa-theater-plus-player&vgnextoid=2f6549738cbb3210VgnVCM1000001a48090aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f424072516d8c010VgnVCM100000dd04090aRCRD&locale=en-US&reqPage=Support

       

    2. Re:WD HD Live by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Second this. Got one at Costco on an impulse and have been very impressed what the little $100 box does. Stick a USB hard drive on it and it even shares that out via SMB. Cool box.

      http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=735

      Although I haven't done it, it seems to be hackable.

      http://b-rad.cc/wdlxtv/

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:WD HD Live by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Seagate's does everything the Western Digital box does, plus it does Netflix Streaming. It's also $100 without a hard drive.

      http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/home_entertainment/freeagent_theater_plus/

    4. Re:WD HD Live by tenaciousj · · Score: 1

      WD does Netflix as well

    5. Re:WD HD Live by ydrol · · Score: 1

      WD HD Live is good for the price. It has some issues with HD Audio that you may want to research to decide if it meets your requirements.

    6. Re:WD HD Live by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      It have a spot for a hard drive?

    7. Re:WD HD Live by recharged95 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, also, on what you're asking: isn't that what a typical home multi TB NAS does anyway...today.

    8. Re:WD HD Live by Crispin+Glover · · Score: 1

      The WD Live and WDTV HD do not. For Netflix streaming you need the WDTV Live Plus. It's about twice what the Seagate Theater+ costs. I got one of the Theater+ units as well and it plays almost everything I can throw at it. The Netflix streaming is HD. Windows shares are no problem. It even played a ripped DVD ISO with menus over the network. Very impressed with the bang for the buck I got.

    9. Re:WD HD Live by loudmax · · Score: 1

      Also seconding (thirding? fourthing?) this. They have them for about $120 at Costco. They're tiny and silent. I had a little trouble with old DivX avi's I transcoded a few years ago, but it plays x264 + matroska just fine. I used one to replace a mac mini in my living room and it generally does a better job of making video streaming convenient. They play files over SMB, but they've been hacked to support NFS.

      Big thanks to the guys hacking it at http://b-rad.cc/wdlxtv/

      --
      KTHXBYE
    10. Re:WD HD Live by g8oz · · Score: 1

      Indeed WH HD Live would be a good choice. To find out more about this digital media receiver product category go to
      http://www.mpcclub.com./

      Just got myself an AC Ryan Playon!HD and it's great. http://www.acryan.com/en/

      The products seem to fall into 2 categories - those that use chips from Sigma Designs and those that use ones from Realtek.

  6. Tversity by Deathnerd · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using Tversity on my windows machine for 3 years now and I can honestly say it's the best solution I've ever seen. Transcoding to multiple devices with different codec/format requirement has never been simpler. I can stream to all the iPhones and computers in the house, as well as my 360 with minimal configuration.

    1. Re:Tversity by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Minor note: The free version of Tversity has the oddly-specific cripplement of not working with iOS devices.

    2. Re:Tversity by Deathnerd · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I haven't done any streaming or transcoding to any of my iOS devices in quite some time. I think the last time I did so was right before they branched into free and paid versions. I guess I should read those release notes more carefully! :D

  7. WD HD Live is your friend. by Era · · Score: 5, Informative

    You will want this: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=735
    And this: http://b-rad.cc/wdlxtv-live/

    Simple, effective and above all...cheap.

    1. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Knightman · · Score: 1

      I've stopped using anything that has a WD disk, they tend to fail too often, but not as bad as Maxtor.

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    2. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After checking what you've suggested, your solution seems to be EXACTLY what I've been looking for for the bedroom TV.

      Thanks muchly.

    3. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I've stopped using anything that has a WD disk, they tend to fail too often, but not as bad as Maxtor.

      I've had the opposite experience with WD, rarely had a failure. Ditto on Maxtor through.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Era · · Score: 1

      No drive, its just a media player, plays any and all media from my win7 box as well as my mac.

      All it wants is a network share.

    5. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WDTV Live is really nice. Especially when you also have a very large storage device (a la NAS) somewhere else on your network. However, I think small nettop + ubuntu + xbmc kills that setup. It all depends on how flashy you want your UI, how big your library is, and how easy you want the setup to be. For ease of use WDTV wins. For flashy, XBMC wins. For big library, XBMC also wins. I have around 2500 tv shows and 1000 movies, all organized well, but the wdtv still chokes sometimes.

      I'm surprised you are running windows 7. My ubuntu + xbmc build boots to the xbmc screen in less than 15 seconds. You tell it to replace the default window manager (Gnome, so there isnt even one running in the background).

      I'd be remiss if I didn't tell you there are occasional hiccups, but nothing that takes more than 5-10 minutes to fix and nothing that has prevented me from watching something that night.

    6. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by lcreech · · Score: 1

      True, but the interface is pure s**t (aka simple file browsing) and it's sluggish. I'm much happier with my 16T XBMC Box. As far as WD Drives, I like the WD Green, they were the only ones to work with the SA Tivo HD.

    7. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WDTV is golden. you owe it to yourself to try one of these before you try and build any type of media center box.

    8. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this at home and love it. Only think i would like is the ability to resume when i hit the stop button instead of pause. Supports most popular video formats (all i have every wanted to play) as well as LAN/Wireless(some) and USB HDD with and video HDMI out upto 1080p. I actually replaced my existing Linux Media PC with it.

    9. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hard drives fail. Consumers tend to take the hilarious path of refusing to use again any hard drive brand that ever fails on them.

      For what it's worth, I've had to replace drives made by WD, Seagate, Maxtor, Hitachi, Samsung, JVC, JTS, Quantum, Conner, Miniscribe, IBM, IMS, CDC, Imprimis, ExcelStor, Fujitsu, Micropolis, and I swear to god one Plus Hardcard.

      But more Seagate than anything else.

    10. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by daveholio · · Score: 1

      I tried several boxes before settling for the popcorn hour. the WD HD live was a complete piece of crap. It was tiny, the firmware updates didn't work, and I spent many hours beating my head against a wall trying to get homebrew or any other firmware to actually work on it. And I soldered my own chip into my xbox to run xbox media center long ago, so I know what I'm doing.

      --
      "hard work often pays off over time, but laziness always pays off now."
    11. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      I agree on maxtor but also have had the opposite experience with WD. I had one fail but it gave me plenty of warning before it did so I snagged all the data off it before I slagged it.

      On the other hand I have a 10 year old 80gb maxtor drive thats been reading/writing almost ever since I bought it and it won't die. The day I unplug it is probably the day it'll die.

      Seagate however is so far my worst experience by a long shot. I had some old drives in the 2-40gb range years back that were pretty decent from them but I've had 6 250gb, 1 160gb, 3 500gb and a 1tb drive fail within 3 months from them. thats out of a total of about 20 seagate drives.

    12. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by hairyfish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vote Up - until you mentioned Seagate. If I had a dollar for every " I had a brand x HDD that died, I'll never buy them again". It's all the same stuff and they all have roughly the same failure rates (ie very very small). Unless you're dealing with thousands and thousands of drives, your sample size far too small to be reliable.

    13. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I have hit a thousand (repair bench work). Right now I've taken a Seagate hiatus because I had the same drive take me down a 5-incident RMA chain. I'll try again when 7200.13 rolls out.

    14. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by RockHammer · · Score: 1

      I tried out the WD TV Live and was impressed by it. I was streaming recorded content from MythTV using UPnP/DLNA and tried a number of other media files over USB and it was able to play them quite nicely. I played a bit of content recorded from a HD-PVR (in 720p) and it played back nicely.

      Based on size, features, and price it is a worthy consideration. One of my co-workers owns 2 WD TV Live and at least 1 of the original WD TV. He has been very happy with them. Currently at least one of his WD TV Live is running the b-rad firmware.

      I built a HTPC, along with some friends, several years ago to run MythTV. I have been very pleased with the result. It took a while to decide on the hardware. I have a system that sits with the TV. It is reasonably quiet., basically I only hear it a little when all sound is off and even then mostly when I walk closer. I looked for cases with Silicon mounts for HDs and 120mm fans (1/2 speed switch). I've got a passively cooled video card. We picked the Antec Fusion and I have been really pleased with it. There is also the NSK2480 without VFD and the MicroFusion now. One friend even built a second machine using basically the NSK2480 since he like the Fusion case design so much.

      That said, I have been looking for a nice compact low cost front end that I can use if I get a second TV. Ideally I would like to run mythfrontend since it provides complete support with mythbackend (LiveTV, Commercial flags, etc). The devices I have primarily considered over the years are the HD TV Live, popcorn hour, Apple TV/Mac Mini (only if I can install Linux and run Mythfrontend), or a itx computer.

      Based on how content is being accessed is the primary consideration along with required features. Aside from the LiveTV and commercial flag limitations with MythTV, I am currently most interested in the WD TV Live based on my criteria - small, networked, HD, significant codec support (MPEG2, DivX, Xvid, h.264, ogg, ac-3, etc), cheap. I had been looking for a device for several years and I became excited when the the WD TV Live came out. It is the closest device to what I'm looking for. I figure I can even just make LiveTV on MythTV accessible over UPnP with a little effort.

    15. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree here. I spent months trying to figure out if I should build something and ended up buying the WD TV Live because it was on sale, and it works great. The stock UI is a little funny with network shares but it works. Wife is happy that it will play the DVDs and TV shows she missed. I haven't loaded the brad firmware yet but I heard it makes improvements to the way the files are presented. I have it connected wireless g right now through some junk adapter I bought on meritline and it plays 720p fine as long as no one else is using the wireless. Looking to hardwire it eventually. Also does Pandora, Live365, Youtube. They have a plus version which I think does netflix I think too. It could be more powerful but it plays damn near every file format I have. Definitely best value out there.

    16. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Osty · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing the WD Live devices don't contain a hard drive. They're completely solid state. You can hook up an external drive, but you're better off using them to stream from a NAS or other networked storage.

    17. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by UncleWilly · · Score: 1

      I have two of these (WB HD Live) one wired and one wireless. I am very happy with the performance. Not many bells & whistles but it gets the job done. I would recommend it. However http://www.dlink.com/boxeebox Boxee Box seems to do all this and more (at about twice the price) but it's not available until November. I will probably get myself a boxee box for xmass :)

    18. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      I remember this quote from a /. HDD discussion a couple of years ago.

      Hard drives are like hard liquor. Everybody has one particular brand that they've had a bad experience with and will forever avoid because of it.

      My personal experience has been with more IBM drives failing, but that's probably because I was working at an all IBM shop during their Deathstar plague. Other than that, the only brand that sticks out is Quantum, but mostly because every Quantum drive I've encountered was so God-awful loud, I almost welcomed the "click-click" of impending failure.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    19. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Narbo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you are posting about? The device in question is not a hard drive and has absolutely nothing to do with the WD hard drive division.

      It's a media player which supports playback from USB attached storage or over a wired network connection.

    20. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Just replyin' to the parent...

    21. Re:WD HD Live is your friend. by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      I can't agree more. WDTV Live with b-rad's firmware is excellent. It can't really transcode other than transcoding to a particular output resolution but it is cheap and amazingly powerful. At ~$60-80 bucks it is worth a flier. Under the hood the WDTV Live is a 500mhz, 512meg linux computer. It's not fast at it but you can have the WDTV host an attached usb HD on NFS and SMB which isn't bad at 6 watts. The Sigma chipset is a decoding, transcoding beast. If the SDK for the 8655 ever gets into the wild it will be even better. The WDTV binaries are lousy and the after market firmware can only work around that so much. B-rad and the other coders have done an amazing job.

  8. ASUS OPlay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using my ASUS OPlay! for about six months now. It does pretty well streaming from my SMB server @ 1080p. Now it they'd only add a Netflix player...

    1. Re:ASUS OPlay! by zonky · · Score: 1

      I have one of these and they're indeed great.

  9. Popcornhour by grub · · Score: 2, Informative

    PopcornHour Network Media Tanks ! We own two and LOVE 'em. Xvid, mkv, iso, vob etc. Up to 1080p.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Popcornhour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded.

    2. Re:Popcornhour by SchizoDuckie · · Score: 1

      Popcorn hour and NMT mediatanks in general are just awesome. They run samba, stream your 1080p stuff through the air (mine does, over a 300mb wifi stick). Cheap (my 100% china clone was €120) and there's the NMT Community Software Installer, where you can install webservers, torrent clients, heck i'm browsing my library with my android remote! If you want an option that can connect to anything you have available, have a look at popcornhour or something with an NMT chipset.

      --
      Quack damn you!
    3. Re:Popcornhour by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      They stream Netflix?

    4. Re:Popcornhour by grub · · Score: 1

      No netflix in Canada until recently. We just download.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Popcornhour by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I love the PopcornHour boxes, but I don't believe they stream Netflix at all, which pushes me towards the Seagate box that does almost everything the PopcornHour box does (and also streams Netflix).

  10. MythTV by Onthax · · Score: 4, Informative

    MythTV, do all the processing on the backend server and have a lightweight (quiet) frontend it should bolt onto your existing ubuntu server

    1. Re:MythTV by XanC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly. I've used the ~$200 Acer AspireRevo as a frontend. Full HD and everything. Even got a Windows refund! (Well, technically it's still being processed, but they've agreed I'm supposed to get one.)

    2. Re:MythTV by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Being a Slackware user for many years, I went the MythTV+Slackware route when I got my HTPC up and running. One day I managed to totally break my system and decided "What the hell, let's give MythBuntu a go". What used to be a 2 hour+ set up time went down to 10-15 minutes. I actually switched my server over to Ubuntu soon afterwards and haven't looked back.

      MythTV and Ubuntu (and mediabuntu) marry well together on both the backend and frontend. It's worth an afternoon to try out if you have the hardware around. I used nfs instead of smfs to connect the two, but the principles the same. Plus I have additional "TV" sets all around the house with dual booting partition. Those took a little extra time to set up but it is a bonus.

      Some of the new mini SSD based machines (Like the Acer Revo) might be the way to go for the frontend. They're powerful enough and can playback HD video. MythTV works great on my Asus EEE 901 running Ubuntu Netbook remix.

    3. Re:MythTV by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      MythTV, do all the processing on the backend server and have a lightweight (quiet) frontend it should bolt onto your existing ubuntu server

      Question: my server is running Debian Lenny. Can I run the backend on that?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:MythTV by Pax00 · · Score: 1

      I agree.. Been running mythtv for a while now and I love it.

      There are several mythtv specific distros. I am running mythdora myself. I really like the fact it uses LVM.

      Also the it's got some great plugins for weather and game emulation.

    5. Re:MythTV by XanC · · Score: 1

      I think that should work. As long as the versions of MythTV are close enough. Check Marillat's Debian multimedia repository.

    6. Re:MythTV by mldi · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as your server+frontend are both either at .21 and earlier or .22 and later. Those two versions are incompatible.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    7. Re:MythTV by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for the Revo, that is a *great* piece of hardware, and perfect for a home media PC. And if you don't want Myth (I'm a Myth user, but let's face it, the UI ain't great), XBMC on Linux is another good option.

    8. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythTV, do all the processing on the backend server and have a lightweight (quiet) frontend

      it should bolt onto your existing ubuntu server

      Myth tv is NOT user friendly in ANY way whatsoever

    9. Re:MythTV by timeOday · · Score: 1

      All the recommendations of using a general purpose PC are neglecting to mention you NEVER get frame-accurate replay this way. Watch a scrolling ticker and you'll see it jerking along. Also you may or may not be able to eliminate tearing which is quite annoying. You need dedicated hardware, integrated closely with the software, to really get replay right.

    10. Re:MythTV by mishehu · · Score: 1

      To elaborate, I'd go with a frontend that was an Atom-Ion type (make sure it's a dual core Atom). From what I hear, due to the VDPAU supported by the nvidia graphics chipset, these are supposed to handle playback of 1080p no problem.

    11. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded - I've been using MythTV for all my live TV viewing, as a PVR, photo viewer, music player, web browser, video/DVD player, game player and more on my living room TV for years now, with excellent results.

    12. Re:MythTV by Salpula · · Score: 1

      "I've used the ~$200 Acer AspireRevo as a frontend. Full HD and everything." I know so many people who do this. Its definitely the way to go, it would cost you less than a mac mini (you can buy 2 for the price of a mac mini, which is overpowered for this application).

    13. Re:MythTV by jamesbromberger · · Score: 1

      2nd'ed. Great little box. The originalk Atom 220 CPU on the original Revos are a little slow on true 1080p at times (though the video is off-loaded to the GPU for decoding); the followup Atom 330 based units were a dual core CPU. I've been using mine as combined backend & front end for some time - plus file server, NTP, DNS server, IPv6 gateway and tunnel endpoint, music DAAP server, and DLNA server (mediatomb).

      Was wondering what the product line is for this small form factor from Acer. Atom has continued to evolve, but I havent seen any more products....

    14. Re:MythTV by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      It's not user friendly to set up and configure, but it must be OK to use, because my wife can do it.

      WAF levels on MythTV are so high that it's the one system in the house that she actually complains about if it goes down.

    15. Re:MythTV by Skapare · · Score: 1

      But what networked playback boxes can be used with MythTV for the front end where a computer cannot go?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    16. Re:MythTV by rmcd · · Score: 1

      This is a little OT but where did you buy that you were able to get a windows refund?

    17. Re:MythTV by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

      I configured the samba server and setup a windows share. You can then play your recorded shows on any pc or tv on your network.

      --
      -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
    18. Re:MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mythbuntu just makes it so easy to setup - using 2 acer revo's as frontends - excellent 720p / 1080p playback - Mythtv isn't as pretty to look at as say plex / xbmc but mythtv development continues and I think we'll see some improvments in the interface come .24

    19. Re:MythTV by XanC · · Score: 1

      I bought it from Newegg, but I don't think that matters. When I first fired up the machine, it presented me with 50 pages of legalese, which said I could either accept all that crap or get a refund from the manufacturer (Acer). All my arguing was done with Acer directly.

      That was the WinXP OEM agreement; I understand some of the newer Windowses may not have that "loophole".

    20. Re:MythTV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of waiting for Vertical Sync? Yeah, most video cards do that now, and MythTV and XBMC both support it too. Look for an option called Vsync.

    21. Re:MythTV by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      MythTV seems easier to hack than XBMC though. I've tweaked mine with
      some special features (not coded in C++) that allow me to better manage
      my rather large video collection. I don't think any of the video players
      including XBMC really do a good job handling large video collections.

      They don't "scale up" very well. ...but if you're already a happy XBMC user then I would see no reason to switch.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:MythTV by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Question: my server is running Debian Lenny. Can I run the backend on that?

      There is no server only gui-less mythbackend build. There is just a combined frontend/backend build.

      Your version of QT might not be up to snuff.

      I've had to do Ubuntu upgrades over that sort of thing with my own setup.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:MythTV by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Vertical Sync fixes tearing, except when it doesn't. For example, some cards or drivers only support hardware acceleration on the first display port, and if you connect the TV to the second port, it won't work. Or watching youtube or netflix from a flash player, it may not work. My experience is sometimes it's hard to figure out why it's not working when it seems like it should be. From the number of forum posts you see about tearing and VSync, I'm not the only one.

      Anyways, the bigger problem is getting a steady framerate, meaning exactly one interlaced field per TV refresh. I'll bet whatever software solution you're using with whatever settings, if you watch a side-scrolling banner (e.g. stock or news ticker), it moves along with a bit of jerking.

    24. Re:MythTV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Sorry - I've had perfect vsync in all interlaced TV and classic console games I emulate (SNES, Genesis, Gameboy, Playstation, N64). As long as I have the OpenGL settings on Vsync and Mythtv set to Vsync. I have a fairly recent (< 3 yrs. old) NVIDIA card, and I don't use Youtube in Linux. I only expect hardware accelerated video to be able to vsync successfully, and that's what I use it for.
       
      It does require a little bit faster hardware.
       
      I also have this PC connected only to the TV. Many older graphics cards only do overlay/vsync on whichever port is being used as primary - but that's usually switchable.
       
      If you're getting a jerky side-scrolling banner from TV source video, then it's possible that you have the wrong de-interlace settings. My TV is capable of 60Hz, so I play my interlaced video with alternating frames at 60fps. If you try to de-interlace down to 30, then you'll have judder on scrolling items and that's unrelated to vsync or the fact that it's even a PC. There's a reason why pans are really slow in movies. They only have 24fps to work with vs. TV's 60.
       
      Keep in mind, I use DVI out on my computer for connecting to my TV, not analog. Perhaps your problem is compounded by the shoddy S-Video out connections a lot of cards have.

    25. Re:MythTV by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Youtube in Linux is hardware accelerated when possible, but for me it crashes if I full-screen it when using acceleration. Another problem I've had (for example) is having to run Netflix "watch instantly" under VMWare (no Linux support), and VSync not working through that mess. Another problem I've had was each display could only have one accelerated app; the second would fail to get an XV port and lose VSync. It seems like there was also some conflict between 3d acceleration vs. XV so it was either/or in XF86Config, but I think that was some time ago.

      Rock-steady frame synchronization (I mean the framerate, not VSync) is something I simply haven't seen a PC do. I use mplayer with no deinterlacing. I always assumed the problem is mplayer is trying to control the replay framerate itself, so it occasionally waits slightly too long to decode the next frame in time for the next VSync. Looking at the documentation, mplayer has some options such as vidix=nvidia which are fairly new, or at least I haven't tried with my current hardware. Maybe it's time to give it another whirl.

    26. Re:MythTV by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Get an NVIDIA card that supports VDPAU. I've been through the Xv mess. Glad it's over.
       
      I wouldn't use mplayer with no de-interlacing, unless you really mean double frame rate. Otherwise, you actually see two frames at once on alternating lines at 30fps - doesn't look like tearing, but combing.
       
      I'm a MythTV user, and I now use the internal player for all video - even DVD rips. It has full VDPAU support and I can play 720p video on a fairly old system as long as the GPU is recent enough.
       
      I don't do anything in the browser, since I run everything by remote control. I use my standalone Blu-Ray player for Netflix and Youtube - but I don't even use it for DVD's anymore, since I have my whole collection ripped to my network storage and it plays flawlessly with 5.1 sound under Mythtv (using optical out and AC3).
       
      There's probably some trick to getting Mplayer to play Youtube videos via a script that points it to the URL of the actual H.264 video on the server.

    27. Re:MythTV by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Fooey, I'll need a new card for vdpau.

    28. Re:MythTV by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      > Question: my server is running Debian Lenny. Can I run the backend on that?

      There is no server only gui-less mythbackend build. There is just a combined frontend/backend build.

      Your version of QT might not be up to snuff.

      I've had to do Ubuntu upgrades over that sort of thing with my own setup.

      Sounds like I'm better off just setting up another machine.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    29. Re:MythTV by Skapare · · Score: 1

      My TV has no ethernet connection. That would be a plus if they added that along with all codec support. But so far I have not seen it. I have seen some TVs with ethernet, but the described support is always minimal (lets you get online for some web surfing on a restricted set of sites ... that pay the TV make tons of money, I'm sure).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    30. Re:MythTV by rmcd · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on getting Acer to listen to you!

    31. Re:MythTV by XanC · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Tier 1 was the problem. After eventually being escalated, the next tier understood immediately.

      The winning point with Tier 1, as they tried to say that their policy was to not offer a refund, was that _I_ didn't make up the refund offer, it was _their_ offer! And in fact it was the first thing that popped up when I turned on the machine.

  11. mac mini / front row by sl0ppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    personally i use a mac mini with front row. i map my fileserver via smb, play content using sapphire, the hulu plugin for front row, boxee, etc.

    it works reasonably well.

    1. Re:mac mini / front row by mraiser · · Score: 1

      I agree.. Mac Mini makes the best media pc. Make sure you have VLC in addition to the apple/itunes juggernaut and you should be good to go.

    2. Re:mac mini / front row by drewpt · · Score: 1

      This is what I use too. Works great.

    3. Re:mac mini / front row by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

      Does the mac mini come with the little remote? That would be super handy and possibly enough to justify the cost all by itself.

      Also, what sort of output does it have? DVI? HDMI?

    4. Re:mac mini / front row by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The remote isn't included, but it has the infrared port required for one. You just need to buy the remote separately, unless you want to use an iPhone/iPod touch/iPad to control your media (free "Remote" app).

      The new Mac mini has both HDMI and mini DisplayPort outputs.

    5. Re:mac mini / front row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the mac mini come with the little remote? That would be super handy and possibly enough to justify the cost all by itself.

      Also, what sort of output does it have? DVI? HDMI?

      The remote isn't included, but it has the infrared port required for one. You just need to buy the remote separately, unless you want to use an iPhone/iPod touch/iPad to your media (free "Remote" app).

      Are you serious? A remote would justify the cost? You can pick up ANY remote on the market for another solution (putting XBMC on something MUCH cheaper but just as powerful). I just don't understand why people are so willing to shell out that much money when they don't need to just because it's branded by Apple.

  12. XBMC + Asrock ION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    check out the nvidia ion based boards and systems.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856158009&cm_re=asrock_ion-_-56-158-009-_-Product

    enough muscle for 1080p, all packed into a tiny, quiet package

    1. Re:XBMC + Asrock ION by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seconded. An Ion system with xbmc is what I use and so far we haven't found anything it can't play... case isn't much bigger than a DVD player and even with the optional CPU fan installed it doesn't make much noise.

    2. Re:XBMC + Asrock ION by NightWhistler · · Score: 1

      I agree: I've been running an EEEBox with an ion chipset for some months now, and the performance is excellent. I run mine with Ubuntu and XBMC, but I'm sure it would work equally well on Windows 7.

      XBMC is one of the best interfaces out there IMHO, especially when combined with Lirc and an IR receiver (I use an ancient Irman with an USB converter).

      Also, the EEEBox is quiet and is small, shiny and black... helping a lot with the wife-acceptance-factor :)

      --
      PageTurner Reader: open-source e-reader for Android with cloudsync. http://pageturner-reader.org
    3. Re:XBMC + Asrock ION by kava_kicks · · Score: 1

      I was pretty much intending to do this, but you guys should also consider XBMC on the AppleTV - not running it as a jailbroken app, but completely overwriting the iOS and installing Ubuntu+XBMC. You throw in an add-on card and it will output 1080p, plus it is fanless, has a working remote, is very small, connects to SMB and runs the world's best media player! The only reason I would run XBMC on a small PC instead of an AppleTV is if I wanted to do other things (DVD, web, etc). But honestly, all I want my box to do is play all my media and do it well. XBMC on AppleTV is perfect for that.

    4. Re:XBMC + Asrock ION by nitehorse · · Score: 1

      I have done this and it is a nightmare. The software that supports the CrystalHD card is buggy as hell, the XBMC support for it is still not great, and the performance is still spotty (running the latest XBMC SVN builds and the latest CrystalHD code from svn). I can't get it to stream The Dark Knight without dropping frames, pausing/resuming causes all sorts of problems, and exiting out of a movie crashes XBMC half the time for me.

      ION hardware is absolutely the way to go, no question about it.

    5. Re:XBMC + Asrock ION by Derwood5555 · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with this. ION systems can play 1080p content no sweat. They also are very low power, so the system is quiet.

      Also, why in the world would you run XBMC under Windows?????? XBMC in Linux supports VDPAU, which is how low end stuff like the ION can play 1080p flawlessly.

  13. My Setup by Nexzus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I run PS3MediaServer on my fileserver. Streams (and trancodes when necessary) over the network to my PS3. Works well.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    1. Re:My Setup by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I run PS3MediaServer on my fileserver. Streams (and trancodes when necessary) over the network to my PS3. Works well.

      I would frequently get stuttering with this setup, even just doing flac audio files.

      I'm thinking of one of these:

          http://www.thinkgeek.com/electronics/home-entertainment/d3fe/

      Any experiences here? It looks great from the description.

    2. Re:My Setup by Nursie · · Score: 1

      You could try mediatomb, it does DLNA to the PS3 too and I've not experienced much stuttering with it.

    3. Re:My Setup by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I do this too. Never had any stuttering as the other replier did, but I do occasionally run into problem files.

      At least with the stuff I have - a lot of older movies and TV shows, not necessarily encoded by people who know the best methods to do so, but also plenty of HD rips and so on that should be properly encoded - almost everything needs to be transcoded on the fly, and while it usually works fine the high CPU and bandwidth usage can cause problems occasionally. Then you hit a problem file as I mentioned, and it just won't work or the sound is out of sync or whatever. Can't think of any time I got stutters, but it's possible that happens too.

      It's also a little fiddly with things like subtitles and alternate audio tracks - you can't use the subtitle and audio button on the PS3 remote, PS3MediaServer gives you several "links" for lack of a better term labeled with the different options and sometimes they don't work properly. If you watch a lot of foreign movies you will get frustrated with this. Most of the time I have to rename the subtitle file (and occasionally convert them to a different format) to get PS3MediaServer to pick it up.

    4. Re:My Setup by mi5key · · Score: 1

      Too much stuttering, and the DRM (Cinavia) is oppressive.

    5. Re:My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to recommend the same.

      Cheers!

    6. Re:My Setup by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      That would involve owning a PS3 though. Pretty pricy if all you want is a media front end (although obviously a great idea if you've already got one, or if you wanted one to play the games anyway).

    7. Re:My Setup by lollacopter · · Score: 1

      I use a PS3 too, but drive it from my mac using Medialink software http://www.nullriver.com/products/medialink.
      It can transcode video formats that the ps3 doesn't support on the fly which is pretty cool (but means it just breaks if you try to fastfoward/rewind)
      I use ethernet-over-power adapters (200M/b) between the ps3 and the router (gigabit/802.11n)

      mostly works as intended, can stream 1080p over 11n no problems. Its a little wobbly and requires occasional server restart on the mac, but the wifes figured out that part now too (go to mac, open system preferences and restart medialink )

      It can see our itunes library and iphoto library, including all playlists/albums etc too, which is pretty nice , I have some large usb drives hanging off the mac where my library lives. I also have a maxtor nas drive which the ps3 can also see and play video/music from but the upnp server in it isn't so good. (no thumbnails, silly ordering)

    8. Re:My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've achieved the same result with a simple Apache webserver. 30-second install with apt-get, streams like a champ to the PS3. Worth trying if you don't need it to be pretty. :)

    9. Re:My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPnP works well with PS3.

      I know I'll hear gasps of horror from the /. crowd when I say I'm hosting my media on a Windows 7 laptop, but fuck it, I'm not spending an extra penny for a fileserver & it works out of the box. No fiddling about, just enable media streaming under the network centre, set your directories to share, and BOOM, you're set. I'm streaming movies via wifi to my PS3, & enjoying 1080P without extra media-centre boxes, or junk.

    10. Re:My Setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to run that setup as well, but a part from quality loss, albeit small, it completely fails to give you the choice of changing language and subtitles on the fly. Not to mention it's beyond awful at rewinding or fast forwarding.

    11. Re:My Setup by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      PS3 + Mediatomb is how I do it, works great for me. Also, the PS3 makes a pretty decent MythTV frontend now that MythTV has a UPnP (aka DLNA) server function in the backend. The disadvantage to this is that it is playback only - no scheduling/deletion of recordings from the PS3. (Maybe you could fudge it with Mythweb...)

      Do note that if you download any H.264+AC3 MKV files, the PS3 cannot play MKV files. However, tsmuxer will remux the streams to an MPEG transport steam (.m2ts) without reencoding the video. A 1.1 GB file takes around 20-30 seconds. (It's a lossless operation.)

      Also, on a Linux box, tsmuxer will write an output file with permissions such that only the user who created it can access it. You'll need to chmod a+r the file so mediatomb can read it.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    12. Re:My Setup by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Compared to a nettop, it's about the same price or cheaper, and can play HD 1080p video more reliably.

      Also keep in mind it serves as a Blu-Ray player too.

      Most of the sub-$300 media frontend solutions have some pretty severe limitations. I've heard the firmware in the Popcorn Hour devices is awful, for example.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  14. PS3 by dtmancom · · Score: 4, Informative

    I researched this long and hard. I wanted what is known as a "Networked Media Tank," but I didn't have the bucks to make a poor decision and try again. I just plugged the PS3 into the receiver I already had, plugged it into the network, and pointed it at the folder on the server which had all of my music/photos/movies. On the server I installed "PS3 Media Server," which is freeware, pointed it at my media folder, and that, literally, was all it took. Plus the PS3 will play your Blu Rays, and as it is Sony, the firmware updates for new releases will always be available... unlike with the dedicated BD player I had from Samsung. Over a year later and I have never regretted the decision.

    1. Re:PS3 by r3verse · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second that. PS3, PS3 media server [http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/], HDMI into your TV. Transcodes anything the PS3 can't handle. That simple, and all for a ~$300 outlay, plus you get BD capability into the bargain. Can't be beat.

    2. Re:PS3 by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that there is one downside - the PS3 is pissy about video framerates. So, if you have anything that is 25fps (standard for UK and Euro TV shows and often used for their movie releases) it won't play on a USA-version PS3. Almost all dedicated "network media tanks" and most standalone bluray players will play any framerate video and do a pretty good job of matching it to your display, be it 25fps, 24fps, 30fps, etc.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:PS3 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      A long time ago (back when 60GB PS3s were still on the shelves) I tried this out. I found the experience to be lackluster, particularly since rewinding didn't work at all on transcoded streams. I ended up taking the PS3 back. Has this issue been resolved yet?

    4. Re:PS3 by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

      PS3 Media Server's transcoding can be used to correct the framerate too, if you set it up right.

    5. Re:PS3 by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      My PS 3 (first generation) makes way too much noise when playing DVDs or BluRay. And I can't play online games unless I update the firmware and lose the Other OS option. Makes a good dust collector, though.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:PS3 by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      I use MediaTomb on my Linux server and the PS3 as the living room appliance. Works a treat, and no one in the family has any problems using it at all.

      Plus, Blu-Ray, games.. bingo.

    7. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use this setup as well, and no longer have any problems rewinding while transcoding. I agree that it was a major problem at the beginning, but it's fine now.

    8. Re:PS3 by zaffir · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do this for my PS3, and there are a few issues that would make me NOT recommend it for the OP.

      Occasionally my PS3 refuses to find the media server and both have to be restarted. Not a huge deal, but annoying- especially to someone who doesn't know how to reboot the media server.

      Sometimes PS3 Media Server doesn't get the auto-transocde right. So you have to browse to the TRANSCODE folder on your PS3 and select a transocde preset manually. Very handy for a techie, not user friendly at all.

      The interface on the PS3 kinda sucks. It's a basic hierarchy-style file browser. Yes you can find something if it's labeled properly. I have a "TV" and "Movies" folder, and in there each show or movie has its own folder and in that is the media file(s) associated with it. But after using XBMC or Boxee which automatically find your media, pull all of the metadata you'd ever want about it, then make it easily searchable, you'll realize just how much the PS3 is missing. They both offer WAY more in terms of usability, plus Boxee streams all kinds of fun internet content. I had occasion to run Boxee this summer after using my PS3 for 2 years, and it was like fucking magic.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    9. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rewinding/fast forwarding problem is still my main put-off about using the PS3 for this purpose.
      That, and the fact that it is as loud as a jet engine.

    10. Re:PS3 by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Loud as a jet engine?

      Compared to the Xbox my PS3 fat was as quiet as a mouse. The newer PS3 slim is quieter still.

      Granted, compared to something fanless it still makes some noise, but I have the tv on loud enough I don't hear it.

    11. Re:PS3 by gaboalonso · · Score: 1

      Yes, Ps3 seems to be pissy about that, But I've found that ps3 meda server resolves all these issues.

    12. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was using the 'Go to...' feature in the PS3 video options and it worked fine for me though I've noticed you can't fast forward past 1.5x or the video will often cut out. Just use Go to instead i guess...but hey - it's free and plays just about anything :) Combine that with the PS3's BD player and you've got yourself a pretty kickass box

    13. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for me, using the PS3 works really well with DVD rips, but with blu-ray rips that go up to like 4 or 8 gigs, I have trouble sometimes when seeking. Just playing it through usually works fine, but after seeking (which does work, although if you try to just do a fast forward/rewind it lags considerably... Pressing square to bring up a thumbnail preview to select from works much better) it will sometimes lose audio sync, start skipping or lagging or playing really quickly, or sometimes crash altogether. Not saying that these things happen every time, but they do on occasion.

    14. Re:PS3 by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I also went with the PS3 media server solution. I stumbled around with PC based solutions for years having no end of problems. I always ran into either the lack of a critical feature, or a bug that prevented a functional system to work in my setup. I bought a PS3 slim when it came out as a replacement for my annoyingly slow BluRay player, and I only began to start using it more and more for streaming content in later on. It was just as you said though. Just plug it in, start the app, and away I went. There are two possible caveats to the PS3 exclusive setup:

      1. I used to surf the web here and there with the media PC. Having PS3, I -could- surf the web, but frankly the web browsing experience on the PS3 is horrible, so I usually hop over to my PC or use my phone if I need a quick browse while watching shows
      2. The color coming out of the PS3 was a tinge lower gamma vs. my media PC. It was really notable at the time when I was running them both in tandem (when I was testing both, etc..) but now that I'm 100% PS3, I can't even tell. Note; This could've been more an issue with the PC's gamma settings than anything. I point it out only as a possible consideration if you're really not sure.

      PS: For those using ps3mediaserver, the java sources in SVN seem to be a lot better than the officially posted releases I've noticed way better navigation, slightly better compatibility (though it still has problems transcoding at 10X speedup which occasionally causes sync loss as well as network errors), and it has iTunes playlist support which for me is great since that's the tool I use to build my playlists.

      --
      Bye!
    15. Re:PS3 by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Rewind works, but it isn't 100% all the time. On the odd occasion I have to replay streams back and use the red square jump to fast-forward in order to get close again. This is more of an issue with your PC trans-coding in real-time in reverse! It isn't as good as I'm sure a natively decoding player would work, but at least for me the number of incompatible streams on PS3 is so rare that I don't even think about it anymore.

      --
      Bye!
    16. Re:PS3 by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Replying to self- I forgot to mention that one of the really great parts of the PS3 was the remote. No more keyboard/mouse combo's to get things working means that the system is super straight forward to use. The only think on the remote that I miss from my old DVD player is a jog-wheel for fastforward/reverse. That was a really rare but absolutely great feature for the remote.

      --
      Bye!
    17. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used PS3 Media Server for years. Works almost flawlessly on practically any format I can throw at it.

    18. Re:PS3 by GNious · · Score: 1

      The rewinding on transcoded streams would be a server-side issue, since the PS3 should simply see it as a regular stream.
      I would suggest trying out different backends (I use twonky w/o transcoding, instead having a script on a Mac that does it up front)

      The real reason for not using a PS3 is noise - mine is unbearably noisy :(

    19. Re:PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I researched this long and hard. I wanted what is known as a "Networked Media Tank," but I didn't have the bucks to make a poor decision and try again.

      LOL so you bought a SONY product? Well, at least it's working for now, SONY hasn't decided you're the enemy, yet. Are you using your PS3 as they intended? Not likely. Will they allow you to continue?
      One thing I've noticed about ripping for the PS3 is that it is very picky about how the video is encoded. Resolutions, framerates, bitrates, file structure - it all has to conform to SONY's specs, doesn't it? The upside of a PC or a Popcorn Hour and its ilk, is that there are far fewer restrictions on how the flick has been encoded. If your pal brings that really great anime on a 4G USB stick, it's probably going to play in a stand alone media player no matter how it's been encoded, but it's a real crap shoot as to whether or not it'll play on a PS3.
      IMO, there are too many lmiitations with a PS3, if all you're looking for is a dedicated playback machine.

    20. Re:PS3 by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      Occasionally my PS3 refuses to find the media server and both have to be restarted. Not a huge deal, but annoying- especially to someone who doesn't know how to reboot the media server.

      I have seen the same problem, but in my case I think I know the reason:

      1. The DHCP server in my router hands out a new ip address to the PS3 every time the PS3 is booted.

      2. PS3 Media Server keeps track of which PS3s (or other DLNA clients) it has seen on the network. This list is based on ip addresses, not MAC addresses.

      The combination of these two behaviours is that the PS3 Media Server's list of known PS3s just keeps growing and growing over time, even though I only have one PS3. I think that the problem when the list is finally too long.

      So the easy solution would be to use a fixed ip address on the PS3. I just haven't bothered yet.

      I do agree to your reservations against using the PS3 as a media player. I think it is a great combined gaming console, internet browser, network music player, network movie player and blu-ray movie player. But everything except the gaming can be better handled by dedicated devices. I have already ditched it as a music player and have bought a Squeezebox Touch (which is almost as expensive as the PS3).

    21. Re:PS3 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Good to know, thanks. I'll look into some options.

    22. Re:PS3 by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      The Big Concern is... the PS3 has done nothing but lose functionality throughout its life. The first real feature add is 3D... Don't get me wrong I like the PS3.. I just don't like what Sony has done with the platform since launch. The only way to get any big corporation to listen is not to buy their products and be vocal on-line about it.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    23. Re:PS3 by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting, I'll have to try that out. Thanks.

      The PS3 works just fine for me as a media player, and it even passes the girlfriend test as long as it's working. I really like it. But if I were looking for a dedicated media box, the PS3 is not it.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  15. WDTV Live+ or PS3 by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    WDTV Live+ does a pretty good job so far, and it has better Netflix support than Tivo.

    However, if you want a bluray player too, PS3 is probably the way to go, I don't know of any DLNA/UPnP-capable bluray players besides a discontinued LG unit.

  16. Just wait until Nov for the new Boxee Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:Just wait until Nov for the new Boxee Hardware by kava_kicks · · Score: 1

      I am looking at this too .. though I think the design is a little crazy. I prefer my media box to be small and out of sight if possible. Or you should look at installing XBMC on the AppleTV (not just jailbreaking it). Pretty much rocks.

  17. WDLive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Western Digital has a small 8"x8"x2" roughly box that plays every format I have from a smb share. My only complaint is that it doesn't do a good job thumbnails of content so the interface is rough like browsing the share. There are 3rd party firmware installs that are encouraged by WD that do even more but the official one works well enough for me. Works flawlessly for about $129 or less.

  18. PS3 or Xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS3 or Xbox 360 combined with PS3 Media Server / Tversity / whatever... the game consoles have intuitive UI's and can stream from any DNLA source.

  19. Small HTPC - Like This by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Puget Systems Echo: http://www.pugetsystems.com/echo.php

    There is an Atom / Ion version that may suffice for your needs (Echo I) and a more powerful Core i3 / i5 model if you need extra horsepower (Echo II). Both are very small, pretty darn quiet, and could run whatever software you'd like. I personally prefer the Windows 7 Media Center interface, but it sounds as though you aren't a big fan. Other nice options to check out are MythTV (Linux) and Boxxe (Windows or Linux).

    --
    William George
  20. Seriously? Did you even try Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What say you, Slashdot?

    Mostly, I'd say that you earn a big Google Fail badge.

    There are lots of products available that do exactly what you want: Popcorn Hour, WD HD Live, Mac Mini (get a used older one) + XBMC, build your own small linux box and run XBMC, etc...

    1. Re:Seriously? Did you even try Google? by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

      Forgive me, but "STFI" is such a lame response for this type of question. Googling "home media player" nets 360 MILLION results and they don't look particularly helpful. I think it's entirely reasonable to ask the nerd collective a question and am very interested myself in the reponses here as they reflect the considered opinions of people who are very knowledgeable on the subject matter.

    2. Re:Seriously? Did you even try Google? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      Having tried to solve this problem myself (I have an SDTV, so I used TVersity + XBox360), I'll tell ya that it's a damned jungle out there.

  21. Bandwidth by hardburn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bandwidth probably won't be your limitation. The Blu-Ray format has an absolute max transfer rate of 54 Mb/s, and only 48Mb/s for A/V bandwidth. Even movies on disc won't usually max that out, since they'll be VBR-encoded. Movies on a file server will usually be compressed all the more. Even at 50% throughput loss, a 100Mbit ethernet will still be able to keep up.

    Don't know what your experience has been, but when I was using Samba, it often bogged down and caused the stream to stutter. I made my movies available over Apache w/DAV instead and the problem went away.

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:Bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the opposite experience. Using WebDAV at work as a fileserver (NOT my choice) it is slow and fragile and has frequent problems with what I consider to be normal filesystem operations. My precursors tell me that there's nothing wrong with WebDAV and it's all fine, but they don't seem to notice the bevy of habits they've acquired over the years to ameliorate WebDAV's shortcomings. Not to mention that when it does fail outright, they don't attribute it as a serious failure (like the good old Win95 reboot issue, but these are mostly OSX folks)

      On the other hand, watching a video at home from a networked samba share, I'm able to watch it fluidly with no stutter... and if I just move to a point 2/3rds of the way through the movie, it's instant - I experience no seek time (though obviously there must be some), which is pretty impressive when watching a 1GB video via a 100Mb network. I've never experienced stutter viewing from samba, though my movies are 1GB and less, no 4GB monsters here. Server is Debian squeeze, movies are watched with WMP or VLC.

    2. Re:Bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that never happend to me, u must have shitty hardware.

      I stream 1080p movies via Windows Media Center on my Win7 Ultimate box to my XBOX360, via 100mbit LAN.

      No stuttering, no buffering after the initial 2 seconds. Can fast forward and rewind a bit... though I hope this gets worked on as it's not perfect.

    3. Re:Bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What configuration were you using?

      I have a 850MHz Duron PC from 2001 acting as my filesharing server (and network gateway) and I have no problem streaming videos stutter-free from Samba. [Server is Linux of course, playback works fine on Windows, Linux and XBOX]

    4. Re:Bandwidth by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Athlon 1.2GHz, though file sharing isn't its only job. Samba can be a bit of a CPU hog sometimes, and if anything else wants in, things could bog down.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    5. Re:Bandwidth by hardburn · · Score: 1

      I should make a correction, which I forgot about in my original post. I don't use WebDAV much anymore for actually watching stuff. Instead, I wrote a mod_perl plugin that lists out all the files being served. Whenever it sees some kind of media player file, it adds a link to an .m3u playlist for that file (which it also creates automatically on request). So it's really straight HTTP streaming.

      I also added links to an automatically-created HTML5 file with a video tag, but that doesn't always work, as you might expect.

      --
      Not a typewriter
  22. AppleTV by term0r · · Score: 3, Informative

    I run an AppleTV and have done the following non-standard things with it:

    -Hacked it to enable SSH and read/write FS
    -Installed Mplayer and XBMC
    -Made it so a folder called ATV on my desktop computer automatically syncs with the ATV using rsync regularly so whatever I have downloaded is always on the ATV
    -Ordered and installed a Broadcom CrystalHD mini PCI card that renders video and takes processing that away from the ATV's limited CPU
    -Installed kexts that support the above and a nightly build of XBMC so I can now play 720 and 1080p media using XBMC

    Works perfect for me. I could install Linux on it but both myself and my partner love Apple's movie rental system and the iTunes integration for our music. So by applying the above hacks we get everything we need.
    It does also support network shares with a bit of hacking.

    1. Re:AppleTV by HogGeek · · Score: 1

      If you're interested in doing this, you had better hurry. Currently ATVs are $149 on Apples site, and comparable on EBay, but will be going way up when Apples supply is diminished.

  23. XBMC + Acer Revo by mprinkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to roll you own, use XBMC on an Acer Aspire Revo R1600 ($200). It uses the Nvidia ION LE chipset that supports h264 offloading. I would use these myself, but I already have three Popcorn Hours.

    PCHs are nice, quiet, and cheap, but the UI is awful. It will require some tinkering to make nice. YAMJ is your friend (Yet Another Movie Jukebox).

    1. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by cf18 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And here is a newbie guide for installing XBMC on Acer Revo:
      http://lifehacker.com/5391308/build-a-silent-standalone-xbmc-media-center-on-the-cheap

    2. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The r1600 has a *really* hard time with 1080p content.

    3. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by OttoErotic · · Score: 1

      Came here to post this same link. I just went with the same setup and I love it. The Revo is nice and quiet, and small enough to mount behind a wall-mounted LCD.

      Any suggestions for wireless keyboard/trackpad combos? I plan to use the XBMC remote app for Android as the basic playback remote, but I'd like some kind of Bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo for more full-featured control when I need it. This looks kind of swanky, but might fall into that unusable middle-range between small remote size and large keyboard functionality. Maybe something like this?

      --
      "Once in Hawaii I had sex with a 102 year old male turtle. It is difficult to argue that it was consensual." - Steve Ma
    4. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by kava_kicks · · Score: 1

      Or just install XBMC on the AppleTV (instlal - not just jailbreak). You can get an original Apple TV cheap nowadays (especially more so now the new ones are out); they are silent (no fan); they include a remote; etc etc

    5. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by XanC · · Score: 1

      False.

    6. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Acer Revo with Ubuntu + XBMC + Wireless Keyboard/Trackball. Absolutely perfect. XBMC streams movies in ANY format from my media server via SMB. The Atom chips aren't very powerful, but XBMC is able to offload all of the video to the ION chipset with the NVIDIA drivers installed. This is a perfect solution. You can also use the XBMC Live CD if you don't want the Ubuntu Desktop.

      Also, I have an Wireless original XBOX controller hooked up via USB (Spliced the connector myself). It's a pain to get set up, but XBMC has support for it, and it's a very natural way to browse through the XBMC interface.

      You can get the revo for as little as $200, and I heard you can get the Windows Refund too.

    7. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

      vote for this. XBMC has FAR better interface than myth. and the revo box let's me play 1080 video all day long.

      the box is the OP's problem, not the software

    8. Re:XBMC + Acer Revo by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You don't need a bluetooth keyboard. Just a standard wireless one will do.

      I found this out when I was just playing around with a Logitech wireless keyboard I happen to have lying around.

      It works better than the IR dongle that I got for my iPhone.

      The iPhone doo-dad doesn't have enough juice to make it across my living room. The wireless keyboard works just fine.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  24. WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by cheeni · · Score: 5, Informative

    Option 1: ReadyNAS Duo (built in torrent client) + WD TV Live (simple remote)
    Option 2: Ubuntu server on network + PS3MediaServer + Sony PS3 (enable HDMI CEC for use with TV remote)
    Option 3: Fritz!Box 7270 + USB HDD + PS3 as DLNA client / built in DLNA client on TV
    Option 4: ASRock ION330 + Ubuntu
    Option 5: Mac Mini + Apple Remote + Plex / XBMC + NAS/USB HDD

    The key bottle neck is the network, if you can run LAN cables no worries, if you decide to go wireless 802.11n will do fine for 720p, 1080p is pushing it

    1. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by cain · · Score: 1

      Option 6: ushare + XBox360 (or any player that supports UPnP)
         

    2. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      The key bottle neck is the network, if you can run LAN cables no worries, if you decide to go wireless 802.11n will do fine for 720p, 1080p is pushing it

      If you are serving up native BluRay, then you might run into problems, but a transcode to less than 15Mbps will still keep 1080p24 looking stunning on anything less than a 60" display.

      Now, if you have some 1080p60 source that really is that (and not 24fps film with duplicate frames in a 60fps stream), then you'll need nearly 25Mbps, so wireless would be iffy.

      This is one of the reasons I went with an actual HTPC...there are very few media players with a BluRay drive (other than the PS3), so you unless you can rip the disc, you can't watch it.

    3. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by hellola · · Score: 1

      My 2 cents: If you want really good scraping XBMC is way better than MythVideo Otherwise I have been trying to get 802.11n working from ubuntu, not a pretty place to be, not yet at least.

    4. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by mldi · · Score: 1

      Just too bad that's iffy at best, not to mention that you'll have problems seeking to a different part of the video.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    5. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by cain · · Score: 1

      Just too bad? Iffy? *shrugs* Works just fine for me.

    6. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by mldi · · Score: 1

      Sorry for not explaining more properly. At least this is my personal experience...

      From what I've experienced, I've had issues with certain video formats, and as I said in the last comment, I found I couldn't skip around the video. To solve the video format issues, I attempted to use PS3 Media Server (http://ps3mediaserver.blogspot.com/) which happens to handle the 360 as well, but my source machine didn't quite have enough juice for transcoding on the fly for HD media. For the files that ushare worked with, it worked fine, but the limitations between this and my hardware for realtime transcoding eventually motivated me enough to buy a little atom nettop box to do my media. I'll never turn back.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    7. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      802.11n works just fine on all my Ubuntu setups... I find that you really need 10.04 if you want it reliable though. Of course all versions seems to limit me to 65mbit when I connect. Still plenty fast enough to stream even native bluray though.

    8. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1080p only refers to the resolution. an 802.11b network can stream 1080p if the bitrate is crap.

    9. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I've got a dvico tvix 6600, which gives you a HD PVR / jukebox with network access in both directions. Plus it runs linux, though I have no idea how to hack a custom firmware image together.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    10. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by EyeSavant · · Score: 1
      Netgear also make a range of media players.

      http://www.netgear.com/products/home/hometheater/media-players/default.aspx

      I have an EVA 9100 and it works pretty well, can read network shares etc.

    11. Re:WD TV Live, PS3+UPNP, DLNA on the TV by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The 360 has pretty crap codec support. This is why even though I have a 360 I went from Xbox to a PC (soon to be Aspire Revo I think, still haven't found a better option) for my media player. In both cases, running XBMC. I'm running XP though, so that I can watch Netflix on it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. An experience by taucross · · Score: 1

    I have a MacBook Pro (Core 2 Duo, circa 2008) connected to an SMB share on a Windows 7 box (1055t/8GB ram) over wireless-n (~300mbit) and 1080p STILL gets the jitters - sometimes completely fucks out at high bitrates. 720p will mostly play nice, standard divx is fine too. If I close the lid of the laptop and lose the network share, it takes about 10 minutes to find the SMB share again. All I'm saying is, if a MacBook Pro is still complaining about 1080p over 300mbit wireless-n, AppleTV is a pipe dream unless in a 100% ideal situation.

    My ideal setup, based on my experience, would be to store the movies locally connected to the lappy via e-sata/usb2, run a sabnzbd server on it and download via Windows 7 desktop. Nothing else will get A+ 1080p.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    1. Re:An experience by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      I have a MacBook Pro (Core 2 Duo, circa 2008) connected to an SMB share on a Windows 7 box (1055t/8GB ram) over wireless-n (~300mbit) and 1080p STILL gets the jitters

      You realize running a serious stream over wifi is asking for trouble, right? You can't just say "oh it's 300mbit" and expect everything to arrive on time. There's a difference between bandwidth and latency, and every time the wifi has some freak drop in signal you're going to see problems. You would have to specifically configure a huge playback buffer software side.

    2. Re:An experience by Straterra · · Score: 1

      Install InsomniaX and it'll solve that whole "Closing the lid puts the MBP to sleep and wifi drops" issue. Off topic : There is also a copy of InsomniaX in the Cydia store if you run a jailbroken iOS device. Very very very nifty if you want your wifi to stay active after you shut off the screen!

    3. Re:An experience by mldi · · Score: 1

      I have a MacBook Pro (Core 2 Duo, circa 2008) connected to an SMB share on a Windows 7 box (1055t/8GB ram) over wireless-n (~300mbit) and 1080p STILL gets the jitters

      You realize running a serious stream over wifi is asking for trouble, right? You can't just say "oh it's 300mbit" and expect everything to arrive on time. There's a difference between bandwidth and latency, and every time the wifi has some freak drop in signal you're going to see problems. You would have to specifically configure a huge playback buffer software side.

      I can tell you from experience that unless you got a crap signal, you'll most likely be just fine streaming over wifi-n, especially if it's only 1 device connected to wifi or you have other problems.

      Of course, I'm also running XBMC on Linux with the shares over NFS. So, that may play a part too.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    4. Re:An experience by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Ok, so one of your devices has 300mbit wireless, but what is the end-to-end throughput between them? If you just copy a file from the SMB share then what throughput do you get? I would check and see if it was anything like 37MB/s before assuming that it is impossible to do 1080p video over wifi. You haven't mentioned what interface the harddrive is connected to the windows 7 box with, how the windows 7 box is connected to your network, your router or anything else.

      If your windows 7 box is also on the 802.11n network then are you aware that the access control is time-based multi-plexed: in simple terms you cut the bandwidth in half as the devices take turns in accessing the radio.

      Lastly, what kind of 1080p content are you trying to stream? There is a world of different between 2GB compressed rips of blueray, through 5GB compressed rips to 50GB uncompressed versions.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  26. What's wrong with XBMC? by do0b · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    After 12 years and a few days, I finally gave in to the dark side and joined slashdot.
    1. Re:What's wrong with XBMC? by Bruha · · Score: 1

      Did they fix all the issues with running on ION? Hardware accel, sound over the fiber port etc.

    2. Re:What's wrong with XBMC? by kava_kicks · · Score: 0, Troll

      Absolutely nothing - world's best media player, hands down. Install it on an AppleTV and you are done!

    3. Re:What's wrong with XBMC? by do0b · · Score: 1

      On my Asus AT3IONT-I, the optical out and VDPAU work out of the box.

      --
      After 12 years and a few days, I finally gave in to the dark side and joined slashdot.
  27. Appliances may not be upgradable by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The beauty of a PC is that it's no big deal if a new codec comes around, and if you don't like the interface you have others to choose from.

    Appliances have limitations, may not allow new codecs to be installed etc.

    Find a quiet PC

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Appliances may not be upgradable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a few years of wasting money looking for the 'perfect' solution, I also came to exactly the same conclusion. I lot less waiting/messing around and just serves up what I need.

    2. Re:Appliances may not be upgradable by tabdelgawad · · Score: 1

      Or a laptop with HDMI out capable of 1080p. Pricier, but more attractive than most nettops and also doubles as a laptop :)

      --
      Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  28. apple tv solution by isaaccs · · Score: 1

    This is not something I've ever tried , but in principle, here's a simple solution: Set up one of your computers iTunes with its library stored on your SMB share. I've never run iTunes from an SMB share, but it works dandy from an AFP/NFS share, so I imagine it would work. An AppleTV can pull a stream from any iTunes on its network, so you should be then be able to connect your AppleTV to the SMB-backed iTunes and access your videos/media.

  29. Boxee Box by Daas · · Score: 1

    If you can wait until November, the Boxee Box seems to be a really good option. It's boxee based (which is, itself, based on XMBC), cheap (150$), small and does pretty much everything you want.

    Plus, it's sexy.

    http://www.boxee.tv/box

  30. O!Play all the way (across the sky, double rainbow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark one more for the O!Play. it's a fantastic little box that plays every format I've thrown at it. Other options would be the WDTV Live and the Patriot Box Office.

  31. Apple TV with Boxee by dlp211 · · Score: 1

    Pick up a used 40GB Apple TV and throw Boxee onto it. Then just point it at your SMB share and let it populate. Cheap, queit, and efficient front end that looks good and comes with a remote control. Or wait and see if they can shoehorn Boxee onto the new Apple TV and then you get solid Netflix streaming to boot, or just wait until November and get the Boxee Box retail 199.

    1. Re:Apple TV with Boxee by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Boxee's cool, and very simple. I run it on a 4GB MacMini.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  32. Patriot Box Office by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    I personally have a Patriot Box Office that I bought off NewEgg for $65. It is solid for what it does. Every format, streaming off a network SMB share or from its own HD. Also has a P2P bitorrent client with web browser interface that'll store your torrent files directly to a local hard drive. This is a feature missing from many of the other similar media streamers.

    Problem is the interface. It's not as slick as Boxee or AppleTV. I'd go with one of those if you want it to be accessible to people not familiar with directory structures. AppleTV, btw, will read from an SMB share, I believe. The new one will not play Divx or other common formats, though.

    Seth

  33. Blu-ray + Streaming Network Shares by jonbtn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just hooked up a LG BD570 for <$200 that plays Blu-ray discs, Netflix, Vudu, Pandora, other online content, files on a networked CIFS share from a Windows box and has built-in wifi. Only issue I've noticed is that it doesn't play .vob files from a network share.

  34. GeeXboX (Linux) by sven_eee · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.geexbox.org/ Its a mini Linux install using Mplayer. I had been using it for years with out issues. You can install it to a USB flash stick or LiveCD to test it out be for install

  35. Cripes. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I spent a couple hundred bucks on Newegg, put together a MicroATX box in a home theater case (looks like a DVD player, virtually silent.) I've run Linux on it and played videos with Xine, and I've had XP on there with the Mega Codec Pack's Media Player Classic. Plays everything I've ever thrown at it, including Quicktime videos (hell, it even plays Real's media, as if anyone still uses it.) I used a $35 ATI Radeon with HDMI out, and plugged it into a 65" Samsung DLP TV. Plays everything in 1080p, smooth as silk. Better even than the upsampling Samsung DVD player I bought with the TV.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Cripes. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      The newer AMD//ATI based boards with integrated graphics work great for this... Would consider MiniITX as well.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    2. Re:Cripes. by theantipode · · Score: 0

      Did you have any problems with overscan with the Radeon? I have a 60" Mitsubishi DLP and the Zotac MAG that I tried out with the nVidia ION overscanned by 3%, and by manually tweaking the resolution it insisted on leaving a black bar about 1" wide on the right side of the screen. It was either that, or I couldn't see the taskbar.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall
      With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
    3. Re:Cripes. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The newer AMD//ATI based boards with integrated graphics work great for this... Would consider MiniITX as well.

      Well, be careful. The motherboard I bought had an Intel shared-memory chip on it, and the thing frankly just could not keep up at 1920x1080. The ATI card had no problems whatsoever.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Cripes. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Did you have any problems with overscan with the Radeon? I have a 60" Mitsubishi DLP and the Zotac MAG that I tried out with the nVidia ION overscanned by 3%, and by manually tweaking the resolution it insisted on leaving a black bar about 1" wide on the right side of the screen. It was either that, or I couldn't see the taskbar.

      Nope, but whether that was due to the video card or the Samsung TV I couldn't say ... but it zocked in with perfect framing. No bands, no bars.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Cripes. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to newer AMD integrated graphics, which are far better than Intel's... From, iirc the 780g series boards, haven't had issue with 1080p video, paired with even a modest dual-core cpu. I tend to go for a lower wattage >2ghz Athlon2 myself... only real reason for dual core is for the antivirus, if you aren't running windows, wouldn't worry about it... but I like Hulu/Netflix, and the media support tends to be a bit better... My current HTPC is intel based with an nVidia chipset (w/ onboard gfx), but have done a few AMD ones for friends/family over the past two years. This is definitely a space where AMD is better. Getting HDMI audio with the multichannel output is a good thing.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    6. Re:Cripes. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to newer AMD integrated graphics, which are far better than Intel's...

      Gotcha. Yes, ATI really invested a lot in media handling, I agree. Hardware MPEG decoding, etc. And yeah, the HDMI output was great, once I figured out where my 100% CPU was going under XP (Microsoft's UAA driver, disabled that and everything worked fine.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  36. May be possible with your existing equipment by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    I've actually done this two ways:

    1) PC in living room.... if you can, see if there's a way to hide the big noisy PC. In my condo, I have a conveniently located closet exactly on the other side of the wall from my TV. Poking a hole through the drywall and feeding AV cabling and the IR sensor for the remote was trivial. No noise, no mess, all the convenience.

    2) Instead of an AppleTV, take a look at a Mac Mini. Has HDMI out, is only twice as tall as the AppleTV, and is incredibly silent. I use this with Plex (forked from XBMC) for the TV in the bedroom. I believe it's also possible to run Plex on an AppleTV, but I could be wrong.

    In my setup everything is networked and all my movies are stored on a local server, an old Mac mini in the closet with the PC. Both the MediaCenter PC and the Plesk Mini can access the shares (afp or smb).

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  37. Windows and SMB is your problem by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you use a real OS and a real file sharing protocol(not MS garbage) then you won't have any problems at all. I use AFP(though NFS works equally as well) to view HD media over wifi and works perfectly. Ditch windows and you will have 0 problems.(The previous sentence pretty much works in any context)

    1. Re:Windows and SMB is your problem by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      If you use a real OS and a real file sharing protocol(not MS garbage) then you won't have any problems at all. I use AFP(though NFS works equally as well) to view HD media over wifi and works perfectly. Ditch windows and you will have 0 problems.(The previous sentence pretty much works in any context)

      Yes. Although at the moment I'm running a Debian box as the server, and an XP client in the livingroom running Media Player Classic. Works great. I used to have Windows 2000 Advanced Server on the same hardware (it's an old 1.4 Ghz Athlon system) and it had difficulty maintaining a single video stream without stuttering. Now I'll have a couple of laptops and my media PC all playing different AVI files off the server (the media system wired, the laptops wireless) and they play smooth as silk. The kicker really is the server. I've had Linux on the media system too, playing with Xine. That also worked extremely well, especially over NFS.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  38. www.xtreamer.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recomend the xstreamer it is about 150.00 and will play anything form a network share (picture, Video, music). it will play 1080p through the HDMI port. and suports 6.1 audio. I have 2 of these devices and they work great. It is a small box about 7" H x 1" W x 5" D. A neat feature is that you can control the xstreamer with any device compatable with Flash over the network or with the remote it comes with. it is both wired and wireless. You can also add a laptop sata harddrive up to 1 tb for more storage. It is the cheapest player that will play MKV, Divx, Xvid, Mpg, AVI, H.264 and more. The web site is www.xtreamer.net.

  39. Shuttle XS35GT, Xtreamer by De+Lemming · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Shuttle XS35GT is a fanless box with the new NVIDIA ION2 GPU, if you put a SSD drive in it it's 100% silent. It should be able to handle H.264 1080p without a problem. You can run Linux (e.g. XBMCbuntu) or Win7 with XBMC on it. It also supports a DVD, DVD-RW or Bluray drive.

    Another option is the Xtreamer, I don't know much about it but it's cheap ($99, that's without a HD) and according to the site it can play 1080p (the new Apple TV only supports 720p). It has an option ("SideWinder") to attach external heat sinks to make it fanless.

    A good place for more information is the XBMC hardware forum.

    1. Re:Shuttle XS35GT, Xtreamer by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Underpowered. Let me know when the CPU gets up to 2x3.0MHz or 4x2.66MHz. Or feel free to point to a decent commercial front end box.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Shuttle XS35GT, Xtreamer by tgd · · Score: 1

      Underpowered. Let me know when the CPU gets up to 2x3.0MHz or 4x2.66MHz. Or feel free to point to a decent commercial front end box.

      I'm pretty sure you could pick up a few Atari 800's or something, if thats all the power you need.

    3. Re:Shuttle XS35GT, Xtreamer by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Underpowered. Let me know when the CPU gets up to 2x3.0MHz or 4x2.66MHz. Or feel free to point to a decent commercial front end box.

      The only reason you need a powerful CPU on an HTPC is because Flash sucks.

      The GPU can do ALL of the heavy lifting.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  40. TV Set? by KingFrog · · Score: 1

    Aren't there TV sets that can do this? I occasionally stream media from my PC over to my Pioneer TV set. Haven't tried it with Ubuntu, but that's on the list of experiments I have lined up - in fact, got a distribution for it just last night so I can do that this weekend.

  41. Far Out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBMC is the most fully featured and most efficiant media center there is, if you want a small quiet machine that can handle it, just get an ION system and put xbmc on it, full 1080p playback is flawless with VDPAU.

  42. I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    with the whole focus being power, heat and noise mgmt.

    simple idea: allow dynamic spin up/down of drives via some mgmt console (a truly out of band console, even allowing the system to be booted and shutdown).

    I gave up on RAID. too much heat and noise and I just don't need all my drives spinning at once. I'm starting on a new project to mount 16 or more drives for use on a standard pc. way too much to keep spun up all the time.

    no, auto spin-down is not working for all architectures (usb, sata, etc). I need a mgmt solution (worked out on paper, right now) that spins drives up and down for the duration of the movie (etc). even better, a way to find the drive that holds the movie file, spin that drive up, mount it and 'exportfs -a' it. when the movie is over, signal to the mgmt console that its done and the disk is cleanly unmounted from the OS and its physically spun down via power control (relays inline with the power jack on the drives, essentially).

    all done via arduino control (size, cheapness, coolness factor).

    at least that's my approach. raid does not make sense for such a large # of drives and I'm going to handle my redundancy by saving multiple copies across multiple drives (via software user-land hacks).

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The proper solution here is to get hardware that does properly support spindown, rather than spend days/weeks of time trying to hack around broken components.

    2. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick it all in one box with Linux on it and use:
      mount / unmount for drive access
      hdparm -y to spin a drive down when done with it

      If you really need an external console to be able to boot it and shut it down then do it via ethernet and get a PC and NIC that can power up when you call it over ethernet.

    3. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the 'easiest' way is to buy it all working from the start. that's what you're saying.

      my method is there to glue together a bunch of 'whatever you have' at home. very different design and objective. I'm NOT doing an enterprise system; this is a way to have drives spin up and down (outside the power saving mode that SOME controllers and SOME drives not; not all do, though; and that's my point).

      some higher end raid cards also do staggered spinup but not all. one pin in the sata wiring standard allows for EITHER spin-up or a couple of other signals; but its left up to each vendor how they do it, IF they even support that wire on the sata bus.

      finally, I want this to be outside any one single os. in fact, I'd like to be able to pick which drive is on and running even with the pc down (see sun's: SP (svc process) and ILOM (lights out mgmt) for these concepts).

      I'm thinking outside of any one o/s or type of drive or controller. my solution will work 'no matter what' you throw at it. that is actually quite rare in the industry and that's why I'm building this instead of 'just buying it'. you can't 'just buy this'. not yet, anyway.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      what if its not linux? what if someone wants their drive jukebox to be running some flavor of windows? some people do, you know (not me but others).

      you can't count on the hdparm power saving thing. not all drives and controllers support it. when it works, its great; but also other things can falsely trigger a spin-up. I don't like that. I like admin-controlled things (like disk mounts). hard-mounts, essentially. perhaps even mounting read-only when the operator 'mounts' a drive for movie watching.

      I also plan for this external NIC system (like a pogoplug; in fact) to be able to do environmental monitoring like the big boys (again, like the sun rackmount systems do, today). watch for fan speed, temperature and also control fans on the drives.

      since my system will 'know' which drives are spun up (and keep only 1 drive spinning at a time, if you are watching a movie, etc) it can throttle the fan down or even turn it off. having the smarts all up and down the layers really will help. the fan can be switched off entirely during the 2 hour movie and if no other drive is spinning nearby, its probably fine that way. no 'automounter' can be this smart in terms of how the application system is support to work together.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I have your solution - unRAID. unRAID uses a standard ResierFS filesystem for all of it's drives and stores parity on a dedicated drive. When a drive isn't in use the drive spins down. If a drive goes bad you're still protected and it can be swapped out without data loss. If you lose TWO drives at once you do lose data - from those two drives only. Unlike many RAID solutions this doesn't span data across all of the drives along with parity so you don't lose ALL of your data. Since the f/s is standard you can also use data recovery tools on the data to try and recover it offline. the software is pay for play but not uber expensive and it WILL support 16 drives. There's a free version you can use to test hardware compatibility. It boots from a USB stick too so no issues with the OS taking up space you would prefer to use for data storage. It's fast enough to feed media no problem although to max it out you'll want a gig ethernet network. I've been using this for YEARS without issue and have two of these servers running now. Good stuff IMO! http://lime-technology.com/ They have a forum for discussion hardware and software stuff if you've got questions.

      IMO this is way better than storing multiple copies of the media as yuo plan...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    6. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Okay one more attempt to reply to this

      Head over to http://lime-technology.com/ as they have exactly what you want. Pay for play but not uber expensive and it will solve the issue you're trying to solve. I run two of these boxes and 16 drives isn't an issue. It will do spin-down for you as well as data protection. It stores parity on a single drive and uses ReiserFS on the data drives. If you lose a single drive no biggie, swap it and go. If you lose two at once you lose the data from those drives but not the rest of the data and you can use ReiserFS tools to recover from those drives. Check out the forums for more info and give the free version a spin to see if it's compatible with the hardware you have. Because parity is stored on a single drive it must be as big or bigger than the rest but you can run any cat or dog drive in any other slot no problem. Mixing IDE and SATA is also not an issue, the OS boots from a USB stick so no space is taken up by the OS - low end hardware is fine too but DO use Gig ethernet! One caveat - if you're watching a movie on a drive paired with another sleeping drive and THAT sleeping one is needed for something the video will pause while the other drive spins up - this is a Linux issue and one that Limetech it trying to get around through various means. It doesn't ever effect me but something you ought to be aware of no matter what solution you go with using Linux.

      IMO this solution is way better than what you are currently planning and it solves the power issue nicely - tailor made for you methinks :-)

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    7. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Stringly suggest you take a hard look at unRAID - it will do much of what you want in the way of spinning down drives etc.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    8. Re:I'm working on a video jukebox fileserver by keriaan · · Score: 1

      Take a look at unRaid if you haven't already. It is has a lot of the features you are looking for--it provides redundancy, will auto spin-down the drives and supports up to 20 drives. I'm in the proces of putting together a media storage server with it. Check it out at http://www.lime-technology.com/.

  43. Viewsonic VOT132 by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

    Viewsonic makes an awesome little nettop box (basically it's a high end netbook without a screen) that is absolutely perfect for this.

    http://www.viewsonic.com/products/vot132.htm

    Stick a USB tuner card in there and use Windows Media Center and you have a fantastic all round entertainment system for your living room - and nearly silent and very low power so you won't feel bad about having it on all the time. I don't understand why you would buy a box that can only do streaming when you can have a full computer that can do anything.

  44. SageTV!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to try SageTV (www.sagetv.com). I've been using it for the past 5-7 years with wonderful success. They also sell fanless extender boxes ($150) that can access all your media from your server. Sage plays HD, DVD, BluRay, shows pictures, etc. Plus you can access your server remotely via a laptop with their free Placeshifter software.

    Have fun!!

  45. pr0n by shams42 · · Score: 1

    Just watch your porn on your laptop.

  46. Mac Mini with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run a Mac Mini with Linux for each of my TV frontends. The Mac Mini is low power but with enough processor and graphics power to output 1080p over HDMI. MythTV's interface got an overhaul in 0.23, and is now much nicer and easier to use. Add Firefox or Chromium for watching streamed videos, and you've got everything you need. Plus being a full computer means that you're not tied to one interface, or even operating system, you can upgrade as new things come out and try alternatives as you come across them.

  47. A Real Desktop OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asus EeePC - like the notebook with no screen. Might need to add an external USB DVD drive.
    wireless keyboard/trackpad like a cell phone - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823126039
    Windows XP

    I would prefer Kubuntu but Netflix requires Microsoft "Flash".
    Nothing beats a PC for compatibility.

  48. All right cheap and easy. by BKX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'll need two things:

    1. A computer that stores your movies. This computer must run some sort of UPnP media server software like PS3 Media Server on Windows or fuppes on Linux. It must be powerful enough to transcode in real-time your movies. Think Core 2 Duo 2GHz for 1080p, or P4 3GHz for 720p.

    2. A Playstation 3 or XBox 360. This will be your display device hooked to your TV. Both are cake to use for non-computer experts and can do other fun things as well, like games, the Internet, Netflix, etc. I prefer the PS3 since it can handle Netflix without paying Microsoft a subscription fee, but if you already have an XBOX 360 with and Xbox Live account, then that may be a better idea.

    All other answers to this question are lame and/or missed the point. Seriously. Making some crap computer out of spare parts and hooking it up to your TV just doesn't make sense when you probably already have a PS3 or Xbox 360 and a computer good enough to transcode on-the-fly and large enough (storage wise) to hold your media. Hell, that computer probably sits in the same spot all day, every day and never gets turned off, so put that wasted power into good use. If you're really just trying to shoehorn some old, piece of shit computer into something useful, then what you really have is a solution looking for a problem. Fuck that. Sell the POS on craigslist and be done with it.

    1. Re:All right cheap and easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you probably already have a PS3 or Xbox 360"

      assuming too much, are we?

    2. Re:All right cheap and easy. by DomNF15 · · Score: 1

      I agree - the Xbox360 or PS3 is definitely the way to go, especially if you already have one. Can't speak for PS3, but with Xbox360 not only can you stream movies but also music and digital photos. Pair that with online gaming and Netflix and you have a pretty solid package right out of the box, and the box is likely cheaper (and less work) than putting together a mini-PC to do the same task. I think all the latest MS OSs have UPnP support built in, and that's all you need on the server end to get things going. Even with the OSs that don't natively support it, it's easy enough to graft it on ( I've done this for Server 2003 for example).

  49. SageTV + Media Extender by chmilar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been using SageTV and their Media Extenders for a couple of years now, and I am very happy with it.

    The basics:

    1) You set up a "server" PC loaded with hard drives and tuner/capture cards, running the SageTV software.

    2) At the TV, you connect a small, low-power Media Extender, which presents an identical user interface to the SageTV software.

    I am using this to record broadcast TV from an antenna, watch DVD and Blu-ray rips, and (with the addition of PlayOn) watch Hulu and Comedy Central streaming.

    Their website: http://sagetv.com/

    I used to use MythTV, and I find that SageTV has pretty much identical functionality, but I could remove a computer from the living room and use the small extender device instead.

    --
    Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    1. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by kamikaze2112 · · Score: 0

      definitely have to agree on SageTV. I believe they just came out with a new HD Extender, and it's not ready to ship just yet but it should be by the end of the month.

    2. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by fidget42 · · Score: 1

      And it runs under Windows, Linux and MacOS

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    3. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Will Sage and Myth interoperate? I'm looking for a powerful but dead quiet front end box. It needs to be able to handle the ATSC stream files I've saved from my tuner server running Myth (this box in the basement captures the streams, only). I haven't yet found a computer box I could use because they are either underpowered, or big and noisy.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by GrumpyOldMan · · Score: 1

      Sage & Myth will work together, but fairly poorly. I moved from MythTV to SageTV a few years ago. I had intended to export my recordings from MythTV and import them into SageTV, but I never got around to it. I just used the mythrename perl script to create meaningful filenames for the myth recordings (rather than 1021_2010010010.mpg style mythtv names), and re-recorded anything I really cared about the show descriptions / etc.

      The really nice thing about the sagetv media extender is that all the normal plugins for sagetv (like commercial skipping) work on the extender. The new extender is a little bigger than a box of playing cards, and pulls 7W when playing back 1080p. People have velcro'ed them to the back of wall mounted TVs.

      Drew

    5. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by jbarr · · Score: 1

      SageTV now has an HD extender called the SageTV HD Theater 300 for about $150.00. I have not used it, however I have used other SageTV media extenders with great success.

      You also need to run the SageTV server software on your Linux box. The HD Theater 300 just connects to the network.

      SageTV costs, but it is very solid, and they have reliable hardware partners.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    6. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by jbarr · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention that the SageTV HD Theater 300 does NOT require SageTV Server software to run. You can navigate the filesystem and directly play music, videos, and view pictures.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    7. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by Atacama93 · · Score: 1

      I have a SageTV HD Theater, dual tuner HD HomeRun, a D-Link NAS and an original Mac Mini running SageTV Server. This provides two major benefits:

      * ability to stream audio, video and photos from a computer or NAS to the TV
      * ability to record and playback HD over-the-air broadcasts with DVR software

      The living room set up is:

      HD OTA antenna ---> HD HomeRun ---> GB Switch AV Receiver and TV

      Then I've got a cat 6 ethernet cable running under the house connecting the switch to a router in another room:

      D-Link NAS --> router --- Mac Mini

      With respect to noise, this works well, since the HD Homerun and SageTV are completely silent (though the blinking green network activity LED on the SageTV should also be silenced).

      I kept costs down by using a free, first generation Mac Mini that was headed for the electronics graveyard. But, it appears to be too under performing for the task. I had to upgrade it to 1 GB of RAM for it to be tolerable, but I'm still having problems when using it with the NAS.

      The setup does actually work well as long as it is writing just to the internal hard disk. If I have it write to the NAS and then stream from the NAS through the Mini, most HD channels have an intolerable amount of stutter. However, I still need to experiment with directly mounting the NAS from the SageTV and using an external USB drive on the Mini. I also purchased the Placeshifter software, but haven't had time to try it out, yet.

    8. Re:SageTV + Media Extender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly... I'm not the biggest Micro$oft fan in the world, but... if there's one thing they did well... it's the xBox 360.

      I've got Tomato Linux running on a Netgear Router with USB... and a 2TB USB drive attached which makes the Router a NAS.
      As the Media Server, the router runs http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ ... and the xbox sees it fine.

      Also... when I don't have time to copy Files from my Mac, or Linux box to the NAS... I run:
      http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/
      I can run it on my Mac, or Linux box (it runs on Windows too because it's Java Based), and it also does a good job of serving out media to the xbox 360.

  50. SaveTV HD Theater is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Sage TV's HD200 for a while. They just released the HD300. Natively it supports nearly everything you can throw at it. The previous version lacked DTS support (but supported mkv files with AC3 encoding, which is just about why I purchased it in the first place)

    SageTV HD300 Theater Media & File Format Support (I don't own one yet, but this is what I'm reading):

            File formats: AVI, ASF, MKV, MOV, MP4, QuickTime, MPEG-1, MPEG-2 PS, MPEG-2 TS, M2TS, BDMV Folder (Blu-ray), Blu-ray ISO, DVD ISO, DVD VIDEO_TS, VOB, M4A, MP3, FLAC, OGG, FLV, WAV, WMA
            Video formats: MPEG1, MPEG2, MPEG4, XVID, H.264 up to 1080p, WMV9/VC-1 up to 1080p, MJPEG, Flash Video
            Audio formats: MP2, MP3, AAC, AAC-HE, ALAC, WMA, WMAPro (stereo downmix), PCM, Vorbis (stereo only), FLAC(stereo downmix), Dolby Digital/Dolby Digital Plus/Dolby TrueHD (stereo down-mix/pass-through), DTS/DTS-HD/DTS-MA (stereo down-mix/pass-through) AC3 (stereo down-mix/pass-through)
            Closed Caption/Subtitle Formats: EIA-608(NTSC/ATSC/QAM Closed Captioning), SSA/ASS, SRT, VobSub (sub/idx,mkv), Nero MP4 VOB Subtitles, MP4 Text, SAMI, .sub (Subviewer/MicroDVD), DVD, BDMV, M2TS
            Media sources: Online Video, external USB Mass Storage Devices, NAS or Mac/PC over SMB/CIFS, UPnP, SageTV Media Center (The flagship, SageTV HTPC software), Unofficial support of Amazon VOD, Hulu, Netflix via 3rd party PlayOn plugin
            Playlist formats supported: M3U, WPL, ASX, WAX, WVX
            Pictures: Any image formats viewable in SageTV are also viewable on the HD300 when used in extender mode. In standalone media player mode JPEG, PNG, TIFF, and GIF formats are supported.

    The SageTV UI, in general, isn't great (look at the remote with the 400 buttons to get an idea). With a server and one of these dedicated units, you can customize everything. At a buck and a half it's not a bad deal.

  51. Dvico TViX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dvico TViX 6640N plays pretty much any media format from local disk or over the network from SMB shares.

  52. Samsung BD-C6900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd recommend the Samsung BD-C6900 player combined with a DLNA server [Wild Media Server is my favorite, but there are many]. The player plays Bluray and supports Samsung Apps [Netflix, Hulu, Pandora, etc] and plays directly from the DLNA server. It doens't support many formats, but WMS supports transcoding and has worked really well for me.

       

  53. XBMC on AppleTV by kava_kicks · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is the way to go:
    - Small appliance
    - XBMC (the world's best player IMHO)
    - Integrated remote
    - Quiet
    - Plays everything
    - Connects to SMB shares
    - Can use the local storage if required (I would put all the kids movies locally ... cause they are played 24/7!)
    - If you get a small add-on card, it will output 1080p natively

    DO NOT BUY THE NEW APPLETV:
    - only 20 output
    - only 3 video formats
    - no local storage
    - you are locked in to their walled garden
    - you will need to recode all your existing content

    1. Re:XBMC on AppleTV by lcreech · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Apple TV won't do 1080p

    2. Re:XBMC on AppleTV by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Check out the prices on those add-on cards these days. Ouchie!! The Crystal-HD got way expensive once folks saw the damned last I looked.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    3. Re:XBMC on AppleTV by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      It will with a Crystal HD card.

    4. Re:XBMC on AppleTV by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and calculate, using your screen size, and your distance from the tv, whether or not you can even SEE 1080. Hint: most people can not, as their screen is not large enough for their viewing distance. His calculation also assumes perfect vision in general, but many people with mild correction needs do not wear glasses for looking at the TV.

      Seriously, 1080 is completely pointless in perhaps the grand majority of home theater setups.

    5. Re:XBMC on AppleTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe under average viewing conditions most people won't see the difference between 720p and 1080p, but they'll definitely notice that their 1080p files won't work at all if they try to play them on an AppleTV.

  54. Acer Revo + Boxee was a good solution for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted a quick cheap route without building my own HTPC, so I recently bought an Acer Aspire Revo 3610. It's an Atom 330-based system with Win 7, but you can install Linux if you prefer. It's just a little bigger than a stack of 2 DVD cases. I got mine refurb'ed for $250. I put Boxee on it and find the interface to be great - simple and remote-friendly. My non-computer-savvy in-laws use it without problems. 1080p works fine. You can point it at SMB shares. The Revo has a fan in it, but it is very quiet (Revo is next to the TV, and I can't hear it from the couch. Most of the time I can't even hear it when I'm standing next to it either). If I hadn't gotten the Revo I would have gotten a flavor of the Dell Zino.

  55. ps3, tiny form factor pc, or tv by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    The PS3 will do a lot of this but not all formats. It's a bit picky with some things. A small form factor pc connected to the tv and a lan would probably work best. I believe several other people have suggested exact models. If you have a newer tv, check if it has a ethernet jack or usb jack built in. I have the samsung series 8 led tv and it natively supports more formats than the PS3 but doesn't do DTS sound and can't fast forward or rewind mkv files (which is my only hurdle at the moment to ditching my secondary computer that I'm using as a media server so I'll also be watching this thread closely).

    1. Re:ps3, tiny form factor pc, or tv by gaboalonso · · Score: 1

      The Ps3 can do all the formats you want using Ps3 media server.

    2. Re:ps3, tiny form factor pc, or tv by zaphod777 · · Score: 0

      I agree just install PS3 media server on your server and then stream it to your XBOX360 or PS3. It works great for me.

      --
      "Don't Panic!"
  56. Roku Netflix Player + other stuff by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

    I have a Roku Netflix Player (or whatever they call it these days, one was just on woot the other day for 50$). It is an network-connected device (wireless, ethernet and also USB in the new version) which can stream Netflix and Amazon and other junk. It is about an inch high and maybe 5 inches wide and makes no noise (no fan, no hard drive, just a couple A/V ports). But also...

    You can install aftermarket applications on the box, in a manner of speaking, and Roku offers an API along with detailed examples which you can modify yourself. Several people have already done so. I use the Roksbox application, despite its developer's insistence on updating the live branch of code and occasionally breaking everything. It allows me to stream live video hosted on a local (or remote, I suppose) web server. I have an Ubuntu box in the basement I use for transcoding. It works well and the UI is pretty simple, and quite end-user controllable.

    After building the necessary XML files by hand for a while I wrote a couple of scripts to parse everything out of IMDB, download posters and descriptions, etc., and that goes into the display code. So when I turn on the Roku box, it pretty much "just works", so long as the network is up and I haven't mangled the XML file. My wife and baby love it; I've got tons of Elmo on there and other cartoons she can see and recognize, so there's no more playing around with DVDs and scratching them up. And we have many movies and other content on there. It's very simple to use, but the backend can take a little work unless you're a Windows person (my server is not).

    I've tried using a DNS-323 NAS box as the server, which seems to work well. I just haven't switched everything over. So in short, with a Roku box, a little additional software and a server/NAS to host the files, you're good.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    1. Re:Roku Netflix Player + other stuff by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Haven't tried setting up a local server for it yet, but have been using the Roku for a while for mostly Netflix. My only real complaint is that since there's such a silly amount of local buffering, there's not a very decent scan forward/backward. That said, I'm looking forward to setting up a local media server for us AND setting up a private Roku channel or two for friends and family anywhere AND setting up a public Roku channel that will appear on anyone's Roku channel list. Right now there aren't many Roku channels, so even though Roku ownership isn't that huge, many of the owners will see your channel. Particularly after reading through the comments here I can see that Roku's not the best choice for just in-home media, but offers some things that none of the others can. It does "just work," which is more than I can say for even many DVD players.

  57. I'm an ex-Myth user... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I worked exhaustingly to get my MythTV setup 'finished' and gave up on it after about three full years. I had a server, a living room PC, and one/two bedroom deployments, depending on whether or not they were broken at the given time.

    Streaming killed it all. The wife added Netflix, and I added Hulu (and later Plus), and we haven't looked back. We keep basically nothing, and thus are at the whims of the people controlling the services, but aside from needing a relatively-beefy Windows PC to handle the Flash and Silverlight, there's almost no overhead.

    Having been at a place somewhat near yours, I'd advise you to wait and see. Things may get better, technology-wise, or you may just wind up getting hooked on Netflix...

    1. Re:I'm an ex-Myth user... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Hulu is fine if you are willing to put up with commercials.

      One of the big advantages of any PVR is commercial avoidance.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:I'm an ex-Myth user... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Hulu is fine if you are willing to put up with commercials.

      One of the big advantages of any PVR is commercial avoidance.

      Yes, and I've appreciated that fully, but the commercials on Hulu are really, really minor. They're not even long enough to get up and go to the bathroom, really.

      Besides, weighing the annoyance of those versus something going awry and the wife missing the season finale of her show - and it's no contest...

  58. Mac Mini and Plex by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plex running on a MacMini is what I use. The mini is a solid low power platform that you can easily hook up external disk or access your NAS with. Has HDMI output for connecting to your stereo/tv etc.

    Plex is made to use the apple remote control, so you don't need a keyboard/mouse after the very initial setup. There's also a iPhone/Pad/Touch app so you can control Plex or stream from the plex app to your iPhone/Touch/Pad. The main application for your mac mini is free and the iOS component is $5.

    Great community of support for the app definitely better than XBMC.

    1. Re:Mac Mini and Plex by lcreech · · Score: 1

      Problem is, the Mac Mini won't do 1080p

    2. Re:Mac Mini and Plex by mldi · · Score: 1

      Not to mention significantly overpriced. May as well get a well-powered laptop for that cost.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  59. iMac by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I used to use a Mac Pro on my TV, which is very quiet. It had no problem with 1080p video. I later bought a mac mini for my TV. I bought whatever they were selling in July 2009, It can do pretty much anything, although 1080p video is a bit of a stretch because the mini's CPU isn't as powerful as the pro. Specifically, it tends to skip in high-motion scenes. I really wish I spent the extra money for the faster CPU.

    If you have a budget slightly over $1000, the Mac Mini with the fastest CPU will probably handle 1080p. Just remember this: The extra $1000 you spend for a general-purpose computer will buy lots and lots and lots of BluRay disks and iTunes rentals.

  60. intel d525 + broadcom 70015 -OR- d525+ION2 by itzdandy · · Score: 1

    The d525 is a dual core, 4 thread atom at 1.8Ghz.

    ION2 = just a low power GPU but can decode high def easily with this CPU
    bcm70015 decodes divx, xvid, wmv, mpeg4, vc1, h264.

    slam these in a cheap case from newegg for 75 (includes power, is VESA mountable.

    Thats a ~$225 system.

    This system has zero fans and is completely quiet. no lights blinking, nothing.

  61. the tim taylor way of doing it.... by jpedlow · · Score: 1
    I'm currently building this baby up:

    1 of these http://www.norcotek.com/item_detail.php?categoryid=1&modelno=rpc-4220
    1 of these http://www.lsi.com/channel/products/raid_controllers/sata_sas/3ware_9750-8i/index.html
    1 quad core Xeon + mobo + 8gigs of ram of your choice
    1 of these http://www.chenbro.com/corporatesite/products_detail.php?sku=75
    1 of operating system of your choice
    20 of these http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=733
    and then put on the media software of your choice (mine is ps3 media server)
    This is all because my current (6tb) array got filled with media, home movies, tv shows and what have you. So, hopefully ~30tb (raid6 + 2 hotspares) will do the trick for a while.....
    Probably WAY overkill for your use, but +hypervisor of your choice, its nice and easy to run as a media server and an ARMAII server or TF2 server....
    lastly, check out i-star or istar usa, they have rackmount cases for prettymuch everything. Awesomeness! (50drive case....maybe for my next one, mwahaha)

  62. Retarded form factor. by Mr+EdgEy · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the original Xbox. Why make it impossible to stack things on top? (say, a dvd case, cellphone, etc) Also looks fairly tall, too tall to fit in where a set-top box would.

  63. or Seagate... by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    I had tried over and over to build a computer that would work well for playing video and that would be easy to control, the video always seemed a little jerky, couldn't get the remote quite right, so I finally gave up a bought a Seagate FreeAgent Theater+ (www.Newegg.com P/N: N82E16822148499). It was on sale for $70 when I bought it, then went on sale for $50, now is out of stock. If it can be found anywhere, I would recommend it because it works great for me (sounds like I was looking to do the same thing). It can connect to my Windows shared drive and play the HD content perfectly. It can also access miscellaneous online sites like YouTube and NetFlix. I haven't had it long enough to see if there are easy ways to search and find media on the network shares, but I don't have a problem just browsing to the right folder and selecting the right file. I don't know how this device compares to the WD, but one thing I did notice about the WD is that the component video comes out of a little 1/4" jack + adapter, which I didn't think would be as robust as the RCA type plugs.

    1. Re:or Seagate... by Osty · · Score: 1

      One thing to note is that a lot of these devices (many of which all use the same Sigma Designs chip internally) don't support DTS audio, or if they do they only support 2-channel DTS and will not downsample. For most people this won't be an issue, but if you plan to rip DVDs or Blu-Rays for archival purposes you'll have to go with the lesser-quality AC3 audio (or worse, re-encode the original DTS to AC3).

  64. Box Office by Patriot by DodgeRules · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am currently using a Box Office by Patriot purchased thru CompUSA (TigerDirect) and it supports Linux kernal 2.4.1.0 or above as well as various Windows flavors and Mac 9.0 and above. The box supports a good number of video formats including MPEG-1 (MPG/MPEG/DAT) up to 1080p, MPEG-2 (MPG/MPEG/VOB/IFO/TS/TP/M2TS) up to 1080p, MPEG-4 (MP4/AVI/MOV) up to 1080p, DivX 3/4/5/6 & Xvid (AVI/MKV) up to 1080p, H.264 * AVC (TS/AVI/MKV/MOV/M2TS) up to 1080p, Real Video 8/9/10 (RM/RMVP) up to 720p, FLV, WMV9 (1080p) and ISO (1080p). Many audio formats including the regulars plus OGG and FLAC. Image formats include JPEG, BMP and PNG. The box has fast Ethernet, 2x USB 2.0 ports and internal 2.5" SATA HDD connections. (HDD sold seperately, but very easy to install.) A USB wireless adapter is available, but came included in my package. You can stream video from network storage devices. Best of all, it is small, quiet, has a remote control, HDMI output as well as composite A/V and S/PDI outputs.

  65. This is easy - XBMC on an ION and unRAID for a NAS by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I use an ION based HTPC. I have two of them and both are about the size of a Wii. The decoding is done via the NVIDIA chipset and VDPAU under Ubuntu. My ASROCK has a DVD drive - it's not needed. My Zotac is small enough to mount on the backside of the TV if I wish. I get 1080P video just fine and I get surround sound as well. Visit the XBMC forums and peruse the Linux section for hardware help - I post there too. Hardware I use is quiet, power saving, and produces little heat. The Live distros work well IMO with a little tweaking - plenty of help for that.

    As for feeding this beast - I use unRAID as a NAS. I have 2 of them with quite a few TB of video rips and TV shows from my HD TIVO. I can play this all fine with a 100meg NIC but I happen to prefer a Gig NIC for speed of copying rips to my NAS. My entire video and music library is contained in these servers, I can access anything quickly and it wasn't a million bux to build...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  66. TVersity + Linux (coming soon) by zeroRenegade · · Score: 1

    There is a post in the TVersity forums from back in April stating that TVersity would be coming to Linux within months. http://forums.tversity.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13993/ IMO TVersity is a solid application. Unfortunately, at the moment, there is only a windows version released.

  67. I'm trying the Dell Zino by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    In my case, the problem was the kids scratching up the DVD collection, so I wanted a way for the kids to watch a movie without worrying about them popping it out of the player with peanut-butter covered hands. Now I backup up the originals (which go on a high shelf) and we watch the digital backup over the network.

    I am having good luck with the vanilla Win 7 media center that comes with Win 7 Home Premium. The user interface is easy enough for my 5 year old to operate it without assistance. No trans-coding or format translations required. I have my video library (DVD native VOBs) backed up on a 2 TB NAS (WD My Book World Edition, which is a Linux box that you can admin through the web gui or SSH ). Everything plays perfectly my two Win 7 media center clients and on my Vista media center client (Vista requires an easy registry hack to get the DVD library to show up, Win 7 needs only be pointed to the NAS). Again, these are straight DVD backups with no trans-coding. The good thing with this is that all the DVD menus and special features are available.

    I am in the process of extending my setup to the TV in the living room. I have a Dell Zino HD on order (delivers Saturday). I can't comment yet on fan noise, but this is an extremely small box (8 in x 8 in) with a HDMI connector. I bought a Hauppauge tuner and a wireless keyboard with trackball to go with it (I suppose I could also buy a media center remote too, but I think the keyboard and trackball will be enough).

    I had tried a media center extender before and I was severely disappointed because they don't play VOBs, which means you have to trans-code, or rip to another format, and in either case you won't have menus. But the Win 7 clients can play VOBs over the network flawlessly. I am high hopes for the Zino when it gets here in a few days.

    I also have to say I've been favorably impressed with the WD Mybook World Edition. Nowadays, they include a checkbox in the web gui to enable ssh. You can then ssh in and do anything you want with it. In my case, I replaced the busybox setup with a full system using optware (ipkg), installed a cups print server, and attached a printer to the USB port. So far it has been able to serve up different movies to three different clients simultaneously over my home network without any problems.

  68. RLY? by malzfreund · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    why the fuck is this question even accepted by /.? Do your research before submitting, there are dozens of solutions: HTPCs, a bunch of the latest Blu-Ray players and TVs, media streamers (a couple of which have been mentioned above), and 7th gen video consoles. hell, even some recently-announced tablets will be able to grab content from SMB (or DLNA) and output it to your screen via HDMI (gotta look closely, though, not all do 1080p)

    1. Re:RLY? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      why the fuck is this question even accepted by /.?

      My guess is because home theater is near and dear to Slashdotters hearts, and the editors know it will generate lots of discussion. Besides, I like to read about other people's experiences: sometimes I learn something new.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:RLY? by jp102235 · · Score: 1

      I think this is a good topic: there is alot of misconception with attempting to do this, and a huge variance in what is being attempted by all: The big takeaway: serving high-bitrate video (home movies/ blu ray) is REALLY HARD. I haven't seen a media player do this a rock solidly as a BD player / or HTPC. It would be hard to imagine a home network handling more than one high bit rate movie (40Mbps) being streamed at one time. The other big takeaway: there are tons of folks who do this who do not care at all about video quality: transcoding is a nasty way of sharing video - but then again it may suit a multi tv household. The other other big takeaway: you'll see lots of people saying that this device and that device can do 1080p. That is actually nonsensical: as any faithful handbrake user knows: its high bit-rates that bring quality: not resolution. that being said, this is a quest to balance quality and convenience - and I wish it was discussed more thoroughly than what we see right now. ie: max bitrates of media players on the market right now / suitable off the shelf HTPC's, etc.

      --
      jp
  69. XBMC Dedicated by SlimXero · · Score: 1

    The Acer Revo and several other machines will handle this, but I've felt that the full 1080p just doesn't feel smooth with one of the small nettop style boxes. I would recommend something like the following (customized to your discretion):

    http://www.computerlx.com/config.aspx?t=&product_ID=1390
    ALLPCZONE AMD 215 ICEBERG SERIES AMD 215 MIKE

    Current Configuration:
            AMD AM2/AM2+/AM3 PROCESSORS
    AMD Athlon II 64 X2 215 2.7GHz Dual-Core AM3 Processor
            AMD PROCESSOR COOLING FAN
    AMD STANDARD COOLING FAN
            THERMAL PASTE (STANDARD PASTE INCLUDED)
    OCZ/ARCTIC Ultra 5+ Silver Thermal Compound
            MOTHERBOARDS FOR DDR3 (PICK IF GOING W/DDR3 RAM)
    MSI GF615M-P33 Socket AM3/ GeForce 6150SE/ DDR3/ A&V&GbE/ MATX Motherboard
            DDR3 DUAL CHANNEL RAM
    2GB (1 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600MHz (PC3 12800) Dual Channel
            SATA HARD DRIVES
    Hitachi / WD 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB CACHE SATA 3.0Gb/s
            DVD-RW/BLU-RAY DRIVES
    22X DVD-RW DUAL LAYER
            PCI-EXPRESS VIDEO CARDS
    nVidia GeForce GT220 1GB DDR3 DVI/VGA HDMI SLI PCI-EXP Video Card
            SOUND CARDS
    REALTEK 6-CHANNEL DIGITAL SOUND ONBOARD
            NETWORK CARDS
    REALTEK 10/100/1000 Gigabit Network Card (onboard)
            COMPUTER CASES
    HEC Blitz Black Steel Edition ATX Mid Tower Computer Chassis Gaming Case
            CASE COOLING FANS
    THERMALTAKE/ANTEC ULTRA-QUIET CASE FAN
            POWER SUPPLIES
    OKIA 420 WATT POWER SUPPLY (BASIC LOAD)
            WARRANTY 3 - YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY PLAN
    3-Year Limited Warranty Plan with Lifetime of free USA based Support...Custom Hand Wiring For Ultimate Air Flow, Assembled in Cleveland, Ohio, USA
            SHIPPING METHOD
    FED-EX GROUND SHIPPING "INCLUDED" (1-7 BUSINESS DAYS)

    Beyond that, install XBMC live instead of using it as an application in Windows. All of the newer Nvidia cards support VDPAU, which allows for the video decoding to take place on the GPU, which is much better than software decoding. I think you'll find this solution much more satisfactory than running both windows and XBMC (especially considering Windows 7 has between 768MB - 1GB memory footprint by itself, not to mention CPU usage). Alternatively, your current setup may work just fine with XBMC live and you may not need to build anything at all (and i would suggest trying that first). Good luck.

  70. PS3 + NAS by Jherico · · Score: 1

    Get a PS3 and either a network attached storage device capable of running twonkymedia, or a small quiet PC you can stick in the closet running linux and PS3 Media Server.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  71. Mac Mini plus XBMC, Hulu Desktop, Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a Synology Cube Station to store my files and share via SMB.
    I use a Linksys Wireless G router to get it to the living room.
    I use a Mac Mini running Boxee, XMBC, and Hulu Desktop in the living room. It's connected to my receiver via HDMI for video and TosLink for audio.

    I can use everything with a Mac Mini remote. Very stable, easy to set up, easy to use, quiet, access to tons of stuff. I don't even have cable now, just DSL for internet.

  72. Why not just build something to suit your needs? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    You can get fanless Atom based motherboards in mini ITX and pico ITX form factors, some of which have actual (as in, not intel embedded crap) graphics hardware.

    Right now, you can get a 1.6ghz atom CPU, pair it up with 2gb of RAM, and use an SD to SATA adapter for booting a minimalist linux. Since it won't be running any major applications, it shouldn't need swap.

    The whole thing will be fanless, and wont have a mechanical disk drive. As such, it would be totally silent.

    Put a USB2 wireless N dongle on, and you are good to go. (It would also take up far less space, and use much less power than a typical MMPC.)

  73. MediaPortal by MrFancyPants · · Score: 2, Informative

    I highly recommend MediaPortal http://www.team-mediaportal.com/

    The setup is significant, but once you have it going, it's great. You can use hardware accelerated h264 decoding (whereas Boxee, XBMC and many others are software only). The plugins for it have great, poweful support for automatically matching Movies and TV shows based on regexps and online lookups of the filenames.

    Some screenshots can be found:
    http://code.google.com/p/moving-pictures/
    http://code.google.com/p/mptvseries/

    1. Re:MediaPortal by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Woa FUD.

      XBMC has had VDPAU hardware acceleration for almost a year now. The beta that was just released supports VDPAU, ATI's thingy, Broadcom, Apple's Hardware decoder.

    2. Re:MediaPortal by MrFancyPants · · Score: 1

      It does? News to me. It's been 2 years since I tried xbmc, and when I last tried it, a fairly decent machine struggled with HD playback while Mediaportal (and MPC and others that used avivo and purevideo). I did a quick search before posting to make sure I wasn't mistaken and saw this:

      > Note! Developers wanted! XBMC does not yet support any listed methods of hardware accelerated video decoding.

      at
      http://wiki.xbmc.org/?title=Hardware_Accelerated_Video_Decoding

      So I didn't do more digging...but that page hasn't been updated so 2009, so my bad.

    3. Re:MediaPortal by lavaboy · · Score: 1

      I can second this. MP is really great if you have an extensive collection of video, tv-rips, photos and/or music. Only thing I haven't been able to do with it well is web-streaming (NetFlix, etc.) I use Boxee for that.

      Setup and media indexing is pretty simple, if a bit time consuming. There are several good walk-throughs on the MP forums.

      I have it running on my HTPC, and even my wife is happy with it in the living room. As far as XBMC goes, MP is a fork from a couple of years ago, so they have a lot in common. I've found that the movie/tv-show handling is better with MP, especially with the Streamed MP skin.

      --
      Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
  74. He wants the player people, not the server by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too many people here miss the fact that you want the PLAYER side of the equation, not the server.

    I'd suggest something like the Patriot Box Office:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=patriot%20box%20office
    http://patriotmem.com/products/detailp.jsp?prodline=6&catid=69&prodgroupid=159&id=895&type=20

    Small, reasonably quiet (more so if you do a bit of work on the fan), HDMI or composite out, does 1080i, does S/PDIF, does just about every form of media I've tried, does SMB/CIFS, uPnP (not just DLNA, but also plain old uPnP), runs Linux internally, can accept an internal 2.5" hard disk, can use an external USB WiFi stick, supports external media via USB (including EXT2/3 file systems).

  75. Re:Why not just build something to suit your needs by mldi · · Score: 1

    I second this option.

    I have an Asus Eee EB1012, which is a 1.66ghz atom with ION graphics, and it runs fantastic. XBMC is on it, and I have no problem streaming full 1080p over wireless-N to my TV. Plus, the entire thing only cost me $350 total. You can do it for cheaper since all your storage is on the network and you don't need anything of a hard drive to speak of. Before I got my hard drive, I was running it off of a flash thumb drive, and that was working perfectly well.

    Furthermore, and I can only speak of this particular Atom+ION solution, but it's nearly completely silent. I have it sitting right next to my TV (it's REALLY small), and even with all volume off, I can't hear it unless my ear is right next to it and it's doing something heavy.

    A word from the wise: don't waste your money on the new ION2 systems with the Atom D510's. They cost more, but won't deliver you much more at all, and nothing more for just simple viewing purposes.

    --
    If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  76. Might not work for everyone... by Restil · · Score: 1

    But this is what I do. I keep all of the computers in my office. The server that plays the media (several are in use for purposes of storing it), has video and audio output that feeds into a UHF modulator, and I feed the output of that into a backwards splitter and combine it with the regular
    cable signal on channel 90 (which is unused by my cable company). I could easily use more channels as well with extra modulators, but I so far haven't needed more than one channel at a time. I set this up several years back, and I think I tried mythtv at the time but had issues getting it installed correctly, so I just wrote my own interface and use a netbook as a remote control, but if I was doing it over again, I'd probably use myth or something similar and a RF remote or an IR transceiver.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  77. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WHY DO YOU PEOPLE WASTE TIME TRANSCODING ANYTHIGN???

    SO I CAN WATCH IT ON MY HANDHELD!!!

    (why are we shouting?)

    Seriously, there's lots of reasons to transcode. Not all movies are available for download in friendly formats. I recently got a beautiful DVD set of the silent film Greed by Erich von Stroheim and I wanted to watch it on something that didn't have an optical drive, away from home.

    How else but to transcode?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  78. Use a Mac Mini or a Dell Zino by greggman · · Score: 1

    I have a Mac Mini. Anything post Oct 2009 is fast enough for HiDef. I have an Ubuntu server sharing via SMB and I use Boxee or XBMC on the Mac Mini.I'm connected to a 42 inch Sony at 1920x1080p. Bonus because the Mac has remote control support built in. The Mac Mini is SILENT!

    The only downside is cost. A Mac Mini is $599.

    A Dell Zino is the same size and seems like it should also fit the bill and they start at only $260 but (a) I've never used one so not sure they can do HD. Boxee and XBMC are supposed to use the GPU for video decoding now so maybe the Zino is fine. (b) I have no idea if the Zino is silent. (c) no built in remote but given the price difference you could easily add that and still be well under the price of the Mac Mini

    Bonus, you can get BluRay on Zino, something you can't do on Mac Mini AFAIK.

  79. Yes you can... by TheJonnyBoy · · Score: 0

    ... connect the AppleTV to network shares... sorta.

    I have a gen1 AppleTV. I have a NAS with all my video files on it.
    In iTunes on my desktop, I have added the NAS-stored files to the iTunes library (by link, not by copying).

    Now when I use the AppleTV to play "Shared Movies" from the linked iTunes on my desktop - those movies show up and play just fine.

    From what I've read on the new AppleTV, it will be able to stream files from an iTunes library... so this should still be usable.

    Now if only it did DLNA so I could watch Hulu/Amazon/etc. via PlayOn.

    Anyone know if Roku does DLNA? don't see anything on it so far on their website.

  80. Windows it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried. I've tried for years. The best solution: WinXP OS with Zoom Player. This combo allows a standard universal control to run 100% of my media in any format. In addition having the power of a full computer and using ffdshow I can get the best picture quality AND can reliably fast forward & rewind (something that is very hit or miss on the various media streamers). I started with an old computer determined to not spend any money about 7 years ago. Now I have: Antec Sonata III case, Corsair 40GB SSD (boot OS), Nlited XP (remove everything not needed), Zoom player. 2TB local drive + 1GB wired network access. 4GB ram (overkill), Intel Dual Core E6550 in a new Gigabyte motherboard.

    important bit: CPU heat sink, no fan. Power supply, no fan. Video card, no fan. 2 120mm case fans running at 600rpm (silent). Plays everything perfectly and my wife can use it 100% of the time. Boot time is 12 seconds but mostly we leave it in standby so power up is faster than the TV.

    And since it is a full computer: Firefox and web surfing (with remote keyboard/touchpad)! Games, you name it.

    ZP plays everything and will run slideshows, etc. Highly recommend.

  81. We can do better... by cslewis2007 · · Score: 1

    It seems obvious to me, that after many comments, that there is no consensus to this question. The art in deciding what is the best technological solution in terms of streaming video to the living room remains unevolved. Everyone has their opinion. I use a dlink 323 that talks to my xbox 360, but it sucks - requiring time consuming transcoding and the all too familiar experience of a data file that for all intents and purposes should play, simply doesn't. I know in my heart of hearts that there ought to be an inexpensive open hardware solution that can stream content from either an internal or network based source video and dts audio to my TV but it simply doesn't today. At least there doesn't seem be to a definitive, universally accepted as the best way to do this, at least at cost of less than $400. I think this community can do better. We should be able to define a hareware platform / software configuration that is both open and reliable to do this simple task.

    1. Re:We can do better... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You have to actually listen to the person asking the question and try to answer based on their requirements and experience.

      Different answers will be appropriate for different people.

      It might call for recommending something that is not your personal favorite.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  82. Plex == Closed source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, even better, if you want to support an open source project, use XBMC instead. Plex is now 90% closed source.

  83. Re:Use a Mac Mini or a Dell Zino by greggman · · Score: 1

    One more thing. I think a PC is better than a dedicated box like AppleTV, PopcornHour (which I owned) and other boxes because...I can also browse the net and use the latest software. So for example if Boxee ever dies I can still use a browser to watch Hulu or Vimeo or PBS. If some new service suddenly appears it's pretty likely I'll be able to use it immediately. With a dedicated box that's generally not true.

  84. An Apple TV should do it... by Reeses · · Score: 1

    If you can find an open source implementation of Bonjour. I'm pretty sure there is one, the name escapes me.

    --
    Reeses
    1. Re:An Apple TV should do it... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of mDNSResponder or Avahi.

    2. Re:An Apple TV should do it... by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=830241
      VM + iTunes + Apple TV.
      The Apple TV is $99. Cheaper than every other suggestion I've seen on here so far.
      And its Apple... can't get much more "non-Slashdot crowd" than that.

  85. Mac Mini + Plex by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 1

    Just chiming in with my vote for Mac Mini + Plex (the new Plex\Nine is quite promising though still has some bugs). I'm running this setup via my 1080p projector system and a NAS over wired gigabit ethernet and it's just fantastic.

    --
    True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
  86. PMS by gaboalonso · · Score: 1

    Easy task. Just get a PS3 slim and stream your content with Ps3 Media Server. Works charms with me. It even muxes subtitles on the fly, for my non-english speaking girlfriend. Can do 1080p just fine, assuming you've got a decent server.

  87. WDTV Live by Genocaust · · Score: 1

    Does everything you want and more; including Netflix support.

    http://wdtvlive.com/

    --
    It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
  88. Plex is closed source - watch that EULA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plex is now 90% closed source. No way am I gonna use an app by folk who don't give a shit about the opensource model that they're building from.

    1. Re:Plex is closed source - watch that EULA! by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      The Plex client that was forked from XBMC is still open source. But the Plex Media Server back end is closed. And the devs seem to be concentrating most of their efforts right now on the media server.

      They also seem to be doing everything they can to give as little as possible back to XBMC. I don't know if that's due to bad blood from their split two years ago. Or because they want to turn Plex into a business.

  89. unless there is an update, it won't work by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the most recent Mac Mini. With Plex, it cannot play full-screen 1080p, even 24fps (my test is Avatar, full blu-ray file). XBMC nightly builds can do it if you have h.264 acceleration on, so maybe Plex will work soon.

    All in all the Mini (even my 2.66GHz one) is probably not a good choice due to the slow CPU and high price.

    It's too bad too since the Mini does HDMI audio (7.1 channels, 24-bit, 192KHz).

    Also, if the Mini wakes up with no TV attached (because your amp is set to another input) it switches audio back to the internal speaker from HDMI audio out and you have to reset it.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by Skapare · · Score: 1

      That's a stupid design, then. It should just output the audio both ways at the same time. Maybe the previous iPhone antenna engineer guy was wandering around the halls and told some programmer that if he outputs both at the same time, each only gets half the volume level.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      All in all the Mini (even my 2.66GHz one)

      You bought the server one?

    3. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Core Audio, the OSX audio API, can output the same sound to any and all sound outputs, or can output completely different sounds to each output simultaneously. It's completely flexible.

      Just outputting the same to all sound outputs would be stupid. You don't want a tinny noise from an internal speaker added to the output from a good speaker system or perhaps headphones.

      If there's a problem there it is with what the application chooses to do. Plex appears to be open source though, so you could always fix it rather then whining.

    4. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by jythie · · Score: 1

      My mini runs into a similiar problem only with the video component instead. If the TV goes to sleep (or is shut off) and I wake the mini, it reverts back to 640x480 and I have to manually tell it to redetect the display.

    5. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Then it should be as simple as letting someone turn on or off each output device, and even let each select which sound to output, or even mix sources. There is never a valid excuse for only being about to output one at a time unless the device channels would be overloaded (then we drag the hardware engineer in for his grilling).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    6. Re:unless there is an update, it won't work by Narcogen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both XBMC and Plex have supported hardware acceleration on the 2010 mini for a few months now. XBMC "dharma" supports it, Plex9 supports it, and there's a standalone binary of Plex 0.85 that supports it.

      If you haven't already I suggest enabling the "true fullscreen" option in Plex. (Go to windowed mode, and in the Plex menu, open "advanced settings" and enable "True fullscreen".

      If you're seeing dropped frames or stuttering that makes you think Plex9 can't do 1080p full screen, try this option. I've actually had no problem doing this on older machines than a 2010 mini, and using less capable video hardware, like the 9400M instead of the mini's GF 320M.

  90. Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Media Center. It's built into Vista and Windows 7. It has access to Internet TV, it holds your media, it plays Netflix, and it runs on XBox as an extender.

    1. Re:Windows Media Center by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Windows Media Center. It's built into Vista and Windows 7. It has access to Internet TV, it holds your media, it plays Netflix, and it runs on XBox as an extender. ...sucks donkey balls compared to XBMC.

      It doesn't even do terribly well compared to MythTV and is harder to set up.

      XBMC is the gold standard for dealing with a large video collection.

      Even if he wants to use MCE, he should still try to use XBMC as his video browser plugin (like you can with MythTV).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  91. What about the Dune BD Prime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised nobody has suggested it. Supposed to be better than the PopcornHour and WDTV boxes.

  92. From The /. Crowd by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Informative

    for the non-*crowd, set-top ready.

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/electronics/home-entertainment/d3fe/

      Native 1080p video output at up to 1920x1080 resolution (check)
    - Analog recording of your favourite TV shows from Cable or Satelite (check)
    - Time-shift and scheduled recording (check)
    - Incredible variety of video and audio codec support including MKV (check)
    - Built in BitTorrent client for sharing and downloading video files (check)
    - HDMI, composite or component video output (check)
    - Optical SPDIF 5.1 Channel Dolby Digital audio output (check)
    - Takes up to 2.0 Terabyte SATA hard drive (check)
    - Built in samba server with UPnP implementation (check)
    - Oh and a completely sweet price! ($169, plus $35 for 1 to 3 week coming wireless N USB adapter4, plus you supply the SATA drive up to 2TB, and an external DVD burner if desired).

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:From The /. Crowd by Skapare · · Score: 1

      But can it read, via SMB or NFS over gigabit ethernet, the ATSC capture files from MythTV?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:From The /. Crowd by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't play Netflix or indeed much of anything but a common-codec video file (where is my Intel Indeo? I want to play my old video too!) without adding commercial software. Complete fail. I would be better off with a $25 dockstar (check) and a ~$100 Blu-Ray player with Netflix and SMB streaming support. Or ye olde Aspire Revo (the original one) which is about $169 refurb'd and which has a GPU with VDPAU support.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:From The /. Crowd by Skapare · · Score: 1

      After looking closer, this thing can't record HD at all. I definitely need HD timeshifting from unencrypted TV channels.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  93. WD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another vote for the Western Digital box here...Great product.

  94. WDTV live + NFS. Cheap and works great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup an NFS server on your Ubuntu box and then get a WDTV live. Install the updated Brad firmware, and map the NFS share with xmount. The WDTV live is cheap, and NFS is free.

  95. Agreed! by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Came to say just this. Right now I'm using an older iMac with video and sound out to my large screen. But the idea is the same. I'll eventually move to a mac mini but there's no point in spending the money right now while the iMac is running just fine.

  96. I've got an LG Blue-Ray player that does this by reezle · · Score: 1

    Actually, I have two of them. It plays discs (of course), Netflix, Pandora, Youtube, etc... But also will connect to networked machine via SMB.
    It's a pretty simple file browser, but it plays most anything I throw at it...

    It's the BD-590 I believe. Although I'm sure other models of theirs will probably do the job, too...
    http://www.lg.com/us/tv-audio-video/video/LG-blu-ray-dvd-player-BD590.jsp

  97. Western DIgital by Elenor · · Score: 1

    WD TV Live comes to mind.....

  98. Hmmm, plex by speedingant · · Score: 1

    I built a cheap hackintosh, with reasonable grunt (Core i5, mini ATX etc). I use Plex, which is just amazing, especially the latest version. Will transcode anything. The same box also runs Apache/MySQL for a webserver, and hosts DNS + a few other services. It's great!

  99. Re:MythTV -- kinda sucks by lanner · · Score: 1

    I tried MythTV some time back and it wasn't all that. I still have that Asus Pundit box that I bought for it sitting around doing something else now. It's more like a framework than an actual usable product. Note that most of my gripes were actually about the DVR capability rather than just media-player capability.

    What about a remote? Nothing that works out-of-the-box. Sure, you can tinker and hack anything to work with it, but no matter what, you have to tinker and hack. Nothing "just works" with a drop-in config. I just want something that works and it wasn't there.

    I had endless issues with the video, on a hardware platform that was apparently "highly recommended". Wasn't just me. Forms were full of people with the same issues at the time.

  100. Re:My Setup (ie Buy a Playstation) by maas15 · · Score: 1

    My friend uses a similar setup - Twonky media server + a playstation 3. Works flawlessly, beautifully. Plus, the playstation 3 can do 1.5x fast forward with sound that's digitally sped up without altering the pitch of the conversation. Really, Sony made the PS3 an awesome media center.

  101. Western Digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WD make a fine little gadget that can do CIFS mounts, has youtube capability built in, can use DHCP or assigned addresses, and can stream HD.
    Bout $200 AU. Its great - now I can watch Pr0n in the living room when no one is home! .... Did I say that out loud?

  102. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by Inner_Child · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why the hell would I hire a DVD? Their references are almost always terrible, have no work experience prior to 1996, and they don't do any work -- they just sit around looking all shiny.

    --
    Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  103. WD Live by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

    I bought a WD Live the other day, and it's utterly fantastic.

    It's small (About the same size as an Apple TV) and uses very little power. It can connect to a Wired network, or you can plug in a USB WiFi adapter. You can also plug a USB Hard Drive or Memory Stick into it and play movies directly off that.

    As for networking, it can browse DLNA and Samba shares with a somewhat reasonable interface, and will happily play full bitrate 1080p content.

    It seems to play most popular formats (Specifically, it'll handle h264/MKV and Divx/Xvid perfectly).

    It also has built in support for Youtube, Live365, and Pandora radio.

    There are a few flaws with it, but nothing major.
        * Copying via samba *To* the attached hard drive is very slow
        * Very occasionally loses lipsync. Can be fixed by pausing it for a second.
        * Corrupt/broken files sometimes crash it, and it requires a full power cycle (Turned off at the wall) to fix.

  104. Nvidia Ion by Distan · · Score: 1

    Since you are happy with XBMC, you just need a smaller box to run it on.

    Buy an Acer Revo, Asus EEEBox, Zotac Zbox, or something similar. Pretty much anything built on the Intel Aton/Nividia Ion combination is going to be able to play full 1080 content with XBMC.

    Or you could go for a Popcorn Time box, or even a boxee box.

    I'd still recommend XMBC on an Ion.

  105. I eventually gave up on something small... by bwalzer · · Score: 1

    I have tried various media centreish things over the years. The problem is that for a particular amount of computing power bigger is better. Once you cross the transition to something with a fan then larger fans are quieter. Presently I have a bog standard ATX case in the living room. The large ATX power supply has a large slow turning fan. The CPU has a huge heat sink with a large slow turning fan (I think it is a Golden Orb II). Video is integrated. The result is a lot quieter than the projector it drives, even when the projector is on low mode. That is with the computer sitting right beside the couch. I presently have a dual core Athlon in there. If I run short of CPU I can just add cores. Much simpler than fooling around with hardware acceleration.

    Adding a video card with a big heatsink (no fan) gets me a free living room computer using Linux multiseat (which seems to work well now). I control the projector session with one of those wireless multimedia keyboards with a built in trackball. I no longer bother with media centre software or a remote control. That includes recorded TV. It is just a computer that happens to be in the living room. It ends up being a lot simpler.

  106. Mac Mini w/ frontrow by solosaint · · Score: 1

    Hate to sound like a fan boy, but I too tried everything and now i Love my setup, mac mini with frontrow is the way to go. email me if you have any questions about my setup. PS i put HULU and Boxee inside front row along with a folder attached to a NAS device that has my archive collection on it.

  107. Re:MythTV - Yes Yes Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The previous version of Knoppmyth (R5.5) is based on Debian. I still run that. There are Debian packages for mythtv.

    For a relatively painless Debian like experience, I would install the latest Ubuntu and then install the mythtv packages on top of that, or I just might try MythBuntu, or you could back up your Debian server root (easier than remembering and removing 100 packages) and just try slapping in on there from the repositories.

    root@mythtv:~# apt-cache showpkg mythtv
    Package: mythtv
    Versions:
    0.23-0.0lenny2 ... (sounds like Lenny to me)
    0.20.2-7 ... (the version that I am still running)

    The question is all the tweaking and glue that Knoppmyth did for you. MythTv is probably a lot easier than when I started 4 years ago, but I would still recommend that you find someone with MythTv experience because you will have issues and questions unless you buy a pre-built system.

    MythTv has all the features that you know you want and all the features that you didn't even know about, that you still want. Although MythTv can control many set top boxes, I find that one set top box is all we need in the house.
      It manages, prioritizes and records for everyone off the one Set Top Box with results going on the file server. It knows how to move recordings around so that it will record everything (if possible). It knows when the shows get moved to a different night. It flags commercials for automatic skipping. The schedule is $20 a year. You find that you never watch things live any more, you watch when you want.

    Any PC on the network in the house is a TV set and they can all watch any mixture at the same time (of course with the limitation that you can only watch 3 different live shows at the same time if you only have inputs).

    Windows machines can run "mythtv player". Ubuntu machines can run a true MythTv native front end. Other distros have packages too.

    HD is the question. There is no good, generic way to get encrypted HD from a set top box into a PC. Many shows are now marked "play once" by the provider in the DRM inside the STB and e.g. the STB firewire won't talk to open source because open source could be coded to ignore the DRM restrictions (if I recall correctly).

    SD runs fine, even over 802.11g WiFi, possibly even two streams at the same time. I run ethernet where possible to minimize WiFi usage.

    Weather button, music storage and playback, TV, video files, burn a DVD of any TV or video for use in a DVD player, automatic commercial skipping on playback. I even have some old virtual computer images that I can run on the server.

    I have shown this wonderfulness to relatives and now manage 3 KnoppMyth R5.5 systems.

    Come to think of it, I should probably do a backup :)

  108. Nvidia Ion2 + top-line Intel Atom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just got my hands on one of these:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856107072
    the "Jetway Mini-Top", comes with an Intel Atom D525 (1.8GHz), and the new Nvidia Ion2. It has onboard HDMI that definitely supports 1080p out, onboard optical, onboard A/B/G wifi, a handful of usb, etc. The thing is unbelievably tiny to me, and it's VESA compliant so you can bolt it to the back of your TV. I have mine set right now as dual-boot with Vista and Ubuntu 10.04, XBMC works just fine in both over the network via smb shares. Allegedly you can run bioshock 2 and some more recent games on the Ion2, haven't tried it yet but that's what reviewers have said. A sub $500 (ram, HDD, etc) solution that can do 1080p video, it looks great when connected to my 55" samsung.

  109. Re:MythTV - Yes Yes Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just to be clear, with MythTv, you can play any HD content that you can get into the system, like via download or a BD player(?), provided you have the network bandwidth and CPU/GPU power.

  110. Western Digital TV HD Live Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is what I have and it plays everything at 1080p no problem, works with DLNA servers no need for SMB shares, but it works with shares as well. Does Netflix, Pandora, Live365, YouTube and something else I don't use.
    Works great over WiFi I have tried a 802.11n USB adapter, has 2 USB ports for local storage as well.

  111. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use mythbuntu with nfs on a gigabit network and you are good to go
    using it for years

  112. Dare I suggest this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP MediaSmart, running Windows Home Server. It can stream content to clients running iTunes, including Apple TV. Also acts as a backup host and generic shared storage. http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/mediasmart-server/index.html

  113. D-Link Boxbee by sakti · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for a D-Link Boxbee. It is small, dedicated hardware which supports both online streaming from netflix, hulu and such as well as full support for your local library of video/audio. Should be out this fall.

    I'd provide links, but it's easier to just google for it.

    --
    "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
    1. Re:D-Link Boxbee by lavaboy · · Score: 1

      even easier if you spell it right. That's Boxee.

      http://www.boxee.tv/

      --
      Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
  114. Overkill by hairyfish · · Score: 1

    Not sure why you would bother with the streaming server idea. big, noisy, expensive, inflexible. As others as pointed out go the WDTV and a portable HDD. The HDD has everything on it and I can play from my PC, my laptop, my TV (via WDTV), take it to work, take it on holiday, take it to a friends and share (OMG! call the cops) and it's all there ready to go at all times.

    1. Re:Overkill by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Not sure why you would bother with the streaming server idea. big, noisy, expensive, inflexible. ...more capable.

      The streaming server can do anything PC hardware or software will allow for.

      It can ADAPT. It can adapt to any new standards that arise and adapt to what ever 3rd party appliances happen to appear.

      If anything, it's the "portable" solutions that are inflexible.

      This also is the same reason that HTPCs generally outperform frontend appliances.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  115. Digital Entertainer Elite by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1
    I have in my bedroom a Netgear Digital Entertainer Elite.

    It supports 1080P as well as all the other lowly formats.

    I have a Windows machine that acts as a server. I can access any of the shared directories on that machine. It supports 802.11n (which I use) and seems to stream high end video quite well. It also has an ethernet port, but I don't use it, and I am unsure if it supports gigabit or not, but I would suspect it does.

    It supports youtube and a photo site if you have some software installed on a remote PC. The neat thing about the software is it gives you remote control over that PC from the digital entertainer. Very useful when you forget to turn on your torrents at night.

    It has HDMI output on the back, as well as component and a composite output, as well as digital and analog audio. I originally had it hooked up to a 20 inch via the component, but when I changed to a 37 inch 1080P HDMI connection, everything clicked. It supports pretty much any video i throw at it, including MKV and really really old xvid stuff.

    There is a version with an internal 500G hard drive, which is what I am using. It works quite well, altho i haven't had the need to store any video locally as it plays pretty much anything I throw at it.

    The GUI is simple and i had it configured out of the box in 2 minutes. It took me longer to put the shelf up next to the TV in the bedroom. I haven't noticed it running hot, i turn it off at night. The box looks like a DVD player or any other CE device that yo would find in the rack. The universal remote is simple to use, if a bit pedestrian, and I haven't tried to use any of the logitech remotes with it, it did support the Sony LCD that I have connected to it.

    I have had it loose connection to the "server" PC (where the video is stored) and it's a bit of a kerfuffle to get it reconnected. The issues all stemmed from when the virus checker on the video storage machine rebooted the system. A reboot of the netgear appliance was required. I have had to reboot it 4 or 5 times since i purchased the unit, which was around 6 months ago. I have not had to reboot it in the last 3 months. There has not been a firmware update in the last 3 months, at least with the automated download procedure.

    Some of the menus run a bit deep. For instance, you can send a message to the appliance from any machine that has the software installed. Lunch, Dinner, come here, that kind of thing. the responses are buried 3 or 4 levels into the machine.

    Overall, I am very happy with how the unit performs. I am watching video within 20 seconds of turning on the unit and picking out what I want. I have found that i need to keep the videos organized, as a long directory list (say over 100 files) can slow down the machine a bit.

    --
    Mean what you say...say what you mean.
  116. Just use NFS by polarsd · · Score: 1

    I have my media in my upstairs office on a Linux box. My media player is a standard Shuttle with a projector in my downstairs living room. Forget SMB CIFS or Windows Too Slow. I expose my media over NFS. At the player I use VLC or Elana or MythTV to play files directly off the NFS mounted partition. And it's over a Wireless adapter.. And I've got pretty old Wireless stuff (802.11b). So, I get a very occasional buffer run out, which causes a freeze for a second or so, but then starts up without a hitch. I can solve that problem by running a wire downstairs or upgrading my wireless router and network adapter, but I'll live with it.

  117. The Boxee box = perfect by hydromike2 · · Score: 1

    the Boxee box: http://www.boxee.tv/box is perfect for you, although it wont be here till November. I also have an ubuntu server with a few terabytes of media that I have the exact same problem with, so I am anxiously awaiting for the release of the Boxee box. Im running boxee(which I love) on my ubuntu box fyi, but again basically the same deal as you.

  118. SageTV by QuasiInsomniac · · Score: 1

    Am I really the first to suggest a SageTV HD200 with SageTV Media Center running on his server box? Full 1080p BluRay rips stream seemlessly over a wired connection.

  119. Zotac with xbmclive by jalewis · · Score: 1

    Start with this http://www.amazon.com/Zotac-IONITX-90-Watt-Intel-Motherboard/dp/B002BA5IHC/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1283483342&sr=8-3

    Get a small case, some ram and a small laptop HD. You could do SSD if you wanted really quiet. Then install xbmclive, once setup, configure it to use hdmi. I have three HTPC's based on that board and they can be run fanless and with the dual core and the Nvidia VDPAU i'm doing 1080p over the network to my NAS.

    I've tried the WDlive, the seagate, AppleTV, xbox360... none are as flexible as xbmclive.

  120. nothing succeeds like excess by swell · · Score: 1

    I feel for you brother. I too have much media. Hundreds of hours of unwatched video, thousands of hours of audio, thousands of ebooks and no time to enjoy them. I hope that before I die there will be time for some of that.

    Is it possible that the problem is not the equipment, not the cost, but the fact that you have no life? Do you have a job? Do you perform any function other than to absorb entertainment? Hey, just curious, and maybe a bit jealous.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  121. Ubuntu with ushare to xbox360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have media on the Ubuntu server running ushare (in xbox360 compatibility mode) and stream media to the xbox. Ushare can stream to xbox, ps3 or any upnp device. It supports other formats too. I sometimes stream media to vlc on my laptop using the upnp plugin, though it seems the vlc plugin has problems reading/displaying the upnp directory structure.

    Ushare can be installed from the repositories - sudo apt-get install ushare - though you might want to create /etc/default/ushare containing: USHARE_OPTIONS='-x' ....to get it to work with some devices.

    In /etc/ushare.conf I share /media and mount my permanent media drives in there. This is good because if someone brings a usb device over I just have to plug it in and restart ushare to make the new files available. Works for audio, video and still images.

    BTW occasionally the xbox gets it knickers in a knot and needs a reboot... but the backend hasn't given me any grief at all.

  122. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like an iPad!

  123. Apple TV + Crystal HD + XBMC = 1080p playback by mohitsharma · · Score: 1

    The original Apple TV is $150 as of yesterday and you can get a crystal HD card off of ebay for $50 or less. Install XBMC on it and for $200 you have a slick, quiet, versatile media front end for your file server! (with a remote!)

  124. Patriot Box Office by LukeWebber · · Score: 1

    http://patriotmem.com/products/detailp.jsp?prodline=6&catid=69&prodgroupid=159&id=895&type=20

    It's small, light and silent, and it even comes with a decent remote and HDMI cable. I paid under AUD150 for mine, and I swear by it.
    You can install a hard drive if you like, or attach USB dries, but I just go straight off the network (ethernet). It does also have wireless, but I don't recommend it.

    I understand the A C Ryan Playon! might be even better...
    http://www.playonhd.com/en/

  125. In the mean time, Boxee by RingDev · · Score: 1

    If the Boxee Box strikes your fancy, you can download and run the Boxee client for FREE (as in beer) on your existing Windows (XP or newer) machine.

    I'm not a huge ZOMGWTFBBQSAUCE fan of the Boxee interface, but on my old XP box, it plays DVDs, ISOs, and ripped movies with ease. The other features and apps are nice, but I use it primarily as a media library, and it does just fine at that.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:In the mean time, Boxee by hydromike2 · · Score: 1

      It does do a good job of playing most everything, retrieving media info from online and is easily controlled from android/iphone with the free app-no more lost remotes ;)

  126. Not a pipe dream... homebrew is the way by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    However, Small, Quite, HD, Cheap : Choose three.

    Personally, I am of the Large, Quite, HD camp. You can make a very quiet system if you get the right case. I have a Antec Fusion Remote Max (not to be confused with the Fusion Remote). The Max edition has a 140mm side exhaust fan, a front/bottom 120mm intake, and a rear 120mm exhaust fan. So you can use extremely large slow rotating fans which make very little noise in this case and still move plenty of air. There is enough room to suspend 1 hard drive using bungie cords without much problem (or you can fit 4 or 5 in the case if you want max hdd space). Better, yet, buy a small 60gb solid state drive. Get a Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P, an Intel Core i5-750, a Thermalright HR-02 PASSIVE CPU cooler, 4GB+ RAM, and a Powercolor HD-5750 Go Green (passive GPU). Only need to run the rear 120mm exhaust fan and the power supply fan. System will be extremely silent (under 16db if you replace the stock fan).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  127. Really? You couldn't find information on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the OP has done zero research on the matter. There is a lot of information available all over the Internet for precisely the types of appliance the OP wants.

    I recommend an Acer Revo R3610 or it's newer cousin with the new Atom 550 processor. It absolutely silent, small enough to be tucked away behind the TV or fancy enough looking if you want to keep it in the open. It can do 1080p easily, has HDMI and has digital audio output if you want to pipe the audio through your HiFi receiver.

    I use Windows 7 & XBMC. It is easy enough to configure Windows 7 to boot straight into XBMC without any password prompt or Win desktop (Hint: search for Windows 7 Shell). XBMC is the perfect Media player & Media library.

  128. Why even put a PC in the room? by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

    Look, if the problem is the PC, why bother with all this nonsense when you can just relocate the PC? Stick it behind a wall or something and it can be as loud as you want. Just run a cable to the TV/projector, and use a wireless keyboard and mouse to control it. (Everything's USB these days, so if reception behind the wall is a problem, use a little USB extender cable (A-male/A-female) to locate the receivers on the proper side of the wall.)

  129. My HTPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is slightly older tech now, but my HTPC that was built 6 years ago, is still unmodified.

    Silverstone LC4 case, Power supply hacked so the fan is disabled, Via Mini ITX board. The one with the 800mhz proc thats passively cooled. Boots from a CF card plugged in a PATA adapter. Uses a internet bought serial IR pickup, so I was able to program the bottom half of my Samsung Plasma remote to work with the menu (It does nothing to the screen as it;s used for setup screens only).

    Running Gentoo Linux which I have not even updated for a few years now. fstab lists the mount point of an external NFS mount for the file store. Lirc converts the IR scancodes in to keyboard commands. mplayer plays pretty much everything for me. Freevo give us a nice front end. My 5 year old work out how to get to the Dora xvids herself.

    Data is stored on a ReadyNAS Dou (now, previous another box). The good thing about the Duo is that it can export both NFS and CIFS from the same back end file system. This mea ns I can happily run a windows torrent client like uTorrent on a VM elsewhere, keeping the HTPC focused on uptime and responsiveness. (Hence the fact that I never update gentoo.). The other cool thing about the readynas is that it'll happily rsync to another readynas for a backup. My backup readynas turns on at midnight for an hour each night for nightly replication.

    The uTorrent VM (Running on Fusion on the old imac) uses RSS feeds to pull down all our shows(about 40 rules are active) and places them on the Readnas when needed. The whole thing works flawlessly except that when there is a power outage the readynas doesn't auto start, so the HTPC is just rebooted after it's finished the FSCK.

    All up I think it weighs in at under 20-30 watts, cpu idles at 40% playing standard eztv standard def files. Is dead silent. It was a lot of effort up front, but was a cool project that has paid us back many times the intial setup costs. The Silverstone LC-04 is looking a bit dated, and looks completely empty with only a mini ITX board in it. the project initially had a riser with a tv card and DVD player but I pulled those out years later to save on running costs as they were never used. DVD's are played on the XBOX if really needed, but more likely to be ripped if we're not watching it the same day. I don't bother recording TV as everything we like to watch is on eztv.

    After the first few months we cancelled foxtel and bulked up the internet plan and never looked back. I'm in -no way- a linux person. I'm an old school mcse from the 3.5 days. Never run linux on a home machine until this for more than a day (then went back to windows). Don't really feel it was 'hard' but certainly required a few solid night of attention and rebuilding the gentoo box a few times to understand whats going on.

    Now, if I were to do it all again, I'd probably just get a Samsung Series 8 and get it to use a DNLA file server. The ReadNAS does that too (it wasn't chosen by chance).

  130. Simple... by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    Zotac Mini-ITX motherboard, low power quad core chip, Antec Mini-ITX case, 4 GB of RAM and a cheap laptop hard drive + Linux + XBMC.

    Completely silent, lower power and tiny (About as long as a shoebox and 1/2 as high).

    Plays everything and can be updated when new stuff comes out. People promoting the appliances are not looking towards the future when stuff breaks, you're stuck with a worthless appliance. With the PC, you can just update the software or replace parts that wear out for cheap. Plus you can dual boot it and do some gaming if you're so inclined.

  131. Boxee + Acer Aspire Revo by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Use Boxee on top of Ubuntu, with a small nettop like an acer aspire revo - just as long as it's an atom with ion processor. You could also just wait a bit for the boxee box to come out :) XBMC, if you get the right plugins, can do all of this but I like boxee's implementation.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  132. what about .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody has mentioned xbox 360... granted, it probably won't play nice with the ubuntu, but throw on any windows from xp onwards and you've got a pretty slick system that plays games, most major codecs, and lets you rent movies and tv shows too (not that i think you're a renter given any type of mass media collection), and is full 1080p when the source dictates

  133. Winblows is your best option (sorry...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MediaPortal with MPC-HC. You'll need an nvidia 8500gt/9500 or better graphics to do full gpu off-loading (currently only developed fully in windows)

    My Current system:
    Core i7
    Six 1Tb drives (raid5)
    gtx275
    6gb ddr3 ram
    passive water cooling
    Windows 7

    The system is whisper quiet and cool (mainly due to the cabinet housing all the AV equipment getting pumped with 52F air from the adjacent wine cellar)

  134. transcode=tversity.com by SteelWolf13 · · Score: 1

    i use that as my network server. I have a PDA and a laptop that i hook in the the HTTP server the tversity runs. open any good web browser and input the local PCs IP:port and you pick video from a menu system. Even my grandma can use it. Windows. Option to hook into your local lan over the internet too. tversity.com

  135. Slingbox!! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    This is relatively simple, except for 1 thing: You need to set up an infrared remote input to your server box. After that, it's simple:

    (1) Set up your server to actually output the video to its video out.

    (2) Connect the video out to the Slingbox.

    (3) Connect the Slingbox to your network.

    (4) Run Slingbox Player on whatever you are watching the video on. (Windows, OS X, or Linux).

    You will need the HD version of slingbox to actually serve HD video over your network. But all the networking part is taken care of for you. You can control the source video device through a "virtual" remote on the screen. Slingbox has 2 IR remote outputs. I have one running my cable TV box and the other my DVD player.

    Slingbox will optimize the video according to your throughput. If you have plenty of network throughput, you get great quality. If your throughput is lower, it compresses the video more and quality suffers.

    You even can access it away from home over the internet, but your throughput will usually not be as good. I took my laptop to the office and showed the folks there how I could get Cable TV and my DVD player, and control them, right there on my screen. It's pretty cool.

    But again: the difficult part would be setting up a control system for your video source. Slingbox is designed to work with a fixed list of "standard" IR video device remotes. But there are links on their website to places where you can get the info to create a custom config file for your IR Remote if it isn't "standard".

  136. Upgrade your TV by thedarknite · · Score: 1

    The current batch of HDTVs on the market all have networking capabilities and claim to be able to play media off connected PCs

    --
    A game has objectives and is competitive, anything else is just play
  137. mede8ter by Dude404 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You forgot mention it can stream from SMB. Actually the 2009 batch of mediaplayers run linux on a mips based CPU. They can also function as a slow(2,5 MB/s-5MB/s) NAS. I myself have a mede8ter with a 2 TB drive builtin. It plays all the downloads without transcoding and possibly with the PC off. A HD of course makes a small sound and the thing might have a fan (not sure). Since it boots in a short time i turn if off to get rid of any whirring. You can buy such boxes without a HD (xtreamer, AC playHD mini) to have more silence.

    Price? about 99 euro for a diskless streamer, my mede8ter (without disk, with ALL cables) 139 euro, for a disked station like the popcorn A200 220 euro.

    (and forget those cheaper pre-2009 streamers, they are underpowered and don't eat averything you throw at them.

    PS, despite the fact these boxes run linux, they have large binary blobs so i would not consider them open source NMT's

  138. SMB + S-Video + VLC by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

    My setup includes:

    65" Rear Projection CRT with Component, Composite, and S-Video

    Desktop computer with some kind of old ATI All In Wonder card with s-video hooked up to the tv.

    All of the videos reside on an ubuntu smb share. Playback with vlc.

    The tv and the computer are at right angles on an inside corner so watching tv from the computer chair sucks. It's set up so we can watch broadcast tv on the computer, tv or both. Video from the server can be watched on the tv, computer, or both.

    Works great for everything except hd due to a) old playback computer, b) old tv, c) network lag (permanently installed cable limited to 10 mbps, permanently means in concrete)

    Lack of hd notwithstanding, it's fine. I never jumped on the hd bandwagon, and besides, what is hd going to do for Family Guy, Futurama, and Southpark anyway?

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  139. Try a QNAP TS-210 by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

    I have a QNAP TS 210 with twin 1 tb drives in RAID. Works a treat as a media server and general NAS. It sits under my desk on a 1 gb home network (the Samsung series 6 TV is hard wired too) and makes virtually no noise.

  140. Dlink DNS 323 & upnp Clients by orange · · Score: 1

    I use a Dlink dns 323 see http://wiki.dns323.info/ for storing all my video/photo's/music.

    Then I use the uPnP client on my samsung C6900 46" LED to watch stuff downloaded to the DNS323.

    My nokia e52 can handle audio streaming, as can the linux machines around the house.

    For PVR functionality, I use a Zotac ION - checkout http://techreport.com/articles.x/16893 .

    I think my home entertainment is getting there :-)

  141. Tversity? by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    TVersity (on Windows) can do transcoding automatically, and also fetch files from another computer. It is a UPnP server program, so devices like the XBox 360 will play from it.

  142. easy for non techies setup by Icebreaker · · Score: 1

    So will probably get modded "troll" for using a microsoft setup but here is what I use. Its easy for anyone especially non techies Xbox 360 a windows box (currently a laptop) Logitech harmony xbox remote Only problem pretty sure only 1080i can't remember but looks good enough The remote allows anyone one touch access to my media through the same remote that controls my entire living room entertainment center Its low cost (used xbox 360 arcade runs really cheap) My $0.02

  143. fit-PC2 by etlerant · · Score: 1

    As an alternative to the Apple TV/Mac mini, you could consider the fit-PC2 or fit-PC2i. It is a small, low-power, fanless computer using the atom-processor. Full hardware video acceleration of H.264, MPEG2, VC1, and WMV9 using the Intel GMA500 (not sure if linux will be able to use this however).

    8W at full cpu load.

    Possibility of built-in IR receiver depending on which model you choose.

    http://www.fit-pc.com/web/

  144. netbook or laptop by yyxx · · Score: 1

    Netbooks or laptops are small, quiet, come with built-in power backup, and a second screen besides your TV for installing stuff.

  145. Hisense 1080p media box - does the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a Hisense 1080p media box

    http://www.expansys.com/d.aspx?i=186127

    They work a treat connecting to ubuntu SMB shares.
    Ok so it does not have flash player or web browsing but it will happily play HD videos and just about every file format available.
    MKV, avi, mpg you name it it plays it.

    1. Re:Hisense 1080p media box - does the job by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I'll name it ... the ATSC streams recorded by MythTV in USA. I'm looking for a playback box that can handle those, directly, including live as they are being recorded (slightly behind in time, of course), via SMB or NFS over gigabit ethernet. It should also support the same format as a static file on USB memory stick (SDHC card support is a plus) or USB hard drive (must support drives up to 2TB). Must be dead quite (no fans, no internal HDDs) and run cool.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  146. Lame lame lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but Slashdot has finally been overun by lame questions.

    There have been network media players available for 3-4 or more years now and obviously do just what the OP is after.
    Wow, looking for a year for a solution? looking where I have no idea...

  147. Solution by shish · · Score: 1

    I am currently using Windows 7 and XBMC, but the case is too big and noisy, I don't particularly care for Windows

    So get a small and quiet case, and run XBMC-Linux on it.

    -- Yours sincerely, Captain Obvious

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:Solution by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Yep. XBMC or Boxee Box (when released) FTW.

  148. No front end needed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont bother with the hot and noisy frontend, Sit a virtual MythTV host on a KVM server somewhere insulated from you. Use PCI passthrough for the video card. Run HDMI and USB over ethernet to your TV/HiFi area. Plug a USB sound device and IR receiver into a hub connected to the USB over ethernet adapter. Plug the HDMI adapter into your tv.

      Works great :)

      -Max.

  149. xtreamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.xtreamer.net/

  150. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imaging.

  151. Boxee Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get a Boxee Box when it comes out in November. It's based on XBMC and has a much nicer, easier interface. ;)

  152. Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could install a POS computer like many geeks do, or you can do two simple steps:

    - Turn on iTunes Home Sharing
    - Connect your Apple TV

    Done. It really is that simple.

  153. Build a silent PC with the right components by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel i3 530
    Scythe Ninja II Rev.B Heatpipe CPU Cooler
    Passively cooled PSU
    Metal case (Antec)
    Notebook hard disk (will eventually switch to an SSD)
    No fans. The only moving part is the notebook hard disk.

    Connected via HDMI using the onboard GPU (the audio is also carried via HDMI).

    I'm using Windows 7 Media Center in conjunction with "My Movies" and Total Media Theatre 3 (for playing rips of my collection of HDDVDs). I also installed Shark007 codecs so I can play pretty much anything. And Core Codec for h.264 acceleration when playing MKV files.

    All media is stored on a Netgear DNS-323 NAS housed in a kitchen cupboard.

    Result is a silent PC with CPU temps that hover around 40C.

  154. ScreenPlay(TM) TV Link, Director Edition by Grimwiz · · Score: 1

    I have acquired a "ScreenPlay(TM) TV Link, Director Edition" to replace my old Emprex-1 which was nice but not perfectly reliable. It plays music (MP3) and videos (AVI or ISO) from SMB shares It also handles Mythtv streams allowing me to provide recorded programs over UPNP. When appliances like this fetch data from a network share you have a risk whether it will support your data format but the ScreenPlay seems to be sufficiently capable for my purposes.

    I recommend this over many of the other suggestions for the following reasons:
          1. cheap - £80.
          2. Small - about 1cm high (smaller than a DVD case), slides in next to my V+ box.
          3. energy efficient, I think about 10 watts.

    FAQ below:
    https://iomega-eu-en.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/iomega_eu_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=22760
    One recommendation I would offer if you bought one - put something over the activity LED as it is bright enough to read by.

    --
    -- Don't believe everything you read, hear or think
  155. PXE BOOT LinuxMCE w cheap noisless frontend by pbulteel73 · · Score: 1

    Use LinuxMCE as a backend and a is Foxconn NT-330I-A-W-NA-A NVIDIA ION as a frontend which you PXE Boot (so no internal drive to make it silent) -P

    1. Re:PXE BOOT LinuxMCE w cheap noisless frontend by Skapare · · Score: 1

      So where is a cheap noiseless front end with enough CPU power to handle all media formats including those saved by MythTV? My guess is 2x3.0GHz or 4x2.4GHz is the minimum, along with 2GB RAM. Got that in a cheap noiseless, yet, with gigabit ethernet?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:PXE BOOT LinuxMCE w cheap noisless frontend by pbulteel73 · · Score: 1

      MythTV can offload decoding to the GPU. The Foxconn has an NVidia ION MB which will do 1080P all decoded from the builtin GPU. The same system has Gig-Ethernet and can use up to 4G of RAM. Plug in a USB Mini BT dongle to use a KB/Mouse if you want. The Foxconn can be bought for $200 (£150 in the UK) as a barebones system w RAM although it's hard to find in the UK. There are other manufacturers that do rebranded systems of the same type and it's so small you can mount it on the back of a TV or monitor. Again, if you PXE Boot a MythTV frontend, you don't need a hard drive inside it'll be virtually silent.

  156. NMT.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget all the rest. Just by a DUNE player.. it is the best in every review.. if you want the best sound. Pch 200 is also good . but what a messy GUI.. it has.. Dune plays everything.. and so easy to use. pch200 and dune are the bet. but for sound.. at least that is what I have read dune is the best. and and for a NMT it has a nice simple GUI .. The one thing I found to be a problem is that , none of these MNT use gigabit ethernet.. they have it built in . but the chip set will not support.. I have talk to PCH and Dune about this. they both say the same thing. maybe in 2011.. That really sucks if you want to play big 50g movies.. over the network. some stream fine others well they don't see to look or play so good.

    True the Dune is not cheap. but it works great. I also have the little Western Digital box.. works pretty well and easy to use. and nice GUI. but feels cheap. well it is cheap..

    Hope maybe this will help you out there. Look at the BD PRIME Dune 3.0.. even has a bluray built in if you want it.. harddrive is easy . plug and play..

  157. Asrock ION 330 + PLC by paketier · · Score: 1

    I've got an asrock ion 330 with XBMC live (ubuntu based distro) in it, connected through PLC to my server. It has no problem playing HD content shared with SMB. You only hear it if you shutdown everything else during the night.

    1. Re:Asrock ION 330 + PLC by Skapare · · Score: 1

      What does the night have to do with anything? Are you living in Dark City?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  158. ssh -x? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you just use a "thin client" and let the backend do the work? You probably wouldn't need any additional hardware. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Terminal_Server_Project

    I haven't tried that myself, just a hunch. And I would hate to see a decent computer turned into a dumb terminal...

  159. Acer Revo R3600 + xbmc by sal_park · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try an Revo R3600 (~ £150 GBP) and XBMC live. The Revo is excellent, very very quite (much quieter than my sky+ PVR), about the size of an original apple tv, has HDMI and VGA output AND comes with a VESA stand that that you can use to hang it directly on the back of your TV (unless it's wall mounted). XMBC live installs very easily and quickly, once you've found a usb cd/dvdrom to boot it from :) The only other thing I needed was a remote / usb receiver but I just bought the cheapest windows media centre one I could find. HTH

  160. How about a Linux-based player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's one on offer from Iomega; the Screenplay Director.
    http://www.iomega.com/support/manuals/hdd2009/spdirector/en/consolidated/main.html#amrgn
    PROS:

    Has a large storage capacity(1TB, 2 TB is available)
    Handles pretty much any video you can throw at it
    Can stream from SMB servers
    Can stream from WMP12
    Full HD (1080i)
    Does torrents
    Shares it's hard drive on LAN via SMB
    Has a linux OS; good for tinkering; has already been done on it's sister media player, the screenplay HD

    CONS:
    Takes a minute to boot.
    The interface responds slowly.
    Has some issues with .srt files
    Will not play Shoutcast radio (even though the capability is advertised)
    Data transfer over LAN/WLAN is very slow (2 MB/s as opposed to the ~12 MB/s over USB)
    Known to hang once in a while
    No seek functionality in video playing mode (it's a pain to FF)
    1080i is the highest res (not 1080p)
    No OS hacking project exists.....yet.

  161. WDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want is a Western Digital WDTV. Great product that retails just over $100. Plays basically any format you can throw at it, networkable, can connect local USB storage. It has a remote with onscreen menus that are not terribly difficult to use, but not the best I've seen. I've been waiting for this device for years and not only is it great, it's cheap.

  162. XBMC on Atom processor by peril · · Score: 1

    Use xbmc - it's an excellent HTPC with a 10 foot user interface and a TON of content available. Plays pictures, movies and music, and has the best plug-in in the world (IMO)

    NaviX - Internet content automagic / site scraper

    http://www.xbmc.org

    Get yourself a teeny atom/nvidia ion box (acer revo/zotac )

  163. alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game console. Has wireless and you get a blue-ray on the cheap (comparatively). Outboard a big drive and you've got it.

  164. cheap route, mainly for movies by furrymitn · · Score: 1

    I usually rip movies to ISO, then use handbrake to pull the title track to m4v, then use http://clip-bucket.com/ to put up our own family toob site. The player plugin is configurable, so you can use any flash movie player(with h264 pseudo-streaming on the server side to be able to skip around) or an HTML5 code-up to play without flash. Also allows for a download link that will stream the file direct(I use this link to stream to iPod/Android). Works well.

  165. Mini HD player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting as anon because I don't have an account here, I'm a closet nerd.

    http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=101&cp_id=10110&cs_id=1011006&p_id=7066&seq=1&format=1#largeimage

    I picked this up last week and it plays "logged in" network shares and creates shortcuts as well as being able to use USB HDs or mem sticks, does HDMI and a variety of video formats. Still buggy with internet youtube playing, but all in all, a cheap convenient package.

    Jason

  166. Focus on the PROBLEMS by fygment · · Score: 1

    You never said you needed a new system. You said your problems were "Windows 7" (don't particularly like) and "case is too big and noisy".

    a) You want a UI for the non-Slashdot crowd. That would be Windows based. Suck it up Princess but that's what normal folk like and understand so make that a concession to the family and friends; and

    b) Downsize your case. Asus, Eee, and others all make really nice small footprint machines. Get one of those. No fuss, no muss, no changing over your whole working system to something new. If you want to get really DIY, rip the guts from a suitable laptop (used), chuck the screen (well, put is aside for another project), and make a nice, tasteful, low profile box to put them in.

    Honestly, your "problem" is really silly. A big noisy case? WTF, you have to ask how to solve that? Honestly, who really put your system together?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  167. For what it's worth by pennyrave · · Score: 1

    I use Vuze and a PS3. All my torrent'ed movies/TV looks amazing on a 52" plasma...

  168. playon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use playon app in my office and a wdtv live box on my tv. With this setup I can stream anything I want from my pc to the tv (pretty much).

  169. Tivo and Streambaby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Tivo and run Streambaby on your media server. Streambaby is on Google code and Tivo will give a UI for non-Slashdotters in your home.

  170. iCore + Good MB by Kirschey · · Score: 1

    I built a full system about a year ago that is versatile and wife friendly. It is upgradable and I never have codec issues.

    1. I chose an iCore 3 because of the quiet nature and the HD-friendly power.

    2. Motherboard - I chose ASUS P7H55D-M EVO LGA 1156 Intel H55 HDMI USB 3.0 Micro ATX because of the HDMI + DVI and the optical sound in addition to its no fan quiet design.

    3. Case - This is always the tricky part. I chose the Antec Minuet350. It works even though it is not the best looking case. I prefer my old ASUS barebones for looks, but they stopped making the book pcs when the eee became popular.

    4. Software - you can choose windows media center or something like sagetv. I prefer GBPVR. It is simple, intuitive and still actively developed. There is a great and helpful community to assist.

  171. Ditch the win7 box.. by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

    Get one of the little 200-300$ book sized atom/ion devices such as the revo or one of the Zotac boxes throw ubuntu and xbmc on it and call it a day. (alternatively you could also pickup a last gen AppleTV and install boxee/xbmc on it via thumbdrive)

    Just because your using a oversized/overpowered device to run xbmc, does not mean that xbmc is not the right tool for the job :P

  172. 1/10 sorry. by Joe+U · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you use a real OS and a real file sharing protocol(not MS garbage) then you won't have any problems at all. I use AFP(though NFS works equally as well) to view HD media over wifi and works perfectly. Ditch windows and you will have 0 problems.(The previous sentence pretty much works in any context)

    1/10, try harder next time you troll.

    This is how you troll:

    Use a real OS, avoid the Fisher-Price style MacOS, it treats you like you're a complete idiot and can't handle anything remotely complex. If you do ever need to fix something, you're out of luck.

    Second, avoid Linux, it's got the style and compatibility of running a small nuclear power station. Anything that would normally require 3 seconds in Windows takes 10 minutes of pulling levers and turning dials.

    Finally, don't ever install itunes on Windows. Steve made sure you have a penalty for not choosing his toddler time playground of an OS, and that penalty is a confusing mess of application garbage and unnecessary services and protocols.

    Thank you, this has been a PSA.

    Remember, if you're too stupid to use a computer, get an Apple instead, it's the AOL of the 21st century!

    Apple, "We're dumbed down just for you"

    1. Re:1/10 sorry. by antifoidulus · · Score: 1, Troll

      You fail it. Tell me, what os ship out of the box with ifs? If you guessed everything but windows you would be correct. If you asked, what os has a security model so broken it gets hacked constantly? If you guessed windows you would be correct. If you asked, what osgoes out of its way to limit the things I can do on my computer without forking over large amounts of money? If you guessed windows you would right. If you asked, which operating system is still so primitive it is unable to distinguish the physical layout of storage vs the logical layout of storage? If you guessed windows you would be right. If you asked, which operating system sets firewall policies in at least 3 different locations which interact with each other in incredibly complex ways instead of having a central easy to modify place for your firewall settings? If you guessed windows you would be right. If you asked, which os doesn't come out of the box with basic tools such as ssh? If you guessed windows you would be right.
      . If you asked which operating system demands you phone home to your corporate overlords each time you add hardware you would be right if you said windows. I could go on but I will address your other points. Os x has an incredibly powerful unix underpinning and a very easy way to manage applications with said underpinning. Windows command line is a joke. Windows machines are so primitive that they refuse to connect to the domain controller you specify if they broadcast and see another domain. In my years of doing os x and Linux admin I have never seen anything so profoundly stupid. Also you boast about how much easier windows is, have you ever tried to connect it to a non windows box? It's a huge pain in the ass. In fact pretty much doing anything on windows is a pain in the asss and takes about 10x as long as it does on a mac. Every time i use redmonds toy i just feel badfor the people that thonk that computing has to be that difficult. Have you ever scrutinized microsofts claims about windows? People whose real OSs have had those features for at least half a decade before Microsoft was even competent enough to copy them, and even then it didn't do it right. Pretty much every feature of windows 7 was in tiger which was released in 2004. Windows is nothing but a toy to people who actually know anything about computers.

    2. Re:1/10 sorry. by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Tell me, what os ship out of the box with ifs?

      Don't care, using SMB, supported by 90% of market.

      If you asked, what os has a security model so broken it gets hacked constantly?

      Oooh, I know this one, a 10 year old OS. Upgrade, or deal with it.

      If you asked, which operating system sets firewall policies in at least 3 different locations which interact with each other in incredibly complex ways instead of having a central easy to modify place for your firewall settings?

      Suggestion, learn how to use OS.

      If you asked, which os doesn't come out of the box with basic tools such as ssh?

      SSH isn't needed for the average user. Telnet and FTP are, and are included.

      If you asked which operating system demands you phone home to your corporate overlords each time you add hardware

      Not really, but you seem to think it does, Apple has taught me that delusion is much more interesting compared to reality anyway.

      Os x has an incredibly powerful unix underpinning and a very easy way to manage applications with said underpinning.

      So, they dumbed down the OS, +1 for you.

      Windows command line is a joke

      Learn to use it, takes 5 mins. How's batching done in OSX anyway?

      Windows machines are so primitive that they refuse to connect to the domain controller you specify if they broadcast and see another domain.

      Not sure what you mean, but it sounds fun.

      Also you boast about how much easier windows is, have you ever tried to connect it to a non windows box? It's a huge pain in the ass.

      Why would I do that? The other systems are crap anyway.

      Pretty much every feature of windows 7 was in tiger which was released in 2004.

      Yawn, no, but again, reality, etc...

      Windows is nothing but a toy to people who actually know anything about computers.

      Yup, that's why no one uses it and has 5% of the market. Wait, that's the Mac.

    3. Re:1/10 sorry. by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I never read anything so brilliantly stupid in a long time. You claim that windows is easier than linux then turn around and savage OS x because it's easier than windows, how brilliantly retarded. You sir are the DUMBEST person I have ever seen on slashdot, bravo!

      Don't care, using SMB, supported by 90% of market.

      And is slow as shit which was my entire point. the OP was having issues with SMB performance because SMB is a garbage protocol only used by toy OSs. All real OSs use NFS or other such protocols.

      Oooh, I know this one, a 10 year old OS. Upgrade, or deal with it.

      Windows 7 is a 10 year old OS? Who knew? Windows 7 still uses the same exact broken and primitive security model as XP does. Microsoft has shown 0 interest in improving the security of their products and it shows.

      If you asked which operating system demands you phone home to your corporate overlords each time you add hardware Not really, but you seem to think it does, Apple has taught me that delusion is much more interesting compared to reality anyway

      Way to not even answer the question, bravo!

      SSH isn't needed for the average user. Telnet and FTP are, and are included. Refer back to the broken security comment, and if you don't know what I am talking about you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

      So, they dumbed down the OS, +1 for you.

      So ease of use = "dumb" to you, yet you criticize linux for being hard to use? I can use linux, so that reveals that you are in fact quite dumb(as do the rest of your comments, but ya know, you are a windows user so I guess that speaks volumes about your intelligence)

      Learn to use it, takes 5 mins. How's batching done in OSX anyway?

      HAHAHAHAHA, this is by FAR the dumbest thing you wrote. In OS X and Linux I have, lets see...shell script, perl, python, ruby, tcl the list goes on, right out the box. I don't have to spend literally HOURS trying to download all these packages(let alone manage the updates). But yeah, you are right, Windows little toy batch script is SO much more powerful than any of those tools. Tell me again, how does windows a batch script locate a file(such as the hosts file) if someone switched drives? Oh right, they cannot because Windows is still stuck 30 years in the past back when people thought mixing the physical and logical layout of drives was a good idea.

      Not sure what you mean, but it sounds fun.

      I mean that Windows is so primitive it still uses broadcast to determine what domain controller servers are out there and refuses to connect to ANY domain server(despite the fact that it told you it did) if it sees more than one domain out there. Again, hilariously primitive. In the real world this problem was solved DECADES ago, but I know Microsoft is a little slower than the rest of the world, you have to pretty much count on them being 20 years behind the times.

      Yawn, no, but again, reality, etc...

      You know, when you make a comment like that you really need to give, oh I don't know, a concrete example. Go ahead, find me a feature in Windows 7 that wasn't available in Tiger(well besides "Windows Activiation" of course). The fact that you didn't give an example makes me think that you cannot.

      You obviously know nothing outside Microsofts little sheltered box, and I'm sure you make Balmer quite happy. Go and actually try to use another OS for more than 3 minutes. You will be AMAZED at how primitive windows is in comparison and how much better computing can be on pretty much any other platform besides Windows. Windows is losing market share EVERY SINGLE DAY(in about 10 years nobody outside Redmond will be using Windows server, an ever bigger joke of a product than Windows client). You obviously need an education.

  173. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the device without the optical drive you speak of is e.g. a netbook, just rip to iso and play it with vlc.

    I can appreciate transcoding in order to squeeze it onto a mobile, but for a home media server, transcoding DVDs is a waste of time these days - hard drives are cheaper than the time, effort, & loss in quality.

  174. A printer? by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

    I replaced the busybox setup with a full system using optware (ipkg), installed a cups print server, and attached a printer to the USB port. So far it has been able to serve up different movies to three different clients simultaneously over my home network without any problems.

    A printer? What are you doing, making them watch movies on flick books?

  175. Anonymous Coward. advises Acer Aspire Revo R360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://lifehacker.com/5391308/build-a-silent-standalone-xbmc-media-center-on-the-cheap

  176. SageTV HD 300 media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just ordered one of these http://sagetv.com/hd_theater.html that does just what the poster wanted. Very small (about 2 playing card packs), 1080p streaming in most any format you could want, quiet (no fan), and only $149. The only thing missing is Netflix (although Sage has a license for it, so it's probably coming).

  177. FreeNAS by psbrogna · · Score: 1

    To serve as a storage vault to work with my XBMC Live box, I threw a low-end PC with a high end SATA storage card + 6 2TB HD's in my basement. I used freeNAS as the OS. Works great- ZFS is da bomb when it comes to large storage systems.

    1. Re:FreeNAS by psbrogna · · Score: 1

      Should have added more specifics on the hardware. I used a QC Phenom MB w/4GB RAM. Because the on-board NIC was garbage I threw a server grade Intel NIC in as well. The entire box, not counting HD's was done for $800 and can handle streaming multiple standard DVD resolutions fine and will stream at least one HD file (Blue Ray quality) without issue.

  178. Acer Revo + XBMC by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    My setup consists of an Ubuntu-based server with tons of storage, media served via Samba, an Acer Revo connected via ethernet, which connects to the TV via HDMI. The Acer Revo box runs XBMC (installed from the XBMC Live install CD). I even picked up one of the SoundGraph remote/receivers to control it all from. Best setup ever.

    But, as I came to discover, the new Samsung TV I picked up recently has media decoding capabilities built right into it. It has an ethernet port built into it that can be used to stream media from a DLNA-compliant server. I don't use this method, however, as I find it's capabilities extremely limited compared to XBMC, but it will play x264 (via the mkv container), as well as divx/xvid files. An advantage to this is that you can use your TV remote to control media playback.

  179. I don't see Mvix by ericbrow · · Score: 1

    I got this MVIX box off e-bay. My model is the 760 HD, I paid under $50, but most auctions seem to go for under $100. It will look for open SMB shares, wired or wirelessly. If you get one with a hard drive, you can also use it as an external hard drive, but one's not required. They have newer versions also. The interface is basically a file browser, and I've only had a few poorly ripped movies not play with all the codex loaded on this thing. Makes about as much noise as an external hard drive, when you have a hard drive in it, otherwise, everything is in the solid state memory. I guess the downside is that it is JUST a media player, and doesn't surf the internet or anything like that.

  180. Re:MythTV -- kinda sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any MCE remote works out of the box.

  181. XBMC Live FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reload your Win 7 box with XBMC Live or Install on Flash Drive

    After setup and scraping your library navigate with your iPhone over Wifi

    You do have an iPhone right?

    Or

    Build a WHS with Twonky to transcode and watch through the Xbox 360

  182. Miro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a laptop with Windows XP and AV, and Miro as a front end for my video library stored on a file server elsewhere on my network.

    I have a inexpensive wireless keyboard attached, and away I go.

    Even my six year old can search through the index for his favorite shows, and not have any trouble finding what he wants.

  183. Boxee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a XBMC user for many years but the xbox just couldn't keep up wuth modern video standards.
    I tried several set top boxes and software packages, but the one that most closely matches my XBMC experience is boxee.
    boxee.tv

    It has lots of app plugins for streaming content
    The best thing is that when installed in windows, it supports netflix.

  184. UPnP is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install something like Mediatomb on your ubuntu box, and then get a hardware UPnP player.

    You can use a PS3 (fantastic for this purpose), maybe even an XBox 360 (not sure about that one), or buy a dedicated device like the ZyXel DMA-1000, Dlink DSM520... Netgear makes one, as does Buffalo, etc.

    Mediatomb can be configured to transcode on the fly (uses a *lot* of CPU) for formats that your UPnP client doesn't understand. It's a bit complicated to get working, but it works very well.

  185. Re:MythTV -- kinda sucks by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

    I can't speak to your set up issues, but I've had no trouble getting the server running on my Myth/server box and I've set up a dozen frontends on all kinds of hardware and several in virtualbox. Not a single issue with any of those, just type in the information and it goes. It doesn't require anything fancy.

    And any Windows Media Center remote works out of the box with MythTV. Unless you're talking about a version that's 2+ years old, you clearly missed something.

    --
    The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
  186. Stick with the windows computer by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    I run the exact same thing, (well, OpenSolaris on the smb server). However, my windows 7 computer is downstairs while the TV i supstairs. I ran a long (30-40ft I think) VGA cable along with a USB cable (2 16ft cables that included a build-in signal repeater powered from the USB) from the room with the computer to the entertainment center. At the entertainment center, VGA goes into the TV, USB goes into a usb hub. The USB hub has a extigy usb soundcard (connected to the sound system) and a logitech diNovo mini keyboard/mouse.

    This setup works great. My wife is not a tech time but loves it because she can watch her netflix and abc.com shows easily. She can also browse the web/etc. There's something to be said for the windows interface. With a good wireless keyboard/mouse combo (like the diNovo) people are familiar with windows and have no problem navigating it on a 50" tv. People find most set-top boxes or fancy media center interfaces to be foreign and shy away. However, they know what a keyboard and mouse is and they know what windows is and can use both.

    --
    I do security
  187. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by godefroi · · Score: 1

    Do you know what transcoding is?

    You could easily rip the DVD and play the movie from the VIDEO_TS directory. Many media players (for Windows, at least, I assume others do too) support this.

    You could also remux the audio and video into a new container (.avi, .mkv), though depending on the container you choose, you may lose features (you're certainly going to lose menus...).

    Transcoding is changing the codec (or the video format) used to compress/decompress the audio and video. Unless you have a specific reason to do that (reduce resolution, reduce file size) then it's better to avoid it. Transcoding ALWAYS (unless you're transcoding to a losless codec, and you certainly aren't) reduces video quality (at least theoretically).

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  188. A lot of TV's/BluRays support DLNA by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    Grab a cheaper bluray player that supports DLNA, or if you have DirecTV the newest updates for some of the units with ethernet jacks support DLNA.. hell even a lot of TV's now do.. Plug bluray/tv/directv receiver into your LAN, setup a DLNA server, and you're done. Period.

    http://www.obsessable.com/feature/home-media-streaming-101-dlna-explained/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance

    http://www.dlna.org/digital_living/how_it_works/

    http://www.rbgrn.net/content/21-how-to-choose-dlna-media-server-windows-mac-os-x-or-linux

    There's a few helpful links for you. No need for a PC for the client side, and can setup the DLNA server on a choice of OS's. Don't over-complicate things

  189. Mac-Mini with XBMC....no brainer. by bodland · · Score: 1

    I can't believe no one said this already. I use my notebook from time to time when the D-Link Media player I have won't play some format.

  190. Ancient setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our TV is a 1366x768 50" Samsung plasma - it was the state of the art several years ago when be bought it (for LOTS of money - they were _expensive_ then) Nice picture, but it does not do a very good job when fed with 1080p video via HDMI - we get _much_ better results feeding it video at 1360x768 via VGA.

    The machine driving it is a fairly standard PC: triple core Athlon, huge passive heatsink, fanless PSU, running nLited Windoze XP from 2 CF cards striped and protected by EWF (no writes, no shutdown required, just turn the power off) Control via a Windoze media centre remote and Event Ghost.

    The player is Zoom player... mainly because we have both been using it for years and know it well. Video decode by ffdshow, which also scales whatever is offered to it to correctly fit the 1360x768 display and makes a damn good job it it. This plays everything from high bitrate 1080p down to ancient, overcompressed DIVX-3 encodes. My only complaint is that there is a short glitch when changing subtitle streams during playback.

    This is not a setup I would recommend for a new build, but it works well for us, and my wife and I are both used to it. The user interface is "arrow keys and OK" (like point and click, but no mouse) and, though not particularly slick, is immediately usable by anybody who has used Windoze.

    The server runs Slackware. In our house the server has always run Slackware starting from when the server was an original 60MHz Pentium.

  191. LinuxMCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at LinuxMCE. They have "Media DIrector" nodes that can be a small PXE boot box, nice and quiet.

    Many other features as well, VOIP integration, home automation..

    http://linuxmce.org/

  192. Re:MythTV - Yes Yes Yes by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    You can easily use an external player (for now) with MythTV for any content
    that may not play well with the one built into MythTV itself. There is very
    good support for GPU accelerated video playback with nvidia cards.

    If you rip the m2ts file by some other means, Linux will play it.

    There's also good IR remote support in the Linux video players.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  193. Re:MythTV -- kinda sucks by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > Note that most of my gripes were actually about the DVR capability rather than just media-player capability.

    ppppfffft. MythTV stomps all over the alternatives when it comes to DVR capability.

    That is not MythTV's weak point.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  194. Drobo, Windows Media Center 7, Silent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drobo (choose your size device) to live on the network somewhere other than your living room - this will allow you great growth at a reasonable cost.
    Pick your low cost \ low noise device to live near your TV
    Run Windows Media Center 7 - No XMBC necessary.
    Windows Media Center 7 has a fantastic interface, very wife friendly, lots of features, and has been quite reliable for me. I use it to record TV as well (4 tuners) and it just works. Zero "management" just use it.
    You don't need to worry too much about re-encoding your videos for this solution (like say AppleTV) - if you can get WMP to play the file (with a codec pack or something) then it will play in media center.
    It's 100% remotely friendly. Netflix support is great. Hulu support is decent. Until GoogleTV comes along, this is the only workable solution I've found that passes the wife test.

  195. What about a Roku Player by ncttrnl · · Score: 1

    The Roku set top boxes have a pretty easy to use scripting language so you can buy one of those for less than $100 and write a quick channel to access your media. They have a table of the media the different players support on their website. It's a very basic interface but its hard to beat for the price.

    1. Re:What about a Roku Player by cypherljk · · Score: 1

      They even have a channel already to map your content into. I'm surprised no one mentioned this already.
      See http://roksbox.wikispaces.com/

      --
      Of all the OS's I've seen, I like the one that runs my mind the most!
  196. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by sexconker · · Score: 1

    SO I CAN WATCH IT ON MY HANDHELD!!!

    (why are we shouting?)

    Seriously, there's lots of reasons to transcode. Not all movies are available for download in friendly formats. I recently got a beautiful DVD set of the silent film Greed by Erich von Stroheim and I wanted to watch it on something that didn't have an optical drive, away from home.

    How else but to transcode?

    You could rip the DVD without transcoding it, then copy the VOBs over.

  197. LiveXBMC + Asrock Nettop ION330Pro by tedpixie · · Score: 1

    If I hadn't built my own HTPC based on a Intel Core2Duo I would have chosen a ASRock straight away, but I built my HTPC before the Atom frenzy started.

  198. Argosy HV335T - Cheap and easy by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    http://www.argosy.tw/product-detial.php?prod_id=154 Not a lot of bells and whistles. But it holds a 2TB drive if you want it. It works with every TV I have tried it on. It has played every media I have thrown at it. The UI is a bit boring, but so what! Dirt cheap, ultra quiet, and does the job. I just wish it also worked as a NAS, and not just samba client.

  199. Windows Home server and Xbox by liquidsgi · · Score: 1

    Personally I have been using Windows Home Server streaming to an Xbox. I copy all of my decoded video to a videos folder on the windows home server. The home server is automatically detected by the xbox and streams through my router to the xbox which is hooked up to our LCD TV via HDMI. It works great!

  200. NFS, Ubuntu, and Freevo by prestonmichaelh · · Score: 1

    I more or less have this same setup. I have a small AMD Athlon X2 machine/case with large/quiet fans that I built that runs ubuntu, but basically just boots into freevo. I have my video files directory nfs mounted at boot up and freevo just sees them as if they were on the local machine. I have another old laptop in the bedroom that is under my dresser that does the same thing. I bought two USB remotes from dealextreme.com for like $9 each and hooked them up. I had to create custom modmaps for a few buttons, but other than that it just worked. The setup was a little bit of a pain, but now that it is done, my wife (non-tech) uses it with no problems. The other plus is that since it uses VLC, Xine, and/or Mplayer to play the videos (you can configure it based on file extension), it can play pretty much anything without having to worry about going from one thing to another.

  201. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You could rip the DVD without transcoding it, then copy the VOBs over.

    So now I've got 4gb of VOBs instead of 700mb of m4v or avi. That's 8 to 1. If we're talking about watching them on a handheld, it means I can pack 16 movies instead of 2. Anyway, I don't even know if there's a mobile application for viewing VOB files.

    I'm not saying you always want to transcode, or that there aren't situations where the very best thing you can do with a video file is leave it alone, but the idea to which I was originally responding, the "Why do you people waste time transcoding anythgn???" is just silly.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  202. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You could easily rip the DVD and play the movie from the VIDEO_TS directory.

    What application would I use to do that on my handheld?

    Don't tell me there's never a good reason to transcode.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  203. PS3 + Mediatomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Mediatomb on the server. It's a UPnP server, so it will work with many different clients (I use the PS3, but there are many different devices you can buy that will work).

    It's the setup I have, and I recommend it.

  204. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by sexconker · · Score: 1

    This article is about a box for displaying shit on a TV. Transcoding is useless except for when you need to improve the source material (e.g., inverse telecine).

  205. A Personal Media Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have described a good open-source personal media network here:

    http://frequal.com/pmn/index.html

  206. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    This article is about a box for displaying shit on a TV.

    The article is about a machine for a home entertainment system.

    It doesn't mention "displaying shit on a TV". It specifically mentions a large media library.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  207. Me, too by odoketa · · Score: 1

    I always buy the lowest level refurb mac mini I can find (paying $300 for an extra 100GB of disk strikes me as insane), and they do a great job. Lower power use, remote control, etc. etc.

  208. mythtv in 1 room and ps3 in the other by phek · · Score: 1

    I use a linux machine as my server and have two machines for the clients (1 in my room and 1 in the living room). The machine in my bedroom is a linux mythtv machine which mounts the media file system over nfs. The mythtv/nfs part has been great, the hardware it's on hasn't been so great. In the living room i have a ps3 (had an older mac mini and it sucked at playing the videos). I'm not too thrilled with the ps3 either, the video formats it accepts is bad and ps3 media server is kinda shitty. So my plan is to buy a small revo 3610 for about $350 and install mythtv on it to replace the ps3 (though the way the hardware has been acting up on my other machine i may replace that instead).

  209. lg bd390 by rsdavis9 · · Score: 1

    I got this about a year ago.
    netflix
    youtube
    1080p
    xvid
    h.264
    dlna

    It doesnt say it anywhere but somehow the dlna allows it to browse any smb share.
    Works for jpg, mp3, and all video codecs that my pc can play.
    Basically a blue ray player. Just check the ones out there and give it a try.

  210. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    There is vlc for the iphone, in cydia.

  211. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by godefroi · · Score: 1

    Again, transcode != remux. Just because your handheld doesn't have software capable of playing video straight out of .VOB files, doesn't mean you need to transcode anything. Just remux into a new container. Should take seconds.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  212. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying you always want to transcode, or that there aren't situations where the very best thing you can do with a video file is leave it alone, but the idea to which I was originally responding, the "Why do you people waste time transcoding anythgn???" is just silly.

    You are getting hit with the typical responses that plague a lot of tech questions. The 'I don't care what the situation is, you must always/never do this.'

    You could ask a simple question "I need to do this, but for a variety of reasons, B is not an option. How would I go about that" You will always get a response similar to, "B is the better way to do it, so throw everything you have in the trash, go buy this, and do B." Or you will get the questions, "Why would you want to do that in the first place? I don't do that, no one could ever want to do that."

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  213. Re:Mac Mini + Plex: TRANSCODING SUX by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Why the hell would I hire a DVD? Their references are almost always terrible, have no work experience prior to 1996, and they don't do any work -- they just sit around looking all shiny.

    Am I going to make you feel old?

    I have no work experience prior to 1996. I've designed aircraft components that have been in service for over 5 years.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  214. Zotac Mag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.zotacusa.com/products/mini-pcs/mag Zotag Mag and Win 7 = 1080p streaming over 802.11n and low energy consumption, no noise.