Not a bad suggestion. But you are vulnerable to filesystem-corruption or errors in the version control system. But it seam like a good enough setup for home-users actually (for media backup atleast). If you got really important pictures and documents they are often small enough to just upload to an online service or even burn to dvd.
What's the point of language? To make your ideas understood by the audience or to write and speak 100% correct grammar? Typos like these just parse "correctly" in my head anyways. I notice it when people mention it, but it really doesn't matter as long as the message is loud a clear.
Anybody that "upgrades" a Windows operating system in place from one version to another is an idiot.
People should reinstall their Windows from scratch at least once a year.
I agree with your first point to not upgrade from one windows version to another. But reinstall at least once a year? What the hell are you doing to your computer? Raping it nightly? I've had a Vista install since RTM and it is working better than ever. Just don't RAPE your computer and you will be fine.
djeez.
What are you talking about? Running client-side java script is not something that will do a hacker any good.
Or are you talking about changing the source-code of the website itself? If so, then that's a completely different matter.
Hackers can just fire up a different browser, so the number of hackers this will stop are exactly ZERO.
It's not about stopping hackers from running these scripts. It's to protect the users if a hacker have managed to insert a remote script via a form on the webpage. It protects users running firefox if the site have implemented the tag.
Slashdot Mirror
MSFT would spend the next decade in court for refusing to allow crapware into the repository. So sorry, it just wouldn't work.
Must.. resist... urge... to... make... joke... about... MS.. and.. courts... and... crapware
Must... try.... to.....make.....up ..something....funny...but...i'm..not..able...to...so..i'll..just ...pretend ...that... i ...dont... want.. to..
Not a bad suggestion. But you are vulnerable to filesystem-corruption or errors in the version control system. But it seam like a good enough setup for home-users actually (for media backup atleast). If you got really important pictures and documents they are often small enough to just upload to an online service or even burn to dvd.
Short answer: yes Long answer: No, not really. Hope that helps!
umm. i meant refrigerators ..
I was under the impression that fridgerators was the way to go.
FIRST! I might not have a high IQ, but I have a really good EQ!
What's the point of language? To make your ideas understood by the audience or to write and speak 100% correct grammar? Typos like these just parse "correctly" in my head anyways. I notice it when people mention it, but it really doesn't matter as long as the message is loud a clear.
Shoe on head is going to be so amazing with this technloogy :D
Cheezburgers.. duh.
What's your point? Now's your chance for some backdoor action.
Anybody that "upgrades" a Windows operating system in place from one version to another is an idiot.
People should reinstall their Windows from scratch at least once a year.
I agree with your first point to not upgrade from one windows version to another. But reinstall at least once a year? What the hell are you doing to your computer? Raping it nightly? I've had a Vista install since RTM and it is working better than ever. Just don't RAPE your computer and you will be fine. djeez.
No. It just passed POST to quickly
Funny. I live in norway but only get swedish adverts!
They still suck.
...your mom's tits.
Bill Gates have made something that CRASHES the storms? I have very high hopes that this works. I just hope BSoD is not literal in this context.
Even better: 1) Record a crappy song, upload it to iTunes 2) Get every iPhone in the USA to "buy" a copy. 3) Babeland
I think that is kind of glorifying the showers in prison.
No. The NSA uses only the intersect. No Novell deals here.
What are you talking about? Running client-side java script is not something that will do a hacker any good. Or are you talking about changing the source-code of the website itself? If so, then that's a completely different matter.
I can see it now. Balmer hooked up to an army of wheel chairs throwing themselves at you.
Hackers can just fire up a different browser, so the number of hackers this will stop are exactly ZERO.
It's not about stopping hackers from running these scripts. It's to protect the users if a hacker have managed to insert a remote script via a form on the webpage. It protects users running firefox if the site have implemented the tag.
Hey, at least those execs and investors didn't clog up my inbox with V|agr@ ads
1999 called. They want their spamfilter back.
Thanks a lot hermit. Now i have to go to the E.R..
In the Perl world I know one major hacker that has done a ton of accessibility work
Perl? Then you're disabled by default so that's not so strange. kiiiid
He uses IP over Avian Carriers of course.
This being slashdot, chances are she wouldn't date him,